The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1419 Crystal Lake Rd.20A-89Â£ 4 19 019 4 bie R 1 Butera Stream Margin Review 2737-181-32-017 20A-89 I 14t c, CrH<314\ Lk RA < ~1 -. ~d 0 4~ [T 11 A \\ S r I j M 1 -4* D 4 ~- ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street )OA -29 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 LAN0 USE APPLICATI0N FEES 1737-/8/-3 2-0/7 City 00113 -63250-134 GMP/CONCEPTUAL -63270-136 GMP/FINAL -63280-137 SUB/CONCEPTUAL -63300-139 SUB/FINAL -63310-140 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS -63320-141 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00115 -63340-163 ENGINEERING F.. 0/ SUBTOTAL Â· 1 9 N 50 County 00113 -63160-126 GMP/GENERAL -63170-127 GMP/DETAILED -63180-128 GMP/FINAL -63190-129 SUB/GENERAL -63200-130 SUB/DETAILED 4 -63210-131 SUB/FINAL -63220-132 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS -63230-133 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/ CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS -63450-146 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REFERRAL FEES: 00125 -63340-205 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 -63340-190 HOUSING 00113 -63360-143 ENGINEERING PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 -63080-122 CITY/COUNTY CODE -63090-123 COMP. PLAN -63140-124 COPY FEES -69000-145 OTHER SUBTOTAL TOTAL Name: .-Fl--ff\-, F f(-j -4 f) P) (2 04,7 Phone: Address: !1-PCAl'f T~1 /1 1 1. 4 1,1.4 I '.A Projed. Ff// 4.r f./t .If' 6.14,1 4 ,1 ~ <*-,17 ~ .i ,Â·7 / V '1 4 1 /. f J"'~tj' Cul ' i rti i Check # Date: i Additional billing: #of Hours: CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 3/27/89 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE : -2,\ 1-A Y<91 0,73/7-/8/-3@-0//7 20A-89 STAFF MEMBER: LL<\ , f. PROJECT NAME: Butera Stream Margin Review Project Address: 1419 Crystal Lake Road Legal Address: Lot 148, Callahan Subdivision APPLICANT: T. Richard Butera Applicant Address: 1450 Crystal Lake Road. Aspen, CO REPRESENTATIVE: Michael Gassman Representative Address/Phone: P. O. Box 740 Aspen. CO 81612 5-2695 PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: $780.00 NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 5 J TYPE OF APPLICATION- 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 11196 P&Z Meeting Date b~.h,~.ah. PUBLIC HEARING: YES ~ VESTED RIGHTS: YES CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Planning Director Approval: Paid: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REFERRALS: , City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District vl City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW) Aspen Water Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ) City Electric Building Inspector Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Other Aspen Consol. Energy Center S.D. DATE REFERRED: 3~29)81 INITIALS: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: 1 t City Atty 9 1 City Engineer V Zoning Env. Health Housing 4/ Other: 0- ...Â¥.. .... f\-& A.-' 1/A'~ i ,#, (,1,1-1- ( FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: On April 25, 1989 the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, as a consent agenda item, the Stream Margin Review subject to the following conditions: 1) Prior to issuance of a building permit a description of the construction techniques- be submitted to and approved by the Engineering Department. The construction techniques should demonstrate that there will be no increase in erosion and stream sedimentation during excavation and construction. 2) To insure that there has not been erosion during construction, a C.0. shall not be issued until inspection of the construction site has- been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning and Zoning office. 3) A landscaped site plan indicating existing vegetation and proposed landscaping (including significant natural features and trees to be relocated), be submitted to and approved by the Parks and Planning Departments prior to the issuance of a building permit. (A plan of the proposed landscaping was received on April 18, 1989 and was sent to the Parks Department for referral. We are waiting for a Parks referral.) 4) A site plan with the surveyor's signature and stamp by a surveyor be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5) The applicant shall dedicate a fisherman's easement in n the Roaring Fork River and for a width of 5 feet along the north side of the river. The applicant has agreed to these conditions as recommended. 1jl butera 5 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission From: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office Re: Butera Stream Margin review Date: April 21, 1989 SUMMARY: The proposal involves the demolition of a single family home and the construction of a new single family residence on the site, 1419 Crystal Lake Road. Section 7-504, Stream Margin Review, of the Aspen Municipal Code requires development review of proposals within one hundred feet of the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams. The proposed development is 24 feet from the edge of the FEMA line. Although the site is within a designated PUD, Section 7-902 exempts review for a detached residential dwelling on a separate lot. APPLICANT: T. Richard Butera, represented by Michael Gassman. LOCATION: 1419 Crystal Lake Road, Lot 14E, Callahan Subdivision, City of Aspen. ZONING: R-30 PUD APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Stream Margin Review approval for the construction of a single family residence within 100 feet of the high water line of the Roaring Fork River. REFERRAL COMMENTS: A. Engineering: Having reviewed the above application and made a site visit, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. We recommend that the applicant grant an easement for a pedestrian trail across the adjacent lot 14 W for the purpose of connecting a trail from 1010 Ute Subdivision to the Aspen Club area. 2. We are concerned that the extent of the excavation for this development may impact the irrigation ditch which runs along that stream bank. We recommend that a registered engineer inspect this excavation and that a C.0. not be issued until the construction has been completed to his satisfaction. 