Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.GR.550 S Galena St.GR-1979-01
D D v b. l.fa\LAO- 7\ U-,-- V /- V. 0»*1 00-)la_ . ~ - MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Karen Smith, Planning Office RE: 8040 Greenline Review - Yarbrough Single Family House DATE: July 27, 1979 This is an application for 8040 greenline review for a single family house of 3,370 square feet to be built in the Tipple Woods Subdivision zoned R-15, next to Little Nell Ski slope. The applicant is Dr. Yarbrough represented by Tim Hagman. For the benefit of the members, I am attaching to this memorandum pages 1478.1 and .2 demonstrating the review criteria for 8040 greenline review. Considerations include compatibility with the terrain and natural features, no interference with geologic or other natural hazards, visual quality and adequate service by roads, water, and other facilities designed to offer protection to residence and property on the lot. We have received comments from the following referral agencies: 1. Bob Jacobs, Fire Marshal, notes that a 2" stand pipe will be installed between Dr. Yarbrough's property and Galena Street as a supplement to the existing fire hydrant on the property immediately to the south. In addition, hose and other necessary fire equipment will be stored in a cabin adjacent to the property. Bob recommends these as minimal improvements for the protection of the property. However, he notes difficulty of their use by untrained personnel and the fact that the access road is impassable during ski season. 2. Dan McArthur, assistant City Engineer, notes similar concerns regarding the problems of access and protection to the property. He notes that on"March 20, 1959 the Pitkin County Commissioners approved the Tipple Wood Subdivision Lots 1 through 5 with no provision for adequate off street parking and no provision for adequate roads to insure fire protection which is in direct conflict with Section 24-6.2, 8040 Greenline Review of the Aspen Municipal Code." He further notes that the City of Aspen annexed the Tipple Wood Subdivision in March of 1967 with no exceptions and no conditions, therefore the Engineering Department reluctantly recommends approval. 3. Jim Markalunas of the Aspen Water Department indicates that there is no problem with water hook-up "provided hook-up is made on 6" main supplying Blitz residence on 8" interconnect to Alps." The Water Department does not want any connection made to the 12" transmission lines supplying the storage tanks on Aspen Mountain. 4. Mountain Bell found no problem. 5. The Aspen Metro Sanitation District commented by letter of May 9th written by Heiko Kuen that there would be no problems with a sewer connection. Given the unfortunate circumstance of a poorly approved subdivision and seemingly little we can do about the access, parking, and fire protection problems, the P and Z should concentrate its review on the environmental impact of the proposed structure, including visual impact. We have asked the applicant for additional materials similar to those prepared for the water tank review. We hope that those materials will demonstrate the impact on the natural topography and visual impact from town. At a minimum we would recommend that the natural vegetation of the site be retained and restored wherever possible, in fact, you might require that someone in the City be responsible for reviewing the vegetation which is removed and insisting on vegetation to be restored. This might be done through a requirement for a specific landscaping plan. We will reserve our other comments in this matter until we have had a chance to review the additional presentations early next week and will comment to you Tuesday night. - 9---% 9 1 .-em 1 4.4/ p , 1 .4: , .1 . 4 1 - 4--1 . -. 1. 1 . .3% %4. 4 , UN ~lt ~ ~..2 ': 1 ' § 24-5.12 ZONING § 24.6.2 r.. 1 - : t' . proposed to be painted in any historic district or on any historic building or structure or at any historic site. Any - recommendation received shall not be controlling on any 1 a i ~ * council action taken. 11 - 1 (h) In reviewing graphic design permit applications, the city council shall give special consideration to any proposal It ~ to repaint an existing historic sign where located, or the re- production of any historic sign anywhere within the city. 0) No graphic design permit shall be required to re- paint any graphic design exactly as it previously existed pro- !- i vided that a permit shall have previously issued therefore. -4 (Ord. No. 10-1976, § 2) 4 ARTICLE VI. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITS k : Sec. 24-6.1. Purpose. , The following areas within the City of Aspen are deemed i to be of ecological, environmental, architectural, or scenic t i :9 . significance and all development shall be in accordance with the general requirements provided in this code and subject to such additional review as provided by this article. . , 1, 1-1 (Ord. No. 11-1975, § 1) Sec. 24-6.2.8040 Greenline review. (a) Intention. To provide for review of all development above the 8040 greenline within the City of Aspen and all -development fifty (50) yards below the 8040 greendine so as i to aid in the transition of development from urban uses to 1 4 , the adjacent agricultural and forestry uses; to insure that ' all development is compatible with the prevailing slopes; to 4 t.. il provide for the least disturbance to the terrain and other ! 1 natural land features of the area; to guarantee availability of utilities and adequate access; to reduce the impact of development on surface runoff, the natural watershed, and air pollution; to avoid losses due to avalanches, unstable slopes, rock fall and mud slides; and to enhance the natural mountain setting. ,#h 4 , i Supp. No. 14 j . -I i ' ~ L '14. ' 1478.1 , 44J E 3 3 1 . f 1 -- 7.- 1 ' 1 . I ./ . 4 4 . I . I . 1 , i r- - -- 11 - .. . 4 ' L f.- . .'ll· I. p. . . t.i.·. ... 14+Am·J,•A •W.·.,16•" ; 4 . 1 / Al . 4 :, 4 . 11 1 ./ . ...~ .. - ... . I .-- .........10.40'. - "' , ' 1 1 :.41 . a •1 , §24-6.2 ASPEN CODE § 2+6.3 \ f, 1 1 (b) Review criteria. In reviewing the de'velopment plan, the zoni,ig commission shall consider the following: (1) Whether there exists sufficient water pressure and other utilities to service the intended development; (2) The existence of adequate roads to insure fire protection, s now removal and road maintenance; i (3) The suitability of the site for development considering ~ - rt . the slope, ground instability and possibility of mud W , | flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers; (4) The affects of the development on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion and conse- quent effects on water pollution; t . , (5) The possible effects on air quality in the area and city wide; (6) The design and location of any proposed structure, roads, driveways or trails and their compatibility with the terrain; . 1 : $ 1 (7) Whether proposed grading will result in the least lt. disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features; >. 1 . (8) The placement and clustering of structures so as to minimize roads, cutting and grading, and increase the £ 1 -open space and preserve the mountain as a scenic , t. i resource (9) The reduction of building height and bulk to maintain - the open character of the mountain. (Ord. No. 11-1975, § 1) i i. Sec. 24-6.3. Stream margin review. (a) Intention. To guide development and encourage [ appropriate use of land in proximity to designated natural . water courses, to promote safety from flooding, to prevent . ~ impediment of natural water flow. and to insure provisions 4 for adequate protection and preservation of the designated natural water courses as important natural features. All I lands and air space within one hundred (100) feet, measured Supp. No. 14 1478.2 , . . /,r . 1 11 r-T-- r- J 4 - 4 . V. 1 - . . 4 1 ./ .. • 1 .Z.. . ... L ' . - 1. . , - . • t.3-1 - - .. 'e . JZ . 4 ..2 . - .C-- .lilli - I . .- 1091 .<8.**..1 ,< 6 L t .. I *1 - -. 0, 4 . ' -4 .. .. - k . 4 . . - - 0--1 - . 2 .,lie,ELD./ -- S - -r'Wm:L . .*.24 -r -- . .....r - *... . . # 42/b-.: T. ...rap# - V. ... 51:2-&li'lill/mill:in. 1//08*31.1 - *t- - 01. / .. ..r 7*' ?i • M„„L., 1//9 I. PAP (41 T . + 9 * i M...6 4.*F.:,4 . . .. ..1 7 . 1 PL..1 . .4 6 ' 4 . 1 2% * * . 25¥*¥ , . I * . / .' 6 1 .: 4.ti~f ~ . i.le.-4.6 p wli*h. , . \. . 1. 2...2 I - . I . 4 + . I .. 02' ' 1 f, 4. 4 - ~ Jkt - I iNT -Il --- , . 2 #li 9. .*-- 7 6 2. 2~ 3. I '1 I . 4 . . . I. I A K bilmil- r . 1*. ' r' ¥' ™ 1 . . - b 99[17/6- 7.,+3,8<RET 1 <0:0\. ./ ., A- I .