Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.500 Doolittle Dr.0003.2012.ASLU
THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0003.2012.ASLU -1019-13 0- 0 9 21 < PARCEL ID NUMBERS NO ~SCEr- PROJECTS ADDRESS 500 DOOLITTLE DR PLANNER SARA NADOLNY CASE DESCRIPTIO SPA AMENDMENT WATER DEPT REPRESENTATIVE ANDY ROSSELLO DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3.2.12 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 3.8.12 0003 · 20 C 1. AN--4 & Edit / @¥* Fum Rm. O% Iab , ~ go#IK) vj@libejad'j b c , 40#AD,1:11iolel Nejili J #Al ~33% aill #* 4 48/84£*Mt .* 1¥ijal *Elq *11* U. *¢ 1 19 -142 ~ Pemi# 00031111£0 -aq WE p DOOLITTLE DR 4/ 13 *FTE 4 k I -, : Pmt *111* ~ Miderpmt .w F~* @57 RatlE Jendng *¥d' 1 0, ~ , Des*n APPUCATON FOR LAND USE NSUBSTANIIAL SPA AEGENT FOR TIEWATER BRE| ~ ~ EARTIENT -1 1 Shnttd ALAN RIONOND 920113 00~ @~ *~-3~ »~2020~3 ~ ~,~~~ 371 I 51-via l e Owner LaM nam CTY OF ASPEN R¢0310 130 S GABIAST ASPEN CO81611 +404 Plue 901 920-5000 Add~55 Appkit 0 Ownel m.ant? 0 C#80101 IS *311? i 4 Last nam ANDY Fist mme ROSSELLO ® DOUTLEDR NATERPLANT AN (910)43·1999 CIEt# 29210 Address ASPEN CO 81811 lender Ld name Fht name 1 Phone r). AddresS .r~f...=.7-r:--~..4 ..~......... A , ...4-0 10*" ~-f. ·. a...1.-,ir»»~·.454.- A#*dA[sm] s# /141 lure AN A-1.- 09*v25:. 12-EV~1 ~r <6ru- A.{104€04 . 2(tu ·44 \-2, CITY OF ASPEN ier Permit Receipt RECEIPT NUMBER 00031072 Account Number: 29210 Date: 1/26/2012 Applicant: ROSSELLO ANDY Type: core it alc 421.00.00000.21463 Permit Number Fee Description Amount 0003.2012.ASLU Planning Hourly Fees 1,260.00 0003.2012.ASLU Eng Referral Fee 265.00 0003.2012.ASLU Parks Referral Fee 630.00 Total: $2,155.00 . TI IE Cin' or Asm.N Community Development Department Internal Funds Transfer Date: 01/25/2012 Department: Utilities and Environmental In:~ Amount Requested: $2,155.00 Account Number: 421.00.00000.21463 Permit Number: 0003·10[2,Ast_M -p 9 'bIo -)1 Permit Address: 500 Doolittle Drive, Aspen , CO 81 6~ Permit Description: Construction of Pump House for AMA on City Property Requested By: Andy Rossello Received By: Angela Scorey QOTICE OF APPROVAL For Insubstantial Use Permit 500 Doolittle Dr. Lot 25, Water Treatment Plant Site Parcel ID No: 273513204825 APPLICANT: City of Aspen REPRESENTATIVE: Andy Rossello, Utilities Engineer SUBJECT PROPERTY: 500 Doolittle Dr. REQUEST: Insubstantial Use Permit including an 8040 Greenline Exemption, GMQS Exemption and SPA Amendment. SUMMARY: A pump station has been proposed at this property site to ensure adequate fire protection to the nearby MAA/ACDS campus, which lacks sufficient space to locate the pump station directly on-site. 500 Doolittle Dr. is the City's Water Plant site. There exists on the property a non-exclusive easement to the City's Water Dept, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District over, across and under those portions of the property for the installation, maintenance and access to the water lines, sanitary sewer lines, and pressure reduction valves and appurtenances. An easement for the pipe was granted by Castleridge Associates. This property has an SPA (Specially Planned Area) overlay, and is subject to both GMQS and 8040 Greenline review. REVIEWS: A. 8040 Greenline. The applicant has requested an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption to permit the addition of a 500 sf pump station on the property. A property may be available for an 8040 Greenline Review Exemption if the proposed development: 1) does not add more than ten percent to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent; and 2) does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit is required; and 3) is not affected by geologic hazard; and 4) does not, over time, cumulatively go over the floor area limit. Standards 1 and 4 relate to 11oor area allowances and calculations. The current Floor Area has been provided by the applicant (Exhibit B) showing the existing Floor Area o f the water plant property to be 49.7 acres, or 2,164,932 sq. ft. No more than ten percent or 216,493.2 sq. ft. of floor area may be cumulatively added through an administrative exemption. This project proposes to add 500 sq. ft. floor area on the property, which is within the allowable increase of square footage. 1 Table 1: Floor Area Addition in Square Feet (sf) Existing Floor Allowable Floor Existing Floor Proposed Floor New Floor Area Area Increase Area + Allowable Area Increase Area Total (10%) Increase 2,164,932 sf 216,493.20 sf 2,381,425.20 sf 500 sf 2,165,432 sf Regarding exemption standard 2, the City Parks Department Staff has found a number of Code-sized trees within the area of disturbance that will require removal. In order to qualify for exemption, the applicant must obtain the appropriate tree removal permit and is required to mitigate for any tree removal in the form of the determined valuation of trees, as per Title 13, Sect. 13.20, prior to commencement of the project. B. GMQS. This proposal is subject to Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) review. Staff has determined that the proposal involves utilities, which are considered to be public infrastructure, and are therefore exempt from further Growth Management review (Sec. 26.470.040 (11). C. SPA Amendment. The Water Plan SPA was originally adopted in 1983. The approval of this proposal will require an SPA Amendment. Exhibit B details the relevant review criteria for an Insubstantial SPA Amendment. Through this examination, Staff finds the criteria have been met. STAFF EVALUATION: Based on the above reviews, staff is recommending approval of this application with the following conditions. 1. A re-vegetation/restoration plan for the site must be created that will include the seed mix, plant species, irrigation and noxious weed control. This plan must be approved by the Parks Dept Staff. 2. To the extent possible, all underground pipes and connections must be installed within the road and trail area. 3. The applicant must obtain a tree permit for the removal of any Code-sized trees, as determined by Parks Dept Staff, as well as provide financial mitigation for their removal as per Title 13, Sect. 13.20 of the Land Use Code. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the administrative application for an Insubstantial SPA Amendment, as noted above, to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit B) and thereby, APPROVES the request. APP*OVEOB;0: Ull* ~ @0 14, lon- Chris Bendon Date Community Development Director 2 ACCEPTED BY: 1409 Andy Rosse# Date Utilities E~ineer 1 Attachments: Exhibit A: Review Criteria Exhibit B: Land Use Application Exhibit C: Memo from Parks 3 EXHIBIT'A' Sec. 26.440.090. Amendment to development order. A. An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director. The following shall not be considered an insubstantial amendment: 1. A change in the use or character of the development. Response: The proposed pump station will not change the character ofthe Water Plant property. The structure will be minor and mostly sub-grade, causing very minimal visual impact on the property. 