HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.534 E Cooper.1978 Fothergillsjq�g- GM- 16
Fothergi ll' s
� r i
19-� G(I -
Fothergi,11- s �j� ` ,
0
C1-I11CA -7071 2y9LL 'S
OUT, O Sri ,US,'jj'W
,�AIT AC995,rAl
can-t:
Ou. C/O "q S,.) o.n Li M.. n
53� 6• Covpon D .
Box 66
f,�Jven COI(' 81611
4tfrt: 'M �cn4"�r4
9A0iV,tlz Manry?m.cnt Pl,gin 6vc,4ua-t 'on R,-p,)At
CommC A c-k u.l Se c b, c,n
Azo jec-t N mo: CzucA }(:.ihenc :.0 Ou C 2voh .Sp oAt man
Loca.t,on: 5 3f 6. Covl� �z, ,�f... C)Ancp, (-oven 6Ilun-te-z
,cn f1z; Stzl:6,t Pi?A tuun(.n-t u-k ld-mc
6,000 SLIP Bu,.tdin
Cuivzen.t _7orz my: COPMeAC4 (1. Cva,� (CC)
Zvn inch wzdea zuh� ch urp,c c.c -,tion g.�.L r�• Cvmme�zc ca l Cane
Maximum Ou i.Ldvu t und,n cuiv, : n t vn en�r: 9 , �j00 Sp :Ao ]e ..t
irzoPoAed Zvlz,cnj:: SOPIC
Tato.t Bu-C'.ldvut P4orojcd— /tad j-, vn,l 1 ,')OO.Sq }-t, -to 7,000 Sri }t
Spec kc:-L PAocedune s None
,l
No. e: Trze ann-Lcon.t , Chucr }vti z._ n�C t GL 'A' .cIi a [eaAee ,in
Shao't Quc. Ldcrz� w.i th ��OUA Yet,,AA nema.crz-jrz . on z vz rat
TA,? C. 4. MUPA COAPU GUon, Ine ouneAA vd- -Me Slzo�t Qu.i.ld-mg,
have Sun t ien jio ted io nr�ea,4e Jto u., o t .Me
G
.tcizmtnutiorz v lea -se. Thu .space �:j.i U be paAJ 0'
he Shcl-lt Sut' ldc yr c:nd owned by. 'Mr Landlord, a.l thvUYA .the
Tenant., Chuck }o.thegy-a- -4. w.i"Ll de clv.iny a,& .t4c „-v.,zh and
�eaziny .the expen e o� tjze j�rcdl-
Expert advice • •
and guidance
C UCk FO 7ll"S BOX88 ASPEN COLORADO 81611
• OUTDOOR SPORT AN Egsupnwntfur thesportssnan
Pu.zpo.ie o� CvnAlAucttvn:
0vc_n ,tne e.t ynt yc,a.1A t i of U tuck }v f i.-n '% �u dvvn
.Sl;va.tsman nu.1 been n Ii�pen, t*� izaa dove-Cvpe(z
a aeputution �vn pnvvi al<rz : �,t�u c chit t6 onw—,zd e,nd exp,,.z.icnced
,irzb'vmm�.tivn, plu-a gm..L-tc� enu�p„ment, va flze .jeaiou,j cicvAA
cvuntAy.. ,d4lk. ?A, �, IZeAmon, and a.L o
Aupp.L.ced exce-Uen-t arzal cyucdcny jeavice6. A .t ze
pa.4.t o,,w y`-aAA Ae demand icon aen,ial and yulding ,seizvic�,4
114A pre jjuaed In" pnYA.icul cup i6x,Li.t c A 4 JA., Anvp :.nd
peAAonnel .tv tAe pv.in t og A(lcA4-4."+ny lh-, �:uul--4 t� 4 the je
.JenviC(?A. -9-� na,4 .thene�oa,, 6ccome nece,J,da,zy .to .'. tAen
develop addi,4.-.conalon gait &-2 n.-nCa.�,i�u�c�in�C end v�
.&I 6u.J.ena•JA. .+.,e. -91 61e v/z .tru:nty pevpl(-, to
aen,t .� �,i.; and 6vv� in 5' ;) �n vp u: to only i � � u,c/t,1 .
