Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.Pitkin County Bank 534 E Hyman.A65-92 VANN ASSOCIATES Planning Consultants July 17, 1992 HAND DELIVERED Ms. Kim Johnson Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company /GMQS Exemption Dear Kim: Please consider this letter an application for an exemption from the growth manage- ment quota system (GMQS) for an approximately two hundred and forty (240) square foot addition to the Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company building (see Pre - Application Conference Summary attached hereto as Exhibit 1). The application is submitted pursuant to Section 8- 104.B.1. a. of the Aspen Land Use Regulations by Aspen Bank Shares, Ltd. (dba, the Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company), the owner of the property (see Exhibit 2, Letter from Pitkin County Bank). Permission for Vann Associates, Planning Consultants, to represent the Applicant is attached as Exhibit 3. Background On December 17, 1990, the City Council awarded the Applicant a commercial GMQS allotment for the expansion of the Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company building (see Exhibit 4, City Council Resolution No. 58 -90). The allotment consisted of two thousand two hundred and forty (2,240) square feet of net leasable area which is to be used to add a second floor to the bank building and to expand its mezzanine. Relevant development data pertaining to the previously approved expansion is summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1 DEVELOPMENT DATA 1. Existing Zoning CC, Commercial Core 2. Total Site Area (Sq. Ft.)' 6,020 230 East Hopkins Avenue • Aspen. Colorado 81611 •303/925 -6958 • Fax 303i920 -9310 Ms. Kim Johnson July 17, 1992 Page 2 3. Existing Floor Area (Sq. Ft.) 4,700 Basement2 None Ground Floor 3,910 Mezzanine 790 4. Existing Net Leasable Area (Sq. Ft.)3 5,460 Basement 2,220 Ground Floor 2,830 Mezzanine 410 5. Maximum Allowable External Floor Area 9,030 @ 1.5:1 (Sq. Ft.) 6. Proposed Floor Area (Sq. Ft.) 8,850 Basement None Ground Floor 4,100 Mezzanine 1,170 Second Floor 3,580 7. Proposed Net Leasable Area (Sq. Ft.) 7,700 Basement 2,220 Ground Floor 2,830 Mezzanine 740 Second Floor 1,910 All numbers have been rounded to the nearest ten (10) square feet. 2 As the basement is one hundred (100) percent below natural grade, it is excluded from the calculation of floor area. 3 Excludes areas used for bathrooms, stairways, circulation corridors, mechani- cal areas, and storage areas used solely by the building's tenants. The City Council also approved a GMQS exemption for the construction of a deed restricted dwelling unit at the Messiah Lutheran Church (see Exhibit 5, Resolution No. 5 -91). The unit was designed to mitigate a portion of the Applicant's GMQS c Ms. Kim Johnson July 17, 1992 Page 3 affordable housing requirement and is presently under construction. The Bank expansion, however, has been temporarily postponed. Proposed Development In the interim, the Applicant would like to remodel a portion of the Bank's existing ground floor and mezzanine to enhance customer service. As the accompanying architectural plans illustrate, the Applicant proposes to enclose an existing opening in the ground floor, and to extend the mezzanine to include the full width of the building. The resulting increase in the building's floor area and net leasable area is approximately three hundred and seventy (370) square feet. As noted previously, the Bank received an allocation for two thousand two hundred and forty (2,240) square feet of net leasable area in the 1990 GMQS competition. While a portion of this allotment could be used for the proposed remodel, an insufficient amount of net leasable area would remain to accommodate the Bank's future expansion. Please note that two (2) of the areas to be enclosed in connection with the remodel were not included in the original GMQS application. These two areas total approximately two hundred and forty (240) square feet of additional net leasable area over and above the original GMQS allocation. Revised floor area and net leasable calculations for the original expansion plus the remodel are provided in Table 2 below. Table 2 REVISED DEVELOPMENT DATA 1. Maximum Allowable External Floor Area 9,030 @ 1.5:1 (Sq. Ft.)' 2. Revised Floor Area (Sq. Ft.) 9,090 Basement None Ground Floor 4,210 Mezzanine 1,300 Second Floor 3,580 3. Revised Net Leasable Area (Sq. Ft.) 7,940 Basement 2,220 Ground Floor 2,940 Mezzanine 870 Second Floor 1,910 • L✓ Ms. Kim Johnson July 17, 1992 Page 4 1 All numbers have been rounded to the