The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1039 E Cooper Ave.A109-951039 E. Cooper Ave. A109-95 11 Chateau Roaring Fork Stream MarEin Review Exemption fid ~j02/*%*~ 0~1 ~2 < Li-1 71 71 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 12/18/95 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: 2737-073-42-029 A109-95 STAFF MEMBER: DM PROJECT NAME: Chateau Roaring Fork Stream Margin Review Exemption Project Address: 1039 E. Cooper Legal Address: APPLICANT: Chateau Roaring Fork Condo. Association Applicant Address: (% Coates, Reid & Waldron 720 E. Hyman) REPRESENTATIVE: Hydro Consulting - Robert Krehbiel Representative Address/Phone: 48-289 Surrev- -9-6-3-=-531-8- - - -Carbondale, CO 81611 FEES: PLANNING $425 # APP RECEIVED 1 ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ TOTAL $425 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: X 1 STEP: 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO DRC Meeting Date REFERRALS: City Attorney Parks Dept. School District >~ City Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT Aspen Water Holy Cross Clean Air Board City Electric Mtn. Bell Open Space Board Envir.Hlth. ACSD Other Zoning Energy Center Other i DATE REFERRED: Â·1 ~ 0~ INITIALS: 70) DUE: ASAP, FINAL ROUTING: 43Â« DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Engineer Zoning Env. Health Housing Open Space Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: 1!VD!26 CONSULTING, LLC. 0289 SURREY STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 963-5818 November 12, 1996 Ms. Suzanne Wolff Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Chateau Roaring Fork - Building A Stream Margin Exemption Permit Dear Ms. Wolff: Per your request to close out the Stream Margin permit process, we are forwarding to you documents relating to the completion of the Chateau Roaring Fork - Foundation Protection project. A copy of our May 29, i 996 engineering letter is enclosed which indicates the project was constructed as designed. Also enclosed for your files are four pictures taken April 25,1996 which show the work in progress and the completed project. You should already have in the file the completed permit application, receipt of the $425 application fee, and letters from the Corps of Engineers and Division of Wildli fe indicating authorization of the project. We are pleased that an engineered solution could be accomplished to protect the building foundation which had almost no negative impact to the environment or river corridor. Please call me a (303) 312-4542 if there are any further questions. Otherwise, we believe the permit process for Aspen is now complete. Respectfully, Hydro Consulting, LLC r ;Â«/2 , At I Robert D. Krehbiel, P.E. Water/Civil Engineer Enclosures CC: Mr. Kent Kuhlmann, Coates, Reid and Waldron N OV 1 5 1996 HVI)126 CONSULTING, LLC. 0289 SURREY STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 963-5818 May 29, 1996 Mr. Kent Kuhlmann Coates, Reid and Waldron, Property Management 720 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Chateau Roaring Fork - Foundation Protection Construction Dear Mr. Kuhlmann: Construction is complete on the Chateau Roaring Fork, Building A to restore a firm foundation subgrade and to provide frost protection cover for the footer. Mays Construction Specialties, Inc. from Grand Junction completed the injection grouting and frost depth cover for the building foundation wall adjacent to the Roaring Fork River. Mays Construction is a concrete specialty construction firm familiar with the use of injection pressure grouting and shotcrete. The project was completed in a quality and efficient manner with a crew ofeight workers. This project was completed without placing heavy equipment in the river or impacting waters ofthe U. S. in accordance with permits obtained from the Corps ofEngineers, Division ofWildlife and City ofAspen. Construction work was performed on April 23 - 25, 1996, and was scheduled for the warmest possible weather period before high flow in the Roaring Fork River due to spring runoff. Mays Construction suspended their work on other projects to complete this project during the short window of opportunity before the river rose too high, and during warm weather so freezing temperatures would not damage the curing concrete. All work was staged from the