Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.1000 N 3rd St.0008.2012.ASLU
THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0008.2012.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 12 1 29 008 PROJECTS ADDRESS 1000 N THIRD ST PLANNER AMY GUTHRIE CASE DESCRIPTION WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS REPRESENTATIVE JUD HAWK DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3.21.12 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 3.22.12 27 35-- 1 1 -\ - 31 - 00 t DOSS . 20 f 2- 1 ASL-bt aftj .J ..2 ifyi·1.,- 44 t.,C .,4 "·4'r' tv=. 2*3~ Elle Edit *ord Navigate Fgm Report Format Iab t!04 i@ y K , ), 4Eli QI 0 3 Zzi~·I i N 1 . 4 0 j i Jump 1 : *Ii 0 IGI ige 21 3 0 .1 13702 .1 .1/ RoL#ing 5tatus ~Feei IFee jummarY @KIActions |Attachments |Routing Estory | Valuation ~Arch#Eng |Custom Relds |sub Eermits | Parcels | - . i ~119 type ash Aspen Land Use Nrmt# 0008.2012.ASLU - L Address 1000 N THIRD ST Apt/Sde 1 21, City ASPEN Rate 'F71 * 81611 ,· EL Perr*t Information 9 Master permit Routing queue aslu07 Applied 2/27/2012 O 7: Z Project , 5tatus pending Approved 0 , i Description APPLICATION FOR LAND USE WIRELESS BROADBAND ANTENNAE AT ASPEN Issued - MEADOWS dosed/Final ~ F Submitted JUD HAWK 303 643 3664 Clock fJ~ning~ Days |~~| Expires 221/2013 4.11 ~ Submitted via ~ Owner ¢©91 2~ Last name ASPEN INSTITUTE INC First name PO BOX 222 QUEENTOWN MD 21658 Phone (970) 319-0442 Address € Applicant Il Owner is applicant? O Contractor is appicant? 34 **Ir:* ~- Last name JUD HA04<)DEAN MILLER First name 845 MEADOWS RD ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (970) 541-7811 Cust # 29224 Address Lender 067 Last name First name Phone () - Address efi C Chi A. ."1 C b*aith;permit ~der'$ address - AspenGold5 (serveil angelas ~1 oil ,:i CER 1342 "»Ur 630 r 6-0 .9, 3\ \1 6 W *dno, g qell W.**AM.1 DEVELOPMENT ORDER City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site-specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three (3) -year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless the change is accomplished or a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date ofthis Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site-specific development plan as described below. Property Owner's Name, MailinE Address and telephone number: The Aspen Institute, 1000 N. Third Street, Aspen, CO, 81611,970-544-7811. Legal Description and Street Address of Subiect Property: 845 Meadows Road and 1000 N. Third Street, Lot 1 A and Lot 1 B, Aspen Meadows Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan: The applicant has received approval for a new equipment room located within a storage area of the Aspen Meadows Parking Garage, one panel antenna mounted to an existing mechanical equipment screen wall on the rooftop of the Reception Center (845 Meadows Road), and two panel antennas concealed by a shroud on the roof of Paepcke Auditorium (1000 N. Third Street), along with required trenching to install underground conduit. Land Use Approval Received and Dates: Administrative approval granted March 21,2012. Effective Date of Development Order: March 29,2012. (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) Expiration Date of Development Order: March 29, 2015. (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 ofthe City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 21St of March, 2012, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. *1 Chris Bendon Community Development Director City of Aspen NOTICE OF APPROVAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT APPROVAL FOR THE ASPEN MEADOWS, 845 MEADOWS ROAD AND 1000 N. THIRD STREET, LOT lA AND LOT lB, ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION, ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel ID No. 2735-121-29-008 and 2735-121-29-809 APPLICANT: The Aspen Institute, represented by Vertical Real Estate Consulting and AT&T Mobility. SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: The subject site is 845 Meadows Road and 1000 N. Third Street, Lot 1A and Lot 1B, Aspen Meadows Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado. The Applicant requests approval for wireless equipment which will only service the Aspen Institute property. This is an administrative review. SUMMARY: The Applicant has requested approval for a new equipment room located within a storage area of the Aspen Meadows Parking Garage, one panel antenna mounted to an existing mechanical equipment screen wall on the rooftop of the Reception Center (845 Meadows Road), and two panel antenna concealed by a shroud on the roof of Paepeke Auditorium (1000 N. Third Street). Substantial trenching will be required to run conduit from the Parking Garage to the two meeting facilities. The Aspen Meadows is a Specially Planned Area (SPA). That designation includes requirements to protect the existing landscape to the greatest extent possible. In addition to the important natural vegetation on the site, there are historic landmark structures and cultural landscapes located on the property. The Reception Center and Anderson Park are the two historic areas affected by the proposed work. This Notice of Approval will address both Wireless Communication requirements and Historic Preservation requirements. STAFF EVALUATION: Pursuant to Section 26.575.130 of the Municipal Code, Wireless telecommunications services facilities and equipment must comply with a list of general provisions and review standards. The requirements seek to ensure that the placements of these facilities are compatible with surrounding development. Depending on the type of telecommunication device installed (i.e. monopole, whip antenna, ground tower, etc.), specific requirements apply. This plan involves the installation of small (25"H x 13"W x 8"D) panel antennas, therefore many of the criteria are not relevant. The majority of the compliance standards address screening and aesthetic considerations to limit the visual impact of the equipment. 1 Y j The panel antenna proposed to be attached to an existing screen wall at the Reception Center will have minimal to no visual impact. This area of the building is somewhat obscured from public view and is utilitarian in nature. The panels proposed to be mounted on Paepcke Auditorium will be visible to the public, however they are relatively low profile and located to the far side of the structure. All support equipment is located in the Parking Garage and/or in underground conduit, with minimal exposed wall mounted conduit to be added to the south wall of the Auditorium, where other conduit already exists. For Staffs response to the Wireless Communications review criteria see "Exhibit B." Approval of a Certificate of No Negative Effect is required for the Reception Center and Anderson Park. The review criteria of Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code require a finding that the proposed work will not diminish, eliminate or adversely affect the significant historic and/or architectural character of the subject property. DECISION: Staff finds that the application for a new equipment room located within a storage area of the Aspen Meadows Parking Garage, one panel antenna mounted to an existing mechanical equipment screen wall on the rooftop of the Reception Center (845 Meadows Road), and two panel antermas concealed by a shroud on the roof of Paepcke Auditorium (1000 N. Third Street), provided by AT&T, should be granted. The project includes trenching for installation of underground conduit. The applicant shall be required to receive Parks Department permits for work within the dripline of existing trees, particularly near the Reception Center, the berm to the north of the Parking Garage, the northwest corner of the Arco Building, and the area to the west of Paepcke Auditorium. The type of equipment proposed to construct the trenches, and the depth and width of the trenches shall be specified. Hand digging may be required in some areas. The applicant shall work with the Parks Department to possibly redesign the trench as it crosses Meadows Road and runs towards the northeast corner of the Parking Garage in order to