- ,;1 MEMORANDUM TO: - KAREN SMITH, PLANNING DIRECTOR PAN'\ FROM: DANIEL A. McARTHUR, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: July 19, 1979 RE: Yarbrough 8040 Greenline Review After having made a greenline review of the above project and having made a site inspection, the engineering department finds that there are two items which should be brought to the attention of the Plan- ning and Zoning Commission. On March 20, 1959 the Pitkin County Commissioners approved the Tipple Wood Subdivision, Lots 1 thru 5, with no provision for ade- quate off-street parking and no provision for adequate roads to insure fire protection which is in direct conflict with Section 24- 6.2 8040 Greenline Review of the Aspen Municipal Code. Because the City of Aspen annexed the Tipple Woods Subdivision in March of 1967 with no exceptions, the engineering department has no choice but tc recommend approval for the above greenline review. A jk -. · •r ,-r Mountain Beil 11 July 1979 Mr, Tim Hagman Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd P.O. Box 2736 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Yarbrough Residence Dear Mr. Hagman: I have reviewed the project location and understand the project to consist of a single family residence to be located on Lot #5 of Tipple Woods Subdivision, As phone lines presently exist adjacent to the pro- perty, I foresee no problem providing phone service to the project. Very truly yours 7*viggic Gene Krill Mountain Bell GK:cs MEMORANDUM 1 '·t,0u / To: kity Water Department ,« F /1 Bob Jacobs, Fire Marshal Dave Ellis, City Engineer FROM: Karen Smith, Planning Office 0304 RE: Yarbrough 8040 Greenline Review DATE: July 16, 1979 ' Attached is an 8040 Greenline Review application for Dr. William Yarbrough's residence. This item has been scheduled to come before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, Jufy 31, 1979. Therefore, may I please have your written comments by Wednesday, July 25, 1979. I know this is short notice and if you have problems with this schedule, please contact me immediately. Thank you. )4 UAU ~-Al U)/m Mulr up= D * 0, / 4 9 -1-2 M..4 up is iw •de c•J 6 M & •14 5 9 ¥¥ '3:.4 j B l iTz & Of 1 J ....,t~ 00 1 4 - 'ii[tu_,~_* 3-• AN s. Que 28- Nit b..Jr ~v~j 'M,4,••~ec» -02• b /3 4 TEANSM,k s,Al 746 I N S Surel i Wl 5<6<.1 0 ¥. N#3 00 *3 ~--> Fvrt N. -00--: 3 1,- M A *H A l'u W 165 A. r· A 14 4 bgr - MEMORANDUM TO: KAREN SMITH, PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: BOB JACOBS, FIRE MARSHAL DATE: July 23, 1979 RE: Yarbrough 8040 Greenline Review I have had several conversations with Tim Hagman of Copland, Hagman, & Yaw regarding supplementary or on-site fire protection equipment for the proposed structure on Mr. Yarbrough's property. As stated on the 8040 Greenline Review proposal under "Fire Protec- tion," a 2" standpipe will be installed between Mr. Yarbrough' s property and Galena Street as a supplement to the existing fire hydrant on the property immediately to the south. In addition, hose and other necessary fire fighting equipment will be stored in a cabinet adjacent to the property. It is very difficult, if not impos- sible, to recommend emergency equipment to be used by untrained per- sonnel. My main complaint concerns the fact that the only access road to this area is impassable during ski season. I would strongly urge Mr. Yarbrough to search out any possibilities for an access road to his property that could be used year round. This is the only way that adequate fire emergency service could be provided. jk MEMORANDUM TO: KAREN SMITH, PLANNING DIRECTOR PAN\ FROM: DANIEL A. McARTHUR, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: July 19, 1979 RE: Yarbrough 8040 Greenline Review After having made a greenline review of the above project and having made a site inspection, the engineering department finds that there are two items which should be brought to the attention of the Plan- ning and Zoning Commission. On March 20, 1959 the Pitkin County Commissioners approved the Tipple Wood Subdivision, Lots 1 thru 5, with no provision for ade- quate off-street parking and no provision for adequate roads to insure fire protection which is in direct conflict with Section 24- 6.2 8040 Greenline Review of the Aspen Municipal Code. Because the City of Aspen annexed the Tipple Woods Subdivision in March of 1967 with no exceptions, the engineering department has no choice but tc recommend approval for the above greenline review. jk 4' Yarbrough Residence 8040 Greenline Review Submitted to: City of Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Applicant: Dr. William Yarbrough 1010 Wilder Avenue Apt. 1001 Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Architect: Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd P.O. Box 2736 210 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 .. Yarbrough Residence 8040 Greenline Review INTRODUCTORY Project Name YARBROUGH RESIDENCE Location Lot #5 Tipplewoods Subdivision Aspen, Colorado Lot Size 6,000 sq.ft. Zoning District R-15 (downzoned from R-6) Setbacks (R-6) Front 10 feet Rear 15 feet Sides 5 feet Open Space Requirement None Maximum Height 25 ft. to mid-span of gable and 5 ft. to top of ridge, and 10 ft. to top of chimneys, antennaes, flues, etc. 1 , 1 ., 1 1 1 IF V 1 1 L - . - I.-- Ill-. .......... I......... - L -- De-AN Ave. O Coe• Afpe.. 1-0-·,st-re- t 2 9 74-0 3/'0- 145 0 -... g-i' 1--i: 7 -T - 131 - 6-1,7-3 'ir -7 -- Grl- - - -1 1 1 1 1 #/ 1 1 11 \ 1 1 *'ii ** il liM-/ pLOC.t 97 4.~3 1 Z & 0 0 1 0 J 11 1 4 1 . 1 1 0 1 1 t 1 1/ 11 1 -1 \ 1 .174.34 w. n. 0 0 k - --- --- -- J / 0- li . Tirtp *kE WOODS SUB-DIVISION Lo, 1 01 72- ..7 f Loc~e61,1 N~/94 fec. 08.-TWP . Ios. 2.84 W. op- GTH $41 1 '' 9£+ I r R. Iltl 1.1 1 P 17.<· M CO. CCLO qc*Le /520 . tu 1 + 17 1 0 :91 2 lit i 1,1 Le-r 2 3 1 DEOI CATION : 11 C y J % : a K Now ALL MEN Sw 1-w... PRE-91,4-rl: T»•·r T., u.O.-tur.en #a'.0 ' 1 -C-64= 0441 NERS OP -1-UAT PART 0- -T,42 N*'/4 9 re \8·-rh•F, ,09 9.54* or 04. 1/ AHO PLATTED -nle- 9*Mt %61¥0 LOr, 1-2.·,-4·'; SLOCK\, eACEMENT FOR I a·rw BM, A, FECO=ORO P,-rk,•4 COUNTY 22*Ce/09, WAVI LAID 03-r. 9~_,Brn¥,t"' Foe Pe,VATE. EC-0 AND PAE©,4, TYEAM Awe UT#LIT» 24•re»e•,·r, u•·,08• T.4. 1 ta, . HAM. € 47'*L. 0. TIPPLaWOOD, quer=44,1910•4 46--4/4 9.44 rl 1. 7.6 .iS'IA' 14....4 OVV--1 1 , 5 l , ~~ MOTAOY, ACKNOWLEOG#•ASher Lo-r 1 # ~~ 9TATe OPCOLOBEADOZ, f 7917 11"r Cou •·rry of Prrk: rH 6 -0/COC.,Ne OLA-r- AND O•r>,CA-rioN 0/ 19.S, 8-0.9_401.20 -/44,4119*rts€:=L #:.. tJ)/091- %:f°g: 222F;- w.9 Aer„0~/Ll<310 Ba-oe. Ve -r-w . /~ 4¢0 HY c ovv,T,ON C.-•la'. 1 \41-TH/,t M¥ 644»~0 4 OF-te~AL SIAL. <- ~-47.9- 30~ di /4. , 2 h. M....¥ \4, 23. >.4/ 7,1 / \\1.9, / ...4 f Solve¥021 AM• 10*vrr. 1, G e Sue.,AN••4, LIC~#9•01-6 PEACFC, IN TH- 61'A-re C- ' COLOIADe 00 &-4-Illy C'•• -rt/*1 -r-MAT Th• E yolvaN AND Quer 0- ThriSIL* 8 JOOQ 9Ub·01719,OV v.'eea »AAD- 967 Wl A¥40 O NO r 0 6.0 -- i, 90*2.Vit,ON AHO IN,¥EUCT.ON, A-0 -T-1.4AT 1%0-r-,4 Aell AccuRAre - 79,· \ 0. Sa,¥ O/ My KNOWL,Dal AND SaL-,21*· 4 49 J lit. 1/> U ,- I Al-€OVA Lf: 4 V L / IT k %\\0 \ _~~~-r;;;~ COUNT•y PLANNI'~2 COMMIHION 71,•-•20, "ES -AfA-/6,9/1-_ C.AA,-'•AM Lo, 4- '91-4 £ . -~442-,0,4. ,Steetr...0 1 7)- .....01.10 \9 ACCEPTED FO. //L\-0 _/2 3-(_f>4- O. 144.£.A. 1999 AY..ilixil'f~ ...~ '63,;ir.e7.q" '. 61 3 ACC'27.0 Fe, W\,#hte 'At 764- 0--'CO 4* 7-Wk *Ii•r I€,4 COON'v B 91 1.. c........ e.ce.0.2 -,11: --•21.~Lzlf:32:tilr- ... . p- C K'¥~L.U.- ~ PL•·rea.< 4£5,412•LA. p... ajv -1 i ' *ted-1~,ow '40..to-77,4-- 1 , . 1 + 6 ... Site Description The project site is part of the Tipplewoods subdivision, adjacent to Little Nell Ski trail and is covered with 3"-5" Aspen trees and native type ground cover. Previously subdivided in 1960, the site is served by a rail tram in serviceable condition. Parking is provided at the parking lot adjacent to the Copper Kettle Restaurant at the bottom of the rail tram. Construction access is provided across the Little Nell Ski trail in the summer through arrangement with the Aspen Skiing Corporation. Project Description The design is for a single-family residence of 3370 sq.ft. plus 600 sq.ft. of exterior decks and stairs. The program consists of a living, dining, and kitchen on the upper level; the middle level consists of two bedrooms and baths, a master bedroom and bath and entry; the lower level consists of a children's recreation room and bath, entry and storage/ mechanical space. To capture the sweeping views of Aspen and the adjacent ski slopes, the main activity functions are placed on the upper level with remaining program functions on subsequently lower levels. By stacking functions thus, the building foot print is substantially reduced, therefore allowing maximum retention of the existing trees and ground cover. Additionally, all trees and ground cover that are disturbed through construction necessity will be restored or replanted to their original state. The significance of this will be to help minimize the visual impact of the structure. To further understate the buildings appearance, it is intended to incorporate wood siding stained a neutral gray or beige. The roof, to be vertical-rib joint metal, will be painted a matt finish neutral color as well. Native lichen-rock and tinted glass (where legal) will compliment the exterior appearance and is attempting to enhance and blend with its setting of natural vegetation. Immediately south, or uphill from the proposed building location, the site contours maintain their same slope until reaching the southern property line, 20' away (1), at which point the grade pitch shallows slightly until meeting an adjacent residence. Therefore, the risk from avalanche is non-existent; as well, the expected minimal surface runoff will be diverted around the east and west faces of the residence and collected in on-site drywells, as in- dicated on the site plan. Areas to the east and west requiring cribbing or concrete retaining walls will stabilize the slopes in these areas and will effectively cover any potential areas of scarring. No exposed cuts will be visible from any public viewpoint. Services and Utilities Water System A 6" water main presently