HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.Park Central West.1978 E
LLI
1; iv,1]; mg; Y L.:4111;2Th OU e
Anclysic !minct on th2 Aspoh Police DcsarMeont
• pf:E February 5, 1978
The Apon/Pitkih P;asninh OfEice is reviciliod a jo“-iaFtest oconespl,
hddnicoo pn cohlysis ofte p; c iippoicL cc ttc cap oe0h of
polkm ;eccrity sro]vicoc to provicie prcL,Uit,o aftt to cchsonoLle
rosoaoc SLFHMH: WithOit the necofeYi ;.„). or odd ition:A fccilii;os,
porsshool 01 egsispiont
•
Tho pt.:tar:Lod apsi;option form; idontifich the location, - ;;!o add type
of devciosmmdli. Heise revicco: thc opplcw.ption pnd r 07 o cotedory
of ins, ct below.
Pcojr.d.t: Park Central West Townhouse Condos. (submitted by_A.C Nicholson)
Rd Submission Dpte: February14, 1978
Thc prmhosod project will o.ci Ho follounn9 type Gf ic,oct on the coscoity
cf t•a ./ispen PcJ icc Dopaetiteht:
'17 Nedlisdhlc ircocot. - suhsthnti,.1 excess capocii.y exisis
considc lifg tho phility of Ur reht solioc secumity
sorvicos to provide protection pocordirm: td lCDSG:JiLiC
respohsu staeoprds without [he necessity of addi-
tional fooilities, personnel or eduipment.
/ Modorate — ally moderate capacity ex:sts con-
sidering tho chility of current police socsrity
services to providoi protection accordipd he ropse:aThe __•
rcesonio Sac ds hithout t necrosity of
tional facilities, personnel or eclipflont
/—/ - Substardial inoot - this dovolopm2ht will OVer
burden curreht SC:CGPity oervidco
to provide protection pocordie to roesenahlo respoic,ff
standprkin without the necessli o addicidnol
A,A facilities, personnel or equi:ipont.
t
ColeA ltu Os li (1., 61 /9 6
. • —
C AT4L11 61 e'ht
(j343e_ Cb",c, Qiu2 ualoNe 1 14°4 (
) Lc e a ti m _ gi sq,p-u c•iLt (
Iff.A.AL
1
ittmk. rti4.,„ 012 Nilo the. Pti.ct 612_ de,..e,
vh-
c ---
sicui:ttire nte `"? 47
. .
IL I ntt_ C; E i iii..
I
,, rek. FE:2 :7 1 :75
_
TO: RH)ci City IThq i ricer
N. al_ '
FROM: Aspen/Pitkin Planninu Office
RE: Analysis of Impact on Sturm Draiffce, Partin5 Desico, aud
• DATE: February 5, 1978
The Asperibffln Planaing Oflico ls revlotinq a develoftftent profiesal,
dn requilee au analysis nt.the pneeofe'is impact no the tapacity of
stens!! dirtirnoe, nf.inq desiun, end roads by considenihq tbs cafteity
el tna (I: -Hp. tanilities to 0c'1 07 dlsio•e of ltfie sorface iPpotb:,
censlclfr if Sho desi,.fillLy of lie. tasign al offestrtfi portine etees;
allr. eons tio. capacity of motif' stecot liubaqe. •
The attacHod applitation form ideofflies them location, size and type of -
develcumest. Please revley: the app:icetion and indicate tho catetery
'of imptct belmx,
Project: park Central NeflOwnhouse_Candos-.(suhmitted hy ILL_ Nicholson)
keferiel Submission Dots: February14 1978
The prbposed project fill have tht following type of impact on the capacity
/- - Nepliclible::::
? stential excess capacity exists
IC
for drailmeife lonilities to aCieqqately dispose of the
t
surface runoff of the proposed development filicot
system extensions beyond those normolly installed hs
the developer,
/7 - Moderale imrsiat - only rtfderate capacity oAlsts for
__
drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the
surface runoff of the proposed develop:mint wilulut
system extensions beyond These normally insialled by .-----
•
the developen.
...
// - Substantial impact - this develop emit f'ill over-
burden the copecity of ilie draineqe facilities to
adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the
prop develepment without systen extensifeis
beyond those nortnlly installed by the develepor.
4 11 144
Comments: ---
1 " e tt' __Ci/P1--of nt 1..■ .4 ' / OZttle 1
A7
7 i
, . ------.
•
PAUVING Iii hifii
/-/ - Noglieifle hHoart - hnhstnnfial excess capacity exisfs
ler Lho dreigu ill fdr harVing areas with rccterf
to visudl 1H:est, osidpal (3 pavod surfaco, CONW'Hir.
and saftLy exits.
- Moderate i:aLeict - enly riuderate capacity exists foe
the design CI ell-sLrett parking oreee with respect
to visual iLr;dol, aire;x■L of paved sin-Faso, convehionre
and safely exitt.
/17 - Sufstential isTL - this devcieus:ent ■n over-
burden tLe oegncidy for the derigu of oft-street
parking :sodas witii respect to visual iiiiierat, amacnt
o ir e> vs d si:r NY CC , ccriv : i c: :1 c c, i id saf c .7: xi Ls.
Cor
:: i t s : Cd22 ,-(4,4-,. ..344 oo OW
1
• tri e lf d•-•,- et_rd , r 5 ____________g .
•
__O-riekriderseetn,6•,_ 6,24-1 Cti -rg---L-e-- La---0-, •
_±4 __ kr,
, -
1A1,11- (• % )( io > la, 1 7, c,))4 c ' p) cri F?
, ..„.
,
Reid:LS
ea
Mi•licY.] 4 MrThf - SULCi'liii Pvcr r:- rvicic
to proviso ror thc Of 1Ly prop-sod devalspradrt
wittipti sslist ant i :di Iv al tor i l!CI CH ;, i
patterus or over loaesg the exisfiug streut system
or the necessity of providihp igcoetsead reaa rUleaga
and/or Lainteuasce.
ri - Madero:Le imovet - moderate casacity exists for the
needs Of iTh" prenesed develexanf without sshstaptially
alturir1 existing tprit'iic parterus 0Y ove(londino
the existing street sy.deni op thc nocessity of
providisg iscrhased egod riiicage and/or eetnteniance.
/I/ - Substantial itpact . this devHopumnt will over-
burden the cagacity of the existipe traffic patterns,
or the overioedlir; of the existing strec L sytem,
or the necessity ci rrcraiding lnci eared road mileaoe
and/or laaintenancc.
CoL 37 Aak
lonts: r. /144,/ Cann.."....... _ Oval
_
e.4 t
4-nytre-c-c-e-j cat c•-.---,9 ,—. ,,-,-..),
A , , __ :_, .___ zfriAjz •
e
- ge. _ a y.eire_to
/ / 71et A 0-eeetti A} 4(iy 0, kitin 40.0
, -
PL! I 0 ;001
..
9
• -
'IL.rFILLLUAT (17; .
,___ ..__ ---•
TO: Asper Tice ftistrief
FUJI: Asoco/Ptftio pl.ar'cirj Office
kb.: AAalyt is oh Imprint ca, the Aspen 1 i..g Ponarginent
D[.fL: February 5, 1978
The Aspen/PO Pilifin GIEFiCE IS reE*nliCI 6) develerwint preposail ,
6'r ra.goirep an gnalysic of the prey:rasa] if laTAA0L rn f:- crHci fp
tlig tire dwTHTLecot i'atility Ty ccatTdecipg thee ahi iiLar of LH Fire
tio- Jppt tri pri •eicia fire pianiaLriTi coy afacorgii pg fu the ostaTT I shed
. rasher f e strndoras ef the aHi-cool ate 6: Lid cl. *ithout the necessi ty
oT eLdriil ishine! r tom staticti or requiring addit ef blajor e(aiinment
to an exisLing statiup.
The attached appi i ca Li :.n torsi identi f i es the 1 oc/t i c:, s 1 ze End type
of developunnt, Please review the application and iirilcate the cotegerz
• of impact beluar.
Projcfat: Park_ Central West Townhouse Condos. (submitted by A.G. Nicholson)
1 sukliss- Ddte; February 14, 1978
The prcoseti pacjecf will have the follovfing type of impact oa the ca p .1(: ty
of the rice F.Thnnit.tect.
- ,
/ - .NociligTbtit a substantt s] excess ccoapity
/ exists au or-TvVe tire Proictotsign gm:coding It tbe
estahl is •!ed respnnsc standards nf the sy:Tcyriate
district bsittinot th2 necessili cir gsanniff.:Pinp a npw
station on requiring addition of meter eciagipment
(such as hydrants, wet standpipgs, ctc.) to am
existing stati.rn,
// - Moderate imnacf - only noderote capaci Ly pa: sts to
_ -
provide 'flue pro Lien according to the eatahlishod
• responsc standards or •Lhe appropriate district
without the necessity (Er establishing a ti ey! stotion
or requirinq additicm of major cqulpiilenc (spah as
• hydrants, b(ot stLutHpes, etc, ) to an existing
station,
/1 - Substantial impact - this developent will over-
_
burden the capacity of the fire department to provide
fire prettettou accoriinq to the established response
standards of the anorcpriate district withnut The
necessity of establishing a. new station or requiriou
addition OF major equipment (such JS hydra:n wet
standpipcs, etc.) to an existing station.
. Of/OF
CoaaLeh .s. 0
t ' 49_9___........eliL.07-__.. •
.. . .. _
_ .. __. _. . ...... ..
l Nty Qi a7 g
f" —
kkeERRAL
FROM: A :/ h t_Nin 'infi in•:i emu
• RE: T.neljrsis of t Het on SF' r r.tt Capacity
DACE: February 5, 1978
the As.ell /Pit[:in Planning Office l5 rev _:inn a development prosos ],
and 1 an n-;iysis Of the nronesnl's impact en the capacity of the
se;a e treatment not Ilty h!/ censiderin excess C 'pir'_l ty Of ill Sj.i,::i
location tit1n of the nearest trunk or cenneching sewer line.
The attached application form identifies the location, size and twee
. of development. Please review the application and indicate the cotc'lery
of iapact below
• Project: Park Central West Townhouse Condos_ (submitted by_A.C.Nicholson)
Referral Subrrrissiion Date: February 14,1978
The proposed project will h ee the felir' ing type Or impact on the eepecity
of the sewage treatkont system.
_ c+ct - suhstantial excess capaeily exists
at ' L r si m a _ Letatmeni plant arrd et the nearest
trunk or c:(r ccLtllu sower 1 i'' to accost h this
devulun: ent.
