Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.Gordon Callahan.0141A-84gLIiq`Sy Gordon/Callahan GMP Conceptual Submission r-M 9 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen CASE NO. STAFF: (� PROJECT NAME: _ Ar✓.li7l X/ W /a APPLICANT: Applicant Address/Phone: REPRESENTATIVE: i�� / �.✓!,,� Representative Address/Phone: i�ij'%�✓ ��., %�% %�:' Type of Application: V-I. GIIP/SUBDIV IS IO"/PUD (4 step) Conceptual Submission Preliminary Plat Final Plat II. SUBDIV IS ION/PUD (4 step) Conceptual Submission Preliminary Plat Final Plat III. EXCEPTION/EXEIiPTI0N/REZ ON ING (2 step) IV. SPECIAL REVIEW (1 step) Special Review Use Determination Conditional Use Other: ($2,730 .00) •� ($1,640.00)�' ($ 820.00) ($1,900.00)- ($1,220.00) ($ 820.00) ($1,490.00) ($ 680.00) CC MEETING DATE: S�"� as PUBLIC HEARING: EY NO DATE REFERRED: INITIALS:_ REFERRALS: ---------------------------------------- / City Atty Aspen Consol. S.D. School District City Engineer �— Mtn. Bell Rocky Ntn. Nat. Gas Housing Dir. Aspen Water Parks Dept. State Hwy Dept (Glenwd) Holy Cross Electric State Hwy Dept (Gr.Jtn) City Electric Fire Marshall _� Bldg: Zoning/Inspectn Envir. Hlth . Fire Chief Other: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: - INITIAL: City Atty City Engineer Building Dept. Other : Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: I/�.J DISPOSITION: Reviewed by: < Aspen P Reviewed By: Aspen P&Z City Council City Council Ui,.,.t VQ CI S. co U 11 C I qf Vie CD h 4 A(,; Vj irl? J. +r, :/.4. z, P ll0 %UL►, 6, r1 U A6 2 GROWTH MANAGEMENT APPLICATION FOR THE GORDON PROPERTY MERGED WITH SIX LOTS OF THE CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION I LOCATION: Lot 2, Gordon Subdivision and lots 4,5,6,7,8 & 9 of the Callahan Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado see map 9 1 2 Proposal: This proposal is submitted on behalf of Sheldon Gordon. It is the applicant's intent to combine lot 2 of the Gordon Subdivision with the land area and development rights of the previously subdivided lots 4,5,6,7,8 & 9 of the Callahan Subdivision into a common developmen The applican_t sus a growth management allot ent_9l two, three a room free market units and one 4 bedroom unit. his allotment would be combine the men_f—rights-ovailable from lots 4,5 f the or a total free market deve addition, There would be six one bedroom low income, deed re`sFrlcted employee housing units. This results in six duplex residential units,(each comprised of one free market unit and one , one bedroom housing unit,) and three single family free market units, all on the subject 4.572 acre combined property. The proposed development is further described by the enclosed maps, documents and the following discussion. 3 Description of development: A. The site is comprised of the 2.187 acre Gordon Property zoned R-15 P.U.D. and the combined acres of lots 4,5,6,7,8 & 9 zoned R-15 for a 120000 total site area of 4.572 acres. The site is located off Crystal Lake road, �5`, 000 bordered by the Roaring Fork River on the west and by the properties /�S, a! 0 zoned R-15 on the north and east (see map V4 ). The site has some slopes in excess of 20% therefore a slope area reduction calculation is required to determine the allowable area for development. This calculation by Alpine Surveys, is shown graphically on map 2. The resulting area available is 3If� square feet (3.795 ac.) not including the land under the water of 1/SW0 the Roaring Fork River. The minimum lot area per duplex unit in this zone is 20,000 s.i. , therefore a density of six duplex units plus 3 single family dwellings are allowed. The site is proposed to be subdivided into 10 parcel , with one parcel for each duplex and each single family dwelling.The \\ remaining parcel is to be a common area, and restricted against further development (see Map 3). There will be a total of nine free market housing units consisting of seven units of four bedrooms or less with a floor area of 4000 s.f. each and two, three bedroom units with a floor area of 3300 s f. or less each. ,/-�-A � There will be a total of six , one bedroom low income deed restricted employee housing units with an approximate floor area of 600 s.f. each. A typical duplex unit floor plan, elevation & section is repesented on drawings 1 thr. 5 provided by benedict.. sutherland.duesterberg ltd. _A oL. the units will meet or exceed City of Aspen energy codes and will employ passive solar heating. B. The project is served by the City of Aspen Water departement. A new cast iron water main will be designed and constructed according to City of Aspen Engineering and Water dep. standards (see Map 5). This water main will connect the 8" cast iron pipe (C.I.P.) water main located in the Aspen Club parking lot with the 6" C.I.P. located at the upper end of the Riverside Avenue. The result of this connection will be a loop water main system (see Map 5). Each duplex and single family dwelling will be provided with a 3/4" service line connection. The estimated average demand for each free market unit is 200 gallons per day and 100 gallons per day for each employee unit resulting in a total estimated demand of 300 gallons per day per duplex. In addition to providing a loop water system, the applicant's share of the Riverside Irrigation Ditch (approximately 1 /7) will be transferred to the City of Aspen. The applicant reserves the right to alter the course and width of the ditch to form ponds in the landscape of the project. C. The project is served by the Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District from an 8 inch sanitary sewer main located in the right-of-way on the site (see Map 2 & 5). Each duplex will be provided with a 4 inch service line connection. The total estimated average demand is 300 gallons per day per duplex and 200 gallons per day for each single family dwelling. D. Electricity is provided by Holy Cross Electrical Association. Electrical service into the site will be underground to each Duplex. Each free market Unit will have a 200 amp. service and each employee unit will have a 100 amp. service. Heat in the duplexes will be electric forced air interconnected with passive solar collection. E. The project will provide on -site retainage for surface and run-off water in excess of pre -development rates. Surface and run-offin excess of pre -development rate will be ponded and released at the historical rate into the Riverside Irrigation Ditch or the Roaring Fork River. At this time there is no evidence of surface water (see Map 2). n--- 7 F. The project will provide two new fire hydrants on the site (see map 3). The nearest existing fire hydrant is in the Aspen Club parking lot (see Map 5). The greatest distance from the proposed fire hydrant to a proposed residence is 170 feet. The distance from the fire station is 20 blocks; travel time from the station to the site is less than 8 minutes. G. The total site area including the area under the Roaring Fork River is 4.572 acres. There is no requirement for open space in this zone, however the project, including paved areas such as roads, parking and build envelopes, covers only 1.23 acres or 26 percent of the 4.572 acres site. This equates to 3.34 acres of open space or 74 percent of the site. ( Sixty Nine percent of the site, when discounting 5% that is under water.) H. The distance to the Lower Elementary School is approximately 1.5 miles; to the Middle and High Schools 3 miles. School busses run on Highway 82, within 600 feet from the site. There is easy pedestrian access to Highway 82 via Crystal Lake Road or Riverside Drive. I. Assuming one car per bedroom, a total of 40 cars will be parked regurly on- site. Spaces will be provided by 18 covered and 22 outside on -site parking spaces. Additionally 4 outside on -site visitor spaces will be provided, providing a total of 44 parking spaces. Extensive landscaping will minimize the impact of outside parking spaces to the site and surrounds. Motor vehicles will reach this site by turning off State Highway 82 onto Crystal Lake Road, a paved street, then onto a private 2-lane paved driveway that serves the site. At the point where the site driveway intersects Crystal Lake Road the road is a one way street bordering the parking for the Aspen Club. Crystal Lake Road serves The Aspen Club and the Aspen Club Condominiums at the present time. The condition of the Crystal Lake Road at this time is good, the type of vehicle that uses the road is primarily family cars. The street's posted speed limit is 10-15 mph. with speed bumps to help induce slow vehicular movement_ The traffic generated by The Aspen Club is constant throughout the day with a peak occuring after 5:00 p.m. in the summer and after 4:00 p.m. in the winter as people arrive from work or skiing to use the facilities. The traffic generated by The Aspen Club Condominiums is similar to the other housing areas with traffic generated in the morning and late afternoon. The volume of traffic varies seosonally as many of the owners are absentee. The traffic generated on the proposed site will also be similar to most residential neighborhoods. The hours of use being primarily in the morning hours, going to work (8:00 to9:00 a.m.), and in the evening, returning from work (4:00 to 6:00 p.m.). The estimated traffic count for the employee units should be 4 to 5 total round trips per day. The estimated traffic count for the 3 free market units should be 7 to 8 total round trips per day. These numbers represent the worst possible case without consideration of the use of alternate means of transportation. The Crystal Lake Road is capable of handling this increase in traffic without causing a detrimental effect on the surrounding neighborhood or road conditions. J. The developer will dedicate a public trail and fisherman's easement to the City of Aspen. The easement will be below the developed area of the L , provide, a bridge across the river, connecting difectiy with the Ute Children's park and existing paths. K. The Aspen Valley Hospital is approximately 3 miles away and within 10 minutes driving time from the site. The Police departement is 20 blocks away with the response time less than 8 minutes. Retail and service activities are approximately 16 blocks from the site. This development will create no noticeable demands on any of the above mentioned services. L. This proposed development is very beneficial to the surrounding neighborhood. The housing units except 119, a single family dwelling , will be clustered, meeting Sec. 24-8.1 of the Aspen Municipal Code as follows: ARTICLE 8 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Sec. 24-8.1 Purpose The purpose of this article is to encourage flexibility, innovation and variety in the development of land and to provide performance criteria for the planned unit developments (P.U.D.) which will: (a) Promote greater variety in the type, design and layout of buildings; (b) Improve the design, character and quality of the new development; (c) Promote more efficient use of land and public streets, utilities and governmental services; (d) Preserve open space as development occurs; (e) Provide procedures so as to relate the type,design and layout of residential development to a particular site and thus encourage the preservation of the site's unique natural and scenic features; and (f) Achieve a beneficial land use relationship with surrounding areas. The objective of these sections is to create a more desireable environment than would be possible through strict application of other sections of this code. The provisions of this article shall be interpreted to achieve the purposes listed in this section 24-8.1. (Ord. No. 71-1975, x 1) The development will provide new and upgraded utilities lines, space and energy efficient liou.)M6 u„ita wi6-i quniiLy a�:a►;i�:i.iC.S, 1><��.ivc' solar heating, active solar domestic hot water, exteiisive laf,U-1s ;apii]g, sufficient parking and roads, new trail and fisherman's easement with a bridge link. The project will provide new low- income employee housing units on site. In addition the project will be developed at the allowed density resulting in a great deal of open space, allowing the project to be more compatible with the existing development. M. If approved, construction of the development will commence in the spring of 1985 and be completed in the spring of 1987.' 4. COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT AGAINST GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SCORING SYSTEM A. Availability of public Facilities and services: 1. Water: Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will 1) allow a branch line to become a circuit line, thus improving service to the area, and 2) increase the City of Aspen's ownership of water rights within the City limits. 2. Sewer: One (1) point should be awarded since the project may be handled by existing level of service and service improvement by the applicant will benefit the project only. 3. Storm Drainage : Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will provide on -site retainage for surface and run-off water in excess of pre- development rates. Also ponding will allow desirable landscape aesthetics and controlled release of water. 4. Fire protection: Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will provide two (2) new fire hydrants, improving existing conditions for the project and the neighbors. The internal roads will meet requirements for width and turning radius. 5. Parking Design: Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will provide the forty (40) required parking spaces on site. Additionally four (4) extra guest spaces will be provided, and outside spaces will be screened by landscaping. DROP S 6. Roads: Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will provide easy in and out access with the minimum amount of road possible. Also, the road will be paved to avoid rutting and dust, minimizing impact on the residents and neighbors. By clustering the development and providing a single collection street, Crystal Lake Road becomes safer than before when the potential was six (6) seperate driveways. B. Quality of design: 1. Neighborhood Compatibility: The existing neighborhood consists of one and two story single family residences of 2,000-2,400 square feet (residences of 4150-4668 square feet are permitted)on lots that range in size from 10,055 square feet to 17,812 square feet (see map 2). The amended development on the Gordon Property consists of six (6) 3900 to 4600 square feet duplexes and three (3) single family residences on 3.99 total acres (excluding land under water) or one (1) housing unit per .443 acres ( 19,31 1 square feet )of land. Taking the slope reduction for density calculations into account there are18,369 square feet per duplex. These numbers indicate Chet the proposed development is in the same density range as the rest of the neighborhood. This is not only compatible with the surrounding neighborhood , but improves the quality of the neighborhood. Together with the extensive site work and trail easements being given, three (3) points should be awarded for this section. 2. Site Design: Three (3) points should be awarded since the project will provide a high quality of landscaping, to include ponding, and extensive open spaces, all benefiting the surrounding sites, and public trail users as well as this project. 3. Energy: Three (3) points should be awarded since the project will incorporate: insulation values of R-24 in the walls and R-45 at the roof, orientation within 15 degrees of south, and extensive passive solar heating and water devices. 4. Trails: Three (3) points shouls be provided since the project will dedicate a trail and fisherman's easement, and provide a bridge link, thus furthering progress of the City's Trails Master Plan. 5. Green Space: Three (3) points should be provided since: the project will provide sixty nine percent (69%) of the site as green space. A large portion of the green space will be adjacent to the trail, benefiting residents and public alike. PAQP. 6 C. Proximity to support Services 1. Public Transportation ( from the Gordon site) : Two (2) points should be awarded since the project is less than six (6) blocks walking distance of a City bus stop. 2 Community Commercial Facilities ( from the Gordon Property ): One (1) point should be awarded since the project is farther than six (6) blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. D. Provision for .Low Income Housing : Twenty (20) points should be awarded since the low income, deed restricted employee housing provided equals 53.8% of the free market growth management allotment requested. The free market housing will provide housing for 9 people according to Pitkin County Housing Office guidelines (two, three bedroom houses - 6 people; one four bedroom house - 3 people; hence 9 people housed). The project will provide a total of six (6) employee bedrooms in a total six (6) seperate one (1) bedroom employee housing units. These units will house a total of 10.5 people according to the Pitkin County Housing Office average of 1.75 people per one (1) bedroom unit.This results in a total of 19.5 people housed of which 53.8% is low income deed restricted employee housing. E. Provision of Unique Financing. Not Applicable. F. Bonus Points: This Project makes a substantial contribution to Aspen's pedestrian trail system by the construction of a foot bridge across the Roaring Fork River and the dedication of land for the continuation of the Ute Trail along the Roaring Fork River. CASE NO. 0 / - d - CHECKLIST ",, CASE NAME: _�•i'.ter -A - oh ,y22.n, ��� 5OAt Lao INITIAL/NA* 1. RECEIPT PREPARED 2. CASE ASSIGNED NUMBER 3. NUMBER LOGGED IN ACCOUNTING BOOKS 4. MUMBER LOGGED ON BULLETIN BOARD LIST 5. CASELOAD SUMNARY SHEET PREPARED 6. CASE ASSIGNED DATE FOR FIRST/ONLY REVIEW 7. CASE LOGGED IN BLACK BOOK 8. CASE LOGGED 01•1 ADJACENT PROPERTY Cl'7I ERS NOTIFICATION 9. REFERRAL IIEMO PREPARED AND SENT OU'^ 10. PUBLIC NOTICE PREPARED 11. DATE BY 1:MICH MUST BE PUBLISHED: 1 .'\_Zp"90 12. DATE BY WHICH BUST BE MAILED TO ADJACENT PROPERTY 017NERS : I-g-85- 13 . PUBLIC NOTICE TAKEN TO ASPEN TIMES (Date Published: IzT[s�l ) 14. DATE PUBLISHED LOGGED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY (XINERS NOTIFICATION LIST 1�. PUBLIC IJOTICE MAILED TO ADJACENT PROPERTY UINERS ( Date hailed: ) 16. DATE 14AILED LOGGED. ON ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFICATION LIST 17. PUBLIC NOTICE MAILS TO APPLICANT(S) (Date Mailed: I �� ) AFTER FIRST REVIEW, IF APPLICABLE 18. CASE ASSIGNED DATE FOR SECOND REVIEW 19. CASE RE -LOGGED IN BL•AC: BOOK 20. CASE LOGGED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY WNERS NOTIFICATION Case No. - Checklist Page 2 21. PUBLIC NOTICE PREPARED 22. DATE BY WHICH MUST BE PUBLISHED: 23. DATE BY WHICH MUST BE MAILED TO ADJACENT PROPERTY Oil N ERS : 24. PUBLIC NOTICE TAKEN TO ASPEN' TIIIES (Date Published: ) 25. DATE PUBLISHED LOGGED 01,17 ADJACENT PROPERTY O-MERS NOTIFICATION LIST 26. PUBL,IC NOTICE BAILED TO ADJACENT PROPERTY MHERS (Date Mailed: ) 27. DATE MAILED LOGGED ON ADJACENT PROPE- TY OUINERS NOTIFICATION LIST 28. PUBLIC NO^1ICE MAILED TO APPLICANT(S) ( Date flailed • ) AFTER REVIEW COMPLETED 29. COPY OF RESOLUTION/ORDINANCE OBTAINED AND IN FILE 30. CASELOAD SUIII,'LARY SHEET ROUTED W/FILE (if applicable) *NA = Not Applicable MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen City Council THRU: Hal Schilling, City Manager r FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office SUBJECT: Allocation of Quota for the 1984 Residential GMP Competition DATE: February 11, 1985 SUBJECT: We recommend approval of Resolution No. 6 (Series of 1985) which allocates fifteen (15) residential units to the two projects which met minimum required thresholds in the 1984 Residential GMP competition, and which does not carry over the seventeen (17) units which are unallocated. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None. BACKGROUND AND PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed three residential applications at their regular meeting of January 22, 1985, and scored the applications at that meeting. The three projects and their scores were as follows: Aspen Mountain Lodge: 50.15 Gordon/Callahan PUD: 45.07 601 Aspen: 25.86 Copies of the appplications were sent to you for review last week. The required minimum competitive threshold for project eligibility is 43.8 points. Since only two of the projects met the minimum threshold, the Planning and Zoning Commission sends them forward for allocation and they denied the 601 Aspen Project. The appeal period for any of the applicants to contest the scoring expired two weeks subsequent to the hearing date, on February 5, 1985, and no appeals were filed. Applicants have, therefore, accepted the results of the scoring session. The Aspen Mountain Lodge Project and the Gordon./Callahan PUD are subject to subsequent review procedures. In the case of the Aspen Mountain Lodge, the units are part of the ongoing PUD review process for the entire project. The Gordon/Callahan PUD will be reviewed through the full PUD process. The employee units for both projects must be exempted from the Growth Management allocation process. Since only 15 of the 32 units available are being allocated, the Planning office requests that you direct us to either eliminate the additional 17 units or to carry them over for the 1975 competition. We see both pros and cons to carrying over the units. In f avor of the carry over is the fact that there has been a low growth rate in the City over the past two years. In 1984, there were 14 units built, and in 1983, 29 units were built. These totals are substantially below the 39 units available. However, offsetting the above -described pros for carrying over the unused quota is the impact on growth in the Metro Area of the Centennial Housing Project and the Aspen Mountain Lodge Project. The magnitude of this buildout will be felt to a much greater degree than the unused residential units from the past two years. We therefore recommend that the excess quota be eliminated. ADVISORY COMMITTEE VOTE AND RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission scored two of the applications above the required minimum threshold, thereby recommending approval of them and allocation of the units applied for. The 601 Aspen Project score substantially below the minimum threshold and was, therefore, denied from proceeding further in the GMP process. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution No. , (Series of 1985) which allocates 12 residential units to the Aspen Mountain Lodge Project and 3 residential units to the Gordon/Callahan PUD, and does not carry over the seventeen (17) unused residential units." 2 CITY OF ASPEN RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANGEMENT PLAN SUBMISSION POINTS ALLOCATION TALLEY SHEET PROJECT: Aspen Mountain PUD ---- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 P6Z Voting Members Perrg__ _Mary__ __Pat_ Jasmine _Roger_ Welton- Ramona David AVERAGE 1. Public Facilities and Services a. Water Service 2 ------- 2 ------- 2 ------- 2 -------- 2 ------- 2 --- --- ---- -- 2 ------- b. Sewer Service 2 ------- 2 ------- 2 ------- 2 -------- 2 ------- 2 ------ ------ 2 ------- c. Storm Drainage -- 2_-- _2 -__2--- ---2---- --- 2--- __-?_-- d. Fire Protection 2 ------- 2 ------- 2 ------- 2 -------- 2 ------- 2 ------- ------ -__2_-- 2 ------- e. Parking Design 2 _0_ 2 2 2 f. Roads 1 ------- 1 ------ i ------- 1 -------- 2 ------- _2_ 1 ------- ----- - .5 ------- SUBTOTAL 11 9 11 11 12 11 9 10.57 2. Quality of Design a. Neighborhood Compatibility ___3___ ___2 _2.5_ 2 ___2 3 2___ b. Site Design 3 2___ ___3___ ___2____ 3 ------- 3------ 3___ c. Energy --2--- --2--- ---2--- d. Trails 3 ------- 3 ------- 25 -----.-- 3 -------- 3 ------ 3 --- --- ---- -- 2.5 ------- e. Green Space 3 2 ------- 3 ------- 3 -------- 3 ------- 3 ------- ----- - - __3___ SUBTOTAL 14 it 13 12 13 14 11.5 12.64 3. Proximity to Support Services a. Public Transportation 3 3 _3___ --- 3___. __ 3 3 3___ b. Community Commercial Facilities 3 __ 3___ 3 __ 3____ ___3___ ___3 3___ SUBTOTAL 4. Employee Housing a. Low Income b. Moderate Income c. Middle Income SUBTOTAL 5. Conversion of Existing Units to Employee Housing a. Low Income b. Moderate Income c. Middle Income SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL CATEGORIES 1 - 5 6. Bonus Points TOTAL POINTS CATEGORIES i - 6 666 6 6 6 __ 6—_ 6 16.8_ 16.8 16.8_ 16.816.8_ 16.8_ 16.8_ -------------------------------------------------------- 16.8_ 16.8_ 16.8_ 16.816.88_ 16.8_ 16.8_ _16.8__ 44_ 4 4 4 5 4 --------------------- ---- — ---------------- ------------- 444_ 4 4 5 4 4.14 --51.8---46.8---50.8---49-8----51.8- - 5�.8- -- -----47_-3--_50.15 ---?---------------------------4--- .86 ------ --53.8---4-6.8---50.8---499.8----51:8_ —52.8_ --47_3- __51.01 CITY OF ASPEN RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANGEMENT PLAN SUBMISSION POINTS ALLOCATION TALLEY SHEET PROJECT: Gordon/Callahan PUD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 P&Z Voting Members Perry__ _Mary__ __Pat Jasmine _Roger_ Welton_ Ramon David AVERAGE 1. Public Facilities and Services a. Water Service 2 ------- 2 -- ---- -- 2 ----- Z -------- 2 ------- 2 ------- -- ---- 2 ------- b. Sewer Service 1 ------- 1 -- ---- 1 ------- 1 -------- 1 ------- 1 ------------- 1 ------- c. Storm Drainage 2 ------- 2_ -- 2--- ------ -- _-_- ___2 2 ------ ------ 2 ------- d. Fire Protection 2 ------- 2 ------- 1 ------- 1 -------- 1 ------- 2 --- --- -- ---- 2 ------- e. Parking Design 2 1 i___ _2_ 1 _2_ _ _ f. Roads 1 ------- 1 ------- .5 ------- 1 -------- 1 ------- 1 ------ -- ---- 1 ------- SUBTOTAL --18--- -- 9--- ---7-5- ---9---- --- 8--- --10--- -- ---- ---8-5---8.86_ 2. Quality of Design a. Neighborhood Compatibility ... 2__ -- 2_-- _- 1--- --- 2---. ___2_-- -__2---------- ---1_-- b. Site Design---3--- -- 2--- ---1.5- ---2---- ---2--- 2 -------------- ---2.5- c. Energy ---2--- -- 2--- ---2--- 2 ---2--- -- 2---------- --?--- d. Trails ------- 3 3 -- ---- 2.5 ------- 3 -------- 3 ------- 3 --- ---------- 3 ------- e. Green Space 3 3___ 2.5 ------- 3 -------- 3 ------- 3 ------- -- 3 ----------- SUBTOTAL 13 12 _9.5_ __12____ __12--- __12 -_11.5_ _11.71_ 3. Proximity to Support Services a. Public Transportation 2 2 _2___ --- 2---. ___2 2 2 b. Community Commercial Facilities ___1___ __ 1___ ___1___ 1 ___1___ __ 1 1___ SUBTOTAL 3 3 3 3 3 3___ 4. Employee Housing a. Low Income 21.5_ __21.5_ ------21.5 ------ 21.5--__21 5_ _ 21.5_ 21.5 ------- b. Moderate Income ------- ------- ------- ----- ---------------- -- ----------- c. Middle Income SUBTOTAL 21.5_ __---- __21.5_ __--.5__ __21.5_ _ Z1.5_ __-___ _ 21.5 _21.5__ 5. Conversion of Existing Units to Employee Housing a. Low Income ------- ------------- ----- ---------------- -- ----------- b. Moderate Income ------- -- ----------- ---- - ---------------- -- ----------- c. Middle Income SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL CATEGORIES 1 - 5 47.5 45.5 41.5 45.5 44.5 46.5 44.5 45.07 --------------------------------------------------------- ------ 6. Bonus Points 2 0.29 TOTAL POINTS CATEGORIES 1 - 6 47.5 45.5 41.5 45.5 44.5 46.5 46.5 45.36 -------------------------------------------------- ----- - ------ MEMORANDUM TO: GMP Files FROM: Alan Richman RE: Residential Quota for Competition DATE: January 22, 1985 -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Following is an analysis of the status of the quota available for this year's residential competition. 1. The annual residential quota in Aspen is 39 units. 2. In last year's competition, an additional allocation of eight units was granted to the Poss and 700 S. Galena projects. Since these units were required to be off -set this year, we start with only 31 units being available. 3. On July 1, 1984, the Sunny Park project expired. Its three free market units get added back to the quota, restoring it to 34 units. In November, the Ute City Place project also expired. Adding its eight units to the quota results in 42 units being available. 4. During 1984 19 new units were built in the City of Aspen but nine units were demolished. Therefore, the net addition to the inventory was 10 new units, which should be deducted from the quota. The available quota for this year is, therefore, 32 residential units. QUOTA SUMMARY Annual Quota = 39 units Prior Year Off -Set = -8 Sunny Park & Ute City = +11 Place Expirations = 1984 Construction = -10 Total Available 32 cc: Colette Penne Glenn Horn CITY OF ASPEN RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANGEMENT PLAN SUBMISSION POINTS ALLOCATION TALLEY SHEET PROJECT:____ — 601 AgQen 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 P6Z Voting Members Perry__ _Mary__ __Pat_ Jasmine _Roger_ Welton_ Ramona- David AVERAGE 1. Public Facilities and Services a. Water Service 1 ------- 1 -- ---- 1 ------- 1 -------- 1 ------- 1 -------------- 1 ------- b. Sewer Service 1 ------- 1 ------- 1 ------- 1 -------- 1 ------- 1 ------------- 1 ------- c. Storm Drainage 2 1 ------ 1 ---- - --- --- 1---- 1 ------- 1___ ------- 1_5_ d. Fire Protection 1 ------- 0 ------- 0 ------- 0 -------- 0 ------- 0 --- --- ------ 0 ------- e. Parking Design ---1--- --1--- --.1--- ---1---. ----.5- --2--- ------ ---1--- f. Roads --2--- --2--- ---2--- ---2---- ---1.5- --2--- ------ ---1.5- SUBTOTAL ---0--- -- 6--- ---6--- ---6---- ---5--- --2- 6-- --6.29_ 2. Quality of Design Q. Neighborhood Compatibility ___2___ 2 _1___ ___2____ 1.5 ------- 2 1.5 ------- b. Site Design --2--- -- 1--- .5 ---1---- ---1--- ----`^--- ------ ---1--- c. Energy---2--- 1 -- ---- ---1--- 1 -------- 1.5 ------- _- 1--- -- ---- ----.5- d. Trails ------- 2 1 -- ---- .5 ------- 1 -------- 1 ------- 2 -------------- 1 ------- e. Green Space 2 1___ ___1 ---- 1 -------- .5_ ------ _1___ __ ____ ___1.5 - SUBTOTAL--10--- -- 6--- ---4--- ---6---- ---5.5- ---8---------- ---5=-5---6.43_ 3. Proximity to Support Services a. Public Transportation 3 3 ------- _3_ -- - __3 3 3 3___ b. Community Commercial Facilities -_ 2___ __ 2___ _-_2 2 2___ __ 2___ __ —___ ___2___ SUBTOTAL---5--- -- 5--- ---5--- ---5---- ---5--- -- 5--- -- ---- ---5— - --5--- 4. Employee Housing a. Low Income---2--- -- 2--- 2----2------2--- -44-------------2--- b. Moderate Income ------- --------------------------- ------ ------------- c. Middle Income SUBTOTAL -__2_-- -- 2_-- 2 2 --- 2--- 40 ---2- _ 7.43 5. Conversion of Existing Units to Employee Housing a. Low Income 0 0_ -- 0 ------- 0 0 -------- ---- 5 ------- -- ----0___ b. Moderate Income ------- ------- ------- ----- --------- ------ -- ----------- c. Middle Income ------- -- ---- ------- -------------- -------------- ------- SUBTOTAL ---0--- -- 0--- ---0--- ---0-------0--- ---5--- -- -------0--- --0.71- SUBTOTAL CATEGORIES 1 - 5 25 19 17 19 17.5 65 iB.5 25.86 6. Bonus Points 25 19 17 19 17.5 65 1B.5 25.86 TOTAL POINTS CATEGORIES 1 - 6 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves f RESOLUTION NO. (Series of 1985) A RESOLUTION ALLOCATING QUOTA IN THE 1984 RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPETITION WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 24-11.4(a) of the Municipal Code, as amended, December 1st of each year is established as a deadline for submission of applications for residential development allotments within the City of Aspen; and WHEREAS, in response to this provision, three projects were submitted for evaluation, involving a total of fifty-five (55) free market units and twenty (20) employee units, identified as follows: Aspen Mountain Lodge 12 free market units, 11 employee units Gordon/Callahan PUD 3 free market units, 6 employee units 601 Aspen 40 free market units, 3 on -site employee units y and WHEREAS, according to the records of the Planning Office and the Building Department, there are thirty-two (32) units available for allocation due to build -out, prior GMP expirations and prior year off- set; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held on January 22, 1985, by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, at which time they F^ did evaluate and score the projects and two of the three projects i successfully met the minimum required threshold of 43.8 points, with the points awarded as follows: Aspen Mountain Lodge 50.15 i Gordon/Callahan PUD 45 .07 601 Aspen 25.86 i WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council did review the recommended Planning and Zoning scoring at their regular meeting on February 11, 1985; and 11� `J WHEREAS, Council accepted the scores, which effectively approved the Aspen Mountain Lodge and Gordon/Callahan PUD projects and denied the 601 Aspen Project; and WHEREAS, Council reviewed the number of units available (32) and the number requested by the projects which scored above minimum threshold (15), indicating sufficient quota to meet the requests of the successful competitors, with an excess of seventeen (17) units. RECORD OF PROCEEDING 100 Leaves NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1 That an allocation of fifteen (15) residential units be made to the following projects: Aspen Mountain Lodge 12 units Gordon/Callahan PUD 3 units Section 2 That it does hereby determine that the seventeen (17) remaining residential units which are unallocated from the 1984 quota not be carried over for award in future years. Section 3 That the allocation to the Aspen Mountain Lodge shall expire, pursuant to Section 24-11.7(a) of the Municipal Code, in the event plans, specifications and fees sufficient for the issuance of a building permit for the 172 lodge units of the PUD are not submitted on or before June 1, 1985. Dated: , 1985 William L. Stirling, Mayor I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that Resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held , 1985. CP:jlr:ccallocationreso Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk f 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen City Council TH RU : Hal Schilling, City Manager FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office SUBJECT: 1984 Residential GMP Applications DATE: February 5, 1985 The following three applications, which were received by the Planning Office for the 1984 Residential GMP competition within the City, are attached for your review: 601 Aspen Aspen Mountain PUD Callahan/Gordon PUD The Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the conceptual submissions and scored the applications at their meeting in early January. The 1984 Residential GMP Allocation is currently scheduled on your February 11, 1985 meeting agenda. It is the Planning Office's practice to distribute copies of the applications to Council in advance of the meeting in order to allow you adequate time to review them in preparation for the allocation. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office RE: 1984 Residential Growth Management Competition DATE: January 22, 1985 INTRODUCTION Attached for your review are the Planning Office's recommended scores for the three residential GMP applications submitted on December 1st of last year. The three applications under consideration are: 1. The Aspen Mountain PUD 2. Gordon/Callahan PUD 3. 601 Aspen QUOTA AVAILABLE The tabulation of residential quota available for allocation this year (based on construction of units and expiration of projects as of January 1, 1985) is as follows: 1. The annual residential quota in Aspen is 39 units. 2. In last year's competition, an additional allocation of eight units was granted to the Poss and 700 S. Galena projects. Since these units were required to be off -set this year, only 31 units of the 39 are available. 3. On July 1, 1984, the Sunny Park project expired. Its three free market units are added back to the quota making it 34 units. 4. During 1984, 17 new units were built in the City of Aspen but nine units were demolished. Therefore, the net addition to the inventory was eight new units which is deducted from the quota. The available quota for this year is, therefore, 26 residential units. QUOTA SUMMARY Annual Quota 39 units Prior Year Off -Set -8 Sunny Park Expiration +3 1984 Construction -8 Quota Available as of 1/l/85 26 units The total quota request for this year is as follows: 1. Aspen Mountain Project 12 units 2. Gordon/Callahan PUD 3 units 3. 601 Aspen 40 units 55 units PROCESS The Planning Office will make a brief presentation to you on January 22 to explain the GMP procedures and to provide you with a suggested assignment, of points to each application. Next, each of the appli.-- cants should be given about 15 minutes to present their proposal to you. It is important. during the applicant's presentations that you limit all remarks only to description of the project as it has been submitted to the Planning Office along with any technical clarifica- tions which you or the staff may request. A public hearing will be held to allow interested citizens to com- ment. At the close of the hearing each commissionmember will be asked to score the applicants' proposals. The total number of points awarded by all members, divided by the number of members voting will constitute the total points awarded to the project. A project must score a minimum of 60 percent of the total points available under categories 1, 2, 3 and 4, amounting to 43.8 points, and a minimum of 30 percent of the points available in each category 1, 2, 3 and 4 to meet the basic competitive require- ments. The minimum points are as follows: Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 3.6 points 4.5 points 1.8 points 12 points Applications which score below these thresholds will no longer be considered for a development allotment and the application will be considered denied. Bonus points cannot be used to bring an applica- tion over this minimum threshold, but can affect the final ranking of the applications for the purposes of awarding the allotments. Ranking will be based on the so-called "ice-skating" scoring approach where scores are used to identify which project each commissionmember felt was first, second and third, and the ranks are then averaged. All of the projects, should they receive a development allotment, will. require additional review procedures. Specifically, the additional reviews required for each project are as follows: Aspen Mountain Project: The 700 S. Galena project and the 8 units in the hotel project will be reviewed in the ongoing PUD process for the entire project. Gordon/Callahan: Full Subdivision/PUD GMP Exemption for employee units. 601 Aspen: Full Subdivision GMP Exemption for employee units. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, each of these proce- dures must be accomplished by those applicants which receive develop- ment allotments as a result. of this process. PLANNING OFFICE RATINGS: The Planning office has assigned points to each of the applications as a recommendation for you to consider. The staff met to assess the ratings of the reviewing planner and objectively scored each pro--- posal. The following table is a summary of the Planning Office analysis and rating of the three projects. A more complete explana- tion of the points assignment for each criterion is shown on the attached score sheets, including rationales for the ratings. 2 Application Public Quality Proximity Employee Conver- Total Facili- of Design to Support Housing sion of Pts. ties and Services Units Services Aspen Mtn. 11 13 6 16.8 4 50.8 Gordon/Callahan 9 12 3 21.5 - 45.5 601 Aspen 6 6 5 2 0 19 The Gordon/Callahan and Aspen Mountain Projects meet the minimum threshold requirements of 30% of the possible points in categories 1, 2, 3 and 4, as well as the threshold of 60% of the total points available. The overall minimum threshold for total points is 43.8 points. The Aspen Mountain Project.'s total score (as recommended by the Planning Office) is 50.8 and the Gordon/Callahan score is 45.5. The 601 Aspen project does not meet the minimum 30% threshold in the Employee Housing category. The minimum number of points required to remain competitive in that category is 12 points. This project score only 2 points in that category. Consequently, the total points for the project are 19, with a required threshold of 43.8. The Housing Authority requested clarification of the location and quality of the employee units before they could recommend approval. The Planning Office feels very strongly that the proposal for employee housing is totally inadequate and makes it impossible to award points. There is no proof in the application that units can be purchased and not even a suggested location. Without this informa- tion, the adequacy of the solution cannot be evaluation, nor can the impacts on the proposed conversion location. Following submission of the application and its review for complete- ness by the Planning Office, the City Attorney recommended that the project be scored rather than rejected. The Planning Office contacted the applicant (see attached letter to Mr. Cant:rup from Alan Richman) cautioning that we expected the project to receive a very low score. Mr. Cantrup submitted two additional drawings (which are attached) and chose to remain in the competition. The award of two points in the employee housing category is given because 3 dorm units are indicated as being on -site in the floor area ratio calculations. This assump- tion on our part that they would, in fact, be provided on --site is giving the application the benefit of the doubt and if this project were to proceed, would require considerable clarification. PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis contained within the attached Planning Office has the following recommendation: Aspen Mountain Project: Gordon/Callahan PUD: 601 Aspen: We recommend that point assignments project. We recommend that point assignments project. score sheets, the you concur with our and approve the you concur with our and approve the We recommend that you concur with our point assignments and deny the project. 3 A G E N D A ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMM ISS ION January 22, 1985 - Tuesday 5:00 P.M. City Council Chambers Regular Meeting I. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS II. MINUTES III. CO1NTINUED PUBLIC HEARING A. Aspen Mountain Preliminary PUD/Subdivision and Viewplane and Subdivision Exception Resolution IV. NEW BUSINESS A. Aspen Grove Addition Special Review V. PUBLIC HEARING A. 1984 Residential Growth Management Scoring Session 1. Aspen Mountain POD 2. Gordon -Callahan PUD 3. 601 Aspen V. ADJOURN MEETING PROJECT: P&Z Voting Members 1. Public Facilities and Services a. Water Service b. Sewer Service C. Storm Drainage d. Fire Protection e. Parking Design f. Roads SUBTOTAL 2. Quality of Design a. Neighborhood Compatibility b. Site Design c.' Energy d. Trails e. Green Space SUBTOTAL CITY OF ASPEN RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANGEMENT PLAN SUBMISSION POINTS ALLOCATION TALLEY SHEET 4AA f ij& 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Perry__ ---- _l4ary __Pot__ Jasmine ------- _Roger_ Welton_ Ramona ------- David AVERAGE ------- ------ z z 2 Z z _ ---1--- --�--- ---1--- ---1--- --- I--- ---�--------- ---E ---I -- ---1-- -- �- ---�--- ---�--- --j -- ------ --' ----1--- -- - ---1 ---�=-- -- =-- -- ;t- ------ -- Z_ 2 --- -- -- --- ----- --!3 ---Lz-- 3. Proximity to Support Services a. Public Transportation b. Community Commercial Facilities ___�__ SUBTOTAL 4. Employee Housing a. Low Income b. Moderate Income c. Middle Income SUBTOTAL 5. Conversion of Existing Units to Employee Housing a. Low Income b. Moderate Income c. Middle Income SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL CATEGORIES 1 - 5 6. Bonus Points TOTAL POINTS CATEGORIES 1 - 6 zi=S------- zL�S 2►_s - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - — - - - - - - - — - ------- ------- ------------- -----_ --_--_ ------ ------ --Z - Q CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1984 RESIDENTIAL GNP COMPETITION Project:_ Gordon/Callahan PUD Date: O1122J85 1. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of twelve [12] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general. 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RAT ING : _ 2 41A, I • 1 • / - 11 / 1 •.. 1 - ill / 1 - ; - .- �.. •1 .. ..- / b. Sewer Service (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the water of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RATING: I .!fop 118114• I • 1 : / 1 1101 1 1 �' •• 1 1 C. Storm Drainage (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. RATING: 2 d. Fire Protection (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. RATING: 2 1 . 1 •• 1 -M-111AM •56M •. 10 • 1 • - 1 1• 11 • - _1 - 1 � 1 � - •• _ '61 0pp-1 -. •1 ..-. • 1- •.1•_ 1. e. Parking Design (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off- street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. RATING: 1 minimal 1 terms of practicality, There• •. ! area and impervious surface than in former L)lans. f. Roads (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. RATING: 1 • 1 • - 1 ! - 1 11 •- • 1 • - • ! 1 • • 1 .1 �• - • •11 - ?11 - . 1 SUBTOTAL: 9 2. Quality of Design (maximum fifteen [15] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design. 3 -- Indicates an excellent design. - 2 - a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum three [31 points) . Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. RATING: 2 b. Site Design (maximum three [31 points) . Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space area, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. RATING: 2 IN --Lake Road sovew-h-at—di-l-utes -th-e--Uurr&se of the - -• MUM PUNW_ - • • • • C. Energy (maximum three [31 points) . Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. RAT ING : 2 d. Trails (maximtur, three [31 points) . Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. RATING: 3 WOMWINZo ! . • - •- -. tt _• -t • ••• • 41 " It• I-Tyl 1" •1 • •• • •It _11 • • ._ . . •- •••- • 1 go e. Green Space (maximum three [31 points) . Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. RATING: 3 — 3 — •14 liziWOMN •• •-� •�•_ J • one •M �' •� • • • !� 11 •� t •!• •• • ! •! • • • SUBTOTAL: 12 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum [6] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a. Public Transportation (maximum three [3] points) . 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an exi-sting city or county bus route. RATING: 2 b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum three [3] points) . The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. For purposes of this section- one block shall be equivalent to two hundred f if ty (250) feet in linear distance. RATING: 1 COMMENTS: The project location is greater than six blocks from the comet cr ci al area, SUBTOTAL:. 4. Employee Housing (maximum forty [40] points) . The commission shall assign points to each applicant who agrees to provide low, moderate and middle income housing which complies with the housing size, type, income and occupancy guidelines of the City of Aspen and with the provisions of Section 24-11.10 of the Iluni ci pal Code of the City of Aspen. - 4 - Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: Two (2) points for each five (5) percent of the total Cevelopment that is restricted to low income price guidelines and low income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each ten (10) percent of the total development that is restricted to moderate income price guidelines and moderate income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each fifteen (15) percent of the total development that is restricted to middle income price guidelines and middle income occupancy limitations. To determine what percent of the total development is restricted to low, moderate and middle income housing, the commission shall compare the number of persons to be housed by the project as a whole with the number of persons to be provided with low, moderate and middle income housing using the following criteria which shall be applied to both the restricted and non -restricted units: Studio: 1.25 residents One -bedroom: 1.75 residents Two -bedroom: 2.25 residents Three -bedroom or larger: 3.00 residents; Dormitory: 1.00 residents per 1.50 square feet of unit space. a. Low Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each five [5] percent housed) . RATING: _ 21.5 COMMENTS: The one -bedroom emyplovee units (of which there are six) will house 10.5•• Two - ••• ••g houses andone • • • i : •WSO It 11MMIUMMOMM99 • • i 1 • x 2 pQints = 20 t• • b. Moderate Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each ten [ 10 ] percent housed) . RATING: COMMENTS: C. Middle Income Housing Provi ced (Two [2] points for each fifteen [15] percent housed) . COMMENTS: RATING: SUBTOTAL: 21.5 5. Conversion of Existing Units (maximum five [5] points) . The commission shall assign points to those applicants who guarantee to provide a portion of their low, moderate and middle income hou:;ing units by purchasing fully constructed units which are not restricted to Aspen's housing guidelines and placing a deed -restriction upon them in compliance with Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. - 5 - Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: POINTS 1% - 33% of all low, moderate and middle 1 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 34% - 66% of all low, moderate and middle 3 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 67% - 100% of all low, moderate and middle 5 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted RATING: N/A _ 6. Bonus Points (maximum seven [71 points) . RATING: NZA POINTS IN CATEGORIES 1, 2, 3, and 4: 45._5, POINTS IN CATEGORY 5: N/A POINTS IN CATEGORY 6: N/A _ TOTAL POINTS: 45.5 - Name of P&Z Commissionmember: Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 420 E. HOPKINS STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TO: Colette Penne, Plannig Office FROM: Steve Crockett, Chief RE: Gordon/Callahan Submission DATE: January 18, 1985 On a broad and general note upon reviewing the Gordon/Callahan submission, I find that Fire Department considerations do not appear to have been a major concern of the developer. My specific concerns are as follows: 1) Fire Department access; a) All access roads, circulation drives,and driveways through parking lots appear to be to narrow. b) The turning radius from the new entry Blvd. into the roadway accessing buildings E, F, G & H is too narrow. c) The cul-de-sac (formerly"DEAD END") radius at the end of the roadway accessing buildings A, B, C & D is too narrow. 2) Fire Hydrant placement; a) Re -locate the new fire hydrant durrently located on the S.W. side of the roadway accessing buildings A, B, C & D. to the N.E. corner of the new entry blvd. and the roadway accessing buildings A,B,C, & D. b) Re -locate the new fire hydrant currently located on the S.W. side of the roadway accessing buildings E,F,G &H to the N.E. corner of the new entry blvd. and the roadway accessing buildings E,T',G & H. With regard to addressing any other concerns, there appears to be insufficient data to make a respnse at this time. 420 E. HOPKINS STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Office ,' Colette Penne FROM: AVFD Plans -checking Committee RE: CORDON/C A_LLAHAN SUBMISSION DATE: JAi1UARY 18, 1985 Herewith find our review of the named application before your office. Thank you. AVFD Plans checklist 1283 Cover 420 E. HOPKINS STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 The Aspen Volunteer Fire Department welcomes the opportunity to participate within the framework that is determining the future configuration of our town. Insofar as our concern is the protection of life and property, we have prepared the following guidelines to establish a sense of balance between our capabilities as a department and the locations we might be called upon to defend. To insure fairness and Equality of application, the most recent edition of the Uniform Fire Code will serve as final authority in our evaluations. This review of plans is intended to impact final approval of a given project. There- fore we see most plans in a "conceptual" form. In many cases specific items of inter- est are simply not available for review as they don't exist in hardcopy. It is recommended that this checklist be reviewed at some subsequent time to insure that these items of concern have been addressed. We at the department will gladly perform this check at the direction of the Planning Office or in cooperation with the Building Department. Each item of the checklist is preceeded by three possible indicators: (OK); (ID), which stands for Insufficient Data; and (NOT OK). General comments and clarificaticns will appear at the end of the prepared list. AVFD Plans checklist 1283 Page 1 ROADWAYS (OK) (OT �Pbe (ID) Any roa considered as access for fire apparatus shall be an all weather driving surface of not less than 24 feet of unobstructed width capable of supporting the imposed loads of the apparatus. All turning radius shall be adequate and a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches shall be maintained. (OK) (NOT OK) �accessThe required wid shall not be obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles. Legal signs and/or other appropriate notice prohibiting obstruction shall be required and maintained. (OK) (NOT OK) (ID) ccess roadway shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of the first story of any building. Where this accesscannot may be reasonably provided, approved fire protection and suppressionsystems substituted subject to review and approval by the Fire Chief. (OK) CuNOTOK) ID)Curb cbe a minimum of thirty feet for commercial or multi -family driveways. Curb cuts for public roadways shall be determined by the Town Engineer. (OK) (NOT OK) (ID) Private ation drives shall be a minimum of 22 feet wide excluding parking, except where water mains are laid when they shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide excludon g. (OK) (ID) Thea pa. -kin lot shall be a minimum of 22 feet wide excluding parking, except where water mains are laid when they shall be a minimum of 30 feet pride excluding parking. (OK) ((�NOTOK))(ID) Radius degree turns shall be a minimum of 25 feet at the inside curb and 50 feet at the ourside curb. (OK) NOT OK) (ID) Dead a exceed 150 feet in length shall be provided with turnaround provision. "K turns" shall be a minimum of 75 feet long and 15 feet wide. Cul-de-sacs shall provide a radius minimum of 50 feet. (OK) (NOT OK) ( ID) Fire access roadw ys may be used for pedestrian and/or bicycle traffic. Roadways so used will ensure ease of access to pedestrians by their design. It may be necessary to eliminate access to such roadways by unauthorized vehicles by posting of legal signs and/or a design device. In no casemay such limiting design or device prohibit immediate access by emergancy vehicles. (OK) (NOT OK) (ID) t 2 clear means of access for Buildings 3 storle"f or higher must provide at leas a snorkle apparatus to a site no closer than 5 feet or no farther than 25 feet from the first floor of the building at the exterior wall. AVFD Plans checklist Page 2 HYDRANTS AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS OK) (NOT OK) (ID) remises where buildings or portions of buildings are hereafter constructed and are located more than 150 feet from access roadways shall be provided with an approved fire hydrant or other fire suppression system as reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief. r��(OK) (NOT OK) (ID) closest point of roadway access to a given building a maximum distance to the nearest hydrant shall be established. In residential areas the maximum shall be 600 feet,in commercial areas 300 feet, in the core area the maximum shall be 2 city blocks as they exist or are to be built per the proposal being reviewed. (OK) ( OT OK) ID) All by a.11 be located at least 50 feet from all structures in the vicinity whenever possible_ (OK) (NOT OK) O(ocated All hydrants sh on the high side of the fire access road. Hydrants shall be a minimum of 10 feet from the paved surface or "edge" of the access road. The center of the "steamer" connection shall be a minimum of 3 feet above the finish surface of the access road and shall be situated so that the "steamer" connection shall face the road. Clearance shall be maintained around the hydrant so as to allow the use of all outlets without kinking the hose and to allow the use of a 24 inch hydrant wr nch on the stem nut without having to remove the wrench. (OK) (NOT OK) CID) Fire hydrants located' parking lots must be accessible without obstruction but protected. This protection will be no closer than 5 feet from all sides of the hydrant and a minimum of 8 inches high. One access area centered on the '•steamer" connection shall be maintained at least 20 feet wide. (OK) (NOT OK) (ID) The builder or v per is required to demonstrate that the proposed complex �r individual buildings will fall within the storage and distribution water systems ability to deliver fire flcw. Computations required shall be ISO "Procedures for Needed Fire Flow", IQ80 edition. No combustible construction shall start at a planned site until such computations demonstrate adequate protection. (OK) (NOT OK) n Poper The Builder or is required to check the Uniform Building and Fire Codes for requirements of automatic sprinkler system and audio/visual alarm systems. (OK) (NOT OK),' ID) the proposed locations In buildings to ovided with standpipe connections, roved b the of the siames and any associated audio/visual alarms shall be app Y Fire Department. Clear access to all connections shall be provided for and maintained. (OK) (NOT OK)( (ID) In a standpipe fmt lation, a charged outlet shall be available to within 150 feet of every dwelling unit in the building. . Page 3 AVFD Plans checklist •• t GENERAL REVIEW CRITERIA (OK) (NOT OK) ( Firefighter acces�to a building shall be provided for both by design and special provisions if necessary. (Fire key boxes in security situations for example.) (OK) (NOT OK) (ID) Posted street ad es shall be visible from the nearest access roadway and/or at the driveway curb cut of buildings set back out of sight. (OK) (NOT OK) (ID) Bridges shall�-to all the same criteria as access roadways. (OK) (NOT OK) (� (ID DI! cut-offs shall be reasonably accessible, subject to approval of the Fire Chief. (OK) (NOT OK) (ID) Unusual vegetafi conditions may exist in rural cases. Limitations may be imposed for wildf;re control. AVFD Plans checklist - Page 4 CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COt• m ISS ION EVALUATION 1984 RMIDENTIAL GMP COMPETITION Project: U�`4 �`�" Date• 1. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of twelve (12) points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only an-] not the area in general. 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum two (2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those no Nally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RATING: COMMENTS b. Sewer Service (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the water of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RATING: COMMENTS c. Storm Drainage (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately di spore of th e surf ace runoff of th e proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. i' RAT ING : L_ COMMENTS: d. Fire Protection (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. RATING: COMMENTS: e. - Parking Design (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off- street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. RATING: 4 COMMENTS: f. Roads (maximum two [2] poihts) . Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. RATING: - 2 - COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 2. Quality of Design (maximum fifteen [15] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design. 3 -- Indicates an excellent design. a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. RATING: COMMENTS: b. Site Design (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed • landscaping and open space area, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. r7 RATING: COMMENTS: C. Energy (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. RATING: — 3 — COMMENTS: d. Trails (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. RATING: COMMENTS• e. Green Space (maximum three [31 points) . Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. COMMENTS: RATING: SUBTOTAL: 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum (61 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a. Public Transportation (maximum three (31 points) . 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. RATING: — 4 — COMMENTS: b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum three [3] points) . The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. RATING COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 4. Employee Housing (maximum forty [40] points) . The commission shall assign points to each applicant who agrees to provide low, moderate and middle income housing which complies with the housing size, type, income and occupancy guidelines of the City of Aspen and with the provisions of Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: Two ( 2) points f or each f ive (5) percent of the total development that is restricted to low income price guidelines and low income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each ten (10) percent of the total development that is restricted to moderate income price guidelines and moderate income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each fifteen (15) percent of the total development that is restricted to middle income price guidelines and middle income occupancy limitations. To determine what percent of the total development is restricted to low, moderate and middle income housing, the commission shall compare the number of persons to be housed by the project as a whole with the number of persons to be provided with low, moderate and middle income housing using the following criteria which shall be applied to both the restricted and non -restricted units: - 5 - Studio: 1.25 residents One -bedroom: 1.75 residents Two -bedroom: 2.25 residents Three -bedroom or larger: 3.00 residents; Dormitory: 1.00 residents per 150 square feet of unit space. a. Low Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each five [5] percent housed) . /f l RATING: v` COMMENTS: b. Moderate Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each ten [10] percent housed) . RATING: COMMENTS. C. Middle Income Housing Provided (Two (2] points for each fifteen [15] percent housed) . RATING: COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 5. Conversion of Existing Units (maximum five [5] points) . The commission shall assign points to those applicants who guarantee to provide a portion of their low, moderate and middle income housing units by purchasing fully constructed units which are not restricted to Aspen's housing guidelines and placing a deed -restriction upon them in compliance with Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. - 6 - Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: POINTS 1% - 33% of all low, moderate and middle 1 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 34% - 66% of all low, moderate and middle 3 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 67% - 100% of all low, moderate and middle 5 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted RATING: COMMENTS: 6. Bonus Points (maximum seven [71 points) . RATING: COMMENTS: POINTS IN CATEG OR IFS 1, 2, 3, and 4 : L' POINTS IN CATEGORY 5: ` POINTS IN CATEGORY 6: TOTAL POINTS: Name of P&Z Comm issionmem ber: - 7 - A CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING C07111ISS ION EVALUATION 1984 RESIDENTIAL - RES IDENT IALGMP COMPETITION Project:�C(V-)C7�lCPL--q'-)-O CU% Date: 2% J ' 1. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of twelve [12] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general. 