minimize disturbance to existing trees and the substantial berm in that area. Regarding Historic Preservation approval, the Scope of Work qualifies for a Certificate of No Negative Effect, which shall be encompassed in this Notice of Approval. As a condition of approval, the pull boxes flanking the bridge in Anderson Park shall be fully buried, with the pull box covers entirely concealed from view with sod. APRN OVED BY: t14* 31 141 Chri; Bendon Date Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A - Application Exhibit B - Review Standards 2 Exhibit B Review Standards 26.575.130 (F) Review standards. The following standards are designed to foster the City's safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: 1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zone district; if the following requirements are more restrictive than those of the underlying zone district, the more restrictive standard shall apply. a. All facilities shall be located at least fifty (50) feet from any property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level within one-hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element, such as a chimney or ventilation pipe or behind architectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal HVAC equipment. Pitched-roof-mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a compatible architectural element, such as chimneys or ventilation pipes. Response: The proposed antennas will be roof-mounted and screened from view. b. Monopole towers shall be set back from any residentially zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) times the monopole's height (i.e., a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a twenty (20) foot monopole) and the setback from any public road, as measured from the right-of-way line, shall be at least equal to the height of the monopole. Response: Monopole towers are not a part of this application. c. No wireless communication facility may be established within one-hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally established wireless communication facility except when located on the same building or structure. Response: This proposal serves only the Aspen Meadows and is not within 100 feet of any other wireless communication facility. d. No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires shall not be anchored within any front yard area, but may be attached to the building. Response: No portion of the proposed antennas extend beyond property lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires are not part of the application. 2. Height. The following restrictions shall apply: 3 a. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment not attached to a building shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height of the given Zone District, whichever is more restrictive. Response: The proposed wireless equipment will be attached to buildings. b. Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for panel antennas shall not exceed five (5) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls and the antenna and support system for whip antennas shall not exceed ten (10) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls. Response: The antennas are approximately 2' tall and are below the maximum allowable height. c. The Community Development Director may approve a taller antenna height than stipulated in b. above if it is his or her determination that it is suitably camouflaged, in which case an administrative approval may be granted. Response: Not applicable d. If the Community Development Director determines that an antenna taller than stipulated in b. above cannot be suitably camouflaged, then the additional height of the antenna shall be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in addition to the standards of this Section) of Chapter 26.430 (Special review). Response: Not applicable e. Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can be fully screened from view as provided in the "Screening" standards (26.475.130 and 26.575.130.F.5) below. Response: Equipment cabinets will be enclosed within the Parking Garage. 3. Architectural compatibility. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless telecommunication services facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style of the surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition: a. If such facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or o f better quality than the materials o f the principal use. Response: Not applicable. Only antennas are proposed to be installed. b. Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such equipment is mounted or as required 4 by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). Response: The proposed antenna at Paepeke Auditorium will be concealed by a shroud that matches the roof color. c. Whenever wireless telecommunication services equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, be as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project above the wall on which it is mounted. Response: The antenna at the Reception Center will be painted to blend in with the surrounding surfaces. d. Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or maintenance of the subject monopole, must be designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. If no recent and/or reasonable architectural theme is present, the Community Development Director may require a particular design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. Response: Not applicable. e. All utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or equipment shall be underground (also see "Screening" below). Response: All utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or equipment will be underground or in existing structures. 4. Compatibility with the natural environment. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography and other natural features and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge line. In addition: a. If a location at or near a mountain ridge line is selected, the applicant shall provide computerized, three-dimensional, visual simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the affected ridges or ridge lines; an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030, may also be required. Response: Not applicable. 5 b. Site disturbances shall be minimized and existing vegetation shall be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography results in less visual impact to the surrounding area. Response: The approval includes requirements for protection of the existing landscape. c. Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible. Response: The antenna will not interfere with any existing view planes. d. All wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. Response: The applicant represents that the proposed wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment are in compliance with the FCC's regulations. 5. Screening. Roof-and-ground-mounted wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of-way and public or private properties by paint color selection, parapet walls, screen walls, fencing, landscaping and/or berming in a manner compatible with the building's and/or surrounding environment's design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition: a. Whenever possible, i f monopoles are necessary for the support of antennas, they shall be located near existing utility poles, trees or other similar objects; consist of colors and materials that best blend with their background; and, have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the appropriate decision- making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). Response: No monopoles are proposed in this application. b. For ground-mounted facilities, landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics; a heavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of growing within one (1) year to a landscape screen which satisfactorily obscures the visibility of the facility. Response: Not applicable. 6 c. Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the screening or monopole structure supporting the antennas; any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the building or other existing structure. Response: The proposed coaxial cable will be underground. There will be minimal surface mounted conduit at Paepeke Auditorium, painted to match the building. d. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities, support structures or accessory and related equipment (including HVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings); fencing material, if used, shall be six (6) feet in height or less and shall consist of wood, masonry, stucco, stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. Response: No fencing material is proposed in this application. e. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with all additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate the visual impact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards, the Community Development Director may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specifications for landscape and screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camouflaged to resemble a tree with a single trunk and branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. Response: The proposed antennas will match the color of surrounding surfaces. 6. Lighting and signage. In addition to other applicable sections of the code regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: a. The light source for security lighting shall feature down-directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spillage of illumination off-site. Response: Security lighting is not proposed in this application. b. Light fixtures, whether free standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade. Response: Security lighting is not proposed in this application. 7 e. The display of any sign or advertising device other than public safety warnings, certifications or other required seals on any wireless communication device or structure is prohibited. Response: Signs or advertising devices are not proposed in this application. d. The telephone numbers to contact in an emergency shall be posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510, Signs, of this Title. Response: The facility is not owned by a separate entity. The Aspen Meadows manages the property. 7. Access ways. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a. No wireless communication device or facility shall be located in a required parking, maneuvering or vehicle/pedestrian circulation area such that it interferes with or in any way impairs the intent or functionality of the original design. Response: The wireless antennas are roof mounted. b. The facility must be secured from access by the general public but access for emergency services must be ensured. Access roads must be capable of supporting all potential emergency response vehicles and equipment. Response: The general public will not have access to the roof top antennas, or the equipment room. c. The proposed easements for ingress and egress and for electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. (Ord. No. 1-2002 § 18; Ord. No. 52-2003, §§ 14,15) Response: Not applicable. 8 . El A ' - 4.- :w . 3 » - 31 . I- L. * Aur . I. - . 'r . . f ' . ,4 z- u:$9 + 34 2 - 4,' 1.~ f 2 - 1 TA,$*-2/ 4, ..4 + =s' L 1 ..4¥ - .N./.7 ..hili.,62*59, 1:Am. , 4 •-- '1 ty. I f 1 fi' '' *io'.1<.WI . Li.£#47 30'. I h.., 1? £*21'74 :flia/fqg/ 0: 551 - ,;. f 4.,1.1,1'*-1® f +4' mt\47~~. 4.14 . 4 r¥ . 17 . 3%?,> ,,-i v.r · ·s *~ ' *772E >ffli~"J~-E»• - . .., 8 ..» 0-9 :,·... 4- , ;p: 2,6-0.0-:i *Mijf<Lia#reft·t~, ;5 8,brr *A" 1-4,9~44)6~diaadit© ',-7'1.' ;*~·":4- " ' 1 -H' 30/k€*44.4 - .,·' ~ .eer-%4 l :t/.„4 .'A~: 4 L.*242*,w s·*·s.2223:.ce<,44. 0 4400'.fal€.4 - -?81 k. h ': . i - 1,1/11<A e . #rzm:v ' . 14. . J -. .. fili . .-I lillil . ./-.. I , . . - A 4/'64/ 1.---4-1<0 , I . I 4. , ,#29472..7 I. .=»Id - . .Emk·r „b: 1.,B- -150 -· •.i 1 - 1.4 - r. 1 0 Ze ./ , K herria- 5>40- ff. ..A 0,6 , :- tabA~V Lifi, -3700**J._~ff ~4'~'1~7 6; M- . U . 12 - - .....L. L. . , . I ./ 1*91FF *-'/,_ 94MS'frk ,~. p *10...&, -VE~*2'-' z- •~'24 ;t#. It · :f. *„i:: 62;~26~tt~ . 1¢:g I 1 I I J (1 , .. .. . 41. I, · ·/Agy¥ ·,-3, . , ..' .3 ...N€~'-,~···. '€1~.Ckti." 0 uty>~t.„i~.,;, ·/ - ,~04 1 *4*4* -- /r ," 4 .s 4 ... L -€ 0470j%M·'U·A> . · . ~ ~ . t VJ . 10 0 1 4. . ,. " -'. ·4 -, , -270:-: ·,1 111 4777~# 1 · 47 . - a 'apt.£1 1. 'i, ..,1 •L - at . t./. - . . 14 )114* .. ,™i# -r ' • f 4 '. 1. 4. /.- 1 . - 4 f . %1, .1 i , r..7--1 4.· ,/u I . , 2414/ ,~*1!9 . . I + I .i , .... 1 I . ". a J . . A 9 --' 11' 1 , . -4 1,i'.4?21,. •7> ..... i. V ... 7. 1-,4 4 , 1 1....0 ¥ -il ..t# Z . # - 0 I. ..1-'Ill . ' , ... 5 . .. .4.=- ./.2.. -K---2.2 2 4,%. 9 -1£,glibi'£2 ' ,CE- -- .1 k *Pfr r 4 , *4-I -. *4*r*'ll//1/ . - 24*kjl*if;jl l. .·~.,8·;it,;.i.·':-0 1 63 fi~ 6 3-, :f . ..i i 1 0 - .. *34.. ·· 1.n' L'Wrfle>'4€.·6 , '/94;IiAND~2 " v Q . r*Ee*Juf:x.:~ 514:.„40.Ac,~731'..9~ , M r . 3 7. in dit I / 69 1% 4 0 3+ -li~i- . br/T- 4979..... ,-' , , T '" » 1- I. ..1 %9 0 '.4.&-1 '-f'·1 J 114. ' ., <ti'~ 441,/ . 4.y I . 11~ . I - $ r. 1 4 4·' 4. e THE CITY oF AspEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: March 1,2012 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0008.2012.ASLU - 1000 N. Third Street,Wireless Telecommunications. The planner assigned to this case is Amy Guthrie. O Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. FLYour Land Use Application is complete: / If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, - 0 6. , AA_. - 3310~ Jennifer PhdAn, Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required SPA PUD COWOP Yes No Subdivision (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No Commercial E.P.F. r, 99 4 7 .f 4 .4 . A 1, ~- 0 . 4 I .1, 41 . .2.'/1.1. . t.' A I I . 2, f. 1& 0.. 10 7 ....0 i ·Vt..., 7 1 11' b . . 9 . , 4, . r'* D ' r' 3 , 1 : - 1. , 413 1' , ' 0 41-'Advt.L/. A. Zillki7 4 1 1* - I ''d, ., y 9 r 7.*44 '. 'H ri ,At, f 14/ iimi#'fl 4- "g' '4 .i , 7,'u'-k -2 > 4 41 1 . bh ) 4 4 4 . 'INA,4 154 ¢ 144 r.0 1 . I <fli .1 1 I ,2 I . 1,4 .2. 4 -- A K 1-48 & 9„, 8 4 2 ** 4 *' f' ~ t©~„ ·•ree A I ' - ~ 0... 71;4,4.,4 &141 1. 1,f- fflfit i 1,444: . 1.1. . ' I ' . , ./.+ ' t jr , I 9:. 7fl„'. 2 . ' .~~''' .1/ 9 1 ' ta v fl r I . : 1 7 + . 41 li , f, A . 441~ e , I .4 ' I '1 9 - .4 1.111/1 ' -VV--1!r , .0.- A e r.41 - t... -' 1/2 'u 1,21~' 2 7 0*,4.,% '*i'* 7 NDUIT 1 1 =U L .0 W: EXISUNG .4, :47,3 (f HANDMOLE 1 '2 . J'' e .7, g ~i 14,4 1 1 ' 3,1.* . '3~' C q,44; 1 AdlhorEAM<ppokil,/S.4:ltig \ 4~'4 ,~'~ ' 0, I TREENCH IN~ · , „4 .r??1=rfl-=» , ni / '.4,7¥ *2% *40_-vt.*§i#~t , 11 i 4,i'4'~ i~ TRENCH IN21%.r -t 42 r'' 2,771*«4 #1' 4.09' 1 GRASS AREA 0 fif€ ~ 444 ~ '~4~· A::wt' 'i r,11 J.4, r 1 17 1.» .r, f 414' ¥ 4 4 ./'I./1 * 11 1.4, ' I ' . 1) I , 0 fl,11 -4 1*/ 4, C..lit ,/ I. 4. ,%~ImlIMllaa.3P . ' .t'.1 4.: i r,t- IL'. 0 L - I It j, 1 1,1. $912. ,¥1 4 *i ; t"t ..EN I f 6, , 4.1 r e.4 f'49 44 AN'. I . 4, 4 '4, i ' 0 -11.1. p /./-4 -ina I 4. 'P * b -4 1,4 .pJ» 5, 2 ~i. i,4 £,· - 1 €- U. . .11 b I 'v I 41 . ... OFF 2 - ** €W P 5,11,7 A., .i, , ,> . * .74 '~i: :'up f 4 1 0 ' e.'', ar , I »' :.4 3 N 9.1 ' *4' ¥ / TYPICAL HAND HOLE If RECEIVED FEB 2 3 20iZ VERTICAL CITY OF ,«-c.N COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT February 12,2012 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Ms. Amy Guthrie City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Wireless Broadband Antennae at Aspen Meadows Wireless Telecommunications Services Facilities and Equipment Application 845 Meadows Road / 1000 N. Third Street Dear Ms. Guthrie: This is an application for a wireless facility located at the Aspen Meadows Hotel. I submit the following documents and information for review by the City of Aspen Community Development Department and in support of the enclosed application. Land Use Application Application is attached. 