Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.The Red Onion.1982 TRANSMITTAL Ir LETTER r_ s AM DOCUMENT C810 AUG 2 3 PROJECT: PiT!'tNV co. ARCHITECT'S (name, address) RED ONION OFFI N PROJECT NO: 8310 PL ANIPIL; OFFICE DATE: 8/23/83 r TO: JIM WILSON If enclosures are not as noted, please PITKIN CO. BLDG DEPT inform us immediately. ASPEN CO. 81611 If checked below, please: ATTN: ( ) Acknowledge receipt of enclosures. L Jim Wilson J ( ) Return enclosures to us. WE TRANSMIT: ( ) herewith ( ) under separate cover via ( ) in accordance with your request FOR YOUR: ( ) approval ( ) distribution to parties ( ) information ( ) review & comment C ) record ( ) use ( ) THE FOLLOWING: ( ) Drawings ( ) Shop Drawing Prints ( ) Samples ( ) Specifications ( ) Shop Drawing Reproducibles ( ) Product Literature (x) Change Order ( ) COPIES DATE REV.NO. DESCRIPTION - ACTION CODE 1 8/23/83 c.o.#, including pages 1-6 E ACTION A. Action Indicated on item transmitted D. For signature and forwarding as noted below under REMARKS CODE B. No action required E. See REMARKS below C. For signature and return to this office REMARKS Please process plan check as per enclosed revisions to contract documents. COPIES TO: (with enclosures) Sunny Vann Tom wells ❑ Charles Israel Hunter .❑ Lennie Oates Collins Eng.Eng. ❑ Mort Keller ❑ BY: ❑ ■avid F. ib on, A.I.A. AIA DOCUMENT Ga10 • TRANSMITTAL LETTER • APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIM) • COPYRIGHT B 1970 ONE PAGE THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1785 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE,N.W.,WASHINGTON,D.C.20036 GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS August 23, 1983 Mr. James Wilson Pitkin County Building Department 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: RED ONION OFFICES Dear Jim: Enclosed are details and instructions pertaining to "Change Order #1" for the Red Onion Offices. We are going to an enclosed 'garden' area open to the sky, as we discussed at our meeting with Sunny Vann on August 12, 1983, as a means of reducing out F.A.R. to the code allowed level. I hope with this revision, we can expedite the building permit for the project. Please let me know if you need any further information. Concurrently, we are making application to the Board of Adjustment for a variance to restore the Garden to its original design. I would appreciate your support of this application, as you had offered earlier by way of letter and/or appearance. Thank you, David F. ib n, A.I.A. DFG/fh Encl. xc: Charles Israel Sunny Vann 203 S.GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 81811 • 303/925'5968 f : ' I b •-...r.1 ,..-..• t i' �, � 110 I ® I , n -1 , 1 ,.1._ 1_ _ __I. :fit, in I / 1 moo i IT 1 = 1 r T I - - 1 1 ■■ ■■l 1 isi „ A V rebr” M/snc I --, < • ON/ON 0 ` I • krl bI✓�_�J'e�6 aeon? � m - Cr' 02 SOW✓ (ORD!) . rrAd.5 cetc:d) cgs Scare 2_ /teZOW — -yP/c-p y¢e_ / . 4/_c„ kle 2B/- 3Y... di L- 4HIN4 ars cGM� - %- /Miee avAr 4• . ./ /N�77i LL EF \� _•• C.-_ V IO°)C6"6Rr/ A5 •} L . _ ft M-I, SVr /NUL- ' 4• L /"w- f hAKG WBATWEf2]/4//T. 1r _ - __ 4 i . . � ,QfiGALY�-- lD/�C�---- -- --�- _`_ Ef --) - ' ri.,-1 r I 1 t 1 .1 T -1 1-71 -1-7 1 1 r 1 1-I I I 1 I I I I j I I I I I I I I I I 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I ( I ; G 1IG4tt77N " N. EW1(41770N at / '- Os MARK win F coin' "TYPE. MANut'. Irl00E - REM•4i' CS *fZ P/EGO MEAa..4 . mixer, �B BU/LT /NSLJL. GL. ' *5 /G'- /P21:44 2* 6/- IN- A57EN 750 A coticr4 0 x o YS"7&w'E2E0 /•cxt.6L •• j L, C/C ,tCiYNES; T /2'—/ ,141• 8/-//4-.i IS II 0STCO No 6c-see-En/S. - V /2/_ / k. 6/_/ZM' n ,i axKO Ii Y a/_ 1 /1- .6)/—04" n I- a ><><- o it ,4' MOTS: C.C. L.woTNS M-41/6- SEEK 1701/7e --O or 6L/et/my ,I1WtE A*tiUUF• ,t'Ee.Nt!t? 6 'V more? IV'KDows / ow< "/Z' 3, r" V' "V "W// /¢!`__/p�� RCN ii-Avg 1j&EgV PE1.E7W FRO' 1 Lv vi7" fzc/,A-Geni s /11v0 77e /1-15e7ve IJ/k?s SuasTnvlen /N 77/E1R {Z`1cc5. W/NL0W eta Rute,iON tg ad I__Sit e� , 3= io1-, /L.b k 3'• x:'4 y 1140",, ,,—.01/27, i/-ion-a roy"t.r¢ 1 (MA -•Y H va m _ Apo .,7asr rH/s -k '#- y t1 E.Q. is I li• AI-/ .y __ `A W ESC .3 1_ •C— ...- - ___ _. _� �._ --I i O O ® _ © 0 J `! d - o• C I I- - 1 = - r ' • 4. — P • • r_ 10" i.li ■t _ j 2', Frri-i- N.9 h - GE°-'M^i Kr- COAT. 497" P,ey PESL r ; r o - e.7 —7f r. )„* Ve.n WW riot J PKrwgL. Mao/n :- by Puyar #- JbM 625 % . 3 1111111 __- - -7a0'woe A CSRM)nC_ TILE I.1l l+ p 7-0„E EaPfrr 45 M/� Mc�/e�'t'•C ell --____--- h (FF�1 ��! Z. AT c*Ae 2EN d \ 0 _ '\H, CLfL. --._ � LyWlJAd FELT ' - y` gyp. Actor-. �zovior �N !, /, o� c WEEP /-7,/,C-E47 . � � \NIG` fFRGAO /- eovErt. (1CePWOon 4771.7nic0 $+.4ce.-- /1ccC-rsrq /}W-) ..41 1, p - 1 Ni (4 i • \I PI° c Au �N7S ri ry W THBX774-HT —nip/cn2 • r 021-ATS/M/471=1--a , w •z I 3#$ 04¢ ■ -.N I -•-l EAA4•4c /'-fl/L... 4nreAC Pr/ 4AZcmr/A . 0, (Reiw N � sn+1wen Bcn ACcepr tyt • C.4 1 :1! n , i ., ., --O_ 4. 477 'AIec ' eA 'L . a"-11 s- .;ij # ,e,o. an 02/See- airiefe fz - ` / • Ni) Lc/- C4 tl . WPNL 4 . 8 `b �„0,k -A C/caP:mss o ewir --42',1,F;F off/ � �RC- --t -- -"--? raraRAc7v u�y-fIN ', -� 1 B` II 1 'Tu4 I f 1 ti I'Ill-' - (Sr /1 eraftl' -----,N / T C-/ ��'� i_ -- • ji 1 \\ p 1 1 , 0 I 7'TB 14'. i 1 ' Imo. I 42.11.1.1. , . y I ;i } .�-L1.,;-(7 . , ` :�, , �;'� (�C i I. - r N N.N i) -� a t L P•41 a/-5 1 .I 1 1• -9 . 8B ' - - - t:1 I L C; r I PA/L Nc,+#►rbKe /N ---- -1- -- -TN/S f 'E !A 41 . mow ; PA✓L 't� 1 i'f' ,vv S �y 1 E1IM/nt.4'T� ALL A-fe Wen " "„tip t O ”,© 1 nom.. -- \ . (c) 1 tl `� / I I AM0 IZet ce (NEST -'` i I,1' 9 i I CoF ass 70 4.5(4-' r.) 1 I Li I is , I I _ F/ nae's• _ t ' '. I I j,,� 1 (L e Cj 1 I ® IA 1 f ® •B'-' }� 1 / ,EF--3) 1 1 ® ® • ® ® ! B r ,. � 1i,�� I l s\J 1 1 1 I I I I I ,, 1 /-■ • 'PRo v/DE C/RCS k -�-) I`I {,. I I �4 _2 ; � Fo.e 4 AJ 7_0 L - . 1. ,l....„....r .. .1, ,...4... .,.., .l - - J SW/ To if w/ L /61/7-8 0,- / , ... -. `i /--1/T✓.0 c" ,�E sr . .. .2oo44 3- 2 'e T;C/-/ GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS August 9, 1983 Mr. Sunny Vann Aspen/Pitkin Planning Department 130 South Galena Aspen, Co. 81611 i+ 7 AUG 1 0 1983 u RE: RED ONION OFFICES 1---11L` —]��-- - hSPEN / fl DON CO. PLANNING OFFICE Dear Sunny: In preparing plans for the Red Onion Offices, I have appreciated the cooperative and helpful attitude of Alan Richman in Planning, Collette Penne of HPC, and Jim Wilson of the Building Department. To get to the end of Documents several meetings were necessary between myself and the following: June 15 Alan Richman and Collette Penne June 16 Jim Wilson June 24 Alan Richman July 8 Jim Wilson July 14 Board of Appeals July 15 Jim Wilson July 19 Planning and Zoning Commission July 25 (Submit for Building Permit) It is to Alan, Collette, and Jim's credit that the project in 6 weeks time was able to navigate through requirements of GMP, HPC, View Plane, and code-related Board of Appeals issues. However, in one area I was led up a "blind alley". Let me describe this. In my first meeting with Alan we discussed the "interior garden" as an area exempted from Floor Area and floor area uses, permanently. He instructed me that this was not Planning's function to compute Floor Area, but rather the Building Department's, and that if Jim Wilson had noprcblem with exempting it, neither would he. The day following Jim looked at and approved this idea. In three subsequent meetings with Jim and Alan to examine the progressprints, nothing was said to the contrary. Now, it seems, all parties are content to disown their involvement. This leaves me looking rather foolish in the eyes of my client, and worse, leaves my client in a position of extreme hardship. He has spent significantly for architectural and engineering plans, and has received bids and (earlier today) signed a Contract for Construction with the successful bidder. I'm sure you understand the added costs of redoing plans, rebidding, and delays. Sunny, I urge you to do the honorable and courageous thing, and to stand by the previous direction given me by your department. Thank you for your consideration. Y s trul avi. son, �AIA 203 S.GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 01611 • 303/925.5868 i August 9, 1983 Mr. Sunny Vann, Continued DFG/fh Encl. : meeting notes xc: Jim Wilson Charles Israel Lennie Oates GIBSON S. RENt • ARCHITECTS 303 S.QALENA STREET • A2-2F-N.COLORA00 111611 6 /75/l33 /y7 . co. A1Ax) R/cent-law or P tvin6- c - lNie- O / ' Re... ' ON/bjsz 2140 j t t __ APpino.J. View PLANis a e2J 2 . d.YC- 57E70 ,a/acres. p - 'his 3 Lone=er LacE A- Yom.y A4 "-t'477easy W y -41,1P C4 o Sicavv -' GI/MI/E. EC:Quilt:tap Rev/ail lam_ l 'pice at ,CexeOvei 'SUJScceP " EAv`77/ca- ea- a i ) v/et<1 lPt/hv6- 5 �iv�t/7- 4-65 c/fe'ta * rNro, Mcleer- 77tzs" Ceara__ 73e_.. Pee z Rawyezoi / flo'c, L-77/1--t /9 coo kt .74 /, .9z.L PO4a 2 - CIS.. 71) /Wye- nowt- asty/ _ toga/ 54-r_dierv/ 1 J /77-four Alai/ 3• a- . 7D T1/97" sv ScodPP 5 0- ; �.": GIBSON E. RENO • ARCHITECT":: .. @ua a13CL 'A TFCET ANN CaOAACO ®tr". e//6/55. Cerbt/G WI OW 60v5oici ..- /Tro a&/it p,'Ns Ic QWi ?eWr Re : aco °A rox/ o Co,e,e,tz fiz IAvroCr 1. &K 7a MA-KG peek-rA/va,T- 9/SR.- a " DF fir zoo PT 7Z Exe7-097- 77/4s AP64 fiCog nowR. AREA . 2, 0K -pzetvr A4R44_ AfeesurnD Crill2DEr4 turn/ Ciro 4z mss_-li_vo wry) 145 Lent _7.9W5 Age► 70 Os/ T , oo ft a%- Less oo- 3• d/:7 e ee /e n1- - e75 /S ,9e9-so4co Rom 7bP 2/sei2 O7 e Aef srAla('no - Sff�Qrs�7`- PAS or-Ta ✓c-�) 4 6rd:te•9-in a t) OP lefewevi Ce pc-e—moo,! Nom-gr 4 - a) A- NAY Re et -- gin— _- map crtit/ 13y 9 Hto - icisiidj- Del itc�'S AT/fe-- 771mv Domes C C.,/ /tC/ p 4ex' CA9 , a• 4Ppgou OP 77115 !GL--A- 15 I'ivp,Arc- ?IVO 1771'9_ _ M -4- litJfaqt,4il ' D'scos5 /7 Wi fro o 47itiv nlreksir- Aspen/Pitki $ift`lanning Office 130 so '' en'a-street aspens n , " ac$ 81611 June 24, 1983 Mr. Dave Gibson [ - . Gibson and Reno Architects L.