The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1460 Sierra Vista Dr.0056.2100.ASLU THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0056.2011.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 11 1 05 002 PROJECTS ADDRESS 1460 SIERRA VISTA DR PLANNER JEN PHELAN CASE DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE REPRESENTATIVE SCOTT BROUGHTON DATE OF FINAL ACTION 10. 5.11 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 12.28.11 00 -. Â·,.Â·. 1 Ali,1 A , A 1460 SIERRA VISTA DR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE .. f ~1 -7, , 22â€¢-4 - i _-/i External Media Located Here M-007997 7 2751- -11-1- DE- - 002- 00 16 - 20 i c . AE L l//l .,1,~.1001 ': ./ /0- 16 1.: .0.k,1.tia: tut,1.11: 11 :. 11, . 1.-1 11 1,-. '' --7;â€¢ Â·2=*.7-27#i'ENZ-137+ 1:. -b-1,4hl.-,I.- lalia I Eile Edit Record Navigate Fgrrn Reports Format Iab Help ~ i@ @,X k e .4 CQI li E â‚¬ 3 2 d'l i 11 4 / 4 0 j A lump 1 ~ *~i 0 JO~ ret] ~ 3 3 J .,22@3% 0 42 91 Routing Status | Fees ~ Fee Summarx ~ Actions ~ Attachments Routing tlistory | Valuation | Arch/Eng | Custom Fields | Sub Eermits 4 ) .-01 PermE type ~aslu Aspen Land Use Permit # 0056.2011.ASLU ~ Address |1460 SIERRA VISTA DR Apt/5uite ~ City ASPEN state ~E---l Zip 81611 Permit Information ~~ ~~*~ii Master permit - Routing queue aslu07 Applied 8/10/2011 1- Projed Status pending Approved Description APPICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE - WINDOWS Issued - Closed/Final j Submitted SCOTT BROUGHTON 927 9552 clock *Ii-| Days 1-61 Expires 8M/2012 ,* Submitted via *blyÂ¥: ; Owner VaÂ· Last name COPITO First name ROB 500 HAVEN LN GREAT FALLS VA 22066 Phone (703) 891-8371 Address ._. Applicant 0 Owner is applicant? Il Contractor is applicant? â‚¬ ~ r Last name BROUGHTON ARCHITECTUE First name SCOTT PO BOX 4096 BASALT CO 81611 iâ‚¬ Phone (970) 927-0552 Cust # 29091 :~sid Address Rt 14 tt, Lender First name 1* Last name I 41* Phone ()- Address 'AsperGokE Iserverl lanqelas I 1 oil .2 otc-=M 3476 ~INW-* 1 410 Â·00 C 65 Usc_. *2-~L~ vÂ«- 3019- 0 to s. *Â·Â»- GTAL clog -& 1 0.f // \ 3 0 ACL/f 15\(C 1 Ual beel-J LAI I fWd\26 - '.%.479 '191 '4' 'Â¢'Â·1&/'60,0.- cJ - r ~ $@loN Mont,11 Koqlod 1 1 *dne,g qell 7 4 93;!F: f tf:ilet, t ... # DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and Telephone Number Robert Copito, 500 Haven Lane, Great Falls, VA 22060 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Lot 37, Filing 1, West Aspen Subdivision and commonly known as 1460 Sierra Vista Drive Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approved one variance from the Residential Design Standard subsection 26.410.030 (D) (3), Windows, to allow street facing windows to span through the area where a second fioor would typically exist. An elevation is attached to the approved resolution. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) Resolution No. 19 (Series of 2011) Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) October 9,2011 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) October 10,2014 Issuâ‚¬LUhis dav of October 11, 2011, by the City of Aspen community Development Director. C 4- Chris Bendon, Director Community Development AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE , 4 ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: i 460 S & e.,v-c. Vishi 1):rwL Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, 411&-7Â£6 â‚¬>c 6\ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: U* Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of tlie publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 4,16&- Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 17 day of Ddr , 2011, by A~HZ *c- #S W-~ A PUBL IC_NOTICE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to My commis,fo~ ei,pires:/ 5 79 )401 A Â·tne Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 4 1.44 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertain Ing to the following described property: Lot 37, Fil- I ing 1, West Aspen Subdivision and commonly known as 1460 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen. Colo- rado, 81611. by order of the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 4, 2011. The Applicant, Robert Copito, received approval of a Residential -'03~~Sh. Notary Public ~ Design Standard variance associated with the re. ~t~:7. f.Â©k model of the existing residence. For further infor- mation contact Jennifer Phelan, at the City of As- pen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena ~ St. Aspen. Colorado (970) 920-5090. 0 9 .8 2/Ca_Qi-Aspen ATTACHMENTS: ~ i CORY J. i Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on October 16,2011. [7110944] COPY OF THE PUBLICATION ~ ~ GARSKE i VA.... My Commisilon Expire, 05/09/2012 Resolution No. 19 (SERIES OF 2011) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE AT LOT 37, FILING 1, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1460 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE, CITY OF ASPEP, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 273511105002 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Robert Copito, requesting Variance approval from a Residential Design Standard for the remodeling of a single-family residence at 1460 Sierra Vista Drive; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the Variance Review Standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval with conditions of the Variance request from one Residential Design Standards - 26.410.030 (D) (3), Windows; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; October 4, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and WIIEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the noted Variance request at 1460 Sierra Vista Drive, by a vote of five to zero (5 - 0), and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a variance from the following Residential Design Standard: RECEPTION#: 583787, 10/24/2011 at 10:34:51 AM, Page 1 of 3 1 OF 4, R $26.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO L.U.C. Section 26.410.040 (D)(3), "Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor." as shown in the attached and incorporated exhibit. Section 2: The building permit application to develop the above-mentioned residence shall include a copy of the final P&Z Resolution and exhibit. All other requirements to develop a single family residence shall be submitted as part of the building permit application including but not limited to: adopted building and fire codes, relevant standards within the Aspen Municipal Code such as engineering and water system standards, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District's rules and regulations, etcetera. Section 3: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on October 4,2011. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: - 656 -1 /:Tfin True, special Counsel Stan Gibbs, Chair ATTEST: Page 2 of 3 . Buy.1.0 U>t// Ja~ie Lothian, Depfity City Clerk List of Exhibits Exhibit A: Elevation (representing approved variance from the window requirement) Page 3 of 3 t-, 9 1- /1 I t --1--- A 0 0 9 41----- -----A - -ill-- --- -I----I--I--1.- -Â»--- 002-0 ------L-'.T:-, - 11 1 â‚¬5 â€¢.--Ill'le....6.BLE.... 4-1-L-- N : ---'- I.-/.-R.' - 1101.."J '-T--It-ii ..&r,0.-â„¢I $' CE L. Ely]_~ -8 â€ž~-- '24=irpff-&1tJ;-~--=- ,LE---- flykt_ 6-k--~PIEL,- - F-.4----51 5 ZIID IFID Trf<|Ili,og ,2 2 -7,I IM 1 . ; ----- M 1 1 1 ./. .L~B,BA. 4C f.-- ILI f_Ifff_2.--3 -JI_JIL-~~fff_JILICIJI________ ______----1- - ~ West Elevation ------- | -saeof---,Â·v-i~ 1 4,9 =V 44- _ __ t__ _YU=L-=Llt~filill:*~ |1 Â¥....LA. Frum=Tr- 1 4 .*-- .. 1.1/T ./ill Ittl___i ~,~~IIN #t ___ ]Illi-G]Il[_20]I~ I I-lf-: 1- 1 1 1 1,11 D f IFT-3 1 1 1... /06....S 110,7 . ...di*Wi*V- -NW*$..Mmgmgh.---W- H-LNJ, I-- --lJMi w. .2 -F South Elevation /1 -%r/m.-r~-11 j GENER. 115SUED FOB COPYR)GHT ~PROIECT DATA SCOT BROUGHTON Architects COPITO REMODEL 16.11 1.NÂ® 5.cul. 0,9/11 1~psa.' .#WN.r SMEELI[ILE ISHEET-NO FROjECTNO ~Ar, New Ele,auon 1 | 1 ====r==2 111.1.- .,rJ~ ' A-204 1460 SIERRAVISTA DRIVE .,-W-...,7-â€ž .....-e . - | SHEET &43$ I ASPEN ' P PC)80* 4096 ~ 2~2807-Al,en Rd,Uni,3 / Bual.C0BI621 2, Â©S COLORADO |, â€ž.: L L Ip W 970/927 0552 [0 0554 J [.] ~barifuiecu,u@rn. com .# & M . I. 23@ f Citv of Aspen Planning & Zoning Meeting - Minutes October 04, 2011 Stan Gibbs opened the regular meeting October 04, 2011 of the Planning & Zoning -Commission in Sister Cities at 4:30. Commissioners present were: Cliff Weiss, '7.. Bert Myrin, Jim DeFrancia, LJ Erspamer and Stan Gibbs. Commissioners excused . were Michael Wampler and Jasmine Tygre. Staff in attendance: Jim True, Special h Counsel; Jennifer Phelan, Community Development Deputy Director; Jackie . .. Lothian, Deputy City Clerk. Comments: Cliff Weiss asked i f Waste Management gets a permit through the city and from which department. Jennifer Phelan asked to haul. Jennifer Phelan said they have to have a business license. Cliff asked how they were regulated. Jenni fer replied that the department that deals with that is environmental health. Cli ff said in his neighborhood there is a 13 hour window to pick up. Jenni fer said for the site visit for Theatre Aspen Jessica wanted to see if we could do something closer to the meeting time versus 2pm on November 1 st. Jennifer said that staff would send an email to confirm. Jennifer said the Building Department was still researching options for the Mother Lode. Minutes: MOTION: Bert Myrinmoved to approve theminutes from September 20~ seconded by Clijf Weiss. All in favor APPROVED. Conilicts of Interest: None stated. PUBLIC HEARING: 1460 Sierra Vista Drive - Residential Design Standard Stan Gibbs opened the public hearing. Jennifer Phelan supplied the public notice for 1460 Sierra Vista Dr; a request for residential design standard variance from window standard. Jennifer said the owner of the property was Robert Capito and introduced the representative for the owner, Scot Broughton, local architect. Jennifer Phelan said the subject property was a single split level single family residence that is undergoing a remodel with a change in the roof and is changing a row of windows in the house on the street facing fa~ade. The issue is the residential design standards do not permit windows in that 9 to 12 feet; the intent ofthe standard is to be able to differentiate between stories. There are 2 standards 2 City of Aspen Planning & Zoning Meeting - Minutes October 04, 2011 o f the residential design standards that the applicant can meet one or the other; one is appropriate to the design considering the context of the neighborhood and the other be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Jenni fer said staff recommended approval. Cliff Weiss said this isn't 2 stories. Jennifer replied that was correct one was sunken and it is a split level building and just doesn't read from the fa*ade asa traditional 2 story building. Cliff asked ifthe 9 to 12 foot zone was essentially from grade. Jennifer replied that our code says when you deal with these sorts of buildings that have to come up and take it from the main level, measured 4 feet up. Bert Myrin asked if on page 3 both standards have to be met. Jennifer replied either or but not both. Bert said on next page it says that "b" is not met so were are down to "a" or what the comments speak to from the code; where can we find that in the code for "intent". Jennifer responded the neighborhood shows a mix of patterns; there are intents in the residential design standards and you can go back to that to see what is the premise for this standard. Scot Broughton, an architect, said that Jennifer did the presentation very well. Scot utilized a drawing and a series ofphotographs to show the project and neighborhood. Scot said the intent was to modernize this 1970s house by just raising the front of the building; to raise that front wall about 4M to 5 feet, which kicks into the no window zone and they are setback 75 to 80 feet from the street. Scot said they were keeping the existing windows at the existing height; it is a very dark interior and was south facing and would like to get some natural light, views and solar into the space. Scot said because of decks we have glazing in the neighborhood on other houses which do have second stories. Scot said they were 4% feet above the ground with their first story so he was looking for commissioner support and approval. Cliffasked if the lower side of the roof was just being brought up to the 12 foot gable. Scot replied that it was on the back side ofthe house. LJ Erspamer asked i f there were any comments from the neighbors. Jenni fer Phelan replied there was one for the record that supported the request. Scot Broughton said he received a phone call supporting it. Stan Gibbs said there were not delineated stories and it seems like the intent was talking about delineated stories. Jennifer replied that was the technique of trying to apply standards across the board throughout the City; there is room for improvement to clean up the code. 3 Citv of Aspen Planning & Zoning Meeting - Minutes October 04. 