HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.901 E Durant.77-78 goodnough apts CO ;IC . ,PiU•L PIC.13.24T _1IC'N
FOR P3OPOSED
GOOD I,CUGH IL
U_IDS3
"" SPEN, COLOR DO, -, ": JVI _ION R. '3uL A1IoNS "
(Ord. No. 22 - 1975, para. 1)
SITE:
LOTS A, B, AND C, BLOCK 119, CITY ,:FD
TCL:SITE OF f21::2,71, T2T, PITKIN COUNTY, 0OLCt. 'DO
A=PLICJVJT:
WILLIAll H. • VIVIAN V. GAD DFNOUGH
221 E, HEI PN ST!23ET
CCLTt •00, 61611
_none: 925 - 3010
225 - 3221
D i E T B. :KO TO T ;:,1 U 1 CE
F:s'B:ZU:•:LY, 1977
•
Page 2
0OHC 'TUAL PTYEiIT2ION
GOODP.GUGH TE -: ° i: }ITS
T "3ULL' OF DATA
LO_'0_ -D :T ;E: Goodnough Apart rents
L i,:;J, i 0tIPTI :N: Lots A. B and C. Block 119 City and townsite
of 'spen, Pitkin County, Colorado
1111:123 7.1 ='.D SIZE OF LOTS: Three lots, contic'uous, each measuring 30 feet by
100 feet for 3,000 sq_ua.•e feat each.
TOTAL S?U'aE FE :,T OF ",^:'D IN PROJECT: 9,000 squre feet.
PlO:01 i 02 U ?ITS: Five
TYPE OF D'..E•LLIWG UTITS L ?D SIZE !'F 'DH: one three bedroom 3,000. square feet ;
one tuo bedroom 1,500 square feet; one one bedroom
1 square feet; two studios 1,000 square feet each
.,J :CT_:0 PCI'UL'.TION: fourteen people
_ OPUL_CION OF L.i ?D 'rfII :;II :;0UTD BE DISPLAC'D: three people
•
_ J L
✓ l L T: vr. 'ASS
I' IC O3_D IN 14R� �� �
I
r s l ia t V Age .
W / � V
../
. ._ ® :ai 3 YJ
1 = d / f o '1 4 C / -
s
q a
or\ gg _ 1 E , YN! I _
_ '' am - ,g1 a 0,..s s 1 !
w P ' . 113N 3
w
1R _ _ , v
6 - ( .ON 3 n
4 y 1 1 H31Hn_
g �(I \C \ \\ — ,1 J1
�
{ � \_ ____ p' i U Z .V ill �� 1331115 Y —J V:
O /
s ni
_ Q YdVd ( (t
04 Ap I tl3N0YM . 5 1 y " `✓
RE. M OUS b % 133915 � — _ _ _
K'J•eancM9 II
:i - n
133H15 N3dSY
"- o L � J 1 � Cog y� __
� , P' 133tl1S W_ dHYD '^'
�. �d _ i w_ _ _ Lii n , • ,
O k
Pm P0 y4 F
P� - t33e_5 — � - - y — _ p . r -- 1S tl_d
/ • 4 _�J —_w__
/ OLQ Ly, _32(_ 1334_S_i - -m —_ W- 0 NOJ3 5 C
....
OO Y NY EHUE -N _ _ x _ __ Z J f
Z J • _ _—
1 \ w4 o i _ w 1 33 413 H14n0A , - W - Q,
_ \6 — _ F s
c J 3 N
/ ' £� � j � Zi�`�__ __a -- 13 3415 Hlif� -- H�(J
g I N
< V - - - -- - -_ 133H15 N_X: ¢ r
/ V mg y ni _ __ _.�_ _— —.__ Q 0
133tl1�N1N3A353 — I — r.J
� ____§ �
113415 4111)13
MEFOOµK pO1D _ �
•
w
..a 3//v1 AW3NS
U _
7 p F3 ASP i 2 .. S P,o j 11 1ZY
GRE N
I
!
E E1: 11 =
U
GS PN i / JNE 1 4E ',
//\\ 35
or .lb t•2 0° _ I' —
A NNnP /n(kK 0101...../ / 35•11103 1100 • s3, v. T
.
a lley ill / i ' 7 _ -_.
i (3.
v
V
Ccuper 0 v
- - - Qlle /
�_
�__ 1 _ //2 Itessk'r o L c Te cta
( old 11ur�dre V j r
46bcn G S -L condos RcGre
'Y d 0-4 cc.•�,lc a o t _ t s = s condo r 5 7 � L r A "v K k ItnM i o I P 1NR15 Id ±Imit Q
10 P� _5 _ °
t.
turan+
� � ] i 1 1 III i p 1 E F I" �H i 1 1 1 l E00 F ork 0
Le CIO trvoU A � C , 3 s 0chimut :,ct- t Q l Ir
\- conc i �k.se v CQn `
I1 ) -!1c: hl
- ` -1R I 3_ I e, { r). E. F __ _ Ih AS, 1 I.
CA at le,/ /13 _ r /1 9 _
1 3 7; q. i ti p f K ` N po— 2 R Slivet q n�U Thu t1 �1C 1. f.` i
F W`f5 4P +5 ley L� � 3 G /fs ��14e � S natU cvnAoi e, n the ‘.. r
�< _I Iz * L ► 1 1 J I i._l__l_ - --- - --__.._____.-_-- ___
4.: HneNet W N A / 'rS A te.
condos _ -- -.. _ —_. F __.____. - �_ -- -.___. _
Lel
S
GOODi1O1GH h' ATP; •i' PI'S t
TI-1C [ fi l *4
Land use of adjacent properties.
Co , j h?
_11-
s
Y — it
- r
^— iii ( /'i
t
y ct
Cr - .._ > - --� I � — _, _ -
Q C cope r rvengee
1
L : ±ffTffIit
DO h Yl - f - O v e t1 C+ e.
1 r7.-_ 4 a \c..
01 I P --/ /! 3 Q) —
__________
I !/ 6/
\ /\ /Q7 4 iencte
GO ID :OTTGH , IP X ;TI -UITS
The folioTing map indicates the pre3ent traffic Pattern. Af'uer the proposed
construction is completed no ch.^.n -e in the pattern - rill be required. Nine Park-
ing spaces will be provided off the alley..
•
•
I
w
J LL
f� , — I a VI U l
y
0 ..c q o ° r. V L
V
/ U
CO
h /
/
\ i I / / ‘
/
'O •D ' �r ' . t I Y.3 /
• r
p
T ��
\ �
T 1
I
.0
'c ' , i
/
Q Pet rtm,PIntS -) _ / . / _ /
St ) C..- r " r /
�
�� r�, P or
C 4 O
L. Z
m
)\. J C41e I F' - -L I LO l > ¢
od
-
a /
gioCE < t(9 / /
/ �'� 0
I 3 y
.7, �
a3
i v � - • 1
.
