Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.Tom Thumb Building.1980c. 03 A= Tom Thumb 1978 Commercial GMP ,Ifflla �,411'2- CIE • BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION i Lkd E NY►4ppj ,;� I-3�V�T,3143oa1 fade CITY OF ASPEN 110 C011TL1 GAI FKIA QTRFFT General Construction Permit ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-2020 `f l ' U O ZE (3 � Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. ' 3 rn 2 2 JOB ADDRESS 400 E. Hyman Ave. n rn Cn Z .n m<O LEGAL LOT NO. C L BL08`8 (j (j TR ACTOR SUBDIVISION (USEE ATTACHEDSHEET) �. DESCR. V r /' OWNER M IKE 1`40N I MAIL ADORES SIB . 105 $pAL$ ZIP ♦ PHONE > t -. 7 1 1 �......,_tme�— Belt 666. .-. T1 1 66 u 1 1. 7 r_ �'I D CONTRAC"r0 MAIL AD RESS PHONE LICENSE NO. m 3. iQ Iri C/� L /' V �-5 3 $ // � m � AR HI T OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. y X "'I 4• Donald Ball 415 E. Hyman 925-1606 m O ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. r r Z r- 5. n, .� USE OF BUILDING (J -6. Tom Thumb c 2. Class of work: ❑ NEW ikADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR ❑ MOVE o WRECK m nl 8. Change of use from m Change of use to PLAN CHECK FEE") oO.I�Q �(14 VALIDATION :gMIT FEE 9. Valuation S U=v of work: PI ,f TALFEE OWl,S��q-�'3.%5 ' 10, REMARKS: Remodel 6✓ ♦ a �,n TER TAP FEE 75Co�� , Q, Type of Construction -�"Ih Occupancy Group Division 1 Size of Bulld in (Total Sq uare�!� 1% a`�'�' No. of Stones Max. Occ. Load I .y 1 V Fire Zone ( Use Zone Fire Sprinklers Required O Yes if No — APPLICATION ACCEPTED P L A N5 CMCK APP�D '(ISS ) NCE �� No. of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: BY BY .� Covered ^ Uncovered D DATE DATE DATE Special Approvals REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DATE NOTICE ZONING SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEALTH DEPT. HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION FIRE DEPT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUC- y SOIL REPORT TION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. PARK DEDICATION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS WATFR TAP y1��OQt� AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME .TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF e.NC,.DEPT. ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PER.QTtIKR (SPECIFY) FO MANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. . 7 Z 7 11 U111 1 FCON I H. /jlil � I 'NATU RL L)f ()WNF It Llf OWNI H HLIILL)k_ I41 --__ —( 7A ) WHITE -- INSPECTOR'S COPY YELLOW - ASSESSOR'S COPY PINK - BUILDING DEPARTMENT FILE GOLD - CUSTOMER'S COPY CITY OF ASPEN 130 south galena ��treer aspen, colorado281611 February 29, 1980 Mickey Salloway Box 666 Telluride, Colorado 81435 Dear Mr. Salloway; The status of building permit approval for the Tom Thumb Building is as follows: 1. Plans were submitted on January 31, 1980 2. Plans have been checked for their compliance with the drawings approved under the Growth Management Quota System and subsequent later review and approval by the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC). 3. The Planning Office will request HPC's (and/or Council's) review and approval of the solar collectors which were not reviewed previously. Issuance of the building permit will follow pending a) ap- proval of the solar collectors and b) approval of the building plans which will be checked as soon as possible - March 3-7. The earliest approval from the HPC would be by I'larch 11. Hope- fully, the building permit can be issued by March 12. Sincerel i/ John P. Stanford cc: Sunny Vann, Planning Office A Jacobs/Ball & Associates, Architects 415 East Hyman Suite 205 Aspen Colorado 81611 303/925-1606, 925-8447 April 15th, 1930 Fred Crowley, Building Inspector Clayton Meyring, Building Inspector City of Aspen & Pitkin County Building Dept. County Courthouse Aspen, Colorado 81611 Fred and Clayton: It is our understanding after various conversations with the two of you, that the following options are open to the Owners of the Tom Thumb Building: PI AN A - Applied for permit January 31, 1980 303C - Expiration of plan check 130 days 303C - Extension of plan check 130 days (ask for extension end of July) - Pay for permit January 31, 1981- 302D - 120 days to start; Must start by May 30,1931 PLAN B PLAN C Apply for separate permit to put in stair in Building 'C' (no approval needed because you are not enlarging commercial space) Phase Building 'B' and 'C' Must accomplish 10` in each 60 day period (local am.-ndment to the 1976 UBC) It is my intention to advise my client of these options. If you agree to these options, please sign below. Than you,, Don Ball, AIA AG� TO. Mr. Fred Crowley Mr. lay n Meyrfn " 130 SIU111 ga.lena,�tree t aspen; co o,ra_do- 81611 July 21, 1980 � CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Asp -Vail Investments Box 666 Telluride, Colorado 81435 Mr. Donald Ball 415 East Hyman Aspen, Colorado 81611 Gentlemen: This letter is written as a coQrtesy to remind you that you are in jeopardy of losing your allocation under the Growth Management Plan for the construction of a 5,455 square foot addition to the Tom Thumb Building. This allocation will expire on July 29, 1980, unless you take steps to preserve your rights. Specifically, Section 24-10.7 (renumbered this year to 24-11.7) of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen., Colorado, requires that you submit plans sufficient to obtain a building permit on or before February 1, 1980. You made initial compliance. You submitted plans on January 31, 1980, to the Building Department and paid the appropriate fee for a "plan check". The plans were approved on March 11, 1980. As of this date, you have not paid the fee for a building permit and a building permit has not been issued. Under Section 303(c) of the Uniform Building Code, 1976 edition, you have only 180 days following the date of application to secure a building permit. Failure to secure a building permit by July 29. 