serves the southerly adjacent residence which would provide adequate water and pres- sure by tapping into the existing main. Mr. James Markalunas of the Aspen Water Department found no foreseeable deficiencies with this design. Sewer System Two viable alternatives exist for a sewer tap; the 8" line on Galena Street is of sufficient size as well as a 8" line at the base of the Little Nell Ski trail. A design review by Mr. Heiko Kuhn revealed no fore- seeable deficiencies with either alternative. Power Underground power will be supplied from a pad-mounted cransformer approximately 90' to the south as indicated on the site plan. A review by Mr. John Spangler of Holy Cross Electric indicated no deficiences with this design. Telephone Underground phone service is available from an existing cable on the northern property line. Mr. Gene Krill of Mountain Bell foresees no deficiences relative to providing service from the existing main line. Natural Gas A 1" line presently exists in the rail tram easement that would be tapped into for servicing the project. Mr. Willard Clapper of Rocky Mountain Natural Gas foresees no deficiencies with this approach. Fire Protection To attempt to adequately provide fire protection service the following system, after review with Mr. Willard Clapper, Fire Chief, is being proposed. Within the rail tram/utility easement, which extends to Galena Street, a 2" dry pipe would be installed with a Y connection at Galena Street. This allows a connection to a fire truck on Galena Street and therefore would enable the water pressure to be controlled for fire- fighting purposes. Presently there is not a fire plug in this location; Willard Clapper is recommending that one be installed for the benefit of the immediate area as well as the project site. Until such time as a new installation occurs, the present capacities of the fire department's pumper trucks would be sufficiently capable during construction;as well, as shown on the site plan, it is proposed to install at the top of the rail tram structure, a fire hose cabinet containing 100 ft. of 14" single jacket hose and fire-fighting tools per r Willard Clapper's specifications (axe, haligan tool, etc.). Also, to allow emergency access around the house, a path system would be developed and would also help protect surrounding natural vegetation. Some further protection is available through a fire hydrant recently installed about 100' to the south of the project site should the Fire Department elect to approach the project site across the Little Nell ski trail road (summer access only). Since the site does not have year-round direct road access, it has been determined that the foregoing represents a viable practical alternative. i, CITY.10?6; SPEN 130 +48...:Illyj#f~*.W-=treet aspenliN~ 81611 9 May 1979 Mr. Tim Hagman Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd PoO. Box 2736 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Yarbrough Residence Dear Mr. Hagman: I have reviewed the project location and understand the project 'G ' consists of a single-family residence to be located on Lot &5 sU-1 / the Tipple Woods Subdivision. There presently exists a dU•MfnE \j which services a fire hydrant which was installed for the adjacent residence to the south. Adequate water and pressure is obtainable by tapping into the ~~)line. I see no foreseeable deficiences with this design. try truly ours L./ k -7„446- J#nes J. Markalunus Aspen Water Department 5/10/79 - Issuance of a tap permit by the water department would be predicated upon permission by Mr. Blitz of the use of the 6" private fire hydrant line. ASPEN METROPOLITAN SANITATION DISTRICT Box 2810 · Aspen, Colorado 81611 · 303/925-2537 9 May 1979 Mr. Tim Hagman Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd P.O. Box 2736 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Yarbrough Residence Dear Mr. Hagman: I have reviewed the project location and understand the project consists of a sin gle-family residence to be located on Lot #5 of Tipple Woods Subdivision. Presently two viable alternatives exist for a sewer connection; one line exists on Galena Street and the other at the base of Little Nell. I see no deficiencies relative to either location in terms of being able to properly service the project. Very truly yours 1 . Nt-,4 4 Heiko Kuhn Aspen Metropolitain Sanitation District HK: sb MEMORANDUM TO: City Water Department cRob Jacobs, Fire Marshal Dave Ellis, City Engineer FROM: Karen Smith, Planning Office RE: Yarbrough 8040 Greenline Review DATE: July 16, 1979 ' Attached is an 8040 Greenline Review application for Dr. William Yarbrough's residence. This item has been scheduled to come before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, July 31, 1979. Therefore, may I please have your written comments by Wednesday, July 25, 1979. I know this is short notice and if you have problems with this schedule, please contact me immediately. Thank you. 4 11<11064it•ck - i e, stal i. 64lA 2 1 MEMORANDUM TO: City Water Department Bob Jacobs, Fire Marshal Dave Ellis, City Engineer FROM: Karen Smith, Planning Office RE: Yarbrough 8040 Greenline Review DATE: July 16, 1979 Attached is an 8040 Greenline Review application for Dr. William Yarbrough's residence. This item has been scheduled to come before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, July 31, 1979. Therefore, may I please have your written comments by Wednesday, July 25, 1979. I know this is short notice and if you have problems with this schedule, please contact me immediately. Thank you. Yarbrough Residence 8040 Greenline Review Submitted to: City of Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Applicant: Dr. William Yarbrough 1010 Wilder Avenue Apt. 1001 Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Architect: Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd P.O. Box 2736 210 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Yarbrough Residence 8040 Greenline Review INTRODUCTORY Project Name YARBROUGH RESIDENCE Location Lot #5 Tipplewoods Subdivision Aspen, Colorado Lot Size 6,000 sq.ft. Zoning District R-15 (downzoned from R-6) Setbacks (R-6) Front 10 feet Rear 15 feet Sides 5 feet Open Space Requirement None Maximum Height 25 ft. to mid-span of gable and 5 ft. to top of ridge, and 10 ft. to top of chimneys, antennaes, flues, etc. Site Description The project site is part of the Tipplewoods subdivision, adjacent to Little Nell Ski trail and is covered with 3"-5" Aspen trees and native type ground cover. Previously subdivided in 1960, the site is served by a rail tram in serviceable condition. Parking is provided at the parking lot adjacent to the Copper Kettle Restaurant at the bottom of the rail tram. Construction access is provided across the Little Nell Ski trail in the summer through arrangement with the Aspen Skiing Corporation. Project Description The design is for a single-family residence of 3370 sq.ft. plus 600 sq.ft. of exterior decks and stairs. The program consists of a living, dining, and kitchen on the upper level; the middle level consists of two bedrooms and baths, a master bedroom and bath and entry; the lower level consists of a children's recreation room and bath, entry and storage/ mechanical space. To capture the sweeping views of Aspen and the adjacent ski slopes, the main activity functions are placed on the upper level with remaining program functions on subsequently lower levels. By stacking functions thus, the building foot print is substantially reduced, therefore allowing maximum retention of the existing trees and ground cover. Additionally, all trees and ground cover that are disturbed through construction necessity will be restored or replanted to their original state. The significance of this will be to help minimize the visual impact of the structure. To further understate the buildings appearance, it is intended to incorporate wood siding stained a neutral gray or beige. The roof, to be vertical-rib joint metal, will be painted a matt finish neutral color as well. Native lichen-rock and tinted glass (where legal) will compliment the exterior appearance and is attempting to enhance and blend with its setting of natural vegetation. Immediately south, or uphill from the proposed building location, the site contours maintain their same slope until reaching the southern property line, 20' away (t), at which point the grade pitch shallows slightly until meeting an adjacent residence. Therefore, the risk from avalanche is non-existent; as well, the expected minimal surface runoff will be diverted around the east and west faces of the residence and collected in on-site drywells, as in- dicated on the site plan. Areas to the east and west requiring cribbing or concrete retaining walls will stabilize the slopes in these areas and will effectively cover any potential areas of scarring. No exposed cuts will be visible from any public viewpoint. Services and Utilities Water System A 6" water main presently serves the southerly adjacent residence which would provide adequate water and pres- sure by tapping into the existing main. Mr. James Markalunas of the Aspen Water Department found no foreseeable deficiencies with this design. Sewer System Two viable alternatives exist for a sewer tap; the 8" line on Galena Street is of sufficient size as well as a 8" line at the base of the Little Nell