2011 Cliff Weiss said that he looked at a wall o f glass on a house behind him and asked if that was legal. Jennifer responded that this standard was only for street facing windows, facades. Bert asked i f P&Z had to consider the context and the purpose. Jenni fer replied the design or pattern of the development concerning the context ofwhich the development was proposed and the purpose o f the particular development. Bert said the next sentence is the context. Jennifer replied yes. Jim True said that you are struggling with that aspect of the code with the intent aspect; the standards of statutory construction are for you to determine the intent of the legislators using the language of the code. Jim True said he wasn't sure which section ofthe code you were referring to for the intent. Cliff and Bert replied 26.410.020.D2. Jenni fer said another way is the potential use in the zone district because you get something in the zone district that doesn't apply. No public comments. MOTION: Jim DeFrancia moved to approve Resolution #19, series of 2011 approving a window variance for 1460 Sierra Vista Drive, seconded by U Erspamer. Roll call vote: Cliff Weiss, yes; Bert Myrin, yes; U Erspamer, yes; Jim DeFrancia, yes; Stan Gibbs, yes. Approved 5-0. Adjourned 5:15 pm. L.4/ ' ~Ackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 4 /1 . 1 1 1, 1 1 'lili T'r664-1 Wh : 46Â»- 64* 111/1/ 14*411#lili 34/1 l e, 49 EXISTING SOWâ„¢ ELEVALON .f'' r - ------ mi I I. 9 ... <fix 1 Â·J , 1 ~f ....49 . I , 6.--1 - i 4' ' d NEW SOUâ„¢ ELEVATION ..... ~. X t .=9.- Â· Â· 4/tr iÂ· 1 1 ExuaTING-TMEN'*4'71 It Â£ 46 t__1 .-7#-/27.--- . D, l : CY ' . ..61 --I+- ..... 3 -11/ 6 -1.â‚¬ , '* 4% At, V ..5 JAY . '6*Â·rN:*4 Archâ€¢te,r COPITO REMODEL 1 41 *0,441#*.A , 4 .Â¥ a-a~tiom tF . .Ibir . .4 4 1 :* 1,6 - .wh . 1wpillill,IM will/'Ili-152696~lil9li~~izlilillilir~li IllieiÂ£illl#i9lleilillililililimililie~j~~~lililit#ilililik-Ililli~lidilli /..."./. - I'll.. 4/1-1..= - **)4* 3*Â·- lA\/PN Nkl -41Â£/â€¢ 6\P~ - 3 -Ii II.-- x.â€žfrk kpÂ·-0.--*Â·u te.- 1 9*vÂ·;e,,a - J.6<615474,-1 . . P1 MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director~r RE: 1460 Sierra Vista Drive- Residential Design Standards Variance, - Public Hearing DATE: October 4, 2011 Applicant: Robert Copito Representative: Scot Broughton . 4. . Zoning: R-15 (Moderate-Density Residential) ..2 Land Use: Single-Family Residence . 1. , 43. 161. ..1 Request Summary: The Applicant is requesting -- - one Variance from a Residential Design Standard. Â· a Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends il-51 - approval of the variance request. - ..,4 1460 Sierra Vista LAND USE REQUESTS: The Applicant is remodeling the subject property. The Applicant is requesting a variance from a residential design standard that does not permit street facing windows to span through the area typically between the first and second story of a building. Variance approval from the Residential Design Standards pursuant to Land Use Code (L.U.C.) Section 26.410.020 (D)(2)., Variances. The applicant is requesting a variance from L.U.C. Section 26.410.040 (D)(3), "Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor." REVIEW PROCEDURE: A variance from the Residential Design Standards shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied after review and consideration during a duly noticed public hearing by the Planning Commission under L.U.C. Section 26.410.020 D., Variances. Page 1 0 f 4 P2 Figure 1: Vicinity ma /. ~ IiÂ» -4 L... t. . 44...., m .-U r..4 te&#1* .1.- Aja 4 Â¥91. -, .3.Ar 2 -alix,Ze' 4940 .AfRA' mer, a., I %12'414.4 1 F. A,9,00ll Caune. ,~11~ i-~~~~,~~z . r 21735 T,OS RBBW - - i ; 1412 31. : 14%9, , . . ts ...1,00!en, 4,MFBAA Aft*jl# *+4*AS Â£ ~ - 11 4,~.41 4 4,34=* .1,3 " 147~~4 414651= 30 -1,5," Â»AA / 1220., Site â€¢ 4: 1.k .*rf.''r, Â»,rri'li#A' fâ‚¬,f~~19'Nt"r"'IM/268/4/: 7/4:tpffr"fl Val/1 9! : -# %4*4~~B'.J(/44 , d ' 1 + <1800:. /,~ 44,4 . _.1- 3, .Â¥34'kt .10; â‚¬*oh' InkNS CM-F,C 19322]11 CRAIh: PROJECT SUMMARY: The Applicant is applying for a permit to remodel the existing residence. The residence is a split level building, with a partially below grade floor. The applicant is proposing to raise the roof height for a portion of the building (Figure 1) and incorporate a band of street facing windows that project into the 9-12 footl "no window area" as shown in Figure 2. Figure 1: Raised roof proposal 1 1 1 11 11 PROPOSED RAISED SHED ROC h 1- -r.F C.J,93Â»6~11 ~ ~ 2~~11-'II>6~~ LNE OFF XIST.066,01.EROOI /-=a-m->-1,-1,1 1 -4 , - i~13'1-LE =11 I '=41= ~Â«-Uff =ju El zo , i ,~u L- kÂ·â‚¬1 4 1 ' c.-e.. # I 11 1 1 EXETINS / FIN GRADE I ~ 11 i In a split level house the main floor level is the floor from which the measurement is taken. Page 1 of 4 Figure 2: Proposed band o f windows HI --- 1 1 1 111111 1 1 1 11 i. lilli! -j-1 j -1]1 2 4 1 12 1 1 -1-71 11 1 -7-~L *11 1 0 1 1 01 l illi Ill g 1 19Â©1 1 * h 1 11!11. 1 A/....I gIII'/4, i i i i t -0| 11 6 1 1 1 11 2 | 1 1 11 1 * It IL-Â»-11 3 -3-13 - 1 /' 27-3 . 4- 1 I| <8,6 0 Â©L.)7 L--1=-221~ 7r-17- ID 1 4/ \1 1/4 1\,Â· 1/ \ ZZILI~- , F fST F~OOR LEVEL ~- ~ ~ 'll 1 -3-[ 31--l.Lujr-rÂ·-p-*2~2 ; 1 111 2 -U==41_* -Unt=*==Er[ 9 Â»_[LL -, 9 -. : 1 1 rte 4=42=::Â«-= [=1 c 11 ' ) t] i r-,int i t..firrâ€ž_2 r-~m-= r-1---t*==r- ' 1' 1 1 - LL_' . 1 ENTRY FLOOR LEVE: 1 7 I 1-1 lili 1 1 1 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCES: All new structures in the City of Aspen are required to meet the residential design standards or obtain a variance from the standards pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.410, Residential Design Standards. The purpose of the standards "is to preserve established neighborhood scale and character....ensure that neighborhoods are public places....that each home...contribute to the streetscape." The subject property is undergoing an extensive remodel but is not being demolished. Due to the split level nature of the residence, the main level is 4.5 feet above grade. There are two review standards that the applicant may meet if the Commission is to grant a variance from the standard, Section 26.410.020 (D)(2): a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Comment: Residential Design Standards have been adopted to contribute to the streetscape, enhance the pedestrian environment and promote architectural elements that are important components to neighborhood character. The intent of the "no window area" is to Page 1 of 4 - P4 provide human scale to the facade and reinforce local building traditions. Historically, windows did not span two stories, so a building read as two defined levels. Although there is no site specific constraint to meet the design standard, the purpose of the standard is not practically met with this split level building. A split level does not avail itself to easily read as two distinct floors. Requiring a "no window area" would not meet the intent of the standard. Staff recommends that the variance be approved. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: In reviewing the proposal, Staff believes that the request does meet the variance review standards that are set forth in Land Use Code Section 26.410.020 D, Variances, for the window variance request. Staff recommends the Commission approve this application. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution No. ~ , Series of 2011, approving a variance request from the Residential Design Standards." ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings Exhibit B - Public Comment Exhibit C - Application Page 1 0 f 4 P5 Resolution No. (SERIES OF 2011) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE AT LOT 37, FILING 1, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1460 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 1273511105002 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Robert Copito, requesting Variance approval from a Residential Design Standard for the remodeling of a single-family residence at 1460 Sierra Vista Drive; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the Variance Review Standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval with conditions of the Variance request from one Residential Design Standards - 26.410.030 (D) (3), Windows; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; October 4, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the noted Variance request at1460 Sierra Vista Drive, by a vote of_ to _(_ - _), and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion o f public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a variance from the following Residential Design Standard: P6 L.U.C. Section 26.410.040 (D)(3), "Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor," as shown in the attached and incorporated exhibit. Section 2: The building permit application to develop the above-mentioned residence shall include a copy of the final P&Z Resolution and exhibit. All other requirements to develop a single family residence shall be submitted as part of the building permit application including but not limited to: adopted building and fire codes, relevant standards within the Aspen Municipal Code such as engineering and water system standards, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District' s rules and regulations, etcetera. Section 3: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on October 4,2011. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Jim True, special Counsel Stan Gibbs, Chair ATTEST: P1 Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk List of Exhibits Exhibit A: Elevation (representing approved variance from the window requirement) P8 EXHIBIT A REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS A. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW No variance shall be permitted unless the Board of Adjustment makes a determination that the proposed development complies with either of the requirements set forth below: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Finding Residential Design Standards have been adopted to contribute to the streetscape, enhance the pedestrian environment and promote architectural elements that are important components to neighborhood character, The intent of the "no window area" is to provide human scale to the facade and reinforce local building traditions. Historically, -windows did not span two stories, so a building read as two defined levels. Although there is no site specific constraint to meet the design standard, the purpose of the standard is not practically met with this split level building. A split level does not avail itself to easily read as two distinct floors. Requiring a "no window area" would not meet the intent of the standard. Stajfrecommends that the variance be approved. P9 From: John Barnes <elwoodbarnes@aol.com> Date: September 19, 2011 2:34:56 PM MDT To: scot@scotbarchitects.corn Subject: Copito house remodel, 1460 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen Dear Scot, I received your letter and the attached drawings on the Copito remodel. After reviewing all the elevations, we are in favor of the proposed changes to the house. I think it will add to the character of the neighborhood in that it is different in style from so much of what has been built. As full time residents of the Cemetery Lane neighborhood, it is encouraging to see people upgrading their homes to keep our area nice in this difficult economic climate. If I can be of any further assistance in the P&Z process, please don't hesitate to call me. John & Sharon Barnes JSO Partners LLC. i Email secured by Check Point 0>it\SEr- L, CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Drew Alexander, 925.2739 DATE: 08.04.2011 PROJECT: 1460 Sierra Vista Dr. REPRESENTATIVE: Scot Broughton, 927.0552 OWNER: Robert Copito REQUEST: Residential Design Standard (RDS) Variance, Windows between 9' - 12' DESCRIPTION: The prospective applicant is preparing to submit a building permit for the purposes of remodeling an existing home at 1460 Sierra Vista Dr. During an initial zoning check of the building plans, it was revealed that one street-facing fagade of the home would not be compliant with a Residential Design Standard (RDS) regarding windows. Specifically: 26.410.040.D.3(a) - Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor. For interior staircases, this measurement will be made from the first landing if one exists. A transom window above the main entry is exempt from this standard. The applicant is requesting a variance from this RDS so that the original design can be implemented. Staff has determined that this review cannot be handled administratively and requires a Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) review. P&Z is a public hearing and will require noticing. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http:#www.aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/41/landuseappform.pdf Land Use Code: http:Uwww.aspen pitkin .com/Departments/Com mun ity-Development/Planning-a nd-Zon i nq/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.306 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.410.040.D.3 Windows Review by: Community Development for staff recommendation. Planning and Zoning Commission shall be the final review authority. Public Hearing: Required (15 days in advance to public hearing) Planning Fees: $1,470. This includes six (6) hours of staff time. Additional staff hours, if needed, will be billed at $245 per hour. Total Deposit: $1,470.00 4 To apply, submit the following information: [l~Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. [f'Pre-application Conference Summary. [~Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. [0~ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. I~ Total deposit for review of the application. [0' A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. [~ Proposed elevations of the development I~ Neighborhood block plan at 1"= 50' (available from City Engineering Department). Graphically show the front portions of the all existing buildings on both sides of block and their setback from the street in feet. Identify parking and front entry for each building and locate any accessory dwelling units along the alley. LM Photographic panorama. Show elevations of all buildings on both sides of the block, including present condition of the subject property, Label photos and mount on a presentation board. [f 1.Q Copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. E An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. I , ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: A-1- 65:'p 9-Â» , . u) 5,Â¥T A4Â·pe:14 Location: Â£4*67 411,#tk \lpfrA. **leâ‚¬ AÂ¢Fâ€¢AL) Us:~:'47 F'~114,8, 1 (Indicate street address. lot & block number. legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) .2 74,9 t o 8272 APPLICANT: Name: 0%.:e~r- 6,rl-rt, Address: â‚¬*zp A.vEA La,1,4 geatt- rfxit \A Â¢ 24/4, Phone #: -70-6 -Â»=rl - F-*-7 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: aerÂ· 35=:~&&4=,1- ,&12*1 *67 LUL Address: 6,Â£ 4Â©14 *Â»dor Ce> 9.l (91-1 Phone #: 137Â· o 65'Z- TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): C GMQS Exemption E Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use E GMQS Allotment E Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) E Text/Map Amendment E Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA j ESA - 8040 Greentine, Stream E Subdivision Exemption (includes 2 Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review U Lot Split E Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion ~ Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment U Other: E Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings. uses, previous approvals etc.) â‚¬)Â£,0+ 4# 11 7*1*ee , allâ‚¬Ae,1 geetÂ·*er 04 7- 6[U -Aeltagl~ PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings. uses, modificationf 6 I 43 lâ‚¬ Fw#**c i 14 zg,Ja,~>e Â£ &4Iled DitÂ·Ula- i)~A 84 -674Â¥130 !1:lve you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ L4-10 ,~~Pre-Application Conference Summary ,~ Attachment#1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form U Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards U 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy ofall written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part ofthe application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: SorrrÂ© 248 ReCEL- Applicant: ~ tz:*t,De'*t'hi Location: l4(#7 42, 1.$224 11*TA treive. A*,1. Zone District: Lot Size: dr-Irtas'll K Â£ 10'-df Lot Area: (901 41 0Â¥ ( for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Â£+ ACL? Proposed: \ 4 AGO Number of bedrooms: Existing: A Proposed: e) Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): 1~. * DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: ~~6*) Allowable: 1~4~2'~ Proposed: *ifil 1 1. Principal bldg. height: Existing: \1.e Allowable: 4.Â¢7~'O" Proposed: 119-d> 1 1 i 1 " 1 11 Access. bldg. height: Existing: \'4 -6 Allowable: 1.8 - e Proposed: \9 ' ~f On-Site parking: Existing: â‚¬7 Required: 05 Proposed: 6 % Site coverage: Existing.- 14 ~ Required. 414 Proposed: 1,1&~~ % Open Space: Existing: 1- 4 7~ Required.Â· A.A proposed: 1 , o Front Setback: Existing: 4.4 *4~ Required: 120 ' Proposed: 1Â·'~'i'~~ Rear Setback: Existing:7~ U" Required. \e~-8 proposed: 428- (f Combined F/R: Existing:E~,1 10' Required. 4Â£:,1.O Proposed: 04,0'4 .. Side Setback: Existing: 11 '-.2~â€¢" Required: 1040 Proposed: 104'Â· Il '~ Side Setback: Existing: 1.0~' 4~ Required: '\,5"d~ Proposed: '2~- 01" Combined Sides: Existing.~ 57'-4" Required. 'ZO~:5) ' Proposed.* *30~~'~U~ " Distance Between Existing 44 Required: \O'â‚¬) Proposed: t\A t% Buildings Existing non-conformities or,encroachinents: ~,nz*,-1~r 540â‚¬-~Â· ~Ac~ 10-0" f..epre{ Pr A ccÂ·ep.wl * 1 - tx' 41. 1 4 24-7 Variations requested: im.-DeErK Â«64=44 - 4Â£46,0 V Â¢1'96(6~2 % w Â«1Â·reâ‚¬,4 +tolf bklwâ‚¬*t 1 1 611 12 12,4#' m ATTACHMENT 4- MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For application requirements, 1-efer to the numbers in the in second column. These nlinibers correspond to the key on page 9. For nitiltiple reviews, do not dilplicate information. All application materials must be complete and submitted in collated packets. All drawings must include an accurate graphic scale Type of Review App. Submission Requirements Process Type (Sec Process Number of Required Submittal (See key on page 9.) Description in Att.5) Packets 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW 1-7,8-10,35 P& Z 10 8040 GREENLINE EXEMPTION 1-7,8-10,35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 1-7, 8, 10, 11, 12,35 P & Z OR ADMINISTRATIVE (Based 2 for 0 Admin., 10 for P &Z on Location) , STREAM MARGIN EXEMPTION 1-7,8,10,11,12,35 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW 1-7, 13,14,35 P& Z 10 MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE 1-7, 15, 16,35 P&Z 10 CONDITIONAL USE 1-7,9,17 P&Z 10 SPECIAL REVIEW* 1-7, Additional Submission Reg. depend P&Z 10 on nature ofthe Special Review Request. SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19, 20, 21, 35 P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL 20 EXEMPT SUBDIVISION 1-7, 18, 19,20, 21, 35 CITY COUNCIL 10 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1-7,22 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW 2 LOT SPLIT 1-7, 22 CITY COUNCIL 10 CODE AMENDMENT 1-4,7,23 P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL 20 WIRELESS TELECOM. 1-7,16,24,25,26,27,35 ADMIN. OR P&Z 2 for Admin., 10 for P&Z SATELITE DISH OVER 24" IN 1-7 ADMIN. OR P&Z 2 for Admin., 10 for P&Z DIAMETER *2 RES. DESIGN STANDARDS 1-7,9,28,29,30 P& ZORDRAC 10 VARIANCE GMQS ExEIMPTION* 1-7, Additional Submission Reg. depend ADMIN., OR P & Z, AND/OR CC 2 for Admin., 10 for P & Z, 20 for P on nature of the Exemption Request. (BASED ON EXEMPTION TYPE) & Z and CC CONDOMINIUMIZATION 1,31 ADMINISTRATIVE 2 PUD 1-7,32,33,35 CONCEPTUAL -P&Z, AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC (Submit FINAL -P&Z, AND CC Separately for Final PUD Review) LODGE PRESERV.ATION PUD 1-7,35 P & Z, AND CC 20 PUD AMENDMENT 1-7 ADMIN.,OR P & Z, AND/OR CC 2 for Admin., 10 for P & Z, 20 for P (BASED ON AMENDMENT TYPE) & Z and CC SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA 1-7,35 CONCEPTUAL -P&Z, AND CC 20 for P&Z and CC (Submit (SPA) FINAL- P & Z, AND CC Separately for Final SPA) AMENDMENT TO SPA 1-7 ADMIN., OR P&Z AND CC 2 for Admin., 20 for P&Z and CC (BASED ON SIGNIFICANCE OF AMENDMENT) TEiMPORARY USE 1-7 ADMIN. OR CC (BASED ON 2 for Admin., 10 for City Council DURATION TIME) ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT 1-7,9 ADMIN OR P &Z(BASED ON IF 2 for Administrative Review THE PROPOSAL ]MEETS REVIEW STANDARDS) REZONING 1-7 P & Z AND CC 20 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1-7,34 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 9 VARIANCE * Consult with a Planner about submittal requirements. ** A pre-application conference with a Planner should be conducted prior to submitting any land use application. Please call 920-5090 to schedule a pre-application conference. ATTACHMENT 4-CONT'D- SUBMITTAL KEY 0/ (1)Land ['se Application with 12, Accurate elevations (in relation to system in the area of the proposed Ntpplicant s name. address and telephone mean sea level) of the lowest floor. subdivision. The contents of the plat shall number, contained within a letter signed including basement, ofall new or be of sufficient detail to determine by the applicant stating the name. address. substantially improved structures: a whether the proposed subdivision will and telephone number of the verification and recordation of the actual meet the design standards pursuant to representative authorized to act on behalf elevation in relation to mean sea level to Land Use Code Section 26.480.060(3).20. of the applicant. which any structure is constructed: a Subdivision GIS Data. demonstration that all new construction or ~ ~ The street address and legal substantial improvements will be 21. A landscape plan showing location. aescription of the parcel on which anchored to prevent tlotation, collapse or size. and type of proposed landscape development is proposed to occur. lateral movement of any structure to be fuatiires. ~~1 A disclosure of ownership of the that the structure will have the lowest 22. A subdivision plat which meets the constructed or improved. a demonstration parcel on which development is proposed tloor. including basement, elevated to at terms of this chapter. and confurms to the to occur, consisting of a current certificate least two (2) feet above the base flood requirements of this title indicating that no from a title insurance company, or elevation. all as certified by a registered further subdivision may be granted for attorney licensed to practice in the State of professional engineer or architect. these lots nor will additional units be built Colorado. listing the names of all owners without receipt of applicable approvals of the property. and all mortgages. 