Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.apz.20111004 AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, October 4, 2011 4:30 p.m. Sister Cities room 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen I. ROLL CALL II. COMMENTS A. Commissioners B. Planning Staff C. Public III. MINUTES IV. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST V. PUBLIC HEARINGS — A. 1460 Sierra Vista Drive — Residential Design Standard Variance VI. OTHER BUSINESS VII. BOARD REPORTS VIII. ADJOURN Q Next Resolution Number: I8 Emir - P1 MEMORANDUM • To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director RE: 1460 Sierra Vista Drive- Residential Design Standards Variance, - Public Hearing DATE: October 4, 2011 Applicant: Robert Copito • Representative: Scot Broughton �r ? . * -15" Zoning: R -15 (Moderate- Density Residential) " ';sue Land Use: Single - Family Residence Request Summary: The Applicant is requesting ... one Variance from a Residential Design Standard. �a Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the variance request. 1460 Sierra Vista LAND USE REQUESTS: The Applicant is remodeling the subject property. The Applicant is requesting a variance from a residential design standard that does not permit street facing windows to span through the area typically between the first and second story of a building. Variance approval from the Residential Design Standards pursuant to Land Use Code (L.U.C.) Section 26.410.020 (D)(2)., Variances. The applicant is requesting a variance from L.U.C. Section 26.410.040 (D)(3), "Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor." REVIEW PROCEDURE: A variance from the Residential Design Standards shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied after review and consideration during a duly noticed public hearing by the Planning Commission under L.U.C. Section 26.410.020 D., Variances. Page 1 of 4 P2 ,, Figure 1: Vicinity ma. .. 4 .: ji . j. '' - — .--. .— ' i ,..... ,.. P r ! A \it N I c' i , - - .. , .,. ... i . ....,...... , -.. ..„,„... Nti .;')), '„, 4 '. 1‘ ' 4, l` . �'L.�. tali T10 ^is 1.`` f �, t ` +;~ ` 110 .,,,_ n i eao n� ,fa iati �^ 1 - -` �� - ,air rn 4'9,...;:r ,, , � N .: t3 �\ 121 • • . Y - r_ r fi ♦ gap uiy F4' .+ as 74 1* A al i 1'l' t o , av . WA ' �V CO''')-' Subject 4 11:z �s rrjj 'v, r �, a V ,,i ; # : r '� -. i•✓ 1;�, 'fir , 823 . . : Y r.+ . Si te f ,.- _ t d65 r r ` '°' ` ° : �' , • - '4 * t;‘,1,177 s ,. .. ...... C CC I...,.Nl,c - -„. -. ` bi3 i ,' `e _i tJ .� ,- PROJECT SUMMARY: The Applicant is applying for a permit to remodel the existing residence. The residence is a split level building, with a partially below grade floor. The applicant is proposing to raise the roof height for a portion of the building (Figure 1) and incorporate a band of street facing windows that project into the 9 -12 foot' "no window area" as shown in Figure 2. Figure 1: Raised roof .ro.osal I {i I 111 ! t 1 12 �0 � 0 5 • xn,s�v s,+e° rao 11 fi ��I�II10 s . �� p � - � � - ,...E Of E%15Titi66ABl.E RO .11.1" iiiiiinnilmn millimmillilmil iiii i i ,.1 ,,,,I, 1 I �di SID' , , � .1' - --,,i_i--.., -1.f i i l n u nn uu �� � • .== lip - ca =� �- - � 1 air 1 EXISTINS / pK 6RA7E I 1 ' In a split level house the main floor level is the floor from which the measurement is taken. Page 1 of 4 P3 Figure 2: Proposed band of windows I i 1111 1111111 h 110 1 I sin t risc i tz - zi .risvip rn11� 1 . . . II 1 1 * 0 1 * 1 - , 1 11,1ill II ii I t , / 0,4. IWO i FIRST FLOOR. LEVEL ;1111 ( imu ll .. 11 ��. ENTRY - LDOR LEVtLi * - I I 1 I I I � I I I - I I ' RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES: All new structures in the City of Aspen are required to meet the residential design standards or obtain a variance from the standards pursuant , to Land Use Code Section 26.410, Residential Design Standards. The purpose of the standards "is to preserve established neighborhood scale and character....ensure that neighborhoods are public places....that each home...contribute to the streetscape." The subject property is undergoing an extensive remodel but is not being demolished. Due to the split level nature of the residence, the main level is 4.5 feet above grade. There are two review standards that the applicant may meet if the Commission is to grant a variance from the standard, Section 26.410.020 (D)(2): • a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site - specific constraints. Staff Comment: Residential Design Standards have been adopted to contribute to the streetscape, enhance the pedestrian environment and promote architectural elements that are important components to neighborhood character. The intent of the "no window area" is to Page 1 of 4 • P4 provide human scale to the facade and reinforce local building traditions. Historically, windows did not span two stories, so a building read as two defined levels. Although there is no site specific constraint to meet the design standard, the purpose of the standard is not practically met with this split level building A split level does not avail itself to easily read as two distinct floors. Requiring a "no window area" would not meet the intent of the standard Staff recommends that the variance be approved. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In reviewing the proposal, Staff believes that the request does meet the variance review standards that are set forth in Land Use Code Section 26.410.020 D, Variances, for the window variance request. Staff recommends the Commission approve this application. RECOMMENDED MOtION: - "I move to approve Rbsolution No. )T , Series of 2011, approving a variance request from the Residential Desigi Standards." ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings Exhibit B — Public Comment Exhibit C — Application Page 1 of 4 P5 Resolution No. _ (SERIES OF 2011) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE AT LOT 37, FILING 1, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1460 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 1273511105002 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Robert Copito, requesting Variance approval from a Residential Design Standard for the remodeling of a single - family residence at, 1460 Sierra Vista Drive; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the Variance Review Standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval with conditions of the Variance request from one Residential Design Standards — 26.410.030 (D) (3), Windows; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; October 4, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the noted Variance request at1460 Sierra Vista Drive, by a vote of _ to ( — ), and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a variance from the following Residential Design Standard: P6 L.U.C. Section 26.410.040 (D)(3), "Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor," as shown in the attached and incorporated exhibit. Section 2: The building permit application to develop the above - mentioned residence shall include a copy of the final P &Z Resolution and exhibit. All other requirements to develop a single family residence shall be submitted as part of the building permit application including but not limited to: adopted building and fire codes, relevant standards within the Aspen Municipal Code such as engineering and water system standards, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District's rules and regulations, etcetera. Section 3: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. • APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on October 4, 2011. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Jim True, special Counsel Stan Gibbs, Chair ATTEST: P7 Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk List of Exhibits Exhibit A: Elevation (representing approved variance from the window requirement) P8 EXHIBIT A REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS A. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW No variance shall be permitted unless the Board of Adjustment makes a determination that the proposed development complies with either of the requirements set forth below: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site - specific constraints. Staff Finding Residential Design Standards have been adopted to contribute to the streetscape, enhance the pedestrian environment and promote architectural elements that are important components to neighborhood character. The intent of the "no window area" is to provide human scale to the facade and reinforce local building traditions. Historically, windows did not span two stories, so a building read as two defined levels. Although there is no site specific constraint to meet the design standard, the purpose of the standard is not practically met with this split level building. A split level does not avail itself to easily read as two distinct floors. Requiring a "no window area" would not meet the intent of the standard. Staff recommends that the variance be approved. P9 From: John Barnes <elwoodbarnes(c�aol.com> Date: September 19, 2011 2:34:56 PM MDT To: scot(a�scotbarchitects.com Subject: Copito house remodel, 1460 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen Dear Scot, I received your letter and the attached drawings on the Copito remodel. After reviewing all the elevations, we are in favor of the proposed changes to the house. I think it will add to the character of the neighborhood in that it is different in style from so much of what has been built. As full time residents of the Cemetery Lane neighborhood, it is encouraging to see people upgrading their homes to keep our area nice in this difficult economic climate. If I can be of any further assistance in the P & Z process, please don't hesitate to call me. John & Sharon Barnes JSO Partners LLC. Email secured by Check Point CST CITY OF ASPEN PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Drew Alexander, 925.2739 DATE: 08.04.2011 PROJECT: 1460 Sierra Vista Dr. REPRESENTATIVE: Scot Broughton, 927.0552 OWNER: Robert Copito REQUEST: Residential Design Standard (RDS) Variance, Windows between 9' — 12' DESCRIPTION: The prospective applicant is preparing to submit a building permit for the purposes of remodeling an existing home at 1460 Sierra Vista Dr. During an initial zoning check of the building plans, it was revealed that one street - facing facade of the home would not be compliant with a Residential Design Standard (RDS) regarding windows. Specifically: 26.410.040.D.3(a) — Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor. For interior staircases, this measurement will be made from the first landing if one exists. A transom window above the main entry is exempt from this standard. The applicant is requesting a variance from this RDS so that the original design can be implemented. Staff has determined that this review cannot be handled administratively and requires a Planning and Zoning Commission (P &Z) review. P &Z is a public hearing and will require noticing. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenoitkin.com/pdfs/depts/41/landuseappform.pdf Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com / Departments / Community - Development / Planninq- and- Zoninq/Title -26- Land- Use -Code/ Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.306 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.410.040.D.3 Windows Review by: Community Development for staff recommendation. Planning and Zoning Commission shall be the final review authority. Public Hearing: Required (15 days in advance to public hearing) Planning Fees: $1,470. This includes six (6) hours of staff time. Additional staff hours, if needed, will be billed at $245 per hour. Total Deposit: $1,470.00 To ap ply, submit the following information: l / Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. C application Conference Summary. 'Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on / behalf of the applicant. C� Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. C+J Total deposit for review of the application. Er A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. g Proposed elevations of the development 1 1 Neighborhood block plan at 1" = 50' (available from City Engineering Department). Graphically show the front portions of the all existing buildings on both sides of block and their setback from the street in feet. Identify parking and front entry for each building and locate any accessory dwelling units along the alley. /Photographic Photographic panorama. Show elevations of all buildings on both sides of the block, including present condition of the subject property, Label photos and mount on a presentation board. Cf ,10 Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. L{J An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: s' _-air / t Location: _SO ' l \ tut 4. 'lVe 1 - ► _ • PEI �. - (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2 nn@ I L to Win APPLICANT: �^ Name: e..., - C se - Address: /1 � . • ws=_� ✓a ' 7 ' , Phone #: 1 ° .ht. P17) REPRESENTATIVE: Name: ., i t -"ru9a7L1� i�z 00 -1! LJ-C Address: t"-Di L �jtelar C S bt/ Phone #: It i• • c 95t TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ❑ GMQS Exemption ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ ESA — 8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption (includes ❑ Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Y`-" Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings,, revio s approvals etc.) etc.) 1 'el -. ' Ia.; Ia.; Mt L V ' +.l ' dT7gc L pp/ �1 l'14� at.iof PROPOSAL: description of proposed buildings uses, modificatio41s!JLS4 etc) _ a Care er o 1- aJ tt v g you att the following? FEES DUE: $ L Conference Summary Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ❑ Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements - Including Written Responses to Review Standards ❑ 3 -D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3 -D model. Your pre - application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3 -D model. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Co r e Z Applicant: �Jcr— T l }4 Location: • i' Fol gf• A . OP _�- Zone District: . L Lot Size: t 1! t d )( t /0 Lot Area: L(Qt1 (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing:1rProposed: 1 4- ,&(() Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): 4A, DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing.:`Q% ) Allowable: 4-qQ4 Proposed: *Z17 Principal bldg. height: Existing: 11 nti Allowable: ti !. Proposed: Z5 / , Access. bldg. height: Existing: i t M r6 t Allowable: 'j} 1 l 0 Proposed: [�/ 'l.!/ On -Site parking: Existing: e l Required: I 6 Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required : L& Proposed: tl.% , % Open Space: Existing: Required: 4.4 Proposed: 1 G Front Setback: Existing: a Required: e j0 Proposed: t t Rear Setback: Existing:' I, Required: 1O 'O l. Proposed: *6)!(P t Combined F /R: Existing:Y.41e Required: &o Proposed: 0440 Side Setback: Existing: 11'4 Required: 10 Proposed: 1 if' Side Setback: Existing: fee * Required: tote," Proposed: Zc9! Cl Combined Sides: Existing: *ter Required: ZOO Proposed: Distance Between Existing q p Re uired: � �C'J " Proposed: 4,4 Buildings Existing non - conformities or -ncroach ents: .,,al 'E t , IMP 're :cc L Variations requested: �_ , •' 5. :K v�f�,iGLYJCICI • old LPM d i ( isle O 0 a a. 0 U a —R . 4 d N d 0 = _ N N N o G o. 0 4 021 04 cn 0 ,n `n . a a a `' 6. CT 7 C! L L L L U R bA Q , 0 0 O C (c, R0 0..D d G .. .. .. R L C C z U N O t U T U) > d s. Y Q 9 t t 7 d. p. . vi y O Q Q Q R L L Z y E Y L L L L O R W W U R O "" O O O O O O O O "" �" 0 "" O d 0 M " R Z a .. N N N ". .-. .. ". N N" N N N .. N cl i N N CA N W O CL re d 7 _ R t. U w U p. CJ w ° _ cl v 0 a Cl U a' o'.E y W> w , w NN U o z w ¢U Z y V u a a U U a UU ¢p F F p L . .n N F > N N N N F >„ j> 0 F �:, a s A N C a N z Q �a via H ¢z HaS��a! UU F ¢ UU o o -.1>< l ie V o r"¢ F g a a a a ❑> ��., >❑ g z N a W ' a a N ro �� z ° ¢ � z Q U zU Q o o °� ooc F CL cl) „= o F° � a ° g N N d d a z a d o z aF m °. d GOo GI ❑ 4 ow W E L ` o v , d a d a U ° a D a o o Q - ° 0 Z . 0 ti ., c Q o . U C G= G ea N Vf G y p `J > LL ti N E cC M et 13 0 . . v y i GG 3 IC M m al '� M M =. M M N e ad X Y �, C M M ° - o a I--' pC a - . 'E s N N N M c E Q z ' o C[ .. .. M N t O O M H M • ., i . R M .y .ti M M y N N N CT _ c ' t M C) ,, a M M .r .-r m N w o 7 '.0 e _ CT GT 7 e M • a t o 0 0 o O .-•I • -1 o o •--� • N N N ° o M �- C: R y �1 ■ i M tr a s 00 06 N N 1 O a d N N Z U -- Y 00 00 0 O , -+ O1 Q e ti • .-r N N [� '-I CT mot. M M W . - c _ NNN NN Nrrc N NN $rtI- Cr NeMr I: 1 5 o Q ti .-i .-� .-. .� ti .-i o • o - - .