Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Gruenberg.37-81 . M `, j 1 (U 0 � 60 No. 37 "'1 #3 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen 1. DATE SUBMITTED: 1 1/d7/S1 STAFF: - 3QCk SohYISOF 2. APPLICANT: Mr (Mrs Li I 11161 W1 J r 9e Vl \pei 3. REPRESENTATIVE: l 1 ∎deoY1 Ku.`f yraw. 7 (� // G'P. Main i/,rei (Sfel CO g$1401 4. PROJECT NAME: ( /7her read/ //2j oid �C' >f /f.'/,!/✓ 5. LOCATION: Ltd 1 $ / Igo k birc . ,S+Gt +P� N5pE 6. TYPE OF APPLICATION: Rezoning Subdivision X Stream Margin P.U.D. Exception 8040 Greenline X Special Review Exemption View Plane Growth Management 70:30 Conditional Use HPC Residential Bonus Other - / - 0 (74' ./ FOn/ YUne 1(5, /tf/ 7. REFERRALS: Attorney Sanitation District _ School District 'lu NA..) X Engineering Dept. Fire Marshal _Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas _Housing Parks _State Highway Dept. _Water Holy Cross Electric Other BI bept • City Electric Mountain Bell v 8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: 9. DISPOSITION: P & Z Approved X Denied Date TLLOP )& 1987 Approval of application under stream margin review subiect to the following conditions: 1. Vegetation shall not be removed nor any slope grade changes made that may produce erosion of the stream bank. 2. There shall be permitted no changes to the stream channel or its capacity, and no acj'tivity shall be allowed which will increase stream sedimenta- tion and suspension loads. 3. All efforts must be made to reduce stream pollution and interference with the natural changes of the stream, and to enhance the value of the stream as an important natural feature. Council Approved Denied Date 10. ROUTING: Attorney /X Building Engineering Other MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jack Johnson, Planning Office RE: Gruenberg Stream Margin Review DATE: June 16, 1981 Location: 1170 N. River D'r,,, off Red Butte Drive (Lot 17, Black Birch Estates; City Aspen, Colorado) Zoning: R -15 Residential Applicant's Request: This application requests co of stream margin re- view pursuant to Section 24 -6.3 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Engineering Department: No objections to the proposal expansion to the Gruenberg re- stden`ce. Due care should be taken to insure that building materials and any excessive excavation is prevented from polluting the river. Building Department: Comments from the Building Department were not available at the writing of this memorandum. Comments will be made at the Planning and Zoning meeting. Planning Office: This application has been evaluated with the review criteria for_, stream -- margin review and no problertp have been identified (see criteria below). The entire house is currently situated within the 100 foot stream margin review line. The mjor additions proposed for this one -story house are oriented away from the river which should have less environmental 'impact ` to river during construction. to Review criteria. In reviewing the development plan the zoning commission shall consider the following guide- lines and standards, and impose the following conditions for permit approval: (1) No building shall be located so as to be within a flood hazard area designated by the U.S. Corps of Engineers Flood Plain Report for the Roaring Fork River. (2) In the event there is a trail designated by an approved trail plan within the development site, such trail shall be dedicated for public use. (3) All attempts should be made to implement the recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan prepared by the Roaring Fork Greenway Committee. (4) Vegetation shall not be removed nor any slope grade changes made that may produce erosion of the stream bank. (5) There shall be permitted no changes to the stream channel or its capacity, and no activity shall be allowed which will increase stream sedimentation and suspension loads. (6) All efforts must be made to reduce stream pollute,. • and interference witli the natural changes of tl,, stream, and to enhance tilt value of the stream as sa important natural feature. (Ord. No. 11 -1975, § 1) Memo: Gruenberg Stream Margin Review June 16, 1981 Page Two Planning Office Recommendations: A_pprrnva1 of application under stream margin review subject to the following conditions: 1. Vegetation shall not be removed nor any slope grade changes made that may produce erosion of the stream bank. 2. There shall be permitted no changes to the stream channel or its capacity, and no activity shall be allowed which will increase stream sedimentation and suspension loads. 3. All efforts must be made to reduce stream pollution and interference with the natural changes of the stream, and to enhance the value of the stream as an important natural feature. c)n4-4c (;1101irrolfreet- r r • • • 1 • ) • callow auxm Lxizmt CAP •l \ \ . ! V40091 / 4.4..... � �� R ---. ••\ �� 'et\ • t :.tii ' / ■ \ \ '` f 1 0. 