13. A landscape plan that includes pursuant to this chapter and growth judgments. liens. easements. contracts and native vegetative screening of no less than management allocation pursuant to agreements affecting the parcel. and fifty (50) percent of the development as Chapter 26.470. demonstrating the owner s right to apply viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. for the Development Application. All vegetative screening shall be 23- The precise wording of any J ~An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating replaced with the same or comparable maintained in perpetuity and shall be proposed amendment. the subject parcel within the City of material should it die. 24. Site Plan or plans drawn to a scale of Aspen. one (1' ) inch equals ten (10') feet or one 14. Site sections drawn by a registered (17 inch equals twenty (20') feet. /GA site improvement survey including architect, landscape architect, or including before and 'after" photographs topography and vegetation showing the engineer shall be submitted showing all (simulations) specifying the location of current status of the parcel certified by a existing and proposed site elements, the antennas. support structures. transmission registered land sun/eyor, licensed in the top of slope, and pertinent elevations buildings and/or other accessory uses. State of Colorado. (This requirement, or above sea level. access, parking, fences, signs, lighting. any part thereoti may be waived by the landscaped areas and all adjacent land Community Development Department if 15. Proposed elevations of the uses within one-hundred fifty ( 150') feet. the project is determined not to warrant a development, including any rooftop Such plans and drawings should survey document.) equipment and how it will be screened. demonstrate compliance with the Review Standards of this Section- ~ ~ A site plan depicting the proposed 16. Proposed elevations ofthe layout and the projects physical development, inclitding any rooftop 25 FAA and FCC Coordination. relationship to the land and it s equipment and how it will be screened. Statements regarding the regulations of surroundings. the Federal Aviation Administration 17. A sketch plan of the site showing (FAA) and the Federal Communications /0 A written description of the existing and proposed features which are Commission (FCC). proposal and a written explanation ot relevant to the review. how a proposed development complies 26. Structural Integrity Report from a with the review standards relevant to the 18. One ( 1) inch equals four hundred professional engineer licensed in the development application. (400) feet scale city map showing the State ofColorado. location of the proposed subdivision, all 8. Plan with Existing and proposed adjacent lands owned by or under option 27. Evidence that an effort was made to grades at two-foot contours, with five-foot to the applicant. commonly known locate on an existing wireless intervals for grades over ten ( 10) percent. landmarks. and the zone district in which telecommunication services facility the proposed subdivision and adjacent site including coverage/ interference ~ ~ Proposed elevations of the development properties are located. analysis and capacity analysis and a brief statement as to otlier reasons for 10. A description of proposed 19, A plat which reflects the la>out of success or no success. construction techniques to be used. the lots, blocks and structures in the proposed subdivision. The plat shall ~~~ Neighborhood block plan at 11. A Plan with the 100-year floodphtin be drawn at a scale of one (1) equals one 1 =50 (available from City Engineering line and the high water line. hundred ( 100) feet or larger. Architectural DepartmenD Graphically show the front scales are not acceptable. Sheet size shall portions of all existing buildings on both be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six sides of the block and their setback from (36) inches. If it is necessary to place the the street in feet. Identify parking and plat on niore than a one (1) sheet, an index froiit entry for each building and locate shall be included on the first sheet. A any accessory dwelling units along the vicinity niap shall also appear on the first alley. (Continued on next page.) sheet showing the subdivision as it relates to the rest of the city and the street Indicate whether any portions of the 35. Exterior Lighting Plan. Show the houses immediately adjacent to the location. height. type and luminous subject parcel are one story (on[> one intensity of each above grade fixture. living level). Estimate the site illumination as measured ~ ~ Roof Plan. maximum. and average illumination. in foot candles and include minimum, Additionally. provide comparable ~ ~ Photographic panorama. Show examples already in the community that etevations ofall buildings on both sides ot, demonstrate technique. specification. and/ the block including present condition ot, or light level i f they exist. the subject property. Label photos and mount on a presentation board 31 A condominium subdivision exemption plat drawn with permanent ink on reproducible mvlar. Sheet size shall be twenty-four (24) inches by thirty-six (36) inches with an unencumbered margin of one and one-half ( 1 1/2) inches on the left hand side of the sheet and a one-half ( 1/2) inch margin around the other three (3) sides of the sheet pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26-480.090. 32. A description and site plan of the proposed-development including a statement o f the objectives to be achieved by the PUD and a description o f the proposed land uses, densities, natural features, traffic and pedestrian circulation. off-street parking, open space areas, infrastructure improvements, and site drainage. 33. An architectural character platt generally indicating the use, massing, scale, and orientation of the proposed buildings. 34. A written description of the variance being requested. 5 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and 4075444 (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1 1 Al?PLIGANT has submitted to CITY,an application for Â¥meÂ»LA; -6\41 'tÂ»,19 f,hau.v,r [/ex vi 9.,ied - $~4 69#pee (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 1 --lz 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 0. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest o f the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of appli~tion completeness. APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount off 14-10 - which is for / hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $245.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By: Â£2242:q- 32=:J,~'Xe'llad. Chris Bendon Community Development Director Date: goÂ·eÂ·ll Billing Addressiand Telephone Number: %" *10 Ce A>*1 1 127 - c 661 OWNERS AUTHORIZATION Robert Copito ("Owner") is the current owner of the premises, commonly referred to as 1460 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen, Colorado, ("Property"). The owner does hereby authorize Scot Broughton of Scot Broughton Architects and his associates to act as our representative in matters concerning work to said property. Authorization may include, without limitation, or objection adjustment applications for variances, development applications, building permits, and other similar and related plans and permits. _~644 0.6730 Robert Copito 500 Haven Lane Great Falls VA 22066 Date Representative Scot Broughton Scot Broughton Architects, LLC PO Box 4096 Basalt, CO 81621 970-927-0552 i 715 West Main Street, Suite 201 WRIGHT & LASAT T F TTP , Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone: (970) 925,5625 Facsimile: (970) 925-5663 August 8, 2011 City of Aspen 130 Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Lot 37, FILING 1, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION alk/a 1460 Sierra Vista Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 The undersigned is an attorney, duly licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado since 1973. This is to certify that according to the records of Pitkin County, the following individual is the owner in fee simple of the above referenced property: Robert Copito 500 Haven [,alie Great Falls, VA 22060 Sincerely, Wriglit &1#Salle, LLP r 'B 4/1 By: ~7*/PA j l/46Â«.G~~ ~~bfolui D. I,aSalle www.wrightlasalle.coin SCOT BROUGHTON Architects , LLC August 9, 2011 City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission 130 S. Galena Street; 2 nd Floor Aspen Co. 81611 RE: Residential Design Standard (RDS) Variance, Windows between 9' - 12' 1460 Sierra Vista Drive; Dear Commission Members, This application comes before you for consideration of our request to allow glazing on the street front elevation of the residence remodel at the above-mentioned address. The current residence constructed in 1971 is a split level home with the main entry at existing grade level, the first level is 4'-6" above existing grade, and the lower level is 4'- 6" below existing grade. The existing roof is a low-pitched slope of 2 to 12. It is our intent to maintain the low-pitched roof, but change the existing gable roof form to a more contemporary shed roof. As proposed the roof slope would pitch up toward the street elevation to take advantage of views toward Aspen Mountain, and Shadow Mountain. It was typical construction practices in the 1970's to place small openings at 6'-8" above respective floor levels. Our proposal is to maintain these lower openings, but provide a higher band of windows to take advantage of the mentioned views. The intent is not to propose a full wall of glass, but maintain a solid strip of wall between glazing bands to provide scale to the street elevation. However, due to the split level construction the proposed higher windows fall within the 9'-0" to 12'-0" area as defined as a no-window zone pursuant to regulation 26.410.040.D.3(a) - as defined in the City of Aspen Land Use Code. It is our request to be granted approval to place a band of windows within this 9'- 0" to 12'-0" range from the first floor level. Within the Sierra Vista neighborhood there exists a wide variety of architectural styles from original 1970's one level ranch style homes, modern mountain style homes, and contemporary homes. Several homes have been designed with street facing second level balconies with access provided by glass doors and adjacent windows that fall within the 1, restricted 9'-0" to 12'-0 no-window zone. We feel that our proposal does not deviate from similar conditions in the neighborhood, and fits within the variety of existing styles. The portion of the street facing elevation with the higher band of proposed windows is setback + 75'-0" from the street edge, thus we fell presents very little impact to street users, and adjacent neighbors. Thank you for your review and consideration of this request. Scot Broughton Principal S PO Box 4096 / 23280 Two Rivers Rd., Unit 3 / Bosoll, Co 81621 B A [t] 970/927-0552 / [f] 970/927-0554 / [e] scot@scotborchitects.com -IA ?El. 3.48 ..1 4 ---1-1-'Â»h ~1 1 r Â·* . 