The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcoa.lu.gm.Herndron.Sub. Parcel D -18-83 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen No. �/yY�� /? G - Staff: eel, La; 114.7 l'1 Q / PROJECT NAME: I II 4 A ` er / n / — / , G./ - .. i/ ✓Ii • APPLICANT: !T 4 Phone: REPRESENTATIVE: 4,;14451)77 Phone: 7,--;h — 9/6.0 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Fee) I. GMP /SUBDIVISION /PUD (4 step) • 1. Conceptual Submission ($1,840) 2. Preliminary Plat ($1,120) 3. Final Plat ($ 560) II. SUBDIVISION /PUD (4 step) 1. Conceptual Submission ($1,290) 2. Preliminary Plat ($ 830) ` 3. Final Plat ($ 560) 1 / III .EXCEPTION /EXEMPTION /REZONING (2 step) ($1,010) re IV. SPECIAL REVIEW (1 step) ($ 465) 1. Special Review 2. Use Determination 3. Conditional Use REFERRALS: Date Referred: 1 7 1 :24 - e.3 Attorney Sanitation District School District Engineering Dept. Mountain Bell Rocky Mtn. Nat.Gas t/ Housing Parks State Hgwy. Dept. Water Holy Cross Electric Fire Chief City Electric Fire Marshall /Building Dept. Other FINAL ROUTING: Date Routed: (rag _x- 3 ✓Attorney Engineering ✓ Building ✓ Othe S US;in ry > .4[10 ( \ • • • • : ,`/ /8 3 /�1! � —r R / ,-; 1 co-r" ►n�r<d ec1 0 /cz U tz_ on KA— c-l° - a I ; le iv\ctkzcn w _ 11 c U � OC.C' ,),:\n, v\c �k�� 3dti0 t r J RZ. • �/� Ito a'\� s' 4'�'-e e;- ':Qar t(&t +k it I 's aed orSc>2 _ or - re p►'dJ��2 3 11.,_._ f +✓ ; t �; -' • - 6,--f (etc 4{toly, a } .- O. 1 e �c.r_I }b r F-c_ vim. I I o ✓- L p -u -c_ {-_O.'.= n_. -- ; e" 1n 0 n 'J YD V Q It ✓ O c L.,. 0.h .Ca. 4 — \\ U 1 �� c n �.yf0✓ CITY COUNCIL REVIEW: 2 33 �a r .,a 1 . f . ` i .. GJf • C A n i r Q t H di a , " . N)r-j n' -,,, r -1 'al c f i r -i / o 0. d PS A 0_ �� C. I r i Q. • 1 _. .• WA; 0 O. L, I< 1f\ .,. 0 t osic bo rtk 4 . " 5 0..2.3-1 1 4` C y V \ C.. , ,o • c-k ,- `1. P ! \ ft •.. 4 1& -VO 0 .414& ‘" l: '1 D Ordinance No. CITY PR REVIEW: • CITY COUNCIL REVIEW: • Ordinance No. • • • 0 • • .r 4 C 61 • , f _ r p f y K S ..L,2 MEMORANDUM r' • TO: City Attorney 1/City Engineer Housing Office, Jim Hamilton PLANNER: Colette Penne • RE: Curton Employee Units - y b ' on Exemption Cute DATE: April 28, 1983 Attached is a letter of application requesting an exemption of an employee unit from the requirements of the GMP for the City, since the lot where this unit is to be constructed was split pursuant to n exemption from the GMP. Please review the application and return your comments to the Planning Office no later than May 6, as the item is scheduled to go before P &Z on the 17th of May. Thank you for your expeditious handling of this item. � $t C °/ 7� � 1�, , LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON 1. KAUFMAN A AROFESS:ONAL CORPORATION a0x 10001 611 WEST MAIN STREET GiDEON I. KAUFMAN TELEPHONE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 -- AREA CODE 303 DAVID G. EISENSTEIN 925.8166 March 31, 1983 Alan Richman , Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Donna Curton Employee Unit Dear Alan, Please consider this letter an application on behalf of Donna Curton for an exemption of an employee unit from the requirements of the Growth Management Plan quota system for the City of Aspen. Donna Curton owns Parcel B, Herndon Subdivision. This lot is a duplex lot containing 21,950 square feet. However, because the lot was split pursuant to an exemption from the growth management quota system, all that is permitted on this lot is a single family unit without further growth management approval. Pursuant to Aspen City Code, Section 24 -11.2, Exceptions, a unit of employee housing constructed pursuant to Section 24 -11.10 may be exempt from the growth management quota system provided it gets the approval of City Council upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. The one requirement is the showing of community need considering the number of units, the type of units and the rental mix. I have been in