HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Smith 1150 River Dr.037A-84 1 ) CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET /4.2/(v 9,)
City of Aspen
•
CASE NO. 0371 •
T�
STAFF: t(I C ntkvc2 C9V^i C.
PROJECT NAME: � – / .li 01 !4 ' n %�R7.�i -1
APPLICANT: To tc S 6 \ Phone:
REPRESENTATIVE: 6 2 -o ` ^ O\ '' ki Phone: 5 ' 1 1/4
41 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (FEE)
I. GMP /SUBDIVISION /PUD (4 step)
_ 1. Conceptual Submission • ($2,730.00)
_ 2. Preliminary Plat ($1,640.00)
3. Final Plat ($ 820.00)
II. SUBDIVISION /PUD (4 step)
_ 1. 'Conceptual Submission ($1,900.00)
_ 2. Preliminary Plat ($1,220.00)
3. Final Plat ($ 820.00)
III. EXCEPTION /EXEMPTION /REZONING (2 step) ($1,490.00) /
IV. SPECIAL REVIEW (1 step) ($ 680.00) v/
1. Special Review
2. Use Determination
_ 3. Conditional Use �/
4. Other: , - I/rh'' /// iyt J •
P &Z MEETING DATE ' L 1 CC MEETING DATE: DATE REFERRED: H °H
REFERRALS: '.
V pity Attorney Aspen Consol. S.D. School District
` Engineer Mountain Bell Rocky Mtn. Natural Gas
Housing Director Parks Dept. State Hwy Dept. (Glenwood)
Aspen Water Dept. Holy Cross Electric _State Hwy Dept. (Grd. Jctn)
City Electric _Fire Marshall ' Building Dept. 2 o'^tJ
Environmental Hlth. Fire Chief Other:
FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: ILO . ,!a i 1
— City Attorney _City Engineer X Building Dept.
Other: Other:
1 FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: C%f�JCLPI/' –
DISPOSITION: /�
CITY P &Z REVIEW: i� reN to `\ 2 1 ( S r c,�C;, Q
•
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW:
Ordinance No.
CITY P &Z REVIEW:
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW:
Ordinance No.
CITY P &Z REVIEW:
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW:
•
Ordinance No.
CITY . : ASPEN
'4 ,, - r
130 F ` ` . 7 , :(reet
asp � ` �' 1611
Nov - 71994 I I
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 6, 1984
TO: Richard Grice
FROM: City Attorney
RE: Smith - Black Birch Estates Stream Margin Review
Other than to note the applicability of the stream margin review
criteria of Section 24 -6.3, we have no comments with regard to
this application.
PJT /mc
City of Aspen
Planning and Zoning Commission
Aspen, Colorado
Request for Stream Margin Review for Lot 15, Black Birch Fstates, Aspen,
Colorado as a result of planned renovation of and addition to the existing
residence and garage on Lot 15.
Dear Commission Members:
Following is the response to the Review Criteria as set forth in Section
24 -6.3 (c) Stream Margin Peview of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.
The Proposed renovation and addtion to the existing residence and garage
on Lot 15 will 1.) A portion of the existing structure is located within
the 100 year flood zone as determinde by the T7.S. Corps of Engineers Flood
Plain Report for the Roaring Fork River, however, the proposed renovation
and second floor addition will add no structure in the flood plain at or
below the 100 year flood elevation. (2) There is no Trail P].an within Lot
15, Black Birch Estates. (3) The proposed renovation and addition to the
existing structure will not alter or effect the requirements of the Roaring
Fork Greenway Plan. (4) The proposed renovation and addition will not
significantly alter the existing vegitation or grading and no alteration or
erosion of the stream bank is foreseen. (5) The proposed renovation and
addition will in no way alter the stream channel or its capacity. No activity
is anticipated which would increase stream sedimentation and suspension loads.
(6) During the construction of the addition and renovation there will he no
pollution of the steam and there will he no interference with the natural
changes of the stream which may occur.
The existing structure on Lot 15, Black Birch Estates is a single family
dwelling and the structure shall remain a single family dwelling subsequent
to the proposed renovation and addition.
Very truly (�, ours,
6'
J%el P. Smith, Owner
Box 7968
Aspen, Colo. 81612
C 19, 1984
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office
RE: Smith - Black Birch Estates - Stream Margin Review
DATE: November 20, 1984
This application proposes the construction of second story addition to
a structure which lies partially within the 100 year floodplain. The
house is located at 1150 River Drive (Lot 15, Black Birch Estates).
The drawing submitted by the applicant, which will be available at
your meeting, shows that the addition will be supported by four
columns and connect an existing garage and house. The columns will be
the only part of the addition which might potentially impact the
floodway.
The Planning Office and Engineering Department have concluded that
even though the addition is technically in the floodplain the impact
on the floodplain resulting from the columns would be insignificant.
The proposal also meets the other criteria for Stream Margin Review
[Section 24--6.3(c)]. There is not a trail designated by the Trails
Master Plan through this pt ..r , _rty. All construction activity will
occur on the opposite side of the existing house from the stream
approximately 50 feet away from the stream bank. We do not ai tscipate
any impact on the riparian vegetation or the stream channel itself.
The Planning Office recommends approval of the plan as presented.
MEMORANDUM
To: Richard Grice
From: Elyse Elliott
Date: November 12, 19 4
Re: Smith - Black Birch Estates Stream Margin Review
The above application was reviewed and a site inspection was
made. The Engineering Department has the following comments
under section 24 -6.3 for stream margin criteria:
1. The submitted plan is complete in supplying information on
bounderies, contours, improvements, construction procedures and
existing trees and shrubs.
2. The proposed second -story addition, with the exception of 7
piles, is removed from the floodplain. It will not effect the
Roaring Fork Greenway Plan or change or add sedimentation to the
stream.
3. The proposed renovation and addition will not significantly
alter the existing vegetation or grading that would produce
erosion of the stream bank.
In view of the above, and in view of what we consider to be
minimal impacts of the proposed construction in the flood zone,
the Engineering Department has no problem with the request.