1980, will cause your application to expire and will, additionally, cause your Growth Management allocation to expire. You have two available courses of action. First, the building official may extend the time in which you may acquire the building permit for a period not exceeding 180 days upon your written request "showing that circumstances beyond the control of the applicant have prevented action frow being taken"; or, you may pay the appropriate fee and obtain a valid building permit. s very tru �._ L Rona d W. Stock City Attorney RWS:mc cc: Karen Smith Clayton Meyring Jacobs/Sall & Associates, Architects i 415 East Hyman Suite 205 Aspen Colorado 81611 303/925-1606, 925-8447 J U LY 215, 80 131J►uDIt.1c-j 'pE-P">- G ITT of ASPEN/ PITK► N COUNTY f I -Me:2 GoL J IzTHo L15 ASPEN, Go• 8t�11 FRF1D ► G L_P.YTON 1 4 PATSY : = AM APP LY1 NG FOK AN EXT'E.N s Iota ot= ► Hs - PLAN CHECK ( ISU IDP.Ys) A5 PEIZ 'T1-ta h�ru -Hso L.C-,-TTSK C -5e;,= ITe+A A uBG 303 C Fm fz THE Tom THuMr.S F3uLr)IN6 2M�T , Dui TO 5F-,—'aN )D TiE- CQNT20L. OF THE APPL_1CPANT" WHICH HA-5 PiZF-vcNTEn ACTION FQoM Bt:I tJ G -FA KEN . 7H E 1 n17-F,2E57T RATS k41 T ZO % + AT TT-4 E--' AFrCo>< I M PATS -n M e We WI ✓RE SCH EDLI L-ER-a -ro CON STZ UCT1C)tJ WHICH MAIDE-:E THE PRGJF—CT FWANCIAU.Y uN FI;A51 B LE * ACT 10 ►J FP.o tvt BE► N c TA k�� . =T 15 Now To L.ATe- To S?Ar-T 6oN 5Tmu GT IoN fit` THIS YEAP-S P3uIL•DI0G 5eASo11,J I T)LIE -RD -n-}E COMPLEY,\-rr OF - H E PF-o.1 EGT i A* BE COMPLETED 1 1,j TIME Fogr Tf-IE WIN-re-f-E = T1-1�2EF�e>✓ Fo2M NLL--r ASK FaK A �xT�1s1aJ OF I eo TAYS Fort T1 -= cHEc AS Pe-P, mg. t:;�oN SToc.KS (5645- ATFAGHED) DPcTC-D � IA 'i UL7 21 ► 80 . GG : MR. QoN SToGK Mr. M I c keY SALLOVJA'( wZ1 TFG.N PL11Ntl! AsPENOPITKeev AGIONAL eUcLOcnsLO DEPARTMENT July 29, 1980 Jacobs/Ball & Associates 415 East Hyman, Suite 205 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Gentlemen: We have reviewed your request for an extension of the Plan Check for 180 days on the Tom Thumb Building and we have no problem with granting your request at this time. As prcvided by Section 303C of the Uniform Building Code, we are permitted to grant you this extension. You must obtain a building permit within 180 days of this date. I.sincerely hope that this will meet your satisfaction. If you have further problems, please feel free to get in touch with us in the office. Sincerely: Fred Crowley Chief Building Ins for FC:mh E 506 Emit Main Street A t3pen, o oloracao 0-1611 303/.925-59-73 February 27, 1981 City of Aspen Aspen, Colorado Re: Lots K and L Block 88 City of Aspen: Building Permit No. 41-80 Dear Sir: By this letter, you are authorized to transfer the current building permit, No. 41-80, upon the above referenced property in the name of Asp -Vail Invest- ments, Box 666, Telluride, Colorado 81435 to Michael P. Cagnoni, 18 North Vine, Hinsdale, Illinois. Sincerely yours, //464"//' Michael/*. Salloway General Partner Asp -Vail Investments JACOBS/BALL & ASSOCIATES, ARCMECTS r 415 E. Hyrnan Suite 20 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-1606 925-8447 To GENTLEMEN: WE ARC SENDING YOU ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter LCTTCE r o 1F "MUMETTG DATE JOB NO. ATTENTION RE. ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Change order ❑ the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: 0For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS [) J n . �_-e ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US COPY FORM 240 2 - A-lnlrle 01.101, M.s• 014%0 ---------------- SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us a once. de J //PG MTV-' 3 • /o . 8/ �-°ej l�- al je 4 a vcC/ /off , s 12e r No 4�.�c ol 3. 1�esir.5'e /o a d/n q o/o c /-- re /o ca /e all a o(9-"^S 1�py�e-.ol 4. lWe C V, an, 0 G4i+�� i2rve Q HPG .�Ef�• /�� 80 111 as ree� �®n -74;, h H1 -- /. Awn, 7 e/�,.- G�urivl C'oxstruc t'�avc Oder r r1n,:71 Ty/Q 'JaY-1e4 To" Tl-/zj"I3 CAS c�/�� Toit/S CFE/1/ SPACE �� 2x /oG� - �o/6, c7 ��s ,� L -- x CSee drv�r, w dmemsi�xs BulL.Dov T CAL CL/lAT/oNS" x 2: / _ /92 3G`�, 3 .4� Allow e of - - �i�JPGoY�E �u�s/n1G /9a 3 Pr�vldeol Cb"44E�C/AL SPAC, /of 6 /8¢. 6� x 47 /0 5-/3, 9 A//w eo/ l� �Co�vT� -�'f305S OF Ze&We ^ F/r, /798 do Ile v;2o 51, �s frloral/e 9/� - Z/� er f So y 0 .H U) m H z � O H � E1 H Q � r� v ro a v z > 4-) H � � C] v 00 a r- H ro v rn F- 0) p� >1 ro m ro �4 4-) ro x U) �j x ro �4 F w 4-) 3 v 0 0 CL4 O o �4 Ei --►' U 00 z U) z O a w O F-+ a F N a z z a z > w w O r H a Q w a z z Ei H w z Ei a a a w O O< E-1 > o a a w F-I H> x H W w E-4 E-4 w O x E-' w E-+ a E-4 a< a a o m a< O H O w z>> w a WOWWWW U� a z c� P z O O P 44 Ei < w w z O H O a H cn H w Ei z W F+ a a z Ei �H Ei h w H z< w w a x w O H z O> as a a a H M x O g o w as H>4 o a x z a w N E1 a a z x w H 3 rl N M �' lfl is O 54 z O E-+ 6 cn 3 H (Y, a Q M m m =MPMMMM �Mmmm H z w H z a � a a as x w O G] U E- H w zw w Hw �a x z as zcHn + Fw 3cHn �a a� a w< awQ E �4E-4zQ zwQ w<� h w°wz� zaa (D 0 z 0 0 can 0 Q x u 0 a I --I 0 xx0 � way z aU) Q� 00 - O 1"'1 < - 1 0 - 1:)>ww a`�w �H W Hoa w aaoa Paoa, H rM U) x U) " U) 0 -4 U) UIH < H <I'D f< UN FC O H C] H H W z U H w H U H H I -I H Pa a U z Pa a >1 - a-1 In 1 �4 r-I �4 tr U) 0., 4-) -ri tr v O rZ 4-) ro a) -1 v� cn cn 4-4 1 }4 44 O En 4J U 0 a) 04 O U -4 O rl v u 0 u Q) a) - a) w v rid -- 1rn rrn o 4.4 a) - cn +J a) �4 zr T o 0 o .� +-1 �3 r. (1) O A 0 00 r-I Ln � r1 -P a C� �4 >~ U +-) ro s~ 0 a) 4J :� > ro r-I N cr 0 a�x ° 0) m� �z � a) a) •r-I u O ro ro +-) ro - U o +-) a) U ro Q, a) 4-j •r-i 4-) O U rn0rAOmrnro m �10v ro r-i >1 C7 •N ::5 a) I~ N - U) A x v 0:�-ri 0 M a ro U 'o [ 0110 m U >~ (1) a) �4 O 14 -H �4-r-i � 4 W M v 0 ro —1 0 >a ro O �4 0 a) a 4-) 4-I rl� s~ (n 4-I a) a >1 -P 4-4 m ro a) 0 --1 44 O O I~ O U cn c 00 •r•I ­4 -4 (1) 4-4 �-I r-•I a) r I a) 0 ri -r-I �r rn ro • ri rid • r 4 04 �)4 r — U r--1 4-4 rn •H CO 'o r 1J 4-4 rA ro ­4 - a) -ri U F9 a) a) 0 v U 04 ro s~ ro 0 F� �44-4 a) A r-♦ �4U) v z A a) O tr .