Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.601 S Aspen.Cantrup.048A-85601 S. Aspen lq g5 6-10 Residential GMP Conceptual Submission CITY OF ASPEN MEMO FROM ELYSE ELLIOTT w w to a4kL--c VV J ernt,pwi, P��eslria►,�d 1,i��rr�P bcns: � . �n� � f ��,;. ,r,✓�...d Ct, utLL l�� , c?h� r�ssid�y G1rt���/ ►D,� i�• �� cFvcphi►+o J V o �� U r JUN 1 6 1986 ---- MEMO TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Members FROM: David Ellis, President Timber Ridge Condominium Association RE: 601 Aspen GMP and Rezoning Application DATE: June 13, 1986 The Timber Ridge Condominium Association objects to the proposed rezoning and allocation of a GRIP quota for the 601 Aspen project for numerous reasons including increase in allowable density, traffic and parking considerations and violation of bulk and area requirements. The following discussion' is arranged in the same order as the applicant's submission covering rezoning, street vacation, GMP scoring and summary remarks. REZONING REQUEST 1. Contrary to the applicant's assertion that all land abutting the proposed rezoning is L2, land to the south and west of the subject tract is currently zoned R15L-PUD. 2. Contrary to the applicant's claim that on -street parking capacity will be increased, on -street parking capacity will actually be decreased on Juan, Dean and Garmisch Streets as discussed later. 3. The project will not improve traffic or road safety since the proposed cul-de-sac fails to account for future development on the Barbee Parcel abutting Garmisch on the west. 4. T.ie proposed development cannot possibly improve upon the existing quality of vegetation or open space since the site plan proposes to cover 60% of the rezoned property with structure. 5. The rezoning will not. contribute to relieving congestion in the area as the rezoning to L2 represents an increase in density of 28 studios versus that allowable under the current zoning. This will not disburse traffic or population better than the current zoning. JUAN STRlil•:T VACATION of both sides of the street are not in the applicant's ownership as claimed. i -1- 2. The creation of a cul-de-sac on Garmisch will not be in the best interest of the neighborhood as future development occurs on property west of Garmisch. 3. The cul-de-sac as shown is parka-l-hy-on_the_Barbee property. 4. Existing Juan Street services the Barbee Residence as well as the Timber Ridge Condominiums and, although signed for no parking, is consistently used during peak ski periods for on street parking. 5. Contrary to the applicant's claim that the vacation will allow "superior land use planning" the open space and setbacks from Lift One Condominium and Timber Ridge Condominium are exactly the same as shown in the December 1, 1985 Submission when no street vacation was requested. 6. Snowremoval operations for the city will be adversely impacted as it is always more difficult to plow dead end streets than loop streets. In reality, it will be quicker and more efficient to plow the full length of existing Juan Street than the shorter cul-de-sac. GROWTF MANAGEMENT PLAN SCORING 1. Storm Drainage: The applicant states that he is clearly improving the general area by installing curb/gutter on both sides of Aspen Street between Dean and Durant. The referenced section of F_spen Street is already fully improved with curb and gutter. No points should be awarded based on this representation. 2. Fire Protection: The closure of Juan Street will not improve the quality of fire protection for the existing neighborhood as futuredevelopment occurs west of Garmisch Street. 3. Parking: 1) The current parking plan indicates a reduction of 12 spaces from the 184 spaces shown in the original December 1, 1985 Submission. This is in violation of r�.the Growth Management Plan Regulations as well as the conditions for resubmission stated'in Alan Richman's =r March 17, 1986 letter to Doug Allen. 2) The underground parking garage as shown on the Entrance Section in the Appendix is clearly on property belonging to Lift One Condominiums. -2- 4. 3) The applicant claims that excess parking is being provided, however, no parking is identified for conference or dining space. 4) There is a significant loss of on -street parking capacity in the neighborhood resulting from: a) The closure of Juan Street, b) The changes in usage of Dean Street And, c) Potential loss of parking on Garr�'sch if all Proposed improvements are completed. Pone of the 172 potential parking spaces addresses any of these losses for the adjoining neighbors or the general public. 5) The proposed parking plan for the Timber Ridge Condominiums on Dean Street as shown on the Entry Level Plan and the Parking Design in the Appendix will eliminate all landscape improvements in front of the Timber Ridge and utilizes Lift One property for parking and vehicular access. The latter has not been approved by Lift One. Roads: 1) It is hard to imagine that the project will not substantially alter existing traffic patterns when the primary access for 112 units becomes the Garmisch and Dean loop. in addition, it is proposed that Garmisch Street become the exclusive ingress and egress for service and delivery vehicles. Garmisch Street south of DUrEnt is presently a relatively low volume street and Aspen Street is the major access street in the area. 2) The traffic generation figures make no allowance whatsoever for service and delivery vehicles and buses. 3) The Garmisch Street right-af-way is only 41 feet compared to 75 feet for most city streets. The street is extremely restricted in the winter due to parking and snow accumulation. To create a fully improved street section (curb, gutter, sidewalks, one parking lane and two traffic lanes) as proposed by applicant will mean paving from property line to property line with no space for snow storage or landscaping. It seems inappropriate to award points for this type of design. It also seems appropriate to have applicant demonstrate how these improvements can reasonably be accomplished. -3- 4) From the site plans presented at this stage, it is not apparent that large trucks can access the service area from Garmisch Street. Any approval should be conditioned upon providing access by full size tractor trailer combinations. 5) The applicant states that while Dean Street will be }' privately maintained, it will be open to the public. i'' L,}..! Is this with a public easement or what are the j' conditions? 5. Neighborhood Compatibility: The applicant claims to have provided maximum open space between existing and proposed structures, but the 5 foot setbacks along Aspen Street and the west property line violate the minimum 10 foot front and rear setbacks specified in the L2 zone. To be more _ compatible with the surrounding R15 zoning the density should shift toward Aspen Street rather than toward Garmisch Street. The high pressure sodium exterior_ lighting- as proposed in the energy conservation letter is no E compatible with the neighborhood. 6. Site Design: As mentioned elsewhere, we find many problems with the proposed cul-de-sac, bike path location, and circulation plan. 7. Trails: The applicant claims to be providing a pedestrian walkway along the north side of the private Dean Street alignment; however, the Development Site Map, the Project Elevation, and Project Section in the Appendix clearly shoe the bike path and landscape buffer located in the existing Dean Street right-of-way and on Lift One Condominium property. The proposed plan does not demonstrate how these improvements will be incorporated on applicant's property together with the 25 foot private roadway. Under fire protection, the representation is made that the street will be 31 feet wide to allow for a 6 foot wide path. The minimum City standard. for a bike path is 8 feet of paving with an additional 2 to 4 feet for s-boulders. 8. Floor Area Calculations: The floor area calculations on page 34 show all of the ground floor and public entry level as being below grade and excluded from the FAR calculation. This space represents _over-26%- of-- the -total -floor area excluding parking. Section 24-3.7 (e)3 of the Municipal Code states that subgrade areas meeting natural light, ventilation, and emergency exit requirements will be counted in FAR calculations. It is hard to believe that none of -4- I these public areas will meet these requirements. Where are the conference area, meeting space, lounge, dining covered recreation areas accounted for? In the L2 zone, From trash areas are also included in the FAclthatnthe the information submitted it certainly appears project exceeds the allowable 1:1 FAR. 9. Density- The applicant has made much retoric over the fact that these are deluxe studios. A quick glance at the Typical Unit Plan indicates that they are much more than a studio. It is inconceivable thatof studithe otryauir doorsando full baths. The convenient placement divider partition evokes memories of pastmanipulationWhile with the door game following approval of the project and at. shown as studios, they are at best one bedroom units, studio plus a lodge room. The worst, an efficiency 90 studios is 112 versus oo ulationwculd bedroom allowable density for lie units. Amore reasonable peak occupancY er studio. The applpeant obviously at least 2.5 people ppeople anticipates occupancy greater than 1.25 p ple per un-ther why would two baths be included. At 800 square feet, units are twice the size of an average lodge room any lar9�'r than many one bedrocm units in town. 10. Allowable Uses: Dining facilities "for guests only" are permitted use in the L2 zone only in conjuction with lodge' units, bearding houses and hotels. The applicant i=-- tt1r applying for rr!ulti-far(:ily not. lodge or hotel. �econ�.ly, (, f the applicant is very vague as to the nature and sccpe dining futilities. We know of nc lodge or hotel facilities that are 100$onn tionalUuto gun etheLL2g!`or,'-larld public restaurant ,s requires conditional use approval. ch has not bier w}t� requested. 11. Multiple �eaT F>1location: The applicant has reque=:t-`"d t}''`t the 92 necessary units be allocated from prior year :nus��� Ygg t c� quotas or from the '85,186, ana 187 quotas. It that it would be inappropriate and unwise to award quotas from prior years in that there is a surplus (.' the condominium units in virtually all price ranges w�tte no City of Aspen at the present time. There rseems regLesteci beneficial gain. from this action. uotas does seem warranted allotment from future year q rrrant. based upon the many questionable aspects of the p Future year allocations are even more questionable when viewed in light of the complex, and probably very lengthy, litigation involving the property ownership as a result of the Robert's foreclosure. By tying up future year allocations with an uncertain project, it is unfair to others who may apply. Finally, there is ample precedence that the applicant has not proceeded with previously approved projects within the time frame required by the GMP Regulations. If an allocation is made, it should be conditioned upon the applicant curing title to the property no later than December 1, 1.986 to allow the plannir_g office to certify the real. number of multi -family units available for the next GMP competition. SUPHMARY The applicant has made many references to "first class resort hotel operation" and to the high standards of major_ hotel operators such as the Broadmoor Management Group. However, he has ducked the issue of a first class resort hotel by applying for a GMP allocation in the multi -family residental category. The concept of "first class hotel units in an apartment configuration" is totally contradictor.•. First class hotels do not have kitchenettes in all units. If the applicant truly intended to provide a first class hotel operation, he would in fact have applied for a hotel - a permitted use in the L2 zone. This together with other defects and ambiguities of the application, and the obvious implications of the two bath studio floor plan warrants denial of the rezoning and the GMP quota. once again, the community is being led to believe itis going to receive great benefits from a "hotel" when in reality the proposed will ultimately cost the public and the City many hours of agony and many taxpayers' dollars. We ask that you deny this project before it goer any farther. To: From: Re: Planning and Zoning Committee Mary K. Barbee et al Cantrup 601 Aspen develA.ien p June, 1986 Primarily my objection to the project lies within three areas of concern. 1. Closure and abdication of two public streets 2. Density and change of density proposed 3. Surrounding property considerations This document will quote from the proposal and offer summary consideration remarks. VACATION OF JUAN STREET AND OF DEAN STREET Essentially this plan asks the City/citizens to abdicate their rights to two city streets which have been existant on maps of Aspen since the 1890s and are reflected on the Willetts map as published in the Aspen Times 1893. Juan Street has been in constant service, has maintained travel and usage and served as a fire access to the properties it serves and houses sewer and water lines serving the property in this area since the Eames Addition was platted and settled in the 1880s. PAGE 12 - 2. "Both sides of the proposed vacation are in Applicant's ownership." This is in error for Lots 1,2, Block 11 (Lot 2 solely, Lot 1 borders the corner of Juan and Garmisch) are on Juan Street and they are owned by Barbee, not the HBC Investments. These owners do not choose to abdicate their rights to the street for transportation, service and safety purposes. 4. It is inappropriate to suggest that the Barbee property adjacent to the West of the proposed development be characterized as a single house property. If the logic of converting the R 15 property to L-2 is accepted (noteably that all the surrounding property is L-2, therefore Lots 3-12 should also be) then the entire Barbee property would also logically fall into this acceptance. Therefore the Barbee property cannot be observed by its current development, but must instead be considered for its potential development. That development if not changed from R-15 would represent approximately twenty family homes of two adults and 2.2 children or a total of eighty people. If the logic of rezoning pervails then the property honestly represents AT LEAST the 112 units suggested here. Therefore to suggest that property with this potential of inhabitants should have a single road access for safety, service and traffic flow is inappropriate in the best interests of the area. Further, Juan Street is not a full 50 feet wide at the corner of Juan and Garmisch. No consideration of land donation for an appropriately sized proposed cul de sac is offered. 5. Juan Street does not serve only the applicant . . . it also serves all the potential people of the Barbee property and has historically served as cited earlier. Juan Street serves an important purpose especially in winter as it relieves the traffic of Aspen Street, serving as an additional exit from those patronizing Lift One Ski Area..It serves to complete the transportation loop. Juan Street serves as a. fire access as well and has for over 35 years been designated a no parking street for that purpose. 7. The elimination of snow removal has been provided for in the taxes of those residents of the area as fairly as elsewhere and every right to such remains. To suggest a lowered City work load is inane, suggesting that the rights of the Barbee property are to be ignored. It is important to note that Dean Street has not been dealt with as a vacation, but it is consistently referred to throughout the document as a "private" access street. The vacation of Dean must be dealt with directly for indeed TWO streets, not one are being requested for private ownership. The Barbee property is not adverse to the proposal for Dean Street, but finds the vacation of Juan not in the best interest of the locality nor the community. It is my observation from having lived on this street for nearly forty years, that in the 1980s is well traveled and has considerable traffic, both vehicular and pedestrian. RESPONSES TO SUMMARY REMARKS DEFENDING THE PROPOSAL PAGE 11 (1.) Although the land to the north and south of lots 7-12 of Block 11 were zoned L-2, that is not the case with lots 3-6 of Block 11. The property South and West of those lots is R-15. The statement: "It appears the when the zone districts were created that in this particular situation the land was zoned by ownership rather than as a part of a comprehensive plan . . " is inaccurate. The ownership of lots 3-6 was held by Mrs. Pechnick at that time and lots 7-12 by still other owners. The inference that the ownership was held by the Barbees who were zoned R 15 is in error. There is no validity to this defence statement for change in the zoning. Page 11 (2.) To suggest that adding 92 units will result in less traffic or congestion to an area is to deny that people will occupy the dwellings of the site. Currently there is parking on lots 7-12 during the winter months as well as street parking on Aspen street for skiiers during the day. These street sites will certainly be target for lodge dwellers as the building exists. Even with off street parking underground, one only has to observe the parking habits of Timberidge occupants to see that the provided parking to the North of their building is seldom used because parking on the street etc. to the South is handier. It is my contention that whenever you put additional people into an area, there is no guarantee they will use the designated parking, but will use handy parking. It is logical to assume that skiier parking on Aspen street will be further dimenished. I do not deny the larger tax base . . . nor should one deny the larger expenditure from additional people. Page 11 (3.) Increased vegetation would be difficult to accomplish on areas that have retained their natural vegetation. Aspen street is already paved as necessary and does not offer severeaparticulate matter"in the air. Certainly increased people in the area will though. I have lived on Juan Street and Garmisch Street for nearly forty years now and can attest to the fact that the quality of life is not dimenished by the"particulate matter"of those streets in the air. Page 11 (6.) "Intelligent . ." traffic and visitor load throughout the lodge area will not necessarily be promoted by this additional density. To the contrary, the congestion on Aspen street will be enhanced. ►_ PAGE 14 "As per recommendations from the Water Department, isolation valves shall be installed at each end of Juan Street, with the 6" Juan Street water line being a private access to the project and maintained by the project." Currently, the water service to the Barbee house and all adjacent property is via the Juan Street water line. This proposal eleminates water access to the Barbee property by making this a "private" line. No provision for current users is suggested, nor any provision when interruption of service would be experienced. PAGE 16 Once again, the proposal denies the Barbee home/property the sewer line. There have not been excessive root intrusions and frequent servicing as cited on page 16. Inference that it is inadequate to the needs is false. No provision is made for the adjacent Barbee property and no provision for interruption during construction. PAGE 17 Dry wells are questionable in light of the underground erosion issues recently so evident on Aspen mountain and elsewhere throughout the state. * "Garmisch Street leading into Durant Street to be improved and widened ." How is the street to be widened? PAGE 17 "The private realignment of Dean Street connecting Aspen Street and Garmisch Street will improve the quality of fire protection service in the surrounding neighborhood by providing better access to the property at a lower elevation." How does the developer propose to guarantee access in this private street? Would this "private" street not be subject to closure of they so chose on their "private" property? How will clearance be insured? Parking could well make access impossible in that emergency period of fire. If "providing better access" is an important issue, then certainly we are reaffirmed in the non closure of Juan Street, for it provides "better access" to the Barbee property. PAGE 19 Parking provisions are inadequate in the very important area of a loading area. We all experience the difficulty with such planning not being a part of development in the past when we travel the streets of this area and the various trucks are parked in the street while doing their unloading. Consideration of this aspect would seem very important and provision for at least two large size trucks should be off street and maintained only for this purpose. PAGE 20 "service area will be screened from neighboring property view . ." How is this to be accomplished in light of the service area directly across the street from the Barbee home? PAGE 20, "The project thus is providing a total of 30 spaces over and above the legal requirement of 142." This is not cause for credit in that these spaces are the result of their agreement with the ski corporation in order to acquire property and has no bearing on special consideration. (see pg. 3 for referrence) * Surface retention and two dry wells as cited on the Storm Drainage plan are not even on the developers property, but are cited on the Barbee property. C I PAGE 20 The developer has substantially altered existing trafl proposing the closure of Juan Street. PAGE 23 "The connection of Garmisch and Aspen streets guaranteed when Dean is a "private" street? ' PAGE 23 "designated route open to guests as well as the public completion of the entire hotel project." What does the "entire infer? Is this proposal not comprehensive and complete? upon ultimate hotel project" PAGE 23 "Service vehicles are permitted access only from Garmisch . This is not compatible with the surroundingproperty ' s proposal constantly suggests it provides. Further, itprrovidessfor truckage as �congerrtion on theonly access street this proposal suggests for the Barbee property. PAGE 23 . thus requiring that traffic to use under-utilized Garmisch Street." Current zoning provisions do not provide this as an "under-utilized" street when development occurs. Garmisch Street is not underutilized at this time even. PAGE 24 "Waste disposal area How will a. "noise controlled manner" be effected? How will this development insure compatibility with surrounding property (noteable R 15 private residence zoning) and control waste disposal smell etc. as it has placed this immediately across from an existing adjacent property home structure. PAGE 24 "The architectural design allows for maximum open space between existing and proposed structures to aid in its compatibility with the existing neighborhood." This proposal places all its buildings directly across from the Barbee property, ignoring this property. Certainly the placement of a building within 15 feet of the Barbee home as well as the wate disposal and loading dock also within ]5 feet of that home hardly qualifies this statement for any validity. It is not compatible with this existing structure nor the zoning for the Barbee property which is adjacent. PAGE 25 "The property to the west of the proposed site is vacant . It I have already discussed this "vacant" statement as not valid. The property must be viewed in light of its potential for eventually this will be the entire impact not just this development. Certainly Lift One Condominium considerations have been recognized. No discussion with this property owner prior to the submission of the plan was excercised and the plan gives little if any consideration to the Barbee property except to continually refer to it as vacant except for a home and out buildings. Regardless . - this paper represents the possible persons cited earlier and not just a singlefamily. If this development were to be placed in another configuration utilizing the already developed Lots 13-20 of Block 11, then perhaps this analysis of the property usage would be more believeable for it would then offer relief from the high density against the Barbee property and be more compatible with the surrounding land owners. PAGE 25 , is a residential complex . "Residential" must I)e interpretered by the opening statement of page 1 . ."designed for short term rental". PAGE 25 . facility including a small conference center, athletic facilities, dining and lounges." This invites other than ty. Where are the parking provisions for these persons? Doesuthis not ests to tspeak he cto�the congestion that will be provided? 10 PAGE 26 Too bad a seventy year old cottonwood will be sacrificed. PAGE 28 Is it my imagination or is the 45,000 Open space consisting of 15,000 which is a pool and a tennis court? Certainly considering Juan Street as Open,) space is nothing gained because it already is open space. MAPS AND PLANS: The Barbee house is always pictured as further from the proposed buildings than is truth. It is also important to acknowledge that the proposed project owns NONE of the green space to the West of the project, yet the project is --heavily built in this area seemingly taking advantage of open space that is not theirs . . . and will most surely be utilized by development of the Barbee property. SOME GENERAL QUESTIONS . . . . What happens to the narking Timberidge currently uses on Dean Street? There seems to be some contradiction in the illustrations sometimes depicting green space . . . sometimes parking. An unplatted portion of Eames addition bisects the property adjacent to Lot 13, Block 11. This property is not owned by IBC Investments. It is owned by Barbees. It appears to be calculated by the proposal in their square footage. LETTER FROM PEARSON AND ASSOCIATES . . "A heat exchanger shall be installed on the boiler stack." Where is this stack, of what configuration is it and what fuel will be utilized? SUMMARY REMARKS .due to the creation of an outstanding project design ." " . . .the high quality resort ambiance of this project, including attractive architecture and site design, meet the needs and exceeds the standards of the Aspen community." uses provided in a first class resort hotel operation." This multi -family development provides first class hotel units in an apartment configuration for "Special emphasis will be given to meet the high standards of major hotel operators These are the claims of the developer. Certainly these are the coloring remarks to persuade acceptance. Their validity however can only be determined by serious consideration of the reputation achieved by an individual submitting the remarks according to the individuals previous achievements. Aspen's reputation is built in the same way as any individual . by these precepts. Certainly the rennovation of the Jerome and other buildings have brought Aspen to the level of development that builds for positive resort reputations. These are the issues . . . SOUTHPOINT CONDOMINIUM 205 EAST DURANT, #SP • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Southpoint Condominium Association William F. Dunn, President Board of Managers and Officers responding on behalf of the owners Sally Glenn, Secretary ' RE: 601 Aspen Residential GMP Project June 1986 The Southpoint Condominium Association objects to the 601 Aspen project as presented. Our major concerns are described below. 1. REQUEST FOR REZONING A PARCEL FROM R15L(PUD) TO L2 would result in a higher density that would be detrimental to the neighborhood. The increased traffic and congestion from this many units in a multi-family/"first class resort hotel operation" would overwhelm the area. There are serious traffic and congestion problems now during peak holiday periods, World Cup, and on powder mornings. The City has under review major changes to the Willoughby Park area (between Monarch and Aspen on Dean), including buildings which would eliminate most of the parking currently there. The 601 Aspen project would aggravate the congestion caused by the changes for a ski club and ski museum. If the 601 Aspen project allows any or all of its amenities, including the "dining and lounges", to be open to the public, then the problems of congestion and traffic and the adverse impact on the neighborhood would be increased tremendously. 2. REQUEST TO VACATE JUAN AND DEAN STREETS would negatively impact neighborhood circulation. An addition of 112 units would seem to demand greater access and circulation, not less. To vacate the streets at this time also ignores the needs of any future developments in the area. 3. REQUEST FOR ALLOCATION OF GMP UNITS FROM mIER2 YEARS always requires careful eval- uation to protect the intent of the GMP and planning process. Such future year allocations should be awarded to a developer with a proven track record of completed and in -compliance projects. Is it fair to future applicants to tie up GMP allocations for future years with a project which has problems of confused ownership and tangled legal status? Thank you for your attention. SCHMUE: GORDON MEYER 1: GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 212 GL.ENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (303) 945-1004 June 17, 1986 Mr. Steve Burstein, City Planning City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: 601 Aspen Project Dear Steve: D I1� JUN20 W6 D On behalf of the City of Aspen, we were asked to offer comments for the Aspen Lodge Area Special Improvement District regarding the 601 Aspen Project. The following items are of interest to the district: A - We support the vacation of Juan Street. B - We support the upgrade of Garmisch Street with cul-de-sac to the Barbee House. The Applicant needs to consider some parking as shown in the district plan. C - The Applicant needs to ensure improvements on the right-of-way of Aspen Street follow district plans. This is particularly im�ort- ant with regards to parking. D -- Thn re is c, need for a public pedestrian right-of-way on Dean Street between Aspen and Garmisch. -he right-of-way should be a minimum of 20 feet. The design the Applicant has submitted is generally what the district desires. We want to ensure concur- rance of the Applicants plans with Lift One and Timber Ridge Condominiums. Final plans should be integrated into district design concepts. E - The district requires a drainage easement a minimum of 20 feet through the property for a.