The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.69 Shady Ln.0068.2011.ASLU0068.2011.ASLU 2737 073 00 012 69 SHADY LANE t- RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE 9 164 1 J __j ..ch. External Media Located Here ~ M-008004 *221 ODGE , 4-0/ C. 64-SL L/ V j THE CITY OF AspEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0068.2011.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 073 00 012 PROJECTS ADDRESS 69 SHADY LN PLANNER JENNIFER PHELAN CASE DESCRIPTIO RESIDENTAIL DESIGN VARIANCE REPRESENTATIVE MUSTANG HOLDINGS DATE OF FINAL ACTION 11.3.11 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 2.10.12 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 6 7 FAR 4 1- , Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, StÂ»-7 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: '~Publication of notice. By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this 24 day of (40, , 20Â» by .4. S 0 -1 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PURUC_NQI!(GE Of De. ENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby give., to the general public of the I My ~ommission expires: 3--7 1.- /7(Â·11~-( approval u, I al, specific development plan, and I the creation of i twisted property right pursuant to the Land Use wode of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following legally described property- 69 Shady Lane, by order of the City of I Rotary Public Aspen Community Development Department on January 12,2012. The Applicant received approv (444- R 1 14~ al for one Residential Design Standard Variance related to the construction of a new single family home. For further information contact Sara Adams, at the City of Aspen Community Development ATTACHMENTS: Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 429-2778. *L-{2KQOÂ¢W2*1 ~ Published in the Aspen Tunes Weekly on January ~ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION f LINDA M.01 ~ 26, 2012 (7485873] f 1.Â·t, fjbliNG / My Commitmon Expires 03129/2014 DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Mustang Holdings IL LLC, 715 West Main St., Suite 201, Aspen, CO 81611. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address 69 Shady Lane, situate, lying and being in Section Seven (7), Township Ten ( 10) South, Range eighty-four (84) West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Residential Design Standard Variance for building orientation. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Approval by the City of Aspen Community Development Department for one Residential Design Standards Variance; received 11/07/11 and signed for approval 1/12/12. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) January 26,2012 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) January 26,2015 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption.from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 12th day of January, 2012, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. Chris Bendon, Community Development Director NOTICE OF APPROVAL For One Residential Design Standard Variances at 69 Shady Lane Parcel ID No. 2737-073-00-012 APPLICANT: Mustang Holdings II, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: John Galambos, Galambos Architects SUBJECT & SITE OF AMENDMENT: One Residential Design Standard Variance for a new single family residence located at 69 Shady Lane. SUMMARY: The subject property is located outside of the Aspen Infill Area just off of Red Mountain Road at the Aspen city limit boundary. The Rio Grande Trail is located opposite Shady Lane from the subject property. In 2010 the Planning and Zoning Commission granted a Stream Margin Review through Special Review to establish a building envelope since the entire property is located below the City's top of slope delineation. The applicant proposes to scrape and replace the existing buildings with a new single family residence and an ADU within the established building envelope. The applicant is requesting a variance to the following code section: 26.410.040.A. 1. Building orientation. The front facades of all principal structures shall be parallel to the street. On corner lots, both street facing facades must be parallel to the intersecting streets. On curvilinear streets, the front facade of all structures shall be parallel to the tangent of the midpoint of the arc of the street. Parcels as outlined in Subsection 26.410.010.B.4 shall be exempt from this requirement. STAFF EVALUATION: 69 Shady Lane is in a residential neighborhood that is largely located outside of the city limits in Pitkin County. Clockwise from the north are residences outside of the city limits, immediately to the east is the Rio Grande trail, directly to the south is Jenny Adair open space, and to the southwest is ACES and Hallam Lake. Page~of ~ Figure 1: Vicinity map l Rio Grande v. .4*0/ 9'i* iL~:' J Trail . H.,11.in) L.â€¢ke . 4 t GrÂ®432*+9.42.'*~ Shady Lane I.gp (1~. ..4. 44:.Ir.I:li:...:. 14 r 1#61/A "': Subject Site i The subject property does not have any unusual site-specific constraints. As mentioned previously, a building envelope was established by the Planning and Zoning Commission to resolve stream margin review constraints on the property. The neighborhood context is somewhat mixed considering that most of the residences in the area are located in Pitkin County and subject to different standards. A site visit to the area confirmed that most of the residences are fully shielded with trees and are barely visible from Shady Lane and the Rio Grande Trail. 69 Figure 2: Neighborhood building orientation. Shady Lane is by far the most visible residence in the The roadway is colored brown. neighborhood. The residences in the neighborhood did Zilf i not appear to be parallel to the street. Building Orientation: Staff finds that neighborhood 1â€¢4 05044 4,e 11 * 1 I context supports a variance to allow the proposed 1 4 '2,1.lia'~11071.4,- building orientation to be rotated slightly unparaIlel to the midpoint of the curvilinear street. The existing buildings id t *%:44' in the neighborhood to not create a consistent block face b ~9f~*50:.,A,j,lbi...41 ?.4,r . since they are all turned to maximize sunlight and views 0 ':L, ,?t IT~Â· - '~'A.: 5 as shown in Figure 2. Staff finds that the proposed * .00 .1/air #R' location of the house will still address the street which B . 1 -394â€¢. satisfies the purpose of the standard. , 5 1 = :4*,.4 4 +:C f . 69 Shady 1 DECISION: 62. I The Community Development Director finds the L~. h.b * Residential Design Standard Variance noted above ~*1' . 4 and on Exhibit 'A' to be consistent with the review .1 criteria (Exhibit B) and thereby, APPROVES the ~ 7- 1~ 4 ~~ $-,.~.n variance as specified below. 1 - Page~ofÂ£7 The approved variance to 69 Shady Lane, allows for the building orientation, as depicted in Exhibit A. APPROVED BY: tilt le ChilÂ¥Irendon Date Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A - Approved Building Orientation Exhibit B - Review Standards Page>f~ n , \ IBE'811 0 LAND5CAPEARC~UIECTUNE LANOPLANN~G 1) .VIL ENGINEER To VERIFY UTILITY LOCATION /4/ REQUREMENTS URBAN DESIGN AND IDENTIFY ANY POTENTIAL CONFUCTS WITH PROPOSED S TE DESIGN, Â· ' 01' Ma~St-1. Sull.. C.ubood~.co 'U,3 19,0.963.4520 2) REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR WALL EXTENDS BEYOND #-1 GFU.DING AND HORIZONTAL LAYOUT ENVELOPE, TO BE \ COORDINATED W]TH \ 3) REFER TO CJVIL ENGINEER]NG CONSTRUCTiON DRAWINGS FOR HUNTER CREEK ARCHITECT ukfiEF.UNE _- - 2~~- ~ EROSION CONT ROL PLANS AND DETAILS. ---~53) 01--7#5 / 4) ALL LAYOUT OF SITE WALLS, PAViNG AND LANDSCAPE FEATURES TO - 3 1 / 44.-904 . Il ARCHITECT. BE PERFORMED IN FIELD BY SURVEYOR AND APPROVED SY LANDSCAPE REMAIN 5) REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES. 1 1 Â· / 63 PAVING PAT-RN SHOWN o. THIS PLAN ILLUSTRATES DESIGN NITENT VA FINAL PAVING PATTERNAND LOCATION OF EXPANSION AND CONTROL JOINTS TO BE COORDINATED wmi CiVIL ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT. 11 SPAÂ·-Â·-. - Â£. '2#' , 4% A .. 1 El PAVING Â· W.TERIAL T B D /'MCA - / 1 1( E.=31 ./.WALLS-MATERIAL 1 1 -M- , '141. 1*7~ 12'1:r=:=JAL C L 4~11 #z 7-2/.2\4 Ll-,1-L TB D f.. /' 2, 1< ,",' . - \ 1~ '.4411-1 . / .T: 41 ' Â»==Â« 1.-k L t. 000 STEPPING SmNES STONE TYPE 7BD Il 7 "Mi ' EnSTING TREES TO 09 ~91! DOFFASE f 173 '1 1 3,07:0 j RE:MAIN STONE PATIO â„¢\ O Â· N /02./. STONE TYPE AND PATTERNT... , 4---Â·... :, 71141 19*i- 11 ,</-1- \ 1\.7~131Â¢.1, / 1 / owls i ~-NEW GATE - NI.WFENCE 1 SEE ARCH SEEARCH ..... ALLIMPROVEMENTS -~A) 1 ,Â· ~ ~ '~'' , ''Ol .-- 7.:OL. 94, 6UTSIDEDEVELOPMEN' l' I .>----~~ ~ coo&=,mm 42.&~93-Â·.iÂ·:471Â¢' Ir ..?10.4 4- 11 M.111.U LOWRETAINING 12 CJTY OF ASPEN UU- 1 04 -- l:-Â·VP340 4, I 4 27;< SWING Â·Â· WALL: SEECJVIL / D.GS. L~NEW FENCE: L.9 31...46.- - \1.-:Â»2, 1+11 1 41: .14 34> SEE ARCH DWGS. f sman: 944... 3-97~ 1 3 'arrsiL. ..2 ~ FIREPIT-~1 0./..... f..4111 '1',fs,5,7Â·:-:it (3 -r=:-1 X.3 41\,1:14* 0 \ LOWRETAINING-O ' - WALLi SE~~~ \ C '.ey , 99 [34 Ne 'T O 0 0 40 1 ~~n-------EFELLIEE-81'21198.-___ ~: 6 1 \3 STEPPING SrONEJ (:953+4..tair 03\ PATHTOBRIDGE. FINAL LOCATION AND LAYOUT TO BE - / 4/ i DETERMINED IN loo FIELD Â»3. C 40Â»- 1-1 1 1 1 377 /14\04 K // >At ~49><>~ i ~ Â«361 40 49/10/ 09. Ile Em ~RajECI. SITE MATERIALS PLAN EXISTING BRIDGE LOCATiON. SEE ARCH DWGS FOR NEW 2 2-*SEP SnE yo BRIDGEDESIGN /13 n.- L-1 -9 111.15 49 + Ged E)(4 6. Â®22. *Z992'US[-2 'lokli",gs M.2....10.1 1 . -mi~liADO':il, plgn.0. Exhibit B Review Criteria and Staff Findings Section 26.410.020.D.1.: Residential Design Standard Variances Administrative Variance, if granted, would: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Finding: The subject property does not have any unusual site-specilic constraints. As mentioned in the Staff memo, a building envelope was established by the Planning and Zoning Commission to resolve stream margin review constraints on the property. The neighborhood context is somewhat mixed considering that most of the residences in the area are located in Pitkin County and subject to different standards. A site visit to the area confirmed that most of the residences arefully shielded with trees and are barely visible from Shady Lane and the Rio Grande Trail. 69 Figure 2: Neighborhood building orientation. The roadwav is colored brown. Shady Lane is by far the most visible residence in the ~ = 0 neighborhood. The residences in the neighborhood did Kili not appear to be parallel to the street. Building ()rientation: Staff finds that neighborhood i~0~,~e,,>, context supports a variance to allow the proposed ~~ -~' '*~ building orientation to be rotated slightly unparallel to . the midpoint of the curvilinear street. The existing 71 . - buildings in the neighborhood to not create a consistent I.,b, block face since they are all turned to maximize sunlight ~ and views as shown in Figure 2. Staff finds that the 1.~~ proposed location of the house will still address the street ~, :.: ..s:444, which satisfies the purpose of the standard. Staff *-15 *lqd recommends that the Commission grant a variance from t.3 - *:VIL~~ "4~ ' Standard 26.410.040.A. 1, Pag*fcb A C/J I < A W 71 U) 41 4 8 2 26 d 1- S n 2 1 O 00 4- 0 7 3 2 04 -2 fa 0 2 'll 5 22 W 12 c:4 ~.2 EU ~ SÂ« 66 ' PUBLIC NOTICE U ./ 1 .4 RE: 69 SH %DY LANE, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN roth ~ 25 STANDARD VARIANCE LAND USE REQUEST B +0 8. 2 9 g U 32- NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing 2 .m 2 0 H will be held on Tuesday, January 17, 2011, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen tu 2 0 1 3E y .9 Planning and Zoning Commission, Sisters City *13E~ C '- Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to con- U B 04 61)"r' -4 ..' S sider an application submitted by Galambos Archi- 8 A E O Â·.8 .0 00 .M --t 0 0 M_ =2 A 5 22 w 201, Aspen, CO, 81611, that is the owner of the tects, 314D ABC, Aspen, CO 81611 on behalf of Mustang Holdings Il, 715 West Main Street, Suite /8192 9 - bo subject property. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing house with a new residence 8 -2 -2 1 8 % b E 3--424--9 7 ,8 * 0 and a detached accessory dwelling unit (ADUL 33 - A UND = ~2 ART 4 q~ The applicant is requesting the following residen- o L tial design standard variances: Section 3 5 0 4.8 3 cul. MA Z 26.410.040.A (1), Building Orientation: C 2 44 C co U re/ated to orientation of the garage; 4 k 00 26.410.040.C.2(b), Parking, garages and carports related to the setback of the garage; 26.410.040.C.2(c), Parking, garages and carports o U o.54% NOE @h MÂ©*e E E ace O 50 60 :U â‚¬ related to garage door design; and 26.410.040.C.2(4 Parking garages and carports 84 6 Â·.2 .2 h.,8 .9 =288 N 26.410.040.D.1(a) Building elements related to UHAR : entry doors . The property is legally described as a 2.9 4 t O C M 00 parcel of land situated in Section 7, Township 10 .C W .C Â¤ U 7. N ~ South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M. County of U O Adams at the City of Aspen Community Develop- Pitkin, State of Colorado commonly known as 69 rA , t:2=< 2 Shady Lane. For further information, contact Sara t E NUM k .4 ~ Be U ment Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, - p U .C -O (970) 429-2778, sara.adams@ci.aspen.co. us. COO>+1 8 2 W s/Stan Gibbs, Chair d **134 =0 M~ Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission * A %2 W u :i e 7: Pt 35 ~015 24 == ber 29, 2011. [7376633] 1 Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on Decem- â‚¬ 561 ./51= 40~,%~gQS= 6 2.8 02 N g 40 22**.Sk .8 . 