--- t O • m Q 2 F z z H g ° 303 OW w H z F w F> z z c z a a E .9 v w w a P. p 3 0 2 W o a a o 0 0 cs w U ? z m a A a z a FO > O g > e w F x w Q w ? ce in o • ° v w W a¢ c U m i Z a c a all q > `r 0 a C 70 o 0 7. a w l a E- z w z 7 .a ❑ w- w 0 a o b R a o o 0 © z a< 0 co z k H U a d A z Q 3 u o 4 H -,7 W U 3 cr. U U G 1.-. . o m as 00 o w r % a � l w • 2 (d ^ 4 0. L v 'O 0 N C el 0 N N U v 0 0 4 Vl G O w U C �°. c•-• = Lc) C C N C L ri • R L y G() N e e ' o R 1 .422 *I E E 0 d 0 6 m o L . i d Q d et w N ° "' o. �° ,o u ° 0. o v CD N < N V] N N N N an d O U a U w w 3 u U U v o z w OF1 ODU U 0 O w z ca • a z w ❑ z 0 CI z ;4 N1 z Q U F Q 2 F ( j O CA CC w p o N zFy z ' ❑ < a c 4 ‘ 10 4 a a d >, p- Q P. � � n w ¢ p cid 0 z '� w z- C C O F o�j co) aZQa,z OO`nis, C c z wUW )4 AZ i o , - 2 z ❑ a ❑ 2 _ CI • U < p? a d = - s E 0 cn 0 `0 0 . ea 0 0 U - O O 0 0 .fl ui O 0 0 O N N L 0 M 01 M d v N. r r- N r r 1 1 I` a .-1 .•1 1■1 . — . .-I Y ^ N 0 _c 3 G c a , F I .. . °' '-y w z z = c c F. 0 C up z a A o 0 • Z O ,r) . w a) 0 ❑ z^ F a w z 0' U ^ O z • - P w z O p w ., a n. ° te ca a�� O A 4.4 N a a 0 ro . C ❑ 7 a. C F. z = - a. i 0. A a z A U E~ 0 0 3 7 cd Q w z ch a. u 7 0. n Q Q A U* 6 • ATTACHMENT 4- CONT'D- SUBMITTAL KEY Q Land Use Application with 12. Accurate elevations (in relation to system in the area of the proposed pplicant's name, address and telephone mean sea level) of the lowest floor. subdivision. The contents of the plat shall number, contained within a letter signed including basement, of all new or be of sufficient detail to determine by the applicant stating the name. address, substantially improved structures: a whether the proposed subdivision will and telephone number of the verification and recordation of the actual meet the design standards pursuant to representative authorized to act on behalf elevation in relation to mean sea level to Land Use Code Section 26.480.060(3)20. of the applicant. which any structure is constructed: a Subdivision GIS Data. demonstration that all new construction or J The street address and legal substantial improvements will be 21. A landscape plan showing location, escription of the parcel on which anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or size, and type of proposed landscape development is proposed to occur. lateral movement of any structure to be features. constructed or improved: a demonstration A disclosure of ownership of the that the structure will have the lowest 22. A subdivision plat which meets the parcel on which development is proposed floor, including basement, elevated to at terms of this chapter, and conforms to the to occur, consisting of a current certificate least two (2) feet above the base flood requirements of this title indicating that no from a title insurance company, or elevation, all as certified by a registered further subdivision may be granted for attorney licensed to practice in the State of professional engineer or architect. these lots nor will additional units be built Colorado, listing the names of all owners without receipt of applicable approvals of the property, and all mortgages, 13. A landscape plan that includes pursuant to this chapter and growth judgments, liens, easements, contracts and native vegetative screening of no less than management allocation pursuant to agreements affecting the parcel, and fifty (50) percent of the development as Chapter 26.470. demonstrating the owner's right to apply viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. for the Development Application. All vegetative screening shall be 23. The precise wording of any maintained in perpetuity and shall be proposed amendment. ®An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating replaced with the same or comparable the subject parcel within the City of material should it die. 24. Site Plan or plans drawn to a scale of Aspen. one (1 ") inch equals ten (10') feet or one ///� 14. Site sections drawn by a registered (1 ") inch equals twenty (20') feet, ✓ P/A site improvement survey including architect, landscape architect, or including before and "after" photographs opography and vegetation showing the engineer shall be submitted showing all (simulations) specifying the location of current status of the parcel certified by a existing and proposed site elements, the antennas, support structures, transmission registered land surveyor, licensed in the top of slope, and pertinent elevations buildings and/or other accessory uses, State of Colorado. (This requirement, or above sea level. - access, parking, fences, signs, lighting, any part thereof, may be waived by the landscaped areas and all adjacent land Community Development Department if 15. Proposed elevations of the uses within one- hundred fifty (150') feet. the project is determined not to warrant a development, including any rooftop Such plans and drawings should survey document.) equipment and how it will be screened. demonstrate compliance with the Review Standards of this Section. gout site plan depicting the proposed 16. Proposed elevations of the layout and the project's physical development, including any rooftop 25. FAA and FCC Coordination. relationship to the land and it's equipment and how it will be screened. Statements regarding the regulations of surroundings. the Federal Aviation Administration 17. A sketch plan of the site showing (FAA) and the Federal Communications / 0 A written description of the existing and proposed features which are Commission (FCC). proposal and a written explanation of relevant to the review. how a