nearest ten (10) square feet. As Table 2 indicates, the building's revised floor area exceeds the property's maxi- mum allowable floor area by sixty (60) square feet. To resolve this problem, the Applicant will revise the plans for the previously approved expansion so as to remove sixty square feet of floor area. The revision will occur prior to the issuance of a building permit for the expansion. Review Requirements Pursuant to Section 8- 104.B.1.a. of the Regulations, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve a GMQS exemption for the expansion of an existing commercial building by not more than five hundred (500) square feet of net leasable area, provided that it can be demonstrated that the expansion will have minimum impact on the City. The applicable review criteria, and the proposed remodel's compliance therewith, are summarized as follows. 1. A minimal number of additional employees will be generated by the expansion. The proposed remodel will increase the building's net leasable square footage by two hundred and forty (240) square feet. Based on an employee generation factor of three and one -half (3 -1/2) employees per one thousand (1,000) square feet of additional net leasable area, proposed remodel will theoretically generate 0.84 new employees calculated as follows. 240 Sq. Ft. Net Leasable + 1,000 Sq. Ft. = 0.24 0.24 x 3.5 Employees /1,000 Sq. Ft. = 0.84 Employees Pursuant to Section 8- 106.F(5)(c) of the Regulations, a proposed develop- ment need only provide affordable housing for a minimum of sixty (60) percent of the employees generated by the development. As a result, the proposed remodel will theoretically require the provision of affordable housing, or the cash -in -lieu equivalent thereof, for 0.50 employees. As noted previously, a three (3) bedroom, affordable housing unit is presently under construction at the Messiah Lutheran Church. The unit has been deed restric- ted as required pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 5 -91, and will provide housing for three (3) employees. The Bank's remaining 1.7 employee mitigation requirement is to be met via a payment -in -lieu at such time as the second floor is constructed. As the original expansion has been temporarily postponed, the Appli- Ms. Kim Johnson July 17, 1992 Page 5 cant proposes to mitigate the 0.50 additional employee requirement which arises from the proposed remodel with the affordable housing unit presently under construction. The Applicant will increase the remaining cash -in -lieu payment to reflect the additional requirement. The revised payment will be $77,000.00 calculat- ed as follows. Original Affordable Housing Requirement 2,240 Sq. Ft. Net Leasable + 1,000 Sq. Ft. = 2.24 2.24 x 3.5 Employees/1,000 Sq. Ft. = 7.84 Employees 7.84 Employees x 0.60 = 4.7 Employees Revised Payment -in -Lieu Requirement 4.7 Employees - 3 Employees Housed = 1.7 Employees 1.7 Employees + 0.5 Employees = 2.2 Employees 2.2 Employees x $35,000.00/Employee = $77,000.00 2. A minimal amount of additional parking spaces will be required by the expansion. The off - street parking requirement for commercial uses in the CC, Commer- cial Core, zone district is two (2) spaces per one thousand (1,000) square feet of net leasable area. The proposed remodel's parking requirement, therefore, would be calculated as follows. 240 Sq. Ft. Net Leasable + 1,000 Sq. Ft. = 0.24 0.24 x 2.0 Spaces /1,000 Sq. Ft. = 0.48 Spaces Pursuant to Section 5- 301.E. of the Regulations, fractional parking require- ments are disregarded if they are less than one -half (1/2) space. As a result, no additional parking will be required by the proposed remodel. 3. The expansion will have minimal visual impact on the neighborhood. The proposed remodel will have no visual impact on the surrounding neigh- borhood, as all improvements will be confined to the interior of the building. 4. Minimal demand will be placed on the City's public facilities by the expansion. As discussed in the Applicant's 1990 GMQS application, all utilities and public facilities are adequate to serve the expanded building. No additional demand Ms. Kim Johnson July 17, 1992 Page 6 will be placed on the City's utilities or public facilities as a result of the proposed remodel. Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. As the Applicant would like to commence construction on the remodel as soon as possible, any assistance you may be able to provide in the timely processing of our application would be sincerely appreciated. Yours truly, VANN AS CIATES Sun Vann, P SV:cwv Attachments cc: Charles Israel Augie Reno Y I CITY OF ASPEN PRE- APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY EXHIBIT 1 PR p +�i� �,aun 1��N�� 4/vas 6-,,,,,,hp, APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: V /N , 'S PHONE: ��� REPRESENTATIVE E: OWNER'S NAME: 7 7 4 -1 0 1 9 ,1-1 L - SUMMARY 1. Type of Application: / 2. 