1 $ A, 25 m '*4=49 j -5->1 Nd 404 3Â£ 0~*>â€¢ 0 U A 4 2 4 4 4 4-4 1- O *** * to be changed or am ended m d part of a general revision Rezoning or text amendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in itle, or whenever the text o amended, wheth uc or otherw iremen f an ey map or other and listing of names and osed change shall be 30I.LON Stil VISS[ #I NOI.LVOIOIIN JIEIdd revisi made by enactment of a new land u ssion expires: ~ ch amendments. ncy durin n '10060Â£0 1[fld GIHI AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 4,4 Shotcl~j LevuL , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: -Taaac...~ 4cv'-' f 7 â‚¬ 44 gof aAA, 20 1. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) ScoÂ»L/\ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting ofnotice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records o f Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) Sara Adams From: John Galambos Ogalambos@galambosarchitects.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 5:06 PM To: Sara Adams Subject: RE: 69 shady lane Sara, I spoke to my client and an 8' door is fine by him. jg John Galambos, AIA President Galambos Architects, Inc. 314 AABC, Suite D Aspen, CO 81611 Tel: 970.429.1286 Fax: 970.429.1296 Web: www.galambosarchitects.net From: Sara Adams [mailto:Sara.Adams@ci.aspen.co.us] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 3:22 PM To: John Galambos Subject: RE: 69 shady lane Hi John, Is there any chance you will know about the front entry door height this afternoon or tomorrow morning? The P&Z packet is due tomorrow at 1pm. Thanks! Sara Sara Adams. Senior Planner City of Aspen.130 South Salena Street Aspen. CO 81611 tele. 9701429 2778 fax 9701920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com From: John Galambos [mailto:jgalambos@galambosarchitects. net] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 1:28 PM To: Sara Adams Subject: RE: 69 shady lane Thank you John John Galambos, AIA President Galambos Architects, Inc. 314 AABC, Suite D Aspen, CO 81611 1 Tel: 970.429.1286 Fax 970.429.1296 Web: www.qalambosarchitects.net From: Sara Adams [mailto:Sara.Adams@ci.aspen.co.us] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 12:39 PM To: John Galambos Subject: 69 shady lane Hi John, I apologize about the misinformation that was provided from ComDev. Shady Lane is a private road according to the Engineering Department and as such the proposal meets the garages and carports section of the RDS. If your client decides to comply with the front entry door height of 8', then I will process the request for a variance from building orientation administratively. Should the proposed door height remain at 9' a variance is required from P&Z next week. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. I am sorry aboutthe mix-up. Best, Sara Sara Adams, Senior Planner City of Ascen.130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 tele 9701429.2778 fax 07(11070 5439 www.aspenpitkin.com Email secured by Check Point 2 r 2.1,kNE. 1,1 ?; 1 IN=/1.l I 1 41 I 11 .. S --~L-~1---------1-- - 'l 11 1 1111 1 >1 */5 711)FL Vi" m 12 o " HID. L Sara Adams From: Janet Leverson Oleverson@galambosarchitects.net] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 8:26 AM To: Sara Adams CC: John Galambos Subject: 69 Shady Lane Attachments: 20111222081746028.pdf Hi Sara, Attached is a sketch of the double garage door designed to look like two single doors in compliance with Section 26.410.040.C.2.f In response to Section 26.410.040.C.2.c, due to site constraints with location of house to preserve open space and large trees, we are unable to position the garage doors perpendicular to the street therefore, a variance is required. Thanks for your help on this and have a great holiday, Janet Janet Leverson Architect, LEED AP Galambos Architects, Inc. 314 AABC, Suite D Aspen, CO 81611 Tel: 970.429.1286 Fax: 970.429.1296 Web: www.galambosarchitects.net Email secured by Check Point 1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: (09 6 801 6.414 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: c->tA). 17 ,2*_Loll- RECEIVED JAN 0 6 2012 STATE OF COLORADO ) CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ) SS. County of Pitkin ) i, Ovoer k,ese---3 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 4- Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. M-- Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the Z day of Â£ 3ANUAYL:-Â·~ , 20+02-, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photo%~aph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. 14 Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) NA Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions that create more than one lot, Planned Unit Developments, Specially Planned Areas, and COWAPs are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing ofnames and addresses o f owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Â»41=j The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was El<~Wledged before me this 3,Aday Of Â·251,~ -a-,-41 , 2042, by -3-ccn &4 1,â‚¬_vu-son D WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL ..ti,w My commission expires: M /12/201 3 0 M .. i WESLEY C. 2 -710. 1 SULEK i Notary Public - OF coy ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 69 SHADY LANE, RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE LAND USE REQUEST NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, January 17,2011, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sisters City Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Galambos Architects, 314D ABC, Aspen, CO 81611 on behalf ofMustang Holdings II, 715 West Main Street, Suite 201, Aspen, CO, 81611, that is the owner ofthe subject property.' The applicant is proposing to replace the existing house with a new residence and a detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU). The applicant is requesting the following residential design standard variances: Section 26.410.040.A(1), Building Orientation; 26.410.040Â©2(b), Parking, garages and carports related to the setback of the garage; 16.410.040.C.llc), Parking, garages and carports related to orientation of the garage; 26.410.040.C.2(0, Parking garages and carports related to garage door design; and 26.410.040.D.1(a) Building elements related to entry doors .*The property is legally described as a parcel of land situated in Section 75 Township 10 South, Range 84 West ofthe 6th P.M. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado commonly known as 69 Shady LaneÂ© For further information, contact Sara Adams at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2778, sara.adams@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Stan Gibbs, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on December 29,2011 City of Aspen Account .24 - i '7 N 2 . 4-Â»1-4 31-,iff.1,â€ž37 110= '/81.94=9$,ttif.r . ..63- , , 1 Â·I Â·L-- I , :4:Â» . 4 -L , 2. . L . â€ž- l.>1 4 .Al f . 6. 7/. / . -Â£=- I -4- I. d.'.. r~Â», 4.-, l,-~#09*,fjAL*51-~' 4 ,Â£2 --r# .Â£. /. .. - - ....r/-* - 01 L. . 1,- j ... -M '52*----- -t.,1,2*,t 1. 1 1 SV j /"r-' J .1 Â· * 1 /1 4~. ?4 - 4. 1 7-2..10 . ./. ' . %,ihit, - ..,AL,Z' f : .... f. e<*Sy, 1-Â·, f .. L, ' ' fiqzy--i>f~ ~, th/ ,Â»iph lidu Â£ . .// A- 1 1 , -/+4& -,-â€ž.- .B., '. -- ' : 1Â»54 1 4 --_2'5 v ~'4|1 IX . jIN Â· - Â·-4 4 1.121/ 1 ~ f ' ~'f' -1,0 64, '.. 1 - *6 ~,51 / I - 4 + *-S/- 1,< .1 . '' --I - L - 4+21 4 .â€ž r. . I.$ '' ' -Qi;.thri - ~:2 -114*imb 1.*;4,1 . 1 1 '11 -...#*-1-6744.EQ~ #~&-7-2-54&4..,.w'*,1--~4 - , -, $ tft</kil./ 'kl-+5-4* 1,#Â·{. ~â‚¬Â£~43 676*1:.0 :./2, w-Â»i:93:~*4101+ 4 49*4 : 4%04Â»792?W45(1;,Jiou~JM'jry:01///MIM""i # 91/ 243414 n 1 77/11-t><94Â»02Â«~,a 1 velt , "42.~N*,â‚¬4*iW ' 9.9 tw %:f.*2.4.Â·rwrs<~<' 412? . 31415%3,0.1,1,1:U~%2'69 --Irkr 0.-5. - - 1 ... , 4~..2** ,#Mt,#2 -:#, c . 1 . - Â· . f..~: 3.'Sf'llu 4 te ' - W.- - - -433*Qk=17,3(3971,7.7,4.;7246*277%43'4'~} Rs. I --- , 1 -2 526:94*t c '. ft'im/6 2/.4 . 3?76*Efe*,1~04 ~ ,11â‚¬~~04%~ , t-riUke _,ili.,Fb '-02,3 1W-1 te........~Â¥88.-9#PA#&~f.: 3/r,? 344#limilaerril,/14. M< m . 1 & t. ...PL.iu= -14-- -1// 85,0~- im.2 3.0- I I pi.= I.*...- A.I. 44 ~ I Jit= 1 . 1/6//EA j,hi Fr 7~ - ~tr --3)%.74 1 -A 1 -F ...-* 1 .1- ' A Â·. t;bul 1.- 1 ~ 1 1 a.-1 1 . -- 1/.1..,'-*/'.Â·2 7, 1 n t "4- .,- 1 . ./'413 H 1 Â¢ 44'' ~ . 31/ .. 4.4 .. .: .4 , -1,1 %11 4 9 , , f f , .,1 AN APPLICATION FOR VARIANCES FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR MUSTANG HOLDINGS 11 69 SHADY LANE ASPEN, CO Submitted by: Mustang Holdings 11 October 31, 2011 Prepared by: GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS 314D ABC Aspen, CO 81611 970-429-1286 Contact: John Galambos r , TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION 3 A. Vicinity Map B. Introduction 11. PROJECT SITE 3 111. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3 A. Existing Site Plan B. Proposed Site Plan C. Building Floor Plans D. Building Elevations E. Roof Plan F. ADU Plans and Elevations G. Neighborhood Plan H. Photographs of Site/Photographs of Neighborhood IV. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS (MAIN HOUSE) 4 V. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS (ADU) 7 VI. APPENDIX A Exhibit 1, Pre-Application Conference Summary Exhibit 2, Proof of Ownership Exhibit 3, Permission to Represent Exhibit 4, Land Use Application Form Exhibit 5, Signed Fee Agreement Exhibit 6, Dimensional Requirements Form Exhibit 7, List of Adjacent Property Owners VII. APPENDIX B Exhibit 1, Site Improvement Survey Exhibit 2, Previous Approvals: Stream Margin Review 2 69 Shady Lane, Aspen, CO Google Maps Page 1 of 1 r . Go<>gle Address 69 Shady Ln Aspen, CO 81611 ~ Get Google Maps on your phone ~ Texttheword "GMAPS" to466453 i.4 242 4 M Re 2 #164 4 04% 2 -Â°Dr <0 a .1 1-lp '4 9 Rs.3 90,1:30.1Â·n '90 '22.â€¢, Â·c, D Li'.941" r d '0 % '12 4'tr 0, F- -2,98 94 r - 'fEWS *d Rtâ€¢ti Mot'.4â€¢ 0. 'rl Re'lge V l ret . '44 ..#t.Â¥8,1 tiÂ·,0-2. 07 q -- 94 2%. C: .24. CO p - d 754 m 498 41 M th : .27.. 7 C:) Rd 21Â» % 'Dug.by. c n JU 40 1... 510''r.. i 1 4.1 r . 0 11 W :*,1.spie St SITE -3 pearl Gl 25 b W North .91 W g 2 03 Â£ Spruce St -3 '9 22 0 . :r & -,4.. 67 20 co4 40 st 4, .l W Smug*er 61 2 8 VV H,31!am St ~A' p ..18? S. 2 6 |a,|. S 4 41, 2,_ -p dr'r., -1 .,5, ' -1 5 .9, j V. 1 1 1 2 2 4.4 9 d"e.,k :24'hhE ; 1& 4 â‚¬. 9 '' 44 -4&. t' W 2!reÂ»* 2 1 .#* E he:b.m St Ray St W Main ST 1 11 4, 9 5 h...41- . ' '82 < 4 4 0.-. 91 ;4*S w Mote' Jernme Aspen 4 44 . 0-5 Af.p an 0 Paepcke S. e 0 5 W Hyman Ave o Cr Park E Mai,) St ~i~ 7 rD - - 9 64,300 . Wheeler - D to C Hopkint; Ave 5 $ 0 t. -'18. 6 Opere House ' _g , 0 1.1 43%Â» 15 + 4 Ill u 1 2 0 0& I r- CO C t: CE:OC,FA.re ~ \1} r. ~ Chaet Apop, .Aspen Ski m ~ E Coopel Ave AW e )6.AÂ· 4% "' "Â°1.nalrl 5249 ' . 9 18 4 alF The Garth b 24 8.14Â¥ A ' A L.0 1/' 12= 21 , '+Al../ b. * 1 .4/I- C' 0 Â©2011 Google - - I IN http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_qkhl=en&geocode=&q=69+Shady+Lane,+... 10/11/2011 . ,Â¢919' L n ce Ro 11 sesed' arrn' ;,AV' pu E,1,01,r 1 I 1. INTRODUCTION The following application requests variances from the Residential Design Standards for a single-family residence located at 69 Shady Lane in Aspen, Colorado (see Pre-Application Conference Summary, Exhibit 1, Appendix A). The location of the project site is depicted on the Vicinity Map on the previous page. The application is submitted pursuant to Chapter 26.410 of the Aspen Land Use Regulations by Mustang Holdings 11 (hereinafter "Applicant"), the owners of the property (see Letter, Exhibit 2, Appendix A). Permission for Galambos Architects to represent the Applicant is attached as Exhibit 3, Appendix A. 11. PROJECT SITE The project site is legally described as a parcel of land situated in Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th p.M. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. The parcel ID# is 273707300012. The property lies at the confluence of the Roaring Fork River and Hunter Creek in the Zone District of R-30 (Low-Density Residential). Currently the site contains an existing house of approximately 2,500 SF, a one-story cottage approximately 760 SF and (4) sheds. These buildings will be demolished to make room for the proposed project. A site improvement survey is attached (see Exhibit 1, Appendix B) and an existing conditions site plan follows on the next page. Due to the proximity to the Roaring Fork and Hunter Creek, a Stream Margin Review was required and the Resolution is attached (see Exhibit 2, Appendix B). 111. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The Applicant proposes to construct a 6-bedroom residence to meet the allowable floor area ratio (FAR) and height limit and a detached ADU of approximately 420 SF. The proposed residence has been sited in the approximate location and orientation of the existing house to maximize Southern exposure and views and to minimize disturbance to the site. The house bends around and maintains several existing large evergreen trees and pushes up against the West edge of the Development Area in order to preserve the existing lawn on the East portion of the site (see proposed site plan on following page IlIA). The ADU is located across a circular turn-around, tucked into existing vegetation in the general location of an existing covered parking shed. Proposed floor plans are included on following pages IlICÂ¤ Materials on both the main house and the ADU include stone veneer, horizontal and vertical wood siding, slate roof and patina copper roofs (see proposed elevations and roof plan on following pages IlID and IllE). A neighborhood block plan and photos of the site and neightborhood are attached on following pages IlIG and 11IH. 3 ., t IV. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS (MAIN HOUSE) The Applicant is requesting three (3) variances from the Residential Design Standards for the main house. The Standards and the proposed development's compliance with or variance from (in bold text) are summarized below: A. Section 26.410.040(A)(1) Building Orientation: On curvilinear streets, the front fagade of all structures shall be parallel to the tangent of the midpoint of the arc of the street. The proposed residence is sited over the existing house footprint to minimize disturbance to the site and to preserve existing large evergreens and an open lawn area. The house, while in general alignment with the complex curve of the street, is rotated slightly to capture sunlight and to allow the circular driveway access around an existing evergreen. While the intent of the design standards is to encourage residential buildings that address the street in a manner which creates a consistent "fagade line", existing houses along Shady Lane typically do not align with the street (see neighborhood block plan on previous pages). A variation from this standard, therefore, is requested. B. Section 26.410.040(A)(2) Build-to Lines: On parcels of lots of less than fifteen thousand squarefeet... The parcel is 2.755 +/- acres therefore, this Standard does not apply. C. Section 26.410.040(A)(3) Fences Any fence proposed will be not more than forty-two inches high and there are no man-made berms proposed therefore, this standard has been met. D. Section 26.410.040(B)(1) Building Form Per Section 26.410.010(B)(3) the parcel is not located in the Aspen infill area so is exempt from this Standard. E. Section 26.410.040(C)(1) Garages, access from an alley or private road... The parcel is accessed only from Shady Lane (a public street) therefore, this Standard does not apply. F. Section 26.410.010(C)(2)(a) ...thewidth oftheliving areaon thefirst floorshall beat least five feet greater than the width of the garage or carport The proposed residence living area on the first floor is approximately 50 feet wider than the garage therefore this Standard has been met. 4 G. Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(b) The front fagade of the garage...shall be set back at least ten (10) feet further than the front-most wall of the house. The house is located in the approximate location of the existing house and is pushed to the South end of the Development Area to rgreens with the garage tucked in behind the trees as viewed from Shady Lane. The intent of this standard is to "minimize the presence of garages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exist" and while not meeting the 10 foot requirement, the visual presence of the garage has been minimized if not eliminated by its distance from Shady Lane and the screening by existing trees and vegetation between the street and the garage. A variation from this Standard, therefore, is requested. H. Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(c) garage doors...perpendicular to the street Exception does not apply to this project. I. Section 26.410(C)(2)(d) driveway cut within the front yard setback The driveway cut is not within the setback therefore, this Standard does not apply. J. Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(e) The vehicular entrance width of a garage shall not be greater than twenty-four (24) feet. The proposed residence's garage vehicular entrance width is twenty (20) feet therefore, this Standard has been met. K. Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(0 ...Ifthegaragedoors arevisiblefrom a public street... The proposed residence's garage doors are not visible from the street and the double door is designed to appear like single stall doors therefore, this Standard has been met. L. Section 26.410.040(D)(1)(a) Building Elements...entry doors shall not be taller than eight (8) feet. The proposed residence's front door is 9'-0" high. Given the distance to Shady Lane and the elevation difference of 7' between theltreet and the main level, the top of the door will not be visible but the human scale will be provided by the first story element the entry gable. A variation from this Standard, therefore, is requested. M. Section 26.410.040(D)(1)(b) A covered entry porch of 50 square feet... The proposed residence has a 11' x 6' deep covered entry porch, the entry porch is one-story in height therefore, this Standard has been met. N. Section 26.410.040(D)(1)(c) Street-facing principal window... A significant window and a group of windows of the proposed residence face the street therefore, this Standard has been met. 5 , O. Section 26.410.040(D)(2) First Story Element The first-story element of the proposed residence consists of a covered entry and porch. This element comprises approximately 30% of the building's overall width, is a minimum of 6 feet deep from the wall it is projecting from and has a plate height of less than 10 feet therefore, this Standard has been met. P. Section 26.410.040(D)(3)(a) Windows...shall not span through the area where a second floor would typically exist... No window of the proposed residence spans through this area other than the entry transom which is exempt. Therefore, this Standard has been met. Q. Section 26.410.040(D)(3)(b) Windows...nonorthogonal This parcel is not located in the Aspen infill area therefore, this Standard does not apply. R. Section 26.410.040(D)(4) Lightwells There are no lightwells on the street-facing side of the proposed residence therefore, this Standard has been met. S. Section 26.410.040(E)(1)(a,b,c) Context...Materials The materials proposed are detailed to be consistent on all sides of the building, are used in ways true to their characteristics and are not highly reflective therefore, this Standard has been met. T. Section 26.410.040(E)(2) Inflection This parcel is not located in the Aspen infill area therefore, this Standard does not apply. 6 , V. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS - RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS (ADU) The Standards and the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit's ("ADU") compliance with are summarized below: A. Section 26.410.040(A)(1) Building Orientation: the front facades of all principal structures shall be parallel to the street. The ADU is a not a principal structure but is an accessory building therefore, this Standard does not apply. B. Section 26.410.040(A)(2) Build-to Lines: On parcels oflots ofless than fifteenthousand square feet... The parcel is 2.755 +/- acres therefore, this Standard does not apply. C. Section 26.410.040(A)(3) Fences Any fence proposed will be not more than forty-two inches high and there are no man- made berms proposed therefore, this standard has been met. D. Section 26.410.040(B)(1) Building Form Per Section 26.410.010(B)(3) the parcel is not located in the Aspen infill area so is exempt from this Standard. E. Section 26.410.040(C) Garages There is no garage proposed for the ADU therefore this Standard does not apply. F. Section 26.410.040(D)(1) Street Facing Entrance and Principal Windows. All single- family homes and duplexes...shall be satisfied if all of the following conditions are met (ab&c): The ADU is not a single-family home or duplex therefore this Standard does not apply. G. Section 26.410.040(D)(2) First Story Element The entire ADU is a first-story element (ten feet, as measured to the plate height, therefore, this Standard has been met. 7 1 '1 1 H. Section 26.410.040(D)(3)(a) Windows...shall not span through the area where a second floor would typically exist... No window of the proposed residence spans through this area other than the entry transom - which is exempt. Therefore, this Standard has been met. I. Section 26.410.040(D)(3)(b) Windows...nonorthogonal This parcel is not located in the Aspen infill area therefore, this Standard does not apply. J. Section 26.410.040(D)(4) Lightwells There are no lightwells on the street-facing side of the proposed residence therefore, this Standard has been met. K. Section 26.410.040(E)(1)(a,b,c) Context...Materials The materials proposed are detailed to be consistent on all sides of the building, are used in ways true to their characteristics and are not highly reflective therefore, this Standard has been met. L. Section 26.410.040(E)(2) Inflection This parcel is not located in the Aspen infill area therefore, this Standard does not apply. 8 APPENDIX A ec /+12'11- U I. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Claude Salter, 429-2752 DATE: 10/14/2011 PROJECT: 69 Shady Lane REPRESENTATIVE: Janet Leverson and John Galambos OWNER: Mustang Holdings 11 LLC TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variance from Residential Design Standards DESCRIPTION: The Applicant is proposing to demo an existing SFR (single family residence) and construct a new SFR with an ADU (accessory dwelling unit). The proposed project is located in the zone district of R-30 (Low-Density Residential) off of Shady Lane. The parcel has completed the Stream Margin Review process the results of which may be found in Planning and Zoning Resolution No.13 (Series of 2010) reception number: 572119. The new development is required to meet the RDS (Residential Design Standards). However, the parcel is not located in the Aspen Infill Area. Hence, it is required all the standards except the following: subsection 26.410.040(B)(1) Secondary mass, 26.410.040(D)(3)(b), Non-orthogonal windows and 26.410.040.(E)(2), Inflection, in its entirety. The applicant is requesting the following Residential Design Standard variances for the main house: Section 26.410.040(A)(1) Building Orientation Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(b) the front fagade of the garage Section 26.410.040(D)(1)(a) entry door The applicant will need to apply for three Residential Design Standard variances for the main house. Residential Design Standard variances are reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission during a public hearing. The review criteria for granting a variance are found in Section 26.410.020.D.2 of the Land Use Code. Please address the review criteria for each variance requested and provide photographs of the context of the neighborhood. The Land Use Code is found here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenUPIanning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.410.020.D Residential Design Standard Variances The land use application is found here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/landuseappform.p df Review by: Staff for complete application, and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Public Hearing: Yes, at Planning and Zoning Commission review Planning Fees: $1470 for 6 hours (additional hours are charged at $245) **please note that planning fees are subject to change in November, 2011. ./ I ", Total Number of Application Copies: 10 Copies To apply, submit the following information: 1. Total Deposit for review of application. 2. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 3. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. Completed Land Use Application. 5. Signed fee agreement. 6. Pre-application Conference Summary. 7. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. 8. Proof of ownership. 9. Existing and proposed site plan. 10. Previous approvals pursuant to P&Z Resolution number 13 (Series of 2010) 11. Existing and proposed floor plans and elevation drawings that are scaled with dimensions. 12. A site improvement survey that includes all existing natural and man-made site features. 12. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. 14. All other materials required pursuant to the specific submittal requirements. 16. List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing. The GIS department can provide this list on mailing labels for a small fee. 920.5453 17. Applications shall be provided in paper format (number of copies noted above) and on a CD. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 8>6 HI 61T 2- WRIGHT & LASALLE, LLP Aspen, Colorado 81611 715 West Main Street, Suite 20] Telephone: (970) 925-5625 Gary A. Wright Facsimile: (970) 925-5663 gaw@wrightlasalle.com 4 November 2011 Community Development Department City o f Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Proof of Ownership Mustang Holdings II, LLC To Whom it May Concern: I am writing this letter on behalf of my client, Mustang Holdings II, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, for which I am one of two Managers. This letter is given to satisfy the Proof of Ownership requirement of my client's Application. Mustang Holdings II, LLC, is the owner of real property located at 69 Shady Lane, in Aspen, Colorado; described by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning at a post standing about 30 feet south of the south bank of Hunters Creek and 50 feet west from the center of the Denver & Rio Grande Railroad track, said post being at the northwest corner of parcel of ground deeded to said Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company by the Hallam Land Company; thence southerly parallel with the Denver and Rio Grande Railroad 266 feet to the north bank of the Roaring Fork River; thence following the north and east bank of the Roaring Fork River with courses westerly and northerly 780 feet to the south bank of Hunters Creek at its junction with Roaring Fork River; thence N. 89Â°44' E. 220 feet to the place of beginning; Situate, lying and being in Section Seven (7), Township Ten (10) South, Range eighty-four (84) West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado. Based on my review of the records contained in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office as well as a Title Insurance Policy given by Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, Inc., it is my opinion that title to the property is vested in Mustang Holdings II, LLC. Sincerely, WRI~HT & LASALLE, LLP By: A Gary A. Wright Copy to Steven W. Caple www.wrightlasalle. com 6>44, 6 LT . 3, Mustang Holdings II, LLC October 27, 2011 Ms. Claude Salter City o f Aspen, Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: 69 Shady Lane, Aspen, Colorado 81611 - Residential Design Standard Variance Dear Ms. Salter: Mustang Holdings II, LLC hereby authorizes John Galambos and Janet Leverson o f Galambos Architects, Inc. to act on our behalf and to represent us with all aspects of planning and development with the City of Aspen on the above referenced project. We have included with this correspondence proof of ownership and the planning fee. Applicant: Applicant's Representative: Mustang Holdings II, LLC Galambos Architects, Inc. 715 West Main Street, Suite 201 Aspen Airport Business Center, Bldg. 134, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Suite D Aspen, Colorado 81611 Mr. Steve Caple - Manager Mr. John Galambos - Principle Mr. Billy Ray Johnson - C.M. Ms. Janet Leverson - Project Architect Telephone: 214-720-1688 Telephone: 970-429-1286 If you need any further information, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, L ke Steven W. Caple Manager 6><M- 1 6l 7- y. ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: MUST-*KJG> ttaL,13/414 5 31~ Location: 4,1 StiADY, L.,hkÂ£, Aâ‚¬(Afk) / Sect -1,10â€¢uJY#tr los, ANGâ‚¬ 94 w (Indicate street address, lot & block number, lekal description where appropriate) oF-+4 (2 P M Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2-737073000(1 APPLICANT: Name: M 05Â») G libLOI OC:.S ~I Address: -1 1 S W M 81 0 SÂ¥- SN:e 10 1 Phone #: 02- 1 Y - 7 20 - 1 G R' P REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 6*LAM 605 AmÂ·CA frecrs Address: 314 D A 2, 61 A SpÂ¥KA Co Phone #: 9 -70- 919 - 1 1.86 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption U Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Text/Map Amendment Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream C Subdivision Exemption (includes U Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review U Lot Split U Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion )SI Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment U Other: 6 U Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) SEE lop O 04-7-1,0 0 PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc,) 1 61â€¢06(+ f-Ap. li~ 9.ps,c g~ku; / Del-nown ADU Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ ~Et Pre-Application Conference Summary U Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ,Et Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form U Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards U 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. m El El El EKH-1611- S CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of CitÂ¥ of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Vil(/SiD*+06 17%>LI)/AJA 5- 31$ (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for Mos'|446 ttbc.01 604. S IR (hereinafter, THE PROJECT), 2, APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that becatise of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this tilne to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is iii the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs aie incuired. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application, 4. CITY atid APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient inforination to the Historic Pieservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservatioii Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to inake legally requircd fitldiiigs for project consideration. unless cun-ent billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5, Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of$ /970 which is for *, hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional nionthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $245,00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such perio(lie payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay stich accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By: L @24- Chris Bendon Coniniunity Development Director Date: 10~61-7 ~/1 Billing Address and Telephone Number: 1115 WesÂ¥ (Main 9. Sk ZDI A..pen , C.0 9 16 i 114-120-luti eÂ·*1-1-1 61 F .,r, 6 ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project. 04017Â»4 6 ffbu:)/2(69 ZE Applicant: M,U 31Â»36 -AOUO'OGS EUP Location: Gsâ‚¬ , SM,1,07 (Â·4.Uf , AS/e,-; Zone District: 11- 3 0 Lot Size: 2-1 59 +A Ac- Lot Area: 9-7/ 4 20,- S se ( for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition o f Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: 1 - MA,4 tiouse e Ado Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed: 1 ).(Wo#Ac AN Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: 7553â€¢ Proposed: 1%93 Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: 2-9 Proposed: lE>' Access. bldg. height: Existing. Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing. Required: 3 Proposed: 1) % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing. Required: No (20â‚¬41â‚¬Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: ~206~301 Proposed: 30' Rear Setback: Existing: Required: 15~9Â§' Proposed: 1 S ' Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: lo Proposed: lo' Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed. Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing Required: I d Proposed: lot + Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: (LeS14*kin.:FL Bgst,-0 Elâ€¢vÂ¢91,109 5 Easy PeelÂ® Labels i A I Bend along line to i 04% e IT -7 Use AvervÂ® Template 5160Â® Feed Paper = expose Pop-up EdgeT 1 .1 . ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASPEN CONSOLIDATED SANITATION CALLWINNIE LLC STUDIES 565 N MILL ST 1606 CLEMSON CIR 100 PUPPY SMITH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 ASPEN, CO 81611 CITY OF ASPEN FRIEDBERG MARC S 50% INT HINES GERALD D ATTN FINANCE DEPT PO BOX 8747 2800 POST OAK BLVD 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81612 HOUSTON, TX 77065-6100 ASPEN, CO 81611 ROARING FORK I LLC WILLOUGHBY PONDS TRUST 7800 BEVERLY BLVD #3371 180 N WACKER DR #001 LOS ANGELES, CA 90036 CHICAGO, IL 60606 Etiquettes faciles & peler I Repliez & la hachure afin de t www.avery.com I Sens de i Utilisez le gabarit AVERYÂ® 5160Â® charaement r#vuler le rebord Pop-upMC 1 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 APPENDIX B RECEPTION#: 572119, 07/22/2010 at 10:15:22 AM, 1 OF 4, R $26.00 13*41617 c.gapice K. Vos Caudill -.tkin County, CO 2- RESOLUTION N0. 13 (SERIES OF 2010) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A SPECIAL REVIEW STREAM MARGIN REVIEW FOR 69 SHADY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. PARCEL ID: 2735-073-00-012 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the owners of 69 Shady Lane - Jack Rowland, Fleeta Baldwin, Jill Boyd, and Roine St. Andre, owners as tenants in common. The application has been authorized for submission by Jack Rowland, Fleeta Baldwin, and Jill Boyd, representing a majority ofthe property ownership; and, WHEREAS, the property is located at the confluence of the Roaring Fork River and Hunter Creek and is subject to the City's regulations on stream margin development; and, WHEREAS, the City's mapping for top-of-slope excludes this property entirely from that area where development can occur and the applicant has submitted an appeal of the determination as permitted in Section 26.435.040 of the City of Aspen Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the property is also affected by the floodplain and the floodway designation as depicted on the Flood Insurance Rate Map and interpreted and enforced by the City Engineer in her official capacity as the City's Floodplain Administrator; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing continued from May 18, 2010 to and held on June 15,2010, upon review and consideration of the recommendation of the Community Development Department, presentation from the applicant, public testimony, and discussion and consideration of the proposal, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Stream Margin Special Review, by a six to zero (6-0) vote, with the allowances and limitations as outlined in this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Approval of Stream Margin Review The Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the Stream Margin Special Review with the following conditions: 1. A Stream Margin map for this property shall be prepared by the applicant for approval by the City Engineer and the Community Development Director. The map shall describe and depict a development boundary based on the more restrictive of the Floodway and the top-of-slope. The map shall also indicate and tabulate all areas of the property above and below the high water line, those areas affected by steep slopes, and those areas affected P&Z Reso No. 13, Series of 2010 Page 1 RECEPTION#: 572119, 07/22/2010 at 10:15:22 AM, 2 OF 4, ~ 4,anj_pe K. Vos Caudill, .kin County, CO by right-of-way or access easements, including potential proscriptive easements. This map shall be attached to and recorded along with this Resolution. A 24" x 36" copy of the map shall also be retained in the planning file and the building address file. 2. All development within the development boundary shall be setback at least fifteen (15) feet from the top-of-slope. In addition, any development within the development boundary a:nd within thirty (30) feet of the top-of-slope shall be subject to both a forty- five degree (45Â°) progressive height limit from the top-of-slope and the height limitations of the zone district. 3. Development between the development boundary and the top-of-slope shall be limited to those types of development allowed within property setbacks as defined in the Land Use Code and the height limitations described above, provided such development is also consistent with floodplain and floodway restrictions. 