HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.P&Z Scoring.1981 •
•
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project V0 1 e/r- //Q C-? Date 2. -F•:
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 3
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage 3
4. Fire Protection c�
5. Parking Design
6. Roads •
7. Energy : ---
Subtotal /o
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation 7
2. Police Protection 2
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities /
6. Handicapped Design Features /
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) � 1 Y
•
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) 2 4/
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal /9. 8
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points) ^ G —
E. Bonus Points
TOTAL 6
Name r7PC ,i J7 //a U-../
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project y - P,c ?ice Date F41, 2. /9p/
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection _
5. Parking Design
6. Roads
7. Energy
Subtotal / 7
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity /
Subtotal 7
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 perdent) / '(
// C,4tC/' y� / 607
i �(2 a uo
•
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal /45
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points) G
E. Bonus Points
TOTAL.
Name ) /7,41/
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project • - /1/F7ge &RK /,c Pe 0/n Date • • 8.1
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage '?
•
4. Fire Protection 2'
5. Parking Design
6. Roads 3
7. Energy 2 —
Subtotal �D
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area •
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection / —
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features o
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent)
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) 3
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points) `)
E. Bonus Points O
TOTAL
2
Name y 7 / /a IiC/
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project /0/3 • /72/777194, Date 2.7. S
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service '2
2. Sewer Service ,?
3. Storm Drainage 3
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design '
6. Roads
7. Energy 3
Subtotal / 7
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation /
•
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths /
4. Childcare Facilities /
5. Recycling Facilities /
6. Handicapped Design Features //
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) e
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal , 2 2
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points
61/76
TOTAL K q
Name 2 l/a
•
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
_ _ RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Y4.
Project 6( 1 ' j • A 4 om- Date •.3 • S/
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 3
2. Sewer Service °1
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection 3
5. Parking Design .�
6. Roads J7
7. Energy 3
Subtotal /c
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection 2
) (./i0 T-271,52, LL y
3. Bicycle Paths J
4. Childcare Facilities
/(7( 7(e.o />, icczr 'cEacr
5. Recycling Facilities /
6. Handicapped Design Features `
7. Commercial Support Proximity /
Subtotal 9
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) C
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
•
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
•
Subtotal G
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points) /
E. Bonus Points
TOTAL ✓ 7
Name � ) Z ///
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
die RE PROPOSALS /� p
Project Date L ^1 - kit
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 3
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage 3
4. Fire Protection 3
5. Parking Design 2
6. Roads
7. Energy
Subtotal [ v
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
• area
1. Public Transportation 2,
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths • f
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity 2
Subtotal 7
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) /6, t/
•
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
c/
•
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
•
Subtotal I I
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points
Lore. Lore. th-1704.-
TOTAL 47
Name 9 11(15-fi
C
i irs:#°°
o
•
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project QUMy /1St L Date 02-2-t/
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 3
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage 3
•
4. Fire Protection 3
5. Parking Design 2
6. Roads 2
7. Energy 2
Subtotal ��
•
0
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new servide at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation ,
2. Police Protection 1
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities 0
6. Handicapped Design Features 1
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal 7
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) t
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points P / tY4 /
TOTAL �O
Name @Ache
t v
07
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
/ RESIDENNTIAL PROPOSALS
Project siiit.�'fi / t„ Date )-- - 9/
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 2
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage 2
4. Fire Protection 3 —
5. Parking Design '2.
6. Roads 3
7. Energy 2.
Subtotal �/ l7
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation it
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths '
4. Childcare Facilities 1
5. Recycling Facilities Q
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity 2
Subtotal
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent)
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points
•
TOTAL v
Name
fs--
•
Z$
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
� R E ESIDENTIIAL PROPOSALS •
Project 10f r el y 0 444 , Date 2 ' % - 2
G
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 2.
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage 2 .