+ 72" pipe for storm waters from Aspen Mountain. The easement could follow the Nordic Trail easement, if that easement is also secured by the Applicant through the Barbee property. Our need is to get from Aspen Street to Garmisch Street. Sincerely, SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. Qmpson Project Manager RT:lc/5726 xc: Mr. Jay Hammond, City Engineer b 04 C-(> Tn MEMORANDUM To: Steve Burstein, Planning Department From: Elyse Elliott, Engineering Department Date: June 4, 1986 Re: 601 Aspen Residential GMP/Conceptual Subdivision/Rezoning ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- After reviewing the above application, the Engineering Department has the following comments: Street Vacation The east portion of Dean Avenue was vacated in 1969, causing it to dead-end about 80' from Garmisch Street. The un-vacated portion of Dean Avenue is presently being used as a parking lot primarily for the Timberidge Condominiums. The application proposes to create a new alignment of Dean Avenue on the project's property. This "new" Dean Avenue would be a private road and would serve as the access street to the project. The proposes width of "new" Dean Avenue is 251. The application is seeking a street vacation for all of Juan Street which is the street directly south of Dean Avenue. Using Dean Avenue as the access to the project would be preferable to Juan Street. The grade of both Garmisch and Aspen streets drastically increases south of Dean. It would minimize the traffic going up the steep section of Aspen Street and would not add congestion to the skier drop-off on Aspen Street. Normally, the Engineering Department would not recommend approval of a street vacation because the City would be relinquishing the entire right-of-way. However, in this case, the applicant is creating a new street that could be used more appropriately as the connection between Garmisch and Aspen streets. Juan Street is 50' wide and 300' long for a total of 15,000 square feet. The "new" Dean Avenue is proposed to be 25' wide and 330' long for a total of 8,250 square feet. This is not an equitable trade for the City. We feel that this project should allow more area for streets. More street area is needed at the end of Garmisch Street. If Juan Street is vacated, Garmisch will become a dead-end street. There is not sufficient room for a cul-de-sac to allow vehicles to turn around at the end of Garmisch Street. The situation is exacerbated because a portion of Garmisch Street was vacated in 1967 to the Barbee residence. We recommend that a cul-de-sac be made from a portion of the west part of Juan Street and parts of Lots 12 and 13 of Block 6. We also recommend that the "new" Dean Avenue be widened to 401. If the City agrees to vacate 15,000 square feet for the Juan Street right-of-way, then the applicant should provide the same amount of area for public street use. Trash The application provides a 12' x 34' area for an enclosed com- pactor. This will adequately house a 6 cubic yard compactor, which is the size recommended by BFI. The problem with the service area design is that a trash truck cannot easily access the compactor because it is located on the side of the truck bay. The design of this area could be improved by locating the compactor behind the trash truck bay. Parking A total of 142 parking spaces will be available to this 112 unit lodge. According to section 24-4.5 (c) , 112 parking spaces are required for this project. The application provides another 30 parking spaces that should sufficiently accommodate cabs, limos, buses, deliveries, etc. Lodge Improvement District The applicant should commit to joining the proposed Aspen Lodge Improvement District. Traffic The traffic generated by this project was analyzed by the Engineer- ing Department and reported in my memorandum of January 17, 1986. It was determined that this project would cause a 10% maximum increase in traffic on Aspen, Garmisch and Durant streets. These streets are adequate to handle the increase. The revised application has deleted all employee units which would lessen the traffic impact. Utilities The applicant has agreed to underground all utilities which will enhance the appearance of this project. Storm Drainage Installation of drywells will enhance the historic drainage of this property. The proposed curb and gutter along Aspen Street should be tied into the catch basin on Durant Street, this would help the drainage of the neighborhood. Construction Schedule The applicant must provide us with a complete construction schedule and phasing plan so that we can accommodate barricading, pedestrian traffic, truck traffic, excavation access, material storage, etc. MEMORANDUM To: Steve Burstein, Planning Department From: Elyse Elliott, Engineering Department Date: January 17, 1986 Re: 601 South Aspen Residential GMP Conceptual Submission After reviewing the above application and making a site inspection, the Engineering Department has these comments: Utilities The applicant has agreed to underground all utilities which will enhance the appearance of this project. The applicant must also be asked to join any future improvement districts. W T e k adequa water f ilities servicing this project, the f i i ie canpotimproved. ,FWever, the applicant has agreed t nsta11 3 new fi-r--& hydrants which would improve the fire prot ction o the neighborhood. Sever There is adequate sewer service to this project that cannot be improved. Storm Drainage Installation of drywells will enhance the historic drainage of this property. The proposed curb and gutter along Aspen Street should be tied into the catch basin on Durant Street, this would help the drainage of the neighborhood. Trash The applicant has not satisfactorily addressed the trash storage issue. Ede need to know the proposed dimensions for this area to determine the number and size of the dumpsters that it could accomodate. The service area of the project appears to be large enough to allow a BFI truck access to the collection area. Parking This project proposes to provide 184 parking spaces, 31 of these will be dedicated for use by the Aspen Skiing Company since this project will be built on the present location of the ASC parking lot. The parking lot is used by ASC employees and day skiers. When the 31 spaces are relocated to the proposed underground parking area, it will not be very accessible to day skiers. The ASC employees will know that there are underground parking spaces available to them, but the day skiers will not want to drive underground to look for parking. Signage on the 31 spaces will have to be noted that they are for ASC employees and day skiers. A total of 153 parking spaces will be available to this 92 bedroom lodge which also will house 136 employees in dormitory units. Code requirements in the L-2 zone are for one parking space per bedroom. This leaves 61 parking spaces for 136 employees, or one space for every 2.2 employees. The code does not specifically address the parking requirements for dormitory type employee housing in the L-2 zone. Section 24-4.5 (C) , which refers to off street parking requirements, addresses dormitory use only in the R zone and requires two parking spaces per 3 pillows upon application of a residential bonus overlay. If this criteria were applied to the L-2 zone, this project would need 91 parking spaces for employees. The L-2 zone requires four parking spaces per 1000 square feet for "all other uses." If this were applied to dormitory use, 82 parking spaces would be required. Apparently, a special review according to Section 24-4.1 is necessary to determine the adequacy of the proposed 153 parking spaces. Factors which contribute to the reduction of parking spaces include the project's close proximity to town, to the bus _o service and to the ski lift, and the limo service provided by the project. X�i�.� NA`^ " 0. a �o -fir (' S o� 3•� p n e we, -1-r; PS nt+- Z.7 a�.� owe. � irr � PS �S Traffic Impact In order to accurately determine this project's traffic impact, a more complete description of the proposed "limo service" is needed. x �eA , d e.n-ta t National averages for one way trips per od unit per day is 0.2 The Alan M. Voorhees traffic study states that this figure is for Aspen. Again, the project's close proximity to town, to t•e bus service and to the ski lift reduces the need for vehicle use. This department estimates that 600 one way trips per day for this project is a viable number for calculation of traffic impact until more information is submitted. This would include service vehicles, employees, guests and limos. The access streets to this project are Durant, Aspen and Garmisch. The approximate daily averages are 5300 vehicles on Durant and 3500 on Aspen and Garmisch. The 600 trips will be divided between these three streets. We anticipate a maximum traffic increase of 10% on Aspen and Garmisch and a lesser increase on Durant. All of these streets could handle this increase. Durant and Aspen streets have a 75' right-of-way width and Garmisch has a 100' right-of-way width from I -lain Street to Durant and then necks down to 40' from Durant to Juan where it ends. This project, the Barbee residence and the Timberidge Condominiums are the only developments on Garmisch past Durant. The Timberidge Condominiums use part of the east side of Garmisch for parking. Since Garmisch only has a 40' right-of-way width in this area, the parking should be eliminated to allow enough room for two way traffic that would be increased by this project. This would eliminate about 8 parking spaces. This issue should be addressed by the applicant and another parking area should be found, perhaps along Dean Street. Employee Housing More information is needed form the applicant on the Kitzbuhl and Shechter to determine the adequacy of utilities, trash facilities, parking etc. A site survey would be particularly useful. Right -of -tray The applicant is proposing to either re -open Dean Street or re -construct it on the project's property. The application is extremely vague as to the location of the "new" Dean Street. The easterly section of Dean Street, adjacent to Aspen Street was vacated and is now part of the Lift One Condominium property. Therefore, a total "re -opening" of Dean Street is impossible. The applicant is also proposing to construct a two story underground structure and above grade walkways on Juan Street. An encroachment license must be applied for. The site plan submitted does not show the property lines making it impossible to determine setbacks, open space, encroachments, etc. A site survey is imperative for accurate evaluation. 601.Aspen g Jan. 17, 1.986 Job No. 16O1OA ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 S. Galena St. P.O. Box 2506 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (3031925-3816 601 S. Aspen Project c/o Mark Danielson 0155 Lone Pine Road Aspen, CO 81611 Reference: Development Plat 601. S. Aspen Area Summary Mine Dump 41,000 + Sq.Ft. Ski Co. & Austin 30,000 + Sq.Ft. Block 6 Barbee 42,545 + Sq.Ft. Subtotal 113,545 + Sq.Ft. Addition No. 1 21,500 + Sq.Ft. (unplatted portion of Eames Addition) ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: ELYSE, ENGINEERING FROM: JIM MARKALUNAS SUBJECT: 601 S. ASPEN ST DATE: JANUARY 15, 1986 Concerning your inquiry about the 601 S. Aspen project, please see our attached memo which addresses the hydrants. We feel the installation of the hydrants is necessary because of the project. However, if the applicant would replace the two existing, obsolete hydrants, presently located on S. Aspen St., (hydrant #s 720 and 721), with new 5" Mueller Centurians, supplied from the 12" main presently located in Aspen St., the resultant increase in the ability to provide fire plows will improve the neighborhood fire protection, and therefore, the applicant should be given consideration for this improvement. We have no further suggestions to make at this time. JM:ab cc: Mark Danielsons Los ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: STEVE BURSTEIN, PLANNING OFFICE FROM: JIM MARKALUNAS SUBJECT: 601 ASPEN RESIDENTIAL APPLICATION DATE: DECEMBER 24, 1985 �r This is to advise you that the Water Department has reviewed the above referenced application for (92) multi -family free market units and (18) employee dorm rooms. We wish to note that since our letter of Nov. 24, 1984, the 5}" steel line has been replaced. It appears at this time that the Water Department can provide the project with water. However, we wish to note the following: There is a recommendation from the Fire Department for an additional fire hydrant to be located at Garmish and Dean. The plans also show (2) additional hydrants to be located along Aspen St. at Gilbert and Juan. We would recommend that (2) new hydrants be located further south, at Garmish and Juan and Aspen and Juan. There already exists, a hydrant at Aspen and Hill. I am clarifying this point, as there seems to be some confusion over the location of the hydrants. We are not sure exactly what the water service plans are for this project and request that the developer provide for us, additional information to include the site utility plans for the project. We have no further comments at this time. JM:ab MENDRANDU N TO: Steve Burstein, Planning Office FROM: Tom Baker, Planning Office RE: 601 S. Aspen Proposal - Trail Realignment and Traffic Generation DATE: January 15, 1986 In response to your questions: Is the proposed trail realignment consistent with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Element? What amounts of traffic would this project generate? Trail Realignment The applicant's proposal to realign the base of the mountain trail is in the spirit of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: Parks/Recreation/ Open Space/`rrails Element. In my view the limiting factors for this new configuration are: Nordic District - The new trail must work for the Aspen/Snowmass Nordic District. Cost - The applicant should agree to give the easement to the City and pay for construction of that trail segment. Timing - The timing of trail construction must be acceptable to the Nordic District. Traffic Generation According to the Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook; Second edition, Institute of Traffic Engineers; p. 275, Table 10-22, Vehicle Trip Generation of Urban Land Use. Resort Hotel Occupied Room 10.2 vehicle trips/day - average Apartment 5.1 Average vehicle trips/day- average .'�F-7.,�"f Y.3Ysa{'c�r"�iLrk.�+ �c'a 'q" �'."i'+ ao j:.,T'"''�i:^"h'7%i`.{'R �4'•�..n F�:i[.I[;�f, ,a_.'i..;. rl r-;,C. c_:r �, .v �. :4 Y. 'o jiled #ox record 4t 41s0S 0.1clock A. He November 30, 1967 1,' c Reception No. 129211 Peggy 4% Coble, Recorder ' ORDINANCE NO. oV% BOOK2JU . ?AA110' n> (Series of 1967) ".:',:, AN ORDINANCE VACATING AN ALLEY AND A PORTION OF AN INTER- IN EAVES ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, AND „} SECTION DECLARING AN EMERGENCY TO EXIST. BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Aspen, ► ``_.;; ' Colorado: r Section 1: All right, title or interest of the City of that certain alley running east to Aspen, o ora o in and to through the center of Block 6, Eames Addition to the City West and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado is hereby vacated. Section 2• All right, title and interest of the City of the intersection of Aspen, o ora o in and to a portion of dJuan Streets ne s Addition to the d Garmisch as Townsite ofAspen,Colorado more particularly described follows: Beginning at North West corner of Lot 1 Block 140-50'-49" East 65.4 11, Eames Addition, North feet on the Eastern property line of Block 5, Eames Addition; thence South 40°-21'-11" East 86.0 West 15.0 feet to feet; thence South.14°-50'-49" North-East Corner of Lot 2, Block 11, Eames Addition; Thence North 750-09'-11" West 71.0 feet on Northern of property line of Block 11 to North-West corner Lot 1 Block 11, and Place of beginning. Is hereby vacated. Section 3: All rights -of -way or easements are hereby —Me Colorado for the continued and reserved City of Aspen, water or similar pipelines and future use of sewer, gas, and appurtenances and for electric, telephone, and similar lines and appurtenances. Section 4: Because of the matters and things hereinabove set fort , the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado hereby determines and declares that an emergency exists, and that this ordinance is necessary for the immediate presentation of the public peace, health and safety. INTRODUC , READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED THIS __DAY OF 1967. ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS70 DAY OF 1967. ATTEST: y Clerk �' R ,y,,, ., , �TL .z xi ' tea- • m •a �- I '� ! i .., 6 00 O t ^ .. • w _ i 1 — . i s w� • � _ w Le �� a c - »43 v • la } "'sad solt Z 1100 3 s N O W60-0 J. CO� a t LL.� ��O a W co co W w .w w 3 _Z co IA Y co F- OE a Q W Q Z Ix 0 .11 .00.001 M 60 ,00 '1S N3dSd 3 „6*,OS .01 N m 0 O 3 ,i0 .09 •01 N X W ASSOCIATED LEGAL RULED PAD 92 (ys 0-1 s �.c�-a.e...-;Woe j ram. �• .�-a i(� � _ io . o `L.�.. voe coo f'o . S— i � . s -7 v q /. v o SO !o SO z�; • S ' %Z�= o►a-*- u...s o-u-2ct�-� o� a7c�L.l; p��s.-i�a�i�k�,, p�cll /�Givi,Q �1.2-c 14. 9• (jam � cv,•rr� rL � s v.�►,n.. E� //6"/ vsl o-E 0/d i> S USE IP�a.�i�p+�L itv 9 z r 9'z ---- - 4�a 9�i 9 9'Z 83 k �S 11s �o y 3 y 7, log 4a, �� �'���-+ � - lPOzfiir'f S'a._^'T % � G �, �s O-�� � �i►C�LZ� � �!�..r�,� 7 9 k z .'7 � ~` / wee u� * 4 = Z 13 0+-Q wn j - �Gc s�tsrtP� v v1,{�iuFS � �g � �2¢�Lo�dy�s�af� G-c�Lsc�j %.���e,��.a..-�-�_/�� S (o o � S . c2-�c�+ 5 i�� /� ,-> GG,ri�JZ�-�-� /` ,���ze> �--=.m� / c��,�iyr.�� �� _�aw�eta�-�j � �� MEMORANDUM TO: City Attorney City Engineer Housing Director eAspen Water Department Environmental Health Dept. r 'E Y .Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District -Fire Marshall d Fire Chief' Aspen School District W, Zoning Enforcement Official RFT A u Roaring Fork Energy Center FROM: Steve Burstein, Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office RE: 601 Aspen Residential GMP/Conceptual Subdivision/Rezon- ing - Parcel ID #2735-131-13-001 Case No. 048A-85 DATE: April 16, 1986 Attached for your review is a resubmittal of the 601 Aspen Residential GMP submission received by the Planning Office in connection with the 1985 City Residential GMP competition. The applicant, Hans Cantrup, has resubmitted his application which now consists of the following. The applicant proposes the construction of 112 free market units for short-term rental. The applicant contends that 20 of the units are to be reconstructed (Mine Dump Apts) and therefore exempt from growth management. The remaining 92 units are being requested through the growth management competition process. The applicant is also requesting approval for conceptual subdivision for the purpose of construction of the multi -family structures, a street vacation of Juan Street between Aspen and Garmi \ h Streets, 8040 greenline review, and rezoning of Lots 3-12, Bloc 11, Eames Addition, from R-15 PUD (L) to L-2. The property i located at 601 S. Aspen. Please review this material and return your draft comments to Steve Burstein no later than May 19, 1986. A meeting of all the referral agencies will then be scheduled to discuss the comments and final comments are requested no later than June 6th. If you anticipate any problems meeting these deadlines, please call ASAP. Thank you. z 1-4 RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMISSION ' 601 ASPEN I ' SUBMITTED TO: The City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 ' APPLICANT: HBC Investments Box 12384 Aspen, Colorado 81612 DATE: April 1, 1986 Preliminary Conceptual Development Plans prepared by Skidmore, Owings, Merrill 1 1 1� 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Cover Letter to Planning and Zoning and City Council Professional Team II. Introduction. III. Conceptual Subdivision IV. Rezoning Request V. Street Vacation VI. CMP Submission VII. Appendix a) Architectural Drawings b) Ownership and Encumbrance Report c) Survey Maps d) Other Site Information e) Referral letters f) Adjacent Property Owners 21/11BC/4.01.86 I L� I I In � COVER LETTER j 1 April 1, 1986 "`% ., (90�9) 9l S d " POO Planning Department Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Aspen City Council 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 601 Aspen To Whom it May Concern: We are pleased to submit the attached application for your consideration. I believe you are all. aware of the critical need for luxury tourist accommodations in order to restore the economic viability of our community. Not only will this proposed project meet such need whic will help reverse the declining revenues recently experienced in ou community but will be so located as to relieve congestion in the Little Nell and immediate mall area. The proposed site is virtually the last unallocated location available in the City of Aspen for short term tourist accommodations. The attached submission does not make for light reading as both the project and the process are very technical and complicated but we have attempted to make it as clear as possible given these technical constraints. We trust that you will be able to act favorably on this application. The development team or any members stand ready to participate in any work sessions required by any of you or any of the various staffs to whom the application may be referred for comments. DPA/kl Enclosures 03/vaca3 Very ,truly yours, / Douglas P. Allen I emu/'� . %5'05� 9�S 95'9d CONSULTANT TEAM ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, LANDPLANNERS, INTERIOR DESIGNERS AND LANDSCAPING DESIGN Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Robert P. Holmes, Partner Sam C. Hyatt, Project Architect 175 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80203 GENERAL PLANNING Danielsen Development Group 155 Lone Pine Road, A7 Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 925-3515 ENERGY Pearson and Associates Mechanical and Electrical Engineering P.O. Box 1047 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 HYDROLOGY Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers, Inc. Leslie H. Botham 2695 Alcot Street Denver, CO 80211 Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. 210 S. Galena Street P.O. Box 2506 Aspen, CO 81611 GENERAL CONTRACTOR Shaw Construction Co. George G. Shaw III Kalamath Denver, CO LEGAL COUNSEL Douglas P. Allen, Esq. Courthouse Plaza Building 530 E. Main Street, 1st Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher George Bermant Suite 4200, 1801 California Street Denver, CO 80202 ' MARKETING Pannel, Kerr, Foster Suite 1200, 1775 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80202 ACCOUNTING AND TAX ADVISORS Alexander Grant & Co. 16th and Lincoln Street Denver, CO 80202 PROPOSED HOTEL OPERATOR Broadmoor Management Co. Colorado Springs, CO 80901 1 02/vaca3/4.1.86 I I I I SUMMARY INTRODUCTION SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENT The proposed 601 Aspen Development consists of a total of 112 Multi -Family Free Market units of 800 square feet each, designed for short-term rentals, (L-2 Zone). 20 of the units are by right (reconstruction of existing Mine Dumps units) and 92 are requested under the GMP Quota System. The proposed Development will also have 172 parking spaces, 152 in an underground parking structure, and 20 surface spaces. There will also be a lounge and recreation area with health facilities, jacuzzi and indoor -outdoor swimming pool and tennis courts. A full array of Hotel Services will be provided such as Front Desk Reception, Lobby, Breakfast area, Limo Service, Concierge, Room Service, etc., swim -up bar and other typical hotel accessory uses normally provided in a first class resort hotel operation. ' The proposed building has been designed conceptually to provide major open space areas between existing adjacent buildings and proposed ' development. On the entry level there is a reception area and Lobby, ' as well as elevators for access to all levels tying the proposed development together with a common Porte Cochere. Automobile access is provided for on the entry level of the site by a drive which will connect Garmisch Street on the west to Aspen Street on the east. The drive will also provide an arrival and departure area in front of the main entrance. I This multi -family development provides first class hotel units in an ' apartment configuration for the short-term rental market. The n 1 Development will be designed by Skidmore, Owings, Merrill for the luxury market and far exceeds the standards of any surrounding existing construction. Special emphasis will be given to meet the high standards of major hotel operators such as the Broadmore Management Group. Construction schedule calls for completion by December 1, 1988. GMP request is for 92 studio units to be allocated from (A) unused past years' quotas totaling more than 100 units that were wiped out, or (B) 1985, '86, '87 GMP competitions, which coincides with the hotel opening for 1988 without using future year allotments. DEVELOPMENT LOCATTON The proposed Development is located just southwest of the commercial core of the City of Aspen at the base of Aspen Mountain. The proposed 601 Aspen Development consists of 113,545 sq. ft. This site is bounded by Aspen Street on the east, Shadow Mountain Condominiums on the south, Garmisch Street to the west, and Dean Street on the north. The proposed Development is located within a short distance from many of the activities and points of interest in Aspen, as follows: --Aspen Airport: 52 miles --Aspen Valley Hospital: 2 miles --Aspen Middle and High Schools: 2 miles --Aspen Upper & Lower Elementary Schools: 2 mile - 2 - --Existing School Bus Routes: mile --Rubey Park Bus Terminal: 3 blocks --Nearest Bus Route and Stop: 1 block --Aspen Commercial Core: 3 blocks ' --Wagner Park and Playground: 2 blocks --Aspen Mountain Lift 1-A: Adjacent to The surrounding use of land and buildings is varied with scattered single family units, residential multi -family condominiums, lodges and some limited commercial activities. The area to the immediate west is vacant except for the Barbee home. On the south the property is used ' by the Aspen Skiing Company for an employee parking area which will be ' replaced by 30 underground parking spaces per agreement with Aspen Skiing Company and City of Aspen. To the north are the Timber Ridge and Lift One Condominiums. To the northeast are the South Point Condominiums. To the east is open space/park land which also houses a building for Aspen Central Reservations. The Skier's Chalet, Holland ' House Lodge and Lift 1-A are to the southeast. To the south is the Shadow Mountain Village. OTHER DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPROVALS ' Further development approvals required after the allocation of a GMP allotment include: - Subdivision Rezoning ' - Street Vacation 1 - 8040 Greenline (See Appendix) It is requested that the Planning and Zoning Commission set specific times for discussion and review of these issues at a date subsequent to the GMP scoring. Applications outlining the major items of discussion for each issue are contained in the applicable sections of this Submission. ri I CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION SUBMISSION in conjunction with RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMISSION 601 ASPEN SUBMITTED TO: The City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81.611 APPLICANT: HBC Investments Box 12384 Aspen, Colorado 81612 DATE: April 1, 1986 - 5 - TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Project Description 3.0 Project Site 4.0 Application Requirements 5.0 Conceptual Subdivision 5.1 Vicinity Map 5.2 Sketch Plan 5.3 Tabulation of Data 5.4 Certificate of Ownership Page 7 7 8 9 Appendix Appendix Appendix 9 Appendix C - 6 - 1. INTRODUCTION This application is submitted as part of the 601 Aspen GMP ' application. The subject site consists of already subdivided land and the subdivision application requirement is only triggered by the ' technical definition of multi -dwelling units as a subdivision in 20-3(s)(2). All utilities and streets are in place. The development contemplates no exception to building codes or the proposed re -zoning. 1I fl 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed 601 Aspen Development consists of a total of 112 Free Market studio units designed for short-term rentals (L-2 Zone). The proposed Development will also provide parking for 172 cars, 152 in an underground parking structure and an additional 20 short-term surface spaces. Also provided will be a lounge and recreation area with a health room, saunas, jacuzzi and indoor -outdoor swimming pool. Since short-term rentals are contemplated for this project, a full complement of Hotel Services will be provided such as Lobby, Front Desk Reception, Concierge, Room Service, Breakfast area, Swim -up Bar, and Limo Service. The proposed building has been designed conceptually to provide major open space areas between the proposed development and adjacent existing properties. This, as well as the floor plan and cross sections of the building are shown in more detail on the exhibits attached as well as in the GMP portions of this presentation. Automobile access is provided by a drive connecting Garmisch Street on the west with Aspen Street on the east. The drive also accesses a loading and unloading area in front of the main entrance. This development will provide first class hotel units for the short-term rental market. The Development has been designed for the luxury market and far exceeds the standards of any surrounding existing construction in quality, design and permanence. The central location and proximity to Lift 1-A adds to the desirability of the proposed Development. All utilities are adequate and existing at site as shown by letters attached to the appendix. Construction schedule calls for completion by December 1, 1988. In addition to the GMP application itself, several other procedures must be considered in conjunction with this submission: 1. This Subdivision procedure. 2. Rezoning for a portion of the property. 3. Street vacation. 4. 8040 Greenline review. 3. PROJECT SITE The site is totally urban in character and consists of 113,545 square feet. 4. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS The Applicant seeks approval of Conceptual Subdivision pursuant to Section 20-10. 5.3 TABULATION OF DATA Subdivision Name Land Area Open Space Green Space Number and Type of. Units Projected Population: Studios (112 x 1.25) 601 Aspen Street 113,545 square feet 45,000 square feet 60,000 square feet 112 studios 140 persons - 9 - • ����� �, ��j� �� ���' y, 6 fo 1•fIp•1�� � r� ♦ •• •! h• •� �I�p�•),i � � �' c: „� `� o ���� Y. a��� ' 7��j ��Sifi��l'•'" ° �f �l �` • �� ' •�1��1� f+ 4 •1 � •rt.� • � 1 r • •�.�1��`C�� •,��0,, �.,—� ��® � T ��� � �� Ss ♦ ��� ip fp _.-i 1. •, 1/1 pI ► r• •MI ♦ f flr�•• f •' I �• -, .� �� �T° � �'7 :L•�.:�i tii �D• Mr�'f.. • a1•'1•. • •� ,� v 11 •+ �1 � �,�'•''p �� � • ��¢i%� r.+.:. :.-�Y , ! fir• . • •'••r °'•: • N a1 •• r •• •a� s: 3 ,O• � 0�,, I� MAP 7�� �� y r1�i f'tii 1♦•. • •1 •ir1!• �q •A r� it j� '� r.,,,.�i •+5 �c�J•. i�',Y cf •1{� R3 MA P. � `�+fit f+ •� •'' •t �y���,� ,,1` r• `S'i. • _ �� `4y i C f •,+ •1 •� • - �t+t ••i • 1 . N1, '�� 1 • ii��, �\`\\ t 9W • w• f r �t�•,�\�., • ^1Mr'^.�'� �.%Y}� +- � ��.�U., �,V��`'`�/`\` 6�, 1•!•' •1 �• ��;' �� �..'�`q. �`\\\\�\`�1�a`,1``�\ ,6�7 ��1 � Yv r:• H- � ' r� yA r}v�•.• � ♦}�,�t `\```���\! , ���� � `� +• � ���g� • ' • ='� 1V;- `\```�U.�;�`►�� �p. y` + - ' l• r kd .:E r r r re r r r ■�r r� r r r m r m m rm r N 14•-50'-49" E 130 00' S SJ-43 .Y -'J' S. GARMISCH ST. (41' ,,(DE( VACATION , N024 196, \ NOTE, &CCO NO— TO COLORADO LAW TOO NOS? CONNCMCC ANY LEGAL ACTION 11ASCD O PON AN♦ OCICCT 1N TN11 SOAYCT •ITNI1 SIS TCAAS AC T(A T00 IT T O,SCOVCA SOCN OCIC CT 1 NO CVCNT, N A Nr KTION f1SC0 JPON ANr At CC' IN TNIf A.ATCT At COW NCMCCO NOOC TNAN It. ♦CARS 1-0- TNC DATC OC TNC CCenlICAT1pN 1NOr" N 4•. 50'-49 E -0006 AREA SUMMARY A. BLOCK 6 BARBEE PARCEL 42,5453 SO. FT. B SKI CO. B AUSTIN PARCEL 30.0001 SO. FT. C MIN_ DUMP PARCEL 4 1. 000 t SO. FT.. TOTAL 113.545 tSQ.FT. N 14' W-49" E 240 OC' 5 3•- 35 '!1 601 S. ASPEN PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAT PREPARED BY Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. 210 S GALENA ST Po BOA 2506 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 (303) 925-3816 DATE JOB NO -16'06 16010-A �1i z 3 0 10' 20 30' 40 50 60 70 80' SCALE 1". 30' v I I I REZONING IVE REQUEST I CITY OF ASPEN 130 south galena street aspen, colorado 81611 303-925-2020 ILAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1 1 I I F7 I u NAME ` HBC Investments ADDRESS P.O. Box 12384, Aspen, CO 81612 PHONE 925-9365 NAME OF PROJECT. PRESENT ZONING Not applicable R-15 PUD(L) DATE SUBMITTED April 1, 1986 FEES LOT SIZE 100' x 300' o�utiiw300 corner— oT 7uan an3-SouTV-Wspen._ Lots J-IZ, BIOCIZ 11, LOCATION EAMES ADDITION (indicate street address, lot and block number. May require legal description. A vicinity map is very useful.) CURRENT BUILD -OUT sq. ft. 2 units That al owed liy Mat aIToweU � PROPOSED BUILD -OUT _ proposed rezoning sq. ft. proposed rezoning units DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING USES Summer use as a private tennis court, and winter use as parking lot (both are interim uses only pending redevelopment) on Lots 7-12 and 2 old single family houses on Lots 3-6. DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE PROPOSAL_ That allowed by the contiguous L-2 lands to the north and south. This tract is art of--the-option tract consisting also of Lots 13-20 also in Block 11 and Lots 1-22, Block 6, all of the Eames Addition as shown herein. TYPE OF APPLICATION RezoninR APPLICABLE CODE SECTION (S) Chapter 24_ Article XII. -_ PLAT AMENDMENT REQUIRED YES X __NO DATE PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE COMPLETED ATTACHMENTS: 1. All applicants must supply Proof of _Ownership in the form of a title insurance commitment or statement from an attorney indicating that tie/she has researched the title and verifies that the applicant is the owner of the property (free of liens and eucumbrances.) 2. If the process requires a public hearing, a Property Owner's List must be supplied which gives all owners within 300 feet in all directions in some cases and adjacent owners in some cases. 3. Number of copies required (by code and/or in pre -application conference.) 