2. An increase by greater than three percent (3%) in the overall coverage of structures on the land. Response: The footprint ofthis structure is approximately 21' x 21'. Since the structure will be buried there will not be an increase in the coverage of structures on the land. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development or the demandfor public facilities. Response: The proposed development will not generate any additional traffic to the area. 4. A reduction by greater than three percent (3%) of the approved open space. Response: The proposed development will not reduce the amount ofopen space on the property by greater than 3%. The majority ofthe structure will be located sub-grade. 5. A reduction by greater than onepercent (1%) of the off-streetparking and loading space Response: The proposed development will have no impact on the amount ofoff-street parking and loading space on the property. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. Response: The development will not reduce any pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. 7. An increase ofgreater than two percent (2%) in the approved gross leasablefloor area of commercial buildings. Response: No such increase will be caused by this project. 8. An increase by greater than one percent (1%) in the approved residential density of the development. Response: No such change in density will occur as part ofthis project. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting of afurther variationfrom the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Response: Staff is not aware of any condition or representation associated with the original approval that would be affected by this proposal. 4 8# 04,3 - 4 41 e ./60,0 044% 9<-4 40 .el WATER PLANT PROPERTY INSUBSTANTIAL SPA AMENDMENT AND EXEMPTION FROM 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW SUBMITTED BY ALAN RICHMAN PLANNING SERVICES BOX 3613 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 920-1125 JANUARY, 2012 1. INTRODUCTION This is an application requesting approval to construct a small pump station at the City of Aspen Water Plant property. The purpose of the pump station is to provide emergency fire flows to the nearby school campus that is occupied by the Aspen Music School and the Aspen Country Day School. The legal description of the Water Plant property is Lot 25, according to the final plat of the City Thomas Property. Its street address is 500 Doolittle Drive. The property's Pitkin County Parcel ID# is 273513204825. A vicinity map illustrating the general location of the property accompanies this application. The Water Plant Campus consists of approximately 49.705 acres of land that is zoned Public (PUB). The property is also designated with a Special Planned Area (SPA) Overlay. The owner of the property is the City of Aspen (hereinafter, "the applicant"). Proof of the ownership of the property is provided in the form of a letter from the City Attorney's Office, attached as Exhibit #1. A letter from the applicant authorizing Alan Richman Planning Services to submit this application is provided as Exhibit #2. A pre-application conference was held with representatives of the Community Development Department prior to the submission of this application (see Exhibit #3, Pre- Application Conference Summary). Based on this meeting, the applicant is hereby submitting the following requests: Sec. 26.440.090: Insubstantial SPA Plan Amendment; Sec. 26.435.030: Exemption from 8040 Greenline Review; and Sec. 26.470.040: GMQS Review (Exemption for Infrastructure). The following sections of this application are organized to respond to the standards of the Aspen Land Use Regulations for these review procedures. First, however, a brief history of the prior development approvals granted to this property is provided to provide a context for this application, followed by a description of the proposed development. Insubstantial SPA Amendment and 8040 Greenline Exemption for Water Plant Property Page 1 11. SUMMARY OF PRIOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT A. Prior Development Approvals The Water Plant property was annexed into the City as part of the Thomas property annexation in 1979 (see Plat Book 8 at Pages 34-36 of the Pitkin County records). The City Council granted subdivision approval to the annexed property, establishing the Water Plant as Lot 4 of the City Thomas Property Subdivision (see Plat Book 14 @ Page 41 of the Pitkin County records). Ordinance 7, Series of 1980 established an SPA overlay designation for the property. The first SPA plan drawn up for the Thomas property was for the purpose of developing the Castle Ridge Apartments on Lot 3. It was not until 1983 that a plan was approved for Lot 4. At that time the City adopted Ordinance 18, Series of 1983, which rezoned the Water Plant Property to Public (PUB) and approved an SPA Plan to allow for improvements to be made to the water plant. That plan was refined and clarified shortly thereafter pursuant to Ordinance 7, Series of 1984, which amended the SPA. The adopted SPA Plan can be found in Plat Book 16 @ Page 6 of the Pitkin County records. In 1996 the City approved Ordinance 23, Series of 1996, granting SPA and other associated approvals to the Waterplace Affordable Housing Project. The water plant property, which at the time was approximately 54.36 acres in size, was subdivided so that the affordable housing project could be developed on its own 4.66 acre lot. This left the remaining water plant property at approximately 49.7 acres in size. The property's new legal description was established as Lot 25, according to the final plat of the City Thomas Property recorded as reception No. 401287 of the Pitkin County records. Plans documenting the AH project can be found in Plat Book 41@ Page 41 of the Pitkin County records. Shortly thereafter, in 1997, the Community Development Director approved an insubstantial amendment to the approved SPA for the purpose of relocating a storage building and administrative offices and adding metal roofs to the east and west water plant buildings. More recently, in 2009, the City Council approved Ordinance 18, Series of 2009, authorizing a remodel of the fagade of the administration building and the addition of a carport to the property. Finally, in 2010, the Community Development Director approved an insubstantial SPA amendment to allow for the installation and maintenance of a solar array on top of the existing reservoir. B. Description of Proposed Development The applicant now proposes another insubstantial amendment to the approved SPA plan. This amendment would authorize the construction of a small pump station towards the Insubstantial SPA Amendment and 8040 Greenline Exemption for Water Plant Property Page 2 northeastern corner of the property. The location and configuration of the proposed pump station is shown on the proposed site plan and on the site plan details sheet, both of which accompany this application. The pump station is needed to ensure adequate fire protection can be provided to the nearby Music School/Country Day School Campus. There is not sufficient room on the School Campus to install this facility, necessitating its