HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.534 E Cooper.1978 Basement (W7< JOTA 2L 4LL 'S
O1U6C SFGWS' W
B4S(1:{1VT AC'O9T9O'V
f pn.LJcan.t:
Chu J ..70.1i n .LL d
OU-tdOOA SSOJZL'Jm. n
5311 C. Cooppiz Si.
Cox 88
4ai»en L a i c S I W I
4.t.tn: Bel 2024n4
c . , ,,,,vii, Monormenf P! -.n e5/60& on R,°pnnt
C ;mr,,ca c . d Sect: cin
&le c -t N 6.2: Chuc1 }u.(hunc :1 OuJdooR ,Coontiman 131A:rm, n t
Loc,.t on: 5 3 L• , /1 Coo,u.-n, N..: /. C.n.n Coop,yn 6 RunLen
1,1 LIi � 't ll:- gtaun Quc.Cd<na
P Si; ,_ 6,000 SS'u -.nc 3' #4! an Slw Lu n(
C unnent Zon.wno : CumracnC4 c,.2 Cana ( l..l.�
_ 7on-iny unden wiAch oly,I,Lca,ion Jyd: Comme AC" a.1 6VZ e
/}1ux.cmum 6u- i.Ldout und_a cunA -n1 �auny: 9,,)00 S�u-:n,: 3e _1
Pno/- ,04d Zonin : Sui
TOE::L BaLtdoui Poop of cL 1dd.;t; unt.2 i,u00.S 3t, to 7,000 Sq 31
Spec ccJ Pnoccdune4 /2;: fu.inca': None
Note: Tie ano.Licant, Chou: 3ot4 -n i.L6 A, 4d o tecmee .in in_-
Sia// Bu-i-ic,inc. w-i.tA b oun yeo nema.n.in� on 4e,.n nn� .ir_nt , ?,;i. .
Thy C. 1. 111uen Loup,.' ' ion, Vie ovine /L4 a the Shat &I-Linty,
have cu,t;<e.. ^. 4 -toted - t4e.in v.,LL,n to nc,/ea2e to u. GI :14c
.teiu,.ino,tion a JJ, pn ,un.t Jea<•,e. The A1.'oce -;iii 6e paAL o3 •
tie S%a't &v1 q ',
u _ dui n,( owned 6 _ Lanc %�ona aLt oug.6 tnc
Tenant, Chuch 3othenu-ii.L A, w -iE Sc a'o oil tic: :-on6 and
6ean.ing the expenac 4 the pnoject.
Expert advice
and guidance
0
Chuck Foth h l' BOX88 ASPEN COLORADO 81611
OUTDOOR SPORTS Equipment for tII€SpOIISman
Pwzp04c 03 6in4tnuctton:
, I t / t' T r
(l t. -:jit .the e yht 'ata f to& C'wc' 7c z; /z 4 c utaoon
Spont4man ha4 Geen e4 -tovL r4 ._: n . ;4 /pan it n a4 dove.
Coned
a reputation pnovi 4tnu Cn t3o W,.../td and expen.i<nced
-cnootmat.lon, pitt4 .(-,1 ,i 1( q(1A/)_n,en-t, 60n e 'Jeit: 0144 c1t044
COUnttlG � Arne Yt and GaC /:pe'Cken. _CI i204 a.L -,0
4upplted e.xce-L1nt .tn4tnuct-ion and g u tdtny 4eitvice4. Qn the
/' 041 b o ,J_ a✓t J -the demand 3'on rental and gU c din0q 4env-iC4
AuA pne44wted th.: phu .ica.L a:p., o$ the 4/10» .:nd
pet4on.ne.L -to ,the point o31 4ucn-i3'..cing 14-2. hua.L.itry o31 the4e
4e.zvice4 1t ha4 taete6lone 6econte n to ct,tnen
develop adcAtiona1 4p1 ; u
' ce oit �.t:.t the n.inta1/ aiding end oic
,the LA 412,2-JA t .e. y IIt Li ;Pp 02 -d GL : G on .t /KR tl peop.1c' to
nnt .4 and Govt.J .ran :: 500 Ara 51 4 w,�th on4 4,i `c o.4144.