\ \JOM
,
i. , ' � 111
•
ASPEN TITLE COMPANY 77 - 02 -11
A TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY
POST OFFICE BOX 27
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
(303) 92-4444
Aspen Title Company hereby certifies that William R. Goodnough and Vivian V.
Goodnough, as tenants- in- corJnon, each as to an undivided one -half interest,
are the owners in fee simple,. of the following described property:
All of Lots A, B, and C
Block 119
CITY AND TOWNS? OF ASPEN
Pitkin County, Colorado
We further certify that we find no Deeds of Trust, Mortgages, Judgements,
Liens, Easements, Contracts or Agreements of record in the Office of the
Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado affecting said property.
Dated this 16th day of February, 1977 at 8:00 A.M.
ASPEN T:[im COP4PANY
- •` -, � - lc c /6
-- - - - --------------------------
•
•
. 7
a
/I/ - iinifi iii ;hie Hi a i. - titis nite: i eysey, candrity ox ie i :i
i si• trin dcaa nii n' f.{F- s.L.s s HI i[JsishiHs H:•. ‘Iii.il f '' ::... !. .
tr. SII•x:“; dfp. si e:saiot ei pcived suridcn, comp:bins
( s uX:X . f.] 0 :S1: .
•
/ — liseir es id: haat i - DO- laddei st s 'IX'' IS C "I LY exis is ter
/k/ . ....
Sill- stv ef Far t isii areas ‘eith resci.
ts vitde i ii tea ri. , sate d. of sedinal set i e.'".2.'x, CC:1;Ve ir. i
• and sd f i:X LI
ri - Subs tedetni al d iiiiriati - this dr,aelciiiid.ht , del 11 (»ifs-
LieHehes a ciicirTadi r eif i ry Hi the rinsufn of off -strr et
par k inn arnde vi th retoest t: V i Slid i iffipaCt , nyTui t,
of paved srr Face, coriVii;Ht•'.. i;;C■ safety exit
C ea: :fa i it s, :
/ 7
7K ja serdm 7 2..a...„-k e .,: o • ......,....... I.
.— ' : •
PODS
_.__.
/ --/ - Neel10Hr insect - suirstemtial excacs cc:Tacit/ exists:
-- . .
to pi ovi de 1 or thn notns cf the paopos cad Sorel opsiarri.
without subs tan thal ly al tnr ing existing 'craft i
pattcl ns or over] oad i rig the existing street Sr teiii
or thd necessity of provid lug iscreesed road rii 1 sawn
and/or idol n Lenando.
/
- Nor i er r 2 1: C ism:a c L - ringorate cd ria c i ty exists Fe r the
X ....a.
neecsc d pr osseraid doyol ongant ti i thaat subs: an
al tppi re ex i s ti n:1 teoffi c patterns :e ovei 1 odf i i dr
the existihq aireel system nr the racet,sity nf
provi ircrodsed road Hitilags and/or sadintei :ince.
/1 - Suhsteirt 101 MM r 1 — ill i ( \ ' IV OV
-- Harden He cepardrir of the ex i sting treell - le pattonn„
OF' Lilo nderload i as ni the exi sting street syst da,
or the nnsess i ty of pncrvidina increased road irrilcryge
and/or tgaintchanen.
,.......---
Colin? i it s:
La
0„..„0 ez„e.
,........4
..." ettA-- _ l
Si gng i pro / e ---- l'ai to
. :, -
,
•
TO: City Ci Rt.p ,'.n , Jf.c c i.,, :i'ri<.
D ' ;cur ii kin Plchhihe Cr , if,-
• RE: roil /;I_ or Jmpcict 1 iH CI>: LSLifi'p 'ia. :,y: Lun and capacity
JAIL: February 5, 1978
The Asoei jinitbin Planning Off icu . re l w;aj a CICVelopHant p upoSel
and r eou i re: an ana Lys i x of the bitches a 1'„ ;Bct on t .dery 1 1 ca pa ci t/
of ava 1 a . Hl :d r;_ en r to r 'ssui -I t�
h'al I i i( -1 G I r -L_i ; ,. aJ -. the 'eurest whiter
. 'Hain or cualieotih line.
1 c.
1 dtti' b .,- )'i
. S �C. r, ,.101' fGl iT.l identifies th fy
. ° 'e- f7lOrl, S _' ell - type of .
develop:i<Ilt. P1eaSe review the application and indicate the c, teoory
of impact below.
• Project: _ Goodnouyh Apartments ksubmitted by William !h liam Goodnou _
Referral Submission Date: February 14,1978
- The proposed project will have the fol1ohing type of impact on the
capacity of the sewage treatment system:
/I) - I,eelitlibl im _ - substantial excess water caracity
exists and l' 1 i no`- advcrsly affect water prec sIn c
in the vicinity of the nearest water main or connectilig
water line.
- Moderate imaae - only liwit d water capacity exists
and water pre :sure will he afFotted In the nearest
water n or connectin water line. ( ySo�
/ -
Substantial i of - this develont.eht will oa
the wattr watt trealcaient plant and seriCn I'. reduce the
Pressure in the nearest raein or connecting water 1
Comments: _—_S e... e 1 /4,c e � ___ �- --
t 1 V .
r,..
Signature Date -Fri �Q
IttilPPAL
tO: W' h Polito tepatIrtlat
FROM: Aspcn/Pitbin Planning Office .
•
. PE: Analysis of Impct on the Aspou Police Department
DAR: February 5, 1978
The Aspon/Pitbih Planning Officc is reviewing a deveioxaent propocal,
aini ye-Hires en afnlysis of the ompgsal's impact on the capacity of
the Acne', [alio Dapattrcht by cousiderire the ability of current
police E-ecurity services to provide protectior according to reasonable
resort's° cia wilhont tke necessity of additional facilities,
personnel or equipimet
The attached application form identifies the location, size and type
of developgent. Please review the application and indicate the category
of impact below. .
Project: Goodnouqh Apartments (submitted by William Goodnouqh)
Referral Submission Date: February14 1978
The proposed project will have the following type of impact on the capacity
of the Aspen Police Department:
ii - Negligible irmact - substantial excess capacity exists
considering the ability of current police security
services to provide protection according to roasouable
response standards without the necessity of addi-
tional facilities, personnel or equipment.
/ - Moderate ithwh.t - only moderate capacity exists con-
sidering thc ability of current police security
services to provide prottectibn according to rcascnable
reFtese stan6Jrds without the netessity oF addi
tional facilities, personnel or equipment,
iii - Substantial impact - this development will over-
•
burden the ability of current police, security services
to provide protection according to reasonable response
standards without the necessity of additional
facilities, personnel or equipment.