1/4 Describe action /type of development being requested: e }t S Opp # -1 , 71: r 300 3. Areas is which Applicant has been requested to respond, types of reports requested: Policy Area/ Referral Agent Comments 4. Review is: !P &Z only) Only) (P &Z then to CC) 5. Public Hearing: (YES) (NO) 6. Number of copies of the application to be sub ittted:� 7. What fee was applicant requested to submit: %0; 25 8. Anticipated date of submission: p VE.. ,...J<,�� q 99/ 9. C /UNIQUE CONCE' S:J 4_J A 1 frm.pre_app _ . I.\ 1 ' " H 1 i EXHIBIT 2 • 1 1 , I 1 14 If f . 1 l t 4 i : 7 . . 4 I 1 I '' I - 111' 1 V ii41:11't '111k, ' i il II •,r.::: :I' A III 6. ■ T ;■.i _ II > 4 • / -) . I t .4 0 1 fr. i'l,' • 1 ,' i 1,r 0 1 : 4 i k t• , ',I; L til (': • :__. _ 7 ■,) ,tt,', ,,, ,11 t. t. ' ' • • I '01'" HIT;t: ii'L a.: -., '% OP ' I ""--,1'..t, / • I 1 1 . it 1 I Lu.depT • I , ' l 1 1 L i V ' \S ( , 46 - g S 1 I • • ■ , I F 1 1 1IP C:c 1 I -4 ar \--- '' ' ' 1 I J Teo. • :\ iii,, : -r 1, , ", 1 i '^'' t:::::; I ‘; :‘, ' ' , , ' t ' ,.. 1 ft..t, '1I; Is ' • i '1 il , 4 1 . . , , , . August 21, 1990 , 1 . r.' li HAND DELIVERY , . ' . Bill Poss, Chairman , . Historic Preservation Committee 1 605 E. Main Street ' Aspen, ,C0 81611 . . ' I RE 1 Pitkin County Bank Addition Dear Mr. Poss, 1 i I am the President of Pitkin County Bank , 61 Trust Co. (the "Bank"). 'The Bank is the tenant of the entire building located on Lot 4, Pitkin Center . Subdivision commonly known; as the Pitkin County Bank Building. , The Bank is also one of the' owners of the building; and in that capacity acts as agent • for the other owners of the building. ' This letter will confirm that I am authorized to act on behalf of the Bank and the ownership of the Bank building in regard to this application. Very truly yours, i, • PITKIN COUNTY BANK & TRUST CO. BY: 111/11(4/5 .: Charles B. Israel, President , (t\pcbt.his I 4 . 1 , • . • I — ---- ----tr.. new gn77 • ACPFN COLOItA1)0 81612 • PIIONE 303/925-6700 EXHIBIT 3 VANN ASSOCIATES, INC. Planning Consultants September 12, 1990 HAND DELIVERED Ms. Leslie Lamont Aspen / Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Permission to Represent Dear Ms. Lamont: Please consider this letter authorization for Sunny Vann of Vann Associates, Inc., Planning Consultants, to represent Aspen Bank Shares, Ltd. in the processing of our application fora commercial growth management allocation for an addition to the Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company building located at 534 East Hyman Avenue. Mr. Vann is hereby authorized to act on our behalf with respect to all matters reasonably pertain ing to the aforementioned application. Should you have any questions, or if we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Aspen Bank Shares, Ltd. &AA A l idtales Charles B. Israel, President Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company (303) 925 -6700 SV:cwv 230 East Hopkins Avenue • Aspen, Colorado 81611 •303/925 -6958 EXHIBIT 4 ATTACHMENT B RESOLUTION NO. 58 (Series of 1990) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, GRANTING COMMERCIAL /OFFICE DEVELOPMENT ALLOTMENTS FOR 1990 UNDER THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM. WHEREAS, Article 8 of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code sets forth a growth management quota system governing new development within the City of Aspen; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8- 103(A)(3)(a) of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code, eight thousand (8,000) square feet of net leasable space is available for development allotment within the Commercial Core (CC) and Commercial (C1) zone districts of the City on an annual basis; and WHEREAS, development applications were received and reviewed y by the Planning Director for 1990 development allotments in the commercial zone districts and forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission did evaluate and score the development allotment applications at a duly noticed public hearing on November 6, 1990, as required by Section 8- 106(D) of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission determined that the Pitkin County Bank project and the 409 East Hopkins project successfully met the minimum threshold for individual and com- bined