4. Fire Protection 2
5. Parking Design 1
6. Roads 2
7. Energy 2 —
• Subtotal " /
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation 2
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths 1
4. Childcare Facilities 1
5. Recycling Facilities 0
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity Z
Subtotal 9
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) 2 1
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal 2 L
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points /_-
br 60..c4 cot bq - Z
• TOTAL
Name 7a
' 2
9
4
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
r RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS c �
Project I94 v Date I • ?- ti
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 3
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage 2..
4. Fire Protection 3
5. Parking Design
6. Roads 2
7. Energy 3
Subtotal 17.
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection 2.
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities 0
6. Handicapped Design Features 1
7. Commercial Support Proximity 1
Subtotal
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) 20
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal 2- a
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points) /0
E. Bonus Points
•
TOTAL
Name
i
S
70
ei
•
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project / /7F e(tir A/46( Date 3 7/
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 3
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection .3
5. Parking Design 2
6. Roads
7. Energy °
Subtotal / 7
r
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation L
2. Police Protection 1
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities
•
5. Recycling Facilities 1
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) iii
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) 2, �f
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
•
Subtotal // 7
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points 4
TOTAL 44r
,
Name
/r
t
i
7
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project ,C9/0/0i AM (1 Date ,2 — — P/
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection 2
5. Parking Design 2
6. Roads 2
7. Energy 2
Subtotal lir 17
r
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths 1
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) /$
1
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal l 8
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points) !1
E. Bonus Points 0
•
TOTAL 44 i
Name
•
e
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project „5M/f)QLr - &f a Date z - a - S'f
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage .�
•
4. Fire Protection —
5. Parking Design 9 .
6. Roads 3
7. Energy 1
Subtotal 1 r9
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation _
2. Police_ Protection 7
3. Bicycle Paths • f
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent)
•
•
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) 4c
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal G
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points fl
TOTAL J2,
Name 7 r ` � '� f G` heiCree`es'
•
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project / &' /, ,� 5. ,J "'f /V Date 2 ° 3 ` S
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service j
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection 1
5. Parking Design .1
6. Roads 0 —
7. Energy 3 —
Subtotal / 6
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation 2
2. Police Protection — 2
•
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features r
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal /
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent)
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal 2 L
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points) 0
E. Bonus Points 9
4/4 Jr& vC 62eN-S
GeeM lip a`0 Iht6 °d :S /N/N A
TOTAL
if
Name G / 4044 -
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project � 7/f4C i,L 4110,10 /1/9404 l%WL'' Date „7
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 3
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage 2..
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design 2
6. Roads
7. Energy 3
•
Subtotal /6
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new .service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection Z
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 . percent) ) D
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal 2 p
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points) /0
E. Bonus Points
TOTAL
Name ,":66t �W " .":1
_,
;.®
J
/6
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
P � a D3 8/
Project t - Dat
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service •:
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection 3
5. Parking Design
6. Roads
7. Energy
Subtotal /S
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation 1
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities 1
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal ,7
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) Uo.
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) 2 . 41—
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal /,E . K
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points .
\ Grip{ c ) n, - ' -
T O T A L 41',3
Name
C..)44,71/C-CA—C. 7-et
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENNTIAL PROPOSALS
Project £ U 1.3 1.H PeS A,/ Date Z-/ 4 '
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 2
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage '
4. Fire Protection 3
5. Parking Design
6. Roads
7. Energy .3
Subtotal 16
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new servide at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities
/6 - (fir s fratay attuia cc con(i 7
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features 0
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal Co
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) i S
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points) 0
E. Bonus Points 67
TOTAL
Name v ' k-K
•
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project SUAR /4 /tee Date 247 45/
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage
•
•
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design 1
6. Roads .
7. Energy S
Subtotal ai
•
•
w f .. O
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new servide at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation 2
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal *�
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent)
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) 5
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points
P '(Q jJ \ QOs pc rip Uk
\Dui - Qrrypteu, -C._2 Un i � H&or
r (C VP,Pk — CA.3V 4(Saz -. o- pc (
houY.t s co S eQ etto 'c.,
o itrez4 kor 0 'Oa (f IQ TOTAL
JD\ O rf - 0 fl & e- POI »ts
Name Jahn") ahn")) 11-e.- ry
r
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project 'pis E H<-(A-09— Date Date e2 -O 3 - IS /
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
O Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 2+
2. Sewer Service Z
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection 2 '
•
5. Parking Design 2 '
6. Roads a '"
7. Energy `
Subtotal / 5
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new servide at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing lev -el of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities 2.
