HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.Hutch.1978\�16 - ocb
m-VW Hutch
lg7R Commercial GMP
G
. + •
f O.M 0 C. f.!"WK(I. P. 0. 0 L. C0.
RESOLUTION NO. le
(Series of 1978 )
100 Leaves
WHEREAS, in accordance with Ordinance No. 48, Series of
1977, i'ebruary 1, _978, was established as a deadline for sub-
mission of. 1978 applications for residential, 1_odging and
commercial development within the City of Aspen, and
WHEREAS, in response to this ordinance three commercial
projects were submitted for a total of 6,639 square feet of
commercial space within the 24,000 square feet of commercial
space available in 1978, and
WHEREAS, duly noticed public hearings were conducted
before the Aspen historic Preservation Commission on March 14,
1978, and before the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 18,
1978, ::o consider the Growth Management applications and evalu-
ate and score these applications in conformance with criteria
established in Ordinance No. 48, Series of 1977, and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning,Commission did by resolu-
tion evaluate, rank, and score the projects subni3.tted in the
following order:
Total Total
P&Z Ave ache fIPC Average W/0 Bonus Bonus W/Bonus
1. Tom Thumb
Building 18.52 13.4 31.92 4.9 36.82
5455 sq.t.
2. The Hutch 12.42 6.6 19.02 2.18 21.02
576 sq.ft.
3. La Tortue 10.62 6.7 17.32 .56 17.88
608 sq.ft.
and,
WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council did consider appeals at
their May 8, 1978, meeting and as provided in Section 24-10.5(e),
Ordinance No. 48, Series of 1977, riid amend the points awarded
M
to the two protesting applicants as follows:
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
W/O Bonus
1. Tom Thuml,
2. The Hutch
3. La Tortue
and,
• WHEREAS, The Hutch and La Tortue did not achieve either a
minimum of 60% of the total available 36 points or 30% of each
category•and, therefore, in accordance with Section 24-1_0.5(c),
_R are not eligible for development allotment.
NOW, `WHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aspen City Council
hereby allocates commercial development allotment in the amount
of 5455 square feet to the Tom Thumb Building application in
the year 1978 and that this project is authorized to proceed
further with any additional. approvals needed by the City of
Aspen to secure building permits.
ANDBE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that:
1. City Council recognizes the unanticipated discriminatory
effect that Ordinance No. 48 has on small projects and
small additions and, :pursuant to the recommendations of
the Aspen Planning and zoning Commission hereby directs
the City Attorney and Planning Office to draft a special
ordinance that would amend Ordinance No. 48 to delete the
requirement that projects must receive 30% of the total
points in the category of community commerical services.
.'. Council will reconsider the Hutch and La Tortue for
development allotments when and if such ordinance is
adopted.
3. That the unused 1978 allotment•of 18,545 square feet
and the unused 1977 allotment of 6215 square feet,
for a�total of 24,760 square feet be carried over to
1979 for possible distribution at that (or a later) time,
unless Ordinance No. 48 is amended before 1979 revising
the carry over provisions. It is also noted that, should
RECORD aF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
FORM SO f.. F. Horcm O. 8. d L. CO.
she Hutch and La Tortue applications be approved, that
the carry-over allotment will be reduced by the equivalent.
amount.
4. Council hereby directs the Planning Office to propose
amendments to Ordinance No. 48 to the Planning and Zoning
Commission including alternative means of dealing with
the discriminatory effect of the ordinance on small projects
and more definitive criteria for architectural design, site
design, and amenities among others.
Adopted this day of May, 1_978.
Stacy Sta.ndley III
Mayor
I, IaTHRYN S. HAUTER, duly appointed and acting City
Clerk, do certify that the foregoing is a.true and accurate
copy of that resolution adopted by the Aspen City Council at
its regular meeting held _, 1978.
r
Kathr. yn ' S . Hauter
City Clerk
-3-
9. HPC GROWTH MANAGEMENT EVALUATION FORM - Ratings of projects within the
commercial one zoning districts shall be assigned points according to
the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw which creates a major
conflict with historic structures in the historic
district or with the urban environment in the other
areas outside the historic district
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates an acceptable design
The following design elements shall be rated accordingly:
massing - (maximum 3 points) considering the massing, type of
roof, and overall compatibility with the historic
scale represented in the vicinity of the project.