location on the Water Plant property. The pump station will be built into the hillside, immediately adjacent to an existing dirt road that traverses the property. That road eventually connects to several trails that extend up the Castle Creek Valley, well beyond the property boundary. The pump station will be built into the grade and buried, with only some locked access ports and a wing wall being visible from above grade. The pump station measures less than 500 sq. ft., most of which should not count as floor area since the vast majority of the structure will be subgrade. It should be noted that construction of the pump station will impact the road/trail and cause it to be closed for approximately 2 months this coming spring. The applicant will temporary relocate the road so that access to the trails above will be maintained. However, this relocated road segment will need to be closed from 8 AM to 5 PM on weekdays to allow the construction to proceed. The relocated segment will be open after 5 PM on weekdays and all day on weekends, providing access to the upper trails. The staff of the Community Development Department has determined that the proposed development qualifies as "public infrastructure" pursuant to Section 26.470.040 (1) of the Code. This section states that public infrastructure includes roads, bridges, waterways, utilities and associated poles, wires, conduits, drains, hydrants and similar items. Since the pump station qualifies as public infrastructure, it is exempt from growth management as an Essential Service and does not require review as an Essential Public Facility. Therefore no further response to the provisions of GMQS is provided in this application. Development of the pump station does, however, require two minor approvals to be granted by the Community Development Director. The following sections of this application address the standards for an insubstantial amendment to the approved SPA and for an exemption from the standards of 8040 Greenline Review. Insubstantial SPA Amendment and 8040 Greenline Exemption for Water Plant Property Page 3 111. INSUBSTANTIAL SPA AMENDMENT As explained above, the Water Plant SPA was originally adopted in 1983 and has been amended several times since that time. Following are the applicant's responses to the standards of Section 26.440.090 A of the Land Use Code by which the Community Development Director may authorize a further insubstantial amendment to the Water Plant SPA. The following shall not be considered an insubstantial amendment: 1. A change in the use or character of the development. Response: The proposed pump station will not change the character of the Water Plant property. The small structure will be a minor addition to the property and will be mostly buried below grade, making its impact virtually negligible. 2. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures on the land. Response: The footprint of this structure is approximately 21' x 21'. Since the structure will be buried there will not be an increase in the coverage of structures on the land. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. Response: The pump station will not generate any traffic nor are other facilities needed to serve the pump station. As noted above, construction of the pump station will impact the existing dirt road/trail and cause it to be closed for approximately 2 months this coming spring. The applicant will temporary relocate the road so that access to the trails above will be maintained. However, this relocated segment will need to be closed from 8 AM to 5 PM on weekdays to allow the construction to proceed. The relocated segment will be open after 5 PM on weekdays and all day on weekends, providing access to the upper trails. 4. A reduction by greater than three (3) percent of the approved open space. Response: There will be no impact on open space since the structure will be buried. 5. A reduction by greater than one (1) percent of the off-street parking and loading space. Response: There will be no decrease in parking on the property. Insubstantial SPA Amendment and 8040 Greenline Exemption for Water Plant Property Page 4 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. Response: No such reduction will occur as part of this project. 7. An increase of greater than two (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. Response: No such increase will be caused by this project. 8. An increase by greater than one (1) percent in the approved residential density of the development. Response: No change in density will occur as part of this project. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Response: The applicant is not aware of any condition or representation associated with the original approval which would be affected by this proposal. Insubstantial SPA Amendment and 8040 Greenline Exemption for Water Plant Property Page 5 , IV. 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW EXEMPTION Because the Water Plant is located within 150' (as measured horizontally) of the 8,040' elevation, development on this property is subject to 8040 Greenline Review. However, Section 26.435.030 B. of the Land Use Code authorizes the Community Development Director to grant an exemption from 8040 Greenline Review if all of the following standards are met: 1. The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five (25) percent. Response: As noted above, the proposed pump station will add a negligible amount of floor area to the property. The building will be less than 500 sq. ft. in size and it will be mostly buried, so the vast majority of the space will not count as floor area. As part of a 2009 land use application for this property, an analysis of the floor area that remains to be developed on the site was completed. The analysis reflected the allowable FAR of 0.08:1 that was authorized in the original Water Plant SPA. That would allow a total of 189,434 sq. ft. of floor area on Lot 4 as it was configured at that time (54.36 acres). If we assume the largest possible floor area reduction for steep slopes (a reduction of 25%), then the resulting allowable floor area of Lot 4 would be 142,075 sq. ft. According to the 2009 application the Waterplace affordable housing units and the water plant buildings have a total existing floor area of less than 40,000 sq. ft., of which more than 22,000 sq. ft. is on the Waterplace property. This leaves in excess of 100,000 sq. ft. of floor area to be built on those two lots. If the analysis were done just for the Water Plant lot the remaining floor area would be even larger (approximately 150,000 sq. ft.). 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section 15.04.450 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said Section. Response: There will not be any trees removed for which a permit would be required in order to install the pump station or the associated utility lines. 