1 / LOT 17 \ '._ \ : • \ .i s s�o • \ t. �r � � -R441'. ' r mq; h r . V A N I s' / S'`.. 1 /�o N. REUR 140 O %P• ' � • � ! q srouccosro^. - - � j \ \ - N - t ' 1� Ev,. ,... w �j %use oz i \ \ "a \\ AA C.. q� I • /� / n WY ♦ONwOODS AMP AR \/ J it \ % e� J I \, \ \ ;f �s'S SS'x 3,1' 'Y \1 S�b'M. \ \ 9 f \\ `Ss. L. ! — im P \ l' y 000 l i,A WS. b' I \ ` ) •4-Cw•o.. ` \ t N. i � \ q'S 4o'x \ \ J \ ' 2D C ♦ ♦ w \ 30 ` V ----- �R+e. 1 TELEPHONE eox L R ]000 ' Lf?D / / / �\ w \ r , �.2 R r • to \ 1° • / w000 BRIDGE •0 • t 4 1 1 1 .1. 4� l2' a 44 . . LAW OFFICES GIDEON I. KAUFMAN 8x 811 WEST T MAIN AIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 A GIDEON I. KAUFMAN / , \. O , TELEPHONE ` REA CODE 303 DAVID G. EISENSTEIN August 11, 1981 � ¢J ` rAoc) / \�G �jV A 825 =8I66 Q P Mr. Sunny Vann Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Gruenberg Stream Margin Review Dear Sunny, Pursuant to our telephone conversation of today, I write this letter to confirm my understanding of the time that a stream margin review approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission is valid. It is my understanding that as long as my clients do not materially change the plans that were approved by the P & Z, their stream margin review would be valid indefinitely and at the very least until next summer when they intend to build. If you have any problems with this interpretation, please let me know. Otherwise, I will advise my clients accordingly. Thank you for your help. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, a Professional Corporation (� J By �. Gi eon K of an GK kw cc: William A. Gruenberg LAW OFFICES GIDEON I. KAUFMAN BOX 10001 611 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 GIDEON I. KAUFMAN TELEPHONE _ AREA CODE 303 DAVID G. EISENSTEIN April 7, 1981 925-8166 Mr. Sunny Vann Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Gruenberg Stream Margin Review Dear Sunny, Please consider this letter an application for a stream margin review pursuant to §24 -6.3 of the Aspen Municipal Code. The Code provides that all land and air space within one hundred feet (100') measured horizontally from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and tributary streams shall go through a stream margin review prior to the issuance of a building permit. My clients have an existing structure within one hundred feet (100') of the river. Their children are growing and they need to expand their existing residence. The contemplated renovations will all take place away from the river as is indicated on the map and plans being submitted with this application. It is important to note we have an existing structure and my clients, sensitive to the intent of stream margin review, have planned all additions away from the river. Their new construction will not contravene the intent of the stream margin review as set forth in §24 -6.3. It is most important my clients receive approval for these expansions; otherwise they will be forced to sell their residence and move to a new house which would clearly be an unwarranted hardship. An examination of stream margin review and the history surrounding it clearly shows the Planning and Zoning Commission has discretion, under the intent of §24 -6.3, to grant a building permit for my clients. I believe this application meets the standards of the criteria set forth under the review criteria for stream margin review. Mr. Sunny Vann April 7, 1981 Page Two We have submitted plans and specifications along with this application that meet the requirements of section (b) of stream margin review. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, ( • Gideon Kaufman GK kw MEMORANDUM TO: Building Engineer Building Department FROM: Jack Johnson, Planning Office RE: Gurenberg Stream Margin Review DATE: May 6, 1981 Attached is an application submitted by Mr. and Mrs. William Gruenberg re- questing Stream Margin Review for the purpose of expanding an existing dwelling unit. The property is located on Lot 17, Blackbirch Estates, Aspen. This item is being scheduled for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on June 16, 1981. Please return any comments regarding this application to me by May 26, 1981. Thank you. 0 1 ED c d ASPEN CITY OF ASPEN 13 south galena street aspen, eolorado :81611 MEMORANDUM TO: Jack Johnson, Planning Office FROM: Fritz Bruggemeier, Engineering Department DATE: May 26, 1981 RE: Gurenberg Stream Margin Review • After reviewing the Gurenberg Stream Margin Review application and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has no objections to the proposed expansion to the Gurenberg Residence. It is our request that due care is taken to insure that building materials and any excessive excavation is prevented from polluting the river.