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum two (2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those no mally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RATING: COMENTS - b. Sewer Service (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the water of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used. the capacity of the system to service the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RATING: COMMENTS - c. Storm Drainage (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surf ace runoff of the proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. RATING: COMMENTS: d. Fire Protection (maximum two (2] points) . Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire prctection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. RATING: COMMENTS U 42� 6-0 M M -Y) L> LILY 1 t ,777 r CJ - J Ice? 0 e. Parking Design (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off- street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. RATING: � COMMENTS: f. Roads (maximum two [2] points). Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. RATING: - 2 - COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 2. Quality of Design (maximum fifteen [15] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design. 3 -- Indicates an excellent design. a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum three (3] points) . Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. RATING: COMMENTS: b. Site Design (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed • landscaping and open space area, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. RATING: COMMENTS: c. Energy (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. RATING: — 3 — COMMENTS: d. Trails (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. RATING: COMMENTS: e. Green Space (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. COMMENTS: �9 RATING: SUBTOTAL: 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum [6] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a. ' Public Transportation (maximum three [3] points) . 1 -- Project is located f urther than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. RATING: — 4 — COMMENTS: b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum three [3] points) . The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. RATING: COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 4. Employee Housing (maximum forty [40] points) . The commission shall assign points to each applicant who agrees to provide low, moderate and middle income housing which complies with the housing size, type, income and occupancy guidelines of the City of Aspen and with the provisions of Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: Two (2) points for each five (5) percent of the total development that is restricted to low income price guidelines and low income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each ten (10) percent of the total development that is restricted to moderate income price guidelines and moderate income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each fifteen (15) percent of the total development that is restricted to middle income price guidelines and middle income occupancy limitations. To determine what percent of the total development is restricted to low, moderate and middle income housing, the commission shall compare the number of persons to be housed by the project as a whole with the number of persons to be provided with low, moderate and middle income housing using the following criteria which shall be applied to both the restricted and non -restricted units: - 5 - Studio: 1.25 residents One -bedroom: 1.75 residents Two -bedroom: 2.25 residents Three -bedroom or larger: 3.00 residents; Dormitory: 1.00 residents per 150 square feet of unit space. a. Low Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each five [51 percent housed) . RATING: .7/• 5 COMMENTS: b. Moderate Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each ten [10] percent housed) . RATING: COMMENTS: C. Middle Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each fifteen [15] percent housed) . COMMENTS: RATING: SUBTOTAL: ' 5. Conversion of Existing Units (maximum five [5] points) . The commission shall assign points to those applicants who guarantee to provide a portion of their low, moderate and middle income housing units by purchasing fully constructed units which are not restricted to Aspen's housing guidelines and placing a deed -restriction upon them in compliance with Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. - 6 - 6. Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: POINTS 1% - 33% of all low, moderate and middle 1 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 34% - 66% of all low, moderate and middle 3 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 67% - 100% of all low, moderate and middle 5 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted RATING: COMMENTS: Bonus Points (maximum seven [71 points) . COMMENTS: POINTS IN CATEGORIES 1, 2, 3, and 4: POINTS IN CATEGORY 5: POINTS IN CATEGORY 6: TOTAL POINTS: Name of P&Z Comm i ssionmem ber : - 7 - RATING: /C CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COmmISSION EVALUATION 1984 RESIDENTIAL GRIP COMPETITION Project:-�G�C/%�G/�G%�� /� % �/� Date: 1. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of twelve (12] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general. 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those no mally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RATING: COMMITS b. Sewer Service (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the water of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RATING: COMIENTS C. Storm Drainage (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system cxtensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. RATING: COMMENTS d. Fire Protection (maximum two (2] points) . Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. RATING: _ COMMENTS: e. - Parking Design (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off- street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. RATING: COMMENTS: f. Roads (maximum two (2] points). Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. RATING: — 2 — COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 2. Quality of Design (maximum fifteen [15] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design. 3 -- Indicates an excellent design. a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum three (3] points) . Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. RATING: COMMENTS• b. Site Design (maximum three (3] points) . Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed • landscaping and open space area, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. RATING: COMMENTS• C. Energy (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. RATING: — 3 — COMMENTS: d. Trails (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. RATING: COMMENTS• e. Green Space (maximum three (3] points) . Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. COMMENTS: RATING: SUBTOTAL: 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum [6] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a.' Public Transportation (maximum three (3] points) . 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. RATING: — 4 — COMMENTS : b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum three [31 points). The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. RAT ZNG : / COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 4. Employee Housing (maximum forty [401 points) . The commission shall assign points to each applicant who agrees to provide low, moderate and middle income housing which complies with the housing size, type, income and occupancy guidelines of the City of Aspen and with the provisions of Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: Two (2) points f or each f ive ( 5) percent of the total development that is restricted to low income price guidelines and low income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each ten (10) percent of the total development that is restricted to moderate income price guidelines and moderate income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each fifteen (15) percent of the total development that is restricted to middle income price guidelines and middle income occupancy limitations. To determine what percent of the total development is restricted to low, moderate and middle income housing, the commission shall compare the number of persons to be housed by the project as a whole with the number of persons to be provided with low, moderate and middle income housing using the following criteria which shall be applied to both the restricted and non -restricted units: - 5 - Studio: 1.25 residents One -bedroom: 1.75 residents Two -bedroom: 2.25 residents Three -bedroom or larger: 3.00 residents; Dormitory: 1.00 residents per 150 square feet of unit space. a. Low Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each five [5] percent housed). RATING: / S COMMENTS: b. Moderate Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each ten [10] percent housed) . RATING: COMMENTS C. Middle Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each fifteen [15] percent housed) . RATING: COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 2/ -J 1C 5. Conversion of Existing Units (maximum five [5] points) The commission shall assign points to those applicants who guarantee to provide a portion of their low, moderate and middle income housing units by purchasing fully constructed units which are not restricted to Aspen's housing guidelines and placing a deed -restriction upon them in compliance with Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. - 6 - Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: POINTS 1% - 33% of all low, moderate and middle 1 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 34% - 66% of all low, moderate and middle 3 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 67% - 100% of all low, moderate and middle 5 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted RATING: �U COMMENTS• 6. Bonus Points (maximum seven [7) points) . COMMENTS: POINTS IN CATEGORIES 1, 2, 3, and 4: POINTS IN CATEGORY 5: POINTS IN CATEGORY 6: TOTAL POINTS: RATING: Name of P&Z Commissionmember: arm 0 CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ffN G CO?• MISS ION EVALUATION 1984 RESIAL GM COOPETITION Project a Date • / 2Z 85/ 1. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of twelve (12] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general. 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those no mally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RATING: COMMENTS • b. Sewer Service (maximum two [2] points) . • Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the water of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. 1 RATING: y COMMENTS ce Storm Drainage (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of -the drainage facilities to adequately di spose of th e surf ace runoff of th e proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. RATING: COMMENTS • d. Fire Protection (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. RATING: COMMENTS: e. Parking Design (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off- street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. RATING: COMMENTS: � stets VisiToK 64 Ik C— NZ OrA-) _ Wti4i- AI�U� iCM P(114 S roil TV - 2 & +K► . 6 Z> . f. Roads (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. RATING: 1 - 2 - 2. COMMENTS: a `7V SUBTOTAL: .5• S Quality of Design (maximum fifteen [151 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design. 3 -- Indicates an excellent design. a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. ,�-- i % i RATING: COMMENTS: NC`aYS i 1�;, b. Site Design (maximum three [3], points) . Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed • landscaping and open space area, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. RATING: �• COMMENTS • Wodi, C- ( L �� C"f v& N c. Energy (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. RATING: — 3 — 3. COMMENTS: d. Trails (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. RATING: COMMENTS: 1-1(6 S - e. Green Space (maximum three [31 points) . Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. COMMENTS: RATING: -� SUBTOTAL: Proximity to Support Services (maximum (61 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a. Public Transportation (maximum three [31 points) . 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. RATING: — 4 — COMMENTS b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum three [3] points) . The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. RATING COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 4. Employee Housing (maximum forty [40] points) . The commission shall assign points to each applicant who agrees to provide low, moderate and middle income housing which complies with the housing size, type, income and occupancy guidelines of the City of Aspen and with the provisions of Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: Two (2) points for each five (5) percent of the total development that is restricted to low income price guidelines and low income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each ten (10) percent of the total development that is restricted to moderate income price guidelines and moderate income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each fifteen (15) percent of the total development that is restricted to middle income price guidelines and middle income occupancy limitations. To determine what percent of the total development is restricted to low, moderate and middle income housing, the commission shall compare the number of persons to be housed by the project as a whole with the number of persons to be provided with low, moderate and middle income housing using the following criteria which shall be applied to both the restricted and non -restricted units: - 5 - Studio: 1.25 residents One -bedroom: 1.75 residents Two -bedroom: 2.25 residents Three -bedroom or larger: 3.00 residents; Dormitory: 1.00 residents per 150 square feet of unit space. a. Low Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each five [5] percent housed). f / A RATING: COMMENTS: lk 6i b. Moderate Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each ten [10] percent housed). RATING: COMMENTS : C. Middle Income Housing Provided (Two (2] points for each fifteen [15] percent housed) . RATING: COMMENTS SUBTOTAL: �• ' 5. Conversion of Existing Units (maximum five [5] points) . The commission shall assign points to those applicants who guarantee to provide a portion of their low, moderate and middle income housing units by purchasing fully constructed units which are not restricted to Aspen's housing guidelines and placing a deed -restriction upon there in compliance with Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. - 6 - 6. Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: POINTS 1% - 33% of all low, moderate and middle 1 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 34% - 66% of all low, moderate and middle 3 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 67% - 100% of all low, moderate and middle 5 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted RATTNG _ COMMENTS: Bonus Points (maximum seven [7] points) . RATING: COMMENTS:- rDOC- `r-4F61�1 `WC— IS ��t P( idzw5i �-y'1 s r7 17d,1dr1cC— c�. e POINTS IN CATEGORIES 1, 2, 3, and 4: POINTS IN CATEGORY 5: POINTS IN CATEGORY 6: TOTAL POINTS: Name of P&Z Commissionmember : - 7 - CITY OF ASPEN PLAIINING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1984 RESIDENTIAL GMP COMPETITION Project Cc , Date. !� 1. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of twelve [12] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general. 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum two (2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those no mally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RAT ING : COMMENTS b. Sewer Service (maximum two [2] points) . • Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the water of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RAT ING : COMMENTS C. Storm Drainage (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system cztensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. RATING: COMMENTS: d. Fire Protection (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. RATING: COMMENTS: e. - Parking Design (maximum two [21 points) . Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off- street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. i RATING: COMMENTS: f. Roads (maximum two [21 points). Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. RATING: - 2 - COMMENTS SUBTOTAL:_ 2. Quality of Design (maximum fifteen [15] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design. 3 -- Indicates an excellent design. a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. RATING: COMMENTS• b. Site Design (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed • landscaping and open space area, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. RATING: COMMENTS: C. Energy (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. RATING: — 3 — COMMENTS: d. Trails (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. RATING: COMMENTS: e. Green Space (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. RATING: COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum (6] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a.' Public Transportation (maximum three (3] points) . 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. RATING: = — 4 — COMMENTS: b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum three [31 points) . The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. / RATING: COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 4. Employee Housing (maximum forty [401 points) . The commission shall assign points to each applicant who agrees to provide low, moderate and middle income housing which complies with the housing size, type, income and occupancy guidelines of the City of Aspen and with the provisions of Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: Two (2) points for each five (5) percent of the total development that is restricted to low income price guidelines and low income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each ten (10) percent of the total development that is restricted to moderate income price guidelines and moderate income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each fifteen (15) percent of the total development that is restricted to middle income price guidelines and middle income occupancy limitations. To determine what percent of the total development is restricted to low, moderate and middle income housing, the commission shall compare the number of persons to be housed by the project as a whole with the number of persons to be provided with low, moderate and middle income housing using the following criteria which shall be applied to both the restricted and non -restricted units: - 5 - Studio: 1.25 residents One -bedroom: 1.75 residents Two -bedroom: 2.25 residents Three -bedroom or larger: 3.00 residents; Dormitory: 1.00 residents per 150 square feet of unit space. a. Low Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each five [5] percent housed) . RATING COMMENTS: b. Moderate Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each ten [10] percent housed). j:a RATING: COMMENTS: C. Middle Income Housing Provided (Two [2) points for each fifteen [15] percent housed) . RATING: - SUBTOTAL: c !. 5. Conversion of Existing Units (maximum five [5] points) . The commission shall assign points to those applicants who guarantee to provide a portion of their low, moderate and middle income housing units by purchasing fully constructed units which are not restricted to Aspen's housing guidelines and placing a deed -restriction upon then in compliance with Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. - 6 - Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: POINTS 1% - 33% of all low, moderate and middle 1 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 34% - 66% of all low, moderate and middle 3 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 67% - 100% of all low, moderate and middle 5 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted n - RATING: / COMMENTS: 6. Bonus Points (maximum seven [7] points) . RATING: COMMENTS: POINTS IN CATEGORIES 1, 2, 3, and 4:/(� POINTS IN CATEGORY 5: POINTS IN CATEGORY 6: TOTAL POINTS: J Name of P&Z Commissionmember : — 7 — CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COf•MISSION EVALUATION 1984 RESIDENTIAL GMP COMPETITION Project: / ��� /�-�%� Date: - 1. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of twelve (12] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general. 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum two (2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those no mally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RATING: COMMITS b. Sewer Service (maximum two [2] points) . • Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the water of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RATING: COMIENTS C. Storm Drainage (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system extension-- beyond those normally installed by the developer. RATING: COMMENTS: d. Fire Protection (maximum two (2] points) . Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. RATING: COMMENTS: e. - Parking Design (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off- street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. RATING: / C014MENTS : f. Roads (maximum two [2] points). Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. _ RATING: — 2 — COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 2. Quality of Design (maximum fifteen [15] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design. 3 -- Indicates an excellent design. a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. RATING: / COMMENTS: b. Site Design (maximum three [31 points) . Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed • landscaping and open space area, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. RATING: COMMENTS• C. Energy (maximum three (3] points) . Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. — 3 — RATING: �,5 COMMENTS: d. Trails (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. % _ RATING s� COMMENTS• e. Green Space (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. RATING: COMMENTS: 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum [6] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a. ' Public Transportation (maximum three [3] points) . 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. RATING: — 4 — COMMENTS: b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum three (31 points) . The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. RATING: COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 4. Employee Housing (maximum forty [401 points) . The commission shall assign points to each applicant who agrees to provide low, moderate and middle income housing which complies with the housing size, type, income and occupancy guidelines of the City of Aspen and with the provisions of Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: Two (2) points for each f ive (5) percent of the total development that is restricted to low income price guidelines and low income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each ten (10) percent of the total development that is restricted to moderate income price guidelines and moderate income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each fifteen (15) percent of the total development that is restricted to middle income price guidelines and middle income occupancy limitations. To determine what percent of the total development is restricted to low, moderate and middle income housing, the commission shall compare the number of persons to be housed by the project as a whole with the number of persons to be provided with low, moderate and middle income housing using the following criteria which shall be applied to both the restricted and non -restricted units: - 5 - Studio: 1.25 residents One -bedroom: 1.75 residents Two -bedroom: 2.25 residents Three -bedroom or larger: 3.00 residents; Dormitory: 1.00 residents per 150 square feet of unit space. a. Low Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each five (5] percent housed) . RAT ING COMMENTS: b. Moderate Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each ten [10] percent housed). RATING: COMMENTS C. Middle Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each fifteen [15] percent housed) . RATING: COMMENTS• S.DBTOTAL : f 5. Conversion of Existing Units (maximum five [5] points) . The commission shall assign points to those applicants who guarantee to provide a portion of their low, moderate and middle income housing units by purchasing fully constructed units which are not restricted to Aspen's housing guidelines and placing a deed -restriction upon them in compliance with Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. - 6 - Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: POINTS 1% - 33% of all low, moderate and middle 1 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 34% - 66% of all low, moderate and middle 3 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 67% - 100% of all low, moderate and middle 5 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted RAT ING COMMENTS: 6. Bonus Points (maximum seven (7] points) . RATING: COMMENTS POINTS IN CATEGORIES 1, 2, 3, and 4: --q77;" / 1_�" POINTS IN CATEGORY 5: G POINTS IN CATEGORY 6: TOTAL POINTS: Name of P&Z Commissionmember : - 7 - CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1984 RESIDENTIAL `GtIP COMPETITION ject O C Date: I �� 1. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of twelve [12] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general. 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those no mally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RATING: COMMITS : b. Sewer Service (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the water of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RATING: COMMENTS • C. Storm Drainage (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of -the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. RATING: �_ COMMENTS: d. Fire Protection (maximum two (21 points) . Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. RATING: �1- COMMENTS: e. - Parking Design (maximum two [21 points) . Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off- street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. RATING: -- COMMENTS: f. Roads (maximum two [21 points). Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. RATING: - 2 - COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 2. Quality of Design (maximum fifteen [15] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design. 3 -- Indicates an excellent design. a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. RATING: r COMMENTS: b. Site Design (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed • landscaping and open space area, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. RATING: COMMENTS• C. Energy (maximum three (31 points) . Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. RATING: — 3 — COMMENTS: d. Trails (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. RATING: COMMENTS: e. Green Space (maximum three [3] points) . Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. �rf RATING: COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum (6] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a.' Public Transportation (maximum three (3] points) . 1 -- Project is located f urther than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. RATING: ' — 4 — COMMENTS: b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum three [31 points) . The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. RATING: [ COMMENTS: SUBTOTAL: 4. Employee Housing (maximum forty (401 points) . The commission shall assign points to each applicant who agrees to provide low, moderate and middle income housing which complies with the housing size, type, income and occupancy guidelines of the City of Aspen and with the provisions of Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: Two (2) points for each five (5) percent of the total development that is restricted to low income price guidelines and low income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each ten (10) percent of the total development that is restricted to moderate income price guidelines and moderate income occupancy limitations; Two (2) points for each fifteen (15) percent of the total development that is restricted to middle income price guidelines and middle income occupancy limitations. To determine what percent of the total development is restricted to low, moderate and middle income housing, the commission shall compare the number of persons to be housed by the project as a whole with the number of persons to be provided with low, moderate and middle income housing using the following criteria which shall be applied to both the restricted and non -restricted units: - 5 - Studio: 1.25 residents One -bedroom: 1.75 residents Two -bedroom: 2.25 residents Three -bedroom or larger: 3.00 residents; Dormitory: 1.00 residents per 150 square feet of unit space. a. Low Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each five [5] percent housed) . RATING: I -� COMMENTS: b. Moderate Income Housing Provided (Two [2] points for each ten [10] percent housed). RATING: COMMENTS C. Middle Income Housing Provided (Two (2] points for each fifteen [15] percent housed) . RATING: COMMENTS SUBTOTAL: 5. Conversion of Existing Units (maximum five [5] points) . The commission shall assign points to those applicants who guarantee to provide a portion of their low, moderate and middle income housing units by purchasing fully constructed units which are not restricted to Aspen's housing guidelines and placing a deed -restriction upon then in compliance with Section 24-11.10 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. - 6 - Points shall be assigned according to the following schedule: POINTS 1% - 33% of all low, moderate and middle 1 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 34% - 66% of all low, moderate and middle 3 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted 67% - 100% of all low, moderate and middle 5 income units proposed by applicant are to be purchased and deed -restricted RATING: COMMENTS: 6. Bonus Points (maximum seven (71 points) . RATING: COMMENTS• POINTS IN CATEGORIES 1, 2, 3, and 4 : POINTS IN CATEGORY 5: POINTS IN CATEGORY 6: TOTAL POINTS: Name of P&Z Comm issionmember : - 7 - MEMORANDUM TO: City Attorney City Engineer Housing Director Aspen Water Department vAspew"Consolidated Sanitati'ori_ District Fire Chief Building Dept. FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office RE: 1984 Residential G11P Submissions: Aspen Mountain Lodge GMP Conceptual Submission, 601 Aspen GMP Conceptual Submission and Gordon/Callahan Conceptual Submission DATE: December 6, 1985 We are forwarding to you with this memo, all documentation and plats with respect to the captioned 1984 Residential Gr7P submissions received by this office. Included is the following: Aspen Mountain Lodge Residential GMP Conceptual Submission The applicants are requesting a growth management allocation for the construction of 12 residential units within the Aspen Mountain PUD. The applicants encountered a great deal of opposition to their original 700 South Galena 12 unit residential project and, therefore, propose to relinquish the prior allocation granted for 12 units at the 700 South Galena site upon the City approval of a new allocation and subsequent review procedures. The new proposal is a request to build 12 units which would consist of two duplexes (4 units) to be constructed at the 700 South Galena site, and 8 units to be relocated from the 700 South Galena site to the west wing of the Lodge. Gordon/Callahan Residential GMP Conceptual Submission This application is also a revision to a GMP application originally submitted last year. The applicant is requesting a growth management allocation of 3 units, for, the purpose of constructing two 3-bedroom free market units and one 4-bedroom unit. It is the applicant's intent to combine Lot 2 of the Gordon Subdivision with the land area and development rights of the previously subdivided Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the Callahan Subdivision into a common development. This would consist of a total develop- ment of 9 free market units, six 1-bedroom low income, deed restricted employee housing units, on 4.572 acres adjacent to the Aspen Club. 601 Aspen Residential GMP Conceptual Submission The applicant is requesting a growth management allocation for the construction of 41 free market units. The project is proposed to consist of 40 free market one -bedroom units and one free market studio unit. The proposed development is to be located at Lots 1 through 22, Block 6, Eames Addition in Aspen and consists of 51,150 square feet. Please review this material and return your referral comments to the Planning Office no later than January 4, 1984, in order for this office to have adequate time to prepare for the presentation and scoring of these submissions at a public hearing before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on January 22, 1984. If you have any questions regarding these applications, or any problems meeting our deadline, please contact me as soon as possible. Thank you. �AL0�­N _ !vo �/-Ci1 4.Cri-f -rm e ASP/.'