4. Development on the river-side of this development boundary shall be limited to at-grade type work which will not raise the base flood elevation and which is secured to the ground and cannot enter a fiood event. Any development activity including landscaping shall be subject to approval by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 5. A riparian restoration plan approved by the City of Aspen Parks Department shall be required prior to acceptance of a building permit application for this property. The restoration plan shall require implementation of the restoration prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Remodeling or other similarly limited development activity, as determined by the Community Development Director, shall not trigger this restoration requirement. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit for redevelopment of this property, the well and irrigation pump shall be vacated and all water rights shall be assigned to the City of Aspen. The property shall be connected to the City of Aspen water system. Remodeling or other similarly limited development activity, as determined by the Community Development Director, shall not trigger this well abandonment requirement. Section 2: Lot Area The effective Lot Area of the subject property for purposes of calculating allowable Floor Area (FAR) is as follows: Lot Size: 120,007.8 sf Area below High Water Line (HWL): - 18,751.0 sf Sub-total 101,256.8 sf Shady Lane prescriptive easement: - 288.0 sf Sub-total 100,968.8 sf !4 Area above HWL and with 20-30% slope: - 1,247.5 sf Sub-total 99,721.3 sf P&Z Reso No. 13, Series of2010 Page 2 RECEPTION#: 572119, 07/22/2010 at 10:15:22 AM, 3 OF 4, - *)Â¥gice K. Vos Caudill, tkin County, CO Area above HWL and with 2 30% slope: - 2,035.0 sf TOTAL LOT AREA for calculating FAR: 97,686.3 sf The Lot Area for purposes of determining allowable density (no slope area reductions) is 100,968.8 s.f. The Floor Area for the parcel shall be according to the zoning for the parcel and the Land Use Code in effect at the time of building permit submission. Section 3: Fishing Easement The Planning and Zoning Commission encourages the applicant to provide a Fisherman's Easement along the watercourses within this properly. The applicant is encouraged to discuss with the City of Aspen Parks Department ideas that may facilitate such a grant of easement such as labor or design assistance with the riparian restoration plan. Section 4: Vested Rights This approval shall be valid for the greater of the three-year period of statutory vested rights, as more precisely defined in the Development Order issued by the Community Development Department, or until the City's Stream Margin regulations are amended. The period of statutory vested rights may be extended pursuant to Chapter 26.308 of the Land Use Code. Until said time, development on this property in compliance with this resolution may proceed to building permit as allowed herein. After said timeframe, this approval shall be subject to any revised provisions of the Land Use Code and may, based on a determination by the Community Development Director, be subject to review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 6: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or poMion o f this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed P&Z Reso No. 13, Series of 2010 Page 3 RECEPTION#: 572119, 07/22/2010 at 10:15:22 AM, 4 OF 4, ~. â‚¬Tar*ce K. Vos Caudill, kin County, CO a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 15th day of June, 2010. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: >L . ~/jim True, Special Counsel Stan Gibbs, Chairman ATTEST: Vft,C,RU,> v j Lothian, Deputy City P&Z Reso No. 13, Series of2010 Page 4 . I. 1 1 - mil [SIBII NOTES: LANDSCAPE ARCHRECTURE LAND PLANNING 1) CIVIL ENGINEER TO VERIFY UTILITY LOCATION AND REQUIREMENTS URBAN DESIGN AND IDENTIFY ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED SITE Â· 311 Main Street. Suite 102 DESIGN. ' embondale CO. 81623 I 970.963.6520 2) REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR WALL EXTENDS BEYOND GRADING AND HORIZONTAL LAYOUT. ENVELOPE, TO BE 3) REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION DkAWINGS FOR COORDINATED WITH - PROPERTY.LINE ----it)*21- \ EROSION CON-,ROL PLANS AND DETAILS. HUNTER CREEK ARCHITECT 4) ALL LAYOUT OF'SITE WALLS, PAVING AND LANDSCAPE FEATURES TO EX]STING - 1 BE PERFORMED IN FIELD BYSURVEYORAND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE 1 ARCHITECT. -- ~ ~~\~, FOUNDATIONSTO | ~33:9;31 4 ceÂ»ViA -1 \ ~ Â«< 1, 'l Â·Â·, REMAIN ~ 5) REFER TO C'VIL PLANS FOR ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES. C.sullant ''~ C ..0 1/22.- \. c. c Â» s qÂ©44~k> Â» - FINAL PAVING PATTERN AND LOCATION OF EXPANSION AND CONTROL P-2,1, 6) PAVING PATi-ERN SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ILLUSTRATES DESIGN INTENT. - 1 (\8~-r~r# 32-QE~~*~~404&44~.~,1.~~.,4// ., 4?<li '' 0.4 f.' ADU - - JOINTS TO BE COORDINATED W[TH CIVIL ENGINEER AND ARCHITECT. â‚¬ ; FFE = 36 >8%5f-x h . 1 IllÂ·: LOWRETAINING '~. 90Â®/*f t. '* . ) m LEGEND: % / LOW RETAINING , 1 WALES, SEE CIVIL 5 (92, 79.59 lili J 0 / ~ PAVING - MATERIAL T.B.D. IA\ k , ) WALL; SE~,g~Jl- At. AW#. 2 .. Â·I + ) d *Mu 1 r=-7-1 slONE PAVING - MATERIAL ~EIT i AND PATTERN T.B.D. ' SPA ~/ 2.-3<t~ -/ F--Â·Â«i "/t':1''.2,,ftÂ« ft.\% f-f{ 02JIn AT~~~~~4- 3.4 9 - St rE WALLS - MATERIAL 9Â·~ i . ...... . . /2,49>.2 ./4.' '/6,4, ./9/,r , 4+ 111 lin,/f #'1'4,1~1. ~ . ~4. NP L 1% e- / r- 44' Y . Â· . " Sl EPPING STONES- .Ut 000 SIONE TYPE T.B. D 09.19.11 DD PHASE / 16-0 :39.4~h, DISTING TREES TO 'm/.4, fi, ukum/hi,. .-Â« 1 ..t / REMAIN 14Â»/ STONE PATIO NEiW FENCE: STONETYPEAND .. i SEE ARCH ~ ~L-NEWGATE: SEE ARCH. DWGS. , PATTERN T.B.D. f \ DWGS Revi,ions: < >4 ) ALL IMPROVEMENTS - ~~...'?.'R~EEIDWNCE 1:111 V 'fOUTSIDE DEVELOPMENT (' ,4 ' -1 - /,5/i , ~ ~ BOUNDARYTO BE -~h n LOW RETAINING 1 ~ ><' 3/ / COORDINATED WITH THE ~~ k 1 1~ Â·Â·Â·.'Â·~..~.--: -Â·-~FFE=,31.5 ~ ~ '~. h .. ZIRCGH '~<~i,~7.Â«'' WALL; SEE CIVIL ~ ~ -NEW FENCE; CITY OF ASPEN , Va . . ./0// / DWGS. 1 1 -- SEE ARCH DWGS. FIRE PIT ~' . 444. ft /..<75 A I L) 1 A â€žrl Ch \ tÂ·~\I-*14 -3>-\ A 1 i ><j ) j -\ \ WALL; SEE~ML 41 ~ 0 LOW RETAINING ~ \ I */ Pr JTLy) ~ . C> U \ .C /.-9.40 / Itm cp 1\ ~---w--_EEYEÂ·25855~ELOPEE \ ( 13 949414 99 1 , STEPPING STONE--1 Â£ PATH TO BRIDGE. ( X I FINAL LOCATION C , .4\ AND LAYOUT TOBIE - < X )0 //-7-h\ 9 46 8.74 DETERMINED IN FIELD 1- n Nryl Â». 6,1 t..AL.- ..3 3 0â‚¬7 0 41% 2476 t PROJECTNO: 945514 ROARING FORK RIVER ~~~--ff~-~~ ~---t Uttj C ><..\.Ur-- 3 SHEETmE SITE MATERIALS 9... 4.27 * PLAN / hou - , / .... EXISTING BRIDGE LOCATION. , SEE ARCH. DWGS FOR NEW , P EopseP SI-lE FL~!A-) BRIDGE DESIGN L-1 Â«- 0 1=18 16 32 . C 111.6 111: X:\Projecls\Mils[ang 1101[Ii,~gi ll\slieets\09.16.11 DD Slibmiltai~g Aiie pian.Liwg . iA' . 601- '4*' 72Â·'. ~~t Â·. . .. L_uL--29 4/1-k ; 1.1 -1.7,1 . F E C- .~ -LEHIEIF~1- - -~ ..~--~ -------------~-----------~- = LOUNGE PL . -~ . Em InIZEZIJI~~ 120'-3" 4 r-Â·r--1 *l* ~ 1 EBEE 1 - 2 21-11 lilli 32uppER LEVEL_, - 111111 I 1111111111111111 // - - - ----- --- 1 11 1 11 .1 1 111'-3" c I - , - , , - Â«.45#/St? 1 1 .=a=; /9Â« - 1_01 i ' r-1-1 -=d ' , Iii,%1 %97 \410.\ 544: .2.11â€¢ 2---=== ' . / F =i==3 - -1 .5 . I 11 I IZ- . 1 EE Il : _1____ i / L - - - - MAIN LEVEL , - 5 Â»: L._1 -4 1 =1-U --4 -,- 1 -~-' 11 --*-- E-----1.--L. . -L 100'-0" C 1 + sou-n-1- ELâ‚¬~crlÂ©Q 1- -3732,7- / 1-Cl 1, ABC E F 1X8 VERTICAL WOOD SIDING STANDING SEAM COPPER ROOF -- SLATE ROOF --- 1 97= - - -------- LOUNGE PL / 1 11 - - - - 120'--r3" t~Mu .._i I -_ _ --- E,-fo 8 3 8 4 1 ttite I. 1 + - L.-LJ 1X12 HORIZONTA L-1 6 ~'./.'I 1-11 ~ EE ' 13-1 ~~~11 EIEBEEE 40 1 1 1 1 . . --~/ ? 1 -- WOOD SIDING L.1 - 13Â« li 49 1 1 -.. U"iL.. | ! 11 kiL , - 9 W~ _ UPPER LEVEL a 111'-5"-0 Pet 7 --11 ~ -6 -A-LK~~-_2~ * -'27*,45 -149?3 -,- - 9--r- ~ 4Â£1 4Â·5 I. / m .1* 74 - 27 - 7-1 11 : ..:ll 111]1111.11 ./ .Â©, .t-- -tr!=11 'r~~111,Â· : 1/ ENTRY 2- r-74-4- , ; EH ~~ ~ 7 4â€ž4= Â·~ Â·-i.~,uxÂ·< ~~ ~~~ = --77 100' - 6" . 4 ~' Fr,4 - 4--7 -1164-4 -r= k 1 U - IL-,-1 , X21 14 IL 0 ----- --'-- e=.:t ':..il *T77.u:riÂ·- - UGARAGE_SLAB / ,~ 1- 221Â·.-I - - - I - u - '392 99,-2-6" I .1.. 1 Â»'*144 r/ LOG COLUMNS STONE VENEER 1 34 1 Â»521-1.1 EleVArl- l 0,-3 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 03/.b â‚¬ =- PO" lili 0 IL ~1 #~1 2 ~ â€¢Â·: Â»9* t .,0 . .1 1. â€ž 4â€ž .P . 0 1. 4 . , ng -0. ....... I .1 1234 5 7 '.49 er. ~-j- -Ii-MM-W- - -- --=32==2=LOUNGE PL Ii- - IN 120'-3" 1/1 ~ 1 UPPER LIVEL_-â€¢3 Illl 111'-3" Cl/ f-a f 1 ) -/ 4 3 - . 1 : 1 A 84, \ i --6=9 +U â‚¬CE -Â· . i rÂ·-r-~ 7- - :% r 1 - _ -- MAIN LEVEL AI) 21 EAST El-aA-1-70,Â·0 - -- - 5lsâ‚¬' p 1 Loll 12 11 (10 9 ~ .It' 1 1 1 1 111 21 111 - --- * IZE I LOUNGE PL /I) llllll 120i-75" A 0 / 1 1 1111111 11111 19111111 UPPER LEVEL *Il 111'-3"1 11_LJ~~"I~.~-r 6-Â»Â»~- *44-6 11 5 29*t 944 3*V 2 9**t .. i- *40* * >4~emyÂ¢. , 9,%%4 9=13% --- MAIN LEVEL /I) r 'm=ZIZILj l' 0 100'--0"/ 1 ' ' 32691- E.L.eVA<-i-Â£ DA.) Ill.P L .&.459 :*QU+V: e l 2/f / 4 1 Ni 1 2:12 4 - 1-i 2.â„¢ 1 1 1 - 1 METAL SNOWGUI (TYP) STANDING SEAM 10 COPPER ROOF 3% SLATE ROOF---1 - 4..12 1 % --9:12~-Â©~9:12 10:12|~ 3 4 10:12 4 -*IN 1 11II1111I I II11II1I11 6 114111111 ~1111111111 9 DECK a FLAT ROOF Â®111.11 IlilllIlll ~| ll[IM'1111 5/ C\1 -N / N - 2 Â«ant 5 - i L- CHIMNEY 2 1 01 01 0. 01 0 ~; 11 - 4 d 0 1 - CS Â«14 /4 &,101, / 3 4 ~ 111111111111 7 _ N 1 -Ft# / // /ll/,/.1 ----- 1 1 lillll It DI IllIllill lilli _ _ 1 2 -1 - 49 - - -WHUN I C\1 2 - - 1 d N ~ ~"F~~ 1"T~"~ 44 ~,Illl 11Illl - -111111 1 lili 10:HIll ~10:12~ - lunci.,15 U.11.11 RIB - / 1111111 LUU lili lili lilli lilli [1-F|||| | CHIMNEY .la_YtaL (Dd 11 1,6 11 //Fr:.42~hil///IMI'll/'ll//5//Ill Fy ..41:fise.~ 12 EEI Mgl 12= (C B A Â«] 4 [~EI[Pi~, , --10 - - 12 111 111111 I 11 C 111111111111111111111 1 II I T.O. PL -1 -- . T.O. PL /I) 10- - ---- -- ------ L~&559 110'-tjii-32. ~<~~1 I10:12 1 10:121 lili -04 - - 110' -0" c. ili ll-L-11111111111 IlllIUJI /74 I I-ELE[N 1 8- 21/1/ ft<11'TI --WAIN LEVEL E--112=1 MAIN LEVEL_-I L_L ' 100' - 0" - 100' - 0" Ll/ 1 1 -lili 1 1 1 1 - - 27 Ch NORTH ELEVATIOP ~4) V\~EST ELEVATION 33/32~~-2Ty~~ -3/32"=-1Â«------ CRICKET I 0Â©09 17(Â»~ _ %11= 1 1-0 B A 13 1 SLATE ROOF 12 12 ' STANDING SEAM ~ C B A 4 d37 1~ COPPER ROOF 12 --12~ 13' - 6" 16' - 0" 12 LIA'FRIE~ - 10 - - T.O.PL I 2 cz~*#21*jÂ©*11&*3~ - T.O. PL .-h (5 - --- - --<Â° ~ 110'-C" 110'-36" 13 m V- - -1~~ WOOD SIDING 1X12 HORIZONTAL b 100' - --- 100' - 0" 4.' 1\ 1 ' lit...Li~ Lal ED 1 - , : , MAIN LEVEL *r 1*1241**iÂ»1*KUL____MAI-N LEME-L_Â£ - 1 1 Ill 0 | | STONE VENEER ~ ~ 1 1 Oil Q 6'. 9" 6' - 9" ~-n SOUTH ELEVATION - EAST ELEVATION (~, 3/32" = 1 1-0" C B - 3/32" = 1'-0" FÂ·(ms quu)_(A 73'22' 2 (43 \44, AD u # i LF WOL EL:OL ZINE % ; : Lvr El _,-r, ./ e 2-4 13.2 'L f : F . 0 900 , 1 0 1 -. rl <,2 , ~ ~f Â»460 fEJ 1- / 9, f=-4- <23 * . .. - UÂ»rÂ·J , e. 1. ..F D Â£31*94*,Mblf> A . ; . 4 1 -,3 -~ i Z a =.-- - 244 J . - . - 4 Te.r~ 4/ 9 , . 0-7 -E ' i.--rÂ« . 2 %. 12) f.-3 00 /:*'*.#.I ;. '*Tt~~ ~~~~ 5+~qne' 6 ' .:': 2*-' .-:-:'*:'-.~-I 22 0 Â»/ --- CO ' 4 .0 0.-~ i 4\-1 J 1-17 -0 I *14 - dp' O .~ CLEO 51. . 1 U -Â«M . 1 . â€ž 4/ 4 'b ~ 1 4 <? C 1'. I 41. X C . . o . n , 1 40 - .P-/3 0 - 101 r.Â·i__7 L.L--1 ..4 ~-A.n~7 fl 40 - U Â«f' 1.':C-Â« -Â«Ae. 1 CÂ»b , L.- 2 - . .7.i . .1... ... 1, 4-2 .9 -11 42 1 i I. 94)Â»- 4<53 9 , , i . O ? 1 f 0, -, ~'Â· ' 8 4 rn - 2 6 -1/ 8 br---7 i L < 4 , 0 h 9 M- 2 + 2 k ' <%/1 - -009 - \ \ U O 1 -1 /9-3 / \Â¢ <6 b NEIGH,5.2 MEDP ~61 / 1 2 - O - I - 9 I 0 I\40 / d-'. 7-I i WOODDWâ‚¬14 LN 14 -4 ---0 1 - : g \ / 0 L.4.-7 \ t>t ' 4.. ---2 *.~ t.. r.- -' 11 T fâ€ž'--- .=22 4 - , '' 01.__f -/ I 0.34 . . n Â· 7\ .72 i /Â» 2 'icIL-J--, 12 V. 01 .. ---GitiliESPIE,AVE.- 1 L- -Â·~.'~2$ ' ---i *0<~r - .... .- 09 0 190 . cp ~~39.1-0. :COE' 1 .1. - .N- - El fh - W..5 0 - *- 'I l. ~'4 - ~rt.\4 . dard . O 1-_i - - CU U -1 -, M l --t.- r In-Il 3 --4 -4-2 4 .i - --â€¢'=~~~ ==~1 7~ :-PEA*Â¢i=Â· :nW O /1 , ~r-'7 0,0510 ' ,_.,_I :-b 411 Â·OLJ B - 1 r. t-- <Cl~.:. . ~. %" ' r i I < ...C<-,- 0 Or-3 .52 i--f-7 - .:. ... -I_ 1 .. ... - - - 2 4 1 .0 .- 1 - - 7 0 -R 1/ . W 3 XEâ‚¬ 2 n , 13 t 'i Pro- -. ' . -*... Ad ro . La c .-J 20101 > ~-7 ~-:Â·Â·Â·;j~,j~' 4,3 - .1 -LJ 1 #,r. l.\ $ C."j. 1-- te444 e.r-Lj oif.f--7 7~t= ~47 n. - C' it-. - 24 - . U * 1 0 1 k re fh .. - . Â»- ,-4< -h r--4 5 462 / ht -- -, L-f 1 - &/I .- h --_h .. .-1 4 . 2 ' . - I ' I- - 21 '13 2 'fÂ« 0 - 19. I }.,,f.;1~7ry-4-7 6.4 7 C--1 - --- . 1. I .4. f ....1 > . 00 02-'.31 \ - Lh F V 5 I L~/i.. & L ~~ 425%;6<jil</fer p--- i- - - /FWI'%. I A- 1 2 fi /17447;43; 3-4.:04,1~3371,7Â·--- (1 < - F 46A2/NA - h Â·L U ..4-4 --1 f 414<, .9 1/CZ '-Â·r 1'71- 1 . 