property on the opposite river bank to reduce the pumping distance ofthe shotcrete and grout. Since concrete segregates when pumped long distances, the use ofthe neighbor's property assisted in providing the highest quality concrete for the project. Work began with injection of grout under the exposed portions ofbuilding foundation footer at a spacing interval ofevery three feet for a distance of approximately 70 lineal feet. Holes were drilled through the soil and cobbles under the foundation to pressure inject grout into all voids behind and under the footer. Fortunately, the river had not scoured away as much material under the foundation as initially presumed, and therefore, less grout was needed to fill the voids. A firm subgrade has now been re-established under the building foundation. After completing the pressure grouting under the foundation, welded wire fabric was positioned against the foundation and shotcrete was pumped against the exposed face ofthe foundation wall to provide a minimum frost depth cover of 24 inches. Shotcrete is a high strength fine aggregate concrete with fiberglass fibers that is pumped and sprayed into position. The shotcrete and aesthetic river rock were keyed into the subgrade to minimize the ability ofthe river to scour under this new HVD126 CONSULTING, LLC. 0289 SURREY STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 963-5818 Mr. Kent Kuhlmann Coates, Reid and Waldron, Property Management May 29, 1996 Page 2 frost cover. Only the exposed areas of the foundation with less than 24 inches of cover were protected with shoterete. Areas that withstood the flooding of 1995 have a firm frost depth cover and were not disturbed. Critical areas along the foundation receiving shotcrete extended a total of approximately 150 lineal feet. Mays Construction Specialties, Inc. completed the project generally in accordance with the specifications and in a quality manner and on budget. Although the design showed more native cobble covering the shotcrete, as constructed the work will provide a high-strength, visually- acceptable barrier. Tile workers found it difficult to obtain enough cobble on-site in the icy water, and the shotcrete alone will be adequate to resist the river scour. Moreover, the new foundation cover is generally out ofview and well blended into the native rock to meet the design criteria. The exposed aggregate finish ofthe shotcrete, along with the placement of assorted cobble, provides an acceptable appearance while meeting the requirements ofthe project. The final task to be completed which will need periodic maintenance is to provide a seal between the new cover and building. The specifications require the owner to caulk the fillet between the shotcrete and the original foundation wall after construction to allow for shrinkage of the concrete during curing. This caulking prevents water from seeping between the foundation and the shotcrete which can become a problem during freezing conditions. The structural engineer recommends the use of Sika Flex 1-A caulk along with a primer to promote bonding. Ifthis caulk is not readily available locally, the manufacturer can be contacted at 1-800-933-7452, or the local representative (Chris Sajbel) can be contacted at (303) 337-1713. The caulking should be inspected annually before winter, and additional caulking should be applied as needed to maximize the service life of the new foundation cover. Please call ifthere are further questions about the project. Respectfully, Hydro Consulting LLC tut. 'Lit Robert D. Krehbiel, P.E. Water/Civil Engineer U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO f A DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 49 157~ 1325 J STREET i SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814-2922 ~ MAR 06 Wdd ,- / REPLY TO fooR -<LIE*-- ATTENTION OF March 5, 1996 4,-rN 1 Regulatory Branch (199675090) 4 Mr. Robert Krehbiel Hydro Consulting 0289 Surrey Street Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Dear Mr. Krehbiel: We are responding to your request for a Department of the Army permit to discharge fill material into the Roaring Fork River for a bank stabilzation project to protect the Chateau Roaring Fork. The project is located on Roaring Fork River in Section 18, Township 10 South, Range 84 