� � 0 -1 N N -1 ,s~ to � I~ -P 4J ro r-a ro 4-)ro a) M � -r-I ro o E ro r 1 U 0 +) 0 a) a) i4 Z rO a) -i 0 ri C E-+ Pa U i~ A 0 ro a) >~ I U U > 4 s~ (1) ro +-) Q1 G U) 34 44 J, 4-) v S4 (1) O U i~ -A O W 0 0 0 m a) O N r-I a) E r•i ra -H rTl a) -H I--U -H- tT > E~ ro E 4J 04rO 'ty tP rn a '0 +) C ro a) O i~ 41 0 ro In �4 from w v r,04JrO 40 O O U U O r- -ri a (n 4-4 W O -r-1 0 4-4 •r•1 41 U r I r-+ A ro n O 0 • -r-I 4-) O w •N r-i ro (1) E~ A a •-i z 4J U 44 ro 'U U ., b is a) ! 4 •r•I U+-J rov 00Q) v r� 4-) 04U0 ,~ U) > I~ (n (1) U U) (1) �4 +-) U) r cn -r-I U �4 A E-r + 0 (1) 0 J-- "I s4 ro 04 M O +) (1) a) ro 3 s~ a F� 4-) r-I r 4 ro Fi C '-i a In ::I cn Oro (1) a a —1D4 ro a) 41 O -r-I tr •--4 a) 0 s4 r-i a C 4-4 4-) a -r-1 01 -1 k -H 4-4 �4 x v >~ 0 C: E-+0Pa F:C H0roroUcnK�v30 Pa W x E-+U4J mom m m m m m i m ti RIO GRANDE PARKING -1 F MAIN HOPKINS l--CITYJ H 0 0I I 0 E WHE L R OPE A OUSE ::1H H HYMAN COOPER Z J. C3j: •,��� a Project Lo ion 0 I E UTE CITY BANQUE H J H Z z J Q Q i o EDURANT DO � NORTH O O 0 � Tmi 1 1 1 1 i MILL STREET - tv A � Z G y I, 2N0 FLOOR ✓t ROOF ONERHNPJG C-ONC EXISTING BUILDINGS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• to remain s; \ \ /� ••• ,'l`:� ',•, °., a ! l a 111XN, \ \Nf Or- �• °� . 0 C z Z pR•'�RLC AP, Sj�• x O 65 10 ........ .... ........................ _................... ...... ... ............ A.00 ................................ -5 "•� 19 EXISTING BUILDINGS •"" to be removed ani��az�H uzlla2oaa v �4 4.) vv0v 4-4 U) 4-) A 44 O O 4L 0)-P0 v>~ 419-: 3 4) O r-I 4-) O o G •r4 4-) r (0 O U -A U r-I 0 'd 44 4-) Q, E~ >,.H � N v 3 r4 (a 3 9� 4J o (0 4-4 O >I �4 U) v•14 (d M rd 4-) M rd U) 4-4 O r� x rd s : r-H O r-I U) is + 'd I~ • rA v Z Q) 4-) v 4-4 U) 44 4J C), C 41) 41) N (a r 4 rd r-4 v 0) > v 41 tT v Qa —I �4 > U rd 4ll rd -rI z v A v X 0J:� U v •� 41 :J 0 m A U 44 •r-4 'd 4J N 41 0 rd 'd U) 'd rd 4-) r Qa In U 4J 4) cn 0 s~ v I~ } 4 Qa v v r-I �4 U v U) tT �4 44 C C v LT r I N —A 4) U) (o �4 •r'4 0 44 >~ v 0 rd 'd C~ N C 04 cn 0 04 �J Qa �4 4J r4 F % 4-) z rd ri 4-) •r4 i r-4 U a A �4 4J v I~ rd r= i4 ro -r•I 04 4J O —4 b •r-4 ov 0(nAv r-I ov O �4 'dU Ucnm s4 44 v U E •ri U .a Q. is 41 v N v (o Q, rd cn 'd r-I v C 4J F 4~ U) A 3 rn rn 0 4y �4 ri (n A is .,q -r-I v 4j O �4 -1 4ll H Qa —A � -.•r rd 4~ f: U) rd -4 O O r-I ri 4-4 .c U 41 + A 3 A rU -r-I O v m v+ r♦ U r-i v Q 4) U •,i 4L 4-4 v 4J A (d Qa >, fO 0 3 rd I~ C 4-I U) + tT H rd 4j 4-) r4 r-I - U 4-4 4) v 'd 3 O N �4 I~ v 44 r-I vr-i (n 41 N 0 w U to O Q4 A -H •r-i 'd O -r-I tT N .> rd rd v • 'd rti v «i v :4 C O I~ E4 M 4J O Q4 �3 s~ .� 4J Z v 4, (n Im 44 41 o 3 .r.4 04 rn 1_= �4 A •r•I 4J O 14 v rd - -4 r-I 'd ::j Q E-4 v —4 N O 41 v • r•I U) 4-J v U) rd r-4 rd 41 H >1 U) v • 44 X 44 U v (d + N 4-J v U) 44 >1 13) •rI •rI U 4-) 41 tT is v Q A �4 >~ •r-I •r-4 44 _ 4) 44 s~ �4 3 'd :1 o s~ �-: s4 O -r-I 4-) 0 M :4 rd �J U) r~ • v s~ 44 W C —4 to rd -r•I 0 v 3 r-I 44 Qa r-1 v rd 4J C O 'd 4-1 + rd 4) r I +y O -4 0 4-) Cs r-4 v 44 Qa -P U (0 r-I U) r-4 rd v N H U �, }-4 U v Qa 4j Z -H ()4 O U ' -r-i r-I rd -r4 r U -P -rA 4-I C 'd v -r+ 3 o U v rd �4 i4 -r-I �j rd U tT > -rr 4J 4-) O Z 4-4 'd �-4 r. A 44 4J 4-I Z A 'd Qa v 1:: V U Q E~ -ri 0 4-) -1 to Q., -r-I 4-) (d U) U) U) x C N •r-, •r•4 x v Gov -r4v 'C� 13) vrd Ursro 0�4 COs4�C-�4is9 oaU)v 4-40UZvrdC r•iz Zs40 Z 4-) 3 4J 4J 9� 0 4-J A �:l 0 4- r4 v v rd �4 • r-4 s4 v a A 4J U) - r-I 44 -rI •r1 -P Z —1 'd S4 Qa A ro v Qa C 3 O rd 4J f~ r1 r-4 4J •rI r-I r-1 S.' r-I f~ 4) O v t3) O I:: v -r-4 r-i 44 o v (d 44 H •rI -H 4-) r- r-I 44 :� U r4,- -rI 0 4-) + i4 -H O -r•I > -r-I O :3 U) 3 :I v m O 0 (a cn 41 v C7 >~ rd rd v :� Qa -P N 4J U) is A �4 Qa �4 > 4 - I~ O 3 'd 44 v 4-) A • rl r-I I~ !~ 4]1 I~ 41 O O v �4 rd 4J C a O N M I~ k (d rd v 0 i4 •r•4 U v 4-4 v U) �l .11. U N v a I C. 4J a4 • r4 v 'd v rl� • r•4 rd v A r. ::3 �:j (o U v v .Ci U) rd v (d U (d v •ri -P (d r•4 -M 4-) v (d C. M 3 41 U (n 4) 'd 0 4•) 44 U) 34 rI 0 4-) 41) v v v O 4, • (n O v z r 4 -r1 I- Is-_ v O rn C �4 4-4 -r-I 44 > rc: Irl. C �4 v U) t\ < r i (') �4 (d A 3 H 4J 4.4 Q4 < A Qa O U) O < E-r 4J 4J 0, A (d v v 44 A � !A s~ 4-J z O -1 0 E-1 'd 'd fn -r4 3 4-4 H H O 0 r4 rd O 4•) U U O ra � A N U) H O v +4 w tr'd' C 0 A rO z > U) -H In U) I~ 4-4 H O O 4J O r-I is -r-I (d O 'd Q 4 4 v N 4y N >~ U) 04 (d >~ 'J r-I (Ti a >~ v s4 $ 4 O •r1 O 4j r4 O 04 C H rd v O C O s~ W k �4 O U) i4 O rd U waEi QaCCQ o 41 m >1 4-) a a r1 U) H U) x 0 •r-I (d 4� M � rd Ga 4: G4 r.: 4:[L: 4-I CO :4 to te 0i 0 � n (rH-4 cn , c44 U 44 U; C i cn vi fn En W 4-) 0 x rd r I s4 0 l4 0 >1 U —1 •1-1 F wX o v v o00 4nu)o O v tt 44 CD 0 >1 9 >1 0 0 0 0 mot' U1 4n a O o r-4 r-) >1 A 4) v }4 43 O 0 4) o rd o + 4) 0 -H 4-4 O -rI 0 0 ID4 E� •r4 O X CN W U) U fGa 4y + '-4 + x •• U A Ei H W E-+ U x a A H 3 w 0 4, z w CA E-4 E-4 •r.4 �z [i H a a z o H U) 4-) U G w z w z H W A > H rIFO N O Ao xx a w A 'd v 'rI z •• H N z H !� a H •• fZ •• rd is U) z z U) A E4 A A A Q U g rd U) O E4 0 E-4 a U•• w a w H r� --,4 H U" a z U x rx a 3 rz; E-4 w w zH xz a HH ow IQ �A U r7 U Ix Ha HwH fzca UA pH a �:) o U x x za xQz E10 woo cn> L•CU) Q O < D Oa z0 oa aW HW E-4 a a a a U N< QN Hw ul xa 3� 0 rd E-4 O }4 r4 z P I u a H 1 r1 („ r� v CQ C m = m m = 9 mm mm mm m mm cn i4 Q) >~ tf1 +J I r i m v o U• ri v ro ri v tr 10 A aJ 4-4 ro rO 4J U v c ro > Q r- O a -4 m +� ri • ri O o 'O U) �4 4J U 4-) . 1 Q) • ri ro r-i >, ­4 to • ri v "0 tP �4 -1 ­4 z m 5~ ro v ro >, ro� rO ri 0 ro v 1~ >I v A ro v 4-) rO 4.4 v-i • ri ri v • ri -4 • ri .--i A 41 >. U ri s4 �:l is 1 (1)i4 ro v 12 ro U -4 -ri U 3 a 4J ro -Q s~ to ro ro ro v a 1~ �4 U U �4 -- �:l ro 1~ -ri tr >, ::5 'U 3 v u-i a r♦ Ln >, ro s~ ro r~ I •ri a) ro rQ a-C: v v U 1~ Q� r-I 0 v U) 0 �6l 3 r ro -ri c U •ri S~ 1~ u1 U 4-) �4 • ri 4J ro 1~ 4J U O :4 r-i ro rO Ln -P • ri 4J 0 ro 4-) ri v 0 Q) 4J ro ro U ro • ri a v v = :4 1,, -4 U) 4J c O ro !~ .s~ C: a to v�C O v �4 r i 0 .c� > N Q 0 ro s~ ri r-I U U -ri ro 3 4J E •ri > +-1 r-♦ a) v Q �4 4-) v r-♦ �4 r i v -ri x ro v 4J C~ v o x �4 >, r �:l a 0 rO 1~ 44 ro �4 S4 v 3 ra to to O tr w c U v v rO Q) 0 (L) a tr 0 ri v -ri -ri U) H 4J -ri •,-A s~ 0 4-) a) to a) > r i UP v �4 v 1~ v U -Q ro >~ tr ro s~ x to •ri �4 v U) 4J i4 a Q) C, o r- -r-I Q> �4 r m r3'.c 0 0 1~ 4J ro Q) to ro 1~ to Q) .c �:l v ro v F U) : 41 4J 4J 3 -r4 v :1 4-) a) 44 -ri v s~ v ­4 0 ro X-- 4J -0 0+ U) v v 4-) 41 M 0 S-4 � � -1 �4 4J s~ 4-4 4-3 �4 v v 4-4 • ri -ri ,.