3. The high water line needs to be drawn and labeled on the submitted plan. 4. The plan needs to have a surveyor's signature and stamp. 5. The plan needs to show the location of any significant natural features, including natural hazards and trees on the site. 6. We recommend that any trees larger than 6 inches in diameter removed by this development should be relocated in that area and that revegetation should take place in the excavated areas. 7. We recommend that the applicant grant a fisherman's easement in the Roaring Fork River and a width of 5 feet along the north side of the river. B. Parks: A referral related to the April 18, 1989 submission of the proposed landscape plan is anticipated. STAFF COMMENTS: Section 7-504 outlines the criteria for Stream Margin Review as follows: Criteria 1: It can be demonstrated that the proposed development will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an elevation certificate prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado. RESPONSE: The lowest floor of the proposed house is 8 feet above and 24 feet inland from the edge of the floodway as shown on the FEMA maps of 1987. Thus, construction of the proposed house will have no effect on the base flood elevation. Criteria 2: Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan map is dedicated for public use. RESPONSE:The are no recommended trails on the subject parcel. There is a constructed, paved, public trail directly across the river which is not shown in the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and another constructed, paved, public trail along the westerly boundary of the parcel which is also not shown in the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. It would appear that this parcel has met it's commitment to public trails. However, the Engineering Department is requesting a trail connection to the 1010 Ute subdivision. The City Attorney has advised that a rational nexus must exist between impacts and exactions to substantiate linking development requirements. We do not believe this development proposal is the appropriate time to obtain that trail connection. There is no rational relationship between this proposal and the land use issues pertaining to lot 14W. 2 Criteria 3: The recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. RESPONSE: The Roaring Fork Greenway Plan makes no specific recommendations affecting this parcel. The area between the proposed house and the river will be preserved in its existing state as a green area. The proposed house is exactly the same distance from the river as the existing house (48 feet). In addition site coverage (building, parking are and driveway) is virtually the same as now exists (24. 6% new vs. 24. 7% existing). Therefore the proposed project does not change existing conditions. The Engineer has recommended that a fisherman's easement be granted, which is appropriate and consistent with the goals and objectives of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan. Criteria 4: No vegetation is removed or slope grade changes made that produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank. RESPONSE: The applicant states that "construction activities and grading will be no closer to the river bank than 40 feet and that construction will have no effect on erosion of the bank or sedimentation of the stream bed." The site is located at the edge of a steep bank and the submitted site plan does not show existing vegetation. Staff has concerns regarding removal of existing vegetation and potential erosion during demolition and development activities. Section 7-507 (C) (2) (d) of the Aspen Land Use regulations, recently amended by Ordinance 6, requires a description of proposed construction techniques to be submitted with the application. When submitting his application the applicant did not have a chance to comply with these recent code amendments. Therefore the application inadequately addresses the prevention of erosion during demolition and development activities. Criteria 5: To the greatest extent practicable, the proposed development reduces pollution and interference with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary. RESPONSE: The applicant states that "The proposed development will have no effect on pollution of the river or natural changes of the river course." However prevention of erosion is a staff concern. Criteria 6: Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. RESPONSE: The proposed development does not require alteration or relocation of a watercourse. 3 Criteria 7: A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. RESPONSE: See Criteria number 6. Criteria 8: Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred (100) year floodplain. RESPONSE: All construction and construction activities will be outside the 100 year floodplain. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Stream Margin Review subject to the following conditions: 1) Prior to issuance of a building permit a description of the construction techniques be submitted to and approved by the Engineering Department. The construction techniques should demonstrate that there will be no increase in erosion and stream sedimentation during excavation and construction. 2) To insure that there has not been erosion during construction, a C.0. shall not be issued until inspection of the construction site has been completed to the satisfaction of the Planning and Zoning office. 3) A landscaped site plan indicating existing vegetation and proposed landscaping (including significant natural features and trees to be relocated), be submitted to and approved by the Parks and Planning Departments prior to the issuance of a building permit. (A plan of the proposed landscaping was received on April 18, 1989 and was sent to the Parks Department for referral. We are waiting for a Parks referral.) 