HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.534 E Cooper.1978 Fothergills (TIC 307715 SLL 'S
OtTT.cL S I0�7S'
PAS :c.-4 T .7
4ppLtcant:
Gael; vtn: >n Of "
ad CIO o,¢ S
537 Coopon Si.
Box 8c
441 en Calf_ cS"1 6 1 11
A.ttr: By
•
c a , :m1. 1 i Manay'emonf l?L (vv..(r<at;on r.pnnt
C omn.cnccu) Sect _c,.n
PnoL'ci N m!: Cauc h B �cahen� . LL i (lutw .Sponmcn i_:r,; n t
Loc: t1 on: 5i 't 6. Cove, n, A; ., C:nnca7 Coop .'n 6 RanLen
An the Slid et IZ:= ftuun,:ni_ u.c -(d;
honcr Sco,r. G, 000 S, / u:acr / }��� _in Sn c and
C anteen -1_ Zon�.ng: Con,r.cncc al Con,- (CO
Zon.incy unden rua_cclt a t c LLA on 3 {I zd: Comrnenc-ta] Cone
MuvA:nium Gut-lc/out undsn cunn:n.t �on.tny: 9,000 S ru.ne }e .t
Pno Zaunr: Sc m
Tata t &zJdou_t PnofOA,_ c : ; / la / aid r wt.) 1,000 Sq }.t, Lo 7,000 So 1
Spec_A :.t / Rcg_u.iA None
Nate: Ti ann -tcanL, (4uc' }otia 2, 4d a ,Leaiee ,in -IAA
Sr ca� t Ljua.co,<nc :u.i fz noun u eunA icema -n:n c z - te LE nncs n.t - 1,'u�,'.
Th C. 1. rnven Conp LAG -il _ tile own o _tlie Shasit Bit,J_,.Lng,
aav? /a fie^ 4ta1.rd L4,-40z 1". It .n rt. 24 Lo nc/eaMe .Lo u/. a -t tae
.icnm_i nut/ on os Jax r -n:A fl 1cc14e. Tae sp ace _uti e pant o;t
the Stu: it &I Jatin [mil owned 6 16- Land,6ond, a-LJaoa % n
Tenant, Ciuct: }oflieiza_i.L('A. w_cLL 6e dotnq cii .tae r ona ono'
,,
6ean.<itq the expennc oy .the pnoJec1.
Expert advice
and guidance
0
�i 1LSCk �'O1 ��1ll�S BOX 88 ASPEN COLORADO 81611
OUTDOOR SPOR MAN Equipment ibr cher/po
PunpoAe 03 CazzA.fnuc -t on:
Oven ,the eAfr41 tram-4 tia -t Cluj }cL .-infri.CL " Ouldoon
.SpotdAman hat been naa developed
a neputJLian pnow'dencr 1,triu.zc c.nd exp,,At i( need
i n ronmativn, piu4 gtu; Lt4 e 3!uip„ment, Son the AenL ouA CIt0A4
countev. Al:XLVt, 6L,iA4enman, and 6cc-:o:Jen. _91 naA
4uppLied exceileni AcnAJAuct-ion and fru e den Aenv.iceA. Qn J ie
paA.t o `'w a`'an a //ze demand on nenlaJ and a z dinc Aenv2 cc4
h�A p4c44wzed 1h.: ph cup.: b-z -L-dA. 4 at .1.11 .z A/1-0p .and
pe4Aannei to .the poinJ o AUCAsi g.4 c-+.ny f 9uaJ..ilzy oy ihe4e
Aenvice4. 4 1 4c4 L6zene51oncc become neceAAanzy Jo e{lhen
develop adclitionai - J OL:ce on auai J42 n2a.L/ fru.idind end o6
IL IVA.Ln,?AA. a • e. 92 AA .impOA4A b.Lcz 6 on 14.1A4 peopie Jo
nznf
A,12 and b00% in :t 590 %n_ 7"-f A llop oniu Aid: C`c2AA.
UU
(/.• %4nne5onc make t z.C4 app,L.icaLion Jo the 04 o5 >�Apcn
O Gn p inm i /,A, r .io conA. a baAarnenl under Quit pneAPnl Afon2
Jo houAe nanla.✓, 2widino ArnviceA, mei :c4andt- e nepa,in,
rela,c.Liny, and out oil zce. The ex.ia _ink 2aound .Levc
extenion o .the build na AhaCL nemmin identical, eccepl gon
.the add/ lion 03 a dooiwary iacnq on flume' Slneel. ConA nuclion
Aha 6e acconp2iA4ed 4 nemov/ny lie Aecl og wall con-to- in-thy
the w;ndvwA pneJenl.Ly gacino on Hunlen SL' eel. The ,inler,.iwt
4402/ .then le zyuLtec/, pnc-Aenl concnele 2101 ,Loon nemoved,
and 6aAemenl dui; enom .inA.ide -the ex-Lai-the Apace. To the eYlenl
thin .the addi.t.iona.L oo.to exceed .the pneAent Apace,
conA.tJcucl.ion 4/2011 le accomp Alted 4 undccnn-in 14e exiA.t in f r
Shaft 3Joon,in2 and inert Ahoicin9 w w.i,th j oLn a . The g.Loon
AhaB .then be nebuLLt ion .the pneAenl lolhen2.i,LL A Apace and
nemodeL.n2 o3! -the pneAen.t and new ,in.ten.ion 31&ina.Li5ed.
