Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.420 E Cooper Ave.1982P? d C-�, c,)-. ;z 6- m p- ` Gm TRANSMITTAL �1� „ LETTER AIA DOCUMENT 7t a i i r 2 1; lr' PROJECT: 4. N / MTK!N CO. ;y>' (name, address) RED ONION OFFI�� +' PLANININ(_, OFFICE r TO: JIM WILSON PITKIN CO. BLDG DEPT ASPEN CO. 81611 ATTN: L Jim Wilson J WE TRANSMIT: ( ) herewith ( ) under separate cover via _ ( ) in accordance with your request FOR YOUR: ( ) approval ( ) distribution to parties ( ) review & comment ( ) record ( ) use ( l THE FOLLOWING: ( ) information ARCHITECT'S 8310 PROJECT NO: DATE: 8/23/83 If enclosures are not as noted, please inform us immediately. If checked below, please: ( ) Acknowledge receipt of enclosures. ( ) Return enclosures to us. ( ) Drawings ( ) Shop Drawing Prints ( ) Samples ( ) Specifications ( ) Shop Drawing Reproducibles ( ) Product Literature ( x) Change Order ( ) COPIES DATE REV. NO. DESCRIPTION ACTION CODE 1 8/23/83 c.o.# including pages 1-6 E ACTION A. Action indicated on item transmitted D. For signature and forwarding as noted below under REMARKS CODE B. No action required E. See REMARKS below C. For signature and return to this office REMARKS Please process plan check as per enclosed revisions to contract documents. COPIES TO: (with enclosures) Sunny Vann Tom wells Charles Israel Hunter Constr. ❑ Lennie Oates Collins Eng. ❑ Mort heller ❑ ❑ BY: avid F. uqi(Pbn,A.I.4. AIA DOCUMENT G818 • TRANSMITTAL LETTER . APRIL 1970 EDITION • AIA® . COPYRIGHT © 1970 ONE PAGE THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1785 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036 e .• GIBSON 6 RENO • ARCHITECTS August 23, 1983 Mr. James Wilson Pitkin County Building Department 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: RED ONION OFFICES Dear Jim: Enclosed are details and instructions pertaining to "Change Order #1" for the Red Onion Offices. We are going to an enclosed 'garden' area open to the sky, as we discussed at our meeting with Sunny Vann on August 12, 1983, as a means of reducing our F.A.R. to the code allowed level. I hope with this revision, we can expedite the building permit for the project. Please let me know if you need any further information. Concurrently, we are making application to the Board of Adjustment for a variance to restore the Garden to its original design. I would appreciate your support of this application, as you had offered earlier by way of letter and/or appearance. Thank you, David F. ib on, A.I.A. DFG/fh Encl. xc: Charles Israel Sunny Vann 203 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORA00 61611 303/9255966 f r: 0 (oA=�=Y-ca) I I IN �© I� I� I I l I I I I I I I' I I I I I I I F'u,e rHe-,� lve�lf 7�'1'^i P�Gv/Oc�i Pc1rn/5, ,4r.L OT�iEx (✓.tr..�s 7r/E Mom— l�fix/e- D)Z E4i�/✓•ftErJT- ".�9r-f5 �2av f�'Sy/naG UFF� E�CE t,�IF27—Al 7� Q74 2,5 /- 31% a /��lE7�,!'T CGti4T / Ai'%F 4� ffAKG WB�a.77/H27fC��/ O I 4 Mee W c-v 7' 'TY M�lnlufi. MIL 1zE�f��¢�cs /A' lyGtl�i� /CCJESJ No%8" PO, G//oTHS ff�►✓E f3E�/S� 77C�1/7E�C� UP SU�iyTLY �1 1/E Hif�t///F- C'C-�of+f+�,vAl�. �!! MOM! lvi�cLbwS MK ,e 5, `T "v/ ✓� w//` ,4�v—p 'X� ft•�vE /3EicN P�LE�I�,o Ffieoy �� Go��T ���ET/Ts �N O 7HL E3 Y � � Y 121 �— 3 3'--/ok11 /L/o•• MAY ! HAvF A,00 r A4eA •- - - Of-R/ - I E. 9, C',r/r / s !u Svrr4 M-/ - 4 WH1?? EEC -- - 77 • 2'r FbR,T[.�i N 17 r' L7xl 49-f- y - #� A� - 937z, — rS��P�r✓,�1[L Moccl�i�'r tt SDN/ l0 25 Tlc.r-- 4� H/L I�IG it O,�1K fI XZGR pi /i- Mu« . I Al 42jr-;� ■ It ,Pr/ fixc<1o�q I � -- D� k crThinreC I ol R-O•) • 19 4—r.9 4t,2'y,F F_ �efpw --�.-- ]'-C_ TC TB Zr _BaR I -TN/S F I 6"M/K.4Tic ALI- VP I f. ' I F: J_/HiA/2 7YFS G 1. _ __ 1 4 ; i 4- 7YReS' �� i cue �`�.% � .: _I � I � D" •!. ( jjj LC1-t ��'"; :, �', i � ,1 ,EF— _�l , ! Dfie•► n P�+ It 7.0 -� __ ;�nra`y-•�-M!tilr�_^�tt .!a� s,r., r$.x x9axri-� '`�--1 L /C'7w7S �� r C"JL�' 700 Al • i ;L= GIBSON & RENO - ARCHITECTS Mr. Sunny Vann Aspen/Pitkin Planning 130 South Galena Aspen, Co. 81611 Department RE: RED ONION OFFICES Dear Sunny: August 9, 1983 ': AUG 1 1993 ;i ASPEN / PI i KM CO. PLANNING OFFICE In preparing plans for the Red Onion Offices, I have appreciated the cooperative and helpful attitude of Alan Richman in Planning, Collette Penne of HPC, and Jim Wilson of the Building Department. To get to the end of Documents several meetings were necessary between myself and the following: June 15 Alan Richman and Collette Penne June 16 Jim Wilson June 24 Alan Richman July 8 Jim Wilson July 14 Board of Appeals July 15 Jim Wilson July 19 Planning and Zoning Commission July 25 (Submit for Building Permit) It is to Alan, Collette, and Jim's credit that the project in 6 weeks time was able to navigate through requirements of GMP, HPC, View Plane, and code -related Board of Appeals issues. However, in one area I was led up a "blind alley". Let me describe this. In my first meeting with Alan we discussed the "interior garden" as an area exempted from Floor Area and floor area uses, permanently. He instructed me that this was not Planning's function to compute Floor Area, but rather the Building Department's, and that if Jim Wilson had no problem with exempting it, neither would he. The day following Jim looked at and approved this idea. In three subsequent meetings with Jim and Alan to examine the progfessprints, nothing was said to the contrary. Now, it seems, all parties are content to disown their involvement. This leaves me looking rather foolish in the eyes of my client, and worse, leaves my client in a position of extreme hardship. He has spent significantly for architectural and engineering plans, and has received bids and (earlier today) signed a Contract for Construction with the successful bidder. I'm sure you understand the added costs of redoing plans, rebidding, and delays. Sunny, I urge you to do the honorable and courageous thing, and to stand by the previous direction given me by your department. Thank you for your consideration. AtrulF. son, Y/AI 203 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN. COLORADO B1611 303/925 596E • L Mr. Sunny Vann, Continued DFG/fh Encl. : meeting notes xc: Jim Wilson Charles Israel Lennie Oates August 9, 1983 GIBSON & R • EN� ARCHITECTS GALF=NA STR ET / ,"'= f ;N, C-U-C)RA00 i111(511 �K' Q-7Z/1--Y 3 -7n�fU Sux�' ScodP 5�1�; l • • GIBSON r,- RENO - AI=,,CHITECT: - &UALF'.N-1 TrO T n:�;-r N, CULORADO all EE77NG wW v'"i� Gt/Iv.�x1 )G5- - gin-7:V OAJ140 -1 ftVD LeICZ- 6v,�100,e L4-;r-DUr- ,; Dr- A?25507- ` 7a 7-AM-5 ARCA Z, 0K -/Z5' 71ZEAP7r AReA• Ale-OeJHD 4Url"W Ctg�q r, Lone- A-s TW/S A-)(Ze�4 79 �� or 7xz,-,ic. z,) NAY A7�7ep 4bog-;�; HCZ271) RATME�e- V/50W rcn� p4r-.04,01-mi ,�0567D t BUD JYh(l !,✓ice 1AJFeK4jV4"-y d1s6e-Is5 /r 7#5--&AkD ��b'Usfi-�r�mT 6V ,¢. u • Aspen/Pitk,p Planning Office 130 south lgalena' street aspen�..�.o: orado 81611 June 24, 1983 Mr. Dave Gibson Gibson and Reno Architects 203 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81612 Dear Dave, r ("I,— ►, , I.VI I'.' �r) v•-i'�: L J Iv8 This letter is to confirm the understanding we reached today regarding the minor amendments you have made to the design of the second floor addition to the Red Onion. You indicated to me that you had replaced the proposed sunscoop with an innovative "skylid" form of a skylight. Underneath this skylight will be a garden amenity not originally shown in the design reviewed by P & Z during the 1981 allocation of a GMP quota. You also indicated to me that due to the FAR calculations concerning the garden amenity, you had some additional flexibility in the design of the offices. You have therefore moved the front portion of the building forward by four feet. This change will still leave the facade of the addition approximately 15 feet back from the edge of the lower floor and will not increase the FAR for the entire building beyond the allocation of 2565.5 square feet. My feeling regarding these changes is that they are minor, generally con- sistent with your original approval, and need not be rescored by P & Z as per section 24-11.7 (b) of the Code. However, since you will be going before P & Z on July 19 for your View Plan Special Review, I suggest that we mention the changes which we have approved so that the public trust in the process can be served. I hope that my comments are in line with your conclusions as to our meeting today. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Alan Richman, Assistant Director cc: Colette Penne Jim Wilson, Building Inspector • • MEETING NOTES GIBSON lam. RENO • ARCHITECTS DATE: PROJECT: 9E�, L2 D& / / _ Od PRESENT: NOTES: COPIES TO: t�I• � ter!/ • .r � � mm 203 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORAOO 81611 303/S2S B.