/ - Mode e iiri.enct - only moderate Car C.lty exists S at.
le 1
t'�' sewage ',:I . _
. . ., plant C aliens; CI:° i!r dSti
trunk or canl C:hind s line i.o ac: o iod - this
de'veiop rent.
rr , I . .1l l over-
S � 6 ;1 i C l ils (e r I rr i � c
— buriLn t _ t the sower rrealement ielT!:
or item cares ; unk en connecting senJer lino.
Comments: cr i 5F - A cc - _ / /Re_47. / - V _ 71 . -/E _ < /. G /ti TNi_
A 0 iz Tre 0 !- Top _ __. � �r� c.ir7. /1 C - __I SE ... C_ Lam.. - . ?Ns c)
TH c - / ,=a s L�_._ /IFI N Ec4 r� T r l r — fu r✓ (1 o.e
O r rN F PR- tree r r _ ._ L� _n t cult o p A 0 3 / -/ 0 L-- z
Signature _ _.__ -- 101 e irtte Fr / ` L > V
wEcF SS/Nri THE Ca.- -r-Fcr .o.- GO& —h /3t hA, To T,l L / h-F
,4Fr Eft_ /r. </ = Ate =s 'rH-C bA. -/fora A-r A - 73r or n OF /0 •
A/.-"S r-7f f(O- %H /S L / /-E /=LOS -s /.`-rO TNS F S7 Srs cr
a r. - 4f c r! /4 ,/4 Jv, - - _ Ric c, r CArAcit - / TO »AA-hhc.s THE.
r'gOSEc q FL -O ' --
FL A /. -r CAP/+c.TY / S S%-'F
•
RfFEPLAL
TO: C cf Aspen Writer hhxsrh dot
FROM: Awn/Tiffin Pion:hue flf
Analysis of Iiiact on hhe (/]stir v:ater ystem and capacity
DATE February 5, 1978
Thy Aspen/Pith Planning Office is rcviewing a dovelorrhnd Itinsposal
and reayiros an anhlysis of the preaesel's irTh[ACt on the ove!nti capacity
of avaiinhie wadec nnd - heeect on , .'ahcr o.nessure and the noarast water
main or connection lino.
The attach ed anHiastien for,i identifies ihe location, size and titpe of
develcfroni. Please rovic• the oprlication and indicate tho cate:Jory
of tr heft'.
Project: Park Central West Townhouse Condos. [submitted _by_A.C. Nicholson)
Rofeoral SubmissiLn Dote: Februany14_1978
Thd Nc»OGd prehicct will have the follctiirg type or impact en the
cacacity of the sewage treatrient syste
y - Neolioihle imnect - suctontiot excess water cannoty
exists and will not adenrsly atfect water pressure
in ties vicinity of the nearest water main or connectilci
water line,
/7 - Moderate impact - only limited v2ter capacity exists
ond \voter Prossore wii he offccto in the noarest
water main or contdctir water lind.
7! hhstantial_impact - this deveThamoht will ovcrberctep
the water trcatccrent - 1 ant and orrloosly rainve the
pressure in the rain or C1 water line.
Cemotents: This development will have neligible impact since it
is being supplied by a 6" main on Hyman Avenue within 250' of the
12" main on Monarch.
Date .9 -/OMPe
Sionature P__ ded.
. • c
re4.:4Orj Poio1 Aiircotioo
H
Proc. t ResegaNswir Ddto - Tagajeday i _ 197.%
A. Ho lac.11itles m» 0rvRes (rIcixiir:on) of?] punts- fr.r/Yr:m] of
3 ocints per rev1e eirflop1,).
1:ervice
V.CT
rr
itymAc-N Ai IL? cc-dat. L 12_ tlAusi t 1
2. `sewer :'
or.:7 r T. Ope•-•:, i(L.LiNT
k-CAAj L-4;-.! 4 4 1./C.:!• (7- ; • ' t
- J. t.. _ . „_ I N F ■•Ni•Lik• Th
3 "St • 1 • "0;14 IM
Storo Urairr
C111, t--ta
•
„PAK) k r 73/47.T.1
1. .7
fire Pi'44;HC
!cc-
11:rt
7t1: ::1 ArNtj> [9(1\i
714-1L IScce. 7 -4Th 4 t
--- ye,c -r eli ac
;F.• 2•-•
•
Ct.)1 14r
t h-t, 44 _BQS (cer..
• re only it€4 t-tt4liS) &Cc 17a&' I-"MeSti
1.
441/4\4E;
-Ats_va CC:CC
• e-L4 ritT kt..t 4--: 1 :\-Vq --k
thy) v.:)<Hvm: _ r 3j -A - '4 2
TCri
5oglal lacilitHe!: and 6e 6gvr! ei 2oints)
1. Public ;H:agca-tatier
1 -1-4Kr-E-1> effokiTa
2. Police Pro!ection
. '4 .
-: ?Tek - ii/ •
3. Childcare Fticilities
1. NQ I ei1.11 .51..L3-4.-t- CC •
61E7c Ptiths
' 3 /4 ' c\
5. Recycling Facilities 0
1111 'q=c TTh Ct
,L&er .kupicit A
6. Rendicareeci Dc(rigH IffAures
arci N [LC _
.kt-je LieS1MF.i, _ k.) I I
1. uo imopiaa Hox
( 1C:rat: 6-1M pLoym ‘011_41±.1!
41
B. 4 4.5. VT
C. Pooire (ria> rHgri 61 :to uoir.tn)
M. riddle
2. Moderate
6 11( 4 44 14 1 / 0 6 / 4
3. Lcv
. 1.6 •
effeC- ALLei<.: AI CT . 13. _ '0 4 -
ON) 1TC i -CIA C
le-AS ri Y. 3751 ---- 7 LIE13-14
c‘itse-reT,
J. .....
.1,? )(44kr
. Soh Tota l uf Above PoinLs
Bonus Peilit'i
. .
-
• itk
TOT/\L RUMS
• Na ine 1 i off Icc._ P.a.,c \A. ,.{.4 Lt_
. ,
101-f vile et s \ P■ nUd • t- k
I - ". • ' - -
1
hieef ,k k i r; LA% 1
1114:17, IAA tc Ion ,.. J.kK ;,.) { i
i
ibit. 9.1- itawakwavet tohnek, 4111-6663ic -
4 "
keccrriicrlrk - d Paid Ji In:: i
[riec Li H of :11s
A. Pueli4 kaci ities an(i Services Oflaximunl of 21 paints
= � ariltl, of
3 points per review eicec:r.;;i.
1, ivaHr Service
2. Sewer Service
3. Sturm L linage 3
4. kiro ��rr ie_Il Pil 2
J. i Y'i:lflg P(s Inn
•
B. `.roc l i i -aci 1 i i es and S:e{'Vl e., (: a Leh of 14 Poi. ilt`, )
1. Pubii 1 . ; ra m urtati or •
•
2. Poi icc Protection �— _ - --
3. ChlldcarE Iacilitjes �� __-
•
•
4. Bicycle P,ths j -- -_-
5. Recycling I<cili`_ies
•
•
6. Laudi capped P,>si qi F ept.cres
I .
Congerci 31 `,n ,Jr { P, ! t
\\
C Heir::: (ncx cc 30 poi )
1. ICI liii[`
2. ildde•rd
3. Low
•
•
Sub Total of Aboin Poi nts et
Bonus Points 1 •
— Pot $
TOTAL POINTS l
Naiso C to 4
•
• r�
Recommended Point Allocation
Residential Proposals
Project D ate i y/ / f7 S
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per review element).
1. !later Service
2. Sewer Service - �_ - - -� -- - -_ -` -- -.-_ .
3. Storm Drainage
S. Fire Protection
5. Parking Cesien ---� --- - - -- -- - — -- � _ --
6. Roads
7. Energy
�9 s- 3
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points)
1. Public Transportation — 0— —
2. Police Protection _ -- �- --
3. Childcare Facilities ^ ^" ___- __Q_,__
4. Bicycle Paths
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity g2
C. Housing (maximum of 30 points) `V - 9.irr
1. diddle -- - - - - --
2. Moderate — 3. Low — ——
Sub Total of Above Points 3 7
Bonus Points // `f
F /7F . 7 20 eR / O/ y 70 '( 4 7%4 &/ Kic •
TOTAL POINTS
//
• Name —
-----
.
)-
T , ..
. .
. Recomended Pnint Allocation -
Residential Proposals
/ .
•
Project / ' it / A r e Date 4 7 - Aalt e / in
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per review element).
1. Later Service 3
c_k_L
2. Sew r Servi . 3
c ci&ei_14:
3. Storm Drainage -- 3
S. Fire Protection
__.
5. Par: q Desion --_5
II
. .
Km)
6. Roads
•
7. Envpy
41
B. Social Facilities and Services (maxinvdm of 14 points)
1. Publ'c Transportation -
2. Police Protection /
411-___-70 .44,7 ze-fer
..a_49227 ..6 .
•
3. Childcare Facilities /
4. Bicycle Paths /
5. Recycling Facilities
7) .
_ 4211/0/
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity • .
r.'
_.( -•: '. eie -294e , - 12t y e (-e
ill .i i eat--_.
C. Housing (maximum of 30 points)
1. Middle
2. Moderate
3. Low
4
4
Sub Total of Abclve Points N •
Bonus Po / j,r� ��1 =
G� t
TOTAL POINTS 'T�-
Name u^ M./ — — — - --
•
Recommended Point Allocation
Residential Proposals
Project Ac; — GEC T4' L /42:57" Date 7j
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per review element).
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage
G. Fire Protection - - -_� -- - - -_ 3 —
5. Parking Design - _- - - - - - -- —, -�_ , - 3 — _
6. Roads
7. Energy
21
•
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 points) J
1. Public Transportation __ -_ _1
2. Police Protection
3. Childcare Facilities --
4. Bicycle Paths
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features _ __ _
7. Crnnmercial Support Proximity
---------
C. Housing (maximum of 30 ooi nts )
1. Middle ___________
2. Moderate
3. Low h 1 —
{
Sub Total of Above Points 3 n( M
a!C1
Bonus Points +'J,
c firidx
TOTAL POINTS 4- 4-
Name . r Co GC
Recommended Point Allocation
Residential Proposals
Project/ (dal Date
/Z( fmat- 78
A. Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per review element).