1 . Ar'. Â·Â· idÂ· . fL~~Â· (14' A 2 441# 434#902 2, . * 0* -1 42 1*.. tr- s . 1~y. ~ L.4,1111, 1~21Â¢i-* â€¢J f *31 *1 62 4-Â·, --4Ft ' 9~. E.V# 4-. j 22 0.4. 9 . 1 4 I .\, 1. ...: 2/4 11 12' - /0- 'r %1- -UCE,11--.4 r- -: S; 2,4- t-- - Â® *.Â·4 05# >'~ttâ‚¬ 4 1 >It>, -2 1 13 }# ' â€¢ E 1...' 9tr ~- -4 L ) ./ I ).> I# se f '091 .//4Â«1 fl t 444%19 :u,ME, 4-4 w- '*- ~f ..p, ' ' 4 J v '' 1.-. J i . 04. -I- 0, Ve 4/ , tÂ¥ 4... S 80.96 3 3=Z--'i.=MEADO CRU-,0. Â· 2,1 - -0% i f Alb & @ i ~, -r - ... r :, '' '1 ' .- -p: p....i .....1.1 1 : ~~..le-h, . 21 _-ul i c51 .-~ .-I.- ..J ' , p -1 Â¢ TZ I i .31 ,- . i 9,94*,Â£ Tr-- 2, 1 Â¥-6 , 633# i-:. 4 t 32Â·1 EDÂ· il-~ 4 & %:48# j) *F# *R#41-Li~~... FIEJ~:~i,*n bS+Ablthit -7*--T# W - 9 f 4 . -- *, 31 r Â· -".4 * i -Â·1 8---- ' t, Â· 4 * - 96 *. Cir ; 3 & - N R. I -p'- ~ h ' 4 4 . - Aer Â·Â·Â·,6 Â·. 4,: 144-9=2?*==---77&4-e q.yn %7-a 5%4Â£- -Â·Â·Â·'~~ Ieei= r.:5.3 -i- --#Lf 2,4 'A 1 /-$Â» --- M. -- - -=car- i Betgrpan 01 A ' 1 AL-- - ... -7_ 1 r. I *#* ~Â«Nk '. i,11 -_~ -~ =z> E.-E-:5: ;f.J - c u FR~%1 C:jj**+ tj 1 | 4 i 3 4 1 1 -- --,-J- *,TE>,42â‚¬1: U.4 --2,1 . .. 4ll-- &. ff. . /{ :t, 2, 0 ..... 1 . I . *L.- 4 <4 . -M~ti/<M W 6 f 1 . I.' 11 ANNARM.CÂ·NS~h ' . .A 4 I: . I 14 trÂ·+2 En *- -Yl.. -7#i 11\\ 0 r-- . e.1 r 4 l- 1 $ -: 1 0 / 4 7 . , 1 % 1/>09 19 A rt 4.-b 1 e 1 . 1 * *1 1 1 i ./ : 4 1* 1 5~ j j *h & 3 A ' 0 - .. 1 j I h Â·/5 ' ---*ii 1 42 1 .1 1 ~ / 1 0 2 cot . It -* nUt. .â€¢ u , 2-i- ~Â·1 ~* #5~434 ..:u i U 1-1 1 f (-ry*AL I- 1 ' I. 0 n Fr-n.. 2 :, r â‚¬ $ I: 0 ..40 ..â‚¬-- a. . r.,1... /.6 /979Â»J, n i.. N. 06 -5,2 -2 \ 4 1 22 b - + 42~4 1/7 1 0:.1 - lit /1 3 ..74/7 O ul + '0 4 #/1 .3 240 2 /4 0 4. N ' * /.2 1. , f /2.-1/2 1 4 f t.< /, \ i Jul . T108 1~ 2(jUb 3 1~03:a,61 *'3Â·:11 #ZÂ· 9,~i 'Â· 714{Â¥, flows>f~) Ct,N ' $ i #....:......... .. - --4 V,42 1 *.1 eas= Â·DW 1,\< 4%4~---f-- ---8 -4 8, 1<525 I~ #k 11 ,1td i Â·f- - - -- : 1486. ' 1 3 ' t, 1544 .3 : > 4 # 4 -IN#\\ I ; i 1 2 1.4EO. 'lt - f: ./.?0-~Nk .1 f f ,(/ . -?.L,fÂ»Ill ..,,t262, 1340,4 j,-4 r,~in-6*~74 1, 321 1 0 1 il f U â‚¬1475,*'â€¢~ '~ ~~ -- 1 14. /1 1 111 49, IL 1 V . 02 44%. 4 - N \\ 4 - - 41 A 01 --Efa~ffYNYLN--1 --- 2, '9 \ 1.1 11 1 NX- ANG D 7"< # 1 i _- % .100â‚¬0 I .4 Y ' 1 -11 1 1*4 Mt. l-4 , 1 , j 12 --- -- 1 1.1 1 p .1 1. ./. \ r f c 1- . 1425 i , 5 - -U MC>/,2,666 4 f -1 426. 11 '.1 rut Â£ i 1. 2-1 1485, L. x Â©952. #0* ClowÂ«ir. r..Â· 1 ' <-1~â€ž.~4Â·. ~.. #. 4 1:.V// Â· Â· 1/ '.&/ b*.: . 1, 1 LtÂ·/ 1 Â¥16 .. . 1 1351 4 ': n 'Â·, . , C f . 94Â»4 1. V. 970. 1 . /- ..52 j>l.1 , L . 4. .f \ 27 3 . :1 1 - tre 1345* i f 1 . 4 6 .. 1. F 1245 -< ,Â·st ..14100 1.-'/ 4 '4 2'', 1.\ Nur' ,*ro. 1 1345 24 1 1 1'41*, <1*11 ./:/ / 4% * .~ ~ A L /'it P# es I . I * i . ...... 93149 .1 I. .. I ... I. 1 I 040. # - AEy*511 41*:11 '2~4'i,29 72 , 9 + I v & /.;, f.. 1 Â·Â· 2735 T105 RBSW / @00. .' .. f.. .. 1 14 1 1, ,-0 t ./.>0 .1/, . \/'.1. /. i. 9: 11480, Â· * Ill A tl.*- f I ' 1, f lit â„¢:11 i 4 1% %.4 1 , ? '13,3/4/ -~ ~ tll~i,~Â·'- Â· LIt 1 1 - c N 9%/ Â· Â·MA , 1 tl w . ,$' 1420,..'A .. - . 4.00 f â€¢ 11 C/, 1. % 1 1.. . 7 6 4 1 2 - 015. 4 9:\>IN 104 640 . 1 ' - 0,4, ' 10 - 'A Xet ../ r ,Â· . i .lit 5,75* * . . \40 ' . th=> 1 %, 1. *4 1455. Â·Â·Â·1 i \\ -2 524. ./ ./ - i ,/h 0 ./ k * W J. .... I r ..~ ~ . 1 . 6 1 -1 1 1". 1 1 . ./ . 244 1 1 - 1 1467*\ }.... 9Â»3 .A 2\ I \ 4.ID, \ *. 1~75*LIU 1,1 !44- 30. 4/ 1 - . 1 41- : 04'Ii# S ' a Â· 1 - 1 .. 61.:. - . 1 - ': 19% j 0.5. Â¢+1,6 , Ky> 1 1 230 0 205.....,1 . hu-Â·Â· I . Ex - . /444 I , I. I V 1 . X ..36 Â· 9,6 I . / J v . 815 .1 '6% iâ‚¬*.,Mt r :, ,>7 //"f 'i h..AI.:: 1. /.-23>/ Â· 1225. 1 V' *2,. f ~ (A) - I Â·%. . V 1 ~ % J ~'2 ~; Mil:}tra:feci'ainA-ttilS CqursÂ¢f'MiC} 19~2:1911 -EGR# 4' M 1 1 1 â‚¬- Copito ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER 1460 Sierra Vista Drive MAILING LIST Aspen, CO ~ LOT ~ ASESSOR ~ OWNER ADDRESS I LOT & STREET ADDRESS ~ R018449 JSO PARTNERS LLC PYRAMID PEAK Unit: B 1470 SIERRA VISTA DR 1470 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 816111045 R018448 SARICK JORDAN L & SHEREEN C PYRAMID PEAK Unit: A 1472 SIERRA VISTA DR 1472 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611-1045 R004673 CONNER CLAUDE M &IRENE A TRUST WEST ASPEN Lot: 34 AND:- Lot: 35 FILING 1 PO BOX 345 [480 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81612 R004764 S'rOI.LER JONATHAN W REV TRUST WEST ASPEN Lot: 33 FILING 1 l475 SIERRA VISTA DR 1475 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R004841 DICKER INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD HOPKINS CONDOS Unit: 1&2 5 HIGHGATE HILL 1465 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN rOORAK MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA 3142 R009472 BICKERT CARL VON ElSEN & E SUSAN SIERRA VISTA DUPLEX Unit: A DESC: AKA UNIT 2 395 DEXTER ST 1445 SIERRA VISTA DR .ASPEN DENVER, CO 80202 R019166 SCHWARTZ RICHARD C WEST ASPEN Lot: 30 FILING 1 1435 SIERRA VISTA DR 1435 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R009141 ODONNELLJOHN &ADRIENNE SIERRA VISTA Unit: B 4083 CUERVO AVE 1425 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN SANTA BARBARA, CA 93110 R009140 WALBERT DAVID & ELLEN SIERRA VISTA Unit: A 1425 SIERRA VISTA DR 1425 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R010840 MCLELLAN DAVID R & KATHERINE V GRACE RAUL Unit: SOUTH 1417 SIERRAVISTADR 1417 S SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611-1044 R020918 GRACE RAULCONDO ASSOC GRACE PAUL DESC: COMMON AREA COMMON AREA 1417 S SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN 1417 S SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN, CO S1611 R009817 SPASCO LTD RENAISSANCE ESTATE Unit: B 109 N POST OAK LN #550 857 BONITA DR ASPEN HOUSTON, TX 77024 R009810 CRS ALPINE LLC RENAISSANCE ESTATE Unit: C/O MICHAELO HART'Z KAITEN MUCHIN ROSENN! 855 BONITA DR ASPEN 525 W MONROE ST CHICAGO, IL 60661 R004781 SEVERY BEITY K TRUSTEE WEST ASPEN [.ot: 4 t FILING 1 1390 SIERRA VISTA DR 1390 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R00556i SIMPSON ELEANOR P REV TRST 25% WEST ASPEN Lot: 2 FILING 2 PO BOX 25425 1435 SILVER KING DR ASPEN DALLAS, TX 75225-1425 R005491 DUCHESS CORPORATION WEST ASPEN Lot: 3 FILING 2 C/O NANCY PAVELL 1455 SILVER KING DRASPEN 11603 GLOWING SUNSET LN LAS VEGAS, NV 89135-1659 R010448 PI {ILLIPS DAVID & ALEXANDRA WEr ASPEN Lot: 40 FILING 1 UNIT 1 PO BOX 11449 1410 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81612 R004957 I IICI ILANDS PARTNERSHIP I.I.P WEST ASPEN Lot: 40 FILING 1, UNIT 2 401 IVANHOE ST 1412 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN DENVER, CO 80220 R020725 1430 SIERRA VISTA LLC 1430 SIERRA VISTA Unit: B 1435 SIERRA VISTA 1430 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R009120 DUBLIN LEONARD & ADELE GOLF COURSE TOWNI IOUSES Unit: A 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR 1450 SIERRA VIS'l'A DR ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 R01-1295 CITY OF ASPEN ASPEN GOLF COURSE Lot: 1 GOLF COURSE AITN FINANCE DEly]' 39551 HWY 82 ASPEN 130 S GALENAST ASPEN, CO S16 11 ,(40# r_ -. . . #5.*LT :1 1 4 Â· SHEET 3 , f SHEET 3 4. WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION FILING No. 1 t : -11 3 36'Â»60 45- E I/14.81 .. 1 0 /.00 , ....1 91.50 1. 3.A MÂ· ~ ../.O , .. J, 7\ I. - - - - - - Â· ~ -rrL- d' le, A.., 4~ 'r 1 - 11 1 - /21 4 . 1 -- . f. 0 3 81- 2 Me...1 :Â° t' Di ~/1 0,# 1 21 4 + 1. \ 4 8 0 X A I 0 . '2 9 6 - 6 r # 17'~ d ~ 2'2 b \ 1 9 0 , . 4. . S 1 1 4 2 /k i: IT \ - 1 - W} O., 4 , t. f ' 0 , - 0 O 4 |..a ~ \ : 21* Â¢ . I I . M I J , 4 4 4 1 1 4,1. .. Â·. 51 , , 6 2----- . Wrimm#4"LU?.1 6._ ..- .,i ir/ -4 2 ...,2-f .2Â·E/ -- 'flf.f- 19Â£~~-I- - - 3-,#reb -- ~ - - -00 56.f,- --W .J- -71 #t--Â·-00 Of/------,U-- I 9 /52 99'.0...3*.5 JIT-- : 1---1 e r--- +2/ .,2 4 . ' 1 1 35 :---,0â€¢.F- Ag-'~-1.\, -00Â·F'Zb ---911 1Â·- 020 Â¥Z - ' J , H .FJ-1-7- 1-- --1- 9 72, r -Â·0 - .2 Â· , 0 2 +4 'ltr7 1 lit 1 1 1\. I - .. 11 40 . + ./ lit 1 1 1 1, & 1 I .Â· â€¢ 3: 4- 4/ - ,. LI' f a, A '41 9 .11 % 4,4 E., ,--\4 ~465 64, 41 2 X /11 -.4 1M .1 , 30. 9'4 1 1 al %\ _ .......158?frrr.-' 0% , '42 5 I . r a 3 7 K f p .:-, .1 ~-5.61 sâ€¢. ~ t Ae * :11 â€¢4 11 6 ~ ~I'll //Â«-/0- 4 . 0 // 7 0 \ 2 + 2 . \ -. ..99 i \ ,1621<bls %3 Â¢ *1 1 ' ~' r 4 : 6 - , 51 1\ .1.-- 49 - - v./ ZI Â· 0 1 .91 , - S 4 . 4 5 500 49 r' '. ~ , /. E ...:,r-2 # I. 4: i \ 5- 0 , 0 H Â·AN , .~ 11 1 E . 1 1 '2Â£+ 00 ..27 **A ' 1 '# 1 1 Z ..,~ 1 R. 11.117 - - 21/ ' 1 3 ':1\ At I 811.-5 aunt-/ ..46' : *70 k ' 1 + I - #-,970- , I u..,<Â£.:21 i 1 6 -0 13 J.00 42' 40' 27 34__.:.Â·- - -- I tt I . 1 1 10-00 - -- * - 11-5TKU ' 1 '. PO ,Â«b .. i !5.00 ...00',77 ....4 *7 I.'10./44 3 1 - 0 $ ,/0.00 - .el \ -1'' ~1 51.12 -4 . - 4 # â‚¬ - j. R .j14-2-20 !38Â·13 0 - I \ .... . 1 + *4Â·. Â¥OOZ50-ets ti 6 5â‚¬ . A ... - 19 4 , , r. R\ . , v. I . \1/1 . 11' C. .0 - 1 - -=1 L--4-â€ž-=- 1. : ./ ge'..... , ~ '-'5'~ i&8.23. , 1 Â£ 1 zur 4. b Lk 11 5 51 4\0 f ty 04 9 44 24 5 4,/ ' ------ , .mi , 10 0 06 -- 11 $ i; I , F 12 ..' 3 - - 7 iâ€¢ED , =11 --'2 ..,6: 11 t:%? t ' 5 449 51'E r . . P.-4 4 4 L . -47,0 < Al 1 1 20 -- .1 1- 1 - * 4,/ - Â·- ..4/./2:17 . : 4,0 1 0 31\ r ~2 99.r...r.ge.r. -1. i / 6 2-- ----li'' 1 '1. 0. 0 . 0/ . E .- -I L.,./2.. -- 9% tkkp :t . 1 Ir.5 ..:.$,r -<A â‚¬ 0 14Â·65) 41â€¢704 VEâ€¢rrA k .Â« 44 . 4 - -TAWEE arsÂ¢zl Â¢4**PAE 4 4. A Â· Â¢ % 5 w 0 +Lpt:. 2/. Ag J *.- ifo-00 ..O-0. 4 44 .al :el \0 - 8,4, - - . 1. --- ...& , P f" , 7 44% / Â£ 4- 0 - 4 11*. 14 #O eltivt:A VÂ»1-* .P y. 44- %, 94 . N' f '7 1<V + . . a 0 *.6 O D , , ./. # 0 - 0 . 1, . .' 0 0 / 4, 4 . 1. f 251*-- * . -4.9 h \ 074 4 --+ 14-10 4 1472 6 -5.,# l /2 7 f .11 1 *4#2#tr /4 4 at*20 VÂ»rA 4/ \ - -111*) 0,01 e . 9 2 . .0 1 /b -takiplex F.*011:> , ' 4~ .% * f 8 4.9. .0 1 e.,#4, j /0 2 *3 - 1 4 1 .4 4 44 4 4 4/ 0 0%% ': ---- --- 0. . .............. - p - Â£ 1 4 *14 7 9 4 SCALE! 11,4.= 50 FT L 1 - 0% 4.4.- r ' \ 1 - + 4 \ 5, X ~ I tie, .1 'St / , 11 ..:/>7 . r â‚¬G I O ' , t. L /' 08 - 14 k ..4 0 41 1 C. 2 4 I k ... ./ 4.1 lei / / 1 1 , .V / '1 1 - /0 . + 7. /3 . . \' 4 ' 1- 4 4 r. 1 4% 0 ' d . c.: . pÂ·. 1,0.Â·0 Tr:z ., .:,i 1 .. 1 ./? - ,+I '591 -- 3,4.25 9.23' .. 5 : /.14Â»l' 17Â· 166 1 /5 4 Â·U 'tiO ~U COLO~AU' i A~ VII /.11 tr49{/U INf (LUL .li â€¢,PO. 4/4 {,â‚¬* +C ~ CITY OF ASPEN OL MONUMENT 11 #.1 1,1 .,s ./8 9â‚¬ C.. CED 1.0. MAN 1, Y... riE DATE OF IHE CERri~,~*110,1 SHO~N HERCON ~~~~~~~~*~~~ ELE V 7849 59' DA ,4 USED IS NAD83 1*2' t/ .<f>/ h/ 9 N N 88Â·56Â·00-1 [BASIS OF BEARING! 102 70Â· ..jilly/4, 'ENCE,3 6492*LAIr 3 12'D ASPEN5 W Tqf....'.cs 1,4 ' UTILITY EASEMENT ,/ YOOkIE>Â·4*3i*till':22 +E 42 #Alt'lt// S <=WRA.. 5 1 Â»4011Â« 0 5 10 15' 207 ,#22='21Â«A <2 CONTOUR INTERVAL: 1'-0" \ SCALE: 1"=10' 5 UTILITY EASEMENT -/'~ ~|1~ 1 7 LOT 37 4\\1'jfA I i HEATER LEGAL DESCRIPTION SUBD~VISION. FILING NO. CITY OF ASPEN. PITKIN. COUNTY. COLORADO 6:4414 430 0 36 9 AC\ 5 8-,O-D ASPEN~j<TÂ·.AMVIt' f :1 Â·I f. '4.