Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Smith 1150 River Dr.37A-87 P . CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 9/3 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: 3,y�QI? - 04-OO 378 STAFF MEMBER: C\ PROJECT NAME At 1 ' IL 1\ 1 � � A 1 �i Project Address: iii difea■` , has APPLICANT: k i a ll A id _ • Applicant Address REPRESENTATIVE: l I . _ . I iw 1� Representative Address /Phone: -- — — -- - -- -- n � 1 4�L —_ TYPE OF APPLICATION: a JI e » 0---64/A7 a R t YI PAID: S; NO AMOUNT: S 35C - 00 1 STEP APPLICATION: 1 P &Z MEETING DATE: ° g)147 - / 0\ots- 2--O PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: LILY 2 STEP APPLICATION: CC MEETING DATE: PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: REFERRALS: City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas Housing Dir. Holy Cross - State Hwy Dept(GW) Aspen Water Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ) City Electric Fire Chief Bldg:Zon /Inspect Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Roaring Fork Aspen Consol. Transit Energy Center S.D. Other FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: /1 4i' Y/ INITIAL: City Atty City / Engineer Bldg. Dept. Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: MEMORANDUM TO: Cindy Houben, Planning Office FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department DATE: October 16, 1987 RE: Third Amendment of Smith Stream Margin Review Having reviewed the above application and made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. The submitted development plan should show the floodway boundary line as depicted on the 1985 FEMA flood insurance map. This development plan should be prepared by a registered sur- veyor. 2. According to Municipal Code section 24 -6.3 (c), the floodway is defined as an area "that must be reserved" or that must not have any development. FEMA documents also indicate that no development can occur in the floodway. If the revised develop- ment plan shows that the support column of the proposed addition is in the floodway, the structural design should be changed so that this column is not in the floodway or this application cannot be approved. 3. On August 5, 1986 P &Z approved an application for Stream Margin Review for this same residence. When this site was inspected, it was observed that a berm had been placed, sub- sequent to that approval, at the north side of the addition approved by that review. Because this berm has the potential for obstructing debris in the flood waters within the 100 year flood plain, the Engineering Department recommends that it be removed. 4. If the revised development plan can show that the proposed addition is not in the floodway, the submitted elevation certifi- cate satisfactorily demonstrates that there will be no increase in the base flood elevation. 5. The submitted plans indicate there will be no removal of vegetation or grade change. 6. Construction procedure should be submitted that demonstrates there will be no increase of pollution in the river and no destruction of the river bank caused by this development. jg /smthstmr cc: Jay Hammond Chuck Roth MEMORANDUM TO: Cindy Houben, Planning Office FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department DATE: October 16, 1987 RE: Third Amendment of Smith Stream Margin Review Having reviewed the above application and made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. On August 5, 1986 P &Z approved an application for Stream Margin Review for this same residence. When this site was inspected, it was observed that a berm had been placed, sub- sequent to that approval, at the north side of the addition approved by that review. Because this berm has the potential for obstructing debris in the flood waters within the 100 year flood plain, the Engineering Department recommends that it be removed. 2. The submitted elevation certificate satisfactorily demon- strates that there will be no increase in the base flood eleva- tion. 3. The submitted plans indicate there will be no removal of vegetation or grade change. 4. Construction procedure should be submitted that demonstrates there will be no increase of pollution in the river and no destruction of the river bank caused by this development. jg /smthstmr cc: Jay Hammond Chuck Roth m,: -s C rte :w:s -1 ,w�. 1112/J7 a= of Aspen :ngineuring Jept. ±3 CilOnl it s concern: I Isl. '',, r'oinc the v.orh on to Kathy jimith residence ,t wQ rve2Rd. ,e:«i throe - ll wwynst: poll- m, e « Stwe:w the w .term w& - ,ili not a ac out o e :Smith iu t \ \ 0 no x es \ e t 1 :; - ° a �©° to the Getj. y\ut < a yw �.« hu , , : : e�� \� _: 2?\a����d' property \o 31yate the now wdGym There lz al:eu a deck in the spot ere the new WdGwa« ,-: 'chill caremoved. a�� 41( « Pu?: MEMORANDUM TO: City Attorney City Engineer FROM: Cindy Houben, Planning Office RE: Smith Stream Margin Review DATE: October 9, 1987 Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Michael Gassman, on behalf of his client, Kathleen Smith, requesting Stream Margin Review to enclose an existing second floor deck. The addition would be 169 sq. ft. added to an already current build -out of 4,647 sq. ft. The property is Lot 15, Black Birch Estates, located at 1150 River Drive and is zoned R -15. This item has been scheduled for presentation before P &Z on October 20. Cindy will be contacting you personally for your comments. Due to the simpleness of this application we would appreciate your prompt attention on this. Thank you. ASPEN /PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 925 -2020 \\ r Date: 0 RE: _6L S t..A I4A.PC ... Dear This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that your application IS NOT complete. Additional items required include: Disclosure of Ownership (one copy only needed) Adjacent Property Owners List /Envelopes /Postage (one copy) Additional copies of entire application Authorization by owner for representative to submit applica- tion Response to list of items (attached /below) demonstrating compliance with the applicable policies and regulations of the Code, or other specific materials A check in the amount of $ A. Your application is complete and we have scheduled it for review by the �° - on 'O Ld ' " O We will call you if we need any additional information prior to that date. Several days prior to your hearing, we will call and make available a copy of the memorandum. Please note that it IS NOT your responsibility to post your property with a sign, which we can provide you for a $3.00 fee. B. Your application is incomplete, we have not scheduled it review at this time. When we receive the materials we have requested, we will place you on the next available agenda. If you have any questions, please call the planner assigned to your case. Sincerely, ASPEN /PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE A A G E N D A I Or ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION October 20, 1987 - Tuesday 5:00 P.M. City Council Chambers 1st Floor City Hall REGULAR MEETING I. COMMENTS Commissioners Planning Staff II. MINUTES September 29, 1987 III. NEW BUSINESS A. Goodman Stream Margin Review B. Smith Stream Margin Review IV. PUBLIC HEARING A. Municipal Code Amendment: Church and Day Care Center as Conditional Uses in Office Zone District B. Residential Zone District Regulations V. ADJOURN MEETING A.COV + r MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and zoning Commission FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Goodman Stream Margin Review /PUD Amendment DATE: October 20, 1987 LOCATION: Unit D4, Aspen Club Condominiums, 1433 Crystal Lake Road, Callahan Subdivision /PUD. ZONING: R- 15(PUD) APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Charles Goodman, owner of the subject condominium unit, requests stream margin review and subdivision exception for a plat amendment in order to enclose an area of approximately 150 square feet below an existing deck. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: A. Referral Comments: Engineering Department: Jim Gibbard requested in a memorandum dated October 8, 1987 that the appli- cant (1) show the existing trees and shrubs on the site plan, (2) describe the construction procedure, and (3) prepare an amended plat showing proposed changes to the Third Amended Plat and Development Plan of Callahan Subdivision. B. Planning Office Comments: Section 24- 6.3(e) of the Municipal Code establishes review criteria for stream margin review. The plat amendment is subject to the Planned Unit Development amendment procedures in Section 24 -8.26 of the Municipal Code. Each review criteria is listed below and used to evaluate the application. 