, kc C/1 Otoovegw
Comments:
1) - A
) , •
fl /ty iemtp.ti toeyetpa.
. I
C A- Le_ _kat se N-it 466Le_
T (toVie 40 ify NIA,
c .
_AC (2-:? 6 .1g. filLtf ‘ 6 -Q , rt a-f-___L_ .Pcbt jet. ccia—lAtily 11 A d(fc6,
si ; 7, ,e(4=s Date /
N. 7 / 71
/
- 1 -
. .
•
G E I l
• PLIEMPAI.
FEB C 197°
u
7 ciy
IsA 0
' c.;
TO: Asper. el ty nyjincur e4, a t r .
• COLO`'
FROM: As Ira : il P i it in Plow.i ny Obi i se
kr: Analysi s oi impncl on Ste. n DI a i one. , Park i ng Design, and Road.,
. DATE: February 5, 1978
Ths Asnen/Mitkin Planninn Office in reviewing s devo:op.leat Proposal,
and rageire an anplysis of tH pe.nocels impact en the capacity of
streo CNHIIFT: paaking desicel ent bands by esansieerisg thp capacity
of the grainnge tacilitias to edit:Hat* disctno of the surface runoff;
considerjnn the desirability of the design of off-street perking areas;
and considering the capacity of :flajno street linkaLe.
The attached application form identifies the location, size and type of
developernt. Please revien: the application and indicate the category
of impact belo.
Prrnject: Goodnouph Apartments (submitted by William_Goodnou9b)
keferral Submission Date: February14,1978
The proposed project will have the following typ of impact on the capacity
of:
STORM DPA
j›( - Negligible impact - substantial excess capacity exists
To facilities to adoohately dispeeb ef the
6
64') surface runoff of the proposed development without
-
Pit system extensions beyond these normally Mcalalled by
the developer:
/I/ - Moderate ismract -- only modernte capacity exists for
______
Ciraina* nnciiitien to aicgim:tely dispose uf the
surface runoff of the proposet develor.tnL without
system extensions beyond those normally installed by
the doveloper.
0 - Substantial iimpe.ct - this development will over-
__
burden the capacity of the drainage facilities to
adequately dispos0 of the surface runoff of the
proposed development without sy stem extensions
beyond those neimally installed by the developer.
CcPr:ents: // 4 ....-9
A
e . i
. / „,;_:. '
1
i
"(....:)
•
. nrum
)
lo: Aspen lire Ristritt
FROM: Aspen/Pittio PlantiH Ontice
RE: Analysis cf Insact un the 1:iv's Fire DeraTtent
DJ:TL: February 5, 1978
The Aspen/Pitt: Planning OFfiee is reyloiYing c devc)opment proPosal,
and require: an analysis of ite pteposci's lwact on the capacity of
the liirc deeataeol. facility by cenoideritoi the ability of the ijre
bepartment to jt•vide firs prCt.eCtiini accordion to the establishe: .
reepsinse stanch of the a opitnnytio. t rai c.: „...-w• tj nocrL -1
of es Lin! i sky; nu a neo station 0 reyliring aeldi ti en of major ecyJimont
to en existio station.
The attoched application form idchtiries the location, size and type
o deveionmant, Please roview the application and indicate the category
of impact below. . .
Project: Goodnough Apartments (submitted by William Goodnough)
Referral Submission Date: February 14,1978
The proposed project will have the folleying type of impact on the capacity
of the Fire Department,
;W: Nee"eihle iim)aat - substnstini excess capacity
exists to provide fire protcction according to the
establishud respense standards of the elinceitolate
district without tho necessity of establishing a new
statics OT requiring addition of major equip2et
(such as hydrants, \yet standpipes, etc.) to an
existing ststion.
/ / - Moderate ihatact - only moderate capacity csists to
— provide filni protection according to the establishati
response standards of the aNyopriate district
without. the necessity 01 establishing a new station
or requiring addition of major equipment (such as
hydrants, wet standpi)es, etc.) to an existing
station,
Substantial impact - this development will over-
.- burden Chti capacity of the fire department to provide
fire protection accerdirg to the established response
standards of the appropriate district without the
necessity of establishing a net statioc or requiring
addition H majnc egulimuna (such as hydrants, wet
stand. etc.) te an existing station.
Comments:
•
9 , eff.e1A2 /IAA, ,
. .744.41n4t_ej [Lift ( r5 FK , C : 76 9
Sigimiure
■
PletEPPAt
Aspen At. _.:1 t .acts nticl; st
IPA :: Amon/ Pi T Pianu - hi cc
{Z Ana of Impc.t 0n Se ae !r ._;11 (7,o.Ec
DATE: February 5, 1978
The r LA. -II1 i 1n'I1ink L " - `,`ice is re ie1lrq a do vc.k Wilt proposal,
,.a analysis r th proposal's s on auu ;�1s 'es a. rl d!lB i y -,1S - Y'CiDO`>c 1 lf'Ip��t. C the capacity i.iT the.
seraoe ., catG'ent facility fV c onsi(er1 1 t''Fcess capacity of the system,
1oest101i of the nearest trunk ur connecting sower line.
1;° attached application form identifies the location, sixe and type
of development. Please rtview the application and indicate the c.:t:U.,L
of impact below.
Project: Goodnouqh Apartments (submitted by William Goodnough)_
Referral Submission Date: February 14,1978__
The proposed project will have the followina type of impact on the capacity
of the sewage treatment system.
/ - i epi 1(7111 impact .. substantial excess canacitv exists
at to c -a P treatment plant and at the naarct
tru ea' connecting sewer line to accommodate this
development.
- Moderate ii: ast - only moderate capacity exists at
the st ieutcrient plant or along the nec:rest •
trunk cr cannectiino sewer 11ne to accontmodate this
deve 1 opi nn'L
P- Sklhsten I ",1 ii -td - this development w1!1 over-
burden the (a p a c] t/ of the sewer 'tt eatc'm'lii it ant
Or the h oaresn trunk or connecEHnq se,ter 1 i ne.