— curp6 S 4rnrr o T / %!� O %'ter.' 4 N r/ a — E P 7He s to r.., T S 6zurtGo _ •C.AIL 0 - rRVJFc' CtNI- Tie Sa 0-r> f3-y 7'h4p 5,4�-� ri9T�a r --- h i 1 T 1- r 6,cl ii�n�' TrflS ('R�JFcr- 64-- '3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 1984 Residential G?1P Submissions: Aspen Mountain Lodge GMP Conceptual Submission, 601 Aspen GNIP Conceptual Submission and Gordon/Callahan Conceptual Submission NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on January 22, 1984, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 P.M. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission in City Council Chambers, 130 S. Galena, Aspen, Colorado, to consider the Aspen Mountain Lodge GMP Conceptual Submission, 601 Aspen GMP Conceptual Submission and Gordon/Callahan Conceptual Submission, at which time the Aspen Planning and ZOning Commission will consider each application and score the applications based on the criteria established the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. Following is a short explanation of what each applicant is requesting in their 1984 Residential GTIP Submissions: Aspen Mountain Lodge Residential GMP Conceptual Submission The applicants are requesting a growth management allocation for the construction of 12 residential units within the Aspen Mountain PUD. The applicants encountered a great deal of opposition to their original 700 South Galena 12 unit residential project and, therefore, propose to relinquish the prior allocation granted for 12 units at the 700 South Galena site upon the City approval of a new allocation and subsequent review procedures. The new proposal is a request to build 12 units which would consist of two duplexes (4 units) to be constructed at the 700 South Galena site, and 8 units to be relocated from the 700 South Galena site to the west wing of the Lodge. Gordon/Callahan Residential GMP Conceptual Submission This application is also a revision to a GMP application originally submitted last year. The applicant is requesting a growth management allocation of 3 units, for the purpose of constructing two 3-bedroom free market units and one 4-bedroom unit. It is the applicant's intent to combine Lot 2 of the Gordon Subdivision with the land area and development rights of the previously subdivided Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the Callahan Subdivision into a common development. This would consist of a total develop- ment of 9 free market units, six 1-bedroom low income, deed restricted employee housing units, on 4.572 acres adjacent to the Aspen Club. 601 Aspen Residential GMP Conceptual Submission The applicant is requesting a growth management allocation for the construction of 41 free market units. The project is proposed to consist of 40 free market one -bedroom units and one free market studio unit. The proposed development is to be located at Lots 1 through 22, Block 6, Eames Addition in Aspen and consists of 51,150 square feet. For further information, contact the Planning Office, 130 S. Galena, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-2020, ext. 223. s/Perry Harvey Chairman, Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on December 13, 1984. City of Aspen Account. MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney Alan Richman, Planning Office FROM: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department C-R- DATE: January 3. 1985 RE: Aspen Municipal Code, Section 24-8.18(a)(1) It has come to our attention that there are two problems with this section. The first is that the language excludes easements from calculations for developable area in PUD zones. This appears to be inconsistent with other land use practices wherein easements are not generally excluded in developable area conside- rations. The other problem concerns the right-of-way area exclusions. There was a recent development, the Aspen Chance Subdivison, and there is a current review, the Gordon/Callahan project, wherein the access roads are private and are not dedicated over to the public. Because these access roads are not dedicated public rights -of -way, their area is not required to be deducted in developable area calculations. This may present an unfair advantage over other developers working in the City who must subietract road and sidewalk areas in developable area calculations. The problem appears to be a stic ntiate between access roads an( driving surface which serves more with more than two dwelling uni driving surface which solely set a duplex is a driveway. Perhaps and (n) should be revised. cy wicket. How does one differe- driveways? I would say that a than one structure, or a structure .s therein, is a road and that a ves a single family residence or the definitions, Section 20-3(e) And what about the width of the access? Section 20-17(a)(3) requires a 60 foot right-of-way width for a local street. This 60 foot width is intended to accommodate room for two way vehicular traffic, parking on both sides of the street, and corridors for pedestrian traffic on each side. It would seem that 24-8.18(a) should be revised such that easements are not excluded from developable area calculations and private roads and pedestrain thoroughfares are excluded. CR/co/AspenMunCode MEMORANDUM To: Colette Penne, Planning Office From: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department C p- Date: January 17, 1985 Re: Gordon/Callahan GMP Conceptual Submission This memo is a follow-up on our memo of January 3 regarding this application. The applicant's representative, Stan Mathis, has been in to see me regarding this application and the engineering department comments. He brought in a slope reduction prepared by a registered surveyor. The engineering department has accepted that work as satisfactory for conceptual submission with the understanding that at the next review stage, a more detailed slope reduction would be prepared. The slope reduction calculations which were submitted were based on a map with a five foot contour interval. At the next review stage, a slope reduction will be prepared on a two foot interval contour map. CR/cr/GordonCallahan2 s MEMORANDUM TO: Colette Penne, Planning Office ,,pp FROM: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department DATE: January 3, 1985 RE: Gordon/Callahan GHP Conceptual Submission Having reviewed the above application, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. There appear to be some proble:as aiti: the slope reduction calculations. The application states that Alpine Surveys performed this work, but the submitted map does not say Alpine Surveys on it, nor is it signed by a registered surveyor. The Engineering Department performed slope reduction calculations using a Cooper Aerial topographic map and determined about 154,381 square feet of developable area. This excludes land under water and the trail easement (996 square feet). There appear to be errors in the reductions. Per Section 24-8.18(a)(2), "for lands between 21% and 30ol, the density shall be reduced to 50V and "for lands between 31% and 400, the density shall be reduced to 25%." The application showed 75% and 50% respectively for this calculation. If the applicant desires to reaccess the allowable area for development, the Engineering Department would need to see a map and calculations prepared and signed by a registered land surveyor. 2. I don't know why earlier reviews have not mentioned it, but the 1973 Trail System Plan shows a riverside trail which appears to follow the river through Lot 2, Gordon Subdivision, to the lower Aspen Club bridge. This portion of trail is shown on the east side or the river from the Cooper Street Bridge. The trail easements acquired actually extend through Lot 1, Gordon Subdivi- sion. 3. There is a language error in 3B. The new water line must be ductile iron pipe, not cast iron. This section would also be more clear if it said that the new water main will be "designed and constructed by the developer." Also in 3B, the City Attorney needs to respond to*the sufficiency of the water rights transaction. 4. Regarding 3D, it should be stated that any powerline extension, as well as service connections, will be underground. 5. Regarding 3I, the site plan only shows 19, not 26, outside parking spaces. 6. Regarding 3J, it should be pointed out that this public trail is already dedicated. Also, a bridge will need to provide two feet of clearance above the 100-year flood level for debris and will require stream Margin Review. There is no mention of developing the trail. 7. This project should be handled as a third amendment to the Callahan Subdivision. There is a problem there with parking overflowing the parking lots and being permitted on stre is which are too narrow for and not designed for parking. Emergency access is then restricted. 8. There appear to be some problems with the roadways as shown on the site plan with regards to meeting fire department access requirements: road radii, widths, and turn arourics. 9. Further on developable area. This department has found a problem with Section 24-8.18(a)(1). In a "normal" subdivision, rights -of -way must be deducted. In this application, there are no dedicated R.0.Td. Is, so the developer is being permitted a greater density than would otherwise be allowed by not being required to deduct roadway areas. The other problem is that easements are deducted, which is not the case in other situations. In comment number 1, I deducted the trail easement. There are other easements which c: ill need to be deducted, such as sewer and ingress -egress. We will need to see a title company statement of easement encumbrances on this property to evaluate the total easement situation. 10. The Engineering Department GPSP scoring is attached. CR/co/GordonCallahan Enclosure CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION RESIDENTIAL GMP COMPETITION Project:_ �Oa� /G�-Uf},J Date:—' 3 �S 1. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of twelve [12) points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general. 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum two [21 points) . Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RATING: 2 COMMENITS: PrnVI5lon ©t Water Math eY+ehsi'2K +V 10tl• A Ioop WIT 6etnef,-1Of�Prs 6esjks GippjiCa►ti� b. Sewer Service (maximum two [21 points) . Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the water of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. RAT ING i i COMMENTS:— Dro'tecT on Page 2 C. Storm Drainage (maximum two [2) points) . Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. RATING: 1 COMMENTS : IV, order- +o receiv a 2 ; An Brant stote5 "proT d WJ1 12106Ae oh-si�e. retaihaoe Jor so4ace and run-oK Beater in xrcas of rre-deyelopmPht n rai11 e5. pr-ovect iS hot lhAbro�A(J�f eet-Vice — t7 �� Wa►nSc��►�ri� . 7 TO IMprr_ OVo Prnle-cf-WpU(d k&VP +0rC.11llh hLi Ot- MCK-nc GW1 Oe Or All OT 100 - Yea t- 51 or w1 . d. Fire Protection (maximum two [2) points) . Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. RATING: 2- COMMENTS: 0hr hev1 k%zd-rant I, 3 Im prnye CoV era a► e 41- nP�l� e. Parking Design (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off— street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. RATING: 2 COMMENTS:�j ImProJeS I1P.ie�iLor�ond Sekyice 6y oerlNa Mn Ral~k���s�aces fkan r d 6VCoat, Page 3 f. Roads (maximum two [2] points) . Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. RATING: 2- COMMENTS: Apply m.n{ls Sfa+e► AeKt 0164f eLu r dk'�u u�ays �accesse s okra _ I_t� �aKe K00,J Is but f1 rtv►ay be offer nrob( W(-Lck Ca V1 6f- Solved 1 r See Cover hnew"a Cov%& meJ 8 SUBTOTAL: iO 2. Quality of Design (maximum fifteen [15] points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design. 3 -- Indicates an excellent design. b. Site Design (maximum three (3] points) . Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space area, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. RATING: COMMENTS: �I ne SJe- Te �la,H IS VxusslKq 1 (SeJeh) CJC Wws i's4 Ci road c,u &f T T r r �..J c CLccesS_- SowAe of luzs ('ea,. as III AL spriV%ltler- sy str,w,.s "In stractores oor n Qrooy S I e J -cn, e.9. Page 4 d. Trails (maximum three [31 points) . Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. RATING: COMMENTS: R Woj(d app�ctr DPrOdJil f -Yor �'rai i �o �X+�K� Soutf4f:r(V OJso, MEMORANDUM TO: HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PITKIN COUNTY FROIM: J. LUCAS ADAIISRI, DIRECTOR OF HOUSI14G DATE • DE CE NB ER 15, 1964 RE: GORDON/CALLAHAN RESIDENTIAL GNP CONCEPTUAL SUBIMISSION I. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant is proposing to combine lot 2 of the Gordon Subdivision with the land area and development rights of the previously subdivided lots 4,5,6,7,8 & 9 of the Callahan Subdi- vision into a common development. The applicant seeks a growth management allotment of two, three bedroom free market units the one 4 bedroom unit. Thi .ent woulde com six ree market development rights available from lots 4,5,6,7,8, & 9 of the Callahan Subdivision, for a total free market devel- opment of 9 units. In addition, there would be six one bedroom row income, deed restricted employee housing units. This results in six duplex residential units, (each comprised of one free market unit and one, one bedroom housing un' , single family free market units, all on the subje t 4,572 acre c mbined property. REVIE�,vj6� 1�J II HOUSIPIG AUTHOPITY W: This application is replacing the previous approvals given to the Callahan and Gordon subdivisions. Six of the nine free market Callahan units received approval April 21, 1976 prior to the GIMP process. The six one -bedroom low income deed restricted employee housing rental units will be built as six duplex residential units, (each comprised of one free market unit and one, one bedroom housing unit) . The following calculations define the percentage of employee housing committment: Gf1P free-market units 2 - 3 bedroom units @ 3.00 people/unit = 6 residents 1 - 4 bedroom units @ 3.00 people/unit = 9 residdents 1 GMP Price Restricted Units 6 - 1 bedroom units 0 1.75 emp./unit = 10.5 = 530 Total of 19.5 = 10 0 0 II HOUSING AUTHORITY RECQNr:ENDATIOrI: The Housing Authority recommends approval of the Gordon/ - Callahan Residential GrIP Conceptual Submission conditioned upon the following pen that the six 1. The owner covs (ass described with the City he sGordon/Callahan employee housing units (a Residential GMP Conceptual Submission)landoccupancy rguidelines eestabf use and occupancy to the rental lished and indexed at the time o l �s design building fora low income building permit by the city employment and income of employee housing units. Verification of employ those persons living in the low income error it units shall tthe eper and filed with the City Council or its dein the p1 he completeded the date of recording hereof, These owner commencing records and annually thereafter • burden County real property enforceable covenants shall be deemed to run with the cifically s ro riate legal action thereto for the base des gneeand by shall any appp p by the City or eviction of noncomplying member including injunction, abatement or during the period of life of the last uCitylof Aspen, tenancy, existing City Councor of for a period of f if ty of the presently one (21) years, real Colorado, plus twenty- hereof in the Pitkin County years from the datwhicheverrding period shall be less. property records, 2 MEMORANDUM TO• HOUSI14G AUTHORITY BOARD OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PITP.IN COUNTY FROI.1: J. LUCAS ADAMSKI, DIRECTOR OF HOUSING DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1984 SUBJECT: ASPEN b1OUNTAIAI LODGE RESIDENTIAL GI1P COI1- CEPTUAL SUBNISSION I. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicants are requesting a growth management allocation for the construction of 12 residential units within the Aspen Mountain PU D. The applicants encountered a great deal of opposition to their original 700 South Galena 12 unit residential project and, therefore, propose to relinquish the prior allo- cation granted for 12 units at the 700 South Galena site upon the City approval of a new allocation and subsequent review proce- dures. The new proposal is a request to build 12 units which would consist of two duplexes (4 units) to be constructed at the 700 South Galena site, and 8 units to be relocated from the 700 South Galena site to the west wing of the Lodge. II HOUSING AUTHORITY REVIEW; The applicant represents using the standards of Section 24'11.4(b) (4) (bb), the population of the non -restricted units is as follows: Non -restricted Units 700 South Galena four 4-bedroom units @ 3.0 residents: Hotel Residential Units one 1-bedroom unit @ 1.75 residents: two 2-bedroom units @ 2.25 residents: five 3-bedroom units @ 3.00 residents: TOTAL 1 Populatio 12.00. 1.75 4.50 15.00 33.25 (58%) The applicants propose to house 24 employees in ten 2-bedroom units and one 1-bedroom unit as follows: Restricted Units Airport Business Center Population ten 2-bedroom units @ 2.25 employees 22.5 one 1-bedroom units @ 1.75 employees 1.5 (1.5 employees assigned to this submission) TOTAL 24.0 (42 u ) The units will be deed -restricted to the low-income price and occupancy guidelines to allow for rental or sale. The units will be deed -restricted at the time of issuing a Certificate of Occupancy for the first free-market residential units. Rental and sale prices will be restricted to the low-income guidelines in effect at the time of recording the deed -restriction. The Housing Authority will have the right to review rents and sale prices. The calculation of the GMP points to be awarded for employee housing is therefore as follows: 42% of total project low income deed restricted units x's 2 points for each 5% low-income deed restricted = 16.5 points. III HOUSING AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION: The Housing Authority recommends approval of the Aspen Mountain Lodge Residential GIMP Conceptual Submission as the proposal is in compliance with Section 24-11.4(b) (4) (bb) of the municipal Code of the City of Aspen conditioned on the following: 1. The owner covenants with the City of Aspen that the employee housing units be restricted in terms of use and occup- ancy to the rental and occupancy guidelines established and indexed at the time of or prior to issuance of the building permit by the City Council's designee for low income employee housing units. Verification of employment and income of those persons living in the low income employee units shall be com- pleted and filed with the City Council or its designee by the owner commencing on the date of recording hereof, in the Pitkin County real property records and annually thereafter. These covenants shall be deemed to run with the land as a burden thereto for the benefit of and shall be specifically enforceable by the City or its designee by any appropriate legal action N ing Pl including injunction, abatement or eviction of noncom member tenancy, during the period of life of the last surviving of the presently existing City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, plus twenty-one (21) years, or for a period of fifty years from the date of recording hereof in the Pitkin County real property records, whichever period shall be less. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Housing Authority Board of the City of Aspen and Pitkin County FROM: J. Lucas Adamski, Director of Housing DATE: December 15, 1984 SUBJECT: 601 Aspen Residential GRIP Conceptual Submission I. PROJECT: A. Description: Hans B. Cantrup, the applicant, is requesting a growth management allocation for the construction of dl free—market units. The project is proposed to consist o 40 free market one -bedroom units and one free market studio unit. B. Location: 601 Aspen, Lots 1 through 22, Block 6, Eames Addition to the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colo. II. HOUSING REVIEW The proposed development will consist of a total of forty (40) Multi -family Free Market units of twelve hundred and fifty (1250) square feet each, designed for short-term rentals to apartment occupants (L-2 Zone has a long term Deed Restriction allowing only rentals of 6' months or less) . The proposed development will also house the required parking (40) in an underground parking structure along with a common lounge and' recreation area with a health room, saunas, jacuzzi and indoor -- outdoor swimming pool. Since short-term rentals are mandated for this multi -family project, a full array of Hotel Sevices will be provided. The 601 Aspen Development contains forty (40) one bedrooms units plus 35 Low Income Dorm Units. The applicant hereby agrees to deed restrict thirty-five (35) of those new units for a period of fifty (50) years to the "Low income occupancy eligibility established by the City Council. 1 III. HOUSING AU71 10RITY RECOMMIDATION The Housing Authority requests technical clarification of the The location and quality of the employee dormitory units. square feet for the proposed employee housing is to be calculated at 1.00 emp. Der 150 s .ft. of dormitory housing he City all other res ri ns for dormitory housing pr The free market units are well demonstrated however, the employee units need to be defined and the low income deed restriction should fof ow owner conant Aspen that the employee housing units be restricted in terms of use and occupancy to the rental and occupancy guidelines establ- ished and indexed at the time of or prior to issuance of the building permit by the City Council's designee for low income employee housing units. verification of employment and income of those persons living in the low income employee units shall be completed and filed with the City Council or its designee by the owner commencing on the date of recording hereof, in the Pitkin County real property records and annually thereafter. These covenants shall be deemed to run with the land as a burden thereto for the benefit of and shall be specifically enforceable by the City or its designee by any appropriate legal action including injunction, abatement or eviction of noncomplying tenancy, during the period of life of the last surviving member of the presently existing City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, plus twenty-one (21) years, or for a period of fifty years from the date of recording hereof in the Pitkin County real property records, whichever period shall be less. The Housing Authority can not recommend approval until the technical clarifications have been provided for review. 2 HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD MEETING AGENDA January 3, 1984 1. Roll Call: 8:00 2. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 6, 1984 and I•inutes of the Special I•ieeting of December 19, 1984 are attached for your review and approval. 3. Communication: 8:05 A. Hans Graminger discussion of proposal 4. Director's Report: 9:00 A. Centennial Update 1. Lease 2. Completed Resale Agreement 3. Lease for Renters B. Discussion of agenda for Annual Meeting C. Senior Citizen Housing Guidelines and definition of Independent Living. D. Next Housing Authority Meeting - January 24, 1985. 5. Old Business: 6. New Business: 9:30 A. Gordon/Callahan Residential GMP Conceptual Submission B. Aspen Mountain Lodge Residential GMP Concep- tual Submission C. 601 Aspen Residential GMP Conceptual Submis- sion MIINUTES OF THE I7OUSIIIG AUTHORITY BOARD OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PITKIN COUNTY HELD AT 506 EAST MAIN STREET December 19,1984 A Special Meeting of the Housing Authority Board of the City of Aspen and Pitkin County was held on December 19, 1984 at 8:00 A.I,1. in the County Courthouse in the Commissioner's Room. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Harry Truscott. Members present were: Jim Curtis, Doug Allen, Jim ilollica, Louise Brainard and Harry Truscott. Absent: None. Also present: Lucas Adamski, Ann Bowman, John Eldert, County ilanager, Richard Grice, Panning Office, Patsy Newberry, Zoning Office, Bud Idler, Building Department, Drake Jacobs, Centennial Representative and Tom Smith, County Attorney. The first item on the agenda was a presentation by Sandra Stuller, attorney acting for the Housing Authority, of the changes in the Resale Agreement for Centennial. After discus- sion, the following changes were incorporated in the agreement: 1) In the first whereas on page one the word Village will be deleted in from the Centennial "Village" Condom- iniums. 2) At the top of page to the word forfeit will be changed to read retain until the Unit is eventually sold. 3) First paragraph page 2 last sentence shall be added not to exceed 20. 4) Last sentence of the first paragraph of page two will have the addition of by the Authority "Guidelines" added. 5) The last paragraph (1)_ the second sentence will have purchase price deleted. 6) The top of page three (2) paragraph will have the computation figured by the following concept and that paragraph will read: "An Amount (based upon the Consumer Price Index, All Items, U.S. City Average, Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (Revised), published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics) calculated as follows: Owner's purchase price x Consumer Price Index last published prior to the date of the notice of desire to sell - Consumer Price Index current at the time of purchase by Owner. 7) The addition of a definition of cost and definition to be defined in the Authority's guidelines to subpara- graph (b) , (c) and (d) . 8) The last sentence in the fifth paragraph changed from the unit shall to "may" be sold by O%,iner.(page 3) The Director was instructed to incorporate in the 1985 Guidelines the following items: 1) Include the issue of owner financing as an option and a definition of what would constitute the highest offer. 2) Include a definition of cost less depreciation and define depreciation and capital improvement schedule. 3) Set an annual percentage for transfers. 4) Establish co-signers can be responsible for 100% of the financing. f Commissioner Mollica moved that the Resale Agreement be approved as amended. Commissioner Curtis seconded the motion and all present voted in favor. The next item for discussion was the issuance of temporary Certificate's of Occupancy (for those persons who are purchasing at Centennial and wish to rent the units until they can close the loans) presented to the Board by Drake Jacobs representing the Centennial Project. After discussion, the Director was in- structed to gather together the pertinent information including the financing documents, meet with Patsy Newberry and Don Iler of Building and Zoning to list the items and schedule to complete the items and the improvement agreement between the County and Centennial and the amendments to that agreement needed to issue temporary C.O.'s. To then schedule a meeting of the Housing Authority Board to review these documents and make a recommend- ation to the Board of County Commissioners. There being no further business the meeting was adjourned. HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PITKIN COUNTY: BY: Chairman, Harry Truscott ATTEST: Director, J. Lucas Adamski MINUTES OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PITRIN COUNTY HELD AT 506 EAST MAIN STREET December 6 ,19 84 A regular meeting of the Housing Authority Board of the City of Aspen and Pitkin County was held on December 6, 1984 at 8:00 A.M. in the County Courthouse in the Commissioner's Room. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Harry Truscott. Members present were: Jim Curtis, Doug Allen, Jim Mollica, and Harry Truscott. Absent: All Board Members present. Also present: Lucas Adamski, Ann Bowman, and the Telluride Housing Authority. The first item on the agenda was the approval of the Minutes for the Regular Meeting of November 15, 1984. Commissioner Curtis moved that the minutes be approved as presented. Commis- sioner Allen seconded the motion and all present voted in favor. The first item for discussion was an update by Jim Curtis of the EPA designation of Smuggler Mountain as a possible super fund site. Commissioner Curtis declared a conflict of interest. After discussion, Commissioner Mollica moved that the Resolution 84-7 be approved and a copy sent to the EPA office. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Allen and all present voted in favor. The next item for discussion presented by the Director was the Board vacancy and a letter from Louise Brainard requesting consideration of her application for the position. After discussion, it was moved that her application be forwarded to the BOCC with a letter of recommendation from the Housing Authority Board by Commissioner Allen. The motion was seconded by Commis- sioner Curtis and all present voted in favor. The next item on the agenda was a presentation of the six month deed restriction and the request by the Director for input by the Board to evaluate the effectiveness of the restriction and to look at possibility of amendments to the codes. After discus- sion, it was moved by Commissioner Mollica to instruct the Director to continue gathering relevant data and to present this issue in the near future. The motion was seconded by Commis- sioner Curtis and all present voted in favor. The next item on the agenda was a review of the Cote Employee Dwelling Unit request by the Director. After discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Curtis to approve the review as presented. The move was seconded by Commissioner Mollica and all present voted in favor. THe next item on the agenda was a presentation of the scheduled dates for meetings through the Holiday Season. After discussion, it was moved to approve the schedule by Commissioner Allen. The move was seconded by Commissioner Curtis and all present voted in favor. The next item for discussion was a presentation by the Director to request reimbursement of the Reserve Funds for Midland Park and Lone Pine. After discussion, it was moved by Commissioner Allen to approve the request. Commissioner Mollica seconded the motion and all present voted in favor. The last item on the agenda was an introduction of the Telluride Housing Authority by the Director. The Board met with the Telluride Board discussing policy issues. The meeting was adjourned as there was no further business to the Centennial Site. HOUSI14G AUTHORITY BOARD OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PITI:IN COU14TY: BY: Chairman, Harry Truscott ATTEST: Director, J. Lucas Adamski MEMORANDUM TO: J. Lucas Adamski, Director of Housing ✓ FROM: Tom Smith, County Attorney DATE: December 12, 1984 RE: Letter from Hans Gramiger I am in receipt of your letter dated November 19, 1984, regarding Mr. Gramiger's request to the Housing Authority for advice regard- ing his proposed employee housing in the event of construction of his restaurant on Shadow Mountain. I have also received a copy of the minutes of the Housing Authority Board dated November 15, 1984, which reflects the fact that they declined to discuss Mr. Gramiger's proposal since there is no application pending at this time and in light of the recent litigation. Please be advised that in my view there would be no problem with the Housing Authority discussing Mr. Gramiger's proposals with him, provided it is clearly understood by Mr. Gramiger and the Housing Authority that such advice is merely given in the spirit of cooperation and is not intended to bind the County in any way. This means that the County should make it clear that it is not to be bound by any discussions to a determination that Mr. Gramiger has a right to construct the restaurant, or that any particular requirements will apply. The reason for this advice is that the Land Use Code provides that there should be a pre - application process, in order to provide adequate information to prospective applicants of the procedures and requirements of the County under our sophisticated land use code. It is for this reason that discussions with Mr. Gramiger would not be inappro- priate. I would not expect the Housing Authority to put aside important business requiring official action in order to deal with Mr. Gramiger's requests. However, as I have indicated in this memorandum, it would not be inappropriate to discuss his request in an informal manner at a reasonable time and taking into account the demands upon the Housing Authority. I have not sent a copy of this memorandum to Mr. Gramiger in the expectation that you will communicate further with him at a time and in a manner that you deem appropriate. TFS:cd r TEL. 925-7267 (AREA CODE 303) SITE OF PROPOSED RESTAURANT & NIGHT CLUB "ON THE ROCKS" HAINTO OF ASPEN REALTY "'AiL TY BOX 67 ASPEN. COLORADO. U.S.A. 81611 HANS R. GRAMIGER. LICENSED BROKER Selling & Buying November 7, 1984 Agent for: -Homes Budding Sites Businesses Mr. James S. Lucas Adamski Motel. Director of Aspen/Pitkin Housing Office Ranches 0100 Lone Pine Road A s p e n•_, CO 81611 Speculative Land Values - Dear Luke ' Re: Employee Housing project for "On -the -Rocks" restaurant Loans i, atop Shadow Mountain. I. I am enclosing herewith a xerox copy of my July 8, 1982, Property Development letter addressed to your predecessor. Conwhent Ever since my earliest planning of this project in 1961 did I incorporate provisions to house on the site all personnel ' Appraisals and staff necessary for the successful operation of this i supper club and restaurant. Proper" Since my letter to Jim Hamilton I have added two more employees Management to staff the planned children's nursery for the use by patrons and "single -parents" employees. The total therefore now stands :y Tradelntermediary at 46 persons. {� It is my top priority to house my employees on the site, south l of Hopkins Avenue (between 6th and 7th Streets), because this Build,ng Contracting will allow them to come home from skiing and summer outdoor activities, clean up and shower and walk over to the tramway or funicular and report for work without the additional hassle Feasibility Studies to commute between residence and job. I wonder how you would feel about my employee housing plans l Correspondents t; and whether or not the Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority would 1 li All P In Arincpa f conceptually support the idea of on housing. May be this U. S. Cams, Resorts could be discussed at the next meeting of the Authority. You and in Foreign Countries could just simply bring it up or I would be available to be present if so desired. rely, EspaFiol DeutschHRG:sens ;Sinc R.Gr iger copy to: Messrs. Truscott, Bal Curtis, Allen and Mollica. .y . 11 _ M E M O R A N D U tI TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROPI HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PITKIN COUNTY DATE: DECE1,1BER 21, 1954 SUBJECT: LEASE AGREEMENT WITH CENTENNIAL TENANTS CENTENNIAL -ASPEN AND BOCC Pursuant to your instructions, the Housing Authority Board has reviewed and has approved the attached lease agreement, which facilitates tenants moving into units at Centennial prior to closing. The Housing Authority Board and staff working in conjunction with Tom Smith, Sandy Stuller, and Joe Edwards have included the following changes and additions to the agreement: 1) The inclusion of an indemnification clause which holds the County harmless by the Tenants ref. para. 25. 2) Warranties provided by manufacturers for appliances, heating units, lighting and wiring, etc. ref. para. 7. 3) Tenant shall obtain and keep in effect during the term hereof a renter's liability, theft and fire or other casualty policy ref. para. 25. We have included the above amendments for the protection of the tenants interest. Further, this agreement should in no way be construed to represent the Housing Authority's approval of the Rental Agreement which will be used for the rental portion of the Centennial Project. That document is being developed and will be submitted for your review and approval. In assisting the tenants move into Centennial prior to the issuance of C.O's we are not establishing a precedence with the Centennial Project but following a procedure which has been used on other employee housing projects such as Hunter Creek. HARRY TRUSCOTT, CHAIRMAN LEASE AGREEMENT THIS LEASE AGREEMENT is made , 19_, by and between limited partnership ("Landlord"), and _ this day of Centennial -Aspen, a ("Tenant") and the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado (the "County"). RECITALS 1. Landlord is the owner of the Centennial PMH Housing Project which will be platted as the Centennial Condominium, Pitkin County, Colorado. 2. Tenant has entered into a contract to purchase from the Landlord a Centennial Condominium unit being the Premises hereinafter described, a copy of which contract is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3. Certain qualification, financing or governmental requirements still remain to be satisfied prior to the closing of the sale to Tenant. 4. Tenant desires to occupy the Premises hereinafter described prior to the closing of such sale and prior to the completion of such requirements and certain public improvements in the project including roads, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, stairs, drainage, landscaping, trails and lighting and prior to final arrangements between Landlord and the County to secure completion of such public improvements. IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED BY THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS: 1. Lease of Premises. Landlord hereby leases "to Tenant Unit No. in the Centennial Condominium, Pitkin County, Colorado, the plat for which is not yet of record ("the Premises"), containing approximately square feet of interior residential space, for a term commencing on the day of 19 and unless earlier terminated as provided herein, expiring on the 30th day of June, 1985, subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease. This Lease term shall automatically terminate as of the date of proposed closing of the sale of such unit to Tenant after Landlord has given Tenant written notice that all contingencies and requirements now preventing the closing of the sale of the premises to Tenant as set forth in Exhibit A have been met and that the Landlord is ready to close such sale at a time, place and date specified in such notice. 2. Rent. a. Tenant shall pay to Landlord as rent for the Premises equal monthly installments of dollars ($ ) (the "Monthly Rent") , in advance, on the first day of each calendar month during the Lease term. The Monthly Rent shall be prorated based on a thirty -day month for any fraction of 'a month if the term shall begin on any day except the first day of the month or shall be terminated on any day except the last day of the month. b. If possible, rental payments shall be made in the form of a personal check or money order. If payments are made in cash, it is the sole responsibility of Tenant to obtain and retain a receipt as proof of payment. Tenant shall be credited with payment on the day rent is received at Landlord's office in Aspen, Colorado, or such other address as may be designated in writing by Landlord. If Tenant makes any payment to Landlord by a check which is later dishonored for any reason, Landlord may, in addition to the other remedies available to it hereunder, require that future rental payments be paid in cash or certified funds. 3. Rental Credits Toward Purchase. In the event of a closing of the sale as set forth .in the contract attached as Exhibit A, then one-half of all rental payments made by Tenant hereunder shall be applied as a credit to Tenant towards the down payments and closing costs payable by Tenant at the closing of such sale, provided however, Tenant shall not be entitled to any interest on such payments made prior to such closing. 4. Security Deposit and Purchase Credit. a. Tenant has previously paid to Transamerica Title Insurance company in escrow the sum of dollars ($ ) as an earnest money deposit toward the purchase of the premises in accordance with the contract attached hereto as Exhibit A. Tenant, by execution hereof, does hereby release from such escrow and assign to Landlord such earnest money deposit as security for the faithful performance of the terms, conditions and obligations hereof. Tenant authorizes Transamerica Title Company to deliver such sum to Landlord and releases and holds Transamerica Title Company harmless from any claims of Tenant therefor. This security deposit may be commingled by Landlord with other funds to the extent allowed by law and shall not be construed as being held in trust for Tenant nor shall Tenant be entitled to interest thereon. b. Upon the closing of the sale of the premises as set forth in the contract attached as Exhibit A, Tenant - 2 - shall be entitled to a credit against the earnest money requirement of such contract of the sum delivered as a security deposit pursuant to the terms of this paragraph. Upon the expiration or sooner termination of this Lease without such closing, Landlord may apply the deposit paid pursuant to subparagraph a. of this paragraph 4 toward unpaid rent, damages, cleaning or other expenses or obligations of or chargeable to Tenant hereunder, other than ordinary wear and tear. In the event that such cause exists for retaining any portion of the security deposit, the Landlord shall, not later than sixty (60) days after the expiration or sooner termination of this Lease provide the Tenant with a written statement listing the exact reasons for the retention of any portion of the security deposit, accompanied by payment of the unused portion of this deposit. This security deposit shall not be construed as liquidated damages and shall not impair or alter remedies otherwise available to Landlord hereunder, or at law or in equity, including the right to proceed against the Tenant for rent, damages, or expenses not adequately covered by the security deposit. 5. Possession. This Lease is conditioned upon Landlord being able to. secure a certificate of occupancy of the Premises from Pitkin County, by the commencement date hereof. If Landlord is unable to deliver possession of the Premises to Tenant at the commencement date for any reason, Tenant's right of possession shall be postponed, without any liability on the part of Landlord to Tenant for any such postponement, until the Premises shall be in suitable physical condition for occupancy, or until Landlord is able legally to deliver possession. 6. Use of Premises. a. The Premises -shall be used by Tenant -for residential purposes only and shall be occupied only by Tenant and Tenant's immediate family consisting of -the- following persons: At any one time, Tenant shall have no more than two persons multiplied by the number of bedrooms on the Premises as overnight guests. occupancy by any guest shall be limited to seven (7) consecutive days or a total of fourteen (14) days during the term hereof unless the Landlord otherwise consents in writing. - 3 - b. Tenant shall not occupy or use, or permit to be occupied or used, any portion of the Premises for any purpose that is unlawful in part or in whole under the laws of Pitkin County or the State of Colorado, or deemed to be hazardous, or do or permit anything to be done that will in any way increase the rate of insurance on the Premises, and in the event that, by reason of acts of Tenant, there shall be an increase in rate of the insurance of the Premises created by Tenant's acts, Tenant hereby agrees to pay such increase and to remedy such condition upon five (5) days' written demand by Landlord. 7. Condition of Premises. For the purposes of this Lease Agreement but not with respect to the .contract attached as Exhibit A, Tenant accepts the Premises in their present condition and state of repair without any warranties or representations by Landlord except the benefit of warranties provided by manufacturers for appliances, heating units, lighting and wiring, etc. Tenant shall, at his/her cost and expense, take good care of the Premises, including interior walls, fixtures, windows, appliances and furniture and shall at the expiration or sooner termination hereof and in the event Tenant fails to complete Tenant's purchase of the Premises, deliver the same to Landlord in their present condition and state of repair, ordinary wear and tear excepted. Tenant shall be responsible for any damage to the Premises, the Centennial Condominium, or any portion thereof, caused by the acts or omissions of Tenant or Tenant's family, agents or guests. In the event of such damage, Tenant shall give immediate notice thereof to Landlord. Landlord may, at its sole option, require Tenant to repair said damage at Tenant's own cost and expense, or Landlord may repair such damage and charge the expense thereof to Tenant as additional rent hereunder. 8. Utilities. Tenant shall be responsible for contracting for electricity and telephone services at Tenant's own expense. Tenant shall contract with Landlord for the provisions of water and sewer services to Tenant's Premises. Landlord shall provide water to Tenant pursuant to a water agreement with the City of Aspen. Landlord shall provide sewer services to Tenant pursuant to a waste water agreement with the Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District. Landlord shall charge Tenant and Tenant shall pay those water and sewer charges which are equal to the charges with respect to the premises for which the City of Aspen and Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District have billed Landlord. Tenant shall pay for water and sewer services on a monthly basis at the time that the Monthly Rent shall be due. Landlord shall be entitled to bill Tenant for estimated water and sewer charges should the City of Aspen and/or the Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District bill Landlord less than once per month for such services. Tenant agrees to pay Landlord a nominal service charge for water meter reading on M.= a monthly basis. Tenant is prohibited from removing, altering or replacing any of the water saving fixtures on the Premises. Tenant is prohibited from any unreasonable or excessive water usage. Landlord shall have the right to assess Tenant on a.monthly basis and Tenant agrees to pay a surcharge for water usage in respect of the Premises which exceed by more than ten percent in any one month the City of Aspen's published average residential domestic water usage of 3,900 gallons per person per month. Should a surcharge .be necessary, it shall be equal to $.01, multiplied by the number of gallons of water actually used for the month of issue, in excess of $4,200 gallons per person. Any surcharge for excess water usage as well as the monthly charge for water and sewer services and any water meter reading fee shall be considered as rent to be added to the Monthly Rent and made a part of and in addition to the minimum rent. Failure to pay any amount under this paragraph 8 in a timely fashion, shall permit Landlord to add a late charge to such payment under paragraph 12. 9. Entry and Inspection. Landlord or it officers, agents and representatives may at reasonable times and upon reasonable notice enter into the Premises for purposes of inspection and repair. This right of entry and inspection shall not be construed to create any obligation upon Landlord for the maintenance of the Premises. 10. Assignment and Subletting. Tenant shall not assign this Lease or sublease, mortgage, pledge or otherwise hypothecate the Premises without the prior written consent of Landlord, which consent may be withheld or granted in Landlord's sole and unqualified discretion. Tenant shall not receive rent or any other payment of any kind or nature whatsoever from guests or other persons using the Premises. This restriction shall apply ---to any transaction which gives, or is intended to give, any -person or entity .other .than Tenant any right to use or possess the Premises. 11. Alterations. Tenant shall not make any alterations, additions, improvements, or repairs to the Premises (other than ordinary maintenance) without the prior written consent of the Landlord. Any and all such alterations, additions, or improvements, when made to the Premises, shall at once belong to and become the property of the Landlord and shall be surrendered to the Landlord upon the expiration or termination of this Lease. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Landlord may require Tenant to remove all or any part of such alterations, additions or improvements at the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease at Tenant's own cost and expense and to restore the Premises to the same condition existing at the commencement hereof, ordinary wear and tear excepted. Any alterations, improvements or repairs shall be made in a satisfactory and workmanlike manner. Tenant shall not - 5 - permit any lien or other encumbrance to be filed against the Premises in connection therewith and shall indemnify Landlord against such liens and encumbrances. 12. Default and Late Charges. a. A late charge of $25.00 shall be imposed if Tenant has not paid rent by the seventh day of the month for which such payment is due. Tenant shall, in addition, be charged $25.00 for each and every notice of default served upon Tenant by Landlord in accordance with subparagraph b. of this paragraph 12. b. In the event of default by Tenant in the performance of any obligation hereunder, Landlord may deliver to Tenant notice in writing specifying such default. Tenant shall have three (3) days after the date of such notice (whether served by delivery or posting in accordance with Colo. Rev. Stat. S 13-40-108 to cure such default. In the event such default is not so cured, Landlord may terminate this Lease and pursue any remedies available at law or in equity. C. In the event of default and failure to cure as described above, or if Tenant abandons the Premises, or should Tenant be evicted, the Landlord, in addition to any other remedies available to it, may re-enter the Premises without any liability to Tenant therefor, and, as agent for the Tenant or otherwise and in Landlord's discretion may re -let the Premises. Notwithstanding such re-entry, Tenant shall remain liable for all rent or other obligations existing hereunder, including those accruing subsequent to the date of re-entry. The proceeds of any re -letting shall be applied first to the cost and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by Landlord in order to re-enter and re -let the Premises, and then. to rent liabilities, expenses, and other obligations of Tenant accrued subsequent to the date of re-entry. Tenant shall. remain liable to Landlord for all rent, liabilities, expenses and other obligations hereunder for which recovery is not made by Landlord through re -letting as provided in this paragraph. Nothing in this subparagraph shall be construed as imposing upon Landlord any obligation to re -let the premises, either for Tenant's benefit or to mitigate the Landlord's damages. d. Tenant waives all claims for damages by reason of re-entry by Landlord or by reason of any act or thing done by Landlord to cure the default of Tenant or to enforce the terms and provisions of this Lease and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Landlord against any loss incurred by reason of any such claims. The payment of rent by Tenant to Landlord after possession is restored to Landlord shall not entitle Tenant to re-enter possession of the Premises. e. The rights and remedies of Landlord provided for herein are in addition to and not an exclusion of any other remedies available to Landlord at law or in equity. 13. Attorneys' Fees. Tenant shall pay, upon demand, Landlord's costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred in order to enforce any of the provisions of this Lease or in any action or proceeding instituted by reason of Tenant's default her under. 14. Quiet Enjoyment. Subject to the terms of this Lease and provided Tenant pays the rentals herein recited and performs all of the covenants and agreements herein contained, Tenant shall have quiet enjoyment of the Premises during the term hereof. 15. Casualty. a. Tenant shall give immediate notice to the Landlord of fire or other casualty. If the Premises shall be rendered untenantable by fire or by any other cause not resulting from the fault or negligence of the Tenant or the Tenant's family, agents, or guests, the obligation to pay rent shall cease until the Premises shall be substantially repaired, whereupon the obligation to pay rent shall resume to the same extent and at the same rate as if the damage had not occurred; provided, however, that Landlord may notify Tenant that Landlord does not intend to repair the Premises, in which event this Lease shall terminate and neither party shall have any further liability to the other. However, the obligation to pay rent shall not cease nor shall any reduction in the rental payment be made during any period that Tenant continues to reside in the Premises. If fire or other casualty or damage shall be the result of the fault or negligence of the Tenant or the Tenant's family, agents, or guests, the Tenant's liability for the payment of rent and the Tenant's performance of all the covenants, conditions and terms hereof shall continue and the Tenant shall be liable to the Landlord for the damage and losts suffered by the Landlord, including all repairs andl re -building expenses. b. Landlord shall not be liable o responsible for any loss or damage to any property or pers n occasioned by theft, fire, water, rain, snow, act of God pr the public enemy, injunction, riot, strike, insurrection, war, court or other governmental order or other matter beyond the control of Landlord or for any damage or inconvenien e which may arise through repair or alteration of any part of the building or failure to make such repairs or fr m any cause, i whatever, unless caused solely by Landlord's willful act or gross negligence. 16. Condemnation. In the event that the Premises are taken by any authority exercising the power of eminent "domain, this Lease shall terminate as of the date possession shall be taken by the condemnor. Tenant waives all claims against Landlord or any condemning authority by reason of the complete or partial taking of the Premises, or the remainder of the Centennial Condominiums, and shall not be entitled to receive any part of any award that Landlord may receive, hereby quit claiming all interest therein to Landlord. 17. Holding Over. Upon the expiration or sooner termination of this Lease, unless Tenant has then exercised his option to purchase the Premises, Tenant shall immediately and without notice from Landlord surrender possession of the Premises to the Landlord. In the event Tenant does not so vacate the Premises, Tenant's holding over shall not be deemed a tenancy of any kind or nature whatsoever and Tenant shall be subject to eviction proceedings without further notice. For purposes of such proceedings, Tenant shall pay the rental of the Premises for the period of such holding over. Payments made by Tenant to Landlord during such holdover shall be credited against Tenant's obligation to pay the rent of the Premises, but shall not create any rights in Tenant, of any kind or nature whatsoever, and Tenant shall remain subject to eviction without further notice. Landlord may, by written notice, specify rent and other terms by which Tenant may remain on the Premises, in which case the tenancy so created shall be a tenancy at will unless otherwise stated in such notice. Tenant's occupancy shall be on the terms specified in the notice, plus such terms and conditions of this Lease that do not conflict with such notice, but there shall be no renewal of this Lease by operation of law. 18. Storage Areas. Tenant acknowledges that Tenant's rental of the Premises does not include any right to or possession of areas on the Centennial Condominiums for storage other than as are specifically assigned to the Premises. Landlord may from time to time allow Tenant to store items in other areas of the Centennial Condominiums subject to terms and conditions to be imposed by Landlord. Any items stored without the consent of the Landlord may be removed and disposed of as Landlord sees fit and without any obligation whatsoever to Tenant. 19. Automobiles. Tenants may not at any time use or occupy more than one (1) parking space per -bedroom at the Centennial Condominium parking areas. Tenant shall supply Landlord with license numbers of automobiles that may occupy such parking space(s) at any given time, including automobiles of Tenant's overnight guests. Any automobile not so registered with the Landlord may be towed by Landlord at Tenant's or the owner's expense. 20. Tenant's Property Remaining on Premises. In the event the term of this Lease expires or is otherwise terminated, or the Premises are abandoned by the Tenant during the term hereof, -or the Tenant is in default hereunder, and the Landlord enters into possession of the Premises and there is within the Premises furniture, furnishings, fixtures or other personal property, Landlord shall have the right and option without liability to Tenant or others who may claim any interest in such property (1) to store such property in a warehouse or other storage space provided by Landlord or others at the reasonable storage expense of Tenant, or (2) to cause such property to be sold a public or private sale with or without notice to Tenant, at which sale Landlord may be purchaser, and to apply the proceeds of such sale .first to the reasonable incurred expenses of collection or sale and thereafter on any indebtedness due by Tenant to Landlord, with any excess over the amounts required for such purposes payable to Tenant, or (3) in the discretion of Landlord should such property be deemed by it in its sole discretion to be of small value, said property may be discarded or destroyed. Tenant waives all claims for damages to the property or for loss of use of the property or for any other reasons whatsoever against Landlord for or arising out of any exercise of the Landlord's rights to deal with such property and shall indemnify Landlord against all claims with respect thereto by Tenant or others. 21. Lien. To secure the performance of Tenant's obligations, Landlord shall have a lien on all personal property of Tenant, and all property, furniture, fixtures and equipment situated in the Premises. 22. Reimbursement. If Tenant shall fail to perform any obligation of this Lease, the Landlord may, if the Landlord so elects, perform such obligations and charge the expense thereof to Tenant as additional rent hereunder. 23. Severable. If any provision of this Lease shall be declared invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of the Lease shall continue in full force and effect. 24. Subordination. This Lease is and shall remain subject and subordinate to all mortgages or deeds of trust now or hereafter affecting the Premises or the building in which the Premises are located. Although the subordination provisions of this section shall be deemed automatic, Tenant shall within five (5) days after demand execute any and all instruments requested by Landlord to evidence any subordination. Should Tenant fail to do so, Tenant hereby irrevocably appoints Landlord as Tenant's attorney -in -fact to execute those instruments for and on behalf of Tenant. 25. Indemnification. Tenant shall indemnify and hold Landlord and the County harmless from all claims, liabilities and demands of any kind or nature whatsoever and from any person arising in connection with Tenant's use and occupancy of the Premises or Landlord's exercise of its rights hereunder. Tenant shall obtain and keep in effect during the term hereof a renter's liability, theft and fire or other casualty policy. Tenant shall reimburse Landlord and the County for all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by Landlord or the County by virtue of any such claims, demands or liability. Neither Landlord nor the County shall be liable to Tenant or Tenant's family, agents, parties claiming rights from or under Tenant, or guests for any damage or injury to persons or property due to any condition, design or defect that may now exist or hereafter occur in the Premises and the County shall not be liable for any condition or defect in the common or public areas or access ways surrounding the building in which the Premises is located; provided, however, this does not effect or release Landlord's obligation to complete the Premises and the surrounding project in accordance with the provisions of the contract attached as Exhibit A, and in accordance with the Detailed Submission Approval Resolution and Improvements Agreement with the County or amendments and addendums thereto. 26. Waiver. Failure of Landlord to declare any default immediately upon occurrence thereof and any delay in taking any action in connection therewith shall not waive such default, but Landlord shall have the right to declare any such default at any time. 27. Rules and Regulations —Part of Lease. The rules and regulations attached hereto as Exhibit B are hereby made a part of and incorporated into this Lease and Tenant shall", observe the same. Failure to keep and observe said rules will constitute a material breach of the terms of this Lease in the same manner as if contained herein as covenants, and a failure to observe the same shall be of the same effect. Tenant shall keep and observe such further rules and regulations as may be required by Landlord or his agent from time to time which Landlord may deem necessary for the proper and orderly care of the Centennial Condominiums of which the Premises are a part. 28. Miscellaneous. . This Lease may not be modified except in writing signed by the parties. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. This Lease shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado; jurisdiction for any disputes hereunder shall be in the - 10 - Courts in and for the County of Pitkin and State of Colorado. 