1. Criteria: No development shall occur within a special flood hazard area unless it can be demonstrated that there will be no increase in base flood elevation as a result of the development, as shown by an elevation certificate prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado." Response: The proposed expansion does not occur within the special flood hazard area, as shown on the site plan and con- firmed by the Engineering Department. 2. Criteria: In the event there is a trail designated by an approved trail plan within the development site, such trail shall be dedicated for public use. Response: An existing bicycle trail is 10 feet away from the expansion. The development will not interfere with this trail. 3. Criteria: All attempts should be made to implement the recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan prepared by the Roaring Fork Greenway Committee. Response: The concerns and recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan to protect the natural environment of flood plains and adjacent areas should not be affected by the proposed expansion. No trees are located within the building footprints, and none should need to be removed in order to construct the addition. We recommend that on the amended plat the young grove of aspens south of Building D be shown and a note be placed stating "existing trees to be protected and saved." This vegetation is also shown on the approved PUD Plan. 4. Criteria: Vegetation shall not be removed nor any slope grad changes made that may produce erosion of the stream bank. Response: No vegetation along the stream bank will be removed as part of this project. 5. Criteria: All efforts shall be made to reduce pollution and interference with the natural changes of the river, stream or other water course, and to enhance the value thereof as an important natural feature. Response: No interference with the course of the river will result from this project. 6. Criteria: Written notice shall be given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of the a water course, and a copy of said notice shall be submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency." Response: The water course is unaffected by the proposed develop- ment. 7. Criteria: In the event a water course shall be altered or relocated, the applicant and applicant's heirs, successors and assigns shall provide maintenance to assure that the flood carrying capacity is not diminished. Response: This criteria does not apply. 8. Criteria: Copies shall be submitted of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred year floodplain. Response: No work is within the one hundred year floodplain; 2 • therefore, this criteria does not apply. 9. Criteria: Changes to PUD plats shall be made only if they are shown to be required by changes in conditions that have occurred since the final plan was approved or by changes in community policy. Any changes approved in the final plan shall be recorded as amendments to the final plan in accordance with the proce- dures established for the filing of the initial approved plan documents. Response: This review has been requested by the applicant in order to create a minor increase in square footage for his unit. There appears to be no negative effect on the PUD plan as long as nearby vegetation is not disturbed. The amended plat should be amended according to the standards of Section 20 -15 of the Municipal Code and following the comments of the Engineering Department. Additionally, the applicant is encouraged to amend the condominium plat reflecting changes through this stream margin review and the Farvor Stream Margin Review recently approved. If the applicant wishes to amend the condominium plat, he should request this at your meeting. PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of the Goodman Stream Margin Review and recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend to City Council approval of the subdivision exception request for a PUD plat amendment (and condominium plat amendment) subject to the following conditions: 1. Excavation and construction techniques shall be specified in the Building Permit application to ensure to the satisfaction of the Building Department that no excavation material will be deposited in the River and no unnecessary disturbance of the hillside or nearby vegetation will be caused by the project. 2. An amended PUD plat shall be submitted prior to issuance of a Building Permit according to the standards of Section 20 -15 of the Municipal Code, following the comments of the Engineering Department, and containing a note regarding the existing grove of aspens stating "Existing trees to be protected and saved." sb.goodman 3 . <, MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Burstein, Planning Office FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department DATE: October 8, 1987 RE: Goodman Stream Margin Review /PUD Amendment Having reviewed the above application and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. The submitted site plan should include existing trees and shrubs. 2. The submitted application should include construction pro- cedure to be used. 3. This development is not within the boundaries of the 100 year flood plain and therefore review criteria which pertains specifi- cally to development within the special flood hazard area does not apply. 4. The applicant should submit to the Engineering Department an + amended plat and development plan which shows any proposed changes to the Third Amended Plat and Development Plan of Callahan Subdivision. jg /gdmnstmr cc: Jay Hammond Chuck Roth • • architecture suthend, fallin, inc. &planning i I :. I II i,'j SE' d September 3, 1987 I� 1280 ute avenue aspen 81611 Mr. Glen Horn colorado Aspen Planning and Zoning Department 303/925 - 4252 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado RE: Goodman Bedroom Expansion Aspen Club Condominiums 1433 Crystal Lake Road • Dear Glen: We are requesting a Stream Margin Review for the above unit located in the Aspen Club. The proposed expansion is below an existing deck, therefore, its effects will be minimal. The floor level of the expansion is not in the flood plain and it is 15.44 feet above the 100 year flood plain high water line. As shown on the site plan, the expansion is 65' horizontally from the flood plain. The lower floor elevation is 7996.69 and the 100 year high water line is elevation 7981.25 at a right angle from the river to the expansion. Recently the Farver deck expansion at 1425 Crystal Lake Road was approved. This project ig similar and meets the review criteria as stated for that project. Also enclosed is a check for $270.00 which is the review fee Steve Burstein suggested for this submission. Sincerely, , " Bruce R. Sutherland, AIA enc BRS:Ib D el W.F eq awu .r.r. M - -' _ c. _- �Y ' tiaa S V _ _ wW OC.oau��MO4 " _ � ...,. gx�dt- '1^^Ol ref h'z:Sr pusPG4Jns - u r .uor OA .. 4 ou O Ol '' - v' Ir o • 1 \ • \ N .. I _ / ) \ LL / tt _ _ r� li g l ,.\ y 1 Z. N- .. / 13 e9 I \ \ 1) 7 ) P i I \ I ,� 1 Or / / 0 \ - IL___i 1 , 00 7 / : i I / / \ \ d.. sesme t(a. •. ... fin Mal [ 41/4b �C2 ` {va iSv' no r /OMCOm Un"e; _ = pue��ayi ns b cam. sums ai ,a o S F I a4 11 x� w 9 I Y � I �� F C� o / C '''' , /s k f 11 III/-C M p * / ' v .- il, ,, , � � � � : , -� 3� . ' Y 1 11 Li U It I LI 1 N VS� 1 liF KK s t id � '. 'AI v it e a[gerot �w�ea rose noet. a` tcP �x' - '%`nz" -Y -'a - cr. Doletotlq�uju�ret •1•o : h '1 M0 _. Cr ' "�O I�5C'?v puepatims a �� co —. _v..- - n 1 k' I <I > ll 1, I. r L� in I 3 G o \ I, II II 0 L_4L I r II {{ 9 f i— j i r I . i 1 41 il 94;fr MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Cindy Houben, Planning Office RE: Smith Stream Margin Review Date: October 19, 1987 APPLICANT: Kathleen Smith REQUEST: Approval of a stream margin review to enclose and expand a second floor deck. The request is to extend the deck area toward the river and to enclose and expand the square footage by 169 square feet. LOCATION: Lot 15 of the Black Birch Estates along the Roaring Fork River off of Cemetery Lane. PROBLEM &9US9N: 1 A. Refer Comm is • s, ' 1. 