4) A site plan with the surveyor's signature and stamp by a surveyor be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5) The applicant shall dedicate a fisherman's easement in the Roaring Fork River and for a width of 5 feet along the north side of the river. The applicant has agreed to these conditions as recommended. 1jl butera 4 ) 1%4 N COU NTY Fir HOU56 0-3 to. 14- l 4 . CE.A. -â€¢2 0 U re 9/ 9 51 . 7Â¢; fl~ 9 4 cue i / Â£ f COF IHE . - OFAVEL FITS) ~ CALL,4 HAN .... OUBDIV/5 ION LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' (bY>FED)Cl 1 4 - ' 0 OMB 3067-00n FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM ELEVATION CERTIFICATE This form Is to be used for: 1) New/Emergency Program construction In Special Flood Hazard Areas; 2) Pro-FIRM construction after September 30, 1982; 3) Post-FIRM construction; and, 4) Other buildings rated as Post-FIRM rules. t. T. RICHARD BUTERA, 1450 CRYSTAL LAKE RD., ASPEN, CO 81611 1 BUILDING OWNER'S ADDRESS NAME 1419 CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD, LOT 142, CALLAHAN Sum)., ASPEN, CO. PROPERTY LOCATION (Lot and Block numbers and address If available) I certify that the Information on this certific,â‚¬lte represents my best efforts to Interpret the data available. I understand that any false statement may be punishable by flne or imptisonment under 18 U.S. code, Section 1001. SECTION I ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION (Completed by Local Communily Permit Official ora Regislered Professional Engineer, Architect, or Surveyor) COMMUNITY NO. PANEL NO. SUFFIX DATE OF FlnM FIRM ZONE DATE OF CONSTA. BASE FLOOD ELEV. BUILDING IS (In AO Zono, use depth) **Now/Emergency O Pr,FlilM Reg, 080287 204 C 6-4-87 x new 7978.00 O PostÂ·FIRM Reg. YES NO It Is Intended that the building described above will be constructed In compliance with the community's flood plain 0 0 ordinance. The certifier may rely on community records. The lowest floor (Including basement) will be at an elevation of.7985.95 ft, NGVD, Failure to construct the building at this elevation may place the b 1 the community's flood plain management ordinance. YES NO The building described above has been constructed In compliance with the comm.*f..AJF#fd&'%1916,'~g~pent 0 0 ordinance based on elevation data and visual Inspection or other reasonable meaghâ‚¬'~p 70..r s SUâ€¢ CO 4:4 2 If NO Is checked, attach copy of varlance Issued by the community. R :ix 0: 3 /1 2, .4 r VÂ·. L. 4 -i YES NO The mobile borne located at the address described above has been tiod down (orithar%,1 in,9911[0)Â®c.':7118:Be 0 0 community's flood plain management ordinance, or In compliance with the NFIP*54Wlicallons. .6.32 MOBILE HOME MAKE MODEL YR. OF MANUFACTURE 40*IR he,/ I. .ih***SIONS *t,/ONAL ty x a\\\00 (Communltv Permit Official or Registered Professional Engineer, Architect, or Survoyor) SCRMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. NAME JEFFEREY S. SIMONSON ADDRESS 1512 GRAND AVE, SUITE 212 PROFESSIONAL ENG#NE~R GLENWOOD SPRINGS COLORADO 81601 TITLE A.A CITY ' STATE ZIP IUM 2 b SIGNATURE 4*14* M-/MA,-7- DATE 3-24.-89 PHONE (303) 945-1004 lf#MF M '4 1 SECTION H #PINION CERTIFICATION (Certified by a Local Community Permit Official or o Registered Professional Engineer, Architect,'or Surveyor.) i 1 1 4 1 1 FIRM ZONE Al-A30: I certify that the building at the properly location described above has the lowest floor (Including basemenl) at an elevation of feet, NGVD (mean sea level) and the average grade at the building site is at an elevation of feet, NGVD. FIRM ZONES V, Vl-V30: I certify that the building at the properly location described above has the bottom of the lowest Noor beam at an el?vatlon of feel NGVD (mean sea level), and the average grade at the building site Is at an elevation of feet, NGVD. FIRM ZONES A, A99, AO, AH, and EMERGENCY PROGRAM: I certify thal the building at the property location described above has the lowest floor elevation of feet, NGVD. The elevation of the highest adjacent grade next to the building le feet, NGVD, SECTION 111 FLOODPROOFING CERTIFICATION (Certification by a Registered Professional Engineer or Architect) I certify to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, that the building is designed so thal the building Is walertight. with walls substantially Impermeable to the passage of water and structural componenls having the capability of reslsting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy that would bo caused by the flood depths, pressures velocillos, impact and uplilt forces associated with the base flood. YES O NO O In the event of flooding, will this degree of floodproofing be achieved with human Intervention? (Human intervention means that water will enter the building when floods up to the base flood level oc- cur unless measures are taken prior to the flood to prevent entry of water (e.g., bolting metal shields over doors and windows). YES O NO O Will the building be occupied as a residence? If the answer to both questions is LES, the floodproofing cannot be credited for rating purposes and the actual lowest floor must bo completed and certified Instead, Complete both the elevation and floodproofing certificates. FIRM ZONES A, Al-A30, Vl-V30, AO and AH: Certified Floodproofed Elevation Is feet, (NGVD). THIS CERTIFICATION IS FOR O SECTION 11 O BOTH SECTIONS 11 AND 111 (Check One) CERTIFIER'S NAME COMPANY NAME LICENSE NO. (or Afflx Seal) TITLE ADDRESS ZIP SIGNATURE DATE CITY STATE PHONE The Insurance agent should attach the original copy of the compleled lonn to the flood Insurance policy application, the second copy should be supplied to the pollcyholder and the third copy retained by the agent FEMA 81-31, April 82 INSURANCE AGENTS MAY ORDER THIS FORM 593-117 - . . , 0 ) . ( OMB 3067-0077 New/Emergency. Program Construction: For the purposes of determining insurance rates, buildings for which the start of construction or substantial Improvement commenced after September 30,1982, are New/Emergency buildings. Pre-FIRM Construction: *k'' For the purposes of determining insurance rates, buildings for which the slart of construction or substantial improvemerit " was on or before December 31, 1974 or the effective date of the Initial Flood Insurance Rate Map (date printed on