CO' ➢'I , c ts: GQ- A ✓I TyS't�. r_Ca .15 P //srr_Tn 114 L3_— eR t?TEc
eel, ^ icF_ L /r ... I�1(/kr_f Ko/N__riL _JerR oreor ry( Sr /-' n rAt- ro r3
6,5- ? _MY ✓ nA - r , r o Cx-T 7 /La C o2 rC 2Q F_ A..-r /fr.
le•• r' ST ' 6C cif
f }/;s frt. sr /i?i__ - T�=A s^ n, S.S- `:tiler o-- r14 ...._ u2q ri
Si r 1 .1 ?0 S _ -.. Date i. /3 / /9 7
57 r L / r E MAY /3€ / G' ■7 / S r'IC L /S /it , t 4A Y
CL01e. 7 /3 c. 0v, =2 Leo ri A,_r.> /=LOcw /r-- Tt-f a /y4
feor -r Or" L /TTr -E Nr4- S sonar/ M es con CS C' -o Sr r0 7v/'
F THC / a rtl E hest / S ffr- S f/6-A re
PQ L-17 r7 /r- 2eKArtAS ro P'✓T ✓R`' r -OS SiA cC , oz 'r, ' -s
4...A/- C./S PI / S S ‘../FEI C , FH-i.
•
CITY •f.dF _ S PEN
aspen ,co ,aoil- ado, am ti) h433tk
• ' 130 So. Galena
October 14, 1977
Mrs. Vivian Goodnough
221 E..Hyman Avenue •
Aspen, Co. 81611 •
Dear Mrs. Goodnough:
Concerning your inquiry as to whether there is additional
capacity in the 6" water main on East Durant Street to
adequately serve a 9 unit employee housing project, we
cannot give a clear cut definitive answer as there are too
many variables involved. In 1974 briscoe Maphis prepared
for the City of Aspen a Water Systems Report listing the
deficiencies within the distribution system, and also making
certain recommendations for improvements. The report also
listed various pressure drops that would occur on the system
assuming projected 1985 flows vis -a -vis certain improvements
being made or not being made. Therefore, I cannot, without
qualifications, state either one way or the other that any
development within the City of Aspen would have a dilatorious
effect upon the system; since the systems future capabilities
must rely upon City Council's willingness to fund the re-
commended improvements enumerated in the Briscoe Maphis Report.
More simplistically stated, if no further improvements are made
in the water system then there is not sufficient capacity to
provide for your employee units. However, if improvements are
allowed on a continuing basis then I see no problem being created
by the addition of these 9 units to the system.
In closing, I might comment that these same points were made to the
Planning Office in reference to the Midland Park project an employee
housing project on a mu di larger scale. Attached are copies of our
comments concerning this project.
•
Sincerely/ t
•
J Markiilunas, Director
Water Department
JM:jmr
cc: Planning Office
Recommended Point Allocation •
Residential Proposals
•
•
Project Da I 1/4.0 0 6 Date /4 t4 L . A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per review element).
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service — _ - - - -- - - -� - --
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection — - --
5. Parking Design _____- -_ - - -• 2 -
6: Roads
7. Energy - -- -_____ __.____-- -- - - - -- -- 2 — --
„
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 pViDts)
\ � �
1. Public Transportation
•
•
• �---__-_-'_-__--''__--__-------_-'_--'-''--_'-
2^ Police Protection
•
' ------ ------'-----'--'----'
� -- -'---.^'..-^-- _ ----'-'
3, Childcare Chi Facilities '--.'-/--
•
--_�--- ----
'
4. Bicycle Paths
-_-_--__^--
• __
5. Recycling FaCi1ities
, ^
--'-__'_--'---_�--
6. Handicapped Design Features
�.- ~-,'--
- -_--_---_------^-_-_'----- ---_---_------
7. Commercial Support Proximity
C. Housing (maximum of 30 p0ints\
1. Middle -----`-----
2. Moderate
3. Low
________ '_. _ _ _ _ . _ _
Sub Total of AboYe Points •
Bonus Points j •
_ 1 1 rte.:; Foe
TOTAL POINTS `
Nave (' " A
•
1
Recommended Point Allocation
Residential Proposals //
Project �oo r/Af yet ! !� Date — / % / 9? 8
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per review element).
1. !dater Service
2. Sewer Service - - -`- - - ---- --- _�L.,,-
3. Storrs Drainage
4. Fire Protection __ ____
5. Parking Design
6. Roads
7. Energy _ �—
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
1. Public Transportation — - --
2. Police Protection
3. Childcare Facilities
•
4. Bicycle Paths ---- - -�---
5. Recycling Facilities --- -1----
T
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
C. Housing
(m ximum of 30 points �^ SV g
1. Middle ---- - ---
2. Moderate �_- — ILI-
3. Low - - -_ _
•
Sub Total of Above Points 34
Bonus Points
A a o
04 s
•
TOTAL POINTS 340
r •
Nacre — — — —
•
• - :
Re;:c1M1(;(•(1 r: A i i Olt
Pe Hell! ; o:H. 1s
•
Pt Net I r 6)6 4 ,7.„4/ OW
A. puidic racilities Sri'V H1(?S Haxinor Of 2) pOi n jilit!;!
3 points per reviey; eicurnit).
I. 'hater
•
•
i
2. Spier Set- v i cc • •
• tri;
3. Storm LnainFirje
•
Fire Protection
46 /2/v 7,11'124/
5. 'nt i no Fe, inn ‘22--
e 6 pic...
92 6 : 1-
2.
`Ye t „ /W& .(
lee?
. . .
/3
l 3 . `,rn. I i i ; dfl `' -r"rvi : f ., (f rif fret.{ n r li HNi It ,)
•
1. P
..hli Tr ;hi {r,..1.. / � G -
2. Ponce Prot OCtion 1 - - - - - •
3. kill d 1•.r i(. _ __. —.. _.__.. ._... -, ._ _..._..._._... ____..__... . _.._. .. ...- --
1r e!,
4. Bicycle [rths /_ -- —..
• 5. i;c2"flin`_I f .ii lit ies,
4 L ej,�
6. l ;:nk ieapp f Iasi,; If HI .. / -__
% . r; r C i 31 I f "T i Ph- '_I - -.
af L , _._
)
1. i.!l'.Mt
'. i Ji., l6
3, I.1...
. n I
_ ;
. .
Suh TirliJ1 of ABUT^ Point',
•
Bonus Points f '
, . .G22__.Zz t i�c f L-Afizioni - r ? '' 'z/z41,
TOTAL Polii- //
•
•
Recommended Point Allocation
Residential Proposals
Project 6a.,e,.: /G ✓t>c ;y ';� Date 3fif ' 0
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per review element).
1. !later Service 2__ --
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage 3 -_-
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking L'esin --- - ^___-- ___ -..
6. Roads � - -.— — ____— _-- _-- � --
7. Energy 2.
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection
3. Childcare Facilities ^ -- _ � - --- - -� ---
—
4. Bicycle Paths _____._ - -_ ____ I --
5. Recycling Facilities ' ^ __- - -�—
6. Handicapped Design Features �
7. Commercial Support Proximity "2-
C. Housing (maximum of 30 points)
1. iiidd1e
2. Moderate 6 M (L -`
3. Low
}
Sub Total of Above Points 3 5
Bonus Points —
TOTAL POINTS v
s
Narne � l / l `/ r
• Recommended Point Allocation _
Residential Proposals
Project -__ Date — t _763_
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per review element).