~ Â· - .bl ..i .~0:.?,~~ 76â‚¬3 z \'k- 1 \\ I VICINITY MAP < : SCALE: 1"= 2000' 1 Lot 36 ' Lot 38 27,7 4/#AP 4,1~"8 11 62 6. %. _18311__168289 T. 11 h /48 *0 2-STORY BRICK HOUSE 0. 75 742.E- - RA 1- 4 7.04 T 2 12-D iASPENJ A . g# i git -Â»2 9 t. =.1 / / 44@94.40 1 33â‚¬645%935,1),9 6-0 -PRUCE 44 9 13 ... . 4\ 4~ D 4 v;, I 4# N 1 2~44%Â¤943y . 5\\- 1 4>j \ Â» Â°- \ i / 1 =r 1 \ ~~~~4 0-[~5PRUCE 1 0,Â·' / i, ~ ~ ~ - ri ; & .,ir ~â€ž. ' 1@ CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL MONUMENT 10 40-D WILLOW - 01':////h\21, 24 1 ELEV. 7871.92-. DATUM USED IS NAD83 ~ q ~~ ~ SPR~JCE t. 4 5 ./ r~ U,Ji Aspen i~**-Qilittr 1 09,94 - 3 1 ' 2 f p li'q'/Â· )11,it * 84 t 4 2ND-STORY 4-h./.&26 r t 9914 r--1 -,4 -,30Â»QIL: :4 8_ ... 12 18Â·D SPRICE 44\1'1444). . 1 213 rEâ‚¬ 1 OvERHANG C> - 14Â·0 S'QUICE -31>$0% s> 3-* '4-212 04*71 1 / .499 Ld.% 1 .7 22 . 1.:L//KIt\\447. 9 1 I. LEGEND AND NOTES 99% I ./ I O FOUND REBAR & ALUNINUN CAP MARKED LS 7168 0 12-0 ASPEÂ«41 'fÂ»-1 - ~ FOUND BRASS CAP Â· 31 GAS R}SER 4 Â® WATER VALVE U 6. 6 91 F I RE HYDRANT 1 - -1 -- Stg//60 - m TELEPHONE PEDESTAL -=9 leg- -FENCE LINE 3 26 - 1--1 13= . 44' 9/rili *~t 14 Â· D 5PRUCE FENCE -1 3 S. 4 1 7 Â·Â·Â·Â·EDGE OP ROAD . ~ ~ -. ~ ~ WILLOW TREE ~ ASPEN TREEI ./. u /0 . 4 h N . . 9--'Iti SPRUCE TREE *th/4 28 9 91,1\6 THE REAL PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON DOES NOT LIE wITHIN THE 4 . LIMITS OF THE 100 YEAR FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY AS PER reMA - / PANEL No 0809720203 C DATED JUNE 4 1987 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY CERTIFICATE 3 12-D ASPENS 7. ' / 2 1,4-D SPRUCE ~ â€¢ -InchÂ· 1 HEREBY CERT IFY THAT ON WAY 20 20,1 A SURVEY WAS PERT ORIED 81 NE ON THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED HEREIN . TWO-STORY BRICK HOUSE *AS FOUND TO BE ON SAID PARC. AS SHOWN ON THI. .. ALL EASENENTS, ENCROACIAENTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN EADENCE OR KNOWN TO I ARE SHOIN THIS SURIVgis TRUE AND CORRECT WHE BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF ,.... 1 --1- 9 1%28%*i 1 Â·Â· , Â·Â·i Â· 444-- ff .i.**b~AÂ« 0.:i. - - . 5 88t&6 00-W 'A5,~02 54~ / 'M' ~6'~''ih4479 '5 4 , ' 0 m . :.29 /1 * 2 - 3*94- ... 1 2Â· . , SYDNEYfINT" 7'D ASPEIN~ IMPROVEMENT SURVEY 71 4\\ 9 q. 16-0 SPRUCEJ 1-2 ~2-D ASPENS T - CURVE DELTA ANGLE RADIUS ARC TANGENT CHORD CHORD BEARING 1460 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE LINES IN SPACE '. , 1, ...........f . C 1 04'48 06 620.00 51 96Â· 26.00 2 .95 S 86'31Â·55Â·W ASPEN, COLORADO LAND SURVEYS BY LINES IN SPACE SIERRA VISTA DRIVE SYDNEY LNCICOME ( LS. Mill) 67 GLENWOOD A VE CARBOMALE. CO 970-963-3852 DATE 06/0/20# SCALE l - 0 JCB NO. 8-0 9Â£Pj'460 7856 4\ \3//1 f PROPERTY L I N E S 01Â°49'08"E 177.21' 24*ftp 1 AQUPA,%61*LORIVERAY -3. i I .W m -0.-1 / Aut-92â‚¬t 14/1 4[1-7854 i + F i E U. t{' 21' U. TZ' i~ ~txi _~~ 9 /41 1 0- W M - 2- ~ $ - - ' - - 3:*- - --r - - r -4 1 - ..1.- - W -" A- -~121 I //Al , 7853~ ~ E--c--Ar--=<--.-~0- 11< 11==2224941 1 \4\44/. 19,4 I 1 3 1 1 L ; i 2 t'llf ]Un-.%--g-*--_ /, u. r___231- 1..-. .I4 ., 0-----qUILLILL i $ ii~ii~~~ 111 ~~I~I *------t-2-3 9-, - 1,/ 1 - - - j 1 1 112_11 IFT 17fifi-17-3-7 rf---7tr-11 Â»IfitÂ« -9, J- I ~ v~i Fir--, 1 . 1 1**t~ 16 / } 61 3 4111] - - 4 1 1,-lalll=--r .Â·2Â«Â» 7 !11115=32-LUEFÂ«3 - 1.- 19444=49 1 l 11 Â¢ 11 |t iii|| A I U. B 1- ---1.-4 244.4. Â·h.-2/1.4.1\ ~efizlzEE'3.~ I 1 N & 1 _____--_6-5 i Â£ i Ex.TÂ·6 . IL_ FI ----i) tONG. ~LAL~-~[~Â¥ ~ L-igdf-'-4'~ 11/ 6 1111-~--- I-------.3 T............ -2-1 | /_ .,27855 1] 1 .07,3 ' I -- 117-0,/2 h 1 1 1 Inm STREEÂ¥~FACINe"AALL SETE}AdK FROM SIERRA ~/ISTA~PRIVE~ -ej<21 - 0,11 -------------1./ 1- --14-I _37---'-:I x 1 lilli L 91 .CI==mTI] M TO 02 R~OVEC) \ -----4-1 1 -0/3//SET//OK - ---~~ -------"!11'11 ~ ......5/K \ IL 30-QL_._ LILLT.., -- \ am!*dAY 1'4-0- - lilli, I i 1 - U F--11---f<im--- --- ----------------4 f iff<~422~ 949-2Â»-e_EHZ-~ 9 _~ ~ /-Zzj~ Ut%% \ 6 439 1\\ \\14 4~--234Â« // -TA 1 + -Â»72-OWE-~ TY L\NE , / 44 99 785#FPEEI..... ..h--,- -- --5.00 UTIUTÂ¥ E. - - 7851 ~ 0 4 8Â· 16 i f. - - --li-158/545 -7-17/ , /1 41 411 1 CUEZIZEnEEZZrEmEZE] - -- 3--Â»99/ fl 1% 1*:41 785253979~~ 181.56' ~ )4:52,1/.44 4\ 11\\ 5:*.v SURVEYORELEVATION OF 7 851.17'IS EQUIVALENT TO ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION OF 90'- 11 "" \ I j Â«44969 -4 49~ 492 OR 13 54.21 'EQUALS 100'-0' 7851 // f / 41 11 \11 /1/4 2,11 k \ ./.0. TREE -3,ji, 444 ePRUGE TREE Â»,3,2*':\4 444 Â¤l RECESSED LENSED LleHT SHIELED RALL LIIHT- tzed.Â«IL V pori~ FAC.6 ASPEN TREE <~ APPRES SIGN UP-L!6HT 94\\F ~ GENERAL 1 ISSUED FOR I COPYRIGHT PROIECT DATA SHEETTITLE 1 SHEET NO, SCOT BROUGHTON Architects COPITO REMODEL ====* DRAWN BY: ANB 1,8. = 1 '-0.. 1Z.118/9/ i i ~ #Project Status 8/9/ 11 1 PROJECT NO: #Pin 1 Sit:e Plan f 23..:312=222' 1, CHECKED BY: SBA gv*~d'~i'~:'52#15"frt;3 Z:rzg'*~ ISSUE DATE 8/9/11 1460 SIERRAVISTA DRIVE 1. lon,Id:.Te~an./.Nb. brcus'.0.. 1 SHEET: 7 of 35 ~ AS-101 i ..... . che Arch,tect prior u> commencement I ASPEN , thework i 1* ~9*9216 N*5*eTZ;c~te,cU~cko~me&,soa~,CO 8l621 ~ ~ COLORADO ~~~~~ .vw,mâ€¢ ./,At _~~Uâ„¢EASEMENL_ __~_._ / 3Alhla Â¥1SIA VhlkIBIS N 88Â°56'00"IE g 102.70' 68 -Â·zo sz ,83~1 ch ~j, Â© ..LIX. 4-Pt (9 614 tr f m (48) 9 - f i f N A.201,0 4-/ 1 7 1 1 1 < 11 . 1 1 1 1 1 1-9--1 1 1 -2 . 1 . I , 1: 4 1 1-1 1 ---- S.U./2/ . _ _ ~ / 1 M - h | INTE-AL *91'TER ... 4-Â·- 9.1- 0 .-1 1 / 1 1 1 -1 13 1 1 1 11 1 i .4. 1 Â· r -- ---------1.----- 1 11 SLOPE 1 I i 1/8. PER FT. I / 1 TrF. li , i *302,9 1 1 4 / 1 1 1 11 / 2:12 h A 4,12 4.12 A 1 _-1 _ZINZEZZ~J-JEZ~Z~EZ---IZZIUU 1 1-ME-0--ht-1 1 If 1 11 1 1 11 i , 1 11 4 1 --- | 1 1 21 1Â· 111 41 H i 1 2.0. 1 \ U[ 0> â„¢[ 1 ~ ~ 1 111 4~Ip 1 NE J ~-1- 1/DIUFT-L~...., - 14' 1 I Ill 1/ 111 1 1 1 7 1 1 E f.4 1 1 111 31 1 1 - ... 11 Â¥ 1 , 1 / : 1 : 4 1--- 7 f f :1 1 A- 04 STAN[~NeS SE* - b I MTL ROOF _ _--f,%) <E 1 1 1 1 _L CRICKET 1 SILLAST I ALL- -/ 2 1 FLAT R.OVE'- ./. INTEGRAL eUTTER ---/* 1 V 1 1 1 < - 1 - 1 ~4 v j r-_J \ 1 '4 1 1 1 ' : i ~ STREET FACING ELEVATION , 4 1 1 4 0 | 2,12 1 IIi,0 1 A 6 F.. 019/# d 41 1 V[.6-i. ie-r--91 111 bi 1 1 11 11, 0 1 --------- .......... 1 0 2-1 =39 r==1/ 1 0 i 1 ~ | i' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 6 i 0 /1 0 6 1 2-9 6 0 9 4) ZO 327 .60/ 4 41 + V GENERAL ISSUED FOR 1 COPYRIGHT PROIECT DATA SHEETTITLE SHEET NO SCOT BROUGHTON Architects COPITO REMODEL PROJECT NO: #Pin New Roof Plan L118/9/11 #Project Status: 8/9/ 1 1 AN de"MIdeas,arra""nellts and plan, indicated i b, th/le d.will //8 .=..... ir, I. PI.OP.rt' 1 and cop,â„¢hi or theA~h,%--JI nel,her be DRAWN BY ANB 1/4. = 1.-0. used on 1ny *therwork nor be used by â€¢r, Mher ? Â¤~st~â€¢ny-v#-44.eruth-Â¥mt- ~CHECKEDBY.Â· SBA Wlitlar, dim,ensrons,+~11 .Ja p~cedence.'. scaled 1 ISSUE DATE 8/9/11 A-107 1460 SIERRAVISTA DRIVE ~ dimerâ„¢ons and *h.,erined ....b ske.Any , dime.lorml disc~p~ncy//11 b. brcurht to I. SHEET 14 of 35 Imenrion . /. Arailmctpnor to comm-cement. i ASPEN the work i Â·3'ap r â€ž COLORADO -t. C. 696'13 I Aitit PO Box 4096 3 23280 Two Rivers Rd.,Unit] / Basalt,CO 81621 4.BÂ¥â‚¬4 90% Â»4 123 [t] 970/927-0552 0 0554 / [e] sbarchitectsco@me.com '24* )22 42 9%4 AE .129Â© 11-. ?Â·*.&1 [-14%22~737.07------ 1â‚¬*5- ;Ef.i-i---T*--iJ#,5-/.*.-/&7-fr.;--%$2--<Ir-/111IF~ -L--= 1111 5974 -1- -1-/ i i ili, ill 1*ililizil<&6165*Imimmimilidiralm#SREE./91-..-4 L_L 1 | _..ICECIZ.4 |i '--r~-WI - mr 3I ~ 1 5 ~ LAL-1UwaILÂ·L*rkup/4- -bub Il E[1*141 1-18"11 I ~ Ir-D I C--11 E--11| I l l | |I~31171 Â£|i l I I |'1 L L__b==*=GEÂ»r=-i Li=UL=+Ea _f[_ 1' 1 T:'b.,1.-2~2 0 [Il-*NEDi.L[u' LL===4!L--'ll 11[791111111111,11111! ...- ------------- - ~ -2:2&-ble:* -. BM-r-Imme--In - '12=EUM~ly:E , i -, I , - - ----Â·,-__-_NIZE=z~~zzl======~=- _ - 1 -- 1 1 1 111 11 1 11 = 1 1. EXISTING WEST ELEVATION r--) 211.-2 r--r-T-IX=====CIa ?fit**9*4*@3T~1\ 10.-9 1/4 2#d),Al]-,~~~9~LiWE-----I.--I---1, 1~ "PE=ifffEUI~IErr-7-1Â©TfiJ~ -*Ali IllillillII ILL]I lill~Illimli~ ~Â¤~i ~i~~~i~i~~i' 4 '1 n 1 F-- Â·J~I-=r-r~~T~rh~1~'r-~~I~~~ MM -_ 1~Â»Ul '- '-2 -'. ~. - g LAA.'? 3.--3, -...0 .FS --2<034-~ - - ..I-- I . I / I. . _' I.-_ Â· Â· - - ~2-f ~:j ~ ~ 3~- â€¢3- ~= -1. L. I Â·" 2 r--1 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION 1 GENERAL ISSUED FOR ~ COPYRIGHT 1 PROIE(IT DATA I SHEETTITLE 123.ECI.NO PROJECT NO: #Pln SCOT BROUGHTON Architects COPITO REMODEL ~ #Pmject Status: 8/9/ 1 I . t....leal.arrang'meno and phn: Indicated F Existing Elevations | t~iZA/'74*ilt./74â€¢,~'67,9 DRAWN BY: ANB r W = 1/ l on any other work nor be used by o~her 1 , per,en lor any $. what,oe,er wi~hout'~~te CHECKED BY: SBA ~ A-202 WA,ten d~ne,won, ,~ -recede~e o~r s~ed ISSUE DATE: 8/9/11 1460 SIERRAVISTA DRIVE In/likon, ir,d *h.' be ~erir,*d It the k,b lkâ€¢ AmÂ· dimen.lonalâ‚¬IÂ¢:cr,p,Val~be b.ou:'â€¢EtÂ©~0 | SHEET: 16 of 35 â€¢ct,nuor, . theA,chk~c~ prk,r t~ ~ummencement oâ€¢f i ASPEN 1 49/4 PO Box 4096 / 23280 Two Rivers Rd..Un,3 / Basalt.CO 81621 )~~~04 6 COLORADO EY 44%4 92(<9 A*' [* - L 13,# fSÂ©3 [t] 970/927-0552 [f] 0554 / [e] sbarchitectsco@me.com -322 [2242 BÂ·{ i ~~., th,;*Ii 1*%21 I 1' <IN - Ezii~ l 0 1_ ----4 9-*7 f 25-0 /06 HEMDHT 1 -- - 1 1 1 -3 1 [F1-- fr-1- r-p r~ 1 1 [+R .~ i TO PLATE [dffFFFAfffifffil.M.I.]09 2x CEDAR BDI - 11 1 'p,topoeÂ·El 41'ED "EP ~OOF 6/5 IS ....s ))\ PRMED t PT/&1 1 01 '1' || ~~--- 6141! 0~ 2*IfTING 6ABLE Booll ~ 12 - ,612:ELUL__ 6-r- 7.... PLN ' OFFICE /2 . 1 *< -Â·r-r-in / fit ___+- 31-4,~hf--3- b + 1-r-~1 +IL- 11 6.il- -4- . - --- -- --- - f'I t Â·~ ~ 53- - r--7111-=11 --1 12 I 1111 + . ? - ? [j 11 Z j,r ~ f 1,11'jit' 31 1 1 ---7. ~ -4- 13/4 _ _-i-/-:ELI.-tr 1 - . .......1 | | tr~&-TA-# zEr<=-63 IZE-ti &;--6 ,-trait i i'21116-&54-sh=L*6T Ed |~ 421-T-1 NT-Effl / k, 00-0- P..FLroeENTRY _ -+ruÂ»41/1 11-1 lub-_ '--7. .U 1-1- ~~ _ __ ~-- , 033 - EXISTING /.......2 1 1 1 2 1 il 1,1 LE# 3 1 1 1.--- I 1 i 1 11 1 -_~~--r---------------~ 140.SLAS,BASEMENT -------------1-2 1 11 ' West Elevation r-1 -L--_--------------------------------- ----------T~--------1 . - -------- --1 1 ------7--SUCE=79-Â«F 4 9 -*30 (D 25-0 &/6. HEIGHT 1 -- I __--- NE. ST.N..6 SE,â€¢M MT. ROOF - L m'11111 i : 11 f - --- | 1,174-01/7 r --I- 1 ,/ .0 PLATE 1 . 4 .._%1.--LNE. 1/ vEIl SIPIN6 1 4/- />r 4 -"~Al.W-Â·| .i IIi. i. i i'. I! i i ; Ll_11'1''Illl'll, '' 1/ 1 1 ~ 4, 1 -- ..,11 1 (1 ',...1, 1.1 r 7 . rt . ... .i Â· 131 - 'Â· Â·10 Â·-A'P m.-6 1/2 4 1 'i p.Â©,1 J 1 11 11 111 1111111'lil:'111 11 11= 11 11 1 b 1 Ill eÂ» LOUVERS ---- - 1 11 11 1 1 11 1 4 1//jl 1 1 - 11111 )#11, 1 1 j jb --1-1; 11 1 .In 1100-0 FIRST FLOOR LEVEL 1! ~ 111 1 1.- ,| i 1 -- . - - - - 11 '11 1 - I ENTRY' FLOOR LEVE , -Â·- _. Doyâ€¢INSPOUT --- --- --- NE,N STale VENEER f~fifffIC~~~~~ff ~ilf-~~ Â£:All'- 1 / ily TOSLA'-PIEMENT South Elevation rh -----------ECALEt$4".1Â»3~-F 1 GENERAL ~ ISSUED FOR COPYRIGHT 1 PROIECT DATA ' SHEETTITLE ~ SHEET NO. IA-- - - SCOT BROUGHTON Architects COPITO REMODEL ~ed-4--_k#.~ed*7* #Project Status: 8/9/1 1 1 Al] delip, Ideal ~rrangernarl. and *ns ind'.ted PROJECT NO: #Pin New Elevation 104,1/*rMrOU:. DRAWN BY: ANB 1/4. = 1Â·.0- i peron .... u. wh~,0-r without.vr aer, CHECKED BY: SBA A-204 1460 SIERRAVISTA DRIVE , d,me-on' ....1 be verifi.1 It ~he job ...Any ~ W~en d,men.cm H nkÂ® p.cadence Mr =. ISSUE DATE: 8/9/1 1 i d),rw,Isior,al di~repancy 'all be b~ought to 'he SHEER B of 35 ~ ~ttendon of,he Archlte. prier to com,nencement Of ASPEN 1 the 'ork 13*f PO Box 4096 1 23280 Two Rivers Rd.,Unit 3 / Basal[. CO 8162 l Fy~~? Elg COLORADO 1- ** *9 62@j Nt,0 [t] 970/927.0552 [f] 0554 / [e] sbarchitectsco@me.com #393 =m Mikf ttiak. 