,W,- J-neneb'vae maze a,n n9.Licaj-ivn .to .14e C.i.Cy
�va to cvn.A�nuc-t a 6nAamen.t unci'e,,c vun nneAPn.t .jfvne
.Co nvu,4e-Aonla.:b, yu-cdcno .�E-zvice,�, men chard E.� tonal: , nepa uz,
,ze-ta.t,&ny, and vun vU-tce. T-e exiatincy y.zvund levc l
exteaivn o f lIze 6uildina 6no,L' A -?MG -in _+denb'ca. , evicep� �OA
Ae addition vg a dva iwaty 9=aG:ny on Aun te- S.caeeJ-. Con,4 tAuct-ion
,eha.L,C 6e accvmp,i.i.Aed 6Y aemvv-Iny -t/ze ,jeciiorz v zva,LL cnntain.zrzg
,Me W-indow.d pnelent ly �oc in y on riun.ten SipeeA'-. Tke
.dna,U A en 6e $uJUed, pAcAenti cvnc Ae-te -41a6 Povn removed,
and basemen- d'uo nvm inside tze exi.d.tinc apace. To Me ex.ten-t
,thu.t .tAe addi.t,ivnaz dpaAe $ o.&,-ye cxcc-eds tke pnesen.t apace,
cv"tAuc-i ion .jAo U 6e accv,:,pl iA.� ed 6y undcr,?t in.iny }.iie ex-c, .t cny
Shu�.t ooiziny and ,men ,shv.7.4-'ny u,u u�A. to p.z-.s.t.s, The �- OOA
, c,U MLn 6e ae6uZ& ton ble pncjen-t }oMea j-.i Ll d ,jpocc and
aemvdeliny vb i4e pre sent and new ,inleA-ioA iina Lied.
T•�ze ' o Uvw,c:na ,A .in A(!,spon le ,tv Sect.ior: ,f i 0.5 (ommeACka,�
and 0��-; ce DeveIopm;,n.t fiPn.6,. cation A,vc.,du,-,eA.
al GO)
T6- wateA
d�".t2m .to 6e
6e-idenJ-iccl ,to
trze pn.menl
-cyd.t,-m
a.,, no
66) Sewage lAeaimenl Apt--m diic U 6e .th._- zc:me. pAe Rent.
cc) &cteA-ivn diza,inaae �z .t..m .i✓1 not anf�Lic�-6�e.
dd) AeAc p ze -_n14 ex i :r t4 11 6, 0 0 J bt vn-
devc-COpmenj- on 14 Shad -t Ae only o/n• "n ip-: ce (`Ize
,inu etz at Me .tvo dvvjzw..: p . }o t era i � Z '.� mu,i n f u.in.4 � �v..,e.z.; .; ,
w.tn.,J✓ OW""'A On 6vf.z :, ,'deA o Ile .4 `_vre cnd t4e,�e a;ze
!vn� Rurlen S&zee�. "Ict6
adG!z tc.az, tne.z�� wound t':e a 7)i-,/6000 /,� --t ryaf io
4evelopmen.t. .to lot i.+_je.
ee) (f,j,t.im...ted ve6-icZe ,t.z_,66,x'c count al`ZCA(�aAe .44(l U 6
minim :1 :;.j V- ze mal',0A iJty v� �eop. ,2 r✓-� L�� .to t;��, .J,to,,ze, i.cnce
3ollz.eAa.i, '/,, 1-novcde-4 au., ding 16 Av.:.ce .tAan4pofz.ia.t.cvn.
e oAe 0140 WitA-n two
61ockA I /U6,u %and 8v� eu�
'ty 6uj ijeAvice.
71ze cvn,6tAu_ct i.on .iA de.4.ianed bon exc4u-ive u z ` dry
-7otAena.i U'A.-7oAeAy,,& 'A lza.6 been .in zfze pa,men.% loca.t ion
gvn e-iaiit yeas and Aaj a Zeaje �vn un ad"onu.L �oun yeaAA
w.i A no ,into nt_ion o� moving. 'Ve ane not owne u o f the
6ux-C� iny, and .t4eiz::�vne woulal not 4ave any A-iah.t vtzen .than
,tv uAe the jpace vujwe lvej.
•
•
Tie pAe�en.t Aunnoundi,tg ,Lund c".-?.4 ane: IVoAA cvn.CnacY.
(fa.4.f Texaco .ilcLi'on, ,Soalf' Q,-,in rn� h�rn i
bu<,Ldc:n inc.Ludcny Ae&.4..4 iny nd o .:cc, I'vell Covpen Qu.1Idinry
,inc.Lud� nay )zeta i14.n y , v�S,t cc, . neA t c.<n r. ana con onu:n,4 unz-J.