-IL�... 0.44 c 5 i983 203 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81612 Dear Dave, This letter is to confirm the understanding we reached today regarding the minor amendments you have made to the design of the second floor addition to the Red Onion . You indicated to me that you had replaced the proposed sunscoop with an innovative "skylid" form of a skylight. Underneath this skylight will be a garden amenity not originally shown in the design reviewed by P & Z during the 1981 allocation of a GMP quota. You also indicated to me that due to the FAR calculations concerning the garden amenity, you had some additional flexibility in the design of the offices . You have therefore moved the front portion of the building forward by four feet. This change will still leave the facade of the addition approximately 15 feet back from the edge of the lower floor and will not increase the FAR for the entire building beyond the allocation of 2565.5 square feet. My feeling regarding these changes is that they are minor, generally con- sistent with your original approval , and need not be rescored by P & Z as per section 24-11 .7 (b) of the Code. However, since you will be going before P & Z on July 19 for your View Plan Special Review, I suggest that we mention the changes which we have approved so that the public trust in the process can be served. I hope that my comments are in line with your conclusions as to our meeting today. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions . Sincerely, Alan Richman , Assistant Director cc: Colette Penne Jim Wilson, Building Inspector A TS MEETING NOTES GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITEC DATE: 7 /8 /53 PROJECT: Pe rJ Ok d7=/Gi IME: 3 % 00 PRESENT: _37/1./ IN/Z-a2/1/411 DA 4"/)39J/C1 NOTES: 9/713///77W P t//hJ S C2S Cbe/ 7) FZ podpisp re3r ifl'Pps- i :5 C . s d QNL tz 3a OcCuP 4N7 - / 3A9¢ op J,B-G - ./1/F5 cif CCU N fits /llbn!- D f,NC-QC. 3o accvPA-,v 2, 256 Co) 5rcede-E- C.cc 5 ec. btien 3. 5Jya,&e ci_0:5502.5 j7/woe Finn g_ bran 767) , e tInOea 30 Occ 040,9mS COPIES TO: BY: ,4C 203 S.GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 91611 • 303/925.5966 Lan: MEETING NOTES GIB SON & RENO • ARCHITECTS DATE: 7 // /,e3. , PROJECT:PROJECT: O . / A arra Sr TIME: /22:00 ?RESENT: tilts /AJ//3CCiS/ /i3/ NOTES: a'.t-/S fr77942K0 Ord >-�v4y. ACeA 3 2 . G17o,V OF 5771/,¢.wmy3 iA*. p4 J ,c r ills "sit _�-• 7771- 70 Ear IS" .deiy (Sr Am e iv( .1i-e-ez0Q0 Br cTIM ItO o/)[ 7s 17 a. /WS) ,ire - a- 701' OF �cr - ERs 3 keit/e/57 Mrs ,4 O,'vzot a/h e?cr7 ro,eP/, c 7 ,247'r'n; - el � v dr 4-par- a. ise/03T- co x/ Ne_f/ E' ectiess 9 Ni FDA_ U'Aw. AfseAcieSte3 4. Pcss,'Atu-y teDvs coe,C, C. /3ea tz 77/ Oc/6// /W ei ow $&,nc burl -¢' ‘100 COPIES TO: BY: .0 �j�' , 203 S.GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • 303/9255966 _ PHONE MEMO GIBSON E. RENO • ARCHITECTS PROJECT: Pap O//fl/,/ c^ flr- 5 DATE: r/a 3 TALKED WITH: JiM /i(//L, ois/ OF: p TIME: 4-.•00 REGARDING: 4(//za,vic-- ag o^-- NOTES: J, WATIT 2 70 ._cam AaeA-7=7' oP -c ,-/evr- '70 fe '14AJezt,7L - fgern Mc-- Ai eA / /N 77te Com Don/Avi tin taP704/ PA-Pes S- totiv L t /NI<GN A-1 w SA?7SPY DECISIONS MADE: FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: / 201-i, /F-A// try Sj site/7'- OW2/ T 7z, w c/ a0Py Z exJ JK-sus fib c.�w od /r- COPIES TO: A • f$ BY: afi,J. 203 S.GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 0611 • 303/9255969 PHONE MEMO GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS PROJECT: %7av °A//b Al OFC/re' > DATE: e /rj 43 TALKED WITH: Af_194 ` _ u ', OF: // TIME: 2%00 © ' 63-c / Caw- ccw) REGARDING: etas- feoft�/jC�.4-R__ NOTES: A Silo Af/T' itar jex) "Ks P770A.1f OF- #, ic/A1 7a �. ,ems 0AAort) /4)1/ec,/OCS 7v 51/6n IT" 1.117tAfi/ WAtiCa "GAR 'n/" Leon/ . Dccr/MC-A//' on/ Sv&SGZ G+. G - 7-o ACC0/41 ss- 72/s .SUP56QG6trt//— 7b 7,-,1,777a 3 - .Son ,v y Jc iv a/, /t,R-ze-'70 ei vim' ,t i ji4L_ / t7 .0-crWa y F- Pe- �! A a 'r2 - iH Ay 114- e AP viz&v v� otia',aa.Penzy 7.0 OTC "- DECISIONS MADE: FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED:/. 5149.1/T LE'TfiL As a. /42)50,455-7150 COPIES TO: i 3 N iii - ✓i// BY: � • 203 S.GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 61611 • / 303/925.5968 PHON E MEMO GIBSON 6 RENO • ARCHITECTS PROJECT: _gee, w/o A(/ /7PpiCFS DATE: eV?/e3 TALKED WITH: J7/-f 10 toot)/ OF: Pi'Teo /52.22G-- TIME: 4:OO REGARDING: l3goev exENPT Fta c. NOTES: /. 37/1/ paNf &'A1S17 7Z' f-t4t - Tff� e5,on/ a ve4e5 Bo4-ieo op A�t7�Tiv - 1�'4rs i3�Gt- 7Revoi Does 5- i-(Kg /T" a. 54-7.5 Aa7 /,v//.L AY.,t DECISIONS MADE: FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: N _1,/ eiMe/f35 Q • ,OOO 4 t COPIES TO: • a. 1 -att.. BY: r( 203 S.GALENA STREET • ASPEN COLORADO 61611 • 303/925 5966 1 I � e Aspen /Pitkin Planning Office 130 south galena street aspen , eolorado 81611 • MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney / Dan McArthur, City Engineer ;/Jim Markalunas, City Water ✓ Stogie Maddalone, City Electric ✓Heiko Kuhn, Aspen Metro Sanitation Herb Paddock, Fire Marshal/Building Department FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office RE: The Red Onion Addition - 1982 Growth Management Competition - Commercial - City of Aspen DATE: October 5, 1981 • The attached application is one of three competing in this year' s Commercial Growth Management competition. These applications are scheduled to be reviewed and scored by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on November 3, 1981 ; therefore, may I please have your written comments concerning this proposal no later than Friday, October 16, 1981? Please include sufficient information in your comments to allow me to address those points relating to your area of expertise and to allow the Planning Office to score them for the GMP competi- tion. Thank you for your assistance. Aspen /Pitki_ n Planning Office 130 south galena street aspen , Colorado 81611 • MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney Dan McArthur, City Engineer Jim Markalunas, City Water Stogie Maddalone, City Electric Heiko Kuhn, Aspen Metro Sanitation Herb Paddock, Fire Marshal/Building Department FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office RE: The Red Onion Addition - 1982 Growth Management Competition - Commercial - City of Aspen DATE: October 5, 1981 The attached application is one of three competing in this year's Commercial Growth Management competition. These applications are scheduled to be reviewed and scored by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on November 3, 1981 ; therefore, may I please have your written comments concerning this proposal no later than Friday, October 16, 1981? Please include sufficient information in your comments to allow me to address those points relating to your area of expertise and to allow the Planning Office to score them for the GMP competi- tion. Thank you for your assistance. Tiler nonsto tic nhA-s/'" of Tle /Lee, ets AP/+a,,�r_n Fns- SR-...irnvio -- Sc P 7N2 antis ,/714-^4' ce, 'j A sn // • SACHS KLEIN & SEIGLE JEFFREY H. SACHS ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE HERBERT S. KLEIN 201 NORTH MILL STREET (303) 828.8700 JON DAVID SEIGLE ASPEN, COLORADO 81811 JAMES H. DELMAN October 1, 1981 City of Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Allan Richman Re: City of Aspen Growth Management Plan Applications/ Chris Tolk for Red Onion Property Dear Allan: You have requested confirmation that Christopher Tolk has full authority to submit and process a Growth Management Plan application for the upper floors of the Red Onion Building. At the present time Mr. Tolk has an option to acquire that property and pursuant to that option agreement the owners of the Red Onion property, Red Onion Investors, a Colorado general partnership, have granted Mr. Tolk full right and authority to process a Growth Management Plan application in the form submitted. In order to verify the above, below you will find the signature of Charles Israel, the managing partner of Red Onion Investors certifying to the accuracy of the representa- tions contained in this letter. If you need any additional information in order to confirm this fact, please notify me so that we may immediately provide you with such material. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, SACHS , KLEIN & SEIGLE By 4,d/ t- Herbert S. Klein HSK/jeb I hereby certify that I am the managing partner of the Red Onion Investors, a Colorado general partnership, and confirm the truth of the statements contained herein with respect to the authority of Christopher Tolk to process a Gro Management Pin application for our property. ar es srae Aspen / Piton Planning Office 130 south galena street aspen , colorado 81611 • MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney Dan McArthur, City Engineer Jim Markalunas, City Water Stogie Maddalone, City Electric Heiko Kuhn, Aspen Metro Sanitation Herb Paddock, Fire Marshal/Building Department FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office RE: The Red Onion Addition - 1982 Growth Management Competition - Commercial - City of Aspen DATE: October 5, 1981 • The attached application is one of three competing in this year' s Commercial Growth Management competition. These applications are scheduled to be reviewed and scored by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on November 3, 1981 ; therefore, may I please have your written comments concerning this proposal no later than Friday, October 16,1981? Please include sufficient information in your comments to allow me to address those points relating to your area of expertise and to allow the Planning Office to score them for the GMP competi- tion. Thank you for your assistance. • /U. ,./� , ' . OCT 19 1581 ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT f;arCiv t ri i KIN CO. PLANNING OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: ALAN RICHMAN-PLANNING FROM: JIM MARKALUNAS SUBJECT: THE RED ONION ADDITION-1982 GMP-COMMERCIAL-CITY OF ASPEN DATE: OCTOBER 16, 1981 As indicated on Page lAa: Water Systems, water is available from a 6" main located in Cooper Street and is of adequate pressure and quantity to supply the proposed use. • l Growth Management Review Checklist City of Aspen Engineering Department' Revised January 31, 1980 Project Name -11.4, Cod Q,,n,` Address Owner -Fa_ ©rt;ov. ,, -„ - �-y-^ • Attorney/Agent/Representative �o-,iA V,p ��s Address z,'z4.j E ✓ Reviewed by - '4- Date • I. Residential Application (secti• 24-14. 4) A. Public Facilities & Services 0 Infeasible to provide 1 - Major deficiency 2 - Acceptable (standard) ' 3 No forseeable def ' iencies • • * Water ( 3 pts. ) - Capacity of system or proposed needs without facility • upgrade at public -xpense. • * Sewer (3 pts. ) Capacity witho t system upgrade. Storm Drain-ge (3 pts. ) Adequate d ' ppsal of surface runoff. • • Parking .esign (3 pts. ) Off str •et parking, visual, paving, safety, and convenience. • • Roe. (3 pts. ). Capacity of road system to handle needs without altering tr fic patterns or overloading streets or requiring more ma ntenance. • • Page 2 Growth Management Rer 'ew Checklist • B. Social Facilities and Ser •ces • • 0 - Requires new servi, e at public expense 1 - Existing service adequate 2 - Project improv= quality of service Public Transp• tation (2 pts. ) • 2 - On ex ' ting route. 1 - �Vithn 520 feet of route. 0 - No near service area. B' e Paths Linked to Trail System (2 pts. ) Design Features for Handicapped (2 pts. ) II. Commercial and Office Development Application (section 24-10 . 5) A. Quality of Design ' 0 - Totally deficient 1 - Major flaw 2 - Acceptable . 3 - Excellent • 4_ Site Design (3 pts. ) Quality and character of landscaping, extend of under- . _ grounding of utilities, and effic en�/cy, safety, and privacy of circulation. ," / r d � e U' S/1�fl;;c ,„,4 A/0 °r s+� Q"Q' ,vt nWJ ioy` Afprhe se- act.ozl, mo ,_, lvw .evysiti p /t e_L:c• fsnir� arka Ki- i s 3 ts. Y t �}i Fra.nd� VI) 1 a Amenit e ( p ) 1 Q� 10,6 � "� "QQ • Usable /open spat?, pedes ri n and icycle ways . / • ,'h 'I6- 0 6( Cx pio;I,w / q vk dog n4I6 Eo e,�+a ads (I:(cJtt tL ca4A Lie at�,u>L etn o) -r dad(P y r of z, Trash and utili y access areas. pts. ) ;le, /RAJ prop is ra-rcin24tC �G 14-66 cam_ III.Lodge Development. Applic- • •n (se tion 24- 0. 6) A. Public Fes' sties and Services (same as residential) Fiage 3 .. • Growth Management Re(;w Checklist • B. Social Facilities and Ser ices 0 - Requires new servic at public expense. 1 - Existing service a equate. 2 - Project improves • ality of service. Public Transportat 'on (6 pts. ) 6 - Abuts transi , within 520 feet of lift. 4 - Within 520 fret of bus route and lift. 2 - Within 520 'eet of bus route or lift. • C. Quality of D= sign Site Desi• (3 pts. ) = Ameniti-s (3 pts. ) Visu. 1 Impact (3 pts. ) Sale and location as it affects public views of scenic areas. C. formance to Policy Goals (3 pts. ) R-duction of parking in coordination with limosine service 1 pt. ) . imo with regular service per 25 guests (1 pt. ) . Prohibition of employee parking on site (1 pt. ) . /oby/ ( IV. Zoning (All applications) Zone • NS - Not Sufficient NA - Not Applicable NR - No Requirement Required Actual / t� Lot Area M c O { 021St Lot Area/Unit T(� Lot Width HC Front Setback Side Setbacks Rear Setback ZO 9Fv L *-4 AD M ' ZS )( 10s (0 ( 111 , Page 4 ' Growth Management Re'~" ew Checklist . . a Required Actual • Maximum Height `tax p� ✓ Building Dist_ ✓ Bldg. Sq. Footage 1354.10..s-- Open Space ___z o —A Net a. Knb..J S'tr o,2:1) External F.A.R. 15 Internal F.A.R. V. Possible further review of proposed project (All applications) Subdivision Exemption 17 Exception (err L CO Stream Margin / / View Plane y�( a� e - e QGI f �✓>l `mar I/ * Areas to be checked by this department and potential deficiencies pointed out to the appropriate authority. Otherwise no comment to be made in the Engineering Department memo. • • • • • t ... Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 south galena street aspen , colorado _ 81611 v- ' • June 24, 1983 Mr. Dave Gibson Gibson and Reno Architects 203 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81612 Dear Dave, This letter is to confirm the understanding we reached today regarding the minor amendments you have made to the design of the second floor addition to the Red Onion. You indicated to me that you had replaced the proposed sunscoop with an innovative "skylid" form of a skylight. Underneath this skylight will be a garden amenity not originally shown in the design reviewed by P & Z during the 1981 allocation of a GMP quota. You also indicated to me that due to the FAR calculations concerning the garden amenity, you had some additional flexibility in the design of the offices . You have therefore moved the front portion of the building forward by four feet. This change will still leave the facade of the addition approximately 15 feet back from the edge of the lower floor and will not increase the FAR for the entire building beyond the allocation of 2565.5 square feet. My feeling regarding these changes is that they are minor, generally con- sistent with your original approval , and need not be restored by P & Z as per section 24-11 .7 (b) of the Code. However, since you will be going before P & Z • on July 19 for your View Plan Special Review, I suggest that we mention the changes which we have approved so that the public trust in the process can be served. I hope that my comments are in line with your conclusions as to our meeting today. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions . Sincerely, Alan Richman , Assistant Director cc: Colette Penne Jim Wilson, Building Inspector • GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS August 9, 1983 y Aspen/Pitkin Planning Department ;, 130 South Galena Aspen, Co. 81611 RUC 1 ` 1983 ; RE: FLOOR AREA OF RED ONION OFFICES FILM Teal Alan In response to your request today for floor area assumptions on our proposed Second Level Offices Addition to the Red Onion, Basic Rectangle 46.7' X 60.5' = 2825 SF North Stair, 4' X 8' = 32 SF South Stair 4' X 10' = ( 40 ) SF Garden (deed-restricted) 6.7' X 27' 6.7' X 11 ' = (255 )SF 2562 SF (Allowable is 2565.5 SF) Our intention, as we have previously discussed, is to deed restrict the "Garden Area" on the condominiumization papers and subsequent Plat to be forever used for this purpose and no other. As such it is an extension of the Passive solar system, retaining heat in the winter through its considerable added mass, and acting as a 'air humidification system' on a year-around basis. I believe this idea deserves favorable consideration, and I appreciated your initial favorable response, and Jim's, to the idea. I am also enclosing a letter I wrote to Jim Wilson describing some of the square footage parameters, and how the numbers were computed. Please let me know if you need anything else. Ve Truly Yo_, s David F. Iron, AIA DFG/fh xc: Jim Wilson Sunny Vann Charles Israel 203 S.GAd n�STREEI`eS ASPEN, COLORADO 131611 • 303/925.5966 • GIBSON E. RENO • ARCHITECTS July 27, 1983 • Mr. Jim Wilson Aspen/Pitkin County Building department 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Red Onion Offices Dear Jim; I thought these square footage take-offs might be of use to you (or to whomever is doing the plan check). I know how difficult it sometimes is to get "up to speed" on what has been approved to be built. In this case, the Red Onion Offices were approved in 1981 as a 2,565.5 square foot addition to the second level above Stephan Kaelins at 413 East Cooper. This brings the floor area up to its code-allowable level. Since the areas must be so closely figured, I have submitted to you my plan with gross square footage calculations for the addition. Measurements are made on a "gross" basis; i.e., to property lines, to the outside of exterior walls, to the center of interior divisions. I have counted the stairways as additional footage wherever there is usable area below. However, where the stairs create dead space below which cancels out presently usable floor area, they are excluded. Also excluded from floor area is the permanent "Garden Area" as per our discussions of July 8th and June; 1'6, 1983. The total added gross area comes to 2,562 square feet for 3.5 under the maximum allowable). I hope this is helpful. Please forward this information to the proper person if you are not doing the plan check. , Tha.