Ski trail. A design review by Mr. Heiko Kuhn revealed no fore- seeable deficiencies with either alternative. Power Underground power will be supplied from a pad-mounted transformer approximately 90' to the south as indicated on the site plan. A review by Mr. John Spangler of Holy Cross Electric indicated no deficiences with this design. Telephone Underground phone service is available from an existing cable on the northern property line. Mr. Gene Krill of Mountain Bell foresees no deficiences relative to providing service from the existing main line. Natural Gas A 1" line presently exists in the rail tram easement that would be tapped into for servicing the project. Mr. Willard Clapper of Rocky Mountain Natural Gas foresees no deficiencies with this approach. Fire Protection To attempt to adequately provide fire protection service the following system, after review with Mr. Willard Clapper, Fire Chief, is being proposed. Within the rail tram/utility easement, which extends to Galena Street, a 2" dry pipe would be installed with a Y connection at Galena Street. This allows a connection to a fire truck on Galena Street and therefore would enable the water pressure to be controlled for fire- fighting purposes. Presently there is not a fire plug in this location; Willard Clapper is recommending that one be installed for the benefit of the immediate area as well as the project site. Until such time as a new installation occurs, the present capacities of the fire department's pumper trucks would be sufficiently capable during construction;as well, as shown on the site plan, it is proposed to install at the top of the rail tram structure, a fire hose cabinet containing 100 ft. of 14" single jacket hose and fire-fighting tools per Willard C]apper's specifications (axe, haligan tool, etc.). Also, to allow emergency access around the house, a path system would be developed and would also help protect surrounding natural vegetation. Some further protection is available through a fire hydrant recently installed about 100' to the south of the project site should the Fire Department elect to approach the project site across the Little Nell ski trail road (summer access only). Since the site does not have year-round direct road access, it has been determined that the foregoing represents a viable practical alternative. 4 CITY,~PEN ./in,i:lital/Zvkagraa,;4~7271- aspen~81611 9 May 1979 Mr. Tim Hagman Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd P.O. Box 2736 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Yarbrough Residence Dear Mr. Hagman: A I have reviewed the project location and understand the project , C', consists of a single-family residence to be located on Lot &5 of -0-1 / the Tipple Woods Subdivision. There presently exists a L...0/ which services a fire hydrant which was installed for the adjacent residence to the south. Adequate water and pressure is obtainable by tapping into the ~ line. I see no foreseeable deficiences with this design. (e) ~ery truly TIours 7 r .Jnes J. Markalunus Aspen Water Department 5/10/79 - Issuance of a tap permit by the water department would be predicated upon permission by Mr. Blitz of the use of the 6" private fire hydrant line. l ASPEN METROPOLITAN SANITATION DISTRICT Box 2810 · Aspen, Colorado 8161I · 303/925-2537 9 May 1979 Alr. Tim Hagman Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd P.O. Box 2736 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Yarbrough Residence Dear Mr. Hagman: I have reviewed the project location and understand the project consists of a single-family residence to be located on Lot #5 of Tipple Woods Subdivision. Presently two viable alternatives exist for a sewer connection; one line exists on Galena Street and the other at the base of Little Nell. I see no deficiencies relative to either location in terms of being able to properly service the project. Very truly yours L.,L-- Heiko Kuhn Aspen Metropolitain Sanitation District HK: sb l'3i 4 k a#r-/ - - - 0 gQA k·.-- _ lkU luu-,di Lu 12~ 1 446 ~6 pituid-- 14.24 JA ; MA (~Al-4 4% 46 ilik. Ck (4 47 milt__~~ to 22 /4.ko 641 9¢0 iki UV.., ~.'U' vurX WUPA' , t-24 52-224 ~-- CAUL,< Ad» U rotuu- AJ <51 kA-£ re_s, MzLJ *r- -&dIC#/pt 4 96(1-7/7/ U,deu<Co l a (tc <g~t- wLE€,64 · U. ./1 f f w--4 9 0 19-WMAW Al i 00 -4 54 i, #Fa/64,«+ Att 642 <t-L-7, / U 0 -V.,44 1/U,1 c \ r, MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Ellis, City Engineer Clayton Meyring, City Building Inspector FROM: Karen Smith, Planning Office RE: Yarbrough 8040 Greenline Review DATE: August 8, 1979 On August 7, 1979, the P and Z approved the Yarbrough single family house in Tipple Woods Subdivision with numerous conditions. While the minutes will give you the seven conditions, I did want to immediately point three out: 1. That an escrow amount be set aside to cover replacement landscaping. The amount is to be determined by the bid price of a landscape plan. 2. That a trail easement be reserved of a width to be determined by the City Engineer. 3. That the recommendations of the August 6th letter of Lincoln DeVore be implemented in view of any potential soils or geologic problems. Please note that this includes a requirement of inspection by a soils engineer at time of excavation and modification of conditions at that time. P.S. minutes not completed yet-Sheryl will give you both copies when completed. N 74030'00"W' 120.00' 1 1 IrrLIL *uu[,0, LOT 3 /4/4-80'74 6133 474.-5122- ecA.. 47*'i.1/64 "4 #4* %7 9 y/.77274- F 44; / 46&18*3~ „r/L --S 57°40'it" W VO ' /\ 4/05 / 401 73.86 / . LOT 4 %399 />< (8 1- 140 .·- , 2.eD 0 -e S 58° 49 40 W--«47 . Tes-5-- ~ 10 96 58.3800 41.20' 799*.~8477- ,·11 ' - ;0 LOT 5 9801:59 4 3 . S 40° 58' 01" W N 75000'00"W- 114.29' 60.00/' z 60.00' 69.471 041 N 74;/30' 00" W 120.00' ~ 9003. 381 5 0/ Y L*/4.1,3-8 (NR¢. t,(12@1 9 795.0645, -4851· LOT M ' 4ff;40 ~ t--S 28°40'09"W 41.145 (ANTHONY ACRES) ~g.~ t-099- l ..>13 f ~-S 10°34'39" W 92.17i (E FOOT TRAIL ~ 19·5139 EASEMENT , 94 i- 3939 -I/ 47 p' /,r,1- 1 0. 1 V 1 FAA -- S 36° 34' 09" W "' va 229.30 ~ 0 30 60 120 .-'.. 3'5II SCA\-E: ¢ = 63 8 -g 0 - 0 b , 1 9 195,0 6 4 3 450&•77 95(0 407415 47.77' ~ ~ N 740 30'-00" W 230.82' S 32° 35' 27"W · 95 0,4 4 Mle ~ 116.87' 9/94: . 99 68 l-------32 EXHIBIT "A" 9 -03, c. c LITTLE NELL FOOT TRAIL EASEMENT , . 0 00"W 180.00' N 15' 00' 00" E 396.51' LAW OFFICES OATEs, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION SUITE 200 600 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LEONARD M. OATES ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ROBERT w. HUGHES RICHARD A, KNEZEVICH AREA CODE 303 DEBORAH QUINN September 4, 1981 TELEPHONE 920-1700 TELECOPIER: 9201121 Sunny Vann, Planning Director City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dan MacArthur, City Engineer City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Ski, Hiking and Pedestrian Trail on Lot 14, Anthony Acres and Lot 5, Tipple Woods Subdivision Dear Sunny and Dan: In the last few days I have been attempting to gain information as to the status of the above trail which exists in place on the Blitz Property (High on the Hill Condominiums) now owned by Mr. Hemetter and on Lot 5, Tipple Woods Subdivision owned by William Joseph Yarborough. My inquiry was and is for and in behalf of the Durant Condominium Association whose members, among other members of the public, have enjoyed the utilization of the subject ski trails over a substantial period of time, and whose property enjoyment and value is enhanced by virtue of the existence of such trail. It forms a valuable and convenient access route from the Little Nell ski slopes to the Durant-Fifth Avenue- Fasching House, et al., condominium area of the City of Aspen (An- thony Acres). Starting several days ago, I.made inquiry as to who at this point in time was in charge of and had a good handle on the City trail system. No one seemed to know. As a consequence, I made a request of Audrey in the Planning Office to look at the City's trail map. She indicated to me that it was hanging in Allan Richman's office, but that Allan really had no responsibility with respect thereto. I reviewed the map in Allan's office, and could not find a designation of the above trail on that map. Allan re- ferred me to the City Engineering Office. There I met with Jay Hammond who indicated that the Engineering Department's records reflected no trail as respects the Blitz property or the Yarborough property. At thatpoint in time, I gave him documentation establish- ing the dedication of the portion of the trail situate on the Blitz property and asked that the City's Engineering Department maintain - a permanent record of it. Lou Buettner of the City's Engineering OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH, P. C. Sunny Van Dan MacArthur September 4, 1981 Page Two Department called me back later that same afternoon, after having had a discussion with Jay Hammond to indicate to me that he had no record of anything as affecting Lot 5, Tipple Woods Subdivision. Rather than let the matter drop at this point in time, because of the importance of the existence of the trail to all of the tourist accommodation facilities situate in the Anthony Acres area, I made separate inquiry myself with the City Building Depart- ment to determine what things had been done on Lot 5, Tipple Woods Subdivision (the Yarborough