Since ,Erie "e vs tAe .jpc,,ce would 6e J;ie Aume aA JAe f re jen f
ume, .t.t Aould have no ed-icc.f on :ny a4acerzt uje.4 on ,Land u-s.2-,i.
n' i� conA Aucfion rui.L,L n piAe 60 .fv yJ Clop ,nay.�h:-,LL b:,
•dcliedu,Led vn ',p. 117y, vA .f%te ea,,t_&L.j.f cvnv,n.ient c1cte
61 1 fen 0 JZOv�;.L.
_91Z A..?YC Ad .fv employee houi.iny, .c.t .cA .impojLt,,,&t 10
ro.fe Jhot 7oViejtya:.L 'a 1"10.6 acA.ieved .cis nepufa,&on Icy ".kny
experienced ,Long �,4me new-iden%. The Vu7ee vwnen s o"
3o,1ieny.4',U A have 35 cumu.Laf..ivcY OAd of ne` i Bence An A
louring joAA, ValL ey. Lmp,Locped and du,ideA are r1,L�v main
,Cony te-Am re s,iden.t j and aAe ul- pne.4,,jntlu_ zoud d ,in .tbe area.
OuA emL.),Loy-eej ane paid cn the SY-75 .fv $!.00 p^n ivun none
p.Lu,4 6ene p t d Iwelv,, mvn.thu pe.t cyean. ycc.ide j nece.ive 'nani
S35 to $�50 pen daY. L( v�` .f.�iem une pnanc.iov capo6. , o0
ma,in.ta,in.in$ permanent hvuA ivy..
u
CHARLES T. COLLINS ❑ CON S U LT I N G ENGINEER
P.O. BOX H H / AS P E N, C O LO RAD O 81611 / 303 925-2089
August 31, 1978
City & County Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: Proposed Basement Addition
Fothergill's Outdoor Sportsman
534 East Cooper Avenue
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Gentlemen:
At the request of the applicant our firm has
reviewed the proposed project described above. We
have found the proposed basement expansion to be
feasible, and that it could be achieved with relatively
little disturbance to adjacent buildings and property.
If any further questions arise, please contact
our office.
Sincerely,
Michael C. Herndon
Collins Engineers, Inc.
MCH:ml
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN EVALUATION REPORT
COMMERCIAL SECTION
1. Project Name: (tuck 3otAen 111'� Ouldvvn S vrct��an Qa
2. Location: 5 3 ' f �vv»en trz
Sit �4 %�c it f i,n —n f i /'q�
u 4
3. Parcel Size: 6,000 ��uaice �e ,1
4. Current Zoning:
Zoning under which application is filed:
Maximum buildout under current zoning: �,OJO �Quan�rP
Proposed zoning: Same
5. Total bui ldout proposed: 1, 000 A.!J x t clldz t 4'ynaI, x1v,1 a t0-ta n� 7,00() 4 gt
6. Special procedures required:
None
View planes:
Stream Margin Review:
Special Review:
Historic District Review
Subdivision (condominiumization):
PUD:
7. Program Narrative and associated graphics to describe the proposed
project's impacts and other data. (to be submitted with this application)
a. Existing. water system, excess water capacity, location of the
nearest water main and estimated water demand of the building.
b. Capacity of the sewage system, location of the nearest trunk line
and estimated sewer demand of the building.
c. Type and design of surface drainage.
d. Develooment summary including lot size, internal square footaae
and open space.
e. Estimated daily number of vehicles generated by the development
and estimated increase of traffic volume on adjacent streets,
number of on -street and off-street parking spaces to be supplied,
location of public transportation stops and routes, other auto
disincentive techniques incorporated into the proposed development,
and hours of principle daily usaoe of the development.
f. Proposed uses for the structure and potential alternative uses
(by general category of use) without SUb:,-i.antial building changes.
g. Types of land uses adjacent and in the imr:.ediate vicinity.
h. Construction schedule and schedule for phasing of construction if
applicable.
8. List of drawings and maps submitted for review:
�n��neen.cn� a��au�ng,j bra Cv_irLA fn �nr n
Submittal Date:
-1-
9. HPC GROWTH MANAGEMENT EVALUATION! FORM - Ratings of projects within the
commercial one zoning districts shall be assigned points according to
the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw which creates a major
conflict with historic structures in the historic
district or with the urban environment in the other
areas outside the historic district
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates.an acceptable design
The following design elements shall be rated accordingly:
Massing - (maximum 3 points) considering the massing, type of
roof, and overall compatibility with the historic
scale represented in the vicinity of the project.