4e 1 Engineering: In summary, the Engineering Dept. is concerned about a previous stream margin review on the property for the elevated swimming pool area. This structure was purposely elevated in order to allow flooding waters to flow through the property with no damage to the new structure, existing structures 1°(g6 or down stream properties. Since the approval for the swimming Gi r r i 4bO pool structure was granted and then built, the area around the outside of the structure has been bermed and built up with rocks t �l tort, and other landscaping. This berming and landscaping unfortunate - ,,Vrirp j ly will not allow the flow of water to pass under the structure f ,which was the intention of elevating the structure to begin with. (Thus a suggested condition of approval is to remove the berming surrounding the elevated pool structure. The berming should be removed regardless of the outcome of this request. B. Planning Office Comments: Section 24- 6.3(e) of the Municipal 1 Code establishes review criteria for stream margin review as follows: Review Criteria. In reviewing the plan for proposed development, the planning and zoning commission shall consider the following guidelines and standards, and impose the following conditions for permit approval: (1) No development shall occur within a special flood hazard area unless it can be demonstrated that there will be no increase in base flood elevation certificate prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado. RESPONSE: The proposal is for an enclosed second floor deck which would have minimum impacts in the flood hazard area. The impacts would be caused by three posts which would support the existing deck on the site. These posts would be replaced with three new posts. (2) In the event there is a trail designated by an approved trail plan within the development site, such trail shall be dedicated for public use. RESPONSE: There are no trails or proposed trail alignments on this property. (3) All attempts should be made to implement the recommen- dations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan prepared by the Roaring Fork Greenway Committee. RESPONSE: The concerns and recommendations of the Roaring Ford Greenway Plan to protect the natural environment of flood plains and adjacent areas should not be affected by the proposed expansion. No trees or other vegetation will be removed in order to construct the project. (4) Vegetation shall not be removed nor any slope grade changes made that may produce erosion of the stream bank. RESPONSE: No trees or vegetation will be removed by this project if all recommendations of the Engineering Department are followed. (5) All efforts shall be made to reduce pollution and interference with the natural changes of the river, stream or other water course, and to enhance the value thereof as an important natural feature. RESPONSE: The applicants have committed to keeping the project outside of the floodway. Therefore, there will be no interference with the course of the River. (6) Written notice shall be given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or reloca- tion of the water course, and a copy of said notice shall be submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. RESPONSE: This criteria does not apply. (7) In the event a water course shall be altered or relocated, the applicant and applicant's heirs, successors and assigns shall provide maintenance to assure that the flood carrying capacity is not dimin- ished. RESPONSE: This criteria does not apply. (8) Copies shall be submitted of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred year floodplain. RESPONSE: All necessary permits shall be submitted and will be a condition of approval. SUMMARY: The increase in square footage is allowable under the FAR regulations for the R -15 Zone District. In general, the project is of an insignificant nature. PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends approval of the Smith Stream Margin Review with the following conditions: (1) On August 5, 1986 P &Z approved an application for Stream Margin Review for this same residence. When this site was inspected, it was observed that a berm had been placed, subsequent to that observed that a berm had been placed, subsequent that approval, at the north side of the addition approved by that review. Because this berm has the potential for obstructing debris in the flood waters within the 100 year flood plain; this berm shall be removed prior to receiving a building permit for the deck. 'Vert r (2) Construction procedure shall be submitted that demons - p - c trates there will be no increase of pollution in the river and no destruction of the river bank caused by this development. (3) Copies of all necessary Federal and State permits shall be submitted to the Planning Office prior to issuance of a building permit. Stream.margin MEMORANDUM TO: Cindy Houben, Planning Office FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department', DATE: October 16, 1987 RE: Third Amendment of Smith Stream Margin Review Having reviewed the above application and made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. On August 5, 1986 P &Z approved an application for Stream Margin Review for this same residence. When this site was inspected, it was observed that a berm had been placed, sub- sequent to that approval, at the north side of the addition approved by that review. Because this berm has the potential for obstructing debris in the flood waters within the 100 year flood plain, the Engineering Department recommends that it be removed. 2. The submitted elevation certificate satisfactorily demon- strates that there will be no increase in the base flood eleva- tion. 3. The submitted plans indicate there will be no removal of vegetation or grade change. 4. Construction procedure should be submitted that demonstrates there will be no increase of pollution in the river and no destruction of the river bank caused by this development. jg /smthstmr cc: Jay Hammond Chuck Roth MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Alan Richman, Planning and Development Director RE: Revisions to Residential Zone District Requirements DATE: October 14, 1987 INTRODUCTION: On October 6, you held a public hearing to review a series of staff recommendations for amendments to our resid- ential zone district requirements. These amendments were based on the direction given to staff by the Aspen City Council, and reflected significant research by staff into the type of develop- ment we are experiencing in our neighborhoods this year. There was a mixed reaction at the hearing to the staff recommend- ation. At the conclusion of the meeting, you gave staff direction to make a number of revisions to our approach, and to return at a continued public hearing on October 20. FORMAT: The current staff recommendation is contained as Exhibit 1 to this memo. You will recognize that the exhibit is in the form of a resolution, but it does not contain either the whereas clauses or signature blocks of a resolution. The reasons for placing the recommendation in this form are as follows: 1. At the last meeting, there was confusion about the specifics of our recommendation because some of our ideas were not in the form of code language (for example, the confusion about setbacks for principal versus accessory structures). We hope to avoid such confusion by providing you specific language for each recommendation in the attached exhibit. 2. By placing our recommendation in distinct sections, it will be easy for you to tell us exactly what you support, what you want deleted and what you want revised. 3. On October 12, the Council imposed an administrative delay on building permit activity in the R -6 zone, effective through 12/31/87, subject to formal adoption of an Ordinance to this effect after public hearing on October 26. For us to complete our work by the end of 1987, you must adopt a resolution on October 27, so that we can have first reading of an Ordinance on November 9. Putting the recommendation in this form will help us to move along toward our deadline. You will recognize that we have not yet addressed all of the issues raised by P &Z at the last meeting. Specifically, we have not yet developed a recommendation for volume control. Since our (- . last meeting we have made contact with several architects, but due to conflicting schedules, have yet to set a meeting time. We have also contacted the Planning Advisory Service, which is a research an of our national planning organization, and await information from other communities which have adopted volume controls. We will continue to work on the volume approach and will report to you as we make progress on it, but expect it will be several weeks before we have anything definite in this regard. Because we are still uncertain about the feasibility of adopting a volume approach and because of the urgency placed on this matter by Council, we are recommending adoption of interim changes to the FAR provisions, along with increasing setbacks and adoption of site coverage requirements. Obviously, if the volume approach proves feasible, we will return at a later date with proposals to supercede the FAR approach. However, because volume is a new technique which may prove to be cumbersome or unwork- able, we believe it is imperative to move forward with Council's direction to address FAR provisions. RECOMMENDED APPROACH: In most respects, our recommendation follows precisely the direction given to us by P &Z. Some of the most important changes we have made are as follows: 1. There are no FAR reductions proposed for single family lots of less than 6,000 sq. ft. The recommended FAR reductions are only for single family lots in excess of 6,000 sq. ft., and for duplex lots. Exhibits 3A and 3B (attached) demonstrate that the proposed curves are generally consistent with the 1981/82 Planning Office recommendation. The new FAR provisions are only i recommended to affect the R -6 and RMF zones, and leave the current FAR for the R -15, R -15A, R -15B and R -30 zones intact. 