Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Han.34-83 • MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office • RE: Han /Eastern Winds Stream Margin Review DATE: August 16, 1983 Location: • Lot 2, Parry Subdivision (the first lot north of Castle Creek on Sneaky Lane, across from the City Shop Building). Zoning: R -30 PUD. Applicant's Request: Special review approval to construct a dwelling unit within 100 feet of the high water line of the Roaring Fork River. Referral Comments: No comments were received from the City Attorney's Office. The Engineering Department reviewed the application and made a site inspection and has several suggested plat changes. Stream margin review does not require the filing of a plat, however. A new development plan must be submitted showing the 100 year flood - plain. No existing vegetation within the 100 year floodplain shall be removed or disturbed in the course of construction, and no construction techniques shall be employed which could contribute sediment to the stream. Planning Office Review: The building site is very flat and will require almost no grading. All existing vegetation is being retained. There will be no effect on the stream channel or sediment loads in the stream. The site • grade will not alter existing grade points of the lot, so the existing drainage conditions will be retained. A pedestrian easement is shown on the plat along the river's edge, useable for fisherman and hiking pur- poses. The criteria of Section 24 -6.3 are as follows: (1) No building shall be located so as to be within a flood hazard area designated by the U. S. Corps of Engineers Flood Plain Report for the Roaring Fork River. This proposal is outside the flood hazard area. It is no closer than approximately 30 feet to the 100 year floodplain line. (2) In the event there is a trail designated by an approved trail plan within the development site, such trail shall be dedicated for public use. There is no trail in the trail plan that involves • this property and the easement along the river bank is indicated on the plat. Memo: Han /Eastern Winds Page Two August 16, 1983 (3) All attempts should be made to implement the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan. This property is along Castle Creek and is not . affected by the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan. (4) Vegetation shall not be removed nor any slope grade changes made that may produce • erosion of the stream bank. As mentioned earlier, all existing vegetation is being retained and site grades will not be altered. (5) There shall be permitted no changes to the stream channel or its capacity, and no activity shall he allowed which will increase stream sedimentation and suspension loads. Again, the house is being built on an open, flat area of the lot. Grading will be very minimal, with no effect on the stream channel or sediment load. (6) All efforts must be made to reduce stream pollution and interference with the natural changes of the stream, and to enhance the value of the stream as an important natural feature. This is a very buildable lot with all vegetation located away from the building site and near the stream bank. The stream is not being adversely affected in any apparent way and the provision of pedestrian access will allow more than just the property owners to enjoy this segment of Castle Creek. Planning Office Recommendation: The Planning Office recommends approval of construction of this single family house on Lot 2 of the Parry Subdivision as presented with the condition: 1. Compliance in the construction phase with the criteria of Section 24 -6.3. • H CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen No. '�l c� 2 J Staff: ./.:, r ♦a_ PROJECT NAME: i-174 Acetyl ii ijA 'Pi't y? S eL- r✓t ": APPLICANT: 7)44/ 1/1471--- Phone: REPRESENTATIVE: / -t `-- Y(d2 /mist - Phone: 6/ S (5 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Fee) I. GMP /SUBDIVISION /PUD (4 step) 1. Conceptual Submission ($1,840) 2. Preliminary Plat ($1,120) 3. Final Plat ($ 560) II. SUBDIVISION /PUD (4 step) 1. Conceptual Submission ($1,290) 2. Preliminary Plat ($ 830) 3. Final Plat ($ 560) III .EXCEPTION /EXEMPTION /REZONING (2 step) ($1,010) ote kV ED IV. SPECIAL REVIEW (1 step) ($ 465) 4e 46' ; 1. Special Review G 2. Use Determination g�c' � 3. Conditional Use REFERRALS: Date Referred: r/ J Attorney Sanitation District School District 1 Engineering Dept. Mountain