Exterior Building Materials - (maximum 3 points) considering the
application of historic building materials and their
use on all facades of the structure, avoidance of
garish, reflective or other disruptive materials.
Architectural Detail - (maximum 3 points) considering overall
visual impression given by fenestration and the use of
building detail near windows, doors, corners, roof
lines and at floor level.
Color - (maximum 3 points) considering the compatibility of colors
and the variation in color when necessary to maintain
historic scale.
Architecture - (maximum 3 points) considering the use of compatible
contemporary design as opposed to the imitation of
historic architectural features.
RATE the above five (5) design elements below. Please comment on the
strong and/or weak factors affecting each of your ratings.
Project Name:
D(A. . ft"!>-c�,L (A
Design Elei„eut:
a) HASSING Rating
Comment:
b) EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL
Rating's
Comment: _F T•_ .� ��14t rir� rt,w
- 2 -
c) ARCHITECTURAL. DETAIL Rating —t _
Comment:c=`_�.T "Ta Pr—_ Coo C•'.r r.,_..
d) COLOR Rating o7----
C omme n t : '4�.► I -o a, �-r`
e) ARCHITECTURE Rating
Comment: P � , C3vF�
TOTAL Rating
Name of person submitting the above rating )L;b. tI.?0( L
3 --
V
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
RATINGS BY HPC
The H.P.C. reviewed the following project and rated each of the
design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth
Management Ordinance.
PROJECT: r�� �.. i�'y 44
REVIEW DATE: rt c r� l•� 1C1 "_
HPC RE-V I Ll; P�
� / ��/ J�v i� `, OHO / 0.�•2, /,O�P�
HPC
MEMBER
.3.
5. Mosr � 8 2. a 2, o . 6 2. a r4'
6. '��� u r. e. 1 2 1 21 I
7. - _ _
GROUP RATING, -
PLANNING OFFFICE RATING J _��...
THE COMBINED RATINGS OF THE HPC AVERAGES 6P Co� —
10. P&Z Growth Management ualt(,v o�g nn_Ev_aluation Form - Projects
t�in w.i—the CommercialCore CC and Commercial One (C-1) zoning
districts shall be assigned points according to -the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates an acceptable design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Architectural design - considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater-
ials) with existing neighboring developments.
Rating
Comment:�e/U
b) Site design _ considering the quality and character of the proposed
.landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiericy of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
12
Rat rig
Comment: fi oel/>
c) Energy - considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices
and efficient fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and
use of solar energy sources.
Rating
Comment:
d) Amenities - considering the provision of usable open space and
pedestrian and bicycle ways.
v
Rating
Comment:-------------
_ n _
e) Visual Impact - considering the scale and location of buildings
to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
,rµI5
100f
Rating
Cor lent: J L �
11. P&Z Growth Management Community Commercial Uses Evaluation Form
Projects within the CC and C-1 shall•be assigned points according to
the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any
housing or uses directed to supplying needs
of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main er.phasis
on supplying tourist services viith little or
no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses
that will be relied on by both the tourist
and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost
exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com-
munity's residential population with only
incidental tourist use and no tourist housi.ng
being anticipated,
Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to which the project
/ supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial
Uses.
Rating 5
Comment:
I b medical and Other Service Needs - considerin the extent to which
9
the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional
office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair,
grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed
and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the
community. 1,8
Q
Rating I
Comment:
- 5 -
12. NET POINTS
HPC AVLRAGE RATING 61&
INDIVIDUAL P&Z MEMBER RATING Ilr
NET RATING
13. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the above net rating) provided
the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality.
BONUS POINT ot)
rev AUzUJAf-3eE t=
14. TOTAL POINTS
NET RATING
BONUS RATING
TOTAL POINTS
NAME OF PERSON SUBMITTING THE ABOVE RATING:
(• toe.117v- A4.1 �-
DATE )6f�z�
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
RATINGS BY P&Z
.The P&Z reviewed the following project and rated each of the
design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth
Management Ordinance.