0 Total Deposit for Review of Application All fees are enclosed. Pre-Application Conference Summarv Summary is attached. Applicant Letter Authorizinli Representation Letter of authorization attached. Site Plans Site Plans including elevations and photo simulations are attached. These plans include before and after depictions of this project. Vicinitv Map Vicinity map is included on the site plans. Structural Intellritv Report Structural Report attached. Written Description of the Proposal The proposed installation will include a new equipment shelter located in the corner of the parking garage. one (1) antenna behind a screen wall on the rooftop of the Reception Center, and two (2) antennas behind a screen wall on the Paepke building. Below we address how the project complies with the City of Aspen code requirements. FAA Coordination Statement No hazard report attached. Evidence of Collocation Attempts There are no other wireless facilities that would be able to be collocated on in the vicinity. Exterior Lijzhtin* Plan No lighting is being proposed. Thank you for your consideration of AT&T's request. Please let me know if you require anything further. My contact information is provided below. Thank You, Liz Walker :, ,. Real Estate Consulting, Inc 21 age Code Compliance Aspen Meadows - Wireless Facility Section 26.575.130 D (1). Site Plans Site plans that comply with Section 26.575.130 D (1) have been provided in support of this application. Section 26.575.130 D (2). Site Improvement Survey A site improvement survey has been provided in support of this application. (Included as part of the site plan attachment) Section 26.575.130 D (3). Landscape Plan Due to the limited nature of this installation, AT&T is requesting a waiver of this requirement. No landscaping is proposed. Section 26.575.130 D (4). Elevation Drawings and "before and after" Elevation Drawings and Photo simulations have been provided in support o f this application. (Included as part of the site plan attachment) Section 26.575.130 D (5). Lighting Plan and Photometric Study No lighting is being proposed and due to the limited scope of this installation, AT&T is requesting a waiver ofthis requirement. Section 26.575.130 D (6) (a) - (d). Structural Integrity Letter or Report A letter confirming the structural integrity of the project has been provided in support of this application. This project proposes installations of 1 antenna on an existing building and 2 antennas on an existing building. A shared use facility is not being proposed. Section 26.575.130 D (7)(a). FAA Coordination AT&T has filed the sites with the FCC and the Aeronautical Studies are pending. The Aeronautical Study Numbers are below: Aspen Meadows DAS_Paepcke Memorial BLDG ASN # 2012-ANM-244-OE (Building) ASN # 2012-ANM-245-OE (Temp Crane) Aspen Meadows DAS_Reception BLDG ASN # 2012-ANM-242-OE (Building) ASN # 2012-ANM-243-OE (Temp Crane) Results are expected on or before April 1,2012. 31°age .. Section 26.575.130 D (7)(b). FCC Coordination A letter confirming that the proposed site complies with the FCC's maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions limits has been provided in support of this application. Section 26.575.130 D (8). Efforts to locate on existingfacility AT&.T was unable to locate this installation on an existing facility because there is not an existing facility in the area that would accommodate this installation that is providing coverage to the hotel. Section 26.575.130 D (9). Signed affidavit This facility is not a typical wireless facility but a facility dedicated to providing improved service to this property. AT&T is requesting waiver ofthis requirement but if an affidavit is required, AT&T will provide one. Section 26.575.130 D (10). Knowledge of Long Term Plan for City If requested by the City, AT&T is willing to discuss its long term plans. Section 26.575.130 E (1). Prohibitions Lattice Towers: a lattice tower is not being proposed. The facility being proposed includes the installation of three (3) antennas on existing building structures. Section 26.575.130 E (2). Site Selection Preference The proposed facility will be attached to an existing structure, Section 26.575.130 E (3). Interference The proposed facility will not interfere with any other wireless services. Section 26.575.130 E (4). Airports and Flight Paths The proposed facility will not interfere with airports or flight paths. Section 26.575.130 E (5). Historic Sites and Structures The proposed facility will not negatively impact and historic sites or structures. Section 26.575.130 E (6). Public Building, Structures and Right-of-Ways This facility is to be located on the Aspen Meadows Hotel and Conference Center. Section 26.575.130 E (7). Co-location Collocation was not possible for the vicinity. Section 26.575.130 E (8). Maintenance The proposed site will be properly maintained in a safe, clean manner. Section 26.575.130 E (9). Abandonment or Removal Any facility not in use will be removed in a timely fashion. 41 age .. Section 26.575.130 E (10). Conditions and Limitations AT&T shall comply with any conditions and limitations as imposed by the City. Section 26.575.130 F (1) (a) - (d). Setbacks This facility will be in compliance with all setback standards set forth. Section 26.575.130 F (2) 00 - (e). Heights This facility will be in compliance with all height restrictions. Section 26.575.130 F (3) (a) - (e). Architectural Compatibility This facility will be architecturally compatible with the existing environment. The antennas will be camouflaged on the roof ofthe buildings. The utilities will be located in the parking garage, away from sight. Section 26.575.130 F (4) (a) - (d). Compatibility with the Natural Environment This facility will not have any impact on the natural surroundings. All existing vegetation and view planes will be preserved. This facility will comply with all FCC regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. Section 26.575.130 F (5). Screening This rooftop facility and equipment will be screened from the nearby public right-of-ways and properties. Section 26.575.130 F (6). Lighting and Signage No lighting or signage is proposed. Section 26.575.130 F (7). (a) - (c) Access Ways The facility will not block any access ways. All proposed easements will be recorded. 51Dage COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property Phone No.: 9 10 - 544 - 28 1 1 Owner ("1"): ASPEA) m 6,•IX,"35 1+0-r€L- Email: Address of Billing Property: (000 A. THreD St/ Address: (subject of 84€ ME-Dot•)3 #2,£ (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it js impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 630 deposit for Z. hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $315 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Chris Bendon ~4*b*1-4,4 -A=U-a-,~~c_r_ Community Development Director Name: 6-4 tabd-h WA·tlce}u<DEAA]AX< LiyE- Title: City Use: Fees Due: $ Received: $ November. 2011 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 . . ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: UIATEL-655 EeAPSAAD AA-rEAA]AE A-r ASPIEW Pl EADold 5 Location: 8961 MEADo(J 5 9.0*9 ilooc> ,3. -nu:RD 5-2 AsPER co 81 &11 (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) Z.73€121,9809 APPLICANT: Name: 3 up WAWk / PAA# m £ 64.22 Address: 849 Me/VD¢x.15 Ze.* / lBS lUruW€55 13)62:Ive_ 064 Gic.u= k-nt (-O 8okz. Phone #: 770 - 6 iN - 7 511 ~10-V G'13 -1664 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: |=t |VAL#,EA / DEAA miLLEK Address: 14 36 5. i\Af WAN j GE» rew.)3:AL: C-0 holla Phone #: (-503) 2-6,9-745-5- TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check ail that apply): GMQS Exemption U Conceptual PUD El Temporary Use GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Text/Map Amendment Special Review £ Subdivision U Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ~ Subdivision Exemption (includes U Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review U Lot Split El Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion U Residential Design Variance E Lot Line Adjustment M Other: W/22,-25> Te:.gu-L El Conditional Use S€g,/Ic.25 ~*c-turr-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) TI+SS -Pkereer•f LS TEE ASPE.) Me/,Dows Hore,- ARD 4£5*FEBE.,04£ CE,U'rEA PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) -[,car.u.7-IMA) OF Wre€1-ASS FA,-r,rEV 04 -1-WO (a~ Bu=£.br~66 ~ve you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ Pre-Application Conference Summary Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement U Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form N A gl Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards g) 3-D Model for large project B A All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. 