commu- nity FIRM), whichever is later. Special Note. If an approved building permit is dated prior to December 31,1974, construction must have commenced not later than 180 days alter the dale of the approved building permit. -Existing Construction" and "Pre-FIRM Construction" have identical meanings for the purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program. Post-FIRM Construction: For insurance rating purposes buildings for which the start of construction or substantial Improvement commenced after December 31,1974 or the effective date of the initial Flood Insurance Rate Map (date printed on community FIRM), which. ever \s later. "New Construction" and "Post-FIRM Construction" have identical meanings for the purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program. Substantial Improvement: Any repair, reconstruction, or improvement of a building, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent 01 the market value 01 Ihe building either (a) beforo the improvement or repair is started, or (b) H Ihe building has been damaged, and is being restored the market value before the damage occurred. For Flood Insurance Progiam purposes substantial improve- ment is starled when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of the building commences, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure. However, the term does not include either any project for health, sanitary, or safely code specifications which are solely necessary to assure safe living conditions: or any alteration of a building listed on the National Register of Historic Places or a State Inventory of Historic Places. Lowest Floor - The lowest floor is the lowest floor (including basement) of the enclosed area. -1 he lollowing modi- fications of the lowest floor delinition are permitted in order to meet community permit practices: (1) In Zones A, AO, AH, Al-A30, B, C, D, and Emergency Program areas whigh are not oceanside building sites, tile following exceptions apply: (a) Tile floor 01 an unfinished enclosed area at ground level or above, which Is a crawl space, or space wilhin the foun- dation walls, usable os areas lor building mairilenance, access, parking vehicles, or storing of articles and maintenance , equipment (not attached to the building) used in connection with the plemises is not considved the building's lowest Iloor If the walls of the unfinished enclosed areas are construcled with openings (such as with parallel sheer walls, open lattice walls, discontinuous foundation walls, and combinalions thereol) to facilitate the unimpeded movement of flood waters or the walls are breakaway walls. (b) The floor of an attached unfinished garage used for parking vehicles and storing articles and maintenance equip- ment used In connection with the premises and not attached to the.building is not considered the building's lowest floor if the walls of the unfinished enclosed areas are constructed with openings (such as with parallel sheer walts, open lattice walls, discontinuous foundation walls, or combinations thereof) to facilitate Ihe unimpeded movement 01 flood waters or the walls are breakaway walls. The unimpeded movement of flood waters is imperative to equalize the hydrostatic pressure Inside and outside of the walls of the building and/or garage. (2) In Zones V and Vl-V30; and Emergency Program areas which ore oceanside building lots, the following exceptions apply: (a) For flood plain management purposes, the Iloor of an unfinished enclosed orea is not considered the'building'S lowest floor if the area's walls are constructed as breakaway walls. However, for Insurance rating purposes: (i) The floor of an unfinished enclosed Area less than 300 square feet Is not considered the building's lowest floor If the walls are breakaway walls. (ii) Â·The floor of an unfinished enclosed area equal to or greater than 300 square feet is considered the building's lowest floor even If the walls are breakaway walls. (b) The floor of an unfinished enclosed area with walls made of Insect screening or open wood constructed break- away lattice work (regardless of the size of the area enclosed) Is not considered the building's lowest floor. Lowest Floor Elevation - The lowest floor elevation Is the elevation of the bottomÂ·of the floor beam of the lowest floor In Zones V, Vl-V30. In all other zones, the lowest floor elevation is the elevation of the top of the lowest floor. ON WITH ON ON SLAB BASEMENT PIERS SLAB - A -< l v -nlm- LOWEST ZONES A ~ ZONES ~~ FLOOR LOWEST FLOOR - -a ZONES .BE=F / -OfF V vr WINDOW .4~ 0 LOWEST FLOOR IN- 2~ / pli ZONES / FLOOR :, LOWEST FLOOR IF ~ r -4 LOWEST BASE AVERAGE GRADE Â·, Â· BASEMENT IS i ,' FLOOD BASE F FLOODPROOFED ~ 1 BASE ELEVATION FLOOD FLOOD ELEVATION , ELEVATION 2 ~, ~ AVERAGE ~__ ~ ~ ~ GRADE '~| 0 L.... ' 133' *.- ELEVATION OF LOWEST FLOOR .. IF NOT FLOODPROOFED 11,IL~... JU.L.... $-7â‚¬ :-Â¥-.r NOTE: A Zones - A, AO, AH, Al-A30, A99, Emergency Program other than Oceanside Building Sites V Zones - V, Vl-V30, Emergency Program Oceanside Building Sites (beach areas subject to wave action during severe storms) Base Flood Elevation - Fli. 1 nlalti managemell' equirements including the Base Flood Elevation are shown on the FIRM tor Zones Ali Al-A30, ' For FIRM Zo, . A, V, and Emergency Proglain Special Flood Hazard Areah the com- mull'.y permit official or the builder has estlin:Â·'ud this elevation by the reasonable Interpretation of available data. Enter that estimated elevation In the spgge prnÂ©!ed In Section I of the Elevation Certification for Base Flood Elevation. If this community permit official or the builder has not selected an estimated Base Flood Elevation, enter NA FEMA 81-31, Aprll 82 -9. <4/4.) ,9 t~%.Â·Ict,â€žÂ·..r t. fli,TLE r :'f FIN; 4%0 1 - MÂ·'L Jn \- ..Alpay Â·<Uj c 'j , Â» 6- ry) /6~9 V 63/64 . '*,4 2 -Â·Â·i=ul\erÂ« k F ya . '.0 AN th 9 j 31 er, (4â‚¬J. A- ,-5 r, L----- (01 C. . rf:) E- #(4 41'*/'/r: ALLD.. / 1. 044 1 1 .18 I * ./ r-. (M J 4.- n r Â£\ c G ~Y .--- ~ ~ U~~ 1'~ I 0~01_4 â‚¬412/ F:,Â§1113iÂ·1 / FIC- 0 14 r.7 11+ 1 A.