Exterior Building Materials - (maximum 3 points) considering the
application of historic building materials and their
use on all facades of the structure, avoidance of
garish, reflective or other disruptive materials.
Architectural Detail - (maximum 3 points) considering overall
visual impression given by fenestration and the use of
building detail near•windows, doors, corners, roof
lines and at floor level.
Color - (maximum 3 points) considering the compatibility of colors
and the variation in color when necessary to maintain
historic scale.
Architecture - (maximum 3 points) considering the use of compatible
contemporary design as opposed to the imitation of
historic architectural features.
RATE the above five (5) design elements below. Please comment on the
strong and/or weak factors affecting each of your ratings.
Project Name:
Date:
Design Element:
a) MASSING
Comment:
b) EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL
Comment:
- 2 -
Rating
Rating
c) ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL
Comment:
• Rating
d) COLOR Rating
Comment:
e) ARCHITECTURE
Comment:
Rating
TOTAL Rating
Name of person submitting the above rating
- 3 -
10. P&Z Groaith Management Quality of Design Evaluation Form - Projects
wit.Tin -the Commercial Core CC and Commercial One C-1) zoning
districts shall be assigned points according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates `an acceptable design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Architectural design - considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater-
ials) with existing neighboring developments.
Rating
Comment:
b) Site design —considering the quality and character of the proposed
landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
Rating
Comment:
c) Energy - considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices
and efficient fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and
use of solar energy sources.
Rating
Comment:
d) Amenities - considering the provision of usable open space and
pedestrian and bicycle ways.
Comment:
Rating
- 4 -
e) Visual Impact - considering the scale and location of buildings
to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas..
Rating
Comment:
11. P&Z Growth Manaqement Community Commercial Uses Evaluation Form
Projects within the CC and C-1 shall be assigned points according to
the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any
housing or uses directed to supplying needs
of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis
on supplying tourist services with little or
no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses
that will be relied on by both the tourist
and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost
exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com-
munity's residential population with only
incidental tourist use and no tourist housing
being anticipated.
Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to which the project
supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial
uses.
Rating
Comment:
b) medical and Other Service deeds - considering the extent to which
the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional
office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair,
grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed
and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the
community.
Rating
Comment:
- 5 -
12. NET POINTS
HPC AVERAGE RATING
INDIVIDUAL P&Z MEMBER RATING
NET RATING
13. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the above net rating) provided
the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality.
BONUS POINT
14. TOTAL POINTS
NET RATING
BONUS RATING
TOTAL POINTS
NAME OF PERSON SUBMITTING THE ABOVE RATING:
DATE
loll
SOUTH ELE VATION
SCALE 1/41= I'- 0"
MAIN FLOOR PLAN
SCALE 1/411=1'- 0
HINTER 5TRFEll
EAST ELEVATION
SCALE 1/4"= I'- 0''
a
+ I
Fc1L 5iary c c 0-T 4 L
--
Hu t4 TF. - `-PiXT-T
PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN
SCALE 1/4"= I'- 0" 0000 F?•` ) @
CUM fLtiC PaR.!'.t�, li
-- - ALLFIVJAY ---�-
toa
1
Z
Q THE
J 5440 5Q. FT.
ttl
� r�
p I AavlTlarJ I
v f 1000 aq. �-T.I
ui
I FDTHERGILL Sl .
{ 5�o N, PI; {
I i
{
i
i
J
- COOPER AVEt4UF. —�►-
51TE- PLAN
SCALF_: t� = 20,
1L
LL1
LY-1
Lij
z
U
Z
_ am
OD
U N
W L0
F N
0)
w
Z U7 J
W
- H
0
Z _
w>
Q
CD
cl) = O
Z � X V
J=O
J w m w
a
O�Ocn
UcoaQ
w
z
0
w
(n
0
w
Y
a
Q
W
cr
U
V/ Z
Q
_.J G
I.L
W0
T
i CL
vJ
0
U-
0
0
� �
U
0
U
w F-
= Z
w
Q O co
a
3 co
c
w z 0
�_- cwn
a0
awo
J J cr
1- w ct
SHEET N°