Tie g Oil OW; fly a cn neAponae :to /0.5 (ommencia.L
and O{'i ce Deve.10p177en1 : n L , ca.Lia't PAoc •Zdune4.
ciao) waters 4u-11, .to 6 e 1.14ca -zaLL e iaent _caLo
v
tie pnz2en2 4y4.t._m 04 no 0'G(1- Lk'on:).1 pium62iny ,ha.LL 6, 6uLLt.
66) Sewage .tneatmen.t 4y41-m 4tzdB 6e th.- flame a pne4eni.
cc) &c.ten o,z d✓ta.inaae flu .t..m ,:1 no.t opp.Lice.6.1e.
dd) Th�e pne.nt [ ek ;4 f4 ppno -"mat, Lt. 6 4C 9 0
devc_.Lopmen# on 14 Sha ',t rite. T42 omit/ op. n 4pcce .i4 t Le
.in4e -t4 a-t the ,tao doonw(: 2 . }o.1 4 t < 'A mei nio,i
i L i ,i L
r %n bat.'2 .! ? de4 O� -�Rp .... -_a;,p c'nc1 -t 2c !.e an? � , ".(n
ng 1)zee4 a (ony flunten ;
ac;catat, Lhene wou..'d r:e a jJG.i d/
deveiopn.en.t -to .lot 4.2. -e.
ee) 64-United a,z_.s count ancizaa4e A u..LL u�
-the ma on.itf og p:zon-Lz .20.J4 -to ...CLL. 4 -tone i.cnce
}o.theit .i.LL % pnovide4 �u., wino 4;.nv,' .i�u:n2pa/dation. e .
;Ue arse 0.L40 wL,.th n two 6iLoc44 og Ru6j rank g'-on ea4, 6ui 4envice.
gg) The conAbwc-Li.on .i d de4.iyned bon exe.Lu4-ive 1142 61i
JobezeAcill '4. }others y,,_.LL '4 1134 been {n zh�e ` pn;-4end ..Location
'Lon e-idhJ yean4 and LA a -tea4e gon an add - tit - .ono -I gouty iea4.4
wail no inteen.tion og movin52. We ane not ownen4 og the
6uilidiny, and .t, en, -gone would not have any n.iyh.t o zen than
.to uae tle 4pac,? oun4e ve4.
Y) The pne4en.t Aun zeundLnq cite: ,Nonih contn�rcf
&.4.t Texaco 4 /CI; on .Sccc.t%i Qe.,n FA -4Aen
6uiIa:nt, incited-my neJaA.l.inc nd (4, , ce, ,te41 Coopen Bu.:..0 n f
includ.n . ne-ta.il no, u� ` ce n e- „t, /n: n. /_e, and condonn
Sin cc dice u4e o the Apace would le -tie A0172,2 02 ,the •ne4eni
tee .L t Ahauld
ave no e / on ..nu ocacen LvJeA on ln n us %�.
U
i) Con/Dzuction will n<:Sw e 60 Jo y0 dcgA ,na Anal
Acheduled O lon pn.c1 1,]y, on the eaniie4.t conv�_nien.t date
u
r
aKien en nnovu
r
ijn /Lr' -to / empl o e te izow' City, Lt .(ii LnpcvcJ;nJ -to
noie 1ha.t lol /Lenq.i,LL /, hc7A acAj eyed BA Reputation lo UA-ing
, c
expen,ienced luny. 11me neA- iden12. 7ne 1/1Aee owncnA 00
}o.then ,;JJ 2 have 35 cumulative c�:caRA o neAidence �n .tiie
Roun,irta 9o11.4 V � l Cec�. LmploueeA and JuiaceA cute 6140 mainly
long tennin ne 42denLA and any caf ,:nc2/>nt L a ,ea.
Gun employee/ cute pa.r in .the $' /.i5 to $5.00 pin r ioun nanye
plug Gen4(7.4 .twelve mon.t/ p.en yeas. gcud:>A nece.ive <`' non:
$35 lo $60 pen aau. i ll o� .them anr- Z.inanc-ia.1.4 capa6L:- or
ma.inlainin2 penmanznl_ houA.in$.
C H A R L E S T. COLLINS ❑ C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R
P. 0. BOX HH / ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 / 303 925-2089
August 31, 1978
City & County Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: Proposed Basement Addition
Fothergill's Outdoor Sportsman
534 East Cooper Avenue
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Gentlemen:
At the request of the applicant our firm has
reviewed the proposed project described above. We
have found the proposed basement expansion to be
feasible, and that it could be achieved with relatively
little disturbance to adjacent buildings and property.
If any further questions arise, please contact
our office.