� 4J r-I - H Q) U) U) 4-4 >y • r i .� Q) �l r- 0 -4 +� .[ O �l 4J 0 4-i ro -1 U -i v >1 v 44 0 ro ,Q x co rO 0 U) U) r-1 v -ri �4 �J v 4J �4 Q a 4J O ri r-4 -ri -1 4 O U O ­4 v U -ri v r-I i~ 4J a) U) O, Q,, v U �4 4J ri 4J • ri 4J r4 ri rn a rO v? r-i r� �A • ri 4J • ri 4J ro o 4-4 \ 3 U v 0 W 1~ 3 3 a > > rC) v c ro-i c4-) 3 �4 75 4J O •ri0vvx•r-, �4 (1) ro ,F • �4 v4-1ro ro -H Q) s~ (0 ro vU 4-) -P U 1~ N 0 a) O rO u) a) m v v a) • ri v s~ • ri 3 v 4-4 U 4J a ro r4 U CO i4 -ri �4 U 0 -ri rO in U 1~ U U) U 1~ v > r .ri 3 O -ri U a) I Q) -r4 04-4 v v 04- -1 .-i cn Q) -ri ro O Q) ro ro E 0 0 to rO 4J ,c v Q rO 3 En • M x O 4-4 C� ,>~ 4-4 44 N a) a U) 4 au a v4-j s4 �4 a c (1) 3 - M (1)• Ln (1) a) 0 v r-i o 4-J 4J Q)44 :4 -4-J U) �4 4-) m ri ro X: ro a 4-4 ro n 0 �4 U) v -ri 4J �4 44 •c: O rO ri v 1-4 U 4J Q) o E� a) - �4 a) O --q > ro a v �4 w C 4J 1~ :4 4-) v a �4 -1 ,Q �4 C) rO C) a) rO to U) a 4J a SQ 0 a) - ri .c ro 0 0 4J . 0 0 U) ro U o ro a v s4 4-) to Q) -1 ro Q) a 4J ro 0 -ri z �4 m v 4J r. LW - r-i 4-I r-4 U w -ri �-: •r4 k-0 44 •ri a o o -ri 'O -ri U 3 �4 is 0 �4 0 �4 3 0 -ri v i•4 ro 4" I U 4-) 44 4J r-1 1 �4 ri — �-: a -ri tp 4-) to O 4-) 44 U rO 0 ro U) --1 4-4 Ln aJ :4 • • �:; 4-) a Q) > 4J �:J Ei >, r-I 1~ U to (1) 0 a) v o • +•r 4-) ro O to 0 rO N w U) v O a Ln 4J •ri ,c 4J v bT -ri Q) < s: s4 to 41 r-I ty) U) v (1) -ri 41 v is • ri > • ri rO ::1 rn ro 't3 is Q)• ri -C- Q) $ - M • ri 0 4J ro 4-4 C Q) �A >~ 4J -ri a) 1~ > H •ri 4J 1~ U) 11 3 •ri �4 U 4J Q ro 0 rO is 4-4 to v U -r-i �4 4J Q 70 4J C-- •ri 0 0 Ei > -r1 0 Q) r �4 s4 o c o ro to to v 1~ -H 4J 4J �4 U 0 O 3 >1 v $4 7� U) -- 4J v 4L4 v Q a ro v to 4) r-1 s A �J v ro- 4J ro -4 ro a -H �-4 v .Q �3 Q)4-)x w 4 O .Q (1)r + -ri 0 :~ c 0 •ri ro 44 a (1) 4J a 4J A to 4J -ri ri •ri Ei U) .. ro 4j ro 0 a r1 U c o r1 0 FC 4-)ro c r-i to ro 1~ ro 44 rn � -4 s~ -4 4J N -1-4 ro ro o ri z to � O a) C;)r4 (1) F- � -ri 1.0 U r-i (1)•r4 -- U) (1)- U) 4J C) U 4-4 -r-i •ri s~ E r-♦ 4-) s~ .ri $a -ri 4J Ur ro -ri U r� rC7 -ri v v tr �5 -ri ,c 0 41 0 3 0 Ei Cn ro a ri 3 a 4J v Z c I v a 3 ro O 4J >. �-: rO 4J -A • ri U ri U > F- 0 rO — to �4 v • ri U E N .ri -1 a E-- 4-) 0 •,1 tr ro -ri 1~ U to 4J W :4 (a) a) —i ro $4 Q) �l ro 4J o •ri —A U) S4 4-) U C) U • 4 U) 1~ ro a) � ro • ri ro 4J - ri rj v 4J v �4 (1) f~ +J • ri ro Un > v v ri >~ U ri .-, a �:l • 4 > 4J 4J 4-4 ri rO O 4-r v U) > O) 41 -ri (a) x cn - r-i `4 v -ri 4-4 •ri x (N O a) 1~ ro O (1) v >Y s~ rO a ro .0 >, Q) a ro ro -r4 Q) x 4-I (1) .c 4-)a) 14 rO m � ro a 3 Ei to rro 3 Ei 4-4 �4 v 0 to 4J -ri s4 w ro 4-I ro x 41 v U }4 r-1 • ri U) ,C� - ri ro H 3 +-) 4J i< �4 a U) ro �4 G, w 0 v N 41 U) v >4 0 rO r i r4 o U) v 4J v �4 U (1) 4J -1 a 1~ M 4J Cn t!) v c rn E to �:s ro �4 4J v CO ro N 0 In 4J ri 0 ro 4J • M -- v 4J s~ o 0 x U) U rO ro• ri t7) a a s Ln o 4W r-i �l ro r-1 4-) ro •ri s~ C: a -1 o rO 0 v .c r-i :4 ro $ 4 rO • ri • r♦ G4 G4 4A v Q .c 4J v 4J v • ri ro rO N 4-r rO > -1 I'o v a s�4� 33ma �ro� �� ow ro rO U) U 0 Q)its H A � fs f�+ G4 G4 Cs+ rz -XI -P La N ro •ri x r4 U N o ,jl~ ro U �4 ro 0 U] v Cn U) to w w N 1� O m U to O ro 0 ri r-i • v >~ ri 1~ v 4-) :1 4J s4 U •a) to c ri rn Ln o Ln Ln o •.i - U >1 • ri U) Q) C U) r-i s4 • ri --I �' t o v' Ln o v r- 4J -ri r-i rC7 -ri a 4-4 a) -ri -4 Q) Q 41 to lc a) N . 00 O m O �4 v ro�1--O 0rO ror4 E �:l ro N 41 41 4J �4 •ri Q) F- v� O lD H cl if1 r I N 'Q M U) ro '0 �4 x U) 4J C) r•-I tP .H c rsg v v •ri v -H r- 'c 0 4J 4J 9-: 4J rt3 • ri U 4J r-1 Fj �4 U1 ro 3 U 5-: v ro .H U r 0 ro v ri N tJ U rO N tr 0 r-i c v ro `•4 U )-4 Q) v E v ro a) S~ -M >~ ra ,Q 0).c 0 1('. 4-) .0 .� > au UP � 0 .,.1 (1) ri 3 v 0 Ei (n -P 4-) o v 0 to ro s~ 0 `•4 1~ �4 O U) �4 1-1 a) r-♦ U r a ri s4 a 0 a 3 v v 4J ro w ro v- v ro v r4 to a i4 N • 4-) rC7 �" U) I a) i4 — > a S4 ro ro v 41 U) 4J v U) �4 rO a ro U) v En r4 r-1 to -, U ri ro >y 3 v v 1~ - • Q v U vC7) ro ro m 4J U ri r-i U) U) a ro O U) >`I f~ I Q L4 U r- -ri ri U) rO U 14 tT s~ r I v v �3 a r4 3 v rO 0 •• ro v ro ri U U tr s~ i 4j w to -- 4-) c ri ro ro .c o 4J �4 �4 •ri w ri o E a to �4 s4 c ro i f~ > v U) ri �3 ::5 4J ro ro a ro 4-) > U 41 U) ;:1 a) v ri r4 a) C H 4J v ri C: U) rO 1~ rO v 4-4 4J CA ro H ?4 0 0 t5) 3 ro rO i E 0 Ei ro :4 (2� O N ri U 0 ro s~ a O U -- 4J Ei Q) a) U r-4 1~ s v U O N m> c -P ro 0 a cn U ro O -ri U to o s4 U ro c ro v 3 tr m O U r. : ri •ri r 1 1~ �4 >4 a ro tr v ro to a r-i 0 tr ro v tr -- v o 4J r-4 4J a o a 1~ U v -- o tr s~ •-I < r-4 -H 1~ U 1~ �4 4-) > •rl to a a) < U U) -ri S4 >, 0 to >~ v ro ro & z —4 ro 4J ri ri • H a) • ri - r1 U �) 4J a (1) z 4J v 0 -1 a) 0 U l4 ,Q ri ro rO r'-1 41 U) rO •ri rO U 4J �3 S-4 tT U) U) -1 E (0 rO ro (1)7 U > f .Q -1 41 S-: 4-4 L: Q) $:. M4J Ei f: .ri a 4J rC3 '.3 s~ a > to 0 S4 �4 �j ro ro a) �3 44 �3 U) U ul U ri ri x 0 E~ 0 ri $ m 0 1 4-) z v v 0 a :4 •-i [ 0 0 �4 U 1~ W 4J 4J v U v 4J (ti U 0 U -A 3 s~ ro :4 (1)4J '4 Q) Q)ro a) '--1h to U) s~ & s~ ro = 0 ro O a v :4 rO > v �4 'O E 4J -r) a ---4O •ri -ri +� 3 3 3 m a) 4J 4J ,4 -1a ro 0 s4 a 1~ v O o s~ 0 C rO to •ri a x x v Q)v 0) a 0 0 i c� a a 2: U w cn ra m Ei 41 co ro U) -H ro d£ a w w z z z z * 0 a Ei = w = m = 9 = = w m m m = = m C: � 4J•r+ > I >1 vs~C4 �l > 4-J vma rov v v 41 b O •ri It O A r4 >1 ro m C: 4 CA O v A -i 4J 4J O 10 ro ro 4J m r: U r i v r4 v m y ro -4 E z I~ v v :j -11 4-) -ri r•-4 C4 r-i a v ro > E O r-+ ro m (n •ri C4 �'! -ri E: v > ro r4 ro � O A :~ v • 4 4J v 4J ro C4 rO C4 v 1.4 r4 :E -i ro -ro X 3 >~ U r-1 1~ I v r4 0 ro v C4 v v ro tT v N r-4 O z rl • r-I • r-I v O > r-i -A 44 C4 4J 4J m C. C; > > m ro m 34 O m 4J 4-4 A E: 4J • ri r-1 ro U) 4J v • r1 O v ro r-I $-I • ri a • ri v U) 44 O v�3 4J ro E v X X >, 4J 9 rO A r-I v A 04 4J U) -r-i ro E: :4 ro U EE r-I U i4 v N 44 ro C4 m ro m ::5 X �4 O -1 v v A O ro -1 r-I O S4 ro 4J cn U) E� v r-I v 4J 4-) �J m 44 v r. ro r4 a tT rl ro a �" •r-1 4J fT 4J v v tT O V-H 4-1 C-, 4J r-I A z ro v a : C: 'ri v ri A S4 >~ 4J v rO ro v .. v 4J ri >r.r-I m N 4J O 4J A .