` RO ILE • • MEETING NOTES GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS DATE: PROJECT:�TIME: PRESENT: COPIES TO: liO;W''liT ilk ,sue. fi it li-W 203 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORA00 81611 303 / 925 5968 • PHONE MEMO GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS PROJECT: PuE�D_ DATE: �3 TALKED WITH: L77H l�(jj��xj� OF: �j TIME: REGARDING: ✓ . /i • I • .r51111.. �� ✓ ra/. .i[ _L. r% fitn' L AZ DECISIONS MADE: FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: 4!tv� r -sus 4c__ PC., COPIES TO: �f�.�L-FS ��u�T� BY: 203 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO G9Gll 303/925 5966 PHONE MEMO GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS PROJECT: AE�p.. .. • i% /^3 OF - TALKED WITWA4A-1 ZL:4]x /• .REGARDING: J_f r • :► rl.�. ► J� • . war w m FA w1m CwA1,0o- OG1Gr//K�Jtl/'�r ¢ OBI/ FAWF-/ � � � �- • � `tom .�/ 4/ i. LOW DECISIONS FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED:/, S&AY et `el7f::,L AS 2. 112 COPIES TO: LT �/ LEj�/y� ,�/N BY: 203 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORAOO 81611 303/9255966 PHONE MEMO GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS PROJECT: l0�0 inN /V AI 19F7F_r ES DATE: 3 TALKED WITH: OF: TIME: 4 / ' REGARDING: .�1 % iI .•� NOTES: �1 MR-. - . 'iAv'ff'v: DECISIONS MADE: FOLLOW-UP ACTION REQUIRED: J�/�j�y CLP� O PPDC t/ COPIES TO:!�.L j �✓Y Z*21,- BY: 203 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 61611 303/925 596B Aspen/Pitkin f. 130 south galena street aspen, e®lorado 81611 MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney ✓ Dan McArthur, City Engineer Jim Markalunas, City Water J Stogie Maddalone, City Electric ✓ Heiko Kuhn, Aspen Metro Sanitation Herb Paddock, Fire Marshal/Building Department FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office RE: The Red Onion Addition - 1982 Growth Management Competition - Commercial - City of Aspen DATE: October 51 1981 The attached application is one of three competing in -this year's Commercial Growth Management competition. These applications are scheduled to be reviewed and scored by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on November 3, 1981; therefore, may I please have your written comments concerning this proposal no later than Friday, October 16,1981? Please include sufficient information in your comments to allow me to address those points relating to your area of expertise and to allow the Planning Office to score them for the GMP competi- tion. Thank you for your assistance. 130 south oalOna street aspen, eulor2(10 81611 MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney Dan McArthur, City Engineer Jim Markalunas, City Water Stogie Maddalone, City Electric Heiko Kuhn, Aspen Metro Sanitation Herb Paddock, Fire Marshal/Building Department FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office RE: The Red Onion Addition - 1982 Growth Management Competition - Commercial - City of Aspen DATE: October 5, 1981 The attached application is one of three competing in this year's Commercial Growth Management competition. These applications are scheduled to be reviewed and scored by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Comilission on November 3, 1981; therefore, may I please have your written comments concerning this proposal no later than Friday, October 16, 1981? Please include sufficient information in your comments to allow me to address those points relating to your area of expertise and to allow the Planning Office to score them for the GMP competi- tion. Thank you for your assistance. t PX0P6sCr,, Oft %Hr n �1/1Rom,..Pn FJc. SA-^.IrArfo- � c f--Ic/_ /3 `I /L d A I a a.- 6-- A-J 7N� ^f b /j o^t,, . • SACHS KLEIN & SEIGLE • JEFFREY H.SACHS HERBERT S. KLEIN JON DAVID SEIGLE JAMES H. DELMAN City of Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Attn: Allan Richman ATTORNEYS AT LAW 201 NORTH MILL STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 October 1, 1981 TELEPHONE (303 ) 926-8700 Re: City of Aspen Growth Management Plan Applications/ Chris Tolk for Red Onion Property Dear Allan: You have requested confirmation that Christopher Tolk has full authority to submit and process a Growth Management Plan application for the upper floors of the Red Onion Building. At the present time Mr. Tolk has an option to acquire that property and pursuant to that option agreement the owners of the Red Onion property, Red Onion Investors, a Colorado general partnership, have granted Mr. Tolk full right and authority to process a Growth Management Plan application in the form submitted. In order to verify the above, below you will find the signature of Charles Israel, the managing partner of Red Onion Investors certifying to the accuracy of the representa- tions contained in this letter. If you need any additional information in order to confirm this fact, please notify me so that we may immediately provide you with such material. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, SACHS, KLEIN & SEIGLE By q Herbert S. Klein HSK/jeb I hereby certify that I am the managing partner of the Red Onion Investors, a Colorado general partnership, and confirm the truth of the statements contained herein with respect to the authority of Christopher Tolk to process a Growt1i Management P n application for our property. CTFa-r-T—e- srae Asj)en/XI,I'-P*,tkIk-,Planning Office 130 south galena street aspen, colorado 81611 MEMORANDUM TO: Paul Taddune, City Attorney Dan McArthur, City Engineer Jim Markalunas, City Water Stogie Maddalone, City Electric Heiko Kuhn, Aspen Metro Sanitation Herb Paddock, Fire Marshal/Building Department FROM: flan Richman, Planning Office RE: The Red Onion Addition - 1982 Growth Management Competition - Commercial - City of Aspen DATE: October 5, 1981 The attached application is one of three competing in this year's Commercial Growth Management competition. These applications. are scheduled to be reviewed and scored by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on November 3, 1981; therefore, may I please have your written comments concerning this proposal no later than Friday, October 16, 1981? Please include sufficient information in your comments to allow me to address those points relating to your area of expertise and to allow the Planning Office to score them for the GMP competi- tion. Thank you for your assistance. ..:�4 r. -� I ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT �;areiv r r �'i KIN CO. PLANNING OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: ALAN RICHMAN-PLANNING FROM: JIM MARKALUNAS SUBJECT: THE RED ONION ADDITION-1982 GMP-COMMERCIAL-CITY OF ASPEN DATE: OCTOBER 16, 1981 As indicated on Page lAa: Water Systems, water is available from a 6" main located in Cooper Street and is of adequate pressure and quantity to supply the proposed use. Growth Management Review Checklist City of Aspen Engineering Department Revised January 31, 1980 Project Name 4 p l! Address `1`7n 6 . Owners Attorney/Agent/Representative Address z�j Reviewed by N Date I. Residential Application (sectio 24-14.4) A. Public Facilities & Servi es O - Infeasible to provid 1 - Major deficiency 2 - Acceptable (standa d) 3 - No forseeable def ' iencies * Water ( 3 pts.) Capacity of system or proposed needs without facility upgrade at public xpense. * Sewer (3 pts.) Capacity witho t system upgrade. Storm Dra iny�ge (3 pts.) Adequate d- posal of surface runoff. Parking esig n (3 pts.) Off str et parking, visual, paving, safety, and convenience. Roa -..*(3 pts.) Cap city of road system to handle needs without altering tr ffic patterns or overloading streets or requiring more ma ntenance. Page 2 `Growth ManAgement R*ew Checklist • B. Social Facilities and Ser�"ces O - Requires new serv�de at pub lic expense 1 - Existing service adequate 2 - Project improvp.,t quality of service Public Transpgf'tation (2. pts.) 2 - On ex' Ling route. 1 - With'n 520 feet of route. 0 - Not near service area. Paths Linked to Trail System (2 pts.) Design Features for Handicapped (2 pts.) II. Commercial and office Development Application (section 24-11.5) A. Quality of Design 0 - Totally deficient 1 - Major flaw 2 - Acceptable 3 - Excellent _ Site Design (3 pts.) Quality and character oflandscaping, extend of under - grounding of utilities, and effic ency, safety, and privacy of circulation. " / < < , z /�, �Ya rr' QV'a e'l Ci �/ flti ,�C2?C y �` r `Si07( � ��iC � � n� Co -tin C i o-� ���C�ut- � � bt,c►: l� P u'� �o mo,r� � ti`�'�t-✓t �n�{ Eh� - e E�c . �;�iv� aG)�` o.-e.�,,�,�� Amenities (3 pts. ) I Q�� Usable open spac pedestri n and icycleways. l�sCQ�'Y`L 11 1 1 I CJYi� l l Lt)k7Ji)C P P P r Tr sh and utility access areas. 