West, City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. We cannot give a detailed review of your proposed project. However, we recognize the need to expedite confirmation for activities that qualify for our nationwide general permits. Consequently, we reviewed your information and believe that you proposed work will qualify for nationwide permit number 13. We are enclosing a copy of the permit. Please review the conditions and requirements of the permit. You are responsible for insuring that your work complies with the permit. Provided that the work is conducted in accordance with the permit, your project is permitted under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. This concludes our action on your proposed project. If you have any questions regarding the use of this nationwide general permit, please contact Mr. Michael Claffey at the address below, or telephone (970) 243-1199. We assigned 199675090 to your project. Sincerely, Grady L. McNure Chief, Northwestern Colorado Regulatory Office 402 Rood Avenue, Room 142 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-2563 Copy Furnished: 2/0kr. Chuck Roth and Mr. Dave Michaelson, Aspen Community Planning Department, 130 South Galena, Aspen, Colorado 81611 State of Colorado DIVISION OF WILDLIFE Department of Natural Resources February 22, 1996 Mr Chuck Roth, PE City Engineer City of Aspen 130 S Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Chuck This is a letter of comment on a proposal to do riverbank work at Chateau Roaring Fork. It is in response to a letter from Robert Krehbiel dated February 15. Robert has come up with an acceptable plan of action which satisfies the landowner's requirements while producing the minimum impacts to the river channel. I am convinced that his proposal is the least damaging practicable alternative. He has mentioned the area of deposition upstream of the Cooper Street bridge as contributing to Chateau Roaring Fork's problem. I agree with him. I'm not sure how appropriate it would be to remove bedload at this time, in light of your coming renovation of East Cooper. Maybe I could suggest that when the bridge is replaced (I am told that it will be a longer span), you consider removing bedload, since it will be mobilized anyway by the removal of the channel constriction. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. Si~~erely, vt,â€¢ak'- Czenkusch Aquatic Habitat Biologist CC: Clark, Cote (DOW) Krehbiel (Hydro Consulting) Michaelson (City of Aspen) Claffey (USACE) HYDIR 6 CONSULTING, L,C. 0289 SURREY STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 2 aix..8 (970) 963-5818 / 029" v .... 0 412 ~ -2, Â«ba -35~ 4.2 February 15. 1996 Mr. Mike Claffey Mr. Alan Czenkusch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Colorado Division ofWildlife Grand Junction Regulatory Office 0473 Mountain Laurel Drive 402 Rood. Room 142 Aspen. Colorado 81611 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-2563 RE: Authorization for Bank Stabilization Chateau Roaring Fork. Building A - Foundation Protection Dear Mr. Claffey and Mr. Czenkusch: I sent both ofyou a letter on October 30. 1995 detailing the proposal by the owners ofthe Chateau Roaring Fork. Building A in Aspen to replace cover over the condominium foundation next to the Roaring Fork River. Floods have scoured the soil cover away from the building foundation causing two problems which need to be addressed as soon as possible to maintain the structural integrity of the building foundation. First. the voids created by scour from the river under the spread footer foundation must be filled to reestablish a bearing on firm soil. Secondly, a "frost depth" cover must be reestablished over the footer to protect the foundation from deterioration due to freeze/thaw cycles. A plan of action to restore this cover was proposed under the Nationwide Permit 13 for bank stabilization. On November 13, 1995. I also sent Mr. Claffey a letter from the State Historic Preservation Officer indicating no known cultural resources for the proposed project ofrestoring foundation protection on the Chateau Roaring Fork building in Aspen. The project did not get completed before the wmter as originally proposed, and now the project is scheduled to occur in late April before a major rise in the river during spring runoff At this time. the City ofAspen must have letters from the Corps of Engineers and the Division ofWildlife to complete the stream margin review process for the city/county permit. Please send your comments as soon as possible to both Chuck Roth, P.E. City Engineer and Mr. Dave Michaelson, Community Planning Department, at 130 South Galena Street. Aspen, Colorado 81611. Respectfully, Hydro Consulting, LLC /7 fri y L.