contact with the Housing Director, Jim Hamilton, who has given us his support for the type of unit we would like to construct. Donna would like to construct a duplex on the site, containing one free market unit which is allowed by right and another unit which would be allowed under the employee housing exemption from the Growth Management Plan. There will be no necessity to vary any of the density or FAR requirements or any other requirements of the Land Use Code. We simply ask that allowable density be permitted on this lot. To accomplish this we need the exemption from the Growth Management Plan for the employee unit. Alan Richman March 31, 1983 Page Two The contemplated size of the unit, per Jim Hamilton's request, is 1,300 square feet. It will be a three- bedroom unit and Donna would like to be able to rent out the unit and then sell it or continue to lease it, at her option. The employee unit will be governed by the ?riddle income guidelines. This is justifiable because this project is not a large multi -unit complex; rather it is a duplex and as such construction costs and high quality of the unit dictate the middle income classification. I look forward to having this item placed on your next available agenda. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, a Professional Corporation II� ( - By _it/ Gideon Ka fman GK kw cc: Donna Lee Curton Donna Lee Curton Trust • Z - G - 3 ,,e,( is.. „ k . Ld try 4 bc. -- ; lie _ (oto,A olio ` ! -4co -..7o 7 a± 't /0 1 co; _ - --- - -- _ -- -- i`re! GL.eCe,o�D (x.2; 4A -. re-ad/pia/ z. ate.'" Mt& 47 A rir( i, << , CA_ 0O -0-4.4Ab - t . _ Q.1 c...1 . C) (-� -: ( Q� Lo peil� o I Y` � - - 3 � I `' 1 Al tut cQ. n1 T (p ` e�tL.aQ - f - `1 _ 5 .7 uz ._ . tom;`( -c,c e.�. .vu . C , trA-A L-� X MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Grice, Planning Office FROM: Louis Buettner, Engineering Department DATE: November 23, 1979 RE: Herndon Subdivision, Final Plat After reviewing the final plat submitted for the above subdivi- sion, the Engineering Department finds the following corrections are needed: On Page 2 J1 The utility easement crossing parcel "B" for parcel "A's" utilities is not proposed but is to be an "underground utility easements ", remove the wording "proposed relocation of ". 4 The access and underground utility easement across par- cel "A" must be defined by bearings and distances. t21 The road and bridge area is to be dedicated as right -of- way, so it will not be part of parcel "A" or "B ". 4) Quit claim deeds are needed for the westerly property line. The deeds will be between the owner and the City. The following five items are correction to sheet one. They may or may not have been past on to survey engineers. .4) The book number for the recorded easement upper part of parcel "A" is 189, not 89. 6) In the legend and notes the contour lines were from 1974 Aspen Aerial Survey, not 1975. 7) The water line easement upper part parcel "A" may be 16 feet, not 18 feet as shown. The deed should be checked. 8) Add a note for why the parenthesis were used on some dis- tances shown. 9) The work preliminary should be removed. This is a final plat. r MEMORANDUM TO: Colette Penne, Planning Office FROM: Jay Hammond, Engineering Department -s*S DATE: May 10, 1983 RE: Curton Employee Unit Exemption from GMP • Having reviewed the above application, and made a site inspection, the City Engineering Department has only one comment that is not related to the matter of GMP exemption. We have no particular problems with the proposed exemption P for an employee unit on the site relative to engineering concerns or provision of services. There has been some discussion recently, however, of access to the site. I would point out that, at this time, it remains our under- standing that access to the site will be accomplished through the access easement in parcel "A" and not through the alley in block 4. JH /co