3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion and sedimentation. Response: The development is located on a flat portion of the site and is not proximate to any known or mapped geologic hazard area. Insubstantial SPA Amendment and 8040 Greenline Exemption for Water Plant Property Page 6 The applicant will ensure that there is no increase in erosion or sedimentation caused by the development. Erosion and sedimentation control measures, to include straw bales, silt fences and similar filtering devices, will be placed down slope of all disturbed areas. Disturbed areas will be re-vegetated no later than one growing season after completion of construction by applying native seed mixes and fertilizer and by mulching seeded areas with straw. 4. All exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches the totals specified in Section 26.435.030 (B) (1), an 8040 Greenline review must be obtained pursuant to Section 26.435.030 (C). Response: The applicant recognizes and accepts this limitation. This proposed exemption does not bring the property up to the cumulative10% floor area threshold. Insubstantial SPA Amendment and 8040 Greenline Exemption for Water Plant Property Page 7 V. CONCLUSION The above responses and the attached exhibits and drawings provide the information requested by staff at the pre-application conference and demonstrate the project's compliance with the applicable standards of the Aspen Land Use Code. Please do not hesitate to contact us if there is anything else required to process this application. Insubstantial SPA Amendment and 8040 Greenline Exemption for Water Plant Property Page 8 EXHIBITS , EXHIBIT #1 : , I I 1 1 r . 1 7 ', 2 THE CITY op ASPEN ' , . · OFFIce op Tile·CITY A·1'IORNEY ' January 23, 201.2 . 1 Chris Bendon Community Development Department 130 S. Galend St. Aspen, CO 81611 . 'Dear Mr. Bendon: I was asked by.Andy Rossello to provide an opinian regarding the ovinership of Property upon which the Aspen Water Plantis located. The legal description of the Water Plant property is Lot 25, according to the final plat of the City Thomas Property. , Its street address is 500 Doolittle Drive. It ·is my understanding that the City proposes to , construct a small punip station on this property and is seeking·land usd approval for this construction. , . 1 ' I I have reviewed the documents associated with the acquisition and ownership of , the subjdct property. It is my opinion that the property described above is owned by the City of,Aspen and the City. of Aspen has the right to proceed with the develoliment of this parcel. If I can provide any further information, please advise. . Thank you. 0 1 ' 1 Sincerely, .11 , I ., A -e >EL @24 0., ,/ James R. True. 6 Special Counsel ' ,. 130 Souni GALBNA STREET* · ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1975 - PHONE 970.920.5055 14x 970,920.5119 Printedon Re(ycled Paper EXHIBIT #2 Ms. Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION FOR CITY WATER PLANT APPLICATION Dear Jennifer, The City of Aspen is the owner of the Aspen Water Plant property, located at 500 Doolittle Drive. I hereby authorize Alan Richman Planning Services to submit an application for an insubstantial amendment to the approvals previously granted to this property so the City can construct a pump station to serve the Music School Campus. Mr. Richman is authorized to submit this application on our behalf. I will be representing the City in meetings with staff and the applicable decision-making bodies. Should you have any need to contact us during the course of your review of this application please do so by contacting me directly. Sincerely, E 11 11 U 01 il //1, 2- f ·pu.. 93GULC Andy 4s-sello, Utilities Engineer The City of Aspen 970-429-1999 EXHIBIT #3 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Claude Salter, 970.429.2752 UPDATED: 1/5/12 (JP) PROJECT: 500 Doolittle Drive, City Water Plant REPRESENTATIVE: Andy Rossello, 970.429.1999 OWNER: City of Aspen TYPE OF APPLICATION: Insubstantial SPA Amendment DESCRIPTION: The City of Aspen Water Department has proposed the construction of a pump station located on the Water Plant site. The purpose of the pump station is to provide emergency fire flow requirements (water pressure for fire suppression systems) to the MANACDS (Music Association of Aspen and Aspen County Day School, 2 Music School Road) campus prior to construction. The pump station is proposed for the Water Department location because of site specific constraints on the MAA/ACDS campus. The MANACDS campus is located on the valley floor of Castle Creek. The steep slopes around the campus will not accommodate a water tank. The other alternative is to replace the existing 8" (eight) line from the Water Plant to the campus which would be prohibitively expensive and disruptive to the community and the environment. Hence the pump station has been proposed for the Water Plant properly. The pump station would be located near the existing 'Backwash' pond in a concrete building approximately 260 square feet (20'x13'). The building is proposed to be built into a hill side and accessible through the roof and by a walk-in door. The pump itself is the size of a conference table. The purpose of the pump station is to provide the required pressure in an emergency satiation at MANACDS campus. The pump would only function in case of the case of an emergency and during periodic testing. The Water Plant SPA (Specially Planned Area) was created in 1984, and has undergone several development projects since, such as the Water Plant Affordable Housing and expansions to the office and work areas near the water plant. Staff is requiring a land use application be filed to satisfy the SPA amendment. This review appears to be able to be handled administratively. The applicant will need to verify that they meet the standards for an administrative review. The review will not include the Planning and Zoning Commission, therefore no public noticing is required. Below is a link to the Land Use application form and the Land Use Code for your convenience. Land Use Application: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/landuseappform.pdf Land Use Code: http://www.aspe npitkin. com/Depa rtments/Commun ity-Development/Planning-a nd-Zon inq/Title-26-Land-Use- Codel Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.440.090 SPA Amendment 26.435.030. 8040 Greenline 26.470 Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) Review by: Community Development Staff Referral agencies Public Hearing: None Planning Fees: $1,260.00 for administrative review. Additional time over three (4) hours will be billed at $315.00 per hour. Referral Fees: Parks ($630.00 - flat) and Engineering referral ($265.00 per hour with one hour deposit) Total Deposit: $2,155.00 Total Number of Application Copies: 3,1 set of full size plans To apply, submit the following information: n Total Deposit for review of application. 1-1 Pre-application Conference Summary. 1-1 Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant (letter from the HOA if applicable). 2 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 1-1 A site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado. 1-1 A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. [-1 Completed Land Use application and signed fee agreement. Fl An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. r-1 3 copies of the complete application packet and maps. 1-1 A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application § 26.435.030.B 8040 Greenline Exemption and § 26.470.040.B, Exempt Development of the Land Use Code. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. DRAWINGS -U · 644 . 1 . .4 Aspen ' - Meadows ... *An , 4 4-4-/ , : =n - 7- 38 r 4 3 l- 0,· ...„, / 4.A -1/ - , , 1~ . 4 It.' \ . 11 A - 7. f 1 4 4 • . 7 4 4 1 ¥ r, a 4 "' I. $ 1 1 t Maroon Creek Road 4/* . 1 0 ,• t ·,P -; a / 7,41, :r 04* *. 1 /.1. . t....., Asp 6 A . t , V ...~ 'r i ron 4 , Val * Marolt . * Hospital Housing * 0.0 - 1 A Aspen ng , I. -PL- 1-5 £97.gE - :9 . I.... 44 CD / r N 7 B ~ ri ef €229-·G . 0 q> 0 .. \4 . 4 \1 41 , .. b Lr %©R./ //31/ -- Qua go . 72 44 P-1 0 9 d I - Mounta~n Aspen 1 3 7 . L . an .rc:ri((02:trt:,t :t=& 1 ~ e 1 . 4 ASPEN MUSIC FESTIVAL O- I. SDUcture Die Nmember 13,2006 F.1 0 AND SCHOOL Parcel bojnciary Souces 0 275 550 1,100 M 0*a kascre*ed t¥ the ~ Aspen. Colorado C14 of Aspen CIty of Asper¥Plodn Courty GIS 1 NA • 1100 M Q Depamner[ In X]06 ,„1>,11,>11'tlrIVIft*1111 PUMP STATION SITE PLAN: CITY OF ASPEN WATER PLANT A PORTION OF LOT 25, FINAL PLAT OF CITY THOMAS PROPERTY , L. ..il SWh OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. # ' ' FL M' · r. ... CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO \1 It ... V SHEET 1 OF 2 1 . .-. :; ..9.31,110· 3.:..9·~ ~ -~ I. . 1 - 2 272.- i 2 1,4..ef 2.j ' . 1 . I ·· CQI.-21 BOUNDARY PER BOOK 270 PAGE 215 1 PLAT BOOK I PAGE 41 ASPHALT SUFFICE (TyP.) FOUND REBAR & ALU-UW CAP, 6 · ·"'~i tt.9.,t..·li ~ ·~· k:·:,=.,· MUSC SCHOOL PUMP Hol)SE (PROPOSED) . I SEARS N 0710'Ly- W. 1.91 VILINI 1 Y MAP 0 096/0 L '06,) 1 SCALE. 1- = 2000' - -1- ~ - * PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOT 25 ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT OF THE Crry THOMAS PROPERTY 1. 41 7---M RECORDED JANUARY 28, 1997 AS RECEPTION NO. 401287 OF THE Pin(IN COUNTY < RECORDS 0 - UL« 2 0 CITY OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. 10' 1&415UE EASE10,T PER PLAT ~ 1 \9, FOUND NO. 8 REBAR. NO CAP BEARS 5 04=,r23* W, 1.40' - \BOUNDARy PER 000,( 270 PAGE 215 SEE DETAIL SHEET NO. 2 9 1 - NOTES OPEN SPACE 1 PLAT BOOK 4% PAGE 41 1) DATE OF FIELD WORK OCTOBER-NOVEMBER. 2008. UPDATED JULY, 2011. 2) DATE OFPREPARATION: OCTOBER -NOVEMBER, 2008, JANUARY-FEBRUARY, 2009 , THOMAS RESERVOIR - __ UPDATED JULY, 2011 AND JANUARY, 2012 , 3) BASIS OF BEARING: A BEARING OF N 00'03'37- W BETWEEN THE WEST QUARTER TRAIL PER PARKS DEPT. MAPPING CORNER OF SECTION 13, MONUMENTED BY A FOUND 8.L M. BRASS CAP AND THE BLM 7' f.,1 1 UNRECOGNIZED NW CORNER SEC. 13 SET BY L S, 2376 (NOT FOUND THIS MAP BUT CONSISTENT MTH PRIOR SURVEYS AND THE COLORADO LAND SURVEY MONUMENT 'i · 6 REPORTFILED BYGERALOPESMAN(L.S.2376)OATEDJANUAR¥ 12,1973. THISSURVEY PER PLAT , 7?AL PEER Qi.1 WAPPING 2 ]S CONSISTENT WITH THE PLATS OF ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL- SUBDMSION AND THE 2 2 FATHERING PARCEL FOR THE ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL SUBDIVIStON AND THE SU8JECT PROPERTY. DWRT ROAD 1 L-,/ -. - PLAT m~PAGE 41 4) BASIS OF MAP: THE FINAL PLAT OF ™E CITY THOMAS PROPERTY RECORDED JANUARY 28,1997 AS RECEPTION NO 401287 OF THE PmeN COUNTY RECORDS, THE PLAT OF TWIN RIDGE SUBDMSION RECORDED NOVEMBER 15,1990 AS RECEPTION NO. 327979 OF THE Pm(IN COUNTY RECORDS, VARIOUS DOCUMENTS OF RECORD, AND THE FOUND MONUMENTS, AS SHOWN. TWIN Rif}GE 91,801VigiON * ~ PLAT BOOK 25 PAGE 40 5) THIS MAP DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC ©7 ~ w (SE) TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. FOR ALL INFORMATION ~);11 h REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND/OR TAE OF RECORD. SE RELIED UPON THE ABOVE SAID PLATS DESCRIBED IN NOTE 4 NO TITLE COMMITMENT WAS ~ USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY, i m * 6) ™E BUILDINGS, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED AND THOMAS POND WERE LOCATED BY 1954 BRASS CAP UNAU,HOR#ZED SUI SIV SEC CORS I2 "1 ~22~U-/,1/ AREDER~ED FROM THE CHYOFASPEN ANDPIRINCOUNJY JOINT GIS/MAPPING SOPRIS ENGINEERING THE ROAD, TRA/L PONDS AND CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON ~STAMPED SEC. 12 MAWSEREr 244 DEPARTMENT 2004 DATASET. FOOLPE} REBAR & CAP, LE 13165 2*t BOUNDARYSURVEYOFTHESHOWNPROPERTIES BEARS 5 85'39'07- 4 4.70' 94 4 CONTOUR INTERVAL: TWO (2) FEET. nONS 11 2/74/11 BEARS S JOU]'4, £ 11.44' M 8) THE EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP IN NO WAY REPRESENTS A LAND SURVEY PLAT OR *62 11 SOO'053r E 220141 FOU#£ aLW. BRASS CAPS SECTIONS O,14 SUREYOR'S STATEMENT BLM UNRECOGNIZED SW CORNER SEC. 12 SET BY LS. 2376 ALED BY GO?ALD PESMAN B.S 2370) DA 715ED JANUARY 12 --r 1, MARK S. BECKLER, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY SOPRIS NOT FOUAO 774 SURWEr BUT CONS,STRVT W™ PRIOR SURVEYS, THE COLORADO LAND SURVEY MONUMENT REPORT ENGINEERING, LLC FOR THE CITY OF ASPEN WATER DEPAR™ENT. AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. PR9~A#) OF ™IS M* MARK S. BECKLER L.S. NO. 28643 GRAPHIC SCALE 9 .IT,WOn. W 4, 94 SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC +ABLJ--di CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 ( IN FEET) NOnCE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW rOU MUST COMMENCE AMY LEGAL ACTION 8ASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WI™IN THREE YEARS CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 1 inch = 100 fl AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT+ IN NO EVENT WAY ANY ACION 'ASED UPON INY DEFECT I THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN (970) 704-0311 1 11132 01/17/12 11132 28149-BASE-27115-29-DATUM.DWG R. 1 11+F DA. AF (TRnFICATION 9HnvIN HFRFr'IN 5 '/ t 55'. I N 8006'59- W 329.69 BOUNDARY PER BOOK 270 PAGE 215 PER Bon,< 270 240 7,T , PUMP STATION SITE PLAN: CITY OF ASPEN WATER PLANT A PORTION OF LOT 25, FINAL PLAT OF CITY THOMAS PROPERTY swil OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 2 OF 2 Mur' 1 / : 0 . 1/ Ck==4423> '11 -1=-1--7- 1 il f »f / 4 .1,1 #,/, f 1/ 9/ U EASEMENT PER RAT 'H < CL f 10- EXIST/NG CONDmONS LEGEND WATERVAL. 9 culs,op A GAS AETER 0 EEC™JCM'm m TELEPHONE PEDEST*L </1 + 494*09 f lilli f ; 31-1 ~ ~ j i illiff f f f Al t* 3. l / dll"l=f 'E·: 6 f,2« 31 ) < < 5 CONCRETE SURFA (TYP.) TRAIL 9/029/22 5 72/ A~EL ROAD / 3 4 4441/ "= -11 C ~ SINGLE-STORY · 612· 13 2-)-,43 ~ SmUCTURE . 4 4 k k '68 STORY 3 STRU ..1 0 4 '«,r 4 14 f~f r C ill 42. 1 11/ 17·81 27.· GRAPHIC SCALE : )( 31.- f 1, 21 \ 42.1 SINGLE-STORY STRUCTURE ( IN FEET) 11\\1 61 71-\\ A> f: 7 62 SINGLE-STORY 1 inch = 20 ft STRUCTURE 6 1 1 U /1 ... 