93Â»EÂ·ST -0 /1 I 1 b..-1 . e .f\, : t.h .B I ell-+ I - 0 . 0 u] f 3 1 3 1---rÂ»4 k r.~- .rf Â». 9 22 '--SEJ * r.-7 f- . Â·.: 4 5 7 ex ...Â·-7 tr' Dh %/ 0 ~ ~6 9'"1.~.O ~: U f 7 rn c j R -vili , b : 11. - c. t got, Ft -7 4 - -er/-1 0 .-1 'JÂ»CD G fo k dr--'r thi - Â· e-- C. 3 ) 1 1 ..22 -- -- I . 2 i j f- 3 /---I:...f~ k~Lri'.Ja PNP f f-fÂ· '=~Â· 43 .0/7,n.> 0 0 ~--.-2 : 141/UÂ»Wl,9 --1...Â© L,;49 ta c (-_1 \ h. ...1 Â«,1./Al 000 L.--#., r. @Aes. Don 999% 0 1 r- -d 0 A fl t-02 fy G f>20 52- - '- b 7 - i..t~~ / 1---- i L., . -Â·- 2.ZY' k U % , A ': n -0. .0/ 3 4 11 ./. Gi 1.....1 T Ort ..33'112 1 0 -4 0 4-j C -2 00 r r % 8 : r-I f Â« . / e rÂ·--p*336RÂ© ; i it## < 4Lri A /h!- 1 rn --3 03 1 0 U t 0 < -j-0 #FA 6 , 06 41-3 B," f&11 f~ 1 \ 1-'_ Icl . 4 0Â£ 1 -I.-I- :. 4 0 . ~ MARC & KAREN FRIEDBERG PARCEL NO. 273707200026 BOOK 766, PAGE 967 GERALD D. HINES 780 % PARCEL NO. 273707200035 BOOK 348, PAGE 951 EXISTING EDGE (DEED CALLS TO CENTER Â·Â·- OF WATER OF HUNTER 0 L.// CD /h AUGUST 2009 4 54* 3~ I-// 1 VICINITY MAP ~ 1 \< la n C -p 6004 111 7830~ d,1, 63' 4007 ,Â·0#Â° \\ HUNTER CREEK 4 06~6â‚¬319 0 1 NS.#19398 ( E ~~--REBAR & CAP REBAR CAP -7 L. S.#2376 (FND) VERLAP- (TIE *ROM 1/4 ON ~ 8 (SET) AREA \1---le 5 50"E ~/~8.99' WEST 1/4 CORNER 4-1.4 j (YIELDING BEARING) (TYPICAL) 835 N88%3'40"E 49 D N89'53'49" SECTION 7 , ~NO. 4 REBAR & CAP 3" BLM BRASS CAP Â· ..~ ~ r ~ \ \LS.#25947 Â»ID) 20.0 (FND) 01% 8 \ * ~ ~ \SITE BENCH MARK ELEVATION: 7838.32 2 04, 1 LEGEND 1 CALLWINNIE, LLC 96 POWER POLE ZONE i 82 WELL 3 o.kQ 1~ PARCEL NO. 273707300010 41 4% 5 TONE 1 \ \ RECEP-nON NO. 501239 8 ; a Y 1 . / 1 i ~ WATER SHUT OFF bL WO D -am . 4 fE EST Â· ----S WATER PUMP B 27* ---- 14 A OF RO RI 24 1.1 - r- I TELEPHONE PEDESTAL FORK RI 4 0 783 UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE kgo VO , AST A ~ -j . ROADWA w 3:HAERADEDJJIERS / ASPHALT 2 - W WOOD FEN~E -0\ ..1 U t.. Al \ 4 * ~ PRIVATE WAY LICENSE DECIDUOUS 1~EE ' CIENCEÂ·.1~*6 7 . W OPOSED 44Â· Â· BOOK 180, PAGE 360 RECEPTION NO. 102374 0- CONIFEROUS ~FE , ~ ( as < ; 6 426 *Â· 'h~ & BOOK 188, PAGE 366 9 Â· - 2 RECEPTION NO. 108447 \'./ 1 , \\ . 5%,440.T.WN'*.,,.12 CA- 0 9 0 ... m + 02 1% ~ CO .i*ISHE[?'f,f~Â·2, . F 4, R ~ . 55& Ac. 42 Y SPIG 4Ks> Z 9 BOOK 568, PAGE 75 A \ REFERENCES C,ENTER -- C .... OF ROARING F~R}< gIVER 2; ' 9 ZONE A . 9 u 4.64 ..\ 3~ SETBACK 5 LIMITS PER FEMA MAPS R >928 w M 0 7836 ASPEN CENTEE,FOR / 0 X FRPM 62Â§ -- 169.-' . ENVIRONMENTAC-STUDIES / , 6 WOOD + ' SETBACK , l PNO. 273707300501 FENC 840 - ~ BOOK 568, PAGE 7p/ F OM TOS b< 4~* EXISTING EDGE h f , ~ ~ OF WATER AUGUST 2009 S RO NG - le ..... 8..... P FO RIVER - , 3. /1. ~- ..-. , \ 1 L . D i.~ PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE f N 21'31'49"W 35.1 ( 24/ N \+0- , ST-/06> / ..+0 --ISLAND - *- ~ .Â£2503 m 0413 i Â·A' ev 1.21-Iv 7840 91*--p.U 42, C \ 4 111.6 -232Â»- RANDE RECEPTION NO. 069109 72 Wg GRANDE RAILRO 7838 OOD BRIDGE 12'-04 K - -..2.*2$,1...1...1 : ~ 2 uu~cm- rÂ·,1 ,i ,..,. - r I 12'-6" Â·L '2,Â·4 -~ Â· ~ 'dfAL_. ..~1~ 2_. i.,i . I . 1 0 3 45 14, -04 10, G al i lill b il j 1 U / / 4h.f fo + fd-3 e.Â«Â»96 24'- 0" 23' - 6" 6 Bâ‚¬Uk)_ 17'_J-21__ c..r,+1 17' - 6" 1-----73-7 1 7-- - / -~ 4 1 10 1 1 1 1 \ 1 1 1 --- 1 j IC==== =3 ===-31 1 1 1 /1 -- -~ - \ -1 47 N , 0 \ 1 1 1 11 1 1 - 1 1 0 \ L_ 11 11 1 1- 1 00 00 - C===2 1 1 1 //2\ -1 (9h th - \ 1 1 0 ON - 1 % . - -- --1 XE#Jr,2.Y 0 _ \ 6 11 0 /0 --1 - 4 1 -- -- 0 -10 1 & 1 0 - 11 1 r 1-1 0 pl I 7 ---23 31_1 1-0Â« 0 -9 1 0 --7 1 0 4 \ - ~1 J ---4 c 3 O\ / --- --2 7 2 1 1 4 -\ to 1 -32Â£2614EfLE*E_flt_ â‚¬r) f vrK' 11\. O 12% 1 \\ 16' -3.111 NAh 4ky -Lis' =139. /1. -- - CM-)01 -300-12 3*Kirpi,YW 7 00.0 Â°00Â·01 Crl -- -; - -li~-I 1 9 - 3 - - ---k n \ -~ - 8 ------n ; '94 7 3 \ --- -- 9 - _ .0 -,00/, =13 L . + .st 9 1*1 -- 1 , 7 - LI V 01- 2 (D L- I O - 11 1 9 11 -- h 3 e - - 1 1 1 --- LJ CO G 3/ 1 -0 , 1 1 1--~ // / 9 4 ~ F7 L___J~O "9 -,00 L = 13 i 23 -_623 0 1/ 7 - 43 11 11 1 ./ -- N - - *-.42 + -- 2 1 1 1.00 00 E -.00 L =1 1 L4F41--4---- u / /1 \ 1 1 --- - ' k 1 - 11 - 1.------J--7/ 1 1 + g L_ - --1 / 1 - '' Le . ///ft \ 1 \ 7 - e ..9 -,Lt .0 - i L (-4 1,9 - 'EE /Lh\\ .0 - 1*Z - AE,7 -- 1 + ft --/0 )L>47 /2/ - 1-lt / / \-2 1 111-1 1 111 j L IED -17 -9,-j----IL Â»E X IR 2 4 .0 *j~2:'~~26//O/W~.",.2., ....43'4.:.~.i~~22.,Â£:, , i.-f"P~,::31 t,..41. ./. 1 D 1.- r. "' 13/*/3 ):Â·1 ~ :1 . ~~Â·1'~P# 0, Fid:*18....LE~f LO,I~....1:.1.~ Â·" Â·'.:T.Â·, 1. .,..1 - .44,1 Â· 4974. >4284 ~ ;Aft::4!~1.1 13 >I M 161 r .m ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE & PARTIAL TOPOGRAPHIC .JRVEY 20 h Â©a 4-*1--9-'.Pr->toJ . 2< .Â·q (:0.- Ar.%-a,-i) E A PARCELOF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. Vt:-4-94 .\ 7, Â·.....j.-hy=~14 N e I 0 2 027 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO TREECHART (PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 311 AT PAGE 307) SE 9 2 Im:g 4,' -jiu~,54.,/i*~,F; ,) 1~ Â· j~-~L,=.r--4~<-'~ _ ~/ t .01 i. \ 1 BEGINNING AT A POST STANDING ABOUT 30 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUR BANK OF o ~ d~ ~ 14 TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP .Fl'â€¢*)...~/4.â€¢.â€¢liâ€¢â€¢411 4 -- 741/ 6.*etÂ© Â·i~ 4 L Â»422 - 1 CONIFEROUS 6- 13 HUNTERS CREEK AND 50 FEET WEST FROM THE CENTER OF THE DENVER & RIO O 6 .15 *f~ 49â‚¬04Â»,mÂ»sp~* -4*- u ' I .h 3 DEODUOUS (314 18' OF GROUND DEEDED TO SAID DENVER AND RIO GRANDE RAILROAD COMPANY BY THE \ - -t-l-2 9~41 1 2 CONIFEROUS E 15 GRANDE RAILROAD TRACK. SAID POST BEING AT THE NORâ„¢W*EST CORNER OF' PARCEL 4 DEaDUOUS 6- 11 HALLAM LAND COMPANY; THENCE SOU1HERLY PARALLEL WITH â„¢E DENVER AND RIO ~ ~ REBAR & CAP-~ - 5 CONIFEROUS 6" 10' GRANDE RAILROAD 266 FEET TO â„¢E NORTH BANK OF â„¢E ROARING FORK RIVER; LS.#20151 (DO) ~ - . J 6 CONIFEROUS 4- MENCE FOLLOWING THE NORTH AND EAST BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER WITH COURSES WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 780 FEET TO â„¢E SOUâ„¢ BANK OF HUNTERS f.rÂ«Â«054tÂ·- s .k:Fier,- 2 4 ~.Frt ! c 7 DECIOUOUS f 18 8 DECIDUOUS 10v 15' CREEK AT ITS JUNCTON WITH ROARING FORK RIVER: â„¢ENCE N89Â·44'E. 220 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH ALL WATER RIGHTS PERTAINING THERETO. 9 DEaDUOUS / 20' SINAE LYING AND BEING IN SECnON SEVEN (7). TOWNSHIP TEN (10) SOUTH, RANGE 3 '1224 9<l,Et,46# 31'Â·96; 1, 11 DECIDUOUS EIGHTY-FOUR (84) WEST OF THE SiXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. / 4 15 12 DECIDUOUS 15- 22' 13 DECIDUOUS A 15' Z 14 DEaDUOUS 8. 15' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 0 15 CONIFEROUS f 121 0 GRAPHIC SCALE ~ 16 DEaDUOUS (3): 18' (AS SURVEYED) o is I . 5 17 DECIDUOUS (2)8- 20' m â‚¬ A .2 %27#rt...-irre,~*LY.~<.~~i<-z.--v:,j 41 Â£ 18 DECIDUOUS (3)8* 20' A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN â„¢E WEST HALF OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF Pin<IN, I ~ STATE OF COLORADO; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARICUALLY DESCRIBED AS 19 DEaDUOUS f 12 I /~l i Â¢3%4291*;2.~Â».Â·'ud'-J r 20 DECIDUOUS 10- 18' FOLLOWS: C IN FEET ) M 21 DEODUOUS 6" 12 1ll MARC & KAREN FRIEDBERG l inch = 30 1 22 DEDDUOUS COMMENCING AT A POINT ON â„¢E WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE DENVER AND PARCEL NO. 273707200026 GERALD D. HINES 6 ---1 BOOK 766. PAGE 967 6- 12 23 DECIOUOUS (3)12- 25' RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD. SAID POINT ALSO BEING 30' SOUâ„¢ERLY OF THE PARCEL NO. 273707200035 24 CONIFEROUS ~ 14' SOUTH BANK OF HUNTER CREEK, (WHENCE â„¢E WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID 1 \Al \ 4,7 BOOK 348, PAGE 951 lip 25 DECOUOUS (2>10- 18' SECTel 7 BEARS: $88-29'40*W A DISTANCE OF 499.25 FEET); THENCE S08-03'41~E F EXISING EDGE (DEED CALLS TO CENTER , ~ OF WATER OF HUNTER CREEK) / 26 DEaDUOUS (2)10~ 18' ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF â„¢E DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN AUGUST 2009 - .wt:4? x % 0~1 ~ 27 CONIFEROUS 3- 8, RAILROAD A DISTANCE OF 260.69 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; â„¢ENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY BANK OF VICINITY MAP 1 1 6 1 - / ; \ 29 DEaDUOUS 8 15 28 DECIDUOUS E 12 SAID ROARING FORK RIVER RE FOLLOWING THIRTEEN (13) COURSES: SCALE: 1~ = 1000 - *Yir~ 1:4-~-fa .. ; .4 30 DEaDUOUS 5' 10 t, S74Â·20'45Â»W A DISTANCE OF 63.86 FEET: 31 DECIDUOUS 6 10 2. 623Â·49'22~W A DISTANCE OF 61.42 FEET; - - OLD WOOD--74 *st' %-FENEE-POS$57 -48 53>' - REBAR & CAP 2 1 32 DECIDUOUS G 10' 3. 559Â·22'27~W A DISTANCE OF 61.71 FEET HUNTER CREEK REBAR & CAP k '&'Â¥ft t' (4 'f 438.99' LS.#19598 (SET) 3% 1 ~WAR & CAP 33 DECIDUOUS (2)12Â» 18' 4. S72'08'49-W A DISTANCE OF 43.05 FEET: LE.#19598 (SET) OVERLAP (TE FROM 1/4 CORNER , LS.#2376 (FND) (YIELDING BEARING) 1 (TI/,CAL) N8545'50"E AREA , ,!88Â·29'40'E 499.25) i 35 DEaDUOUS 4~ 8 6. N82Â·25'32-W A DISTANCE OF 65.31 FEET: 34 DECIDUOUS 6Â» 10 5. S78Â·05'13~w A DISTANCE OF 91.12 FEET: WEST 1/4 CORNER- 4-~- - -1 , / /, 3- 1 \\201 r--- 3 r---- - - - - - - - / SECTION 7 N89 53'49"E 6, c._ , 36 DEaDUOUS . 25' 7. N60Â·40'18~W A DISTANCE OF 53.12 FEET; ~ '- 3 37 Del[>UOUS 10* 15 8. N43Â·23'03-W A DISTANCE OF 79.12 FEET: tit~;I BRASS cAp /1 1 f - -49-4884*jok - 2 1. ~ L~Â·#259~AmÂ® 38 DECIDUOUS 12- 18' 9. N21Â·31'49*WA DISTANCE OF 35.t9 FEET; J /'- I ~ Alth Prdi~ 1_23~*4~t~o- 9.1'6~22 . *\ 41 DECIDUOUS 14' 15 12. 111705'12~E A DISTANCE OF 64.93 FEET: to , 1 SITF FENCH MARK 39 DEaDUOUS 15 20' 10. N55Â·43'43"E A DISTANCE OF 50.85 FEET: ELEVADON: 7838.32 40 DECIDUOUS 18" 25 11. N48Â·15'25-E A DISTANCE OF 62.81 FEET; LEGEND - \51 4 6 tal:.t \ 1 16/ P \-7821 42 DECIDUOUS 15. 20 13. N28Â·27'14"E A DISTANCE OF 136.43 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY Ccl> POWER POLE ZONE X i /-74 4 4 Â¥Â£LL--Â® ~- ~ = 1 \~ ~2-7835--- ~ / CALLWINNIE, LLC 43 DECIDUOUS 1 12' BANK OF ...m 00// O,9.. 1 1 PARCEL NO. 273707300010 44 DECIDUOUS 26- 30' HUNTER CREEK; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY BANK N85Â·45'WE A DISTANCE OF 6/, -47 RECEPnON NO. 501239 45 DECIDUOUS 238.99 FEET TO â„¢E POINT OF BEG]NNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 2.755 ACRES, 46 DECIDUOUS 30' 6 Â® WEU , 1 ...1 1 WORE OR LESS. . 2 \ 47 DEaDUOUS 4 8 f WATER SHUT OFF b ' Olo WOOD i / /,4 / FENCE POST t -An>J / / ~ -- 2 -Â· COTTAGE j 48 DECIDUOUS (3~ 11 NOTES Z . Â· .3 49 DECIDUOUS / 1% 50 DECDUOUS Q 8 1. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF TRUE NORTH DETERMINED ~~ I TELEPHONE PEDESTAL / BANk Of ROARING , -- , , ' . /0 ' 51 DEODUOUS (2)r 12' BY GPS OBSERVATIONS YIELDING A BEARING OF N89-53'49"E BETWEEN THE WEST / FORK RIVER 2 4 ~ i i r. 78 52 DEaDUOUS 4- 8 1/4 CORNER OF SECION 7. A BLM BRASS CAP IN PLACE AND THE SOUTHWEST UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE . ~ ~ t 53 DEaDUOUS C 8 CORNER OF MAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 766 AT PAGE 967 OF THE 54 DEODIOUS 4' 8 PIn<IN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, A REBAR AND CAP LS. NO. 2376 ' - AS MARKED BY OTHERS I ' 9. ~1~\ j~ PHALT ~F ~'<. ----1 Â· OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ~ ~ ~ ~ ''' ~ 9 \\ ROADWAY 10, 55 DECIDUOUS 4- 8 FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. 111 9 2 A WOOD FENCE /r - . . n \\ 1 . i #f' 56 DECIDUOUS 4- 8 57 DEODUOUS 4 8 2. DATE OF SURVEY: AUGUST 13. 2009. SEPTEMBER 1. 2010, ADDITIONAL- DEDDUOUS TREE /~/ 0. ~ RECEPnON NO. 102374 TOPOGRAPHY AND TREE LOCATION ON FEBRUARY 2, 2011. 58 DEDDUOUS 5 10 --r-- PRIVATE WAY UCENSE 59 CONIFEROUS 25~ 30 3. UNEAR UNITS USED To PERFORM THIS FIELD SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET. p - i BOOK 180. PAGE 360 60 CONIFEROUS 25- 30 P '7 1 Â·GRAVEL DRIVE / . ,/ 7 f 7 1 1 6 61 CONIFEROUS 6* 14 4. â„¢IS SURVEY IS BASED ON DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 311 AT PAGE 307. BOOK 512 & BOOK 188. PAGE 366 _ 1-- --4 RECEPION NO. 108447 62 CONIFEROUS 8~ 18 AT PAGE 253, BOOK 348 AT PAGE 951, BOOK 766 AT PAGE 967, BOOK 292 AT CONIFEROUS TREE <Â£ ~ / 02 -7 QU.p- \ .4,/ ~ 1'' 94.2 63 CONIFEROUS 80 18 PAGE 472, BOOK 568 AT PAGE 75, RECEPTION NO. 557260, RECEPTION NO. ~/1 )7 5 $ 2 2 STORY wOOD . ~- gE.,0 64 CONIFEROUS 12. 20' 50!239, RECEPTION NO. 463751, FINAL PLAT OF TRUEMAN NEIGHBORHOOD \ \\ \ 67~D'FlE -4 4/ -1 ) DECIOUOUS 14- 18 COMMEROAL PROJECT RECORDED IN BOOK 5 AT PAGE 70, DENVER RIO GRANDE 65 RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 3 AT PAGE 388 AS RECEPTION / j fr 29frE 7 -h / 4 42,/ 67 DECOUOUS 14- 18 66 DECIDUOUS 14~ 18' NO. 134450 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN. 4$1/5 '~11 4 i 11\ 68 DECIDUOus 14. 