4. Plat by Registered Surveyor X Yes No I I In support of the rezoning application, as you are charged with applying the criteria of 24-12.5(d)(1)-(6) I will address those points. (1) It appears obvious from reviewing the history of the zoning in the City of Aspen that an error was probably made in the zoning of the subject lots as R-15 inasmuch as it creates an illogical jog as shown land to both on the enclosed map of the area. In other words, the the north and the south of the subject tract is zoned L-2. It appears that when the zone districts were created that in this particular situation the land was zoned by ownership rather than as part of a comprehensive plan for the area. This rezoning is to correct an inconsistency in the zoning map. (2) The proposed rezoning when coupled with the GMP application included herewith will result in increased both on and off street parking capacity as well as better handling of the traffic generation and road safety. The applicant proposes to upgrade the utility service in the vicinity of the site, pay for site improvements and thus have no adverse fiscal impact upon the community from the proposed rezoning. To the contrary, the proposed rezoning will. result in a larger tax base improving the fiscal condition of the community. (3) The proposed rezoning will result in increased vegetation and landscaping plus paving of areas which were previously dirt thus resulting in better air quality with less particulate matter in the air. The applicant further proposes to improve the water system in the area as shown in the GMP application. (4) The rezoning proposal when coupled with the GMP project will create a high quality tourist facility in the vacinity of Lift 1A, thus removing some congestion from the Little Nell area resulting in better community balance. (5) The proposed rezoning is compatible with the Aspen Area General Plan, as amended. (6) The proposed rezoning will promote the health, safety and general. welfare of the residents and visitors to the City of Aspen by dispersing traffic and visitor load more intelligently throughout the lodge zone thus relieving present congestion. M+ m m m m m m� r, " a = so um m m Mr are w Q Z Q w 0 ((}},N i4• 50'.49 1 130 00' s 4`.t3 43 w vn :-ri0v 0a✓ ra02< A. BLO B SKI CO. S AUSTIN PARCEL 30.000 50 FT. C MINE DUMP PARCEL 41,000 i SO FT TOTAL 1 13,545 t S0. FT. w 0t[• OwD�w6 t0 <O[Or�DO Lar ♦Ou •u![ CO ww[wt[ •w L[DaL at li0w [•1[D D u;IE a fLtt iM wr1 501vF♦ r • rC•w1 • r DiS COv[r Su<w LCC' O ErL wi, ♦ •OI�Ow'[ S(0 uCOw • ♦ O(f[[t[� r�1 S wv(v [[ (OwwFw([O w0•F [w•w T[w v[•w1 f.O. (w[ Oai[ Of rw( C[•i�li0ati0w twOrw 0 10' 20 30' 40 50' 60 70 80' SCALE 1"• 30' :,. I VNU✓UDGU N nULI v_'D 17 PROPOSED �- �' a WAGNER ZONING 9 D,T, H, ) w NNW Now "Awwaw ,r .m.-.,...t..d Q PARK z o F=311,90cooRd _ MOM © oommomildlm 4t;rljbAN SM --1 45'678910111 , R15L WN !N' I©©M©M©_ all 00,111 IY♦11w,� 14 — 1 GILBERT ST. mom, ©o , LAWN ST. J UN IATA ST. 4 SNARK ST. "-7 3 EXISTING �- — a WAGNER � ZONING 9 coo ( D,T,H,) PARK Z O tOS"M Com mom OEM �w"M■ ' - T Et■■r � DE, , I 2 3 I©©©©m©u 5 6 7 8 II PIT23T 745T6 %fall IkLl !A�se. — I GILBERT ST. LAWN ST. JUNIATA ST. 4 SNARK ST. n -7 3 Ll a V. STREET VACATION 1 PROPOSED JUAN STREET VACATION PROCEDURE 1. Size of Street parcel 300' x 50' = 15,000 square feet. 2. Both sides of the proposed vacation are in Applicant's ownership. 3. Vacated street FAR excluded from density and FAR Project ' calculations. 4. Access to project to be entering from private Dean Street. Realignment at more compatible (lower) elevation. Access for 1 single family house available from Garmisch Street ending in Cul de sac. 5. Present Juan Street only serves property of the Applicant who is, in fact, requesting vacation. 6. The requested vacation will allow for a more neighborhood -sensitive and superior land use planning of the integrated ownership site assemblage, specifically placement of building bulks away from neighboring fully developed complexes (Lift One Condominiums, Timber Ridge) by providing amenities and open space next to them. The opportunity for superior planning on this parcel should therefore be embraced and will benefit the ' general neighborhood. 7. Maintenance and snow removal by the City will be eliminated, thus reducing City work load. I n L I I - 12 - m r= m m m m m m m r m m N 14'-50'-49"E 130 00' 5 4`50-49 w .0770 S. GARMISCH ST. (41' WIDE) I VACATION OqD NO2< 1967 I NOTE, ACCO(w10 TO COLOAADO LAM TOY NuiT CONNEN- All LEGAL ACTION ■A$ED Y ToN ANT DEFECT IN ♦WS SYAv[T YITNIN $ IS TEARS AFTER YOU —ST EISCOVEN SUCH DEFECT IN NO Ev[NT� N Y T AMi ACTION —E. YFON ANT D[F[CT IN THIS SWIv[♦ !C COG CEO [0 HOME TN T(N TlAAS FNON TIC CITE OF TN[ CEIITIFICATION SNO,SN N14•-50-49"E 10000' AREA SUMMARY A. BLO-:K 6 BARBEE PARCEL 42,545 2 SO FT B SKI CO. B AUSTIN PARCEL 30,000 i SO.FT. C MIN: DUMP PARCEL 41,000 *-SO FT.. TOTAL 113,545 *SO.TT. N 14'-50-49 E 240 00' 601 S. ASPEN PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAT PREPARED BY Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. 210 5 GALENA ST P 0 BOz 2S06 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 13031 925-3816 DATE JOB NO. I-ly'Bb I6010-4 d zoo 3 0 10' 20 3D 4E1 50 6O' 7E1 60 SCALE 1' • 30* /. 1 PNVYV W-1— I n VI. GMP SUBMISSION I I I RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMISSION 601 ASPEN SUBMITTED TO: The City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 APPLICANT: HBC Investments Box 12384 Aspen, Colorado 81612. DATE: April 1, 1986 1 I - 13 - 11 Preliminary Conceptual Development Plans prepared by Skidmore, Owings, Merrill 1. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES (MAXIMUM OF TWELVE (121 POINTS). ' The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate ' each development according to the following formula: 0 Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. ' 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits ' the project only and not the area in general. 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. WATER (MAXIMUM TWO [21 POINTS). Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the ' development without system extension beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. There are 6" C.I.P. lines that border the site on three sides. The ' lines run along South Garmisch, Juan and South Aspen Streets. These lines are complemented by a 11" D.I.P. line on S. Aspen Street., The Aspen Water Department indicates that the water pressure in that area I averages between 60-80 p.s.i. As there is sufficient excess capacity in the public system there will be no problem in serving the ' development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer and without treatment plant or other facility ' upgrading. As per recommendations from the Water Department, ' isolation valves shall be installed at each end of Juan Street, with the 6 Juan Street water line being a private access to the project and maintained by the project. - 14 - i In addition, a new 6-8" water line (exact size to be determined 1 by the Water Department at a later date) shall be installed from S. 1 Garmisch to S. Aspen Street along the new Dean Avenue alignment by the applicant. This line will connect to the existing 6" line on S. ' Garmisch Street, and to the 12" D.I.P. on S. Aspen Street, thereby replacing and preserving the water loop system in that area. The developer also commits to installing a new 6-8" water line connecting S. Monarch Street to S. Aspen Street along Dean Avenue. This line will connect to the 8" line on S. Monarch Street and the 12" line on S. Aspen Street. This new line, not even immediate to the 1 will be installed to improve project, greatly the looping system and ' serviceability of the Water Department for the entire area. b. SEWER (MAXIMUM TWO [21 POINTS). i ' Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the water of the proposed development and, if a public sewage 1 disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the development without system extensions beyond those ' normally installed by the developer, and wihtout treatment plant or other facility upgrading. 1 1 There are 8" sewer lines that border the site on three sides. The lines run along S. Garmisch, Juan, and Dean Streets. The wastewater ' and sewage requirements are directly related to unit size and 1 - 15 - occupancy. The Advanced Waste -Water Treatment Plant (A.W.P.) has a 1 capacity of 3 million gallons per day, of which an average of 2.3 ' million gallons are used. Consequently the plant is running at only 77% capacity. The project would generate less than 1/3 of one percent ' of the plant capacity, and thus is well within the capacity of the system. A development review by Heiko Kuhn and Tom Bracewell of. the ' Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District indicates that the sewage wastewater and sewage treatment plant have sufficient capacity to serve the development without system extension beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. The Applicant will improve the existing level of service to a level beyond the benefit to the project itself by ' eliminating both the old Juan Street clay sewer line, which has experienced many root intrusions and requires frequent servicing, and the existing Dean Avenue sewer line, also clay, between S. Aspen and S. Garmisch Streets. ' The development will install a new 8" PVC sewer line between S. Aspen and S. Garmisch Streets along the new Dean Avenue alignment. In addition, the existing sewer line on S. Aspen Street will be extended from Juan Street to the new Dean Avenue alignment. This will also be an 8" PVC line. Thus, the project will eliminate two old clay lines that need frequent attention and replace them with new P.V.C. lines ' that required little or no maintenance. ' The Applicant will fur ther urther improve and upgrade sewer line facilities and servicing the entire area by replacing the old 8" clay sewer line I - 16 - 11 that runs between S. Garmisch and First Street in the alleyway between Hyman and Cooper Avenues. This 400 feet of old sewer line has a minimal grade, and will be replaced by a 12" PVC line. ' C. STORM DRAINAGE (MAXIMUM TWO [21 POINTS). Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. This development will have a drainage control system to collect and ' retain site runoff on the site for underground dispersal. A series of drywells along with surface retention areas will provide sufficient ' capacity to retain site runoff. The drywells and retention areas will be designed and placed consistent with standard engineering practices. The result of this system will be to effectively retain and disperse underground, surface and roof water runoff. Applicant has retained the consulting firm of Leonard Rice Engineering to design a drainage system that will specifically improve the service ' in the area and applicant commits to such a program involving the City Engineering Department's input. Off site improvements shall include curb and gutter on the west side of Aspen Street and on both sides of ' Aspen Street between Dean and Durant, all tying into existing catch basin. Garmisch Street leading to Durant Street to be improved and widened with curb and gutter (see Storm Drainage Map). Clearly this work will improve the area in general. - 17 - Fl L 1 d. FIRE PROTECTION (MAXIMUM TWO [21 POINTS). Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. The development site is located 7 city blocks from the fire station and can expect an average response time of less than five minutes from alert siren to arrival of equipment on the site. Two (2) new fire hydrants will be located, one on the corner of Juan and South Garmisch Streets, and the other on the corner of new private Dean Street alignment, and South Aspen Street. The private realignment of Dean Street connecting Aspen Street and Garmisch Street will improve the quality of fire protection service in the surrounding neighborhood by providing better access to the property at a lower elevation. Applicant commits to upgrade 2 obsolete fire hydrants, nos. 720 and 721, (See Fire Protection Map) which improves the quality of service not only for the subject site but the area in general, since these upgraded hydrants will service the neighborhood. The same is the case with the re -alignment of Dean Street to 31' feet width (minus 6' for pedestrian path) as a Fire Department access to not only 601. Aspen but also provides new, not now available fire access to Lift One and ' Timberidge Condos. The new Dean Street private alignment will have a snow melt system and the full width of the road will be available with ' no parking allowed on the 25' drive. See letter from Peter Wirth of Aspen Volunteer Fire Department attached. - 18 - e. PARKING DESIGN (MAXIMUM TWO [21 POINTS). Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off-street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces ' with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. The Project consists of 112 free market studio units. The development will provide 152 parking spaces, allocated as follows: Requirement for 112 units 112 spaces Requirement for Ski Co. agreement 30 spaces Staff Parking (not required) 10 spaces Total underground parking spaces provided: 152 Per Engineering Department recommendations, the A.S.C. spaces will have signage indicating they are for A.S.C. employees and day skiers. ' The 152 parking spaces are all contained underground. Additional surface spaces provided are: 10 visitor spaces ' 3 cab spaces 3 limo spaces 2 delivery truck spaces 2 bus spaces Total: 20 surface spaces The 152 parking spaces provided underground and 20 surface spaces more than meet code requirements, and provide an extremely functional and efficient method of parking and reducing amount of paved surfaces and visual impacts. ' The entry drive and Dean Street realignment access will be finished in paved surface designs combined with a snow melt system providing improved ice free access to the hotel entrance as well as the hotel service area and underground parking. The hotel arrival and departure ' - 19 - 1 area as well as the service area will be screened from neighboring property view with hedges and low rock wall buffers. The parking design improves the general neighborhood by providing 20 spaces in the arrival area for limos, cabs and visitors plus 10 spaces for staff that would otherwise utilize the public streets in a standard design. The project thus is providing a total of 30 spaces over and above the legal requirement of 142. Also improved curb and gutter as provided by the developer induces orderly parking on those public streets. f. ROADS (MAXIMUM TWO [2] POINTS). Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. Examination of the traffic impact of this project is based upon the UMTA Transportation study by Alan M. Voorhees and Associates, Inc., traffic consultants for the UMTA study. ' The following table presents the trip type and trip frequencies per day per unit. The total of 6.5 trips per unit is less than the 10.0 ' trips per unit for a typical residential unit, because the project consists of studio units generating less people than larger apartment ' units. For purposes of this study, studio units were rated as one bedroom units. 1 - 20 - 1 &rip Type kiing-Recreation Jork Ihopping/Entertainment Personal Business Ither Totals Estimated Estimated Estimated One -Way Trips Non -Automobile Non -Automobile Trips Trips Percentage .75 60% .5 2.00 75% 1.5 1.2.5 75% .9 1.00 50% .5 1.50 25% .4 6.50 60% average 3.8 ' As shown above, potentially 60% of the total 6.5 trips will be non -automobile trips. The resulting 2.7 automobile one-way trips (6.50-3.80) are equivalent to a resident's using his vehicle on an average of approximately one time per day. Vehicle Generation Analysis A. Residential. (F.M.) vehicles Winter Summer High -Use Periodsl High -Use Periods2 Residential Rooms 112 112 Average room occupancy x 100% x 90% Occupied Rooms 112 101 Average people per room-studios4 x 1.25 x 1.25 People in studio units 140 126 Average no. people arriving by cars x 47% x 95% People arriving by car 66 120 1 Average no. people per car6 — 3 — 3 Estimated residential vehicles: 22 40 Footnotes and assumptions: 1. Winter high use period is two weeks during Christmas and New Year; February and March. 2. Summer high use periods are during weekends. ' - 21 - 1 �I 3. Room occupancies based upon market projections, Laventhol & Horwath, and condominium use surveys by TDA, Inc., Seattle, Washington (November 1983). 4. Aspen Municipal Code Section 24-11.4(b)(4)(bb). 5. Aspen In -Room Survey, C.R. Goeldner & Aletta Stamp, Business Reserach Division, University of Colorado, 1980. 6. Ibid. Winter vehicle trips: 22 vehicles x 2.7 one way trips per day per vehicle = 60 one way trips per day. Summer vehicle trips: 40 vehicles x 2.7 one way trips per day per vehicle = 108 one way trips per day. Per T.D.A., Inc., average daily traffic volumes range from 5,300 vehicles per day on Durant Avenue, to 3,500 vehicles per day on Aspen, Monarch and Mill Streets. Access to this development is by way of Aspen, Garmisch and Durant Avenue, thereby effectively dividing vehicle impacts among those streets. Primary access will be via Aspen and Garmisch Streets. Vehicle impacts from the project during the winter will be 60 one-way trips, divided between Aspen and Garmisch Streets, or 30 trips per street. Summer usage results in 54 trips per day. Using the known statistics from the City of Aspen and T.D.A., Inc. traffic surveys, impacts on Aspen, Durant and Garmisch Streets shall be only 1-3% of current traffic levels, a most minimal impact on existing uses. Realigned Dean Street with snow melt equipment provides the ideal approach to the hotel at the lowest possible elevation. The widening - 22 - I I] and complete construction of Garmisch Street to Durant will actually become the preferred auto and delivery and bus approach to the project, with a 50% lesser grade than Aspen Street and following a natural pattern of circulation in and out of the hotel. The connection of Garmisch and Aspen Streets on the realigned Dean Street makes available to the public the previously unavailable missing link with the rest of Dean Street, for a potential future transit use on the most southerly available east -west axis, able to service several major hotels all with access to Dean Street and the future monorail. Limousine Service (3) Limos will be provided during seasonal demand periods. Additionally, two propane gas -powered trolley road vehicles will provide continuous access to all central core points on a designated route open to guests as well as the public upon ultimate completion of the entire hotel project. Service, delivery and waste disposal are located in the ground floor of Building A and protected from snow and ice. Service vehicles are permitted access only from Garmisch and must return on Garmisch. A portion of Dean Street will be closed to service trucks, thus requiring that traffic to use under-utilized Garmisch Street. A compatible detailed alignment will be worked out in the Subdivision process. - 23 - H I I 11 1 I F, Waste disposal area to be covered and screened from pedestrian view. No open waste containers shall be allowed and the compacted waste pickup will be handled in a noise controlled manner. Dean Street is a privately maintained road but open to the public. 2. QUALITY OF DESIGN (MAXIMUM FIFTEEN [151 POINTS). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula- 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design. 3 -- Indicates an excellent design. a. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY (MAXIMUM THREE [31 POINTS). Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighborhood developments. The proposed 601 Aspen Development is compatible with its surroundings in terms of size, height and location. The construction of residential type units in a L-2 Lodge Zone is in keeping with section 24-3.1 of the Municipal Code which encourages such uses in the Lodge zones and allows construction of single-family duplex and multi -family units. The architectural design allows for maximum open space between existing and proposed structures to aid in its compatibility with the existing neighborhood. The surrounding zoning and land uses are varied, along with existing architectural designs. The 601 Aspen Development is residential in nature, in keeping with the Timber Ridge and Lift One Condominiums on the north. The residential neighborhood also extends to the west north west with residential (R-15) and residential multi -family zoning, scattered single family units, undeveloped properties, some small lodges such as the Fireside Inn and condominiums like Aspen - 24 - 1 1 I I F1 F West. The property to the west of the proposed site is vacant, except for the Barbee house and out building which are a part of the Barbee Estate. This vacant property rises rapidly to the south west as part of Shadow Mountain. East and down the hill to north is the Lift 1-A Center, the Holland House Lodge, Skier's Chalet, a proposed major open space/park element and the building which houses Aspen Central Reservations. To the east of these properties along Monarch Street are the Aztec and Telemark Condominiums and the Chart House on the southwest corner of Durant and Monarch Streets. To the north east of the site are the South Point Condominiums, Aspen Manor and Pines Lodge both located on the north side of Durant Street. Heading west from Aspen Street there is a mix of residential and lodge units such as the Pines Lodge Apartments, Aspen Wild Condominiums, Cooper Street Lofts, Snow Queen Lodge, Little Red Ski Haus and Der Berghof Units, immediately to the north of proposed site are the Timber Ridge and Lift One Condominiums. Discussion with owners of surrounding properties such as Lift One Condominium indicates that the approach taken on this site leaving 220 feet open in front of Lift One is a development plan supported by them. The spaciousness and resort -like feeling lacking with so many existing as well as new developments is certainly fulfilled in Applicant's Development Layout. See letter from Lift One Condominium Association. b. SITE DESIGN ( MAXIMUM THREE [31 POINTS). Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space area, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. Located at the base of Aspen Mountain's Lift I -A, 601 South Aspen Street is a residential complex containing 112 luxury and first class rental units. Conceived to be a year-round resort, 601 South Aspen Street will contain all amenities standard to such a facility including a small conference center, athletic facilities, dining and lounges. Designed to be responsive to the uniqueness of the site, the complex capitalizes on views of the ski areas, the City of Aspen, and the surrounding Rocky Mountains. - 25 - L The buildings will be constructed of precast architectural concrete, with glass and wood with color, texture, and scale compatible and complimentary to the town and region. The landscaping is visualized as containing Alpine and regional planting combined with green space areas to provide an extension of the natural landscaping on Shadow Mountain and adjacent parks. All utilities will be underground and the development will provide curbs, gutters and sidewalks on both Garmisch and Aspen Streets, as All movable existing trees and shrubs will be relocated or replaced and incorporated into the Master Landscaping Program. An agreement has been made with the Historical Society to donate all Mine Dumps artifacts for their contemplated old mining equipment display room. Excavation and dirt removal from the site shall be accomplished in cooperation with City and seasonal consideration to cause the least amount of disturbance and noise. C. ENERGY (MAXIMUM THREE [31 POINTS). Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Applicant commits to provide the energy program outlined in Pearson & Associates letter attached. - 26 - F�l 1 1 d. TRAILS (MAXIMUM THREE [31 POINTS). Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. The premium location of the 601 Aspen Development allows residents to be near pedestrian trails, parks, base facilities for skiing, and the mountain itself.. The site is within two blocks of Wagner Park. Located at the base of the mountain, the proposed development is ideally suited to service the recreational needs of the residents. More specifically, the applicant will provide an easement for a nordic and mountain bicycle trail that is in accordance with the Nordic Council's master plan and recommendations made by both the Planning Office and the Nordic Council. In addition, the applicant will also provide an easement that connects from the main nordic/bicycle trail to the proposed Ski Club and Nordic Council offices. The development shall also provide a pedestrian walkway along the north side of the new Dean Avenue alignment. This sidewalk could align with the Woonerf plan currently being studied and proposed by the Aspen Lodge Development District Committee. In addition, sidewalks shall be put in along both S. Aspen and S. Garmisch Streets north to Durant Avenue. These trails and pedestrian walkways shall greatly improve hiking, biking, walking and cross country skiing for the entire neighborhood and the community at large. 1 - 27 - e. GREEN SPACE (MAXIMUM THREE [3] POINTS. ' Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. OPEN SPACE CALCULATION Total. Site FAR 113,545 square feet 25% open required 28,363 square feet Total Open Space Provided less 2 tennis courts ) less pool area ) Total Open Space Required Open Space Surplus Open Space Equals 50% more than required VEGETATED OR GREEN SPACE 60,000 square feet± 15,000 square feet 45,000 square feet 28,363 11it 16,637 Itif Open Space 45,000 Vacated Juan Street 15,000 Total Green Space 60,000 46.6% of total site is green space. (Calculation: 113,545 + 15,000 vacated Juan Street = 128,545 total area divided into 60,000 = 46.6%. 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum [6] points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a. Public Transportation (maximum three [3] points). 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city and county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city and county bus route. b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum three [3] points). - 28 - I 1 The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the ' commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2. -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commercial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance ' of the commercial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent ' to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. 4. PROVISION FOR LOW, MODERATE AND MIDDLE INCOME HOUSING (MAXIMUM TWENTY [201 POINTS. a. The Commission shall assign points to each applicant who agrees to provide low, moderate and middle income housing which complies with the housing size, type, income and occupancy guidelines of the City of Aspen and with the provisions of Section 24-11.10. ' b. Points shall be assigned according the following schedule: One (1) point for each five (5) percent of the total development that is restricted to low income price guildelines and low income occupancy limitations; One (1) point for each ten (10) percent of the total development that is restricted to moderate income price guidelines and middle income occupancy limitations; One (1) point for each twenty (20) percent of the total development that is restricted to middle income price guidelines and middle income occupancy limitations. tIn order to determine what percent of the total development is restricted to low, moderate and middle income housing, the Commission shall compute the number of persons to be housed by the project as a whole with the number of persons to be provided with low, moderate and middle income housing using the following criteria: Studio - 1.25 residents One Bedroom - 1.75 residents Two Bedroom - 2.25 residents Three Bedroom or Larger 3.00 residents Dormitory - 1.00 resident per 150 ' s.f.. of unit space - 29 - M EMPLOYEE HOUSING COMPUTATION LOW INCOME HOUSING 65% Employee housing provided as follows: $4,300,000 CASH 92 studios x 1.25 persons = 115 = 35% Employee Housing (Persons) 215 = 65% Total People 330 = 100% Calculation 215 = 65.15% 330 Applicable Points Earned 13 5. BONUS POINTS (7 POINTS) This project incorporates and meets the criteria and goals of the Growth Management process. It exceeds the provisions of many of the sections, and due to the creation of an outstanding project design, the project is entitled to be awarded additional bonus points. 601 Aspen has been designed to be well -oriented to the needs of both residents and toursts. The proximity of the project to the #lA ski flift, the downtown mall and retail/commercial facilities, and public ' transportation, all assist in reducing the need for residents to use automobiles, thus reducing automobile traffic in the central core of ' town. iAnother unique aspect of this project is the availability of full ' Hotel Services and amenities to residents adding to the attractiveness of the Apartments. In addition, the high quality resort ambiance of this project, including attractive architecture and site design, meet the needs and exceeds the standards of the Aspen community. The I I - 30 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 project will add to the vitality of this important district of Aspen in an ideal location for a multi -family lodge development. The applicant believes this project is exceptional in achieving GMP requirements as well as improving the visual quality of this portion of town. We request that 601 Aspen project be awarded the maximum additional bonus points allowed by code for the following sections: Fire Protection, Neighborhood Compatibility, Site Design, Trail, Green Space, Public Transportation, and Community Commercial Facilities. Applicant's evaluation of scoring the proposed development: PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES (12 POINTS) Maximum Points Available Points Earned (aa) Water 2 2 (bb) Sewer 2 2 (cc) Storm Drainage 2 2 (dd) Fire Protection 2 2 (ee) Parking Design 2 2 (ff) Roads 2 2 TOTALS 12 12 - 31 - QUALITY OF DESIGN (15 POINTS) Maximum Points Available (aa) Neighborhood Compatibility: 3 (bb) Site Design: 3 (cc) Energy: 3 (dd) Trails: 3 (ee) Green/Open Space: 3 TOTALS 15 PROXIMITY TO SUPPORT SERVICES Maximum Points Available (aa) Public Transportation: 3 (bb) Commercial Facilities: 3 TOTALS 6 PROVISION FOR EMPLOYEE HOUSING (40 POINTS) Maximum Points Available Points Earned 3 3 3 3 3 15 Points Earned 3 2 5 Points Earned (aa) Employee Housing 20 13 BONUS POINTS (7 POINTS) The 601 Aspen Development meets not only all the substantive criteria of Section 24-11.4(b) (1), (2) and (3), but achieves an outstanding overall design that merits recognition in the following categories. - 32 - Maximum Points Available Points Earned Improvements to Roads, Fire Protection Services: -- 1 Design that Achieves Neighborhood Compatibility: -- 2 Trails: -- 1 Total: 5 4 POINT SUMMARY Maximum Points Available Points Earned Quality of Design: 15 15 Public Faciities and Services: 12 12 Support Services: 6 5 Employee Units: 20 13 Conversion of Existing Units: Not Avail. (New Code) - SUBTOTAL: 53 45 Bonus Points: 5 4 TOTALS: 58 49 Threshold (60% of all categories) 31.8 31.8 - 33 - FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS AND UNIT COUNT Parking Garage Building A Ground Floor First Floor Studios (800 sq. ft.) Second Floor Studios (800 sq. ft.) Third Floor Studios (800 sq. ft.) Hall, Stairs, etc. Totals Building B Entry level Public Ground Floor Ground Floor Studios (800 sq. ft.) First Floor Studios (800 sq. ft.) Second Floor Studios (800 sq. ft.) Third Floor Studios (800 sq. ft.) Hall, Stairs, etc. Totals Grand Totals Total FAR Available Surplus FAR Total Area and Bulk Required O1/HBC/3.31.86 (Below Grade) Sq. Ft. Unit Count (12,000) -- -- 9,600 12 -- 9,600 12 -- 9,600 12 -- 8,000 -- (12,000) 36,800 36 (24,000) -- -- ( 4,000) -- -- -- 12,800 16 -- 16,000 20 -- 16,000 20 -- 16,000 20 -- 14,400 -- (28,000) 75,200 76 (40,000) 112,000 112 113,545 1,545 112,000 - 34 - 777—m *W-. I Ik NI VNI r �� it ;�, r . � is It 'I low , kelk-w lop „ , ; - IW-w -kv Si Am in kt LI Ali AASSIOW rt■ it bNLAfiWUtJ W lit; t1l ORM 1111111 A its AL ���_��, Jf ................ .......... 11111 ! STU x Ma. Am a 4z it �;v . a ��' - ire"' �,y..wv ����� i �t, - •. 71 ;AOIF ��..s/n/�1�■ � 'Wv� Flo ,.•.. ••c y•. � �7 t . �.Si1Rfi�{'ii1�111tiiy;;S � � �... .�� - __ � ({•iti' .:tc. .' "� ' •* ,�,�i Via• }..a�'�: ... �.. �I•...�Wftw rf .� •A �M.•y�L. e•-1 .! _ .�u{ «.J�i' _ F `+"1•slPi1i% -iir-• t �L. ..,t�M{Mi " i tr.- f.t .d• - �� - st. ry - MEW i�•'k:3:' fA •5,.. w - ��•N{I{{u�{1i1��� ��i sae'•".-j ♦; _2 _ _ �.. 111:A/to at.