5. Recycling Facilities 0
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity 2'
Subtotal 9
C. Employee ousing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) 21./
•
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points /
no MA) fi onatQ cMxYx7
TOTAL cS
Name V c(�vrn7lye, /c( E,
6
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS „ `
Cs `� 4 ettret S. (-\shQr '-)'
Project 0,€ Dt /0 PY1f1� Date 2 " 03-8
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
• 0 Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 24
2. Sewer Service 9-4
3. Storm Drainage 24
•
4. Fire Protection 3
5. Parking Design Z
6. Roads
7. Energy 3
Subtotal ! 5
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new servide at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation ( S
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths
'A. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities 7
6. Handicapped Design Features �+
7. Commercial Support Proximity 1. 5
Subtotal �? 1
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) 9-0
•
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points
TOTAL 4if7
Name '_"'' Q ylit.CA—e. 214/
•
J. 1
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project ate, 4.4 DatesdA6 / , �T/ p`
!
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service 0 4 1 j!'tai
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level TT
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service J
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage 3
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design ?i
6. Roads ?i
7. Energy
Subtotal
c-
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation v
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths /
4. Childcare Facilities /
5. Recycling Facilities /
•
0 . Handicapped Design Features !
7. Commercial Support Proximity 1/
Subtotal 9
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) /19,i
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) P.
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points
TOTAL "erosi
•
Name da.c.,
91.40a°
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS Q/
Project Date �„L6 3 , /9l/
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service 3
3: Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection 3
5. Parking Design y
6. Roads
7. Energy
Subtotal 11
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation ?■'
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths 1
4. Childcare Facilities ?/
5. Recycling Facilities 1
6. Handicapped Design Features 1
7. Commercial Support Proximity t
Subtotal ID
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) it
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal //p
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points
TOTAL
Name "SOW, yee
•
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS / p
Project g�a ^a Date�jc-r/ 6 • 19,
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 7-
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design
6. Roads 3
7. Energy
Subtotal ite
4.1
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
. area
1. Public Transportation 7/
2. Police _Protection
3. Bicycle Paths (
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity v
Subtotal g 1 0
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent)
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) 5
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
•
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points
TOTAL t I
Name nt°!? /8✓
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS _. 1a� /
Project C Date c 3 � 79),
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage 3
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design 7/
6. Roads
7. Energy
Subtotal /7
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation 2
2. Police Protection Z
3. Bicycle Paths 1
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal l0
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) — 2 2-
+
� y +
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points Z
fre,
TOTAL dloresi
Name 0 /
A t ent , d
t • * itedier
e
e
t
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
SAL '
Project �L� ?Sari Datede 5 , /70
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service #1
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design 1
6. Roads
7. Energy 3
Subtotal 0/3
•
s
•
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation /
2. Police Protection 1"
3. Bicycle Paths I
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities ,
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity /
Subtotal f
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) ��
•
r
�^a
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points In `2 g 0
TOTAL
Name �G�ir'
J fel
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESI DDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project LAIC
e( e U (_ Date
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
• 0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 7
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design
6. Roads
7. Energy
Subtotal
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation 7.
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points) /
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) 76,
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) — 2 /
•
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent) 'Lk�,
•
•
Subtotal / _
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points
Li
TOTAL
/10
Name
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS •
Project (,A,A/k AIZC Date
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service ^�
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage
•
4. Fire Protection 2
5. Parking Design
6. Roads
7. Energy
• Subtotal 1 1!