1. Water Service
2. Sewer Service — - - -� -- _
3. Storm Drainage —
•
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design — — — — 3
6. Roads � �-- - - -- -! — �
7. Energy - --
•
B. Social FacilitieS and Services (maximum of 14 points)
1. .Public Transpdrtatinn
•
2. Police Protection
3. Childcare Facilities
. _
4. Bicycle Paths
5. Recycling Facilities 2--
6. Handicapped Design Features 2_
7. Connercial Support Proximity 2--
C. Housing (maximum of 30 ooints)
1. Middle
2. Moderate
CLLIO
Sub Total of Above Points 'L
Bonus Points
TOTAL POINTS
�1, ., • . . . • • • .. S._. .`. L �
•
`Y1"
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Office, Karen Smith
RE: Amendments to Growth Management Score Recommendations - Park Central
West and Goodnough Apartments
DATE: March 14, 1978
During the P & Z work session on February 28th, it was discovered that two
members of the Planning Office had scored the recycling facilities and
handicapped design sections using different assumptions. Therefore, those
point sections will have to be amended accordingly for the Goodnough and
Park Central West applications:
1. Goodnough
a. Recycling - Change from a 2 to 1 point. No extra measures beyond
recycling bins
b. Handicapped - Change from 0 to 1 point. Project will have to
meet UBC.
2. Park Central West
a. Recycling - Change from 1 to 0 points. Project does not provide
bins.
•
b. Handicapped - Change from a 2 to 1. Project does not go beyond
UBC requirements.
The net result is no change for Goodnough. However the total was added wrong
initially at 33. The correct addition is 32, and that'is the recommended total.
For Park Central, the net result is a reduction in two points. Considering
------- -- -" the previous amendment of an additional 3 points under housing, the new score
is 38, the recommended total.
t
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Office, Karen Smith
RE: Park Central West - Amendment to the Growth Management Score Recom-
mended by the Planning Office
DATE: February 24, 1978
Due to an error in evaluation, the Park Central West Project is due an extra
three points in its scoring under ordinance 48, as recommended by the Plan-
ning Office. The project should score a 9 instead of 6 under the employee
housing section since the applicant has allocated three out of the ten units
to low income rentals. The Planning office had scored the application as
if they were in the moderate income category, and we were in error. The
project will then have a total of 40 points and thus has met the minimum
of 60% of the total possible points. The change will not, however, affect .
its rank (2nd) with respect to all of the residential projects.
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: Park Central West - Preliminary Plat
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held
before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on August 1, 1978
at a meeting beginning at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers,
City Hall, Aspen, Colorado to consider the preliminary plat of the
Park Central West project located on the corner of Aspen and Hyman
Streets. A copy of the preliminary plat may be examined in the
Planning Office, City Hall, Aspen during regular business hours or
call 925 -2020 ext. 223 for further information.
/s/
Charles T. Collins, Chairman
Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission
215 South Monarch
Suite 202
Aspen, Colorado 81611
June 22, 1978
Richard Grice Hand Delivered 6/22/78
Planning Department
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Subj: Park Central West
Dear Mr. Grice:
The following are names and addresses of property
owners adjacent to the subject project.
Block 75 Lots A, B, C
Jones, Elizabeth Marie
P.O. Box P
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Block 75 Lots D, E, F, G, H, I
Bass, Harry N. and Mary A.
1150 Mercantile Dallas Bldg.
Dallas, Texas 75201
Block 76 Lots A, B, west 20' of Lot C
Herron, Frances Willoughby
P.O. Box 545
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Block 76 Lot D -I
Snowflake Lodge, Inc.
221 E. Hyman
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Block 68 Lots G, H, I
Pace, Margaret Bosshardt
208 Morningside Dr.
San Antonio, Texas 78209
N I C H O L S O N ASSOCIATES
. I
, ....„ ...
• • "e
rii HA
. .
}-.....,
... 1 \ -... 1...d . 1
. . .
. . 1
k i ....
... _..) t
I
'
./ • . _
, • , /
- -
CI tq
-_. -
1 - --
/ , • .
.1 '
, , 1 .
--,..-- ,
,
•
. ,
_
. .
1 ,
\
_ , -- ,
.. ,
2.= • • . i
1 ' 4
1
,,
\ 1....„._ A-- ■ ' - - - - • • - • -, i i 0 c . ' ••-•.-i r )
...,
/j'er 2_ s _ -, ://i f
(/(,..:" e/
June 22, 1978
Mr. Michael Grice page two
Block 68 Lots Q, R, S
Hearthstone House of Aspen
134 E. Hyman
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Block 69 Lots G, H, I
Hindelang, Dan
c/o Kenneth Senn
Box 1107
Aspen, Colorado 81611
The names and adresses of the property owners for
Lots P, Q, R and S of Block 75 are as noted on the pre-
liminary plat.
Please call me if there is any further information
you require.
Sinc ,
` / /'I
`NICHOLSON ASSOCIATES
A.C. Nicholson
ACN /le
A. C. Nicholson AIA
Nicholson Associates
15 S. Monarch #202
Aspen, Colorado 81611
303 - 925.7265
Hand Delivered 6/22/78
Mr. Michael Grice
Planning Department
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Co. 81611
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Office, Jolene Vrchota
RE: Park Central West Townhouse Condominiums - Preliminary Plat
DATE: July 27, 1978
This proposal is for construction of a two -story building, including
10 residential units (7 one- bedroom, free market units and 3 low -cost
studios) plus 2,781 sq. ft. of office space, for a total building area
of 11,211 sq. ft. The project is proposed for location on a 15,000 sq.
ft. parcel including 5 lots at the NE corner of Hyman and Aspen Streets.
It is currently zoned 0- Office, which allows multi - family residences,
professional and business offices, and accessory moderate - income housing
by special review.
The proposal scored the second highest number of points which was 42 out
of 65 possible, at the conceptual /GMP review stage. Scoring and referrals
indicated no problems with access to or impact on public services and
facilities. The housing category received 30% of possible points based
on 3 low- income units out of 10. In addition, social services (e.g. police;
childcare; and recycling facilities; bike paths; and handicapped design
features) scored adequately.
Having confirmed that the plat has not changed since conceptual submission,
the Planning Office recommends acceptance of the proposal. It is located
in close proximity to the commercial core and to bus routes which would
help to minimize traffic impact. Recycling bins will be provided on -site.
There is handicapped access to a number of units. Necessary utilities
services are located within a 2 to 3 block radius. Most referrals (sub-
mitted to the record) indicated that no problems are anticipated. These
include: the Fire Marshall, Rocky Mountain Natural Gas, Water Dept., Aspen
Metro Sanitation District, and City Engineering Dept.
Two conditions on acceptance however, have been requested by utilities
companies. These should be considered before final plat acceptance:
1. The electric company needs to know the power load and when power
will be needed.
2. J.C. Kilmer of Mountain Bell suggests the following language be
used for dedication of easements:
"And hereby dedicate to the PUBLIC all the streets, avenues
and roads as shown on the accompanying plat, forever, and ded-
icate to the PUBLIC UTILITIES those portions of real property
which are labeled as utility easements on the accompanying
plat, as easements for the installation and maintenance of
utilities and drainage facilities, including, but not limited
to, electric lines, gas lines, telephone lines; together with
the right of ingress and egress for installation, maintenance
and replacement of such lines; together with the right to trim
interfering trees and brush; said easements and rights shall be
utilized in a reasonable and prudent manner."
A final condition,specified in conceptual review, is control of inflation
and rent on the 3 low- income units. The accompanying memo from Mark Danielsen
outlines possible terms from which a final agreement could be formulated.
We strongly recommend that satisfactory rent control terms be included in
the final plat conditions to ensure that the units are accessible to low -
income renters.
•
C'gh
506 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
P
I
T
K MEMORANDUM
I
N
O TO: Aspen Planning & Commission
Aspen City Council
N FROM: Mark A. Danielsen, Housing Director
T DATE: July 27, 1978
RE: Park Central West Townhouse Condominiums
The housing requirement for the three low income units
involves specifying terms for an agreement for main-
taining prices and controlling rental adjustment over
the next five years. These units shall all fall under
the "low income" category.
It is recommended that the rental price guideline fall
under the proposed "1978 Growth Management Housing
Price Guidelines ", a copy of which is attached.
These guidelines shall be presented before the City
Council on August 14th. Consequently, $175 /month
rent is suggested, increased annually according to
the National Consumer Price Index for "all items ",
under the Clerical and Wage Earners revised index,
which uses 1967 as the base (100%) year. This index
is the national rate of inflation and has increased
6.8 %, 5.2% and 6.7% for the past three years respectively.
_ r i
1970 Growth I4anaycmcm_- llousinq Price Guidelines
• LOW MODf.RATE MIDDLE'
Gross Unit l
Income 12,000 and under 12,000- 18,000 18,000- 24,000
Cumulative % •
Employees 50% 30% 20ti
Points Given 8 /person 5 /person 3 /person
Residents /unit
1.0 studio 400 sa:it. •
Rental/Month .175 and under 175 -230 230 -275
Rental cost / sq.ft,. .44 .44 -.575 .575 -.69
Sales 1 25,000 and under 25,000 - 35,000 : 35,000 - 45,000
Sales cost /sq.ft 62.50 62.50 -87.50 87.50- 112.5Q1 ,
Monthly PI 176 /ro, 177- 246/mo. 247- 315 /mo.
Estimated TI 40 /mo. • 55 /mo. 70 /ino.
PITI:I1.come ratio •22% -300 20 % -22£ 19
TOTAL POINTS 8 5 . 3
•
•
•
•
•
• •
• 1,978 Growth Management )6usi.ng Price Guidelines }L/J: Permanent
Moderate Housing
PAGE TWO
P
ONE BEDROOM, 600 sq.ft.: 1.3 residents per' unit
• Rental/mo. 220 & under 220 -285 286 -370
•
Rental Cost
per'sq.ft. .37 .37 -.475 .475 -.62
Sales 30,000 & under.. • 30,000- 40,000 40,000 - 50,000
Sales Cost
per sq.ft. 50 50 -67 67 -83
Monthly PI 211 212- 281 282 -351
Estimated TI 45 60 75
PITI: INCOME 26 -30: 23 -270 22 -24%
TOTAL POINTS 10.4 G.5 3.9
. TWO BEAROO?., 800 sq.ft.: 2.7 residents per unit .
Rental /mo. 300 & under 301 -450 451 -600
Rental Cost
per. sq.ft. • .375 .375 -.5G .56 -.75
Sales 35,000 & under 35,001 - 48,000 48,001 - 60,000
Sales Cost
per. sq.ft. 44 44 -GO 60 -75
Monthly PI 246 0.46 -337 337 -421
•
Estimated TI 50 • 65 80
P1'1'I: INCOME 304 27 -31% 25 -28%
TOTAL POINTS • 21.6 13.5 • 8.1
r .