�.1: Mimi V* ����1�■��s� W \1 � / r,►1�ir '' Il'� f��rr� +ate` - - � ., �. _. � - .a �• � •a. ••r• ■ • �� •■ ' w.i i �� �:.. .. i.«+ •-+�•� :d:.•�� •• .,;. ��.. .. s'�'-" l "y •� ems. Rk t`��t s, .. �. '� ��. �1�'f� • i.+ n: .��•ll.tie • ► \ �'�,.' �1.� !kJl�.� r�'•�.•!t! . f•• :� � '• !'ti►. /: � / 1'\ '�`�f �;1t �. • • 7-�.•• �. •.'S`!IPlrtJ1•, �t � .• a y'} VN +�� ••• • • ti {� � •s �' \� \' �', „�. :..�• , :, \'t: e��N�. s rs:•.`.�;�n;�.�ti.a•�'•. � . ml,•.•�t�'�e'�. ��gl•.,,r�l1' �� �:,\\ � �'� .`�`• •,f flf�,�_.Bl+:,'.•�1,� '�. \ .1 ' ylf . Y fw 1 • .� `' '� `••1t! . f +- ♦ • f �. , f • .is Asa 1„•+1 s• u�1s 1 �I�i 1�.f �v► +ji\. .� r Yi. 1! !t�'� • - � ; / L'1! i�� • �� C J%• • J I •,, ! Ii l , '. 't i! 1� l+, ' a � .: � � . •. • •• n a . f , �/'� � • I• tti � ��! • ♦ • �,- �.... 9IJ 5---+ -- — - - ---- - __ _ JL - - '*�i �ii; .11 0 �s_' 'it �1'►.'+� ►.,._J • .\..� L.r:♦�,. .._i. _ - 00 ed I Ky/r �^ NEIGMT LIMIT Ir �+ 1 Auro [Krwr a ~' � r . jtA 0 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT DRAWWIS LONGITUDINAL SECTION DEAN ST m. TIMBERRIDGE ' ' �` --•'•—•—. "^ a.NFiCN7 LIFT ONE ►ARKI AREA I �'�� 1ER.Yi' •� u l _ I BUILDING A SECTION DEAN ST. CONDOMINIUMS ENTRANCE SECTION DEAN ST. EL?*?- [L 7.lt • CONDOMINIUM z O �— �� W LU cc h W v, O o z a Wo a8.l //► U c vIJ 2 z U.<n Q G W '7 r oU O O `° a All I Mr. Mark Danielson Danielson Development Group 0155 Lone Pine Road A-7 Aspen, Colorado 81611 420 E. HOPKINS STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-5532 March 28,1986 Dear Mark: Once again I have reviewed the plans for the proposed 601 South Aspen St. project. At this point in time I see no problems with regards to access for the fire department. Your plans show two new fire hydrants, one on Juan & Garmish and one on Dean & Aspen Street. These new fire hydrants would satisfy,the fire departments requirements for this project. We would also recommend that you replace the two existing obsolete fire hydrants located on South Aspen Street (hydrant #s 720 & 721). If you have any questions regarding this matter feel free to contact me. firth Fire Chief AVFD l P.O. Box 1047 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 303-945-1251 1 Pearson & Associates MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS 12-02-85 P.O. Box 1072 Stowe, Vermont 05672 802-253-9607 To Whom it May Concern, Pearson and Associates has been retained by Mr. Hans Cantrup to analize the proposed structure at 601 Aspen St,. Aspen, Co.. Mr. Cantrup has committed to minimizing fossil fuel consumption by exceeding the minimum thermal insulation ' standards and using innovative energy conservation technics throughout the building as listed below. ' A) Exterior wall insulation R-28, Ceiling insulation R-49, Below grade wall insulation R-20, Floor insulation R-20. This insulation exceeds the thermal insulation standards by an average of 37%. B All windows shall be glazed with 1" insulating HEAT MIRROR units. South facing glass will be HEAT MIRROR 88.which has a ' high shading coefficient to admit low winter sun and a high insulation capacity ( winter "U"=.26 ) to prevent heat loss. North facing glass will be HEAT MIRROR 55 which has a low shading coeffecient plus a high insulation capacity ( winter "U"=.24 ) to prevent heat loss. HEAT MIRROR equipped windows are twice as efficient as standard glazing which is required by code. ' C) Double Entry Systems will be used in all public entryways. D) The heating system will incorporate a sectional boiler with intermittant pilot lights. An outdoor reset control will allow step firing the required number of sections based on indoor and outdoor temperatures to .achieve the desired supply temperature. E) The entire building will utilize a computerized energy ' management system which will allow the maximum energy setbacks to be achieved in the building. �. F) Air to air heat exchangers will be installed wherever possible to allow pre -heating of fresh air. G) Buried PVC coated sona tubes will utilize the earths temperatures to pre -heat all make-up air conditions. ' H) There will be no air conditioning systems in the building, thus reducing energy consumption. I) Flow Restrictors will be installed throughout the building to reduce hot water consaumption. ' J) Completely automated night shading devices shall be used on window areas to prevent nighttime heat loss. K) A heat exchanger shall be installed on the boiler stack to utilize excess stack temperatures to pre -heat domestic hot water. L) Interior fluorescent light fixtures and exterior high pressure sodium light fixtures with photoelectric controls ' will be used to reduce energy consumption while maintaining adequate illumination. By incorporating all of the above we feel that this 1 structure will be energy efficient beyond any "standard" comparible structure. Marsha M. Smith Mechanical Designer 1 IF r ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. 210 S. Galena St. P.O. Box 2506 Aspen, Colorado 81611 13031925-3B16 601 S. Aspen Project c/o Mark Danielson 0155 Lone Pine Road Aspen, CO 81611 Reference: Development Plat 601 S. Aspen Area Summary Mine Dump Ski Co. & Austin Block 6 Barbee Subtotal Addition No. 1 (unplatted portion of Eames Addition) 41,000 + Sq.Ft. 30,000 + Sq.Ft. 42,545 + Sq.Ft. 113,545 + Sq.Ft. 21,500 + Sq.Ft. Jan. 17, 1986 Job No. 16010A 1 LZIPTONE FULL SERVICE LUXURY RESORT CONDOMINIUM 131 EAST DURANT AVE. ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-1670 April 1, 1986 HBC Investments c/o Mark Danielsen 155 Lone Pine Road, A-7 Aspen, Colorado 81611 I Dear Mark, 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Our annual. homeowners association meeting was held Saturday, March 29, 1986. At this meeting we reviewed the proposed site plan for the 601 South Aspen Street project. After consideration and discussion by the Lift One owners, a motion was made and passed to support in concept the design of the proposed project. We believe that the architect, by keeping the mass of the individual buildings in scale with others in the area, and by the placement of buildings on the site, has planned this project to be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. This play, will save most of the mountain views from our units and provides adequate open space. The realignment of Dean Street will also provide emergency fire access to our South building. This endorsement is the building placement, plan and we reserve the are made to the plans. fgs/st conditional on the developer maintaining size, and heights indicated on the site right to object if any substantial changes Very truly yours, Lift 0C inium Association Fred G. smith, Managing Agent Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers, Inc. Leonard Rice ' Leslie H_Botham (303) 455-9589 / 2695 Alcott Street / Denver, Colorado 80211 Gregg S. Ten Eyck April 1, 1986 ' Mr. Hans Cantrup 0716 Buttermilk Road Aspen, Colorado 81612 rRE: Drainage Planning for 601 Aspen Street Dear Mr. Cantrup: In connection with your proposed project at 601 Aspen Street in Aspen, Colorado, we have been coordinating with Mr. Sam C. Hyatt, of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, your architect. We reviewed the development plan as it existed in late January, 1986, and explored a number of different drainage options which might prove useful in the ultimate drainage plan for this site. The general criteria outlined in our November 27, 1985 letter still apply. The kinds of facilities that may prove appropriate ' include surface retention, surface detention, underground detention with piped outlets to existing storm drainage facilities, underground detention with outlets to dry well facilities, surface grading, channel ization with new curbs, gutters and swales, and interception by surface drainage facilities, like catch basins and storm drains. The drainage facilities are shown in a schematic fashion ' on a drawing prepared by your architects called "Storm Drainage". The effectiveness of the drainage elements will be evaluated during design of the drainage plan. ' We appreciate your commitment to providing drainage planning and facilities which will serve this site and improve the drainage service in the area. We look forward to working on your design ' team to accomplish these goals. We also look forward to meeting with representatives of the City of Aspen to obtain their drainage criteria and input for development of this site. ' Very truly yours, LEONARD RICE CONSULTING WATER ENGINEERS, INC. Ad �'i%11�1�-' ' Leslie H. Botham Vice President LHB/kam 767CAN01 cc: Sam C. Hyatt, AIA ' Hydrology OA- Environmental Water Rights AnalysisUrban Drainage 1 I- lu A SPE SN0WMASS NORDIC COUNCIL Steve Burstein Aspen Planning Office 130 S. Galena Aspen, Co 6 1611 Dear Steve, January 14, 1986 I have reviewed the initial development submission at 601 S. Aspen and find that it fits well with the trail corridor along the base of Aspen Mountain. I will certainly want to review the submission as it progesses further, and make specific recommendations at the final review stage. Sincerely, Craig Ward Executive Director cc: Planning and Zoning Commission Mark Danielson J 11.0. 13OX 10815 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 303/925-4790 11 11 APPENDIX t t t 1 1 1 l , 601 ASPEN , t 1 t t 1 t li 1 �7 � 10 l 1G t L t 1 t l� 1 lid l 1� t 1 t ' t 1 1 1 1 t 1 , 1 1 1 � t 1 � t 1 l 1 � 1 1 • i � 1 � t 1 1 L I 1 1 1 1� jQ 1� IY 1 ' i�E ASPEN CLUB j 1� 1 O 1.y R Soo 00 e°°DD O p 0e O ° C e> ° D v6 � Do � . ® ° Q to� a r vod as oo ° Si 4P6 dJ ae •OmFa. 7 H®O °'15 D L� tty'•. o • °° mum 4 � � 9,a p�o0 0 0 ca O ®F ��0 � Oiv �JS� O & �G• ° o Ab v tm QI a U a° � Q7 m° fl� ry• p 0 ... ° A o 0°. o 0 0 e A,, o•vD O a D aD a,- ° d° 0 0 D:.°I3 opq 0 ° F�jT�7 p h °l,�,�,l.�ij' � � 84-0 0 4 F2. °drP CAD �b 1 O b OFFICE Q '08 M"� od o° n v ° Q �011�j°~ ° � ° 'e....•.a0 O° ..ar=� ° 0 � o po ° O P @ �0 ° 0. j 9 0s° °a0 o D° • A 1 °° • 1( p � o y e o ro TENT c a 04 °� o p 0 ,fig 6 o -- ASPEN • A MEADOWS O X FOtt� RM. ; I VICINITY M A P e w to r� w i' � ,:r! •- A .'d fir-) �?' i�� F. � _ .a� r r� � ti ~ t t : tr•a r "{��• i'id`'' e • t y a . � iI. Pill t��aM��-•.�}.�.: , , r. ±��.i�+ct .ry'..'L.1Stb'' �'1tl''4��'�!� N tl. '�i' !"✓.. (rt 'Ct. •;r„', F' ) :}••e!'p-!�,.,pT��. Wit... F7`I �✓ � }w "k �Sf"Ns o _ '•',� .,t r' 1•�j r it J.. _t. i�. . " ;q• - .0 � M.7' ��� �;, t. .Y yrii; CXd ..:' `., - � „�.�ir�''w��yrJ,+ to 3•,t y`�4(y� `•`- '"►''"'f,.r fit'. .. -hr 1�", � r �Yir' e`7� .r � •• 1- Lr'�. '•8 ".�'� r 3 �t;7•")S•� I �j�p�, a J!d 'F t S,� yy r hnNb '+ '' t ,y,^ �.����` j�!� Ktl*f, c ,y��,,v +•a� ;�. ��rr T4 `:VA'.::� T'-. Z•_ y�++c'4Jrti L?���' - ^.$.•!�ti'_'�...,w.'4:. a..T' �-.... .�!'.i,�l 1.'rl`�+'w"p3F�11-'�.+.'!�i'. T.14b4. •r• �� �`_�,�. •.:+ �.. _ .. N � t�—w�•.•• LS•' r`�� `� ate,. • � 'ft !� N ♦H y�rt - .°r vf�A,.�� 'r�� .. �'jT..�, '\r M�w•r �r � �"� Mt_ '� .' � z }�yN� -./� .�4a � t.A wa.��,��'�;�/,y,��y., i r •rA{,�'."'11t�(Y�,J.v� 'M+ l� :.�s b+,. � 1. a�rtf •R'. f �ti A .:.i.�v y .r ':5� r.. past ; a•i i v .� . .� t±v� r�Jr, �k itvt ,�v • a ' - .r7. u. '�' w�t � ^4 ^ •' ^N^, a�' ' t ..t�, 1, ,j, 'T9 �� r �e -'uY ,r•..r t ,r .J'' • ' f� •' •!f� {{f3 4k tic. r rt �, sJ�� ��ykp s « ki � � ��r `';�" .•- �' �ys`ia t t~ � �, JTrYw��, 4±'I''�,� �i`Y s ���M �"^�i = user. � :K }�. _ .3 �' �, � � � � � �' f t<.: r •. z Sl �" 'z 'O '•' ii y T u Y �t.r•'F"+'� �P� `..,tw�f[r 1 �'; p't" .Yi-,-�y '^ Lt. .f ^ 4,.f � `wi'P �. � � i r� .' M�rr.. 4� ., •xn y Y':11.1; . -lf� F�a. nor,.. ♦ Y � y �.�% 1 .., S .t - P; t`.'1. ��'A: � r�wA� ���`'y'�*"�t•! �°, \ • ^;i'ri:r rbr,' ` � tv • � _�t- t � : L `+rb:L , .. <d. yf w:� '�""- icr.M MRy.a�r *4� �a 1r•,�) ,. � _��".� ..<._� •J., N.��t� H., rIA :'.l nyN tY �.'i'f 1F'ILI. �44 r �_ rY,'ir �• 7S i. WFz'r :.;4 z. s 1 •'%. *,r 6.�n, - ;! ��t n �.�. fzY,�., ;' iJ ��� Y a -� i . ' V t t -., EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP H.B.C. INVESTMENTS 6O1 S. ASPEN STREET SKID ORE, OWINGS & MERRILL DEVELOPER — ASPEN ASPE14 COLORADO ARCHITECTS ENGINEER3 — DENVER bay fottif /� W foalf Laur, mF� er"ti t4FT r2dT1t9`" 4wd $tt5 t,DttiC 1� t I . 6 1 1 % ky, 53 .rr:ict l.Y: - Aoa"x..er uRa--1-�•`�/- -- -- 44��11 c 1�--.1�L.+J , -�. w_r' tin. + � �❑ PtOI► �'I� i s wa 1 77 -w.�►xu'c,sse—i, - -- - 1 r r`- �� r-\RuC`( PAKKiEiMI►II+L .\ Ll.T .: cr. ccs �1],tt�it gtSlW lrrftm 1 nillsfRLRt1MRtERNtlfliIIntV.UMttltltlttlRlt>fft14� tQ1�1f ED t1OX R.Mp [pCWVIZ5 �\ El Faiw � ' w•sc taze — ' - — � 'ZJ l,�' ,I, II I (' � SiiKt+N iKw,7acl :TUXL— � � �� �� n � t �\ t 9 -RN 4�! 1.1R•� — IStb.034RAL �pfc'�.Tf0.S n" DAMP *PC-45—�' IkL . - WOA eve — -- 9,mctw .IUAC— tm CORE �I% ccwFL a kL. loo(.f y� :`:� LOD"-2. L LZ B LDOCrE - I IIIIIlIIIII RMr- Illill R-Is of-M zPr"/pArx BUS we *! W5 Coute p ely PAArl TMMINI•L x LUI H z 0 V W U) l � is ♦.. >:'ol�. •�� � h-.: �Ah'; #6 ! i r ohf �• •r 1 rl op vk At j r 1 k• b t � F ,; eye •�`..4';�..C•� ti� ,� "C:�,,,x. - 7- SITE CONTEXT 1 H.B.C. INVESTMENTS 601 S. ASPEN STREET SKIDMORE, OWINGS a MEnnILL DEVCLOPEA - ASPEN ASPEN COLORADO ARCINTECTS ENGINEERS - DENVER w I } I I Ir WAGNER j 11 ---- ...... ........a 77 z ( In T H) 83 9 TO ?i USES [®R CRA PINESI US R sI I!yL 11� 122 4I Q A EN PA'R K P00 PINES MANOR 5 ; p RUBEY BUS STOP PARK 411 ' 204 42 1 DURANT \L� L............................�.....i i � All TJMBER LIFT a I SOUTHPOIN T' 301U MOU 1 i $IDG� Io 1 Z 205 ! 21�s 9 A SPRUC CHA loo 84 401 C I A 3 N L .;i t . 1 loaf` , 1 Z 3 4 z ;` 601 POOL BLOCK 2; N CONTINENTAL 5t5 tt L'•:`i;. : t- a s ' 1 Z 3 4 5 ,L 1 2 3 INN a g R 5 i �0 9 ; LAWN ST. R15 L (P U D) 7f0. it ! u ` io 9 C YHAL T i .0 GILBERT ST. P Lj�'•�LEri A ST — 1 1 -- t t Vv u v a " W. Ca W L cc Zo a0 Z �z. — aw Z O � < N o (>J m C W ON z n � ON NEIGHBORHOOD USE MAP FI.©.C. INVESTMENTS 601 S. ASPEN STREET SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL DEVELOPER - ASPEN ASPEN COLORADO ARCHTECTB ENOMEERB - DEj, 36L, L VbbL 9 V3UV ON IN U Vd F- Lj 4 cr U) vZ-iV9, W. z or,6L j olz6L I ---O-ZGL--' 3 d V 9NI A48 V 0 -TVA % 0 X 0-0 WSW LLJ �\ ) a F- ;313V N IN U Vd L'IZ6L 2. L 16az V38V V ONIAVI�,Q-11� EXISTING SITE MAP H.O.C.NVESTMENTS 601 S. ASPEN STREET DE�ELOPLR - ASPEN ASPEN COLORADO 9 g 84 96 SKIDMCRE, OWINGS & MERRILL ARCISTECTS ENG114ELRS - C)Ct4VFn DEAN ' H.B.C. INVESTMENTS DCVQOFUI - A`iPLN •. �. MOM a 1R?s.14►a M p..x . c r� Ell m w.' h .I 1 rH.B.C. INVESTMENTS DEVEl OPLR -ASPEN Wt n R } 1 �Y Iseiliilall:� v RCS 2-ekl �Y���Y . fy �a . i� " nRa t r . � �I� • w cvol t r • .' R . 1 H.B.C. INVESTMENTS uEVCLUP I-ASPLN •, 'iS4 wt ti Ilie iffi w t-7 vw. S' Ellu oils, III BRIX r _it�tknA • � liP•ataae'+^= ,tta Mrl t; swi �` b1Rl�lIj,l`fl �6i1ICIlIIII'f1,00 Iry�l 111 'M IK i+�.. •1111d I I � i+�l �� 1 i i�iil�'!_Pj,-,iil Ilut� � I IN >r 1L.1" 'il�inuuiinnnnr w '• r L. , ° ° ' ' •� � iiii �� ii� I �������f I li II � II i ii I • DURANT ENTRY LEVEL PLAN •r III%�G�ifIV���iii���.li��illt �1ill ��I'��lill� I 1;!��Il���l��lll�l� uV V;rr+M!« 1 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DEAN ST. H.B.C. INVESTMENTS DEVRDPCR - ASP[N DEAN ST I. Qw V-1 AM TYPICAL UNIT PLAN 2 H.D.C. INVESTMENTS 601 S. ASPEN STREET SKIDMCRE, OWINGS & MERRILL ULVL 011-H -ASPEN ASPEN COLORADO ARCIYTECTS ENGINEERS - DENVER C_pv 54 on 126 9 W. M. fflijigiff, W 0 MM An IS -2 16, s Ak --,.�_.wi �_ � 'aiii.`{iiiw.'ii�.__ 1� i su O- Y ,+y �, n •,� - ,` ; '� T•. �»•._ - �` _ ��� � ..rc]�.t/.L iJ . ��...� .�'`at 21C � .y•�S,%. �i'4 1 i. �c �.S•�� �•3Cr • C �': f_ =:7 rs r• —s J - Ya•A�Y�YM�i W4!!lu� J�r' wMf4�o�lM�rA.=. �� • _ M'�� -�. _ sn. rt� mrs ""at„=:1 li ;j `-. \"... ,;i � `- :.. � .. tr.. .. i .t .1\• q •. .��..f��'�•'/ .• • .. !R•' v '.�'.v ., ,•.,•. ...• w� •. i • �'- �a 1` ,; l a':Y.y, �3•f. ,�••.. {t.'.• rC.� a< - � �- \ll .:'.1PYM. \� .ti►• ..� �11�:\\+/�-\\�� BUILDING A SECTION DEAN ST. ARCY(TECTURAL CONCEPT DRAWINGS LONGITUDINAL SECTION CONDOMINUMS DEAN ST. ENTRANCE SECTION DEAN ST. CONDOMINIUMS m m = = m = m = = = = = = = = = m I= DEAN ST. DURANT PARKING DESIGN 11.0.C. INVESTMENTS 601 S.ASPEN STREET SKIDMORE, OWINGS & mEnnILI. ocmomn - ASPEN ASPFN COLORADO AnCl"IECTS E140111crns - Drwcn 64 4. VN ENTRY LEVER PARKING SURFACE PARKING 10 VISITOR 3 TAxi 3 LIMO �, r 2 BUS 2 DELIVERY (2 ENCLOSED DOCK A 12 X 33 WITH ADJACE ENCLOSED COMPACTOq AREA AT 12 X 33) �q AUTO ENTRY AND EXIT FROM ASPEN ST. AND ASPEN ST. GARMISCH ST. \ � -\ -------/��-�-;-- � �/ // \�•,\ ��\ ' jam• \ \ I •' � 1 A O I T r � /may iT T I - DEAN 8T, i� E Q. TR IL , �614":A "--,! .T i■ J/ ■ 1.. DURANT ■ `• TRAILS ' N.R.C. INVESTMENTS 601 S. ASPEN STREET SKIDMORE, OWINGS d MFRRILL UEMOIT11-ASPEN ASPEN COLORADO ARCMECTS ENGINEERS - DI?NER 0 __ 37 M. 9e .M uq�-# Tril"IlIF1 t I* mile,, u 1 - —, 4: Yw 6. lk co �� � :✓ is ,� T•... �{, 1 e m ICI „ I t _ — — AC AIN FACE co Adak ; t i 1 DEAN 8T. m I7S� i � W m F (STING — 1 CATCH DURANT STORM DRAINAGE 1 H.O.C. INVESTMENTS 601 S. ASPEN STREET SKIDMORE, OWINGS a MERRILL DEVROPCR - ASPEN ASPEN 6- --- -! ARCIeTECT11 ENm111 FIS - De1NER o �: e. e ve ADED \ IN�\\\ \; \ (� /KYDRANT I \\ \\\ \ IN nF DEAN ST H.B.C. INVESTMENTS DEVELOPM - ASPEN ■ ■ u. 1 -�.�•�..• ��"'!;: "' "rya=�,,�., �. '� r ._:.p!;llv_l. to .. ,•...t, _ 1. m ■ n0 _ ■ — FI E•HYDRAj NEW ■ m. ■ - � FIRE HY ■- - --- NE IRE AC SS '+ - pa4, ■ F__-� j ■_TMETTYDRANT ■ ' DURANT FIRE PROTECTION 601 S. ASPEN STREET SKIDMOnE, OWINGS a MERRILL ASPEN COLORADO A„CHTECTS ENGINEERS - DENVER o ]x e4 ,]B ter-+-- it �— ---- ,'4'• a , - -- ,;' 1 - �� +y.•" `SERVICE �ED .. I�y,i \ t S CE 11,,1. +,,� �. G,1. a'1►�V1 s'xff 9�AlITO•�N'TR1�J! AUTO TRY / ,rk IMPR MISCH R 1 ■ ' ,t TREET "' "l I!• o) „ t��s'1l,;; `CW,.,."A. �; � `. !'f � v�..,... .a„q y'�, '•1 ^:i. '-�`•:b.• -. OUI%A'NT ROADS 1 H.B.C. INVESTMENTS 601 S. ASPEN STREET SKIDMORE, OWING S R MERRILL DEVELOPEA -ASPEN ASPLN COLOGA00 MC14TECTS ENGINEERS - DENJER 1J A4 9n �]n �\\ A III INN I 4. .� , sr t / x M „ „ � ,' ;,�� L SPE JI', VARI0US S'--' - r_J AM R 15Iii IT t NIN RK--<- -, �✓ VY FEKING COTONEAER GINNALA MAPLE --� DEAN ST. N G) N N, , tilryryALA AP - �� �• ° t4dOT a ►i .S.�UM. A —77 r "IV. w :.i °: 11� 1111� lar;�'un I,III' � iii�•a:�•a eaF� larass's:oa �`t� ,I , �, _.... �• fie* �II ���� ���{�i li ��I��IiCll�l ����� I��II����►.�pp.,i •I ,e, �� II�� �� . 'I��� I � III��`�II �����I,�II I���I��IL • Fls" DURANT SITE DESIGN & LANDSCAPE II.O.C. INVESTMENTS 601 S. ASPEN STREET SKIDMOnE. OWINGS a MEnRILL DEVELOPER - ASPEN ASPEN COLOIUDO MCHITECTS EIIIIIN-1118 - DEINER 'i..--- ._--- +n Ire 0 �a 0 W 0 1 fIE&WLWLAL SCALE WITHIN HEIGHT LIMITS AND BUSK OF EXISlnl)(,G SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL BU :USE OF NATURAL MATERIALS (WOOD, STONF, GLAS& CONCR . AND SC TURE OF I A��OLOR,R RE GO, Co AND SCA�E COMPATIBLE AND COMPUMEN7ARY TO TOWN AND REGPDN. 0 D GREENSPAC�S TO PROVIDE EXTENSION OF AL L APING ON3SHADOW UOUNTAJN '.RKS. n LLJ Ozo.Ir0U) REV ON 0 0 4 co m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m = = = = jam.__... ybb/ i J 086E Tx� 36Lx v3av E)NlAavd 0961. —_ --_ -F- V38V 9NIY.8Vd ���.. -- -- -- --- -- -_ w J 0£6L _ 1 r�L O'£Z6L- Oi - 4E T t7/ a Os O� 110. 00, r4o Lo 0100 O 00 06 41 x ~ \ ,w l t>r_- H ; 38V ONI)- V L 126E OZ6L x ZZI6LJ _ x V3aV ONIN>'Vd u- I p3HV ONINaV EXISTING SITE MAP H.B.C. INVESTMENTS 601 S. ASPEN STREET DEVELOPLR - ASPEN ASPEN COLORADO C 3} 64 96 124 SKIDMORE, OWINGS S MERRILL ARCHTECTS ENGINEERS - DENVER 0 i :s:A 7 P , • i r N.•,: nrt 5 L :,Ia ny N 1. L , 1 C , p• 11 t , iv (. i M M ITM E NT: ,t.. w,,,,,,,.., s ct,:,,4.• s I.,,.,i 11.......... 12 P,, pe h T 4 5------ 6 --- 7 --- 9 10 12 14 I 0 Q-- 0 — P -- -- 11 13 Layers Title Insurance Corporation National Headquarters Richmond, Virginia COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A Effective Date January 30, 1986 at 8:00 A.M. Case No. PCT-101-86 2 Policy or policies to be issued ' (a) ALTA Owner's Policy —Form B-1970 (Rev. 10-17-70) & Rev.(10-17-84) ❑ ALTA Residential Title Insurance Policy-1979 ' Proposed insured. DOUGLAS P. ALLEN, TRUSTEE AND/OR ASSIGNS (b) ALTA Loan Policy, 1970 (Rev. 10.17-70) & Rev. (10-17-84) ' Proposed insured (c) ' Proposed insured Amount $400�Q00.QO-PREMIUM-$882.00 ($100.00 credit for Abstract included) Amount $ Amount $ _ __ TAX CERTIFICATE ' Title to the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment Is at the effective date hereof vested in: ' FRANCES AUSTIN AND P.C. KLINGSMITH, TRUSTEES OF THE AUSTIN TRUST, UNDER A TRUST AGREEMENT DATED JULY 14, 1981 AND NOTICE OF TRUST RECORDED IN BOOK 413, AT PAGE 197, OF THE RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, ' COLORADO The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: ' LOTS 3, 4, 5, AND 6, BLOCK 11, EAMES ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO ' Form No. 91 - 88 (SCH. A) 035-1.088-0001%3 Commitment No. M-6Aa097 Schedule A —Page 1 $ 5.00 This commitment is invalid unless the Insuring Provisions and Sched- ules A and B are attached. ORIGINAL W 14 .L.1! A C C OMMODAT = O N- NO L TAB = L= TY s o l e u s e P l e a s e d i r e c t c o r r e s p o n d an c e > Doug Allen t o = PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 )Ef C R = P T = ON: (303)-925-1766 SEE EXHIBIT 1' �ritee in the last instrument apparently n s f e r r i n g ownership : ISEE EXHIBIT "2" C s t d e e d s a n d mortgage s apparent 1 y eleased: I SEE EXHIBIT "3" i e n s and j u d g m en i s ( a g a i n s t l a s t g r an t e e �arently urireleased : ISEE EXHIBIT "4" L' s i n f o rm a t i o n i s f o r your s o l e u s e a n d 5 e f i t a n d i s f u r n i s h e d a s an a r c omm o d a t i o n_ L'he information Yeas been taken from our tract i i c e s, w i t h o u t r e f e r e n c e t o, o r exam i ria L i o n i n s t r um en i s w h i c h p u r p o r t t o a f f e c t t h e real property _ The i.rnformatiori is neither ranteed nor cert if ied , and is riot an 4tract of Title, Opinion of Title, nor a u a ran t y o f T i t l e, an d o u r l i a b i l i t y i s limited to the amount of the fees _ D a t e: NOVEMBER 21 , 1985 a t 8: 0 0 A. M. r P=TK=N T=TLE , =NC 1 .J BK ' EXHIBIT "I" LEGAL DESCRIPTION II. MINE DUMPS: ' That portion of the Northeast one -quarter of the Northeast one -quarter (Lot 1) of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M., described as follows: ' BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 11, Eames Addition; thence North 75009'11" West 181.25 feet; thence South 110 50'49" West 78.00 feet; thence South 03055'43" West 164.99 feet; thence South 750 09'11" East 150.00 feet; thence North 140 50'49" East 240.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. ' also known as: Lots 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,18, 19, and 20, Block 11, EAMES ' ADDITION, and a tract of land being a part of Lot 1 of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M., described as follows: ' BEGINNING at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 13, Block 11, Eames Addition; thence South 14050'49" West 240.00 feet along the Westerly line of said Block 11 to the Southwesterly corner of Lot ' 20, Block 11, Eames Addition; thence North 03' 55'43" East 164.99 feet; thence North 14050'49" East 78.00 feet; thence South 75° 09'11" East 31.25 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. ' II. BARBEE: Block 6 EAMES ADDITION, and more particularly described as ' follows: BEGINNING at a point which is the intersection of the Easterly ' right of way line of Garmisch Street and the Southerly right of way line of Dean Avenue, from whence the Northeast corner of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M. bears North 53020'28" East 814.56 feet, more or less; thence ' along the Southerly right of way line of Dean Avenue South 750 09'11" East 330 feet, more or less, to the Westerly right of way line of Aspen Street; thence along the said right of way line of ' Aspen Street South 14°50'49" West 130 feet, more or less, to the Northerly right of way line of Juan Street; thence along said right of way line of Juan Street North 75°09' 11" West 330 feet, ' more or less, to the Easterly right of way line of Garmisch Street; thence along said right of way line of Garmisch Street North 14' 50'49" East 130 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING therefrom: the portion described in Book 232 ' at Page 362 in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. I III. PARKING LOT: ' Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 11, EAMES ADDITION COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. IEXHIBIT "2" IJOHN H. ROBERT, JR. AS TO PARCELS (I) AND (II) ' ASPEN SKIING COMPANY, A COLRADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP COMPRISED OF MKDG III/TCF PARTNERSHIP, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND BELL MOUNTAIN PARTNERS LTD., AN ILLINOIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WHOSE SOLE GENERAL PARTNER IS CHARLES ' H. GOODMAN, AS TO PARCEL (III) ' EXHIBIT "3" 1. Deed of Trust from JOHN H. ROBERTS, JR. ' to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of COMMERCE SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, A SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION to secure $44,000,000.00 ' dated January 25, 1985 recorded February 7, 1985 in Book 481 at Page 23 re -recorded April 8, 1985 in Book 484 at Page 261 ' First Modification to Deed of Trust given in connection with the above Deed of Trust recorded April 3, 1985 in Book 483 at Page 889. Said Deed of Trust further Modified by Second Modification to Deed of Trust recorded July 8, 1985 in Book 489 at Page 331. ' Said Deed of Trust further Modified by Modification of Deed of Trust recorded July 29, 1985 in Book 491 at Page 894. 2. Financing Statement given by John H. Roberts, Jr., debtor, to Commerce Savings Association, secured party, filed February 19, 1985 in Book 481 at Page 656, as Filing No. 08936. ' 3. Deed of Trust from : JOHN H. ROBERTS, JR. to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of : MAINLAND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION to secure : $14,000,00.00 dated : July 25, 1985 recorded : September 10, 1985 in Book 494 at Page 763 ' Addendum to Deed of Trust recorded November 18, 1985 in Book 499 at Page 159, given in connection with the above Deed of Trust. ' ITEMS 1,2, and 3 AFFECTS PARCELS (I) AND (II) 1 ' RE: ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: SUBJECT PROPERTY: LOTS 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, BLOCK 11, EAMES ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF ADJACENT LAND OWNERS AS OBTAINED FROM THE MOAST CURRENT TAX ASSESSOR'S ROLL FOR PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. LOTS 13-18 inclusive, BLOCK 11, EAMES ADDITION: BLOCK 6, EAMES ADDITION: ' ASPEN MOUNTAIN JOINT VENTURE C/O HOLLAND & HART 600 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 ' ATTN: ART DAILY JOHN H. ROBERTS, JR. 114 WEST COMMERCE, 3rd FLOOR John H. Roberts, Jr. P.O. Box CC SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205 Aspen, CO 81612 ' COMMERCE SAVINGS ASSOCIATION 111 SOLEDAD, SUITE. 1350 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205 ' BLOCK 7, EAMES ADDITION AND LOTS 1, 2 and 3, BLOCK 8, EAMES ADDITION: THE CITY OF ASPEN ' 130 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 LOTS 6-10 inclusive, BLOCK 1, CONNORS ADDITION: ' LOTS 4-11 inclusive, BLOCK 8, EAMES ADDITION: ' JOHN and FRANK DOLINSEK P.O. Box 275 ASPEN, CO 81612 ' LOTS 4-11 inclusive, BLOCK 9, EAMES ADDITION: LOTS 12-14 inclusive, BLOCK 8. EAMES ADDITION: ' HOWARD B. AWREY P.O. Box 248 ASPEN, CO 81612 ' LOTS 1, 2, and 13, BLOCK 9, EAMES ADDITION: JOCOBUS AND JOHANNA DePAGTER ' P.O. Box 182 ASPEN, CO 81612 ----CONTINUED---- ADJACENT OWNERS LIST CONTINUED PAGE 2 LOTS 1 and 2, BLOCK 11, EAMES ADDITION, PLUS UNPLATTED AREA: JOHN W. BARBEE, HALLIE B. RUGHEIMER and MARY K. BARBEE P.O. Box 788 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOTS 1-7 inclusive, BLOCK 12; LOTS 1-14, inclusive, BLOCK 10; LOTS 7-12 inclusive, BLOCK 11, EAMES ADDITION: ASPEN SKIING COMPANY P.O. Box 1248 ASPEN, CO 81612 TIMBERIDGE CONDOMINIUMS: 21 UNITS C/O RESORT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. P.O. Box 7026 ASPEN, CO 81612 SOUTHPOINT CONDOMINIUMS: 29 UNITS SOUTHPOINT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 205 E. DURANT STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 LIFT ONE CONDOMINIUMS: 31 UNITS LIFT ONE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 131 E. Durant Aspen, CO 81611 LOTS 21-27, BLOCK 11, EAMES ADDITION SHADOW MOUNTAIN VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION c/o Coates, Reid & Waldron 720 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 LOT 11, BLOCK 1, CONNORS ADDITION ROLLES, OLSON, ROLLES PARTNERSHIP P.O. Box 10147 Aspen, CO 81612 LOT 13 and PART OF LOTS 12 and 14, BLOCK 1, CONNORS ADDITION MERYL HEARST P.O. Box 67 Aspen, CO 81612 ----CONTINUED---- ' ADJACENT OWNERS LIST CONTINUED PAGE 3 11 7 1 SILVER SHADOW CONDOMINIUMS SILVER SHADOW CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 655 South Monarch Aspen, CO 81611 CARIBOU CONDOMINIUMS CARIBOU CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION 701 South Monarch Aspen, CO 81611 IO1/VACA3/4.1.86 EI�F MEMORANDUM Q TO: City Attorney City Engineer .Y Housing Director �:'o E�• ��•�ER C Aspen Water Dept. ; �CL��P Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District Environmental Health Dept. Fire Chief Aspen School District RE-1 Zoning Enforcement Officer FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: 1985 City Residential Growth tanagement Applications: Sunny Park Residential GM.P Conceptual Submission 601 Aspen Residential GVP Conceptual Submission DATE: December 23, 1985 Attached for your review are the two 11085 City Residential Growth Management aril i) received by the Planning Office on December 1st. Due ode requirements, these applications must be set for hearing before the 11.spen Planning and Zoning Commission no later than Januarv, 1986. Therefore, the Planning Office has scheduled the public hearing of the scoring session on these two applications for January 28th at a special meeting. In order to have adequate time to prepare for this special meeting, we would appreciate having your cor.ments back no later than January 12, 1986. Following is brief summary of the applications submitted: SUNNY PARK RESIDENTIAL GMP CONCEPTUAL SUBMISSION The applicant is requesting a growth management allocation for the construction of four (4) free market resic:ential units on Lot 4, Surnv Park Subdivision, situated at the northwest corner of the intersection of Park Avenue and Park Circle in Aspen. The applicant proposes to build 3 employee studio units on -site. The applicant states that three units already exist on the property: (which have yet to verified), and the applicant is also request- ing Gt'P Exemption for those units. �'7e would appreciate the Building Department verifying those 3 units as soon as possible in order that we may proceed with this application. The appli- cant is also requesting subdivision exception for the construc- tion of a multi -family project, ane reduction of the parking, requirements for the employee units. 