Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout830-169CONNER CABIT\\ ASPEN, COLORADO AND LOFTS SHEET INDEX COVER SHEET 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN 2 SITE PLAN 3 SITE PLAN 4 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 5 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 6 GALENA /HOPKINS /HUNTER FLOW LINE PLAN AND PROFILE STA 1 +00 -3 +50 7 GALENA /HOPKINS /HUNTER FLOW LINE 8 PLAN AND PROFILE STA 3 +50 -END CITY BUILDING AND UNIT 530 SOUTH -NORTH SECTIONS 9 UNITS 532 AND 534 SOUTH -NORTH SECTIONS 10 CABINS WEST -EAST SECTIONS 11 LOFTS WEST -EAST SECTIONS 12 SITE DETAILS 13 - 111 III III N �I I I II � II II SOPRIS ENGINEERIN - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704 -0311 w III III III ill III I 11 III Ili 111 � III III GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 fL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT 25054 25054— SITE9.DWG 4 -24 -06 LEGEND PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED ASPHALT ® PROPOSED SAWCUT. REFER TO SAWCUT NOTES BELOW PROPOSED RAMP PROPOSED PORCH mil IN Iq Z ll� 11 I Z i Y V II III III III III I I I I I ( III I 1 11 I I) I II ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft. 80 )NSTRUCTION DOCUMENT NJI ASPEN, COLORADO I L SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING WITH 0 ASPHALT MAT. 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (COA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND COA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. GRAPHIC SCALE 20 40 CONNER CABINS & LOFTS OVERALL SITE PLAN S OPRIS ENCIN ERINC, LLC. 17 IVIL CONSULTANT 502 MAIN STREET SUITE A3 DES. SJO CK. YTN FILE NO. SHEET 2 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 25064 '6054SITE9 (970) 704 -0311 DR. SJO DATE 8/19/0 25054 OF 13 LEGEND PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED ASPHALT ® PROPOSED SAWCUT : REFER TO SAWCUT NOTES BELOW PROPOSED RAMP PROPOSED PORCH EXISTING BUILDING SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING WITH 2" ASPHALT MAT. 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (COA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND COA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. PR I�) PROPOSED SAWCUT L I i M AN I I � I I � I I ( i I I I i II II o I.-4 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) I inch = SO ft. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT 1 3 V124101 PER CITY OF ASPEN ISJO 2 12210 PER CITY OF ASPEN Isio ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS & LOFTS 25054 25054SITE9 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE. CO 81623 (970) 704 -0311 SJO I CK. YTN I FILE NO. SJO I DATE 819910' 25054 I OF 13 LEGEND ?. PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED ASPHALT ® PROPOSED SAWCUT : REFER TO SAWCUT NOTES BELOW PROPOSED RAMP PROPOSED PORCH SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAVNG WITH 2' ASPHALT MAT. 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE MELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (COA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION, CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND COA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. m W W T � V 1 F— Q GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 fL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMEN I s 25064 25054SITE8 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704 - 0311 N0. DATE REVISION BY ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS SITE PLAN LOFTS DES. S JO CK. YTN I FILE NO. DR. SJO DATE 819910 25054 SHEET 4 OF 13 GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE EXSITNG CONDITIONS ARE FROM A SURVEY BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE). 2. THE EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL IS ONE (1) FOOT (DASHED). 3. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES, INTERIOR DRIAINAGE COMPONENTS, AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS BY OZ ARCHITECTURE. 4. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, DRAINAGE AND RETENTION/ INFILTRATION DESIGN BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING. 5. THIS DRAWING OVERLAY IS FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN, BY OZ ARCHITECTURE. 6. ENSURE THAT DRAINAGE IS AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN HIS /HER CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THE AREA WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROPERTY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA WITHOUT THE PRIOR CONSENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER INVOLVED. 8. ALL UTILITIES BOTH UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO, OR INTERRUPTION OF, SERVICES CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION. 9. THESE UTILITIES AS SHOWN, MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 10. ALL DRAINAGE DITCHES ARE TO BE MAINTAINED. 11. DESIGN OF ROOF DRAINS, GUTTER DOWNSPOUTS, DECK DRAINS IN AND AROUND BUILDING BY OTHERS. 12. SUBSURFACE AND FOUNDATION DRAINS BY OTHERS. 13. THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS OF THE CABINS ARE BASED ON AS -BUILT ELEVATIONS PROVIDED TO SOPRIS ENGINEERING BY CONTRACTOR. THE AS -BUILT ELEVATIONS REPRESENTED THE TOP OF SLAB. THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION IS SET 1.5" HIGHER THAN THAN THE AS -BUILT TOP OF SLAB AS DIRECTED BY THE ARCHITECT. X.1 � 0. 1, GRADE LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE SURFACES AROUND BULIDING PERIMETER AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM EXTERIOR WALL OF BUILDING TO MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE GRADE TO DRAINAGE SWALES AS FEASIBLE TO MITIGATE DRAINAGE IN LOW OR FLAT AREAS. ROUTE ROOF DOWNSPOUTS FOR LOFT UNITS TO ALLEY TO DRAIN TO S. HUNTER STREET. 2, ADDITIONAL SURFACE DRAINAGE COMPONENTS TO MANAGE RUNOFF ON INTERNAL LANDSCAPED AND HARD SURFACES TO BE DETERMINED AND INSTALLED AS NECESSARY. ROUTE ALL ADDITIONAL SURFACE DRAINAGE FOR DISCHARGE TO THE DRAINAGE SWALE. GRADE HARD SURFACES AT A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.5X 3• USE TEMPORARY MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PROTECT DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FROM COLLECTING SILT, SEDIMENT AND ANY OTHER DEBRIS PREVENT ANY OFFSITE DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENTS. V 4 CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY GRADES ACROSS THE SITE TO INSURE THAT THE INSTALLATION OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROVMENTS ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE DESIGN RECOMMEDATIONS ON THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DRAINAGE PLAN. SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING WITH Z ASPHALT MAT. 2 ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (COA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR P RE�TACT BOTH SE AND COA PRIOR TO ASPHALT co W t- 1- W z CONSTRUCTION DOCUMEN OF ASPEN ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS & LOFTS GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 25054 25054SITS9 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 DES. SJO CK. YTN CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704 -0311 1 DR. SJO DATE 8/19 FILE NO. SHEET 5 25054 OF 13 GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE EXSITNG CONDITIONS ARE FROM A SURVEY BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE). 2. THE EXISTING CONTOUR INTERVAL IS ONE (1) FOOT (DASHED). 3. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES, INTERIOR DRIAINAGE COMPONENTS, AND OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS BY OZ ARCHITECTURE. 4. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, DRAINAGE AND RETENTION/ INFILTRATION DESIGN BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING. 5. THIS DRAWING OVERLAY IS FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN, BY OZ ARCHITECTURE. 6. ENSURE THAT DRAINAGE IS AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN HIS /HER CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS TO THE AREA WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE PROPERTY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE OUTSIDE THIS AREA WITHOUT THE PRIOR CONSENT OF THE PROPERTY OWNER INVOLVED. Lo W C/ W I—i F-1 \ \ I ! II II I II III II III I II III III I II III \ I (I \\ IIII \ III (ll 8. ALL UTILITIES BOTH UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN CONTINUOUS SERVICE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGE TO, OR INTERRUPTION OF, SERVICES CAUSED BY THE CONSTRUCTION. 9. THESE UTILITIES AS SHOWN, MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 10. ALL DRAINAGE DITCHES ARE TO BE MAINTAINED. 11. DESIGN OF ROOF DRAINS, GUTTER DOWNSPOUTS, DECK DRAINS IN AND AROUND BUILDING BY OTHERS. 12. SUBSURFACE AND FOUNDATION DRAINS BY OTHERS. 13. THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS OF THE CABINS ARE BASED ON AS -BUILT ELEVATIONS PROVIDED TO SOPRIS ENGINEERING BY CONTRACTOR. THE AS -BUILT ELEVATIONS REPRESENTED THE TOP OF SLAB. THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION IS SET 1.5" HIGHER THAN THAN THE AS -BUILT TOP OF SLAB AS DIRECTED BY THE ARCHITECT. 1, GRADE LANDSCAPE AND HANDSCAPE SURFACES AROUND BULIDING PERIMETER AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM EXTERIOR WALL OF BUILDING TO MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE GRADE TO DRAINAGE SWALES AS FEASIBLE TO MITIGATE DRAINAGE IN LOW OR FLAT AREAS. ROUTE ROOF DOWNSPOUTS FOR LOFT UNITS TO ALLEY TO DRAIN TO S HUNTER STREET. 2. ADDITIONAL SURFACE DRAINAGE COMPONENTS TO MANAGE RUNOFF ON INTERNAL LANDSCAPED AND HARD SURFACES TO BE DETERMINED AND INSTALLED AS NECESSARY. ROUTE ALL ADDITIONAL SURFACE DRAINAGE FOR DISCHARGE TO THE DRAINAGE SWALE. GRADE HARD SURFACES AT A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.5X. 3 • USE TEMPORARY MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PROTECT DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FROM COLLECTING SILT, SEDIMENT AND ANY OTHER DEBRIS PREVENT ANY OFFSITE DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENTS. 4 . CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY GRADES ACROSS THE SITE TO INSURE THAT THE INSTALLATION OF THE DRAINAGE IMPROWdENTS ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE INTENT OF THE DESIGN RECOMMEDATIONS ON THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DRAINAGE PLAN. SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING WITH 2' ASPHALT MAT. 