1Â£Â¢** , :90=- r 1-IN 1 f-- T -t~ 3Â¢41 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 146,0 3 lerra. U ~l,Ar=L ..I>f , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: --iI;â€¢080â€¢~ oct 4,4.29,/r) , 2,11_ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) 1, 146 9 â‚¬-~h SCOC -â‚¬-406 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the CiTy of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in ,.~ height.. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this /9day , 2016 by A-AP~ega Sco.f~â‚¬0~ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My comrasion expirest 04~/9 l 16\S AÂ· ~ary Public t.3 Y P/ /4 0 29. & t JAC\<2 1 ~ ~ ~ LOTHIAN ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: ~74---AL < * COPY OF THE PUBLICATION * PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) * LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED BY MAIL * APPLICANT CERTICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 OIC>O=-COO...0-6 tm E:&8728Â·:0:33:BEN= fi )5*Ek@02.8,3,0-Emi 921 212 -RÂ·% 3'i:3~*21'21. me i: ikillÂ·tillifix : 025 :91:g:Ed::22.2.- 0 P 12 33 0 6 EYER 0 & 3-81:1Â·1%11-41*wit#z1 1 12. -*519111%30%â€ž52-=Sa--2 2.2 12 .zE :62:26:101&23911.-fE-% 2%1 alâ€¢ Â®c~ Ng *:a-%:14:16:19*-21:2 KI* 29 ~~&! 621 EmÂ£ 8812559%215822<4 WJ 22 UOISS'ululoo 6u!UOZ P -uiaideS uo /[/Hae/VI seuvl BLI _NOILE 'STAAr E, e a @ci as en. o.us. [bed$00Â£ t AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: I 4 (/,9 22 1812.eA VlÂ«rA 'tE*ll*_ , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: '20011_ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I. 4340T- E=3Kgue/-1-&' 4 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City o f Aspen. Colorado. hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) davs prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. - ~kbrble,~ / \41 4,1 Uk IM i*Â·th#~11/4 A.Â»14.-~41+1. . 4 Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department. which was made of suitable. waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high. and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 1Â¢ day of 28'Em- Â· . 200 1| , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. ~ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department. which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date o f the public hearing. A copy Of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) AJ A Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice. return receipt requested. to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions that create more than one lot. Planned Unit Developments, Specially Planned Areas, and COWAPs are subject to this notice requirement. Iq A Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation. or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description o f, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners o f real property in the area o f the proposed change shall be waived. However. the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. jÂ«- F -1- , l Signe_J The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 124*day of .520\Â« b.ik .20(11_, by 5(01- BY-Duâ‚¬h tort WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: LA <20( 4 Bmb'tu_ *lin raJU~u Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) ~ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 10,02 ASPEN GOLF PRO SHOP 1430 SIERRA VISTA LLC BICKERT CARL VON EISEN & E SUSAN C/O SSI VENTURE LLC 1435 SIERRA VISTA 395 DEXTER ST 299 MILWAUKEE ST #502 ASPEN, CO 81611 DENVER, CO 80202 DENVER, CO 80206-5045 CITY OF ASPEN BORDEN NANCY S 25% CONNER CLAUDE M & IRENE A TRUST ATTN FINANCE DEPT PO BOX 25425 PO BOX 345 130 S GALENA ST DALLAS, TX 75225-1425 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 DICKER INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD DUCHESS CORPORATION DUBLIN LEONARD & ADELE 5 HIGHGATE HILL C/O NANCY PAVELL 1450 SIERRA VISTA DR TOORAK MELBOURNE 11603 GLOWING SUNSET LN ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTRALIA 3142, LAS VEGAS, NV 89135-1659 GRYNBERG MIRIAM ZELA TRUST GRYNBERG STEPHAN MARK TRUST HAMSHER JOHN HERBERT 3600 S YOSEMITE ST STE 900 5000 S QUEBEC STE 500 1475 SIERRA VISTA DR DENVER, CO 80237 DENVER, CO 80237 ASPEN, CO 81611 HIGHLANDS PARTNERSHIP LLP JSO PARTNERS LLC MACKEY EILEEN S REV TRST 25% 401 IVANHOE ST 1470 SIERRA VISTA DR PO BOX 25425 DENVER, CO 80220 ASPEN, CO 816111045 DALLAS, TX 75225-1425 MCLELLAN DAVID R & KATHERINE V ODONNELL JOHN & ADRIENNE PHILLIPS DAVID & ALEXANDRA 1417 SIERRA VISTA DR 4083 CUERVO AVE PO BOX 11449 ASPEN, CO 81611-1044 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93110 ASPEN, CO 81612 RED MTN GRILL REDNOR JORDAN H ROARING FORK PTNR LTD 25% 1000 TRUSCOTT PL 405 EAST 56TH ST #A PO BOX 25425 ASPEN, CO 81611 N EW YORK, NY 10022 DALLAS, TX 75225-1425 SARICK JORDAN L & SHEREEN C SCHNEIDER ELIZABETH P SCHWARTZ RICHARD C 1472 SIERRA VISTA DR 6 LODGE RD 1435 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN, CO 81611-1045 GREAT NECK, NY 11021 ASPEN, CO 81611 SEVERY BETTY K TRUSTEE SIMPSON ELEANOR P REV TRST 25% STOLLER JONATHAN W REV TRUST 1390 SIERRA VISTA DR PO BOX 25425 1475 SIERRA VISTA DR ~ ASPEN, CO 81611 DALLAS, TX 75225-1425 ASPEN, CO 81611 URIS JILL P VANDERLIP HENRIKN WALBERT DAVID & ELLEN 1415 SIERRA VISTA DR 27 BALDWIN FARMS S 1425 SIERRA VISTA DR ASPEN, CO 81611 GREENWICH, CT 068313308 ASPEN, CO 81611 WEST ASPEN LOT 40 1480 SILVER KING ASPEN, CO 81611 , , 4 -36 r & R . 31-9 ill,# 4 PUBLIC HEARING -I..'.'....I-~ ..-. ..6/.- .A**t. Â£ - Eli 14". DATE â€ž#.1,;j . ..Ii,r' 'UC -1,11'1 TIME 1, b .1 .iw :Â·, 50:Â¢90* , a;~1 .1 j ~2 1 F Pl,AC E : Â·i Il-1 , F ~., 01 't ..,1 QU .,1 1,1 Â·'â€¢ lilli. 9'.Ii 11*14'1 ~ 4 ----- I ft: if//&#//&. , 1 - %, : 1,1 D l. th * 1,6,; C '.1. '. r....':'ll 1 1 . PURPOSE , * C . 3 f 0 ?pt..11.' * i.1 4 #1~ 454 j.jt y'7,11103 t,,S #11 11*11 lit i 44- . :1'.:..,. 5,1.h. Hin.evi 1 ..ir':Â·, l itt?.,11 F ., v,i :24'01 1Â·te ,,1,1,1,â€¢-,lat r --"w.'. r 94 FL*A,9 Al 11.9,Â·A...?,11,41. 1. 11':i,t!,2: ' 14 L, f lit, 9.11 .11 b. 11,4 it. Dil,/1 ' '11,1 - , .4 MI . f,0.1 =1 ' . 11 1 11" I. I . ,~ :k 4.b., A f '0 '1(Ii Â¥4%.t ~i ."râ€¢.{; :t.'Â·u; ial ' : 'ti'.V, .WNE#* .~, ','#''cy)M fli')1 6.,tjil.1 0,~'.0 Ul')-fÂ·â€¢r..1. l'trl-,1 Â·t'rr:y 5 IÂ·. .3 .letÂ·-r Uâ€¢Â·2 .t: 1,4 1.11 . ..:, . - ..t 4!11/141:11) ,Â·'6'4*~ .fl *143 42=i@r 1-5.7...0.71 08 . r *I 1 , ./ I SCOT BROuGHTON Architects , LLC September 8, 2011 SAMPLE RE: 1460 Sierra Vista Drive - Window Variance Dear Adjacent property Owner. My name is Scot Broughton. I am an architect representing Rob and Debbie Copito, owners of the above-mentioned property, in which they have enlisted my firm to redesign their existing house. The approach we have chosen is one that we feel will fit within the varying context of the Sierra Vista neighborhood, and compliment the direction of new construction within the greater community. The intent is to modernize the existing house, built in 1970's, by selective altering existing rooflines to take advantage of views to Aspen Mountain and Shadow Mountain, and incorporate benefits of the southern exposure on the property. A regulation exists in the Aspen Municipal Code that limits glass within a specific range on street facing elevations so as not convey a two-story living space. Our situation is a unique case in that the existing house is a split-level arrangement that establishes the main level of the house at +/- 5'-0" above the exterior grade level. Consequently, in order to take advantage of the views and exposure, we have proposed window units that fall within this range limited by the Municipal Code. Attached are a few images that indicate the area of the Window Variance request. As seen in the elevation drawings - we have indicated by the shaded locations the limits as imposed by the Municipal Code. In turn we have also indicated the window locations that we are seeking a variance on for this redesign, as well as, the condition that would result in a denial of the Window Variance. We would greatly appreciate your support on this approach, and acceptance of the window variance request on the street facing elevation. If there is further information that I can provide, please do not hesitate to contact me directly for further explanation. Sincerely, 1/ 0 .. - Scot Broughton Principal PO Box 4096 / 23280 Two Rivers Rd., Unit 3 / Basolt, Co 81621 [t-] 970/927-0552 / [f] 970/927-0554 / [e] scot@scotbarchitects.com PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 1460 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANADRD VARIANCE LAND USE REQUEST NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, October 4, 2011, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. Sisters City Room. City Hall. 130 S. Galena St.. Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Robert Copito. 500 Haven Lane. Great Falls. VA 22060. The applicant is requesting a Residential Design Standards Variance from subsection 26.410.030 (D) (3). Windows. to allow street facing windows to span through the area where a second floor would typically exist. The property is legally described as Lot 37, Filing 1, West Aspen Subdivision and commonly known as 1460 Sierra Vista Drive. For further information, contact Jennifer Phelan at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. CO, (970) 429.2759, Jennifer.Phelan@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Stan Gibbs, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission ----- --IL- --Il 25'-O" BLDG. HEISHT I | | NER! - 1~11 SEAN 1 < PROPOSED MINIPOINE,~ - | | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 NEP'NI \ LOCATION AND / \ /\ ' /\ CONFIGURATION ~~~4* / \\ .///// 1\\\\\\ I 1 3 = If'h 1 15"x 1 + 94-1 F17 1 1 11 V? 0 jilfiwit 0 i, 1 fox / \ FIRST FLOOR 1 - \ / \ 1 1 1 1 4 L 1 1 L----a - 1 ~ ~ EXISTING /FIN. GRADE | ENTRY FLOOR LEVEL L-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXISTING GRADE ---- -- --__~ -T -0 ---22224-1 -- PROPOSED eLAZING SOUTH ELEVATION VIEFY FROM BIERRA VISTA DRIVE 68.5 ---11-- -I- - -7--Â»--- ----- -Â»-t- --Il 25'-O" BLDe. HEIGHT I | | NEVY 1 SEAN 1 1 1 MUNICIPAL NO GLASS I | , NE}Al / I / \ LIMITe FNITH OUT / \ / \1 / \ , I / \ ININDOAS , 1 'll mi I . / \ / \1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 111 1 1 1 iti lilli 1 1 1 lilli t .1,1 11!11 1,1.11.11 1.01 1 1 1 21 1 1 1 0 - ' ' 1 I ! I 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 N 11 1 0 191 ~ ( li Ijl j 1 L-1 15"x 1 + F-0 04--1 0- 4 4> 10 1 \ FIRST FLOOR L . \ 4 1 - 11 lili 11 11 D .... Â·-r ~ ~ ~ EXISTING / FIN. GRADE ENTRY FLOOR LEVEL L_1 1 | | 1 1 1 1 1 EXISTING GRADE 1 1 1 1 ~_ __ ____1__-________L_________---_-_----_---------------- ------- --' MUNICIPAL CODE GLASS LIMITS SOUTH ELEVATION -37TE'UT'-Q VIEFN FROM SIERRA VISTA DRIVE 4'- 11" - - - -1- -14 - - - _25-Â°BLDS. HEIGHT ~ --+--- ----- + -t - --O.0 - | | NER - - -4 ---1- - 1 lillil SEAK 1 1 ~11 1 11 11 MUNICIPAL NO GLASS I 1 r----=----1 r-----1 , NER LIMITS AITH OUT 1 1/\1/ i / I ---------1 i 'J 11 11 lilli lili lifl! 1111 1 mill 11 -------- 1 5"x 1 + reÂ»--] 1 toll \ 1 FIRST FLOOR L F 5 \ \ 1 1 ... ~ EXISTING / FIN. GRADE 41\-i ENTRY FLOOR LEVEL L-1 1 EXISTING GRADE | 1 1 1 1 - =-4- ---- 1 ------------ ---+-------- 1 MUNICIPAL CODE GLASS LIMITS BOUTH ELEVATION -37TE=1-O VIEFY FROM SIERRA VISTA DRIVE m.lillizill 4 THE CITY OF AspEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: August 12, 2011 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0056.2011.ASLU - 1460 Sierra Vista Drive. The planner assigned to this case is myself. O Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. ~ Your Land Use Application is complete: / If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been ddemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Â»-ftÂ» Jennifer Phe01, Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required SPA PUD COWOP Yes- No-3~ Subdivision (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes - No->C Commercial E.P.F. / I â€žilluk .W . Ill / I 1 ./l-4 ' , -Â· .t.