601 ASPEN RESIDENTIAL GMP CONCEPTUAL SUBMISSION The applicant is requesting a growth management allocation for the construction of 92 multi -family free market units of 400 and 800 s.f. each. In addition, the applicant proposes to contruct 18 employee dorm rooms or -site anti to convert two other build- ings, off -site, to employee housing. This application is quite complex and confusing, and we are including a great deal of correspondence which has been exchanced between the Planning and Development Director and the applicant's attorney Doug Allen. As the letters indicate, there is still some doubt as to the compl eteneww o% the submission. Should you reed additional information, or feel you car -not make a determination based on the submittal, please contact our office ir:u-:ediately ant: we will try to address the problem with you. Thank you for your cooperation. Thank you. December 9, 1985 Hans B. Cantrup Box 12384 Aspen, CO 61612 Dear Hans: We have completed a preliminary check of your residential growth management quota system application known as 601 Aspen. Section 24- 11.3(c) (3) requires the Planning Office to reject any application which fails to comply with the zoning regulations of the City of Aspen. Pursuant to this section, we are compelled to reject your application for the following reasons: 1. The L-2 zone has a minimum lot area per dwelling unit requirement of 1000 sq. ft. per studio unit. Your site, which contains in excess of 113,000 sq. ft., could therefore support 113 studios. However, your plan shows 92 free market units in buildings A&B, at least 20 units in Building C, and at least 30 employee "dorm" units on site (excluding those on the t9ine Dumas site, which I can't find) . The 142 units require a lot size of at least 142,000 square feet. 2. It is extremely difficult to read your drawings, but it appears that you have violated the 28 foot height limit of the L-2 zone due to the columns on each building, as well as the 10 foot rear yard setback for Building B. 3. Your employee housing proposal appears to be inconsistent with the use tables. The L-2 zone permits the construction of a boarding house7 but not a dormitory. In the definitions section of the Code (24-3.1.), dormitory is mentioned in two places, at subsection (c), along with boarding house and rooming house, and by itself at subsection (gg) . However, when looking at the use tables, boarding house, rooming house and dormitory are all allowed in the CC zone, while only boarding houses are allowed in the L-1 and L-2 zone, and boarding houses and dormitories only in the L-3 zone. It appears that we must therefore differentiate between a boarding house and a dormitory, with the latter use being, prohibited in the L-2 zone. 4. As required by Section 24-11..3 (J), you must submit complete applications for your subdivision and 8040 greenline reviews at the same time as your GMP submission is made. You have submitted no information in this regard. In general, your presentation is unclear, confusing and not well documented, and as result, would likely score well below the competitive threshold. For example, it is nearly impossible to evaluate the site design without a clear site drawing, including a landscaping plan. Similarly, to review the architectural compatibility with such schematic drawings is nearly impossible. The application does not describe your employee housing program, except to calculate the numbers for us. Please keep in mind that the requirement for housing is more than an exercise in quantity; it must also be an evaluation of quality. Typically, applications describe the way in which the units function. If a dorm were allowed on the site, what type of common areas (living, bathing) will be provided and how will food service be obtained? What portion of the Mine Dumps will be retained? What is being proposed for the off -site units in terms of upgrade? What type of units exist in these buildings and what is being proposed? 11here is the proof that you have an option or interest in these properties? The application is also deficient in several other very important respects. For example, the review of services and facilities in the area is also unclear. Letters are provided from the referral agencies indicating that water and sewer service in the area is adequate. However, the application then proposes an improvement to the service to some indeterminate level. We need to know exactly what is proposed for the upgrade if you expect to achieve the maximum score in this area. We also need a true drainage plan, not a letter from a consultant saying he is willing to prepare same. Finally, we need a technical analysis of road capacity, particularly on Aspen Street. 184 parking spaces are proposed to be provided on site, on a street which is icy, narrow and quite steep, and yet you expect little impact from added traffic. A more convincina argument could be made if a presentation were made of mitigation techniques which will be employed. Finally, there remain many questions about the ownership of the entire parcel, and your right to apply for this development. I would suggest that your rights and obligations (i.e. Ski Company parking, tennis courts replacement; Barbee land inside and outside of the City) be more clearly defined for us. Since Section 24-11 .7 (c) (3) requirr-s that this application be rejected, we are in the process of making out a ref and check to you. Please advise us if you also want to withdraw your rezoning request so that vie can refund that check as well. I would be happy to meet you and your representative at your convenience to discuss my findings. Please let me know when you would like to have such a meeting. E Sincerely, Alan Richman Planning and Development Director AR/ ne c � . &Z.' dxell (&'U) daoo December 17, 1985 Mr. Alan Richman Planning and Zoning Director Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Hans B. Cantrup/601 Aspen GMP Application Dear Alan: The purpose of this letter is to clarify (1) the employee housing component of the above application as well as (2) the designation of tracts I, II and III on Pages 1 and 2 of the Ownership Certificate furnished by Pitkin County Title, Inc. as part of the application. The property referred to in I as Mine Dumps is reflected on Sheet A-1 of the submission as C; the property referred to in II as Barbee is reflected on Sheet A-1 of the submission as A; and the property referred to in III, Parking Lot is B on Sheet A-1. The "Barbee" property which you asked about yesterday is another piece of property presently owned by the Barbee family and which is located generally to the west of Garmisch Street and to the north of Dean Street. Relative to the employee housing component of the application, I enclose an 11 X 16 blowup of the detail of the typical dorm arrangements on the ground floor of both Buildings A and B. Each dorm is proposed to house 8 employees in each unit of 1,200 square feet. There will be 11 of these studio -type units in Building A and 4 in Building B for a total of 15 units housing 120 employees. In the Mine Dumps buildings that will be existing after the demolition and consisting of 3,300 square feet there will be two units of 1,200 square feet each in one building and 1 unit of the same size in the other building housing a total 22 employees for a total of 144 employees housed on site. Mr. Alan Richman Re: Hans B. Cantrup/601 Aspen Gi1P Application December 17, 1985 Page Two Relative to the existing off -site component of the employee housing there is no major renovation contemplated except as may be required to be in compliance with City Code and UBC. We would like to leave the existing configuration to allow for as much privacy for each employee as possible but will. remove walls as necessary so as to meet or exceed the minimums required by the employee housing regulations. Please call me if any further clarification is needed on this application. I will promptly furnish it or meet with you to discuss it. Very""Ell1y yours, Douglas P//Allen DPA/pkm UN1� A-6E)YE t ��K�ir _ 1 KA .���■� ■ice r■ 3t■��� �.��' ��I� 'r ( pK,.c. . at 120o T d — ISO X g 1��M.ax) _ � 2 0 0 ZLDC§S A E> December 20, 1985 r'r. Douct Allen 530 East Pain Street, 1st Floor Aspen, Co 81611 Dear Doug: Ue are in receipt of your letter dated December 17; 1985, concerning the 601 Aspen Residential GFP application. t-?e continue to find the application very difficult to interpret, and the followinc; information appears to be necessary: 1. A drawing_ showing the conceptual floor plans- for the dormitory units to be located in Buildings. A, D, and the dine ')umps. The plans should clearly demonstrate how the proposed dorms fit into the space proposed for these units. 2.. Floor plans for the two off -site employee housing sites, so that the number of people to be housed car; be evaluated. Describe the number of units which exist on the site, and the size (square footage, be(froom count) for each unit. 3. Reiterating earlier comments, Ordinance 2.0, Series of 1985 requires the submission of complete applications for any other associated review procedure in conjunction with your GMP submission. tThile a complete rezoning request has been submitted, a subdivision application has not been submitted. Review Section 20-10 of the Code and submit 10 copies of a complete package immediately, including maps at the required scale. 4. It still appears that the disclosure of ownership requirements have not been met . It may be advisable for you to contact the City Attorney and demonstrate to him that you have the right to apply for all of the land in question. Without conceding the sufficiency of the sub-:1ission7 we have decided to send this application out for referral purposes and to schedule it for review by the Planning. Commission on January :'.8th. However, it should be emphasized that referring this application should not be construed by you or your client as a final determination that the submission is complete, or that all zoning issues have been satisfact- orily resolved. Instead, we intend to get a reading of your application through the public process and to reserve the right to find, based on Doug Allen Page 2 12/20/85 anv discoveries made, whether or not your proposal is technically sufficient. In referring this application I am making the following determinations regarding your dormitory employee housing proposal: 1. The City's zoning regulations do not specifically permit the result which you are trying to accomplish. Therefore, we have made the interpretations below in an effort at allowing a public determination: of the appropriateness of your Proposal. However, it may ultimately be necessary for you to process one or more code amendments to specifically accomplish your end objectives. 2. The minimum lot area per dwelling unit for the 18 dormitory units you propose on site will be set by Special Review. Section 24-3.4 of the Code provides for the minimum lot area per dwelling unit for "bedrooms unlimited" to be set by Special Review, and this definition of a unit with more than 3 bedrooms is the closest I can come in the Code to your eight person dorms. I must warn you that based on the Special Review, we may find that your dorm proposal cannot be fullv accommodated on. site. The only other alternative is that since the Code does not designate minimum let area per dwelling unit for dorm units, we use the 6,000 sq. it. requirements provided in Section 24-3.4 for individual uses in the zone. In this case, 6,000 sq. ft. x 18 dorms would Ceduct more lot area than you have remaining on the site after your 92 tourist units are considered. 3. Since boardinc houses are an allowed use in the L-2. zone, and in Section 24-3.1fc) boardinghouse is defined in conjunc- tion with dormitory, we will consider the dormitory to be an allowed use in the zone. During the course of the referral and review process- we may find that additional clarifications or materials are necessary for our review. You should be aware that compared to other applications we have received, ,°our submission is most confusing and lacking in the type of detail we would normally expect of such a large development proposal. YOUr prompt attention to any requests we make will help us to meet our acenda, deadlines. Sincerely, Alan Richman Planning and Development Director AR/ nec i i3O�i 9�'S ��OD December 16, 1985 ALAN RICHMAN Planning and Development Director Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Hans B. Cantrup/601 Aspen Dear Alan: Hans requested that I draft a letter in response to your letter of December 9, 1985 to him regarding his Growth Management System application for the above. I will address this response in the same chronological order as your letter. In order to clarify the points addressed in paragraph 1 of your letter, the application does reflect 92 free-market studio units in Buildings A and B. The existing Mine Dumps buildings are scheduled to be demolished except for 3,300 square feet as shown on the attached drawing which will house 22 employees in a boarding house, rooming house, dormitory configuration, referred to herein as "dorm" at 150 square feet per employee. In Building A there will be 13,200 square feet of employee housing all. in a dorm configuration to house 88 employees and in Building B, 4,800 square feet of dorm housing to house 32 employees. Thus with 92,000 square feet for the studios and 21,300 square feet of dorm space there is a total of 113,300 square feet against total land area of 113,500 square feet. Sheet A-9 of the application shows a height of 28 feet for both Building A and Building B. The (mechanical equipment), elevator shafts exceed the 28 feet as they are allowed to do by Code and thus there is no violation of the 28-foot height limitation in the Code. No height variation will be requested. It is our understanding that when a project fronts on more than one street we may designate the front of the building and thus the rear and side thereof. The front of this project is to the north and thus the rear yard setback for Building B is to the south and does not violate the 10-foot limitation. The westerly portion of Building A has fire escape projecting 4 feet into the 5-foot side setback as allowed by Code, as does the easterly end of Building B. ALAN RICHMAN Re: Hans B. Cantrup/601 Aspen December 16, 1985 Page Two Regarding paragraph 3, it is correct that in Section 24-3.1 of the Code, dorm is mentioned in two places and the definition of "boarding house, rooming house, dormitory" is not totally consistent. Reading the two definitions together, a dormitory is a portion of a building where "lodging" or "group sleeping accommodations" is provided for housing six or more persons for compensation but no more than eight persons. Inasmuch as "boarding house, rooming house, and dormitory" are considered interchangeably together in one definition it appears that such interpretation as that mentioned in your paragraph 3 should not be made until a Code clarification is made. Dorm use does not appear to be prohibited by Zoning Code in the Lodge Zone where it is very obviously the most appropriate type and location for such in connection with projects as this. It is my understanding that dorm use is or was allowed in the Sardy House, Skiers Chalet, Asper. Inn., Holland House, Mountain Chalet, Dormey Vous, Snowflake and in the Continental Inn, none of which are in the CC or L-3 Zone. On page 3 of the submission request was made for both subdivision and green line review, although green line review is not applicable to this application for Buildings A and B as shown on Sheet A-1 of the submission. Article 11 of Section 24 of. the Code does not require detail concerning the employee housing at conceptual stage, only that the number and type of units be designated. It was our understanding from the second pre -application conference that employee housing requirements would probably be re -vamped by the presently pending proposed Code amendments to the employee housing portion of the Code. In summation, T think we have clarified the most serious points of concern you stated in your letter and can easily address the others at our meeting today. Ver truly yours, Wouglas P. Allen DPA/pkm RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMISSION 601 ASPEN SUBMITTED TO: The City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 APPLICANT: Hans B. Cantrup Box 12384 Aspen, Colorado 81612 DATE: December 1, 1985 Preliminary Conceptual Development Plans prepared by Hans B. Cantrup INTRODUCTION The proposed 601 Aspen Development consists of a total of 92 Multi-Familv Free Market units of 400 and 800 square feet each, designed for short-term rentals to apartment occupants (L-2 Zone). The proposed Development will also house the required parking (160) in an underground parking structure along with a common lounge and recreation area with a health room, saunas, jacuzzi and indoor -outdoor swimming pool. An additional 24 short-term surface spaces will also be provided. Since short-term rentals are mandated for this project, a full array of Hotel Services will be provided such as Front Desk Reception, Lobby, Breakfast area, Limo Service, Concierge, Room Service, etc., Swim -up Bar. The proposed building has been designed conceptually to provide major open space areas between existing and proposed development. The pool - level also houses the public areas. On the level below there is a reception area and Lobby, as well as elevators for access to all levels tying the proposed development together with a common Porte Cochere. Automobile access is provided for on the ground level of the site by a driveway which will connect Garmisch Street on the west to Aspen Street on the east. The driveway will also provide a loading and unloading area in front of the main entrance and 24 visitory/temporary parking spaces on grade. This multi -family development provides first class residential units for the short-term rental market. The Development has been designed for the luxury market and far exceeds the standards of any surrounding existing construction as far as quality and permanence are concerned. The central location and proximity to Lift 1-A adds to the desirability of the proposed Development. All utilities are immediately available and more than sufficient for the proposed Development. Construction schedule calls for total completion by December 1, 1987. Together with the GMP application itself, several other procedures must be considered in conjunction with this submission: 1. Re -zoning for a portion of the subject property has been' previously submitted under separate cover. 2. Subdivision procedures of which this GMP submission is an Integral part. 3. Greenline review information also contained in this submission. 4. Deed restriction of proposed E. units. 5. Alley vacation - See attachments. 6. City easement under Juan Street and granting of a pedestrian overpass over Juan Street. RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT SUBMISSION. DEVELOPMENT LOCATION The proposed Development is located just southwest of the commercial core of the City of Aspen at the base of Aspen Mountain. The proposed 601 Aspen Development consists of 113,500 sq. ft. This site is bounded by Aspen Street on the east, intersected by Juan Street, Garmisch Street to the west, and on the north by the vacated former Dean Street right-of-way which is to be reactivated but privately maintained. The proposed Development is located within a short distance from many of the activities and points of interest in Aspen, as follows: --Aspen Airport: 5� miles --Aspen Valley Hospital: 2 miles --Aspen Middle and High Schools: 2 miles --Aspen Upper & Lower Elementary Schools: �4 mile --Existing School Bus Routes: it mile --Rubey Park Bus Terminal: 3 blocks --Nearest Bus Route and Stop: 1 block --Aspen Commercial Core: 3 blocks --Wagner Park and Playground: 1 block --Aspen Mountain Lift 1-A: Adjacent to The proposed Development is located on a property presently zoned L-2 and R15L PUD which permits residential multi -family uses and the surrounding zoning included a mixture of L-2 Lodge, Residential Multi -Family, Residential-15 Lodge -Planned Unit Development, Commercial Lodge and Park. Like the existing zoning, the surrounding use of land and buildings is varied with scattered single family units, residential multi -family, condominiums, lodges and some limited commercial activities. The area to the immediate west is vacant except for the Barbee home. To the south the property is used by the Aspen Skiing Company for an employee parking area which will be replaced by 31 underground parking spaces per agreement with Aspen Skiing Company. To the north are the Timber Ridge and Lift One Condominiums. To the northeast are the South Point Condominiums. To the east is open space/park land which also houses a• building for Aspen Central Reservations. The Skier's Chalet, Holland House Lodge and Lift 1-A are to the southeast. To the south is the Shadow Mountain Village. WATER SYSTEM (2 POINTS There are 6" C.I.P. lines that border the site on three sides. The lines run along South Garmisch, Juan and South Aspen Streets. These lines are well suited to serve the development's water demand. The proposed water demand is directly related to unit size and use in terms of long or short term occupancy. The Aspen Water Department indicates that the water pressure in that area averages between 60-80 p.s.i. As there is sufficient excess capacity in the public system there will be no problem in serving the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. 1 ' Applicant is committing to improve the existing level of service beyond the benefit to the project itself to improve the quality of 1 service in the subject area. Applicant is looking for guidance to the ' City Engineering Department when the project gets finalized through the application process. (See attached letter Water Department). ' SEWER SYSTEM (2 POINTS) There are 8" sewer lines that border the site on three sides. The ' lines run along S. Garmisch, Juan, and Dean Streets. These lines are ' sufficient to serve the development's sewer requirements. The wastewater and sewage requirements are directly related to unit size and occupancy. The Advanced Waste -Water Treatment Plant (A.W.P.) has ' a capacity of 3 million gallons per day, of which an average of 2.3 million gallons are used. Consequently the plant is running at only 77% capacity. The project would generate less than 1/3 of one percent to the plant capacity, and thus is well within the capacity of the system. A development review by Heiko Kuhn of the Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District indicates that the sewage wastewater and sewage treatment plant has sufficient capacity to serve the development without system extension beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Applicant is committing to improve the existing level of service beyond the benefit to the project itself to improve the quality of service in the subject area. Applicant is looking for guidance to the City Engineering Department when the project gets finalized through the application process. (See attached letter from Mr. Heiko Kuhn, District Manager, Aspen Sanitation District). STORM DRAINAGE (2 POINTS) This development will have a drainage control system to collect and retain site runoff on the site for underground dispersal. A series of drywells along with surface retention areas will provide sufficient capacity to retain site runoff. The drywells and retention areas will be designed and placed consistent with standard engineering practices. The result of this system will be to effectively retain and disperse underground, surface and roof water runoff. Applicant has retained the consulting firm of Leonard Rice Engineering to design a drainage system that will specifically improve the service in the area and applicant commits to such a program involving the City Engineering Department's input. FIRE PROTECTION (2 POINTS) The development site is located 7 city blocks from the fire station and can expect an average response time of less than five minutes from alert siren to arrival of equipment on the site. The project site is within 250-300 feet from the center of the property to three fire hydrants in the area (150-200 feet from property lines). These are located on the corner of Durant and South Garmisch Streets (S.E. corner), Durant and South Aspen Streets (N.W. corner) and on South Aspen Street by the Skier's Chalet on the west side of the street. The re -activation of the south !I of Dean Street connecting Aspen' Street and Garmisch Street will improve the quality of fire protection service in the surrounding neighborhood. Applicant commits to install 3 new fire hydrants (See attachment) which improves the quality of service not only for the subject site but the area in general, since these hydrants will be available to the neighborhood. The same is the case with the re -opening of Dean Street to 50' feet width (minus 10' for bicycle path) as a Fire Department access to not only 601 Aspen but also provides not now available fire access to Lift One and Timberidge Condos. 1 PARKING DESIGN (2 POINTS) Parking for 184 cars for the proposed 601 Aspen Development will be 1 provided in a 160 parking space parking structure located under the proposed building on the site and 24 surface spaces. The proposed structure will provide safe and sheltered parking for automobiles of the occupants of the Development. Pedestrian access to and from the parking structure will be by two stairways and two elevators. The parking structure will provide a paved and covered parking and storage area for automobiles with no visual impact on the surrounding neighborhood. ' Dean Street R.O.W. will allow for convenient surface access to 24 short-term parking surface spaces and a loading and unloading area in front of the reception area. The proposed parking and driveway system will result in minimal paved areas on the site for automobile access" and visual impact while providing maximum convenience and safety. The main service entrance is located on Garmisch Street with exit 1 direction via Juan Street. The opening of Dean Street will improve the quality of service in this area by providing 31 more parking spaces than required which will alleviate the congestion in this area during the Winter Season and benefit the area in general. i 1 1 1 i ROADS (2 POINTS) The proposed development is located between two paved roads, South Garmisch and South Aspen Streets, and within one block of Durant Avenue. Juan Street intersects the site, but will carry little, if any, additional traffic as the primary entrance to the site is from Aspen Street. Juan Street serves primarily as access for the Barbee residence. Surface access to the site is provided by a driveway that connects South Garmisch Street to South Aspen Street at the northern edge of the property. 24 parking spaces are provided for temporary parking to allow for arrival and departure. An additional 160 parking spaces are provided in the underground parking garage. This garage eliminates the need for surface parking while minimizing the need for paved areas. Access to the garage is from re -opened Dean Street to be privately maintained. Applicant will upgrade Dean Street R.O.W. and South Garmisch Street as may be necessary and appropriate to service the project. This upgrading will not only improve the road for the project but will also increase the quality of road service in the area, including Timberidge Condominiums. These improvements will provide for the needs of this development area without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased maintenance. Examination of the traffic impact of this development is primarily based on work generated by the UMTA transportation study by Alan M. Voorhees & Associates, Inc. traffic consultant for the UMTA study. The table below presents the trip type and trip frequencies per day per unit for a project unit as estimated by the Voorhees studies. The 6.5 trips per unit is less than the 10.0 trips per unit for a typical residential unit because the development consists of one -bedroom units generating less people than larger apartment or condominium units. Total trips are estimated between automobile and non -automobile trips. Estimated Estimated Non -Automobile Estimated Non -Automobile 5 Trip Type One -Way Trips Trip Percentage _ Trips. Skiing/ Recreation* .75 60% .5 Work 2.00 75% 1.5 Shopping and Entertainment 1.25 75% .9 Personal Business 1.50 25% .4 TOTAL 6.50 60% (average) 3.8 *The 60% non -automobile average for recreation trips assumes approximately 75-80% of ski trips are non -automobile but only 50-55% of summer recreation trips are non -automobile. Due to the convenient location immediate to downtown Aspen, Lift 1-A and Rubey Park buses, it is estimated a high percentage (60-75%) of skiing, work, shopping and entertainment trips will be non -automobile trips. As shown, potentially 60% of the total projected trips per unit will be non -automobile trips. The walking and public transportation convenience of the project's location plus the proposed development's low resident population results in very minimal traffic impacts. Principal daily usage will occur between 8-9 a.m. and 5-6 p.m. for adjacent roads. Alternate transit means include the Durant Avenue bus route which connects with all major areas in the city and county. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY Q POINTS) The development design takes the surrounding neighborhood and existing zoning into consideration in order to design a project which is compatible with the neighborhood. The surrounding zoning and land uses are varied, along with existing architectural designs. The 601 Aspen Development is residential in nature, in keeping with the Timber Ridge and Lift One Condominiums which bound the property on the north. The residential neighborhood also extends to the west north west with residential (R-15) and residential multi -family zoning, scattered single family units, undeveloped properties, some small lodges such as the Fireside Inn and condominiums like Aspen West. The property to the west of, the proposed site is vacant, except for the Barbee house and out building which are a part of the Barbee Estate. This vacant property rises rapidly to the south west as part of Shadow Mountain. East and down the hill to north is the Lift 1-A Center,• the Holland House Lodge, Skier's Chalet, a proposed major open space/park element and the building which houses Aspen Central Reservations. To the east of these properties along Monarch Street are the Aztec and Telemark Condominiums and the Chart House on the southwest corner of Durant and Monarch Streets. To the north east of the site are the South Point Condominiums, Aspen Manor and Pines Lodge both located on the north side of Durant Street. Heading west from Aspen Street there is a mix of residential and lodge units such as the Pines Lodge Apartments, Aspen Wild Condominiums, Cooper Street Lofts, Snow Queen Lodge, Little Red Ski Haus and Der Berghof Units, immediately to the north of proposed site are the Timber Ridge and Lift One Condominiums. The proposed 601 Aspen Development is compatible with its surroundings in terms of size, height and location. The construction of residential type units in a L-2 Lodge Zone is in keeping with section 24-3.2 of the Municipal. Code which encourages such uses in the Lodge zones and allows construction of single-family duplex and multi -family units. SITE DESIGN Q POINTS) Discussion with owners of surrounding properties such as Lift One Condominium and Timber Ridge indicates that the approach taken on this site leaving 220 feet open in front of Lift One and 85 feet open in front of Timberidge is a development plan supported by them. The spaciousness and resort -like feeling lacking with so many existing as well as new developments is certainly fulfilled in Applicant's Development Layout. The architectural design allows for maximum open space between existing and proposed structures to aid in its compatibility with the existing neighborhood. Building construction is of precast Architectural concrete and in keeping with the City of Aspen building codes. The exterior of the building will be redwood or cedar siding accented by stone and recessed glass elements. The interior will be done in a first class manner with custom finishes and furnishings. Access to the site for underground parking is from Aspen Street on the East or from Garmisch Street on the West of the site. The double access should minimize any traffic problems which may occur on the Aspen Street side of the proposed development. Re -activated Dean Street will allow for auto access to 24 surface visitor parking spaces, access to the parking garage, and access to reception and pick-up/drop-off area within the site. The underground parking structure will house 160 parking spaces. Required parking is 92 spaces plus an estimated 30 spaces for on site dormitory space in addition to the Aspen Skiing Company 37, Leaving 31 surplus spaces. Other amenities located on the site are a two -level building element housing a Reception/Office, Lounge and Elevator access, a health room located 100% sub -grade, an indoor -outdoor swimming pool. All utilities will be underground and the development will provide curbs, gutters and sidewalks on both Garmisch and Aspen Streets, and Dean Street. ENERGY (3 POINTS) - See attached Pearson & Associates letter. Applicant commits to provide the energy program outlined by Peason & Associates. TRAILS (3 POINTS) The premium location of the 601 Aspen Development allows residents to be near pedestrian trails, parks, base facilities for skiing, and the mountain itself. The site is within one to four blocks of Wagner Park and Cooper Street Mall. Located at the base of the mountain, the proposed development is ideally suited to service the recreational needs of the residents. More specifically, Applicant will provide a perpetual Right of Way for ,the Dean Street Trail pedestrian/bicycle link, all in cooperation with the goals of the Master Plan and the Lodge improvement district. In addition to the ROW for the Shadow Mountain Lodges Ski -in Trail (See Sheet A6). Total Site Area 113,500 sq. ft. 25% Open Space Required 28,375 Open Space Provided (Excluding the footprint 35,000 of future Exempt Building C) GREEN/OPEN SPACE (3 POINTS) - See Site Plan. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ( 3 POINTS ,!I- (;n1 Aspen Development's premium location allows for easy pedestrian access to and from existing bus routes within one (1) block of the development. The main bus terminal located at Rubey Park is within a short walking distance of three (3) blocks. COMMUNITY COMMERCIAI. FACILITIES (3 POINTS) The premium location of this development just three (3) blocks southwest of the commercial core facilities provides a short walk for residents to the commercial shops and services located in downtown Aspen. Additionally, the development is located within two (2) blocks from Lift 1-A at the base of Aspen Mountain. BONUS POINTS (7 POINTS) This project incorporates and, we believe, meets the criteria and goals of the Growth Management process. It exceeds the provisions of many of the sections, and due to the creation of an outstanding project design, the project is entitled to be awarded additional bonus points. 601 Aspen has been designed so as to be well -oriented to the needs of both residents and toursts. The proximity of the project to the #1A ski lifts, the downtown mall -and retail/commercial facilities, and public transportation, assists in reducing the need for residents to use automobiles, thus reducing automobile traffic in the central core of town. Another unique aspect of this project is the availability of Full. Hotel Services and amenities to residents adding to the attractiveness of the Apartments. In addition, the high quality resort ambiance of this project, including attractive architecture and site design, meets the needs and exceeds the standards of the Aspen community. The project will add to the vitality of this important district of Aspen in an ideal location for a multi -family lodge development. The applicant believes this project is exceptional in achieving GMP requirements as well as improving the visual quality of this portion of town.. We request that 601 Aspen Lodge Apartment project be awarded the maximum additional bonus points allowed by code for the following sections: Fire Protection, Neighborhood Compatibility, Site Design, Trail, Green Space, Public Transportation, and Community Commercial Facilities. 1 1 C1) FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS Below Grade Sq. Ft. Units Parking Garage - - (GMP) Building A Ground Floor Public ( 8,000) - - lst floor employee dormitories - 13,200 2nd floor standard studios @400 8,800 22 3rd floor Deluxe studios @800 8,800 11 Public Halls/stairs/maids 7,000 - (GMP) Building B Entry level public (24,000) - - Ground floor public ( 8,000) - - Ground floor employee dormitory - 4,800 - Ground floor standard studio @400 3,200 8 1st floor standard studio @400 9,600 24 2nd floor Deluxe studio-@800 8,000 10 2nd floor standard studio @400 1,600 4 3rd floor Deluxe studio @800 8,800 11 3rd floor standard studio @400 800 2 Public Halls/stairs/maids 7,000 - (Exempt) Building C Total FAR allocated to Building C 31,900 T.B.D. Total FAR allowed (On site) 113,500 Total FAR Provided (On site) 113,500 Kitzbuhl (On site) 6,00'0 Shechter Units (On site) 4,750 Grand Total Provided (On and off site) 124,250 sq. ft. FAR Debit per unit (92 studios @1000 sq. ft.) + 92,000 Total Employee Housing sq. ft. required under this submission (On and off site) 32,250 Total Required Debits 124,250 EMPLOYEE HOUSING COMPUTATION LOW INCOME HOUSING Employee dormitory on site (new) Existing -On site (a portion of existing Mine Dumps) Fxisting-Kitzbuhl (Off site) Existing-Shechter (Off site) Total Represents 65% Employee housing provided as follows: 92 studios x 1.25 persons = 115 = 35% Employee Housing 215 = 65% Total People denominator 330 = 100% Applicable Points Earned 26 DEED RESTRICTED EXISTING EMPLOYEE HOUSING 215 employees at 150 sq. ft. per person Composed of: New construction -On site employee housing Existing -To be deed restricted Applicable Points Earned 3 18,000 sq. ft. 3,300 6,000 4,750 32,250 sq. ft. 32,250 = 100% 18,000 = 56% 14,250 = 44% UNIT COUNT AND PUBLIC AREA LOCATION WITHIN PROJECT Sq. Ft. Number Public Employee Areas Units Units Below Grade BUILDING A Ground Floor. Public Area 8,000 - - 1st Floor Employee Dormitory - 13,200 - 2nd Floor Standard Studio Units - - 22 3rd Floor Deluxe Studio Units - - 11 BUILDING B Entry Level Public Area (below ground floor) 24,000 - - Ground Floor Public Area 8,000 - - Ground Floor Employee Dormitory 4,800 - Ground Floor Studio Units - - 8 1st Floor Studio Units - - 24 2nd Floor Studio Units - - 14 3rd Floor Studio Units - - 13 TOTAL 40,000 18,000 92 All public area below grade, except accessory stairs, halls, etc. Total above grade public area (stairs, halls, etc. in Building A & B is 14,000 sq. ft. BREAKDOWN BY TYPE OF UNIT Standard Studio Units 60 Deluxe Studio Units 32 E. Dorm Space (30 spaces @600 sq. ft.) 18,000 _ 18,000 92 In addition 3,300 sq. ft. of existing E. Dorm Space will be located on the Development site in the area reserved for future Building C (a portion of the existing Mine Dumps Building). Applicant's evaluation of scoring the proposed development: PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES (12 POINTS) Maximum Points Available (aa) Water 2 (bb) Sewer 2 (cc) Storm Drainage 2 (dd) Fire Protection 2 (ee) Parking Design 2 (ff) Roads 2 TOTALS 12 QUALITY OF DESIGN (15 POINTS) Maximum Points Available (aa) Neighborhood Compatibility: (bb) Site Design: (cc) Energy: (dd) Trails: (ee) Green/Open Space: TOTALS 3 3 3 3 3 15 Points Earned 2 2 2 2. 2 2 12 Points Earned 3 3 3 3 3 15 PROXIMITY TO SUPPORT SERVICES Maximum Points Available Anticipated Points (aa) Public Transportation: 3 3 (bb) Commercial Facilities: 3 3 TOTALS 6 6 PROVISION FOR EMPLOYEE. HOUSING (40 POINTS) Maximum Points Available Anticipated Points (aa) Employee Housing 40 26 CONVERSION OF EXISTING UNITS (5 POINTS) Maximum Points Available Aniticnated Points 5 3 BONUS POINTS (7 POINTS) The 601 Aspen Development meets all the substantive criteria of Section 24-11.4(b) (1), (2) and (3). We feel the Development achieves an outstanding overall design that merits recognition in the following categories. Maximum Points Available Points Earned Improvements to Roads, Fire Protection Services: -- 1 Design that Achieves Neighborhood Compatibility: -- 5 Trails: -- 1 POINT SUMMARY Total: 7 7 Maximum Points Available Points Earned Quality of Design: 15 15 Public Faciities and Services: 12 12 Support Services: 6 6 Employee Units: 40 26 Conversion of Existing Units: 5 3 SUBTOTAL: 78 62 Bonus Points: 7 7 TOTALS: 85 69 Pearson & Associates MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS P.O. Box 1047 ' Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 303-945-1251 12-02-85 P.O. Box 1072 Stowe, Vermont 05672 802-253-9607 To Whom it May Concern, ' Pearson and Associates has been retained by Mr. Hans Cantrup to analize the proposed structure at 601 Aspen St, Aspen, Co.. Mr. Cantrup has committed to minimizing fossil ' fuel consumption by exceeding the minimum thermal insulation standards and using innovative energy conservation technics throughout the building as listed below. ' A) Exterior wall insulation R-28, Ceiling insulation R-49, Below grade wall insulation R-20, Floor insulation R-20. This ' insulation exceeds the thermal insulation standards by an average of 37%. ' B) All windows shall be glazed with 1" insulating HEAT MIRROR units. South facing glass will be HEAT MIRROR 88 which has a high shading coefficient to admit low winter sun and a high ' insulation capacity ( winter "U"=.26 ) to prevent heat loss. North facing glass will be HEAT MIRROR 55 which has a low shading coeffecient plus a high insulation capacity ( winter ' "U"=.24 ) to prevent heat loss. HEAT MIRROR equipped windows are twice as efficient as standard glazing which is required by code. tC) Double Entry Systems will be used in all public entryways. ' D) The heating system will incorporate a sectional boiler with intermittant pilot lights. An outdoor reset control will allow step firing the required number of sections based on ' indoor and outdoor temperatures to achieve the desired supply temperature. ' E) The entire building will utilize a computerized energy management system which will allow the maximum energy setbacks to be achieved in the building. F) Air to air heat exchangers will be installed wherever possible to allow pre -heating of fresh air. G) Buried PVC coated sona tubes will utilize the earths temperatures to pre -heat all make-up air conditions. ' H) There will be no air conditioning systems in the building, thus reducing energy consumption. ' I) Flow Restrictors will be installed throughout the building to reduce hot water consaumption. ' J) Completely automated night shading devices shall be used on window areas to prevent nighttime heat loss. K) A heat exchanger shall be installed on the boiler stack to utilize excess stack temperatures to pre -heat domestic hot water. 1 L) Interior fluorescent light fixtures and exterior high pressure sodium light fixtures with photoelectric controls ' will be used to reduce energy consumption while maintaining adequate illumination. ' By incorporating all of the above we feel that this structure will be energy efficient beyond any "standard" comparible structure. 1 Marsha M. Smith ' Mechanical Designer Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers, Inc. Leonard Rice Leslie H. Botham ' (303) 455-9589 / 2695 Alcott Street / Denver, Colorado 80211 Gregg S. Ten Eyck November 27, 1985 Mr. Hans Cantrup 0716 Buttermilk Road Aspen, Colorado 81612 ' Dear Mr. Cantrup: We are pleased that you have selected our firm to accomplish ' site drainage planning work in connection with your project at 601 Aspen Street, in Aspen, Colorado. We understand that the site faces on Aspen and Dean Streets and that it is about 113,000 square feet in size. You have indicated your desire to accomplish the design and construction of drainage facilities that would serve the site and provide improvement to the drainage service in the area. This could be accomplished by solving a drainage problem or by providing facilities with enough capacity to serve other adjacent sites also. We would begin such a project with a site visit and a review ' of your plans for the site. A very important element in our planning would be a meeting with representatives of the City ' of Aspen to obtain their drainage criteria and to obtain input into drainage problems in the area, possible solutions, and projected anticipated development plans for adjacent and upstream areas. We will rely heavily on their input in the tearly stages of this project. Proper drainage planning must consider the changes in site ' runoff (rates, volumes and quality) that will result by development of the site. In addition, adequate provisions must be made to handle tributary flow from other properties. ' The plan must identify and mitigate potential impacts on downstream properties and facilities. Hydrology A ' Water Rights Environmental Analysis '� Urban Drainage ouw� Mr. Cantrup November 273, 1985 Page 2 1 Different types of drainage facilities may be used ' effectively including grading, curb and gutter, storm sewers and inlets, ground level detention and/or retention areas, roof top detention, infiltration/recharge areas, swales and ' channels. It is impossible at this time to determine which elements would be appropriate for your site. The plan will be shaped by many factors which have not yet been studied. ' We are pleased that you have adopted a help -the -neighborhood position and look forward to working with you. ' Very truly yours, ' LEONARD RICE CONSULTING WATER ENGINEERS, INC. Leslie � H. Botham Vice President ' LB/kr 064Cantrup ()�) Leonard Rice Consulting Water Engineers, Inc. jS 5 i + ; .5 1 -Z ; I go OS! :il N'l Od W� i �, 2 r - ;3NId ecT i ON I -d-mna-3N I L Appi, I Q AN p ED f I j 9. 1' .9 i Z 1 i If i Nvnr -zz i I It ; Ex .4 1 V 3!8 vi I Al .LNv8no 0'0' V 731� H 2 H S fAM A S3Nld Orl 6- C�p NO CITY OF ASPEN 130 south galena street aspen, colorado 81611 303-92.5 -2020 November 29, 1984 Mr. Hans B. Cantrup 415 E. Durant Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 601 S. Aspen Street Dear Hans, In response to your inquiry regarding the attached letter of December 1981: since this time, the 5}" steel line has been replaced. Upon application for a tap permit and submission to the Water Department of the plans for review under the GMP process, you may connect. to the existing 6" water mains in either S. Aspen Street or .Juan Street. Sincerel , J'm Markalunas Director, Aspen Water Department JM:ab Aspen consolidated Sanitation District 565 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tele. (303) 925-3601 Tele. (303) 925-2537 October 1, 1984 Dick Wilhelm Project Manager 601 So. Aspen St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Mr. Wilhelm: This letter is to again verify that the proposed 601 So. Aspen St. pro- ject which will facilitate 500 people can be served by the Aspen Consolidated Saniatation District. Our trunk lines in this area have the line capacity and our main plant has the excess capacity to handle this project. Sincerely � Heiko Kuhn Manager Aspen Consolidated Sanitation Dist. 420 E. HOPKINS STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 Mark A. Danielson 450 S Galena Suite 202 Aspen, Co 81611 Re; Project at 601 South Aspen Street. 60 - One bedroom units Mark Danielson; I have checked over the area of the preposed new project, and with fire hydrants at the corners of Garmisch and Durant, and Aspen and Durant, and one other � block south of project on S. Aspen St. I believe that an additional hydrant at Garmisch and Dean would assist this project for fire safety. With additional hydrant, and access to the roadway north of the project available, they would assist in any fire problem at your project. I see no other problems at this time on access, or available water, that would delay our response. �y Truly Y ur�j 1 Willard C. Clapper Chief MEMORANDUM O F OWNER S H I P A C C OMM O DAT T O N- NO L =ABILITY ,<>:E: Doug Allen D E S C R I P T I O N ' SEE EXHIBIT "1" u s e P l e a s e d i r e c t c o r r e s p o n d an c e o = PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303)-925-1766 ' G r a n t e e i n the l a s t i n s t r um e n t apparent 1 y ' t r a n s f e r r i n g ownership SEE EXHIBIT "2" a n d mortgage s apparent 1 y SEE EXHIBIT "3" VJ-r- and j u d gmen i s ( a g a i n s t l a s t g r an t e e ' Ap parent 1 y uri r e l e a s e d SEE EXHIBIT "4" ' Th i s i n f o rm a t i o n --Ls f o r your s o l e u s e an d b en e f i t a n d i s f u r n i s h e d a s an a c c omm o d a t i o n. The i n f o rma t i o n h a s b e en t a k en f r om our t r a c t ' indices , without reference to , or examinatiori o f i n s t r um en i s wh i c h p u r p o r t t o a f f e c t t h e g u a r an t e e d n o r c e r t i f i e d, a n d i s n o t an A b s t r a c t o f Op T i t l e, inion o f T i t l e, n o -jr a Gu a r an t y o f T i t l e, an d o u r 1 i a b i 1 i t y i s ' limited to the amount of the fees _ ' D a t e: NOVEMBER 21, 1985 , a t 8: 0 0 A. M_ EXHIBIT "I" ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION I I. MINE DUMPS: That portion of the Northeast one -quarter of the Northeast one -quarter (Lot 1) of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M., described as follows. ' BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 11, Eames Addition; thence North 75°09'11" West 181.25 feet; thence South ' 14' 50'49" West 78.00 feet; thence South 03°55'43" West 164.99 feet; thence South 750 09'11" East 150.00 feet; thence North 14' 50'49" East 240.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. ' also known as: Lots 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,18, 19, and 20, Block 11, EAMES ADDITION, and a tract of land being a part of Lot 1 of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M., described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 13, Block 11, Eames Addition; thence South 14050'49" West 240.00 feet along the Westerly line of said Block 11 to the Southwesterly corner of Lot 20, Block 11, Eames Addition; thence North 03° 55'43" East 164.99 feet; thence North 14°50'49" East 78.00 feet; thence South 75' 09'11" East 31.25 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. II. BARBEE: Block 6 EAMES ADDITION, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is the intersection of the Easterly right of way line of Garmisch Street and the Southerly right of way line of Dean Avenue, from whence the Northeast corner of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M. bears North 53020'28" East 814.56 feet, more or less; thence along the Southerly right of way line of Dean Avenue South 750 09'11" East 330 feet, more or less, to the Westerly right of way line of Aspen Street; thence along the said right of way line of Aspen Street South 14050'49" West 130 feet, more or less, to the Northerly right of way line of Juan Street; thence along said right of way line of Juan Street North 75009' 11" West 330 feet, more or less, to the Easterly right of way line of Garmisch Street; thence along said right of way line of Garmisch Street North 140 50'49" East 130 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING therefrom: the portion described in Book 232 at Page 362 in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. III. PARKING LOT: - 1 - Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12, Block 11, EAMES ADDITION COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. ' IV. REID AND CLARK LOTS R AND S, ' BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. - 2 - EXHIBIT JOHN H. ROBERT, JR. AS TO PARCELS (I) AND (II) 1 ASPEN SKIING COMPANY, A COLRADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP COMPRISED OF MKDG III/TCF PARTNERSHIP, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND BELL MOUNTAIN PARTNERS LTD., AN ILLINOIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WHOSE SOLE GENERAL PARTNER IS CHARLES H. GOODMAN, AS TO PARCEL (III) KATHRYN K. REID AND C.M. CLARK EACH AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 2 INTEREST, AS ' TO PARCEL (IV) EXHIBIT "3" 1. Deed of Trust from : JOHN H. ROBERTS, JR. to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of COMMERCE SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, A SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION to secure $44,000,000.00 dated January 25, 1985 recorded February 7, 1985 in Book 481 at Page 23 ' re -recorded April 8, 1985 in Book 484 at Page 261 First Modification to Deed of Trust given in connection with the above Deed of Trust recorded April 3, 1985 in Book 483 at Page 889. Said Deed of Trust further Modified by Second Modification to Deed of Trust recorded July 8, 1985 in Book 489 at Page 331. Said Deed of Trust further Modified by Modification of Deed of Trust ' recorded July 29, 1985 in Book 491 at Page 894. 2. Financing Statement given by John H. Roberts, Jr., debtor, to Commerce Savings Association, secured party, filed February 19, 1985 in Book 481 at Page 656, as Filing No. 08936. ' 3. Deed of Trust from : JOHN H. ROBERTS, JR. to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of : MAINLAND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION ' to secure : $14,000,00.00 dated : July 25, 1985 recorded : September 10, 1985 in Book 494 at Page 763 ' Addendum to Deed of Trust recorded November 18, 1985 in Book 499 at Page 159, given in connection with the above Deed of Trust. ' ITEMS 1,2, and 3 AFFECTS PARCELS (I) AND (II) 4. Deed of Trust from : KATHRYN K. REID AND C.M. CLARK ' to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of : MAJESTIC SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION to secure : $310,000.00 ' dated : October 2, 1979 recorded : October 12, 1979 in book 377 at Page 529 ' Assignment of Rents and Leases, recorded October 12, 1979 in Book 377 at Page 533, given in connection with the above Deed of Trust ' Financing Statement given by Kathryn K. Reid and C.M. Clark, debtors, to Majestic Savings and Loan Association, secured party, filed October 12, ' 1979 in Book 377 at Page 537, as Filing No. 218723. ITEM 4 AFFECTS PARCEL (IV) 1 I I EXHIBIT "4" 1. Notice Extending Time to File Statement by John Doremus and John Doremus dba Doremus & Wells and dba Doremus & Co., recorded November 5, 1985 in Book 498 at Page 484. 2. Notice Extending Time to File Statement by Joseph Wells and Joseph Wells dba Doremus & Wells, recorded Noember 5, 1985 in Book 498 at Page 492. 3. Statement of Lien, by John Doemus and John Doremus dba Doremus & Wells and John Doremus dba Doremus & Co., in the amount of $22,082.40, recorded November 19, 1985 in Book 499 at Page 293. ITEMS 1, 2, and 3 AFFECT PARCELS (I) AND (II) i DENVER OFFICE SUITE 2900 555 SEVENTEENTH STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80202 TELEP H ONE (303) 295-8000 TELECOPIER (303) 295-8261 MONTANA OFFICE SUITE 1400 175 NORTH 27TH STREET BILLINGS, MO NTANA 59101 TELEPHONE (406) 252-2156 TELECOPIER (406) 252-1689 ARTHUR C. DAILY Hand Delivered HOLLAND & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW 600 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81511 TELEPHONE (303) 925-3476 November 26, 1985 Douglas P. Allen, Esq. Courthouse Plaza Building 530 East Main Street, First Floor WASHINGTON, D. C. OFFICE SUITE 1200 1875 EYE STREET, N. W. WASHINGTON, D. C. 20005 TELE P HONE(202) 466-7340 TELECOPIER (202)466-7354 WYOMING OFFICE SUITE 500 2020 CAREY AVENUE CH EYENN E. WYOMING 82001 TELEPHONE (307) 632-2150 TELECOPIER (307) 778-8175 S. E. DENVER OFFICE SUITE 1250 7887 EAST BELLEVIEW AVENUE ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80111 TELEPHONE (303) 741-1226 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: John Roberts/Hans Cantrup Option Agreement Dear Doug: John Roberts (as successor in interest to Aspen Mountain Joint Venture) has asked that I respond to your letter to me of October 16, 1985 in the following manner. In order to provide the Cantrups with unimpeachable standing in such matters, Roberts hereby expressly acknowledges that so long as the March 31, 1985 Option and Purchase Agreement between the parties remains valid and effec- tive, the Cantrups have the right to submit and to process before the City of Aspen such GMP and other land use applications per- taining to the option property as the Cantrups may find necessary or appropriate. No further consent from Roberts shall be required in this regard. Please understand, however, that this authoriza- tion is provided solely for purposes of establishing the Cantrups' standing in a technical sense, and that Roberts cannot be construed or represented as supporting any specific element or elements of the land use applications which may be made by the Cantrups., 1 Furthermore, I wish to emphasize that no land use approvals or commitments can become binding upon the option property until the Cantrups are the fee owners thereof, and that under no circum- stances will John Roberts ever be personally obligated thereby. Finally, Roberts hereby accepts, and requests that you continue to observe, all representations and agreements set forth in your let- ter for his benefit, particularly including those contained in the final paragraphs on pages one and two thereof. HOLLAND & HART Douglas P. Allen, Esq. November 26, 1985 Page 2 Very truly yours, Arthur C. ily for HOLLA & HART ACD/jg cc: Mr. John H. Roberts, Jr. Mr. James Pavisha Doremus & Company P1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l } 1 1 1� 1 1 iQ IN 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 l 1 7 l I 1 I l 1 ie 1 - 1 I Ix _ I I� I 1 TIJE ASPEN CLUB I' ® I ° O vd B a s,•� Q � II'.4 p�� '•O® O a jL•. p O 000Q 00 O �.\J u O O O ° 0 0 O0. I p 0 0 °O bD Odj�°oo0° O_ I O 0 n' _ ❑ o❑ei%oo �® A va OD -- ❑ o D0D o a° ° o• ,o ° doe 0m am m ° d 0 10 'Oo ° a ° o•- 1 •b 6�0 � � o tl 9 Q4. oe Oil ;o 1 o ASPEN MOUNT D°A•IM6 TITLI iew The Lodge -Galena-Top Of Mill American Century Corporation DAT[ :1 1 1 1 4_..1 1-1 1 1> 1Q 1p 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 l L l 1 1 1 1 1 1 , t 1 I 1 l 1 1 1 1 i� I I l7, IQ I •_ 1 i I 1 t I L I 601 ASPEN K i tzbue I Lod e Shechter AptsJop tonal) I® � 0. o. b Il : D . e — ®�?,/ Li 0❑ — DD-,o ° oiD O PL fi b d D 4.be' ¢O . ° A •e,oD d dD ar 0 Da a..oEJa 4° 0 dCn ODD tb 1 O b o FFICE Q � p De � �� V �"v.r oQo0o D o a��� 0e a 0. • i 4 >° oQo v Qo a e 00 9 C G. a •o 0 & ® 1( D d 1 MUSIC v °p TENT n o -- ILASPEN - A MEADOWS X F� )M* 1 CDMIUITAMi° D•A LINO M0. DFULrio j 601 ASPEN _ - 14 DW M E �DR L KAOF �LmLF 0 -lce_tre :aO: —-- �- WMT Cc,--5 LlaPtD�� 1tAi� �WIMMEAD COMMf2C1AL Co;ZE j� Cop-WFEC1AL LoDGE LODGE -Z LDDCK -1 RMf OFfN sPAa1PArx INVM Asia P Wm TIMEIC¢ WLX! cc LVO5 Ctiv corxcs 601 Ads+ IL x•rt+1 an.T s.eer� .;..cr Fn6e — $ARBEt 4i V- — f*QVO C;4ALPr— Mne D.MpePacrMran— F;& a • Pbte* Xcte —._ S W'LW ?40-7N.: '.1LLAGE— Bus fDutE i I l_ r\ I � 9 � f �o Ibtlt� � iiZ.A Il PDT PARK TERMINAL "' ASPEN 15 UdWE if mrwor =ZET LOFT 13 El U MI vx�, —"ct� T � . [:1 F PgbpW MUL LI Etr ApgrA40M P;1141vWIKFI * L �. L I.J INVVCNW, f:1 :7 -INE' =t Aw FA" ,e N--e A5pek: MA11= rxe 7—) DUS 7 mv cts _ t1t� , . (�v?1 � r ti ' �- _ ` n�.ecmr, ixrc5—M FabY PARK TEKMiRAL man .igiMiltillil ..lilt �'.;ncr ::ase — .. .. - — ��j� " :1 I r^�� �('nT.4M1Tw.lraa! � S'SMOK UNWE V VWAAtMm UNE M " DUW ApCrMM-M Lj SHARW tAPAIAlk ',IU-A*\ ( �l 1/ — �- �, o L*1 SITE CONTEXT WAGNER a> r � U DP HO R i = c� �ISSeQA0e�1 ••. •mIIf .oDEM:m=mgT.,=m... KEEPS 111 mImomm���m� ��n�oOpOO�� [elm GILBERT ST. LJIt i •._ CT:_r. LAWN ST. JUN IATA ST. SNARK ST. 161 A ••. •mIIf .oDEM:m=mgT.,=m... KEEPS 111 mImomm���m� ��n�oOpOO�� [elm GILBERT ST. LJIt i •._ CT:_r. LAWN ST. JUN IATA ST. SNARK ST. 161 A The printed purl ions of Ihi, form nppro ved h) the ("dorado Itenl I•:atale ('nmmission (SC 22-2-NI1 THIS IS A LEGAL INSTRUMENT. IF NOT UNDERSTOOD. LEGAL, TAX OR OTHER COUNSEL SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE SIGNING. COMMERCIAL CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE (Seller's Remedy limited to Liquidated Damages) ---- ._NQVEMRE.R_29 -- ._. 1. The undersigned agent hereby acknowledges having; received from BANS B. CANTRUP --- the sung of $ 2, 000. 00 .._ - in the form of_ _personal - e --.heck .-.---------------- — to be held by John _LaSalle — — broker, in broker's escrow or trustee account, as earnest money and part payment for the following,, described real estate in the . City of Aspen, County of Pitkin , Color'a(lo, to wit: Lots R and S, Block 46, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado I; together with all casements and rights of way appurtenant thereto, all improvements thereon and all fixtures of a permanent nature currently on the premises except as hereinafter provided, in their present condition, ordinary I` wear and te:u' excepted, known as No. 300 West Hyman Avenue, Aspen, _ Colorado 81611 - -- l - Address, Oily. 'J.ipl ------- — —_,and hereinafter called the Property. 1�I ree- , 2. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 17, the undersigned person(s) _ HANS B. CANTRUP (as joint tenants/tenants in common), hereinaftercalled Purchaser, hereby agrees to buy the Property, and the undersigned owner(s), hereinafter called Seller, hereby agrees to sell the Property upon the terms and conditions stated herein. 3. The purchase price shall be U.S. $ SOO, QQO._OQ— payable as follows: $ 2j 000. DP . hereby rec•eipte(l for: and the balance of $498,000.00 payable in cash or certified funds at time of closing. 4. Price to include the following personal property on the premises. All personal property of Seller located to be conveyed by bill of sale at time of closing, in their present condition, free and clear of all personal property taxes, liens and encumbrances, except: none and except any personal property liens in any encumbrance specified in paragraph 11. The following fixtures of a permanent nature are excluded from this sale: none 5. if a new loan is to be obtained by Purchaser from a third party, Purchaser agrees to promptly and diligently (a) apply for such loan, (b) execute all documents and furnish all information and documents required by the lender, and (c) pay the custonuu•y costs of obtaining such loan. Then if such loan is not approved on or before _... _.. ., or if so approved but is not available at time of closing, this contract shall be null and void and all payments an(l things of value received hereunder shaII he returned to I'urc•haser. 6. If a note and trust deed or mortgage is to be assumed, Purchaser agrees to apply for a loan assumption if required and agrees to pay (1) a loan transfer fee not to exceed $ .--_--_--_— ____ ;uld (2) an interest rate not to exceed __—_— —%n per annum. If the loan to be assumed has provisions fora shared equity or v;u•iablc interest rates or variable payments, this contract is conditioned upon Purchaser reviewing and consenting to such provisions. If the lender's consent to a loan assumption is required, this contract is conditioned upon obtaining such consent without change in the terms and conditions of such loan except as herein provided. 7. if at note is to he made payable to Seller as partial or full payment of the purchase price, this contract shall not. he assignable by Purchaser without written consent of Seller. -- --- ...._.._..- -- -- ._..... -- ---. No. S(• 22.2-81. ('onlrx rl to itu., and sell Iteal F�(:de 1(•onlmerriall Bradford Publishing. 5W W. 61h Ave.. I.akcwood. CO M0214 — 00) 213.6900 — 5-NI 8. Cost of any appraisal for loan purposes to be obtained after this date shall be paid by purchaser. 9'�������=a3tcL2�xka® current commitment for title insurance policy in an amount equal to the purchase price, at Seller's option and expense, shall be furnished to Purchaser on or before ' January 1 , l9_8L_. If Seller elects to furnish said title insurance commitment, Seller will deliver the title insurance policy to Purchaser after closing and pay the premium thereon. 10. The (late of closing shall be the date for delivery of deed as provided in paragraph 11. The hour and place of ' closingshall be as designated by PurrhagPr 11. Title shall be merchantable in Seller, except as stated in this paragraph and in paragraphs 12 and 13. Subject to payment or tender as above provided and compliance by Purchaser with the other terms and provisions hereof, Seller shall execute and deliver a good and sufficient _genet warranty deed to Purchaser on January 29 , 19 86 , or, by mutual agreement, at an earlier date, conveying the Property free and clear of all taxes, except the general taxes for the year of closing, and except no other ' free and clear of all liens for special improvements installed as of the (late of Purchaser's signature hereon, whether assessed or not; free and clear of all liens and encumbranees.=oTAX ' except the following restrictive covenants which do not contain a right of reverter: none ' and except the following specific recorded and/or apparent easements: those presently of record affecting the property which do not affect marketability, ' and subject to building and zoning regulations. 12. Except as stated in paragraphs 11 and 13, if title is not merchantable and written notice of defect(s) is given by ' Purchaser or Purchaser's agent to Seller or Seller's agent on or before date of closing, Seller shall use reasonable effort to correct said defect(s) prior to date of closing. If Seller is unable to correct said defect(s) on or before date of closing, tit Seller's option and upon written notice to Purchaser or Purchaser's agent on or before date of closing, the ' date of closing shall be extended thirty days for the purpose of correcting said defect(s). Except as stated in paragraph 13, if title is not rendered merchantable as provided in this paragraph 12, at Purchaser's option, this contract shall be void and of no effect and each party hereto shall be released from all obligations hereunder_and all payments and ' things of value received hereunder shall be returned to Purchaser. 13. Any encumbrance required to be paid may be paid at the time of settlement from the proceeds of this transaction or from any other source. F4roYide(1,—}x>,rcwer -trl -t}ae o}�bier}�itkeF �a� t3�ri£ tke total in(ie]�Ladva s ' secured by liens on the Property exceeds the purchase price, this contra o e ect and each party hereto shall be released fro n er and all payments and things of value received hereunder- shall nrrretl-t�-F'tarelrnser. ' ' 14. General taxes for the year of closing, based on the most recent levy and the most recent assessment, prepaid rents, water rents, sewer rents, FHA mortgage insurance premiums and interest on encumbrances, if anyxWKlg t shall be apportioned to dote of delivery of deed. Purchaser shall be responsible for any sales and use tax that may accrue because of this transaction. 