1. 4iater Service 2
2. Sewer Service --- �------- _ - -_-- - - -2 - - --
3. Storm Drainage 3 - --
4. Fire Protection 3 - --
5. Parking Design
6. Roads �._ �__
7. Energy 2_
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
1. Public Transportation . 2—
2. Police Protection
3. Childcare Facilities
•
•
--
4. Bicycle Paths 1
5. Recycling Facilities 2-
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
C. Housing (maximum of 30 points)
1. Middle
2. Moderate
3. Low
Sub Total of .Above. Points 35
Bonus Points
/
• nn//
TOTAL POINTS c7O
� (
Name 'l A J • a Al. A.A. . ♦ .... \✓
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Office, Karen Smith
RE: Amendments to Growth Management Score Recommendations - Park Central
West and Goodnough Apartments
DATE: March 1.4, 1978
During the P & Z work session on February 28th, it was discovered that two
members of the Planning Office had scored the recycling facilities and
handicapped design sections using different assumptions. Therefore, those
point sections will have to be amended accordingly for the Goodnough and
Park Central West applications:
1. Goodnough
a. Recycling - Change from a 2 to 1 point. No extra measures beyond
recycling bins
b. Handicapped - Change from 0 to 1 point. Project will have to
meet UBC.
2. Park Central
a. Recycling - Change from 1 to 0 points. Project does not provide
bins.
b. Handicapped - Change from a 2 to 1. Project does not go beyond
UBC requirements.
The net result is no change for Goodnough. However the total was added wrong
initially at 33. The correct addition is 32, and that is the recommended total.
For Park Central, the net result is a reduction in two points. Considering
the previous amendment of an additional 3 points under housing, the new score
is 38, the recommended total.
— R.C )
1-crcnnroftrd 'Q n. 11Iloctlon
r■ pHIT
nr U M ( C ca l pi44+ Arr. ' -rger-decy 1 q78
• A. PuOl1i: Thc 1 os aHd Service:-; Noximuni of 21 points - maxirin
3 nothts por review 0 Ietiet1„
1. tiater Sorvice
L[LcJ L LJ 1
-11 <b&iT /, i ILFVTVL
41..
- (r f . -
2. Sewer •ico
2 - ;;t: kuie Lo.se T 1 ,
_AA/ t (Ce , LILL EuAt tiLLI ±± 1L]
t/fj< ctLC LL. ('-.J--
3 . Storw tiro i natio 3
_)16 •• • :WI
±ae _R" LLL itte& A 1 A AC
- Atd-L-L y .■kleidari
4. r Protect itm
- - .3 •
1"c " . (
b. Par:in('
Hevi/c.
-- PAN:ir , i'vertiff-
ett>
j
Lteys;-, Er-
• it.,44/ . PLEIcX 14 -LecieLE.
2.
1.4\ML, ktH 11_ A. .
1Vr ±It.;
it
i lcci.• h'•:•iiitir` and Fervi is
1 . •Publ Tran s ;lurLat i on 1
rMii V/ s 1 ° ., m _ w, tTN + (21145_ L_
2. Poi ice Protection _ - --
., >'t" ��l 1 . I%&/ ; • NI) LCP AT CK —=i]r
3. Childcare FacilitiQs J. ..___
4. Bicycle ycle lath s
koc cling Hcilitie
6. hi'Idlcdpre a icatur , / _
.0 C.IIAx ., , �IGN. IF Js N4 Nft) H.,
C2 rte' t. w elt i ) ) ' (
It Lc. r t<; .. •
7 . C0111E^"c: i< 1 S ;
I, 1 /Z _ �;llt k . _ } Ks�<I _ ._ Fft/\i l• 'Mc fitt
et, .- r�r a t F : F - r i t ' ITV MKT
c. oU- r ('1 r r(1
i. illd
/d
wtT4-1' -rte Avt4t <ii! u ; , ctr . 4.70 S
) l
mC,ID \I 3
•
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ALLOTMENT APPLICATION
• RESIDENTIAL SECTION
r .
•
1. Project Name: lcodnnn,h 41artnents
2. Location: 901 East Durent Street Lots A, D, C, Block 119 Ci,y and totmsite of
s en , Pitkin County, Colorado
3. Parcel Size: 9,000 scunre feet •
4. Current Zoning District: a _ •s 1 7 'n6_ t "1 i -Frd1'
5. Zoning Under Which Application is Filed (Proposed): sane
6. Maximum Buildout Under Current Zoning: 9,000 rnuere feet
7. Total Number of Units Proposed: 9 studio _nsrtncnts
and Bedroom Mix:
•
8. Size of Units: livins area 740 sn. ft. . "_.orac3e n0 seuare ft. Dec'_: (4rerae)
130sq:ft.
9. Price Range for Sale or Rent: ou=ent ner!cet value. 'le hoe Under - X100,000.S) end
plus or ninus unit • er
10. Program Narrative: believe t'2 t <Ale - r , .o utilization of this ' en located
pro :)erty is vory poor. The present de houses only t - ro _ spen ',eo"?le who own
their o-m :;hon. Our pro •ict r it nrovic'e 7idCle and Moderato Income :?ousinr* for
aproxinately 114 neople who work in ,s - :;en. It J.s our intention to sell ccrozi_:;ately
3 units or noro denondinr; on our construction costs. '1e *sill rent the remaining
apratmcnts on long tern leases. Our prices All reflect the nerket vai e at the
Zane 01 sale or rental..
A. PUBLIC FACILITIES
1. Written Description of the Following:
a. Type of Water system to be used including information on main
size and pressure and, if public, the excess capacity available
from such public system; the location of the nearest main;
the estimated water demand of the development or building.
p - 6" 'tat 7r main on 33st L?Irnat Tt. it o "Ge refer to attached
Letter from 'ae: er Department. z50 gallons : :r ::::•son nor a Cy -
14 oex'o ^le o_.os to 3500 Tallnais nor dej.
b. Type of sewage treatment system to be used and, if public,
the existing excess capacity available from such public system;
• the nearest location to the building site of a trunk or
connecting sewer line; the expected demand of the development
or building.
�;.- v +-n'•� i^. , •rf „(1) rrintinn - kith .^rti'rtrd eludn end _?'.'enco, 7este
_i- This s r -n- ail' ' J 7crnded to ”. M.G. clad be: e
tra.r�::ent. . .r_ —� b� _ •�-
to h ^ndlc the nroleot. o'er line i3 021 T'r ;•?t St. There 1' also
.one on Then '4t„ 100 - anon.: nr'nn . fi is 1400 '"allo'ls of
• ua•;te per clay.