score categories and scored the Pitkin County Bank project at 31.48 points and the 409 East Hopkins project at 28.73 points; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, in accordance with Section 8- 106(H), ranked the Pitkin County Bank project ahead of the 409 East Hopkins project and forwarded its recommen dations and scoring to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended that the Pitkin County Bank project be allocated a development allotment of 2,240 square feet with the 409 East Hopkins project receiving an allotment of 5,760 square feet, thus, exhausting the available 1990 commercial development allotment of 8,000 square feet; and WHEREAS, no challenges to the Planning and Zoning Commis - e - _ sion's scoring and /or rankings have been submitted to the City Council as allowed under Section 8- 106(I) of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT Section 1 In accordance with Section 8- 106(J) of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code, the City Council of the City of Aspen does hereby grant to the Pitkin County Bank project a development allotment of 2,240 square feet of net leasable space from the 1990 commer cial growth management quota. 2 Section 2 In accordance with Section 8- 106(J) of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code, the City Council of the City of Aspen does hereby grant to the 409 East Hopkins project a development allotment of 5,760 square feet of net leasable space from the 1990 commercial growth management quota. Section 3 In accordance with Section 8 -108 of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code, the development allotments as awarded herein shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the date of approval of a site specific development plan for the projects as identified herein, unless a building permit is obtained and the project is developed, or unless an exemption from or exten- -- sion to the approval is obtained. Dated: a.,4'"' AY , 199 %. William L. Stirling, Mayor I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held AS '' // 1990. ,e / SA__ Kathryn . Koch, City Clerk 3 EXHIBIT 5 RESOLUTION NO. S (Series of 1991) RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING HOUSING MITIGATION IN THE FORM OF DEED RESTRICTIONS FOR NEW HOUSING AND A CASH -IN -LIEU PAYMENT FOR THE 1990 GMP APPLICATION FOR THE PITRIN COUNTY BANK ADDITION AT 534 E. HYMAN (LOT 4, PITKIN CENTER SUBDIVISION) WHEREAS, on December 17, 1990, the City Council of the City of Aspen awarded commercial /office development allotments for 1990 pursuant to Resolution No. 58 (Series 1990) under the growth management quota system as set forth in Article 8 of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the development project known as Pitkin County Bank Addition was awarded 1990 commercial /office development allotments; and WHEREAS, the City Council initially rejected cash -in -lieu as the affordable housing mitigation proposal as offered by the Pitkin County Bank and provided direction as to the preferred methods of mitigation as authorized under Section 8- 109(J) of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the development for the Pitkin County Bank Addition must mitigate for 4.7 employees; and WHEREAS, the Pitkin County Bank has requested that the City Council approve an affordable housing mitigation method by which it shall deed restrict one (1) three - bedroom unit of approximately 1,400 square feet to be owned by and constructed at the Messiah Lutheran Church, 1235 Mountain View Drive (Parcel "A ", Block II, West Meadows Subdivision); and WHEREAS, the Pitkin County Bank will work with the Housing Authority to determine the income category to which the unit will be deed restricted, anticipating that the deed restriction will reflect the .Church's salary level for the eligibility of its current and future employees; and WHEREAS, the proposed- deed restricted unit will provide housing for three (3) employees; and • WHEREAS, the Pitkin County Bank will mitigate for the remaining 1.7 employees by a cash -in -lieu payment of $59,500.00, or $35,000.00 per employee at the low income category; and WHEREAS, the Bank commits to obtaining all appropriate municipal approvals, including Conditional Use approval for construction of the unit on the Church's property; and WHEREAS, during the Conditional Use process, the Bank will seek to increase the unit to four (4) bedrooms, thus housing 3.5 employees, reducing the cash -in -lieu obligation for the remaining 1.2 employees to $42,000.00 or $35,000.00 Der er^1r:T,? at the low income category; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined the Pitkin County Bank's housing mitigation proposal to be fair and equitable and consistent with the mitigation requirements contained in Section 8 -109 of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: In accordance with Section 8- 109(J) of the Land Use Code, City Council does hereby accept the employee housing mitigation plan for 4.7 employees as required by the Pitkin County Bank Addition to be a deed restricted unit to be constructed at the Messiah Lutheran Church, 2 with cash -in -lieu payment for the remainder of the employees at the low- income category amount, with the following conditions: 1) The Pitkin County Bank must obtain Conditional Use Approval from the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission for the addition of the employee housing unit at the Messiah Lutheran Church. 2) If a three (3) bedroom deed restricted unit is approved, the cash -in -lieu payment for the remaining 1.7 employees is $59,500.00 (low income category). If a four (4) bedroom unit is approved, the payment shall be $42,000.00. 3) Payment must be made to the City of Aspen at the Finance Director's Office prior to the issuance of any building permits for the Bank addition. Receipt of payment shall be forwarded to the Housing Authority and the Planning Office. 4) The Church, as owner of the unit, shall execute a deed restriction in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney and the Aspen /Pitkin County Housing Authority. Proof of re' = r'_..L.1.n. of the restriction with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder shall be forwarded to the Housing Authority and the Planning Office prior to issuance of any building permits for the housing unit and Bank addition. Dated: Qh P 40 1 7C , 1991. William L. Stirling, May. - I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado at a meeting held r " ° c4 , 1991. 3 0 Kathryn . Koch ,Cit� k 4 ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920 -5090 FAX# (303) 920 -5197 July 21, 1992 Sunny Vann Vann & Associates 230 E. Hopkins Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Pitkin County Bank GMQS Exemption Case A65 -92 Dear Sunny, The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. We have scheduled this application for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, September 8, 1992 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. Should this date be inconvenient for you please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Planning Office. If you have any questions, please call Kim Johnson, the planner assigned to your case. Sincerely, Suzanne L. Wolff Administrative Assistant forms :apz.no.ph CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 7120/92 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: .24/9x'` 2737- /82 -/5 - 00'4/ A65 -92 STAFF MEMBER: KJ PROJECT NAME:Pitkin County Bank GMOS Exemption Project Address: 534 E. Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Legal Address: APPLICANT: Charles Israel, Pres. Pitkin Cnty Bank Applicant Address: 534 E. Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 925 -6700 REPRESENTATIVE: Sunny Vann, Vann & Associates Representative Address /Phone: 230 E. Hopkins Ave Aspen, CO 81611 925 -6958 FEES: PLANNING $ 912 # APPS RECEIVED 2 ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED 2 HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ TOTAL $ 912 PAID:(YES) NO AMOUNT: $912 NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED 2/2 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: P &Z Meeting Date / // p a` PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Planning Director Approval: Paid: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REFERRALS: City Attorney Mtn Bell School District City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn NatGas Housing Dir. Holy Cross State HwyDept(GW) Aspen Water Fire Marshall State HwyDept(GJ) City Electric Bldg Inspector Envir.Hlth. Roaring Fork / Other Aspen Con.S.D. Energy Center Clean ir Boar DATE REFERRED: 42-1(q2---- C INITIALS: D 1/0 a/Lt./L_ 0 7 tl . &1- FINAL ROUTING: 71 DATE ROUTED: ////q/9 INITIAL: City Atty City Engineer Zoning Env. Health Housing _ Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: itAM, taPi, RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE APPROVAL OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION FOR A 240 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION OF NET LEASABLE AREA WITHIN THE PITRIN COUNTY BANK BUILDING, LOCATED AT 534 E. HYMAN AVE. (LOT 4, PITRIN CENTER