3 pts.) % Nl;?e �� Pr/ �a4e a aAZoL iS � t1" M ro v �1rat G DLO acre-, J;s III.Lodge Development,Applicati�sIt ion 24-1.6) A. Public F o' sties and Services (same as residential) F�age 3 Growth Management Re0w Checklist E B. Social Facilities and Ser ices 0 - Requires new servic� at public expense. 1 - Existing service adequate. 2 - Project improves juality of service. Public Transportat}/on (6 pts.) 6 - Abuts transiwithin 520 feet of lift. 4 - Within 520 f,et of bus route and lift. 2 - Within 520 feet of bus route or lift. C. Quality of Design Site Design (3 pts.) _ Ameniti�s (3 pts.) Visu1 Impact (3 pts.) Sale and location as it affects public views of scenic areas. YC formance to Policy Goals (3 pts.) R duction of parking in coordination with limosine service 1 pt.). imo with regular service per 25 guests (1 pt.). Prohibition of employee parking on site (1 pt.). IV. Zoning (All applications) Zone c_ NS - Not Sufficient NA - Not Applicable NR - No Requirement Required Actual t� Lot Area Mc"X'1 Lot Area/Unit 74F, Lot Width Front Setback Side Setbacks Rear Setback - % f t v ZSxIOn f0 �In1. Page 4 Growth Management R*ew Checklist • e Required Actual Maximum Height 0 !2nK Building Dist. ��� ✓ Bldg. Sq. Footage Open Space _--Z�— �- 64o External F.A.R. Internal F.A.R. V. Possible further review of proposed project (All applications) Subdivision Exemption Exception C��c Y�,z Coyp Stream Margin J View Plane E1t(fiGL('f'QCI C� %'�o * Areas to be checked by this department and potential deficiencies pointed out to the appropriate authority. Otherwise no comment to be made in the Engineering Department memo. al • Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 south galena street aspen`, colorado_'81611 June 24, 1983 Mr. Dave Gibson Gibson and Reno Architects 203 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81612 Dear Dave, This letter is to confirm the understanding we reached today regarding the minor amendments you have made to the design of the second floor addition to the Red Onion. You indicated to me that you had replaced the proposed sunscoop with an innovative "skylid" form of a skylight. Underneath this skylight will be a garden amenity not originally shown in the design reviewed by P & Z during the 1981 allocation of a GMP quota. You also indicated to me that due to the FAR calculations concerning the garden amenity, you had some additional flexibility in the design of the offices. You have therefore moved the front portion of the building forward by four feet. This change will still leave the facade of the addition approximately 15 feet back: from the edge of the lower floor and will not increase the FAR for the entire building beyond the allocation of 2565.5 square feet. My feeling regarding these changes is that they are minor, generally con - sistent with your original approval, and need not be rescored by P & Z as per section 24-11.7 (b) of the Code. however, since you will be going before P & Z • on July 19 for your View Plan Special Review, I suggest that vie mention the changes which we have approved so that the public trust in the process can be served. I hope that my comments are in line with your conclusions as to our meeting today. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Alan Richman, Assistant Director cc: Colette Penne Jim Wilson, Building Inspector • E k_= GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS Aspen/Pitkin Planning Department 130 South Galena Aspen, Co. 81611 RE: FLOOR AREA OF RED ONION OFFICES Dear Alan : August 9, 1983 17' , AUG I C 1983 pSPENJ Pi TWIN Co- p� In response to your request today for floor area assumptions on our proposed Second Level Offices Addition to the Red Onion, Basic Rectangle 46.7' X 60.5' = 2825 SF North Stair, 4' X 8' = 32 SF South Stair 4' X 10' _ ( 40 ) SF Garden (deed -restricted) 6.7' X 2 7' 6.7' X 11 ' _ (255 ) SF 2562 SF (Allowable is 2565.5 SF) Our intention, as we have previously discussed, is to deed restrict the "Garden Area" on the condominiumization papers and subsequent Plat to be forever used for this purpose and no other. As such it is an extension of the Passive solar system, retaining heat in the winter through its considerable added mass, and acting as a 'air humidification system' on a year -around basis. I believe this idea deserves favorable consideration, and I appreciated your initial favorable response, and Jim's, to the idea. I am also enclosing a letter I wrote to Jim Wilson describing some of the square footage parameters, and how the numbers were computed. Please let me know if you need anything else. Ve Truly Yo s David F. son, AIA DFG/fh xc: Jim Wilson Sunny Vann Charles Israel 203 S.GALENnpSTF1EETeS ASPEN. COLORADO 61B11 303/925596B �L== GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS July 27, 1983 Mr. Jim Wilson Aspen/Pitkin County Building department 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Red Onion Offices Dear Jim; I thought these square footage take -offs might be of use to you (or to whomever is doing the plan check). I know how difficult it sometimes is to get "up to speed" on what has been approved to be built. In this case, the Red Onion Offices were approved in 1981 as a 2,565.5 square foot addition to the second level above Stephan Kaelins at 413 East Cooper. This brings the floor area up to its code -allowable level. Since the areas must be so closely figured, I have submitted to you my plan with gross square footage calculations for the addition. Measurements are made on a "gross" basis; i.e., to property lines, to the outside of exterior walls, to the center of interior divisions. I have counted the stairways as additional footage wherever there is usable area below. However, where the stairs create dead space below which cancels out presently usable floor area, they are excluded. Also excluded from floor area is the permanent "Garden Area" as per our discussions of July 8th and June; 1.6, 1983. The total added gross area comes to 2,562 square feet (or 3.5 under the maximum allowable). I hope this is helpful. Please forward this information to the proper person if you are not doing the plan check. Tha you, David F. Gibson, A.I.A. DFG/fh xc: Charles Israel Mort Heller Pat Hunter Encl. 203 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORAOO 61611 1- -.�_r ) ASP N `i;� _ . r.�lhrr�t�)N CO. r) FFr,, F 303,1925 5968 MEETING NOTES GIBSON & RENO • ARCHITECTS DATE: PROJECT: i�_��� O�_ Z �I TIME: NOTES: e'3 f� - A-�/" &// L,-5c> l,/ Z,/ • e';;"> . C ,-i,�1�97-FOPS iI _ ► t7 kAf. 4F, -PAW VA �►AWS, _...�� 1L — 1 203 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO B1611 303/925 596E MEETING NOTES GIBBON KENO • ARCHITECTS DATE: -3 PROJECT: / Q TIME: �Jd PRESENT: •l_%J� I1%��j� N_ �'lV�/ � ♦ �/L '�-�i COPIES TO:3-3by ,�i�J�/�3�2,��f��/. aY 203 S. GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORAOO 61611 303/925 596E • • MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office RE: 1982 Office - Commercial GMP Applications DATE: October 29, 1981 Introduction: Attached for your review are project profiles for three office - commercial GMP applications submitted on October 1 of this year and the Planning Office's recommended points allocation for each application. The three applications under consideration are as follows: 1. The Red Onion Addition (414 E. Cooper Avenue) 2. A Garden Office Building (615 E. Hopkins Avenue) 3. The City Plaza Building (517 E. Hopkins Avenue) A copy of each application has also been provided to you for your review purposes. Quota Available: The available quota for this year is based on the provisions of Section 24-11.8 (Building Inspector reports to Planning Office on commercial -office construction during previous year), 24-11.5(e) (unallocated allotments may be distributed during later years), and 24-11.7(a) (expired allotments shall be added to available allotments). The Planning Office has done a careful survey of previous years' allocations and the rate at which they have been built. We find that based on the five previous competitions, there is a total of 24,324 square feet of space which was unallocated or expired from previous years. Of course, this year an additional 24,000 square feet is available, for a total of 48,324 square feet available in this year's competition. However last year, you did award a bonus of 6,000 square feet which we would strongly recommend that you offset this year by a corresponding reduction in available space. Summarizing then, the total quota for this year is as follows: Quota unallocated or expired from previous years 24,324 Quota available for 1982 24,000 Bonus to be offset this year - 