0000 ... ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: WrgE 0255 2152•DS»'P ARTA.WA* E Ar +69 b) MEApowj Applicant: 457>20 r,72*Dou,5 MOT-8.L- A-*D <10,0 G EL€,Jug C-E,0-rec Location: 3 45 nlz,•Pows 1~o,p 1 800 9. THZ=:p Si' Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: A)O Riw A.000. 4(24 IS % aracr Pcopes€ D (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing: Proposed: Proposed % ofdemolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing. Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed. Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing. Required: Proposed Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed: Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: O & E REPORT To: VERTICAL REAL ESTATE CONSULTIN Date Ordered: 05-27-2010 Land Title GUARANTEE COMPANY Attn: ELIZABETH WALKER Order Number 351747 W.W...0.·CO' Fax: 720-200-3595 Phone: 303-264-7455 Address: 1000 N THIRD ST ASPEN, CO 81611 County: PITKIN LEGAL DESCRIPTION SUBD!VISION: ASPEN MEADOWS LOT: 1-A OWNERSHIP & ENCUMBRANCES Certification Date: 02-06-2012 OWNERSHIP: THE ASPEN INSTITUTE, INC. Doc Type Doc Fee Date Reference# PLAT NA 04-11-2006 78/35 ENCUMBRANCES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS Item Payable To Amount Date Reference# DEED OF TRUST THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MAR $5,000,000.00 01-26-95 378422 Cust Ref# This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any form of title guaranty nor insurance. The liability of this company shall not exceed the charge paid by the applicant for this report, By: LESLIE BOYER nor shall the company be held liable to any party other than the applicant for this report. Land Title Property Resource Specialist Email: Iboyer@Itgc.com Phone: 970-925-1678 Fax: 800-318-8202 Form OE.WEB 06/06 1 Prepared For: i a -n,l VERTICAL REAL ESTATE CONSULTIN M'AM 112% ELIZABETH WALKER WWW.LTIC.COM Reference: 1000 N THIRD ST ASPEN, CO 81611 Attached are the additional documents you requested: Doc Type Recorded Reception#/BookPage LESLIE BOYER Land Title Propeny Resource Specialist Email: Iboyer@Itgc.com Phone: 970-925-1678 Fax: 800-318-8202 ADD.DOCS 351747 trii-™1•1=1:li:11:•:111,114,1,:OR·F.I€•11•1:14•1-9.™.1,1:{•11121•I•lia'.1.lit=1:111:,11•101:11~·.'i-iq'.0.•t,1, I.,119,11'J.,1,~1•1:14.in•.,1.'.1,1.e.,11:•/:,•1••.0.,eq"li.,Iia •t•h, I 1 1 Vertical Real Estate Consu , Inc. 1342 Bank € Vest 7436 S. Ivy Way 6050 S. Hotiy Street Centennial, CO 80112 Greenwood Village, CO 80111-4251 303-264-7455 82-214/1070 2/20/2012 PAY TO THE City of Aspen s **630.00 ORDER OF Six Hundred Thirty and 00/100 ********************************1„*********************1.1.****************************1„******* DOLLARS Secumy features M vuded City of Aspen De:aEs or, back 130 S. Galen St Aspen, CO 81611 MEMO Deposit for Community Development Time Np ~AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE Vertical Real Estate Consulting, Inc. 1342 City of Aspen 2/20/2012 Aspen Meadows Zoning Review 630.00 Vertical Real Estate C Deposit for Community Development Time 630.00 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Guthrie, 970-429-2758 DATE: 11/16/11 PROJECT: Wireless Broadband Antennae at Aspen Meadows Lodging REPRESENTATIVE: Elizabeth Walker, Vertical Real Estate Consulting, 303-264-7455, liz@verticalrec.com OWNER: Aspen Institute, 1000 N. Third Street, Aspen, CO 81611 TYPE OF APPLICATION: Wireless Telecommunications Services Facilities and Equipment DESCRIPTION: The applicant plans to erect Wireless Telecommunication Services Facilities and Equipment on rooftops of buildings that are used for lodging at the Aspen Institute. The Community Development Director will determine if the proposal is in compliance with required standards related to placement, height, etc. No public notice is required. Appeal of the Director's determination is through Special Review before the Planning and Zoning Commission. The buildings were constructed in the 1 980s and are not designated historic, but are adjacent to designated structures and landscapes. Staff understands that because the FCC licenses telecommunications equipment, the applicant will be subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and will be required to consult with the State Historic Preservation Officer regarding potential impacts on historic resources. The Colorado SHPO may consider the property National Register eligible and may have comments regarding minimizing visibility of any equipment. Ideally, SHPO comments should be received prior to the Community Development Department's review in order to avoid having to amend the project at a later date. Below is a link to the Land Use application Form for your convenience. http://www.aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/41/landuseappform.pdf Below is a link the Land Use Code for your convenience: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenUPIanning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.575.130 Wireless telecommunications services facilities and equipment Review by: Community Development Staff Public Hearing: Not required Planning Fees: $630 deposit for 2 billable hours. Additional hours will be billed at a rate of $315 per hour Total Deposit (P&Z): $630 Totai Number of Application Copies: 2 To apply, submit the following information El Total Deposit for review of application. 1-1 Pre-application Conference Summary. E-1 Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. £ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 0 A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. m Completed Land Use application and signed fee agreement. E-1 An 8 1/2" x 11 " vicinity map locating the subject parceis within the City of Aspen. 1-1 A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application (§26.575.130 D-F). 0 Elevation drawings or "before and after" photographs/drawings simulating and specifying the location and height of antennas, support structures, transmission building(s) and/or other accessory uses, fences, and signs. U Structural integrity report or letter clarifying the installation and support program for the proposed wireless telecommunication equipment. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO FILE LAND USE APPROVAL / ZONING APPLICATION TO: City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO RE: Application for zoning/building permitting 845 Meadows Road Aspen, CO As owner of the property described below, I do hereby appoint AT&T and Vertical Real Estate Consulting, Inc., its agents and contractors, as authorized representatives for the purpose of filing and processing any permitting applications for the purpose of constructing a wireless communications site. I understand that the application may be denied, modified or approved with conditions and that such conditions or modifications must be complied with prior to issuance of building permits. Authorized Agents: Liz Walker Vertical Real Estate Consulting, Inc. 7436 S. Ivy Way Centennial, CO 80112 O: 303-264-7455 Dean Miller AT&T Mobility Antenna Solutions Group 188 Inverness Dr W - 4th Floor (4212) Englewood, CO 80012 O: 303-643-3664 Property Located at: 845 Meadows Road / 1000 N. Third Street Aspen, CO 81611 The Asp,n Institute, Inc. By l-A /1 'Allr Its: - 1, 1»due_ Date: -16 9 20(1 1 Site Name: Aspen Meadows SITE NAME: ASPEN MEADOWS DAS € at&t I -t&t ZONING DRAWINGS 7..."·72.9 --/I- 188 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST SUITE 400 , ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 r/77774 .j~ 9 PLANS PREPARED BY CSAi CHARLES STECKLY ARCHITECTURE, Inc. PROJECT INFORMATION VICINITY MAP DRAV/ING INDEX ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING - DESIGN 593S SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 SHEET DESCRIPTION UTTLETON. COLORADO 80127 PROPERTY CONTACT: BOB STUMPUS OFFICE: 301932.9974 ASPEN MEADOWS INSTITUTE FAX: 303.932.6561 Tl.O TITLE SHEET 845 MEADOWS RD ASPEN, CO 81611 PHONE: 970.948.8610 -SITE PROJECT NO: C0U4181 Al.0 SITE PLAN APPUCAbIT: AT&T MOBILITY, LLC DRAWN BY: MF >r ADDRESS: 188 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST, SUITE. 