-v Robert D. Krehbiel, P.E. Water/Civil Engineer CC: Kent Kuhlmann. Coates. Reid and Waldron, Property Management 0462â‚¬- ,Ult c_ el A â‚¬ 1.1 6 4 - b C ++11 c'A- 1 urt Chateau Roaring Fork Condominium Association November 27, 1995 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to state that Hydro Consulting, 0289 Surrey St., Carbondale, CO 81623, 970-963-5818 is authorized to act on behalf of Chateau Roaring Fork Condominium Association, c/o Coates, Reid and Waldron, 720 E. Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611. Sincerely, F'--6 L / Kent G. Kuhlmann, Associations Manager :rcf 7 161/44 c/o CRW Property Management 720 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611, (970) 925-1400 ~VI)126 CONSULTING, ~C. 0289 SURREY STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 963-5818 October 30, 1995 Mr. Mike Claffey U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Grand Junction Regulatory Office 402 Rood, Room 142 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-2563 Mr. Alan Czenkusch Colorado Division ofWildlife 0473 Mountain Laurel Drive Aspen, Colorado 81611 Mr. Chuck Roth, P.E. City ofAspen Engineering Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Pennit Application Chateau Roaring Fork, Building A - Foundation Protection Dear Mr. Claffey, Mr. Czenkusch and Mr. Roth: Tile owners ofthe Chateau Roaring Fork, Building A desire to replace cover over the condominium foundation next to the Roaring Fork River. Floods have scoured the soil cover away from the building foundation causing two problems which need to be addressed as soon as possible to maintain the structural integrity ofthe building foundation. First, the voids created by scour from the river under the spread footer foundation must be filled to reestablish a bearing on firm soil. Secondly, a "frost depth" cover must be reestablished over the footer to protect the foundation from deterioration due to freeze/thaw cycles. Pitkin County Building Code requires 36 inches offrost depth protection cover over the base ofthe foundation footer. Although this requirement will not be enforced on existing development, frost depth protection is recommended by the structural engineer. A plan of action to restore this cover is proposed which is can likely be permitted by the Corps ofEngineers under the Nationwide Permit 13 for bank stabilization and by the City ofAspen in the stream margin review process. APPLICANT j The applicant is Coates, Reid and Waldron, attention Kent Kuhlmann at 720 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611, telephone (970) 925-2347. Tile designated agent is Robert Krehbiel of Hydro Consulting at the address shown on the letterhead. i I.., 4. , 4. ; 3- -- i ; 'lt,-4.:,El'.'. 9.-19 '' ; NOV 0 1995 1 Mr. C laffey, Mr. Czenkusch and Mr. Roth October 30, 1995 Page 2 LOCATION The project is located within the City ofAspen, in Pitkin County Colorado. The site is in the NEW of Section 18 (protracted), Township 10 South, Range 84 West ofthe 6th P.M. The property is located along Highway 82 (Cooper Street) on the upstream, west side ofthe last bridge over the Roaring Fork River leaving Aspen toward Independence Pass. SCOPE OF WORK The City of Aspen can likely provide an exemption to the stream margin review for restoration work within the floodplain if construction can be completed without the use ofheavy equipment in the river. Therefore, restoration offill over the foundation using hand labor, small tools and pumping offill material to the site is the only action proposed under this permit application. The use of heavy equipment in the river is not requested under this permit application. Approximately 150 lineal feet ofthe total building length of 273 feet along the river will need restoration offoundation protection. Fill is needed against the building foundation to a maximum depth of 36 inches, however, not all areas will require a full additional new three feet