• C. Type of'srainage system proposed to harm ; surface, underground
and runoff waters.
•
• Surface and Pino£f wr', rs ro weft one block on Durant St. to Original St.
where they meet a storm drain and (Po to settling ponds by the River.
Surface runoff from the Mountains would go down Ute to Spring St; and to
• Glory Hole Park. To the City 3ngine ors Imowled,ge Pilate 13 no problem
with under ^round water at the sight.
•
•
d. Type of fire protection systems to be used, (such as hydrants, •
wet standpipes, etc.); distance to the nearest fire station
and its average response time.
There will be a battery powered buz :er that noes off in the case of
- high tfrneratur.os or smoke One nor each bedroom. In the utility and
mechanical area there will be ceiling fi;etu_ es of the fire liquid denres-
sent. The entire building will *feet the Fire Code, Sec. 7 -1 page 435
of the Building code of the City of !open. The property is located 4
blocks east and 3 blocks south of the ±ire House. Response time is 3 min
e. Total development area; type of housing or development proposed;
number of units including employee housing; expected price
range .of sale or rental; the distance from the proposed
development to the nearest elementary, middle and high school;
the distance to existing school bus routes.
Develcpaentarea including storage and decks 8550 s_. ft. 9 Studio Aspts.
• . to anneal to .n;d'ie inrrrle non -le Distance to elementrry school:
7 blocks ':Test and 4 blocks north. ilistance_to Middle Lichool and
.High School 2 1/4 miles. School bus route goes along 82. Nearest
stop is 5 blocks east. .;ale price is below x100,000.00 and will vary
as to location. Dental denending on location of the anartment in-
long i'la ionany in crease. _fns or ,Minus ;�35o.OJ per month long &ern.
f. Estimated traffic count increase on adjacent streets resulting
from the proposed development; description of type and condition
of roads to serve such development; total number of motor
vehicles expected to use or be stationed in such development;
hours of principal daily usage of adjacent roads; on and off
site parking to be supplied; location of alternate transit •
means (bus route, bike paths, etc.); any auto disincentive
techniques incorporated in such proposed development.
7 additional cars To be used only to go out of torm since project is
with in walking distance of all city services. People will use
erupting str o s y oil' aL.ey par.ang Gp cos n oviaed.
Bus routes 7ithin 4 bloc'cs. Bice bath is 3 bToc'cs south
-2-
•
• g: Location-relative to proposed or exi,stiri "parks, playground,
• hospitals, airports, mass transit systems and estimated
increased usage of such facilities by reason of the proposed
development. •
Parks: Bass ?ark - 8 blocks; Firemans Park - 7 blocks; Garish - 7 blocks; Glory Hole - 2;
Golf Course and its elayine fields - 1 1/2 miles; Jenny Adair - 10 blocks; Lift 1 - 9;
Paepcke - 11 blocks; Plum Tree - 1 1/3 miles; Rubcy - it blocks; Triangle - 1 1/4 miles;
Tot Lot - 1 3/4 raffles U'.,e - 1/4 miles; Ute - 1/4 mile: ia,ner - y blocks. Hosnital is
1 1/2 miles Airport - 5 miles. -r 'n,.^ syntc'n. Mountain vaJ i e.r :>onte -till stop at
corner of 'Jest and and Durant St. Doubt if any increased usua_ o will occure. We believe
People already tivinr here will inhabit the nroject.
h. Location relative to the proposed development of police •
facilities, and their average response time; estimate of
additional police personnel needed by reason of the proposed
development.
Prnjnc+ i ^ l nn'• +n, 3 }�ln ^' -^ ten' +H ^n �� iii nn� -^ nom..+ nr' inn Pnli ng Depart-
ment. des tine ij estimated by Ten as 3 minutes or less.
No additional noli.cc facilities are needed.
i. Location relative to proposed development of retail and service
outlets and estimated increase demands on such outlets by
reason of the proposed development.
•
The project is 4 1/2 blocks from the riddle of the Nall, in Dounto'n
AM?en. 1 block fro m City i:arket. No in creazzed demands will be put on the
retail or service businesses of the area.
•
j. Effects of the proposed development on adjacent uses and land
- uses in the vicinity of the project.
There will be no affect on adjacent land in the vicinity of the
project.
•
k. The proposed construction schedule including, if applicable,
a schedule for phasing construction.
We are -ire ar ed to begin the spring of 1978. We estimate that the
project consit- unction 11i11 take 4 months or less.
•
- 3 -
.2. A site utitifation map shall be submitted to `show the following:
• a. Preliminary architectural drawings in sufficient detail to
show building size, height, materials, insulation, fireplaces, •
solar energy devices (demonstrating energy conservation or
solar energy utilization features), type of units, and location'
of all buildings (existing and proposed) on the development site. •
b. Proposed landscaping, screening, attempts at preserving natural
terrain and open space, and undergrounding of utilities.
c. Motor vehicle circulation, parking bus and transit stops and v )
improvements proposed to insure privacy from such areas. T,-;-(7,12.... �/ •
• d. Any major street or road links and school sites, pathways,
foot, bicycle or equestrian trails, greenbelts. P , � Cf
e. General description and location of surrounding existing land
uses and identification of zoning district boundary lines, if -
any. ('a 1 V (�- /
1
3. Additional Detailed Information:
a. Description of potential for service of project by public
• • transportation.
The City bus: Haute - Mountain Valley - st :ns on our corner.
West End and Jiurant St.
b. Description of potential for service of project by the following
miscellaneous public services.
l.) Police Protection
I refloat: Project is _iocc„ ^d 3 blocks s-uthond 4 blocks east of
the Poll - )-n _ nnt. to s i:ne is 3 ninutos or less.
•
No nc itional noli_ce facilities are ne:nded.
. 2.) Child Care Facilities
Any Child csre facilities are located with in a 'esonalble dis-
trance ;rem nose units, via -public or or:ivate trpn "ortat.).on.
•
se 4-
•
.;
3.) Blcvdle /Pedestrian paths (comment o:Arelationship to
city sidewalks)
d rennet: Downtown A''mdh is within f4 blocks.
Bike path /hiking oath a blocks south.
•
4.) Recycling Facilities •
We would be ha py to nrovide a recyling bins for color glass
•
alluninum cans and paper.
5.) Design for the Handicapped
Should a ',.andica: erson ;•�fant to rent or buy one of our
[-
studios on the 7c:und floor. would be happy to hake
chancres like ;_ T,..
