Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Weisman.A032-98 MEMORANDUM TO: Stan Clauson, Community Deve opment Director ``'' e O � FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner PPP RE: Weisman Residence Stream Margin Exemption - 113 Nada& I?' DATE: July 23, 1998 ts1 SUMMARY: William Weisman, owner, has applied for an exemption from the Stream Margin Review to relocate an existing spa, and associated improvements, currently within an unapproved area. The improvement is currently in an area not approved by the Stream Margin Review and within a easement held by the City of Aspen. APPLICANT: William Weisman. Represented by Glenn Rappaport, Architect. LOCATION: 113 Neal Avenue. ZONING: R -15. Moderate - Density Residential. REVIEW PROCEDURE: Reconstruction of existing development within the Stream Margin, and development proposed further from the river than existing development, may be approved by the Community Development Director. STAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." The application has been included as Exhibit `B." RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Community Development Director approve this Stream Margin Exemption with the following conditions: 1. The development may occur as represented in this application or in a location further from the river than shown as indicated by the applicant. 2. Prior to construction, the applicant shall pay a land use review fee of $250, and provide the written authority for any third person to represent the owner of the property. 3. Prior to construction, the applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Building Department as required. 1 4. The applicant shall prevent erosion and maintain sediment on -site by placing, if necessary during construction, silt fencing on the river side of the construction area and covering disturbed areas prior to revegetation. 5. The applicant shall revegetate all areas disturbed with this construction with native species similar to those used in the surrounding landscape or as otherwise approved by the Parks Department. 6. The hot tub shall be drained to the sanitary sewer and not to the river. 7. This hot tub will be moved, and all necessary improvements and revegetation, shall be accomplished according to this approval by no later than October 15, 1998. APPROVAL I hereby approve this Stream Margin Exemption for removal and reconstruction further from the river of a hot tub at the Weisman Residence, 113 Neal Avenue, with the above conditions listed 1 -7. __ /ALI date • 3 ° 'q C 1 — Community Development Director ACCEPTANCE: I, as a person being or representing the applicant, do hereby understand and agree to the conditions of this approval and certify the information provided in this application is correct to the best of my knowledge. '7 i date 7. 7 1 . 71 Glenn Rappaport, Architect, representing William Weisman, owner. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Application 2 qsr „elm. cam /P. P ` . /1. f /3d S. c.t'n ,, 1T /611 fie: /147 / .3 A4..P St /& y n?b c.c h A . / - fie • �C.c /W,.,,,,• ,. ,,,. ifs-.. d / ., 4-c .00 t / . a/1/ Td WuLT:80 8661 60 'Inf : 'ON 3NOHd ONI S3SIJdS1NS NIJWSI3M : WOdA RF'. GLENN H RAPPAPORT MAY 2 2 1998 05 A R C H I T E C T 21 P O S T O F F I C E B O X 2 7 6 I rl I KIN ;OMMU MTN' DEVELOPMENT A SPEN COLORADO 8 1 6 1 2 T 9 7 0 9 2 7 0 6 3 5 A I A F 9 7 0 9 2 7 0 6 5 4 Stan Clauson Community Development Director 130 South Galena Aspen, CO RE: Weisman Hot Tub Relocation 113 Neal Ave. Aspen, CO Dear Stan, This is just a follow up on our conversation . I would like to work with you and Chris Bendon to move the Weisman hot tub outside of the 20' -0" fisherman's easement and beyond the 15' -0" top of slope requirement for stream margin protection. tire I hope that administratively we can establish criteria to protect during the removal and to insure proper revegetation. It would be great if we could have until September 30th, 1998 in order to complete this work. Thank you for your consideration. • Glenn Rappaport architect 11 =two \l, V1• PRQJECT. • ,. - rA. Name Wel sre% ?.€t ci.SALG • Location: Ili t l cM. tr (Indicate street address, lot & °block number, legal description where appropriate) APPLICANT: • Name: vJ; t. taM \A) tick w LI _ Address: U"o n1E ST As?trI — Phone #: (9 1 Sq 4 3 Vic REPRESENTATIVE: sp — Name: &tCiW (� ° o�'r Mal Address: 1, o , CS rib b A S f E , Co . _ Phone #: (Q 7o) e i 2"7 • 3 t _ TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): • Conditional Use ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Conceptual Historic Devt. Et Special Review Q Final PUD (Sc PUD Amendment) ❑ Final Historic Development © Design Review Appeal ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ Minor Historic Devt. ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ❑ Historic Demolition ❑ GMQS Exemption 0 Subdivision ❑ Historic Designation ❑ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption (includes ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumiaation) Expansion Mountain View Plane ❑ Lot Split ❑ Temporary Use ❑ Other: Lot Line Adjustment . ❑ Text/Map Amendment _ EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Y IS 'CI NC, ReS iceJCF Ss/lru I.ter -rul, Loc.a'11ro WitIII.J FISH�NC ei PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Me .toi" -6b oteTs o oC Zv rich I a, eAsEMGNT'. 6x r -unite fa- 0M ST ft. GAM MARGIn fae ve • Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: S ▪ Pre- Application Conference Summary ❑ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement 0 Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form • Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents O Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents O Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application a , .% C. Exemption. The expansion, remodeling, or reconstruction of an existing development shalt be exempt from stream margin review if the following standards are met: 1. The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty -five (25) percent; and 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code. 3. The development is Located such that no portion of the expansion. remodeling or reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is the existing development; 4. The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope if one has been designated through a prior review; and 5. The development is located outside of the of the special flood area and more than one hundred (100) feet measured horizontally from the mean high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction will cause no increase to the amount of ground coverage of structures within the special flood hazard area. G L E N N 14 R A P P A P O R T A R C H I T E C T P O S T O F F I C E B O X 2 7 6 30 ASPEN COLORADO 81612 9y T 9 7 0 9 2 7 0 6 3 5 A I A F 9 7 0 9 2 7 0 6 5 4 A .24,-. EE : la- ..e.%oczt,:. . /l3 A tte f St , Ayer, ) ce. 6 -,n o 1 en. f � s� M� iatnt.o • Corsi I 3 Cr- - 4 f4 , creenrc.g, s e ict.,� . (- 4. /1. 1.-1.•-•••••1 1 [,¢ m- 7' . .... 47 C /!//�u?.c�+..+ce .C/�[ �a La �i r.. /60/ / 0 .4 7Lce . A e�.. / /Vi»Le�1 ,( / 1.'- z Gve F•-..¢. / ` , /• i e0 -9.0. ) .,t , .. c..o✓ Lo U 1=e w -F-.✓p r own" ) Ge'riUl u S2_ 5 A 444_ c � r,..t i3 fn C e 4 - 7211. Crt.4-toeen 4.t 4 - ZOO\ V N� . �F It._ Z t V 1- 11S W - j Z SC < SC V al :IN- S te // ' 2 d t 1. N Oil 1< $1Elc • ( @ / Z c/J . / 3:1 r ' ifi / 0 . Q f` 0 ;‘77.4.1! li I Z ' Z <' _ y zfl° II < .ti d`< II Z�� r r� p Z 1 _ ........ 3 , . ..■.■.... in. EA r o. -..\ ,i u u� o a nL -ft '`-'" \_,-._.-.A7 i . I! a m Z r a o d o • CITY OF ASPEN PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Chris Bendon, 920.5072 DATE: 10.16.97 PROJECT: Herron Park Place Condo Stream Margin Review & Special Review REPRESENTATIVE: John Kelly OWNER: TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 step -- Steam Margin and Special Review DESCRIPTION: Stream margin review for development closer to RF, Special Erview for essential development within 15 foot setback to remove existing structure. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.68.040 Stream Margin Review 26.64.040(D) Special Review for Encroachment in 15' Setback Review by: Staff, Development review committee (referral agencies), Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing: No. Referral Agencies: Engineering, Parks, Building Planning Fees: Planning Deposit Minor ($1080) Referral Agency Fees: Engineering, Minor ($110); Total Deposit: $1,190 (additional hours are billed at a rate of $180/hour) To apply, submit the following information: 1. Proof of ownership 2. Signed fee agreement 3. Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 4. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 5. Total deposit for review of the application 6. 15_ Copies of the complete application packet and maps. HPC = 12; PZ = 10; GMC = PZ +5; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 1 /ea.; Planning Staff = 2 7. An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 8. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current (within one year) status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document) 9. Additional materials as required by the specific review. Please refer to the application packet for specific submittal requirements or to the code sections noted above. 10. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. 11. Copies of prior approvals. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.