- U) ri U C; v �4 4J E ro rn v m v O m v U ro 4J •rl -r-I r-I ro 4J 4J 4-4 >1 >~ O > A v 4-4 > r-1 •ri ro C; ro O v •- r-i •1-1 i4 ro ro�l ro 4J 4J r 4 �4 U O 44 - ri v ::I 4-4 �4 I~ '0 C4 44 a C: -A 4J •ri tr O rO O $ v C4 O H O v v O N ro tT v >~ 4J 4J v •ri m 44 4J C Z 4J m ro C4 9 U) N rO r-i I~ U) S4 - r-I v ::3 ro m $ 1 44 r-4 •ri r- ro v ro C4 v:� -r-I CS -r-I m ro A A O v z ro�:5 X O >4 U v m :3 r- 4J tT U > U 9 v 4J 4J Ic: v �4 m O 34 U) 34 -r-I tT r4 ro �4 •r-I In v H v U O -r4 i4 U U) •ri 41 rO a, -H 4J v ro 4J Z v a U ,a �., U 4J .C: m C4 4J ro V v ro .[ rO C4 a U •r4 r-4 m Z 4J S4 104 ro U 4J m 4J a �4 a ro > ri 3 E-4 C: 4J •• :� x O ri O 4J O a v v I~ ro •ri .-. r-I ro 4J (d ro ro U) rO C4 i4 U) r-i r. -1 ro •n v U v v a 4J Z 4J yr -1 (D -4 v . r-i ,S-. �.. Z 4) ro ro r4 -r4 N v v >~ U O tT U C4 A v ro ro 4J 4J �4 A 3 • >~ 4J m O ro U) a (d • ri r4 4J Er rJ -4 C4 ro ro i4 v v •ri C: • m -H 4J m ro ro m z v U ro v -r1 a N X N a f4 :3 rl A C4 C4 i4 O U) m ­4 4J v -r1 rO ro tT O v S4 S4 Er U m O A i4 ,S.' ;:s r. U r1 4J 4J v Z }4 v r-4 Z m i4 a) v v I". U ri ro v m ro 1 -1 ro 4J v O ro -H rO (n U) 4J a) v rO -ri v m 4J 4J U) 14 ri A a r- v • a U U-r4 C 3r1 1 vr-4 044J.1-. v 3 4J v m ro ro av ro v >1 En O W U) -1 m i4 4J :� I~ rO (d ro 4J 4J a U) z N a v tT a A r4 O O i4 a) rJ rO •rl rJ -H 4J -H C:) O O v 2: v m -r-i •r1 rO •ri �4 r~ O 4J •ri 4J U v r-A I ro H C: �4 rO (n 3 I~" A a U) A E v v m m v U U •ri ,c rr > (d ri E + ro 1~ v a) • ri m rO 1~ v O A • r•I 1:.. �:l a r-I Z 3 m ?r r% :. ri ri m rC O m O rO v 14 v 4J •ri v m f4 4J �4 O A 4J -ri O A (KI -H ro ro U Q)ri H 4J (1)U $-I Q) 4-) r- 9 m -r-I 4-4 (1) U E„ r, rl , C: �4 ti) .C.' Z O 4J O a L: (d > • ri v :4 " >1 > r1 O ro r4 ri U r0 44 v O S ." 41 a •ri ro 41 rO ro n.+•r-4 E: r-i ro m v A -ri • -i S4 r-i O - r-I v O A CQ) H ro Z 4J ::J v v 'b 4J •ri -1 a m m r-i ri ro ro 4-4 4J -.i 44 44 S: 4J r14 >~ >r C4 r-I m m tT �4 >~ -4 v v v A 0) v v E: O 3 44 m >~ 4J -r1 • O U A &4 O ro 9 �l ro O v v U m v U •r4 r- rO C4 U r: v ro •ri 0 0 rO U) U U rJ C4 C4 U 4J U a)X rd >, U m -r-I rd r-1 •ri 4J C" -r-4 r- S4 -4 -r � O ro W m v 0 m� U -r-I I~ 4 a)0 0 (d m m � r4 44 m Q) 4J P A 4J � C) -4 Z (1)r3 C: 3 rl O ro In -r-I 4-) -H r4 a) m U -1.4 ro 44 -H Q) ro ro r-1 4) C) ro m O row 4J m U I m v 34 a m U O U ro C4 C4 4J Uri >~ l0 4J R i �4 ..C: v L: S:� r. • H 4-4 4 (d �. ,'� U i4 14 O >i S4 4J 4J O .-. m O • 11 N O .-• ro a4 E4 E-q C Es a) H O r0 O 4J > v A ro U H rO A 4J H U) 4-I r-1 v r-A $ �•N M 4J M U v N I Lo I W I4 4J v O r4 N v O v U -P O A m r� -rl 4J 1 m rd ro m U U ` 4J r- �4 r-I 4J 4J r- 4-4 ro i4 N a m ro v ri O h m O ro v v rO 0 m U O C4 rO v C4 t3) E: rO •ri 4J •r-I 4 4J 4-) Q) 4J 4J v tT (d v N -r4 v O fT O 1~ •ri v A -P 3 41 (d 41 >1 r� ro 4J �4 i-1 .C: v 3 ro 44 •r.i N 4J v r I rl r4 4J E: ro I- U v -1 3 1:' tT -r4 v 3 m Q) .. rO O -r-I A ro r4 4J r-I m r.. O 34 4J ro A t✓• v v a rO X: ro m O ro O -r-I c r-♦ -1 :3 -r-I C v S4 tT a �C t~ U) E+ :1 Ei w v U r-> ri O I •r4 U O 3 'r•I U 44 rO rz I v a v O 34 >i U O>i 4J �4 s~ ro ro ro A v •r4 s~ U O 4J !~ U C4 CO 4J 4J S4 r-1 �:l 44 O ro 4-1 4J 4J C4 'n44 i4 4J O -ri -4 z -ri (d U ro a r4 4J r-I U rO rO 44 ::1 ro v 4-) �. r-1 v ro -i 4J • ri 4J >1 ri r: ro >1 4-) r-I U v 3 v ro O U U r-i r4 U A > r-I v �D -H r-I C4 4J O C> rl -A ro v tr •n ro I ri A ro N v a N • 4J I~ -r-I 41 -N 4J 4J O ro 44 O v �4 S-. ro rO -ri 3 Ez a rO t3. C4 44 v ro m m rO C4 I~ m C: 44 �4 C4 v ::3 H C tT 4J 4J c m ro -rI v r0 •r1 N v Er tT •14 O a ro 3 :4 > - r-I -r4 r tP v rO C c(n (t) v 0 4J C4 rJ C4 C4 O i~ ro I N -1 O C: ,C v v N 00 ro= ro ro S4 34 •ri 34 C; m rO m v v m C. �4 -r4 4J In FZ r-1 r-i I dr >., U tT rO �l r4 44 4J rO : ri C: U Z ro v 44 4J O 4J r-1 O C: C4 C: -ri v G U r4 r-I C4 ro E; ro -ri .c r- U) rA 44 a ro ro • r-I r- -1 r v , C- rO C4 ro ri C4 :1 44 4J C4 44 1--1 v �4 ::1 0 0 v x > �:l >~ In 3 v m O u r. 44 O s4 4J ro -r-i v m i4 �4 >1 41 4J x •r4 rC v •ri 4J C U O �4 O 41 :S m U 4J 4J r- >4 a 4J A 14 r3 -i r1 41 U 41 O >4 ro -r1 O O m U) •ri -ri v -r4 4J O 4J v O O -rl r-4 O 4J •r4 ro .r >i v U 4J 44 m 44 :4 .f C4 > --4 (1)U -H 0)�-I rO rO A m r. -H .X U 3 a U 4J ra -rl i4 C; '9. 4J 4J (d -r-I r-♦ U >~ O vr� ro v -4 $ ri -r-I m - r-I -r- U-rj ro E+ --^ m A U ro 4J >:j :4 E+ v C4 4J A U 3 m ro In a v rO = 4J t') -ri ro 3 m a m 34 v — 4J x 4J m r4 3 ro rn v v a X 4J v 00 v I~ A r4 44 to v v ro v r~ v >1 A ri ro U m -rl ro a •r4 4J (d 44 N m a d v •ri r♦ -ri 4J U •J O m -P r4 v • -ri X r; - ro 'J ro U O >1•1i 34 9� 9--: •r4 v • rJ ro �4 -r•1 �4 -1 -ri 44 •n C4 A v O 41 U O v •r1 r In a tr 4J v O 3 0) O v •ri v v In >1 (1) —1 3 0 O . r-I r� Z C4 U m v v v r- U) v -ri ro Z i4 U U) C.' r-i a •ri i 4 C. m 4J ro 44 O s4 L" m 4J r4 •ri 44 4J 4J C: O 4J v 4J 0 3 m v a O v -r1 r1 O tT 4J m y 4J O m O ri 4J r4 ro C: -r-1 tT 4J m >~ O 4J r. }4 -r-i m 4J •ri •r1 rO a C U m v a>I C4 ro m r4 4J 4J a) ro z U m O 4J m 4J x Q) a rO -r- � Q) rO -r-I 4J U rO wa -r4 v Q r� m m m 4J C; -H -ri r: •ri E+ �- r-i N F:4 •r1 z ri v m r. Ei 1-. C 3 ro C: ro 4J to 3 - r-) ri •r4 -ri ,r. C4 X X v %. 04'0 3 'n 4J N r- E; v v ro v 4J ro 4J v c r- m O rb tr rO v O v a) m (d O (d O rO .,4 E: O !~ v E: > 4 C'i Es 4 F- C. •rl •ri v v i4 C4 Z Z v r- tT U 4J C4 v U) ri E C4 14 >~ rdv•14 O4Jv a4Jv •E-4Ov OI~U4Ei> AP4rov O>1ro >~vv�4 vs4 AGaro rO 0) m C F -H mr� 4J ro tT 4J rO -ri ro -H -P 41 -4 . ro -H r-i I~ v -H4 rO a 4) >O FC ro m 0) 4J >1 m m O C: 4J U) 44 ro v 41 C: 41 v • ri tT 4J t~ A v 4J Z -r1 4J ro m iy •ri 4J f4 •ri s~ r-I ro v 34 v 4J -ri ro 4J (d ro 44 �l 4J 4J rO m •• A ro E+ m O m v 41 a 0 r4 m C r0 O S4 ro v v ro :3 ro �4 c O rO ro v >1 r-I r-I v 4J 3 m . -H ro :4 v 44 4J E. E. U C4 r-I �:J rO r4 v v rO rO tT U U) (d CO 4J 4J C v -rA 44 4J Fj N a v H a >~ A ro of ro 4J v -P . U) s~ N I~ C cn > En ::I •ri a) m X U m > m -4Q)x 0 Q)> a)U s4 m 44 -H -r-A ro m -ri (U E4 4J i4 v O O m U v O o f . (J+ A �i O rl �4 v ro • ri ro • r4 m O 4-) i4 3 C: v a�r. (d rO lfl r~ m O ro v 4J i4 v v C4 ro rH m r-4 v a m v E O (d 3 v m 4J v •n v v I I~ -r•1 U v v U a D 44 O a)A a) 1~ -4 (1)4J U O •ri 44 O C4 r-4 Q) r •r-1 -r, 1' rO 4J �4 rn O .