lot) requiring building permits and/or land use approvals. After reviewing the dead files of the City Building Department, I came up with the enclosed Planning Office memorandum dated August 8, 1979, and minutes of a Planning and Zoning Commission meeting dated August 7, 1979. These documents would reflect that an 8040 greenline review took place with res- pect to the Yarborough property .and that as a condition of the approval of that greenline review, that a trail easement be reserved along the existing trail alignment, the width of which was to have - been determined by the City Engineer. Apparently, this is as far as the matter had gone in 1979, and at that point in time, it simply had gotten buried. As an immediate matter, I would ask that the alignment and width of the trail be determined by the City Engineer. Upon such determination being made, I would request that the City Attorney prepare a dedica- tion of this easement to be presented to Dr. Yarborough. I am as- suming that by virtue of the 8040 greenline review approval, Dr. Yar- borough committed to the creation of the easement. I think this is important at this point in time inasmuch as the Durant Condominium Association has certain information which would lead it to believe that Dr. Yarborough intends to block the trail as of the commencement of the coming ski season. Such action would ap- pear to clearly violate the spirit of the 8040 greenline review and will, of course, be a detriment to the neighborhood. In the event that Dr. Yarborough should be unwilling to execute an easement for the benefit of the public, then I think it would be appropriate that steps be taken to require or enforce the conditions of approval made in 1979 under the 8040 greenline review. As a general matter, while I do not intend to be critical of the Planning Office or Engineering Department, it would seem to me that these types of documents should not be misplaced or buried as this one has. There may, perhaps, be yet additional easements of great value to the public which have not been perpetuated because O«rEs, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH, P. C. Sunny Vann r.-496 Dan MacArthur September 4, 1981 Page Three of some administrative error. Were it not for the interest of the Durant Condominium Association in this trail and its willingness to bear the expense of investigation, it would not have been called to the City's attention that it, in fact, does have a valuable pub- lic trail for access to the Little Nell ski slope. I would ask that I be apprised as to the progress which is made in resolving this matter. Very truly yours, OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH, P.C. . By '~~Q, A .¥~2- (Ehho LeorTard M. Oates LMO/caa Enclosure CC: Phillip R. Moore, President Durant Condominium Association Wayne Chapman, City Manager Lou Buettner, Engineering Department Mark Conklin, Manager Durant Condominium Association Paul Taddune, Esq. City Attorney , t», 0 Book 7 gale 96- =~-tONDOMINIUM MAP OF ~52'HIGH ON THE HILL CONDOMINIUMS 0 ... AN Exts/, h.0 OUP.L. S,TUATW 0,4 v-MI 'AS¥,.W, pe-·ric- O/ ,-01- 14 ANT•·60»4¥ .C-al. 2.,7.. /4374.39·c - liu,) ..00 , C,¥V or 'SPEN. COLO OWNER'S CERTIFICATE 0. , ./H' 41.. .... Cpow.. s•..7 / / 4 * 91 66~NO.,0.~R 04*Imr,t' 'UUMA. .1-LO i,4 'ME CO.,00¥I¥•iuM DEU •-1,0• 8 130.1UKI_ Bul-Z AS ow,•R• 0, .InLINETES=-2=*Ilgh-aZS--1~3111.~M0~2:CL..,LUI # / G CE, 4. COLOAAeo •Ealgy CER•rip[ t•Al '•,5 9%0 0¢16,I Blat£/2,A_la.Lkil6,6.-CZ»l;X;~huaLL~·61.- ' f . 6A,0 COWDY.NUUM-. DATED IWI ·1' 0.05 11.- . . 1 ...0 ...0.0.0 '4 ~8040 1 i .- 00.- _L . Ar ,•Aes l.,2 0/ 1.Al ILCOROD o• rilk CLE,Abt AND Al' CIO.. O, •rvt C,n•,•,·rf 0, _ PurAIN 5,"54 0/ co'C-Do -rwil MAI ....Ts -ro /,4. pumwc n•- I.'..4.- .-I.....V CAP U¥ 0. , I , SHOWN O. ¥H. MAC'. 9 :i 14.1 W, A 6 6 - 6-J - 1 - Re...7 -i -Y •p• ..™ 0- -r ..O.2-4 ...... 0 T.d aol -•TE 6. C-Cal'qo ,$. \il IMIT' 9 _213£1/ 1 3 5/0// / 'MI ,CAIGANG 0%'4.u' C.%-t*r,¥1CATI WAS AC.*Mr>h,NLS'DO~' SlrOA. M. .*5 ' DAY 1 1 ....0 -1 V DIce& ' wte"p ~1_17.'t •N MMAN -1.-hAA,2 4 MOSE~T ,»1.,Ti~ A¥r¥ IN -CT 0 , ¢ CON€ACE l..~ - DUPLEX l~ ./• w'NOO~ / Se MINIDS $ MANO AND O..20.1.L ...L / 23 M. COW.MI-,0,1 . 'P " I. t . b le hs'* \ 1 39 11 -/ C i i Arlt...u..£. , ,<At*.J , .....1 /0.-•I I li · '~NE. 91--,77* _ 1 0 1 1 9 1 15 ch , ... i 97 I /:ni.. IC '- 1.1/. (·'. woo o WAL k accEs, AND UTIUT¥ . 4 rt,~A#Q SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1 G..... I coll.AAN, A Con'RIDC> ....ST...0 P........... .....Ell '40 ....D ......0. "SEMT.¥ 1 L ~ /~IAAE WIREIN C.liTIV, AS FOLLOWs I•,PRIL 2*MA Guu,Ir wil w,/01 -Dil MI O •te-TKJ,4 AMD , ~T ...........a'w.. & i.~ rrvt·r, 1>t_af_=2--11_6[4-£1/1//A/REB///0, 040€/. 1,4..E O• c.060..OC~ . .., 9 ru· • · · 4 ft' I.-4 -·4 _CA)11.lbUL DUPLEX Le Calil iNT,RILY Wiwit, TH, 00/I t) In, --- 1-04 i -/i/// b C? ': 1 6,·•tt Er 1,- r 7 6.C-R.ILO P„opk,~TY A* ~42»vl e•, Tue, 94.A·r,~ASID ON wi. *.LLO E·,I.OL•ti .)'c'1/. AS in•·I) 1-wi ..-·CATioN AND DIMINIONS 0, T,•R 0600.Alili LI.•LI. ~VILI,Me •40 th•/~•SW,Uill, )4 1 - V EVI/" S " "CNN TO hAE "S 'C.C.v"96.4 *MIN. ON TRS '"P "7 -r" MAD ACCUR'T 'Cr "O -%/1-Al¥ - i"v.,CAL C- 15 TRAN EAS/M/~--2/ ~ 1. L) ...,C.. N. LOC-All- AND r.. ./.ile. TIL IND ....1./. M...ME -I'll ..... \-L luiLDING TRE CONOOMIN,UM UN,Ti TIERLIN, 1,4I UN r 0£%10/«20/I THERIO€,1,6 DIMEN,10• 6 6/ 70' ON 1.ACM SIDE OF £ _ bAID UN,TI, IND TIE ELIVITIONS O/ IME Et,Ilit·O FLOOR ANI CE,LIN€i OF .1,1.71.6 -W , e 1 It 6*4 Up- GE'*SH PE'MIN coc, RE' "" "G• ••0 La•le Welill• 117• €\ 1.1 .CE SCALE CouNT-4 0, Pirk:iN i ...1 0. COLORADO 1 1, 47-9/ £; 1 1 'Ne. 20 FE t·r -11,1,121) al /•RA•D B PELMAN I *Cal..... suRvivor'/ C.Ing\/Al. WAI .........0/CO 5....../ T.'I 2.Efi.... 1 1 1 1 .%..... •Al ./.O ./O 0....AL .... 1 -- COM M'"104 /"tRES A].JIM r LEGEND £ NOTES // EASTERLY . Lid•r.' C &14'ty ~ ~/~ PC> ET!·ON OF ~ 0 + 9 SET SuRVEv CON'r.0.- ...... lillie- ' CON' . 3 4€/AR ,V/CAP AS Ne·r,0 1 0 I. ..... 4.1 T. ... .... CAP * 2.-7. TRAIL EASEMENT ACCEPTANCE ~ , 0 pow.4 -:*E SE SEr BLOCK 2 / THE TIA,L EA~~MINT 4 SWOWN ON TH,I MAP i j *,LAI-, AGCE/¥IO~aY- 3,4, crry or CALLS IN € ) DEI/V/D /Row. RECORD ASPEN ·ri, 6 -41_ 0,•·Y o• -41-- - -- l /1 All'THONY Aspr, 7,-6/ POLICY NO 01 5,6,-1. DA-rio ' 1 Pr- 1 li FEe. 1 ,- UGED IN THIS SM .....1- lA "' /:t ;h· , j .A , (' L ELEVA-riONS e.~SED ON ~60•40 ' 84,6.,1 A.C. E-b Z:,L,DO. CAP .00.0 1/ *ACI , It , 393/ 'Clil .C '. ...1/ ..O COMMON EL.MEN. d... G...... COMMON ILIMINT CLERKiRECORDEKS ACCEPTANCE /1 1 ACCEPTIO /O'L •16••0 1~ r,4, 0/,icE 9% CI# AND Pic.OROFR ey 1~4£ COUNTY OF Pat-16, ././1 OF COLO,•ADO Ar -L.21 0'c..OCK.L./ , Ims 22.1-0" oF " 4 .': 4 ~ / "1 -'r '004 -~Ar .AG; 1, -El._ Ric.p-rioN No . 4.42.1. , ./1169 11 .1 11 CL-' A.O ",Co~Dn N 14 \ 1 1 11 - I ¥ It IN, 7.•30.W) SHEET I OF 030,0 0 (N.,5'10 E ) (1*01 00·) • W. / - r---1777 ' .1. 92* illf~%;/&* 1> -6- A 4 . . /4.. . 7 - - ·j. , & HLI...·6*t~~~9'~ 2~~- '-'-7-;7-7#0.-~ -8 1 1 : the Uit:i:IntuniytraiL.a~p~~Li.Iti)'~ri'~a~ ~~di, Iin:Ltt : 4 and approval of Willian Yarbrough, *tates that the City of Upon 10 the owner of a trail easement along the exieting trail alignment for 1,4 i been determined by the City Engineer for the City of Aspen, Colorado, #which trail *asemant cro•••• the real property of Willia Yarbrough %12 4 A situated in Pit)48 County, Colorado. and d•,cribid am follow,t: , . *146 t. *11 of U 5'.:T'IPPIJkW,.ODS fSUBD~SI0N~~41? .: S~~it~#19)#I£ % $ - 4 Pitkin County, Colorado record•. F..12 Th• subject trail easement was reserved to the City of Aspoil And 1%0EN' I approved by willian Yarbrough in connection with proc-ding• before *MMET re 3%' the Ampen Planning and Zoning Commilsion on July 31, and on August 7, tpfirt 1979, for an 8040' green line review prior to divelopment.of th• .: ~ . 3*>i:~ f :~ oubject real property. The Bingle-family house that Mr. Yarbrough .1 -4.14*02 9.21 4 wai then requ••ting to build *ove the 0040 0 elevation line ha• bion ?4:*4 + u constructed, and Yarbrough has refused to sign an appropriate final fil* document regarding thi trail easement that he granted thi City as a ha,24* 7 s. condition of approval of his 8040' green-line reviow proce••, linutes 34153 **y:i of which ari attached to this notice. Th• attached minutes of the hZ* ~ ~ .1*,fc July 31, and August 7, 1979 proceedings before the Aspen Planning and * r. s I It: .1.7 Zoning Commission are cortified as true and accurate by thi 6 91% 1 undersigned City Clerk. , The existing trail alignment for the Aspen/Pitkin County traili , -4 , € r system is available for inspection at th• offices of the City 3 Engineer, City of Aspen, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 130 South Galena. Aspen, Colorado 81611. Dated thim ,1 day of ~ft **L, , 1985. r ..Rit '* 41. CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO p4 *fau-4 L,~ fle-A--4 . 9 . 1 : Kathryn Koah, City Clerk BVCZ Cl ) 0'k Sh CO„*At: .4 -*.... , - i ·· I. - <Ja~~ammond, City Ingineer.3 Sworn to and iubscribed bif~]*'~e by Kathryn Koch, City Clerk for 32 4 the City of Asnen, and lay Hammbild, City Engineer for the City of '9.-NEN.. f *... . A•PAnt this /2<LL_ day oft.~€c.uL = , 1985. 94 ... 21.4,¥1,2 /41 nWIT'll!*S my hand •id official lial. f n~ V'xy,commission expires: 4*2*/7 .. b 1 ~14144 26 ~ ~4 L (41-7, X bisid# Notary/Public W */Fir - . .-·:im:fl ' •,4€ 4• ~ IiA: 2.'I'·~ 1 :A2#·A~ .M, 4 - . 7 - 'V,44 . 