proposed development complies 26. Structural Integrity Report from a with the review standards relevant to the 18. One (1) inch equals four hundred professional engineer licensed in the development application. (400) feet scale city map showing the State of Colorado. location of the proposed subdivision, all 8. Plan with Existing and proposed adjacent lands owned by or under option 27. Evidence that an effort was made to grades at two -foot contours, with five -foot to the applicant, commonly known locate on an existing wireless intervals for grades over ten (10) percent. landmarks, and the zone district in which telecommunication services facility Is the proposed subdivision and adjacent site including coverage/ interference f 9 Proposed elevations of the development properties are located. analysis and capacity analysis and a v brief statement as to other reasons for 10. A description of proposed 19. A plat which reflects the layout of success or no success. construction techniques to be used. the lots, blocks and stnictures in the proposed subdivision. The plat shall . Neighborhood block plan at I I. A Plan with the 100 -year flood plain be drawn at a scale of one (1) equals one 1 =50' (available from City Engineering line and the high water line. hundred (100) feet or larger. Architectural Department) Graphically show the front scales are not acceptable. Sheet size shall portions of all existing buildings on both be twenty -Four (24) inches by thirty -six sides of the block and their setback from (36) inches. If it is necessary to place the the street in feet. Identify parking and plat on more than a one (I) sheet, an index front entry for each building and locale shall be included on the first sheet A any accessory dwelling units along the vicinity map shall also appear on the first alley. (Continued on next page.) sheet showing the subdivision as it relates to the rest of the city and the street • Indicate whether any portions of the 35. Exterior Lighting Plan. Show the houses immediately adjacent to the location, height. type and luminous subject parcel are one story (only one intensity of each above grade fixture. living level). Estimate the site illumination as measured in foot candles and include minimum. 99 Roof Plan. maximum, and average illumination. Additionally, provide comparable / 30 Photographic panorama. Show examples already in the community that e evations of all buildings on both sides of demonstrate technique, specification, and/ the block, including present condition of or light level if they exist. the subject property. Label photos and mount on a presentation board 31. A condominium subdivision exemption plat drawn with permanent ink on reproducible mylar. Sheet size shall be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six (36) inches with an unencumbered margin of one and one -half (I 1/2) inches on the left hand side of the sheet and a one -half (I2) inch margin around the other three (3) sides of the sheet pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.480.090. 32. A description and site plan of the proposed.development including a statement of the objectives to be achieved by the PUD and a description of the proposed land uses, densities, natural features, traffic and pedestrian circulation, off - street parking, open space areas, infrastructure improvements, and site drainage. 33. An architectural character plan generally indicating the use, massing, scale, and orientation of the proposed buildings. 34. A written description of the variance being requested. • CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and ''C . 1 L (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: AAV'qPLI ANT has submitted tp CITY n ap icayon for > •¢l4 ` slett rrol VUVI19.1.0t - a/( ti iQ'" (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). J - Z 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior t a determination of applic tion completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ 1 L � '10 — which is for, hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $245.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By: Chris Bendon Community Development Director Date:_�� Billing Address and Telephone Number: 01 Alfet 17 - OWNERS AUTHORIZATION Robert Copito ( "Owner") is the current owner of the premises, commonly referred to as 1460 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen, Colorado, ( "Property"). The owner does hereby authorize Scot Broughton of Scot Broughton Architects and his associates to act as our representative in matters concerning work to said property. Authorization may include, without limitation, or objection adjustment applications for variances, development applications, building permits, and other similar and related plans and permits. Robert Copito 500 Haven Lane Great Falls VA 22066 Date 4 Representative Scot Broughton Scot Broughton Architects, LLC PO Box 4096 Basalt, CO 81621 970 - 927 -0552 WRIGHT & LASALLE, 11 P 715 West Main Street, Suite 201 , Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone: (970) 925-5625 Facsimile: (970) 925 -5663 August 8, 2011 City of Aspen 130 Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Lot 37, FILING 1, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION a/k /a 1460 Sierra Vista Drive Asti, CO 81611 The undersigned is an attorney, duly licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado since 1973. This is to certify that according to the records of Pitkin County, the following individual is the owner in fee simple of the above referenced