Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Butera.1415 Centennial Cir.82A-89 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 8/24/89 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: 2737- 181- 32- 01,82A -89 STAFF MEMBER: PROJECT NAME: Butera Stream Margin Review Project Address: 1415 Centennial Circle Legal Address: Lot 14W. Callahan Subdivision APPLICANT: T. Richard Butera Applicant Address: REPRESENTATIVE: Michael Gassman Representative Address /Phone: P. O. Box 740 Aspen. CO 81612 5 -2695 PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: $780.00 NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED: 6 TYPE OF APPLICATION: - 1 STEP: / 2 STEP: P &Z Meeting Date /O //7 /Ft PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO/ VESTED RIGHTS: YES ; N) CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES (N0/ VESTED RIGHTS: YES Ot1 ) Planning Director Approval: Paid: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REFERRALS: City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District J City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW) Aspen Water Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ) City Electric Building Inspector Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Other Aspen Consol. Energy Center S.D. DATE REFERRED: 91/27 INITIALS: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED:J /74 INITIAL: City Atty Y City Encj Zoning _ Env. Health Housing { other: � n 1 Q F. /� ,/ FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: /lit l i(0'" RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE BUTERA STREAM MARGIN REVIEW FOR LOT 14W, CALLnHAN SUBDIVISION Resolution No. 89 -fI1 WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission held a public meeting on October 3, 1989; and WHEREAS, Commission approved the consent agenda; and WHEREAS, Planning staff recommended approval of the Stream Margin Review with conditions on the consent agenda; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission that it does hereby grant approval of the Stream Margin Review for Lot 14W, Callahan Subdivision with the following conditions: 1. The elevation certificate states that 7779' will be the elevation of the lowest floor, staff believes this is a typo and the certificate shall be verified and corrected before issuance of a building permit. If 7779' is the correct number than the building shall be moved up on the site to above the base flood elevation. 2. Construction and grading activities shall also be conducted without disturbing the ditch. Before issuance of an excavation permit a barrier shall be erected to prevent debris from falling into the ditch and the river and shall be approved by the Engineering Department. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a registered engineer shall inspect the excavation and a C.O. shall not issued until the construction has been completed to his satisfaction. 4. The 100 year floodplain boundary and the high water line need to be drawn and labeled on the submitted plan. 5. Before the issuance of an excavation permit, tree removal permits are required from the Parks Department before any trees may be removed. Every effort should be made to relocate on site the trees that must be disturbed. • 6. A fisherman's easement shall be granted in the Roaring Resolution No. 89 -_ Page 2 Fork River and a width of 5 feet along the north side of the river. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on October 3, 1989. ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION By Gc S l+ a C a . JI\S N iY u tCL- . C4IN Pst�3n1 ATTEST: Jan rney, eput Ci Clerk ljl /resobuterasm MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planner aaP RE: Butera Stream Margin Review - Consent Agenda DATE: October 3, 1989 SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to construct a single family home within 100 feet of the high water line of the Roaring Fork River. Pursuant to Section 7 -504 Stream Margin Review is required. The Planning Department recommends approval with conditions. APPLICANT: T. Richard Butera, represented by Michael Gassman LOCATION: Lot 14W Callahan Subdivision, 1415 Centennial Circle, Aspen ZONING: R -15, PUD APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Stream Margin Approval for the development of a single family home within 100 feet of the high water line. REFERRAL COMMENTS: Please see the attached referral comments from the Engineering Department. STAFF COMMENTS: Pursuant to Section 7 -504 C a development is required to undergo Stream Margin Review if it is within 100 feet from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River. The applicable review standards are as follows: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off -site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development. RESPONSE: According to the site plan, the top slab of the lower floor is at elevation 7979'. The elevation certificate indicates that the base flood elevation is 7974. However, the certificate states that 7779' is the elevation, staff believes this is a typo and should be verified and /or corrected before issuance of a building permit. 2. Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: Parks /Recreation /Open Space /Trails Plan map is dedicated for public use. RESPONSE: There are no trails proposed for this site. There is a paved trail across the river that extends from Ute Avenue to the Aspen Club. 3. The recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. RESPONSE: The Roaring Fork Greenway Plan does not specifically make a recommendation regarding this parcel. However the Plan does recommend that the banks of the river be preserved as a greenway. A fisherman's easement is recommended in the river and along the banks of the river. 4. No vegetation is removed or slope grade changes made that produce erosion and sedimentation of the stream bank. RESPONSE: The application states that construction and grading activities will be no closer to the river bank than 40 feet. The riverside ditch does flow through the property and the footprint of the proposed house is within close proximity to that ditch. Construction and grading activities should also be conducted without disturbing the ditch. It is recommended that a barrier be erected to prevent debris from falling into the ditch and the river. There are some trees on site that the caliper is 6 "and over. Tree removal permits are required from the Parks Department before any trees may be removed. Every effort should be made to relocate on site the trees that must be disturbed. 5. To the greatest extent practicable, the proposed development reduces pollution and interference with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary. RESPONSE: The application states that the "development will have no effect on pollution of the river or natural changes of the river course." Again to best protect the riverside ditch and the river a barrier should be set up to prevent debris and construction materials from falling in to the ditch and river. 6. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. RESPONSE: The development does not require the alteration of the river or relocation of the watercourse. 2 7. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. RESPONSE: Not applicable. 8. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred (100) year floodplain. RESPONSE: There are no State or Federal permits required for this project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the Stream Margin Review subject to the following conditions: 1. The elevation certificate states that 7779' will be the elevation of the lowest floor, staff believes this is a typo and the certificate shall be verified and corrected before issuance of a building permit. If 7779' is the correct number than the building shall be moved up on the site to above the base flood elevation. 2. Construction and grading activities shall also be conducted without disturbing the ditch. Before issuance of an excavation permit a barrier shall be erected to prevent debris from falling into the ditch and the river and shall be approved by the Engineering Department. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a registered engineer shall inspect the excavation and a C.O. shall not issued until the construction has been completed to his satisfaction. 4. The 100 year floodplain boundary and the high water line need to be drawn and labeled on the submitted plan. 5. Before the issuance of an excavation permit, tree removal permits are required from the Parks Department before any trees may be removed. Every effort should be made to relocate on site the trees that must be disturbed. 6. A fisherman's easement shall be granted in the Roaring Fork River and a width of 5 feet along the north side of the river. The applicant has consented to all these conditions. 11 /buterasm 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department DATE: September 29, 1989 RE: Butera Stream Margin Review Having reviewed the above application and made a site visit, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. The elevation certificate indicates that the lowest floor of this proposed structure is 200 feet below the base flood elevation. This needs to be corrected on the certificate. 2. We are concerned that the extent of the excavation for this development may impact the irrigation ditch which runs along that stream bank. We recommend that a registered engineer inspect this excavation and that a C.O. not be issued until the construction has been completed to his satisfaction. 3. The 100 year floodplain boundary and the high water line need to be drawn and labeled on the submitted plan. 4. The plan needs to have a surveyor's signature and stamp. 5. We recommend that any trees larger than 6 inches in diameter removed by this development should be relocated in that area and that revegetation should take place in the excavated areas. 6. We recommend that the applicant grant a fisherman's easement in the Roaring Fork River and a width of 5 feet along the north side of the river. jg /buteral cc: Chuck Roth Bob Gish ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920 -5090 September 6, 1989 Michael Gassman P. O. Box 740 Aspen, CO 81612 RE: Butera Stream Margin Review Dear Michael, This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that your application is complete. We have scheduled your application for review by the Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, October 17, 1989 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 pm. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to your application is available at the Planning Office. If you have any questions, please call Leslie Lamont, the planner assigned to your case. Sincerely, Debbie Skehan Administrative Assistant MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineer FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planning Office RE: Butera Stream Margin Review DATE: September 6, 1989 Attached for your review and comments is an application from Michael Gassman on behalf of Richard Butera requesting stream margin review approval. Please review this material and return your comments no later than October 4th. Thank you. u� T. RICHARD BUTERA • Fss'!� /� 1450 CRYSTAL LANE ROAD _/ 1 , _ i g ,, ASPEN, COLORADO 61611 'TM November 10, 1989 •' 14 Mr. James Sneider President, Riverside Ditch 210 Midland Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Mr. Sneider, • Thank you for attending the meeting on Lot 14E, Callahan Subdivision. The understanding that we will agree to, is line the entire ditch length, from the edge of our property past the proposed home, with butalyne. This butalyne will be done in a way that the capacity of the ditch will not be diminished in any way. In addition, we will maintain the exact grade that is in line now. If there are any changes or future work that needs to be done on the ditch during the construction of the home, we agree to have that `'w"'w work done with your approval, and at our expense. It is our understanding that you will agree to shut down the flow in the ditch for approximately 10 working days, so Mr. Schlumberger can complete the lining properly. During this period of time, we will get the digging for the house done, and be able to clean everything up before the butalyne is put into place. At that time, we will deliver back to you a ditch that is in perfect working order. Thank you for your coo•eration, and we will keep in touch with you as the pro:ec • oceeds. 40101 Y, T. Richard Butera • Michael Gassman Architect Box 740 Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 925 2695 August 23, 1989 Application for Stream Margin Review Lot 14W, Callahan Subdivision 1415 Centennial Circle Aspen, Colorado Contents 1. Land Use Application Form 2. Letter of Authorization 3. Disclosure of Ownership 4. Vicinity Map 5. Response to Review Standards for Development in Stream Margin 6. Elevation Certificate 7. Site Plan of the Proposed Development ATTAC)MENr 1 IAND USE APPLICATION FOId4 1) project N ene Butera House 2) Project Location Lot 14W, Callahan Subdivision (1415 Centennial Circle) City of Aspen (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description there appropriate) 33,454 3) Present Toning R -15 4) lot size Square Feet 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # T. Richard Butera 1450 Crystal Lake Road Aspen, Colorado 81611 303 - 920 -1000 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone # Michael Gassman, Architect Box 740 Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 - 925 -2695 7) Type of Application (please Bieck all that apply): _ Conditional Use Conceptual SPA —. Conceptual Historic Dev. Final Historic Dev. Final SPA special Review — _ 8040 Greenline — Conceptual PUD — Minor Historic Dev. ■ X Stream Margin Final PUD — Historic Demolition _ Mountain i n View Plane Subdivision — Historic Designation Condaminiumizatico Text/Map Amendment — GCS Allotment Lot Split/Int Line — GMQS DO3Mptial Adjustment existing structures: 8) Description of Existing Uses (number and type of �� granted to the approximate sq. ft.; number of bedrooms; any previous app ProPertY) - Lot 14W is vacant. 9) Description of Development Application Construction of a new single family house. 10) Have you attached the following ? Minimm Submission Contents to Attachment 2, Response to Attachment 3, Specific S„ tmission Contents Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application o - T \ � EIRUM IC March 20, 1989 Michael Gassman Architects 414 N. Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Michael, This letter is to inform you that you are authorized to act as my agent in the stream review application. This application is for lot %14 at the Callahan Subdivision, which I own. I am enclosing proof of ownership, which is apparently required. 5• - 1 T. •ichard Butera • 3 3 0 E A S T M A I N S T R E E T • A S P E N , C O L O R A D O 8 1 0 1 1. 0 0 0/ 0 2 0 - 1 0 0 0 C.) Sanctity of Contract STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. 602 E. HYMAN • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • (303) 925 -3577 March 20, 1989 Pitkin County/ City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Galena St. Aspen, Co. 81611 Planning and Zoning: This letter is to certify that T. Richard Butera and Julie Anthony Butera are the owners in fee simple of the following described property: Lot 14, CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION, according to the recorded Plat thereof. County of Pitkin, State of Colorado This statement is neither an abstract, opinion nor guaranty of title and is intended specifically and exclusively l for the use of Planning and Zoning. It is understood and agreed that Stewart Title of Aspen, Inc. neither assumes nor will be charged with any financial liability whatever on any statement contained herein. If I can answer any further questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, / a-& Peter P. Delany Assistant Vice President Title Examiner K . /� �� ___ � l" ` 6 '4`y , '/ 4 7"� �UNiY (lJURT NOOSE :�� I�� N II / ',' GRY FIN-L /177_ pa ._ 1 i 1 i l / *. ( \ t-, F 1 \ �9 J j ti� rrE �` I �S Pf.N J/ GL R EFR • 1 1 \ 1 Lor \ / W W ' 6PA�EL RT9 31 / G LIAWAN �l LLI ? f3DIV15 /ON L,OCATION-1 MAP SCALE ; I "= 20001 (MPRox) Michael Gassman Architect Box 740 Aspen, Colorado 81612 303 925 2695 August 23, 1989 Butera House Lot 14W, Callahan Subdivision Stream Margin Review Response to Attachment 4 - Review Standards Standard 1 - Base Flood Elevation Response - The lowest floor of the proposed house is 5 feet above and 24 feet inland from the edge of the floodway as shown on the FEMA maps of 1987. Thus, construction of the proposed house will have no effect on the base flood elevation. An elevation certificate is attached. Standard 2 - Trail Designation Response - There are no recommended trails on the subject parcel. There is a constructed, paved, public trail directly across the river which is not shown in the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and another constructed, paved, public trail along the easterly boundary of the parcel which is also not shown in the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. It would appear that this parcel has met it's commitment to public trails. Standard 3 - Roaring Fork Greenway Plan Response - The Roaring Fork Greenway Plan makes no recommendations affecting this parcel. The area between the proposed house and the river will be preserved in it's existing state as a green area. The proposed house is 44 feet from the river. Page 2 Standard 4 - Vegetation and Slope Grading Response - Construction activities and grading will be no closer to the river bank than 40 feet. Contruction will have no effect on erosion of the bank or sedimentation of the stream bed. Standard 5 - Interference with the River Response - See Standard 4. The proposed development will have no effect on pollution of the river or natural changes of the river course. Standard 6 - Written Notice Response - See Standard 4. The proposed development does not require alteration or relocation of a watercourse. Standard 7 - Guarantee Response - See Standard 7. Standard 8 - 100 Year Floodplain Response - All construction and construction activities will be outside the 100 year floodplain. rwy NaN OMB 3067 -0077 I 2 N° ^ ^` � O j ; a FEDERAL EMER GENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY Expires: June 1984 = ,Ill % NATIONAL. FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM '`',, ELEVATION CERTIFICATE This form is to be used tor: 1) New /Emergency Program construction in Special Flood Hazard Areas; 2) Pre -FIRM construction alter September 30, 1982; '3) Post -FIRM construction; and, 4) Other buildings rated as Post -FIRM rules. • T. Richard.Butera 1450 Crystal.Lake Road Aspen,.COlorado 81611 BUILDING OWNER'S ADDRESS • NAME _Lot 14L Callahan Subdivision,. PROPERTY LOCATION (Lot and Block numbers and address it available) • • • 1415 Centennial Circle, Aspen, Colorado 81611 I certify that the information on this certificate represents my best efforts to interpret the data available. I understand that any false statement may be punishable by fine or imprisonment under 18 U.S. code, Section 1001. SECTION I ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION (Completed by Local Community Permit Official or a Registered Professional Engineer, Architect, or Surveyor) COMMUNITY NO PANEL NO. SUFFIX DALE OF FIRM FIRM ZONE DATE OF CONSTR. On S Zone. depth) BUILDING 15 (kNew /Emergency 080143 0204 C June 4, X New 7974' 0" ❑ Pre -FIRM Reg El Post -FIRM Reg 1987 YES NO II is intended that the building described above will be constructed in compliance with the community's flood plain IX ❑ ordinance The, certifier may rely on community records. The lowest floor (including basement) will be at an elevation of7779 ' 0" fl, NGVD. Failure to construct the building at this elevation may place the building in violation of the community's flood plain management ordinance. • YES NO The building described above has been constructed in compliance with the community's flood plain management U ❑ ordinance based on elevation data and visual inspection or other reasonable means. . If NO is checked, attach copy of variance issued by the community. YES NO The mobile home located at the address described above has been tied down (anchored) in compliance with the U ❑ community's flood plain management ordinance, or in compliance with the NFIP Specifications. MOBILE HOME MAKE .,, .4 "EL YR. OF MANUFACTURE SERIAL NO. DIMENSIONS ^ OF CO( x (Community Permit • Ictef Registered Pro .311' Engineer, Architect, or Surveyor) NAME Mlchae- G• \ . ADDRESS Box 740 �1 earAan TITLE Arch t •�, - ! 74TY - •en - STATE Colorado zIP 81612 J SIGNATURE • .; - „_ fie / — DATF 8/24 PHONE 303 - 925 -2695 SECTION II ELE ATIO :I�IC1 '' J% ( \ . ified by a Local Community Permit Official or a Registered Professional Engineer, . /- chitect, or Surveyor.) FIRM ZONE A1-A30: I certify that the building at the properly location described above has the lowest floor (including basement) at an elevation of feet, NGVD (mean sea level) and the average grade at the building site is at an elevation of feet, NGVD.