6,000 Total available for 1982 42,324 We believe that based on the extraordinary amount of office and commercial development we have recently been witnessing that you should not even consider using the 6,000 square feet bonus for this year. Should you find it necessary to award in excess of 24,000 square feet this year, it should be awarded from the previously unallocated or expired quota. The total quota request for this year is as follows: 1. The Red Onion Addition - 2,565.5 square feet 2. A Garden Office Building - 9,656 square feet 3. The City Plaza Building - 15,300 square feet Total 27,521.5 square feet Memo: 1982 Office - Commercial GMP Applications Page Two October 29, 1981 Process: The Planning Office will make a brief presentation to you on November 3 to explain the GMP procedures and to provide you with a suggested assignment of points to each application. Next, each of the applicants should be given 15 minutes to present their proposal to you. A public hearing will be held to allow interested citizens to comment. At the close of the hearing each commission member will be asked to score the applicants' proposals. To ensure a reasonable comparison of the relative merits of each application, the Planning Office suggests that .all applications be scored at once on a category -by -category basis. The total number of points awarded by all members, divided by the number of members voting, will constitute the total points awarded to the project. Please note that a project must score a minimum of 60 percent of the total points in categories 1 and 2, amounting to 14.4 points, and a minimum of 30 percent of the points available in eacn category 1 and 2 to meet the basic competitive requirements. Applications which score below these thresholds will no longer be considered for a development allotment and the application will be considered denied. Remember that bonus points cannot be used to bring an application over this minimum threshold, but can affect the final ranking of the applications for the purposes of awarding the allotments. All of the projects, should they receive a development allotment, will require additional review procedures. Employee housing units constructed as part of a Commercial GMP project are subject to the approval of the City Council upon the recommenda- tion of the Planning and Zoning Commission, as are employee parking requirements. Similarly, requests to utilize the FAR bonus available in the Commercial zone district must also be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Finally, two of the projects will require condominiumization review and approval by P & Z and City Council and one will require a view plane special review. All of these procedures will be accomplished subsequent to an applicant's receipt of a develop- ment allotment. Planning Office Ratings: The Planning Office has assigned points to each of the applica- tions as a recommendation for you to consider. We have rated the applications both objectively, on their own merits in comparison to each criteria, and relatively, by comparing the positive and negative features of each proposal to the other. The following table is a summary of the Planning Office analysis and ratings for the three projects. A more complete explana- tion of the points assignment for each criterion is shown on the attached score sheets, including rationales for the ratings. 1 2 3 4 Community Quality Commercial Previous Bonus Total Applications of Design Uses Performance Points Points 1. The Red Onion Addition 11 3 0 0 14 2. A Garden Office Building 15 5 0 0 20 3. The City Plaza Building 18 5 0 0 23 Memo: 1982 Office - Commercial GMP Applications Page Three October 29, 1981 As can be seen, two projects, A Garden Office Building and the City Plaza Building, :-!bstantially exceed the minimum competitive threshold of 14.4points while one project, The Red Onion Addition, falls just below the minimum points total. The two applications which qualify for allocations are requesting a total of 24,956 square feet of commercial space this year. While this total slightly exceeds the 24,000 square feet which are available, it would appear reasonable to obtain the small excess of space by using previously unallocated quota, particularly since these two projects both score so highly (83% and 96% of the available points in categories 1 and 2). Planning Office Recommendation: Based on the analysis contained within the attached score sheets, the Planning Office recommends that P & Z concur with our recommended point assignments and effectively approve the Garden Office Building and City Plaza Building projects while denying The Red Onion Addition. The Planning Office further recommends that P & Z recommend to City Council that a quota of 24,956 square feet be awarded this year by using this year's 24,000 square foot quota and by carrying over only 956 square feet unallocated or expired from previous years, thereby awarding 15,300 square feet to the City Plaza Building and 9656 square feet to the Garden Office Building. Finally, the Planning Office recommends that P & Z recommend to City Council that the remaining 23,368 square feet which was unallocated or has expired not be carried over to next year. We believe that it is appropriate at this time to "wipe the slate clean" on the commercial quota, since we will be formu- lating new quotas for new zones next year, and particularly since we have recently been experiencing exceptionally high office and commercial growth rates, both due to projects in the CC and C-1 zones which have competed under the GMP and because of those in the 0 and 14C zones which have previously been exempt from competition. MEMORANDUM • TO: Alan Richman, Planning Office FROM: Jay Hammond, Engineering Department RE: 1982 Growth Management Competition DATE: October 20, 1981 Having reviewed the three submissions competing for 1982 Commercial allocations and visited the proposed sites, the Engineering Department has a number of comments. The application for a Garden Office Building, the City Plaza Buil- ding, and the Red Onion Addition were reviewed with particular attention to those areas under Municipal Code Section 24-11.5, b., pertinent to this depart- ment as well as areas identified as warranting comment at this, the first step in the development process. What follows is an outline of concerns relative to each application along with attached copies of our G.M.P. checklist. 1. The Red Onion Addition - 420 E. Cooper (mall) a. This application is for an addition to an existing structure currently undergoing remodel. As a result of the "existing" status of the lower level, the proposal does little to provide additional amenities com- plimentary to the mall. It should further be noted that the proposed trash/utility area does not comply with current code within the zone and in fact has been further reduced in size during the course of the remodel by the architect and the contractor. b. The applicant should be required to relocate all utility pedestals and meters to the protected trash and service area. c. The proposal creates no new open space. d. The Wheeler Opera House View Plane would appear to be encroached by the proposed sun scoop. 2. The City Plaza Building - 517 E. Hopkins a. This application probably represents the best of the three in terms of pedestrian accommodation and compliance with trash and utility area needs. b. The applicant should be required to relocate the existing phone pedestal to the protected trash and service area. c. Credit should be given for the design's compliance with the north/south pedestrian route in the Gage Davis' Streetscape Guidelines. 