400 0 A3.0 PAEPCKE BUILDING ELEVAnONS ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 w CHECKED BY: ™ PROJECT MANAGER: DEAN MILLER ATaT SERVICES, INC. 188 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST All RECEPTION BUILDING ELEVATIONS ENGLEWOOD, CO 80012 J PS1 PHOTO SIMULATIONS 303 643.3664 ARCHITECT: CHARLES STECKLY, CSAi 5935 S. ZANG ST., #280 UTTLETON, CO 80127 303.932.9974 SITE ACQUISITION: UZ WALKER 82 4 VERTICAL REAL ESTATE 0 0 02/02/12 CLIENT CO•&181• CONSULTING, INC. A 01/31/12 ZD REWEW PHONE: 303.264.7455 W. H•' ·- REV DATE DESCRP™ON UCENSURE NO: qt A ASPEN N.T.S. CONSULTANT. NOTES PROJECT DESCRIPTION CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONSTRUCT A NEW EQUIPMENT ROOM IN EXISTING PARKING GARAGE, ROUTE FIBER TO EXISTING RECPETION CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY SPECTRUM AND PAEPCKE BUILDINGS, AND ADD NEW ANTENNAS TO RECEPTION & PAEPCKE BUILDINGS. CONSTRUCnON TO WHO WILL- CONTACT THE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS ANY • DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG - COLORADO STATE REQUIRES 3 WORKING DAYS UTIUTY NOTIACATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS LOCATES ARE REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO BEGINNING THIS PROJECT. PROJECT DATA SITE NAME. UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER OF COLORADO - 800.922.1987 THESE DRAWINGS MAY NOT INDICATE All UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE GENERAL JURISDICTION: - CITY OF ASPEN ASPEN MEADOWS DAS CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CARE DURING ALL EXCAVAnONS AND C0U4181 OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ZONING DESIGNAnON: - A - ACADEMIC 845 MEADOWS ROAD OCCUPANCY GROUP: - RECEPTION & PAEPCKE - B ASPEN, CO 81611 PARKING GARAGE - S-2 CONSTRUCTION TYPE: - 8 SHEETT'TLE·. ~ FULLY SPRINKLERED: - NO GOVERNING CODES IF APPLICABLE: 2009 IBC, 2009 IFC, 2009 IMC, 2011 NEC TITLE SHEET ADA COMPLIANCE: THIS FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. SHEET NUMBER· T 1.0 & a N ETH ST \2011\Projectsl&t\A Meadows DAS\ZDs\T1.0.dwg LOTTED Feb 02,201~~ 1 al € at&t 1 -7/--1«~-9 1 188 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST / ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 119 11 SUITE 400 r-- EXISTING RECEPTION \ / CENTER W/ (1) NEW . 1, < ~' ) AT&T ANTENNA & EQUIPMENT IN (E) / TELCO ROOM \\\/ -- 90- \// 1 ) !1 -0-- F \ \\%- PLANS PREPARED BY: \ \ lk-- - -~~ ~r ~- NEW 20"*30' PULL BOX 1 -- r 1 3 CSAi / PULL NEW ABER THROUGH \ ~ CHARLES STECKLY ARCHITECTURE, Inc. ff-EXISTING 1"0 CONDUIT FROM ~ - / / PULL BOX TO EXISTING BRIDGE -£512 / (APPROX. 280 LF.) \ i ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING - S935 SOUTH ZANG SlREET, SUITE 280 LITTLETON. COLORADO 80127 1 7 \ OFFICE: 303.932.9974 $7*R 44.1/ f X. FAX: 303.932.6581 / :6 9-6-0 ii] / / - (E) 75 KVA XFMR / ---I ../----h.\ 1 PROJECT NO· COU4181 & TELCO PEDESTAL ~ 00 . C Non« DRAWN Erf: bAF ENSHNG 4»0 U.G.-1 <e \ ABER CONDUIT TO / 1/ re\- TERMINATION POINT OF EXISING ; 1 / \.1 NEW 200'<30~ PULL BOX AT CHECKED BY: TN TELCO ROON IN (E) UNDERGROUND CONDUIT. RECEPTION BUILDING '~ Y \ (APPROX. 250 L. F.) 4 1< NEW 2 1/2" FIBER CONDUIT FROM 4,4-1. / ./1 , jj EXISnNG VAULT/FIBER- / NEW PULL BOX FOLLOWING EDGE \ A / I -NEW 20™30" PULL BOX ON EAST \\ MEET POINT --- 1 SIDE OF BRIDGE. , UNE OF GRASS' TO NEW PULL BOX (APPROX 330 L.F.) NEW AT&T 20"X30" PULL BOX \\-///« I /« \%\ -/11 -9 NEW 4'0 U.G. FIBER CONDUIT--1 10 - \\\) NEW 20»X30~ PULL BOX 4. trJ C J -7- (APPROX. 260 LF.). PATCH AND REPAIR THE ROAD AS CORE DRILL O EACH END OF 79\11 -1 .--1 -_- ---) j B 02/02/12 CUDIT COMMe,TS NEEDED TO ACCOMODATE :T _ i T EXISTING BRIDGE & RUN NEW . 011 A 01/31/12 ZD RE%10# NEW UNDERGROUND ABER . rh ' 21 -1-3 9 2-1/2"0 ABER CONDUIT I i lili ill - NEW Et-ECTIOCAL RUN FROM THROUGH LENGTH OF- BRIDGE / \ .\\\ (E) FIBER VAULT REV DATE DESCRIPnON EXISTING ELEC. ROOM TO 11 / imil, i iMI NEW AT&T EQUIPMENT ROOM, \ 300 KVA XFUR FOR 1 I I I ~ __1-_ ] 1 ' -1, E~ FOUOW EXISTING CONDUIT NEW 2-1/2»0 FIBER CONDUIT --" I ~ pAEPCKE BUILDING BUILDING (FOLLOW SIDEWALK) UCENSURE NO: FROM BRIDGE TO PAEPCKE (APPROX. 525 LF.) / 1 NEW € FIBER CONDUIT FROM . 1 EQUIPMENT ROOM LOCATION 1/ TO NEW PULL BOX 1 L.-11 T - ----1 11 F--ri) 111 ~« \\ (APPROX. 240 LE) CONSULTANT. A\: 49?~74 1 11 ~ 1-2 '1 '[-1.21 l // 11 It>N NIki EQUIPMENT ROOM LOCATED \N CORNER OF EXISnNG PARKING GARAGE 939 ¥ \ -61 1/ / 40.---34*4 3 EXISTNG PAEPCKE-\ L- -1.·-··-29 -NEW 20'X30' BUILDING W/ (2) NEW \ . ' 42« SITE NAME· ATaT ANTENNAS ON ROOF & EQUIPMENT IN 4 -\.\ 1 / ASPEN MEADOWS DAS ATTIC COU4181 1 lillil a I gr 845 MEADOWS ROAD NEW 20"*30" PULL BOX -, yu ATCH AND REPAIR ASPEN, CO 81611 4 SIDEWALK AS NEEDED TO Ke, ACCOMMODATE U.G. FIBER E SHEET TTLE 0 SITE *E < ~ * PLAN *Z SHEET NUMBER. ·*.LL NORTH At.0 1 SITE PLAN 1 SCALE: |50 25 0 50 1 1-=50 Meadows DAS\ZDs\Al.O.dwg 0=5 at&t 188 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST (2) PROPOSED AT&T 25"Hx13-Wx8-D PANEL - SUITE 400 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO NON-PENETRATING \~ ROOF TRIPOD, BEHIND 36"0 RF SHROUD, , EXISTING PAEPCKE BUILDING -1 PAINT SHROUD TO MATCH (E) BUILDING. ~\ iiI \ LJ L.3 4 - ta W & W PLANS PREPARED BY r--rh-LT--9-T- Ll-1 . O 1 ..-1 _ 1_. Ir ·'· 1- l. a 1 T . Li lll11II r--I+ 1 11 1 7~17 0 1Illlll 1 ~ '-~-1-1 1-~-1-~-T-j-1' CSAi 4 liU 1 6 ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING - DESIGN 14 0 CHARLES STECKLY ARCHITECTURE, Inc. !lilli 111111[ 0 -1 1jllll1 lillit 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET, SUITE 280 UTTLETON. COLORADO 80127 lilli l OFFICE: 303.932.9974 11II1!1 FAX: 303.9326561 - PROJECT NO: Cou4!81 DRAWN 87: MF CHECKED Err: TN NOTE: EVERYTHING IS EXISTING UNLESS CALLED OUT OTHERWISE. 2 PAEPCKE BUILDING WEST ELEVATION 8 02/02/12 CuorT 00-1065 A 01/31/12 ZD REWEW REI DITE DESCRFION LICENSURE NO· - (2) PROPOSED AT&T 25'Hx13~Wx8»0 PANEL /7 ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO NON-PENETRATING .. 1// 111 LJ-J F EXISTING PAEPCKE BUILDING CONSULTANT. /- EXISTING CONDUIT TO ATTIC ..7·- PROPOSED FIBER CONDUIT TO ATE -T Fi-j l 1 r--1 71-~ l i [-~-i I r J} 21-1-[ ~-i-L-' f -1-1-1- '31 1, 3~[ -1-1-1-2 1--LT-1-r-~-T--- T- --~--' -1- 3-1 lili lili!111111 1 I I I I I I I I -711-- 7 lili .I lilli lilli 11|111 11!lilli lili _1_ttli_ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~'# ij 1 SITE NAME' T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l l i.,1 iIi li li I I lil i 1 1 -3 1 1 1 111111111111: 1 11 ASPEN MEADOWS DAS 111111 11 -1 _1 1 L 1 lllllll11 C0U4181 En- F 11111111 1|1~1~1~1~1~IlllI~ll liti! 1111~1'l ~/7- ilf",~ITil-Wriinnilnnr--1- i- -Ing[1'-1-- 919[1111-- ri: a·-~ 1, 1 ~ -:'t'~'i'~'~'1'1'1!lilli 845 MEADOWS ROAD Il lilil Iii il I,I Iii I. I .1,~401[ ' Ibi'dI~I'l~I~I I Mil~ 'IIi ASPEN, CO 81611 _Ii-'-i~-r-_[~ l_-12-T-1- ~111-T-1-'_111 -Lf]1841141'15 '' " ~~Il~~~~1~~1111 1 1~,~1111 1~~111111 11[ ~~-14#f-1- .11 11-11,1-1-~1~_1_~_1 ~_1.I L~_[_~1: SHEET TITLE. E 11 0 . PAEPCKE BUILDING ~- PROPOSED UNDERGROUND FIBER CONDUIT ELEVATIONS *E /7 9.-·--FIBER -FIBER -FIBER -FIBER -FIBER-FIBER -FIDER -FIDCR riDer rIDER rIDCA rIDcrt S: SHEET NUMBER 12 1 SCALE: 1 4 2' 0 4' A3.0 ab 1 PAEPCKE BUILDING SOUTH ELEVATION 1 1/4- = 1'0' 1 115i 20 0008HS Vhi O del .6-.+Z 24'-9' TOP OF ANTENNA SHROUD 23'-9" CENTER OF ANTENNAS 22'-7 T.O. PARAPET Meadows DAS\ZDs\A3.0.dwg *=51 at&t 188 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST SUITE 400 ENGLEWOOD. CO 80112 PLANS PREPARED BY- CSAi CHARLES STECKLY ARCHITECTURE, Inc. ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING - DESIGN 5935 SOUTH ZANG STREET. SUITE 280 LITTLETON, COLORADO 80127 OFFICE: 303.932.9974 FAX: 303.932.6561 PROJECT NO: C0U4181 DRAWN BY: MF CHECKED BY: ™ r-- (1) PROPOSED AT&T 25'Hx13"Wx8~[) PANEL ANTENNA, MOUNTED TO (E) MECHANICAL- SCREENS, r- EXISDNG MECHANICAL SCREENS PAINT TO MATCH MEDI SCREENS. AA. .981 ' be'.V r- EXISTING MECHANICAL 8 02/02/12 CLIDIT CO-ENTS i Nes A 01/31/12 ZO RIMEN REV DATE DOMIPPION Z LICENSURE No . 