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (COA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND ODA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. LEGEND X ELEV PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION FG= FINISHED GRADE SPOT ELEVATION G GRADE BREAK SPOT ELEVATION X LP = LOW POINT SPOT ELEVA11ON FL= FLOW LINE ELEVATION EOC= EDGE OF CONCRETE ELEVATION y EOA= EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATH PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS PROPOSED 1' CONTOURS — — — — — EXISTING 5' CONTOURS — — — — — EXISTING 1' CONTOURS 7 PROPOSED RAMP '';;;,. PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED PORCH PROPOSED ASPHALT ® PROPOSED SAWCUT: REFER TO SAWCUT NOTE CONSTRUCTION DOCUME 13 V124101 PER CITY OF ASPEN ISJO I r 2 A2 122 10 PER CITY OF ASPEN L3JO I I NO.1 DATE1 REVISION BY ASPEN, COLORADO 25054 25054SIT29 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE. CO 81623 (970) 704 -0311 CONNER CABINS & LOFTS GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN DES. SJO I CK YTN I FILE N0. ISHEET 6 DR. SJO I DATE 8119104 25054 I OF 13 a I LEGEND GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 40 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 & ��♦�t .. r PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION FINISHED GRADE SPOT ELEVATION GRADE BREAK SPOT ELEVATION LOW POINT SPOT ELEVATION FLOW LINE ELEVATION EDGE OF CONCRETE ELEVATION EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATH PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS PROPOSED 1' CONTOURS EXISTING 5' CONTOURS EXISTING V CONTOURS PROPOSED CONCRETE #1;tibY?D7• IJ./:Ta i ® PROPOSED SAWCUT : REFER TO SAWCUT NOTES SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING WITH 2' ASPHALT MAT. r )ATOM Ei 7910.0[ ELEV PER CITY OF ASPEN FG= 2 4? GB= X LP= X FL= X EOC= X EOA= ��♦�t .. r PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION FINISHED GRADE SPOT ELEVATION GRADE BREAK SPOT ELEVATION LOW POINT SPOT ELEVATION FLOW LINE ELEVATION EDGE OF CONCRETE ELEVATION EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATH PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS PROPOSED 1' CONTOURS EXISTING 5' CONTOURS EXISTING V CONTOURS PROPOSED CONCRETE #1;tibY?D7• IJ./:Ta i ® PROPOSED SAWCUT : REFER TO SAWCUT NOTES SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING WITH 2' ASPHALT MAT. r )ATOM Ei 7910.0[ 1 +00 2 +00 C�� 24112 3 +00 ' TER FLOW LINE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT 25054 25054SITB9 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704 -031 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (ODA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND ODA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. EGO W W V1 W H f-�-1 s /2410 PER CITY OF ASPEN PVI STA = 2+21.54 2 4? PM ELEV = 7916.08 sio N 50.0 VC N SJO M n fA 920 0 to CD w AJ ao o 'o a3 n '918 m 2.2 APPRON MATE STING FLOW UJ 4E w z '916 w IL (1) z '914 OPOSED FLOW NE FINI ED GRADE m U MAT E)O NG FL LINE w STA. 1 +00 . 7115.17 z U '912 SCAI ES a w HOPI ONTAL; 1' =10' E)a NG GRADE PROPO VER CAL• 1 2 EV c+ n °� n w N w a v °"� n m ui N a ai ` ¢i n co n a C6 rnW " m ° o0 1 +00 2 +00 C�� 24112 3 +00 ' TER FLOW LINE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT 25054 25054SITB9 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704 -031 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (ODA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND ODA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. EGO W W V1 W H f-�-1 s /2410 PER CITY OF ASPEN Isju 2 4? PER CITY OF ASPEN sio 1 V 0161061 PER CITY 9/27/05 COdfMFmT.S SJO I N0.1 DATE REVISION BY ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS & LOFTS GALENA /HOPMS /HUNTER FLOW LINE PLAN AND PROFILE STA 1 +00 -3 +50 DES. SJO I CK. YTN I FILE N0. I SHEET 7 DR. SJO I DATE 811910' 25054 1 OF 13 I III U IIIIPJPJPJIIII n I I/ ' V I �7 ( i 6`6 t 0 6 7 r n 1 N -- — — — — — — — — — — — — 8 ------ 1 `1---------- 7c9c - - --7. V� 6� HIGH POINT ELEV = 7918.93 HIGH POINT STA = 4+01.68 PVI STA = 41.05.61 PVI ELEV = 7919.00 L� W M W M F V1 W E r � l V 7920 7918 7916 r 7914 7912 3 SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING MATH 2" ASPHALT MAT. 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (COA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND COA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch.= 10 fL - ZV.V VG m W n W Sry W N n W N m rn � n n LP= LOW POINT SPOT ELEVATION �/ /�/� FL = FLOW LINE ELEVATION EOC= EDGE OF CONCRETE ELEVATION X EGA EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION --''+ PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATH PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS PROPOSED 1' CONTOURS — — — — — EXISTING 5' CONTOURS — — — — — EXISTING 1' CONTOURS PROPOSED kOW V FEFINII E D GR E °p vl a ° cl J im 1.O1X 31X U) m M N -31 IA a o. a APIROXIMITE Da NG GR WE 1 77X 14 ATCH STING FLOW L NE ST • 5+41.42 ELE 1. 