~:it/Tr..,0 /01Â« '441Â·/Â· r,Ne 4 'i:1.1 %148 N. /1(/Ar,+IÂ·'1 r... Â¢ b ~,rl f~~,v~t < 7 - -Nâ€¢.tÂ·Â·/r r L.'W/Aa tNâ€¢>IN NALL, 1 40 f TA> Arr> / 021 /21 ~,~L.A.~cy--,x.i,,~-2 rl".1 It -2/ \\7,% 11 . M. O 0 0 fu:â€¢'*F. .r"FINS ~ ~ Tr-- - 9*hivâ€¢ -- 09 2Â£10 Ff:j .1, ' - ' -- -:7:L' ,~,>69'*1 049 rINI ,Â¥;'23YZE- 11 Â· A:.,Â·-Â·-.f (- ---- ti,Â¢ 4~ 1 e Â¢V>t 4,4, $/; N ' t 3442 fri 4 Y3 144'Y . 744&11.- . f . 4% 9 9 2 -1 : ~.74 t<Â·14Â· Â· , 5.'(C.MIN 1.,6 1 0 Â· 44 47544 1 1 11 7 A X .VIL 4'Â· i~>*-~: . . 1 -trrÂ·Zx 74 ALe 1 , i %49. t + r L... --- ----I 1 1 ist,A . Â· F Â»-1,2 LINE i.qd.vil.94*F 1... ... - 1 . PROPOSEDLANDSCAPEPLAN t Â¥30 - N~ W i~. ' 1.~~ . .. 2 + 3.. - APR' 8 i . .,Ah 40(-~~T~~~. (Wrm NILDFI.:WfA< 7 , \ // . t- 1 I ---I '% t / i / 1 / 7// // \ /35 & co /11 \ 1 .0.6/ C \ ///1 1 1 .// - 1 \ l 11 1 ,%-1 -Ii f 2 4 -1 j . 111.9-.1.0.-0 / 1 L +*--/ 1 \ N / .>11 1 4 9.21't -7 1/l 01Â¥ 56>rs / 1 4\\ 1 b -:. 4 :...-4 -4,/ DA+--7 I / \ 1 / 1 K,â‚¬7...--1Tge;FÂ£72/1~â‚¬ ~~ / 4 0 ./ 049 -PÂ©1 k h-/ 111' ' . Exce.â‚¬OVED- \ 3 - \ \0 --- , Â£ . iii// 0 u 70 DE .*MAÂ« D 1 L Z -923- EX Â· ... ' - - - -L_ -7-- 1 Ill i. 7*646Â·EMOOED 1 1 . ' - /1 - 1 1 -- - - ' 1 \ ..... 4 1 Iii/ Jl 1 \ 1 '1 -11 1 1 =-61 Â«21.116-1,13 lili i \ 4 k ~1:01,-9Gj Â·3-4#)'i~1;tr: .v : - 1 1- 3. NE W ' -3' . --_-/'A 1 Â·f--6;2 2-~,-4---1,6471:6- 1 / . / // 1 WN,bu Â«f, I - 11 1 1 - 7 1{' Â« / \C 1 oJOE .' '. - 4/ / i >1-1-j -- 11 1 1 11 k :1 1 1 1 ~:1:c _u.i-Â£.s- 4 . 6.15-j~ Mi DI ~ ~ 35E It 1 1- p.in . 2'â‚¬3 < 3 Tt--7- 1 1 . . 1/ i AI,1,Â·Â· - -LEÂ¥/G rut = r. joRMRaWoN â€¢ N 8,-7 5 36'N f . -X- 0 1 . . .. L / L. - 41\\ \\ \ 1 --_ 4 3-\ 1 1 -6/ 'Houjf \\ \\ \\U \ 77 Â«.se +9-11.00 - / -- \\ \\ - E.<1 flrqu -11/\\ \\\ \\ 51 \\ i {11 \ \ 1 crl i ...01>.Ef=2Â« Â¢~-1-1: 0.Â« 410-2,--1 - ...94' '* f . 1 .. L 0 11 1 1-1 Â¥7-- GEE I,, \ k -~210.%0. ' . t\ - ..62*fk,w-:e l rJ. ' ~1 \ -12- ' 1 " 1 17 +956\ f I --11--4 Â· fl 1 - . % 1 U.-12 -1-<- -----4 \ - 41 --42 -trzOÂ»13--2<62--1 ~ 7EFRACE \ L~1 ----~-ZE-- J \ 1 1 1 ' I \ 1 REFAh .8/941>- 74.2\. --4 -----------t-- ... 21 --% 1 b'40\ \. . \ 1.- j 1 \ \ ------ 1--- -*-*Ii \ 1 t*fu.re -I \ Ul}514.- ------ <w-22:13.I fR--lic-JIF----- LIZIN T _l/ i \ - I. --0- \ \\ I - ---4 -\ Uh r'./- \ .c 2--* -- --) --- VRip-/ 1 1 i *...:A.A : 1. - - - -0 ----=U- - ---2-- \ \ 7 Ex/3/7/ve \ 1 0\ -\\ \ \\1 . \-, \ .CON/2'0â‚¬ UNE \& l | i\\\ \ \/' ' 225:2tÂ·cotroue \ . -1 \ 1/ -4<3\\ \ \\\ 24,(f .Â» : Â«4,445. \ t- \ /1 .. 2 h~ 4-\ .7 \ .323-2 --Mek 4. - Rt: i--I- -7,1*2-- I. . -4- ..7 \ . I 1 \ \ 71 -N /- 233392Â» h~ x fly\5 - - --- 1 -- - i 6 67 ---21.5%**422 - 4..6 3 b - -Â·-- -.0- 2~~ ,~ -0 -0- ~4/ \% <..tlek. - I i 1- 1 \\ / . 44\ \ , PROPOS~DSITEPLAN g ..3%, 11 - -Â».1,Â©A> ---*- RE#(*034242-93*42-91.94*49#ty=biabb-zi~i~ -.w- 1<31 uÂ»Â« ~ -x#L12~412(143*4~~~<l4~11i~~~~17L~21-f~<36~~~3 "Dit!!tuuu// 1 Michael Gassman Architect Box 740 Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 925 2695 MAR 27 March 17, 1989 Application for Stream Margin Review Lot 14E, Callahan Subdivision 1419 Crystal Lake Road Aspen, Colorado Contents 1. Land Use Application Form 2. Letter of Authorization 3. Disclosure of Ownership 4. Vicinity Map 5. Response to Review Standards for Development in Stream Margin 6. Elevation Certificate 7. Architectural Plans of the Proposed Development AITAOIMINr 1 ) USE APPLICNrION FORM 1) Project Name Butera House 2) Project Location Lot 14E, Callahan Subdivision (1419 Crystal Lake Road) City of Aspen (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) 42,215 3) Present Zoning R-15 4) Lot Size Square Feet 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # T. Richard Butera 1450 Crystal Lake Road Aspen, Colorado 81611 303-920-1000 G) Representative' s Name, Address & Phone # Michael Gassman, Architect Box 740 Aspen, Colorado 81612 303-925-2695 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor IIi-storic Dev. X Stream Margin FiIal FUD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivi-sion Historic Designation Condaminiumization Text/Map Amendment - GMQS Allotnient Lot Split/Lot Line - GMQS Exemption Adjustment 8) Descript lori of Existing Uses (number and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft.; number of bedroams; any previous approvals granted to the property). There is an existing single family house on the site which will be demolished. 9) Description of Development Application Construction of a new single family house to replace an existing single family house. 10) Have you attached the following? Response to Attachment 2, Minint.Im Submission Contents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents Response to Attachment 4, Review Stanlards for Your Awlication /- $ O ..1. E Â£ 9.4\ 4 March 20, 1989 Michael Gassman Architects 414 N. Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Michael, This letter is to inform you that you are authorized to act as my agent in the stream review application. This application is for lot #14 at the Callahan Subdivision, which I own. I am enclosing proof of ownership, which is apparently required. Sid# e r e~,y\, T. -Richard Butera ) EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN COLORADO 81611 303/920-10 im ~lfli m.3* Sancial of Contract STEPHART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. 602 E. HYMAN â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ (303) 925-3577 March 20, 1989 Pitkin County/ City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 Planning and Zoning: This letter is to certify that T. Richard Butera and Julie Anthony Butera are the owners in fee simple of the following described property: Lot 14, CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION, according to the recorded Plat thereof. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado This statement is neither an abstract, opinion nor guaranty of title and is intended specifically and exclusively for the use of Planning and Zoning. It is understood and agreed that Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. neither assumes nor will be charged with any financial liability whatever on any statement contained herein. If I can answer any further questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, U O.QOG- Peter P. Delany ~ Assistant Vice President Title Examiner Michael Gassman Architect Box 740 Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 925 2695 March 17, 1989 Butera House Lot 14E, Callahan Subdivision Stream Margin Review Response to Attachment 4 - Review Standards Standard 1 - Base Flood Elevation Response - The lowest floor of the proposed house is 8 feet above and 24 feet inland from the edge of the floodway as shown on the FEMA maps of 1987. Thus, construction of the proposed house will have no effect on the base flood elevation. An elevation certificate is attached. Standard 2 - Trail Designation Response - There are no recommended trails on the subject parcel. There is a constructed, paved, public trail directly across the river which is not shown in the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and another constructed, paved, public trail along the westerly boundary of the parcel which is also not shown in the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. It would appear tha.t this parcel has met it' s commitment to public trails. Standard 3 - Roaring Fork Greenway Plan Response - The Roaring Fork Greenway Plan makes no specific recommendations affecting this parcel. The area between the proposed Page 2 house and the river will be preserved in it's existing state as a green area. The proposed house is exactly the same distance from the river as the existing house. (48 feet) In addition site coverage (building, parking area and driveway) is virtually the same as now exists. (24.6% new vs. 24.7% existing) Therefore the proposed project does not change existing conditions. Standard 4 - Vegetation Response 4 Construction activities and grading will , be no closer to the river bank than ~ 40 feet. Construction will have no l effect on erosion of the bank or sedimentation of the stream bed. Standard 5 - Interference with the River Response - See Standard 4. The proposed development will have no effect on pollution of the river or natural changes of the river course. Standard 6 - Written Notice Response - See Standard 4. The proposed development does not require alteration or relocation of a watercourse. Standard 7 - Guarantee Response - See Standard 7. Standard 8 - 100 Year Floodplain Response - All Construction and construction activities will be outside the 100 year floodplain. OMB 3067-0077 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY 14 1=1 1 M #NE.. 141 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM ELEVATION CERTIFICATE This form is to be used for: 1) New/Emergency Program construction In Special Flood Hazard Areas; 2) Pre-FIRM construction after September 30, 1982; 3) Post-FIRM construction; and, 4) Other buildings rated as Post-FIRM rules. t T. RICHARD BUTERA, 1450 CRYSTAL LAKE RD., ASPEN, CO 81611 BUILDING OWNER'S ADDRESS NAME 1419 CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD, LOT 142, CALLAHAN SUED., ASPEN, CO. PROPERTY LOCATION (Lot and Block numbers and address If available) I certify that the information on this certificgte represents my best efforts to interpret the data available. I understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S. code, Section 1001. SECTION I ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION (Completed by Local Community Permit Official ora Registered Professional Engineer, Architect, or Surveyor) COMMUNITY NO- PANEL NO. SUFFIX DATE OF FIRM FIRM ZONE DATE OF CONSTR. BASE FLOOD ELEV, BUILDING IS (In AO Zone, use depth) ~{*New/Emergency 080287 204 C 6-4-87 x new 7978.00 O Post-FIRM Reg. O Pre-FIRM Reg. YES NO It is Intended that the building described above will be constructed in compliance with the community's flood plain 0 0 ordinance. The cerlifier may rely on community records. The lowest floor (including basement) will be at an elevation of,7985.95 ft, NGVD. Failure to construct the building at this elevation may place the b, 1*m/Â®,tolation of the community's flood plain management ordinance. litill,lift 9 +Â·490 RFG/je,t YES NO The building described above has been constructed in compliance with the comm;Â®f#)18Q~I'EPT%i9~4~~~~ient D 0 ordinance based on elevation data and visual inspection or other reasonable trlea#R(v/q> Â£&.Apti SC., a 43 = If NO is checked, attach copy of variance issued by the community. 2 : 4. <0 9 = A 11 1 , U YES NO The mobile home located at the address described above has been tied down (aÂ®hore,i in':1#ild)4Â¢'clk'~illywe 0 0 community's flood plain management ordinance, or in compliance with the NFIP'*fÂ¢*gcations. : 4,4 .'~f'.k " MOBILE HOME MAKE MODEL YR. OF MANUFACTURE Anf4'NQ. .~9111Â¢1@SIONS 0/7,491.kIL 'lk:y X '/4//111111'tn\\ '11111 11\" (Communltv Permit Official or Reaistered Professional Engineer, Architect, or Surveyor) SCRMUESER GORDON NEYER, INC. NAME JEFFEREY S. SIMONSON ADDRESS 1512 GRAND AVE. SUITE 212 PROFESSIONAL ENG,INEER GLENWOOD SPRINGS COLORADO 81601 TITLE 1 4 CITY ' STATE ZIP / SIGNATURE 0/Ulm/ -4 /,1,1~DATE 3-24-89 PHONE (303) 945-1004 INIMF N', 1 SECTION 11/JITNION CERTIFICATION (Certified by a Local Community Permit Official or a Registered Professional Engineer, Architect,'or Surveyor.) f v ' V 11 FIRM ZONE Al-A30: I certify that the building at the property location described above has the lowest floor (including basement) at an elevation of feet, NGVD (mean sea level) and the average grade at the building site is at an elevation of feet, NGVD. FIRM ZONES V, Vl-V30: I certify that the building at the property location described above has the bottom of the lowest floor beam at an elqvation of fent NGVD (mean sea level), and the average grade at the building site is at an elevation of feet, NGVD. FIRM ZONES A, A99, AO, AH, and EMERGENCY PROGRAM: I certify that the building at the property location described above has the lowest floor elevation of feet, NGVD. The elevation of the highest adjacent grade next to the building is feet, NGVD. SECTION 111 FLOODPROOFING CERTIFICATION (Certification by a Registered Professional Engineer or Architect) I certify to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, that the building is designed