29. Additional Terms and Conditions. DATED this - day of , 19_ TENANT(S): LANDLORD: CENTENNIAL -ASPEN, a limited partnership By the President of World Class Housing, Inc., general partner of Centennial -Aspen, a limited partnership BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: Bob Childs, Vice -Chairman MYLER, STULLER & SCHWA ATTORNEYS AT LAW DAVID J. MYLER SANDRA M.STULLER ALAN E. SCHWARTZ December 26, 1984 HAND DELIVERED Jim Adamski, Director Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority 0100 Lone Pine Road Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Centennial Resale Agreement Dear Jim: 450 S. GALENA, SUITE 202 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 920-1018 Mark Boscoe called with his requested changes to the Agree- ment. Two of them I could accommodate; the rest, I believe, require consideration by the Board. I have made the following changes: 1. Paragraph 8 subsection (a). As previously written, it did not require the Authority to attempt to lease the Unit. I think the Board anticipated th Authority would at least make a good faith effort to do so. 2. Paragraph 11. The introductory sentence was reworded to make more sense. Here are the changes Mark requested that, I believe, should be addressed by the Board: 1. Paragraph 1. Mark feels that retention of the full 1% of the purchase price in the event an owner rejects all bids (e.g. all bids are absurdly low) is onerous. He suggests a refund of all except an amount reflecting the cost to the Authority of offering the Unit for sale. 2. Paragraph 3(a)(2). Mark continues to insist that the formula as written results in appreciation equal to multiples of the purchase price. At a minimum (he says) it requires insertion of parentheses. Please have Ann call me so we can go through an example. 3. Finally, Mark would like language to the effect that if the Authority, its successors or assigns fails to MYLER, STULL CHWARTZ Jim Adamski December 26, 1984 Page 2 function as such, the agreement will be null and void and of no further effect. Please advise as to how the Authority would like to proceed with the above requests. Very truly yours, MYLER, STULLER & SCHWARTZ By: L�'yI2� P 5randy'a M.-Stu 1ler SMS:klm CENTENNIAL TENNIAL CONDOMINIUM OCCUPANCY AND RESALE DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into effective 198 , by and between of the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado (hereinafter referred to as Owner) and the HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO (hereinafter referred to as Authority); WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owner has purchased a Condominium Unit No. , of the Centennial Condominium according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book , Page , of the records of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder (hereinafter referred to as Unit), and, WHEREAS, it is acknowledged by the Owner that the Unit is subject to the control of the Authority for the purposes of addressing the moderate and middle income housing needs of the area and that the parties hereby wish to insure that on resale, the Unit is again made available to satisfy the need for moderate and middle income housing within Pitkin County, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties hereto, and other good and valuable consideration, it is agreed and understood as follows: 1. In the event that the Owner shall desire to sell the Unit or any interest therein, which is described above, the Owner shall notify the Authority, in writing, of his intention to do so and deposit with the Authority an amount equal to one (1%) percent of the estimated value of the Unit. The Authority shall immediately advertise the Unit for sale by competitive bid submitted by qualified purchasers (as hereinafter defined). Except as provided in paragraph 8 hereof, the Owner may accept the highest bid, or in the alternative, reject all bids and retain ownership of the Unit provided that the Owner continues to occupy the Unit as the Owner's sole and exclusive place of residence. (If the owner rejects all bids the Authority shall retain the deposit until the Unit is eventually sold). If the Unit is sold, there will be an additional fee paid to the Authority of one (1%) percent. An adjustment will be made at the time of closing, so that the owner shall ultimately pay to the Authority two (2%) percent of the actual selling price. In the event of a partnership, joint tenancy or co -tenancy transfer or transfer in which one Owner buys the other owner's interest or a new partnership is created, a fee, as may be from time to time established by the Authority in its guidelines (but not in excess of 2% of the value of the interest being sold), shall be paid by the selling party. 2. Qualified purchasers are those meeting the qualifica- tions of the Authority, which qualifications shall be established annually by Resolution of the Authority, taking into consid- eration length of employment, length of residency, financial stability, net worth and maximum income and all other criteria adopted by the Authority reasonably calculated to determine eligibility for moderate and middle income housing and ability to finance the same. In no event shall any qualified purchasers submit a bid for an amount which would result in the purchaser assuming obligations in excess of any liability/income ratio established by the Authority. _ 3. In no event shall any Unit be sold for an amount in excess of the total of the following (hereinafter "maximum resale price"): (a) The owner's purchase price plus appreciation equal to (1) or (2) below WHICHEVER IS LESS: (1) An amount equal to six (6%) percent of the purchase price for each year from the date of purchase to the date of the notice of intent to sell (pro -rated at the rate of .5 (.5%) percent for each whole month from the date of purchase), or -2- (2) An amount (based upon the Consumer Price Index, All Items, U.S. City Average, Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (Revised), published by the U.S. Department if Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics) calculated as follows: Owner's purchase price x Consumer Price Index last published prior to the date of the notice of desire to sell r Consumer Price Index current at the time of purchase by Owner; plus (b) The cost of capital improvements made to the Unit, determined by cost less depreciation according to methods established in the Authority's guidelines, plus (c) The Owner's actual cost of his pro-rata share of capital improvements made to the common elements of the condominium and assessed to the Owner by the Unit Owners' Association, plus (d) The Owner's actual cost of any public improvements for which assessments were imposed by any governmental or quasi -governmental agency and which have been paid during the period of ownership. NOTHING HEREIN SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO CONSTITUTE A GUARANTY BY THE AUTHORITY THAT ON RESALE THE OWNER SHALL OBTAIN HIS MAXIMUM RESALE PRICE. RATHER, IT SHALL CONSTITUTE, ONLY, THE MAXIMUM PRICE PRICE FOR WHICH THE UNIT MAY BE SOLD BY OWNER. 4. In the event that a bid is received equal to the maximum resale price herein established, the Unit shall be sold to such bidder at said maximum price. In the event that two or more such bids equal to the maximum resale price are received, the purchaser shall be selected by lottery. Nothing herein shall -3- .11tr ...!4�""'tYt^!�J.�: :-��.y"-.. ..nwF�w i+.. r..r:•�r•i.rl ...•.p+"rT �.. .R7.^Yr"- ?•r'" -.. a r. +.fra.+vswR' be construed to prevent the owner from rejecting all bids and retaining ownership of the Unit provided the Owner continues to occupy the Unit as his sole and exclusive place of residence. 5. No owner shall permit any purchaser to assume any or all of the owner's customary closing costs nor accept any other consideration such as to increase the purchase price above the bid price or maximum sale price or so as to otherwise induce the Owner to sell to said purchaser. 6. The following transfers of interest in the Unit shall (unless designed to avoid the provisions of this Agreement) be exempt from the restrictions on transfer contained herein: (a) A transfer by operation of law of a deceased person's interest to the surviving joint tenant. (b) A transfer of an interest by will or inheritance. (c) A transfer by genuine gift without any consid- eration therefore. (d) A transfer of an interest to a trustee for the benefit of the owner of the owner's wife or issue. (e) A transfer of an interest by Treasurer's Deed pursuant to a sale for delinquent taxes or by a Sheriff's or public or private Trustee's Deed pursuant to a judgment of execution or foreclosure sale. (f) A transfer, either by foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure, to a lender holding a deed of trust on the Unit; or (g) A transfer of an interest to the Unit owner's Association of the Condominium by action to enforce the Association's lien for assessments. In the event the Unit is transferred in any manner described in paragraph 7(a) through (g), the transferee, his grantees or successors in interest, shall be bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement notwithstanding the prior exemption. -4- ��.� .. .r ,."'r`"� - --,.-.ter--�.:+., �^�. -. ... - -• - - --i -+� . ..�-. �,---r-+;�-- - 7. In th event that any Unit suuject to these re- strictions is sold and conveyed without compliance herewith, such sale shall be wholly null and void and shall confer no title whatsoever upon the intended purchaser provided, however, that the Owner is entitled to rely on the determination of the Author- ity as to the qualifications of a potential purchaser and any sale or conveyance made in reliance thereon shall be valid. Each and every conveyance of the Unit shall conclusively be deemed to include and incorporate by this reference, even without reference hereto, the covenants herein contained. 8. The Owner agrees that, in the event that he changes his domicile or ceases to utilize the Unit as his sole and exclusive place of residence, he will offer the Unit for sale pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The Owner shall be deemed to have changed his domicile by accepting permanent employment outside of Pitkin County, or residing in the Unit for fewer than nine (9) months out of any twelve (12) months. IN THE EVENT THE OWNER IS REQUIRED TO SELL THE UNIT PURSUANT TO THIS PARAGRAPH EIGHT, OWNER AGREES TO ACCEPT THE HIGHEST BID (in excess of the purchase price) AND SELL THE UNIT EVEN IF SAID BID SHALL BE LESS THAN THE MAXIMUM RESALE PRICE PROVIDED FOR IN PARAGRAPH 3(a) through (d). In the event no bids are received equal to the Owner's purchase price the Authority shall continue to offer the Unit for sale until an offer is received equal to or greater than said purchase price, and during this period (a) the Authority shall make a good faith attempt to rent the Unit for a rental equal to the rental formula described in Paragraph 11, and (b) no appreciation [as described inparagraphs 3(a)(1) and (2)] shall accure. 9. In the event that the Housing Authority believes the Owner is violating the provisions of this Agreement, the Authority by its authorized representative, may inspect the Unit between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, after providing the Owner with 24 hour advance, written notice. -5- 10. Any ..o.._ce which is required _o be given hereunder shall be given by mailing the same, certified mail, to any address provided herein or given as the current mailing address of the party. 11. In the event the Unit continues to be the Owner's sole and exclusive place of residence as defined in Paragraph 8, but the Owner desires to lease the Unit from time to time, he may undertake to do so at a rental not to exceed the Owner's monthly expenses for the costs of principal and interest payments, taxes, property insurance, condominium assessments, utilities, plus an additional Twenty ($20.00) Dollars and a reasonable (refundable) security deposit, to any person or persons approved by the Authority as meeting the qualifications for occupancy of the Unit. Nothing herein shall be construed to require the Authority to indemnify the owner against any losses attributable to the rental including (not by way of limitation) non-payment of rent or damage to the premises; nor to require the Authority to obtain a qualified tenant for the Owner in the event none is found by the Owner 12. In the event a co-owner who does not meet the ownership qualifications of the Authority shall have been permitted to acquire an ownership interest in the Unit solely for the purpose of obtaining financing, said co-owner agrees that (a) he shall not occupy the Unit or acquire sole ownership of the same unless or until qualified by the Authority and (b) he will join in any sale of the Unit whether the same be a voluntary or involuntary (pursuant to Paragraph 8) sale of the Unit and execute any and all documents necessary to do so. 13. The provisions of this Agreement shall be covenants running with the land, be binding upon the owner and the Authority, his or its heirs, successors, and assigns (and be enforceable by any of them) and shall run for the period of the life of the survivor of the present Board of commissioners of the IM: Authority plus _wenty-one (21) years. If the Owner sells, transfers, or otherwise relinquishes his ownership interest in the Unit, he shall be relieved of his obligations under this Agreement with respect to such Unit and these obligations shall be imposed on the person to whom title to the Unit is transferred. 14. The term Owner as used herein shall refer to any and all persons (without regard to number or gender) or entities having an ownership interest in the Unit which is the subject of this Agreement. 15. There is hereby reserved to the parties hereto any and all remedies provided by law or in equity, in the event of a breach of any of the terms of this Agreement. 16. The Owner acknowledges that he has read and fully understands and accepts the terms and conditions of this Agreement limiting the rental and resale of the Unit and further acknowledges that he is relying upon no oral representations qualifying or limiting the terms hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument on the day and year above first written. Owner Owner (Mailing Address) -7- 1.�..�..A.r.�...�w-+.A`.w tee!► Ti'T.".:TT�'�'�'°7tMT �. '�'T�'-^vT.. ..�. i y. ���...<VF .. � �..t �— a-�.r. .%- i r _ y!Y STATE OF COLORAD.- ) ) ss. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 198 , by Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public Address: ACCEPTANCE BY HOUSING AUTHORITY The foregoing grant and its terms are accepted by the City of Aspen and Pitkin County Housing Authority. THE ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY By: STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) (Title) (Mailing Address) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 198 , by Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public Address: -8- MEMORANIDUM TO: HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PITKIN COUNTY FROM: J. LUCAS ADAIISKI, DIRECTOR DATE: DECEIIBER 28, 1984 SUBJECT: SENIOR CITIZENS GUIDELIIIES Attached you will find a draft of the "Senior Citizen Guide- lines". It is to be understood that this is a working document and can be revised. The Housing Authority Staff is working closely with Farley Sheldon and Gary Esary to develop a definition of independent living. Gary is researching legal ramifications and seeks the Housing Authority Board's input. As a starting point, I would suggest the following definition: A condition to admission and occupancy is that the Tenant must possess the ability to live independently, i.e., the ability, either in conjunction with available supportive services or otherwise, to maintain both their person and apartment in a manner which is not detrimental to either the TENANT's safety or personal well-being or to the safety and well-being of other tenants. Inability of such a TENAIlT to live independently, whether due to reasons of poor health, physical disability, unavailability of required services or rejection of those available, or for other reasons, shall be deemed non -acceptance for admission and occupancy. The Council on Aging subcommittee as defined in the Housing Authority Resolution 84-2 shall "assist in the screening of applicants for senior housing". The applicant shall provide the following: 1. Personal interviews with the applicant 2. Home Visits 3. Interviews with previous landlords 4. Employers 5. Family social workers 6. Clinics mental health record 7. Physicians statement 8. Police Department records This will be done in order to determine whether the individual attributes, prior conduct, and behavior of a particular applicant is likely to interfere with other tenants in such a manner as to diminish their enjoyment of the premises by adversely affecting their health, safety or welfare or by adversely affecting the physical environment or the financial stability of the Author- ity's Senior Citizen Housing Program. Eligibility for continued occupancy shall be determined once each year in accordance with established re-examination schedule as outlined in the Senior Citizen Guidelines. I would suggest that a definition be included in the Senior Citizen Guidelines in the Definition Section Part 2, 4(b) page 10 and in the dwelling lease - Section 3. These guidelines were put together in July 1984 and submitted for your review in August 1984. They have been submitted to the Senior Coordinator and others for review. To date, we have had no response. I feel that the Housing Authority should pursue the establishment of Senior Housing Admission and Occupancy Guidelines as one of it's top priorities in conjunction with the development of senior housing in 1985. 2 SENIOR CITIZENS GUIDELINES FOR HOUSING OF THE MUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PITI:IN COUNTY AUGUST 1984 1 f . • WEI 0 03 • f Page Definitions.. .... ..................................... .3 Eligibility Requirements ..............................a Profile Requirements . .. .............................8 Income Limits for Admission ...........................8 Asset Limits for Admission ............................8 Other Qualifications.... .............................9 Eligibility for Continued occupancy ...................10 Tenant Selection and Assignment Policies...................11 Schedule of Rents..........................................13 Additional Charges......... ... .........................14 Re-examination of Tenant Eligibility and Rental Adjustments................................15 Verification of Applicant's Statement and Income ........... 17 Occupancy Standards........................................18 Leasing............................................19 APPENDICES AND EXHIBITS Appendix A: Income Limits ............................A-1 Appendix B: Asset Limits.............................B-1 Appendix C: Table of Gross Rents.....................C-1 Appendix D: Rental Deposit .....:....................D-1 Exhibit A: Dwelling Lease...:.. .................... A 2 PART I DEFINITIONS A. Assets: The value of equity in real property, savings, stocks, bonds, and other forms of capital investment. The value of personal property such as furniture and automobiles shall be excluded. The cash surrender value of insurance policies shall be included. Unpaid bills for food and medical expense (but not for education or personal property or other expenses) may be deducted from assets for purposes of determining eligibility. B. Contract Rent: The rent charged a tenant for use of the dwelling accommodation and equipment (such as range and refrigerators), but not including furniture, services, and reasonable amounts of utilities determined in accordance with the Authority's schedule of allowances for utility supplied by the project. Contract rent does not include charges for utility consumption in excess of the Authority's schedule or other miscellaneous charges. C. Disabled Person: Disabled person means a person who is under a disability as defined in Section 223 of the Social Security Act or in section 102(5) of the Developmental Disabilities Services and Facilities Construction Amendments of 1970 or is handicapped as defined in this section. Section 223 of the Social Security Act defines disability as: 1. Inability to engage in any -substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months; or 2. In the case of an individual who has attained the age of 55 and is blind (within the meaning of "blindness" defined in Section 416(i) (1) of this title,) inability by reason of such blindness to engage in substantial gainful activity requiring skills or abilities comparable to those of any gainful activity in which he has previously engaged with some regularity and over a substantial period of time. 3 Section 102(5) of the Developmental Disabilities Services and Facilities Construction Amendments of 1970 defines disability as: *** a dissability attributable to mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, or another neurological condition of an individual found by the Secretary of Health, Education and welfare to be closely related to mental retardation or to require treatment similar to that required for mentally retarded individual s,which disability originates before such individual attains age eighteen, which has continued or can be expected to continue indefinitely, and which constitutes a substantial handicap to such individual. D. Family: A family whose head or spouse or whose sole member is at least sixty years of age, or disabled or handicapped as defined in this section, and may include two or more elderly, disabled or handicapped persons living together, or one or more such persons living with another person who is determined to be essential to his or her care and well being. E. Family Income: Family income means total family income less the following: 1. A deduction of 10 o percent of the total family income. 2. A deduction for extraordinary medical expenses, defined for this purpose to mean medical expenses in excess of three percent of total family income, where not compensated for or covered by insurance. 3. A deduction of amounts paid by the family for the care of children or sick or incapacitated family members when determined to be necessary to employment of the head or spouse, except that the amount deducted shall not exceed the amount of income received by the family member thus released. 4. An exemption of the first $300 of the income of a secondary wage-earner who is the spouse of the head of the household. 5. An exemption of $300 for each member of the family rM residing in the household (other than the head or spouse) who is under eighteen years of age or old and disabled, handicapped, or a full-time student. 6. An amount equal to the sums received by the head of the household or his spouse from, or under the direction of, any public or private nonprofit child -placing agency for the care and maintenance of one or more persons who are under eighteen years of age and were placed in the household by such agency. No person in the family shall be entitled to more than one exemption. G. Full -Time Student: n•eans a person who is carrying a subject load which is considered full-time for day students under the standards and practice of the educa- tional institution attended. H. Gross Income: Means total family income as defined in this section. I. Gross Rent: Gross Rent means the Contract Rent plus the appropriate Schedule of Utility Allowance given to the tenant for utilities purchased separately by the tenant and not included in the Contract Rent. J. Handicapped Person: A person shall be considered handicapped if such person is determined to have a physical impairment which; (1) is expected to be of long -continued and indefinite duration; (2) is of such nature that his ability to live independently could be improved by more suitable housing conditions. K. Head of the Household: -That member of the family who is held responsible and accountable for the family. L. Minor: Any member of the household under 18 years of age excluding the head of household or spouse. M. Rent: The term rent, as used herein, unless otherwise specified, shall mean the Gross Rent. N. Serviceman: A person who is part of the family and who is in the military forces of the United States at the time of application for housing. O. Spouse: The husband or wife of the head of the household. 5 p. Temporary, Nonrecurring or Sporadic Income: Temporary nonrecurring or sporadic income includes the following income: 1. Casual, sporadic, and irregular gifts and amounts which are specifically received for, or are a reimbursement of, the cost of illness or medical care. 2. Lump -sum additions to family assets, such as, but not necessarily limited to, inheritances, insurance payments, including payments under health and accident insurance and workmen's compensation, capital gains, and settlements for personal or property losses. 3. The value of the coupon allotments for the purchase of food in excess of the amount actually charged an eligible household pursuant to the Food Stamp Act of 1964. Q. Total Family Income: Total family income means income from all sources of (1) the head of the household and spouse, and (2) each additional member of the family residing in the household who is at least eighteen years of age, anticipated to be received during the twelve months following admission or re-examination of family income, exclusive of the income which is temporary, non -recurring or sporadic. Total family income shall include that portion of the income of the head of the household or spouse temporarily absent which, in the determinate -an of the HA is (or should be) available to meet the family's needs. Total family income includes, but is not limited to the following: 1. The full amount, before any payroll deduction, of wages and salaries, including compensation for overtime and other compensation for personal services (such as commissions, fees, tips, and bonuses). 2. Net income from operation of a business or profession (expenditures for business expansion or amortization of capital indebtedness shall not be deducted to determine net income from a business). 3. Interest, dividends, and net income of any kind from real or personal property. 4. The full amount received from annuities, periodic payments from insurance policies, retirement income, pensions, periodic benefits for disability or death, and other similar types of periodic receipts. 5. Payments in lieu of earnings, such as unemployment and disability compensation, social security benefits, workmen's compensation, dismissal wages. 6. Welfare Assistance payments. 7. Periodic and determinable allowances, such as alimony and regular contributions or gifts, including amounts received from any person not residing in the dwelling. 8. All regular pay, special payments and allowances (such as longevity, overseas duty, rental allowances, allowances for dependents, etc.), received by a member of the Armed Forces. 9. Payments to the head of the household for support of a minor, or payments nominally to a minor for his support but controlled for his benefit by the head of the household or a resident family member other than the head, who is responsible for his support. R. Utilities: Deans water, electricity, gas, other heating, refrigeration, and cooking fuels, trash collection and sewerage services. --- S. Veteran: The term "Veteran" means any person honorable discharged from the Armed Forces of the United States who served in World War I between April 6, 1917 and November 11, 1918, both dates inclusive, or in World War II on or after December 7, 1941, until final cessation of all hostilities or in the Korean Conflict, Lebanon Crisis, Berlin Crisis, Quemoy and Matsu, Taiwan Straits, Cuban Crisis, the Congo, the Dominican Republic and Vietnam. "Veteran" does not include a person enlisted and accepted for active training only for a period of six months or less. 7 PP1? T I I ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS 1. Profile Requirements To be eligible for admission an applicant must qualify as a family. A family consists of: A. Two or more persons who have a family -type relationship or or B. A single person who is 1. eligible, by age, to receive an old age benefit under Title II of the Social Security Act, or 2. handicapped within the meaning of either Section 223 of the Social Security Act of Section 102 (5) of the Developmental Disabilities Services and Facilities Construction Amendments of 1970 or C. Be a resident of Pitkin County 2. Income Limits for Admission To be financially eligible the applicant family must provide adequate evidence that the family (after deductions and exemptions) for the twelve month period following -occupancy is not anticipated to exceed the Income Limits for Admission (See Appendix A) 3. Asset Limits for Admission Asse s shall not exceed the limits established in Appendix B unless such assets together with the income of the family are insufficient for the applicant to obtain and maintain standard housing on the private market. Any applicant who has assigned, conveyed, transferred, or otherwise disposed of property within the past two years without fair consideration in order to meet the asset limitation shall be deemed. 4. Other Qualifications In determining eligibility, the following factors shall also apply: A. Whether the conduct of the applicant in present or prior housing has been such that admission to the program would adversely affect the health, safety, or welfare of other residents or the physical environment, , or the financial stability of the project. A record of any of the following may be sufficient cause for the Authority to deny eligibility: 1. A record of non-payment of rightful obligations including rent and utilities. 2. A record of disturbance of neighbors 3. A record of distruction of property 4. A record of poor living or housekeeping habits 5. A history of criminal activity involving crimes of physical violence to persons or property or a record of other criminal acts which would adversely affect the health, safety, or welfare of other residents. B. Whether the applicants are capable of living INDEPENDENTLY. C. In determining eligibility for admission, the Authority shall rely upon sources of information whir may include, but not be limited to, Authority records, personal interviews with the applicant or tenant, home visits, interviews with previous landlords, employers, family social workers, clinics, physicians, or the police department. This will be done in order to determine whether the individual attributes, prior conduct, and behavior of a particular applicant or tenant is likely to interfere with other tenants in such a manner as to diminish their enjoyment of the premises by affecting -adversely their health, safety or welfare or by adversely affecting the physical envir- onment or the financial stability of the Authority's low-income housing program. D. In the event of the receipt of unfavorable information with respect to an applicant, consideration shall be given to the time, nature, and extent of the applicants conduct and to factors which might indicate a reasonable probability of favorable future conduct or financial prospects. Each applicant determined to be ineligible shall be promptly notified by the HA in writing of such determination with the reasons therefore, and of his right upon request within a reasonable time to an informal hearing on the determination. 5. Eligibility for Continued Occupancy (annual Tenant Re-examination). Eligibility for continued occupancy shall be determined - once -each year in accordance with established re-exam- ination schedule. So recently admitted tenants can be fitted into the re-examination schedule, the first re-examination for any tenant can be extented up to a period of not more than 18 months from the date of admission. To be eligible for continued occupancy, the tenant must meet the following requirements: A. The applicant must constitute a family as defined in Part I. B. Family income, as defined in Part I must not exceed the maximum listed in Appendix A for continued occupancy. C. Assets shall not e_xceed the continued occupancy limits listed in Appendix B, unless such assets together with the in come of the family are insufficient for the tenant to obtain and maintain standard housing on the private market well into the future. 