2. In the R -6 zone only, we are recommending variable front yard /rear yard setbacks and variable side yard setbacks. Variable setbacks mean that we set a total size for the front plus the rear yard setback (30 feet) and a minimum size for each of the front and rear yards (10 feet). Similarly, we set a total size for both side yard setbacks (25 feet for a 6,000 sq. ft. lot) and a minimum size for each side (5 feet for a 6,000 sq. ft. lot). This approach will give greater flexibility for house placement, creating usable yards and also incorporates the concept of the sliding scale for setbacks, as requested. 3. The size of the setbacks is recommended to be increased from current code provisions, but to a slightly lesser degree than we previously recommended. In the R -15, R -15A and R -30 zones, the only recommended setback change is to increase the side yard from 5 to 15 feet, while in the RMF zone the only recommended setback change is to increase the side yard from 5 to 10 feet, with no provision for variable setbacks. 4. The site coverage recommendation has been liberalized, to allow the maximum FAR to be built within two stories. Site coverage is only recommended to apply in the R -6 zone. 5. Exhibits 2A through 2D depict how the proposed setbacks and site coverage requirements could be complied with on lots of 3,000, 6,000, 9,000 and 12,000 sq. ft. Because of the variable nature of the proposed limitations, these should be viewed as illustrative, and not actual design constraints. 6. The FAR calculation methodology has been revised to allow overhangs of 3 feet, not 18" to be eligible for exclusion, and to allow covered porches, with no limit on the width of their cover, provided that all such unenclosed areas do not exceed 15% of the maximum FAR allowed on the site. 7. The volume approach to FAR calculation which we proposed at the last meeting has been drafted, but is written as a continuous scale, where for each foot over 10 feet in height of an interior space, the degree to which it counts increases by 0.05 sq. ft., to a maximum of 2.0:1 for a 30 foot high interior space. 8. We have revised the provision in the damage /destruction section of the proposed nonconformities regulation to differ- entiate between "willful destruction" versus "acts of God or nonwillful destruction ". I spoke to our Code consultant, a loan officer at the bank and a real estate appraiser and all agreed that with such a provision in effect, properties would definitely continue to be loanable. PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that you review our proposal, make any additions, deletions or changes you feel are appropriate, and direct us to return on October 27 with a resolution for your action on this matter. farrec EXHIBIT 1 Section 1 That in the R -6 zone district, the minimum front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, as established in Section 24 -3.4 of the Municipal Code, be repealed and be re- enacted to read as follows: 4. Minimum front and rear yard: For principal buildings, the front and rear yard shall total no less than thirty (30) feet, and the front yard and rear yard shall each be a minimum of ten (10) feet. For accessory build- ings, the front yard shall be a minimum of fifteen (15) feet, and the rear yard shall be a minimum of five (5) feet. 5. Minimum side yard: Minimum Size for Total of both Lot Size each side yard side yards (s.f.) (ft.) (ft.) 0 -3000 5 10 3001 -4500 5 20 4501 -6000 5 25 6001 -9000 10 35 9001+ 15 45 6. Maximum site coverage: Lot Size (s.f.) Site Coverage ( %) 0 -3000 40% 3001 -4500 35% 4501 -6000 30% 6001 -9000 22.5% 9001+ 20% Section 2 That in the R -6 zone district, the external floor area ratio, as established in Section 24 -3.4 of the Municipal Code, be repealed and re- enacted to read as follows: Iat Size Single -family Allocable Dwellings (Sa.Ft.) Sq.Ft. 0- 3,000 80 sq.ft. of floor area for each 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 2,400 sq.ft. of floor area. 3,001- 6,000 2,400 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 28 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 3,240 sq.ft. of floor area. 6,001- 9,000 3,240 sq. ft. of floor area, plus 14 sq. ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq. ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 3,660 sq. ft. of floor area. 9,001 - 15,000 3,660 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 6 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 4,020 sq. ft. of floor area. 15,001 - 50,000 4,020 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 5 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft in lot area, up to a maximum of 5,770 sq.ft. of floor area. 50,000+ 5,770 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 2 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area. rot Size Allowable Duplex (Sp. Ft.) Sp. Ft. 0- 3,000 90 sq.ft. of floor area for each 1 0 0 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 2,700 sq.ft. of floor area. 3,001- 6,000 2,700 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 30 sq.ft. of floor area for each.additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 3,600 sq.ft. of floor area. 6,001- 9,000 3,600 sq. ft. of floor area, plus 16 sq. ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq. ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 4,080 sq. ft. of floor area. 9,001 - 15,000 4,080 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 6 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 4,440 sq.ft. of floor area. 15,001- 50,000 4,440 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 5 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft in lot area, up to a maximum of 6,190 sq.ft. of floor area. 50,000+ 6,190 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 3 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area. 2 swIN Section 3 That in the R -15, R -15A and R -30 zone districts, the minimum side yard setback, as established in Section 24 -3.4 of the Municipal Code, be repealed and re- enacted to read as follows: Minimum side yard (ft.): 15 Section 4 That in the R -15, R -15A, R -30 and R -40 zone districts, the external floor area ratio, as established in Section 24 -3.4 of the Municipal Code, be repealed and re- enacted to read as follows: Lot Size Detached Residential Allowable 1Y ellizns (Sq.Ft.) Sc.Ft. 0- 3,000 80 sq.ft. of floor area for each 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 2,400 sq.ft. of floor area. 3,001- 9,000 2,400 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 28 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximinn of 4,080 sq.ft. of floor area. 9,001 - 15,000 4,080 sq.ft. of floor area plus 7 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 4,500 sq. ft. of floor area. 15,001 - 50,000 4,500 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 6 sq.ft. of floor area for each arirditional 100 sq.ft in lot area, up to a maximum of 6,600 sq.ft. of floor area. 50,000+ 6,600 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 2 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area. tot Size Allowable Duplex (Sq.Ft.) Sq .Ft. 0- 3,000 90 sq.ft. of floor area for each 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maxi num of 2,700 sq.ft. of floor area. 3,001- 9,000 2,700 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 30 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 3 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 4,500 sq.ft. of floor area. 9,001 - 15,000 4,500 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 7 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 4,920 sq.ft. of floor area. 15,001- 50,000 4,920 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 6 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft in lot area, up to a maxinimm of 7,020 sq.ft. of floor area. 50,000+ 7,020 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 3 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area. Section 5 That in the RMF zone district, the minimum side yard setback, as established in Section 24 -3.4 of the Municipal Code, be repealed and re- enacted to read as follows: Minimum side yard (ft.): 10 Section 6 That in the RMF zone district, the external floor area ratio, as established in Section 24 -3.4 of the Municipal code, be repealed and re- enacted to read as follows: lot Size Single- family Allowable Dwellings (Sq.Ft.) Sa.Ft. 0- 3,000 80 sq.ft. of floor area for each 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 2,400 sq.ft. of floor area. 3,001- 6,000 2,400 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 28 sq. ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 3,240 sq.ft. of floor area. 6,001- 9,000 3,240 sq. ft. of floor area, plus 14 sq. ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq. ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 3,660 sq. ft. of floor area. 9,001 - 15,000 3,660 sq.ft. of floor area plus 6 sq.ft. 4 of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum mt of 4,020 sq. ft. of floor area. 15,001 - 50,000 4,020 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 5 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft in lot area, up to a maximum of 5,770 sq.ft. of floor area. 50,000+ 5,770 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 2 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area. Lot Size Allowable Duplex (S4. Ft. ) Sp. Ft. 0- 3,000 90 sq.ft. of floor area for each 1 0 0 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 2,700 sq.ft. of floor area. 3,001- 6,000 2,700 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 30 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 3,600 sq.ft. of floor area. 6,001- 9,000 3,600 sq. ft. of floor area, plus 16 sq. ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq. ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 4,080 sq. ft. of floor area. 9,001 - 15,000 4,080 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 6 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area, up to a maximum of 4,440 sq.ft. of floor area. 15,001 - 50,000 4,440 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 5 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft in lot area, up to a maximum of 6,190 sq.ft. of floor area. 50,000+ 6,190 sq.ft. of floor area, plus 3 sq.ft. of floor area for each additional 100 sq.ft. in lot area. Multi- Family: 1:1 0 5 Section 7 That Section 24- 3.7(e) of the Municipal Code be repealed and re- enacted to read as follows: FLOOR AREA means the sum of the gross horizontal areas of each story of the building measured from the exterior walls, or from the center line of the party walls, including the floor area of accessory uses and of accessory buildings and structures. In measuring floor areas for floor area ratio and allowable floor area, the following applies: (1) General. In measuring floor area for the purposes of calculating floor area ratio and allowable floor area, there shall be included that floor area within the sur- rounding exterior walls (measured from their exterior surface) of a building, or portion thereof. (2) Decks, balconies and stairways. The calculation of floor area of a building, or a portion thereof, shall exclude above -grade decks, porches, stairways, balcon- ies and similar features when the area of such features is: (a) Not surrounded by exterior walls or enclosed, provided the area may be covered by a projection from the building which is less than or equal to three (3) feet, and further provided that a porch may be covered by a roof or projection from the building of unlimited size; and (b) Less than or equal to fifteen percent (15 %) of the maximum allowable floor area of the building. All area included in an above -grade deck, porch, stairway, balcony or similar feature which does not meet either of the above conditions shall be included as part of the floor area calculation. (3) Garages and carports. For the purpose of calculating floor area ratio and allowable floor area for a building or portion thereof whose principal use is residential, garages and carports shall be excluded up to a maximum area of four hundred (400) square feet per dwelling unit; all garage or carport space in excess of four hundred (400) square feet per dwelling unit shall be included as part of the residential floor area calculation. For any dwelling unit which can be accessed from an alley or from a private road entering at the rear of the dwelling unit, the garage shall only be excluded from floor area calculations if it is 6 located on the alley or at the rear of the unit. (4) Subgrade areas. The area of any story which is one hundred (100 %) percent subgrade, as measured from natural grade, shall be excluded from floor area calculations. For any story which is partly above and partly below natural grade, a calculation of the total volume of the story which is above and which is below grade shall be made, for the purposes of establishing the percentage of the area of the story which shall be included in floor area calculations. This calculation shall be made by determining the total percentage of the wall area of the story which is above natural grade which shall be multiplied by the total floor area of the subject story, and the resulting total shall be that area which is included in the floor area calcula- tion. (5) Volume. For the purpose of calculating floor area ratio and allowable floor area for a building or portion thereof whose principal use is residential, a determin- ation shall be made as to those areas within the building which are less than ten (10) feet in height and those which exceed ten (10) feet in height, as measured from floor to ceiling. Those areas which are ten (10) feet or less from floor to ceiling shall count toward allowable floor area at the ratio of one (1) square foot for each one (1) square foot of floor area. For those areas which exceed ten (10) feet from floor to ceiling, the ratio at which they shall count shall increase by five one - hundredths (0.05) of a square foot for each one (1) foot increase in height, to a maximum ratio of two (2) square feet for each one (1) square foot of floor area. (6) Planned Unit Development. For residential Planned Unit Development applications, the allowable floor area shall be calculated by determining the square footage of the entire land ownership, reduced according to the provisions of Section 7- 903(B)(2)(b). The reduced square footage or land shall then be divided by the total number of dwelling units existing and proposed for development to determine the land area for each lot in the Planned Unit Development (PUD), which shall be the area used to determine the amount of floor area attributable to each lot in the Planned Unit Develop- ment (PUD). The total floor area allowed for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) shall be the cumulative total of the floor areas for each of the lots in the Planned Unit Development (PUD). 7 Section 8 That Article XIII of Chapter 24 of the Municipal code be repealed and re- enacted to read as follows: ARTICLE XIII - NON - CONFORMITIES Sec. 24 -13.1. Purpose. Within the Zone Districts established by this chapter, there exist uses of land, buildings and structures that were lawfully established before this chapter was adopted or amended which would be in violation of the terms and requirements of this chapter. The purpose of this article is to regulate and limit the continued existence of these uses, buildings, and structures that do not conform to the provisions of this chapter or any amendments thereto. It is the intent of this article to permit these nonconfor- mities to continue, but not to encourage their survival. It is further the intent of this article that nonconformities should not be enlarged or expanded. The provisions of this article are designed to curtail substantial investment in nonconformities and to bring about their eventual elimination in order to preserve the integrity of the Zone Districts and the other provisions of this chapter. Sec. 24 -13.2. Nonconforming uses. A. Authority to continue. Nonconforming uses of land or structures may continue in accordance with the provi- sions of this article and this section. B. Normal repair and maintenance. Normal maintenance and repair to permit continuation of nonconforming uses may be performed in any period of twelve (12) consecu- tive months, to an extent not exceeding ten (10 %) percent of the current replacement cost of the struc- ture. C. Extensions. Nonconforming uses shall not be extended. This prohibition shall be construed so as to prevent: 1. Enlargement of nonconforming uses by additions to the area of the structure in which such noncon- forming uses are located; or 2. Occupancy of additional lands. D. Relocation. A structure housing a nonconforming use may not be moved either to another location on or off 8 the parcel of land on which it is located, unless the use thereafter shall conform to the limitations of the Zone District into which it is moved. E. Change in use. A nonconforming use shall not be changed to any other use unless the new use conforms to the provisions of the Zone District in which it is located. F. Termination. 