791495 EXISTI G fOP GRAD HORIZ TAL• " =10' VERM tO n app IO W I� M C u n P .- c r 7920 7918 7916 r 7914 7912 3 SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING MATH 2" ASPHALT MAT. 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (COA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND COA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch.= 10 fL PROPOSED RAMP PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED PORCH ff ; PROPOSED ASPHALT I PROPOSED SAWCUT: REFER SAWCUT NOTE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMEN Ella ASPEN ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS & LOFTS GALENA /HOPMS /HUNTER FLOW LINE NA /HOPKINS f HUNTER FLOW LINE STA 3 +50 -END SOPRISENCiNxeRING LLC. PLAN AND PRUU STA 3 +50 —END FT'IL CONSULTANT 502 MAIN STREET SUITE A3 DES. SJO CK. YTN FILE NO. SHEET 8 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 25054 25054SM9 (970) 704 -0311 DR. SJO DATE 811910 25054 OF 13 LEGEND ELEV PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION FG FINISHED GRADE SPOT ELEVATION GB= GRADE BREAK SPOT ELEVATION LP= LOW POINT SPOT ELEVATION �/ /�/� FL = FLOW LINE ELEVATION EOC= EDGE OF CONCRETE ELEVATION X EGA EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION --''+ PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATH PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS PROPOSED 1' CONTOURS — — — — — EXISTING 5' CONTOURS — — — — — EXISTING 1' CONTOURS PROPOSED RAMP PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED PORCH ff ; PROPOSED ASPHALT I PROPOSED SAWCUT: REFER SAWCUT NOTE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMEN Ella ASPEN ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS & LOFTS GALENA /HOPMS /HUNTER FLOW LINE NA /HOPKINS f HUNTER FLOW LINE STA 3 +50 -END SOPRISENCiNxeRING LLC. PLAN AND PRUU STA 3 +50 —END FT'IL CONSULTANT 502 MAIN STREET SUITE A3 DES. SJO CK. YTN FILE NO. SHEET 8 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 25054 25054SM9 (970) 704 -0311 DR. SJO DATE 811910 25054 OF 13 791 7911 7914 7912 DATUM ELEV 7910.00 1 +00 III CITY BOILO III II I II I t tll C I III t I I I � i✓ II I � C I I( � �f I �I I II I) I II / II b30 SOUTH /NOR II I 1 RONT OF WALK 3TA: 1+31.34 ELEV. 7916.79 7918 BACK OF WALKAUILDING CORNER STA: 1+37.34 ELEW. 7916.91 1 7916 EV: 7916.69 ION V. 7916.19 7914 7916.41 7912 2 +50 SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING WITH 2w ASPHALT MAT. 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (GOA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND ODA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. 7924 7922 7920 7918 7916 7914 7912 LEGEND x ELEV PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION FG= FINISHED GRADE SPOT ELEVATION X r GRADE BREAK SPOT ELEVATION X LP= LOW POINT SPOT ELEVATION FL= FLOW LINE ELEVATION EOC= EDGE OF CONCRETE ELEVATION /< EOA= EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATH PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS PROPOSED 1' CONTOURS — — —• — — EXISTING 5' CONTOURS — — — — — EXISTING 1' CONTOURS 7924 Sf FT N z Q [7 N to O z 7922 a w a 3 a a o 0 ELI o z w F `! d z (FF OF ORIGINA CABIN 7920. 7920 v FF UNIT 7 0. 6 w ' FF OF UNII 530A= 919.72 RESH ELEV: 7920. Z gRB. OTTOM OF ELEV. 7919. 7918 BA OF C IN ELEV 919.46 2 .009; 7916 ACK GARA ELEV. 7917. FL W LINE 1823 T OF GARA /EDGE 7974 ASPH T 7917. 7 ED OF V P N ELEV 7916. OW U E OF 7916. M TCH TING . 79 ;6. 7912 9 H ALES MORT C 0 ELEV 00 TiCAI_ 1' =2' 1 +00 2 +50 SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING WITH 2w ASPHALT MAT. 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (GOA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND ODA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. 7924 7922 7920 7918 7916 7914 7912 PROPOSED RAMP PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED PORCH PROPOSED ASPHALT ® PROPOSED SAWCUT : REFER TO SAWCUT NOTES CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT 2 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 & 25054 25054SIT65 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704 -0311 ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS & LOFTS CITY BUILDING AND UNIT 630 SOUTH -NORTH SECTIONS DES. SJO I CK. YTN I FILE NO DR. SJO I DATE 8119104 25054 CITY (y nF 1 q LEGEND x ELEV PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION FG= FINISHED GRADE SPOT ELEVATION X r GRADE BREAK SPOT ELEVATION X LP= LOW POINT SPOT ELEVATION FL= FLOW LINE ELEVATION EOC= EDGE OF CONCRETE ELEVATION /< EOA= EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATH PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS PROPOSED 1' CONTOURS — — —• — — EXISTING 5' CONTOURS — — — — — EXISTING 1' CONTOURS PROPOSED RAMP PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED PORCH PROPOSED ASPHALT ® PROPOSED SAWCUT : REFER TO SAWCUT NOTES CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT 2 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 & 25054 25054SIT65 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704 -0311 ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS & LOFTS CITY BUILDING AND UNIT 630 SOUTH -NORTH