% 1 T / SHEET 3 : / " .-141; . 1,4, Ir~- -~ , * i~â‚¬1~~ 1. h SHEET 3 WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION FILI NG No I V < .Ut * , 7, 5 3â€¢ ' '60' 45 E I l l 4.8 f ' - ./, -Il-- - Il--Ill .-* ...0 '4.0 '82.5-0 , ./6, .. 1 I I -- ' 1 4 1. , 1 1 1 , 1. 1,1 /1 1. G. 4' li/8..A 1, 1 7 \ 11 1 71-33. . - 41 i il. 1 1. in ,/ 3 4% 4 m - 01- -- =4 D-Â·.... 11.-ij ' ' -- 1 1 *\ <m..14 4 0 DO 1 M. <-1 11 4.% 2 f : 1 + f 1 . 8 0 0 - 1 0 4 I q. 0 7 4 ~ w ' ~ 14 tr; c; 0 0 4 0 | 0 1 40 ' WS 24 180 23 4 O N 05 <4 4 4 '4 2 4 a t 1 in O + O - N IN 4 -- - 0 9 6 4 E '7 \ 4 - -0 - 'A .6 - 4 Â¥ 0 Of 40 . N A â€¢ 6 9 4 -J 0/ .1 1 1. - 1 1 1 1 0% 1._ i 1 04 4 L. . + ty_ * ~,0 ' 00* A >1 - . b r 1 1 1 , 1 0 A 1 4 - 4 5 1 ' 1 1 ' 1 I i 4,1. -------- --5/'03.------- I t ~ 1 t ' 1 --- - ---- 1 0 he- b .4 â„¢ i in l 0 '.992 , -94' -OS * St 3 , , f 1 ... 1 6. . -5% 1 / 1 Â· ' ' 00:<--- 20-y' 26 Ill lit .1, I JL----1 11, . -' g - /0 1 , , i ' 11, ' // -- ---- -- i-+~-*14 7/5 1 ' ' I ./ 1 q ... ,\1 241 '1 1 1 ' 0 6 Â£21- ~ 4-erÂ«.Â¥2 3 1 1 1 1 - -1 40 111 1 1 i \ i U i Â¢. . 1% 091 - 6 :I .1 11 4, -16 4 V * 9 - ..1 -160 1 1 4- ./- 9 1 \,6 7 01 .- ,- 4. -1 m \ / , .4 1 4 k 0 mt . F 0 4% i, , 01 . 4 0 M ~TS ~* ' 4~ 10\ r.1 . E t - f . .\N , 46/.e ~ 30 - 1 . - t o' 4 -3 0 69 1. %1 .% ... -- / 1,1 1 -1. . L.... 4 -4 - '. \ , 1 so / h -4 f FR 6. , .41 1 21 4, 2 0 N 0 191 , 0, 91 \ t.1 4, , Â¢ .0 79 t 1t >1 i 4,1 ~ - \ '1 IN-- , , 1 f 1 44 .4 Â© 0 )' 15 -- . 00' 7 0 - - 5.51 sâ€¢.9% '6 ' 44 iâ€¢1 - a 0- i t \ '1' -7 6 1 lili //// / . 1 , . 1 4 1 4 0 .1 + 'O 11 - 1 50' 4, i 7 & 1 1 , 1 , '25'00 1 t / W -0 , 1 9.\ N 4 -- 11 , 1 ' / a . 7- 1 1 \ 1 / 1 1 **t'...0 21 413 ---1 , .3 1 1- \ , 0 t' $ - 1 ZE. Co t 1 ...... 1 1 ..1-; A. 21 s-. 41 \A , .0 J' 13#.00' 1 ...,6 1 re, '. 4, /280 tilll!: 73 - \\ A ./100 00 S.- . 77 8 ~ 1 "LU 42' 40' 21 T E-*.'.-0.- 4 -53, .. 5,4. 41 114,41 4 ill 8 / * , 4 05ia Jr' A - 150.4 4 Râ€¢ZOON \ 1112=-22 \ 5 4 4 * it. 0 W 2 % t. N A- //0.00 4 ~i i A , r â€¢ lie' i . GO'+D. , 1 - / w i \ 1 1 - \ 66* 00, Râ€¢11 0.00 I38Â·13 21. 53 1 / 1 - 4.e I 1191- . -1 1 6 0 400.SO. *Ca 0 i 115.00 K 4 AR' r , 1!1 6, ' '4'. 6, - - - - â„¢ 2 * 1, il. 0 1 : F â‚¬ 4 , i j , x I 1 -1% 4 - P . 414.3 4* 4* 06' E I Re /'.. 4 4 1 ..j . 01 4-Â» 49 - 40 17 2 ~lit: 4 ' :T 5 55 - 4, f 0 F - 02Â¥ 2 Ir f ' O A , 1 ut=L_Â» 4 j Tj. .m,Zg - , 0 \ ' :----Tif4, -2 ' tl 434, - $ 10 'E , 544â€¢ 51 i 3 /1 p/ 1 4 ( I *'. 1 0 â‚¬ 1 ARD \ 44, C 1 , 1 N] 0 1, '4 ~%3* , 4 1 16 ./. .,4,--7=.n.44 W ~ A h s ..----,0 W</ -550$.0%.st, .0 2 : Lif*t 4180./2.82*.. 91 2 'Â¥r'6â‚¬ . A 4 - ........ - ... + 4,0 6 - 4 . j 4. . . . 11 - ..,..,tA --- - I -- 1 rb 0, *,2/ . - - A 6 '0* .â€¢Clees - . - ./ r ' 30/ -< 14#30 '9 1.%0â€¢ VIÂ«rA ,Â¢.00+ 4 L e 00 10 4& %- I - .! - TAE 41-001 geÂ»* 4 04 i 411 if, 0 Â· ' U ili . 4 . / 44 0, W Ne, .26/ - 98.-00 -O '00 4 U f Â¥ M 11 . 1 f 0/ ------- ., . -1- /O,004 - - , 4 ~1 A .. Â¢ 1 1, F 1 1 6 ... -'q. - 0 2 4) r l. 4 1. 14 (/O etâ‚¬FwA VIGTA - 60/ I. I -- . 4 + -' 44 4.. 1 , i L 11$* Â·Y - 1 61 - 02 N 4 I. 0 '0 9 4 9 6 .. A y. t - i . - I 494 R 7,4:T7& - I ft .ab. 3% FPJ I 50 .... /0 # f *3'N, ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 f . .4 32 'S 92 ./ U W 7 115*Jil \4-10 4 \471 <4Â· 'h 1 6 .4 - .Im/1 471*025 VÂ»t-A i Â·44 , 4 9/ 2 1 - -4 h h 143 ' 4 01 .. '24. \. *7leo 0,49 4, ~/~~731 4 4 324. 4 7 /0 , . . e / D n 13Â»ex Fep V . 0 0 /4 CPI. 49 / ,4.00 -' 4/0, 1 / \ 4 .4 4 4 , j 1 4. ... .... 0 /5 .0/1 4 4, . I . r ' . 9 1 m. 8%,9,0 DE+ - - -- - ' SCALE! I IN.= 50 FT. ! 4 + / 4 4 -oft, 4.t- / I-'. 1.7& I \ 20 40' , 6> . 1 4 1 4 ' .21 - 4 I . , \\\1 0 0 - .4, 3 #r# -,2 / / + 4 . 5 6 1 2 i .' U L 0 - 1, 91 t. 'f v.' 00 -. Ui - N. f- Â¢ 4 1 1 #4 f 29. - :,1- 9~,U 1 Y â‚¬ . ga\. A.. Am,MI- .- -*- ---------- - 1 . * i 1.1 /0 . r ! I . 1 - Â¢ 1 /0 1 0 / / Ej / 04 ' /1 . , \r 0 ./ I I .di r Â· r /:' \ 1 1 . y. 50 1 t .1 . /;I 4 ; i....17 i 5 . Â£ 4 -: 4%4 ' % '' 1 .P 4.11 2 -'&. m / ler* W m Â°o. '4 -4-*;Ir- -- j.,4 . * 4*4 1. B,A' 4 . 0.2 * , /Â· 1,1 :Â·.hz - Â·i: f ' r ..1.- 1.,1 19+ i.~'L t. t Â·. e ~.44'.44 152'r~ f fill'j '-6. Â· ~,., ~h'. Ji;6 '4.r~."..'1:, 2 ~3JNZ~LIJ~u-~i-44A , 41:~i ' 0 ti.*iÂ·:Â·t~ : :hip 4,/1EiW ..' ' .1 ' '. ' :Â®t,iÂ·#Â· / i 4 . , , N -4â€¢MI'Â· - Â·* 1#ehrÂ·.w.. .- 1, im- 9 9 1 W E %.. f., : / .'6Â·ki. . . 31* I it 1/ . f. , S>.S.&004 t. OPP IN(.7 'l) COLORAI)0 LAW 10(3 Ilal COMP! Na ANY LEGAL ACTION 8A5ED WPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS !,UNVFY vt''HI N 11(REf YFAP!' A[ 11 R et) K Â·R 5T hi V OÂ·/1 R 51101 1*' F< r IN NO [VINT. UAY ANY *TION BASED UPON AN'f ., CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL MONUMENT Il DEFECT IN IHIS SURVEY SE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM l HE DATE OF THE CERTIF ICATION SHOWN HEREON. A 7Y ELEV 7849.59' DATUM USED IS NAD83. . AÂ« 490/ N 4,/ 3/ - N 41 4,1 - N 88Â°56'00-E (BASIS OF BEARING) 102.70' A ---- Â£ \G'\ 11 \4'WAN / / - ----- - / FENCE~ 3.-4- 12Â»D ASPENS ~Â»13 I ,<>0-42*3134A ... -lill"- '.- '44 1'-0" TION , FILING NO. 1. OLORADO dAP 2000' , -hh N. t N.91%" / 1 (+43 tuâ€¢,%Â¥ Lo 4 J-4ny Ct % 4 NVI' *4 8 ex. \11 ..11Â· - U i f Â· g,~..p~0 s, 237 41 4--t- *1Â·Â·N Th- I / Sri,ic. 111- ' l-149 - i.52Â¢n: 41 ....h-- M:K** 4.6. i ~ v j U#0404 SURVEY CERTIFICATE A SURVEY WAS PERFORMED BY ME ON THE PARCEL OF LAND )USE WAS FOUND TO BE ON SAID PARCEL AS SHOWN ON THIS ) RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME ARE SHOWN. BEST OF NY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY 1460 SIERRA VISTA DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO - BY LINES IN SPACE SYDNEY LINCICOME ( L.S. Mill) - , 0. 67 GLENWOOD AVE. CARBONDALE. CO. 970-963-3852 DATE: 06/10/2011 SCALE: r - 10 JOB NO.: 11-17 I. 1 SIER1460 4419-11 . 0 A ---- : i. p ' I --- - .. 41 . 0 : .0 1 0 0 . . 0 .. 00 ' O A. I ... . 0 9 .41 4, .. 0 0 . A I . I. 0 . . .. . 6. .. . . 0 M - . D I. . . . -:6--=m- 0 - Â£ â€¢ D .. I D. D AD: 91 91 t . t. D .. A 4. D I .. 1, 1 ./ . 0 I:.' A. . .. . h D A . I . . . \ 0 ... lo, I D .. D . ...D - 0. ... a . ..0. I I I. .... . I . 0 DO 0 0 .. . 4.D :. ... ... 1 A I .4 0 041. DAD , I. ... .. .... 1 . 1.0 .... . / /'/ 0 -- .AB#MA 0 *- 0. ' . a A .7. fi -' -8:9:Ard94"114 ill , %11~2 A ' : . . . D 0 . 4 2 1 f 9 9 h D. _7 I Â¥ 44.9 6 , ' - ./0 - - 0 11 . 4 . t . E 0 k I . . D ..1 4. OlD ..1 : '. I' . . 0 .0 .. . .. <14~.Il/ ..A 7856 \Â«lf 1 - - -----------------------'.-1--1--1.--------.--,-â€ž-- - - - - - -------------------------------.--1...------------"-- - - - - - -------.-1---1- - -------â€ž--1.M----.--h---.-h.-1.--------------- - - - --------------------h---------------------------------- -- -- .~â€ž 1 f/- --. --1~- - - - - PROPERTY LINE S 01Â°49'08"E 177.21' 1<JUF~ - . -1/ 1 1 7853 k IN 1 7852 k IN r-- 7851 4 EEINO. SCOT BROUGHTON Archit AS-101 gliks PO Box 4096 / 23280 Two Rivers Rd., Unit 3 / Basalt, CO 816 A* [t] 970/927-0552 [f] 0554 / [e] sbarchitectsco@me.com A- 1: 11.11 1@!Â®Rg?8 % ir.n}Â·.,10.&/: i.ir.w.v~y.Â»-n' N 88Â°56'00"E 102.70' . = i. 4, . .. 0 7,4. ar-Â· I 4. . -0,0-'-I-/1. 0 1- I'll./A 1-3~E. - . 4.:FE:JO~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' e AR......ri -71'.~=11.111 ................... 1... A -1 ...1~: 0 16 ..................... ~ . - lillillillillillillillillilillillillilillillilillillillillillillillillillillillilillillillillillilll ..............m 1-~1 ./. r - O .. '.1111 r -li ...lill~~Illimllimill:*IL~-.0 - ---7 -~~~~~~illilill~11'l~: -11 'R.1- 1/"""Ii""I"lill'llill'll'll'll'll'll/ -11- 0 I Z ..~0 0 . - - -7 I' . .......M - .. 11.11.11/1.11/ ..0....................1,1,1 -. 2 0 8 - ill/ -~ L .- -4. .. , 00 . 1= 0 0 90/ - 0 I= A . 0 .: 9 1:. /1,4 :. ..: - .-I - ... . .. 0 .. . A ... ... ... D. A .. . .. I .. .. A A .D A . ...... 4 0,0 9 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 00 0 1 0-0 1 e 9 1 e 1 . - 11 r 0 0 1. A . 0 -- . 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0~ - e. e V .r .A ... ... ... . . A - ~. .. A:. ... .. .. .. A . . . . 1. .. ... A .. . A . . ..AD. 0 1 I .0 -. 11 1'-49/4 108'-5" -3-1 031_ 33 0 Ill 71 - - 111'1111111 ~j~~~~~~~~I Elli - r# r====31 1-=I=~1 /ATION 0-1 ION - ]EET NO. SCOT BRC A-202 ~ PO Box 4096 / 23280 10*0 [t] 970/927-0552 [f] 055 @fi! En'-11-1111 1-111-1-111 lillillillillillillillill'llillillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillillillillillilillillillillillillillillilli~I--"Illimill'llimmrr==r 1â€ž2:Illi~bIMinlimlmi,Ii,~&1~iliul##,IN,-----~~---â€ž, .IIIII....I â€¢â€¢---â€¢â€¢â€¢-1-â€¢â€¢I ~IiI.I.layi~~~l~iiirgui~.IiA~~~~FI~Il'~1111.Il~lilll~Illitl,i--illi-:IILLIIIII-:IIL-lt - = ___--.-211222mmri~~~F~-~~1 ======1 ~. ..111111111111111.m'111 1.11 "11 11 Il 1111111'fl ili; 111.'IM -------1 r71 -U- --11 ..i 1- I 0 - - =6----I-~Ii-------I--i---Iwil-I~mi~liE#,1%~:.1 ~,â€ž111 2Mle~----------~~:M----~----------E~~-----Ell#2 ~1F~- -E---. --1 1-1-,1 --- "mâ€žc~---------~~~42-~*-----,~-----3~E: F-7- - â‚¬--~ - 1 ----&.--1.---d--Il-- =1.2- -- ----1------ ~Il----- Irdiki--ail:: .. "1111111'111111112/11--9/11/1 111/----------------------------------------------1 "11111,11'lli~~ 1~~-~---------------- 11111111111.1.1111111111.11 1ii'MI,4 6-1 1....111. maill-~~limimilli'mi~mililia--il--I~i-=-m.--I-fl~~-~-~Illii~mf~-~i-Immagmagal-I~-Iltifimal-li--~-Iq. .--~ A e , I A ... .A A .....1~ -11~ A . ...... I..: -:.' :/. 0:' : '' r * itil#IM*aâ€¢,i,,R.-1'L#811'#q.~lillillill-Adal.. Â¢ f < to 1 <2~ /1J /2J A-301 43>' LA-302 / A-302, 3 (5) 6 (81 1 1 7-- --0- r- -Ilill -*7=,-0---t - - --i EZZEBEEZZIE~HT - 4-- ---------1-------- 12 I - -- -3.- ----- ---- -f-- --~ 11 17'-0 1/2" 1 1 1 - 1[122, 1/1 11 lilli\ 1-1> I I rkloq'-6 1/2 I T.O.PLAD-#OFFICE-in E rk 1 00 _0" TÂ¥Â». PLAD. ENTRY rkqO'-11 1/2" *T.O. SLAB @BASEMENT 1-0., c 2 j 11 11'-0 1/2 -79-FLATE- 1104-6 1/2" Â¥EFERDIOFFEE-*37 1 1 00,_0â€ž 'OUT )NE VENEER ~90'-11 1/2" T.O.-SLAB#Â·BASEMENÂ¥- %-ffi) EET NO. 204 ...~12ew:tat 1./.4.. 1 UÂ·.iÂ«â‚¬4**41 Il..':?111" 1%Rt '644;:GRNIN;~5MÂ¥ 4 1.-111!~lilll'.1 .-.. .. .0.-41[ ------9111 + 11111 1 1~ --1- '1 -liz,~3 ..1 ==111'W.1 11~I--9--U--.:lililii--1/,Ii,Ii,ili,Ii,il,ilil-- ---:, ----a --~.~, . -*--cs~Tri,- c:,li~~~ui'Ill 1-1 tal.'p4 11...=-- ~.=*~1~ 1.... 1.11 11'i. i .1.- 11'll ..~Ii, .........................1 =1.1 .lilli......4/~.....11111.11'll/....4/,-Ill,11 ........#:::::::11"m'11- 1~1 1 11 111 ......1....... ..... ........... ...... ...... ..... --mill--1..,-In- 1Ililillillignillililifillillill'11111 /....../..././.1.Im lilli....... i 1! ~1:.1 i- d-1-1- m -li - ..1 A . 00 0 0 0 ... "/1/11/0./~I..~ .................... -~*~0EJILLIEdill_ . I.I.....................I.I 11-. ill'11111.1111111.1.11.1.1.1 1.1.11.1.1.11.11.1 Ill...1.Ii'..11..il-.1.mlill'.1.-Ill.1,~Ill ........ IlL-1321 - ~~11~~ 1.--~ - -,r- -11- --I--ir ----------11 L- -=-2---1*,11111111111.11111111111111.111.1.111 ..... -I..... ...1.i.....:1,0.1-....11 1 ...... 1 ~/M~=1////~~-=-t/LO=q///.q.~==M///q//61.q////<~~~ ~~~ .---.-=-i:idwiti.'11.------1---i------.-----=&.11.,1.1 -----Ii=.-1111.-1--r.i---1--=--1.11 lili . - . A .1 ..................im. A:. ...:. . k. -.. .. V'I ...... . "iG~. A A~_ 9 A.â€¢.9.41-- A . ..... ...... Â£**Â· ./&004 :...:. 1 1, I .mi,-.,. 21