3. A Garden Office Building - 615 E. Hopkins a. This application is also excellent in terms of open space, amenities, I 1982 Growth Management COARtition • October 20, 1981 PAGE TWO pedestrian and bicycle access. b. The submission is confusing, however, with respect to the proposed trash and utility area. The application on the one hand claims an area in excess of the code requirement to accommodate its own trash and utilities as well as the trash of the adjacent Grasthof Eberli. On the other it shows a sketch of an undersized (10' x 19') area and roughly 1300 square feet of landscaped open space for which credit is taken elsewhere in the application. c. The applicant should be required to relocate the phone pedestal currently in the alley into the protected trash and service area. d. Credit should be given for the extensive (and expensive) underground parking proposed by the design. Confirmation should be obtained regarding availability of service from both the City Water Department and the Aspen Sanitation District for all three projects since letters are not included in the applications. Ll • PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT: Red Onion Addition DATE: October 28, 1981 1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating 2 Comment: Addition is generally compatible in size and height to the Aspen Sports Building next door and provides for continued dominance of the main existing historic building. b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating 2 Comment: Open space cannot be provided at the ground level, but by setting the second story back from the existing building,a landscaped deck and usable roof have been created. c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating 3 Comment: Insulation to exceed Code provisions, use of insulating glass and skylights "sunscoop" to provide concentrated heat and diffuse natural light to the building. d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating 2 Comments: Usable open space for building residents only provided through the sundeck at the front and the outdoor roof deck at the rear of the building Project will enhance the viability of the Cooper Street mall. e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating 1 Comments: The visual impact from the mall will be minimal due to the 24-25 foot setback of the addition from the front of the existing building. However, the Engineer states that "the Wheeler Opera House View Plane would appear to be encroached by the proposed sunscoop" f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating 1 Comments: The Engineer states that "the proposed trash/utility area does not comply with current Code within the zone, and, in fact, has been further reduced in size during the course of the remodel by the arthitect and the contractor.. Subtotal 11 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community's residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) 0 • a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating 0 Comment: The applicant does not propose any employee housing on or off site. b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating 3 Comment: The occupant of the addition will be Reese Henry and Associates, a local accounting firm providing local professional services._ Subtotal 3 3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Rating 0 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded.) BONUS POINTS 0 Comment: The project is only eligible for bonus points if it scores_ 14.4 points in categories in categories 1 and 2. 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2 14 Points in Categories 3 and 4 0 TOTAL POINTS 14 Name of P & Z Member Planning Office (3) (minimum of 14.4points needed to be eligible in competition) PROJECT PROFILE 1982 COMMERCIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMISSION 1. Applicant: Red Onion Investors 2. Project Name: The Red Onion Addition 3. Location: Lots N, 0 and P, Block 89, City and Townsite of Aspen (414 East Cooper) 4. Parcel Size: 9,027 square feet 5. Current Zoning: CC Commercial Core 6. Maximum Allowable Buildout: 7. Existing Structures: 18,054 square feet, at an FAR of 2.0:1 10,975 square feet in the Red Onion Building 8. Development Program: 2,565.5 square feet for a total of 13,540_5 square feet on the site, an FAR of 1 5•l The applicant proposes to build a second story where there is now a vacant space in the Red Onion Building. 9. Additional Review Requirements: Wheeler Opera House View Plane Special Review, final approval from HPC 10. Miscellaneous: This proposal is a relatively low impact addition to an existing building rather than a proposal to build an entirely new building on a vacant lot. The applicant has received conceptual approval for this addition from HPC. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT: DATE:—T-rJ4,4- 1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. . Rating 3 Comment: b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating_ � Comment: c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating_ Comment: • d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating Comments: I n%/a..,, el. ,O &IJ.&CAC 6% e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating_ � Commef4 nts: *t 11 N f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating Comments: nk Yjt/1 ` h 4 t Subtotal i 7 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community's residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating__ Comment: b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Ratin g Comment: Subtotal_ 3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Ra t i n g_-C)— 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded.) BONUS POINTS_ Comment: &CA &A4SJ _ LOW 0�h ........... At4u dee k 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and (minir.um of 14.4points needed to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 3 TOTAL POINTS_Jn�7!1 Name of P & Z Member 0) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT: DATE:U' 1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating Comment: b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the.extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating Comment: c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating Comment: d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating Comments: e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating Comments: f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating X Comments: Subtotal 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 poi-nts). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - In a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community's residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) 0 • a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating Comment: b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating ' Comment: 2- Subtotal 3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Rating 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded.) BONUS POINTS Comment: ; 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2--k—/_ Points in Categories 3 and 4 TOTAL POINTS Name of P & Z Member —4�—d (3) (mi ninum of 14.4 points needed to be eligible in competition) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION —� 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT: DATE: 1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating Comment: �� � /G4( �(,G1i)l�ua� b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating Comment: c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. 2 Rating Comment: d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. e_�, Rating L Comments: e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating l/ Comments: f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating Comments Subtotal l �� 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within -the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community's residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) 0 • a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating_ Comment: b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating Comment: .n, Subtotal_ 3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Rating (� 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded.) BONUS POINTS Comment: 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2� (mininum of 14.4points needed to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 O TOTAL POINTS iO Name of P & Z Member —, L is (3) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT: C� dw_)\Cp�_7 C Env nC) _ DATE: 11 3 g 1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. . Rating Comment: lti1�`IYI��IY`n► �Q.