• you, David F. Gibson, A.I.A. DFG/fh 44L i xc: Charles Israel Mort Heller Pat Hunter Encl. 203 5.GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 61611 • 303/9255966 MEETING NOTES GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS DATE: ` i 3 PROJECT: I .'I St 0.4„,_ t,Sr// _gip TIME: i a%/r PRESENT: _ . / p^.. ra- I� �� V W Le° Ali .i r i/ ` sal NOTES: Jr b L -P 2Chr/ieec- ,,-�arrr Zn,v.Ac & tAr�- o = 9w&- o ar b• ii w/Ls — 1i • .y.er-fr 6NLY• )At�y etzsoneAwy s &Cer re A Z . Bar k3aLSc f/crr- 3• >/ &— 12etz-ei mice Q • c.52 -n oni : #r) P 10 , U'srMr • T, 4. pi AD AJ earl c. err,V6 4,11 v APP /4t f,c J( P- Cx Prra " P17_ Up 7o 2 o -. b, 1/MithvnNG ui,/ti co.anatrE 00g_ 7-6-4377MDAT . c. ,A1//-ni Am-r- roi'-t u4) 'v tev n vet. se/f 1:Zi oo,e you 77d -" Q.5QJpS r#s SJ7-7 h4-1-7 n/1/41 ,84 eeO �yy A1Ir-cM /UGC 770/V 4-ty p/ k) 7514•41- - p'r 2.0 itt■Eiv7•23 Attu 17 1983 t; ., S) ctjT/�y 'Y4 }r ¢) Ott CAMits '7a Latt ' 5) GV / 4ferier COPIES TO: 914 A/Vf Cfrhatzt c riv vte— BY: 203 S.GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 61611 • 303/9255966 MEETING NOTES GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS DATE: 674.jM-3 PROJECT: a167 CONS 0/V TIME: 3 00 PRESENT: _%' _ • .04 :;•art!' f I Ail tarn/L NOTES: /. �ZE'VLew S/TU47?E ' 4"A-,027-22 Sird4wryti a. f, FT �e we coves, • Vie_r• ! _.e E,Cn-tpn Are-- /p--" Renal #rte P1-0012-. 4 LIGE 47WD IC 0/✓ 9-E Coiv.Do 7V-4r 'r WOOD is_ L! •tom • e-• --' Arr., ,E"9 ,na-jt`nelari CR> eg-tcSfF7- 3. Xe u-7-' r-K-- ' - a gr�...ap TA. � COPIES TO: £;/ . p °a i ' = BY: LEN i& frlo• r-3 V WAJ'- 203 5.GALENA STREET • ASPEN, COLORADO 61611 • 303/9255966 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office RE: 1982 Office - Commercial GMP Applications DATE: October 29, 1981 Introduction: Attached for your review are project profiles for three office - commercial GMP applications submitted on October 1 of this year and the Planning Office' s recommended points allocation for each application. The three applications under consideration are as follows: 1 . The Red Onion Addition (414 E. Cooper Avenue) 2. A Garden Office Building (615 E. Hopkins Avenue) 3. The City Plaza Building (517 E. Hopkins Avenue) A copy of each application has also been provided to you for your review purposes. Quota Available: The available quota for this year is based on the provisions of Section 24-11 .8 (Building Inspector reports to Planning Office on commercial-office construction during previous year) , 24-11 .5(e) (unallocated allotments may be distributed during later years) , and 24-11 . 7(a) (expired allotments shall be added to available allotments) . The Planning Office has done a careful survey of previous years' allocations and the rate at which they have been built. We find that based on the five previous competitions, there is a total of 24,324 square feet of space which was unallocated or expired from previous years. Of course, this year an additional 24,000 square feet is available, for a total of 48,324 square feet available in this year' s competition. However last year, you did award a bonus of 6,000 square feet which we would strongly recommend that you offset this year by a corresponding reduction in available space. Summarizing then, the total quota for this year is as follows: Quota unallocated or expired from previous years 24,324 Quota available for 1982 24,000 Bonus to be offset this year - 6,000 Total available for 1982 42,324 We believe that based on the extraordinary amount of office and commercial development we have recently been witnessing that you should not even consider using the 6,000 square feet bonus for this year. Should you find it necessary to award in excess of 24,000 square feet this year, it should be awarded from the previously unallocated or expired quota. The total quota request for this year is as follows: 1 . The Red Onion Addition - 2,565.5 square feet 2. A Garden Office Building - 9,656 square feet 3. The City Plaza Building - 15,300 square feet Total 27,521 .5 square feet Memo: 1982 Office - Commercial GMP Applications Page Two October 29, 1981 Process: The Planning Office will make a brief presentation to you on November 3 to explain the GMP procedures and to provide you with a suggested assignment of points to each application. Next, each of the applicants should be given 15 minutes to present their proposal to you. A public hearing will be held to allow interested citizens to comment. At the close of the hearing each commission member will be asked to score the applicants' proposals. To ensure a reasonable comparison of the relative merits of each application, the Planning Office suggests that all applications be scored at once on a category-by-category basis. The total number of points awarded by all members, divided by the number of members voting, will constitute the total points awarded to the project. Please note that a project must score a minimum of 60 percent of the total points in categories 1 and 2, amounting to 14.4 points, and a minimum of 30 percent of the points available in earn category 1 and 2 to meet the basic competitive requirements. Applications which score below these thresholds will no longer be considered for a development allotment and the application will be considered denied. Remember that bonus points cannot be used to bring an application over this minimum threshold, but can affect the final ranking of the applications for the purposes of awarding the allotments. All of the projects, should they receive a development allotment, will require additional review procedures. Employee housing units constructed as part of a Commercial GMP project are subject to the approval of the City Council upon the recommenda- tion of the Planning and Zoning Commission, as are employee parking requirements. Similarly, requests to utilize the FAR bonus available in the Commercial zone district must also be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finally, two of the projects will require condominiumization review and approval by P & Z and City Council and one will require a view plane special review. All of these procedures will be accomplished subsequent to an applicant' s receipt of a develop- ment allotment. Planning Office Ratings: The Planning Office has assigned points to each of the applica- tions as a recommendation for you to consider. We have rated the applications both objectively, on their own merits in comparison to each criteria, and relatively, by comparing the positive and negative features of each proposal to the other. The following table is a summary of the Planning Office analysis and ratings for the three projects. A more complete explana- tion of the points assignment for each criterion is shown on the attached score sheets, including rationales for the ratings. 1 2 3 4 Community Quality Commercial Previous Bonus Total Applications of Design Uses Performance Points Points 1 . The Red Onion Addition 11 3 0 0 14 2. A Garden Office Building 15 5 0 0 20 3. The City Plaza Building 18 5 0 0 23 Memo: 1982 Office - Commercial GMP Applications Page Three October 29, 1981 As can be seen, two projects, A Garden Office Building and the City Plaza Building, s.tstantially exceed the minimum competitive threshold of 14.4points while one project, The Red Onion Addition, falls just below the minimum points total . The two applications which qualify for allocations are requesting a total of 24,956 square feet of commercial space this year. While this total slightly exceeds the 24,000 square feet which are available, it would appear reasonable to obtain the small excess of space by using previously unallocated quota, particularly since these two projects both score so highly (83% and 96% of the available points in categories 1 and 2) . Planning Office Recommendation: Based on the analysis contained within the attached score sheets, the Planning Office recommends that P & Z concur with our recommended point assignments and effectively approve the Garden Office Building and City Plaza Building projects while denying The Red Onion Addition. The Planning Office further recommends that P & Z recommend to City Council that a quota of 24,956 square feet be awarded this year by using this year' s 24,000 square foot quota and by carrying over only 956 square feet unallocated or expired from previous years , thereby awarding 15,300 square feet to the City Plaza Building and 9656 square feet to the Garden Office Building. Finally, the Planning Office recommends that P & Z recommend to City Council that the remaining 23,368 square feet which was unallocated or has expired not be carried over to next year. We believe that it is appropriate at this time to "wipe the slate clean" on the commercial quota, since we will be formu- lating new quotas for new zones next year, and particularly since we have recently been experiencing exceptionally high office and commercial growth rates, both due to projects in the CC and C-1 zones which have competed under the GMP and because of those in the 0 and NC zones which have previously been exempt from competition. MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Richman, Planning Office FROM: Jay Hammond, Engineering Department RE: 1982 Growth Management Competition • DATE: October 20, 1981 Having reviewed the three submissions competing for 1982 Commercial allocations and visited the proposed sites, the Engineering Department has a number of comments. The application for a Garden Office Building, the City Plaza Buil- ding, and the Red Onion Addition were reviewed with particular attention to those areas under Municipal Code Section 24-11.5, b. , pertinent to this depart- ment as well as areas identified as warranting comment at this, the first step in the development process. What follows is an outline of concerns relative to each application along with attached copies of our G.M.P. checklist. 