[.- A a) —A r— a (1) Q) 4-) C O r.3 f-' O •ri 4 'ri 4, �4 X v E4 U a In rO ro ro ro'T U 4J 4J (n > O ro rO f4 U) Ei 4J a P U 3 4J m y a v >4 � U C I v ro 1: C: 44 1 ro v4Joa C 4J -1 .1~ �4 O In rd 4J 44 v 0 r4 A C O —1 U +� •.-4 O C C U U) W 4J cn r(3 r4 �:l b v �4vvvv.�v 4)A C v UA U) ri Ga C U) C 74J 4 O C v r4 r4 U m C •rl Uv4-)4-+3 c0 -H C v U) r .r- O '0 �4 U) >, m 3 C rd U) O ro v ro A 4J rd U v N U ro N C rn r4 v C C t� � • r-i U) tT • r-I 0 v Cx r i 3 �4 In r� Un 4J C a U) C U • r-I � ,� v • �+ rn >1 �4 v C rt3 1 :4 4J —1 0 .0 • r4 4J 00 v 4J 14 C 3 4J rn C r- r4 U) ro 1-7 v C rn C C 4J 4J 44 A rd r4 rt� O In >1-r4 0 E v U A U) v 1 C A U N r4 v rO O i4 C 4J to )4 C 4J C • ri rd rd 0 v ro 4J v 1-71 O O a U m r4 C y r C O ro v i4 4J C O. H r-1 C r C U • 4 U a rd r-+ rc� C C —1 rd r1 41 �4 Hv>1U(dU ro 4-) E 'C� —1 (n �4 -H C v U) C 0 r4 ro 41 1-4 3 -P C m F M C C A O rd O In(D-HMQ):3•0�-4 U �C �4 4J —i U a = 0 A A � C C I •ri � :4 ro 0 to U) �4 a 41 a0 m C •r� U C � �4 U rO O 4J rd �4 U 4J � ono U v in 54 r4 4J r— .r-i 44 rd v 4-r r I ro v m 41 s4 4, �4 a 4-1 U 1 -r-1 ro v x �4 S4 4J rd C 0 O v :4 3 0 va cn a 4J v v �:l 4J �4 v z rd I ri 41 O C U C U� 0 0 O O C U) rd v 44 4J 4J r4 O ro C �-I -H O rd ro -r-i ro v C a 4-) 4-) E-4 r + 0 :4 rd U) Z A �4 C v S4 v ::D ro • r•I 0 4J C 4J v —4 •r4 C (d C 4-) S4 .1i . 4J v C v U) S4 0 (d v .rI E 0 C v o 44 b unM •� tT�> � > 4-) (a U) 4J C —4 O ro A C (a 4J a X 4-) 10 C [n .a +1 ro C Ei -P rn r4 O v • r4 S4 O �4 3 C C v •r4 0 �-� ro 0 Id A Ei Ur a E4 � C, 4J 4J E4 4J v v v �4 1 O C O U U `•-I C �4 a •� •r4 U > - A C 4J rl rd U •r4 v r4 �4 - r-i 3 rd 4J 0 E En i4 4J v a c C73 vravv •r4 a -C�' �4 4J 0 4J '0 r-i U) v 44 v v 41 o 'c� U vvvtT rO a 4 >~ O ri v v �4 C 4-J 4 44 r--I 4J 44 O a rd 0 -r. 4J v 4J >4 a 4J 4J v • r-I rc� U U) v C C 41 v O v 04 Ri 4J U •t� O —4 C 4J 4J 4J rd C C b� • r-I rd > C 4J •r-I C m •r1 41 O • r•I r-i rts • ri H i4 4J 4J 4J 0 rd H:�ar� I C • r-I C ,4 O 1 ai In H �:l r--1 v ro A • r-1 r4 C ri v • r4 � Ua v v tT �4 rd U) 44 C O N U C N �4 v 44 v �4 C H U) v v •C U) 4J C lc� ro U C • ri rd 3 �4 O O 4-) L +� v vEn 4) x >~ v .H v U) ,c v 4J :T C N m • r4 .0 U �4 M v ::I 41 rd r•I U i4 U r4 r-1 In o 3 v • r4 �v U) 4J 4J 4-1 C rd C -r1 4J —4 -4 U (1)> 0 ••1 U v b N O > ri) 'U .0 v 4J Nb-r-A 3 tT r•4 4J v >1 O ro 4-1 44 C: U) r4 +� • r•1 4J C U) v •rl •.•I N Z7 4J .� m U f -1 a) F4 a 1 O •r1 C r a 4J C 44 U U) O v ro 41 I rd v 4J E-r v C 4J 4J LO U) > . H mv�l-r4 mu 4) 4-)ro� mA C v v O v r4 m v �4 is U • r4 r-1 v v U o C 4-) vrf,- U) RS 44 rd r-i • r•I 3 4-1 C-mvAr4r-♦ S4 U r4 • r-1 >1 S~ ro(1� • r4 C O 4J O -P 44 U) 4J 44 tT 41 C v V C C C rO rd U) r v• r•I v rd v U v O> U) E C a �4 rO U 4-1 O O rO 4) .H M a C r4 roro vE v vC.r-Iv> 4J 4J �4 4-) v v 0>1C04 C>,rO C r1 v 4-4 • ri O v O O r-1 S4 rl In a C In a (13 1-1 O 0 41 4J E r-I r4 —i r-, v U) C v -r-I 3 U> ro E r- 4-1 4J v v v v 0 In U A rO 1.4 4J 4J v U ro C C n r-i 4-1 C tT O 0 O r-1 0 —A 4J C -r•I , 4 • r•I r-A • r4 U) 4J a 3 v -r•I C 41 C U r-I 3 3 U) r--I v v ro rd 0 —4 U 44 rC C U 4J C x C 44 Ei rd (1) -14 .14 v -r1 v 10 �■r �■i r rr M r M r r r Ir ���,'�,'� ''''J�� WALTON-ABEYTA Robert E. Walton, P.E. AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Y v \, Mont E. Abe tn, P.E. _ as\ Consult,ng Enp:neers N. Joan Heckman 2404 Glen Avenue Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Dr. Laurence W. Ross, P.E. Thomas J. Buchko Allan E. Deems Maurice C. Cox John J. Moruzzi TOM THUMB BUILDING UTILITIES ANALYSIS February 1, 1978 A. Sanitary Sewer: Determination of the sewage requirements using the guidelines established in the 1976 Uniform Plumbing Code are: 1. New Building a. Residential b. Commercial 2. Existing Building a. Office b. Retail 27 fixture units 24 fixture units 12 fixture units 16 fixture units 3. Total fixture units (which are subject to design revisions) equal 79; which would require a 4" sanitary sewer. A 4" sanitary sewer can accomodate from 35 thru 216 fixture units. B. Water: Determination of the water usage is also based on the 1976 Uniform Plumbing Code and is as follows: 1. New Building '�yr• a a. Residential b. Commercial 2. Existing Building a. Office b. Retail 24 fixture units 28 fixture units 14 fixture units 18 fixture units 3. Total fixture units for water usage (which are subject to design revisions) are 84: which requires a demand rate of 40 g;mn. In order to effectively serve 40 gpm a 1-�" tan is required. The 12" tap can accomodate a maximum of 150 fixture units (55gpm) effectively. r M= no mow� •ice � � � � TOM THUMB �� ..' page 2 C. Storm Drainage: Storm drainage requirements are based on a maximum rainfall of 3" in a one hour period on a total site of approximately 6,000 square feet. Taking the hourly rainfall times the site area and converting to gallons of water equals a maximum flow of 11,250 gallons in a one hour period. This flow rate, per 1976 U.P.C., would require a 4" connection to the storm sewer. D. Existing Services 1. Sanitary sewer: Connection would be made to a 12" main which paralles the West side of the site in Mill Street. 2. Water: Water service to the site would come from a 12" main which parallels the South side of the site approximately 20'-0" from the border. 3. Storm sewer: Storm drainage would connect to a 48" main which parallels the sanitary line in Mill. E. Sunniary: The close proximity of services (water, sanitary and storm) and the relatively large size of these services would result in a very small impact on the utility processing involved to serve this proposed expansion. RIO ORANGE PARKING NORTH r-t15ToR�G pr2�:e�/� ioJ R6 R6 O O O H MAIN ' CC' ZONING DISTRICT R6 11EH C1 O H O P K I N 8 G -~ R6 O Cl J L O Proect R MF O H jLocatio C i O HYMAN R MF L H C i O • R MF L • °��'w r++' COOPER j "�•: MALLS R MF w L L Q L` OURANT L L L CL CL Cl O J CL z Cl z 0 CL Imi Cl ]OF Lm I I 0 RIO GRANDE PARKING D000 .MAIN ......... ..... ..... ...... .. . .... .. ............. .. ... ..... ... ....... .......... `1 1 1 -, IF il 1:1 I uuunun""��! HOPKINS -= O.n'nuuuuuuwnuunnnnug `------, rA1 I I E' I I I"::F �:—� Project]:::E 1 +o' - H -- H Location=L 1 ---�1 HYMAN / H COOPER w z: _0 1 J 1 IL 1 a i f o 0 1 L------i• - — --—.