10 Part III TENANT SELECTION AND ASSIGN14ENT POLICIES The Tenant Selection and Assignment Policies have been designed , by the Authority to take into consideration the needs of individual families for low-income housing and the statutory purpose in developing and operating a socially and financially sound low-income housing program which provides a decent home and a suitable living environment and fosters economic and social diversity in -the tenant as a whole. The Authority, in order to attain a tenant population with a broad range of incomes, representative of low-income families in the Authority's jurisdiction, will select tenants from the waiting list with rent paying ability sufficient for the Authority's housing program to maintain financial stability. "A. The Authority shall not discriminate against any applicant because of race, color, religion, sex of household, _. creed, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, national origin, or age. B. Each applicant shall be assigned his/her appropriate place on a community wide basis in sequence based upon date and time his/her application is received, _ suitable type or size of unit, and factors affecting preference or priority established by the Local Authority's regulations. At a given time, the applicant first on the waiting list shall be offered a suitable unit at the location that contains the largest number of vacancies. If the applicant rejects the unit offered he/she shall be moved to 1-ast place on the eligible waiting list. In carrying out the above plan, should the applicant be willing to accept the unit offered but be unable to move at the time of the offer and presents clear evidence of his/her inability to move to the Authority's satisfaction, refusal of the offer shall not count as one of the number of allowable refusals permitted the applicant before placing his/her name at the bottom of the eligible applicant list. C. Preference Factors in the Selection of Tenants. The Authority in selection of eligible applicants to fill available units of suitable size shall give consideration to the following factors in the order shown. 11 1. Individuals and families who are residents of Pitkin County. 2. The applicant's disability or handicap. 3. Date and time of application. r 4. Whether the applicant is a veteran or serviceman or dependent family. 12 PART IV SCHEDULE OF RENTS A. Gross rents are based on Family Income as defined in Section I. Except as provided for in Paragraphs , B of this section, rent is determined according to " the Table of Gross Rents. (Appendix Q B. The gross rent for General Assistance recipients shall be equal to the maximum dollar payment for shelter and abilities payable by the welfare agency. 13 PART V ADDITIONAL CHARGES A. Security Deposit Each tenant is required to pay a security deposit in an amount determined by the Authority. Such payments must be made prior to occupancy, unless other arrangements are mad with the management. The security deposit will be held until the tenant moves out and will be returned, with interest, at that time if the following conditions are met: 1. There is no unpaid rent or other charges for which the tenant is liable. 2. The apartment and all equipment are left reasonable clean and all trash and debris has been removed by the tenant. 3. There is no breakage or damage which is not due to normal wear. 4. All keys issued to the tenant are turned in to the Management Office when the Tenant vacates the apartment. The security deposit may not be used to play charges during occupancy. The amount of security deposit required is noted in Appendix E. B. Excess Utility Consumption Where the utilities are included in the Contract Rent, the Authority will charge each tenant for utility usage in excess of necessary amounts. These charges will be determined either by a Schedule of Charges for use of Tenant - supplied Major Appliances or by individual check metering where the Authority will charge for actual usage in excess of the established necessary amounts. C. Schedule of Charges for Damages, Routine Service Charges and Repairs Charges for the above items billed on a time and material basis. 14 PART VI REEXAMINATION OF TENANT ELIGIBILITY AND RENTAL ADJUSTMENTS A. The Authority will annually reexamine the status of each tenant family relating to eligibility for continued occupancy, and the rent charge. Such re-examinations shall be made at least once each occupancy year. The length of time between admission of a family and the first reexamination of such family may be extended to eighteen months. B. Tenants who, at the time of application for continued occupancy, are deemed ineligible by failure to meet the continued occupancy requirements shall be notified of such ineligibility and the reason therefore. Applications for continued occupancy whose income exceed the income limit shall be notified in writing that their family does not meet the requirements for continued occupancy and that their lease shall be terminated as soon as a housing unit suitable for their family is identified. The Authority, when it has identified for possible rental by the family, a unit of decent, safe, and sanitary housing of suitable size available at a rent no exceeding 25 per cent of income as defined in this policy, shall issue a thirty day notice terminating the lease. The tenant shall pay rent in accordance with the approved Pent Schedule, until the effective date of lease termination. C. Rents will be reviewed eacIT-year at the time the annual re-examination of income is made to determine eligibility for continued occupancy. If, upon such income review, it is found that the rent being charged no longer conforms to the approved rent schedule, the rent will be adjusted accordingly. D. Once rent is established, such rental rate shall remain in effect until the next annual re-examination or until circumstances occur that warrant a special rent and income review. Anytime any of the following circum- stances occur that warrant a special rent and income reviec•:. Anytime any of the following circumstances occur rent and income will be reviewed and rent adjusted 15 in accordance with the approved Schedule of Rents. 1. Tenant can show a change in his circumstances (such as decline in income) which would justify a reduction in rent pursuant to the Schedule of Rents or such other circumstances as would create a hardship situation. 2. Tenant commences to receive public assistance or his public assistance is terminated. Such a change must be reported within ten (10) days or its occurrence. 3. It is found that the tenant has misrepresented to I;anagement the facts upon which his rent is based, so that the rent he is paying is less than he should have been charged. If this is found, then the increase in rent may be made retroactive. E. Increases in rent resulting from rent reviews are to be effective the first of the second month following the change. Decreases in rent resulting from rent reviews are to be effective the first of the first month following the change. F. If, upon re-examination,- it is found that the size or composition of a family, or household has changed so that the apartment occupied by the family contains a number of rooms less or greater than necessary to provide decent, safe, and sanitary accommodations and give notice of at least 30 days to the tenant that the Tenant will be required to move into another unit. PART VIII VERIFICATIO14 OF APPLICANT'S STATEMENTS AND INCOME A. Tenants must furnish proof of .any of their statements as required by the Authority to insure accuracy. B. All income and assets will be verified at the time of admission or re-examination. Income will be verified by contacting employers, checking W-2 Forms or.check stubs, viewing checks in payment of pensions, social security, alimony, etc. (or the certificates awarding such payments). All reasonable steps or investigations to insure accuracy of income and asset determinations will be made and will be documented in the files of the tenant. C. All decreases reported in income, which affect rent, between admission and re-examinations must be verified in accordance with the above provisions. D. For those claiming a disability status, as defined T - in the Social Security Act, or in Section 102(5) of the DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SERVICES AND FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION AMENDMENTS OF 1970, but who are not receiving Social Security benefits, a Doctor's Certification as to the degree, and the possible length of 'such disability shall be required. n 17 PART IX OCCUPANCY STANDARDS The following standards will determine the number of bedrooms required to accommodate a family of a given size except that such standards may be waived when a vacancy problem exists and it is necessary to achieve or maintain full occupancy by temporarily assigning a family to a larger size unit than is required. Such family should be transferred to the proper size unit as soon as one becomes available. In no event should waiver action be taken to assign smaller units to families than established in the following maximums: No. of -Bedrooms No. of - Persons 1 1.25 2 2.75 3 3.00 PART X LEASING A. Prior to admission, a lease shall be signed by the family- head or spouse and executed by the Authority. The head of a family is the responsible person of , the family who is legally and morally responsible ' for the group and who is actually looked to and held accountable for the family'sneed. B. The lease is to be current at all times and must be compatible with Authority Policies as well as State and Federal law. C. Notices of Rent Adjustments which are issued to amend the dwelling lease require the signatures of both - the tenant and the Authority. 19 No. in family 1 2 A-1 APPENDIX A ITdCOIIE LIMIITS Elderly Admission 20 Elderly B-1 APPENDIX B Admission 21 c I4ONTHLY GROSS RENT C-1 APPENDIX C TARTS OF CROSS RENTS ANNUAL INCOME FOR RENT FROM THROUGH 22 MONTHLY ANNUAL GROSS INCOME REI4T FROM THROUGH 5 D-1 APPENDIX O. The security deposit for tenants of elderly housing is $ 23 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF ASPEN AND PITY.IN COUNTY, COLORADO DWELLING LEASE I. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTIES AND PREMISES The Housing Authority of the City of Aspen and Pitkin County, Colorado, (hereinafter called the "Authority") does hereby lease to the family (hereinafter called the "Tenant") headed by and consisting of the following family members: . the dwelling unit described below, under the terms and conditions stated herein. The address of the unit and unit number is The family shall occupy the unit on , 19 _, and rent shall begin to be incurred from this date unless the Authority and the Tenant specify, in writing, otherwise. The term of this lease shall be one month, and shall automatically be renewed the first day of each succeeding month, unless terminated in accordance with Section X hereof. II. PAYMENTS DUE UNDER THE LEASE A. Rent Monthly rent of $ shall be due and payable in advance beginning on , 19 , and on the first day of each month thereafter. This rent will remain in effect unless adjusted in accordance with the provisions of Section III hereof. Rent and other charges to Tenant shall be paid at `- If for any reason, Tenant's payment of rent and other charges due will be delayed beyond the 10th day of the month, Tenant must no later than the 15th day of the month contact the Authority and explain the circumstances which will delay Tenant's payment, and indicate the date on which full payment will be made. If the Authority agrees to accept payment of rent and other charges later than the loth day of the month, the agreement will be set forth in writing and indicate the date on which Tenant is to make full payment of rent and other charges. 1 C. If Tenant fails to make payment by the 20th day of the month, and the Authority has not agreed to accept payment at a later date, a notice to vacate will be issued to the Tenant on or after the 225th day of the month, demanding payment in full or the surrender of the premises. Security Deposit Tenant agrees to pay $50.00 as a security deposit to be used by the Authority at the termination of this lease toward reimbursement of the cost of repairing any intentional or negligent damages to the dwelling unit caused by the Tenant, his family, dependents, or guests, and any rent or other charges owned by the Tenant. Payment of the security deposit is to be made in full prior to occupancy and shall bear simple interest at the rate of percent per annum. The Authority shall, within two weeks after termination of the tenancy return such deposit to the Tenant, plus any interest earned, or furnish to the Tenant a written statement stating the specific reason for the withholding of the deposit or any portion thereof. The Authority may withhold from such deposit such amounts as are reasonably necessary to remedy the Tenant's defaults in the payment of rent or of other funds due to the Authority' pursuant to the agreement, or to restore the premises to their condition at the commencement of the lease. The security deposit may not be used to pay rent or other charges while the Tenant occupies the dwelling unit. Utilities 1. The Authority shall furnish the following utilities, services and equipment: The Authority will not be responsible for failure to furnish utilities by reason of any cause beyond the Authorities control. 2. The tenant shall supply the following utilities: 2 3. The Authority shall bill the Tenant for excess utilities consumption in the manner described below for the following appliances and/or services: a. $5.00 for cable t.v. b. C. II'I. REDETERMINATION OR RENT, DWELLING SIZE, AND ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTINUED OCCUPANCY Once each year as requested by the Authority, the Tenant shall furnish accurate information to the Authority regarding family income, employment, and composition for use by the Authority in the determination of whether the rental rate should be changed, whether the dwelling size is appropriate for the Tenant's needs, and/or whether the Tenant is still eligible for low -rent housing. This determination will be made in accordance with the "Income and Occupancy Guidel- ines", copies of which are available in the Housing Office. A. Rent is fixed in Section II hereof or as adjusted pursuant to the provisions of Section V and will remain in effect for the period between annual rent redeter- mination unless during such period: 1. The tenant can show a change in his circumstances (such as decline in income) which would justify a reduction in rent or such other circumstances as would create a hardship situation. 2. The tenant commences to receive public assistance or his public assistance is terminated Such a change must be reported within ten (10) days of its occurence. 3. It is found that the tenant has misrepresented to the Authority the facts upon which his rent is based, so that the rent he is paying is less than he should have been charged. If this is found, then the increase in rent may be made retroactive. 3 L B. Tenant agrees that if the Management determines through the application of its published occupancy standards that the size of the Tenant's dwelling unit is no longer appropriate to the Tenant's needs, the Authority may amend this lease by notice to the Tenant that the Tenant will be required to move to another unit within the project in which the Tenant resides, giving the Tenant reasonable time in which to move. ' C. If the Authority finds that the Tenant's income or assets have increased to an amount which are above the approved income or asset limits for continued occupancy in low -rent housing, the Authority will then determine whether or not the Tenant can, with reasonable effort, find other suitable housing. 1. If the Authority determines that due to special circumstances the Tenant will be unable to find other suitable housing, the Tenant may remain in low -rent housing so long as the special circum- stances exist, but the monthly rent will be adjusted. The Authority shall notify the Tenant of the rent adjustments according to the provisions of Section IX. The adjustment will become effective the first of the second following month. 2. If Management determines that the Tenant has gained admission or remained in occupancy in the Housing Authority's project through the Tenant's misrepresentation of his income or assets, the Authority shall notify the Tenant that the Tenant has thirty (30) days to find other housing and vacate the leased premises. D. If, as a result of misrepresentation made by the Tenant ,at the time of admission, annual re-examination, or rent review, the Tenant pays rent in an amount lower than that which wuld be in accordance with the annually adopted Housing Authority "Income and Occupancy Schedule", the Tenant shall be liable for the difference between the actual rent paid and the rent which should have been paid. The tenant shall be liable for such difference from the date of the misrepresentation to the date on which the proper rent adjustment became effective. 4 IV. OCCUPANCY OF THE DWELLING UNIT The tenant shall not assign this lease; nor sublet or transfer possession of the premises; nor give accomodation to boarders or lodgers. The tenant shall not use or permit the use of the dwelling unit for any purpose other than as a private dwelling unit solely for the Tenant and his/her family and/or dependents, which may include with the written consent of the Authority, foster children and individuals providing live-in care to a member of the Tenant's family. This provision does not exclude reasonable accommodation of the Tenant's guests or visitors. The Tenant shall conduct himself, and cause his/her family, guests, and other persons who are on the premises with his/her consent to conduct themselves in a manner which will not disturb his/her neighbor's peaceful enjoyment of their accommodations and will be conducive to maintaining the project in a decent, safe, and sanitary manner; and shall refrain from illegal or other activity which impairs the physical or social environment of the complex. The Tenant shall abide by such necessary and reasonable regulations as may be promulgated by the Authority for the benefit and well being of the housing project and the tenants. V. OBLIGATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE AUTHORITY The Authority shall assume that the maintainance of the building, equipment, and common areas and grounds of the project in a decent, safe, and sanitary condition in conformity with the requirements of local housing codes. If repairs of defects hazardous to life, health, and safety are not made or temporary alternative accommodations offered to the Tenant within seventy - two --hours of Tenant's reporting same to the Authority, and if it is within the Authority's ability to correct the defect or obtain the correction thereof, then the Authority's rent shall abate during the entire period of the existence of such defect while he is residing in the unrepaired dwelling. Rent shall not abate if the Tenant rejects alternative accommodations or if the defects were caused by the Tenant's negligence or the unit or equipment were intentionally damaged by the Tenant, his family, dependents or guests. 5 VI. OBLIGATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF TENANTS Tenant shall use reasonable care to keep his/her dwelling unit in such condition as to prevent health or sanitation problems from arising. Tenant shall notify the Authority promptly of known need for repairs to his/her dwelling unit, and of known unsafe conditions in the common areas and grounds of the project which may lead to damage or .� injury. Except for normal wear and tear, Tenant shall pay reasonable charges for repair of intentional or negligent damage to the leased premises or project caused by Tenant, his/her family, dependents, or guests; or for services performed or caused to be performed by the Authority because of Tenant's failure to adequately maintain the grounds on which his/her leased units is located. Charges billed to the Tenant for repairs or services under this section shall specify the items or damages involved, correctional action taken, and the cost thereof, and shall become due and payable in full on the first day of the second month following the month in which the charge is made. Scheduled charges for damages, routine service charges and repairs will be billed on a time and material basis. VII. PRE -OCCUPANCY AND PRE -TERMINATION INSPECTIONS A. Prior to Tenant's occupancy, the Authority and the Tenant shall inspect the dwelling unit noting the condition of the grounds, the dwelling unit, and the equipment. Both the Tenant and the Authority's agent shall sign the inspection report, and a copy shall be retained by both the Tenant and the Authority. B. When the Tenant vacates, the Authority shall inspect the dwelling unit and provide the Tenant with a written statement of the charges, _if any, for which the Tenant is responsible. The Tenant and/or his/her representative may be present at such inspection. OWNWERM-MM09 ME: . ►:► The Tenant agrees that any duly authorized agent, employee, or representative of the Authority will,upon no less than two days advance written notice having been delivered to the Tenant's premises, be permitted to enter the Tenant's dwelling unit for the purpose of conducting routine inspections and maintenance, for making improvements and repairs, or to show the premises for re -leasing; provided, however, that the Authority shall have the right to enter the premises at any time without advance notification to the Tenant, if the Authority reasonably believes that an emergency 51 I exists which requires such entrance. In the event that the Tenant and all adult members of his household are absent from the premises at the time of entry, the Authority's agent, employee, or representative shall leave in the dwelling unit a written statement specifying the date, time, and purpose of entry, prior to leaving the Tenant's dwelling unit. IX. LEGAL NOTICES Any notice to the Tenant required by this lease shall be sufficient if in writing and delivered to the Tenant personally or to an adult member of the Tenant's family residing in the household; or if sent to the Tenant by first-class mail, properly addressed, postage pre -paid. Notice to the Authority must be in writing, and either delivered to the Authority' agent at the Housing Office or sent to the Authority by first-class mail, postage pre -paid. and addressed to the Housing Office 0100 Lone Pine Rd., Aspen, Colorado 81611. X. TERMINATION OF THE LEASE This lease may be terminated by the Tenant at any time by thirty (30) days written notice forwarded to the Authority in the manner specified in Section IX. The Tenant agrees to leave the dwelling unit in a clean and good condition, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and to return the keys to the Authority when he/she vacates. This lease may be terminated by the Authority only for just cause, which would include but not be limited to: non-payment of rent or charges to the Tenant for repairs or excess utility consumption; serious or repeated interference with the rights of other tenants or Tenant's neighbors; serious or repeated damage to the premises; creation of physical hazards; over -income status; failure of the Tenant to use the dwelling unit as his principal place of residence; or for serious or repeated violations of the material terms and conditions of this lease. This lease may be terminated by the Authority at any time by giving written notice as :yet forth in Section IX, not less than 14 days fro non-payment of rent or other charges; a reasonable time prior to termination commensurate with the urgency of the situation in the case of creation or maintenance of a threat to the health or safety of other tenants or Authority employees or the safety of the premises. If the Authority elects to terminate this lease, the Tenant shall be informed of the reason (s) for the termination, his right to make such reply as he/she may wish, and his/her right to request a hearing in accordance with the Housing Authority's grievance procedure. 7 IX. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE All grievances or appeals arising under this lease shall be processed and resolved pursuant to the grievance procedure of the Authority which is in effect at the time such grievance or appeal arises. -The--grievance procedure is available at the Authority's office at 0100 Lone Pine Rd. -� XII. MODIFICATIONS This lease, together with any future adjustments of rent or dwelling unit, evidences the entire agreement between the Authority and the Tenant. Except for the rent adjustments made by the Authority under the provisions of Section III, no changes herein shall be made except in writing, signed, and dated by both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this lease agreement this .... day of ----. - -- .-•-.. _ 19 at Aspen, Colorado. Tenant Housing Office of the City of Aspen and Pitkin County 8 R'/� TITION OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE fF) CI'r` ASPEN AND PITKIN COUNTY DEFINING THE R OF SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSI COMMITTEE Resolution No. 84-2 WHEREAS, the Pitkin County Housing Authority is responsible for the development and administration of housing programs for Seniors and, WHEREAS, it recognizes the need for assistance in the Admini- stration and development of senior housing by Seniors, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing Authority of the City of Aspen and Pitkin County that the Senior Citizens Housing Committee (S.C.H.C.) be an advisory committee and that the following constitutes the committee's functions and membership in accordance with all of the provisions of the Home Rule Charter which apply in respect to appointment, terms, etc., 1. The members of the S.C.H.C. shall be representative of the following: - Staff of the Senior Citizen Program - Pitkin County Council on Aging - Community Center Board of Directors - Housing Authority Representative - Aspen Valley Visiting Nurses Assoc. - Senior Citizens - Care Center Inc. - Concerned Citizens 2. The functions of the Committee are as follows: ✓ - Assist in the screening of applicants for senior housing - Recommend policies and guidelines for senior housing - Assist in the review of current residents for financial need and physical capability - Make recommendations concerning assessment of the facility and determination of improvements necessary - Assist in the assessment of the existing and future senior housing needs in Pitkin County - Assist in purusal of the development of future housing programs. Approved by the Housing Authority of the City of Aspen and Pitkin County, Colorado, this day of 1984 ATTES BY: andra M. Stuller, Chairwoman .,,• i.� /'mil; %.,. ames L. Adamski, Sec. R-'�'TJTION OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE ! � CI' 1, ASPEN AND PITKIN COUNTY DEFINING THE R OF SENIOR CITIZEN HOUSI COMMITTEE Resolution No. 84-2 WHEREAS, the Pitkin County Housing Authority is responsible for the development and administration of housing programs for Seniors and, WHEREAS, it recognizes the need for assistance in the Admini- stration and development of senior housing by Seniors, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing Authority of the City of Aspen and Pitkin County that the Senior Citizens Housing Committee (S.C.H.C.) be an advisory committee and that the following constitutes the committee's functions and membership in accordance with all of the provisions of the Home Rule Charter which apply in respect to appointment, terms, etc., 1. The members of the S.C.H.C. shall be representative of the following: - Staff of the Senior Citizen Program - Pitkin County Council on Aging - Community Center Board of Directors Housing Authority Representative Aspen Valley Visiting Nurses Assoc. - Senior Citizens - Care Center Inc. - Concerned Citizens 2. The functions of the Committee are as follows: ✓ - Assist in the screening of applicants for senior housing - Recommend policies and guidelines for senior housing - Assist in the review of current residents for financial need and physical capability - Make recommendations concerning assessment of the facility and determination of improvements necessary - Assist in.th6 assessment of the existing and future senior housing needs in Pitkin County - Assist in purusal of the development of future housing programs. Approved by the Housing Authority of the City of Aspen and Pitkin County, Colorado, this day of 1984 ATTES BY andra M. Stuller, Chairwoman ;2L/�., -�� /' ames L. Adamski, Sec. I D-R-A-F-T HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD ANNUAL T•IEETING FEBRUARY 21, 1985 Agenda 1. Election of Officers: 8:00 2. Chairman Report for 1984: 8:15 3. Director's Report for 1984: 8:30 1) Housing Office General Administration 2) Housing Development 3) Management of Employee Housing Stock 4) GMP Review 5) Marketing of Resale and Rental Vacancies 6) Needs Assessment 7) Special Projects a. Centennial, Mobil Home Parks, Senior Citizen Housing 4. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR 1985 (Note: Invite Managers, Council._&_BOCC, Development Pod, Both P & Z's) MEMORANDUM TO: City Attorney City Engineer Housing Director Aspen Water Department ,Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Fire Chief Building Dept. FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office RE: 1984 Residential GNP Submissions: Aspen Mountain Lodge GPiP Conceptual Submission, 601 Aspen GMP Conceptual Submission and Gordon/Callahan Conceptual Submission DATE: December 6, 1985 We are forwarding to you with this memo, all documentation and plats with respect to the captioned 1984 Residential GPSP submissions received by this office. Included is the following: Aspen Mountain Lodge Residential GMP Conceptual Submission The applicants are requesting a growth management allocation for the construction of 12 residential units within the Aspen Mountain PUD. The applicants encountered a great deal of opposition to their original 700 South Galena 12 unit residential project and, therefore, propose to relinquish the prior allocation granted for 12 units at the 700 South Galena site upon the City approval of a new allocation and subsequent review procedures. The new proposal is a request to build 12 units which would consist of two duplexes (4 units) to be Constructed at the 700 South Galena site, and 8 units to be relocated from the 700 South Galena site to the west wing of the Lodge. Gordon/Callahan Residential GMP Conceptual Submission This application is also a revision to a GMP application originally submitted last year. The applicant is requesting a growth management allocation of 3 units, for• the purpose of constructing two 3-bedroom free market units and one 4-bedroom unit. It is the applicant's intent to combine Lot 2 of the Gordon Subdivision with the land area and development rights of the previously subdivided Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the Callahan Subdivision into a common development. This would consist of a total develop- ment of 9 free market units, six 1-bedroom low income, deed restricted employee housing units, on 4.572 acres adjacent to the Aspen Club. 601 Aspen Residential GMP Conceptual Submission The applicant is requesting a growth management allocation for the construction of 41 free market units. The project is proposed to consist of 40 free market one -bedroom units and one free market studio unit. The proposed development is to be located at Lots 1 through 22, Block 6, Eames Addition in Aspen and consists of 51,150 square feet. Please review this material and return your referral comments to the Planning Office no later than January 4, 1984, in order for this office to have adequate time to prepare for the presentation and scoring of these submissions at a public hearing before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on January 22, 1984. If you have any questions regarding these applications, or any problems meeting our deadline, please contact me as soon as possible. Thank you. r GROWTH MANAGEMENT APPLICATION FOR THE GORDON PROPERTY MERGED WITH SIX LOTS OF THE CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION 1 LOCATION: Lot 2, Gordon Subdivision and lots 4,5,6,7,8 & 9 of the Callahan Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado see map "I 2 Proposal: This proposal is submitted on behalf of Sheldon Gordon. It is the applicant's intent to combine lot 2 of the Gordon Subdivision with the land area and development rights of the previously subdivided lots 4,5,6,7,8 & 9 of the Callahan Subdivision into a common development. The applicant seeks a growth management allotment of two, three bedroom free market units and one 4 bedroom unit. This allotment would be combined with the six free market development rights available from lots 4,5,6,7,8 & 9 of the Callahan Subdivision, for a total free market development of 9 units. In addition, There would be six one bedroom low income, deed restricted employee housing units. This results in six duplex residential units,(each comprised of one free market unit and one , one bedroom housing unit,) and three single family free market units, all on the subject 4.572 acre combined property. The proposed development is further described by the enclosed maps, documents and the following discussion. 