1. The Red Onion Addition - 420 E. Cooper (mall ) a. This application is for an addition to an existing structure currently undergoing remodel . As a result of the "existing" status of the lower level , the proposal does little to provide additional amenities com- plimentary to the mall . It should further be noted that the proposed trash/utility area does not comply with current code within the zone and in fact has been further reduced in size during the course of the remodel by the architect and the contractor. b. The applicant should be required to relocate all utility pedestals and meters to the protected trash and service area. c. The proposal creates no new open space. d. The Wheeler Opera House View Plane would appear to be encroached by the proposed sun scoop. 2. The City Plaza Building - 517 E. Hopkins a. This application probably represents the best of the three in terms of pedestrian accommodation and compliance with trash and utility area needs. b. The applicant should be required to relocate the existing phone pedestal to the protected trash and service area. c. Credit should be given for the design's compliance with the north/south pedestrian route in the Gage Davis ' Streetscape Guidelines. 3. A Garden Office Building - 615 E. Hopkins a. This application is also excellent in terms of open space, amenities, 1982 Growth Management Comtition October 20, 1981 PAGE TWO pedestrian and bicycle access. b. The submission is confusing, however, with respect to the proposed trash and utility area. The application on the one hand claims an area in excess of the code requirement to accommodate its own trash and utilities as well as the trash of the adjacent Grasthof Eberli . On the other it shows a sketch of an undersized (10' x 19' ) area and roughly 1300 square feet of landscaped open space for which credit is taken elsewhere in the application. c. The applicant should be required to relocate the phone pedestal currently in the alley into the protected trash and service area. d. Credit should be given for the extensive (and expensive) underground parking proposed by the design. Confirmation should be obtained regarding availability of service from both the City Water Department and the Aspen Sanitation District for all three projects since letters are not included in the applications. F^. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT: Red Onion Addition DATE: October 28, 1981 1 . Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating 2 Comment: Addition is generally compatible in size and height to the Aspen Sports Building next door and provides for continued dominance of the main existing historic building. b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating 2 Comment: Open space cannot be provided at the ground level , but by setting the second story back from the existing building,a landscaped deck and usable roof have been created. c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating 3 • Comment: Insulation to exceed Code provisions, use of insulating glass and skylights, "sunscoop" to provide concentrated heat and diffuse natural light to the building. d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating 2 Comments: Usable open space for building residents only provided through the sundeck at the front and the outdoor roof deck at the rear of the building. Project will enhance the viability of the Cooper Street mall . e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating 1 Comments: The visual impact from the mall will be minimal due to the 24-25 foot setback of the addition from the front of the existing building. However, the Engineer states that "the Wheeler Opera House View Plane would appear to be encroached by the proposed sunscoop". f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating 1 Comments: The Engineer states that "the proposed trash/utility area does not comply with current Code within the zone, and, in fact, has been further reduced in size during the course of the remodel by the arthitect and the contractor" . Subtotal 11 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on-site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community' s residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating 0 Comment: The applicant does not propose any employee housing on or off site. b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical , dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating 3 • Comment: The occupant of the addition will be Reese Henry and Associates, a local accounting firm provi.ding_1DSal professional services. Subtotal 3 3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Rating 0 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded. ) BONUS POINTS 0 Comment: The project is only eligible for bonus points if it scores 14.4 points in categories in categories land 2. 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2 14 (minimum of 14.4 points needed to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 0 TOTAL POINTS 14 Name of P & Z Member Planning Office (3) • PROJECT PROFILE 1982 COMMERCIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMISSION 1. Applicant: Red Onion Investors 2. Project Name: The Red Onion Addition 3. Location: Lots N, 0 and P, Block 89, City and Townsite of Aspen (414 East Cooper) 4. Parcel Size: 9,027 square feet 5. Current Zoning: CC Commercial Core 6. Maximum Allowable Buildout: 18,054 square feet, at an FAR of 2.0:1 7. Existing Structures: 10,975 square feet in the Red Onion Building 8. Development Program: 2,565.5 square feet for a total of 13,540.5 square feet on the site, an FAR of 1 .5:1 . The applicant proposes to build a second . story where there is now a vacant space in the Red Onion Building. • 9. Additional Review Requirements: Wheeler Opera House View Plane Special Review, final approval from HPC 10. Miscellaneous: This proposal is a relatively low impact addition to an existing building rather than a proposal to build an entirely new building on a vacant lot. The applicant has received conceptual .approval for this addition from HPC. • • . t T- .+ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT: ..49 ci .1 DATE: ii1A/c 1 . Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating 3?Mat_ Comment: low kl11 A kQ% t r idiftis O01141114 1 b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating 3 Comment: A IX J1otau e+, / . {AKc{t AMA du h.i -txmtl .& • c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating 3 Comment: • d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating Z Comments: ant p AEji"s di...4 S 4L t .COCOJIW e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating 3 1 Comments: e4.4.1 kift AliM 14AI OLMUE — ft f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating 3 Comments: 0'[ GMA Lb i s 2 ktG " o-S.1 Slit L ' c lw t land len.%, Subtotal 17 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on-site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community' s residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rati ng_o__ Comment: b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical , dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating 3 Comment: Subtotal 3 3. Applicant' s Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Rating t 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded. ) .}. BONUS POINTS 5 Comment: D'�(t�t. oMs o.JneMu l� a LOW im130 * climum esamid phJ& u, 4ts ,}aktua 4t hlatub-... • 4t irm deck Mews Scr,,,. 7f5"eat, 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2 21E) (minimum of 14.4 points needed to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 3 TOTAL POINTS '3—f?, Name of P & Z Member j en (3) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT: � e"` k"' DATE: 1 . Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating 7.2 Comment: b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating Comment: c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating Comment: d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating 2- Comments: i?. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rati ng, Comments: f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating Comments: Subtotal Se. 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points) . The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to • being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on-site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community's residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating ',` Comment: b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical , dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating 2 Comment: Subtotal 37 3. Applicant' s Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. • Rating 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded. ) ,/ BONUS POINTS LJ.� Comment: rA:401 4 (, 3 ,l/U"t-'�0 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2 /9 (minimum of 14.4 points needed to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 TOTAL POINTS 1 Name of P & Z Member 01,114-(3) • PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS ` PROJECT: ��- 0 le DATE: / AJ ,• 1 . Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. ,,J Rating Comment: �/F/�'-( 25(,z\,o ,)4a) PJeS t AJ b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating Comment: i'l PA2b/4-L 44.)0 %' 6-)a9 f dam) • c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating Comment: • d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating Comments: e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating Comments: f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating, Comments: Subtotal 171/7 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within 'the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on-site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community's residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) _ , ... . a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating Comment: b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical , dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating Comment: Subtotal 3. Applicant's Previous Performance Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Rating 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded. ) BONUS POINTS Comment: 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2 1 ( (mininum of 14.4 points needed to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 IO t TOTAL POINTS W ---±77))AfTh Name of P & Z Member (3) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT: eap CC\k5- PvDmov5 DATE: 11l3Igi 1 . Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating -3 Comment: WQI \Y `a.w.- ‘ YY\i16kO15 4 rnS -410V1) U,0410l C& + 4t) haw) %an+ 4o i f'f\MCA- hcli Wei ri. SA 1'1<i\ Cax' rt,at i✓1 s anv,A \:iCw8 or 1 V2 ' • Nt af1G • L en C• • • b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating 2-- Comment: c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating 3 Comment: d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating 2 Comments: e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating 2 Comments: f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating 9' Comments: Subtotal it 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points) . The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on-site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community' s residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) •. • ,. a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating o Comment: b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the _ project supplies medical , dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating 3 Comment: Subtotal 3 3, Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Rating 0 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded. ) BONUS POINTS L Comment; PW()bc I nl flE* CL1cXXZt4flj CfLS t DIYi"1s� t. 41MY\v- 44V i S A CQ, for a rang& tot) mrALMI C.a •A-- ' t a 9.A.00atc#1 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2 /7 (minimum of 14.4 points needed to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 CD TOTAL POINTS / 7 Name of P & Z Member JASM(d t //(7- C... (3) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT: go/ ii. 49 i DATE: / ,' 1 . Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating LI Comment: b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating Li • Comment: c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating Li • Comment: d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating et/ Comments: e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating ',, Comments: f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating Comments: Subtotal //_f 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on-site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community's residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) p i $ a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating f7 Comment: b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical , dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating 3 Comment: Subtotal `- 3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. • Rating b 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded. ) BONUS POINTS nz, Comment: ,:L41,(1 60 PT Q.s>f L /12(4/ /AI 4f C 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2 1,1 (minimum of 14.4 points needed to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 ,Z TOTAL POINTS / 47 Name of P & Z Member i Sue (3) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION �, ) 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT: '<'�" " /V'O'L DATE: /S/g7 1 . Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. �I Rating 3 Comment: b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating Comment: c. ENERGY -. Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating & Comment: 0 d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating 2. Comments: e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating 7 Comments: f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating Comments: Subtotal 16 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to • being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on-site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community's residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating 0 Comment: b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical , dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating 2 Comment: Subtotal 3 3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Rating 0 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded. ) 1 11 BONUS POINTS 2- Comment: ! p i kiro s'e. foot, '2 . 14- - 6(4, 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2 (6 (minimum of 14.4 points needed • to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 7 TOTAL POINTS (0-14 ( 4;)4/c: Name of P & Z Member (3) er PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT: Re/ 0 O /fo ' Y/ 12/: ? DATE: ///< 1 . Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating 3 Comment: b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating 3 Comment: c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating 7 • Comment: d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating -� Comments: e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating Comments: f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating 3 Comments: Subtotal /6 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area' s tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on-site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community's residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) • a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating / Comment: A/0 /7042 J/:I2(2 7 Kioca-/ 4,449 6%'? Qr= � 27Ot O 6 c:c/?/ 7 )/), or-c x/22 77 b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the _ project supplies medical , dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating r Comment: Subtotal 4174. -5 3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Rating—(c) — 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded. ) BONUS POINTS Comment: 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2 ."P S`(minimum of 14.4 points needed to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 TOTAL POINTS .92 r � yName of P & Z Member // (3) • co n v v • A w 0 N -• n Ch al A (.0 N .0 C. • O • • • C N 0 rn a 3 �*I —1 - � rn N n —A 0 0 ID C 0) C) 0 n v 7 w C CD m Cr 0 rr - -.. N C 7 'S N S �G co kc 4'G S ..-' C* 'C O ft 0 (0 CD •-I -• /D 0) a. CD (D -h CL C O CD C) 0 .-1 CD to C) 3 -1 w 0 a g (n -• (-r O CD O r C. 0 B C w 0 C vii 0' O C CD ft 0 J -• m 0 00 0 to Cam) - 7 t O .. s 0 - C Z CD In 0 ft- CD a -.1 • -. t< to a N 0 (D N 0 0 - -I < N a) 0 CCI N N U) C) C C) C (n O co C co A --I •--I -. O C 0 (m/) p CND D a I- h r I CO J l0 • co N , n (7, 3 3 -o m N _ CD ) O . W C1) CO N N CO CO CO 'S C C) Z c0-1 CT n (.< v 5 n I- . Ip L) N 0 XI O -I -3 • > 0 O -I r .. x ....a r r Z CO CO CO O CT W N N CO CO (J -< (D V) n CO Z = a n f.l r O M r m -4 0 3 C) m n Z --I --1 0 0 v _ -.a Z I- --.J W CO 0 a i--' N N W (A - CO G. -h Z N C CO . • 3 M G. N co N _ _ N .--0 • V W CO O A N N N W N W 0 0 Z 3 CD A _ -, 0 C) W W 0 W N N N CO N N to CD 'S -, (D CO CO CO 0 C1) N W CO W (N CO (-P- O O N n O CO CO O V (.J CO N (.J W W C X- < -a 0l CO (D 'S N) C LC CD r o 73 sn o m D CJ N o O -o NJ m C • G —1 0 v, —• 0 f) et ✓ 0' J. m o 0 0 J et et m 0 et in 3 n r v• v co O j —I m O O O O -a. in 0 —1 . v o D = r C 0_ In a 3 •° •D O m J = ra m Z -I O Tu N O m 3 m a z m n 0 m o D r r m '.< N N a = I m CD m Cu UDI v m N m O O O -% N Ut < DJ r v o m m . O _, J LO N O Cu C+ Cu N V O O a 0 m A O al O O CD Z . CD CV a b h O N D CO W O -a r 1 i I t to l0 O -5 lC Q` 10 0 144 MC MC ma mao 0, 44 '0 § \ ) . c v D / D H il _ f 7 / 0 ` / f Efl § En 2EaE »= ■ � a c ¥ ¥ § e _ i £ E a© »F - = D « § _ _ _ � ■ . . � § \ | � �_ � I § ® 3 � f } 2g £ c © ( . _ ° c 00o f 6 - ` / ( @0- - » k / � � ` �f | - ` - � £ obfk / oaEbe � � - � % ¥ � [ E ` i c � � ] ak2 ƒ ; »2122 ! o ■ � = k6 F# mW / ƒ / ' 33 e $ tCOW2 8 � � 2ww � w ■ 2 § { ffi _ 2sos = _ E �■ 282 ■ E §£ a ; e .0 o = aE § £7 c - - - - • = | ee � � - 2 .a 0 Q -- ■ ƒ cI231A § A ) 2 ! I- c <0— N m nLO « O Q<< CO << < <C : L. . _ 4 L. -- c= I L L - _ . - . , r in V _O 0)L 0 Y CD c > E a m m N a T 0) a) 00 0 0 a1 .c O _ O car TU C a1 C C can co V•C 3 L p C T. N o i m a 0 Y 3 Y T m N Q Q m C m m N m C >.� m C m : t m \ aN 7a) r N3.EE aLa Nd a� � a a ; C m cc Y L c 3 m -a U 0 °: U 0 = c N ° ° o C U « C ,--a) y t CD rn3 - c a 3 o ° ° N m a o a to maic0 � . cnm cN " 0Y y ". vc cc a 0 C c min ` ° N OL.. O N C~ L ca N U •min a7 Vl a x w a7 • N Co � E moo c m'- o dcm 77 c r .(1)7 m m in 3 ._ c co d N a n1 a0a -m _ ac' - tc o � Nwo4 .EyDa Y '. N ail aT70 � L .2 Ec °-�r Ea '- :5dcrcE opi°, a 0 m o o c E L 0 d " v o f o m - T m ca Cm W .T. 0 mr O r w m N >, CD m ,_ N .0 a C o m 'i d C 7 'x m a 3 a a 7 T p .- � .L-. .N. am N m .-, c ' 0 .L-, CO CC -1° M ea C m O m a N m 7 a ° m N -a ° 00 m C N C 'j m m co Y = CO m e io C E 7 > - U 0 c cOc0 CD. �- cEE ° ELmmm ° y 0 m � cwoc � aam ¢ NCa m ° NY °ir MI5 -• 0i r E N W E - 0 m ¢ O N aa)i .-.. O n O c 7 >. a'v, U . o - E E '3 0 2 u. .