PROJECT:
REVIEW DATE:
P&Z REVIEW
V q
ti�
R 4C,Z
Q
MEMBER
GROUP RATING
PLANNING OFFICE RATING
PLANNING OFFICE TOTAL
TOTAL INDIVIDUAL RATINGS
AVERAT OF ALL P&Z RATINGS
rt--�-
10. wV`�flth ae ConirierciniMo*re r C.'t, �f -,iid�C mmcrcia'� Ube Form - Projects
4 ._.��Y
( � n �(G-1) zoning
districts shall be assigned points according to the foll-owing formula:
0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates.an acceptably design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Architectural design - considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater-
ials) with existing neighboring developments.
Rating Z,S
Cornnent :
b) Site design -.considering the quality and character of the proposed
landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
Rating Z
Con-nen t :
c) Energy - considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices
and efficient fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and
use of solar energy sources.
Rati ng 2,8
Comarent:
d) A;nenities - considering the provision of usable open space and
pedestrian and bicycle ways.
Comment:
% Rating LDS
-4..
e) Visual Impacu ; considering the scale and lococion of buildings
to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
Rati ng
Contnen t :
11. P&Z Growth Management Community Commercial Uses Evaluation Form
Projects within the CC and C-1 shall be ,assigned points according to
the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking'in any
housing or uses directed to supplying needs
of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis
on supplying tourist services with little or
no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses
that will be relied on by both the tourist
and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost
exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com-
munity's residential population with only
incidental tourist use and no tourist housing
being anticipated.
-Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to which the project
supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial
uses.
Rating
Comment:
b) Medical and Other Service Needs - considering the extent to which
the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional
office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair,
grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed
and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the
community.
Rating
Comment:
- 5 -
12. NET POINTS
HPC AVERAGE RATING 6.6,
INDIVIDUAL P&Z MEMBER RATING
NET RATING
13. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 200/';-of the above net rating) provided
the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality.
BONUS POINT
14. TOTAL PO I P1 S
NET RATING
BONUS RATING
TOTAL POINTS
NAME PERSON SUBMIT/T/ING THE ABOVE RATING:
DATE /-.(-- 16 7c5
m
T0" P&Z Growth Manageiirent ualit «f Desidn Evaluation Farm - Projects
within the Commercial zoning'
districts shall be assigned points according to the following formula:
a - Indicates a totally incompatible design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates an acceptable design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Architectural design - considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater-
ials) with existing neighboring developments.
Rating 2
Coi, rent :
b) Site design - considering the quality and character of the proposed
landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service. vehicles) an-i increased
safety and privacy.
Rating
Comment:
c) Energy - considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices
and efficient fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and
use of solar energy sources.
Rating 2
Comment:
d) Amenities - considering the provision of usable open space and
pedestrian and bicycle ways.
Rating
Comment:
- 4 -
I
e) Visual Impac considering the scale and 10c_—ion of buildings
to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
Rating 2
Cornnen t :
11. P&Z Growth Management Community Commercial Uses Evaluation Form
Projects within the CC and C-1 shall be assigned points according to
the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking 'in any
housing or uses directed to supplying needs
of local residents
I - Indicates a project with its main emphasis
on supplying tourist services with little or
no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses
that will be relied on by both the tourist
and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost
exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com-
munity's residential population with only
incidental tourist use and no tourist housing
being anticipated.
. -Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to which the project
supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial
uses.
Rating �
Camment:
b) Medical and Other Service Needs - considering the extent to which
the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional
office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair,
grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed
and intended to serve the routine trade and serviceneeds of the
community.
Rating L
Conxnent:
- 5 -
12. NET POINTS
HPC AVERAGE RA1 ING
INDIVIDUAL P&Z MEMaQ R% RATING
NET RATINIG /7 6
13. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20' of the above net rating) provided
the project merits recogpition due to its outstanding quality.
BMUS POINT �.
14. TOTAL POINTS
NET RATING Z
BONUS RATING
TOTAL POINTS
NAME OF PERSON SU MIT
.i'ING THE ABOVE RATING:
DATE 4WI ap /,�
6 _.
.A
9. HPC GROWTH MANAGEMENT EVALUATION FORM - Ratings of projects within the
commercial one zoning districts shall be assigned points according to
the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw which creates a major
conflict with historic structures in the historic
district or with the urban environment in the other
areas outside the historic district
2 - Indicates an acceptable (bu,t standard) design
3 - Indicates an acceptable design
The following design elements shall be rated accordingly:
Massing - (maximum 3 points) considering the massing, type of
roof, and overall compatibility with the historic
scale represented in the vicinity of the project.