3 Description of development: A. The site is comprised of the 2.187 acre Gordon Property zoned R-15 P.U.D. and the combined acres of lots 4,5,6,7,8 & 9 zoned R-15 for a total site area of 4.572 acres. The site is located off Crystal Lake road, bordered by the Roaring Fork River on the west and by the properties zoned R-15 on the north and east (see map 114 ). The site has some slopes in excess of 20% therefore a slope area reduction calculation is required to determine the allowable area for development. This calculation by Alpine Surveys, is shown graphically on map 2. The resulting area available is 165,321 square feet (3.795 ad not including the land under the water of the Roaring Fork River. The minimum lot area per duplex unit in this zone is 20,000 s.f. , therefore a density of six duplex units plus 3 single family dwellings are allowed. The site is proposed to be subdivided into 10 parcels with one parcel for each duplex and each single family dwelling.The remaining parcel is to be a common area, and restricted against further development (see Map 3). There will be a total of nine free market housing units consisting of seven units of four bedrooms or less with a floor area of 4000 s.f. each and two, three bedroom units with a floor area of 3300 s f. or less each. There will be a total of six , one bedroom low income deed restricted employee housing units with an approximate floor area of 600 s.f. each. A typical duplex unit floor plan, elevation & section is repesented on drawings 1 thr. 5 provided by Benedict. sutherland.duesterberg ltd. All of the units will meet or exceed City of Aspen energy codes and will employ passive solar heating. B. The project is served by the City of Aspen Water departement. A new cast iron water main will be designed and constructed according to City of Aspen Engineering and Water dep. standards (see Map 5). This water main will connect the 8" cast iron pipe (C.I.P.) water main located in the Aspen Club parking lot with the 6'' C.I.P. located at the upper end of the Riverside Avenue. The result of this connection will be a loop water main system (see Map 5). Each duplex and single family dwelling will be provided with a 3/4" service line connection. The estimated average demand for each free market unit is 200 gallons per day and 100 gallons per day for each employee unit resulting in a total estimated demand of 300 gallons per day per duplex. In addition to providing a loop water system, the applicant's share of the Riverside Irrigation Ditch (approximately 1 /7) will be transferred to the City of Aspen. The applicant reserves the right to alter the course and width of the ditch to form ponds in the landscape of the project. C. The project is served by the Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District from an 8 inch sanitary sewer main located in the right-of-way on the site (see Map 2 & 5). Each duplex will be provided with a 4 inch service line connection. The total estimated average demand is 300 gallons per day per duplex and 200 gallons per day for each single family dwelling. D. Electricity is provided by Holy Cross Electrical Association. Electrical service into the site will be underground to each Duplex. Each free market Unit will have a 200 amp. service and each employee unit will have a 100 amp. service. Heat in the duplexes will be electric forced air interconnected with passive solar collection. E. The project will provide on -site retainage for surface and run-off' water in excess of pre -development rates. Surface and run-offin excess of pre -development rate will be ponded and released at the historical rate into the Riverside Irrigation Ditch or the Roaring Fork River. At this time there is no evidence of surface water (see Map 2). n--- F. The project will provide two new fire hydrants on the site (see map 3). The nearest existing fire hydrant is in the Aspen Club parking lot (see Map 5). The greatest distance from the proposed fire hydrant to a proposed residence is 170 feet. The distance from the fire station is 20 blocks; travel time from the station to the site is less than 8 minutes. G. The total site area including the area under the Roaring Fork River is 4.572 acres. There is no requirement for open space in this zone, however the project, including paved areas such as roads, parking and build envelopes, covers only 1.23 acres or 26 percent of the 4.572 acres site. This equates to 3.34 acres of open space or 74 percent of the site. ( Sixty Nine percent of the site, when discounting 5% that is under water.) H. The distance to the Lower Elementary School is approximately 1.5 miles; to the Middle and High Schools 3 miles. School busses run on Highway 82, within 600 feet from the site. There is easy pedestrian access to Highway 82 via Crystal Lake Road or Riverside Drive. I. Assuming one car per bedroom, a total of 40 cars will be parked regurly on- site. Spaces will be provided by 18 covered and 22 outside on -site parking spaces. Additionally 4 outside on -site visitor spaces will be provided, providing a total of 44 parking spaces. Extensive landscaping will minimize the impact of outside parking spaces to the site and surrounds. Motor vehicles will reach this site by turning off State Highway 82 onto Crystal Lake Road, a paved street, then onto a private 2-lane paved driveway that serves the site. At the point where the site driveway intersects Crystal Lake Road the road is a one way street bordering the parking for the Aspen Club. Crystal Lake Road serves The Aspen Club and the Aspen Club Condominiums at the present time. The condition of the Crystal Lake Road at this time is good, the type of vehicle that uses the road is primarily family cars. The street's posted speed limit is 10-15 mph. with speed bumps to help induce slow vehicular movement_ The traffic generated by The Aspen Club is constant throughout the day with a peak occuring after 5:00 p.m. in the summer and after 4:00 p.m. in the winter as people arrive from work or skiing to use the facilities. The traffic generated by The Aspen Club Condominiums is similar• to the other housing areas with traffic generated in the morning and late afternoon. The volume of traffic varies seosonally as many of the owners are absentee. The traffic generated on the proposed site will also be similar to n., ., � 2 most residential neighborhoods. The hours of use being primarily in the morning hours, going to work (8:00 to9:00 a.m.), and in the evening, returning from work (4.00 to 6.00 p.m.). The estimated traffic count for the employee units should be 4 to 5 total round trips per day. The estimated traffic count for the 3 free market units should be 7 to 8 total round trips per day. These numbers represent the worst possible case without consideration of the use of alternate means of transportation. The Crystal Lake Road is capable of handling this increase in traffic without causing a detrimental effect on the surrounding neighborhood or road conditions. J. The developer will dedicate a public trail and fisherman's easement to the City of Aspen. The easement will be below the developed area of the provide a bridge across the river, connecting do ectly with the Ute Children's park and existing paths. K. The Aspen Valley Hospital is approximately 3 miles away and within 10 minutes driving time from the site. The Police departement is 20 blocks away with the response time less than 8 minutes. Retail and service activities are approximately 16 blocks from the site. This development will create no noticeable demands on any of the above mentioned services. L. This proposed development is very beneficial to the surrounding neighborhood. The housing units except 119, a single family dwelling , will be clustered, meeting Sec. 24-8.1 of the Aspen Municipal Code as follows: ARTICLE 8 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Sec. 24-8.1 Purpose The purpose of this article is to encourage flexibility, innovation and variety in the development of land and to provide performance criteria for the planned unit developments (P.U.D.) which will: (a) Promote greater variety in the type, design and layout of buildings; (b) Improve the design, character and quality of the new development; (c) Promote more efficient use of land and public streets, utilities and governmental services; (d) Preserve open space as development occurs; (e) Provide procedures so as to relate the type,design and layout of residential development to a particular site and thus encourage the #%-aOn Q preservation of the site's unique natural and scenic features; and (f) Achieve a beneficial land use relationship with surrounding areas. The objective of these sections is to create a more desireable environment than would be possible through strict application of other sections of this code. The provisions of this article shall be interpreted to achieve the purposes listed in this section 24-8.1. (Ord. No. 71-1975, x I ) The development will provide new and upgraded utilities lines, space and energy efficient huu-,M6 uiiliJ Witi'l quad y ak.oiii"AtIcs, pii`blv4'• solar heating, active solar domestic hot water, extelisive ialidscal„ilg, sufficient parking and roads, new trail and fisherman's easement with a bridge link. The project will provide new low- income employee housing units on site. In addition the project will be developed at the allowed density resulting in a great deal of open space, allowing the project to be more compatible with the existing development. M. If approved, construction of the development will commence in the spring of 1985 and be completed in the spring of 1987.' 4. COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT AGAINST GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SCORING SYSTEM A. Availability of public Facilities and services: 1. Water: Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will 1) allow a branch line to become a circuit line, thus improving service to the area, and 2) increase the City of Aspen's ownership of water rights within the City limits. 2. Sewer: One (1) point should be awarded since the project may be handled by existing level of service and service improvement by the applicant will benefit the project only. 3. Storm Drainage : Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will provide on -site retainage for surface and run-off water in excess of pre- development rates. Also ponding will allow desirable landscape aesthetics and controlled release of water. 4. Fire protection: Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will provide two (2) new fire hydrants, improving existing conditions for the project and the neighbors. The internal roads will meet requirements for width and turning radius. 5. Parking Design: Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will provide the forty (40) required parking spaces on site. Additionally four (4) extra guest spaces will be provided, and outside spaces will be screened by landscaping. 6. Roads: Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will provide easy in and out access with the minimum amount of road possible. Also, the road will be paved to avoid rutting and dust, minimizing impact on the residents and neighbors. By clustering the development and providing a single collection street, Crystal Lake Road becomes safer than before when the potential was six (6) seperate driveways. B. Quality of design: 1. Neighborhood Compatibility: The existing neighborhood consists of one and two story single family residences of 2,000-2,400 square feet (residences of 4150-4668 square feet are permitted)on lots that range in size from 10,055 square feet to 17,812 square feet (see map 2). The amended development on the Gordon Property consists of six (6) 3900 to 4600 square feet duplexes and three (3) single family residences on 3.99 total acres (excluding land under water) or one (1) housing unit per .443 acres ( 19,311 square feet )of land. Taking the slope reduction for density calculations into account there are 18,369 square feet per duplex. These numbers indicate thet the proposed development is in the same density range as the rest of the neighborhood. This is not only compatible with the surrounding neighborhood , but improves the quality of the neighborhood. Together with the extensive site work and trail easements being given, three (3) points should be awarded for this section. 2. Site Design: Three (3) points should be awarded since the project will provide a high quality of landscaping, to include ponding, and extensive open spaces, all benefiting the surrounding sites, and public trail users as well as this project. 3. Energy: Three (3) points should be awarded since the project will incorporate: insulation values of R-24 in the walls and R-45 at the roof, orientation within 15 degrees of south, and extensive passive solar heating and water devices. 4. Trails: Three (3) points shouls be provided since the project will dedicate a trail and fisherman's easement, and provide a bridge link, thus furthering progress of the City's Trails Master Plan. 5. Green Space: Three (3) points should be provided since: the project will provide sixty nine percent (69%) of the site as green space. A large portion of the green space will be adjacent to the trail, benefiting residents and public alike. P94P. it C. Proximity to support Services 1. Public Transportation ( from the Gordon site) : Two (2) points should be awarded since the project is less than six (6) blocks walking distance of a City bus stop. 2 Community Commercial Facilities ( from the Gordon Property ): One (1) point should be awarded since the project is farther than six (6) blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. D. Provision for .Low Income Housing : Twenty (20) points should be awarded since the low income, deed restricted employee housing provided equals 53.8% of the free market growth management allotment requested. The free market housing will provide housing for 9 people according to Pitkin County Housing Office guidelines (two, three bedroom houses - 6 people; one four bedroom house - 3 people; hence 9 people housed). The project will provide a total of six (6) employee bedrooms in a total six (6) seperate one (1) bedroom employee housing units. These units will house a total of 10.5 people according to the Pitkin County Housing Office average of 1.75 people per one (1) bedroom unit.This results in a total of 19.5 people housed of which 53.8% is low income deed restricted employee housing. E. Provision of Unique Financing. Not Applicable. F. Bonus Points: This Project makes a substantial contribution to Aspen's pedestrian trail system by the construction of a foot bridge across the Roaring Fork River and the dedication of land for the continuation of the Ute Trail along the Roaring Fork River. A GROWTH MANAGEMENT APPLICATION FOF THE GORDON PROPERTY MERGED WITH SIX LOTS OF THE CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION I LOCATION: Lot 2, Gordon Subdivision and lots 4,5,6,7,8 &9 of the Callahan Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado see map #1 2 Proposal: This proposal is submitted on behalf of Sheldon Gordon. It is the applicant's intent to combine lot 2 of the Gordon Subdivision with the land areea and development rights of the previously subdivided lots 4,5,6,7,8 &-9 of the Callahan Subdivision into a conman development.The applicant seeks a growth management allotment of two, three bedroom free market units and one 4 bedroom unit.This allotment would to be combined with the six free market development rights available from lots 4,5,6,7,8 & 9 of the Callahan Subdivision, for a total free market development of 9 units. In addition six ,one bedroom low income, deed restricted employee housing units. This results in six duplex residential untis, or,e free market unit and one ,one bedroom housing unit, and three single family free market units, all on the subject 4.572 acre combined property. The proposed development is further described by the enclosed maps, documents and the following discussion. 3 Description of development. A. The site is compromised of the 2.187 acre Gordon Property zoned R-15 P.U.D. and the combined acres of lots 4,5,6,7,E & 9 zoned R-15 for a total site area of 4.572 acres. The site is located off Crystal Lake road, bordered by the Roarinq Fork River on the west and by the properties zoned R-15 on the north and east (see map #4 The site has some slopes in excess of 20% therefore a slope area reduction calculation is required to determine the allowable area for development. This calculation by Alpine Surveys, is shown graphically or. map 2. The resulting area available is 165,321, square feet (3.795 ac.) not including the land ubder the water of the Roarinq Fork River. The minimum lot area per duplex unit in this zone is 20,000 s.f.,therefore a density of six duplex units plus 3 single family dwellings are allowed. The site is proposed to be subdivided into 10 parcels one parcel for each duplex and one single family dwelling remaining parcel to be common area restricted against further development (see Map 3). There will be a total of nine free market housing units consisting of six units of four bedrooms or less with a floor area of 4000 s.f.each; two three bedroom units with a floor area 3300 s.f.or less each; and on; four bedroom unit with a floor area of 4000 s.f.or less. There will be a total of six ,one bedroom low income deed restricted employee housing units with an approximate floor area of 600 s.f.each. A typical duplex unit floor plan, elevation & section is repesented on drawings 1 thr. 5 provided by benedict. sutherland.duesterberg ltd.All of the units will meet on exceed City of Aspen energy codes as will employee passive solar heating. B. The project is served by the 4"ty of Aspen Water departement. A new cast iron water main will be designed and constructed according to City of Aspen Engineering and Water dep. standards (see Map 5). This water main will connect the 8' cast iron pipe (C.I.P.)water main located in the Aspen Club parking lot with the 6' C.I.P. lcated at the upper end of the Riverside Avenue. The result of this connection will be a loop water main system (see Map 5). Each duplex and single family dweliinq will be provided with a 3/4" service line connection. The estimated average demand for each free market unit is 200 gallons per day and 100 gallons per day for each employee unit resulting in atotal estimated demand of300 gallons per day per, duplex. In addition to providing a loop water system, the applicant's share of the Riverside Irrigation Ditch (approximately 1/7) will be transferred to the City of Aspen. The applicant reserves the right to alter the course of the ditch and the width to form ponds in the landscape of the project. C. The project is served by the Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District from an 8 inch sanitary sewer main located in the right-of-way on the site(see Map 2). Each duplex will be provided with a 4 inch service line connection. The total estimated average demand is 300 gallons per day per duplex and 200 gallons per day for each single family dwelling. D. Electricity is provided by Holy Cross Electrical Association. Electrical service into the site will be underground to each Duplex. Each free market Unit will have a 200 amp.service and each employee unit will have a 100 amp. service. Heat in the duplexes will be electric forced air interconnected with passive solar collection. E. The project will provide on -site retainage for surface and run-off water in excess of pre -development rates. Surface and run-offin excess of pre -development rate will be ponded and released at the historical rate into the Riverside irrigation Ditch or the Roaring Fork River. At this time there is no evidence of surface water to deal with (see Map 2). F. The project will provide two new fire hydrants on the site. The nearest existing fire hydrants is in the Aspen Club parking lot ( see Map 5).The greatest distance from the proposed fire hydrant to a proposed residence is 170 feet. The distance from the fire station is 20 blocks, travel time from the station to the site is less than 8 minutes. G. The total site area including the area under the Roaring Fork River is 4.572 acres. There is no requirement for open space in this zone, however the project, including paved areas such ac_ roads, parking and build envelopes, covers only 1.23 acres or 26 percent of the 4.572 acres site. This equates to 3.34 acres of open space or 74 percent of the site. H. The distance to the Lower Elementary School is approximately 1.5 miles; to the Middle and High Schools 3 miles. School busses run on Highway 82, within 600 feet from the site. There is easy pedestrian access to Hiqhway 82 via Crystal Lake Road or Riverside Drive. I. Assuming one car per bedroom, a total of 40 cars will be parked regurly on- site. Spaces will be provided by 18 covered and 20 outside on -site parking spaces. Additionally 4 outside on -site visitor spaces will be provided, providing a total of 44 parking spaces. Extensive landscaping will minimize the impact of outside parking spaces to the site and surrounds. Motor vehicles will reac this site by turning off State Highway 82 onto Crystal Lake Road, a paved street, then onto a private 2-lane paved driveway that serves the site. At the point where the site driveway intersects Crystal Lake Road the road is a one way street bordering the parking for the Aspen Club. Crystal Lake Road serves The Aspen Club and the Aspen Club Condominiums at the present time. The condition of the Crystal Lake Road at this time is good, the type of vehicle that uses the road is primarily family cars. The strews posted speed limit is 10-15 mph. with speed bumps to help induce slow vehicular movement. The traffic generated by The Aspen Club is constant throughout the day with a peak occuring after 5:00 p.m. in the summer and after 4:00 p.m. in the winter as people arrive from work or skiing to use the facilities_.. The traffic generated by The Aspen Club Condominiums is similar to the other housing areas with traffic generated in the morning and late afternoon. The volume of traffic varies seosonally as many of the owners are absentee. The traffic generated on the proposed site will also be similar to most residential neighborhoods. The hours of use being primarily in the morning hours, going to work (8:00 to9:00 a.m.), and in the evening, returning from work 4:00 to 6:00 p.m.). The estimated traffic count for the employee units should be 4 to 5 total round trips per day. The estimated traffic count for the 3 free market units should be 7 to 8 total round trips per day. These numbers represent the worst possible case without consideration of the use of alternate means of transportation. The Crystal Lake Road is capable of handlinq this increase in traffic without causing a detrimental effect on the surrounding neighborhood or road conditions. J.The developer will dedicate a public trail and fisherman's easement to the City of Aspen. The easement will be below the developed area of the site, adjacebt to the Roaring Fork River. Further the developer will provide a bridge across the river, connecting directly with the Ute Children's park and existing paths. K. The Aspen Valley Hospital is approximately 31 miles away and within 10 minutes driving time from the site. The Police departement is 20 blocks away with the response time less than 8 minutes. Retail and service activities are approximately 1E: blocks from the site.This development will create no noticeable demands on any of the above mentioned services. L. This proposed development is very beneficial to the surrounding neighborhood. The housing units except #10, a single family dwelling ,will be clustered meeting Sec. 24-8.1 of the Aspen Municipal Code as follows: ARTICLE 8 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Sec. 24-8.1 Purpose The purpose of this article is to encourage flexibility, innovation and variety in the development of land and to provide performance criteria for the planned unit developments (P.U.D.) which will: (a) Promote oreater variety in the type, design and layout of buildings; (b) Improve the design, character and quality of the new development; (c) Promote more efficient use of land and public streets, utilities and governmental services; (d) Preserve open space as development occurs; (e) Provide procedures so as to relate the type,design and layout of residential development to a particular site and thus encourage the preservation of the site's unique natural and scenic features; and (f) Achieve a beneficial land use relationship with surrounding areas. The objective of these sections is to create a more desireable environment than would be possible through strict application of other sections of this code. The provisions of this article shall be interpreted to achieve the purposes listed in this section 24-8.1. (Ord. No. 71-1975, * 1) The development will provide new and upgraded utilities lines, space and energy efficient housing units with quality aesthetics, passive solar heating, active solar domestic hot water, extensive landscaping, sufficient parking and roads, new trail and fisherman's easement with a bridge link. The project will provide new tow- income employee housing units on site. In addition the project will be developed at the allowed density resulting in a great deal of open space, allowing the project to be more compatible with the existing development. M. If approved, construction of the development will commence in the spring of 1985 and be completed in the spring of 1987.' 4. COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT AGAINST GROWTH �MAGEMENT PLAN SCORING SYSTEM A. Availability of public Facilities and services: 1. Water: Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will I) allow a branch line to become a circuit line, thus improving service to the area, and 2) increase the City of Aspen's ownership of water rights within the City limits. 2. Sewer: One (1) point should be awarded since the project may be handled by existing level of service and service improvement by the applicant will benefit the project only. 3. Storm Drainage :Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will provide on -site retainage for surface and run-off water in excess of pre- development rates. Also ponding will allow desirable landscape aesthetics and controlled release of water. 4. Fire protection: Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will provide two (2) new fire hydrants, improving existing conditions for the project and the neighbors. The internal roads wii, meet requirements for width and turning radius. 5. Parking Design: Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will provide the forty (40) required parking spaces on site. Additionally four (4) extra guest spaces will be screened by landscaping. 6. Roads: Two (2) points should be awarded since the project will provide easy in and out access with the minimum amount of road possible. Also, the road will be paved to avoid rutting and dust, minimizing impact on the residents and neighbors. By clustering the development and providing a single collection street, Crystal Lake Road becomes safer than before with the potential of six (6) seperate driveways. B. Quality of design: :. Neighborhood Compatibility:The existing neighborhood consist of one and two story single family residences of 2,000-2,400 square feet (residences of 4150-4668 square feet are permitted) from 10,055 square feet to 17,812 square feet (see map 2). The amended development on the Gordon Property consists of six (6) 3900 to 4600 square feet duplexes and three (3) single famil;: residences total acres (excluding land under water) or one (1) housing unit per .443 acres of 19,311 square feet of land. Taking the slope reduction for density calculations into account there is 18,369 square feet per duplex. These numbers indicate thet the proposed development is in the same density range as the rest of the neighborhood. This is not only compatible with the surrounding neighborhood ,but improves the quality of the neighborhood. Together with the extensive site work and trail easements being given, three (3) points should be awarded for this section. 2. Site Design: Three (3) points should be awarded since the project will provide a high quality of landscaping, to include ponding, and extensive open spaces, all benefiting the surrounding sites, and public trail useres as well as this project. 3. Energy: Three (3) points should be awarded since the project will incorporate: insulation values of R-24 in the walls and R-45 at the roof, orientation within 15 degree: of south, and extensive passive solar heating and water devices. 4. Trails: Three (3) points shouls be provided since the project will dedicate a trail and fisherman's easement, and provide a bridge link, thus furthering progress of the City's Trails Master Plan. 5. Green Space: Three (3) points should be provided since: the project will provide seventy one percent (71%) of the site as green space. The majority of the green space will be adjacent to the trial,benefiting residents and public alike. C. Proximity to support Services i. Public Transportation ( from the Gordon site) :Two (2) points should be awarded since the project is less than six (6) blocks walking distance of a City bus stop. 2 Community Commercial Facilities ( from the Gordon Property One (1) point should be awarded since the project is farther than six (6) blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. D. Provision for .Low Income Twenty (20) points should fifty percent (50%) low income of six (6) employee bedrooms employee housing units. These according to the Pitkin County one (1) bedroom units. Housing be awarded since the development will be occupancy. The project will provide a total in a total six (6) seperate one (1) bedroom units will house a total of 10.5 people Housing Office average of 1.75 people per E. Provision of Unique Financing. No Applicable. F. Bonus Points: This Project makes a substantial contribution to Aspen's pedestrian trail system by the construction of a foot bridge across the Roaring Fork. River and the dedication of land for the continuation of the Ute Trail along the Roaring Fork River.