SECTIONS DES. SJO I CK. YTN I FILE NO DR. SJO I DATE 8119104 25054 CITY (y nF 1 q z 7928 2 7922 � III w III � II ICI REMOVE AND 3 CURB AND 1+00 1 +00 SOUTH /NORTH SECTION OF 534 B AND 534 A \ CL Pa79,9.23 z 7920 7918 7914 7912 OATW ELEY 7910.00 7924 7922 7920 7918 r �>0 7916 lo \ r \ 7914 7912 Z O itp X19 U') r = 1\ 0� o U) w Q N F- V) \ 7 olo AREA TO BE I I i i I I GRAPHIC SG ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 fL ELEV X FG= m GB= LP= FL= EOC= x EOA= I II I II = z 7920 7918 7914 7912 OATW ELEY 7910.00 7924 7922 7920 7918 r �>0 7916 lo \ r \ 7914 7912 Z O itp X19 U') r = 1\ 0� o U) w Q N F- V) \ 7 olo AREA TO BE I I i i I I GRAPHIC SG ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 fL ELEV X FG= m GB= LP= FL= EOC= x EOA= = U Q < < d i a V o 0 0 z W IL w z ? m m Z 1.- a o O Z Y Z Al CD ff m EE p W I K = �O :3 z O w a. 3 0 w z (1 STEP, 6` RI or 9 � PROF OSED FI NISHED GWE o > a .1 z o (DRIGINAL CABIN FF -791 .26) 8 00 .009 OF Ul IIT 532E -7919. 3 .00% OF UNI 7919, r - RESH ELEV. 7919. \ . 2.007- PORCH EL rV. 791 .94 A N \1 - FINISHED GRP DE 7919. EDGE OF WALK ELEV: 7918.9 2.009, APPRO MATE DOSTINC FACE OF WAL C FINISH 595 - BEV: 919.22 2.00% ELEV: 7919.1 TOP BACK C F CURB LOW POINT WALK REV 918.83 GE OF WALK 7G 19.06 6. BA OF WAX ELEV 7919. 0 7919. NISHED GRADE 19.09 CENTEF LINE OF HOMb S GE OF kSPHAL LOW PO NT OF ALK EL EV. 7913.98 • El EW 7918.71 STA: +15.96 M". 91732 9 . STA.' 2 +37 ELEV 7916. TOP ACK CURB 719.34 ACK GARME ELEV. 7917.0 EDGE ASPH T . 7919. FRON GAR AGE EDGE 4W VALLIX PAN ELEV- 7916.47 El GE OF I fALLEY AN ELE V. 7916.61 FLOW UNE OF Y P E7.EV 916.22 FLO LINE 4 F VAW.Y SC LIES 16.37 MAT EXI NG 7916 8 EDGE Y HORIZONTA ELEV: 1 " =1 ' TIDAL: r =2' MATCH SC z 7920 7918 7914 7912 OATW ELEY 7910.00 7924 7922 7920 7918 r �>0 7916 lo \ r \ 7914 7912 Z O itp X19 U') r = 1\ 0� o U) w Q N F- V) \ 7 olo AREA TO BE I I i i I I GRAPHIC SG ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 fL v 170 7(,-.. DATUM ELE' 7910.00 Fz"b7 2 +50 Ld ELEV X FG= GB= LP= FL= EOC= x EOA= v 170 7(,-.. DATUM ELE' 7910.00 Fz"b7 2 +50 Ld m wm a a � 8 a V O O {� O O z ? m Z 1.- W W a CD S 2 :3 a. o w z (1 STEP, 6` RI 9 � o a � a .1 z o (DRIGINAL CABIN FF -791 .26) 8 OF Ul IIT 532E -7919. 3 OF UNI 7919, V%a -3 .1 9 2.007- PORCH EL rV. 791 .94 79 9.27 FACE OF WAL C FINISH GRADE BEV: 919.22 2.00% ELEV: 7919.1 TOP BACK C F CURB GE OF WALK 7G 19.06 6. 7919. NISHED GRADE 19.09 GE OF kSPHAL LOW PO NT OF ALK EL EV. 7913.98 El EW 7918.71 9 . ACK GARME ELEV. 7917.0 FRON GAR AGE El GE OF I fALLEY AN ELE V. 7916.61 FLO LINE 4 F VAW.Y PAN 16.37 EDGE Y PAN ELEV: 916.62 MATCH SC HORIZONTAL " =10' VER • 1'- ' 1 +50 YCr7�1 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION FINISHED GRADE SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED RAMP GRADE BREAK SPOT ELEVATION LOW POINT SPOT ELEVATION FLOW LINE ELEVATION PROPOSED PORCH EDGE OF CONCRETE ELEVATION EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATH PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS PROPOSED 1' CONTOURS EXISTING V CONTOURS EXISTING V CONTOURS 2 +00 SOUTH /NORTH SECTION OF 532 B AND 532 A ;<;. "_,. :';. PROPOSED CONCRETE LA PROPOSED ASPHALT ® PROPOSED SAWCUT : REFER TO SAWCUT NOTES SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING WITH 2' ASPHALT MAT. 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE DQSTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPETJ (('OA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND GOA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT 25054 25054SITp 2 +50 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704 -0311 7924 7922 7918 7916 7914 7912 7924 7922 7920 7918 7916 7914 LING 8". 791700± 7912 I s 11/241061 PER CITY OF ASPEN ISJO 1 I N0.1 DATEI REVISION BY ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS & LOFTS UNITS 532 AND 534 SOUTH -NORTH SECTIONS DES. SJO CK. YTN FILE NO. SHEET10 DR. .S.Tn DATE R /fA /n. 25 54 nr, � o 7, 7 i DATUM i 7910 .4 124 4 LEGEND P ER AS BUILT COMM ELEV PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 7922 FG= FINISHED GRADE SPOT ELEVATION PER CITY OF ASPEN GB= GRADE BREAK SPOT ELEVATION I J� LP= LOW POINT SPOT ELEVATION FL= FLOW LINE ELEVATION 7920 /�/� EOC= EDGE OF CONCRETE ELEVATION EOA= EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION /� �• PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATH PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS PROPOSED 1' CONTOURS 7918 — — — — — EXISTING 5' CONTOURS — — — — — EXISTING 1' CONTOURS �¢ a 322 Z td IL V_ 3 m FF OF FF GIN UNIT CABIN 7 7920.0) 20.26 3 m a ( GINAL CABIN =7919 z 26) 0 j w �' �+ ? °' n a ? vi S us Ll 920 FF UN 7919.5 TOP ACK CONN PARK WALK ELEV: 7 919. 