1. Abandonment or discontinuance. The intent of the owner notwithstanding, where a nonconforming use of land or structure is discontinued or abandoned for twelve (12) consecutive months, then such use may not be re- established or resumed, and any subsequent use must conform to the provisions of this chapter. 2. Damage or destruction. Any structure housing a nonconforming use which is damaged or destroyed to the extent of less than fifty (50 %) percent of the fair market value of said structure or which is damaged or destroyed to any extent by an act of God or through any manner not willfully accomp- lished by the owner may be restored as of right if a building permit for reconstruction shall be issued within twelve (12) months of the date of damage. Any structure housing a non - conforming use which is willfully damaged or destroyed to the extent of more than fifty (50 %) percent of the fair market value of said structure shall only be restored in conformance with the provisions of this chapter. Sec. 24 -13.3. Nonconforming structures. A. Authority to continue. A nonconforming structure devoted to a use permitted in the Zone District in which it is located may be continued in accordance with the provisions of this article. B. Normal repair and maintenance. Normal maintenance and repair of nonconforming structures may be performed in any period of twelve (12) consecutive months without limit on the cost of the maintenance and repair. C. Extensions. 1. General. A nonconforming structure shall not be extended by an enlargement or expansion that increases the nonconformity. A nonconforming structure may be extended or altered in a manner that does not change or that decreases the nonconformity. 9 2. Historic Landmark. The only exception to this requirement shall be for a structure designated as an Historic Landmark pursuant to Art. 7, Div. 7 which is nonconforming as to allowable floor area and is used as a detached residential or duplex dwelling unit. Such structures may be extended as long as the enlargement does not increase the floor area of the existing structure by more than five hundred (500') square feet, and the enlarge- ment complies with all other requirements of this chapter. D. Relocation. A nonconforming structure shall not be moved unless it thereafter conforms to the standards and requirements of the Zone District in which it is located. E. Termination. 1. Abandonment. Where a nonconforming structure is abandoned for twelve (12) consecutive months, then such structure shall be removed or converted to a conforming structure. 2. Damage or destruction. a. General. Any part of a nonconforming structure which is damaged or destroyed to the extent of less than fifty (50 %) percent of the fair market value of said structure or which is damaged or destroyed to any extent by an act of God or through any manner not willfully accomplished by the owner may be restored as of right if a building permit for reconstruction shall be issued within twelve (12) months of the date of the damage. Any part of a non - conforming structure which is willfully damaged or destroyed to the extent of more than fifty (50 %) percent of the fair market value of said structure shall only be restored in conformance with the provisions of this chapter. b. Structure in stream margin. Any part of a nonconforming structure which is in the stream margin as established pursuant to Sec. 7 -504, which is damaged or destroyed to the extent of less than fifty (50 %) percent of the fair market value of the structure, may be restored as of right if the structure can be rebuilt in the original footprint, consistent with the provisions of Art. 7, Div. 5. 10 c. Unsafe structure. Any portion of a noncon- forming structure which becomes physically unsafe or unlawful due to lack of repairs and maintenance, and which is declared unsafe or unlawful by a duly authorized City official, shall only be restored, repaired or rebuilt in conformity with the provisions of this chapter. Sec. 24 -13.4. Nonconforming accessory uses and accessory structures. No nonconforming accessory use or accessory structure shall continue after the principal structure or use shall have ter- minated unless such structure or use thereafter shall conform to the provisions of the Zone District in which it is located. Sec. 24 -13.5. Lodge and hotel preservation. All lodge and hotel uses and structures that are lawfully established at the time of adoption of this chapter or an amendment which would be considered to make the lodge or hotel a nonconforming use or structure under this chapter are hereby declared to be conforming and not subject to the provisions of this article as long as the following standards and requirements are met. A. Reconstruction or renovation. All reconstruction of a structure shall meet the dimensional requirements of the underlying Zone District. Renovation shall not increase the nonconformity of the structure. Renova- tion is the investment of up to fifty (50 %) percent of the appraised value of the structure, net of land value. Reconstruction is the investment of fifty (50 %) percent or more of the value of the structure, net of land. B. Increase in units or size. There shall be no increase in the number of units in the lodge or hotel, or the total square footage in the lodge or hotel, unless the enlargement is for the purpose of constructing deed restricted employee housing units accessory to the principal use. C. Construction of employee housing. The enlargement of the lodge or hotel for the purpose of constructing employee housing shall be reviewed and considered as a Development Application for a conditional use pursuant to Art. 7, Div. 3. In determining whether to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the application, 11 the Commission shall ensure the following standards and requirements are met. 1. There is no increase in lodge or hotel units; 2. The proposed employee housing units are in compliance with the adopted housing plan, and specifically the need for seasonal employee rooms; 3. There is a maximization of construction quality and unit size in the proposed employee housing units; 4. There are adequate public facilities to serve the proposed development, and off - street parking is provided pursuant to Art. 5, Div. 3. 5. The proposed employee housing is compatible with surrounding land uses and the dimensional require- ments of the underlying Zone District. 6. The proposed employee housing is deed restricted to the employee rental guidelines, and against commercial rental or sale. In the event the lodge is condominiumized, the deed restricted units must be retained as a portion of the common elements of the lodge or hotel. 7. The proposed employee housing receives health, safety and fire inspection and commitments are made to comply with the results of said inspec- tion. 8. The deed restricted employee housing units are limited in their rental solely to employees of the lodge or hotel, and shall not be rented to other employees of the City nor rented on the open market. 9. The expansion may be in rental rooms, provided an equal amount of existing square footage of space is converted from rental rooms to deed restricted employee housing units. D. Abandonment. The intent of the owner notwithstanding, when a lodge or hotel subject to this section is discontinued or abandoned for twelve (12) consecutive months, then the use may not be re- established or the structure occupied, without conforming to the standards and requirements of the underlying Zone District. 12 .