- Growth Management ilopr;inq I'riCo Guidelines For Per.mahent •
eratr Iloucin� '
.GE THREE REE
•
THREE BEDROOM4, 1100 sq.ft.: • 4.0 residents pe,r unit
, Rental/mo. 450 & under 451- 600 601 -800
Rental Cost
per sq.ft. .41 •.41 -.55 .55 -.73
• Sales N /A . 45,000- 60,000 60,001 - 80.,000
Sales Cost
. per sq.ft. - -- 41 -54 54 -73
Monthly PI - -- 316 -421 422 -561
Estimated TI -- -- 75 90
PITT: INCOME ...--• - 33% 33£
TOTAL POINTS 32(Rental Only) 20 12
•
• RENTAL COST PER PERSON
Studio 175 176 -230 231 -275
1 bdrm. 169 170 -219 220-284
• 2 bdrm.• 111 112 -167 • 168 -222
3 Minn. 112 113 -150 151 -200
•
SAFES COST PER PERSON
Studio 25,000 ' 25,001- 35,000 35,001- 45,000
1 bdrm. 23,077 23,078- 30,769 30,770- 38,461
2 bdrm. 12,963 • 12,964- 17,778 17,779 - 22,222 i
3 bdrm. N/A 11,250- 15,000 •15,001- 20,000
{
J.97E,Growt:h Mananevo_nt pausing Price Guidelines For Permanent
Moderate }lousing
PAGE FOUR
,,
•
' FOOTNOTES:
1. Adjusted from s the
arr.?d $lU,000 Employee
oruundyr. In 1975 50% of the
•
total employ -' c
2. Interest computed on standard 80% financing, 30 years, at 10%
interest. Principal and interest only, taxes and insurance •
not included.
• 3. Minimum Required Household Income for maximum 30°% ratio is . •
$9,024 /year (752 /mo.).
4. Usually cannot be afforded by people in this income bracket.
5. Mini -mum Required Incoms of 1173 /month (= 14x076 %yeir) required
t support PITI of $391/month. 1
6, Per person costs bases on number of residents per unit given
v,
•
above.
It is also recommended that a balance of 2 rental units per
1 sales unit be maintained as a minimum, adjusted annually.
.
i
•
•
•
JE:1
Mountain Bell
Grand Junction, Colorado
June 12, 1978
Mr. Richard Grice
Planning Office
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Park Central West - Preliminary
Dear Mr. Grice:
We have reviewed the plat of "Park Central West" and found the easements to be
adequate.
However, May we suggest the following phraseology be used for the dedication of
easements within said subdivision.
"And hereby dedicate to the PUBLIC all the streets, avenues and roads as
shown on the accompanying plat, forever, and dedicate to the PUBLIC UTILITIES
those portions of real property which are labeled as utility easements on the
accompanying plat, as easements for the installation and maintenance of util-
ities and drainage facilities, including, but not limited to, electric lines,
gas lines, telephone lines; together with the right of ingress and egress for
installation, maintenance and replacement of such lines; together with the
right of trim interfering trees and brush; said easements and rights shall be
utilized in a reasonable and prudent manner."
We believe all preliminary, as well as final plats, should show the dedication
or reference to the particular "Protective Covenants" which will run with the
property. Also, all "Private Roads" should be dedicated to the utilities for
the installation, maintenance and operation of gas, lights, power and telephone
lines. No easements should be dedicated to the property owners, cities or
counties exclusively; all easements should be dedicated to the public utility
companies.
The preceding request is in accordance with C.R.S. 106 -2 -34 (3) (d) (viii) and
the Colorado Land Use Commission's paragraph 5 -2, Item #G -7.
a
Grand Junction, Colorado
Page 2
We appreciate the opportunity of being able to review this plat.
Very truly yours,
/ S.C. Kilmer, SR /WA
6 Right of Way Agent
P.O. Box 2688
Grand Junction, Colorado 81501
JCK:md
cc: A.C. Nicholson
Survey Engineers, Inc.
Pitkin County Commissioners
W.M. McDaniel, Mtn. Bell
Nick Marquez, Mountain Bell
Leon Peach, Mountain Bell
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
•
TO: Dave Ellis, City Engineer
Water Department
Parks Department
Fire Marshall !(/��N
Electric DepartmentY'V
Rocky Mountain Natural Gas
Mountain Bell
School District RE -1
t-A Metro. Sanitation District
FROM: Planning Office, Richard Grice
RE: Preliminary Plat - Park Central West
DATE: May 22, 1978
Attached for your review and comment is the Preliminary Plat of the
Park Central West Condominiums. Written comments should be addressed
to the Planning Office and returned within 20 days.
•
Thank you.
•
lmk
enc.
•
•
f ,to.frc. r j-.. i rii SAF-1 7 A T/u,— S f5fl-"
fr /`ice
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dave 11is, City Engineer
er Department
Parks Department
Fire Marshall
Electric Department
Rocky Mountain Natural Gas
Mountain Bell
School District RE -1
Aspen Metro. Sanitation District
FROM: Planning Office, Richard Grice
RE: Preliminary Plat - Park Central West
DATE: May 22, 1978
Attached for your review and comment is the Preliminary Plat of the
Park Central West Condominiums. Written comments should be addressed
to the Planning Office and returned within 20 days.
Thank you.
i/V) Ravin
lmk aJ 4.112-"9—)
enc.
e a
Goa
•
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM
•
TO: Dave Ellis, City Engineer
Water Department
Parks Department
Fire Marshall
E_�l > ctric Department
Rocky Mountain Natural Gas
Mountain Bell
School District RE -1
Aspen Metro. Sanitation District
FROM: Planning Office, Richard Grice
. RE: Preliminary Plat - Park Central West
DATE: May 22, 1978
1
Attached for your review and comment is the Preliminary Plat of the
Park Central West Condominiums. Written comments should be addressed
to the Planning Office and returned within 20 days.
Thank you.
•
lmk 4 0-7
enc.
.f 6jed •
•
r -a te
,(-)
/9) ,/s/Peaci
vita'
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dave Ellis, City Engineer
Water Department
Parks epartment
e Marshall
Electric Department
Rocky Mountain Natural Gas
Mountain Bell
School District RE -1
Aspen Metro. Sanitation District
•
FROM: Planning Office, Richard Grice
RE: Preliminary Plat - Park Central West
DATE: May 22, 1978
Attached for your review and comment is the Preliminary Plat of the
Park Central West Condominiums. Written comments should be addressed
to the Planning Office and returned within 20 days.
Thank you.
To'
g( (g, pp G(z(
ppvm 6e g �c v .
lmk
enc.
9 .4_
•
•
• .
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dave Ellis, City Engineer
Water Department •
Parks Department
Fir shall
' Department
Rocky Mountain Natural Gas
Mountain Bell
School District RE -1
Aspen Metro. Sanitation District
FROM: Planning Office, Richard Grice
RE: Preliminary Plat - Park Central West
DATE: May 22, 1978
Attached for your review and comment is the Preliminary Plat of the
Park Central West Condominiums. Written comments should be addressed
to the Planning Office and returned within 20 days.
•
Thank you.
/Yew d _ ��
x -t
sJ
lmk L ' P •:., ` e a.,.7
enc. v
.r
•
•
•
MEMO
TO: RICHARD GRICE
PLANNING
FROM: DAVE ELLIS
ENGINEERING
DATE: June 22, 1978
RE: Park Central West Subdivision -
Preliminary Review
The engineering department has reviewed this project and
finds that it complies with the preliminary plat requirements.
Consequently, we are recommending that it be give preliminary
approval.
jk
PUBLIC NOTICE
Re: Park Central West - Preliminary Plat
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before
the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on August 1 at a meeting beginning
at 5:00 p.m. to consider an application for Preliminary Plat Approval for
Park Central West (10 residential units) located on the northeast corner of
Hyman and Aspen Streets. The application and all relevant material may be
reviewed at the Planning Office (925- 2020), 3rd floor of the Aspen City Hall.
/s/
Charles T. Collins, Chairman
Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times, July 27, 1978
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Dave Ellis, City Engineer
Water Department
Parks Department
Fire Marshall
Electric Department
Rocky Mountain Natural Gas
Mountain Bell
School District RE -1
Aspen Metro. Sanitation District
FROM: Planning Office, Richard Grice
RE: Preliminary Plat - Park Central West
DATE: May 22, 1978
Attached for your review and comment is the Preliminary Plat of the
Park Central West Condominiums. Written comments should be addressed
to the Planning Office and returned within 20 days.
Thank you.
lmk
enc.
N I C H O L S O N ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN
A.C_NICHOLSON AIA
SUITE 202 215 South Monarch
ASPEN. COLO. 81611
(303)925 -7265
May 10, 1978
Karen Smith
Planning Office
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Subject: Preliminary Plat Submittal
Park Central West Townhouse Condominiums
Dear Karen:
In accordance with Section 22 -11, Ordinance 22, Series of
1975, relating to Subdivisions, accompanying are 21 copies
of sheets 1, 2 & A -1 of the preliminary plat for the subject
project and my check #1522 for $96.10 based on .3432 acres
of land times $280.00 as required by Section 20 -20, Sub-
division Fees.
I will check with you in a week or so to confirm a tentative
date for the public hearing required for the preliminary plat.
The names and mailing address of owners of land immediately
adjacent to the proposed project are shown on Sheet 1 of
the plat submittal.
Would you kindly notify me if there are any other items you
need.
Sincerely,
%L
A. C. Nicholson
ACN:kc
enc.
. .
i ,
. . .
4 ..
• :i
4/
• • I I .
. i . . t • • Reca ked 3;45 PM Nov 6 1979 Reception 0 . 21 /fiS sc . Loretta Banner Recorder
il
4
• . . . i
• I
- I • • 1
I I • ' Man PV625 ' •
0 . % .
.'• if . . DECLARATION Of COVENANTS
4 " Alfred C. Nicholson, Eli-nboth Ann Nicholson and Richard J.
----_-___.
1 .
• 'Meeker (hereffter "covenanto for themselves, their heirs. ' •
. Ilixecutors. administrators, and assigns, hereby Jointly and
.. t
1 •• fly covenant with the City of Aspen, Pftkin County, -
1
1'..
1 Colorado, that: • si
' • 1 I , ! • :
..1
t - - 1. Covenantors Ire the owners of the following-described 3
• 1, . : property together with improvements thereon: ,e
Park Central West Condominium :A:bdivision
City of Aspen. Pitkin County, tolorado
• : . J -., 2. Residential Units 8. 9 and 10 stall be restricted to
4
' L :
• • : , a monthly rental for each unit of not mori than 5175.00, unless .. • . 1
4
the duly constituted Housing Authority of the City of Aspen shall
, • i r I. ., 1 :.
! . consent te an increased :enter! to reflect increased expenses of j ...
the owner in operating the premises, adiuntments P'
1 .67 4 Y /
I
1 me
3. -At the residential enits the property are
t 7 °•-• 1 . '-
• offered for sale, in whole or in part,thetenant or tenants
k
' i ' ' whbliK€uFY *k4441re-tirration shall. 1
i h -
f't ',remain 448400 Wien the siMd,the efoperiy is Offered 4
. x.