-ri n�; door �d r. -.. os to entrances. etc.
6.) Proximity to Commercial Support
•
We repeat. tie a °e it blocks from Downtown and the
schools are list ;d on nacre 2 sect' on e.
B. PROVISION OF LOW, MODERATE AND MIDDLE INCOME HOUSING
1. Middle Income Housing
a.. Number of Units
3' Studio inart_a^.ents on the top floor of the building
b. Bedroom mix
none
c. Size of units
We repeat: Living area Per unit 71 :0 sq. ft.
Storage 80 so. ft.
Average Dock 130 sq. ft.
- 5-
d. Points .ticipated for this section
We feel that our project should receive full points.
It is just the type of housing Asnen Weeds. HOW
.2. Moderate Income Housing
a. Number of Units
6 Studio :h2rtmcnts located on the ground and piddle floor
•
•
•
b. Bedroom mix
none
c. Size of units
Living area 740 sn, ft.
• Storage SO so. ft. _^ve Dock 130 so, ft.
• d. Points anticipated for this section
We feel thrt our r)roject should receive Lull paints.
It is ,hunt the ty :'e of housing '2s yen deeds i'0W
3. Low Income Housing bone
a. Number of units •
b. Bedroom mix
•
c. Size of units
d. Points anticipated for this section
Total points anticpated under the Housing Section and general comments:
ede feel that ;re should rec2;ve full points for the iadd].e and Iiodera_te
sections. This area is not conclusive to Lou income housing. The location
is perfect for people who work dountown. The neighborhood I'm sure would -;elcome_
i.ce ne-: C
bti_mmenici.n' s nn the sight $nstcad of the rather second rate house that is
1d t
there now. :de have lilted in Pspen for 22 years. We have built two good looking
stall Lodges. 1n still pun and operate 4.he , no flrske Lodge end VlanH to live
many nor° year; x-r- -in otr b b,aridThll valley. Hai dreonal.ly :.122137^ this
proffer. -
1 . - t -
-....
iii -- v / / '7 _1 i _..
` _- -_.... Bus I- 0uL-e. Cooper Given .
1
ci Hey r i 2 _ //e ._.mot .....
1 __ _ •
Doran tom 0 verl it e_
v , •
. 1-LI A- 1 & \ IC
Utley ;l3 Q1 _ _ . _ ...
1 ____
\� /a - ers A\,encte.
1
GOOD TOUGH ;2 '`RT110.1 ^1S
•
The following map indicates the present traffic Pattern. After the proposed
construction is completed no change in the pattern ::ill be required. Nine Park-
ing spaces 1:ill oe provided off the alley.
•
G n 5 co e 1^ 1-0 Tp C r e.... 4 _ :2 - G1
`'q� fl
•
t1 I
GIle) /// // r/
W
cei
('toper o ye.
le / / 9
�I '( l/2 a
1 I 1 1 1+ 1 1 1 1 )te S S )e r- ; o U7 e c 1+uf2::
it i < ,v;le 2 13 C 1 of n do�rec( V �QCi y 0 nct opi-s condos Rutty.): Fork ! I 0 ger
D K I L 1rri ,1x'SI ±lrnIH`oIPEQ[R S - _
bu ra In+ ave.
i 11 1 1{ t. p �� I �'a r.,,e fot-k 0-7-;-
.I ' Le Clatr..kroU)< • a s' • iLr s -I- c,d4r•isevet- dIP
,. W:e 44at!" a ,
1 1 VI cof` o5 _ v H . t 1 i_e,aa+,i
-`_�lt I Th. � I r)- I, E,IFtG H!i 9 P,S, i I H . I�
a at 1/3 / /
� . 2 3 T,,t p K I1 L N, IC h �.�i r ^< c i (ou ti hOL!.;e5
af{+rfl` Qp+ S •�IF�r Lt S `` a /5 j D I Led
k 4 1 n c, I P a f _ I ') t i l l 11 1 1 1
4; !fie f(e11 t \A do 4 l- r, Ave,
Cot,dv
!j {( W
1
-
i
V
GOOD IVUGH tl', i ?:S
Land use of adjacent properties.
Cu s CUE r "70 Tic cic 2-1 c - ,
-p G cl -
r
; 1 U1-2122-:" n 1;V PENDENCE P.CS ` i
- /1 'CLOSED IN WMTER1 �
f
• it A 'bE d /
1 1 1 /
t �, / i y • Iw // �S 1 3Ni5 ONY1) < 4
vl a ��� Q
� ¢ _ .y Pte/ - 3tbilti I ,. "
[ 1 _
_ b ry ` � iq ] t /
11 - . \i‘
pO a }tlt DNydS - IR lYN
. L I 1 / 1I u
1 . 1 ) TR E _ ` W ` u V 8 1 tl31Nl - _ �. ON 1311 T •
• 1\ I I i I 113N 311111 • i d ,� \ n B 1 Y Y ]133tl1S VN31Y0 V)
3
o
. 4,- I a s s'
N i Y . • / . tl3NOVM • - m uw f
pN H01D ✓ -- -- - - 1
qc M i / 133n15 .01r/t4,0•4 - -. -.- -.- - ' {'
//��� 133 _ w tiFT�0.��� r..
- '`;` .c..------
i' , ter / 8 _ -87-- _. •
< n15 N3d1y _ _ _ c;:::2 � Z uT 1 Ti n (�
o.
wag;
��� P Pr_ W lStl_f v `
• / 0Y� W- 133e15_ F __t. —r. 0 r _
N
/ 3
w
r •
// O a w 13 3d_S_ .- -W�— W 0NO339s !
t r - L _ 3. — _ r __ C 07
\ ---
0 `s) a ;_ — u — 133n15 Rln. o- — �l
y � r._ N r21 GC
�� J w a �i
F o c w — ; —
1 'S n s� --- "_' --"-" i3 3nls Htdl F • w .Lc-,P
CC __ �� L � _ Q 5 p
m= -r
"- - - --
- 133815 R1N3n35 - r + ......;
i ^ -
' I 1 E n J I' H I( U T, 1 II1lnJ'� m - \ n C Lt) /J v- ^)
ME P
O r
g S . .t.•
p
.... i m � {
� E CRFEw V f i c i
0 p< . // 1 MS W ar& '0
//\\ P ME� •, s F 1 a •
• - ANNORM9NS 01,/ ,....-< 35n0031 ‘',.":5. \ U O 1} - ,
1 ` T`�— C
•
1,
,. :/
CITY OF ASPEN
aspen,coiarado, av6$ &mixxtx
4 _,,./ 130 So. Galena
r
October 14, 1977
Mrs. Vivian Goodnough
221 E..Hyman Avenue
Aspen, Co. 81611
Dear Mrs. Goodnough:
Concerning your inquiry as to whether there is additional
capacity in the 6" water main on East Durant Street to
adequately serve a 9 unit employee housing project, we
cannot give a clear cut definitive answer as there are too
many variables involved. In 1974 briscoe Maphis prepared
for the City of Aspen a Water Systems Report listing the
deficiencies within the distribution system, and also making
certain recommendations for improvements. The report also
listed various pressure drops that would occur on the system
assuming projected 1985 flows vis -a -vis certain improvements
being made or not being made. Therefore, I cannot, without
qualifications, state either one way or the other that any
development within the City of Aspen would have a dilatorious
effect upon the system; since the systems future capabilities
must rely upon City Council's willingness to fund the re-
commended improvements enumerated in the Briscoe Maphis Report.