-, •■ E. Damage or destruction. If a lodge or hotel subject to this section is damaged or destroyed by any means and is not repaired or replaced within two (2) years from the date of damage or destruction, it shall be recon- structed pursuant to the standards and requirements of this chapter. Sec. 24 -13.6. Nonconforming lots of record. A. General. A detached single family dwelling and customary accessory buildings may be developed on a lot of record if: 1. The lot of record is in separate ownership and not contiguous to lots in the same ownership; and 2. The proposed single family dwelling can be located on the lot so that the yard, height, open space and floor area dimensional requirements of the Zone District can be met, or a variance is obtained to vary from said dimensional require- ments pursuant to Article 10. B. Undivided lot. If two (2) or more lots or combinations of lots with continuous frontage in single ownership (including husband and wife as in all cases a single owner) are of record at the effective date of the adoption or amendment of this chapter, regardless of time of acquisition, and if all or parts of the lots do not meet the requirements established for lot width and area, the lots shall be considered an undivided parcel, and no portion shall be used or occupied which does meet the width and area requirements of this chapter. Sec. 24 -13.7. Lot reduction. A. No lot or interest therein shall be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided so as to create a new nonconforming lot, to avoid, circumvent or subvert any provision of this chapter, or to leave remaining any lot in violation of the dimensional requirements of this chapter. B. No lot or portion of a lot required as a building site under this chapter shall be used as a portion of a lot required as a site for another structure. C. No building permit shall be issued for any lot or parcel of land which has been conveyed, sold, or subdivided in violation of this section. Any trans- feree who acquires a lot in violation of this paragraph without knowledge of such violation, and any subsequent 13 transferee, shall have the right to rescind and /or receive damages from any transferer who violates the provisions of this paragraph. Section 9 That the following definitions be added to Section 24 -3.1 of the Municipal Code: NONCONFORMING STRUCTURE means any structure which was estab- lished pursuant to the zoning and building laws in effect at the time of its development, but which no longer conforms to the dimensional requirements imposed by this Code for the Zone District in which it is located. NONCONFORMING USE means any use of land, building or structure, which was established pursuant to the zoning and building laws in effect at the time of its development, but which use is no longer a permitted or conditional use under the regulations imposed by this Code for the Zone District in which it is located. NORMAL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF A NON - CONFORMITY means any work done in a period of twelve (12) consecutive months on ordinary repairs, or on repair or replacement of non - bearing walls, fixtures, wiring or plumbing. SITE COVERAGE means the percentage of a site covered by build- ings, excluding roof or balcony overhangs, measured at the exterior walls or supporting members of a building at ground level. 14 u. 1 4\ gt " --. • 1 g s a Lt\ — i k I____ ._ 1 ;s li ‘%i.1 >\% 4 it I g o .A__ 1 1 i 1 s - %. I . 1 a k_i 1 1 b- .2, CN( scC 8 11.1 - - - - - -- n -- I I I I i is 1 I I . _ \I\ ci ' k S Iu s r ' 0 ‘ * v_ ? I f L ,, 1 u; ‘ IN I _.?' -4 - 8 o x 1 to _ r A i R \) .. -,...... ,s\-- \--) 0 i ;,, ; fi p li e R E r- 1, - - -� X I 11 i I I I I 1 I I --- - - - - -- J r..' . th Nft :a vi p a U % ip ' 9 4 4- i o 'off r ` a��F ag lil c .' , 6 gl, 14. tf2.1„v_ , li) X kV g i 4 u g. 1 ‘ C-1 6 - g ‘,('' - =„ 2 a .q z h 2' F i 4C • ‘Ni kiS % 0 C I U i 0 I - 4 ec;, 0 0 u u i u 0 N v i7 zz d 1 2 t pi j U. It g g Ji p i i - Id I 1. ,.._ A , , Is_t1)( tr t ti c ' s r ki .... 9 0 i 1- 1 E I I t I i � I 1 0 N I I 1 P. I I I j I � I I I I • 1 F F g • `11 0 1 1 _ 1 11 iyy 1 SAO 1 • \1 b 1 1 i \ 11 11 g 1 ` 1 1 4 tO \1 u \, 1 1 t 1 11 1 1 n 1 1 1 ■ 1 1 1 r 1 J 1 1 1 • ILI 1.. S 1 P Z A VJ p . 0 o O u` I 1 \ ' L \ \ ' OCT 1 3 87 CITY , e PEN � 130 - ' reet — asp t . 611 1 1 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 13, 1987 TO: Cindy Houben, Planning Office FROM: City Attorney RE: Smith Stream Margin Review We have no comments with regard to this application, except to point out that the application should be scrutinized with regard to the stream margin review requirements as amended. PJT /mc CITY OF ASPEN 130 south galena street aspen, eoiorado 81611 303 - 925 LAND USE APPLICATION FOR ?f DATE SUBMITTED�tember.28, 1987 FEES $350.00 , .. Kathleen D. Smith :IMF. -- - - - - -- - -- -------------- ------ - - - - -- .EDDRESS 1150 River Drive, Aspen, Colorado 925 -4347 : I OF PROTECT -- - - -- -- — -RESENT ZONING R - -- — — — — „T SIZE 23,654 Square Feet — -- — Lot 15, Black Birch Estates - -_ - -- ._ - (indicate street address, lot and block nunber. May require legal description. A vicinity map is very useful.) s units 1 BUILD- -OUT — — -- 41647 q. ft. -- -- 4,816 sq. ft. units ?!tOPOSED BUILD - OUT -- - - -.-- _ - - -- 'SCRIPTION OF EXISTING USES Single family residence _ n E close and enlarge slightly existing second ;_SCRI ?TION OF LAND '!S ^. PR0.CSA1. — _ - floor deck. The new addition -- — — will be supported by three posts which -- - - - - -- — posts the total addition is 169 Sire Feet_ - - replace three existing p " - -_ - - - - - - -- Stream Margin Review OF APP LICATIOti PLI.CABLE CODE SECTION (5) __. - -- _..- ---- -- - --- -- ------ PLAT e'L*fENDME \I REQUIRED ES NO --- - -- --- -- - -- - -- --- DATE PRE- APPLICATION CONFERENCE COIPLE "QED September 24, 1987 CTACHMENTS: 1. All applicants crust supply Proof of Ownership in the form of a title insurance commitment or statement from an attorney indicating that he /she has researched the title and verifies that the applicant is the owner of the property ,roe of liens and eucumbrances.) 2. if the process requires a public hearing, a Property Owner's List must be supplied which gives all owners within 300 feet in all directions in some cases and adjacent owners in some cases. 3. Bother of copies required (oy code and /or in pre - application conference.) 4. Plat by Registered Surveyor Yes__ No KATHLEEN D. SMITH P.O. Box 7968 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 (303) 925 -4347 May 23, 1986 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Michael Gassman is my agent and architect in the matter of an addition to my house and has authority to act for me in my behalf in all matters concerning the addition. Kathleen D. Smith KDS:ht / , Lc _ -1/ t / ,. ..- ..... , - . - - d i itTi3. iiiii, OMB 3361- 't ' T /1:7:. 07 > , 1 / 4 " - ) r . \ FEDERAL ENIEFIGENCY IVAi4A615.5.1ENT AGENCY : iipirec Juiii - 1 . . NA rioNAL I000 INSURANCE PtiOGRAM v= kii, cr ELEVATION CERTIFICATE ..___..... , ,,,,, learn is to bh kdeel '), 1) New trtairr h v c'rer row...hart. at -n Spot ,a1 Fit J Huard , ,... 2) Pie:FIRM )7:v415h lieu) aft Wet 30 1982, 35 Poc.1 rt;uo r thist.u..i.c.o. \h.:: 11 ()I. er bo adorn= ra' isd as F'...,t-f if- 1.1 rui, - I 1 ■,11t_DINC OWN!. H S i■nopess ,..ME r., - --,--",...-,:(- A - .•-ic___..5•cI . ' ..:1•if_i_771 __ • - ;OPEPT'r 1 OCP,TION h.ol and 1312..1 numbers and .,,i.ort ,,,- r o- el tr‘i that WO Intorrnatton on tti.s t erhficatt, reo-e..cd, 'toy bi-:A -thatt. tt 1..t o.ot ::.t Cl( ava lacle I 1. riderstPri thrt any fa -• role.. may be punishable by tine or imprison:1w, it uaratr 18 ...11 Col.?, Lachon I( )1 C: FION 1 ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION OS •llip , hy Lac il C iinfit,'■ I rt•/. ii , /lit 31 r faLgistered Protessicrial Eng., e. r Amt (a ricrueyur) 1 T i mttlIN.ry hol PAWLN.1 SUFf te I I °Ali 0/ friPid 1 '() I rne CF' A., ,'' 4 ° psi' s ta,DD f LE, I . . 21 '''' ''`` - . 2 - :T. New t-rergeN , i i I . •Air , L,. .; i , , ,, r) , I fl I r•,-, •_, ,L-to , :• - i, 1 -., , - ____ • C 11 — • L___ 1 I _j iF No It ts intended that the bulidi,:g rt..-... st...... h )%1 i t ( or Orth I n 5riphar th with the carrantantq's good plain ) , ( . 1 ,11, ) ,- of -, ti.i., (-2- .t.,(,r * -,,,, tia., 11. - , .1,t/ , r." ; 1 ' , I.;‘, ' r ch ':' . Jirg b,ente nt) %wit be at on elekati .t 1 r, be Nt i r) i',Iduriel :I ' ' , 2,t ; : ,,,1 , ,. J ,, :7M . .: ' j I n m 1, , i;:at e 4 :h. - .) budding in violation of I hit_ ;am. t 'thy s f! 1 . , .atta die 'P :)“, I r ., € ' rl - -. -1 t : 'I '''`. C ri ... , t.. 01,4 1 11 -.: : , r '' . :'-- ' t --", ' 7!r--.71r.f?I`" 1 \(-., , 0,0 ..i.od nq descr.bLd ahove his '.tr..tr. ( ), '-'■ .r .