Sincerely,
Michael C. Herndon
Collins Engineers, Inc.
MCH:ml
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN EVALUATION REPORT
• • COMMERCIAL SECTION
1. Project Name: l!luch }o,thenp i Ou -goon .Spon14man Ba4Pmon.t
2. Location: !' ooie s . _.- ;,.. 1..
6,000 uane e ,t
3. Parcel Size: � -
4. Current Zoning: (omn i a.� [ on> T
Zoning under which application is filed: 0"menc10-2 Cone
Maximum buildout under current zoning: f,000 4 &uane goe' •
Proposed zoning:
Same
r �
5. Total buildout proposed: 1,000 A t cicid-.tc:ona� n a ._ ,000 i� t
6. Special procedures required:
one
View planes:
Stream Margin Review:
Special Review:
•
Historic District Review:
Subdivision (condominiumization):
PUD:
7. Program Narrative and associated graphics to describe the proposed
project's impacts and other data. (to be submitted with this application)
a. Existing water system, excess water capacity, location of the
• nearest water main and estimated water demand of the building.
b. Capacity of the sewage system, location of the nearest trunk line
and estimated sewer demand of the building.
c. Type and design of surface drainage.
d. Development summary including lot size, internal square footage
and open space.
e. Estimated daily number of vehicles generated by the development
and estimated increase of traffic volume on adjacent streets,
number of on- street and off - street parking spaces to be supplied,
location of public transportation stops and routes, other auto
disincentive techniques incorporated into the proposed development,
and hours of principle daily usage of the development.
f. Proposed uses for the structure and potential alternative uses
(by general category of use) without substantial building changes.
g. Types of land uses adjacent and in the immediate vicinity.
h. Construction schedule and schedule for phasing of construction if
applicable.
8. List of drawings and maps submitted for review:
Cng.neeminy dnawina2 by (o,CLinm fng,inePfJny
•
Submittal Date:
- 1 -
NI.i '-
9. HPC GROWTH MANAGEMENT EVALUATION FORM - Ratings of projects within the
commercial one zoning districts shall be assigned points according to
the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw which creates a major
conflict with historic structures in the historic
district or with the urban environment in the other
areas outside the historic district
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates . an acceptable design
The following design elements shall be rated accordingly:
Massing - (maximum 3 points) considering the massing, type of
roof, and overall compatibility with the historic
scale represented in the vicinity of the project.
Exterior Building Materials - (maximum 3 points) considering the
application of historic building materials and their
use on all facades of the structure, avoidance of
garish, reflective or other disruptive materials.
Architectural Detail - (maximum 3 points) considering overall
visual impression given by fenestration and the use of
building detail near windows, doors, corners, roof
lines and at floor level.
Color - (maximum 3 points) considering the compatibility of colors
and the variation in color when necessary to maintain
historic scale.
Architecture - (maximum 3 points) considering the use of compatible
contemporary design as opposed to the imitation of
historic architectural features.
RATE the above five (5) design elements below. Please comment on the
strong and /or weak factors affecting each of your ratings.
Project Name:
Date:
Design Element:
a) MASSING Rating
Comment:
b) EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL Rating
Comment:
-2-
•
c) ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL Rating
Comment:
s
d) COLOR Rating
Comment:
e) ARCHITECTURE Rating
Comment:
TOTAL Rating
Name of person submitting the above rating
Y
- 3 -
10. P &Z Growth Management Quality of Design Evaluation Form - Projects
within the Commercial Core (CC) and Commercial One (C -1) zoning
districts shall be assigned points according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates 'an acceptable design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Architectural design - considering the compatibility of the proposed •
building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater-
ials) with existing neighboring developments.
Rating
Comment:
•
b) Site design - 'considering the quality and character of the proposed
landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
Rating
Comment:
c) Energy - considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices
and efficient fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and
use of solar energy sources.
Rating
Comment:
d) Amenities - considering the provision of usable open space and
pedestrian and bicycle ways.
Rating
Comment:
-4-
e) Visual Impact - considering the scale and location of buildings
to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
Rating
Comment:
11. P&Z Growth Management Community Commercial Uses Evaluation Form
Projects within the CC and C -1 shall be assigned points according to
the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any
housing or uses directed to supplying needs
of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis
on supplying tourist services with little or
no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses
that will be relied on by both the tourist
and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost
exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com-
munity's residential population with only
incidental tourist use and no tourist housing
being anticipated.
Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to which the project
supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial
uses.
Rating
Comment:
b) Medical and Other Service Needs - considering the extent to which
the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional
office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair,
grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed
and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the
community.
Rating
Comment:
-5-
.
12. NET POINTS
HPC AVERAGE RATING
INDIVIDUAL P &Z MEMBER RATING
NET RATINGG
13. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the above net rating) provided
the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality.
BONUS POINT
14. TOTAL POINTS
NET RATING
BONUS RATING
TOTAL POINTS
NAME OF PERSON SUBMITTING THE ABOVE RATING:
DATE
•
-6-