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
•
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths — I
4. Childcare Facilities 1
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity 4,
Subtotal
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent)
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal / eS
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points
TOTAL (O
Name 46,4„)
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
�_
Project �JA'�
�C °- Date
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 2
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection `Z--
5. Parking Design 7 -
6. Roads
7. Energy 7--
Subtotal /1
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation —
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths 1
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal 1r
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent)
•
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
•
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Gl�
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points / 6
e A$ i e-4 7c, (Q 1(-- / A) Aft-' A
bpi: R.: s n r? 1)
TOTAL
/ 7
Name <.7 ti
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project /1) r `-; 41- Y kti-0_4., Date
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service
•
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection `7
5. Parking Design
6. Roads
•
7. Energy
Subtotal
•
s e A,
od
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths f
•
4. Childcare Facilities 1
5. Recycling Facilities 1
•
6. Handicapped Design Features I
7. Commercial Support Proximity .
Subtotal
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) Z t
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal Z
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points
TOTAL
Name `s
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project `7k..), -% f ` 5714,12c.24.) / Date
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service
.-->
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design
6. Roads 2 - -
7. Energy
Subtotal tq _
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
,1
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection 2.
3. Bicycle Paths I
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity /
Subtotal
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) —27-0
•
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal - Z-cm
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points) /0
E. Bonus Points 41664'71/c F
12» C`:- i 1} A.) ST S Pt L-K-= Y1 14-e-c 0 cc54-7
TOTAL
Name U/
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
•
/ L RESI PROPOSALS
Project (X +e 1.»7`7 P/ G' Date_ 2 ri-4 V /
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service ________!7__
2. Sewer Service 174
•
3. Storm Drainage /
4. Fire Protection '5 —
5. Parking Design 4�
6. Roads
7. Energy
Subtotal ( /J
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation 2
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths 1
4. Childcare Facilities
Jr/
5. Recycling Facilities 1
6. Handicapped Design Features /
7. Commercial Support Proximity /
Subtotal _
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points) // /J
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) `(� a T
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) v�
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal��
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points
,/4 f
7 4fit Mak
TOTAL elf
Name ( 4 `
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS /�
Project 4 fr /` Date Z/ / 9 7
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 3
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design 2.
/rte
6. Roads 1
7. Energy p
Subtotal
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new servide at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths • !
4. Childcare Facilities '
5. Recycling Facilities I
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal iU
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points) J
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) /
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) 5
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal /9
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points � �C n / ^ n
/� / i k
TOTAL
Name OW A--
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
w �
RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project �� /l.G��n"` % ^'.— " y 11v Date d e/
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage !�
4. Fire Protection • Z
5. Parking Design 3
6. Roads
7. Energy
Subtotal / 7
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths
4. Childcare Facilities /
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features 2,
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal _
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent)
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points 2 y4J
— --
TOTAL _
Name C2
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESSIIDENTIAL PROPOSALS
Project ( t) /5 • &Flea— _ Date 5//4457
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service 2
2. Sewer Service 3
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design 17,
6. Roads 5
7. Energy
Subtotal ._
•
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths 1
4. Childcare Facilities /
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features /
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal Q
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) 2-2-
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points)
E. Bonus Points '/
/f 4/ Y j
TOTAL 7l
Name
I
RECOMMENDED POINT ALLOCATION
RESIDENTIAL 674,9<c40,94-, PROPSALS 17/1.0.0.
Project Date
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points)
0 - Indicates a total infeasibility of providing services
1 - Indicates a major deficiency in service
2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) service level
3 - Indicates no foreseeable deficiencies
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design 4
6. Roads O
7. Energy 3
Subtotal
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
0 - Project requires the provisions of new service at increased public
expense
1 - Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area
2 - Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given
area
1. Public Transportation
2. Police Protection
3. Bicycle Paths l
4. Childcare Facilities
5. Recycling Facilities Z
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
Subtotal 1!
C. Employee Housing (maximum of 40 points)
1. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) �d
•
•
2. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent)
•
3. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent)
•
Subtotal
D. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum of 10 points) 1 D
E. Bonus Poipts
• M - Goo r, ,cf,./ , S <, yr.ry c
i� arc lh a .'
TOTAL 6(
Name `�' V -
•