�'1 C�YI S C � `i�A15 j r !J • �� J1♦ b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rati ng 2— Comment: c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating 3 Comment: 3 • • d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating 2 Comments: e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating Comments: f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating Comments: Subtota l 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community's residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating O Comment: b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating Comment: Subtotal 3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Rating O 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded.) BONUS POINTS L Comment: N4,Y:s � m ►1I�i Q.I. �C , 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2-1 (minir;umof 14.4points needed to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 O TOTAL POINTS O Name of P & Z Member J�s�'i��� ire (3) • PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT:�ili�, ( �_",�` *�y1• DATE: l 1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating t_ Comment: b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating_ Comment: c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating_ Comment: n d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating_ Comments: e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating_ Comments: f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Comments: Rating__ Subtotal Iq 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community's residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) • LJ a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating_ Comment: b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating_ Comment- Subtotal 3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Rating_ 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded.) BONUS POINTS „Z Comment: I /-1i// _ .C- ,= 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2 j Y (mininum of 14.4 points needed to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 "Z- TOTAL POINTS. Name of P & Z Member 4 • u PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS i PROJECT: v' c/u DATE: l �� 1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design 0 Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating J Comment: b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the.extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating Comment: c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating \3 Comment: d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating Z Comments: e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating 7 Comments: f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating Comments: Subtotal !G 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 poi•nts). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development will house its employees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community's residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) 9 • a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating 0 Comment: b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating_ Comment: Subtotal J 3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Rating 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded.) BONUS POINTS Comment: ` n T �..�`t"ac'� �' j ✓� � dam'_ 5� i �cc �' 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2 lC (mininum of 14.4points needed to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 TOTAL POINTS Name of P & Z Member (3) • PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION 1982 COMMERCIAL GMP APPLICATIONS PROJECT: �� �/ NiG.c� �C���d� DATE : Zj '' 1. Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 18 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design Rate the following features accordingly: a. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN - Considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating -7 Comment: b. SITE DESIGN - Considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangements of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating Comment: c. ENERGY - Considering the use of insulation, passive solar orienta- tion, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating Y Comment: 0 d. AMENITIES - Considering the provision of usable open space and pedes- trian and bicycle ways. Rating -! Comments: e. VISUAL IMPACT - Considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating_ Comments: f. TRASH AND UTILITY ACCESS AREAS - Considering the quality and effi- ciency of proposed trash and utility access areas. Rating_ Comments: Subtotal 2. Community commercial uses (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider, with respect to construction and office space within the CC and C-1 zone districts, the uses which are to occupy the development and the extent to which the development_wi1L_hou_s_e_its_empinyees on site. The Commission shall evaluate the probability of its supplying commercial and office uses and housing to satisfy the needs of the residents of the community as opposed to being designed to accommodate the area's tourist needs and shall assign points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the community's residential population with only inci- dental tourist use and no tourist housing anticipated Rate the following features accordingly: (2) a. EMPLOYEE HOUSING - Considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating / S Comment: Ao b. MEDICAL AND OTHER SERVICE NEEDS - Considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating a Comment: Subtotal "�4. f)- 3. Applicant's Previous Performance - Any applicant who has been awarded a development allotment during a previous commercial competition and who, within two years from the date of submission of that application, has not submitted plans to the Building Department sufficient for the issuance of a building permit, shall receive up to minus five (-5) points unless the applicant demonstrates that for reasons of unusual hardship, such submission has not been possible. Rating — 4. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the points awarded above, maximum 5 points) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. (Note: Explanatory comment must be provided if bonus points are awarded.) BONUS POINTS Comment: 5. TOTAL POINTS Points in Categories 1 and 2 2q. `(mininumof 14.4points needed to be eligible in competition) Points in Categories 3 and 4 TOTAL POINTS Name of P & Z Member (3� Z O (N N CY] S N Z Q J Z Cl- O i4 F- F-- Z Q W U E O F- L.tJ J W Cu _J LL] Q Q S Z N Q V) Z J F- O Q O a ~ K tV C� J Q CL U la.J O U N 00 CT r av s 1 ., O M N M N lJ r r- 3 L O N N M N N N M O r- O •r E M N M N N N N r-- b 7 4- ro M M co N N .---I r O N O co co co N N M I'p J r L L M M : 7 N N M l0 r a_ J Q F- O F- m N � (N N � (V O V a--) Q Q p V1 C r O.�- CU r- �0 U d-> -0 N L C r0 E (3) :3 m n 01 C] + r to E T3 "� v rn o 4-) m >, 4 .— C •r •r r0 •r >> L a) S- C :3 tN +-) +3 U 4-) N CU N r0 O •r L •r C E •r L N W Q �• F- U �0 W N .7 O• r N LA CD O cl CL CL 111(7)I )Cl) Cl) =-1 i Lc,:)) I cyl N I am N J (V Q V)N F- W O F- CU m O r fN W N > F- O L Q N CU U V) r S- S- V) O C]. 41 7 E = C Q O �0 F- U O r a a O U •r r •r C CL V R E O U r- N Cn N Q) d F- W W S (/) J J i d Z W E W U` O d Z 4--) E �r S � F-- 3 c O O c.s � J O d -p U N 01-1 (Z W O F- U U W (V '7 00 O r d ai CD - s S= O a t r 3 S_ OCD CT O or - C O O E N r0 '7 «S O N O N O J O S" S_ OI U d I O U C rO E S- O S- W Cl- (A O rn r S_ > E n- O � g to +-J C cn 4 r s= C o r (O C- 4-- U p •r V1 r :3 Q C fV a O d m ca Cl. L; 0 co N M N N to O N d N W O (D W d U V) Z O d J d O a • • m = m m m = = = = m = = m = = = = Zz ~ �o -- o BOO !n0 ca UO CO Z �,,, a a c 4) ca Q c �Nn CI Q N >,c 073 �Q w � �a 3 a�JQ 30 W �(A �M -0 cc O cts0 3 W Q (nCD m r= m � m m m= ■r = m m m m m N m m Z N m N � _U c c Q N -J O C d 0 C E N a N U'y m co E °? 0 ay O'D c 0 a c�a °_ C� ..� °f�' _ °= E o C= cc �cj a�ip >�v o a) E c c� V �i �,m rn �UON2 44im�,:_ C 3Cwr-O0)ca 0 o 0 Vr- o f 0= "0=0 0= c E 'QfAWQ>� caE �3cncn��awUw Ewu �S m Wit_ aE a� av��� W d � N N CO LO LO N i+ D rn C y X N w E N J Z c C C O O � U OC W d U a� c ca C •' 11 i O N O O L O . N cC 8Na::a m 0 0— 0 wE:U- o a «. cU CT - 2-0 N TL ycr y-0W ' amCCU tWr— s NN0O C500x m OV - N o O AZZi =aQ=mwa-U)0 3 CQQ Q QQ Q QQ r m� m m m m = m m m m m m m = m r o c� � 0-0 o E cc-C �,a°, cco °c)°c) ` I- `a ' _ o C .. Y c0 L NY 3-0Y �,0 cn 0 3 L C o Q) a) to C >. co m C i t a) ca c0 (C O C N `. a) (D U'D = U a p - a o C U a) 3 .'rn� cnt E me h c`o a.o c '- co c 0 0 c 0 C N� U 0� C �� L Co C O n co c CO cn o p Y O a) = C U <n cn C E .x a O p C rn'3 O a) C a) >> C a) a) U Y "0 a) a) N C V C c�O Co p L OLY a N-L C 0 a) nw.�C•�.yoY L� n ocL.0 Ec�co v 0) a)cLc° oa co w, L --c cn C •• p .c '� U 0" .. N ca p° >, O 0 a) U C " a) C° t a) O a) N a m m o cn L >+ a) m °) c c U c� c 0'X � (D-L- M ~ 0--'0 V C Co cU0 (n a M r- N O Y 3 O .� y ate) Q) C O a) '� co O -X- O C m C E O > O L L c`nc0:?U L L) ca)E0Ep0)co0 L)); cn a) . ��°�o� aci�o� � �ac°immco�Y-C: Lott EE E3vs U- c U a)�aa�a �n0a) ro 30 -CE0 `C" y «: �; � u. •� U mc'3 Ya an i cn af°- ° `� actin E Q w? H v)c�o �? �a c 0 `� ( E a) E cz 3cVoc C]3-y rn cn -: G) L>> .. mp c�oa)� L 'C C C O 0) to 0 a) C C " Nvi U L U a) a) C (U p- w O C/% Ecccacc c!E tea) d p E LO a L=c°E`ncUo�0 o co M- d wZmOUc W a°i aci.0 = `� p _ = 3'0°°CM a) caUc3o.0o _ -0 Co fA X C .0 C C co 'j O N U O _M C Q) a) .O O t •V y Y C p ch ID c0OU t% c- C- a' •� w 3 y m > ai co 0 0 �� a��i E 0(n > `o n 0 Cs .N 3 E c ``) >, o cic rn N °) u°'i V o 0• a a3) ° o a) Y U w o V�a) a) a) _ c . r U C cc$ co O a . U ca 0 n c° C y C C i L pC O 3 a) cr .L C O a) - O p � 0 p m = a) o c° � N '� a) � a m � H Mn vi FL- 3 Q X O ns "' L X L O O x i o L ` U co >> > C �'a)ba c/i ►-OaD°� F- -j w a F- H 3 a- -M'0cn° a)O Y v V a) 010 - 10 0- ` 0 L'O i '° rna.