SUBDIVISION) Resolution No. 92-'5 WHEREAS, Section 24 -8 -104 B.1.a of the Aspen Municipal Code allows the Planning and Zoning Commission to grant an exemption from Growth Management competition to projects increasing net leasable area less than 500 square feet; and WHEREAS, an application for Growth Management Exemption was submitted to the Planning Office by the Pitkin County Bank for internal expansion which increases the building's net leasable area by a net of 240 square feet; and WHEREAS, the application was reviewed by the Planning Office, who recommended approval with conditions to the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the application and the Planning Office recommendation, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Growth Management Exemption request with the recommended conditions by a 7 -0 vote at its regular meeting on September 8, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: that the Pitkin County Bank Growth Management Exemption for an internal expansion of 240 square feet of net leasable area is approved with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for construction of commercial square footage allotted by the 1990 GMP approval (excluding this 240 s.f. GMQS Exemption), the Bank shall: A. pay cash -in -lieu for 2.2 employees; and B. demonstrate compliance with CC zone district Floor Area Requirements by the removal of 60 s.f. of floor area. 2. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on September 8, 1992. Att Planning d Zonin Commission: Ate /2 4 / � �, Jan C rney, eput Clerk Jasmine Tygre, Chair // 2S • MEMORANDUM / / D TO: Planning and Zoning Commission / FROM: Kim Johnson, Planner RE: Pitkin County Bank - GMQS Exemption for Commercial Expansion Less than 500 s.f. DATE: September 8, 1992 SUMMARY: The 11 iting Office recommends approval/kith conditions fortt'IQS Exemption for commercial expansion of 240 s.k. at Pitkin County Bank. The expansion results from the redesign of the ground floor and mezzanine.. APPLICANT: Pitkin County Bank, Charles Israel, represented by Sunny Vann LOCATION: +.534 E. Hyman (Lot 4, Pitkin Center Subdivision) ZONING: CC (Commercial Core) APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The Applicant seeks GMQS Exemption for expansion of commercial net leasable area of a total of 240 s.f. Therek net leasable area is proposed by extending the second level mezzanine throughout the full width of the bank building and by enclosing an open area on the ground floor: In order to comply with employee housing mitigation requirements for this expansion, the Applicant proposes to use deed restricted housing currently being constructed at the Messiah Lutheran Church. See floor plans, Attachment "A ". STAFF COMMENTS: The Pitkin County batik E&ceived a Growth - Management allotment for 2,240 s"t'f". of net leasable commercial area in 1990, This square footage was to involve a new second floor and an expanded mezzanine. As part of the approval, the Bank had to provide housing mitigation for 4.7 employees. The Bank subsequently received approval from City Council to supply housing for 3 employees by constructing a three bedroom deed restricted housing unit at Messiah Lutheran Church and by paying cash -in -lieu for the remaining 1.7 persons. According to the application, the n7c has postponed construction of the entire 1990 allotment: The Bank is pursuing the current proposal as an interim expansion project to ',t. ove customer service. The rtrrrent expansion plan calls for 70 f. of new 'area, of which, Tr .f. received allocation in 1•°. 'herefore, the remaining 140 s.f. must be approved by this GMQ• Exemption application. 1 K �Q c. �„ < �� ^P r Section 8 -104 B.1.a. gives the Commission authority to grant GMQS Exemption for expansion of commercial or office net leasable area not to exceed 500 cumulative square feet. It must be demonstrated that minimal impact will occur upon the City. Impacts of additional employees, parking required, visual impact on the neighborhood, and demand on City's public facilities shall be considered in the review process. iiftiftneteagaliiiiiiiiia. The Land Use Code states that employee generation is based on square footage of net leasable. The employee generation 4- „,.on ,.,the 240 s.f. expansion is Q 5” employee. The following formula was used to calculate the 0.5 figure: 0.24 (% of 1,000 s.f.) X 3.5 (employees per 1,000 s.f.) X .6 (minimum GMP threshold). As the entire .1990 GMP square footage allotted to the Bank is not being built at this time and the'edfittruction of the three bedroom - watt has begun, the Bank is proposing to accomplish the 0.57 employee housing requirement via the unit -at the Church.: In return for "using" part of this housing for the GMQS exemption at this time, the Sank "twill increase its cash - - lieu wpaymen by 0.5 employee (1.7 + .5 = 2.2 employees% when construction begins under € e 1990 allocation. Housing Office Director Tom Baker and Planning staff have no objections to this housing proposal. 