so that the building is watertight, with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy that would be caused by the flood depths, pressures velocities, irnpact and uplift forces associated with the base flood. YES O NO O In the event of flooding, will this degree of floodproofing be achieved with human Intervention? (Human intervention means that water will enter the building wher, floods up to the base flood level oc- cur unless measures are taken prior to the flood to prevent entry of water (e.g., bolting metal shields over doors and windows). YES O NO [J Will the building be occupied as a residence? If the answer to both questions is yES, the floodproofing cannot be credited tor ratir,g purposes and the actual lowest floor must bo completed and certified instead. Complete both the elevation and floodproofing certificates. FIRM ZONES A, Al-A30, Vl-V30, AO and AH: Certified Floodproofed Elevation is feet, (NGVD). THIS CERTIFICATION IS FOR O SECTION 11 O BOTH SECTIONS 11 AND 111 (Check One) CERTIFIER'S NAME COMPANY NAME LICENSE NO. (or Affix Seal) TITLE ADDRESS ZIP SIGNATURE DATE CITY STATE PHONE The Insurance agent should attach the original copy of the completed form to the flood insurance policy application, the second copy should be supplied to the pollcyholder and the third copy retained by the agent INSURANCE AGENTS MAY ORDER THIS FORM FEMA 81-31, April 82 593-117 k-- ' ) OMB 3067-0077 New/Emergency Program Construction: For the purposes of determining insurance rates, buildings for which the start of construction or substantial Improvement commenced after September 30,1982, are New/Emergency buildings. Pre-FIRM Construction: For the purposes of determining insurance rates, buildings for which the start ot construction or substantial improvement was on or before December 31, 1974 or the effective date of the Initial Flood Insurance Rate Map (date printed on commo- nity FIRM), whichever is later. Special Nofe: If an approved building perinit is dated prior to December 31,1974, construction must have commenced not later than 180 days after the date of the approved building permit. -Existing Construclion"and "Pre-FIRM Construction" have identical meanings for the purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program. Post-FIRM Construction: For insurance rating purposes buildings for which the start of construction or substantial improvement commenced after December 31, 1974 or the effective date of the initial Flood Insurance Rate Map (date printed on community FIRM), which- ever \s Mer. "New Construction" and "Post-FIRM Construction" have identical meanings for the purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program. Substantial Improvement: Any repair, reconstruction, or improvement of a building, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the building either (a) before the improvement or repair is started, or (b) if the building has been damaged, and is being restored the market value before the damage occurred. For Flood Insurance Program purposes substantial improve- ment is started when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of tile building commences, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure. However, the term does not include either any project for health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which are solely necessary to assure sate living conditions; or any alteration of a building listed on the National Register of Historic Places or a State Inventory of Historic Places. Lowest Floor - The lowest floor is the lowest floor (including basement) of the enclosed area. l he following modi- fications of the lowest floor definition are permitted in order to meet community permit practices: (1) In Zones A, AO, AH, Al-A30, B, C, D, and Emergency Program areas which are not oceanside building sites, tile following exceptions apply: (a) The floor of an unfinished enclosed area at ground level or above, which is a crawl space, or space within the foun- dation walls, usable as areas for building maintenance, access, parking vehicles, or storing of articles and maintenance equipment (not attached to the building) used in connection with the piemises is not consid~ed the building's lowest I loor if the walls of the unfinished enclosed areas are constructed with openings (such as with parallel sheer walls, open lattice Walls, discontinuous foundation walls, and combinations thereof) to facilitate the unimpeded movement of flood water's or the walls are breakaway walls. (b) The floor of an attached unfinished garage used for parking vehicles and storing articles and maintenance equip- ment used in connection with the premises and not attached to the.building is not considered the building's lowest floor if the walls of the unfinished enclosed areas are constructed with openings (such as with parallel sheer walls, open lattice walls, disconlinuous foundation walls, or combinations thereol) to facilitate the unimpeded movement of flood waters or the walls are breakaway walls. The unimpeded movement of flood waters is imperative to equalize the hydrostatic pressure inside and outside of the walls of the building and/or garage. (2) In Zones V and Vl-V30; and Emergency Program areas which are oceanside building lots, the following exceptions apply: (a) For flood plain management purposes, the floor of an unfinished enclosed area is not considered the' building's lowest floor if the area's walls are constructed as breakaway walls. However, for insurance rating purposes: (i) Tile floor of an unfinished enclosed Area less than 300 square feet is not considered the building's lowest floor if the walls are breakaway walls. (ii) Â·The floor of an unfinished enclosed area equal to or greater than 300 square feet is considered the building's lowest floor even if the walls are breakaway walls. (b) The floor of an unfinished enclosed area with walls made of insect screening or open wood constructed break- away lattice work (regardless of the size of the area enclosed) is not considered the building's lowest floor. Lowest Floor Elevation - *The lowest floor elevation is the elevation of the bottomÂ·of the floor beam of the lowest floor in Zones V, Vl-V30. In all other zones, the lowest floor elevation is the elevation of the top of the lowest floor. ON WITH ON ON SLAB BASEMENT PIERS SLAB F V 1111- LOWEST - A ~| ZONES ) 1 ZONES If FLOOR ZONES A L LOWEST FLOOR - --.