✓,� t,teneone ,rate In l4 app ( cotuon -to the (24 u 447 �zn
O o,t p,2nmi -42on to cofAJtnuct a Ga4.ement undeiz our pnc4ent Atone
to Izou4e h rm _ ,
nepa�n,
n rntati4 l , �uu RC 4e men c_ and <4e „do
neta.2 -cng and cu.t o33 <ce. The exi cut n2 mound - Lev( .G
exten<on o 3L the 6u.i-Ld/nc 440.61 nema -in .iden-beat, except 3
the addition o31 a doo,zwarr 3acinfr on / .SL'teet. C)n.J-tnuct.ion
elzo l le accomp- LLihed Grp nemov ir t %2e 4ectton o wall co.nta.ining
the w.indow4 pneienLLrr 8 ta ing on Runten .Street. The .interi
440(1 th <n 6e gutted, pte2ent concrete 4,106 ,Loon .aemoved,
and laAement dug 3nom - in4idz the ex At.iny Apace. To the extent
.hut the additional 4cuane jootcrie exc,'ed4 the pne4ent Apace,
con4lvtue,t.ion 4ha.LL le accompL4/iea' 6 und.iuiun.in_y ,the e.uttin
$hu�i �Lvvnin� and .tn 4hon -in2 up w.it/1 0 o,i42.J. The -loon
4ltaLL t/zen Ge nebu( Ct on the pne4ent jotrteA LL 4 4,000! and
nemodelin o31 the pne4ent and new .inten.iot 8' ed.
. ........ ........
The gollow ny n ne4pon%te Jo Secl or. ? l 10.5 rommenciai
r
and OKK -ice DeveJopmen.i i�' c • cation PPoc (aune4
aloe) Tz wa,teiL Au %::ra tc, be r(2°1 4,ia,11 6e .idenJcca Jo
/ ,/.r.
ane pnz4ent 4,uA.t m a4 nc - �:�,,: <.t- ione! r ;jun6.inu AlZaL.L 6. 6u,e;Lt.
66 Sewageneatmcrnf 44tm 4.1::1-4i 9e t,k.2 rn:e / on(TAeni.
cc) &Jot -ion c'Aa,inage iu4-£..m &i no aopLc:6.Le.
dd) T6ene pne.r�n.t L ex. 4.t4 sppn -let 6,' 00 40 �,t
devc..Lopmen.t on th. Sha '-t A te. TL2 on -L op. n Avcce 14 1:t e
.in4e-t4 al .th .two aoonw yA. }oihe_rg i J L 's maintain-4 K .Lo n i 4
ina'ow ?U'' %4 !in 601: ^ ae4 o .rie A.fo w and / -Ui'i . 2 aft.? T 'U/L
e\ n -ine'4 on('. ILunJeR SL^,eet. �l ✓± � -1.40 ('aAJrmr-al
add ikon, lizene would be a i / /C ✓G( o ..at.to "
U
dev ,t„ ,Lot 4.ce.
•
c
ee) t 4.L;m..�ed ven- ce tin 4 count ,tncic(-:a4e ALE_ t._
/ /
m.Ln -Lm .4
..0 i.Re maa U /i-(tG U8` p•'p % r)- 1�� ✓C'..L: �(:U -t 4,i0120
}o.then tl pnvvide4 gU d ng 4 -nv ce .lucan4pon-tat,con.
We ane a,14o w.i.tlun .two 6,Loch4 og Ruly rank gon ea4g 6u4 4envice.
a) The corc4Lauct-ion -i4 de4.i0ned 3 o
0A exciuAive u42 6U
}o- Lnen21JJ /4. }o2Aeny'-; -.L. '4 // 4a4 6ntn .tn .L/2e pn.'4enJ - location
3 Un e.igh_t [�ean4 and ha4 0 lea4e 8 an add.(LkonJJ gouty yea.a4
wi-th n_o ,in.L- n.t.ion og moving. We ane not ownen4 og -the
6uildin2, and .t /ien :Kone would no-t have and Ai AI. others .than
.to u4e .tie 4pacc oun4e.Lve4.
6S) pne4enL 4un✓;CW1c'i n ,La ~w' 1 1 ?A ane: Month contnact.
p Un ,:Yea, 6.%4L T'xa Ca d /a I, on, Sot-{, afe rn FriA4Aen
6a4,1dun incLudin neJa.l :. in c.nd uh :', cc , :W4,1 °zopen /3uAicina
inaLua./n ( tail nd, u�'ccr, r- (2 end condom; n unA
, re 4c r
Since .rite ztie o� Jhe cp'ce uocial 6e 40171t1. a4 L pne4eni
h .Ldh
rv�r, �t � ou ave no txd::c.0 on .:ny. a cen.t 12-4t-4 OR ,Lan
h h� w/A1_nuci ion mi l L ncou / e GO to yo dae �.nc Inc:
LL 6,,
r
.�chedu.Lea 6 vn , on .the eanGieA,t convenient date
a� ,ten cypnovaJ.