of cover. At most 0.33 cubic yards offill material is required per lineal foot. Therefore, only 20 to 40 cubic yards of fill will be needed. PROPOSED PLAN OF ACTION The proposed action involves the use of concrete mixer trucks, pumps and compressors located next to the buildings, in the upland yard areas. Only 2-inch hoses and laborers will be positioned in the river corridor. First, the area along the exposed building foundation will be cleaned of debris and loose material using hand labor and air compressors. Next, a brown-tinted, low-slump concrete will be pumped against the foundation to provide a frost depth of cover of 18 inches minimum, 36 inches maximum The very low slump mixture, called "shoterete," will used which will minimize spread ofthe pumped fill material away from the foundation. Native river cobble from the river bed will then carefully be placed in the wet concrete to provide a scour protection barrier and cover the shotcrete to provide a "natural" appearance. Assuming the rock cobble cover is no more than 0.5 feet wide this will amount to approximately 10 cubic yards ofnative rocks removed from the channel and placed in the wall. The use of rock from the channel will minimize the addition ofnew material into the channel cross section. Where willows exist, the plants will be protected to maintain existing bank stability, and the fill material willbe discontinued or placed carefully around the vegetation and separated by the use of filter fabric. Therefore, we do not anticipate impacts to existing wetland vegetation. Mr. Claffey, Mr. Czenkusch and Mr. Roth October 30,1995 Page 3 With the shotcrete frost protection cover in-place, non-shrink grout will be inject through this added material to fill the voids created by scour under the footer. (The grout is injected after the backfill is complete so the voids can be filled under pressure without it flowing out from under the foundation.) The amount ofgrout required under and inside the foundation cannot be determined at this time without exploratory testing since scour over the years may have washed away the fine material from inside the foundation wall under the building floor. ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS Over time, existing conditions will cause irreparable damage to the building foundation. This project is a maintenance issue to replace foundation cover material that once existed. Corrective action must be undertaken as soon as possible to protect the structural stability ofthe building foundation. Therefore, to protect the existing building and its occupants, the "no action" alternative is not considered an option. Another option is to have a front end loader working in the river which is loaded with off-site material by an excavator stationed on the top ofthe river bank. A loader hauling an average of 2.5 cubic yards per load would need to make approximately 20 round trips in the river to complete the restoration work. Fill material could be placed to a depth ofthree feet above the bottom of the footer at a 2: 1 slope extending toward the river six feet. This option was rejected due to the permitting problems associated with heavy equipment in the river. A final option to consider is lowering the floodplain elevation. The Cooper Street bridge has created two problems which impacts the level offlood water at the Chateau Roaring Fork building. First, the constriction ofthe channel at the bridge increases the normal depth ofthe 100- year flood from an average of6 feet to a depth of 11 feet according to floodplain mapping. The increased flood depth impacts the channel a distance of 300 feet upstream from the bridge entrance which includes the reach in front ofthe Chateau Roaring Fork building. Secondly, the constriction reduces the velocity of flood water upstream from the bridge and causes sediment deposition, thereby raising the river bed elevation which further elevates the flood water level and causes a widening ofthe channel upstream from the bridge. This is evident by the changes in channel slope and unnatural steep channel slope immediately upstream ofthe bridge. These two impacts can be reduced by removing the flow restriction oflarge boulders and huge chunk of concrete that have fallen into the main channel on the upstream side ofthe bridge. Originally, these