19. (SHED ETFW E 919.19 FINISH ELEV. GR 7919.2 FINISH F918 OF ELEV. 7919.1 ROXIM TE DO TING E FINI ED 7918. FINI ED E 7919. OW U E ELEV 7817.6 TERU E HUN .791 1 D YUGHT ELEV. 17.54 GE OF ALK 799.42 7916 E OXI ATE STING V2 W 7914 7912 SC r TICAL • =2' BEY b I 2 +50 2 +00 1 +00 1 +5U 7924 _ _ i iI II 7919.23' { I� GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN DEPT ) 1 inch = 10 fL [ 7916 PROPOSED RAMP PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED PORCH PROPOSED ASPHALT ® PROPOSED : REFER TO 7914 SAWCUT NOTES CONSTRUCTION DOCUMEN 7912 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (GOA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND COA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REWIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING WITH Y ASPHALT MAT. 4 LEGEND P ER AS BUILT COMM ELEV PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 7922 FG= FINISHED GRADE SPOT ELEVATION PER CITY OF ASPEN GB= GRADE BREAK SPOT ELEVATION I J� LP= LOW POINT SPOT ELEVATION FL= FLOW LINE ELEVATION 7920 /�/� EOC= EDGE OF CONCRETE ELEVATION EOA= EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION /� �• PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATH PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS PROPOSED 1' CONTOURS 7918 — — — — — EXISTING 5' CONTOURS — — — — — EXISTING 1' CONTOURS 7916 PROPOSED RAMP PROPOSED CONCRETE PROPOSED PORCH PROPOSED ASPHALT ® PROPOSED : REFER TO 7914 SAWCUT NOTES CONSTRUCTION DOCUMEN 7912 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT REVIEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (GOA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND COA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. SAWCUT NOTES 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REWIRE MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING WITH Y ASPHALT MAT. 4 4 5 06 P ER AS BUILT COMM 3 24/0 P ER CIT OF ASPEN 2 22 p PER CITY OF ASPEN 01610 PER CI TY 9/27/05 CO 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 25054 25054SITB9 (970) 704 -0311 ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS & LOFTS CABIN WEST /EAST SECTION DES. SJO CK. YTN FILE N0. SHEET 11 DR. SJO I DA 25054 1 O • i EAS 1 1i f - t \ \.70 -- — CABIN WEST o�, i s r 7924 7922 7920 7918 7916 7914 7912 DATUM ELOV 7910.00 r cc 0 r \ � III w III wo III a I 111 i REMOVE AND iG CURB AND i ( \ >o7S R TO SAWCUT, GUTTER. CE EXISTING RE- GRADED t �J •i _�• r..::. QI � :�..:. r f r/✓!�jl � Mm �! �y 1 < �y. :41i a. l ,r h A ;� '3'•+i ,� � .+ :�7 i' ytyv - :'G �.. �4 �*! ..�>a3 �xY` { ��+ ( ��.0 �.. �� `� �y r'Y+' L ..+ }�U' h { 0.. +� tl f '.LC�ff•(Kb a+a K:Y \�' l C -.� •fi �.. U � 1+r.'YF *'.3^ 'p �`K�rf `$�' w r } �. �..�y F C( S , �Tr.n � 4V � '•"`��. y(� §�"4• "��5' It � Ffi'� f :rt.l /G/j�/ .) a�\ ' ��. vh. /,,{ F` l ��3"��li(1X� ". v V" •' "• / y •�. ✓m '� 3 4' / L� , A-a�fi t..�:,.. h 1: � kl t . '4 y`.t< v S , y l AY ss a�:,a. 's,; �..a rn : 2�W. }`H ", ` A� �^'mF .G, .. :. �^'� „$v3 tv , �,; ?�y •. � j � "�� . st,, ., / \ < — — — — 70'1 •� %— _ — a+ — — .;�,':;. �` I 3 ` I w � K °• J I I C-4 IN I N� 3 c W 41 F 7917.60 FG=7�917.44 ?h .�, I ' 1 +2 1 +40 1 +60 1+ 2 +00 + FF= 7919.7 91 Ff =7919 72 (1) STEP IRISE a SE LANDING SLOPED AT 2% FINISHEII 0 FLOOR OF l -7919.72 S.OPED AT 2% {) STEPS 6" RISE /(t2" RUN / FF =7919.72 I SIOPEQ AT Z% ' I - 919.72 I 1 - - -7077_ .. ,. \ ;., 9 EDGE OF WAIX ELEV 7917A 5 m -..:. •:., 7'919. 1 \ ; lit Z rz THRESHOLD REV Ca, I (2) STEPS fl� v 7" WS .� N ( SE /N" RUN I �� 5" RISE /11" RUN e I SLOPED AT 2% I I ( 0 I :. , % o SL ED AT 2% I G I 7" RISE ( 1 ) " RUN K SLOPED AT ELEV 7916. — s UN 530 I ,• g I I I 5 ` OPOSE FF =9 PR D 7 ACTUAL FF�7920. I � m m UNIT 2 -B I ! Al UNIT 534- S 7924 7922 7920 7918 7916 7914 7912 DATUM ELOV 7910.00 r cc 0 r \ � III w III wo III a I 111 i REMOVE AND iG CURB AND i ( \ >o7S R TO SAWCUT, GUTTER. CE EXISTING RE- GRADED 1 +00 2 +00 WESTZEAST SECTION OF CABINS 7924 7922 7920 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. LEGEND ELEV PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION FG 7918 FINISHED GRADE SPOT ELEVATION '( C' GRADE BREAK SPOT ELEVATION LP= LOW POINT SPOT ELEVATION J FL= FLOW LINE ELEVATION / x EOC EDGE OF CONCRETE ELEVATION 7916 y EOA= EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION � PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATH PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS PROPOSED 1' CONTOURS — — — — — EXISTING 5' CONTOURS 7914 — — — — — EXISTING 1' CONTOURS ® PROPOSED RAMP PROPOSED CONCRETE 7912 ` PROPOSED PORCH rdfE PROPOSED ASPHALT K / ® PROPOSED SAWCUT: REFER TO SAWCUT NOTES CONSTRUCTION DOCUMEN SAWCUT NOTES 5 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN g AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE 2 MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING WITH 2" ASPHALT MAT. 1 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT RENEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (COA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND COA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 25054 25054SITS9 (970) 704 -0311 ASPEN DATE ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS & LOFTS LOFT WEST /EAST SECTION DES. SJO I CK. YTN I FILE NO SJO 1 DATE 8/19/0 25054 1 O 13 W Z 3 w � K °• J 9 3 c W 41 ?h FINISHEII 0 FLOOR OF l -7919.72 0 EDGE OF WAIX ELEV 7917A 5 m Z THRESHOLD REV 919.68 G ELEV 7916. — s S AP PROX MATE GRADE AT 27L TSTING TERU E 7917. FLOW L INE ELE P 7916 31 m � W SCALE I VERTICAL 1 =2 Co rn to 1 +00 2 +00 WESTZEAST SECTION OF CABINS 7924 7922 7920 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft. LEGEND ELEV PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION FG 7918 FINISHED GRADE SPOT ELEVATION '( C' GRADE BREAK SPOT ELEVATION LP= LOW POINT SPOT ELEVATION J FL= FLOW LINE ELEVATION / x EOC EDGE OF CONCRETE ELEVATION 7916 y EOA= EDGE OF ASPHALT ELEVATION � PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATH PROPOSED 5' CONTOURS PROPOSED 1' CONTOURS — — — — — EXISTING 5' CONTOURS 7914 — — — — — EXISTING 1' CONTOURS ® PROPOSED RAMP PROPOSED CONCRETE 7912 ` PROPOSED PORCH rdfE PROPOSED ASPHALT K / ® PROPOSED SAWCUT: REFER TO SAWCUT NOTES CONSTRUCTION DOCUMEN SAWCUT NOTES 5 1. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO REMAIN g AT OR HIGHER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES REQUIRE 2 MILLING ASPHALT AND OVERLAYING WITH 2" ASPHALT MAT. 1 2. ALL PROPOSED GRADES WHICH ARE TO BE LOWER THAN THE EXISTING GRADES ARE TO HAVE THE ROAD BASE AND EXISTING ASPHALT RENEWED IN THE FIELD BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING (SE) AND THE CITY OF ASPEN (COA) TO DETERMINE THE ADEQUACY OF THE ROAD SECTION. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT BOTH SE AND COA PRIOR TO ASPHALT PREP. 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 25054 25054SITS9 (970) 704 -0311 ASPEN DATE ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS & LOFTS LOFT WEST /EAST SECTION DES. SJO I CK. YTN I FILE NO SJO 1 DATE 8/19/0 25054 1 O 13 ASPHALT C SIDEWALK WIDTH SHOWN ON PLANS F 2X « w� w Y w « « w w 6' w WIN. GG w « .._:::� PM N F CROS Y SIDEWALK RAMP TYPE __3A & 3B PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. AVOID PLACING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT, JUNCTION BOXES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS IN FRONT OF RAMP ACCESS AREAS. TOP OF 2. RAMP SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 12:1. THE PAVEMENT DETECTABLE WARNING AND WELL AREA SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 20:1. i 3. CONSTRUCTION OF THE CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB CONCRETE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE CURB RAMP. CURB & GUTTER .. _..._ SIDEWALK WIDTH , 6' WIN. CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION E —E SIDEWALK WIDTH 1 4 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION F —F 6' rtnw• rnr wcrw F 1 �.2, TOP OF /— PAVEWENT WARNING AND WELL i�^ i• M) SIDEWALK RAMP TYPE 3A & 3B DETAILS PER M & S STANDARDS M -608 -1 N.T.S. 4000 PSI CONCRETE 8" 3" WITH FIBERMESH I 6 X 6 10/10 WIRE MESH REQUIRED IN CROSS PAN ALLOW 2" CLEARANCE TOPS AND ENDS 6" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. CROSS PAN DETAIL N.T.S. 6' MINIMUM OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS 4000 PSI CONCRETE WITH FIBER MESH 27 CROSS SLOPE (TYP) TOWARDS ROAD. 12" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR STRIP ALL TOPSOIL, SCARIFY & RECOMPACT SUBGRADE A MINIMUM OF 8" DEPTH TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. ALLEY ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION LANDSCAPING N.T.S. BY OTHERS 3' -0" 4 1/2" 1 1/2" LEGEND FOR RADII B _ 1/8" C = 1 - 1/ 2 " — 2" � 6' � 2" ° ' PAVEMENT L CL6 BASE COURSE CONTINUED FROM STREET. STRIP ALL TOP SOIL, SCARIFY SUBGRADE, RECOMPACT TO 957. MIN. STANDARD PROCTOR. CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL N.T.S. SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION OF SIDEWALK I 20'— SIDEWALK TO BE 8" THICK AT ALLEY BACK OF CURB FLOWUNE OF GUTTER UP OF GUTTER LANDSCAPE MATCH FINISH GRADE TO CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND CURB. LANDSCAPE 8" -4000 PSI CONCRETE NO LIP AT DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE WITH FIBER CURB FLOW LINE TO BE 1" DEEP. TRANSITION CURB THIS 6' AND TRANSITION T FLOW LINE TYPICAL ALLEY ENTRANCE DETAIL FROM 2" TO 1" DEEP. N.T.S. v 1 1 i 1 SIDE CROSS SECTION VIEW OF DETECTABLE WARNING WELL CURB AND GUTTER FL DETECTABLE WARNING WELL L AND CURB AREA 4 FOR 121 R A M P GUTTER 3' SID I WTRANSITION 6' J CURB W 6" 24" T --I I-- 3 / + ' DNA. DRAINAGE WEEP HOLE — DETECTABLE WARNING PAVERS ... °o a GENERAL NOTES a a a a a as aaa oaaa SECTION A —A • o a o a 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0" 1. THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° THE TOP DIAMETER OF THE TRUNCATED DOMES AT SIDEWALK /STREET TRANSITIONS. THEY SHALL BE 12 + WING 7RANSRION 4 4 0:1_ ` I DO 4' 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36" SHALL BE 50% TO 65% OF THE BASE DIAMETER 10 — 2.4" * MADE IN PAVER FORM WITH A TRUNCATED DOME SURFACE \ \� b T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o u o 0 0 THE DOMES SHALL BE PLACED IN A SQUARE GRID. . � • I 00000 co onocooa ° � ` 08' p•J SbND ! o• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e o a • • 2. THE TOP OF THE DRAINAGE WEEP HOLE SHALL BE LOCATED DETECTABLE WARNING WELL ° a o 0 0 0 0 a o o e o 0 0 ,.4 CURB ° 24" • • • * AT THE LOWEST POINT OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING WELL PAID FOR AS 6' MIN. TO a ° ' ° a : ° . FLOW UNE CURB 1.6" — 2.4" PAID FOR AS CONCRETE CURB RAMP e , FLOW UNE • • • 3. ALL DETECTABLE WARNING AREAS SHALL START A MINIMUM CURB AND GUTTER TO BE POURED MONOURBCALLY CURB FLOW LINE ° .d' d ' — OF 6 INCHES FROM THE FLOW LINE OF THE CURB AND (SEE NOTE 3) ° 09 1.4' p NOT BE MORE THAN A MAXIMUM OF 8 INCHES FROM ANY A DETAIL FOR TYPES 1 AND 3 CURB RAMPS DETECTABLE WARNING WELL 6" — 8 TO POINT ON THE FLOW LINE OF THE CURB. ALL DETECTABLE CURB FLOW UNE * SHALL BE WARNING AREAS SHALL BE 24 INCHES IN LENGTH AND ELEVATION VIEW PLAN VIEW EQUAL IN COVER THE COMPLETE WIDTH OF THE RAMP AREA ONLY. _ PLAN VIEW OF BOTH DIRECTIONS. 