15. Possession of the Property shall be delivered to Purchaser on date of closing. ' subject to the following leases or tenancies: those in existence at time of closing not exceeding six months -from date of closing. ' If Seller fails to deliver possession on the date herein specified, Seller shall be subject to eviction and shall be liable for a daily rental of $ 300.00 until possession is delivered. ' 16. In the event the Property shall be damaged by fire or other casualty prior to time of closing, in an amount of not more than ten percent of the total purchase price, Seller shall be obligated to repair the same before the date herein provided for delivery of deed. In the event such damage is not or cannot be repaired within said time or if the t damages exceed such sum, this contract may be terminated at the option of Purchaser and all payments and things of value received hereunder shall be returned to Purchaser. Should Purchaser elect to carry out this contract despite such damage, Purchaser shall be entitled to all the credit for the insurance proceeds resulting from such damage, not ' exceeding, however, the total purchase price. Should any fixtures or services fail between the date of this contract and the date of possession or the date of delivery of deed, whichever shall be earlier, then Seller shall be liable for the repair or replacement of such fixtures or services with a unit of similar size, age and quality, or an equivalent credit. 17. Time is of the essence hereof. If any note or check received as earnest money hereunder or any other payment due hereunder is not paid, honored or tendered when due, or if any other obligation hereunder is not performed as herein provided, there shall be the following remedies: (a) IF PURCHASER IS IN DEFAULT, then all payments and things of value received hereunder shall be forfeited by Purchaser and retained on behalf of Seller and both parties shall thereafter be released from all obligations hereunder. It is agreed that such payments and things of value are LIQUIDATED DAMAGES and (except as provided in subparagraph (c)) are the SELLER'S SOLE AND ONLY REMEDY for the Purchaser's failure to perform the obligations of this contract. Seller expressly waives the remedies of specific performance and additional damages. (b) IF SELLER IS IN DEFAULT, (1) Purchaser may elect to treat this contract as terminated, in which case all payments and things of value received hereunder shall be returned to Purchaser and Purchaser may recover such damages as may be proper, or (2) Purchaser may elect to treat this contract as being in full force and effect and Purchaser shall have the right to an action for specific performance or damages, or both. (c) Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, in the event of any litigation arising out of this contract, the court may award to the prevailing party all reasonable costs and expense, including attorneys' fees. 18. Purchaser and Seller agree that, in the event of any controversy regarding the earnest money held by broker, unless mutual written instruction is received by broker, broker shall not be required to take any action but may await any proceeding, or at broker's option and discretion, may interplead any moneys or things of value into court and may recover court costs and reasonable attorney's fees. 10. Additional provisions: 0. IC this r osal is accep e ley Seller in writing and Purchaser receives notice of such 19j t instrument shall become a contr tween Seller , nd inure to the b nefit of the irs, cces ors a ssigns of such parties xcept din r'a/ Broke rurehaa 1 HANS B. CANTRUP . ate HN LA SALLE Purchaser Purchaser's Address to By: efo (The following section gtro�bjecompleted by Se l er and Listing Agent) / 21. Seller accepts the abovg roposal this ,� day of ore �ae1- 196, and agrees to paaancet I % of the purchase price for services in this transaction, and agrees that, in thp yments and things of value received hereunder, such payments and things of value shall broker and Seller, one-half thereof to said broker, but not to exceed the commission, and t Seller's Add Listing Brol (`l E '. T H SE �R DdR- I 1-111, L A M Z PINES Z L T122 "*-US R! I DURANT JUAN brp .C- 0 2 SOUTHPO N 7, L-7 ST. FILBERT ST. --w HILL ST. II i MO NTAIN U CHALET:"RUCE ;84 PvOL B Lo c k 2 LAWN ST. 90 RUBEY PARK BUS STOP 420 AVE. A^-2 ' � � . '�� it . ST. 680 5E2 70 705 FA tHING I j 9 HAUS* --7 7477- -7 Soo IFIF'TH AVE. CONDo. F -7 1 I 1 7911.1 _i 1 0 LQ 7910 PARKING AREA T / I x -��_ 7910.1 7910.4 ° x 7918.5Ez I A R K I N G I = ARE I • *�r'913� I I I I 1-7 --- PARKING AREA 7917.2 7920 ° i I x PARKING ARE 0 7921.7 x 7923.0 ' rn 0 x 7928.4 DO •7930 cn rn _z �uRAn 7940 CAP -15 x 7942.4 7941.54 7950 • PARKING AREA -I rn � rn 7960 t � PARKING AREA x7963.8 x x 7979.4 x P x 7996.7 � o ---- 799 '966LX 6L M \ o� 06 M M M M SCALE: I"= 50' o I o � O �o o, t 11phase Fans 7950 Ulm y , I ti ' ■t�� �� s. • 1yJ. yi � Y4 a 1 •. '� • • one V38V ONNHVd Li t t SHOWING BUILDING AND BUILDING BUILDING IS SET BACK 86' FROM TIMBER RIDGE CONDOS; BUILDING B IS SET BACK 220' FROM LIFT 1 CONDOS; i •: • m r it m m m m m m m m o� m m m m m i M�� m 36L 79 e jalr ���iti � .� � I •yjn. � � I _ �_ i}anm1.2 7950 t t t • t . 6;r • • u� , i '" s��� � ", ` also • t t t�• t t t t t �, • Epp � LIN� rr �k�f%w:t.3� SY. ilv ■ss -a; 0 1y' IMMIdaltia • • • e r i • • • . t i 1• M E N T S I T E . L 1 N AND TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SHOWING BUILDING 1 i i FOR GMP ALLOWANCES AND BUILDING 1• UNITS BY BUILDING 1 IS SET BACK i• FROM TIMBERRIDGE CONDOS; BUILDING i IS SET i/ 1FROM LIFT 1 CONDOS; 1 1 1' AND TRAILS •0 An D) .00,a'fN .,,a -TN r 0 F I R S T F L 0 0 R B U I L D I N G (ALL EMPLOYEE DORMITORY AREAS) 0PD DRAWN O[/-\1N\F CHECKED . a-rVA SULE S-0 108 NO. m m� m m m m m m m w w m m m m m m m m m m .. aTH _ ct'C N m m m r m m m m m r m 115M w m m m m m m s r _ -, cl -r VA m m m m m m m mm mm mp mm m m m m m mm m L I A .O"ta-rvA ao� B U I L Dj N G G)- F I R S T F L 0 0 R STANDARD STUDIO$,TYPICAL O P phase II a mil I W4 moll DRAWN SCALE CHECKED 108 NO. A5. M M r SSA M M SSS M M M SIB SIB M M ASS M M M s s s M p0 0 F �- OPEN M INS I BU I LDI NG(B� SECOND AND TH I RD FLOOR DELUXE STUDIO UNITS, TYPICAL a 0 /A� D . olft a -r V4 O�v phase II M 101 16;���i11 - D"WN SCALE CHECKED 108 NO. A5ml r r M w M OM M MOM M M Ml� M M w M 1 1 1 �IIIIII � iIINII nua� b� 1 •4 � ,•�: � � ir�`�, J. ^:JImLem wNs W% n'tN Wall 1-4 Sol \ ek. �, e� ���r. "�"•? •� �O ��I�. ail■ B U I L D I N G QC L L F L O O R S APARTMENT LODGE UNITS BY RIGHT OR INFORMATION ONLY) PART OF TOTAL DEVELOPMENT ON THIS SITE BUT NOT PART OF GMP PRESENTATION O0 /A\ D DPAwN. sclmx A 6 CHECKED )OB NO. yI Gt�If l `ti A "'[A ti Fil- -... 0. L LEVATION/SECTION AA (SEE SHEETA6) AND BELOW GRADE 1� D DRAWN SCALE I =L CHECKED JOB NO. A7 bldg. B A4A VATION / P E D E S T R I A- N VIEW ( ABOVE GRADE ONLY) F-ASPEN EET LOOKING WEST. BUILDING A IS SET BACK 150' FROM ASPEN ST. � p $ - DRAWN . sc.M.E � � 1 � 1 1 i 1 � 7 70 0 � 796 t i I ' l Fs'©' UoY- St�ow►�t � 1 bldg. g groud- IovieI food 8 beverage laundry 1 7C150 120' 3 gSS I -rt+cs s1z_crc pN ::�UAN Sr m J()v lobby bldg. A arrival iaA garage -level r-� y-1, I 3rd 28'® 2 nd M. 1 st —_ U ca►vrt, j l 7990 30 '7 �26 i I © c, MEASURE-rP F-R-oh P 5WaN F>t: C BI-Db A 1,5 SST 134e,I< <` j1 eFj;�DM Pm9Pem e.1- 4T- E A S T ELEVAT I O N/ SECT I O N -A A HEIGHT AND FLOOR LEVEL ARRANGEMENT, TYPICAL ELEVATIONS SECTION COVERS 396' ALONG ASPEN STREET 0 h p DRAWN . rg ) a /A CHECKED w Z SJ N C O 0 Z w 2 V N r r s� ..fir-,...,..�-�.,�, �=.�'+�'�.. •�a'�'�:- -_ „ ' ;, • Y F; ��� {G-'�.i.-JI..3.i".!J+Y• .r:-D :ems irOEM t.. -- "":?-erg.:... `.'c.•=.....:...- _ +�.i�s �:� �::F�:i -=- - .:..Pc - - - -- - - ,--` - - � ��:'� t' �' iN I iTCHEN - Doo2. \I 1 o Ul DO:i a \y , �ao I:` V • Y I ;� i •!; i. 1 II i SI ^7 S (`OPE rJ C-)C) P-- m 0 z Q V) c z 0 J m Q J 11 CL O F-- N F- H z ZD LLJ CD 3.1J SUN DE -CI<, CO KFZi D 0 R- RA,,7- H I CT I CD �, -,--It - I - — SUr-4DECK L-EV 70 P F= Lc. o P?-, co 0 IRE 'd lk q WSM-2-- Awl KA w I L'I .101a w u r rar.r.- CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION SUBMISSION in conjunction with RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMISSION 601 ASPEN SUBMITTED TO: The City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 APPLICANT: Hans B. Cantrup Box 12384 Aspen, Colorado 81612 DATE: December 1., 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Project Description 3.0 Project Site 4.0 Application Requirements 5.0 Conceptual Subdivision 5.1 Vicinity Map 5.2 Sketch Plan 5.3 Tabulation of Data 5.4 Certificate of Ownership Page 1 2 4 4 Appendixes & Page 5 Appendix A Appendix B 5 Appendix C 1. INTRODUCTION This application is submitted as part of the 601 Aspen GMP application. The subject site consists of already subdivided land and the subdivision application requirement is only triggered by the technical definition of multi -dwelling units as a subdivision in 20-3(s)(2). All utilities and streets are in place. The development contemplates no exception to building codes or the proposed re -zoning. -1- 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed 601 Aspen Development consists of a total of 92 Free Market studio units designed for short-term rentals (L-2 Zone) and 17 dormitory spaces. The proposed Development will also provide parking for 184 cars, 160 in an underground parking structure and an additional. 24 short-term surface spaces. Also provided will be a lounge and recreation area with a health room, saunas, jacuzzi and indoor -outdoor swimming pool. Since short-term rentals are contemplated for this project, a full complement of Hotel Services will be provided such as Lobby, Front Desk Reception, Concierge, Room Service, Breakfast area, Swim -up Bar, and Limo Service. The proposed building has been designed conceptually to provide major open space areas between the proposed development and adjacent existing properties. This, as well as the floor plan and cross sections of the building are shown in more detail on the exhibits attached as well as in the GMP booklet. -2- Automobile access is provided by a driveway connecting Garmi.sch Street on the west with Aspen Street on the east. The driveway also accesses a loading and unloading area in front of the main entrance and 24 short-term parking spaces on grade. This multi -family development provides first class residential units for the short-term rental market. The Development has been designed for the luxury market and far exceeds the standards of any surrounding existing construction as far as quality, design and permanence are concerned. The central location and proximity to Lift 1-A adds to the desirability of the proposed Development. All utilities are adequate and existing at site as shown by letters appended to the GMP application. Construction schedule calls for completion by December 1, 1987. Together with the GMP application itself, several other procedures must be considered in conjunction with this submission: 1. Re -zoning for a portion of the subject property which has been previously submitted under separate cover. 2. Alley vacation as shown on Sheet A-1 of the GMP application. -3- 3. Peed restriction of proposed employee units. 4. Easement under Juan Street and granting of an easement for a pedestrian overpass over Juan Street as shown on Sheet A-1 of the GMP application. 5. Greenline review information as shown on Sheet A-1 of the GMP application. 6. Subdivision procedure of which this GMP submission is an integral part. 3. PROJECT SITE The site is totally urban in character and consists of 113,500 square feet. 4. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS The Applicant seeks approval of Conceptual Subdivision pursuant to Section 20-10. -4- 5.3 TABULATION OF DATA Subdivision Name Land Area Open Space Number and Type of Units Projected Population: Studios (92 x 1.25) Dormitory (20,400 divided by 150 sq. ft./person -5- 601 Aspen Street 113,500 square feet 35,000 square feet 92 studios 17 dorm spaces lt5 persons 136 251 MEMORANDUM OF OWNERS H AC C OMMODAT 2 ON - NO L 2AB 2 L 2 TY F o r the s o l e u s e Please d i r ect c o r r e s p on d an c e o f : Doug Allen o = PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 D E S CR 2 PT = ON : (303)-925-1766 SEE EXHIBIT 'T' Grantee in the last instrument appa=ently transferring ownership: SEE EXHIBIT "2" T r u s t d e e d s and mortgages apparent 1 y unrel.eased : SEE E}HiIBIT "3" } Liens and j udgmerits (against last grantee Apparently urireleased - SEE EXHIBIT "4" This information is for your sole use and benef it and is furnished as an accorru�czodation . The information has been taken from our tract ind i c e s , w i t hoot r e f e r en c e t o, o r ex am in a t i on of , ins truments which purport to affect the real property. The information is neit2zer gua r an t e e d nor c e r t i f i e d, and i s not an Abstract of Title, Opinion of Title, nor a Guaranty o f Title , and our liability' i s limited to the amount of the fees - D a t e: NOVEMBER 21 , 19 8 5 , a t 8: 0 0 A- M- W lr 1 � EXHIBIT "1" LEGAL DESCRIPTION I. MINE DUMPS: That portion of the Northeast one -quarter of the Northeast one -quarter (Lot 1) of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M., described.as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of Lot 13, Block 11, Eames Addition; thence North 75009'11" West 181.25 feet; thence South 140 50'49" West 78.00 feet; thence South 03055'43" West 164.99 feet; thence South 750 09111" East 150.00 feet; thence North 140 50149" East.240.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. also known as: Lots 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,18, 19, and 20, Block 11, EAMES ADDITION, and a tract of land being a part of Lot 1 of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M., described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwesterly corner of Lot 13, Block 11, Eames Addition; thence South 14°50'49" West 240.00-feet along the Westerly line of said Block 11 to the Southwesterly corner of Lot 20, Block 11, Eames Addition; thence North 03° 55'43" East 164.99 feet; thence North 14°50'49" East 78.00 feet; thence South 75° 09111" East 31.25 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. II. BARBEE: Block 6 EAMES ADDITION, and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point which is the intersection of the Easterly right of way line of Garmisch Street and the Southerly right of way line of Dean Avenue, from whence the Northeast corner of Section 13, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M. bears North 53°20'28" East 814.56 feet, more or less; thence along the Southerly right of way line of Dean Avenue South 75° 09111" East 330 feet, more or less, to the Westerly right of way line of Aspen Street; thence along the said right of way line of Aspen Street South 14*50149" West 130 feet, more or less, to the Northerly right of way line of Juan Street; thence along said right of way line of Juan Street North 75*09' 11" West 330 feet, more or less, to the Easterly right of way line of Garmisch Street; thence along said right of way line of Garmisch Street North 14° 50149" East 130 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING therefrom: the portion described in Book 232 at Page 362 in the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. III. PARKING LOT: - 1 - • 1 1. i 1 Lots 7, 8, 9,110, 11 and 12, Block 11, EAMES ADDITION COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. IV. REID AND CLARK LOTS R AND S, BLOCK 46, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.- - 2 - EXHIBIT '#2" JOHN H• ROBERT, JR. AS TO PARCELS (I) AND (II) ASPEN SKIING COMPANY, A COLRADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP COMPRISED OF MKDG III/TCF PARTNERSHIP, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND BELL MOUNTAIN PARTIERS LTD., AN ILLINOIS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP WHOSE SOLE GENERAL PARTNER IS CHARLES H. GOODMAN, AS TO PARCEL (III) KATHRYN K. REID AND C.M. CLARK EACH AS TO AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST, AS TO PARCEL (IV) 9 EXHIBIT "3" 1. Deed of Trust from JOHN H. ROBERTS, JR. to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of : COMMERCE SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, t1 SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION to secure : $44,000,000.00 dated : January 25, 1985 recorded : February 7, 1985 in Book 481 at Page 23 re -recorded : April 8, 1985 in Book 484 at Page 261 First Modification to Deed of�Trust given in connection with the above Deed of Trust recorded April 3, 1985 in Book 483 at Page 889. Said Deed of Trust further Modified by Second Modification to Deed of Trust recorded July 8, 1985 in Book 489 at Page 331. Said Deed of Trust further Modified by Modification of Deed of Trust recorded July 29, 1985 in Book 491 at Page 894. 2. Financing Statement given by John H. Roberts, Jr., debtor, to Commerce Savings Association, secured party, filed February 19, 1985 in Book 481 at Page 656, as Filing No. 08936. 3. Deed of Trust from : JOHN H. ROBERTS, JR. to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of : MAINLAND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION to secure : $14,000,00.00 dated : July 25, 1985 recorded : September 10, 1985 in Book 494 at Page 763 Addendum to Deed of Trust recorded November 18, 1985 in Book 499 at Page 159, given in connection with the above Deed of Trust. ITEMS 1,2, and 3 AFFECTS PARCELS (I) AND (II) 4. Deed of Trust from : KATHRYN K. REID AND C.M. CLARK to the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin for the use of : MAJESTIC SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION to secure : $310,000.00 dated : October 2, 1979 recorded : October 12, 1979 in book 377 at Page 529 Assignment of Rents and Leases, recorded October 12, 1979 in Book 377-at Page 533, given in connection.with the above Deed of Trust Financing Statement given by Kathryn K. Reid and C.M. Clark, debtors, to Majestic Savings and Loan Association, secured party, filed October 12, 1979 in Book 377 at Page 537, as Filing No. 218723. ITEM 4 AFFECTS PARCEL (IV) : EXHIBIT "4" 1. Notice Extending Time to File Statement by John Doremus and John Doremus dba Doremus & Wells and dba Doremus & Co., recorded November 5, 1985 in Book 498 at Page 484. 2. Notice Extending Time to File Statement by Joseph Wells and Joseph Wells dba Doremus & Wells; recorded Noember 5, 1985 in Book 498 at Page 492. 3. Statement of Lien, by John Doemus and John Doremus dba Doremus & Wells and John Doremus dba Doremus & Co., in the amount of $22,082.40, recorded November 19, 1985 in Book 499 at Page 293. ITEMS 1, 2, and 3 AFFECT PARdELS (I) AND (II) DENVER OFFICE SUITE 2000 555 SEVENTEENTH STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80202 TELEPHONE 1303) 295.8000 TELECOPIER (303) 295-8261 MONTANA OrrlcE SUITE 1400 175 NORTH 27TH STREET BILLINGS, MONTANA 59101 TELEPHONE 1406) 252.2186 TELECOPIER (408) 252-1689 ARTHUR C. DAILY Hand Delivered HOLLAND & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW 600 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TELEPHONE (303) 925.3470 November`26, 1985 WASHINGTON, D. C. Orrice SUITE 1200 1875 EYE STREET, N.W. WASHINGTON. D. C. 20006 TELEPHONE 1202) 456-7340 TELECOPIER (2O2)456-7354 WYOMINI3 OFFICE SUITE 500 2020 CAREY AVENUE CHEYENNE, WYOMING 82001 TELEPHONE 1307) 632-2160 TELECOPIER (3071778-8175 S. E.DENVER Orrice SUITE 1250 7887 EAST BELLEVIEW AVENUE. EN OLEWOOD, COLORADO 80111 TELEPHONE (303) 741-1228 Douglas P. Allen, Esq. Courthouse Plaza Building 530 East Main Street, First Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: John Roberts/Hans Cantrup Option Agreement Dear Doug: John Roberts (as successor in interest to Aspen Mountain Joint Venture) has asked that I respond to your letter to me of October 16, 1985 in the following manner. In order to provide the Can with unimpeachable standing in such matters, Roberts hereby expressly acknowledges that so long as the March 31, 1985 Option and Purchase Agreement between the parties remains valid and effec- tive, the Cantrups have the right to submit and to process before the City of Aspen such GMP and other land use applications per- taining to the option property as the Cantrups may find necessary or appropriate. No further consent from Roberts shall be required in this regard., Please understand, however, that this authoriza- tion is provided solely for purposes of establishing the Cantrups' standing in a technical sense, and that Roberts cannot be construed or represented as supporting any specific element or elements of the land use applications which may be made by the Cantrups. Furthermore, I wish to emphasize that no land use approvals or commitments can become binding upon the option property until the.. Cantrups are the fee owners thereof, and that under no circum- stances will John Roberts ever'be personally obligated thereby. Finally, Roberts hereby accepts, and requests that you continue to observe, all representations and agreements set forth in your let- ter for his benefit, particularly including those contained in the final paragraphs on pages one and two thereof. -- 9 WAGNER TH (DIT, HI) ;;-Wl amw, Now mi Q PARK vi ro mm amm Now I �eSeeQQOeell��Ioi�oo��:N� m 0 m m �o0G09oG0G� ..j UAN ST. � i, 1 2 34 5 6-7 8 9101112 . 13 14 16 17 18 1) 19 21 r-; t ARM GILBERT..ST MORE aminialaut LAWN ST JUNLATA ST. 4 SNA K ST. i . .11,11W101111 4 - p4L' - 9 i 8•9-96Lx � •1 �r �jj' •:;C �. �;yi�.+=��,nr Y ply-+' .jIT�'.�;'��,, '"!Y•r.�t��+�.n �,,,...rteraw'M�1�.�/re�•'—.�'+'.�'=.s��+ �►�t��Y,'t�' tt�, , 4:r ri,•PS R� fit` ,,.,,..,,:• �. Ia � y..J.�•— 1 �M ! y Y'�:• �G�r.,(',t..•,►`' fib ��', (�ac. 0, 4 1 ` ' YY��1 ho-44 .Y•.. .,I.,I A 't,19w l fir_ ♦♦:ilia p h a s e - Me tv — � i .n�i�r � ', / •�Y �. ,...iL�.�' .tee... •� 11. '� 'R. ♦d,'hk'� ,$r N��,. � � � r�¢� � ` l41•� I i �f : � At i�� fL. 0I r ex 5 1 0 0 0 f 1�. wT 026E r �. W , U) � r , �• �: _ _ �., - D'.9.Z6L x ' _ _� ._`�t'` __ -_ � �''r���: }�� k:�p �dd�X T26L 3 3 O — — — — 03il � Z'L16L d38V 0N1>QJVd --- L OZGL !I OWNERSHIP ASSEMBLAGE MAP PARCELSA, B, ANDC - GREEN LINE REVIEW _ - -- - D DRAWN SCALE A I CHECKED 108 NO: O [A\ NN r EMPLOYEE 110USING A. EMPLOYEES GENERATED BY THE PROJECT. A schedule showing employees generated by the project itself shows the applicant is providing employee housing for 50% of new employees generated, or 65 persons. Because this is a Multi -Family application however, 1.51 additional persons are being provided with low cost employee housing (or approximately 235% more than required for actual employees generated by the project, a total of 216 persons). This low cost lodging is specifically directed to accommodate seasonal help who cannot afford and do not want to commit to long-term leases, but who are serving the Aspen Tourist. During the Winter the 216 beds will be available on a priority basis to project employees and the balance as low cost seasonal lodging to the general qualifying labor pool. In the Summer 151 of the total 216 beds will be committed to low cost MAA Student Housing with a long term lease commitment, all.owing the MAA to rely on this housing over an extended period rather than the year to year hassle of trying to find people willing to rent to MAA at rates they can afford, all this located within a 3 block walking distance to Cafeteria, Central Core and Transportation. Rather than adding to the apparently saturated low cost apartment supply, notwithstanding the Code mandated GMP application procedure, to supply more low cost apartments in a changed environment, the applicant is carefully targeting the need for low cost housing for the seasonal worker and the ever-present seasonal low cost housing needs of the MAA. This will be substantially satisfied by this proposal and commitment. In this connection it is worth noting that this project from a public policy standpoint probably represents the last opportunity to extract a major commitment for this badly needed low cost seasonal housing from the private sector, since the core area GMP regulated land will be more or less fully developed with this project. (No future development applications of any consequence can be submitted because new development land suitable for GMP application does not exist in the City and certainly not in the L-2 zone). B. HOUSING PROVIDED: 1. On Site: 17 Dorm Spaces @ 8 persons each (8 x 150 square feet = 1,200 square feet per unit). 17 x 8 = 136 persons x 150 square feet = 20,400 square feet gross unit area. Net square footage within unit (without halls, stairs, service areas and public areas) is 800 square feet + 400 square feet public = 1,200 square feet total FAR per unit. -1- l By Code definition a Dorm Space Unit allows no more than 8 persons per Dorm Space Unit. Area and bulk debit against total site area is 1,200 square feet per Dorm Space Unit (8 persons x 150 square feet) or the same as a Multi -Family one -bedroom unit (1,200 square feet). 2. Off Site: (a) Kitzbuhel Lodge Zoned L3. 12 MF Units. 6,000 square feet. 2 lots. FAR 1:1. 40 dorm beds proposed @ 150 square feet = 6,000 square feet (area and bulk debit against total site area) Net interior living space of units (without halls, stairs, etc.) is 4,000 square feet or 100 square feet per bed average (U.B.C. requires 100 square feet per person). Individual rooms vary in size but will usually house 2 persons. There are 12. existing kitchens that will remain. All proposed improvements will meet recently enacted dormitory code and/or remodeling will be reviewed, itemized and documented with the Housing Authority at detailed submission, the same as Aspen Skiing Company Holiday House proposal. The entire existing Lodge will be deed restricted to low income housing guideline rents. Free market rents for the past 18 months have been approximately 100% higher than under low income guidelines for the same period. No displacement of existing low rent tenants will therefore occur on this property. Dormitory use constitutes a change in use from allowed use (Lodge) to another allowed use. Max. area and bulk requirement in this zone is 1:1 by special review if 33� of the area over .75 is for approved employee housing. In this csse, of course, 100% is employee housing. (b) Flower Garden Apartments, 210 West Main (Schechter Units) Zoned 0. 8 M.F. Units. 2 lots. 6,000 square feet. (FAR 1:1 by Special Review for approved employee housing) HPC preliminary approval only required for a development allotment application on the property. This is an application to convert existing free market units to deed restricted status with remodeling plans to be approved by HPC after approval by Housing Authority. Conditional approval for change to dorm use. 40 dorm beds proposed @ 150 square feet = 6,000 square feet. FAR = 1:1 (area and bulk debits against total site area). Net living space inside of units (without halls, stairs, etc.) is 4,000 square feet or 100 square feet per bed (U.B.C. requires 100 square feet per person). Individual rooms vary in size but will usually house 2 persons. Will meet recently enacted dormitory requirements. All proposed improvements will be reviewed, itemized and documented with the Housing Authority at detailed submission, the same as Aspen Skiing -2- Company Holiday House proposal. The property will be deed restricted to low income housing guideline rents. Free market rents for the 18 months have been approximately 60% higher than under low income guidelines for the same period. No displacement of existing low rent tenants will therefore occur on this property. C. ESTIMATED LOW COST RENTAL RATES PER DORM BED would be based on 100 square feet net living space times 60C per square foot + utilities + furnishings (20C) = 80C x 100 square feet = $80.00/month, all based on 150 square feet of gross unit space. This results in the lowest square foot rental for the employee and is in conformity with mininum U.B.C. standards for dorm accommodation. The above applies to all employee housing dorm spaces provided (on and off site) in this submission. D. COMMITMENT AND CONCLUSION. Applicant commits to supply housing for greater number of employees both than those generated by the project or required by code. We feel that the above along with the supplemental charts and information furnished clarify the application as meeting all code and Housing Authority requirements. The housing commitment more than meets the mandated requirements for housing employees. In the event the site is more fully developed, the applicant reserves the right to relocate the employee housing in an appropriate manner so long as it continues to exceed the minimums required by code. In the event either the Planning Office or the Housing Office desire minor modification or change the applicant will attempt to accommodate such and will, in such case, guarantee compliance with any such agreed changes. -3- EMPLOYEE HOUSING_: COMPUTATION LOW INCOHF HOUSING Employee dormitory on site (new) Building A & B. 150 square foot Gross FAR Debit per employee x 136 people = Existing-Kitzbuhl (Off site) 40 x 150 Square Feet Gross FAR Debit Existing-Shechter (Off site) 40 x 150 Square Feet Gross FAR Debit Total 65% of persons housed are employees:: 92 studios x 1.25 persons = 11.5 = 35% Employee Housing 216 = 65% Total People 331 = 100% Applicable Points Earned 26 Points 20,400 sq. ft. 6,000 6,000 32,400 sq. ft. DEED RESTRICTED EXISTING EMPLOYEE HOUSING 216 employees at 150 sq. ft. per person 100% 32,400 (Gross Floor area Debit) Composed of: New construction -On site employee housing 63% 20,400 Existing -To be deed restricted 37% 12,000 32,400 Applicable Points Earned (34%-66% Bracket) 3 Points Total On -Site FAR Debit 92 Studios 92,000 17 Dormitory Spaces @ 8 beds = 136 x 150 20,400 1.12,400 Available Site FAR 113,500 Surplus FAR 1,100 UNIT COUNT AND PUBLIC AREA WITHIN PROJECT Sq. Ft. Number Dormitory Publf- Employee Areas Units Units Spaces Below Grade BUILDING A Ground Floor Public Area 8,000 - - 1st Floor Employee Dormitory (net) - 8,800 - 11 2nd Floor Standard Studio Units - - 22 3rd Floor Deluxe Studio Units - - 11 BUILDING B Entry Level Public Area (below ground floor) 24,000 - - Ground Floor Public Area 8,000 - - Ground Floor Employee Dormitory (net) 4,800 - 6 Ground Floor Studio Units - - 8 1st Floor Studio Units - - 24 2nd Floor Studio Units - - 14 3rd Floor Studio Units - - 13 TOTAL 40,000 13,600 92 17 All public area below grade, except accessory stairs, halls, etc. Total above grade public area (stairs, halls, etc. in Building A & B is 14,000 sq. ft. TYPE OF UNIT Standard Studio Units 60 Deluxe Studio Units 32 Total Studio Units 92 Employee Dorm Spaces 17 FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS (Actual FAR of Buildings A, B and C) Square Footage Below Grade Above Grade Units Dorm Spaces Parking Garage - - (GMP) Building A Ground Floor Public ( 8,000) - - lst floor employee dormitories --- (at 800 sq. ft. net) - 8,800 11 2nd floor standard studios (at 400 sq. ft. net) 8,800 22 3rd floor Deluxe studios (at 800 sq. ft. net) 8,800 11 Halls/stairs/service areas 7,000 - (GMP) Building B Entry level public (24,000) - - Ground floor public ( 8,000) - - Ground floor employee dormitory (at 800 sq. ft. net) - 4,800 - 6 Ground floor standard studio (at 400 sq. ft. net) 3,200 8 1st floor standard studio (at 400 sq. ft. net) 9,600 24 2nd floor Deluxe studio (at 800 sq. ft. net) 8,000 10 2nd floor standard studio (at 400 sq. ft.-net) 1,600 4 3rd floor Deluxe studio (at 800 sq. ft. net) 8,800 11 3rd floor standard studio (at 400 sq. ft. net) 800 2 Halls/stairs/service areas 7,000 - 92 _ 17 (Exempt) Building C Total FAR allocated to possible future Building C 36,800 T.B.D. Total FAR allowed (On site) 113,500 Total FAR Provided (On site) 113,500 Kitzbuhl (Off site) 6,000 Schechter Units (Off site) 6,000 12,000 FAR Debit per unit (92 studios @1000 sq. ft.) + 92,000 Total Employee Housing sq. ft. required on site by this submission. 