� ` r c m m t a� u N o m 'di coy my � y d "-;',D N u. `n a' U = � c3 � . a-6 a10io � >,2 to m a m _ p a) '0"is � E Q r N N m1� N 0 m a m c m E y N 0 m C m `a o 0 3 o N r m 0 u') N 0 7 O U C ` C T ca O C a O N 2 p T. w 0.- EroU cL `O .CN W ? C 0 a v .LNE0o .nOro .mc >�voiU m m o i C! N �' c N y N O Q p a m Q m a >.: p ; m N ai wZmmcc m m � dc . O. _7 a ,n 3 .. ° cm m >,t080 .0a m N N C _, C a)w-. 7 c 7 ° N p "O o, c U m > a m «L+ 'r a7 U a-0 ac C o N c — c _ a ° Eo 0 0 7 33 cc0 . 0 _ E W ; N d d T ` a1 i > a7 N c o « > lQ a1 _o c N E c M >.w c m m p ai 0) m Q p V o c m L d L ~ >,a U L a W m L N OC1 E N .-. c - y ro N C O LL Cl o a a tmn `a O S] •• ` •-• U U m O C U 7 U C U 7 C a1 C .0 (n W a ro f U -C2 a O w a O y C a T L m p H32aa, Vi Hoot 1-- -J W d H H c3caoEroa � oaa>> o ~ v, a ^ - a m L m ~ C « E. j Y 6---2 ° tc L « N 1D 0 ^ a m OI' m Si N = 0 `° F- N a1 m r U co ° m i- = V C rn 0 o •c o n 0 0 0 3 C a aimm2•- omia 0m Thai o-'�?= o m2 = N0- O � a cz E0 .c amma- � oc - 010 003 ' al c '5ioaa, m L > L C � � oo -° � EoN aU � UcO° � N cLa- oa030-CO2 �_ = o m3 E _ a a ° o m U . c Up? m a o = c m - a N a0 j N 0 7 N 3 N m a E m co O V w a1 C °? cmoo3 ° a a, ai0 "2 « .5it� c 0 -_000aCr = ° m 3 -Cc7v U O U c p N E C C 0 U N - ` 3 m m C .2 = -0 N •O m ~ c a N N o'2 O m c N C a -c > In p 0 co c co 0 m L E ~ ° x m m a C 2 D4- .2 "3 C w mcp ._ E F O m C �:. 'C � « - NO co ) ccaaa)i -° av ° ° 0 - -010 cc `m __ ma�0cco5 03 13 co.0 C .... H 010 N 'C ill N m N m Q a C m Q fr N w_ N y ca m V m a N L N O pa a~ Q m N a7 a7 Y LL r ° m d 0 it: m 0 a, C ocoma° 3ia-oU - or � U4- -° • vE `" aaci mm � am ° moE Q. 0 0 of co aa) L a m m a0 o 0Z m t6 a: ". a� o o a p as co 3 2 � C p `a .c .c w ,ca m m 2 `n N o 1`-a m a 0 0 m 3 c a E to m Q .2 ° 2 3 m N E ° o : •� � D O C � .N « a 0 - y •Ca -0 o a �, 01 `p zgva0ao N mma°, ° 0 > a> 2UaEE oc0i O C 'Q 1 y j T Ca E O w N N N 0 cp ,- a Q 0 U O T-° :� y y OO m .� O a N d - cN.m - c °- ada �_ mp � mV ° 0acLm ma U � 0' rnm H^ ma° a0c3a� atmaE � cm � U � � a � � � 0" _0a),_ . 3 , A, a O U O W 0 C O C E m .Lm. L • U N N se.N s O T C ° C m a O ...=O .m. m O. U o E 0 2`a y c m a 7 . N , a c C 0/ 0 '5007 -0.,,- " mc = .c ` adE - = o2 ° c3 > nc0 ca %- CI w Oa 00 _ crmaoc '3o7L 7 E3oi -0cor0 .�. ° - 2mo-° ¢ E ° ■ C. o ¢ 7 aF o m 0 ac o -c C C '` mmaa) a38c0mcoc � E � acm .- aaoCaE yea ° � ° cm ' c• t0 ¢ ° Y ma 3 a � m a[ QQaa w ocmoc ,nN . 3m O C N E N m '� o _ 7 Q E as n a) n o m m LL m 0 y m _ 0 co - m E — C O L o m .' « a i 0 3 7 c .- 0) a o r .2 0 >, o -v_, Z c o m o a d C 3 m 0 0 > 0 L a a E m m a > .E o o _ >•L co co o 0 3 E " .c E ° 70• = 0 NLa Td o cY0 m mw a -a 0 m m a) m_ aa, 3 '" ,`nTc007,. E .. ._ -03cm � � � c0t 0-008 co a) � 3Eva = N '/0�� 0 pmE 'E ¢ mcc ' yc = N N 3 F- O33a ° moa � //W� L .O '— U O -0 - a 7 0'U L E c m c o 7 m Wl i = m al CC L N O a C (duct O 0 2, U H E0 " > 01- 0 0 0 1- d 7 7 7 m l0 a ,o, amOm ~ OEm .a 0001- - 0n07 N 0 g c m =a c1 m m o V C m c « f C C 3 a C . Y •-' O r E m y N L O) m a m . m O) m C, - F C C � V cN « m3 .3cm 2 EN oc a0 ° ym 'm �, m m3cma . c 0 omm m m m pE aC ; 8 Q - m . m , x m � o > " cta Ypa3Yvom LdE 2 . a) B. Lj Ndca $ ° m y°ct m Oct ° ti mm ° - � aam •� NVO o m3 .„ dN ~ c _ N j'O c m y m a clia r y C O U� ° O N m L ° O La w> ° m m m ... m W O C >C o U C L m ° E 2m ? 2 :6-. 0 0 . m C - Y L m :E C m y 0 > O m m Q 1 > L ur 0 - N c a) L O ° 0 E O) O t o y m a m C m O W m C 7 0 'm .c m co O ae C TO m o L c L O Y ° N O - LO 70LN YmmaUCOma_ CNoE13L d. m yi mO01 co a cd ` L � m Ta 0 N =E °cyWcmm � O 'cmcc - E7 O2 m « a ; a y - A a 7 ° a ° - ohm am °' 0 mommmo « >-0 - vd m . CIw .$_ m0 � �cm E A a ; 10m a � WaET � t m O a ` y m N O y O L m aJ C C C U N 0 w O o o O m « a Y j 0 m E m C a m a C 'x L z L N 2 E m O c a m a- ¢ m 7 >, ' >ro) m n _ ) a2 rn3 E O oa E ' m U o cp m coca c YpLd m 3 N ao C and a 0 N _ s &-E0 C ° N E o. N a c a) .. o c C o m a m 7 � mm x Esmym ° c ° i m E so -E0 Ea c ,_ corao a 0— o - oL ' N >,,r0) „ .c au „ 0 - ° •• 00co3 cmt 0 mc) � cvm3m a .. X ° U < 0 0 o L L c O y _To a 3 c O E Sal o - m - 0 m C N m - L m I- O O Y co O m - y C ° m m O o .. m L m C F m ._. o N O ) >a m p ., « m c.VN C C •- .c m c U E a O) 0 ..- - L 7 N E O -« N °)U L LC O ' O o .. Y O U UL ° m17C `' 3 °) ..-C) m ° - aa. cm3 � ' vN mvE ym -- da) cc' Wc o maL o °-c � 3L � ' � mocWNoo d (00 co > EgEm .' 2F « wc - 2 - r a ooC i EC m aUmmmcd OsCL Omx to Lm C T >OL L • L am Co ° EL t - o03 mmL m E m Oa o 0 w c 0 - T C 7 O y 0 U y N Q .- e m O a« W r C O_ ` C m 0 L . Nm m ° r m O 2 L O > O O m N O m a m ° .. m 7 m L m O ° Ox ° 0 U m « C C T - U ) ) i U Q._ ap C m m V m 03 m - m m3 a « 7 C y « a- ° m C m C C O 'O O L. ) N U m m « C C N O m C o m m. m c '" mcvam my d ca) > a '2 ° urn a)._ 0ma) ac0 ; 3y � 5F m " N1) aia . Y � m0 " Cc C LC NY _ ° X mU a C d N ° t ° > m ° N,w G m _ a t O U L a. > c 0 'O a 04 U O a.g F- mQ cn coma . mmc c - rnac c LCmm U 8QLomm a m my m ° cL m owE - - cEYoc yma oo � -cF- mmm an a c E U m y o 0 .... m `o a° a m y o o _W 41 m C m m . N �, m C C C - > m m O) 0) an d CD o d 7 y 7 C L c o - 0 0 a' O m L .0 C C tO N 7 ° ¢ ocm7 ` O3 a� amc ° um ` = TE .�' ON o. c 3° d O y > o 2 L i U L O` x o o E w c m a ..- ca ate) p °v •m 0 E � � aw c- .o « m a.c a ° � E U (°j j 'E Q ° r QI L" > O O C L N N °) c >� C la0 N N 0 co o y T 3 m C L O U m - C C m ° y m m C - rnL m a y C N O a) 0 � 4-' m 0 o N _0 a.0 L C C N .3 a� U co C C C N ° C m O C .=co U m y C U L U i .7O E N N . j co 7p N ate) U m m U a)CO O N 'y •� ° cas- O) `O m N N m E m L-. N N N � $ dUm` Eo ° occo orm nw °° a oaaCnao W >:'000 7 0 ° c.c ° aa) > - oa) .�7cmi -m. Enz ° CmU aica7a) O m « N — m m o = ° a) '0 N 7 m L" N a) as m e - '3 ° > la ° m N C 'O 7 .L-. E m ° >, 7 C m C ° ECU C Z y a) .L.. 'N m N N a V L. N m C y -0 « C C CV 13 00 ° >41-22 v m = m E V .L_, o Y L,. C Q U o m 3 E c N .L-• `• O O d �� NO L a rn E O U m m - O N O a, N U C Q Q 7 ; � cmiEN3a 'a a« ° c min 0 >,_C o -c g mm . L co L C a 2 tin« c `O O a y a< ,- m C O r C C =.O = O « c) a) 7 m 7 ° (n cm ° J amLx � °6a d Leo :. o .- a) 3o �a `a c CO >m, o '- mma m Fmm o 7 cEUQ'- E « :- 00 -° 0 7c m L OI N L N N r .L-. C co L Z' O 'p O m C a m a« ny.°- 7 ° ° oL ti a0i L n 3 N oL E 0 Ec o c m m c o E a d 5 d `o . m co c E o -- 3 m - ,a 000700� ° 'S U m a > �� m C ° .mac_ « C N m Q m y m C o m c y c 3 m « c O U M U m C° O L a'0 4=!' a U O « « m U O _ O ra m T.- `1 an -ow - mow O C m 03 C L C - = C m O C Q Ts U a) 2 C o C >,m Co T' m r m a U O) O c F O c ` O m L m IL 8 a -- ,, C O «) a U T N y V m _ m o m s C U N y ° O N m • CL C ``f N « 0. N 9, c d G. o 0° 7 j -0 W o)• m E To N L U m C CO N O O. 0 >` .0 O L m ° a 7 x c t O. o O C U L C y O a 7 O m .L-. DO a C '4 N E m U a > °a a H = « W mmm W Ja000Fc >, U mE0—coEmc°) a � `o W Fsa, co v O7 .c Q t v Itch: s - r ... . r .: . • .. .. . M co 8 0 . d a o T d ro a 3 ; � .Eal0 .) o .., Wd ooEEy 0 , ) -0 • 0 ti 0 2 Op = , O y N . L CE aL 3 . C O _ a EC O C .. _ \m l L N d O L 2 N N C o N N C O c L a)N > ` . i F NC ' O rna U_ N 'a _ a) a) a) as-c° N C .. N OO C O O U T r > O N y U ..- C C N C = V O N 7y C 0 U C -0 CO y a) 7 . C[" CO a) 'N _ a 0 m O a a m r a ^ N ° a m v m rn 0 '� v o p .` '9 0 E 7 a) 03- = Uo 7 CNT L jO CN =0 O a � ._ No (0 N > a) O " Y .. 'N d a) ?) N 3 .0 N U U O V N E a) El N aU a L C . O 'EC- C m 7 N 7 N c o LN Y N ° c Na C :2 E C U C N O o '" O L ° cE aa) o E — U C O C 7 , U ad C V i r o ._ 7t _ L N ' C o ' E U - N p N N a a) U> N a co L O y 'c Q as o N U O W E U O c V ao � .> U 0 . L a) t o d C N 'a t0 h o ° !0 E 5 N m N C V N h -y' U p)` In o O 3 c0 N > a) C L a C o C O co Cl C w 230 N cn E C C N - N 0) 00 .0 L N O O as N a) - m m i O U C c O E a) .s- of n 7 L a) y ` T N C O N - N U co U y E L c a " .y _0 7 .N 0 0 co '. N n ¢ U T Y 0i a) cco al Ice -o .c E N ° > O L U .- > as 07 7 j Y CO U C_ 7 p ▪ N t O ° LN. o o C C ~ N L C O L c1N N -a o L U E Y - 3 clL L ~ c v ~c_ _ p u E _ co 7 o a... ._ L . rn m 5005 a) omEo m '` .E � Ev 7iaN ETrd � imp) cu o =V c L •E C O) y E ca -ES =..N O a) O) 7 N n U N 0 as 'a D c y V E > .a> C oO it, da i0a) c 'p � y2 « c 710 a) N "' _om 22C .rnQUyo -) ooaE C .. ,aao � � oa) o .. EC _0c ° m Cr3n .N N o C c n U O 0 O 7 co 3 h v c c N n) y a w a) •' O N N o O ■o` O 'O X00 E co ° E co m 0 avit aV• ms E N E Casa o ° c o c co d oa N 3 0 p0 O O 'O C . N Z a a> N N N CO O N L CL. E > O a N r r 0 7 0 « �' C O N lc0 c O T N N i0 .) c _O ` 5 i- r twa O Z O Ow m a3 'u) Q o ' a -7V E as 'at aaai- ar 2 025 .� cca m a of - .c L � c * u- ' iai ' in� rotm � 0� E rn- w Tom dL a) C N co -0• N O c la U ) L a) ` Q 00 N V O)a • 7 � o T m� j O N 7 d a > « to a CD o o N Lo co. a) -0 - O -0 .- O . N C N 3 Bco in V CO CO c .0 o = U = Y� N L nU O p U N j 0 — M O 6 v h a) 13 N C N 0 c aa) co d 0) N o a) o▪ p Y T t0 L C j C a) c N 4- N 3 0 o N- U a o Z N m ° ° ° EO d N o 0 o -0 w L o, c0ir -6v� ca) CL i rn 0 ° oLL ¢ Et0c0cFc ` 1- L p) > U c > N C t U _0 U t6 •-• m a° 7 O \ 7 ca Cr) . - a m N O) > C c)L N V L N E W A = N E a) C a)a CU -0' > > O L CD c 'o � '� � 3 Qom a 0 = ii Q _I o) c) oait 0C $ aapi0 >`" m - ZaNCa a) d « E cii , c 0)'C - = - a) mo va' yrnu -° a � Ua u) Ea ° _ < pica ° , y0' C '- ° « o) •C C i0 N x V a) O N 2) v U L O a_ O T U N , `OT)E 7 p .c.. C m p a C N C C V i, Li a c c Ci Q O X -' a) c a)t C t0 N K o Ol 0 _° d C — E U a U U •� N N U . �_ _U lU0 O C N % ] COI O p)-0 co `—° V d a N N N N a) 0 r O U 03 o O Q l0 ` 7 W W = N 7 to C a) a) c0 p a a) 0 a p _ c N m 0) m 7 N• T~ td CO l0 C N c U N - - m c U 0nu X J o N a C N O• N a) - y C- cum - m .- - c010 .- .o O -� tc0p3 U U ¢ V E7 QC a) 03 EC > Y00 ° m of co UDc a) pa>qa t0 C a O C 7 `0 C 7 . LL O t a m O 7 L = v 0 C 'a O r -p a' ° ~ C C H 92 C C `$' N a) o , N N Q mC OLLCOQ H O p N N NL N 7 O .N. N C —° L a O > y U O a co N c U - a) - U co x ca .c c -6 c a) W .