18 5. â„¢IS PROPERTY IS SUeJECT TO RESERVAnONS, RESâ„¢ICIONS, CovENANTS AND 1 L / #ER-9 \ \ \I. 12.755+ Ac. h \ ~\ M 1 0~ 12 ~ ~ 69 DECOUOUS 14- 18' EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN THE \ / SPIGOT a moo 1 I 70 DECIDUOUS 24 25 11TLE COMM]â„¢ENT PREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TILE GUARANTY FUND, INC., DATED 9 444 BOOK 568. PAGE 75 +~ 1 8 -Â«1, \ 71 DECIOUOUS 24' 25 AUGUST 18, 2010 (COMMITMENT NUMBER PC201008007311 ALE NO. PC10002778). REFERENCES CENTER ~ * 1 t 73 DEaDUOUS ly 17' ~ \*\ . \ %3/ tip J \ 72 CONIFEROUS 15- 22' 1 1 6, ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF OF ROARING FORK RIVER / ZONE At-49{2~ . \ * . \:. ./1 , / \07 ...% 1 DEaDUOUS (2>4- 15 1929 (NAID 29) REFERENCED FROM NAnONAL GEODETIC SUREY (NGS) e \+ . --/4.12 1 i24 j ~ \ 74 BENCHMARK STAION S159 HAVING A PUBUSHED ELEVABON OF 7715.64. X UMITS PER FEMA MAPS ~\>,4:1426 flgi %\1~4 ~ 75 DEaDUOUS 12 17 8 76 CONIFEROUS (2)8~ 15 7. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. ASPEN CENTER FOR -1- / /2 1 /Scftf~737Â°nnl ./ 4 - - c-m- 0.* TM ~A . -_ : 61 78 DECIDUOUS 24- 28 8. FLOOD INFORMAION WAS TAKEN FROM FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP OF / 77 DEODUOUS 6~ 12 BOOK 568. PAGE 75 ~Â· / 1.4 -\ \ 1 \9*,3 -1 # 81 DEaDUOUS 24~ 28 SHOMN THEREON (NAID 1929). FEN 79 DECIDUOUS 15" 18' PIâ„¢IN COUNTY COMMUNITY PANEL NO- 08097C0203 C WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE 0 - 80 DECIDUOUS 12. 18' OF JUNE 4,1987.100 YEAR FLOOD UNE WAS BASED ON DETERMINED ELEVAIONS / 1- TEXISnNG EDGE l--. / OF WATER / Â© <12- -71 0,4~ * \6$*1 9Â· THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOWN IN PARENTHESIS (NOS'DO'00Â»W) ARE 82 CONIFEROUS 8~ 16 \ ~ AUGUST 20092 83 CONIFEROUS 8~ 16' RECORD MEASUREMENTS. / 66 \ ~ - .0 -71 -2 1.0. ~~ ~ x .- . 2, ~ 85 CONIFEROUS 8~ 16' 10. ONLY â„¢OSE UNDERGROUND UIU'nES MARKED OUT AT RE TIME OF RE FIELD 84 CONIFEROUS 10" 18 ROARING I li/sy \. 86 DECIDUOUS 10~ 13' SURVEY ARE SHOWN. FORK RIVER -/ 3.L '- 87 DECIDUOUS r 10 88 CONIFEROUS 15Â» 15' SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE _gff - \ DECIOUOUS 8- 12 -WOOD U_ 89 DEDDUOUS 11- 1T PEDESTRIAN -, \ TO: MUSTANG HOLDINGS, LLC, ATTORNEYS TITLE GUARANTY FUND, INC.. 91 DECDUOUS 6- 10 N21-31'49'W 35.19 BRIDGE -1 1 DEaDUOUS 11Â· 12' THIS IS TO CERTIFY â„¢AT â„¢IS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED 92 1 - - 94 DECOUOUS 14- 18' ALTA/ACSM LAND TTLE SURVEYS.' JOINTLY ESTABUSHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND 93 DECIDUOUS 14. 18' WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WIâ„¢ THE MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR CONIFEROUS 8. 15 ISPS IN 2005, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, A, 3,4,5, 7(a), 8,10, 11(0)(b) cid 13 OF 95 ~-- ISLAND - --- --- ./* 96 CONIFEROUS 4Â· 10' TABLE A THEREOF. PURSUANT TO â„¢E ACCURACY STANDARDS AS ADOPTED BY ALTA 97 CONIFEROUS 6- 12 AND NSPS AND IN EFFECT ON THE DATE OF THIS CERnFICABON, UNDERSIGNED FURTHER -3 0 0 \ -- -- -3 98 CONIFEROUS 7' 12 CERnIES IMAT IN MY PROFESSIONAL CANION, AS A LAND SURVEYOR REGISTERED IN -j Q ~ ~ THE STATE OF COLORADO, â„¢E RELAIVE POS,n ONAL ACCURACY OF THIS SURVEY DOES 99 CONIFEROUS ( 10 NOT EXCEED THAT WHICH lS SPECIFIED THEREIN. UNEAR ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LEES \ 3 0/ 100 DECIDUOUS 8 10 THAN 1 PART IN 10.000. ~ ~ ~ ~J \ 102 DEaDUOUS (2)4' 10 101 DECIDUOUS 4 100 0 r-REBAR & CAP . 1< // / .i~ 103 CONIFEROUS 8- 14 / L.S. /19598 (SET) 61 104 CONIFEROUS 6* 13' DAE -~< P=:mix e 106 DECIDUOUS 4' 8 C..ICAL) 105 DECIDUOUS (2)12- 25' ~~~~~*:fafl aÂ·B / 47 / A. 107 DECIDUOUS 6- 10 9805 . Lit i.ga El ME 022 108 DECIDUOUS 8- 14 \ \ I 0 .59%4'. es:.11 -- // / Y ~|' CITY OF ASPEN ~ log CONIFEROUS 4' 8 4& 40 sw *SE 78. BANKOF ROAING // ~L-GOOK 292. PAGE 472 LOT 3, TRUEMAN NEIGHBORHOOD ~ "9*2500, 4 1-g< / 71 *1 91.12 --- __ -ROARING FORK RIVER- BOOK 5, PAGE 70 ~ 113 DEODUOUS 10- 18' < ~ REFERENCES ~ , PARCEL NO. 273707352853 DEaDUOUS 15 22 FRANK W. HARRINGTON, LS 14,59.8........2* FORK RIVER - 11t CONIFEROUS 6' 15 COMMERCIAL PROJECT lt2 DECIDUOUS 3' 6 -I). N8275'32"W 65.31 //// / 1 114 DECIDUOUS 10 18' CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE , Â· 115 DECIDUOUS 10- 18' < 1 1 EISTING EDGE --~ ---- . \ \ 1---- -- --- ---- ...... -- 115 DECIDUOUS 8' 15 THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN â„¢E OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF ~ OF WATER - ~ 117 DEaDUOUS (5)8~ 18' PITIN COUNTY AT - O'CLOCK___.M., ON THE - DAY Or AID. AUGUST 2009 \ 11B CONIFEROUS 36~ 25 2010, AND IS DULY RECORDED IN BOOK / / PAGE . RECEPnON NO PROJECT NO 119 DEaDUOUS 4 15' . / CITY OF ASPEN 120 CONIFEROUS 24" 200 2101655.0Ft ~ Â· PARCEL NO. 273707301851 121 CONIFEROUS 26- 30' / BOOK 292, PAGE 472 122 CONIFEROUS 26- 30' BYÂ· 123 CONIFEROUS 26~ 30 CLERK AND RECORDER / NOTICE: ACCORD(NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU W. ENCE ANY .CAL - \ ~ 124 DEaDUOUS f 10 RYÂ· ACTICÂ», BASED UPON ANY DEFECT I THS SURVEY 'TWN T>REE 'rEARS *i- DEPUTY 1 OF 1 AFTER YOU FnST DISCOVER 9.10{ OEFECL I ~40 E'~ENT UAY AN. ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURvEY BE CO-ENCED ~ORE DIAN TEN YEARS FROM THE w- CERâ„¢onoN SHO,!IN HEREON , ' 111 3~~ION~~IN'00 9991â‚¬D6 (OÂ£6) gâ‚¬IZDIM .~A=31 1 ONVI WS NI WI ~H 0 31 AVOX hi 'AHdVHDOd011Â¥NOLLIOOÂ¥ ONÂ¥ 933810300Â¥ L 1-DE ELLVa 'ON 00 '3nNIA L.St ~ 344*3323 IS OF RAILROAD R.O.W.) PROPERTY DESCRIFr]ON â€¢18 9 v PÂ¥7 Â»~ ' 69 SHADY LANE STREAM MARGIN REVIEVV PLAN (PER DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 311 AT PAGE 307) 00 OwEE FBEGINNING AT A POST STAND NG ABOUT 30 rEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTH BANK OF HUNTERS CREEK AND 50 <Or 4% 1%% FEET WEST FROM THE CENTER OF THE DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILROAD TRACK SAID POST BEING AT THE 4. A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 7, NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL OF GROUND DEEDED TO SAID DENVER AND RIO GRANDE RAILROAD COMPANY BY THE HALLAM LAND COMPANY THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE RAILROAD 266 64 Â°*: FEET TO THE NORTH BANK OP THE ROARiNG FORK RIVER, THENCE FOLLOWING THE NORTH AND EAST BANK OF TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. 7HE ROARING FORK RIVER WITH COURSES WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 780 FEET TO THE SOUTH BANK OF SUREEYCRS STATEME}IT HUNTERS CREEK AT ITS JUNCTION Â¥UTH ROARING FORK RIVER, THENCE N89 44 E 220 FEET TO THE PLACE OF > 3 6/ Cld 0 ..0 1 FRANK W HARRINGTON DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENaNEERING, INC- FOR COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO Em z . BEGINNING TOGETHER WITH A-L WATER RIGHTS PERTAINING THERETO JACK C ROWLAND, THAT SAiD SURVEY WAS PROARED BY MEE IR UNDER MY SUPERVISION ANC) RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND O 0 7 HAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF UY BEUEF AND KNOWLEDGE SITUATE, LYING AND BEING IN SEellON SEVEN (7) TOWNSHIP TEN (10) SOUTH RANGE EIGHTY-FOUR (84) WEST ./- E . SLOPE LEGEND REBAR & CAF-O S \ OF THEE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MER~[DIAN 00 Z LE#2[n/1 (FND) 1 , PROPERTY DESCRIPTION D BY # - - ..t*/*... A // 0% - 19 99% SLOPE // (AS SURVEYED) FRANK .08~NGTON â‚¬3. 19598 3 -3 1 1 D g.-/:i#--m--Il \ L gS Dg< 20% - 29 99% SLOPE // A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 7 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH RANGE 84 WEST OF THE SLOPE / SIXTH PRINaPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO SAID PARCEL BONG MORE PARTICUALLY 1 : 3 - U DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS / - I * RAILROAD SAID POINT ALSO 8EING 30' SOUTHERLY OF TlE SOUTH BANK OF HUNTER CREEK (WHENCE IHE WEST 1.1 9 41.21' 1- , 1,1 - / COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY R]GHT-OF-WAY OF THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN - .1 : 1 E -32 - ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD A DISTANCE OF 1 QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SE CTION 7 BEARS 588-29 40~W A DISTANCE OF 499.25 FEET), THENCE SO)8*03 41-E '. 260.69 FEET TO A POINT ON THEE NORTHERLY BANK OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY BANK OF SAID ROARING FORK RIVER THE COLLOVANG THIRTEEN (13) COURSES , : il' ~~. - 40~~i k .31 i -i .... 1 ,;,- i ' 0 - 1 574Â·20 45-W A DISTANCE OF 63.86 FEET, i - MARC & KAREN FRIEDBERG --~ Â· PARCEL NO 273707200035 6 - ' CE*U O HINES . PARCEL NO 273707Z00026 2 S23'49'22~W A DISTANCE OF 61.42 FEET 8 BOOK 766 PAGE 967 3 S59-22'27 W A DISTANCE OF 61.71 FEET BOOK 348, PAGE 951 - - - 4 572-08 49' W A DISTANCE OF 43.05 FEET - 'Â·i ',7-,,i' O)EED CALLS TOCENTER .~.~n--- -1 1 1 5 $780513 W A DISTANCE OF 91.12 FET, w *j*<- - r- . * 2- ,~,~| . )EEX~p#0:F. ~'Â·. .-OFHUNTER GREEK) _. 'r_ .1. - -- . .*- - 6 N82*25 32-W A DISTANCE OF 65 31 FEET 7 N60Â·40'18-W A DISTANCE OF 5312 FEET . 1 .,/ + t/ AUGUST 2009 L "..,3~-'. v , . I - / , - .-i-.5 ;-- 8 N 43*23 03-W A DISTANCE OF 79.12 FEET, r:cs:Jiw-e : ~i -13, - -2 / - @9//2 2 9 N21 31'49"W A DISTANCE OF 35.19 FEET, P.O.- -2 - -1/ \ 10 /55 43'43-E A DISTANCE OF 50.85 FEET 1 3- ILM BRASS CAP , 11 N 4815 25-E A DISTANCE OF 62.81 FEET, REBAR I 12 N17-0512Â»E A DISTANCE OF 64.93 FEET, -7~jJ~E~CREEK ~5Fpe,s- I/>~ ~ (FND) LfF9598- - -- #' ~ Fllm & CAP 13 N 28-27'14"E A DISTANCE OF 136.43 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY 8ANK OF o HUNTER CREEK, 7HENCE LEÂ»ING SAjO EAS7ERLY JANK N85Â·45 50-1 A DISTANCE OF 238 99 FEET TO I}dE_22!NI 1.- L.n= {CO AREA N85-45'50-E - ' 0/.0~ T/4 / LS.#2376 (FNO) I .....' - OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 2 755 ACRES, MORE OR LESS _(YIELDING BEARING)9_ t- r cp,9 ,-- - - - - - - NOTES L_a _ - - -- -- -- '|I=,NCAP 9 N*Â§Â·554Â¥E: - 7 j--- -7- - - 1 %1/025947 CrNO) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF TRUE NORTH DETERMINED BY GPS OBSERVATIONS 1 -~~1 IEWIOR 783&32 YIELDING A BEARING OF N89*5349-E BETWEEN THE WEST 1 /4 CORNER OF SECTION 7, A BLF BRASS CAP IN 9â€¢ED eks:PM'-a $ 5 1 PLACE AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN BOOK 766 AT PAGE 967 OF 0 N . . I -/. 0 -4 â€¢000 - I I 1 .2 Fi THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER S OFFICE A REBAR AND CAP L S NO 2376 FOUND IN PLACE _ le -'- 7 7 AS SHOWN HEREON 24 4 1 CALLMNNIE LLC -1 ---- . % 1- 421 lA\. li [C -b ZONEX.'' f \1 L- /2 s. ' s- /44 -4 1 ..6.13 ~ Â· PARCEL NO 273707300010 . LL X I : 1Â· ' ' - ~&%- ImE Er + 2 DATE OF SURVEY AUGUST 13 2009 0 i I PARKIRC RECEPTION NO 501239 U . / . ZONE X -- - - 3 THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 311 AT PAGE 307. BOOK 512 AT PAGE 253. B00K348 - e - AT PAGE 951 BOOK 766 AT PAGE 967, BOOK 292 AT PAGE 472 BOOK 568 AT PAGE 75, RECEPTION NO I .# .241 -1 2/#. 0 ..3 - wig *-10 557260, RECEPTION NO 501235 RECEDTION NO 463751 FINAL PLAT OF TRUEMAN NE]GHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL PROJECT RECORDED IN BOOK 5 AT PAGE 70 DENVER RIO GRANDE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ..@Se'POAW:2 /5-- - MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 3 AT 'AGE 388 AS RECEPTRON NO 134450 AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS ASPEN CENIER FOR ENVIRONMENTAW STUDIES -- - ~ , Â·2 - O# 9 ~ ic#.lit ... -1 d /--Al~ - -I --- 1-1-4-=-2 Z- - * - SHOWN p~Ren No 273707300801 ' ~ : - -DEVELOPMENT -r-'- . 2 1~ T , >-v. te>o. 4 THIS PROPERTY IS SU8JECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR 10 BOOK 564 PAGEJ 75 . r 1. AItICI ' IN PLACE AND EXCEPTnONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY TITLE COMPANY OF W / I Â· ~ AREA , n x 2 / F M I ROADWAT.Â· â€¢~1 -- t . Â·Â·CU TPE ROCKIES, INC, DATED JULv 27 2009 (COMMITMENT Nl.!k,18ER 0702799-C) N 1 l. / .A cib 4 1 1 Ir\ 5 EuriATIONS SAOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NOR-9- AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 (NAVD 29) m 6 *NA. 15'-- .q.,- < 7. \.. :2 -4 0,-0,-1 r. -i. ..... GU~El. DFIVE -- : 1- ' Â· - . REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL (,EODETIC SURVEY (NGS, BENCHMARK STATION S159 HAVING A PUBLISHED iII 8 ~ _Nk- i - E-EVAPON OF 7715.64 W A \4 1 g Z -0 -, -IA. f -92Â£- --*. :- C -111-*-- - -i.. -F-L Â·' 2:1 2 STORY Â¥/30[> 6 CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT ROARING-n . .4-Â·r LAIE . 7 AF - FRAME HOUSE Â« & 7 FLOOD INFORMATION WAS TAKEN FROM FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP OF PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY GIL Z 1 te 0 00- a d - PANEL NO 0809700203 C WTE AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JUNE 4 1987 100 YEAR FLOOD UNE WAS BASED Z . E 6 W FORK RIVER \< . , - \/ WATERC ~ . \ ON DETERMINED ELEVATIONS SHOWN THEREON (NAVD 1929) w 9%[3 0 . 2 -smear \ .. 