- dinphad ooth h..: h..,tiirrth '44-1400if.plittOytan!tgathent :: - . o . -1 l ,ritt • i eill:e Lased ort ...ovation dtto ,,, 1 ‘I't al tow: thon 4 ogler T, mod .._ o 4. _ .12. it 31,1 .3 chocked. 3 h rep, of var•pat - , o. tied Oy the .;orn.-thor'y - . .S NO ihe 'nubile home located at the adore s „lko, :Jibed above hat.; Leen tied our Tc-hared, in COlt withPoe 1 , ' ( ,, l'...eat pi en maroonnent wa h;tr. • dot in cot.. dare with ir. ol F IP ipecillcatiors - t‘ok'FB1'..L 110ME M 'AKE I 7 MO, ,F-o I { in 11E 1.-1 At . i -.IPS I SEI- L NO. DIMENSIONS . . 1 1 X --I : -....: --- --- I L ----- . trtionity Permit ()tt.c.iat of clegrster(d Prole. ; ( ' 1 a Lrqineer Arcip..o...t. (,r Sur vt.y or) • ‘ME 1‘4 r-11-- < A :' .)t i ADDRESS ,,j1.2„ / -t 0 . ... , _ I TLC A e-I -1 :"7 (-- ;-, t, 7 E it: v. -C „itili - -- - . - --- ff / S'GNATURE y 1 - ' - DA II_ 9 /5,217_ Ptit,2} _ _3214 =',.: 1 sitCTION 11 ELEVtA CERTIFICA (Curt tied to, n Let,a' Cr mrhuo,t,. Pora.it C tticlal or a Regiote Engine Ar !0.t. Ser.eyer ) . 15- '■T". /.."1 .5-... (77J.E . r I marl zome Al-A30 I cnrrity that the huildiy t ' ;,,,,,, city 'L./cation oescht- d -,. .ovrt ha., l he itos-3eti hs pnclral ig baser .f t an oievation of 77 c l_-.1 . 6 4 itstL NIC.V1) Ora. an St:ci d. , .0: e d t re prag grade at the poncho() stte IS 1 an elevation ofi:72.7.4..c.: __feel Ni:viii. IVI ZONES V. V1430 I :Tend/ that the bt..I 1 tie el 9 1 ' protio' :ocan , , - dr-d i t - . ' ,t1(....i3 hat', 'hc t thr::),)) of The t.;ttve.sr Poor ;oar - at a» ehtvatton el— _ tont N'' VD ;lilt cel c P ii`d,d r '1 tde .;.ve. a ie cyacte at (te buildirtg ts at an elevation O...... __tea: iilivD. i I , xv, zor4Es A, A99, Ail and EMERGENCY PROGRAM. I ce (icy that the hudnint, at the operty io.ation dtstritxxl above has the loam i I or ate /ation rtt ____.. __het, NGVD. The eit yahoo of the hi.The•it aitta:nn- nrai • trxr to It e bwIthrty is feet, NGVD. i -.- -- ■ . ZONE AO; I certify that the t,aildinn at the tht pit' tv location ..rsciitiCO at000t= ha; the hwest floor elevation ot I ., i, NG.VO. The aleva6on o'IJIE ttigh‘t adja...ent $jrcale 1 ext h the t hi.ii,la Is tem t-IGVD. - I i. CTION 111 FLOOORROOFING rtifolvic, rooN (certi :catinn by a Hey --ot.h d Pr if€P-storki Engl. or Architect) . i owl; to the best of ov know t‘dge. ell dild be lt. ti P' the diuddifej it die:lied so MPt ele ti), Id■ri9 is watertight, A i I IIS t.11)51.111tiallY :MPer. ri Bah! 0 in the pastircge 0 water ;).1; structural cor.perterit' hasohp ''.- capability at resisting flyero3rat ..td hydrodynamic loads and after ist burp/sect :frit Attild he eau 1 fry the tier 4 1 't P r cssi:res ■,elocilles, impact and tic' I ; 'eS asoociated witt the Gaze load YES NO 0 Inthe event at !tootling, w n M.- it e of l'nodcore he orth.•, vat, numan interventon?- t ; ' (t4ttnian intementioil nit:unti •hit wiib r Will elite! Ple YellIding when h., , ds up to the se flood level or, . - . - • . - .- .,,CaSmotes.; measures au LA.-. prior te no 1' )(A •r t.re rot entry ot ‘^,a3y (a 2. brating rtfolat she'd& ovot ' 4 ,.__f ti Y..tS U NO I' Witt the bolic.h1 be tar ..rec , i res,nono.o9 3 edostorer to both nuiii.;tions is YES, the flcede rc c • , 1. he Lredttrid hit lo'Jng put, PSit'S 1,4irt the actual tewest. Non- must = i ornpleted and Certift 4 .atead Complete huh. '. le ,,1 *- - votte- ...to Coocipto Ting errtchc.ate: i 1-tM ZONES A, A1-A.30. VI-V30, AO and Ald Certified r dp ci Eh waton is - -- ---.1het,:1•13kr I t ' I HS CERTIFICATION IS r .1 SECT' _‘/ I: tic i f2.(:1: Il AND :11 , ( ti ,. _k () it ) . I — . ' ;in if lEf-l'S NAME CliMf'ANY NAME LICENSE N , or Alfix Sea 1 .. 'LE Ai [1217ESS ZIP . ..;NA rlirtF. ()Al E C i t I-.' (... T ,-... pt-13N i r h , Ismaili e agent should attach itte eliginal cony of the mplette, lorm to trio Hood insttrance ofilief app'ic it tot second Sepy should be supplied to the policytt.:;der an.; .h1 - bird ( op , retained ie agent INSI,RAt':..F ACiFirt 71AY OFV7tEit i tin: hiiiitha . . t. 1s P �1� to � •N I. .41%. . w o 1 Q z to � . t (L2 C �� w�Q Z- 0 ! II!UII � 4 I CS 'LI ° Ote -I " v e c..,._t/%1.)Q ._ o (..(;,9 � �NMrn������ NN W Q --c-c...4,4,-.4.,..w,--z.---:-.:.‹.<---:. i al Q W 2 i 8 cl N V 2 k Q/ �� 2QLI A 341 -k n h n. � 3� 3� 3 4 `� � `� K � �� s � $ mss- a �s 4 ....if), hb Q ' , v a ny Kff v) .‘"Mk ;II ..`K q Pie '1'041 oi a k C 8 Po 12 it p s o .c41`4°- - n W �� W W h W �J , c(2, AO � h A V11 ^�M zts t •_ tir ice_ 2/ 0 Jt �.. .10.0005-70.60- Y r o O I o d Z f01, � � \ U 1 8 611 � � e, Q l ti tt11 CO /� �� ri e hash y .r ".titi....11% il • J • I 1 �'t °. "%-"A...--10 o 2 1 i''0 i LI 1L. c- 1 t o y1 t` � ': ' oo 1 �■� ° nice 1 : , ' OO 1 1 °o f � • . 1 � V) t o � � "i'. o ° ° r 1 1 r , ; o I 1 8 1 w o 6. 1 8 j 4 `ti o �NaQ °OO1 t an7i�`� J r % ,,. A .4..,-...-..,..:. 0.5s,...1 tvp-9 .... eiCCNI cc N IL 4 „A q LIG il ■.. k i � J k h 40. k h 3 i �. roc OA Q 8Q k'Q Ez ui 410 0 at o \ rji ', I , ll � .._ . �.1 1 1 11 r W , m Lo it 1 . ii 1 1 1 w it 11 �1 1 I 11 1 1 � r 11 �1_ o 1 1 0Z i '' V) 1 % 11 z2 1 � c4 1 iL Q 1 Pi ti L. 0 �9 h M W ED o� O u 6.4 Ill M•vN/M jJ I 1 I 1 3 = i �� �� i1 8 1 4 c W 0 n ii.% y, 4 - "\ J 3 L kt I \ o j 6 IQ 1 I Z .. \ ,ti I r II .tea I 4' I I I °A 1 1 S3nr3HS \ \ O S ) 1- N Z ■ Ol o j to idi , . 1/4, 2 ; c.. ,,, d . &,_ L i N , 4 i ,,,,_ le JAI tie...) h42 ! fr l �w� v Z' L N k a o z °�` 1 t �w u P. O gJ /Q No -! &' A r , g ° 1 6 k K i 'oaf t RI A „;S, 1V Q v t" O 1`x1 \ N. d r 1 ww \ 1 - r r).\ \ Cb k$1 t. o` \ > > LI I kt 1 ) LL Jt N t.i in Lr) 'gk �. O �C Cir W �r v W keLa ��,5 No A /avA 0 oat ae 4Q L e i �. \ h h °I> ' C C -C ) (V N l & c NS °) .... 1 ) I I I I 1 11111 1 111 ` I 111 43 y�u cd r ,,,,, ,-, It: 111 N� ; _ j. 1 ti -r il 1 r i 1 �i \ w h � Z \)j W 0d Q V A kl ti g I Lh i � � `C Ch 0 o 1 . 3 '. ,. i .F 7b 'Oaf LS \W it \ i h _ -� , , / Z -__-- r/ yM a :o \ N___; . ,'� kv)F N1 Q ii 1 8 o M ' 1 W li �� n dft nb W 0 16 ° k 0 km •. C NO ,/- 24 v7.a Z i ;Wig - o ,, c 0 II) i Z i V W p ii W ZJ '�'� of /� w n\A 1 f 1 ' 1 L ' 1 i U I__ 1 Li LT z) N F o r ...Izc nn , z r 1 I I . 2 ,-:�_ Z' � (ju W % L a at 6 °e _ F Qg *. 8 ` `' �- ; � J - �3 • . , \ Q , it I . .4., o t 1:'''' °1 0. 2 W gg N N AT tt N . 4. N C o 4 N tt 3 N -"gin/ N Z� ��, N� „ -/ ���o %b L7 N ;8 -� \ 7 • • a... >.�L �� \�_ _ tip q -_ ���. -..."_ L'l r.‘ r _____ A.;J 11 .1 catra/ \ Iti ' k 0 \ Van i v i vv • 1 .� i,4 ea - S 1 L 8 n P" R ILYr* .-.,.,. a A4 i4 itti k ,,,, 0 ,„ , , -, , cg , v) g 0 • q -„, 1 , ,) e , h '0 w . pt.c, i r 4 t di, If) it ta o� Ph.. q 0 ki 0 .. . 1.,.._ ...( v) i k t w � � �� o o o e Q 'Q e) � o Cam ' ,( r 4 ' N �`C i C�I�I II li 1 2 hi ft Li a , 4 -- 144 V ■ii) tbc e.) i t i° 0 kP e R to Iti ti \ _ IDE ia. 'AO I Illiniall C -_r-' 3 o z C'�Q V a ' 1 11 11 11 7f 111111 ,1W QUW � IA* ii ii�o i 11 i i L to __I kR 4 _ ._ Lti Lti e 0 1 kK , N nal 1 1 _k �h fl �_ uW , 4 o 6 to � � L. �1 o h&Ins hit i�4 n ggi rri rr2'+ 1 I k \ 1....I r3fg — 1 I— ha. t_ 9 —P0 1 '10 W t - or — ,8 111 IIIIIIIy z-,.. (/) kg ' QI M 701 � . N , 1 1, . g - -- — r 1 Q � . - . k . __. .1 q �(! 1 )� � � ,slow 4 8 g4 1 . r 'S1 N O� .. „r rr if /'i o00/N.C�I jo sex 0,„-„,..,,, y L ZI ‘b I _ 'c. % a a'1 w c ii wiz, I 0I I 1 1 1 ,_ Mc) trE o t . A / % 14 \ 1 \i_ \iic H\ 4'. Virgte r 6. W bL I 1 4 In R Ll le 0 k L o hc h v�Q f1 1 Lb I ! c9 1 % cw J t . ti, b 0 ce kj i of (�fl � 6 � � 0 I j ., of 'K___I S � � 8 it j (1. \ _ sa 1 caAl . Y = - . �$ %f fl �����/�����u4 . rr, r t. �»YS ill G� 4 v Og. . n , ` , } n ? S Z r uT�S.4 iii Z Th. -1d' QA y y 02,3 tinc 1,, 4.' , o 1 L a Z g 0 t 1 a ki 1 i) .w .2 NO 2 „....,... S W� / �� 9 i, iii I k I I ] tI I-. w I t.,„ / i , ,,s. o_RS I t / 1 `D g. ft ; i ski\ r I . \ \ 1 I 1 4w in 0 J.S kn S ti 8 S=1 4 , .1- t ib,,il , W W J /74;7,4 Aly, h c1 K •� < C /ice -1 b.,zl � ` � ll- Z�li /L 11 �l 1' : 4 1 I 1 - ` - 1 ▪ tp 4L) I v) � / �� U �p❑ kZ N ❑ = �F a� °o I J W � N �b 1 '-(-3-- J x Q A ule � FQ6 N 1 s 1 ) I T CV I ----41 ❑ I T st i 0 _ 11 \ 1 cb �3 U . ..__ . .�. . , a P.& q g `' ¥ ink / 2 ( \j \ \ } � \ / t \ s / 2 \ R \ k h \ 77�. \ �§ � \ ±. ) \ / ¥ \ )< \ § ti i t- 1 Q 2 , ® m - ® L. / */ .L., � / _ gPAI \ / \V . w w 2 Ni + { oz 1 �A ii. ( I_ ! }� » -- 5 § ' \ .1 � } f bi \ Nt \� \ ° ƒ \ &\ ' '0' , 9 ? �J �\ / \ \ 4 w e\ y / \/ 9 \ / . ƒ Y \ eiisz i- 6 < % � \ � \ , \ ez& z .. / _ -1 e % 19 . 7 777 , f\ ! ( T T 1 e z7 w 1 ± w \5 /( @ \\ a \\ d L I i k c IAn o N t. Z p lh "c 0 41 ;h NC tir r P) Li k . Tc ) LI k i Q. •s, { * a g / M ).,, Ne ,,,) sr S ch, ooaw�� i A s- n1/4-7 E 1 -�- �_ ---a. 1 1 d '1 c � f 1 ,9 N i ) t,e) � 1 1 _ 1 1 h �_ NI X `-1 h ir " N I 11 i �11— . ----- 1 � � 11 1 11 — i 1 i k 1I I � r.��s I I ► r�kz 1 11 �_ 1 w 1 I .1 r 4 i1 _ --- r_ - - --- r— ]1 I1 11 2 a ;1 it H W 11 11 � 1.1 it 1 1 311 ?� L I � k J O V6 I 1 tZ� 11 i 1 I