44 . >35:.2 .... 0 ....... .9992, 1<%.. , ' · ., 437 - ' ' ff'. --- . 02. 1 0· Ivy: · 0 yx .0 ..,F. ·.529 ~ Z ./X C , . 44 'flt . -22 ' 4.. I I .... I. 9. ·19 - 4,« 44... 2 04»123- -- 3- it«»4-~ 31*9-- :1412/- ~-211»- . -r - 4 -»>.'€' 1 1 CONSULTANT d 0 / 11 1 41 1 11 - p.' r -- r i | i 1~ _1-<_-T--1-- ji 1 1 SITE NAME+ 1 1 11 11 \ 1!11 -2-4- -1- L 1 ; ASPEN MEADOWS DAS COU4181 \ 845 MEADOWS ROAD ~ ASPEN, CO 81611 - EXISANG RECEPTION NOTE: EVERYTHING IS EXISnNG BUILDING UNLESS CALLED OUT OTHERWISE. SHEETT1'LE: RECEPTION BLDG. ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: A3.1 1 RECEPTION BUILDING NORTH ELEVATION SCALE· ~3' 18" 0 3 3/8" = 1'-0' 1 ~ r-Lu i Icu reoud, LU IL Ki i U.U<*am E at&t i ·t 188 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST SUITE 400 ENGLEWOOD. CO 80112 1 *' &14 ff i ·1 /f *:M~ i *1*47 I --#4 -I'l".i. PLANS PREPARED BY 14tlillilli<j._1'lleSTH**Tri.2ellillillili" i ...3 .- .....3~,7...r. T™......„m?F~mm~ 30:' - CSAi 11 - _Id.- ' CHARLES STECKLY ARCHNECTURE, Inc. 4 * ARCHITECTURE - PLANNING - DESIGN 1 11'4 ~'© S935 SOUTH ZANG STREET. SUITE 280 UTTLETON, COLORADO 80127 , A. - -- OFFICE: 303.9329974 FAX: 301932.6561 - 7- - U.' 61 PROJECT NO: COU4181 -./.b- /73/r/--- DRAWN BY: MF CHECKED GY: TN EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS B 02/02/1 2 CUENT CollerTS A 01/31/12 20 m REV DATE DESCRFTION LICENSURE NO· L St / PROPOSED ANTENNAS-* B j f & BEHIND RF SHROUD *1 1 9./ - t '' U. 1-f 1 -1 j 1 PROPOSED ANTENNA-~ 1.Ar ., S li dowil , 1,8 %1 . 1 CONSULTANT. PROPOSED ANTENNAS 4 5914.1 "-- ,- r BEHIND RF SHROUD ~ 10.In.111'lillil,4 ~ lk/1.k~ 1~ "142 4 A - 41, - ,·f 1, /* 24@v,. gly '·C*Ni SITE NAME: ./-' e. : ~€%-- 18·'f'....T-:Ir/%-i.-"M.92- 1 ASPEN MEADOWS DAS 845 MEADOWS ROAD 4 .1 1 - C0U4181 - ASPEN, CO 81611 4 - -. .1 4 SHErr Tm_E E CO - 0 .4 4, . PHOTO Jmr./ P SIMULATIONS SHEET NUMBER: PROPOSED CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS fB 3 RECEPTION BUILDING PHOTOSIM 2 PAEPCKE BUILDING PHOTOSIM - SOUTHEAST 1 PAEPCKE BUILDING PHOTOSIM - SOUTHWEST PS1 = 0- YYIf'~0'73 DAS\ZDs\PS1,4,/g M.D. Miller P.E., P.T., Ltd 29156 Summit Ranch Dr. Golden, Co 80401 P: 303.526.9207 F: 303.526.2706 February 10, 2012 Structural Evaluation - Level 1 Site: Aspen Meadows Institute Site Address: 845 Meadows Road, Aspen, CO 81611 Description: Add (2) AT&T panel antennas to rooftop of existing Paepcke Auditorium. Add (4) RF distribution units in existing Paepcke attic. Add (1) AT&T panel antenna to existing mechanical screen at reception building. Add (2) RF distribution units in existing telecom room in the reception building. Add RF equipment in a new equipment room in the existing parking garage under the tennis courts. Documentation: The following documentation provided the basis of this evaluation: • Existing structural roof framing plans for Paepke Auditorium, dated 08/10/09. • Antenna specification sheets, XEA-FRO-130. • Field inspection of screen wall and telco room at reception building. • Field inspection of parking garage. Project description & Loading configuration: Paepcke Building: The roof upon which (2) antennas will be installed is framed with 2x10 roof joists @ 16" on center. The top of the roof parapet is approx. 22'-2" H, and the top of antennas will be at a height of 24'-9". The proposed antennas will be mounted on a non-penetrating roof top tripod mount. The proposed coax cable will be run up through an existing conduit from the attic to the roof top. (4) proposed RF distribution units will be installed in the existing attic. The existing attic is steel and concrete framed. The RF units add a load of approximately 145 psf over a footprint of approx. 2.5 square feet. Reception Building: There is an existing steel framed, perforated screen wall on the north end of the reception building with a top height of approx. 25'. The proposed single antenna will be mounted to this existing steel frame. For wind loading purposes, since perforated screen panels are calculated as a solid structure, and the antenna will be within the area of the screen wall, there is no increase of wind load on the screen. The proposed coax cable will be routed from the existing telco room in the reception building through the exterior wall (following existing exterior mounted conduit), under the mechanical screen to the antenna. (2) proposed RF distribution units will be installed in the existing telco room in the reception building. They will be wall mounted to an existing 2*4 framed wall and add a weight of 88 lbs each. Parking garage: RF equipment will be placed in a proposed equipment room in the existing parking garage. Ail equipment loading will be on the existing concrete slab. Design Loading: Wind speed: 90 mph (3 sec. gust) exposure B. Roof snow load: 75 psf Proposed Loading: Paepcke Building: (2) panel antennas, 91bs each; (1) tripod mount, 435lbs; (4) RF distribution units, 360lbs. Reception Building: (1) panel antenna, 91bs; CD RF distribution units, 180 lbs. Parking Garage: (1) battery stack, 2500lbs; (1) PDF, 18001bs; (1) UMTS, 12001bs; (1) ION host, 25lbs; (1) fiber rack, 250lbs; (1) LTE rack, 350lbs. Evaluation Statement: The existing Paepcke building, reception b.@A~110 cpark,ovmM~fge are adequate to support the proposed AT&T panel antennas & equipment.- -1 : ze . Yours Truly, -r V.k b 1 1 Marvin D. Miller, PE A.-t Jt i 1, 1,40 m k l»4,1:2,31/4,1AV Tom Walker Subject: FW: FAA filing for Aspen Meadows Hotel From: STOUT, VINCENT J [mailto:vs7074@att.coml Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 12: 17 PM To: Elizabeth Walker Cc: MILLER, DEAN B Subject: RE: FAA filing for Aspen Meadows Hotel No, they are pending. The Aeronautical Study Numbers are below: Aspen Meadows DAS_Paepcke Memorial BLDG ASN # 2012-ANM-244-OE (Building) ASN # 2012-ANM-245-OE (Temp Crane) Aspen Meadows DAS_Reception BLDG ASN # 2012-ANM-242-OE (Building) ASN # 2012-ANM-243-OE (Temp Crane) I wouldn't expect any Determinations until around Mid-March. Vincent J. Stout Manager - Network Compliance AT&T Mobility/Rocky Mountain Region Phone Number: (303) 643-3732 Fax Number: (303) 643-3707 Address 188 Inverness Drive West, Suite 400, Englewood, CO 80112 From: Elizabeth Walker [mailto:liz@vet-ticalrec.coml Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 11:16 AM To: STOUT, VINCENT J Cc: MILLER, DEAN B Subject: FAA filing for Aspen Meadows Hotel Do we have any FAA filing results back? The City of Aspen wants to see FAA a no hazard determination if available? Thank you, Liz Liz Walker 1 : ~ at&t Date: February 20, 2012 To: Whom it may concern Re: AT&T FCC Coordination regarding EME AT&T Mobility' s national RF safety program policy requires that all of its sites are in compliance with the FCC's RF exposure guidelines at all times, and its RF safety program is designed to ensure policy requirements are achieved. The national program uses both specially-trained AT&T Mobility employees and carefully-selected RF safety consultants. Travis Parsons RAN Design Engineer Rocky Mtn Region RF Safety Coordinator 7£014 79*jna AT&T Mobility - 188 Inverness Drive West - Suite 400- Englewood, CO 80112 l-For external distribution. This Q&A is intended to provide landlords with more information about the FCC RF Exposure Rules and what AT&T Mobility is doing to comply with these rules. Remove this portion and place text below into a company letter head j Questions and Answers about the Safety of Antenna Facilities What are radiofrequency (RF) emissions? Cellular and PCS base station antennas transmit and receive radio signals to and from wireless phones. These radio signals are radiofrequency (RF) emissions that are transmitted intermittently at very low power levels within radiofrequency bands that formerly included UHF television and now include cellular, PCS, public safety service, and other telecommunication services. AT&T Mobility's antenna facilities comply with the rules established by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to limit exposure to RF emissions from FCC-licensed antenna facilities. Who is