�O 2NTcn -Oa3) Lcon U CU .C- a) L C 0 C L L -0E-0C r-cr m v ca O � v p.,- 'no a) cc 7 a)� a=E LLm O UCEL� ocUCo U--UO N =o'a)cO Em 06 oO3 pc 0- 3 a)f0 noa) CL 3 N� co a) Q ccu en 0 3 co a) a) Y CO c p 0(-) a) Q C w� YUc �Ua C O = cn o c-o 0� ? c o-�n o)� om °c y ��L° >� — L°.L70 Y o c 0- cca� m e ac) oa0 0 0 �.-'0 cL cc) -•c aa) cn'0 cCL C mQ >w cn- _ L N O° a c Q O N c0 LL i 0 C 3� (1) 3 �� o cn 3 cO - o U'=cr? a) c fl. O c� N rn� a�U-o °� Z N m yU E 0 o E Q. oho m co a) c°.r- 0 p � >,�'Co ac as co c: cuc�ocn�,..0.0--(1) _oa)0 O i°c3a) oE.v_0 c-n �oC�N�> ♦.. C) p O 7 p Y °) a p C°' cn C N .� cn O> a) •� n j >. c o w a) a) N c p j y N U a O a% L cn <o-C� a0�=tO'o-a- Ups c0 CO v) NL CD N E cO o ~ U a) 3 c .0 U >. 4) � 0 E 0 d O C C to Co a) L cn cc 0 o C m a) L 7 L y I O -c o act) jc - ao_ cn ( a) E-= oar C cc •a a) (n a) 7 0 C U a) c 7O C 7 U U X y CC a L _ cr 0 ,c m o 'c a) E a) Q Q cO 0 E cn a) ro 0fi)- Q E m cn a) a° a) L p cn .2 L U y " L L 0 ? 7 0 0v�a0 N+•��.L.. y 0 I-3c>oyo>cn y'ccacoz<>t-oo->,�a L W) C >,a) o cY0 v.Nw •�.. �.. c .. co co a) x 0 a°i m a) a) 3 ?C c-C C Q) a) O� :� y:-Y4.2 Nw y n co 62 E'0 a) a) ca 0 0 c N a)= a) co •��CO��c�-aOQ-0a)Ecc°c0m(D L•-L , .0= o �n c mL aoL- coo cO� V d ccoo,-QLm0 m.2 6E m2 c°�O oF°- o cUc~.a' (cnr-a Q( Et Q) E 0 Z D 0 M c °0 cr03 w CO " C -0 0-0 c aca a)._r O U U n`L°o"L3oca cmD w co _co 300-Y0 3 n c a) owe ca)a)CE,�O'Xco o E F- o a) C c C i a)cn m C co p a) co- co a) c 0� ate) a)co 0 - X Y p aai aa)a a)`c v ° E y coY n .0 c c Ernw • O a 0 • a) cc -0 a ca o E 0 0 0 caN)a)oa)53 ate L a) U .. a) cc " cc 0 ° � C C tO �a'C .-3 o L Y c° E o o c c 3 0'D Qo< a� O_ Lp _ EU a)N ca 0) cCY Y. c .0 o c U) 'N 3 aci - U co a) E cc a) o ax) 3 E c c E •o) = a)a)�COaa))E L..n o U..3 Eac � cn �- °3 32 o mo.0 r �r r� ri ■r r� r� rr rr �r rr �r r� it r� r� r� rr N cm 3(1)ai 0-a_cm rn= 0)cV)-- c ��� C. Ycca cy.c0 E o m N. co U) a)O � ) X� EPEE co tea) m �° a)a 0��� N cm C ` U) t w 3 L m a� a) ° C y U .r O L m O E C Y O m O OO- �� O L O a' C O O O) C m iLU C >. m j c WOai a-- oa)aY a)a oo -�-0 a) - cz 0)�.. vc N C mcaa) m rn in " a) ai O L 0 CD a) w e _c rn U E L m C a) L- a) aU _rn3 E.. oP E} ca y - O m U_ _� m a Y N 0 L �wO a3a cmLc �a0mYaXi0 L s `oU °-0 CO c° o)- ° `= 3 c E fort C c OOO m3--OmUE�;=ca0> W0N C cc L Y ac) .c 0 Z) c .`7. r- aa) Z 0 E v rn c°a a) L ti •� of m L m a C m C 3 0 a) m U N L m •� N y m°gym>�cEaa))N�ta)����Uca�>i 0 m m a) o H L '0 O ccaa c E L 0 C L a"i c 3 >� a O r-C L C CD ai �p o5Ovcn o-c m O 3 o m o o-0 o o« U)@ N° as a� ° a0 > -0 m c� aci o �°� i3 N �� U o 3 CO ° y w-C rn ca O ai aL O y O L a w �' C aL N U O 3 L a) a) °< ~ m x m~ E` ctm cCn-ao ccaa a Q F-0rna cnmm N0a)cn a� O�-C. T � >� ' D O m a) = 0) 3 a) -0 a) _ O O) a) c c' EY cn C �.c a)- a) coca c c o m m3� caOaO� c �o3UY a m " o c�:_ °E cn o a) a) y ca cav O> c� X �� 3L-0 0 m O cn M cca N °' c a' N =°° w C w O m a) aL 0 0 > `" C w -0 rL. a m + .> m C O r a) a) to m m O> w 0 O W to m 1 > L y = N cUa C a) L° w L m O ._ c 0 O 0 m C O O cYa - a) 0 0 y a` U Lim >. -- H.- 0 4) t m O cn C a to a= C N O �' m 3 L a Ec°�oa)E°° -'a - :3 0 m m U) 0 U 0 •0 . U N c _- E _ c w aa)a) `acna)cmom°'mo�'> c N �L a)LO� 3 o)E�- - O 0— m m -0 .- .. c is c u N� a) O m uai OC V D a) y t 'O �? t 0 O 0)v c aaca Cl - v,•. >E,� > (a C0 a° °L ac0i rn3 3� c ° c cc c E rn� ° Q)oL v a) c ° ° o)E cc N U O .0 a) = a) ° 4) L c L = L Q) O a� .02 0- (c0'0s 0� E.'- a) O� =0 0 O fn Y 0 m �� .L Y O c c�a U <a E L O m0 co > 0 cn N N N 3 0) 0 Y w to y a) U N Cc mz "L a) XL. a) am rnm c°a °o m E o: m o 0 3 W c ._�Y E-}cc- w Y 3 >,c � C �3U ma)Ocomcnmo�ma)oo a) » 3 L CoYU Q a« Cp C N Of y N v c m C C y Y a) >+ O) C m O C cn a) as- O C to ' a) 0 C a C >, O Y CO 0 �' O .N ° ` ca 'X �.6 0. a) 0 c0a C L > 0 0 «" cu y a) N a) m C c •= D) W p C j C m 3 _� m vi C��YOC--SL 00c- O a U a) m to O to —" m 0 a— a rn v N- ` a) N m C a) a) Y ui >. I c c c �- >, a) a) cm 0) a) a) _-0 O O �_ p` 0 L� U O r cC 0 0- O— L L c O c _ m 0 0 0 C= f. O U L + 0 0 m} .. m to D U omC_00 °) �c O m- ma.w c > > m.. > >.E �) ° O ac 3 `m c 3 ao > p `L � v-0 o aXi a) a) ° ° E we u) W 0o- a) E cn a `�� aY E 0 a0i w ° E L OCn.� Y y_> 0U Cn- C O.�C 'S C-0_0w L U O C 0 _ p O N cc >. 3 a w .., C O c C 3 m N <n O 0 0 •C- L p) U c a W m a) « C O .0 a) m m co m 0 L m c c m 3 a cr _p CD m 0- O a-D.- v c 0 C: C O� a y D E N Q U U C C a) N° cn cn ° N— 0 ._. •2 O N-0 L C C m-0 E Y U CV O �0 UmL�- O °)aaa))0 CO W cn - 0 W U O �«- a) � u0i L u0i .- O O E c a 0 U >. O p C 0.- WU �� E pw N m a) m�'m a> m 6 ° a) rno E o _ a) _° m a) M.. 0 c L m a) -- O O _O a) .. — . a) ` > UO . O g' r E a) O O ct m cZ o 0) aM c 3- m oL 3Y o-= C my a) °L x 3 >, j m c C -- O y Y C Z cn a) N m •' L a M = E 0) W e 0 Y 0 � 0� O 'C cac accL�O� c c u0i O- 3 m.N u0i r= 0 0 O a) a 0 m UO 0 m m .. 0o N cn U c c 0 0 a) E`3 a) a� ° °c)c 0� c)�Y c �o �L� c a) CD 0L �aca)aiai� C 0—a«a<� °ca we �cO�a) 0 U) a 0) U 0 ea a° .mc .X a) C6 a - t m c° p -C ate) .3 U is -N C c>, m J a)m a)m O ..0 U�=-EY w°coo L 0) y L w 0) r L ~ m L - 0 -0 O y E a) C T m a Y p O cc 3 c° Uc c _ m o�iY �U y£ a).0 Cv a- E- c 0 a) U O E c a O c�a (� 0« a c= Y V 3 a) ° 7 W O 0)_ O C N .. 0 _ -- Y a) U .. L .• D U .y Q) c-ivm� (Y a) 0 y a) 3a a`nio r 3 a):° cm c cn O� c O a---) 0 c a)o .. 'C o N.� °,c Ica Q a) a) 0 ac)_`� C N G c oaro•c UL UY ° _ .. E cQ c o C a� >. n� >.:- m +r a) a� rnO c c : cc t a) LL ioQ cc O E ��cac v Ea)°)�v .:«.' comcc? :� atf C w _M ° >` C a m .N .N ` a) Y is 0 a) C U u) >► -a a) a) _ a'c N m V c a) a0 o >>� C °)� CO ami E �rn a co ° °�a a) °) O t L a X c '� a O c U L c ai >. 0 a) a) "° a c j a) L CC U E c>a a a. H2..wcna)m W 0moF m>% U mEEW omLv, M 0 -0+' p m 0 p O'00 N `) O E o c c >. cco O O E •� 3> O 'O co E a) .• f0 — co ` 2 O co I co p 7 m C N0 0) C L o w> O 3 ~ C` O a O C m m N O C .0 Y-C o m 0 > m co — a co 12 O 0 L c ._ a) 0 O m . C -o e m u rn 0) O 0 CM :W :E CO O O a) 7 +r _c O cUv Y cYo j � a) _ 10 a) M N 15 c «- C C = C .0 = ca 0 0 a U a) - C E Q m j 0 co T CD to p m t a co 7 0 y 00 CO u0i C 'O y> 0 ? O CO L C co = Y > _ N 0 O U a) NUN d co V �_ C C t « C C l0 7 .0 co m 0) C C 7 Y C O= 0= O O co O C} (CO p. U N O 0 O C O O '' m co +• C 7« '. co ` C O `' co 7 U 0 E cti — U v •C y c -- m t a) O L- O C >. N ca N O , C co V_ O �_ -_ co 0' C O U E U 0 0 0-O cC mom, >> >.. m C c� mL�iR O E.. etc m a) c aY �°, mC0' m� o N coL E 0 a ccog > U U �� > I U c `-°�o�CO Om13)-a) D-�Uca"iQ)cat0o0�3a�icn>c� 0 m a) 0) . C 7 C 0 "- m E- C 0 0 ;;- m 0) m ca L L a) O CO (D c p C p m c wY 3 O� a) mow= �- N rn3v•°' 0)U m p v of c o E M- M :3 II �n m >, E O 0- a)-0 o a co C a .`_ «J co O O o (n a a) U >+ t 0 co Y s E O U L N 3 •m 7 t ` t. O c>C co co O O L m U C 7 U; a) a) 0 OY o c.�~ a)s tL c(m� o� �� E co � 3 cw Q)IL- c� } U 3 vi E c m� "= r� F o E b o c E a) W C coo 0 0 0 O O as E O +. C > a) a) cm +0 m O M O c`o a) W e s E -0 co U m . c�W a`r 3 °)v .0 Ca) �= c)- rnN N 3 -" c � c° c_ )= o �?� rn� rn Q o •� C 7 co E C aL+ : -0 O rL+ m DI C +' ,_� p Q C 'y am) C c�� �'�.0 E U 3 0 0 N c in -C c 3- 'N— c le ccr, 0 0-00 0 .0 co .S E'- N C m �. L C-0 C toy E YO U a) w C C m C a) >. U O C '5 O p O EO y ca 0 U 0)« p a CL N o a) m N O O 00 U= - a E > O O U _ _ ._ `-° a� Q) '= o O tYo 7 7 Q) Z Cr 0 co a) o f M U> 0.— ` C~ O a) N O Z C7 (ncc 0.3'ai< U m m'0 E a) m m aaaH a.E U2'co C.0 co a Q ch — 1 0 O C .- 3 C co •c—`0 °a) O C 0.> ate) �O�a:>a — p .- m 010 0 C co N «• O 0 U Y >,M M 0 w _) 7 a a)0a)co`-'E U a)U (n = (D i�L 0)>t U N 0) > •C O L C a) C •— U — m M co •0 i 0 Co N j 0 N C C U 0 O c .N « O C- rno.oaX)cc -E O C(D C(D� 7 to .� fo 4) U) t >` O a) U >� « C _ co (yo w 0 3 o O _� C U ca 0 co U U m M co L C C a «. 0 0 co y m c Y m rn_c "C=a.E>, co -- E v a) E Q 0'E w a)a)C = W U N _7 co - C"t ca U U coo E — co �_ co o m O 0) M a) a)Y co > >cn a) C� N m� � 3 >CM cl C-r -vte) c rn` —mo m o� 0 0- a)--s> 0 m rn� r � d t` QO — O N to CO ' — a) .0 ' o N � CV U N O CN 7 �M C) LO— t c0 co L p= U� Ou � � U O 0 C oo �aiviCi o N �j 3 v0i a°'i �' U ai o _� U= Q •C C�(n C U(n CT a C Ccco _ a) 3 O Yam' Z a)0oo 2-Oa) YD5 IL E 3 0 0) O os a)pr m O a)� 0 C c O C co_C C UY E 0 C 7 O 3 a) .0 a) t U 0 m rnca �0. "0 m a M > y m w co C y C_ a) C O M co •> > O 0 m�� _ O C_ (n i �� N... cnL '0 — U - LL O ._ >. Q a) a) a r= U O O C O O U O D a) '� E C LL L a J C C O) O 0 L C` O 0 U O = Q -0 .- i co t_ _ > C ~ X - r- cc U � � (n > -0 a) r C a � Y j, U � - 00) .