' . .. Ifor Shie be 04bOduatite Mb 0400 tobbilr filth the 4
utfereJ purchase price, Each SUCh tenant ;nal] have a ninety- m
I , 1 .
.
. • . day hed-assignadi Olii00 tO DOrthase the portion of the pro- 1
? petty :f has unuer lease at tne price stated in the offer of 1 .
1 . -
sale. .
.
C '4. At the time a bona fide offer to purchas_ is made and
. .
I - - "r1 accepted, the same tenant or tenants shall have a ninety-day
II
4 i
• 1
exclusive non-assignable right of first refusal to purchase the
• 1 ,
• portion of the property which he has under lease. In the event
• that such offer is made while the ninety-day option is still
i .
II to effect, the Lenart may purchase the unit for the amount of
' If g
lithe bona fide offer or offered price, whichever is less.
-; 1 . :
i •5. In the event that any improvement or improvements
• reiuiren by SeCtJUf: . et tilt: Lthle ot the LIty f Asper. uec, ,
• '
i t •
. j . • . •
. Y • p
.
erx351 Pt,. , .
i ` 1n the sole judgment or discretion of the City Council of the a. • :iCity of Aspeh. necessary or desirable, no objection will be . t
y ( !made to an special assessment or special tax or proceeding
j 'therefor on the basis that the property Is adequately nerved y
1
r..
rby existing improvements, nor on the basis that the premises
1 I w111 not be served or benefltid by.the improvement or Im-
1 14
`} p is proposed.
1 { 6. Ths covenants contained herein specifically referring t
to the monthly rental for Units 8. 9 and lA contained In Para r
i a graph 2 are to run withlthe land and shall be binding on all
1
4
parties and all parties land al( persons claiming under them .
for a period of five (5) years. The,remaintng covenants con
J .
run with the land and shall be
i- tamed herein are to ru binding . _
7..
on all parties and a't, persons claiming under thin fOr a period
ti - I 'ef twenty (201 years from the date these covenants aPe re -
ii
- corded, after which time, said covenants shall be automatically as
• - extended for successive periods of ten (10) years, unless an
, l ,.. - _ instrument signed by the City of Aspen and the then record
?
}
owners of the property • has been recorded, agreeing to change
1 it said is in whole or in part or agreeing to release said
''''
i c ovenants.
1 - IN W ITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration has been duly executed
t
t11 . 06i) g4 WYB lrtri 1i£�: - J l t I
i ice
1 t .vis
v(i
r
1 - Alf
C. Hithdlsun
y �
. ' iiiabethy Api Nicholson
i t
,.� r
'1 t• o cha d(J. (Me '
'STATE OF COLORADO
4 i County of Pitkln I ss. -
1
II The foregoiu, Instrument was acknowledged before me this
1st_ day of November, 1978, by Alfred C. Nicholson,. Elizabeth I I.
Ann Nicholson. and Richard J. Meeker.
WITNESS HT HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL.
y My commission expires: July, 19$1 --,
,, ! ry ?u blic
t : • �j s try r• :
St s 'a n e .
�' .p.t„a;.nLf i • i
i .
f
i
Recontled 3: -�:.
Ik PM NOv 6 1978 Rceaptton It
l 208516.1 Loretta Banner Recorder
•
• ,i1Dr33 Mk; G21
i
0
yy PARK CENTR'ST •
+ (A Realdentia;_Offlca Condominium)
•
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this "
day of '. y
, 797_, by and Between RICHARD J.
MEEKER and ALFRED C. t
NICHOLSON 1 ELIZABETH ANN NiCHOLSON I
I ( "S ubdividers "), and THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, a
Municipal Corporation ( °City "),
M i T N E S S E T H:
WEERLAS, Sbudirlders are owners and subdividers
of . a tract of land within Pltktn County, Colorado
ststln9 of Lots K. eon -
L', M. N and 0, Block 75. City and Town-
site of Aspen, and
i :
WHEREAS, Subdividers have submitted to City for
approval, execution and recording a plat of
the above-
descrlbed property, such subdivision to be known . ! I f`
and dos$gnated as "bark Cectrat West Condominium Sub-
« fi
division"; e d
WHEREAS, the Y consid
City has full t such sub - I
division plat, the proposed devalopment and a
meat of Y shown thereon, the Improve °
the sublect property ;
ereon, and is willing
to approve, execute and accept said plat for recordation r
upon the agreement of Subdividers
to the matters hereinafter
•
i
h described, which matters are deemed necessar• to protect,
II
i : Promote and enhance the public welfare; and
t '
s !! WHEREAS, 5
ubdividers and the City wish to redu[e <
11 said agreement to writing,
NOW, THFRFfORE,1n consideration
ij
the mutual of the premises,
covenants herein contained, the parties hereto
II hereby agree as follows:
k
c
'•- � . � ^'e wP'�� r .ter y' .r �•eT� — ..._
4 •
9 1. Subdividers covenant and agree to and with the
1' .
City that they 011 affirmatively consent to and
s• N 4 3oin in the formation of any special improvement
distrlc, encompassing all or any part of Park Central j r
Nest Condominium Subdivision, •that may hereafter
_ be proposed or formed for tht construction of '
V
drainage taproveaents, or any other such uti111y,
A.
or Street Inv ovements abutting Lots K. L, M N 4 , v.
- end 0, Block 7fi, City and'Tcwnrite of Aspen. Sub- .
• I
dividers hereby waive and further covenant and agree ' `i
vi.
to waive any *tight of protest against the formation
of any such district.
2. Subdividers covenant and agree to and with
the City that they will we the uubaved portion i
of the allej of Block 75 with aspr.Alt (appro:a wately E
150 lineal het) no toter than October 1, `•979. w
3. Ile City tngineer has a timate0 the cost of t
the improvements provided for to Paragraph 2 above a t
to be $1,918.00 (One Thousand Nine Hundred rlfty- i
•
Eight and n0/100 Dollars). Subdivider agrees with
• M /s estimete agrees to provide a guarantee j
Willi IO/i %d BNB ktIlred(100)perceot of the total
4 Uiiiiridlitlf, prhiM, icsiiiiit,18H tit this instru- i •
Nrlay, me ouirostoi iN11i bt i11 !hi tbr$I of a 4
tith fitrdj with the
04 or e. dt n k uk saVings bid 5
loan association, or an irrevocable sight draft or
• letter o' commitment from a financially responsible
lender, such guarantee shall be completed prior to
. recording the Final Plat. The guarantee shall give
the City an unconditional right, upon default by ,
1 • Subdividers and afttr 30 days written demand to sub• -
6 dividers, to withdraw funds upon demand to partial!,
if
- 2
e.
. •
6
s .
•
or fully complete and /nr pay for the im
provided for in Paragraph. 2, or pay any outstanding
■ bills for work done with reference thereto by any
party.
;I 4. Subdlvid ?rs agree to executea promissory note
in favor of the City of Aspen prior to issuance of
to
II a Building Permit for the herein .named smbdivision
•
• ' h for the sum of $27,408.70 (Twenty -Seven Thousand
II Four Hundred Eight and 70/100 Dollars) as full payment r'
I I for all obligations for payment of cash in lieu of 4
land dedication as required by the provisions of -
Section 20 -13 of the City of Aspen, as amended by k
Ordinance 13, 1978. Such note shall bear interest 1"
at the rate of 9% from the date of issuance of the
ggq building permit, and the interest and principal sum
shall be due and on or before the date of
11 issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the
,tc Park Central Meet Condominium Subdivision. f
5. Upon, execution of this Agreement by all parties ¢
hereto, City agrees to approve and execite the final ^"
i plat .gfPark Central West Condominium Subdivision •I s
,
•� and accept the sage for recording in the real pro-
,
perty records of Pttktn Coanty, Colorado, upon 1
payment of recording fees and costs to City by
u Subdividers.
6. The Covenant of the Subdividers contained in
Paragraph 1 and agreements of the Subdividers herein
G •
O. shall be deemed covenants that run with the land,
. I.
1 shall burden the land included within the Park Cen- •
I tral West Condominium Subdivision, and shall bind
8
ii and be specifically enforceable against all subsequent
ii owners including Subdividers, their heirs,
1i personal representatives, successor_ in interest and
Ii assigns.
3
y1
�...- .�_._.._. r .
•
- 9 o01a�i 7 ►� Bg4.
IN,WITNESS WNEREOF, the parties hereto have exe-
s r
;i " Cuted this Agreement as of the day nd. year first above
- ' written. I
':
I f •
aC
T
C. liti
•
A a J / l
• Mi Fiiri A c oTr��non --
II
CITY OF ASPEN` '
•
1 9 t +cY an ey, T1 T, syor -
x
ATTEST: C
4 .
4
1 M
• y Clerk .y
itATE OF EBttR>� t—
y )
!j 'COUNTY OF P )� ,• j
y The foregolao MIS acknowledged before me tails al _
ter
l day .ot 1
it ,, QaCdxes __,� al l78, by Richard J. Meeker and
. Alfreg A. Nicholson 1 tl /tabeth A. Nicholson.
• ,f . 6 11♦'1fe } 0y heed and official seat. Wy commission expires
a ' 1W M 'Fly 8th, 1981
• ;s ,
t,
t
'f C 6:* GO�,, ota y u t •
•
STATE OF COLORADO)
;i COUNTY OF PITKIN ass
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this
! day of . 1978, by Stacy Standley, 111, _ Aayor,
Witness r hand and official seal. My commission expires tit
Notary Public -` -- -- -- I
•
• bottled 3N6 PH Nov 6 1979 Reception
Loretta
2(1HS4}$ a Raoner Recorder
.
71►!
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS
4446 Allred C. Nicholson, E1
-- _,�[ibeth An Nicholson and Richard J.
tI ¢ eker (hereIfter "covenantors'), for themselves, their heirs,
executors, administrators, and assigns, hereby Jointly and
i *
n
ily covenant with the City of Aspen. Pftktn County, I'
Colorado, tilt:
1. CIMuantors pip the owners of the following- described j .v
` property together °with improvements thereon: I i
;; Park Central Nest Condominium 4W/division
City of Aspen, Pltkin County, Ctlofedo I
2. Residential Units 8, 9 and 10 s0111 be restricted to JI
a monthly rental for each unit of not more! than 1175.00, unless
r f the duly constituted Housing Authority of the City of Aspen shall
consent to an increased rental to reflect increased expenses of
1 the owner in operatin the i
9 premises adjuutments Co rosY,
' 3 A2-484 :Ike the residential units•of the
property are
offered for sale, in whole or in part, the tenant or tenants 3
" ffelt ps9.it4 P : 14.0444W44.08441-4141414
ti+, Nt4*ratloA shell, f
if 16,E riN118.0. kdd(lett LUlth 4h4 *Mc ilia d4'id*l+f is offered I 4
' FOP ilk OR gliit 111449 .10 Iilbh offef toylike iith the
I
if4.0i1 hurtiiie,pr(ii, H ill IUth thkldt *hill have a ninety-
114O NON- ass4g0481I gptldN t� jUftjase the portion of the JJ 4
Pro -
dortg kt Nati ihdir Wile it lilt Price stated in the offer of ,
HID.
r •
4. At . t he time a bona fide offer to
purchas- is made and '
accepted, the same tenant or tenants shall have a ninety -day , ! i
. exclusive non - assignable right of first refusal to purchase• th e
the
e Portion of the property which he has under lease. In the event
that such offer is made while the ninety -day option is still
l ie effect, the tenant may purchase the unit for the amount of
the bona fide offer or offered price, whichever 1s less.