20,400 Surplus Debits 112,400 1,100 EMPLOYEES GENERATED (Rased on Winter Season Requirements) Maids 12 Head Housekeeper 1 - — Assistant Housekeeper 2 General Manager 1 Assistant Manager & Secretarial 5 Building Maintenance 5 Grounds Maintenance 3 Bell Men 8 Limousine Drivers 3 Laundry 5 Reservations and Tours 5 Concierge 2 Hospitality & Customer Service 2 Conference Staff 6 Accounting 3 Public Relations 2 Health Club & Pool Related 4 Room Service 3 Dining Room ) Breakfast Room ) 58 Grill ) Bar ) Total Employees 130 50% housed under Low Income Rental Guidelines = 65 people Applicant is providing approximately 235% more employee housing than required by project itself Total provided on and off site (151 more) 65 216 UO x ¢ a 44 o 0 0 •r-� d, O O O 1 I m cn O O O I I U O w 41 O O O CD O O 6 O O O O Lr •ri -Y cn cn z O o C i 4 K, N N Q'\ •--i U O 00 C r, O O O O cU O O O O -H v \c O O 110 .a �4 6 rl 7 7 •--� U N ro � N v, s4 u o C, o O n o O o o O m y v, <1 o o o O o o .o .o z CIA z i4 ifl N O� U v O N O N U O O OD O CD �4 �4 v > v P v a, v z z z G s. a P. ca P. m C-4 P+ CO J N v v y o0 w u cu ro I 1 ci r` o >4 O >4 I N 1 P. N v N N I rn I v, �> > ro ro uJ P. O IO O O G �I v cn -Z r cn N O ►J 4-J v a) a 6 +-3 4 v m u r-1 H -H r-1 U 00 N 6, co cd UI P- 4-1 Ali Ca P pG cn H E-+ 0 cn i • i i t { I iiii - � �POYrOEF r •t. 2/G...•�, Ij J t 21 3 3-.4 x b I -. :. TYPICAL QF?-zUNO Ft-�Ofz, -A? 12 0 dt Vu t T 14?-EA 00 RESIDENTIAL CROWTH MANAC EMENT PLAN SUBMISSION 601 South Aspen Street Project Supplemental Information: Parking There are not direct or indirect references pertaining to parking requirements for dormitory units in the L-2 Zone given in the Aspen Municipal Code. Parking is given for residential zones but only in terms of Residential Bonus Overlays, which is inappropriate both in terms of nature of the zone and extremely high density of the overlay. Given below are three possible means of calculating parking for dormitory type units in this zone: A. If a strict interpretation of the zoning code were to be made, the parking requirements of Section 24-4.5 would incorporate dormitory units under the heading of "all other uses". In the table found under this Section (P. 1470.2), there are four parking spaces provided per 1,000 square feet of use. As there are 17 dorms in the project, each containing 800 square feet, this computes to 13,600 square feet. The employee parking requirement under a strict interpretation of the Code then results in the following: 13,600 square feet divided by 1,000 square feet = 13.6 13.6 x 4 = 54 parking spaces required As there are 136 total employees being housed, this yields a 40% ratio of employees to vehicles and 40% parking space requirement to total number of employees. B. The applicant proposes to exceed the strict interpretation of the Code in terms of parking requirements by Incorporating a 45% vehicle parking to employee ratio. Thus, a total of 61 spaces shall be provided for employee use. This 45% ratio, yielding 61 spaces is exceptionally high in proportion to anticipated actual parking need in terms of the following factors and auto disincentives of the project: 1. Project limousines and shuttle services to town. 2. Project's close physical. proximity to ski lifts and town. 3. Seasonal aspects and characteristics of employees. 4. Location within 1 block of major transportation routes. Thus the total parking spaces for this project are allocated as follows: 92 residential units = 17 employee dorm units = (45% employee/vehicle ratio) Aspen Skiing Company = Total spaces provided by project 92 parking spaces 61 parking spaces 31 parking spaces 184 parking spaces C. Article 24, Section 24-4.1(c) allows the parking requirements of deed restricted employee units to be established by special review of the City Council. Special review of employee parking for new developments typically reduces the requirements as given in the Code. The applicant requests that, should the amount of parking spaces proposed for this project be deemed inappropriate by the Planning and Zoning Commission, a special review be done to determine an appropriate amount of spaces for this project given the proposal and site constraints. Supplemental Information: Traffic Impact Analysis Examination of the traffic impact of this project is based upon the UMTA Transportation study by Alan M. Voorhees and Associates, Inc., traffic consultants for the UMTA study. The following table presents the trip type and trip frequencies per day per unit. The total of. 6.5 trips per unit is less than the 10.0 trips per unit for a typical. residential unit, because the project consists of studio units generating less people that larger apartment units. For purposes of this study, studio units were rated as one bedroom units. Trip Type Skiing -Recreation Work Shopping/Entertainment flea F;onal Business Other Totals Estimated Estimated Estimated One -Way Trips Non -Automobile Non -Automobile Trips Trips Percentage .75 60% .5 2.00 75% 1.5 1.25 75% .9 1.00 507 .5 1.50 257, .4 6.50 60% average 3.8 t As shown above, potentially 60% of the total 6.5 trips will be non -automobile trips. The resulting 2I.7 automobile one-way trips (6.50-3.80) are equivalent to a resident's using his vehicle on an average of approximately one time per day. , Vehicle Generation Analysis A. Residential (F.M.) vehicles _ Winter Summer High -Use Periods High -Use Periods - Residential Rooms 92 92 Average room occupancy x 100% x 90% Occupied Rooms 92 83 Average people per room-studios4 x 1.25 x 1.25 People in studio units 115 104 Average no. people arriving by car x 47% x 95% People arriving by car - 54 99 x Average no. people per car =� 3 13 Estimated residential vehicles: 18 33 Footnotes and assumptions: 1 Winter high use period is two weeks during Christmas and New Year; February and March. 2 Summer high use periods are during weekends. 3 Room occupancies based upon market projections, Laventhol & Horwath, and condominium use surveys by TDA, Inc., Seattle, Washington (November 1983). 4 Aspen Municipal. Code Section 24-11.4(b)(4)(bb). 5 Aspen In -Room Survey, C.R. Goeldner & Aletta Stamp, Business Reserach Division, University of Colorado, 1980. 6 Ibid. B. Employee Vehicles Per parking requirement calculations and an analysis for employees in dormitory units, a maximum of 40-45% employees will have vehicles. Each dorm unit therefore equates to some three one bedroom residential units in the L-2 Zone, or 61 vehicles. On -site limousine and shuttle service will further reduce the necessity of employee vehicles. C. Vehicle Trips Generated by Project: Winter Summer Residential F.M. Vehicles: 18 33 Employee Vehicles 61 61 Total Vehicles 79 94 Winter Vehicle Trips: 79 vehicles x 2.7 one-way trips per day per vehicle = 213 one-way trips per day Summer Vehicle Trips: 94 vehicles x 2.7 one-way trips per day per vehicle = 254 one-way trips per day Per T.D.A., Inc., average daily traffic volumes range from 5,300 vehicles per day on Durant Avenue, to 3,500 vehicles per day on Aspen, Monarch and Mill Streets. Access to this development is made by way of Aspen, Garmisch or Durant Avenue, thereby effectively dividing vehicle impacts among those streets. Primary access will be via Aspen and Garmisch Streets. Vehicle impacts from the project during the winter will be 213 one-way trips, divided between Aspen and Garmisch Street, or 107 trips per street. Summer usage results in 127 trips per day. Using the known statistics from the City of Aspen and T.D.A., Inc. traffic surveys, impacts on Aspen, Durant and Garmisch Streets shall be only 3-4% of current traffic levels, a most minimal impact on existing uses. Supplemental Information: Drainage Applicant proposes and commits to improving drainage for the neighboring area by installing both curb and gutter from the southernmost area of the project along both S. Aspen and S. Garmisch Street all the way north to Durant Avenue. Supplemental Information: Trash Trash facilities shall incorporate a 24' x 50' area covered, with an overhead door to close the facilities off to public view. Compacted trash containers compatible with compressed materials shall be used, totally accessible to garbage trucks. 601 ASPEN ST. PROJECT Supplement Information and Clarifications (All Departments) January 14, 1986 1. Survey by Survey Engineers Total. land Area Plus 4 additional Lots (Tennis Courts) Plus 6,000 @ 50% Slope Reduction Plus 20,000 @ 75% Slope Reduction Less Vacated and unvacated portion of. Dean St. Less Vacated Alley 20 x 180 Total FAR Required under this proposal Surplus FAR 2. Unsubdivided Portion of Eames Addition 113,500 12,000 3,000 5,000 1.33,500 8,250 3,600-11,850 121,650 112,400 9,250 The unsubdivided portion of Eames Addition immediately north of lot 13 consists of 3600 square feet. This narrow strip is privately owned and maintained as part of Eames Addition and has never been dedicated or used as a public right-of-way. No vacat- ion is therefore necessary. It has been included in land and FAR calculations. The project thus creates meaningful open space here instead of an unused area. 9250 + 3600 Surplus 12850 sq. ft. 3. Ownership information and A.S.C. parking Lot agreement. Will be addressed through City Attorney's Office. 4. Employee Housing (on and off site) addressed in separate Housing Memorandum. 5. Dean Street Easement Aspen and Carmisch Streets will be connected by a new private Dean Street easement running partly on Applicant's land and partly on the un-vacated portion of existing Dean Street (a dead end). 6. Bicycle Path The proposed pedestrian/bicycle path running parallel on the northl.y 10 feet of the new Dean Street alignment. - 7. Service, delivery and waste disposal are located on the ground floor of Building A and protected from snow and ice. Service vehicles are permitted access only from Garmisch and must return on Garmisch. The private portion of Dean Street easement will be closed to service trucks, thus forcing that portion of traffic into under-utilized Garmisch Street. A compatible detailed alignment to be worked out in Subdivision process. 8. Waste disposal area to be covered and screened from pedestrian view. No open waste containers shall be allowed and the compacted waste pickup will be handled in a noise controlled manner. 9. Full points are expected in water and sanitation categories because applicant has been informed no improvement can be made to the systems. 10. Storm Drainage (Full points expected) We have been informed of improvements to the drainage system desired by the City Engineering Department and Applicant is committing to those specifics (extending curb and gutter, etc. to Durant Street) pursuant to Applicant's commitment as stated in the application to improve the system in the general area (not just limited to the needs of the project itself). 11. Permission for encroachment under Juan Street is for underground parking and access 300 feet x 50 feet) two 10 foot wide pedestrian overpass bridge encroachments over Juan Street are also requested (See location on A.I.A. plans). 12. Location of proposed sidewalks and open space (See landscaping supplement). 13. Trails See separate Letters of Recommendation and Memo. 14. Transportation See separate Memo by Mark Danielson. 15. Lift One Condos Tennis Court lease expires by its own terms in 1987. 16. No fireplaces will be constructed in this project except in the main lobby (1). 17. The Rezoning Application for a portion of the property will be amended to reflect additional land now included in the GMF Submission. 18. All free market residential iinits will have kitchen facilities even though omitted on some drawings. 19. Disregard display of Sheets A13 and A14. All top floor deluxe units are represented by Sheet All. 20. All movable existing trees and shrubs will be relocated and incorporated into the Master Landscaping Program. 21. An agreement has been made with the Historical Society to donate all Mine Dumps artifacts for their old mining equipment display room contemplated. 22. Excavation and dirt removal from the site shall be accomplished In cooperation with City and seasonal consideration to cause the least amount of disturbance and noise. 23. Parking is provided for 92 studios A.S.C. relocated 31 Estimated need for 17 Dorms subject to special review 61 Total 184 24. Limousine service (3) will be provided during seasonal periods. Additionally, two propane gas -powered trolley road vehicles will. provide continuous access to all central core points on a designated route open to guests as well as the public. A request for special review to reduce the number of spaces required by Code from 1:1 to .70:1 is therefore made in the 92 studio category as a result of the traffic mitigation mechanisms employed. V* EXH IB IT A CONDITIONS OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I. Parking/Transit/Circulation The following conditions are intended to address the mitigation of parking/transit/circulation impacts created by the 1,300 skiers -at -one - time capacity increase of Aspen Mountain, and not to address lodge/commercial development at Little Nell. The incremental impacts of lodge/commercial base area development at Little dell should be addressed by the City of Aspen upon receipt of an application for base area development. Similarly, the ASC should not be asked by the City of Aspen to mitigate parking/- transit/circulation impacts resulting from the capacity increase because those impacts have been addressed by Pitkin County. A. ASC will work cooperatively with the community to reasonably accommodate transit at the base of Lift ulA. B. ASC shall agree to maintain the existing parking lot (of at least 30 automobile parking spaces) located on Aspen Street within the City of Aspen for skiing area parking or transit related uses. The agreement shall be in the form of a recorded covenant on the property to the benefit of Pitkin County and the City of Aspen. C. ASC shall continue the taxi -limo-automobile drop-off facility at Little Hell. D. ASC shall institute a taxi -limo -automobile drop-off facility at Lift lA within the time frame of the three year improvement program for Aspen Mountain. E. It has been found during the Pitkin County land use review process that ASC must provide an additional 46 off-street, skier automobile parking spaces to mitigate the effects of the 1,300 daily skiers -at -one-time skiing capacity increase on Aspen Mountain. This requirement may be met by providing on -site automobile parking, off -site automobile parking, cash contributions to the City of Aspen as described herein or a combination of the above. If future studies undertaken or approved by the City of Aspen, and/or Pitkin County indicate that the proposed skiing area expansion (1,300 skiers at one time) generates a need for fewer than 46 off- street skier automobile parking spaces, the ASC's automobile parking requirement or contribution to alternative programs hereunder will be decreased accordingly. under no circum- stances will the automobile parking requirement of Pitkin County be increased unless ASC proposes additional daily "t� r RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, APPROVING THE ASPEN MOUNTAIN SKI AREA MASTER PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AF-SKI ZQNE DISTRICT Resolution No. 85-_i WHEREAS, on December 20, 1984, the Board of Countv Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado (hereinafter "Board"), approved Resolution 84-138 adopting the AF-Ski zone district and rezoning the Aspen Nountain and Buttermilk Ski Areas from AF-1 to AF-Ski; and MIEREAS, the Aspen Skiing Companv (hereinafter "ASC") submitted the-,,roposed Aspen Nountain Ski Area Master Plan (hereinafter "ANSAMP" ) to Pitkin County for review and consideration in accordance with the AF-Ski regulations; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Cite Council and Planning and Zoning Commission submitted resolutions to the Boar(f recommending conditional approval of the ANSAMP; and 41HEREAS, the Pitkin County Planning and Zoning Commission considered the ANISAINP at public meetings on March 5, March 12, March 19, and April 2, 1985 and submitted a resolution to the Board recom- mending conditional approval of the AMSAMP; and WHEREAS, representatives of the Aspen City Council, City Planning and Zoning Commission and County Planning and Zoning Commission have participated in the Board's public discussions of the AMSAI,P; and WHEREAS, the Board reviewed the At SAMP at public meetings on April 1, April 9 and April 16, 1985 and held a duly noticed public hearing on April 22. 1985. WHEREAS, the hSC withdrew their generic request for night-time and summer use of restaurants at a Board 11ork Session on April 16, 1985. cfd5 3 i I .z. •' _ •:ham x;,/�' � .. - '=�r � . �r rL y'•ay'��� l y ��! "�/ i ��� t.' i1• -`X- t. i ar. .. ` 4F.y] _. ._��--•-` _ _ fiet.`' '� r_� � ��zt�`�,i. � � f j f } �, F _ �s°�^.F �r " ";�:•. �kYt' !. '� " IN`V R�' ,:i • pd: �'`�':�4i - Jt.. - •' fi±'t ;3ter•.- _ - : y.. Rct .�: >,r� .`t ,�F JA r f7 s " '� f j: qt-" - - '" _ j . _ R_` •cK:-�4 {�-i' "a "�,, _ . a� x y ,:Y.. `- 4ty : T , z �.'t - t >' .: I :JX--� q-.�C'+> __�` �Y�ari•-' j' ; - f., 'S� � #. " r ` - t" s j ' slc. �'� - � _ �.> - ���r6s�� � -i , "y,•: °.. "-'.���4n� -,�'.: R �. .C �•4.�z.>. �!y9'.c Ky si>tx4+j� iG � • .4 -'r t f, .#,y ? -.Is ` 4-'. - - :. r, f - • -' �,. a :�: Stt ' .;., wo.-m-lis :' '- X a�. -lam ..54 -l• - a ' - - �� :z,:� ,.�,.. a *'�" > .� : `'ems `'�T •` _ .a'.T.`>.S+' -3'y` T•L t` - .:fr !. ,C`:2`i1t 7 °2�'_ -i_f4 :S - �_ ��> s - :Yr.3':' -� ?' _ - 'fi } r�''.a ,dam` �` ti'• - � " '►•- - r �_ --. - ayb rat- - ,r 4 � ;-. -� "9?.- spy( � �ay � :�>. 3 I �r4#•ems- , • I ,,,,�_' -�„ _:4E ^adp L a: -A twW � WYYW I0 13 rD.kfw0"%.cr3. ,1*1 W nftr k�T•bT '►.e laic T�aaTnrTTs— ASPS: rwtt .� L,r cx-xx, b .� C�.�,4c minas � • - 6•swr,�c � 0 *Atm UNE k; i * • fVeA Ixae — `ww ?44owk :TU.4cf- 8u5 POc,Tf ocQ %Txel IGFT ANf�C rl El Lj ^ — Rtt51' PARK UM1►tRl �- q[Mgrtpltnjrn � K�a�ntuatr��11t1lltunty{�ttt1nU_tetRwrtn�i' �u{c �IA�e+ Q El — _ Q a1 ❑ Q U yid Ln�'� ❑ F, I M►� D--p opts— � - +b.A '1LGE — -- %OCZW AV -CV-. !TLLXC— CDMtMUMAk COZE WKWECIAL IOOf•f lOpGf -1 IIIIIIIIII( RMf III111 R-Is BUS f.Outf =.. Dcrs fartE F'j6V Pic TERMINAL a a J L u mz LJ u � o dS � W _t = oa to W v lJ F- U x TT o a i ()F t77 TO 415 S ES DOR- I RA' MEZ PINES L vzus R: > 1 �14 122 -r dcz- 0 DURANT SOUTH POI N T. ST. 7 LIO 9 r :T FILBERT ST. F2331 2- 3 4 5 172:0 1� rpnL Q r) Fu—;41 1c. HILL ST. 03; MOUNTAJN LU A SPRUC CHALET, i844LJ U POOL BLOCK 2 LAWN - ST. go RUBEY PARK BUS STOP 42 AVE. ■ ST. ST- 800 00) tu wo 20 (n Lu uj u)-o 0 z < 0 uj 0 v! U z < a(j) <w o 0 3: uj z a L 77 70 Cf) - -r Q-S-W+M4 E nnp- < RA' Mt Z PINES Z L EJS R ,44 12 2 �r IL DURANT PUO PINES S P EN INES MANOR 411 j204 SOL)THF>011 EEO. PEW PEAN Sr Pa. ID-W 7 T ST. 7- 5 -4, :s * AL tz. , 11 T GILBERT 913 -90 RUBEY . PARK BUS STOP AVE. Imlinumm—FORM's C., Aa- IF—N4 N 800 Zo 0 N TA I N CL uj LLJ W- Z 0 < a 0 ac U) 0 T- C) 0 uj z N 14°-50'-49" E 130 00' -� TYP1 TYP` 77 22 o 2 In m u� 21 rR5 I- z o U w � oCD 1 U- -j _ I q 18 � 0 Q 3 O Q W 0 z o 0 o w o CL (r Q J Cr Z m CO , Q F ~ J w (� a Q -- ti . S 14°-50'-49"W 10770' S. GARMISCH ST. (41' WIDE) VACATION ORD N024 1967 1 ;,T .1,112kiol BK.232 N 14°-50'-49" E 100.00' N 14°-50'-49" E 240,00' 1 TYP. 1 •7 I _ o N l o 13 14 1-516 X 18 IT) 20 O a w - - Cl w o � � h o O Z O 0 w ol S 14°-50'-49"W AREA SUMMARY A. BLOCK 6 BARBEE PARCEL 42,545 t SQ.FT. B SKI CO. 81 AUSTIN PARCEL 30,000 * SQ.FT. C MINE DUMP PARCEL 4 1,000 SO. FT.. TOTAL 113.545 tSO.'FT. NOTE, ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN SIX YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH 601 S. ASPEN PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAT PREPARED BY Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. 210 S GALENA ST. P.0 BOX 2506 ASPEN ,COLORADO 81612 (303) 925-3816 DATE JOB NO. I hO I o- A W 0 � Z 0 O 3 0 10' 2d 3d 4d 5d 60' 70' Bd SCALE I"= 30' N 14*-50'-49" E 130 00' 10 60 �O- TYR"7. 22 co CD 10 21 'Df7S U') (7) z 0 a P5 V) < U < Sy 0 9 20 Uj z U 0 U 8 19 LLI o —0 L0 7 U) a) 0 "D 6 17 D < z .0 5 Ib z 0 U') 4 IS 0 LIJ 3 Uj 0 0 Cr cr w < 2 CD < 6K.232 0- 25 -4- 12 0) S01-50'-49"W 10770' S. GARMISCH ST. (41- WIDE) VACATION ORD N024 1967 N14*-5d-49"E 10000. • -2 12 TYP. to 0to 13 14 CD 3: CL - Z 0 0 0 z 6 0 in Uj LO Ln 6 4 3 100.00' S 14°-50'- 49"W AREA SUMMARY ':K 6 BARBEE PARCEL 42.545t SQ. FT. B SKI Co. a AUSTIN PARCEL 30,000 SQ.FI. - DUMP PARCEL C MIN: 4I,000 S L//: pHuHutitu bmuk.'Iu--� I N 14 °-50'-49" E 240.00' 0 ul I rb is Iti 20 W 0 -7 Z 6.01 S. ASPEN PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAT PREPARED By Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. 210 S. GALENA ST. P.O Box 2506 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 (3 0 3) 9 2 5 - 3 816 DATE JOB NO. IGC>10-4 0 to' 2d 3d 4d 5d 6d 7d 8d N 14°-50'-49" - 130 00' 0' 6 0' 2 2 T YP. b �f M ?_1 Kol 19 ID 18 A Co O W 17 l I-- 1�/ O. I6 13 8K 2 12 o. S 4°-5O'-49 ` W 107 70' T� VA 'ATION ORD. NO.24 1967 \ , C ) L , - - I AREA SUMMARY u ` A. BLOCK 6 BARBEE PARCEL 42, 545 3 SQ. FT. B SKI CO. & AUSTIN PARCEL 30,000 _" SQ.FT. C MINE DUMP PARCEL 41,000 S0. FT.. N 14 °-50'-49" E 240.00' TYP. C O0 13 14 fR b 3 m 0 n z � 601 S. ASPEN PROJECT � DEVELOPMENT PLAT • i PREPARED BY Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. 210 S GALENA ST P 0 BOX 2506 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 (303) 925-3816 _ DATE JOB NO. J ... O V, 0 O 3 0 10' 2d 3d 4d 5d 60' 7d 80' i/� PlluvUJtu J I MUV 1 u"ZI DEAN ST. t. m z ri) 71 Ki ,I r, %L vqt b, ISBN"' IL ga of Ul tliitl.iisrirrriot ROW MEMO 0 DURANT H.B.C. INVESTMENTS DEVELOPER - ASPEN SITE DATA MAP 601 S.' ASPEN STREET ASPEN COLORADO 0 32 64 98 128 I am SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS - DENVER ........... 0 h;�J gii "A & o ifti I k1w. A rug IN .1 NIN I Sri 1 �, ;EE{ , i{=?#;r.P . qgp a mill, P. X. 14r" DURANT ft DEVELOPMENT SITE MAP H.B.C. INVESTMENTS 601 S.' ASPEN STREET SKIDIVICRE, OWINGS & MERnILL DEVELOPER - ASPEN ASPEN COLORADO ARCHITECTS EIIGIIIF-EI13 - DEN',IL11 0 32 64 96 128 DEAN ST- r / \ • \\ ..�ol lit �:�, ,��; >'t �, Gas' r.`,��, �'.� •�...\.� \•. \ ?14 0 i r. � (�lY1l �♦ 11. a i• •R � . ti lip � . r� { � r , .� , 1�^ �*• .y,t ti/ �� r t � �A�.r:��'1P7HT'"� �SrT�' ral ,rt•+�r, �. .' v.- �JI _�, � , Y / P• _PARKING bARAdE t. .PARKING GARAoc i ra UNDER RdUN P 1 CARS TOTAL (36 AS.C.) _ R •c A .� a• mW H.B.C. INVESTMENTS DEVELOPER - ASPEN PARKING PLAN 601 S: ASPEN STREET SKIDMORF., OWINGS & MERRILL ASPEN COLORADO ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS — DENVER 0 2 64 98 128 -4A •- i { rw I ,rfl1 .I.I.�jY� l f ii. \ \ •f � . . 1 r 60 A DEAN ST. H.B.C. INVESTMENTS DEVELOPER - ASPEN ilf W44N -:4 71; "t" IIII lo 11 Role gn J)"a"aftoom L04r T IF EkAVICE > c ---- El -0 n m caw. `�" cn G) .0 CA DURANT ENTRY LEVEL PLAN 601 S'ASPEN STREET SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL ASPEN COLORADO ' ARCHTECTS ENGINEERS — DENIER 0 92 64 9= 28 -� m mZ N N N N CO CA)O C m0x z voo.�—a m D� G) r(n x D -I m 0 m m x00=o > zr Wr D v G)m w -v o 0 Z 7 G)m �mD -----_----_-J� fit. DEAN ST. A I T IT! z G� �1 D D mC m 0 -1 K K0 rn D z Z D �v Dm Z X C7 -'1 ARKING DESIGN EI❑ DURA.NT. H.B.C. INVESTMENTS DEVELOPER - ASPEN 601 S'ASPEN STREET ASPEN COLORADO 0 32 64 96 128 SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS - DENVER 73 *� ■l■sonu si■ii■ i■■■s■■■■■■■■f■■t /■■■ • . ■�.a�1.son q,�i1Ri1�11alIM2!41 mono ■monsoon ■■o■n/ ■also,■Itoologlolloolon ■/ ■■n■■■n■orf■- "snows�! now loll_ _ ■■■moms ■nw■snomminton moww.qnam gal �m■s. Lr. �.� �`; a,a■■w will l �0 om■ffi■f■■■i■■■rifmi i■iiii■iiin■rini'MN-0■ll Isms as iiin■■■iii■■■■■■■■■■■■ i ■r■m■■■n■■■■f■■■■fr■f■ ■■m■n■■■r rwn ■fann■■l I■■■m■■mi s■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■f■■f■mfm■■■■f■mf■■s ■■■■■■ ■s► ■ --=■psr • ��■■�•m■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■il■■■■■f■■■■■■■■■■■■/ ■■non■ ■■l 4i .■ i I■ w t ���■■ �1 .. ■r . �■r .. , aid m■■Lm■mr■■■■■o■■■■■■■■■s fmmm■■om ■� ■ . ._ . �1. ■ i. ■■■. = 1 0641110111 o ■r ��1 �i ■llf■■■yro■■■■■■■■■■■■■/ ■■n■mm■■sii s► 5:.. ■. l iii3� 11 oa '1 rsss . ■ wrn . l �iiiiiiiiiiil■riiiiiiiiiii ■iii/mi*o:.. ■■ r.■ ■almiiii� 1 man s► �ii=iiiiii�iiiiif�0mwiii' ■■wM■■■■/;�■■■■■■■■■■■� •■■■■al !"Mag4agmx �■■■m■m.:e� ,l 4/--mall M ) Image■m�■■■■f■■ali■■f■■■■■■■ ��r= 1!i:07�..P/J'G9�►..�■■■m4sm1}L1■9s� .-W � a1s■��■ ■■ f■■nm■m■■�'f■■�/'a 3{0:+� ��vaa:.Y •�Iglr3o/ ■mdr®q•k1 u.uu��r. /� 1. _ �1�•�' ■■■/d..�'•..low dir• X' _ �,JbL • �`�$]. ..w!; Wk 121. pp( p;tit • .3 1 ■nil%�%%%�rM�r���%%%% %��..m sommonommano man Based ■■■o■■■■■■■o■■omom■■ I■mom■ f■■■■■■■off■■■■■■■■■ f ■fro ■■■■■■■off■■■■■■■■■■ iason an an i. PR` owl '.�unum immt numim Moto an Victim Gluuil ullllll'!Ilillllln llllll01J1lnilll lllll�_ >i11lnA w {� w\��I:1!•t I � • 1 • owl .......... .... auu 6uir�l --.- �uudtllillW o+ �- "" "" .�' {Iy��l'�liillljYpII�Y�`�YW J. �lYv �.uu. •��ir1,�.r� - I� ���-_�'�—t— 't m�-j�`' .n., "•'. N►�-Iiiw'iI iYLW'' ii �' lI�EIMYY{_ �•--• . eA'!• EMISSION mom%= ON ROM Vol p` Ll mod. � "!1 �••qi v, ,�z. Y,�c. �omo�,� � , i �ti~a•.�s 1[ �11:►' et M�;` q c ,�. �. �ti•.ti1`�' ►, ')FA ' ,� �� • ,1 i� �y,-t +� '!'►9"•• ��' rt 1:� sY'� Q Jr ) ►�i � '� � ;� .1 •,� � dj°•'+"t l:l`.�it,�'�;��, t t ( l f }*�' q; r��' .�t�ti' f, a, r i �s r • i { 3 is ` N.3 n�I q'�i 44 1'1r<!�! t, wx t� '�1. d�1 4 tl�'�'�� ��•,.i� If ONGITUU F;01 S. ASN 9 n�am�i•C •�• __ �ciw..w...w�.i.. -. ...._�;�r_.'��a. �+�Li �i-�'\�"'�1.�` �r��.6.;� .. .'!" _ �� .w.�a�•�:���a r. ti,� � _\ •''.'►.�� w�t�iA''��� �:.t ..aQf .'►L'Q', ielt�Y` \��.t�l,\� _..\�� -:�\ #111 Ken 2 I'Ll 11: M lie, & . -1 . am Mo. ON !!`SERVICE Ming Oman .0 1l:: " me MMUMMUMBIL, iiiiiGauoagwgug,I- 'All a sum log0001 a a 000r an Ono EMOMUM, : mommin so -IL Ram"----- ------ -------- HHHHUMMU: slM mammal gans I F,.,j P, NONE! ■wommamman .4 1 BENI �4 In I ma3moma I L 182 1 :,-a I.- - .1 1 1 111 �, -,, . ! I I . . . I . -10 a a 'a FE, 'a I it LI _Xb I so ; rA� I :0.41L'Anal, 1,21IF, ' moms, tollsollowdra" do :rw dh V, 4 R.J11 01 Faus '!LIL.It 11 in in, MIT -1, 1,10wo won ruu on am : No SEMMofr-man—wo-lon immummabal no W. 0. me on NO, a a's mummax:mm:l loommollowN� !, Mom No 10,11,11MMIUMI-112. wood *actim": mo:nm:r 7,6411:01 up".0b; IJoawgfn f W, 25 imov Al a sawal. -- ----- -,I - F-77. Pit lei IN .e'LOSED—C P R 0 -)F.-HVI NUTC NFM"CH r :,I •�.1 �1� • ` iii7.'l ,1[ ...( .1. ;;. . ,,Y.��i .� +.:i..::. w • • • n1t. �t . i%•�•. rl l.'' .Y "'III ``i `�-_ ''��. � • ! • �J:�ii�tLlt c•tc` ;�. r' " I Iir�ai we!RION language ■■■aee//noon■■//•cwomeennowndanioda ,. —r-1■■■■/■nee/e■■■■■mang ■J■■1 �--- •7t'� • �- , ■ '•M� ■ anwad _ -- I1'�='-i.I�����z•�_����_- -iNa■■■■ei■o■■a/■ne■■�■■■r■�■1r1 .♦ �■r■.I;■o.■■■0.! ■s—��;a T ,e1.�1-iy111 1.=•1._'■�►�".ice—�.1�-,�� ■■■/■■/■■■/\ra■■■l■//■a■e/le■■■■ 1a■■s�11e■■■•ir !■n■■�!gas ■mammon fl "2laSO■a■■■soe■0 t,■■Mo ! 1 1 F■■■■■■na■■■■■I•semi ■ea■■o■■■■■■e■usual•■■■..•.1•l nouveaux we ■1■■ ■■■/a■■■■81■6l..!.111millmsol ■■ ■/1.P1P!le?aoaandsI■ega�IZZ1■n■•la■a Ik ` : I�oil/■■ z a�lir •■■■O■ 'room, see �e//■■///■■■r■re■■ % .. r *■s■anew I ire•: r/,,, %vi. �, r-1e■q/■//a/e■■■■e■■ I■an on a /■■nee■e■■/■■■■■ 11 t•. .I ` t was SH 1 t� Sri �Z-.li • �1 ��y�.3} �•'� i' s y #fit ryy tl �- J.4 f . Ir' �!! � lot �'• � , 1•...i.... �-�.�ailalrerr� A` �w. •wwwwwwww.www•w• ' Yx-`'':+'.. ,fh -,t .ww• WAMIL onsommummad1 u r` =7 ww�wr• .• +..w:.ww�..a• i..uw.r r..i� •. Ili■Griiiriil■e■iiGir■■■ir■i woman Ma■■ bum Nonni iironenii iiiGisiil3■i■eea■r■■■�%�% s�■don■onomemamoi■■■ee■ ; lae■da■e/aa■er■/■■■■■■■■• o■aelt■■raaaaateaar■rdorooll lo■■er■r■1! raa■a/ni■tea■e■err■■■■■•. /■Pr■a■/■■■■r■■■a■o■eao e■■■■■■d■■r■■ro■■e■eoeo■ ��; 1■■ee■o■ee■■■nr■■■o■■■■■! do■eno■ree a■a■nrI f1■ I- MINrrr ■A■■/�■■■■air■■ore■■■■■o ■■oar■■a■a■■nee■■■are■■ nn■■��:�%o■se■br■a■■ le■r■IIa■rra■rr■■a/■■■■n/! ■■eraaae■la ; ■e■e..eGe■■oreNeere■ I� :■eaLed■I/lrea■er■■■nornn/ doerare■erin ■■1 •� I■ 1 1■■■ • \■ . !.LIMO 'all ..or or 'ar -. \ r., a■no■■ao/renno■a■■onr■■ ■eIm!F:d ■oa/a■►�■■/r 1 ■■.. A In �I �/ �. ■ 1liY. �I ■' / ;► rl ■/■ "�1 �• ■■■■aar/■■■■■e■■■■■■■/■-��■■de■o�■�■■►■a■■ 1o■won■■ •urso■eonooen■rr/ @nere■■aa1e1 i .. Ieo■a■e■d■aarae■■■on■■r■! ■or■a■aa�l�ie ■ ■� a I iir� .. r I/a■rto � .Iar Il •aNi aaa■. 1■■■r■■■rre■/■rr■o/■o■a■ , io■on■■n■o�■er■ar■o■eiirr 1■■■r//■r/ea■r•er■■■o■■onl r■r■ar■ Iroe�lreds, alas- A-r■l.r■_®. -A ►•- Idaanoa■r/■■/■oar■r■■■oo ■■■e■■■ragai[!a■o/■■rod■■ afar■■■■garellrr7nmee 1■roa/e■o !r■■■.deee■■a■Qa■r■rr■nc' 1■r■n■r■er000r■■■■■■■rn■ ■■e■�a■■orb■e/■r■■■■■■/1 ~■eaar■1 •or►.rar■I.LrVGV■rar■■■e■oe -�,is■e�.,:��■o•.�--rr■o■■n.-� IP''�'l IIe.•rs►�,1, I■■■■■err! leo■■er■ar■aLiofr■eeaer■ ■o■■o■■e000■■e■rn■e■■a■ .enerr■r2rnnronao■oo■■nao r■•. a•.r��s a• •r■■■[.cof �, �•r■■arae !■a■�.■■aeo■■■•• Goner d■■r■■■■■r■rr■■a■■anr.a or�eraa■er■eeo'ieo�ra�or■ ••f •ii •1/rxf�� •■rltirSJ16: 3 II1•'�9 ��f /11 ca �; 2 u,rw:r. • ■a■/ "� !■r: I4+ r0.• \■■o. 4, 1■OiM .• •aaa 7r••.c1s •sno•■�f - ems. 1/r! Mr�e■Rnnn•Qrft\■■ 4.1 r. it■• I ■A■ . �. ' .r .fit•■,t e! ,. �,.' •may t`#�i, _ 1_ _.��.. .. iN a... • iU ■■•re.0 .5 �. a! �, D �e •4•► i F •'/JCO • ■ b 7`?7- t■[.H� 3s i [ R � , �� r/I��4 ...:�` <. �w .� rk - ``��W"••V Ness,IC''•.'` e���� t 'a `.'.. ��'�''- .1. �. i i�]M� �? � y ' t�.,�� 1�.. •' •fy , _'�i tea".`" .. �� — -- - - � }'�Ir•It/■. f/��� •r w.�..•�■� - w �r �.... :_j`UHFAQES'SPA riBER - \\\ , • , - i ifit y 1 - IJ DEJ DEAN ST. I'j •, + �I®� el ■ i®� ail ®i i� ■ 1� ®i, _�►soon amp" o■amitmum mmipf - - j z DURANT TRAILS I-I.B.C. INVESTMENTS 601 S. ASPEN STREET SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL DEVELOPER - ASPEN ASPEN COLORADO ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS - DENVER O 32 64 96 128 r--: now a mlarlm;. 0 8:0:81 son N3" Or to �\ D -� Z � f 20 _--SI�RF�►L'E — - , \__ r —'' .Il�t � .'M1. }I 'i'-oaf r.=i.: •*ny; '— /-_ � to or I 1 ! �, •, `, „Y,. Q N Z fYWELs.:T - AC RAIN SURFACE cnAWLi = DEAN ST. r---- •' - .......:1,-. _ � _.... I . _f. .. _ _.i — �. _ t'f.. .r3gr:l... tip, �, � ,•,� r ---- -- ISTING LATCH DURANT STORM DRAINAGE H.B.C. INVESTMENTS 601 S. ASPEN STREET SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL DEVF`LOFT_R - ASf EN ASPEN COLORADO AnCHITECTS ENGINEERS - DENVER 0 32 6� 96 128 LAI V V \ f ---- \ \ \ _ ADED 6 HYDRANT RE 4' rl 3 fly -MAN 71, I H H4 . ........• . . m ElEj CO) -HYDRA NEW FIRE HY NE ss DEAN ST. ........ .. 0 7�, m V-nr- RM4ANT DURANT FIRE PROTECTION H.B.C. INVESTMENTS 601 S. ASPEN STREET SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL DEVELOPER - ASPEN ASPEN COLORADO ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS - DENVER 0 32 84 98 128 1 - -_._ mil• , ,,' � „ ��\�\ t r' � i '� ��. i' 'r: b. u,e,.i; �n. r , ♦r Z. •I"'�'. ;S,r•%•.r '1� r�'`•{I \ •.', •♦ ♦•.` �\\�- \ '^♦1 raMN,4sIN�' ; '----... __- , ___ If'7'1 ;�) ` at'� ,.7" '!'�..] r.i'�, ,�� ' :/ 1�• � • • '♦ 1. \ \\ i1 i ."r:r �.ti :e,i+f+µ►1,%"' j>.++,'},:ft��'�„' �T' ;!�� . ,,ti,. rl;r'�4,a �i. � ,h.,� � J 'i�' —_ ` `-_ _ / i y '�t tl..--♦ 17.. t 1: +Qk'/'1 �ii�-. 1S i '_ '- �-�__-- '• -_ • - - _- it r , �y,l �" '' - ' 1 1 � • •,� rY.+�'�jt,•' •, .. . ;1'1 + / `ti`� ' a l F 1�� }I�,J l`iI ��t, 1 �� � '�.t'/ '', f� :•1 t,.. .{ h �,.,�� i ,., � �t 11, ,S}t�. � i - - ' -1 T, �, Fl ., � :� •, 1♦ � r � �^ , 'r ti `. it ti �At _ ^tia of NCL 'I SERVI IPOCK '��� ! ���. `��• • . °, .,�,.' 4 �� � � � '� SCR A.:.EA'J4'+s'`rr\' 'AUTO AUTO TRY �'' ,t�+.�,,�.�,,•+t,;�,�• �,•, r i• �..Y, ;',',...:, • i. G �. � C,� � •' •. � EXIT b A. l: IMPRO\ � ARMISI �i. TREE i � ;N '�. fir`" � � � / � ,; • ti+ rd'-+• t Ski. +• :;. r�'d.(•'S'1 ''�.{ !`..� ,:1 41 +.. ••r , ` .. tip•.. �'� P/[ ,r •". •`li Y.�.. '.i 1�: ,. ''.. 1 .. •41 t��, � .t + ry..�.i6da �:.. _,� -ti.,. '•' ., _ �:r.IKr. _: ii's.'% ,'LIL` .. Vy�,... � ';��t�y, 'r, `. � �. _ DURANT ROADS x co H.B.C. INVESTMENTS 601 SA ASPEN STREET SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL DEVELOPER - ASPEN ASPEN COLORADO ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS - DENVER O 32 64 96 128 r (ID, r ___ - — Z�__ 113) - I PROPOSED S. ASPEN ST. (75.3' WIDE) DEVELOPMENT � w w� c 3 J o N 14o-50'-49" E 130 00' N 14°-50'-49" E 100.00' N 14°-50'-49" E 240.00' m Z 0 o Q D z S 14'-50'-49" W 107.70' S. GARMISCH ST. (41' WIDE) VACATION ORD. NO.24 1967 NOTE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN SIX YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. a U) w 0 J 3 -j o = In S 3-75,2.3 = PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPOSED STRUCTURES NOTE: BUILDING "C "--� FUTURE DEVELOPMENT NOT INCLUDED IN THIS G M P A PPL I CA TION AREA SUMMARY A. BLOCK 6 BARBEE PARCEL 42, 545 t SQ. FT. B SKI CO. a AUSTIN PARCEL 30,000 SO -FT. C MINE DUMP PARCEL 41,000 SQ. FT.. TOTAL 1 1 3,5 45 t S0.'FT. 601 S. ASPEN PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAT PREPARED BY Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. 210 S. GALENA ST. P.O. BOX 2506 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 (303) 925-3816 DATE JOB NO. I-i(�-80 l6olo-q 3 0 10' 2d 30' 40' 5d 60' 7d 86 SCALE I" = 30' SHEET 2 OF REVISED JAN. 21, 1986