objects were used to stabilize the river bank, but now only block the flow. In addition to removing or repositioning these concrete blocks and boulders, which are likely within the highway right-of-way, removing material from the river bed would increase the channel cross section and lower the flood water level in front of Chateau Roaring Fork. This option again requires the use ofheavy equipment in the river channel. Mr. Claffey, Mr. Czenkusch and Mr. Roth October 12,1995 Page 4 TIMING OF WORK k *cu - c 62Â·r, It is understood that a major disturbance to the channel bottom cannot occur during spawning and hatching ofthe brown trout from October through February. Removing boulders from the stream channel by hand is not considered to be a major disturbance. The use of concrete and grout should be completed when the temperature is above 40Â°F which may require that heaters be used during construction ifwork is completed this fall and winter before the next spring runoff. Restoration work is strongly encouraged to begin as soon as possible, before heavy snowfall and before next spring runof[ Therefore, prompt attention to this permit application is appreciated. The proposed action using pumped shotcrete and native river cobble for frost depth cover will likely be completed within one week. The injection of grout under the foundation footer to fill subgrade voids can be completed in three days. Therefore, the total project is anticipated to be completed in less than two weeks. Please review the enclosed design drawings and call with any questions or comments. Your expedient review is appreciated for issuance ofthe necessary permits. Respectfully, Hydro Consulting, LLC A -AU-% , i- Robert D. Krehbiel, P.E. Water/Civil Engineer Attachments: Site Plan Drawing Foundation Profile Design ec: Kent Kuhlmann, Coates, Reid and Waldron, Property Management ..... /0--=,--. .17 9473 1 VES- - -- / .. ' 4 k...14- !1 ) r . \\4 &4 - - f 01. 1 -: ,/ / C\\ 4 /-- % 1 (152 ..AL-- -,W I J L L *, \ Â·\, iÂ·Â·1Â· :qernetery 1 0 . 0- 1-f fiff -3Â» \ t~~h\ Iowa. - \\ lfÂ·--fitti>) 1111 111 / -4 L:, N / 1.Au L ~Â«- C 8 424) 1 34 L E-[~) s. wackep~ \,l.. 1 714 l._tx 1 1 --=9 3 34 <2 #34 ha~ 5*ar*-Mega \ A./64. 4,#*.~,9 wr#MF4f.,ijilf~: Id - ~0 Itti i'(r: /F~:==:*-4_ Â·~,9::Â»mÂ®&Â·CAsp 1 I ' r \4< l (1 t~Th ) A,43#- f ~ 1 \\ . ..5 4%~ --15- C Cit (Câ€ždi, ~A\\, :VlÂ·*."2~-7/ 0/Z~~~ 0~Â©1V*t. .A ..1 a X Â£ . 1....Â·' â€¢ .Ii I ie M 790 ) 02- -3. I 1 i -al t. 1 -J/>~2222--- 9 fj 17/ 1 - ///47~== 1... .//674 lk.81 //. 1 ~â€¢â€¢â€¢.A 0 . . iÂ«-4. A 63.~ :Ts 81Â©3%Â»11.-- 1[rtn'nel L <'A,~6 W \ I. .. .. , #â€¢-4- 96Â»404*42/ ... h C C. 4 i{ \ P. C./ dâ€¢ '0 ho ) 6 9)Â·Â· 4 . 7 I:.AF&/2.9 i : - 1 - -4 --11- L- 1- -Ill Isj ttÂ» 1....11, llÂ· ; Ch g ~f~jÂ»6 .6 67.11 ' ; .. 1 0 I .k-El. I ....Ve. ... .\ . 1 11 .. 1 .. at ..' .\/: ~4414\ .. 1 7114 ,/ f /6.,v,-Â·Â·- -Â·i''/ 3,kILE--p< VIN â€¢tÂ· .Il *â€¢â€¢3 - / // <.1 - .36.- .../1 ) 0 - 11 1 -- 6- . P - 49 4 It\(r '29-1 7 , : .. j /6--1/./.- I .2\ .. ..19 pâ‚¬2Â»%41 / / c~~~~~c~~/J~~~ASPEN1/j <6 :'r . lk. ta*z' .4.1-\ f.f 1-3. .4.3 ... 1 PROJECT LOCATION }~ . -==="-7-47 6> 1Â«4 k yth<49 Â·344 2211Â». 48 .... 3. ~~ .. 4 ** Â· :%: 4 Â·Â·â€¢ i*20 .. Â«. dill @/ 1 .. C \< 1 1,4 \ . IMN P.:3 I \11\r , â€¢â€¢ ~-J 4% 4, d ... 7 Ir 1)\\44.46 . ..... .,-4- )~i .2.077Â»271,; ~;i.~i :.. . L--- 1 -P- 1 ....... 7. 1 1 .... \F ....... . e. \\L 3 .. 24 ,' u tnt .. Â·~~_lkjtj~- ~JC+-<~~ Â· ///~4~f~*4 ~HATEAU ROARING FORK , <S- . --- 13 .... -0 LOCATION MAP tx < , /-351Â«322 A Q ~// 1Â·0~fgd~J~~.~~1~~~~c~,0..~,~4/~,.*Â»A.o~~4,;~33~ 0 ~ \Â»\\1 fitii 3 Scale 1" = 1/4 mile U% . \ 01 r \ a ...56 (4/1 0\ t.12:''j//A,qll,GO>tit,40~Â·53Â¢pfu~@' Hydro Consulting LLC " 7 /'ffÂ·.-t_jj t L,*~0,1((~''~U ,4+Ok<>1~349\ .xt'Tr//7((~1 October 1995 l \ 3. .42.: hz.J#424 .\ Irc l. Â· 3 v - -3 14\ l. 11 -4 *:%25:f/// ift>00.~lf/./.59<fi,7 0'.,1, (D.11 1 \.45: a,/7~\Ct<lt .tk ....... Â·, ,., I i'ch'Â·/ 7/, ,Â·aule h,Â·, h, ..cp:Â· .â€¢rÂ·- â€¢ 21' 14.P 126 CONSULTING, LLC. 0289 SURREY STREET CARBONDALE, CO 81623 (970) 963-5818 AL L F#LL F - AREA 06 FJLL 130 Fn iD' I I 'CRATEAU Â· Ro.4,Al. Fo,Lk 8.,+RD A rÂ·Ek 15-r, 4 6 11, Dec,1,-- 8 1 - -L--12? E / Co..ck.r \ALL 4.:-4/del I. 6.......v...........UUJr ..64*9*,99,2. A .............AA -.*-I Â·Â·,P .':4:..Pigo#<f . : '. A ...... A A A.X.,A-A..X-A.