000000
3n ne Jo employee nou_iing, .+,t ..A .impontuni to
note !hot }oblien 4 1264 achieved .i.'i nepuia.tion 6y u4.1ny
expen.ieticed .Long .tune ne4.idendi. The .amen owners. 0,3
}oihenn LL ' have 35 cumu,1a1 ive y.ran4 o; ne4i dence in .the
� � am r �
.Li o mainly
/?uan.inq �on� Vu,LLer�. �mp.Lo��_e� , cite a
v
.Long Lem ;Le 4Adent4 anal one U.!L / r:n ntL1 houA .in tine anea
eon em/Jof/ece one pa: u , 'n .the $t/ 7 to $4.00 r) -rn , tours nange
p t 6ene6 .2 /,we've monthA prin. yet-n. g u.ide4 nece.ivr „om
$35 #o $60 pen uay. . o zhem ane inancca eapo6.L. o
ma.inLa4.n.in9 penmanenf r oGii inr5..
E ft
CHARLES T. COLLINS ❑CONSULTING ENGINEER
P. 0. BOX HH / ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 / 303 925 -2089
August 31, 1978
City & County Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: Proposed Basement Addition
Fothergill's Outdoor Sportsman
534 East Cooper Avenue
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Gentlemen:
At the request of the applicant our firm has
reviewed the proposed project described above. We
have found the proposed basement expansion to be
feasible, and that it could be achieved with relatively
little disturbance to adjacent buildings and property.
If any further questions arise, please contact
our office.
Sincerely,
7 -
Michael C. Herndon
Collins Engineers, Inc.
MCH:ml
1
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN EVALUATION REPORT f ,
COMMERCIAL SECTION ,
1. Project Name: G ,
2. Location: et.. G cc _,c_
.:3. Parcel Size: _eeO - I'• 1=-r •
_4. Current Zoning: CC-
• Zoning under which application is filed: C G
Maximum buildout under current zoning:
arrx3 F"T' .
Proposed zoning: CG
5. Total buildout proposed:
6. Special procedures required: j N�
View planes: . G
Stream Margin Review: NO*►G
Special Review: NCN G
Historic District Review: NO�t
Subdivision (condominiumization): t-.301--1"
POD• t..1orJG • • •
7. . Program Narrative and associated graphics to describe the proposed
project's impacts and other data. (to be submitted with this application)
a. Existin estimated water
watercapacity, location
demand ofthebuiilding.
n
b. Capacity of the sewage system, location of the nearest trunk line <.
and estimated sewer demand of the building.
c. T7 :f :vdace drainage. }
d. Development summary including ':nt size, internal square footage
and open space. 1
e. Estimated daily number of vehicles generated by the development •
and estimated increase of traffic volume onsad adjacent streets,
eets,ied,
•
location of public transportation stops and routes, o
number o on- street and off - street parking
ther auto
disincentive techniques incorporated into the proposed development
and hours of principle daily usage of the development.
f. Proposed oftuse)uwithout substantial t building changes.
g.
Types of land uses adjacent and in the immediate vicinity. 4s
• h. Construction schedule and schedule for phasing of construction if ,
applicable.
8. List of drawings and maps submitted for review:
— t to m
Submittal ate: P ,1
..
_l - '1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Independent Commission
FROM: Jim Reents, Planning Office
RE: Evaluation of Fothergill's Under Existing Regulation
DATE: October 6, 1978
Because Section 24 -10.5 b 1 did not anticipate projects with no design
modification may only recommendation until such time as the Code is amended
is to award the minium number of points to qualify the project (30 %).
This recommendation is due in part to the fact applications were not received
under Growth Management for the yearly allotment.
•
. I
1
10. M. Growth tiana!lemmnt uality of Design Eyaluatipn form - Projects
• witT'I Uie CoiimerciaTCorc (CC) and Commercial One VC -1) zoning
districts shall be assigned points according to the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally incanpatible, design , r E
. o
1 - Indicates a major design flaw j : r'
r f,
2 - Indicates an acceptable Out standard) design
LI
3 .. •Indicates an acceptable design '
Rate t following features accordingly:
•
•
a) Arch'tectural design - considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater- f
ials) ith existing neighboring developments. 1.
• Rating r 1`
•
• Comment: .
f!