Exterior Building Materials - (maximum 3 points) considering the
application of historic building materials and their
use on all facades of the structure, avoidance of
garish, reflective or other disruptive materials.
Architectural Detail - (maximum 3 points) considering overall
visual impression given by fenestration and the use of
building detail near windows, doors, corners, roof
lines and at floor level.
Color - (maximum 3 points) considering the compatibility of colors
and the variation in color when necessary to maintain
historic scale.
Architecture - (maximum 3 points) considering the use of compatible
contemporary design as opposed to the imitation of
historic architectural features.
RATE the above five (5) design elements below. Please comment on the
strong and/or weak factors affecting each of your ratings.
Project Name:
Date.
Design Element:
a) HASSING
Comment:
b) EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL
Cominent: -�
- 2 -
Rating
Rating
c) ARCHITECTURAL DFTAI L
Comment:
d) COLOR
Comment:
e) ARCHITECTURE
Comment:
Rating.
Rating
Ra Li ng y=-
TOTAL Rating
Name of person submitting the above rating
- 3 -
2.
3.
4.
5.
r
7.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
RATINGS BY HPC
The H.P.C. reviewed the following project and 'rated each of the
design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth
Management Ordinance.
PROJECT:
REVIEW DATE:
HPC REV I E14
HPC
MEMBER
r
—
GROUP RATING
PLANNING OFFICE RATING
THE COMBINED RATINGS OF THE HPC AVERAGES
i
10. P&Z Growth Management Qualityof Desi n Evaluation Form - Projects
witr' -in the Comm rcial Core CC andoC mmercial One CC zoning
districts shall be assigned points according to.the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates an acceptable design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Architectural design - considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater-
ials) with existing neighboring developments.
Rating,
11
b) Site design _ considering the quality and character of the proposed
.landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
Rating -.21
Comment:
c) Energy - considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices
and efficient fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and
use of solar energy sources.
Rati ng
Comment:
d) Amenities - considering the provision of usable open space and
pedestrian and bicycle ways.
Rating �.�J
Comment:
01
e) Visual Impact - considering the scale and location of buildings
to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
Rating
Comment:
11. P&Z Growth management Community Commercial Uses Evaluation Form
Projects within the CC and C-1 shall.be assigned points according to
the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any
housing or uses directed to supplying needs
of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis
on supplying tourist services with little or
no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses
that will be relied on by both the tourist
and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost
exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com-
munity's residential population with only
incidental tourist use and no tourist housi.ng
being anticipated.
Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Employee Housing - considering the -extent to which the project
supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial
uses.
Rating 0 D
Comment:
b) medical and Other Service Needs - considering the extent to which
the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional
office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair,
grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed
and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the
community.
Rating __z_Q
Comment:
24
12. NET POINTS
HPC AVERAGE RATING
INDIVIDUAL P&Z MEMBER RATING
NET RATING
13. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the above net rating) provided
the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality.
,�� ✓ �i*''�_ BONUS POINT.D
14. TOTAL POINTS
NET RATING
BONUS RATING
TOTAL POINTS
NAME OF PIERSON SUBMITTING THE ABOVE RATING:
DATE �'-
- 6 -
a
11PC GROWTH MANAGLMENT EVALUATION FORM - Ratings of projects within the
commercial one zoning districts shall be assigned points according to
the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw which creates a major
conflict with historic structures in the historic
district or with the urban environment in the other
areas outside the historic district
2 - Indicates an acceptable (bu,t standard) design
3 - Indicates an acceptable design
The following design elements shall be rated accordingly:
Massing - (maximum 3 points) considering the massing, type of
roof, and overall compatibility with the historic
scale represented in the vicinity of the project.
Exterior Building Materials - (maximum 3 points) considering the
application of historic building materials and their
use on all facades of the structure, avoidance of
garish, reflective or other disruptive materials.
Architectural Detail - (maximum 3 points) considering overall
visual impression given by fenestration and the use of
building detail near windows, doors, corners, roof
lines and at floor level.
Color - (maximum 3 points) considering the compatibility of colors
and the variation in color when necessary to maintain
historic scale.
Architecture - (maximum 3 points) considering the use of compatible
contemporary design as opposed to the imitation of
historic architectural features.