1, I g. -' - ./. - p . I ,Â· 1 Â°01%- 1 ,/ f , '-3:; ' 1 as <O. P * r ... U 8 THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES SHOV~1 IN PARENTHESS 0108 00'00=W) ARE RECORD MEASUREMENTS H WRE 1 44Â£ -:' - f.z ., iy L r V ./ 4 1. , 0 0-Â«6 - 44- - 7- ''' 1 9001< 568, PAGE 75--1 - 9 THE "HIGH WATERUNE AND THE -TOP OF SLOPE- SHOWN HEREON WHERE DELINEATED BY GARY BEACH OF 1- Ele $ AiffJrSAR \-f. / BEACH RESOURCES ON FEBRUARY 12, 2010 .-- Ar / t./ f f .-~-u#oNEAEÂ»*._4.242 3 31>I --': /7- 7 52 3 D mal uwlÂ·:5 PER FEWA /APS 10 2 CONTOURS SHOWN HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM THE PITKIN COUNTY GIS O -dw -1 '.7/ 41.0 FED TOPOGRAPHÂ¥ : 1\ 1730â‚¬.4 7-1//F ./. : 1 - ~7936 11 ZONE AE = 100 YEAR FLOOD EOUNDARY, ZONE X = AREA OLTSIDE OF 500 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY - .. I - 12 THE GAP LABELED IN THE NOR HERLY CORNER OF THE PROPERTY IS A GAP BETWEEN THE SUBJECT - PROPERTY AND THE DEED FOR THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTHWEST 1 OLD- r.r . I <iblb. - V' ...0 --1/ /- OF VATHI 1 13 THE OVERLAP LABELED IN THE NORTHERY CORNER OF THE PROPERTY IS A DEED OVERLAP BY THE .* . PROPERTY TO THE NORTHWEST 4 --kier [ los> -- - . ...7 25.-.h'.2 ZIL- r 14 DEVELOPMENT ON THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE ALLOWANCES AND LIMITAnONS OF CITY OF ASPEN Â· Irt 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLLInON NO _1 SERIES OF 2010 RECORDED AT 8001< - 1 -4 4 - 2.755+ ACRER ' -- > T - - ,- - - --~ M --id \ 0 - Â·- LEE, '6 .- PAGE - AS RECEPTION NO 4-'11 ' 41 2- ..sÂ· , CITY ENGINEERS APPROVAL- 0/.a . ...4 - 2 1 $1.6- '..\ r O 4 .1 1.**E111 -7 ' p,14~ ..' -"* - . PEDESTRIAN - / THIS PLAT OF THE 69 SHADY LANE fTE-AM MARGIN REVIEW PI AN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER 91 ~ ENDGE OF THE a TY OF ASPEN THIS + r DAY OF 2 i i 2010 - 2101'49'W 35 190 - z. .- j Â· - ' / -- L 4 - k ' /'I Nthr- ' - p . TRIGA ARAGON CITY ENGINEER -' 2 ' r -f - ~- -. -- COMMUNITY DEELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S ADPROVAL 0 - A 0 - - - C ISLAND k.4 - .l , ~ THIS PLAT OF THE 69 SHADY LANE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED 8Y THE DIRECTOR OF Ste- - - 1 ,2010 0 0 COMMUNnY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF IHE CITY OF ASPEN, THIS 1 .- DAY OF M V.. 9 i r. -, ' --e.lili'm - *--- - r + I 53% , -14* 9-r 11 -1 --I I ' I -- 1. 1 I Cl . 27 i 31& ./. I 62-' -' ',--- 4'14->' F--3 ~1~7- ~ OWNERS' ACKNOWLEDGEâ€¢ENT CHRIS BENDON. COMMUNITYDevELOPMENT DIRECTOR 0 3 26 * - 2.V t.224 - 14-7- -- 9 .2.-)311.,thz-Li,f. -%-24i'.7.': I. .th L-- --- .... 3- ' --:49'* -gÂ· Figf*F 4,--- COUNTÂ¥ COLORADO SHOWN HEREON ACKNOWLEDGE THE ALLOWANCES AND UUITAT:ONS OF CITY OF ASPEN 10- 0% KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT THE OWNERS IN FEE SMPLE OF ALL THAT PROPERTY SITUATED IN PH-11<IN , 1 ap- 0 01 1. 421 1-517266. . =..S>,A :-M..7. - .- 1 aTY OF ASPEN / Â·~S- - , \---.00~291 PACI 472 ' ~ L .- , ' i F LOT 3, TRUEMAN NEIGHBORHOOD Ar 6 2 (0 , I PARCEL NO 273707352853 ~ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REFERENCED IN NOTE NO 14 ON IMS PLAN & - Il I *./ i . :V' I - 00% I <â‚¬- / . .1/ REFERENCES , ...,.. d \ ,.,U e r.,.,t~ <10 COMMERIAL PROICT EXECUTED. THIS ,__DAY OF #+ 9 20,4 / 3=E - Â» 23;W 91.12' Â£ -- - - ~ *fs/# - I -T-f .,#P; ~ C #e -ROARING FORK RlvET . ", '-,r 8001< 5 PAGE 70 RT 1*0 4 vii , - - - *82Â·2542eir 65.~1'' 'Â· - /. *l/P *. i /. RECED-- - 513â€¢29 08,30'2010 at L BY UL 72 43*42 . .D 0Â¥dltR X 24 -4 ./51 4 2" JC Janice K VCS -=6- Pt*1286/4 CO E2 \ OWNER CITY OF ASPEN ' i PRO.JECT NO CLFRK AND RECORDER'S CERT1FCATE GRAPHIC SCALE 7- ' - THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY AT 2 'T 03 4 OCLOCK-CLM ON THE .il DAY OFF,4,-7- AD 2010. AND IS DULY RECORDED IN BOOK 2091640.00 / ~ PAGE _.i- RECEP-noN No <-41,â€¢24 ' 1.11 j d- " 1 1/// 4 1 4. ./.M-'I NOTICE ACCO,DIG . CCU,RADO LAÂ¥ = Ws CO-COICE mr LEGAL C m FEET) *CneN 'ASED m...CT I THIS SUPEr 'THN Â»11ME YEARS ---*# TEARS FROJ I. DATE ..CA..910/N ~ERE'I 1 mch - 30 1 BY AFIER You AR. ..COVER sum DEFECI I N. E'DIT hIK, ANY ACTION BASED UP(,2 .......... er B. coh~,19,aED /01/ 7.Â»1 TEN 42RK AND REEORDER 7 DEPUTY 10Ft laA ./ Oalll NI 00Â£90 17Eq UO 3 1Â¥AVOXI NI SAVO GeN,/rE] 2 -11\0 Ilo Al I n 11 3 AS NOISIAZZ 1 N..% /V,3IA3 hl NISM Â¥3M1S 1 .ONI '9NB 3 HDIH 10918 00 'totals '3nN3 6 (0Â£6) OH 43.-.A, 1-1 RECEPTION# 573126, 08/30 10 at 03 24 , Janice K Vos Caudill, Pi n County, LAT BK 4 PG 0700'NEdSÂ¥ I., , *3%â€¢3%2-i/*v 2 + L ' f.' 1.Â·21 F jr - 1.~ 1 ~â€¢. *~. ~. -1* i ~+ 641- . 4,Â·1Â·141. 1 . ~Â· 72â€ža... -~_ Â·Â·32<ij:.hiN': -1 -1 : YOÂ· " 45* "-#Â£274 ' A 1.2.':.4-4:11&82'"'~"' - i 4â€¢Â·Â· 7-- &B- f?~ 71 2 L 1 1 4 3,4 77. 1. _ 2-4 -0/9/ \Nate//151/fe//var#61*2 4 d 92 . . 1.-7/1 , 311'. 1/. . 1 N . i Â·iÂ· Â·yÂ·... 3, / 'i Ziz~~91)JAY j \ 2, -L / 4- 9 . r . /, - Ch .dp>14.<1~~ . I + 4) - .t . 2 1,2--ry-â€¢N--10~ >WS=!Uâ€¢ Urt- _*Reil --/ 120 -- #El I. . r . Â·â‚¬-1 -=49. j.e, 4 ll- 1- .J --- -EL /:H 4~ , . -L .64@Guef-, --- I., t. --,ma - .. - 4- 2 - 2*~tkit--,4~~.~~~~~I'.~,~~'_43;3~y,42Â»Â«- 2-qÂ·--jE*4414%'~-5--rÂ«-t-~-i:Â«2--54Â·--~uLEN*iynÂ·Mi=Â»~~ , 4/' I ~Â·72735;.:? 3%74:3..% f.':.. -4, Â· Â·- 1-2 -----Rk.:9.LUP:Ey.u_ok/~J/~~//7/- 2-.. - -2-Li-764- **40,Â¢*~ 412+1d %443:*.t't...cÂ®OÂ«':Â·t - .,- i---1- >45.--443-2:i.-2--â‚¬2-- -- 14~4,~2..~: *2412 [; f ~01*.*.?G64011::iÂ·~*143Â¢~~.1 ' e _- .-_-_6- 2341Â¥IPa-2 -F*- E-7 + .13=2 :-4 -- .70'2 1.- - RE/*Châ‚¬2773 C ffÂ·hi )2 -A..C:U. 2% - 77 7:Of- -I-t=-7-â‚¬zT'7'tyâ‚¬.. 3.-I.-1-11.7-2=- 7-~~__~.~~.~17-4-d-2 5 . -- fÂ·- i ~Fj~.Â¢f#26431&42Â£34 hy~~ P/100â‚¬cr .S,re As VIEWED F"'1 6 Had Y LA-ke 11\. H I , . Q .1 , , 'w ' 4, 14'/1 ./ ~ 0 *,11 / ** 2 'i . 9, 1 t t V, 4,/t'* ' 4.Â» I ..7 F 43./SP - . 1 1/7.. A, 44~9. ' p d . 9 1*â€¢ f 45. e . 1/4/:t , -0 ' . 1 '.. , Â·Â· .}t:. f '211/0 . ,1 '1 "1. . le, *60 11 4 .9.-,~~airit . f.1 ...1. 4Â¥~*;1~.1. fi~~ ...2 .A, 9 I 4 4, 4,.': Â· p 'P,,. 1 -4 t .': I Ult . 1 1. I . $ I Â£ p :*06' . 0 4 , . 4. 44 E. 3 1,1 & ~.~ ~ t~*,* , *t?7 - %#e t i?t % . - 4 p . 4 : . 0134Â·,4~& 6 Â· h"~. Â·â€¢ ,. ' 31 9 f. 7 r 4. 7 ' ' * j W brd. 4. 1 t r .e. *' 1-<'1 1 -11 Â· ./. . f,.. ..â„¢ ..1.i ..9 #1 . .7'* .AK jE 4Â£42. i .ftq 4*.* eu ' Â¥ Efâ‚¬' â€¢ig@W~ -' ' 4 94,4, t. - - 10 - 4,4 r ..1 iÂ· .. k. -6 1 11, f e + RA 2 ' -. Â·uÂ·,ilia~~li f.trt. ' n. 9. 1 ill 74 f 1 1 1 . 46 7, 1. i 1 lf'14 1 .1,6 Â·)~,sie Â£ r. * i<i~ i ~ ~ 14fLr' % â€¢ /1.74 *10â€¢ I i â€¢te' - e I . . I 4 fpft#v v#*w# U 1 'Wite.'1.0 *1 % 4,1 4 , , .' '- lb,4 :i'. , 4.At + E , 1/, 7 5 Â£ tru')12, 1, 7/' 1 4 f. 1 1 '; t' Â·! ' f .1 + 44 ..1 , 1, f 1, '' . 11 11 1 * ' 11. 0'....... , r. 4 11 1. 4 , ./b" ; 1,4 + 1, 1, .. . V a.. U 11+ 0,2 .t â€¢ '401+Fi/ek'.4,1/. 4 21. 14 4 I . . ?t.9 Â£919~ â„¢ â€ž *a ,~ ~ ~ ~*' :' t. * 'lf ff , 14 1 r Ir l * tÂ· 15'FA F . , Â· tÂ· .* 1,16:ky ~A~..j * ~ 0. 1 Ull 3 a.1/. . 1 :443 1 't . 1. 1*# i I ' 1 & 4; ' yi- er,f' , 0 //4440-11 , , 9 : i #9~F #i.WIE/.= IM' 2, 6 4 ~-3 F* .t, 24 4 '01:/ f F *aIr 1 f v - 94?: A ' Â·: 61 1 ' Ar' 4 1 ~fâ‚¬ic,Inf: ' ' " %94 1,% / . . 4.4 21 A ./40. , <t , L , 4.,1,1112 , 1 0: ~1'46,hAY#9' 1 3 165 4-4.-1:*0; Air, : :T *; -AT 41 7 . h , ' 4 1 12 } 1 , 4*47 <42 ..; r,\ ... Â· 944:V , 1%1.14,:- , ' Â· . 47< r<*3 4 '?43,Â·Fi f 4,1. 901 *2. I '. , - Â·2>"41& '99.-Ols= V.Adft,:bi *i tity) 1,1, v ~ 4~1 1004:1 / 48 4 /3?t. 26244., St, A 0 / Â· 7 *\' 'Â·f,&?'tillf,3% 1 k *4 4*0 + 41, 44 1 1 -< ir.-9?:44-t' *edÂ·*4:%>5~?h 4. 1 , ' 911:~il ' * c t'F#.:.r , 2 t...6- ' .*,4''U'N i "titi.Â·2 5 A 10*,1 0 1 1 4 -*C Â¥k . 1 3 v Â· J 2,3 jt 4- ,. 4,Â· 0.:C i <1* 9,419Â£,fa :I:al'at 4 9 pl~ 44, .. ~ - ~ ~ ~ i ~~~ 14*/#L~,11Â¢#:AllÂ£â€¢#Â¥ 9'C ., :fty *,i. l. 4.â€¢t 1, f '/4â€¢1 /1 4694 1 Aft .4 : , . VA ,I,*, .f Zi ,~'& \= i -Will , I ' '. 44#t.,7'.1.4.1% 1 I. 44*21 i . A , â€ž71 ' ,_ 9-.2- 4 :i,f :t~L * :e~~t. %&% ; A - tdo, .44%.A:. 1.4 I - 1 4 -I...I- *... 1 1 : 4 â„¢aol ..41. I . 1. la â€¢ Av , milltl, t<>*~"~~'~*'~ lili 1 0/4 .1 1 11 , i%. $ i t., . 5 I , 49 1 641 ..1 9. 7 A le , 211 40' "14 41'4 Â· 41 â€¢ . 41 , f . ''.. '' f 9%91 , /0 1 3 715 West Main Street, Suite 201 WRIGHT & LASAI_LE, LLP Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone: (970) 925-5625 Gary A. Wright Facsimile: (970) 925-5663 gaw@wrightlasalle.com 4 November 2011 RECEIVED Community Development Department NOV 0 7 2011 City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street CITY OF ASPEN Aspen, Colorado 81611 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Re: Proof of Ownership Mustang Holdings II, LLC To Whom it May Concern: I am writing this letter on behal f of my client, Mustang Holdings II, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, for which I am one of two Managers. This letter is given to satisfy the Proof of Ownership requirement of my client's Application. Mustang Holdings II, LLC, is the owner of real property located at 69 Shady Lane, in Aspen, Colorado; described by metes and bounds as follows: Beginning at a post standing about 30 feet south of the south bank of Hunters Creek and 50 feet west from the center of the Denver & Rio Grande Railroad track, said post being at the northwest corner of parcel of ground deeded to said Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company by the Hallam Land Company; thence southerly parallel with the Denver and Rio Grande Railroad 266 feet to the north bank of the Roaring Fork River; thence following the north and east bank of the Roaring Fork River with courses westerly and northerly 780 feet to the south bank of Hunters Creek at its junction with Roaring Fork River; thence N. 89'44' E. 220 feet to the place of beginning; Situate, lying and being in Section Seven (7), Township Ten (10) South, Range eighty-four (84) West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Pitkin County, Colorado. Based on my review of the records contained in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office as well as a Title Insurance Policy given by Attorneys Title Guaranty Fund, Inc., it is my opinion that title to the property is vested in Mustang Holdings II, LLC. Sincerely, WRI~HT & LASALLE, LLP By. ~ 4%w Gary A. Wright Copy to Steven W. Caple www.wrightlasalle.com - WRIGHT & LASALLE, LLP 00 POSC, *.45 715 West Main Street, Suite 201 Aspen, Colorado 81611 1-==-â€¢/ PITNEY BOWES bk--.1,7/91/5!* 0 W 8%154Â· 40 SOOO 440 01 K.Mr- ...Al. 14 rii## Lo ceâ€ž f -7- .7 Jennifer Phelan Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 81*illi302 111,11,11|111|11â€ž1111,111,11|1111â€ž11!,i,!111â€žlilliâ€ž,Ii,1,1 Jennifer Phelan From: Jennifer Phelan Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 10:41 AM To: 'Janet Leverson' Subject: Shady Lane Application Hi Janet: I just reviewed the application for 69 Shady Lane and it looks fine except for the form of the disclosure of ownership. The city requires either a title report (the easiest form may be an Ownership and Encumbrance report) or a letter from a Colorado licensed attorney listing all owners, liens, mortgages, etc. affecting the property. Please provide either an 0&E or attorney letter at yourearliest convenience - we'll need it priorto a scheduled hearing. It looks like the first available meeting before the Planning and Zoning Commission is Tuesday, January 17, 2012. Let me know if that date works for you. Thanks, Jennifer Jerutifer Phela*, Al CP Deputy Director Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 PH: 970.429.2759 FAX: 970.920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com 1 2131 07 5 00 012- 006*2011. Ask q Elle Edit Record Navigate FQrm Reports Format Tab Belp |i@@ 4< , 1 -3 0 ~Ii Q.~ 0 3 23Â·0 1 N 4 , 4 3 21 A Jump li_11 4 01 0.61 )32 S J 3 2 011.3 4-4 / 991_ Routing Status |Fees |Fee 5ummarx ~ Actions |Attachments Routing History ~ Yaluation |Arch/Eng lCustom Fields |Sub Eermits 4 ) Permit type aslu ( ~pen Land Use Permit # 0068.2011ASLU ~ Address 69 SHADY LN Â·Â·Â· Apt/5uite City ASPEN Rate @11 Zip 81611 Â·Â·Â· Permit Informabon Master permit ... Routing queue |aslu07 Applied 1081/2011 Project Â·Â·Â· Status )ending J Approved 1 1 Â· f2 Description Residential design Variance Issued L. Closedlfinal --7~~-- 4= Submitted MUSTANG HOLDINGS Il 429 1286 Clock ~Runreig ~ Days ~ Expires 10/25/2012 v ... ,~ Submitted via 071.,1 ~ Owner -1Â¥3Â»teÂ« 942 ted. Last name MUSTANG HOLDINGS LLC Â·Â·Â· First name .. 315 E HYMAN AVE i- ASPEN CO 81611 Phone Address ~ t. Applicat @ Owner is applicant? I~ Contractor is applicant? --,~ Last name MUSTANG HOLDINGS LLC Â·Â·Â· First name ~-,~-1-"--7~ 31 5 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN CO 81611 . r Phone ~"'~~Cust # 29156 - Address ./ * Lender 1 93 Last name Â·Â·Â· First name Â«le- -J./ Address Al'llillilit4illill 73 Phone () 4..b Displays the permit lendeis address . " e.,.a. .. -- Â· ..:.~~.:â€ž.,::5:,:i:â€ž. -w:.u.~ ~AspenGold5 server] ' angelas Edil Jilot 1 -_ 02 C.-2 =R * 2- 9 9Â«\-Â« c._o eao AU+ 4 1*flo-DO rÂ©~uÂ» 356 4% ibi,1 46'AEil [364iBB'il Fsandis"q'il