48. A SNGLE~STORy 3.5 42'• 40«00 j -~- - STRUOTURE .3 SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 NOnCE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU WUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION 'ASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN ™REE YEARS CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 AF·TER YOU FIRST DISCOER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTICN BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN (970) 704-0311 YFAI?9 FRO,l THF nATF OF EFRT!Flr:ATI"d *Irm'11 HFRFr»1 GRK 11132 01/17/12 11132 28149-BASE-27115-29-DATUM.DW{ , . j ~ \ i LNE ZES UNWR ZONgs MATER!81=$ t 0 4 \ \\ SERrt MANTAN 7' MN cov'Ee EACW SEE OF= OPEN FIELD CONDInON ROAD CONDITION \ " - not-~ti~« .2-1.Crea'V 4-~~~1~EMNMW \\- \4 '5 ~m-;I~,~ ir-*4 1,? G.;a ,/i' 'Lb•"c:P 8,/ UP,BOT; NLASBREMel»ger OF·.b it\, 111% f - , '2 1 *' --8'*6'720"GK•'~69: 0* IN OPEN FIELD CONDITIONS, 11 MOUND BACKFILL TO 4 19* £ DP ABOVE EXISTING GRADE - \111/ kkn f. « EXISTING GRADE J / , >-80 90' BEhE> ll/Te,Pt's AT 7321 I \ t 4 )' , \. ' 40'51<78 1- -e-·-41~ j r i /-/ - *iLi . r L.. l --\ La> >29 1 Y 1 ''I . - 1 Da>·, 2) 24 1 2 IN £ *8116.10 fiL-,« 3 -/7 2 ~ i " CULVERTS ; i i ' ' ...6, DA.h i te- . ; Nki~J ' 1 + : 1 LOCATON GF *<STN¢3 , lE OUT 81 1.40 ..1, f , A .6 // \\ - ' ' -I ' *. f /,1 11 4 LNe N ROAD[&*r To' € AL, p-* 1 - 'fh A op<€ 2 ' i- - - CO\;el AL T ..1 L f I i -- - i /·& FOR AGGREGATE Il , i , 1 1 · ' 1 , /i 1 8 + 1 .A'« 7,9-V .4 3 7/ . ~ Ah© DEPTUD OF: 48# 8" ~ 7 J O ' , x \~~f REPLACEMENT 1 \ 7 1 1 BEYOND TRENCH , 1 1 //34 0, f.:>f 31, 2 DF TO APS , --tift:ECT 8 DP-OVER 14 1 1 9 %. 42 4/ NE CMP CULYERTS. Ur, TREEKH 1 1 ... p-- \~ *REr -' BACKFIL- ZO 1,1 11'El ./ 1 alvERT Roy MIN ; 1 1 1 1. OF O' INSTALL. 1 OF R 1 4- SLOPE OR SUPPORT 3 1 1 1 , .yL¥ 11. 8 1 48.1. -£~ A--- . 1 1 SIDE WALLS 1 1 1/2 / i U~. 't hi / ~ NSULAT©N ©' 5,494 8.CE OF / 114 I M' CROSS#*36 EE71!EEN UATER P € f / /l-- ~ - s,CKFU MATERIAL. ) 'i lt# b 49 - 44.-~-0.2 -1/ * 1 Ait a.afRE-coMER* .._--- l .h/ COMPACT IN DISTINCT I ~»Stispx - , / 0 . * LIFTS WI™ \ \I/V EQUIPMENT TO 95% MECHANICAL SPD. NO ROCKS 2-1 \,29 GRANULAR OR OVER 2" COMPACTED SELECT , TO ADD FLL OVER 62 1 j KSUB"OP TOOBTAN/·ZNF' PIOE .113 "TITTJTITETTrT-rrr,rrr~ NEED TO BE REUORKED -·1 / COVER, INSTALL NBU 8" DP - 6 BACKFILL -,2 • 1 - NATIVE MATERIAL ~ f ..54/ 24.22:895>«33» 4 et¥,f•M#,•A,•,·A.¥.,~K -- 3 THICK DOW STYROFOAM INSULATION OR 2 FET OFF EC)GE oF 24" DIP TO ZCNE 91 }(,R R 1# 34 M 320 EQUAL F LESS THAN 4' OF COVER. MIN 1 + 9 \ < Ca 4 1 E--2,Id uer *;'~ 4--DU-I~JWL-LY* INSULATION WIDTH TO BE PIPE OD + 12 ' .- EXTENDING BEYOND EDGE OF PIPE(S) ON - - '1.E -+IM- ../ I. I -2 A. A.>I EACH SIDE Et:)GE OF 24" DP, 7' Cov~ -1 / F t '· -7 - GRANULAR OR j MAINTAIN ALGIMENT - 6' OF•: 7 12 , ... ' 2~~VILID - --»-1-4 i - 1, 0<~ SEE 016 NO 3 FOR DETALS THIS DETAR IS FOR THE PIPEUNES / 0-62~13/1/,///f«///{/ // //6>*56% 9//1<111 ------ --\ 8tr I < COMPACTED SELECT ~_-isT uFT (4- - 7 /-11 1 /7 1 14- %4«.1 »ASPEN MJet SCHOOL PUMP MIN.,1 '-0" ___1 NATIVE MATERIAL 1 9 /' STATON AND METERNG BLDO MAX) REQUIRING INSULLATION. THE CIrr OF , J-/ 0 .....1 .....7 .. .. ...J \- 1+NZA .*\ 11 --- . -**/<64>#D (fj -' 8 r-4 4-4 8·07 TYPICAL PIPE TRENCH IMMEDIATELY AROUND THE PUMP STAnON / 1 ~ :/// 0 -\\\ %*---Iof-refF--=r~--~'-- --- -r UT 1 -4 LF. B' DIP, DETAIL 1 APSEN 2011 WATER INSTALLAITION \- auf ,-~1 · STANDARD DETAILS ARE TO BE USED IN 0.. NO BCALE C2 ALL OTHER LOCADONS AND ALL OTHER 3, -n(55-ye"ap'ae,£28*67:24' WATER UNES INSTALLATIONS r 044 1/-- LF ,.Dp M" DP TO &£:a U*7154>L k a' TO - '1.- '~ 1 ' ff--- *o•Se)4'0*9 0' MI/ale *-- 00™01.£ 7-v·E,3/52 GM NATALL 2" NSULATION 10' EACH --- --03 4 0 \. -1 1 / y 84 € 9 -k I .~ 11 i K I ./4 r ¢ 46- N- ----fi-FLE-2*SR&ENG ON C F LESS ji 11 8" 22-1/2* BE© W/TB,M-'30 1 , REST?RAN BEND BACK TO PS --- 1 6.\ ~-~-. 1- »«1-----1 -2 -<- 1 - 21-1-1 ~" f /1, ' \0 A 1 1 , r\-----ap- 24.0 TEE, (D 8' GV, 8 SITE WORK LEGEND 1, , /, 1, 1 --9 9 .q:6=.2-- 12-N -CE'.- 24" ey'a, 24" SOLD SLEEVE, 14* LA 1 \ 8" DIP. C 90* BEND. 5'8"DP TO EXISTING ITEMS \ 7 ..2_29'p~- ----z=--=r·ki~,~\1>f\\ 1..'6 1*~ - 4.; BLE,6 - Laij PRESSURE SUCTION ' --.* -4* . \- 48'* 8" DIP - - lib'1'ARI / ~14 £ -~- t17Ed,STOR le PSe,PX -IT - - STORM SEWER LOCATION AND DEPTWOF= VE ill VAc.1 E><15TNG 24" DP AND EXSTING B" - ELECTRIC 'PSTREA• 0.2411 -" rge , -LK#-- 1 11 1 AND VALVE COMP.Ex - ' SERVICE TO AMS G ---·-- --- NATURAL GAS €111 814/.83, 1 1 1 Z-34_/ ----C,+- PO'[haE'AlER */ ,?ALVE l To= -2,-£ 81346' -,i'.1 /.6 -<235-,€7•*91€£>ra"SP'aEMB .i:21. h -WL ,1,1 1 1 ASTALL 8" 7Z (00"evi - -LT - - BURIED .LEP'ONE ~1 ~0 i ----441. i 7% 1 \ 1 ,1 ,M CONNECT NEWa"C>PTOE><8" ; 1 141 1111 DP TO APS, Ui/TE¢ML'e -- ~ --- ~ -- FENCE iLATLC? -ANK 2 ,/ 2- Iii *\ 11 PROPEHTY LINE ///// ---\\ 11._1.-.1~ .1 /L- % WATER E.-8'3354' j . M -- 'ANHal · '-- 2: 009 / ....El Sug.CE 'r': 1 - -- - .-OHE-2-- OVERHEAD PIER - POWER POLE ./ Guy ¤ UGHT POLE --k .a #6 4 I # ..O \1 1/ 1 . il 14 0 11 1 1 13 ' 1 ./ 1.. \ PROPOSED ITEMS 1111: t.d 6/j,, 1?OIl ~ 1% - m -4,2 / 1' ' /4 PROPOSED WArERtINE */ ,·AL€ hr --* 1 20« 1,1~/f j I ~ 1 SLOPE L'NES 413.9 I SPOT ELEVATION ~ ORAVEL SURFACE ~---7"*45~.1 :--ff,A /,fi /1//., //,/'''f) 2 f . a :1>1 ah 0 \ 1 « « L-1-6 744> 77 l / £: ' CONCRETE - PLAN 'El =ill_ DESIGNS-OPE ..· % 7 1 I . ABBREMAEONS ¢ 46% ASPEN MUSIC SCHOOL CES CONNECT TO EXISTING SYSTEM '6 3 9/1£ ' w/re-L'. WITH THRUST SLOCK AND MEGA LUGS Ll .1 / ,~ tom:~~~i)614'. m~ DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE 9 m :'It WL WATER UNE EX EXISTING --4 firli#A-3 ~ ~ f Id 1----4 !:: c ) 1 COA CITY OF ASPEN h /9 - FLTI.7~ -«--14,/1 1~ t» 1 O~fi»~4~ 11 1 21-1 -n»iu ~~' ~F~ f,~1.04 /' 30 0 30 so „,· lfEA9_. 1 inch = 30 feet 4 01Jl L/1, ur \-421 l!=1 6-r~ / ~f<4//// r '1%&9. 1 4.-t iumber Revisior Desclipt on 2> Cote CITY OF ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT INTERCONNECT TO COA and SITE PLAN DES,GN:GDO Drawing Numbe'. ~Laughhn Water DETAIL: RD PROJECT NUMBER PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO ASPEN MUSIC SCHOOL PUMP STATION AND DETAILS Ergineers, Ltd CHECK: GOD. RJM 03-03-5g 2 '=15 DATE· AUGUST 2011 C.=Ar A~-4-, 69-£0-£0 -roac / ttog LO 838,13 Ld3S / SMC·31.5 Sd S DISAM N3dSV / Sd -100HOS OSON N3dSV LAND USE APPLICATION RECEIVED APPLICANT: JAN 2 3 2012 Name: c.49 09 ks?e» - LUL, UP o,4*5 0-a.< 4 C \3 0 4 -4.-• <44 *14 Co g ~N~BO.'P A Apcm Location: UEI,Ela,4. (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 21 15 \32 01 31 5 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: ALA- 42.L JL--. QLK#44 9 A- VLC, r Address: 40,4 3 6 \8 6, rk Co S £ 6,1 Phone #: Rio Kl-• lil5 PROJECT: Name: wA•g. 1(Avj Q.AF,ki- ?ev.? <\Ak. 4 Address: 500 0.64014 98..Vt kia- a jific Phone #: 914 -\449 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Conditional Use El Conceptual PUD U Conceptual Historic Devt. Special Review U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ~1 Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal U Conceptual SPA , ,.4.2644*.R•.1 m Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment 1 Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) C] Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption ~ 9 xi-,4,1 m Subdivision C] Historic Designation ® ESA -8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes ~ Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane U Lot Split U Temporary Use ~ - ------ ----- m Other: E Lot Line Adjustment D Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) lee- A-K.-1•, 4 fl~"k-1- PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 41•.l v,KA Qv*.f 5KA414- 4.0 <ekve- Ast'. "-v#A, Pe'fA.V.(ACA-1**4 Have you attached the following? FEES DIJE: $ 2 , 5~ 5- - 4) Ar . eu i A ise..6.