------ MAR • -----------J D U R A N T....................................................................... ................• ..'!1'!'.. !!f IIIINI.IIIIIII OIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I111III111111111111111111111111111111111111111.N.111111111111111.1111111111111111111I lll.... llld MILL nm • WHEELER OPERA HOUSE _ 12" SAN. SEWER MILL STREET 48" STORM SEWER e --- SPORTHAUS LINDNER _ EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING NEW COMMERCIAL rl RESIDENTIAL BUILDING COLUMBINE BUILDING LEVEL I / 0 5 10 20 40 as d a SABBATINI (� SPORTS ►� 0 SITE PLAN UOIjVlIjVA[ff E~ 0 Ei 4J z Q) C E~ 0 (1) •r-1 ty) ri) ro (1) ro � � rA A L 4J O ro �4-1 Ua v �75 � ro ro� v ro 4J U v ro 4-4 a U) ro U) U U) 4J v •�I v a r4 U o� a)z�4 -P 44 U) O w tr O t7) z z • r-I >1 -r•1 ro 4J rO C .1i z ri r-i z U ro O C s4 •ri C)' ty) ` a) a) z A rd O 4J z --I C +� m ro •r4 Q) r-i C +) U O �4 -r4 ` -r-1 4-) tT U ro C ri a 0 ro ro ?1 U z U Q) U) tJ� ro r0 -r I r7 Q) z cn -r•I E 4 r-I r0 a G • r-1 U) Q) Q r-i ro i4 0 4J U v 4J U :4 l< ro 4J C v E a 0 41 r4 C a) r✓ .� aJ a) � A v .0 ai 4J N w U) 0 44 >, O 4J r•I U) r-i Ej •rl i4 A a) •ri 4J 4J ro z a rI E~ 0 (n U a) �4 U) a) C r� rr. 4J ro 41 U • r-1 z �4 U) $4 Q) .rq 4.-) 4J U) ro z Er 0 4J r-I C r0 4J a) z (a U ro z ro ri•nC ro rO O ro •rq vra � Q) 4J U EAi 3 >4(n z 41 ri a) ro ri U) O r-I �� z ro •4 •,1 4J ro 4J z 4J M (0U) C F U) O S4 •r•1 3 U Q) ro 4J -J ro �4 tr 4J (1) r•i Q) tT --i C Ei X r0 a) z 0 z S4 z U) ro Q) C 14 O U i4 Q) o v ro 4J •ri -r1 0 4J 1-4 10 U) to U) S-1 U 4J ro ro z ro 41 C (1) a) a) ro U) r1 -q > C A ' Q) ri U) Q) r-♦ U a) 4J 4J U a(0 :4 -14 C4.4 aro v00.a) .-) 0000 n aJ U) C c z r0 z ro 4J O C Zs O (1) ro i4 •ri z Q) ro z -r-i > (1] a ro 44 a) •r-I 4J 0 p U) -1 O :4 C z r-i ro �4 U U�° rg-,I S4 4J U) •r v ro 0 4 4-) 4J Q) (1) U x a Q) r-I U r0 a �4 a) ro U) a) ro z-I P a ro H O Z A z ro E •i ri 4J S4 �-I -11 ro r-i rU)Q) ((d 4-) () a) 4-) • 3 CO is a z C 41 Q) r0 ro z U C 0 0• r-I O z• r•1 Q) O Q) •ri -A .11 z > �4 •r•i r0 44 4J 4-4 4J z 4J O O U 4J •r4 • H U) O U (d a U �4 (13 U) C • 4 C (1) a r0 r-4 is x z z U) U C C (1) •r•1 Q) O 44 Q) z U) ri CO U C In H U) 0 z r-I 34 C tT 4J 10 0 U ro •ri ri -r•I v 4J z z C a -H 3 r-1 U> Q) U) -14 A ro 0 r-•i f4 ro rQ U 0 41 -r-I 54 r-I 41 Q) r4 C z a i4 4J CO r (1) ro tT -ro ro U U) o C -r•I 4J r0 a C p ri a a O 4-) U a) Q) U) -ri 4J >, 44 (U S-t U z Q) r� a 41 N x H C O Q) n 4J z U) Q) z 14 U U) cn O s4 Q) -14 ry v is Q) C 41 U) }4 44 0 a x Q) A -r-I a -14 -14 a) a O 44 0 0 a 4J U) U) U) (1) 44 tr v rC. a O C 4J 44 4J • r-I rI C z A z a) 4J z N z 0 r-1 4J U •r•I z ro -H z- r•I tT z z A 4J a) U) 4J Q) 4.) z ro • ri tr ` O O ro ri z x z z U) z U r0 41 Q) z a) O -r•1 4J z a) �4 ro •�" 4J% 4J •r-I 4J rz Q1 r-I rczd Jti � ru N ¢ 44JJ Q) X 04'0 r i 14 O 4J Q) >1 a) 0 ?4 -1 4J 34 4J 4J �4 0 r4 O ro (n a Q) -r-I o -4 U)Q) 0 m04 A En44 � 4J Q) -r-I C U ro C tT Q) r0 10 Q) 1 Q) .H z 44 is r-1 4 Q) -r-I 44 0 tr ro r4 Ei 4J >1 3 O z r0 Q) (a ri O U) -r-i U) r. 3 U r1 r-i z Q) i4 Q) CO �4 RS ri O -r•1 O 4J 44 U) U •r.1 ro -H 4J A ro ` O aJ ) U 4 r� ri 4 Q) ✓, r% O a) Q) •ri r-I OT 14 :4 z -H 4J a ri r0 (Ij--i U ro 0-4 X rib z Q) S4 •r•I U) Q) .0 ro tr' C Q) 0 4J 1-1 -ri $ ►4 a •r4 C v ,~ z r r0 44 t) 3 ` C: r-1 4J 41 (1) ro Q) z a) U) ro M -r-i U 4J S4 U) -r-1 z r-i U 3 a) 41 z -4 ro a) U) 4J - (1) ra •ri U Q) •r-1 C z b) rO C �4 ro -rivz0ro(1)04 r I A U .' a oE� 4J (n 4J 4J M < �4 r-i r-i Nra 4r 0) c a) O r o tT •,ii U E~ z- r I . 44 O z z U O •ri �4 4J •r-I a) •ri i-I -i U N N.Cr4•r-i 3ro -ri (1) -H a 4J -r-1 r0 4J -ri �4 X a -ri z r0 (1) O 3 ro w ro 3A ro4A U aoz a.-+ •rl M ro 44 O A `b s4 v z U a) -H i4 tT 4J (n CCnA • H -4 U r-i A O2: ti) -IJ ri z �4 44 tF) -r-I z z S4 O r-1 0 a U -4 U) U) U) C 4J z ro 44 a) O a (n •ri �A S4 ri -ri r0 .0 ri (n z (n ro z ro -H s4a)a r-I C �( U) ri O tr v H U �i 3 a) (n N > ro H 0) ro aC E ro-riOs4 U (n Q) U? U) 4J r0 Q) rC C zv4Jro ro �4 • r-I r-♦ a4J3a ro ro z QJ 4J •ri .� z 4-) v 0 z `A O O .(.- 4J -H 4J 4J �4 44 z •r•1 O O Q) (n C a z Q) U) ro Q) ri a' 34 ro 4J 4J U 44 va O roO 4J z to o ro o �G (n • r•I z ro M �4 •ri rz C 41 r-4 -r•1 U) O rO a) 4J 41 r1 r0 rC •r•1 Q) vr� aU�i z Q) C i4 U ro ro (1) 41 ,� a) r-I r-i 4J �4 a r+ r0 ro 3vAa�4ia0i C U) i4 0) 4) z Q) 41 z 34 to .r.1 z E•+ a ri g O 4J • r•I C 4-) E-+ E ro (1) 4J -r-I 441 z .0 4J tT cn ro a) •ri r I a) O Q) x :4 34 Ei •1. (1) ro 44 �4 O >1 44 �E 0 >, >~ U -4 44 ro a) 44 a) z� 41 O Q) E a) A ro (n 4J a 41 r 4 C >1 U r-♦ Q) 4J O () .ri -r•1 a) U a3 U4-4 U) -r-1 M Q) ro U) 44 U) A�v >.,l~ r-i rQ) $ 7- 1ro ri 4-4 tY) ?4 3 ro S4 14 4J cn O v cn U) 44 C Q) 0. � tP 0 v r4 ro z 44 a a r4 -r-I � v a)tpv tr s4 v >~ (n z v ri Q) 3 �4 �4 ro O a) U 14 Q) C 4-) z r0 J-- U) (1) -r-I Ei r0 r0 •-) Q) z C O r0 ro ro +� •ri r0 •r4 > a) r0 CO 0 >, r0 ro (1) S4 : ro a r+ O �4 tr 0 ri �-I O • r1 4J 4J is . r-I 4J 0 >4 14 U) 4J Q) U Q) In ,A r0 4-) r% • r-1 ri z x z x < z a) -r-i a) r-i Q) (u 34 4J z ry U 4J Q) � •ri m C �4 i4 0 Q) ro W A rU 4J r-1 U) U r1 r-1 l4 3 —4 4J ro U) ro 3= v S4 >i r0 ro 34 C z ro ri v O -i �En (0 E rZ 0 0 0) 4-) X ri z U O •ri z -H U 4J O 14 U] A -rl x O 0) S4 Q) U C 4•) U) r0 r0 .0 r-I 0 (1) 4J ro r-i 4J ri U C .0 S4 C 4J Q) •ri •r-I 4-) 3 ro ` � � r-ii z .0 A •r•1 tr 3 4J ra z 0 ro r-1 O r0 a r1 �4 z r 0 rC •ri O r�4J3U i~ ro �4>i 41 (L) U) r-q (1) ri Q) Q) r0 ro �4 A v � av � A N r� 4J 4J 3roza) _4 ta i4 v Q) ro ro �4 ri ri N .r.1 • r•I U ro V O U rJ -11 a) Q) > U U �4 �4 •ri ri (1) Q) 9 A N 14 �4 4J o 0 O ro N U) F 4-r ­4 O 0 ro vw Q) (U) I~ U) O r•0 z z •r-1 Q) z 4J 4J O :~ (z 0 �4 4-) � ro a>1 >I Q) A r-4 U) C U) C 4J 10 z >1 O �4 a) O -1 -r-1 0 4J -,I Q) 4J C (d 4J ro a Q)Q)-1or� S4 -4 0 C U a a U 4J -r•I r f4 4J U)O -r-fOC ,< U U 4J ro a) A -i A -H 4J U •ri � 3 z O r0 U Q) >z 4J H U C ro U) -P 10 N (1) s4 41 U) ro U