--4 -. ZONES ~ -or v WINDOW ~.:4~~ LOWEST FLOOR IV M ZONES ' Â· L _ T ELEVATION OF :, LOWEST FLOOR IF -+1- LOWEST BASE AVERAGE GRADE rt, Â·: BASEMENT IS 'It ; FLOOR FLOOD BASE . - FLOODPROOFED ~ 1 BASE ELEVATION FLOOD FLOOD ~* AVERAGE ELEVATION ELEVATION - ~ ~ / GRAVE - ~ ~ ' ELEVATION OF LOWEST FLOOR - IF NOT FLOODPROOFED :r-Pr - .-r-- IJOTE: A Zones - A, AO, API, Al-A30, A99, Emergency Program other than Oceanside Building Sites V Zones - V, Vl-V30, Emergency Program Oceanside Building Sites (beach areas subject to wave action during severe - storms) Base Flood Elevation -- Fl, ! plain managemeni equirements Including the Base Flood Elevation are shown on the FIRM for Zones All, Al-A30, ' For FIRM Zo, â€¢A, V, and Emergency Progiatn Special Flood Hazard Areas the com- mum.y permit official or the builder has estitij; ~d this elevation by the reasonable interpretation of available data. Enter that estimated elevation in the spage pre : <.jed in Section I of the Elevation Certification for Base Flood Elevation. If this community permit official or the builder has not selected an estimated Base Flood Elevation, enter N.A. FEMA 81-31, Aprll 82 ....... -- 11 A.â‚¬ feN 7 58AVICEOETAT - * h--/ 5. #Al(TLE(Â·.NE FINE 5 Ati,8/4 1 lY<v~// + 7- AnifÂ·REAN J/V\FÂ·I Fbfkk : -Â·. 3 #4 T .9, ~Z-0 k Â© 4 V Â«,f ' 1 - 4374-t /0 T 060 9 3 /-4 f 2. - C * 9 2 Â¢ 0 % '*,IÂ¢ 0 i 053Â» 94> C 64 0 0 U LU Â»1 92 v//4 L,AA/r/ L -r e AS G 1 + 1 600 UNâ‚¬> -- - / .C f 03 U <--- - 41*f -+Ai~* 1/--*-**,c:-'- Â·Â·: rin 9- - A< At - CA (,2 VAÂ¥ --- ///7 9 z 1 4 yal\-1 I i. 10,0 A f -tity It I IN B , 0 0 1 5.FA WL + C $ El/'6.-'A. IA'..1:-'.4 R ASTED! -- NATCVE ft--fNEAS ' . 5 FAL.( Ce A 4 jv.,1 L /& I . 41*,h#M :Elt\/iCEBER,fir <-4//1 ~Il MsiDE NALL 1-OCE % 1? 2 1 . 32 3 - 42 <f , 600 2 It 6 ' 4 1 & 570 r Ne--2 L Â° 4 C \ ew 1Â·.'f F. 4 B.NE (NE, 4 .1., iz-/--*~ - \ 70 - --- '4,6 %400# C U.1. r271 -1 T e.\.-Â£ Â»,-h 00 /,4 4/kil\1.K~444. SO 4 L 10 *.52 i - t> Â° 4 rs.v J . . . .1 2/ *- - li 1 24 fl, ' -TI 11 - Bl<(6TLE E."NE -32, r tr *t/,4// ... ./ F INE '411\Â¥ *4 F,4 9 5 -3, AU54, + 9 4441*J- *2Vt2e 23'%400 @VA ,~, ~AR~1k&f<k . 7 +<3 - 5/ 2% , 40 1 \4 34417 /,Â¥ - 4/kkiÂ» Â· r~ f 0 0 . I *IM_In,--59<Â«~- Zavt(*1 -R i 1~'>3 - 1 0 14 Avt 4, 73 1 1 1 + "/4$ - -~ :I",\~ 1 -----_-----1 L 1\144 1 1 1 1 f FE 0:MEN 1 k fE- (400'LLY m-{ER /ve.6 ' 1 3 - IN M lTE 31 A /\ 4 1 1 1 -3 , Ati,F A. 90 -2<1*2 1 -' - ~'|'~ 47%6~Y L.. /7. f 1 11 1 51 1 1 I fl 301 V <74 'AAIP '*AN I I ' :*~ r Â» 1 . fÂ» , 9 1 % 1 ..1 1 022 i i,ft<ir irl.-:F/cks T 2 1 1 1 t It I f % 1. A 1 3%9 + l-- _ _ iv'/A t .\ . 4 0 K \9 0/9 1 */0 + XE ~ f Â»-4 2 2 L f \1 E 4.... 6 .44.- .. / 46,0 p 234Â· 'ifi j 0,1 9 i. - 3 - C 17 1-10 eN 'Al 626* P 04 4 1 - 7 - AS FEN ' 74" 4 + h. - .. - *\1 1 5 0, P 1/1 N & 3 1 1 ', e C,-h r-r-3 n 7\ 17 E-, i ) 1 1 17>31 -W 1 23 i , \1~/ 1:Ja \' . I , / 171 tr --1 -1. 14 . D & 1 10//1 + t. - 1 1 c.~ i f .. - y A i 1 9 Â· lut--=--------=---U-J. 1. (502[) fl) NIC D FL 6/.' NFAC / . I ..i hi P u T B fi A 1186\PENCE -1- -T) . t /9 Â·41 J l . MEMORANDUM TO: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department D DATE: April 17, 1989 RE: Butera Stream Margin Review Having reviewed the above application and made a site visit, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. We recommend that the applicant grant an easement for a pedestrian trail across the adjacent lot 14 W for the purpose of connecting a trail from 1010 Ute Subdivision to the Aspen Club area. 2. We are concerned that the extent of the excavation for this development may impact the irrigation ditch which runs along that stream bank. We recommend that a registered engineer inspect this excavation and that a C.0. not be issued until the construction has been completed to his satisfaction. 3. The high water line needs to be drawn and labeled on the submitted plan. 4. The plan needs to have a surveyor's signature and stamp. 5. The plan needs to show the location of any significant natural features, including natural hazards and trees on the site. 6. We recommend that any trees larger than 6 inches in diameter removed by this development should be relocated in that area and that revegetation should take place in the excavated areas. 7. We recommend that the applicant grant a fisherman's easement in the Roaring Fork River and a width of 5 feet along the north side of the river. jg/butera cc: Chuck Roth ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 March 29, 1989 Michael Gassman P. O. Box 740 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Dear Michael, This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that your application is complete. We have scheduled your application for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, May 2, 1989 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 AM. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to your application is available at the Planning Office. Michael, as Alan mentioned to you on the phone today, if the Engineering Department comments indicate that this application presents no problems, Alan will try to make it a Consent Agenda Item at one of the April P&Z meetings. You will be informed if the schedule date changes from May 2. If you have any questions, please call, Leslie Lamont, the planner assigned to your case. Leslie will begin working in the Planning Office on April 3, 1989. Sincerely, Debbie Skehan Administrative Assistant MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineer FROM: Leslie Lamont RE: Butera Stream Margin Review DATE: March 29, 1989 Attached for your review and comments is an application for stream margin review for Lot 14 of the Callahan Subdivision. Alan believes that this is a simple review and would like to schedule it as a P&Z Consent Agenda Item in April if you would be able to make comment on the application by then. Thanks.