RATE the above five (5) design elements below. Please comment on the
strong and/or weak factors affecting each of your ratings.
Project Name: ^_
Date:
Design Element:
a) HASSING
Comment:
b) EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL
Comment:
- 2 -
Rating
Rating is
c) ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL
Comment:
d) COLOR
Comment:
e) ARCHITECTURE
Comment:
Rating 2
Rati ng
Rating
TOTAL Rating
Name of person submitting the above rating
- 3 -
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
e
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
RATINGS BY HPC
The H.P.C. reviewed the following project and 'rated each of the
design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth
Management Ordinance.
PROJECT:
REVIEW DATE:
HPC REVIEW
�Q�
�J��
JQ��O
OQv
P
HPC
ME11BER
GROUP RATING
PLANNING OFFICE RATING
THE COMBINED RATINGS OF THE HPC AVERAGES
ffv-fah
10. P&Z Growth Manaqnijjen t f)uality of DPsi�n_ Evaluation Form - Projects
ORNin�-the Commercial zoning
districts shall be assigned points according to.the following formula:
0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design
1 - Indicates a major design flaw
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design
3 - Indicates an acceptable design
Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Architectural design - considering the compatibility of the proposed
building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater-
ials) with existing neighboring developments.
Rati ng ;� ,
Comment:
b) Site design - considering the quality and character of the proposed
.landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of
utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of
circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased
safety and privacy.
Rating
Comment:
c) Energy considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices
and efficit.:t fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and
use of solar enc-gy sources.
Rat ng r 0_
Comment:
d) Amenities - considering the provision of usable open space and
pedestrian and bicycle ways.
Comment:
Rating Zoo
_n_
e) Visual Impact - considering the scale and location of buildings
to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas.
Rating�r
Comment:
11. P°.Z Growth Management Community Commercial Uses Evaluation Form
Projects within the CC and C-1 shall.be assigned points according to
the following formula:
0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any
housing or uses directed to supplying needs
of local residents
1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis
on supplying tourist services with little or
no on -site housing
2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses
that will be relied on by both the tourist
and residential populations
3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost
exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com-
munity's residential population with only
incidental tourist use and no tourist housi.ng
being anticipated.
Rate the following features accordingly:
a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to which the project
supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial
uses.
Rati ng
Comment:
b) medical and Other Service Needs - considering the extent to which
the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional
office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair,
grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed
and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the
community.
Comment:
Rating
- 5 -
12. NET POINTS
HPC AVERAGE RATING
INDIVIDUAL P&Z MEMBER RATING _IL
NET RATING l�,C
13. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the above net rating) provided
the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality.
BONUS POINT _&Jr jekw -FA IF
14. TOTAL POINTS
NET RATING
BONUS RATING
TOTAL POINTS
NAME OF PERSON SUBMITTING THE ABOVE RATING:
DATE
- 6 -
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
GR0WTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
RATINGS BY P&Z
The P&Z reviewed the following project and rated each of the
design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth
Management Ordinance.
PROJECT:
REVIEW DATE:
PLANNING OFFICE RATING
PLANNING OFFICE TOTAL
TOTAL INDIVIDUAL RATINGS
AVERAT OF ALL P&Z RATINGS
The PR rev-i(.v;r'(i f.)((! Fc�; i;,�,i t c t;, (_, . ,.+ , )t i .) .I'- 1, i;lk. t^i.ti:: .c:C f)f .r1C
des -ion raFid C(: ;!':I!1111 1.�r ((Y•'!';' :1"(.l il� (i �'�!;;';1) � u`_ r(/!a, l f l (_' 1 i?.:` rA r G1 (!;l'l rl
r-i<n ayc,tnet;t (it'c' i n�nc(' ,
• Pr;OJCCT:
r
ate? �-',•z,—. � � // i . �' �
`! (. ,
Fr lC/:� � 1. / / G/ ' r 7 ��' i ,•.�7 ,
r Z/
z. �.���f/ li?�� � Z•8 Zg _'Z►5 _�Z,S"- ��_ � _� !� 3 I_/r% � �Z3.%
t �-
,.
It
4.
7.
PLANNING OFFICE
THE C(?; Gii Ei) RATINO"S OF T(Ir
t
-10
_.. l3.4I ZZ•a