5. In the event that any improvement
Or improvements
� requtred by Section 20 -16 of
the Code of the Cityf Aspen become,
•
tot351
naafi t--
in the sole judgment or discretion of the City Council of the i
t k Ai ty of Aspeh. necessary or desirable. no obJectton will be . •
r ' 'made to any. special assessment or special tax or proceeding
ii
.
'therefor on the basis that the property 1s adequately eerved
lby existing improvements, nor on the basis that the premises r
L ill not be served or Denefltid by .the imprevement o" tm-
4 1provements proposed. L7
6. Th♦ covenants cdntained herein specifically referring y
J
to the monthly for Units 8, 9 and 10 contained in Para -
# ;graph 2 are to rue with i the land and shall be binding on all •
3 parties and all peitiesland elf persons claiming under them
4 for a period of five (3) years. The remaining covenants con -
tained herein are to run wlth,the land and shall be binding
on all parties and t ,,,persons claiming under them !Or a period
- of twenty (20) years from the date these covenants are re-
corded, after which time, said covenints shall be automatically
.. extended for successive
periods of ten (10) year!, udless an
3
1 instrument signed by the fifty of Aspen and the than record
. owners of the a propert3 has been recorded, agreefr - g to change
4 . said covenants in whole or to part or agreeing to release said .
ts.
3f IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration has been duly executed
� toil' as. •u 1f Nelifliiii ins, s.
x54441
is
i ,
HAVE OF COLORADO; • char . 'ee er v
County of Pitkin
ss
The foreeeii 4nstrument was acknowledged before me this ''
day of November, 1978, by Alfred C. Nicholson,. Elizabeth •.
Ann Nicholson, and Rtchard J. Meeker. •.ti
WiTNESS -MT HAND ANO OFFICIAL SEAL.
My commission expires: July .O.1, 19 1 -,
Cr I •
f: 1
r n • It 81 .1�J 1 '' •
A 7 . I.
0
mo
l P 1,
h1 ._ 1. i It :\ ,
r Cil Council
} GM: Planning Office, Jolene Viminta
•
RE: Par!: Ccntr:nl Ucsl, Tot, hn; ;_ Cot donjniurls - Final Plat Apllication
See ca:uer 21, 19/8
his proposal is for construction of a two-story building, including 10 rest-
cential units (7 one b droom, free rocket units and 3 low-cost studios) plus
?,/81 sq. tt. of office space, for a total building area of 11,211 sq. ft.
The project is proposed for location on a 15,009 sq. ft. parcel including 5
lots at the HE corner of Hyman and Aspen Streets. It. is currently zoned
0--0ifice, which allows nulltl- fuln'I ly residences, professional and business
offices, and noceSSO'y moderate-income lousinj by special review.
The proposal scored the second highest nun_ner of points (42 out of 65 possible)
at the cence Guai /0 rP review stage. Scoring and referrals indicated no pro-
blems with access to or impact on public services and facilities. The housing
category 'received 30% of possible points based on 3 low - income units out of
10. In addition, social services (e.g. police, childcare and recycling
facilities, bike paths, acid handicapped design features) scored adequately.
It is located in close proximity to the commercial core and to bus routes
which would help to minimize traffic impact. Recycling bins will be provi-
ded on- -situ There is handicapped access to all ground -level units. Necessary
utilities and services are located within a 2 to 3 block radius. Most re-
ferrals (submitted to the P&7_ record) indicated that no problems are antici-
pated. These include statements from the Fare Marshall, Rocky Mountain Natural
Gas, Water Dcpt., and Aspen Metro Sanitation District.
The City Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the application at a regular
meeting on August 1, 1975. The Commission recommended preliminary plat
approval subject to the following conditions:
1. Holy Cross Electric needs to know the power load required and when
power will be needed.
The applicant has discussed this with Holy Cross and gained approval.
A letter confirming approval will be entered into the record when
received.
2. Mountain Bell suggests that a dedication of easements for roads and
utilities be made. Appropriate language will be placed in the Sub-
division Improvements Agreement." before the final plat is recorded.
3. In an effort to control the lour -rent studio units. P".1 recommended
that final approval he given conditioned on a covenant adopting what-
ever price guidelines City Council adopts. The City Attorney, however
has reviewed previous actions of City Council and determined that a con-
tract regarding housing has been made. City Council minutes record an
agreement that the applicant will fulfill his employee housing obli-
gation (Ordinance 53) by holding the rent of the three studio units
at $175 per year for five years. A housing agreement will be written
to bind the property to this restriction.
In addition to fulfilling the P &Z conditions for final plat approval, the app-
licant has also received approval from the City Engineer. The problems cited
on Dave Ellis' memo (see attached, dated 9/15/73) were settled in a revision
of the plat (except for a couple of semantic problesm).
The applicant is submitting for City Council approval a "Subdivision Improve-
ments Agreement" which includes: •
1. Agreement to joing any special utility improvement district which may
be formed.
2. Agreement to pave the remainder of the alley of Block 75 by October 1,
1972 (as requested by Dave Ellis).
3. Agrrr)ceont to rntabiish a" cash escrow fund to cover default in payment
Gi ill: Alloy pdvoment. (Dave will hake do estimate to be inc in
the iuireumunt bolero the plat is recorded.) •
•
Memo to City Cconci l
C_.ntral blest
Srl:tomuer 21, 19!8
Rer;r Two
4. Agreement to pay <_ park c'vdication for, equal to 1% of the assessed
property voluo i!lui It i'2lied I!y the la.dledr Of residents (13.5), as
defined by Oro once 1 3 (BM). An arprabal w i l l be made and appro-
ved by City M0n "(Cr, Mick Mahoney, awl the fee calculated prior to
recording of the plat.
•
5. Dedication of road and utility easements to the public and to utility
companies, respectively.
6. Agreement to duly record the final plat.
7. Agreement that the covenants and agreements run with the land.
The Planning Office recommends approval of the final plat conditioned on the
above - mentioned clarifications and approvals, including:
1. Final approval of the plat by Dave Ellis;
2. Clarification for Holy Cross Electric of power load requirements;
3. Revision of the "Subdivision Improvements Agreement" to includ.n the
engineer's estimate of paving costs., calculation of a park dedication
fee, and language covering dedication of utility easements and roads;
4. A "Housing Agreement" which meets the approval of the City Attorney;
and
5. Provision of the original plat and copies for recording as specified
in Section 20.14 of the Municipal Code. •
•
•
•
fl E l M O i t fi .. U li
TO: JOL73id3 v /RCilOTL
PLANNING
FROM: DAVE ELL IS •
EEGINLL IiNG
DATE: September 15, lP7
RE: Park Central West Subdivision -
Fina1 Plat Review
The engineering department has reviewed the final plat
of Park Central Pest, finds that it is substantially
in compliance with the subdivision requirements and
recommends that it be given final plat approval subject •
to making the following correction:: and /or additions:
1) The description for the public electric and
communication utilities easement is incorrect
as written.
2) All the certificates should be corrected so that •
the title of the subdivision reads "Park Central
West."
•
3) The area of subdivision should be shown either
in the written description or on the plat else-
where.
4) The survey monuments, either found or set, should
be designated for the easterly property corner.
5) A handicap ramp should be indicated within the
sidewalk at the corner of Aspen and Hyman.
No proposed subdivision agreement has been submitted at this
time; however, the engineering department would like to have
included in such an agreement that the subdivider shall. pave
the remainder of the alley in Block 75 according to the
existing City plan for that alley and commit to completing
construction by a date certain.
i
• i
jk
1
•
•
•
. I
N I C H O L S O N ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN
A.C.NICHOLSONAIA
2155. MONARCH. SUITE 202
ASPEN, COLD. 81611
(303)925 -7265
October 10, 1978
Planning Department
City of Aspen
130 So. Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Attn: Jolene Vrchota
Subj: Park Central West Subdivision
Dear Jolene:
Enclosed is a copy of the Subdivision Agreement and Sheets
1 & 2, final plat, dated 10/10/78. These are for your review
so that signatures may be added in preparation for recording.
I will contact you this coming Monday to see if there are any
changes you need before I submit the mylar of the plat and the
original of the Subdivision Agreement.
The rental covenant will be delivered to the City Attorney by
my attorney, Mr. Jon Mulford.
Dave Ellis will have a final figure for the paving now estimated
at 20' x 150' (333 yds.) x $5.00 = $1667.00. He also should
make a final check of the documents.
Sincerely,
NICHOLSON ASSOCIATES
. Nicholson
Enclosures
ACN /le
N I C H O L S O N ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN
A. C.NICHOLSONAIA
215 S. MONARCH, SUITE 202
ASPEN, COLO. 81611
(303)925 -7265
September 19, 1978
Planning Department
City of Aspen
130 So. Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Attn: Jolene Vrchota
Subj: Park Central West Subdivision
Dear Jolene:
Attached are two prints of the Final Plat which has been
revised in accordance with the changes requested by the City
engineering department. These are for final review by the
engineering department. I will contact you to see if they
are o.k.
Sincerely,
NICHOLSON ASSOCIATES
A.C. Nicholson
Enclosures
ACN /le
4,
"CITY OF ASPEN
130 SOUTH GALENA STREET - ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
MESSAGE REPLY
TO r r_ t ✓'LLTJJA._ 1 DATE
k . . ce su w,
L � .
DATE - 02/78
7Re g t CSre 4a 4 <c(C/ ers a
l
/M cen.Rm,tn„4 tit - Mc* 7�is /e i& /L -
, .
S 77 a Cerry/P ern S'eraaa. �►uGiewtf
Itt 7%e ea _ PilAasl ehrcrr ,p - lei /Aar
A -6 .4 r c a c U o� / n -fie S 4t4c/ily •
4 14 V hmy c e 4 s 4 4.4.44 "Int"
BY SIGNED
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: JOLENE VRCHOTA
PLANNING
FROM: DAVE ELLIS " - - , .0
ENGINEERING 'L---
DATE: September 15, 1978
RE: Park Central West Subdivision -
Final Plat Review
The engineering department has reviewed the final plat
of Park Central West, finds that it is substantially
in compliance with the subdivision requirements and
recommends that it be given final plat approval subject
to making the following corrections and /or additions:
1) The description for the public electric and
communication utilities easement is incorrect
as written.