49/ 3. 3443.'mwien:- . , 2..'I~/RE r..720.7.-1-- taaa ~ 3 *7Z : , t~ Aty *~~iR77' 4/"Fillia 41*5-/* - -- · ·1 ..420™ .2 4-®C p.lk ..1 proposed to be painted in any historic district or~FR anv ASPEN CODE 5 24-8 3 § 24-6.2 . , . historic building or structure or at any histmic site. Any recommenclation reccive¢£ shall not be controiling on any ..- - council action taken. (b) Review eT:tena. iii reviewing the development plan, tlpe zoni,ig commission shall consider the f€t lowing: (.c) in :evie-,ving graphic declin per:Ilit eloplic,acions, the city council shall give specia congideralion to a.ny proposal OX (1) Whether there exisis sufficient water pressure and to repaint an existing historic sign where located, cr the re- - other utilities to service the intended development: ., production of any historic sign anywhere within the city. THERE ARE KIOT ADEFATE (2) The existence of adequate roads to insure fire (i) Ne graphic design permit shall be required to re- (ROADS To IN SuRE Tb Fl€,-/protection, snow removal and road maintenance; . I . paint any :Traphic Gesign exactly a.3 it pre-,Ii Ously (L'Jited 21'0- PRO ~Fau-7 ON ~ (3) The suitability of the site for development considering -- vided that a per:nit shal have previously issued therefore. 1 rn-,7 VA 10-1976, § 2) N EAvL. .VEccET-ATDA) wHIC·H the slcy·e, f~ound instalility and possibility N moo. SitOUI.O ELIN 4 h) ATE MOD flow, roCK Ialls and avalanche dangers; FLoW 1 20(J.LIFIALLS <6"Thc affects of the development on the natural ARTICT.R vT en-or,·r. r nFT Trtr A·r·,9~0,¥-•,~,- -m---·----- 0.-, u.£.A, .00=j ¥ ....:£2-ruu.- .U.iL. 4 4 .it ..Lul...11 11 43 DUOUL-b OE ok v/ watershed, runoff, drainage. soil erosion and conse- quent effects on water pollution; 4-4. 41-0.1. 4 6,1 *,Jb-. ~ NONE €Al(,ter faft- ·wide; (5) The possible effects on air quality in the area and city . The following areas within the City of Aspen are deemed ADo~T\OPAL Firt(PUIDEO to be of ecological, environmental, architect'Ltral, or scenic e,4 -"- FN n n n -0 . r -1-:.-- 0/5,.....&«-lu., NO RE>reos off OruVED.)/11~5 (6) The design and location of any proposed structure, ....d all development shall be in accordance roads, driveways or trails and their compatibility r, -' * h i - -404 ¥~AvA' the general requirements provided in this cod.e and the terrain; subject to such additional review as provided b:- this article. (Ord. No. 11-1375. § 1) . T Fel, 'r-}t Af w. Th A 3 510*lfs(B Whether proposed grading will result in the least tfuu,c 11·49 164 il CA,41! n·Ar disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land - " Sce. 24-6.2. 8040 GreenIine review. le•97 0~ *WR 611\~ LE " · i>12 7lfikid;Lfeatures; (a) Intention. To provide for review of all development -nt,5 L.JIL.L /~£ 1~'C-·~041(li·,i~) ~iniIni~93}a~s, cut~bir~andINCE~1.:~g, ~e~c~rie,.~cr~:~the above the 8040 greenline within the City of as:en ard 211 development fifty (50) yards below the 8040 gr eer<Me 4 as WH /-'MWIN; f T')fll,EK 5 318.9 open space and preserve the mountain as a scenic to 29 1-- Cio transition c; development irom U..A A-• 6&- # & 6.04- 9,"00" .ll C"S to reseurce; the adjacent agricultural and forestry uses;.to insure that _ all development is compatible with the prevailing siopes: to the open character of the mountain. (Ord. No. (9) The reduction of building height ana '01.:c to maintain ; , provide for the least disturbance to the terrain and other 11-1975, § 1) natural land features of the area; to guarantee avaiiability of utilities and q 1 1 £ " 13%2122St to reduce the impact of Sec. 24-6.3. Stream margin review. aevelopmen, 0.. eu......., iuitifi, u:u natural watershed, and : air Foliution; .to avoid losses due to avalanches, unstable · <a) Intention. To gulae development and encourage appropriate use of land in proximliy Lo designated natural slopes, rock fall and mud slldes; and to enhance the natural mountain setting. water courses, to promote safety from flooding, to prevent impediment of natural water flew, and to insure provisions SuPP. No. 14 for adequate protection and preservation of the designated 1478.1 natural water courses a.3 important natural features. All ' lands and air space within one hundred (100) feet, messured Supp. No. 14 1478.2 $ , .././.4 . 1 + i £ Il ·• A letter of r.rotest concern' ng Count,r Toning re·31.1. ...0..uu 12" Loo Jon.20 01' Wor*, , 4 ./ 0 % r. n '- o Creek was read, discussed and referred to the Ccunty Attorney for reply. James I Pruitt was appointed as Const:.Llc for Justice Precinct No. 1 for a p,!rl 0 4 of four years, The Resignation of Stonley Beal:noar as a member of the Pitkin Chanty Hosnital Board was accepted with regret.and the Clerk was ·instructed to write a letter of a~nrect,ti,,r tb Mr, Bealmear for his past sorvice. i There being no further business the Board adjourned to meet March 18, 1959 at Zo., [Ar,r - f i- ~AL ~ 94311$&227-, Approved: Chairlianv /Uj (7_--Erk - I March 18, 1959 The Board of County Connissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, met at 10:00 AM March 18, 1959, with the following members present: T. J. Sardy, Chairman; Commissioners Ore.st Gerbag and Sainuel Howell; Robert Delaney, County .Attorney; P eggy E, Coble, Clerk, Bills were audited, approved and ordered paid from the various welfare funds as follows: OLD AGE PENSION FUND: $5,998.10 WELFARE FUND: 1,222.36 Unon request of Harold Leish the Commissioners made a personal inspection of th c., road leading from State Highway 82 to the Highlands Ski Area and assured Mr,,Leish and ot..0.: concerned that impro vernents would be made at the earliest practical date and?hoped to incli:·iI this section of road in the County roving program as ranidlv as possible. Kenneth N. C. B. Moore presented a plat of th& prbposed Tipple Woods Sub-Division reporting that the same had been approved by the Planning end Zoning Commission and requeste i that the County commissioners approve th·3 same for filing. After discussion the Corry.iscir.:,···r approved the sub-division plat subject to conditions that the Planning and Zoning Co..irsion approvel be endorsed thereon; that proper signatures be affixed by dedicators and that t:c , Plat show an extension of the platted easement to intersect with Galena street. Upon .trn- ' compliance with the foregoing conditions the Chairman was authorized to approve the plat on behalf of the Commissicners. The County Attorney was instructed to investigate and report back to the CGI'z·lisolt t,;·-, concerning investment of unused County Funds in Treasury Notes or other short term interest i bearing securities. The following resolution was adopted: j RESOLUTION WHEREAS Legislation has been introduced before the Colorado General Assrmbly for ! reapportionment of the Highway Userts Tax funds of the State of Colorado to provide for ~ allocation of a larger proportion to Cities and Towns, i AND WHEREAS A large proportion of county roads are substandard And in urgent need of substantial improvements, and available moneys and sources of revenue to counties are insufficient to pay for such improvements, 1 AND WHEREAS most cities ind towns are dependent upon the trade areas using such co *:,·. roads and are adversely affected by the lack of good county roads, AND WHEREAS any increase in ad valorem taxation that might be imposed by counties ~ to offset loss of highway users' tax funds would be assessed against city and town property ~ as well as property in the counties, thereby increasing the tax burden of cities and towns, ~ liOW THEREFORE Be it resolved by the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County, Colorado, does hereby oppose legislation increasing the proportion of highway ~ ~ users' tax funds allocated to cities and towns at the expense of the counties as being unwise, uneconomic and impractical. Warren Conner was appointed as a member of the Pitkin County Hospital Board to ) · replace Stan Bealmcar who resigned. The following resolution was adopted: ' RESOLUTION i WHEREAS, improvements on the Aspen Pitkin County Airport exceeded the cost, I estimates provided by tho Engineers; and the Federal. Aeronautics Authorities have contributed participating funds for such improvements and it in necessary to match said funds in ordor ~ to complete payment to the Contractar for work that has been performed and accepted and it i is also necessary to provide certain repairs and installations during 1959 all of which i constitute conditions that could not have been roasonably foreseen at the time of adoption ~ 'of the County's Budget for 1959, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the board of County Commissioners of Pltkin i County, Colorado, that an emergency exists th t could not have been reasonably foreseon at the time of adoption of the County&3 Budget and by reason thereof there is hereby ; appropriated from the Contingent Amd of Pitki.n County to tho Airport Improvemert Fund tho sum of $5,000.00. Fred Glidden appeared before the Commissioners concerning rezoning of the ; railroad area west of Mill Street. Following discussion the County Surveyor was directed to make a survey to establish boundaries on a proposed unrestricted area. Clinton Stewart and Pat Maddal.one representing the Hospital Board requested that a committee be appointed "by the Connissioners to act on proposed additional improvements and construction at the Pitkin County Hospital. Following discussion it was unanimously aerced that S a:nuel Howell and the Chairman of the Board of County Commissionars would act with Rose Stanton and Warren Conner as a Committee to further plans for future hospital improvements. ~- '1;here being no further business tho Board adjourned tc meet April 6, 1959 ut 10:00 AM. / / APPROVED: /41 4/ . -- Nt'rp,pr~ : f'.r,., F.i , .t...