property: Robert Copito 500 Haven Lane Great Falls, VA 22060 Sincerely, Wright • Salle, LLP By: 40 • h f 'ohnD. LaSalle www.wrightlasalle.com S C O T B R O U G H T O N A r c h i t e c t s , L L C August 9, 2011 City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission 130 S. Galena Street; 2n Floor Aspen Co. 81611 RE: Residential Design Standard (RDS) Variance, Windows between 9' — 12' 1460 Sierra Vista Drive; Dear Commission Members, This application comes before you for consideration of our request to allow glazing on the street front elevation of the residence remodel at the above - mentioned address. The current residence constructed in 1971 is a split level home with the main entry at existing grade level, the first level is 4' -6" above existing grade, and the lower level is 4'- 6" below existing grade. The existing roof is a low- pitched slope of 2 to 12. It is our intent to maintain the low- pitched roof, but change the existing gable roof form to a more contemporary shed roof. As proposed the roof slope would pitch up toward the street elevation to take advantage of views toward Aspen Mountain, and Shadow Mountain. It was typical construction practices in the 1970's to place small openings at 6' -8" above respective floor levels. Our proposal is to maintain these lower openings, but provide a higher band of windows to take advantage of the mentioned views. The intent is not to propose a full wall of glass, but maintain a solid strip of wall between glazing bands to provide scale to the street elevation. However, due to the split level construction the proposed higher windows fall within the 9' -0" to 12' -0" area as defined as a no- window zone pursuant to regulation 26.410.040.D.3(a) — as defined in the City of Aspen Land Use Code. It is our request to be granted approval to place a band of windows within this 9'- 0" to 12' -0" range from the first floor level. Within the Sierra Vista neighborhood there exists a wide variety of architectural styles from original 1970's one level ranch style homes, modern mountain style homes, and contemporary homes. Several homes have been designed with street facing second level balconies with access provided by glass doors and adjacent windows that fall within the restricted 9' -0" to 12' -0" no- window zone. We feel that our proposal does not deviate from similar conditions in the neighborhood, and fits within the variety of existing styles. The portion of the street facing elevation with the higher band of proposed windows is setback + 75' -0" from the street edge, thus we fell presents very little impact to street users, and adjacent neighbors. Thank you for your review and consideration of this request. Scot Broughton Principal sr: PO Box 4096 / 23280 Two Rivers Rd., Unit 3 / Basalt, Co 81621 & A I 970/927 0552 [f] 970/927-0554 / [el slot @stotborchilecIs. tom �' f 0 ,, ' v rD C io t Atr 1 / / - r.' u '+. 1N i (Y�T� "' 9 f r W ,-.5:. C r- - -' C 1 !a '� e ►,g N } > "i _ i _ _ 1 i s . c p MEADOWS R. " ).. ~ 4 . . J r + 'gig I"- At l9"' 'J J • -4 3 . ; �". - a eye h �` �a�a)O r Via e► 1 am N "... - } __,,- Hess c . ,Therm ^ '{L� f f • . "S As J A r 1 ee 4^ yy t crsr�ECREeK P ' � „"S‘ _ • ~ -,-...—.4 t: t x p ' /r' a • ,Nl "ANN09M[}N. "' ,�-- + ; ?..A iilla y� i 't k ` � ci ,.y y l } � • 4 yon - Q } ti G E j 4 Y � F _ 5 7 *\ .. 3 � :{�-, IV . A 0 0 TT R ounaabo . + ` ( f ' :as 4.4A1 Of t f } �t gam. utw .. C W !° �«y�y^�,'` f, f s' `4 k`s' t 3 q�° m al . /a ' 4) d L ” ' `.:::' / . . ,../ * 1 l' J '.. , g '' / � qJ J`' 't �t / + / // U Cl: r'J{ a� 9 m W 5 r f 4 --4. f �QI f p ,,r. ,,4 t /rr�:' 4 , 1 , i t - Tt ir' .'' •. ,i '-' ' '. ,,- k... 7- ' 4 "e• e „44s. ,,,,,„?,,,, ,.. ...„- „,,,,, ,, .0, „ , r ± t se s isc, 4 \ ; . ( b \ /.:0 V g -- ,. , , 4/ ,,,...) . \„, ( 4,e- „ ' i. 1 : i - • , c ii? ' i , §,, --,,. Th C..t, - ------ — L e.- I Z - .7.- g V is cz . • , 1 „, , k.m? ,,,, ,..., -,,, 2 . - r ..,,,..g2 § „ (tics / R: , • 4 - 7 „,0, e i ,,,,,>, ,,,, ,, , c , C , t t 1 • --- r ' af- on t§ AY 4 - CP ; - .1 7 , i • "! :2 \ / 4 • 1 i I t I 8 ' ? le - - "1/4 --".-c • S . \ c 001 '''?....,..„. . or A ;5< ,,,, 0 •- ■,. — ,.... 0 . 11 k -,,,,„ •/. ... • sh tn ".,,,, —,-.., . • 1. - . — . s1/4, i .4. / c 44 ., • ' 4 ''' ' . -.= \\NN Ar 1+-b ii,----1 .,. _ \ \ --- -,...„ 1 i „---- , 'e . - =-- i , 1 --, uc / 4 ' — " 1 1 ,,, i 7 / _-- , , 1 / i — * / - -I 5 r L.,... , ,. 1 %-- i a --,- ' - / 1 _ t„, / § / (\\ . / • / --........ — i / i ------ i ,----- .......4-__ 1" / 1 ..----- ------ 1 ,r1 @ 1 c, R ..7 Copito ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER 1460 Sierra Vista Drive MAILING LIST Aspen, CO LOT1ASESSOR1 OWNER ADDRESS LOT & STREET ADDRESS R018449 JSO PARTNERS LLC PYRAMID PEAK Unit: B 1470 SIERRA VISTA DR 1470 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 816111045 R018448 SARICK JORDAN L & SHEREEN C PYRAMID PEAK Unit: A 1472 SIERRA VISTA DR 1472 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 -1045 R004673 CONNER CLAUDE M & IRENE A TRUST WEST ASPEN Lot: 34 AND:- Lot: 35 FILING 1 PO BOX 345 1480 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81612 8004764 STOLLER JONATHAN W REV TRUST WEST ASPEN Lot: 33 FILING 1 1475 SIERRA VISTA DR 1475 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 8004841 DICKER INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD HOPKINS CONDOS Unit: 1 & 2 5 HIGHGATE HILL 1465 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN TOORAK MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA 3142 R009472 BICKERT CARL VON EISEN & E SUSAN SIERRA VISTA DUPLEX