--A-U,9A-,AU,AWA--,ju.Ajej. -AA'A lAA A ...... ....... -&k.W'.--_A.6/5--/ .--L.-A-I-A./.- -LA-,U.-.j'&.--I-9...-:2AA A-Â»_-I.--e-A-A_Â»-A-0--AXA-'u/L-Le-A-A-A.A/K-A-I-/IW.-I-'-I-/*--4#V-A-â€¢U.%-*.WI%-A--A-. ..Al -e662>A.-A.-4-A-/v/vi#A-/-~-vi# Le===- PRO.JECJ- PLAU VIEW SCALE j "= 110' Â«'FFI TYP/CAL CROSS SECT, DA) Srep 3: AJEcr 64.our f.y. ::..,. SCALE 145 j 1 iA/TO Voib. 0...9..., Â· Â·. e. A o kle*UY EQuiP,Â·4â‚¬47- */ILL BE ALLowâ‚¬b. 1,4 rA-â‚¬ R,Uet. , I PRov,De aosr bEPTIA Cov *IL , )8" ha w. 36" MAX -/' U>35, .197/*.uÂ·t,Â·:a :i'.2-'.t 0.,.. S rep / : A e-AL Loo sâ‚¬- DeR<13. F=10- TÂ»Â·â‚¬ Fo.iNbAT,64 8 Y #+A-ib A:#b LOIT-4 44 Arlk. Cok,QLâ‚¬-1502. PL,Â«p .// kou./ S LUAA P 51+PrceÂ¢râ‚¬ â€ž k6**%1- FouND<r,0,44/ Rk- A FLOST De-0)77#L~ 4 C O U â‚¬fL / 8 "-4,4.,36' +44< I. ' . /'' I.: -.*' f- ' I I. : - I ' ' I.' I r<. STEP): 41. qa PLACC . Aesrue-77c 2.ock. iran, s.#rcAeTE J- 1 1 K... ~ Ug/A/6 M<we.*94â‚¬... 922*844:B:;Â·% 3*%61Â¥.9 tÂ· JÂ«Â«....' u,.r*Zit:-~.2.- 740â€¢A RIVER C#+APNK.9' '';" KEY A.OUâ‚¬I.*Im . Rl]'â‚¬'9[Â·-I -r-=- Â£32:469.. *4:7::.:.Â·:.j)...1:..:S.:2 I L--*.':, ...19#: -..41 . 844& Ado tkisT,44.Ct{*KjA -, .,.. Â·#'~Ii-*.--'ZE.'...#..t.,trÂ·:..1,% /' ;Â·'. 7 ~--:~ -*~ -1- : 4 . 0~<. ' . .. re< 520,4/1 ProrecT/04. ROALIA,16 FORK ..7 Â»161,4... 1 -rvi . h--, v,:14.46 -4. t~41',2,71 Ditt~ r .#ft,YR.4.~~Â·*~.4-7 91.-- ,2 + .,I_I n. ilÂ·,#>4 r-> U*'444~2,4.1~.tifi~49*M%%044Â»29492*if;.FOI~~?ti:.943 4%**549%3034.'I:~gieN..2924*i*%4......J up . . ... < ..C 13.Phs, Fadoo.J)~390173 - , 1. -fil. .p'./. â‚¬1.1 \-\2~ . . 12 I lili ,k Jet: SLS--0-6 Â·.1. . 4;0I1~ e~-. --- u~. . _ -2.-..0.dibillf ma#&4 9 --4 .=ri Â·44> z . CJWP-1,/12 â€¢ . t 5.......ANT;f/Df/Milf 9 'ek. 12. 4~ 1 Al!]Ilt' 11), m JILL_ 3-1 hill . e. - f,/4 iii+ 4 lili*~1 4Wdlul ~ f 1,/1, 011111'i lii . .4 ..... a..i "~li....-,"' . . p ..4:r - '40 ... . -' .5 - - â€¢f>..1.s . * Sh =60 -- 1 .t 13/34'Jaw,9,1/:.1 6 4 . .5 11--: 0(11,7 .:41~~,93<~,p ?<f i I /< ~; ~-f fA.'. . t,+ 91 4 i I ' I 1-2-- --&~ r. , t ' r 11 0 11 111 --% A - 1&:ILili'Iii tif z..., â€¢ ... . , Ttif ; ,* 1. e 1, 0, *r- 'Ne"% 49 f.''f \ 1 7 9. 5 - 03' 9 . 9 ' . t'. . t. I -<- 4 , W.. I . 44 V. 4.: I I i .. 1 -Ma-A-'2,46~:< 3.:. :04 4 Al 0 'i . . 7 %,4 I I. +-94-1~-iti~'~f ' , v 1 i ... -0 1. t':;.4.f,42'.93,4, j t. L.,7, 1. .010 4 1â‚¬'43**t,<9,34'tti *1 I,1 a.-4.-4 U. E &'4. .4 J 1 â€¢ i"/'11- i. & .: I 1 11 4 1- I N,F.Â·Sc . , 1 r I , , /1 1 . ~ 1 till,262//* 5 '1 .' Â· i,1. ' 91/- 1/. 4 ~A' Ti,A. A f .. 7 3,1.- . 2 ./ . 974.,I I Â· . f .. . ..f 4#3 917>,r ..dy Er - NOV 16 '95 09:03 MCI Â£2'1 'GHLIN WATER ENG 303-4587019 P.2 OCT-26-1995 09:47 FROM ASPEN/P ITK IN BLDG DEPT TO 9-9639243 P , 02 Al'JA.tru:Nl' 1 IAND USE APPLIC:ATIONKâ„¢ 1) Project Nage ~ 64 47 GAU- 20*ktâ€¢46 Fkk Fou,4*wrle.4 1/1.Q.ret&744 2 2, proltes I.=cation /637 E. C,9.Pet A-,Pâ‚¬,4 CO 92/0 1/ 1 -Aâ‚¬'/4 0Â£ Sar,- 18 T.,O S.. R,84\4, 62\P.M. ,' 1 (indicate stivet aailess, lot 1 blade nOmber, legal description tere arpropric:-e) 1 j 3 > Present Zoning - --'. 4 ) ht Size 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # _Ck* re,i~~4-AlwL..Â£~168.-*----- (1400,~,4,u... Assoc, C/o (04,6, /2~ID.* 4/40,2-04 7.20 e. 6/7-* 4-4 Asee,4, 03 8/6 // \ 6) R.presentative's Name. Address & Phone # . /Uy'DA o ~04.<Lic-7174/g, . 1 2.-ogeerr- ~2,248,Â¢-l_ 0289 5,84* Sr-~Câ€¢-6040.-cr.816 2.5 963,58/8 1 7) Type of Apelisation (please deck all ti'at apply) z Cbnditioral Use Canceptal SPA Conceotlial Historic rev. - Special Review Fir.al SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline - CÂ»nseptual ED ' __ Minor Historic fk:,v. 1)4 St=eam Margin n - Firal FUD __ Historic Demolition Molmtain View Pl_~ _ _ kbdivisior Historic Cesignation __ Corriceindulizatiot _ Text/Map Amandlent- _ GEOS Allot=ent - IDUCL Lin+--*EACEMPno 4 p*%-. 4 4..o o - <2125 Eametion ' 8) Descriptial of Existing Uses (nmeer and type of acistirg structures. approximate sq. ft.: number of bedcoc=ss arry previous apgtovals graxited to the preperty). ..8*ND,46 4 is A 301-,7- Co....PLe,r O, |/4<-4-77Â©4.._(~,109,4/4/tÂ».4,s. 8uill,46 92.r #s 1&.Ppext,-#rELY 10.000 .i Fr. \ 1 . A L.L. 1,/0 11<. l,//1-L dr ounS IDâ‚¬- .-44044 Tffâ‚¬ Fbu-Ap*7704 .Amre,t . 