2) All the certificates should be corrected so that
the title of the subdivision reads "Park Central
West."
3) The area of subdivision should be shown either
in the written description or on the plat else-
where.
4) The survey monuments, either found or set, should
be designated for the easterly property corner.
5) A handicap ramp should be indicated within the
sidewalk at the corner of Aspen and Hyman.
No proposed subdivision agreement has been submitted at this
time; however, the engineering department would like to have
included in such an agreement that the subdivider shall pave
the remainder of the alley in Block 75 according to the
existing City plan for that alley and commit to completing
construction by a date certain.
jk
N I C H O L S O N ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN
A.C.NICHOLSON AIA
215 S. MONARCH. SUITE 202
ASPEN, COLD. 81611
(303)925 -7265
September 14, 1978
Mr. Richard Grice
City of Aspen
Planning Office
130 So. Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Subject: Park Central West Condominium
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
Dear Mr. Grice:
With respect to the final subdivision plat submitted on
August 10, 1978, enclosed is a copy of a proposed Subdivision
Improvement Agreement for the subject project for review
by the City of Aspen. Since the Subdivision Improvement
Agreement concerns itself primarily with improvements to
City property abutting the proposed project, the Employee
Housing Agreement will be in the form of a separate covenant
to be prepared as agreed upon by the City Attorney, Ron
Stock, and my attorney Jon Mulford.
Kindly advise me if there are any changes to this agreement
you require.
Sincerely,
NICHOLSON ASSOCIATES
A.C. Nicholson
Enclosure
ACN /le
PARK CENTRAL WEST
(A Residential - Office Condominium)
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
day of , 197 , by and between RICHARD J.
MEEKER and ALFRED C. NICHOLSON & ELIZABETH ANN NICHOLSON
( "Subdividers "), and THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, a
Municipal Corporation ( "City "),
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Subdividers are owners and subdividers
ii
of a tract of land within Pitkin County, Colorado,
l i l
consisting of Lots K, L, M, N and 0, Block 75, City and
Townsite of Aspen, and
1 WHEREAS, Subdividers have submitted to City for
Iapproval, execution and recording a subdivision plat
of the above - described property, such subdivision to be
known and designated as "Park Central West Condominium
Subdivision "; and
WHEREAS, the City has fully considered such sub-
division plat, the proposed development and the improve-
j ment of the subject property shown thereon, and is
willing to approve, execute and accept said plat for
recordation upon the agreement of Subdividers to the
matters hereinafter described, which matters are deemed
I necessary to protect, promote and enhance the public
j welfare; and
it WHEREAS, Subdividers and the City wish to reduce
said agreement to writing,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises,
the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto
hereby agree as follows:
1. Subdividers covenant and agree to and with the
City that they will affirmatively consent to and join in
2
(1 7
the formation of any special improvement district, en-
compassing all or any part of Park Central West Condominium
Subdivision, that may hereafter be proposed or formed
for the construction of drainage improvements, or any
other such utility, or street improvements abutting
Lots K, L, M, N and 0, Block 75, City and Townsite of
Aspen. Subdividers hereby waive and further covenant
and agree to waive any right of protest against the forma -
1
tion of any such district.
2. Subdividers covenant and agree to and with
the City that they will pave the unpaved portion of the
alley of Block 75 with asphalt (approximately 150 lineal
feet) no later than October 1, 1979.
3. The City Engineer has estimated the cost of
f the improvements provided for in Paragraph 2 above to be
. Subdivider agrees with this estimate
and further agrees to provide a guarantee for no less
than one hundred (100 %) percent of the total of this
estimate prior to recordation of this instrument. The
guarantee shall be in the form of a cash escrow with the
City or a bank or savings and loan association, or an
irrevocable sight draft or letter of commitment from a
financially responsible lender, such guarantee shall be
completed prior to recording the Final Plat. The guarantee
shall give the City an unconditional right, upon default
by Subdividers and after 30 days written demand to sub-
dividers, to withdraw funds upon demand to partially or
fully complete and /or pay for the improvements provided
for in Paragraph 2, or pay any outstanding bills for work
done with reference thereto by any party.
4. Subdividers agree to execute a promissory note
in favor of the City of Aspen prior to issuance of a Building
Permit for the herein named subdivision for the sum of
dollars as full payment for all obligations
-2-
-2
for payment of cash in lieu of land dedication as required
by the provisions of Section 20 -18 of the City of Aspen,
as amended by Ordinance 13, 1978. Such note shall bear
interest at the rate of 9% from the date of issuance of
the building permit, and the interest and principal sum
shall be due and payable on or before the date of issuanc
of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Park Central Wes'
Condominium Subdivision.
5. The subdividers hereby dedicate to the PUBLIC
all the streets, avenues and roads as shown on the accom -
il.
ing plat, forever, and dedicate to the PUBLIC UTILITIES
those portions of real property which are labeled as
utility easements on the accompanying plat, as easements
for the installation and maintenance of utilities and
drainage facilities, including, but not limited to,
electric lines, gas lines, telephone lines; together with
the right of ingress and egress for installation, main-
tenance and replacement of such lines; together with the
right to trim interfering trees and brush; said easements
and rights shall be utilized in a reasonable and prudent
manner.
6. Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties
hereto, City agrees to approve and execute the final plat
of Park Central West Condominium Subdivision and accept the
same for recording in the real property records of Pitkin
County, Colorado, upon payment of recording fees and costs
to City by Subdividers.
7. The Covenant of the Subdividers contained in
paragraph 1 and agreements of the Subdividers herein
shall be deemed covenants that run with the land, shall
burden the land included within the Park Central West
Condominium Subdivision, and shall bind and be specifically
enforceable against all subsequent owners thereof, including
Subdividers, their heirs, personal representatives, suc-
cessors in interest and assigns.
-3-
Y
IG,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have e,e-
cuted this Agreement as of the day and year first above
written.
Richard J. Meeker
ii
I t
1 Alfred C. Nicholson
ii
Elizabeth A. Nicholson
CITY OF ASPEN
By:
Stacy Standley, III, Mayor
ATTEST:
i
City Clerk
STATE OF COLORADO)
)ss
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this
day of , 1978, by Richard J. Meeker and
Alfred C. Nicholson & Elizabeth A. Nicholson.
Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires
1
Notary Public
I STATE OF COLORADO)
)ss
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this
'; day of , 1978, by Stacy Standley, III, Mayor.
Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires
Notary Public
-4-
I�
0 ,/6»
qusi -/E)
PARK CENTRAL WEST
(A Residential - Office Condominium)
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT
I I
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
day of , 197 , by and between RICHARD J.
MEEKER and ALFRED C. NICHOLSON & ELIZABETH ANN NICHOLSON
( "Subdividers "), and THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, a
Municipal Corporation ( "City "),
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Subdividers are owners and subdividers
of a tract of land within Pitkin County, Colorado,
consisting of Lots K, L, M, N and 0, Block 75, City and
Townsite of Aspen, and
WHEREAS, Subdividers have submitted to City for
approval, execution and recording a subdivision plat
of the above - described property, such subdivision to be
known and designated as "Park Central West Condominium
Subdivision "; and
WHEREAS, the City has fully considered such sub-
division plat, the proposed development and the improve -
ment of the subject property shown thereon, and is
willing to approve, execute and accept said plat for
recordation upon the agreement of Subdividers to the
matters hereinafter described, which matters are deemed
necessary to protect, promote and enhance the public
welfare; and
WHEREAS, Subdividers and the City wish to reduce
said agreement to writing,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises,
the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto
hereby agree as follows:
1. Subdividers covenant and agree to and with the
City that they will affirmatively consent to and join in
the formation of any special improvement district, en-
compassing all or any part of Park Central West Condominium
Subdivision, that may hereafter be proposed or formed
for the construction of drainage improvements, or any
i other such utility, or street improvements abutting
Lots K, L, M, N and 0, Block 75, City and Townsite of
Aspen. Subdividers hereby waive and further covenant
and agree to waive any right of protest against the
formation of any such district.
2. Subdividers covenant and agree to and with
1 the City that they will pave the unpaved portion of the
alley of Block 75 with asphalt (approximately 150 lineal
feet) no later than October 1, 1979.
3. The City Engineer has estimated the cost of
the improvements provided for in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above
to be . In addition, the City Engineer
has estimated the cost of the landscaping for the pro-
posed subdivision to be . Subdivider agrees
with these estimates and further agrees to provide a
guarantee for no less than one hundred (100 %) percent of
the total of these estimates prior to recordation of
this instrument. The guarantee shall be in the form of
a cash escrow with the City or a bank or savings and loan
association, or an irrevocable sight draft or letter
commitment from a financially responsible lender. The
guarantee shall give the City an unconditional right,
upon default by Subdividers, to withdraw funds upon demand
to partially or fully complete and /or pay for the land-
scaping or improvements provided for in Paragraphs 1 and
2, or pay any outstanding bills for work done with
reference thereto by any party.
4. Subdividers agree to pay to the City prior to
filing for record of the subdivision plat, the sum of
dollars as full
-2-
payment for all obligations for payment of cash in lieu
of land dedication as required by the provisions of Section
20 -18 of the Aspen Municipal Code.
P P
5. Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties
hereto, City agrees to approve and execute the final plat
of Park Central West Condominium Subdivision and accept
the same for recording in the real property records of
Pitkin County, Colorado, upon payment of recording fees
and costs to City by Subdividers.
6. The Covenants and agreements of the Subdividers
herein shall be deemed covenants that run with the land,
shall burden the land included within the Park Central
West Condominium Subdivision, and shall bind and be
specifically enforceable against all subsequent owners
thereof, including Subdividers, their heirs, personal
representatives, successors in interest and assigns.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have exe-
cuted this Agreement as of the day and year first above
written.
Richard J. Meeker
Alfred C. Nicholson
Elizabeth A. Nicholson
CITY OF ASPEN
By:
Stacy Standley, III, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF COLORADO)
)ss
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day
of , 197 , by Richard J. Meeker and Alff ed
C. Nicholson & Elizabeth A. Nicholson.
Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires
Notary Public
-3-
v
CITY F ASPEN
130 south galena street
aspen, colorraado) 81611
September 6, 1978
Jon K. Mulford, Esq.
600 East Hopkins, Suite 305
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Nicholson
Dear Jon:
This letter confirms our conversation of last week.
Mr. Nicholson has voluntarily agreed to rent three studio
apartments for the price of $175 per month for a period
of five years. It is understood that these studios will
have no less than 400 square feet per unit. In return for
receiving this consideration, the City granted your client
special points at review under the Growth Management Plan.