Bell Rocky Mtn. Nat Housing Parks State Hgwy. Del Water Holy Cross Electric Fire Chief City Electric Fire Marshall /Building Dept. Other FINAL ROUTING: Date Routed: A ttorney /Engineering �uilding Other • • DISPOSITION: i i • t�\ - ' ♦. . II. CITY P�L REVIEW: 6 ' P93./ cienAs".)i of a Q� - o C as rfe_c1 l,v - k k o C,o -,ncl i- R 1. Ccr,tevvl a / ( 4 k c.s -, Q oc- St-CI Zi-lam• 3 CITY COUNCIL REVIEW: 0 Ordinance No. CITY P &Z REVIEW: CITY COUNCIL REVIEW: Ordinance No. • O , f ir /'- )_ / �• 1 4030 12 . �3 14 —� R _ _ , 1 s 097 1 7 M 764792 ! .c,o„ ».,�, 8 389.50 11 112 ` IRST SPECIAL CH ARGE (CREDIT) SECOND S-- PE --CIAL CHARGE (CREDIT) 11 13 », GE ICR EOI T) THIRD SPECIAL CHARGE (CREDIT) *`^ .. F `^ 14 m. +.our.. 15 16 .... ,,,oU ». 17 18 19 20 Al TA OWNER'S POLICY - Amended 10/17/]0 C5 /kc /1 / SCHEDULE A Order No.: 11060 Policy No.: 0 357563 Date of Policy: October 29, 1982 at 4:12 PM Amount of Insurance: $ 185,000.00 1. Name of Insured: David Han and Chen Lang Jang 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: ice Simple 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: David Han and Chen Lang Jang 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: Lot 2, PARRY SUBDIVISION, according to the Map thereof recorded in Plat Book 6 at page 124. County of Pitkln State of Colorado „ . . D 0 fr r ..._ e .<: uw SCHEDULE 8 Cider No. 111160 This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the follows g• 0 357563 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. S. Any and all unpaid taxes and aseessments. 6. The effect of inclusion in any general or specific water conservancy, fire protection, soil conservation or other district or inclusion in any water service or street isproven:ertt area. 7. The right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrce, should the same be found to penetr t prunises, as reserved in United States Patent tern or intersect k 55 at Page the 32 and in Sook 55 ac Page 35. d la Smolt A. A U; foot easettent for waterline, to the cuurse of said easee.ent for maaint ter with the rr ht to in teed to the City of enter along eu and repair, is described at Page 320, Ten recorded ceuber 10, 1954 in Book 18? 1 • An easement for s 15 foo 195E in B dvav as reserved in deed recorded January 27 IEJ at Page Di. A right uP y for i dery recor ugress and egress 40 feet In width as described in F' bruary 18, 1963 in Book 201 at Page 180. 11. A 2f) foot easement for road purposes as set forth in deed recorded August 19, 1%4 in /lout 208 st rage 512. 14. Fasesout granted to As in instrugat pen Metropolitan Sanitation District as set forth recorded May 17, 1978 in Book 348 at Page 112. 13. k A DPW of trust . ny; Jan T t ltoveeher 1, 1982, executed by nand Le f , og�1 p to he Public Trustee of Pitkin County, to *4* inn Chen o $l8O , : , in favor of The Fitzgerald K enure 1 r e c o rded f s 9 1982 in Zook 434 at Page 409 ass Receptip .2 4451 pays. .acedad 4 y 1 lyy ' -Y 1 44 ,, Awm ..y, � r h , X1 ,6" �~ rn. ..�.� ..k`r YrfIlY.141n'.!'§^d4, . v ♦ l LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION BOX 10001 GIDEON I. KAUFMAN 611 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TELEPHONE DAVID G. EISENSTEIN AREA CODE 303 925 -8166 July 6, 1983 Alan Richman Planning Office 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Re: David Han /Eastern Winds - Lot 2, Parry Subdivision Application for Stream Margin Review Dear Alan: This letter constitutes an application for special review approval under Section 24 -6.3 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, providing for stream margin review. Enclosed herewith please find the following: 1. Site plan indicating boundaries of the property for which the building is requested, contour lines, existing trees and shrubs and the location for proposed improvements. 2. Outline of construction procedure. The property is currently vacant and unimproved. This application should be approved because it fulfills all the criteria set forth in Section 24 -6.3 (c) of the Code. 1. No building is located within a flood hazard area. 2. There is no trail designated by an approved trail plan within the development site and thus no trail needs to be dedicated for public use. 3. The Roaring Fork greenway plan does not affect this property. 