0 0Pgrting: Based on CC zone parking requirements of 2 spaces per 1,000 s.f. of net leasable, fl- generateerby the increased square footage is 0.48 space Section 5 -301 E. states that parking requirements of ' a c.:.than.,1J2. of a parking space are disregarded.`_ Visual and Public Facilities Impacts: There will be no negattVE 't1st5Ie impact resulting from this 240 s.f. internal expansion." No added impacts are anticipated on public facilities as a result of this expansion. There have been no previous expansions of net leasable within this structure. If this request is approved, there will be 260 s.f. square feet remaining for future GMQS Exemptions. The FAR of the /current proposal meets zone district requirements. The application does state that the future addition of the 1990 GMP allocation allowable FAR will be exceeded by 60 s.f: The Applicant recognizes this and commits to revise building' plans for the previous ,allotment at the time of building permit for that major expansion. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff recommends approval of GMQS Exemption for 240 s.f. expansion at the Pitkin County Bank with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for construction of commercial square footage allotted by the 1990 GMP approval (excluding this 240 s.f. GMQS Exemption), the Bank shall: 2 A. pay cash -in -lieu for 2.2 employees; and B. demonstrate compliance with CC zone district Floor Area Requirements by the removal of 60 s.f. of floor area. 2. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to recommend approval of GMQS Exemption for 240 s.f. of expansion of net leasable area within the Pitkin County Bank with the two conditions listed in the Planning Office memo dated September 8, 1992." Attachments: "A" - Proposed First Floor and Mezzanine Plans pitco.gmgs.memo 3 PLANNIi ZONING COMMISSION EXHIBIT '4 , APPROVED ...............—.—, • 19 BY RESOLUTION • •-- ■ 1 ,i—it — • , -- 1 I i 111 • • I • . , 2 17 --4- - 1 a p., i !• t I ii L. rijra L.4 > --- . • I__ - , y ,t)..... _ 11; r -: ,>„------ t :: _ .- - . ; • : t .:--- sa : ! : .. : : • i t ---- , 1 I j 1 , 1 ■ I .. i ■ - 3 ek, Cr 13.) : Li 0 1. l't)- ; I • - .../ o ; LA- -Cc I & 2 A . ; a 4 LI be t) A E , f N , la , ,. . \ 4) 1 ! 1 \---- r \ L'l .1 ci ' ---- 1 i i L] k../ i i - 2- 1 di n c1C Y11 1 I i . 1 n Ls' il ! • Yk i _ • i di' • i jt4f. 1: 1 • 2 i '9, li__•___I 3 :-_,- ,-- 1 thl li ID ' I I 4Fibar, : 1;;:\:\A"; • ir---; — , - i , ! i ;13 4,1 . , :a: ii q wal ' ■ : , II "Y" .........,........1...-- ___ . • - ?,..-- i i ; • ' ." .C N < , ' ■ -, r r -1-- 1 4 ; -., •( -....- :!J -- -- 1 r ----i I ' I i f rr r I E ; 11 ' I . 6 \I i ! I ; 1 I I Jo E E $II s 6 a ir �i �_.......� �I is • i i - I T _ i Vl i- -- I 1 T P i a ^ 2 [ , l C ) • cr it - N i. z' _ ar, 7i I fie; �5" . u z u • oa P � 3 t S s 11 oz 0 as Q 2 , il a a [u ..____5 : --t r 1 ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 920 -5090 FAX 920 -5197 MEMORANDUM TO: Zoning Administration FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning Office RE: Pitkin County Bank GMQS Exemption DATE: July 21, 1992 Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Charles Israel. Please return your comments to me no later than August 14, 1992. Thank you. ASPEN /PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and % �4/ . / Tit 'sr (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 44 (Series of 1991) establishes a fee structure for Planning Office applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties to allow APPLICANT to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and /or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and /or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of applicaJj}}'on_, completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ W? which is for c hours of Planning Office time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30.days'of. the billing .date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT • By: / f � X By: C 14Qt &'' • Di a Moore City Planning Director Date: �� For Planning Office Use Case Number Case Name Deposit or Flat Fee Amount: Referral Fees: Engineer: Housing: Environmental Health: 2