I agree that the City has no authority to unilaterally
modify the term provision of this agreement. However, there
is no provision for the modification of the price of the
studios due to increased utility or tax costs. The City
and your client may agree to modify the price term to allow
for such increases, but I believe that they would demand in
return an increase of control which may not be acceptable
to Mr. Nicholson.
ry truly yours,
Rona d W. Stock
City Attorney
RWS:mc
cc: Karen Smith
f 1 f
e a
•
8
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS
Alfred C. Nicholson, Elizabeth Ann Nicholson and Richard
J. Meeker (hereafter "covenators "), for themselves, their
heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, hereby jointly
and severally covenant with the City of Aspen, Pitkin County,
Colorado, that:
1. Covenators are the owners of the following described
property together with the improvements thereon:
RESIDENTIAL: Units 8, 9, and 10, Park Central West
Condominium Subdivision, City of Aspen,
Pitkin County, Colorado
2. The above - described property shall be restricted to
six (6) months minimum leases with no more than two (2) tenancies
in any calendar year and the monthly rental for each such unit
shall be not more than $175.00, unless the duly constituted
Housing Authority of the City of Aspen shall consent to an in-
creased rental to reflect increased expenses of the owner in
operating the premises, adjustments in cost of living indices
and other similar factors.
3. At the time the property is offered for sale, in whole
or in part, the tenant or tenants shall be given notice of such
offer together with the offered price. Each tenant shall have
a ninety -day non - assignable option to purchase the portion of
the property he has under lease at the price stated in the offer
of sale.
4. At the time a bona fide offer to purchase is made and
accepted, the tenant or tenants shall have a ninety -day exclusive
non - assignable right of first refusal to purchase the portion of
the property which he has under lease. In the event that such
offer is made while the ninety -day option is still in effect, the
tenant may purchase the unit for the amount of the bona fide offer
or offered price, whichever is less.
D
I�C
O
5. In the event that any improvement of improvements required
by Section 20 -16 of the Code of the City of Aspen become, in the
sole judgment or discretion of the City Council of the City of
Aspen, necessary or desirable, no objection will be made to any
special assessment or special tax or proceeding therefor on the
basis that the property is adequately served by existing improve-
ments, nor on the basis that the premises will not be served
or benefited by the improvement or improvements proposed.
6. The covenants contained herein are to run with the land
and shall be binding on all parties and all parties and all persons
claiming under them for a period of five (5) years
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration has been duly executed
this day of , 19
Alfred C. Nicholson
Elizabeth Ann Nicholson
Richard J. Meeker
STATE OF COLORADO 3 ss.
County of Pitkin
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of , 19 , by Alfred C. Nicholson,
Elizabeth Ann Nicholson, and Richard J. Meeker.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
Notary Public
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dave Ellis, City Engineer
FROM: Planning Office, Jolene Vrchota
RE: Park Central West, final plat
DATE: August 16, 1978
Attached find 2 copies of the Park Central West final plat and landscaping
plan. Please review the submission for conformance to the preliminary
plat. Could you return your comments to me by August 31, 1978, as the
comments must be referred on to the developer before final approval?
sr
. i
A CHI
RTEC'CURE PLANNING INTERI TES =
IiOT'SpN ASSOCIATES
A. 0 NICHOLSON MA 202
215S. MONARCH. SUIT E
ASPEN, CO1,0 .81611
(303) -7265
October 30, 1978
Hand delivered to:
City of Aspe Dept
Planning l
9 and
CitY Galena
130 South Gal
Aspen, Colorado
Attn: Jolene Vrchota
Subject' park Central West Condominiums
Final Pla
one and two for the subject
Dear Jolene: sheets the parks Department
final Accompany Yang are original
s ignatur es of the subdivision agree-
9
project requiring the mayor; original the mayor; and a 2 ch
Directo si gnature x $60.0 20 of the
Subdivision uirin9 •3432 acres in Section .0 = 20. 10, 1978
Showsthe preliminary and fo
ment 59grepresentil fee, required dated 20.
$120'100.00 initial attached letter dated
paid.
the � Code. See final
which
which
Sincere
NICHOLSON ASSOCIATES
, C Nichols
r edm Enclosures
ACN /le
•
I
I ■ a
1
t
i 9
i' RECEIPT Date / if 5755 —
Received From ALL 4 `�
r
Address Dollars 'M
• - je •
For f
ACCOUNT HOW PAID ,.... 1 .
-.
AM O -.�
i ACCTOUN T . ®- / / Ar
5K800 wer -r.. ..
( . n t
; " E.." � ,
1 � �
t
Z. C,-(1 ( Li`C. d ;C ;\ C\ri\-...._i t
l T ++r".-YYY
1
li ~ -. 1� �� /. , ,.- ` _ ' '1 11 {5 +]l . . . , c !v ll __.•rte... _ , -I `'•\•� „s r
�/ �
a
..
GL
r, ,
......................
....„..
1
.._
. ,
I
_ 11 I.. _
. P 1
.1
. .1
N I C H O L S O N ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN
A.C.NICIIOLSONAIA
215S.MONARCII,SUITE202
A5PEN,COL0.81611
(303)925 -7265
Hand Delivered:
November 8, 1978
City of Aspen
Planning Department
City Hall
130 So. Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Attn: Jolene Subj: Park Central West
Final Plat
Dear Jolene:
Enclosed please find $12.00 in cash which is the necessary amount
to cover the recording fee for the Housing Agreement and the
Subdivision Agreement for Park Central West. The fee is $2.00
per page.
I spoke with Survey Engineers today and I will pick up the mylars
that they mistakenly received.
Thank you.
Please call if there are any further problems, questions or
comments.
Sincerely,
NICHOLSON ASSOCIATES
Linn Eckman
/le
Enclosure $12.00
N I C H O L S O N ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN
A. C. NICHOLSONAIA
215S . MONARCH. SUITE 202
ASPEN.COLO. 81611
(303)825 -7265
August 10, 1978
City of Aspen
Planning and Zoning Dept.
City Hall
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado81611
Subject: Park Central West Subdivision
Final Plat
Attn: Mr. Richard Grice
Dear Richard:
As required under Section 20 -14 of the Subdivision Code of
the City of Aspen, enclosed are four copies of the final
plat (sheets 1 & 2, dated 8/9/78), four copies of a land-
scape plan (sheet L -1, dated 8/9/78) for the subject
subdivision and a check for $12.01 based on a fee on .3432
acres x $35.00.
I am in the process of setting a meeting with Mark Danielson
to review the employee housing I am providing in the project,
and will contact you after my meeting with him and after
the August 14th meeting of the City Council.
Kindly notify me if there is any other information you
require.
Sincerely,
NICHOLSON ASSOCIATES
Nicholson
Enclosures
N I C H O L S O N ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE I'I.ANNING INTERIC II CI"
A.C.NICHOLSON AIA
SUITE202
ASPEN. COLO. 81611
(303)925 -7265
tic S. MonavC-ti
February 1, 1978
Mr. Bill Kane
Planning Office
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Ref: Park Central West Townhouse Condominiums
Growth Management Plan Submittal
Dear Mr. Kane,
Attached are prints of sheets A -1 through A -5 and A -L
(landscape plan), and sheets 1 through 6 of the Growth
Management Application.
My submittal is for 10 residential units, 7 market and
3 low cost under the control of the city housing authority,
and 2,781 Sq. Ft. of office space for a total building
area of 11,211 Sq. Ft.
Please contact me if there is any other information you
request.
Sincerely,
A.C. Nicholson
MT
CC:AN
1 )))"
Enc
17
•
1978 CITY G.M.P. HOUSINr
PRICE GUIDL *
LOW MODERATE MIDDLE
Gross Family Income $12,000 and under $12,000 - >$18,000 t18;000 - >$24,000
Rental Guideline $300 /Mo. and under $300- 450/Mo. $450-600/Mo.
(30% of gross
monthly income)
Sale Guideline $30,000 and under $30,000 - $45,000 $45,000 - $60,000
*Values are for 2 bedroom 800 sq.ft. units. Adjustments
must be made for studio, 1 bedroom, and 3 bedroom
units on a rational, per square foot cost basis.
Ranges are intended to cover the ranges in quality
of construction. All housing plans will be referred
to the housing Advisory Board for recommendations on
point assignments for each project.
pi2tc cGs" 7 n Wes? r,UiNHo Cowb6 S
46 f 115 S7C/D/ o ( con 1Q2 4 ("l S7 t s CA. &a7 ( AA
A 56 F /34-57 rsA.v store z 6h / h5 env;
2pto + — ittoo tte -ce
kart ,ter:
•5Y 37.54 /75 ¢6Ss- S ..zf = ZLZ
Dsl s/,S 34" 37 64 5/5 4 S S62 d
coo 7 (a)
5.46 -E SAc :
46S 37.Sb= 7937 ¢6rx Zf= zc 16.
B fry S _ ) a oous 3 4 S cab
rocs 9 ra
rye
N I C H O L S O N A S S O C I A T E S ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN
A. C. NICHOLSON AIA
4 * *KFXIYT1K. SUITE 202 215 S. Monarch
ASPEN. COLO. 81611
(303)925 -7265
February 27, 1978
Karen Smith
Planning Office
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Subject: Park Central West Townhouse Condominiums
Dear Ms. Smith,
This is to confirm that it is my intention to put the 3 studio
units in the 10 unit project under the "low cost" category of
the growth management point system, and that the points for
this section would be 9 rather than the 6 as shown on item
C -3 of the point allocation form. The 9 points are based
on a figure of 30% of the units allocated to low cost housing.
This would put the project in compliance with the requirement
that it have at least 39 points (it will have 40 points) and
that each of the three sections have at least 30% of available
points.
My figures are as follows:
1. Public Facilities: 100%
2. Social Facilities: 70%
3. Housing: 30%
Since this project fully complies with the minimum requirements
as set forth in the existing growth management plan, I am request-
ing that it be processed under the existing P & Z procedures,
while those not complying be subject to whatever ordinance re-
visions are made in the future.
Sincerely,
-----
S.C. Nicholson
MT
CC:AN
N I C H O L S O N ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN
A. C. NICHOLSON AIA
420 E. MAIN ST.. SUITE 202
ASPEN, COLO. 81611
(303)925 -7265
February 2, 1978
Mr. Bill Kane
Planning Office
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Ref: Park Central West Townhouse Condominiums
Growth Management Plan Submittal
Dear Mr. Kane,
Attached are prints of sheets A -1 through A -5 as additional
sets for the Growth Management Allocation submittal. These
should be attached to the material delivered yesterday.
I was told several seeks ago only one set was required to
be submitted.
Please contact me if there is any other information you
request.
Sincerely,
A.C. Nicholson
MT
CC:AN