4. No vegetation will be removed and no slope grade changes will be made which will produce erosion of the stream bank. 5. There will be no changes to the stream channel or its capacity and no activity will take place Alan Richman July 7, 1983 Page 2 which will increase stream sedimentation and suspension loads. 6. This development plan will cause no stream polution and will not interfere with the natural changes of the stream. This development plan will enhance the value of the stream as an important natural feature. The proposed site plan does not disturb any existing trees and shrubs; the site now is an open field. There is an existing driveway to the property and building site and thus no additional driveway cuts will be necessary. The site grade of 103 will not change existing grade points of the lot and thus the present drainage conditions will be retained. It would be impossible to build on the lot and maintain the 100 foot setback due to the easements placed on the lot previously. A greater setback could be achieved but only with a consequent cutting into the grove of Aspen trees. There will be no polution impact at all to Castle Creek because the project will be supplied with City sewer and water. This development plan as contemplated fulfills the intensions stated in Section 24 -6.3. The proposed improvements will be safe from flooding, the natural water flow will not be impeded in any way, the designated natural water courses are protected and preserved as important natural features and appropriate use of the land is encouraged. As you can see below we are concurrently submitting a copy of this letter along with the enclosed site plan and outline of construction procedure to the Building Department as per the requirements of Section 24 -6.3 (b). We would request that this application be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission agenda. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, a Professional Corporation By ideon ufman GK /ks Enclosure cc: David Han (w /o enclosures) Building Inspector, Aspen Building Department (w /enclosures) OUTLINE OF CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE Excavate 3' - 0" crawl space grade of dig 100. Finish ?ade of foundation wall 103 8" block foundation. Use existing road to access. Drainage to follow natural contour of property. Drainage will flow towards Aspen Grove and creek at 1/2" per linear foor from 103 to 102 grade. All decks will be on 8' on center 2' X 2' concrete footings. MEMORANDUM TO: Colette Penne, Planning Department FROM: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department eta_ DATE: August 3, 1983 RE: Han /Eastern Winds Stream Margin Review Having reviewed the above application and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. There is a pond which is not shown on the development plan. The pond may be situated on the adjacent property (Lot 1, Parry Subdivision), however no pond is indicated on the final plat of the Parry Subdivision. There is a ditch which flows into the pond, which ditch appears to be on the applicants' property. The ditch is supplied by an approximate 8" diameter corrugated metal pipe from Castle Creek. If the ditch is in fact on the applicants' property, it must be indicated on the development plan, and the contour lines must be corrected accordingly. 2. The development plan must show the 100 -year floodplain to verify that the building is not situated therein. 3. The development plan must show all easements recorded on the final plat of the Parry Subdivision. 4. The development plan does not show the entirety of the property boundary. The development plan should show the complete boundaries of the property. There is a non - exclusive easement for public right -of -way which is not shown across the southern portion of the property. If any building is to be undertaken on any portion of the property not shown on the development plan, an additional development plan must be provided for that portion of the property. 5. No existing vegetation within the 100 -year flood plain shall be removed or disturbed in the course of construction, and no construction techniques shall be employed which could contribute sediment to the stream. CR /co W .r MEMORANDUM TO: City Attorney \ pity Engineer PLANNER: Colette Penne RE: Han /Eastern Winds Stream Margin Review DATE: July 14, 1983 Attached is a letter of application for stream margin review for property located on Lot 2, Parry Subdivision. Please review the application and plat, and return your comments to Colette at the Planning Office by August 1. Thank you.