More simplistically stated, if no further improvements are made
in the water system then there is not sufficient capacity to
provide for your employee units. However, if improvements are
. allowed on a continuing basis then I see no problem being created
by the addition of these 9 units to the system.
In closing, I might comment that these same points were made to the
Planning Office in reference to the Midland Park project an employee
housing project on a much larger scale. Attached are copies of our
comments concerning this project.
S neer !
� im Mark Director
ater Department
JM:jmr
cc: Planning Office
.., ,
.. 1
4 ,
........ --
•
- i
, 2 \
I _
) 1 .
-, e j
z 0
! or
\ - 0
.0
c
i.
)
b ,
t
g :
I 2
4 I : CI O I V
g 1 3
.• ,,
\ \ \ ).° • _ • t.t•O RS/
Y
1 a To • 0 ,
10
co
os
co
10 •
•
•-•
.---
•1 -Tr • ' • ' 0 4,‘N
'e r■S'
a A
IC
..t. 1 7 , ..
•
\\1\ \ . \ k
U •
7 - -------( • ,
C o
\ --"'
K 0...
• .,
----../ • N. .
_,. ,.. • --• „..... 4...... , ,‘ .• • • ,
, • .., . y• • . • • 1 °
• • • ,, . • 4 , • 1 4 , \ •444 ------- •
• • t 14 0‘ 0 • 4. • 0 -•--- • 1 -•44----1-"7. , - . '' . 4 \ ;;.'"V \ '4 .0P . % '.1... . .: 4 4 444- .14 .4 •
7 .
a „ • $(.. • • •)0 • • • 1 — . -- L le .-- ` A:- A b■ILS -*4 \ 0 . A \ , kD
• • Ac \ • ..‘• 41-
• .., a I I. • • a • A ---\ / 1 A e :.■ \ -4- - ....". A . - ,
• • /.1/4, 7 c a * 7 ' a • 9- • • • A L A!' ' ' --t- .. . .. • .‘ ' /
• I - A *, * • C ---- • • • .. ' --A . r -- ' " ■ 11 .-.- - r- '*- A“ P a. \:(:-. \ 4.... '
...,e r• • • • • , • • , . • • . • A C.---)- •,. ''. • ' S i___L vc..---
,........ •
L.-..... , A --- ••, ,-, q • = ..,::- , ,),-\
....\ • ..,. ..,2„,\-`,..--Lr-r174, -- t , :-.•....: Pi / \ ; i -- 1 i, - . ) ,-. .--\\
‘• .";\`,.; • . ° \ (, \ ',. = ', i . ‘- ' ..:: 4, v • \ --)" • \
(11
^ T
.,.... ° • r `: .= ....... t ,,,A,,,..
1 -"A
• _ , , ,,.:,__,^„:,- ;J:1( . : _-,...„-- ...„,..4: e 'ci, , L \ t.. • ' -,,,, t
ry n r '. I t ."' ".• '
7 ••"''''6' —
...- , •,\ --,_-.,----; .. , • .n:cr: - _. • . ...:.•:"
--•`" ' %VP/ ',. - ". . 'cl-C.'-cer.ce4;. ', -, - ii..:::•"/••:' fk; ....'i::::::2; • . ' /- ...“;,,, ">‘-',. .'. it . • • ' I ' . ‘
\■ ' ii. : / ' fl 1 ' \"?' .- ; rt. ':..' . .. .,P 4: . ii;•., i i\:.441. Co..1`;,i'efr -',L
• / C M ,,
' • i . I „ ■
s . f „ , . .! a . . ( ' e \''-, -',"" , 017 ';;:' • ' . , - F: : t 4:4 ?, ; f, , 4 ' \ ' 5 0 :
:t ‘: ' 1. • :. '
. :4=se-c \.- .t•-' -(:. \:,--- \ ,'" ,,, - :4 I a ;AA .4E-1. r d. \j'". .. AA 2 -*"
7 7-:-,•-44 .,--..... . .. \ , ...• ' . A f: .. :,- .....:ai 4 • 4° f ':. a . -,... ..‹) ,
• . q`, D) 4 c - , ., A.- 5 4. ,,
I,
, a
.>,,-C \ \ k \\ ip "-. . • ' ' . ":"0 .4.."', '' , . .. ' . './E" "
to "" ......t " ‘' .0 : 4 \ t. .1' . : , 2 4
\ . '
....,;,.. /.,,
\ ,
.....,,......-T,, . , .
''' ' ' ' , t' r i. -," -, k . - 2' .' ,.`tt,.......< " `1-C1CL4 -,..4
L7 I ' A* ..' ' C 7- — \ 1 A \
.
• - ' \F ,.. \ C `‘,‘ .--- ' -,,. • , i \ \7,
.s• .
'Y
..
. L ' _ , ' I 13 D. R. C"
". „al ' —•".. \ C. ' - , . r- ' • . '' L i ) ,;,. 1 `1, 1-. .- 1, '
) • -..
0 4- ...."4'eli
4 .- ). VM .0 1 ° ,M .44"4- ' ' \ \ ' ' -•••.- ...—. _, e'' v t -t, t ;'''. ' ' " i r ---- -_____ — ___ '>-_ .. ,, lq.. . n.
;,-;-'.%:, ',.•,. _X • -,/,') -
1 4-------
• • L
c",
+ 1 t S f t \ '-'
/ \AN f
\ \\ , LA ' A ' , .• a 4,x• , ,-/' , , : , • 4 . '')
k '''A Of S 1 0
‘ \\ , \ \\ „ , NY ,,i .., , 1' ' ■ .":-.:
, . \
\
f A /
. o
•
„..--
44
, ■\ 'V, -' , , t". '-',. , i '.r
/
/ fr-
.3 /
- ,
, .
o / o : 4
A-
e /
\ r
\ u
i )
( t Cik"--
\,
\ I
1
1
i
0. ir ,.. pi 171-•surI\ \
r r