Unit: A DESC: AKA UNIT 2 395 DEXTER ST 1445 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN DENVER, CO 80202 R019166 SCHWARTZ RICHARD C WEST ASPEN Lot: 30 FILING 1 1435 SIERRA VISTA DR 1435 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R009141 ODONNELL JOHN & ADRIENNE SIERRA VISTA Unit: B 4083 CUERVO AVE 1425 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN SANTA BARBARA, CA 93110 R009140 WALBERT DAVID & ELLEN SIERRA VISTA Unit: A 1425 SIERRA VISTA DR 1425 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R010840 MCLELLAN DAVID R & KATHERINE V GRACE PAUL Unit: SOUTH 1417 SIERRA VISTA DR 1417 5 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 -1044 R020918 GRACE PAUL CONDO ASSOC GRACE PAUL DESC: COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 1417 5 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN 1417 5 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN, CO 81611 R009817 SPASCO LTD RENAISSANCE ESTATE Unit: B 109 N POST OAK LN #550 857 BONITA DR ASPEN HOUSTON, TX 77024 2009816 CRS ALPINE LLC RENAISSANCE ESTATE Unit: C/O MICHAEL 0 HARTZ KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENM 855 BONITA DR ASPEN 525 W MONROE ST CHICAGO, IL 60661 8004781 SEVERY BETTY K TRUSTEE WEST ASPEN Lot: 41 FILING 1 1390 SIERRA VISTA DR 1390 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 14005561 SIMPSON ELEANOR P REV TRST 25% WEST ASPEN Lot: 2 FILING 2 PO BOX 25425 1435 SILVER KING DR ASPEN DALLAS, TX 75225 -1425 2005491 DUCHESS CORPORATION WEST ASPEN Lot: 3 FILING 2 C/O NANCY PAVELL 1455 SILVER KING DR ASPEN 11603 GLOWING SUNSET LN LAS VEGAS, NV 89135-1659 R010448 PHILLIPS DAVID & ALEXANDRA WEST ASPEN Lot: 40 FILING 1 UNIT 1 PO BOX 11449 1410 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81612 8004957 HIGHLANDS PARTNERSHIP LLP WEST ASPEN Lot: 40 FILING 1, UNH' 2 401 IVANHOE ST 1412 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN DENVER, CO 80220 8020725 1430 SIERRA VISTA LLC 1430 SIERRA VISTA Unit: B 1435 SIERRA VISTA 1430 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R009120 DUBLIN LEONARD & ADELE GOLF COURSE TOWNHOUSES Unit: A 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R014295 CITY OF ASPEN ASPEN GOLF COURSE Lot: 1 GOLF COURSE ATTN FINANCE DEPT 39551 H W Y 82 ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 i / / ' _ 4 w 1 I W S PA ��SI X 60 .F5 6 I ' ■ y/ . gy p ` ) \ , „ �Z ti , y C .. [7 - 9, 1 ..I h / I I '4, / , '4 4> 9. / bn °o�F 0 / 'i c / II CS 1 - •% 1 J ,o0.021 /c 44 .n I .. ,Y C1 11 , z ; J ,a a Fs t,: 1 1 4,5. % n s i p W p 1. o '{ O z e • „Y2 / 0 /� ao /g \ .J i1d .FM4 w O / n 1 . 4 „ % \ : . a V - 1 Y e c.. • I 0 �' " ' p ; li be m 0 / a_ , • te o . rf N t , { __..g. a,. IS' r I ° N It ■ U , P I V DC 4 W W f� 00 Sp1_ -- , } j" 1 oo' en Son. i2`et+ • 4 o - _ - , !C ' oLL -. , a f : 0040,/ n _ a r r w: 6/ % v R / 0 4° °o it\,. LLI a r = ' c . .. i . A _ . B y LL b1 • 4 e r lZ'3'II - / ' • Y W , v Q h • - *. - - f ° W 4 - t °r W • \ lir. t to • , A ■ (./.) J. i �. 'h.,- PJ e . . e � Y v •. t t K U W u 1 1 • O S9 / /• ' - i y ` kb ' Y 'i bo.o.. J 1 Lt - - - -.6, on 1 yy '®Y 3 • WA g a 6 x , Y 4 Y � Di 1 ■ • s 4 0 • ♦ , L I - 6 6052P•6 41r'L r + b \ • o% .0e/ . -m os F f co yr/ 1 0 di 9/ ' 1 °° r %;`: ' N '''' e a ° e '5. ',.... 4, a'9E/ a a ' ,ti S jgr. a : � v .y aye if a \ 1 ° ' o - + I ` F o" ♦ -� { son, +oo r - <!. 3 B S � Jr* tl r. s S e' 1 r •ff r Crf b k i4 ' e SC Iet { d ��a $ 1I 4 i F' 1 , ° f .n i.fl a Y f 44:4. �� 1 ae 0, yp J �i% 7\ 9F 4 • L Z • ` f r ,; y yt• V {4- Q • ...I ` ter 60 • q T E- . \ , 2S a .s -t 1 ri cif- . A ., . . r W 1-. 1 4 ill 'o °a U g € s V _ - aW CCopnpQ ) w F : • g wa° g W Q :!E" oNV ef 1, t ` „ 4 1 N_ _ ° a m w p o a. o ,. . its"------" N 7�i '7 :'3� L . N •. 1� .' 1i N . a F �/,� //-� L E-1 w m e F y z 53c E .: ;� mi l., z m la,! �ru k i ` " � w o ,- -Jo ! i1 !/ .%� W - � 8, €" w9 Ti or H /7— 5: a - 0 - € Tur 0 /,., Z a Re 8 Vw 6 z m= 5 W a $$ g 1 / 01 a f l i �= I .. II / i`� + '' % Ili - I I to tl B I V I ! c R' 3. S0 .6r.0 S \ p� _ 1N3W3SY3 AlIIIID .S pr� \A T: •� y \1104,4; (: I ;r . , „ I 4 , 1w Y ,= - — a60 y./. RE: g' 1 —_ i�:fl'.WD - it N t...*.*. 1 pia 5 - 6314041 =} • , • ✓ is '0 ms s c- 'I \ \ \ \ Ictgr 7 7 -- - s - \ § °Ljill ' 14 7-;2 - _ , : I N.. itb % ‘,7??.. —, 4, ___...— --- 2 - -:22 7 , t i, f ___ / V tivl v ��—= Z�, t Is ; ' _ I L b is g m V I i 111 > I !zn,,\ el � � a . .. 5 1 1 P 1 0 ch IL Q w N I. 1 1 I % I w 341g14b f, I gl g I d ra s § ill I 1S14 b?j2131 w _ a w /j;l \\ 3 I lk Y �; q� � 1i w /, �� o n C i A ik. tit, ,`° j a ,z9 z nn.ao.• 9S 9 - � �= P Ill E a $ ` S 5 x °-. C, J V W 11111 Bi • y I J ai` / \, \\. 1 > <° �IIt _ a $ T A I o _ °�O / ,\ \\ 1 a 1 \EDI d i r 1 e e 1 as — 4\1 I I =1. o � 1 I n i2 A 6. Ili._ 1 I y1 I o W j OIl, _ 1 1 1 1 z -1 < ' w �1'/ I \\\;! 1 — _ i ; � -- � 1 z We f, a - — "-----'----1 � d- � \i/ 'v < //�!� i 11 , I I _ . _AV a c@ <�.� 1 � i , 1 � - p � , ' ° , ■ V 30 1 55,_ � -q I �Cs� ll I _ aid z • v vAIi i� I 1 1 -1 I -� ` w a ' r : v � II • o 1 11 \\ , _ i 1 { \J \ I � I W ` W e I \ • W. l ' w: i z >7 __ _ , I 1 1 v `v A \9 1/1/1 / 1 w -- o; l_� I / / / / / /�AAJ w y 0< 1 i \111 - - 1 0 1 !MCI /� � � � � � _ \ , W ; 1 1 \\ ( \ i 6, I' f C I 1 j . . I '' _ '74 J 1 o I ' 1 1— I CD 1 r W _t!..:12;14";sit,iti 1 r e 0 _ 1 I, a W 1 frla b� ■ B Oo�o == \ u ,r v,o —au M — III ' I T ' AW k * Novenas Y 1�3W35Vd AlItIN,O'Ol ._.____ N r \ P .00701- g 3 „00,99099 N i U cc i JE a I9 Z ^$ 0 yy � G I ^ El V . 