— 7 C O C C a) I I 0 a C � O X O) .0 7 C Q) O co C c`Q X o O O z L- (n C O O C a) — coo � O - m C U= U V O N U Y U _ a0 - 7" C_ (z 0) C` 0. U N a L � i a.. 3 cLi cUo °_o< cco� ww =_ I - c cc ca c ns o aco co C N C O C m m C U 0 X J C 3 C a) O N M .W C UOi � O U a) cn U o m a) o .- Uo[ 0 EcriQ i a) rn� E E �? 0 0 cam° Q 0� N° o 0��. o a2 C -O" m c.--- Q -�.0 a) O NU a a) a) O ocD j vU «s c t O c v0i O' E ma)E" mt m C a) O �'0 � .- C C� C C aa) Q m o U LL (n Q H o o a) a) () C a) :. m U O— O..— C U m U m c0 •O >, O co i a) W 3 C a C 0 X m cu 0 D oL ��QL OL C— a) cwU QQ> = C Ccn 303 3 o co a)m � N L i Q H _d V Q ca co H M 0 L H �ccoocc6cL�voi a�i� c°cu'a nE0cnai>,.3a) ao� o f c.6�n -, v c 3 w c E Y � w L Q> N j m L Q) L V i co is co " co 3. Oco0Y UOYc cu c �� :. �.rn_c m�a) '5� s �o cc U aa)i E co a) O O Y >� rn CO) U L (� co 3 O a) a) cz Y `U3v�=aa)3 corns m a)Corn aa)a�10aa))co co c Yo0 a) cucn O :. cLioco .oL o cu c co n o,c V o° o o a`)i E o c (D x mo a� a) C L O a) O a) a) N0 (D >:(n rn3 3 `� c L ° co c=c c 3s�o a� o'0 0 a) c t� `n o E rn" oQ O �'- o m > >L Y � -- a) a) r- N p C c-0 a L C m >' a) n O a) cn L c a>) >. U co O y C� U C C a) J C L 'O rn o .0 a) -o L p Y L L •� p U U a)cn a) p ro L U Y a_ a V .> C Y a) C }, L uj c a) U L O C E p T C 3 C O co U Y N Y .LO U C .0 Q) .0 `' p p0 cC _ a) •— L a) ~! � cV � N L = a)- N O w Q U) y p) — cc 0) c i a) cm w p Q y a) as x xt '>. O ui - c c rn a) - � a) c c co L ,, a� °� a� c a o� °) �' a) cv" E cn C a o c >.� o ate" o E E L c vi m cn N a) u) U ` 0 N C a) O O CIOC = o a) ) to O a) — 0) p N — 7 o EYL a, a)} o ��0 a) w -�v C�� s - E c EHD c� c N o cc-0 -0 �.�'0 o �..-aa)i'0 o o <>u 3 ca N c O- c cn v cn cn a'a0-0co���ogot tcocr mcoco E��co���Q10) C aa) cc 0 CIO .. _� N - o O _ a) co c io . N co ` o O i U Y 0) 7 a) U M N "•' E 'L _0 E a) O co C cC D1 i O - 3 O C 0 0- co 0 0 7 O c_ O O E 3 y d co >+ i c r cn Y C C i t0 .O Y i L 3 N p) U a U a) L C a) p p y _ «. a) . _ cn c co E N N 01 L c .> U) O -O .� 7 cn 'O C -cn to a) >` E 3 E c a) O vNi Y O a) O p `O U C O a) aj N� O_ j U a) V O Y cn O ui C m o O 0� N C� a) U) O `� � N � C 3� C C C L a) � c� -_ C L >+ a a) a) E � in ' 7 V co X U a) in C co CI O O L Y .N O C) L w N L Q) co U > O L U O Q orn ro��,o��co a• -oU •_cn0coY33-� • • Eitn - a� _ O .a L O U U p .. D `` N Y 0).5 c c co m a) co I c y L o as a) c c "0N Q cps 'Fn m o O Y .� UO J Y ,� H H .� ui o O O 'I c O I a) - O a) a) O' a) @ c co C- nj I- a) o ro .Ln c-0 LL cn L.> L_L_ CL p U CO L L co C 0~ O Q) U j U O in U C w co ' N Co E H p~ C N :E _CZ C L r a a) C c 0 0 iin " i p O C a) O i a) a) a) i ._� U C a cn C �' L a) +. L C L U 00 = O cC C U •- d p U r m LL vUj '� a) 'O c N C O L 3 cC0 O) o co C C C o O C cn co to C Y cz L a) c `� a) C o 7 cUv U .V a) OU U U o .0 7 .� Y 'E 4) N _ _ O N� o p mcp Cco d� `- >1cz o O0 i p a) C m 3 C C 'p O L >' O L Yt i a) c >' c .— Y a) a) C • O c L a E N S O '0 '0 Y> O a) L in c 0- a) O> E co y o E O— C c � m a) > -0 - L = Y a) O ai E p F C O E d > E E" co o c c -0 a a� -0 3- E d3 w _o a r CT O C It u) O O E j U co L �O i— M O O) O cn @a C Q N c C � '`� cn 3 a) a .- C::m cn - E U °' � � c i >. a .� C U Q1 cc :3 i o a) 03.c C a cn c cn � co ' a) a) 3� a) w ca a) .E c E O 3 .- w �a) a3�mUOm>c°)L>+p0 Coa)OOULco����_a)N ��rnp`m:t, c co °) c) �- N D L~ L v o L E o co m- L rn Y 3 o v E N. O .3 _ v a) ~— O= O N ME .m p) =_ L p 0) X 0 p i a cn Y cn U co p C L U (1) 0) �a)oo�cc`m3o�>a Ncc`um_cn'- cn_ -- C a.C)oY- X(1) cacn(13 IN-cn NMC>.� ma- >�oa°0) cYLQ) d cvo a a) °) c Co c`o c >. �p 0 O) c4 c a) c 0) ai coi co .c L D o m � � � E E 3 ai `C o w a O «- n- - a)) O O- L a) ac) O 0- c c>a >, a) w ccaa C vUi ,U U Q � M L. M ID LY ` o o:. co me coo aa.- cn a)o � `� n).c °' °' �'� x CL«? U N a ego ° 0) C: ° �L v o'��� o oo.�Y�N m3 aELM mu) m �'� 3 Q,°o Lr Q U j c y o r 3 uVi rUn V o C O •c a) o>') U) a v E a) m i 0 a`) in `—° U � N !n C YO cu a-0 a) > j w Q) i L cp U Q p0 cc N H .� t cNc a c O co > C a) cc O p a C L N rn — O)o o)_ C U cn o C O 3 7 N W O Z) Q 3 Y c.) co co +. = _ co C = co O cn co _ (n 0) L N rr w L Q wN, W .O O N Q ca 3 N c0 O t H m r m m m = = = r r= m m= m = = m Y c C y " 0 0 �n as cn -p m p O Y U C ; 0 C" ..4 c o c� E OLcaa) cocas tnL L U O_'O_ C 0 a� X E _� c _� 7 -0 cC a) O !ED U O ca O U O U U 0 0 ca 0. o y. a� m o, a) 3 t- E 0.0a00) yc>c � 0)-0 �r=U _ 4) Ec�� 0 c)-Mcc0 Yc�Eo 4 ) � L y cn C L O rn L O 0CL 0 t i c c .0(D >030a��c =o 0 0 (A0 Rf c� v L c`o .� 3 cn C cv o D 0 0 C a) Z U aXi w Q O c0 aaccL ro O 'a ass E c aC G� Y y m c� c0)0 cc .i c p V .� p—` •2 3 > a) ai cna) C a) >� — 0 L a C N O O Q C L E L O w E .Z 4 C) cn -0m'Da)U ca�0a) c� °2E a) C" o or 0 rncco a)� J (n y CO 0 m ` C"ac 0 •� a0 C -0 Cc ° a) ui Q �) �, O cc c r- a c �v a> ° 3Z Y E m C � a) _ ca co N a) as G� O O cnc O �� m° E c c0 a)c y N L ]00coQ a a)0 u M OEa) N O c 2> a) `C U O L +- c°n O S0 W Q.N cL3 U c aci0 c`nc a 0 .r V � R � QO_a`>.' 00) E 'O� a>cna>rn rn0 (n�a) p) i .L C C O O - L a) 'L L .L- c j .0 a) ccC U (0 .. C N D C E► •> , •' L c a) > c 0—. 0 (C - U O a) X N 0 0 rn L o � °) °) � 3 c CL 0) �a°i w � � a) 44) -0 E L a O O .0 c a� `p m t c°i CL c�Uo c°i rnc°a c `o=� Uc ° 3 aci c �'D n - a) 3 a) c CO 0 co '0 U) c O a) c'�o p > c •• o� ° (aa N NL ��CL � CM a) rnZ3 S 3 0 `� m U-0 a) L 0.0 N C C O C N 7 L L O C c Mco NYvo3 "(1)zUQate) O-a)c°a)c° -�� a) 3 LEo°° a)—p)-oY c`�-Z°' 3 pis o —' a°i'a cnEEccE E> >°v0iM°O>mc2ac)•-c c E3I--aEi(L)'a in a)mN ° �r'�O L) o Y Y C >++ V C 7 V C > to >. cn 0 _O 0 m y .. L U C U O Y Y 0 a) y L N C• O C C O > > cn .p 0 0 Q .0 L >_ U O) Of O C co O c O c Y L N a C m U O V� Q c C C C� C E Q" a Y a� C C: CD (D ai } o►-Ew°)-va0)a)Za0"W- a)'0c0E..00E� ` C r a) l0 !A (n O Y O L c'a' L o 0 � 3 � � 0)N � 0 0)�c 7, as (L) � CO ` ► Y 0 O *Z ' L * t a w a) .. t d 0 O 0 .0 cd c q) 'O 'X v O ca a) c y O C U 3 «."r=. O� 0 aLLLY 0.+ Co— aa). C C O O > v> +. N _ _ ��ca�ai`"0)CCU00.0�3 _cn mo0 c°cu0i�c`o�o�� evo c 5«.cna)c co c y ca)'0cc$ a)c 3�� a 0 c`o w�0 c 0 ate) w O a0i Y = O M «. p -p c- c 7 '> j = U cow.. Lc m 0 c_ m � 3 c a) c y� m= S- u aci U.- eo E y OL p 0 U V Q 0 m � c O ca Q �w ac0n 0 > 'O O �a)Fza)oY a)un3a)a) �L-. L= 0 U = L O= U _ CRS _E ttiL O" O cC 0 c 0 cn -r 0 a cC — cn 0 0 y U 0 a) U a) cz O L E'0 .LO C C 3 L E o c� o�� C c� O-DoE >, O Y cUn c L— j O ccz a)a)_Ea)N�ccn o 0'�Y a-- •`- -- aa)) .-cCvoco>1 E-0 E 0� Coy 3 c �c o a) E ai o �� = aEQ) °' c o (3) C 3 �L..c o a> > C cc co O a) O ) a>,Eo7 :.3�Lca -0 � w 0 � .c_ aai ° O, cn a)c�a c c ca ccnowc<E� cY0Na�Ei 0 C O C.0 3 =_ >C._M0 a4)ma�3 ca a 0 0 0 M 0 Co cY'D ° 0L 3L 3 a - a= ECYc°-c} w a) �' m�X0uaia a0)�c>`�� O N C Y 7 -0 O 'Xcc a O- o �£ a)'c a) 0 OL a)- L � C C <o ad O� L c° O c.o 3 E (n C C a) 0 Ca L O t- 0) O. :E a) 0. Q a) — F- O- U a.c F- Ew 3 := -C) rnco cn ° E t Q m = r = = = = = r = m = = m m m = m WAGNER PARK HYMAN AVE MALL cr w 3 cccc �O w cn 3 it ■I ■I it ..... -a -alt. it it U) it z :I w ■I Q ■I ■I it 'i I _i F— 2"TAP ■ BICYCLE RACKS —� ■ 611WATER ------------� i I COOPER STREET MALL I I PHONE,GAS,TV,ELEC. 8it SEWER �. ,";AM� QP- cH W Z� O J Q ~ ci D OZ Um 7 R oW a~ c- T Q HA LLAM F�j BLEEKER N MANY 4TTORIC D16. I H MAIN RIO GRANDE PARKING HISTORIC DISTRICT ROARING FORK RIVER ��CI;CI C -PROJECI �LJOCATION I � C -�-�} NC N 4 POST OFFICE I UPPER ELEMENTARY HALLAM I BLEEKER SILVERKING COURT HOUSE • I MAINSNOW BUNNY N..NNMN.M... ..................... N . ........................... 1 i • PAEPEkE_j 1 PARK 1 ' 0000" HOPKINS 1 BASS PARK FIRE STATION J CITY HALL/ 1 � 1 � 1 �• • I i • i tt HYMAN i i i PARKING LOTS = IF MALL I VA 1 - PROJECT L TI( • , • COOPER 1 ' 'VVAGNER 1 = PARKr • w _ Q a • DURANT .. INS ................... N................t F .....N..NN..NN.NNN...NNNN.1 *406 c • - BUS STOP ASPEN MOUNTAIN ROARING FORK RIVER VALLEY C� C 0 C 0 C g0 C C C H 4. 0 Q Z W YW ZJ Ln Q W '- Q oW Xo =a m M Q sala6ue sol uedse S10311HOHV / S31VIOOSSV $ S113M SdWOHl Z O � J J 2i Q O Q AHIN3—aooi:j aNnous ISO EO sala6ue sol uadse S10311HOH%f / S31VQOSSV V S113M SdWOHl NVId HOOIA aNO03S III r== m= m m m= m m= m m m = = r SI03IIH08V / S31VIDOSSV '8 S113M SVWOH1 N01133S HinOS-HIHON Q m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m r seleBue sol uadse S1031IH38V / S31VIDOSSV I? S113M SVWOHl NOIJLVA313 HIUON ZH H selesue Sol uedse S1O311HOdV / S31VIOOSSV T S113M SVWOHl NOIIVA313 IIVW z 0 a W J W J J Q m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m= r Y .. I �I 0I I a LL] 1- Q � III z Mi Cl.. Y w Li N 0 u z • w n LL Q LL � i0 � Alley �.- -- - FFICE GA E _ - - OFFICE _ _-- -- I EXISTING R OFF, F_ _ r % � a STAIR ------ - t FRAMEOUT _ ` J r4 ?� L _t L-� Sports Shop e SECTION k+,, - I, Mall Q CG �i I L� �I .. I tj [7 zi Z Q O Q e WO J � O I i _ W � u W EL LL A LL � 0 � z Q 0� , ZW IL , D 0 0 • 0 w �� W o0 � a