</L:,.. -- · .,. C ~t'eY' 1·: /*• 1 · ~iail'mali April 6, 1959 The Board of County Conunissionors of Pitkin County, Col.orado mot at 10:Oino'clock 1 ' AM April 6, 1959, with the follow'ng mombors present Chairman T. J. Sardy; Commi.,u I Orest Gerbaz; Commissi,inor Sate.unl Howell be.in,g absent haking been excused, Robort 1)01 anny, ! ~ Countv Attorney; purry E Col) le, Clerk. U I Reports of the'Clork of the County Court, Clark o° t-.he District Court, Cotlilly (1'~,1 I~ Sheriff and Service Officer worc examined, approved and oi Bills we-re audi-t airroved and ordered paid Cro Jartous Colit-ity I·'und .1 0:1 f'01!('14.11 ORDINARY FITND: 37 099 19 1, ,-..2 -* a i . .1 . i n f.. ix L 1- n n TO T.1 IT:n , rU:76 -71 k (69 . -6 3 -5- ~D PUBLIDMING CO., DINVER RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Regular Meeting Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission - - ---August 7, 1979 - Hedstrom felt there were two questions: the use of public property in a public zone by a private company and the desirability of the possible affect on the neighborhood. Pardee felt the third question is the loss of use of a structure that was built with public funds.for the public. He suggested letting the taxi company use the stables in the winter when it is, necessary to be near town. Ochs noted they are using two of the four stalls, two horses in I one stall and one horse and the tack in the other. Hunt asked if the public would be getting some income from the use. Ochs said they would pay $50/month. Hunt moved to determine the use of the County Stable facili- ties by a hgrse-driven taxi company within the original ~ conditional use provided that: 1) the stalls be cleared daily of manure and at all times properly maintained to avoid obnoxious odor, 2) that no maintainance or repair of thelhorse-driven vehicles be accomplished on-site, 3) main- . tain the grounds in a sanitary, litterfree state, 4) the approval be conditioned on a hearing being held sometime in October of this year to review the extent of compliance with the stated conditions and with neighborhood impacts, 5) no more than two horse-powered vehicles be parked on the property, and 6) the horse-driven taxi company occupy no more than two of the existing stalls, however, are respon- sible for the service maintenance of all four stalls, Pardee. seconded. All in favor, motion approved. farbrough Smith noted the P&Z attended a site inspection of the 3040 Greenline . property. She added to her list of conditions that the teview applicant comply wibh the construction techniques and inspection requirements suggested in the letter of Bob Bash from Lincoln Devore Lab dated August 6, 1979. She also added the trail easement and an escrow for landscaping to the list of conditions. Klar asked if the adjacent property owners were aware of the fire access problem. Smith noted some of the adj acent properties were put through the same · review. There is no notice requirement for this type of application. The Fire Marshal has suggested several modi- fications that will make'firefighting easier which the applicant has agreed to comply with. McDonnell asked who would check to be sure these requirements, such as the.,fire cabinet with firefighting. equipment, would be maintained after the approval. Smith said the Fire Marshal makes the inspections. Pardee asked about the liability on the ease- ment. Stock said the liability on the improved trail would lie with the City. Pardee moved to approve the Yarbrough 8040 Greenline Review subject to the following: 1) the conditions recommended by the Fire Marshal that a 2" standpipe be installed between Yarbrough's property and Galena Street as a supplement to the existing fire hydrant on the property immediately to the South; hose and other necessary fire equipment to be stored in a cabinet adjacent to the property, 2) a covenant of indemnity be implemented to absolve the City from any responsibility in the case ef fire, 3) a trail easement be reserved along thd existing trail alignment the width of which to be determined by the City Engineer, 4) pursuant to the recommendation of the Aspen Water Department, water hookup is made on the 6" main supplying the Blitz residence, 5) that there be an escrow placed in reserve for landscaping specifically for the replacement of dead trees and any vegetation damaged by construction, 6) the building is con- structed of fire resistant materials .anthpilt to one-hour standards, 7) the recommendations for construction-an-iR- *npuctioli-inade in the August 6, 1979, letter of Lincoln Devore be a condition of approval, McDonnell seconded. All in favor, motion approved. \. Lincoln De\be 1000 West Fillmore St Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907 (303) 632-3593 August 6, 1979 Home Office The Architects Box 2736 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: File No. GS-876 Sile Inspection Lot 5 Tipple Wood Subdivision Aspen, Colorado Gentlemen: At your request, Lincoln-DeVore personnel have inspected the above-referenced site in order to evaluate geologic conditions. The site is located on an alluvial fan deposit originating from Vallejo Gulch to the south. The soils correspondingly will be slopewash and debris flow materials originating from the higher ground to the south. Bedrock beneath this site appears to be of the Belden Formation of Pennsylvanian Age. The site is rather steep, having an average gradient of about 220, based on a topographic map supplied to Lincoln-DeVore. The slope appears relatively stable, although minor creep movements have occurred, as is evidenced by pistol-butting of aspen trees. Potential creep movements can be compensated for in foundation design, by rigidly reinforcing the foundation and by cross-con- necting opposing foundation walls. According to the Atlas on the Geology of the Aspen District, Colorado by J. E. Spurr, 1898, no mining shafts or tunnels are located directly below the site. Because of the history of this area, however, fill may exist on this site as the result of mining activity. Foundations should be extended through any fill and into competent material. Extensive faulting exists in the Aspen Mountain area. While there is no record or evidence of faulting immediately below this site, the structure should be designed to withstand low-magnitude earth accelerations due to seismic activity in this area. We recommend designing for seismic risk Zone II, as detailed in the Uniform Building Code Section 2314. It is emphasized that seismic condi- tions are regional in nature and are not limited to this one site. No significant hazard due to rockfall was noted. The hazard for debris flow is minor. '700 Highway 50 West PO Box 1427 109 Rosemont Plaza P O. Box 1882 P O. Box 1643 Ueblo, Coio 8 1 003 Glenwooa Springs, Colo 81601 Montrose. Colo 81401 Grand Junction, Colo 81501 Rock Springs, Wyo 82901 303) 546- 1150 (303) 945-6020 (303) 249- 7838 (303) 242-8968 (307) 3822649 The Architects Page 2 August 6, 1979 The depth of cuts required for the foundation excavation is not known at this time. However, based on current knowledge of the site cuts greater than 8 feet vertical depth are not recommended. The structure should be designed and constructed such that vert- ical cuts are minimized. The foundation excavation should be inspected, and laboratory tests performed on soil samples if required, to determine bear- ing pressures, lateral pressures, and other pertinent design information. Any anomalies in the excavation can be identified and additional recommendations made at the time of inspection. We hope this has provided you with the information you desired. If duestions arise or if we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING LABORATORY, INC. By: :4662- i -15=48 Robert L. Bass Civil Engineer RLB/vfb --- emr: . 1 I . k £M'' 4.1 4 .....I /- 0 I. , . L 4% : - 6/2 - 2 6 .1:.., 9 >. e 4 - r · ..7 ./. .- 4 111 V JOul 33/5 1 -- . - ./M \ , i 12 - '' iy U j » ENGINEER o j 1 47 ' '42 COLOR*' , »,4 1 . . I e ,.r ! FOUND REBAR a CAP ELEV. 7994.5 '92 2 £ 2,¥ .f . . -1 ' r 1- r 5 / AT 'R ;-· U. . %· 61 / tj , 00// i 1. ./. \%\ 8000 1/ 6/ ,8004 1 9 1 1 1 410 t ef D,9 / +% CA%LE TV BO)£~ -- .8008 l I 9 /4/ 7 i- 43 /6 . 0 SET REBAR 8 CAP/ , 4 9/6 , BURIED CABLE / 1 ! 61 1- 6.- %• 1 TELEVISION ~7 # /90 f + 9 -- - - / 0276 CO lie f 4> 4/ 1\W NA 8000 ./.\ 11\/ / . . / Ul // i LOT < 5.60 4 \N A I D m / 29 / j -400 G. 0 gh /leo\% 3/:.\\ 2/ Z ~80 I6 1" = 10' Qu * 1 0/ NOTE: DENSE BRUSH THROUGH- 1 4 «\ , ht --8020 OUT LOT 8004 4 0: 6 ,t k- Z / /- 0 0 W e O 0 9 / q. - 1 ~/f- f 0 -~- 0 0 i --1 b , \ 8008 m ELEV 8009.6 rN 740 30' W ELEV 8027 4' C,2- SE T REBAR 8 CAP 60.00' SET REBAR 8 CAP~~ '0 0 0 0 0 00 TO THE LIENHOLDERS AND OR THE OWNE RS OF THE PREMISES SURVEYED AND TO STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY: THE UNDERSIGNED DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS THIS DAY MADE ON THE GROUND OF THE PROPERTY CORRECT, LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON AND IS AND THAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, SHOR~'AGES IN AREA, BOUNDARf LINE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, OVERLAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME , EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. DATED THIS THE - DAY oF 0 0 h . 