responsible for setting safety standards for radio signals from antenna facilities? The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires agencies of the Federal Government to evaluate the effects of their actions on the quality of the human environment. To meet its responsibilities under NEPA, the FCC has adopted requirements for evaluating the environmental impact of its actions, including the licensing and regulation of FCC-regulated transmitting antennas. One of several factors addressed by these requirements is human exposure to RF energy emitted by FCC-regulated transmitters. In its 1996 Report and Order and its 1997 Second Memorandum Opinion and Order in ET Docket 93-62 (http://www.fcc.gov/oet/dockets/et93-62/), the FCC established guidelines for evaluating the environmental effects of RF radiation. The FCC's primary jurisdiction is not in the health and safety area. Thus, the guidelines for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) to RF emissions adopted by the FCC were derived from the recommendations of two expert organizations - the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) and the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). The NCRP and IEEE exposure criteria were developed by expert scientists and engineers after extensive review of the scientific literature related to RF biological effects. The FCC also consulted with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Occupational Safety and Health Administrations (OSHA), and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and obtained their support for the guidelines the FCC is now using. What are the RF safety standards for wireless antenna facilities? The FCC rules define two exposure environments with MPE limits designed to provide a large margin of safety. The more restrictive General Public (or Uncontrolled) environment applies to locations where exposure to RF emissions of persons who have no knowledge or control of their exposure may occur. The MPE limits for this environment are 5 times more restrictive than those for the other environment, the Occupational (or Controlled) environment. The Occupational environment applies to locations where exposure to RF emissions may be incurred by persons who have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and are able to exercise control over their exposure. MPE limits are normally expressed as power densities and are dependent upon the frequencies used for RF emissions. Power density is normally expressed as microwatts per square centimeter or milliwatts per square centimeter, where a microwatt is one-millionth of a watt and a milliwatt is one-thousandth of a watt. The chart below shows the most restrictive FCC MPE limits for each exposure environment in each ofthe two AT&T frequency bands. FCC MPE Limts (milliwatts/square centimeter) Exposure AT&T Frequency Band Environment 700 MHz Cellular PCS General Public 0.47 0.58 1.0 Occupational 2.33 2.9 5.0 Is there a scientific basis for the FCC RF exposure standards? Yes. The FCC RF exposure guidelines are based on exposure criteria recommended in 1986 by the NCRP and on the 1991 standard developed by the IEEE, which was later adopted as a standard by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). These organizations are internationally recognized for their expertise in establishing radiation protection standards. The FCC rules constitute a consensus of the federal agencies responsible for public health, occupational safety, and the environment, including the EPA, FDA, OSHA, and NIOSH. As the landlord, am I responsible for ensuring that antenna facilities on my premises comply with the FCC RF exposure guidelines? No. FCC licensees are generally responsible for compliance with FCC rules, including the RF exposure guidelines. However, because site owners and landlords have significant control over allowable activities on their properties by FCC-regulated entities, the FCC has asked site owners to allow FCC-regulated entities to take steps necessary to comply with the RF exposure rules and to encourage common solutions for controlling access to areas where RF exposure levels may exceed the FCC's exposure limits. This is captured in the following FCC language: "Accordingly, we (FCC) urge site owners to allow applicants and licensees to take reasonable steps to comply with our RF exposure requirements and, where feasible, encourage collocation of transmitters and common solutions for controlling access to areas where our RF exposure limits might be exceeded." See Second Memorandum Opinion and Order,Et Docket 93-62, 12 FCC Red 134941[ 74 (1997) What is AT&T Mobility doing to comply with the FCC's RF exposure rules? AT&T Mobility's national RF safety program policy requires that all of its sites are in compliance with the FCC's RF exposure guidelines at all times, and its RF safety program is designed to ensure policy requirements are achieved. The national program uses both specially- trained AT&T Mobility employees and carefully-selected RF safety consultants. .. 0 . As the landlord, how can I assist AT&T Mobility to evaluate the exposure from antenna located on my premises? When requested by AT&T Mobility employees or its consultants. provide the name and contact information for each of the other antenna operators located on your property. This will enable AT&T Mobility to coordinate with all operators on your property to collect the data needed to evaluate RF exposure at sites with multiple transmitters. At some sites, AT&T may need to conduct on-site measurements. Allowing these measurements will help to expedite the evaluation process and ensure that AT&T Mobility antenna facilities located on your premises comply with the FCC rules. What are on-site measurements? On-site measurements are frequently needed for evaluation of compliance with the FCC RF exposure rules at sites where multiple transmitters are collocated. Measurements are performed using a probe that senses levels of RF emissions and a connected meter that displays those levels as power densities. The power densities are displayed on the meter as percentages of the FCC's MPE limits. The on-site measurements may be conducted by either AT&T Mobility employees or consultants who are trained in the use of the measuring equipment and the application of the FCC rules. The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology has issued guidelines for conducting on-site measurements. See OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01, (http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/bulletins/) If AT&T Mobility must post signs, where will they be posted? AT&T Mobility will consider posting RF safety signs only when an RF exposure analysis has identified the need for them. However, AT&T Mobility will first consider other options, such as elevating antennas, which might reduce exposures to safe levels and remove the need for signs. When needed, signs will be placed in accordance with appropriate guidelines to provide sufficient advance notice of areas where RF exposure may exceed established limits. As the landlord, can my employees or contractors work in areas near the antennas? The FCC rules do not include specific guidelines for worker safety practices. In fact, the FCC has determined that it would be more appropriate for OSHA to promulgate such rules. See Report and Order,FCC -ET Docket 93-62,11 FCC Red 15123 11 33 (1996) (http://www.fcc.gov/oet/dockets/et93-62/). However, an important part of AT&T Mobility's RF safety program is ensuring compliant workspaces for landlords' employees and contractors. For instance, signs and barriers are used to identify areas that are to be avoided by employees and contractors. In the event that work needs to be performed within the areas bounded by signage or barriers, AT&T Mobility is, upon advance notification, prepared to temporarily relocate or de- energize its antennas that produce emissions into the work area for the durations of the work. For interested persons, an RF safety awareness video with information for people who work near antennas can be obtained at http://www.radhaz.com or at http://www.grfs.net.