4 THE DETECTABLE WARNING AREA SHALL BE INCLUDED CONFORMINGITO M 284 AT 1 IN SPACING. DETECTABLE NO. 4 BY 18 IN. BARS DETECTABLE WARNING AND WELL DOME AND AND D�ECTABLEWARNING DETAI��DETAI�S IN THE COST OF THE CONCRETE CURB RAMP. 5. RAMP SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 12:1. THE (PAVERS NOT DRAWN TO SCALE) DETECTABLE WARNING AND WELL AREA SLOPES SHALL NOT TO BE POURED MONOUTHICAU.Y BE STEEPER THAN 20:1. - -CURB AND GUTTER TYPE 2 6' WIDTH OF DETECTABLE WARNING AND RAMP 6' WIDTH OF WING WIDTH OF WING CURB AND GUTTER TYPE 2 -- FLOW LINE ° F e 12:1 PAYERS (IYP.) 12.1_ _ •. e . o FLOW LINE o•" a e ° DOME �•) e o e 4 s D a oe D 2' '° ° 4 .. ..... ._... _ .. ... _ _ 4 e � ' e 2 ° a . n �3/4' Mk . DRAINAGE WEEP HOLED 4' _ _ T T� 24• .�. 6•� SAND FOUNDATKNN 6 24• 'i f FRONT SECTION VIEW OF DETECTABLE WARNING, WELL, CURB, AND GUTTER SLOPE PER PLANS 20' — 10' 6' CONCRETE CROSS PAN — 4" ASPHALT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT NO.1 DATEI REVISION I BY ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS & LOFTS SI'Z'E DETAILS 25054 Z6054SITES 4000 PSI CONCRETE WITH FIBER MESH CL6 BASE COURSE CONTINUED FROM STREET. STRIP ALL TOP SOIL AND CLAY, SCARIFY SUBGRADE, RECOMPACT TO 95% MIN. STANDARD PROCTOR. STANDARD CURB & GUTTER 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704 -0311 DES. SJO CK. YTN DR. SJO DAT 212l FILE NO. 25054 SHEET 13 OF 13 �— 12" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR ALLEY DETAIL N.T.S. SECTION G —G PART OF PART OF WING OR WING OR me nnoo. DOMES ° NNM SAND FOUNOATKIN ° ° --I I-- 3 / + ' DNA. DRAINAGE WEEP HOLE — DETECTABLE WARNING PAVERS ... °o a GENERAL NOTES a a a a a as aaa oaaa SECTION A —A • o a o a 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0" 1. THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° THE TOP DIAMETER OF THE TRUNCATED DOMES AT SIDEWALK /STREET TRANSITIONS. THEY SHALL BE 12 + WING 7RANSRION 4 4 0:1_ ` I DO 4' 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36" SHALL BE 50% TO 65% OF THE BASE DIAMETER 10 — 2.4" * MADE IN PAVER FORM WITH A TRUNCATED DOME SURFACE \ \� b T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o u o 0 0 THE DOMES SHALL BE PLACED IN A SQUARE GRID. . � • I 00000 co onocooa ° � ` 08' p•J SbND ! o• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e o a • • 2. THE TOP OF THE DRAINAGE WEEP HOLE SHALL BE LOCATED DETECTABLE WARNING WELL ° a o 0 0 0 0 a o o e o 0 0 ,.4 CURB ° 24" • • • * AT THE LOWEST POINT OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING WELL PAID FOR AS 6' MIN. TO a ° ' ° a : ° . FLOW UNE CURB 1.6" — 2.4" PAID FOR AS CONCRETE CURB RAMP e , FLOW UNE • • • 3. ALL DETECTABLE WARNING AREAS SHALL START A MINIMUM CURB AND GUTTER TO BE POURED MONOURBCALLY CURB FLOW LINE ° .d' d ' — OF 6 INCHES FROM THE FLOW LINE OF THE CURB AND (SEE NOTE 3) ° 09 1.4' p NOT BE MORE THAN A MAXIMUM OF 8 INCHES FROM ANY A DETAIL FOR TYPES 1 AND 3 CURB RAMPS DETECTABLE WARNING WELL 6" — 8 TO POINT ON THE FLOW LINE OF THE CURB. ALL DETECTABLE CURB FLOW UNE * SHALL BE WARNING AREAS SHALL BE 24 INCHES IN LENGTH AND ELEVATION VIEW PLAN VIEW EQUAL IN COVER THE COMPLETE WIDTH OF THE RAMP AREA ONLY. _ PLAN VIEW OF BOTH DIRECTIONS. 4 THE DETECTABLE WARNING AREA SHALL BE INCLUDED CONFORMINGITO M 284 AT 1 IN SPACING. DETECTABLE NO. 4 BY 18 IN. BARS DETECTABLE WARNING AND WELL DOME AND AND D�ECTABLEWARNING DETAI��DETAI�S IN THE COST OF THE CONCRETE CURB RAMP. 5. RAMP SLOPES SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN 12:1. THE (PAVERS NOT DRAWN TO SCALE) DETECTABLE WARNING AND WELL AREA SLOPES SHALL NOT TO BE POURED MONOUTHICAU.Y BE STEEPER THAN 20:1. - -CURB AND GUTTER TYPE 2 6' WIDTH OF DETECTABLE WARNING AND RAMP 6' WIDTH OF WING WIDTH OF WING CURB AND GUTTER TYPE 2 -- FLOW LINE ° F e 12:1 PAYERS (IYP.) 12.1_ _ •. e . o FLOW LINE o•" a e ° DOME �•) e o e 4 s D a oe D 2' '° ° 4 .. ..... ._... _ .. ... _ _ 4 e � ' e 2 ° a . n �3/4' Mk . DRAINAGE WEEP HOLED 4' _ _ T T� 24• .�. 6•� SAND FOUNDATKNN 6 24• 'i f FRONT SECTION VIEW OF DETECTABLE WARNING, WELL, CURB, AND GUTTER SLOPE PER PLANS 20' — 10' 6' CONCRETE CROSS PAN — 4" ASPHALT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT NO.1 DATEI REVISION I BY ASPEN, COLORADO CONNER CABINS & LOFTS SI'Z'E DETAILS 25054 Z6054SITES 4000 PSI CONCRETE WITH FIBER MESH CL6 BASE COURSE CONTINUED FROM STREET. STRIP ALL TOP SOIL AND CLAY, SCARIFY SUBGRADE, RECOMPACT TO 95% MIN. STANDARD PROCTOR. STANDARD CURB & GUTTER 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 704 -0311 DES. SJO CK. YTN DR. SJO DAT 212l FILE NO. 25054 SHEET 13 OF 13 �— 12" CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR ALLEY DETAIL N.T.S. SECTION G —G PART OF PART OF WING OR WING OR me nnoo.