40<* i} - JOHNSON - LO~GFELLOW 8 ASSOC., INC. 013... 't'' 1, HAROLD W. JOHNSON ( JOHNSON - . HAROLD W/$HNSON - , -1 BY I #VS#-ti-'-44-/Ux /- 0 4.1 5 r - LONGFELLOW & ASSOC., INC., ) A COLORADO . 2/ ; c; 9 P N G j - 1 D :07 REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, DO HEREBY CD: , ! CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE -Ciat... .....· ./ 1 4 A 16.-L v UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND 4, c r r THE ENTIRE LOT WAS FOUND TO BE ] REVISED Il/9 /73 - ADD TOPO., ELEVS. , CHANGE SKI TRAIL j BELOW ELEVATION 8040.00'. TOPOGRAPHY MAP 7 1,21 SAID SURVEY IS TRUE AND ACCURATE r ''' TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND . L. BELIEF. ..- 1, JO' ':.' »4 4 LOT 5 i fo ........ 4%/4. JOHNSON - LONGFELLOW & ASSOC., INC. ik,6> 54*L VJ 401~ :31:7 : t- St k TIPPLE WOOD S SUBDM ; f ir.: 0. . *%09 4 BY: .,C 6.- .d.. - <r. kt" a I . 9018 =:- HAROLD W./JOHNSON ©: g f JOHNSON - LONGFELLOW 8 ASSOC.. INC. . PO BOX 5547 · WEST VILLAGE, COLORADO 81615 1 '. ..A >LF- 1 6 . 0 13 341 4201* OCTOBER 2, 1973 SCALE: 1" = Id ~ lk. 4 · , i 4K , I .A -1 ELE/. 79949 ¥ .SEWER ALITERNACTE"a . /107 55 4 j~,TIPP0 WOODS SUBDIVISION 74 f / ///< \ 9 \ 054 //-- lkA --3 . 92 -1 ... 9 V / %4 ...2, , 42.4 3.72 / \\ / ~634 1/ 50 1-_.ft f ~ 11 / 6:I21 _ 1 62*f' 0/2* . 00#lp // b - ' 9,5, F irl le 1 /~yo«ff / 4 ti~ -~ ~~t, 40, , U , 60/0 60·ni 0 Lf , 'io 4-' * PRAINTILE A!*DUND Bull-DING TO COLLECT IN PRY WELLS AS :SHOWN 3/re 2 ~42 -7 ~ A 9 'f 20/2 1 - Ux / . il 1 0 . err-O / /// in, 60,4- / 4/22 7 0 $ 09., / UlTLE NELL 4./ 644/ 7»u- ..< 1, / ' 1 00,4 /1 1. 00 n.4 \4 , 1 8002 / 1 1·~ 1 1 1 65£.72>00* , Pgrr70 =*48#/Ate ./ / - %202£2 _ ¥ 1 1 4/ 7 - acce e W 4 3 *Ne 6 zi '1 ! i ) / / "Fav I /, C Ests<Ck' lai -- 'EL-EV: 2039.8.0 (11/1 I--3 M,-74°30' 1,4. __ CLE, 2927.4' A _ 4657-FW(TAL €=€?AVIC€ SE«4// CE 1 % 2 a M ' SITE PLAN . 0 05 1" = »'-d' t. 41 ed b 4 l *f PA 0 6 1 C- . . 1. t- r ... · .> I . , ·t 1 1 I SITE PLAN 1 1" fa~ ,·~4~4,~~-=c dktt~21...,.2 -UZUU 216ii.IN*6,La:., ..,11 - 4 t 441-01 44.1.-011 , . 61 . .toi-If ,,, 2-8/2. . . 12!-10" ~-cy 2,-4'1 51. toll , -,4 My -2.44 2%2 12'- 00 NTE.5. .51 -1 W 41 4'-0 1/2 5-0'1 3,0 4-11/2 0 5-01% 4(472 53/21' 12- 0. 3. 4%2.-06*--1-2.14* fr 5'-0' 4, 1412 *' 97£ 1 /3 11 li 2 ,. ID . 4 , , 1 -1 1 6 .. 1 6 6•1 6 2* /0*206 621 - C-~FL -(5070 ~ m \4. 02 fl X.0 7 2 - e~ -2 1 1 0 \ 450 t I J : 15 .... erpee i 5I | 4~~22- iti,i®I pwaz-z_ ----5 + ill 1 -- --50(0/16. SL+05 0.2.--- V 1.- n .3: V --0 10 1 ~ 1 5 1 ; 6--- - --- 16 : -, 1 - 9 2 ·v . . li__~14 V 1 P ' 1 11 11 0 0 (-' , . 11 BEDROOM BATH BATH 32-DrROCRA , 1 ./- 0 / - 4 1 <. i 20} 20 2 ,/ - 1 0--\28 207 72 1 1 4 ~ 570€AGE · ·€7DVE 9 . 9 11- -he - 4 L>)41 1 EL <32 U _- __-9-+ 84< 41 ., il . 17 04 £ 4.- 1 - . ' ---8 4', 1 ~ t.i op : , ~ t 1.1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 2 4: 7 - 1 r 1 , 1. 11 1 4 . 4 J / 3-/-23,2 \\l 2----- l 047 , --1 1 i WAsHER 441 --~ \ .1 ~*d.3~AR PET.4/LS \ e- /2'* 40•484 1 \41 ; --4 1 1 DAO ,b/,/ .5,49r\NA - 9,0 .i i A.9 304 4 : . TA <27 k .~- 1.-INE OF \ 0'_ -1-3- CAB. OVER f C f f I N 1 ~ 11 I b, 1 .-7 r-T 1 10 1 , 1 1 ' il, .J 4 i Flf/2344/39 X j · , i , 16%2 1004 1 27, 7-/70 6>u.2 1·· ~ I 5 4 \ '1 ~ 1 i- 1 1 F 2111 1} 11 , 4 1 . 1 ill -' 1 -i. -1 4 .r 1 : /O.3 -- --- i i 1 \3 - i 1 kir~ HALL ENTRV 1 1 e. 1 41 1 L 1. ; Il l:l n 1--1 - 1 4\%303 UPO 1 /1/ ~ ) 1 e i- -- 2 - 44,1 . 46 .%b,Waey/.44 f #4--t- ____~~-t--n - -7 ¢-3, . 11~ }11- 1 1 lit i .1 4, 7. 4, 206 1 1 ~ 2 1 ' --- -f¥-4 ~34<25;9723- 14 'Lk'~; 4 · ~;41--: ' bl i' 111' i; 1.- 4 Lt--3 ¥ . A. 3 : ~. ·% Vj. --- -*- , EN 1 ~ 111 1 1 - - L - 1, tA. JI--- 0. .1 4 2 .. 0 ; -1 :1 .91 ve 1 1 8 9/ /«SHAN/CAL h 1 1 1 1, m - 1 k 11 JHOM,af' 't'....~1 -- - . 1 1 r gil / f 41 1.r k 106 I ·' 444 ' MAsTER BEDROOM ~ %-71 f 204 t\1 ~ ~ | -3'=0' H/GH -32.2- 1-J 4 - F ~3·t--- pv/Ns WAL,1 --, 3}f 1 --1.@E[El_ - DARKROOM/ WORKSHOP + . 102 - 107 - F»« 5 1-2 1 1 . 1/\ 7pw 9 7«<EA .'i· \\,- / 0 6 .1 .V J ' „ \24© · 1\y--- F Dii - 40 \5 lo '•1457-EN ZEM-721 ---F , 21-12'g) --6 , 6 + 6 1 1 31 22 4 r-90_ J 1 1 --1- 1 -- 1 1 U 1- 31 larN 1 11 \C».1 IL- 9 V . 0 f; 6%2 Wif 3 1 ~'~ 4 £ 7 .1, 1 · 6 4, 1 6 f' I C 1 1 6 4/2 6 6~-592 at -51 -O joi: , . .10'. h 12 -O NTES· .02 2 1- 11*>/2 9-cy' 4W /0, St-04 104 6 - I .. W-C' SL Icy : .51-104 7 :I 4 5 - 1 . .6-0 /00 1 1 \ . L/VIE or= . 4 t. . i /94 489 r · -7-~- P 6--Sk.4£-Dll.44 G OVER r -lp-es# . / 1 If I g~~J MIDDLE LEVEL PLAN - - 3#'1 1.*_ 0 _ ~kjLQWER LEVEL PLAN 1--9-------1 1/1.,1,1.,i,1 0 1-01 4 »-AN NORTH .ir" =P-04 ~PLAN ~biR-EN 1 ' LOWER & MIDDLE LE *r t.O-,5 54-\12-#.8-~%* ak-14 . .. 43'-792 . W -6/4 mf- 234 W/-ON __.2,2,25/4. 11-46 .1 1- . . , -00' 2,-,9'-3,24 4'4cau 54* 24,22 34*I·'ell- 4 -1 42'-331' c B -. 6 6 p L .. 111 1 1 / 16 Y. L L& 7\. /1 1 ' 19¢ll 3 Re~ ON | \3 \ 'X / 7/01 / \ , \\ b 4 4 \ :,720&05 iT I . 1 -. 4.- , REFE /,»r \42, E*&7 |i ~ h 99 / ... 101 11 1. . It[ / 6/TCHEN A- ~·- SHELYING 301 1 k -r-f.-4-.--- 1 DANTRY T- - -1-:-t- ~ L -322£ -- 4 t_ 11 ·5 4 1 /.C. 11(371'6~ =*1 2.__-~ i ..i 4 * , 1 14>9 ! 23' 09 -42 2-3!4 3~ 2-54 372 8 - - ',,L- 15 -~ . .- t · 3 -- -9-*- a / 1 OPEN 44/L . 1 /4/ k -11- i --4 ALIGN V'/t 1 1 1 -1 1 3'-O HIGH ./ -444 ' ' I. \57*R Def*VA.5 0 1~ 1 »-3 PANTRY1 >\ 0 . 1.4:1 liA/-491/1 . , ' l 1 1 ~ 5 54 1,--3 1 - --1-; '.·· ~-- ri. upo AU \ . 5, 5 1 '6/ rig/,N-MECH. pue 1 P \J 'FROM BELow 9< 0'%*oa~r 11 i41 V 1 .~ 302 · / LIVING 7,1 I. D/NING 603 t. /4/ \\71 82*DER =t 1 4 1-. . U. 021-11'.2 / *19 30+ 11 ~-984 0~336. Aa.Dy'C - Ci[ 16,- ·--4 -'- '- -4 · F - *j b +--p F -1 . 1 41 - KITCHEN . 1 1%1 . 92-34 , 91·9 7.1 3 ·, t. 1 J #34/9 TRY ~3> 1 19 *1.' k J k \91/4 V #DI z.- ® 14 1@ 21 . )11 bu- 4 ) 452 Bum==7- ~ ~049 L 1--I l]--0 1 -_ -2-1- 11 - 1 1 +Fril 1 -3- - , , 0 ]/ i ' "a/RE Cl, --- - /// T : dill 7Ndu- 41 / 1 liu 1 10 0 ~ 1 0 Vt 1 1 14 '.1 1 1 OVE»64/Ve Aa:OVE DECK ll_~ ~ i rry/:7) 4/FO --_ __ %*I-'--- * 1 I ~ - 1| *5-7-DRAGE | , -2 11 , .b \IV ,& i lili kill -- 2 1 t11 - 1 J'!i'r ./ 'i f 'f 7 1 1 1 1 1 ]1 1 , 1 1 11 1 9 -1 J/-0// HIGH " 1 4~/NG WALL> i 1 1 1 1 1 1/ --1 C 1 1 2~ 39 \ *S'£72 5'-1,1 24:136.'/ 6 G k A . 1 < #3#,i € 44-00 &5 - 422 . , 31-472 . af ott . I. ,, to '9/-£2,*0 iII-+Me· . ., I -1. I u ~ ~' SENCH RAIL . ~~KITCHEN PLAN .. 7... ' MI11111111111)4 toi-011 .. 4-AN 19ORTH 2 >4-lt = 11 -Olt - )27,4, B /21%\ UPPER LEVEL PLAN -'I - -- - UPPER LEVEL & . I £7- 17* 1,€*-f 6 0 0 1 -t----1 4, 11 Ps. --- L._-_ 1 - - /1 N /7 -1 - --- - - // .1.444' PEG. f - -- ..'.1-.~9- - - -. 1 ---- -<.- . - . - i F ------- - -- - --- -- --- - --- c--4-»01 j 1 - / ---- -· Zis ~ -_ _--_ _~__ Ii ! i 11 1 1 .. I . 3' 0, PLYWOOD 1 - 1 - - --- 3 EL.= 120-»*t - S LIVING - · 4#,4- *.-u ..& 70. PLYW<DOD f EL-=Una, RG· F.G. 1-- MEG. i A RG EG. EG. 1 TOPL>WOOD ..:-'. - - EL.= /// '-9 34-6 S ENTRY . -4 14 r --1 r jL--*-3) - A-I - 1 1 < u-~ 4 UL. - 05.4, 1 1 To. PL>*2202 - 1 C--7(1 -- i! --' 4- - I En .- 0-- i1 1 1 -/7 l/3 l 0-1 . 4 1 , -,RETAN/NG WAU- ~ 44.r-1 2 1 . --/ 1 Ut - 21:a pLY-WOOp 3 F=-1 -=- tor: -0 1 1 [1 .- 0 0 i L _ -_- _ _ _ *:*L 1.~ .1- ·t-' 9.i.. 1 SOUTH ELEVATION 4 - »x NORTH ELEVATION -Al rx\.. r. 1 It\ 1 % 11 A \ bl: li 8 4% - 69 44 03--1 11 -\ bt «1/ 6 -=t rio ,/5/ 4 11 i 1 [--1/1 r " I , 1 I lilli »4- in ma· Il MG " 1 7 EG F.G. PEG. Fs 0/ Fe. i --7 *_ ~ \El 0 -1 - TO. A-Yll/DOD .k EL.=· /20~-79€ vJ 1 0/13 L.ff )1 7.0. PLYWOOD .--1 t..1 \ 2-L. = HZ'-50 - _ 6-G 1 -I ./ - - --4/VOOD -5101 NG (TY'103 0 1 Lf--123~« RG P.G. . 77-9 GRA,DE (TYR) i \ 21 K -5TDNE <T¥11 -- - -·» ._. . 7.0.'PLYWoop /A //-- 4 EL-= U/'- 954# . ,9*15Pt GRAPEr <-EYA --->--~- \- -- -- ·\ ~ ~46_~ 4(j~ w_-_1 TO. PLYWOOD i.1 1 4 EL_== ~as~-/ou --- t 1 Ll --1 / 12 4 - 6- my -STAIRS BEYOND-----*-9 k- 1- X ~~--~-URIBBING CTYP.) u i 1 <~00- r- i 7 4 \ --7- 9 1 1 K 1 1 0-1 )42- 4 + 1 + 1 -it-/O,0 623*.. 072) 1 *1 1 1 +- 1· 1 TO PLYVVOOP EL- 100' - 011 1 L T TO A KPV-POD _~ 1 1 1 ' 1 1 22 0 -/223'-25 4 1 1 1 1 1 11 * - - - -/4 - - - -i €, 1 P. . .. - .- P 1, 1 - - ~r.- -- .1. I .1 •**:i /4-.I I '-4 .. »h-.- 4,-** --- ---4,- -| WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ~ ~~~-1 EXTERIOR E 2 00 T 7 -n_____ S * TO PU€WOOD . 41 IO EL.= 120'-7;34" cl eL . -TO. PLYWOOD A) 1' rt m. 70 PL¥Waco IA , +4 --1 4 - 6 / 1 1 1 - ~ - - -- -I-- -- 7-22 YWOOP EL- . 2UiTai*---~~___ 1 2- la 05 .4,6, 4,4 l ==RECBQQ.DEL -- -TO Fl.*VOOD ,2 148 0£2 £2.6 - I J ii 1 . .1 11 11 . 11 a CRAWL .SACE - .1 O 11 f , I BUILDING SECTION J1 . BUILDING l '4 - lurs:*e - : - ·.~-- ~~~W_- A. , I *~~ -. I il- Z. '3"/1./i/,ixifiligilililigiligilililil'/I//1///4/Millimiginimim,mml~ 1 1 1 - ... Ialm/l/llll'll.!.3/1/1/3/7*3 - . ....111 1.- -5/ ,) 1 01,1-1-1-1-1"IlII!-1-11.- -- ~IM/'///L" ~- 6. ........li 1-~ 21 . ...Illill..........% Irg,1~ I'll'll'll'll'll"~llllmmill"IM'Emill:le,"120"'Ill'vla@lllllllilllilllll~£1"WI'Milli"Illll*.ill"lli ... *. F..1 - 1. :4 . Imil.... 1- -1 1.. ... .21-IIM E.....~Z 0 0 .... 1 0 .11,11~111 lillillillillillillillillillillillimillillinlillillillillilivillillilillimill tillillir*jiial'/1- Mili~ilin--- m 1--ml-~= 1 im"0- 41.--~ -- 81~mill./.......Amwil......Il