-Al €kt,v, 6% Pre-Application Conference Summary ~ Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement 81 Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ® Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards 00000 ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: U)-64 ?La tfu~ r·39 0 v v--¢ 4-XAJFL M Applicant: 01)61 0F AE€,f•t'6~- 9~'\0\ZL &JOAv,5 PuLGA Location: 500 9,•i.#Al«· O#.uc Ar; r'-- Zone District: 94 6\ €04 Lot Size: (44-1 A e,45 Lot Area: A o f 04/ 4 L.4 (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: AA Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing.*v#\ A Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: ACA Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Toi La·\' 4 + 9045 €44·k, 1 Floor Area: Existing.-*~- 40 05'eUllowable. Al- H.1,000 Proposedf *|- Ho,000 Principal bldg. height: Existing: («A Allowable: '14 Proposed: ~£9®» Access. bldg. height: Existing. #\ A Allowable: •·•44lp.-Fi'9Proposed: Li€ On-Site parking: Existing: #\Ar Required: W LA Proposed: N(A % Site coverage: Existing. ACA Required. H (A Proposed: 14 k % Open Space: Existing. M \ A Required: A lA Proposed: h k Front Setback: Existing. B l A Required: \0 Q Proposed: 7 Itcl Rear Setback: Existing: AR Required. (00, Proposed: -1 (09 Combined F/R: Existing: .\A Required. - vil• Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: A<A Required: \004 Proposed: 7 J<0 4 I Side Setback: Existing: •1 * Required: \00' Proposed: 1 |001 Combined Sides: Existing: .C A Required: BE 1•- Proposed: W U Distance Between Existing -\A Required: MIA proposed: N N Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Aowe Variations requested: AO.Q. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT =».:--» I,4 ~ 6$-4-'/*76r-..137*1C<#.RE<F#;.AE*1*3* tofr<K'**I)*9**.*0*E'%/i#.t'3'F8#M+4446.*i;*ti,Exy'q&.%£1·>~.*&5'.If..'32#&'1 '<Il'en'li Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City») and Property i Phone No.: 9 70 /,/2-9, /990 Owner ('1"): C--1 14)°4 4>pe-,n Email: bir,)-1 Possell<(«j c ·'./Cjpr,i. /('. 1 LS 1 Address of ./1 Billing /56« ) Properly: .572(3 bcol, T Tie. br Address: (subject of i~ pe, , Co b (623 (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the properly owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ 630.00 flat fee for Park Dept referral . $ flat fee for $ flat fee for . $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 1260.00 deposit for 3 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $315 per hour. $ 265.00 deposit for 1 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. Engineering will bill against the deposit. City of Aspen: Property Owner· /- 7 fi D ,/ bAWN Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name: O 5 5 f 1 1 U Title: 01,41,9 43~~eer r.0.2. City Use: Fees Due: $ 2.155.00 Received: $ November, 20 It City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 Wk»*63:*3 91524442,7/~,~ CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT » Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees </~AA&~ CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and The City ofAspen Water Department (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for Insubstantial SPA Amendment thereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City of Aspen has an adopted fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because o f the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment ofan initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty ofrecovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $2,155 which is for 4 hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $245.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such acerued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT Chris Bendon A.J.j L•y:O>~ Community Development Director Date: 1 ~ l7 <11- Billing Address and Telephone Number: 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 970-429-1999 544 bit O I - Memorandum Date: February 8, 2012 To: Sara Nadolny From: Brian Flynn, Parks Department Re: Water Plant 8040 Greenline Review Tree Permit: It is the opinion of the Parks Department that Standard #2 of the 8040 green line review is not being met and the application will impact trees that are of code size, requiring a permit. Per City Code 13.20 an approved tree permit is required for the removal of any tree or the excavation under the drip line of the tree. Parks is requiring that the tree permit be approved prior to approval of building permits. Mitigation for removals will be paid cash in lieu or on site per City Code 13.20. Parks will approve a finallandscape plan duringthe review of the tree removal permit based on the landscape estimates. The proposed locations of the water lines will require the removal of several code size trees. The grading of the site will also impact code size trees. Specific excavation techniques will be required to decrease the impact of the excavation on tree roots for all trees remaining on site. Contact the City Forester for details on pre- cutting roots. Excavation/Earth work: As planned, construction of the pump house requires a re-grading of the surrounding hillside. The grading impacts areas as far as 30 and 40 feet from the finished structure. Parks believes that these impacts are excessive and will require the removal of code size trees. Alternative excavation techniques should be required to minimize impacts. 8040 Greenline Review Standards, C: requires that any grading minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural features. Parks Department Staffbelieves the proposed grading does not meet this Standard and thus requires alternative excavation to minimize disturbance to the terrain. » Road/Trail: Parks and Trails Staff require approval of the proposed detour and plan for pedestrian safety prior to building permit sign off. Infrastructure: Parks recommends that when possible all of the underground pipes and connections be installed within the road/trail area. Keep as much of the work and infrastructure in the existing disturbed areas to reduce impacts to vegetation. Reducing vegetation impacts has a direct impact on cost, requiring less restoration and is consistent with the 8040 Greenline Standards. Re-vegetation/Restoration: Parks requires approval of a full re-vegetation or restoration plan that should include seed mix, plant species, irrigation and a noxious weed control plan. Approval of a building permit is contingent on an approved re-vegetation plan. Sara Nadolny From: Andy Rossello Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:35 AM To: Sara Nadolny Subject: FW: Water Pump Plant Proposal at 500 Doolittle Dr From: G Dean Derosier [mailto:mweaspen@rof. net] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 2:43 PM To: Andy Rossello Cc: 'Alan Richman' Subject: RE: Water Pump Plant Proposal at 500 Doolittle Dr Answers in Red From: Andy Rossello [mailto:Andy.Rossello@ci.aspen.co.us] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:09 AM To: Dean Derosier Subject: AN: Water Pump Plant Proposal at 500 Doolittle Dr Let me know how you feel we should address issues 1 and 2. Thanks From: Sara