2 91 Delecti#tion of D:Nelopart Nelication %712*r kAâ€¢r,4-(â€¢/4 2.ev' â‚¬U gieÂ»â€¢Pi-11Â»J ~Joix rD /4 C.LuT),7- /â€¢41â‚¬17746 Gle.our- U-HberÂ£ 7-4+â‚¬- Fo,-u;h477>1 L 1 11 Foo TUL *-Wi> 7-m:.4 F-/Â£-L AÂ£04â€¢41) 7-HE- A)121&:<_ 27 +4/4) 36 4,+44Â¥ \A// TH ~Â£1772677â‚¬ 4,.th Abc~. 7â€¢ PROUIJDâ‚¬- F,Â¢er Pja ret77.J \ Pon.. T,+â‚¬- Pou,â€¢-/b*TUÂ« IJAL#c- /1 Dact,gui) 1,4 TW-â‚¬- Acrn-t#-Gl \ 1% Rave ygi attatied the YoU04:14? E-4 G /4 GER_/46 *Le-pr,Cr, ,-'-~ Response to At:tactmnrrt 2, Mininum 5,2=i.*sion Contents - Respxse to Attactmert 3, *ecif ie Sutmission Chnterrts - Re#ponse te Attadmerm 4, Review Standa]Dds for Your AppliÂ¢ation 1 C LJ L, .) 1 02 - CONDOMINIUM MAP OF CHATEAU ROARING FORK APARTMENTS J vJ, 46RL 3 'ERT\Fl CATE THE CHATEAU DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A ce,LoRADÂ¢, CORPORA-HON as OWNER OF RE L . 1 I , CERTIFY THAT .Hi: MAP OF- CHATEAU ROAR#NG FORK APARTMENTS .As Â·,LEN PKEPAZED PLAS Â· . DECLARATION VOR CHATEAU ROAR~ NG FORK APTS BATED DECEMSE< 8,1 49 AND Â¥<E,Obâ‚¬DE IN 509.< 2.45- , PÂ«GE 6 66 , RECORDS OP r#-E CLERK AND RECOR DER , COUNTY OF PI PRESIDENT W Illa A Â¥ AIrt.ST 71 124 ./ r. SEK.RET-KRY NELter , 4 C.OcPER Av E STATE OF COLORADO 1 <e - ' COUNTY OF PlTKIN ) THE FeREGOING OWNER'% CERT\F\CATE wAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS 3154 DA L WALLEN E, As PKES,DE-NT AND NELIGM C. COATES JR., As sEC+TARY 0, CHATEAU 0 WITNESS DAY HAND AND OFFICIAL UAL TH, 3 21 94 DAY OF C<<*â€¢-0-r lE)49 - -- 67~09'INE 09 94 9 c O 0 6\03 CHARNES T BRANDT I Â· di. 4 N O 0 \ 9 .9 1 f 2 2 M 1 10 F z., O ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE A . -- / "* * ON KOCK L, GERARD N PESMAN, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, De MERE.SY CER-nVY THKT 71,Ut MAP S N- 1â€¢ AOR,ZONTAL AND VERT'CAL MEASUREMENTS OF -THE BOILDIMI , -PAE UN 1-rS, TME UNI-r DE.fleD,KriCÂ» L LEGEND Â¢ NOTES 1 OF TWE UNFINISHED CLOORS AND CU UNal AS CONST.UCTED, AND THKT THIS MAP WAS PRE.PAR[t S' 11 3 1 i h RLINFORCING ROD- 2' Lo NG SCALE k - . mgr v TI NPROVEMENTS. . wiTH STAMPÂ£D CAP - SE=r , CITY MONUMENT - FOUND O 0 SURVEY ORO ENTED WITH FOUND ll w GERARD M PESMAN REG PROF- EM / c r 011 - CITY MONUMENTS ~ 4 4 - - 1 -r STATE oF COLORADO ' g COUNTY OF Ptl-KIN ] SS - ~ 4, WITNESS MY WAND AND OVA<u:~~aAk*DAY 05-216.4 ' 1969 H Z THE FbREGOING CER-nFEATE V~*OWLEDOED EEFOKE Mt TRS 3\ 14 DAY . - L-1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRESÂ· I / . . -6- . id - - - lij - 18 /0 . BLOCK 0 LLEY BLOCK 37 -- â€¢t dl - r ~ ~ CHARLES r. SIZANOT NO~ . f. 0 -1 575'09'trE 01 0 e . ...6-4 -In 1~ qi 5.6 - '' 0 E 1/ -- - 41 0 1 .:11 S.*'*' # 1 7.' 0 F - ~ 1 -5 2,10 -1 -1, G Z SURVETORS CERTIRC SO j .r, .1 - F r .O f C 11% I,GERARD M PESMAN, 4 REGISTERED LAND SURVENOK, MEREBY CER-rl,Y -1Â»Al -TWE. PROPER-( . 2. Z.1 Â¢ri-4 -1 1 4 1, -U, DESCRIPTION AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP- rl 01 - A PORTION OF -TH Ar C.,CrAIN -TZACT OV LAND SITUATTED Â»1 TME E "a NW 4 ANO -IHE Wlk NE,k . S.1 111. . 20 1 IN BOOK |90 PAaE- 114 Pm<IN COUNTY ~-COKDS AWO MOG PAKTICUCAKLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS Bel,N.,Mi Kr A PO%NT 0,4 THE WES-rcILY IMANk OV TUE. ReAKN< FORâ€¢ RIVER wuiNCI THE NO<T i PARKING 47| d, , D 5 1, . Aspgri 70-113,Ti *Ae 415'09'1~W 218.0 FT. , TWINCI. *475'09'll"W ISS.O 17Â· ; TwiNCE Â¥4\4 0 Â¤1.0 Fr. , TMENct NI4o50'49"E 45.-74 2. Tb THE SOUT,Â·4â‚¬1LY UNL OF Coo/â‚¬, AVE.,(Of w -1,4Â£ TOWN C P 21. 1/ 1 g ..~9 3-8-09'11'â‚¬ 9.9.94 gr AL.O.Lq -r,JE SOUTHOLY LINE oF SAID COOPU AVENUE; TWEMCE 84'5* 36.' 1 -~|35 KOAK\~4% FORK .RN'Â£<, -rÂ·KiNCE. SeU-tuâ‚¬R.LY ALONT -4(E WE.'51Â«-CLY SANK 6/ BA,O K.cAQâ€¢4% F<** ~VEL -1 - I FURTMER STATE -11(AT -twÂ£ SUILD*,44 TIES AND MONUMENTS AU LOCATED AS SblOWN <1014 ANI ACCUIATE KEÂ· SURVEY or T."s PKOfEITY W r . 0 & 11 4 11.-14 K P- '11.3 - 1 - -- GERASED M PISMAW, REG Mo t*GR -- 1 C & 0 STATE. OV COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY Of PITKI N j e V i *112 " 00 r _ 61.4 AccE,TED veR FILING IN<,TH~ ovâ€¢,C E O/ THE CLEKK AND RECOKOER 05 THâ‚¬ COONTY OF PmUN, COLOR nus 3/ DAY W.4Â»buu.4&44A--, 1969, IN 500,< f , PAGE 20 - $ 45 DURANT AVE. PEGGY M;KLER r . ;21 1/ 1 ( OIl Prn.*4 3. * p w ..d Â£111- C LE RK AND REOKOE< 0 1 N,~09'I ,-w 163-00 p â€¢ ..26=Z__:G P COUNTY OV PITKIN, SMTâ‚¬ Of COLD r + 'F-'- '-7 u NW COR LIT A 26=2~6 Â· - N-1 5'09' 11- W 6/OCK. 124 0 -- d-L-,1:41._46 a L O C K Il 9 J - ' 1'. OS CLEVELAND N M' De' *D' E. 11 SO BUILDING *B