1 p e m 4c O� u JP P TzKi Q I Q q> 44 E g 1 N I Q i L 0 - - - - -- _ n O N SO I ' 1 � 1 ra.xoo. I _ 1 =. III 1 1_ ' I. -- , H as T 1 a I \ ot!g's O r d� 1 __ 0 r s q ' me �\ W I, 1116 iIi1 1 - - . ., Nu (� vox I, 1 > t ii f;s it * 7:a� 5- — - ----- z t i 1 u o dap kg a = ` - -- _ —__— .. _ {__— _ �� - -I � ii 4 N tu O g -- -- -- IP \ C)---b f T - f '� ° r�-i l C -1� ------ \ _ 0 Q 1 1 g ' I , _I _ • ? 1 7 1 -H - I -, I " -a - — J _____________0 C� 1/ 1 1_11_ -0 t€i1111 - , - -_ f j 111111111 w w LIJ a I I [ O � w Nzo . 46 u 4Qo i i 1 j i Zia I 1 L 0 ss 0 11 Z � I O p I j1 a I 1 1 ' ( = g S �______ _- __i � L ce 0 I L� CO MOM I i i I i 1 as Q tz " a U 4 lea a ma Oki Ie ' O M 1111 ^d Z4 O 1�1I 1 i SIi1ilil11i11 ,ry" O " z Z Q 0 — ® J . / :1 ll.f Li I s ktl I nk s 4*%[ , I— W rr ..� 2 I'V' 111 _ i ll h lll� r- 7,71 o o . b , +�r 5s . � , F- 11 H wc .Fy s +r ]AP "'.' Z _ _ - Ss" CO 11 . ` a 1 ®® ; Ili W co o *Noy i oa Q _ " 11 1 II111' x ?« Q °z 111.11.11 + +, Y l y a:0: `i*u < 3 5 – I 11111111111111114111'III'I'1'I� :a`kmE N �II 1 d 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +4" I— 6 s ° I 11111••111111111111114111111111 « 6 O G 6 IIII11h1 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 i 1 ' 1 1 1 ' 1 1 I ' I I l i 1' I ° g g a I g a 1 III 11111111111111 1 C — h h I� I 1�� 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It1111111 3' _ n . Y q N 1' 111111Lil1lllll11 ' r '`r ,n pp� II I X11 II1 1 i b rF 1 I 11 I � III�I� � a q 11 19= 1 I 11 IIi -1';1;'1' -4 I ---lp = €=1 I ll it �I II,II . ys' 111 111 .."31111111111111 {S s I ry Q pI ��1� ,c = -w II 111111 tit IIII II - 111 1 11 x n �k 111 II 111N11 4 1 I' a 1 Iyy 111111111111 i L s p lh I I ��11 11 4 j " I I IE14 'i 11111111 p'41 11 1 I 1111111111111 N hill I t lhl� 1 1rphp111 n $ n 4 i 1 � 1 1 1111 V I I I{ 1 l :6-J ig lilt V 1 1j11 11 x N (III Ihl it 1 1 '1 4 k ? h it 1111i II I 11111111111 dr N P I 1 11111111111A ....a-Ali i 1 11111 1{ 11 11111 11 1111 Y 1 1116 II IN 111 litt1; 1 — `,1I11 II411114 °4; 1 r I !Will 111111 1 ' 1 1111111111111 € � �. III � ' 1 " "' li p 1 1 1 111 '1111'1'1'11 lI l I..�m1111 1011111 q3 X1 qa Ili 111111111111 III 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 us 1 i1111$1111111IIf1111111i11u l k IIII6�IIIII111111111 d1i�41111 , sv _ !lira.., Iu6 61 III 1 II 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 s s 1 = ' Y � IIIII 1 1lI�Ii11111j1 r ° % ll 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 ' 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 11 III 1111 0A c t9 as HIE' 111 { 1 Ih 11 1111111 1 1 1 , w i l kY ■ I r 3 f1 1 I l l I I1y I I II I 1,1111,1 c 7 I1 I I I I I hh l h! 1 t�'!'i li 1; l 11 , » ' . III I l h l l ll 111 1 11 . 1 . 1 . 1 . 1 . II 1111 I 1 17 11 I I I I 111111111111 I� 11 41, 11 I I I – - ,�<` III IIII 11 — � il�% <Al, I i�1 I I I 1 1 ` i z - 1' 1 11 � 1 h 1 ' x 1 1 11 ' 11 ' 1 ' 1 w 11 hllh� 11 111 1 '11 1 �p X 1101 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 j ; iii 111131! VI 111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' a li 1 € ( IIII 1 111 Ilt—j [k ti � hI II I 1 { I I � 1 ;i 1 r 9 f� I , Y n t�r. 1 IIII "kill! 1I 1 l'11l'1'1'i 'f 1 t 11111111 i 1 i I ( ' 1¢ . " . " 111111111111 h 1 1' IH1111111111 111141 . • • x , � X11 1r1 1111���11 _ f � 1 I I�1 7 ce.�r.�}- VIII '111111 11 1 1 r 1 1 11 1 1 1 Ii 1111! 11 1'1 9.1.1 ... 111 I II I �I� i161,1. T 111 11 j � 1_ mil _ "f� a II 1 1 �' �a ` «^� ry; n 1'1'11111I 1 `T" 1 1 11111111 I I I 11 11111 _ 1 ' 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 � 1 �1 1 1 rq . 1 I 1 1 .1 . 1. I I I� 11411401114 I1! 1111 1� 1 111111 1.1 1 1 1 , ' 1 I1 1 1I1111I L — I I - 1 �4 1 14 � ,�^§ aft . l - II 11 I I lI I I . Y I I14 1 i i 14'Ihii 1' 1 Y 1 1 1 { 1 1 HAY a- .. -- - - I �k` % , 1 I1 IIIIIIIIII1111141II1 I 1 1 1 1 44 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 r�.'�t � -- 1 11 1 ' 1 OA lb 111 AWN! I 1 111 111111 • _ ; I � ;� 1 1410 ilidr Ird'I,, 111111! 1 ;1 - -1 X1 1 " oJS, I I PI 1 1 1 . i. 111 I II .. 111 � IIlL1.1.1.1�.1. 1111 ....11 11 ,, �1 r �1 1 c 1,0 1,11,4 11111 11.1.1.1.1.1 .. 11 — 11 �, 1,11,4 L 11 W mu11111! IIII 1 1 111 fk1'et 1'k r m . 44411. (IIIIIIII 11 x c v 111 E L ..l1l10l'! .11I.1.1.1y. h.I 1!1!1!1!1111 r �� {111 � 4.... • i 1 61 111 !11 '1 1 Ij 11 ' 1 ' Y l 1 # 111 1 ■ II 1 r� ti r; _ � 111111�101111W1111 r - I 1 1 _ 11 1{1{ 1 1 1linid 1 .a 11 s 11 �._ 111111111111 i s c ' � 1� 6 14 11 Al 4 I{ I d. C. VIe -iY} 111, II Ililllll ' " 1111111111111 1a i L .1111111111111 J til Lli ° 0 It ll III Yt� t � ' 1111 � 3t FV 1 11 1 1p 1111011 i H ti1.Sw1` 1 11 � � I �1 B � 1 111 1111 11 �/ O 11'111 C , it frti O N _l r`1� H O I �w 1 = III!!!1�11lil14d k w 0LE — II 1 J r% 44'1'I'11: P11 —_ .L - -- — ■ 1 N wil N IIl1 ! !!!!!!!iI!!!1l1 l 1111 1 4,• ' 1�1 !I "` } Q = o ri • � I - = 1 ■ _ •II o p ub P c 0 ,o m n O e4 N ,g3 x P m b o 84 m 0° a i i 1 ): : bl 3 ; Eo a a C? o C? I L W CD w u , W _ ,1 111111.10 N LI _ � I ` � �. = I �1 i l id / � E § -I- —1.1 — ® o- � � _ — p —t i � UM � l � *11111:11: 1 : �� ______ ,l l G ton �_�� m • J �• = +'1 - co 3 Es HI" III �� 1 1 RI I � N 4 �, � h ��, 11 I t 0- ,;� _lent. rll! i 1rC ®in ( o r , � , V _ . cowl 01 J{�i la�ltil1���: ,, f g Ii �l k ' i I� �Illi� ill liv e -� � ' 11'1 1 I i ; mini V , a pill 111 I I I m 1 1 : II;∎ s _I 0- f , E; X1 1 1.. U �T ® �i � ! o '� III -II N 1 1 \ Nu 1� II��i hi L° u Mil ll .1[„111.5 . 1 � I . 41_ I 1 - - mar _— t t Li ' IL 1•�Yill 1 �� 1 1 i lir I C '1� L:91 II it 1 J 1 t w a I till _1�� - I ' 1E V III 1. 4 ,, - I I W O ii /� Vaz 1 11111 H O �, VIII 1 I ill I I �o R, I __ 1 i p 0 I ! ur. l �o ._. L I z T s tl J- 2 r � ° rn I 0 E° f u a RE L ■■ 0 t - " .I. •....BS_— _. I 1 1 1