` N a) o N ct N W 3 C a N C N N a) L N N a) a) 7 N Vp N 0 7 0 .L. "' v Q L O L C = .L.. — EcdNmaa >` ItO ¢ ¢ > ° 3occo aa) a) ~7. 3o3 � 'm ` cao >. � ^ r 5 E - d d D E co) - - c 7 C 2 2 .0 7a H W .. U V # t-H V. _ a e ► .. 4.. .- L.._ .1 L.,-.J 4..- d b.d ►. .../ -- .. r - ...- - . • . I .. ille N (r W •> CZ' cL4- OItL ° O ° a mN t h N E ON. N T 7 N N = ; E 0 Ec am 3 Y _ Q O N ° N .L. 0 O N c (0 CO N ' .O7 m C ~ W w d N w CJ 01 N U - - U .L.• ' 0 ` • N .0 7 .- 3 = L O co % ) .o 3 • d N U N ' d 10 O N 1) O h T m O U O) N o b- - ° j �. a) C N ) c Y 2 C13 (n• 30 " N 0) > O ..,,CU 17.3 NN - 0a., LNUONi0o 0 N L _° 0 '0 76 10 C L L N O O 3 01 N p O U V0L 000- U CN 7 mN o) NC @O - 0 ° a) E .20 N K j° N w O N� 01 1 a C 3 L L Q p N 0 E �' Q O W O C O O N > 7 L L 1] N .- N N 7 N L .° CO cu >C0 O co c c U a) a a) L C O1,L y h C _O a) a) L C o T p O 06 N ccycca2 C ° O V2O C > C .L. N C ° LLOI« C U a) ^ i 0 ea °• O _c 7 c E p 0 c 3 0 0 0f ° w O N N Y U F O •C N 7 U p O m W R r N 7 N• N N ° O 2 ^N N .w a N N 0) t0 O) C d 0) c L w O a y 0) en ca, d a) ma - m Eu`0ica o " oC >. cooar EE .0 ca) . ca co 0 C ,LN, co w N N w ccO d -- O y ° O .� p 7 w L .=II ci V c 0 j., co '0 °•) - N O m ° a7 � _ _ 03 > E r c t E . O c N ° 7 o c m p ° d L7 ° o a o 'o ° 3 Y l- ° N O N a) O 0 7 ° ° O a1 a) C c O ' C N 7 C o) ° CO .L-. a) '-4aw ° c ° 0T � Nm .c Lm cc `ONO Eo � Ocn ° 10m c ay, a1430 120 71°0 ca 0 c a) 2 U o ..N .L.. N o a- ° d = _ N 0 N o 7 l0 o c E 0 0 co -E30 ow := T� cL6co YCC 3o2 oY 3 a °r 'e' am -° °0 - rnac ea W N O' a) O L c > C 7 N m O 07 7 tl1 'O C N N O T E 3 Or L 7 N a) p ° cOc0 OO7p .- U C_ y y v� tYO o ._ a) a) O)c1°� O D N0C - of O0Y V• ` N c c O rn ° f0 L co (°0 0 3 A C C C L N ._ 0 _ C no T a d m E N 7 4Erna ?c � mNnvdcE •O � � - o • -60) • ° en0ma53 '3 -i°o • - � � Wmiron . o 4- 0 ° E. on8aso _ voa E E ° W p) m 'C -o 10 0) ° (0 co C e 1- ° O N o c .L.. C - a) O n7 N Q 0ei SS 0io 2 m mE c0 J c � c FHcoi2 N (O 1.4 O▪ L Y N C O N > g O L .0 O C Lp-. m C 'Ea C C N L O m• L 100 ° ° Cl U L <0 11)" ° N '-' L U V ' N 0) ,a -° 7 r O ° F .L-. 0 N 01 C c cO o o- 2 T-7p o o C N o « N _N N r to o ° C a a C T L 0 C L E L_ a CO _ 7 01 C U -. 0) p y 0 �' L m w O N o IC 0 m m O T 01• O a) y O L r 3 ro 0 t N 100 -to cat `p o o U (q O - C)L N d y L L " 4) c o o ." = 030 .- o U .N. ° O � ,c — y 'y .. E L• > 2 N U O .c 0 c10 C N a:_ L` .= T N o U v__ U 0 c 01 3 C ea a°) ° 3 m 0.rn� y > o >, ° - .°).c C r ~',, d CD = =a 3 aC6°n o> E .E N _m m ! E ° E ° (tO - cco ° o! '- 3 . n = m,, = Zo °iEor 70p04°) m Ova 6. mcN0Ui - a° 0 > 17 - 3c EY0 dam�, 1° O) c --• NEo. G a N - OT) O C 7 ft tl) c 3 E i .0 01 .0 - `p y C a c V C a c O 2 0) 0 0) y NLOOE703p ° ac rn0 m _ "-' oc 4`107 .N Tic a'm c y " - _ a° .r- 00 . o o a) Lo . .g a° c c E r ? E '' d c _ C O 16 a) 01 a) N a) 0 T O)L p N ` U L la O v) L .N " O1 O N ..' O o ` roN ` v to ? R8' N F DIOTILDOrn.K ,oitl0Om3 h00cORQCL U to L al c L U N N O C E g)L N 3 o - J. a N C N a_a) - S c i- t` U ui r L 0 0r C 0 p T H 01 ° .0. 01 N D .. .N co N 0) m f0 ° a v C N >. 01 O o U C 3 .0I d maa) -0p dc@ mCTm °porca`> EQma�) cm .�� 7c°ioa°ra - EE - c c o 0- O a o N 17 ,- N C p m 10 T <0 10 m N 0) a) O)°cr,- 4-' O O ' l0 O) 0 -' O 40..0 o " 0 c N a) c c Ua cL C - C o c y o N ` L C m E c.L o0 oO C r ° N 0l- a E L en C y 0 N C 3 in - L L a5 0 J •O 0 C N O � 3 C C V 0 Y ° C a) 0) V an E N co 0 0 0) 1°0 E/ a) C O CO > C O N 020 O ac - - D N N O m O ~ O)O C a C N 4N) H N w a) 3 7 t0 'a N N _ V1 W 0 7 < 3 .. U (a ea _ : V (a C = (O N N 2 01 :I LE Q : N o)O : i ai a O e . _ . 1 C . C- _ C__„ C....., •..- a C C_ ... 7 C� - . . . . la 2 V r� C c aj o a> a1 co a G m p» 0 p Y U E c Q . m c C - 0 C O m . ._ O L W m o C m . w T CI cc 0 E 0a> vc .pain X co U of O C m 0 c 7 To a O L .m`-. U — O O is o U o L it .y ; To 0 >,r 0 0 0 ca W 'o �m3 � 0 -' 'N °Ni = co $ 'E agagi' o n0 > c c3op 'y a1 - V E c NT'y . Ecd C y 0 - 01 co C 7 :c O 7 . - cn - o ._ E ,y Qw m .y ro 0 L C N 7 _ aa) oa) 7Yd � roFa01m a mLm .L = ad y a) 0)-...• d m >. d t 9 vi c _ •E 3 N � o ° am> mroc0i Ym .N3y N L C W y D O y C 0 Z 'U d to Q W o c m T a y a.. a) Y N 0 c E v m 0 r — W O 0 o •V ¢ « co 0 co V C of a1 m - _ c O p .a O .. ` L = O a1 C o ; . Q) ... c « a N c c y N a1 Oc ca m o E n d E °_ a) ca = .0 a) va1U E 00TOa1 c = Ea m ¢ > « y 0) `o> ma> .° J ti) Nm y �u O O n a S 2 E 1>',..E1) c a) _ ° ° W ma> a.. r- U 'w ro . _ � c n ¢ Na) ¢ CO , .01 m ro a1 N O C O a c CO .N, N ?+ a -0 E Q 0 m E co 8Y � mro = ° L0a> .! c _ as -- :c - « =5amE 3 : oE!= w 2 c3ymoc = Taros d > d .F ro d roc 0 o•0> c 207C a`) 'O CD E Oa) °E .5 w 0 O L Y N E N c L O L t U 1°i> O im ¢ C4a- Y 0 W QNa3 U _ asonma .. .. " a .0 , < ‘- •- ..1. 004,-,,, E O a) o N p .0 N L CI N co)�O C «T. .0. C) L N .0 0 0 .0 Y 30 .0 cD 0 .-0) .L.. C c .0 c O : L •0 L •• :p 7 . y ro U -p lCa ~' N 'L, 7 40 N C y � 01 0 _ > W .> m U 0 ' ,- 0 a> O c E .L-.- o O C al O vCC � o>:_ - � ° pu Yro4- a aa)i ° aa) - E co roOa7Eo 9L. E 'ma 0) a).c " — c'y c 3 L a y w 0 W N N c o 'O ' E Y N O 0 0 ro - ca N O aO130 'Cro V0m LCO c `pt0a L -p L.. V acU L0OYE7 �a .- YC a) 7 c d — o L 7 ° ha-- c . 0 0 3 2° E p —co ca Je o (CCw v -c yaciu aNi13 oaym3 > c ° C7da� � 7 « mapE C f• l0 0 O _N N a) _O Ya m a .. p 0 c O �O 3 3 m y T ":" ro :Dm y c _ U O ro a) O m U L C C aC O c a1 a T L V C O 4O m m ro N y 0 _E a1 0 > a1 C C c L y 0 m N y U L C U 0 d O C ro m T L ° C 0 0 - D a- ' a) C romy0oc = 002 < a) 2La' mQa3 a) ° taoNT= g -3 � � E 0 UNLV 00UC-EJ. N p0ma> 0 > C 2C C roalc2y'3 000O3a E a1a - a+ EE ` roE E7 T Cl) a ° romc a> 0 ad00a - Ea1a> vE !n - n E : a.- La> s 0 am7 L o 0 3 Eu ro . - a � m o ° o a> o y % v CO X T N N cO V m o o 1O m a> N C - a a) j 0 a > > �C- G a t V V V > v> >. u> a) o 0Ch a ° c0 � � ma> ro o " - Oa' CC . ° la ' •C �mE 'o _pcoc '> � '5v» aa¢ - ° L •E a> a )., E52 :. ; ` .c y O1¢ a c a E aY a o° c c Y ° d x 1:as 0 r y o °, E « W naa ro N ro °°• � oNL ° ccLi ¢ ` � O � a> dvca rocd0 - cmo 0 -c �QE m « 8Nd co .3 C « �0 C a1 C..— a) L Q m a 0 ro a ttl a) O» E a> Y O L o -o - U O o C a-12 W c E 1:2 L O U a1 .N -0 -0 C y CC O C>H ` .L°', ¢ p. a1 O .—n a ° O X >.. c 3 O 2 m C_ __ .L. X .01, 0 p - — L `p - a a> -o L ca a1 .-. a m ro a1 ro yYNOdroroca) aa) ° • E cam > 7a) � E c : . t S13311HOtltl / S31tlI3OSStl 4 S113M StlWOHl S3NOI.L f1 ONIISIX3 HdIM INV NOI1VOOl 103P0>id - I .o : 2 tl3M3S aI OIS „9t ._ _.. .. I 11111M lf 1S VN31VS I I I LI — —r- . I 2 O I CC • IL L J J a Q 4 , ___. N iii ~Ili w . 1 I ._ 1_ , w I w 2 1 f I /// I , i > / I g _ I Z U W Q a h IZ to r j..) I I 0m Z I W I / a 8g IL 1S THIN J I IJ „9 U \ m L - I O: Z O: at -, 1 r a t- C C. 1 C.... .._., C..� C...1 C-] ►_.. .....3 La _ :. ..I .....7 L. ..s. S13311HOW / S3IVIOOSSY t S113M "MONS S131111SIO 011101SIH / ONINOZ 1Nnvrav Zit : uiiiiiriiiiuui dnon dimmest/ IS Is a Sr cliay PI: I Ir. AN ii, O FYcr � U —— —+—3nlUes� w I i sr V a � El.11111.11111M MOM IM Maar. U O I- z N a V x x til E •11■16 Sill a 0 as lap IIII II; 311/9 _Doli O = it • et ■ C . � ___. — IIII 111111i ,1� ��11 uiuIii _' _' , �� IM� X X • sr SI S 1 Lj J Sr yr ..r ITV Sr INS III . Cr I IM I Q x 1 I- w z1 a a 1 Fin nrii fi -1 S. • ►. . S. a L. .4 1...,d r--,+1 l-.-..a a a. .f R-I c - - - .. J .. . ... a S13311H3UV / S3IVIOOSSV V S113M SVM•OHl dYW 133d1S / ST1VW N/V ll1S3OEd EV 9101 ONINNVd ONIISIX3 / S31f1OH Sf19 a (i\jr Li uu L U \::: •I // _ ter a 1 as _ ..■_ ( ... 2 w c -- r,. ..........., e, . ......a ••• ,,,.. 7i.., :al ■ F: \ � ., �- Iy 9. I Z . a 1 � 0 _ 1- = I P ll31Nf1H j �r �� .ter O \ I1_1 � vii °� • y�j CC Nil a I 1 S a 1 r7i Z ' IIIIII 31V° C�7 2 `I i Ir ;� o \-\\ tit' \. _ • c... • \_ y !•as s__. �' I illil'IIII I I IIIIIIIII I IIIIII 11W • a.ans.. ... . . sr W R • u. j J • w i • tif. / 411.111•1Mb S • W *.- ,r. rte.;. •• g • g ••• yi • ..__.r■. ._... Iminr Isis sr ,___ .__.awe .__r •__. t —%s ILI • W • Q • Is - Y Q d Q • cc 2 W Q Y Lu ? a a _, Q a O f p • • I t •. • •• ... •S•. •••� -- 1 nn nmil-Ft nn n NIl3S1 • sweetie sol toxin S1O31 HO!!V/ S3IVI3OSSV 8 S113M SVWOHl AdlN3-1:UOO1d aNfOao Z 0 t J C Q aC f ��� LL • . . ■■ z __J -- , • S S �MSS\ cn mo1 = it sat 5 L Z Q IL. C C Cw C.Z G.7 ICH r. C : Z C.2 La ;`._. ■■ ■ sataeue sot usase in S1031IHOHV / S3SVIOOSSV '8 S11JM SVINOHI NV'ld 1OO1d CN003S a♦bw— — .a a v �+y w `S zu • ea t _ u (\ F_'Jr_� — s re \ �— ..` y i \ Y K O O _ —_. \ ° 2 \ a. Z F_ ` r n 1 a E u • \ n a a u i i E F ° 0 J) I u pp o \ °u 1 _ ° °Ex — I u ° \ w tC) O J \ si 2 N • Q N. • F % w i I I 1 1 • \ • \ m e N \ LL w LL illi i Lo N N N N ■ • w i \\ r ■ �\ J\ 1 • Ng u ° \ \ C \ 4e \ te.4) I Lionise Y Sl 311HbaV/ S3IVIOOSSV V S113M SVWOHl N01103S H1f OS-Hl>ION CCO P . a 4 ze, 7 w a .l- • t . w, i' 1-1,H I \V IIII l \\ 4 \A\ II I l I4 VA\ \ J vy`\ ic' La \ 4 U W V A\ p 2 \ \ 3 - 6 \ Jw \ i� 2 Jul Irr $h \ yl3 m V d § 8 Z N b J w H II _1 off LL iw. N _i li Id I 11 II IIIII 6 E I i III III , � I�� �I I��i I I III u it? N¢p� F 1 0 1 4 11 It . C. : Ma I 1 C11 I - .1 16: 1 . ,. 41 :... S1031IHOLIV/ S31VIOOSSV '8 S113M SVW N OHl NOIl\1A313 HIUON Pitt 4 z" WQ LL N o u <y• mm IIIII I III ' II Ii it II 0 i! ,l i .1,t > Ni J W f II 1 ¢_ iert III I L 1 II I [ fq J JI il 'S or 6 ', II II I II � ' IiI II I Ili g G LL 0 E. <Z 6 rc.. • a _a IL:2 sele6ue 901 uedse CO 9103.OHMHV / S31VIOOSSV '8 S113M SVWOH. NOISYA313 11VIN Ji iu ir 11' ill IfI J ..,. 1 M li— III _ ' r. ---1 II i ribb r= ill 1 -1[ I ii 1 �1III �Ic liin 'I r ii �I o l II o a Lu w J 7 a I II 1 11 i � 1111 y q II 1 1 , _Thl i 6 O Y u• U m 11 1 III 1 ... 0 2• m oil'1 m III . all N IX F 6 I m I 1L w N a C- 17 J 1 1,_ - -