[
b) Site design - c the quality and character of the proposed {
landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of E,
utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of. A .
.... .....,,,__ ,... circulation (including ace ss for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
Rating
t..._ t .:
t
Comment: f
., 1,
p....
c) Energy - considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices
_ and efficient fireplaces to maximize conserv-tion of energy and
use of solar energy sources. .. " .
t ,
. Rating
F
. . :Comment:
j
1
d) Amenities - considering the provision of usable open space .nd
pedestrian and bicycle ways. i
F.
Rating
Comment:
1 C
..___w. —
ii
dd -4-
1 .
e) Visual Impact - considcr=-j the scale and location of bu lings
• to maximize public views surrounding scenic areas. •
• Rating
Comment: 1
•
11. PLZ Growth Management Community Commercial Uses Evaluation Form
Projects within the CC and C -1 shall be assigned points according to
the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any
. housing or uses directed to supplying needs
• of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis
•
on supplying tourist services with little or
no on -site housing
•
- 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses
,. will be relied on by both the tourist
and residential populations
; Indicates a project which is designed almost
:re ,exclusively to satisfy the needs of the cm-
' munity's residential population with only
• incidental tourist use and no tourist housing .
_being anticipated.
Rate the features accordingly: •
a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to which the project
A
supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial
uses.
•
Rating Q
' Comment: 40 *-44E: r
• 1
•
b) Medical and Other Service Needs - considering the extent to which
the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional
office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair,
grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed
and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the
• community.
- r
Rating -
Conment: E1L'&tJSto•t er - S. c•_
CALIWTED LiTy
•
•
•
-5-
•
•
. . t
•
•
•
12. NET POINTS
HPC AVERAGE RATING .
INDIVIDUAL P&Z MEMBER RATING
• rr
NET RATING
13. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20Z of the above net rating) provided • 1
the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality.
• • BONUS POINT
14. TOTAL POINTS
NET RATING ____
BONUS RATING •
• i
TOTAL POINTS
•
NAME OF PERSON SUBMITTING THE ABOVE RATING: •
• . • • . ,
DATE
•
t b "Off ' r • ` 1 1 •
•
•••
1
•
•
-6-
4
.4
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
RATINGS BY HPC .
1 i • ' a
The H.P.C. reviewed the following project and rated each of the
design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth '
Management Ordinance.
PROJECT: CI•j1XX -- •et t u.:s Tr7P SO4—c 1c1Pc5 Nen . •
1.
REVIEW DATE: 4•1 eq-P) _
� Pte
Q
HPC REVIEW 'ti •
�Q '
. " . //i i
HPC t, 4
MEMBER .
1 1 i I t 5
ct ts6 J1 11/4k.. ,
Kit. Pe ' s .
GROUP RATING 10
1 I ,a
PLANNING OFFICE RATINGI 1 1 1 I 11 ( I
• • THE COMBINED RATINGS OF THE HPC AVERAGES
3
1 frp LT 1, Mu1 AA. 'fb1.rrS 'to C T1A14; c
1;120604(7 T
•
• • 4 .
•
. . , ,' .
GROWTI1 MANAGEMLNT PLAN •
. RATINGS BY-F&i n ccfe+JPe Jr cpwwNJsStop
The P &Z reviewed the following project and rated each of the
design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth
Management Ordinance. •
t
TR�JC�T f
P ROJECT: C.EEucu- .0-S I
REVIEW DATE: Ib• lO •1 - " i i
t
t
E
i
. f
P &Z REVIEW '
Ail 4' / 1
0 c. w w e4 c •
i
• , h at y v v a� 41- <r
co
. MEMBER I
i •
=. JLN CPC- 3 3 2 3- 3 n z. i
.L.t..N:.AN.. z.. . . Z . ..3 1 0 _ 0 • , . 1
s. 4 I `R.6M , 2 - 2 es - 3 1 O 0
.4. m1\lAvuo E.nisiE.INI 3 3 3 0 .3 a . i
j.1/4,bRKI oUI- . 3 3 2 3 3 2,
1. t
1 •
?. Q 1 .
GROUP RATING . 2 �0 2./0 l'8 z 3 1
.
PLANNING OFFICE RATING I — 1 — 1 ( 1 0 Q 1' 11 5 1 .
- PLANNING OFFICE TOTAL • . 7
a
i
r
i
. A
TOTAL INDIVIDUAL RATINGS
AVERAT OF ALL P &Z RATINGS __
.
t
. _ f