Nadolny Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 4:09 PM To: arichman@sopris.net Cc: Andy Rossello Subject: Water Pump Plant Proposal at 500 Doolittle Dr Good afternoon Alan - I am the planner who is working on the land use application approval forthe installation of the pump house at 500 Doolittle Dr. In the application you gave an estimated 500 square feet as the size of the pump house. Are you comfortable with my using this number in calculations, or would you like to provigelliipre accurate square footage? IS this forthe building or area of disturbance - area of disturbance is larger tharkEDP.: I believe that you are eligible for the 4080 Greenline Exemption with the condition that the removal of trees will require a permit as well as mitigation for tree removals. Brian Flynn of Parks has determined that there are a number of code sized trees that will require removal. Parks Staff have further requested the following conditions upon approval: 1. An alternative means of excavation to minimize disturbance to the terrain; We are limited due to the main 24" water line in the edge of the road. Excavation needs to protect the 24" main feeder to Aspen. We also are installing the Pump Station into the side of the hill to reduce excavation and grading required. 2. The approval of the proposed detour and pedestrian safety plan by Parks and Trails Staff; Contractor is required in the contract to submit a detour plan for approval by the Parks- Section of the Special Conditions '11.04 PEDESTRIAN PATH I'lie existing access road is a public pedestrian path. The contractor will need to maintain public access for an existing pedestrian path after working hours along the west side of the ' existing access road. Trenches will need to be fenced. filled, protected from the public at all time when the contractor is not on site. The pedestrian path will be closed during working hours. but open during non-working hours. No work on Saturdays or Sundays will be allowed. Contractor shall provide a plan for tempoiary path relocation, signage. fencing. safety, protection for the public, and all other issues. The 1 contractor shall prvvide the Temporary Pedestrian Path Plan to the City of Aspen Parks and water department for review and approval. 3. Where possible all underground pipes and connections to be installed within the road/trail area; and -All pipes *pre in the roadway except in the South side of the pump station where we need to connect back into the existing 8" feed to the music school with is on the edge of the road. 4. A revegetation/restoration plan the includes seed mix, plant species, irrigation and noxious weed control. Andy , - is Alan providing this??? If so we need to make sure it has the excavation storage area on the east side of the PS excavation. Please let me know if you agree to these four conditions. Thanks, and I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, SolrouM. Nad.01« 901*a- Te»v Coty of-Ame,vv ' Dept ofCO+71+7!Ufl£ty DeA/elOp Flle*lt 130 S. Cia·1£,na,St Aspere, CO 81611 ph<' 970.429.2739 www. a.*penpECkin:covvt,/ Email secured by Check Point 2 Sara Nadolny From: Brian Flynn Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 8:47 AM TO: Sara Nadolny Subject: RE: 500 Doolittle Drive Nothingon the closure, 1 agree that we won't want people in there duringthe working hours, so I am happy with it. If the road/trail is used a lot we'll hear about it and water will be forced to find a detour. Thanks for keepingthe update on your radar. BIM" Pyr"n Open Space and Special Projects Manager (P)970-429-2035 (17)970-920-3128 @ASPEN 0 PARKS & RECREATION From: Sara Nadolny Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 2:58 PM To: Brian Flynn Subject: 500 Doolittle Drive Hi Brian - a couple of things. First off I told Jen about the mistake that is in the Land Use Code, regarding where it references Section 15.04.450 instead of 13.20. She said these mistakes are all over the Code, and to make a note of it for the next round of updates/revisions. So I'll be sure to keep this redline on the list for parts that require change. Secondly, in your comments you didn't mention anything regarding the temporary road that will be closed during specific periods of the weekdays. I do note your comment regarding the need for Parks and Trails staffapproval of the proposed detour and the plan for pedestrian safety. Do you have any comment regarding the trail closure? Sincerely, Sol,rou M. N a.dolvl PIanFLer Tech C gy of A *e» Dept ofcordKnicty Developyyu~nt 130 5. Cia**wt,St. Alpen·; CO 81611 pIt. 970.429.2739 w ww.cuperlpakon<Coyli/ 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property C . Owner ("1"): <LI 43 0 4 45 P e,n Phone No.: 9 70/9 2-9- l999 Email: 411 · Eosselli© c.·.Lpen, ro. 0 5; Address of Billing /9-4 ) Property: 33-'6 bc©{,tile_DE·. Address: (subject of application) ~-5 PLA, C 0 %> (62 3 (send bills here) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ 630.00 flat fee for Park Dept referral . $ flat fee for $ flat fee for . $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 1260.00 deposit for 3 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $315 per hour. $ 265.00 deposit for 1 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. Engineering will bill against the deposit. City of Aspen: Property Owner· Chris Bendon Y« f zt-j u. AB& Community Development Director Name: l./ b4 r«) .3 Title: 02,41··es 6~rkeen 0.0.4 - City Use: Fees Due: $ 2,155.00 Received: $ November, 2011 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative - meaning an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amounts may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant's request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purposes of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and all past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final application submission. Upon final approval all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 or more days past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, an unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. November, 2011 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 THE Cin or As],EN Community Development Department Internal Funds Transfer Date: 01/25/2012 Department: Utilities and Environmental In~ Amount Requested: $2,155.00 Account Number: 421.00.00000.21463 Permit Number: Permit Address: 500 Doolittle Drive, Aspen, CO 816~ Permit Description: Construction of Pump House for AMA on City Property Requested By: Andy Rossello Received By: Angela Scorey THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: January 30,2012 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 003.2012.ASLU -Insubstantial SPA Amendment. The planner assigned to this case is Sara Nadolny. 3 Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. ~&~Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. 1-~pnk You - h «9- ft-AL--%-X NAnifer Ebelan, Deputy Director City o f Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required SPA PUD COWOP Yes No -.c_ Subdivision (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes - No-,ZE- Commercial E.P.F.