HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.boa.008-99 RESOLUTION NO. Ir
Series of 1999
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN
DENYING A VARIANCE IN CASE NUMBER 99 -08 RELATING TO PROPERTY IN
THE CITY OF ASPEN WITH AN ADDRESS OF 824 EAST COOPER AND A LEGAL
DESCRIPTION OF LOT Q, BLOCK 111, ASPEN,COLORADO.
WHEREAS, Pat Rymer made application, dated May 22,
1999 to the Board of Adjustment for a variance from the
dimensional requirements of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal
Code; and
WHEREAS, this matter came on for hearing before the Board of
Adjustment on July 8, 1999 and after full deliberations and
consideration of the evidence and testimony presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF
THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO:
Section 1. Findings of Fact.
For purpose of approval, the Board of Adjustment must
determine the following findings of fact:
1. A development application for a variance was initiated
on September 24, 1998 by Pat Rymer for property with a
street address of 824 East Cooper, Aspen, Colorado.
2. Notice of the proposed variance has been provided to
surrounding property owners in accordance with Section 24-6 -
205(E)(4)b) of the Aspen Municipal Code. Evidence of such
notice is on file with the City Clerk.
3. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with
the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the
Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 24 of the
Aspen Municipal Code.
4. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that
will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel,
building or structure.
5. The literal interpretation and enforcement of the
terms of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code
would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed
by other parcels in the same zone district, and would
cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical
difficulty. In determining that the applicant's rights
would be deprived absent a variance, the Board
considered certain special conditions and circum-
stances which are unique to the parcel, building or
structure, which are not applicable to other parcels,
structures or buildings in the same zone district and
which do not result from the actions of the applicant.
The Board determined that findings #2 and #3 above were not
satisfied and the variance request was therefore denied by a vote
of 5 -0.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of Adjustment
of the City of Aspen on the''-- 8` day uly, 1999.
Chairperson
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Deputy
City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate
copy of that resolution adopted by the Board of Adjustment of the
City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held on the day hereinabove
stated.
Deputy City Clerk
Approved as to co nt:
e
Ass stant City At orney
4..
2