ro a) C r0 •n U v to a a n O z a ro Q) U 0 �4 (1) 44 0 �4 Fel 4J I v 1 v (a v v v tT r-1 0 zs • b is U U +-) �4 4J s4 4-4 C r1 ro v ro 4J v 3 ro C -ri :� tr m ro v � -ri 0 -ri v -H A v 4J rO 0 E r1 4-J 73 C O S 4 U m O '0 3�4 +J �4 aJ C 34 —1 4J 0 ro v • ri E a) •,q ro tT' �A • ri 4J ro C• r-I a) C ro 4-J E�4 4J �4 C ro O. CT v v> m m - In v 0 .0 A v v v O ro v 0 m �-4 m O ro v v 4J —1 U E 4-) v 4J C m 4J 0 v I-- C a) ri O �4 ro In -,1 r4 ro 1 E A v v O 4J 1---P rO C rO E Oa 3 v C ro- n 4-1 v 0 r-1 �4 rJ < m -r-I v r I ^� v 0 04 0 E rO 0 .0 �4 4J 14 v r-1 . Us s-, 4J 4J m Q4 ri E �c >4 C w 4J ro 0 4J 4-1 0 E 4) 4-4 m y -,I (n C 41 0 C r1 4) M m -'4 0 v C O ro 4J U ro v v C A C r-i v A 4-4 v U 3 r-1 C m I I-- E O ro v 4J 4J r-1 4-4 0 r-1 U) r-1 v 04 rO t') -P r I - E 4J A C 3 U ro v 0 A ro�4 4-) ro E m v - r-i $-4 v A r-I 0 ro v C -ri C 4J 4J -� C ri 0 v U (04-)(n ro ro v A is rO v�-4 H ro v �4 In v -C� �A ri �4 Q., v v m E C C • ri • ri of • r-♦ m ro • ri v .0 0 ri —1 0 v 4J ro r I U C In 4J 4J • r-I • r-I U) S~ 0 rO rO a> m41�-4 -0roGa.Cs4 ari rimro v�4 (a) (1) �3 0 O' 41 0 v E > 4-4 ro 1~ 4-4 U) sa rO > 04 3 E v C v O w v v C 4.1 O a) 0 ro a) ro C C 04 O E O A `-I 4J m 14 -ri In E 41 U 4-4 S C R- ro O ro r1 -ri 4-I 0 C m v 0 m 0 4J v C U r I C 4J 4J rO r-1 tT rO 4J �4 U S4 v C 0 >, A C C 4J U) v 0 0 0 v v v C v C -ri O U) 0 H ro to v ro m `•-I rO v U 73 •ri C v N -X A ri U) v ::5 4-4 4-4 �:l •ri (n 3 C �4 0 ri �3 C -r-1 4) ro 0 4J _q • -r-I 4J �3 E 0' 0 4J ri O 0 4J s4 E 0 ro 4J 0 sa H ro r-1 —1 r-1 ro v v 'O ro > a) ri E 4J O U ri C U) U U ri 0 -rq r4 v v �4 �4 I v r1 O r-1 4J U) U) s4 >1 C rO v C O- H U 4J 4J -ri -a A - ri v m- r-I C s 4 U ro v ro a) 4-4 `'O +J a) v v U - r-i r-1 3 �:$ m 3 :� 4J > �:l 3 U �), 4J N rO a) v E �4 •ri 44 0 �4 —1 O'-� v �4 U •ri •ri 0 v C 044-4ro rd 3 > 4J ro>i 0 v E U) v r i v r-1 v>1• H a) ri E U) C)4 O ro rd 0 v U a) A v 4J -ri $-4 U) �4 v U .0 A -ri �+ -ri U m v I q v C .0 1~ - U ro 3 ro C ro A v 41 r-1 4-J v v 4J m rO v >Y r-I •ri 4J 0 r-1 r-I •r4 $ tT v -IJ �-4 rO C U is U rO �4 -ri U) 41 C 0 • ri r-i ro > U) C > (n U) v ro 41 a) 1~ 0 > ' �4 • ri 0 �4 m v 4J • H • r-I v ro 41 -r-I rO • r-I v — 4J • r-1 ro ,C r1 f)4 4J ro 44 0 v C U H s 14 �4 �-4 ro 3 4J rO 1~ ro 11 a) C) U C ro -P r-1 m rO 0 r-1 ` 4 m 0 41 O v C C ro -IJ ro m ro 3 v C C .H C S4 rO R. C U ro CO v 4J .0 -r-I >, v >1 m v C ro r-1 0 C O ro C 3 C ro 04 >`I v > C U 3 E v 4J v 0 s) C ri • ri C v rq C r-1 rd 4-4 m �4 4J v s4 .0 0 v U E v $-4 v m rO 4J �4 -ri 4J Q1 4J f4 v C) —1 C 0 •r1 a) r•-1 44 v 4J 04 > ro �-1 v A 0 H C ro 4-) 7� U O U O 4J -ri •ri ro U) �4 1--1 0 4J O R. v E 4-I -ri >I ro m a m C v v 4-I a) m 3 C O O O v -IJ U U m C -ri 4J l 4-4 —1 v r-i v ro •n S4 •n r-i v C m S4 v 0 44 U S4 7�:J • ri v +J 4J O 1 C) 4J tP • ri ro rO 4J O O 0 m 0, rO 4J 0 v v 41 U I A E �-1 v I C I C >Y C C 4J > v m S4 4-4�4 tT E U •ri r I ,C -ri m f-1 �4 r-I O U 4J 4J ri C v- ri ri v 0L i4 R4 C14 C 0 In v 4J U 4J m C ro 0 ro - C 4J C U) —1 4) ro m +) C v 4J ri U C- n ro >1 ro —1 O C 41 0 ro rq m�p r-i 41 v U v v rO rO v 1~ v C 4J O U U -rJ v r-I 0 r-1 • r-1 a) U v v a) • r-I - ri v 44 �4 C E C C C ,L" v .0 3 m ro ?-I 0 C: a m 4-4 w >, v x �-+ �4 C 3 m H D4 rO E-1 ro a aJ E4-) ro ro �)4 R. —1 PO A 41 ra U) �4 q 4J ro a ro v rO q v v> C 4J 4J 0 �n A ro ro C ,C m 4J 0 >, z U) 4-4 t) 4J 4) r-I N r I . y 4 r-1 4J 0 -r-I r-I (D U) - C v U 41 E-4 O O m O ro r-i r-1 m •ri r-I r-i v r i N 1~ LT -r-i U v C U) 4J -1 -ri r-i m ro v C 1-- ro -H -ri C C -n ro U'1 x r-i N -ri 0 3 -H 0 U v 0 -- U -r-i rO ro O U F, N rn r- 3 m 3 r-i rO x > aJ -ri v - •� C 4-I v C L4 -r4 U 11 m r-1 v ri U -P I-- 4J 4J rO ro -P '-♦ �)4 4- w a m v v m 41 0 -IJ v ro aJ m;J v v ro rO i rj v N v r-1 ro U C ro • r'i > v �4 is S4 Q) C O U • r-I i4 -- v 4J r-I 0�-4 ro3O O O a roE4JM Q)-rq::3 �-1 v C 4J m y C)4 -IJ -ri a Q4 —i 3 N 3 m QD4 m ro ro C U S I >M In m x r• � vri C C C rro .0 ro 0 4J - ro, C U E 4J —4 v 0 m ro v 4J c)4 U -r-I C In 4J E ro 4J �J ri ro C U is C m C U O rO z C �4 rO C r-q v 4J C 4J t✓ -H .ri is H v 0 m 0 v -ri 4-4 .C: v - r-1 m - r•I m S 4 4-4 -IJ ro • ri 4) tT �4 �4 E 41 4-4 C rO rs m m 0 v 0 m rO �4 C v 0 41 r-i v a) 0 4-4 A r-1 C W 0 .0 ri • O O A 4-4 .ri rO r-1 m O rd q cn 4J C C 4J 4J 0 >, v C C) U) r-1 rO m 41 O O O d O —1 C 3• r-I - 3 4J N A C v 4J r-1 r-1 �4 C m U —1 0 ro ro ro rO r-i v 0 -ri -H 41 A ro a) -ri (a ri o Un r1 0 -ri m CY) a) a) - r-I tr 1~ r-i E is v:� 3 rc� its a N N -1 3 �-i C a ro m ri • r-I C 0 --1 .0 4-4 > -: r i v 1 v in 41 ro O�) 41 x � a t C .0 T ro ri m C coA(d 4 —A v —4 v 4-J � W E m (n 3 N• ri C U) i C W H ro .1-. m a) 0> 4J v • ri a) ri m tr v tT' x m 0 .0 ro rO 0 rO ro C 0 x S4 r- E m -ri 4J C v E z v 4J S4 �4 —4 �4 ro--i 4J 4J v C 0 -r-i 0 C C +J S4 O rO a) v tF) v O C 4J -ri C 44 1.- v H m> A r I v E 0 4J m 4-4 U 4J -ri U S-I �4 C p O ro r-i ,-14 ' 3 •r-♦s~ -rim O�lUECv }400 a rov ::Ia)-1 (0u 4J v 1--. i4 1•-1 C 0 4J C ' 3 4-4 ia+ q �4 > 4-4 m 4J -1 4J U •ri E O C a) v 4J �4 r'O O U ::I z �j v 0 ri •ri ro rO a) - ri 0 m m m 4J C rO tr • ri — q aJ -1 0 4) E 3 O r� 0) m •r1 m ro v C 4J 4J v l0 v O U :4 -ri -ri C 4J 44 FC ro m +J 4J C U -H U (a A t` > •. �' � r 1 0 -,1 ro r-O v C O C ro 3 v r-i 4J O U) rn +P En v -H -o g 3 A ro E �l C C a) U 0 ri 0 •n �3 r-I l4 g a ri -ri �J —4 r-1 >. 0 4J O m E E A -1 ro 4J U -r-i 04 r-i 0 m C C)4 O w m C r-i r-1 rO ro -ri v O ro ro 4J 4J r-1 �4 C 0 m E r-1 E-, a) U 4J C 0 v C> 4 4J • r•i S" 4co > m > f-. -n U ro rO O C)4 H v -H r-1 W q �-1 m 3 4-3 E -,1 41 ro 4J E+ aJ v v 13) •ri rO v ri C u-I rO •r1 0 to v) ro v v 3 r-4 -i - r-I 3 C I U :i rC ro n O ro m v r 44 44 V) H C C rO S•i ri C r 1 E O ro a) a) rd v 4J O m E v• ri m y —1 ,_a O a v t7� • ri v 4J r-1 4-I m ro 0 :i r-i C rC t). C •r-I 44i4 C v C C (d m -H m � O 4 w C •rI ro m x H C C O h U a w h m v 3 0 a •ri rO E, 4-) W -- 3 ro 3 a Ur as H C tr :� v ro •ri •ri rr U U s � .............................. co v ra 1~ 14 3 (0 a > A : v � 4-4 O 0 0 l4 v H v ri O 0 A t3, 4J Ri v O r 1 rd A i4 > v 3 -r-I ro rd > ri z~ +� U) r A ro > 44 4-) v 4J -i (n C �4 s~ •ri (13 U) 0 (0 •-I -4(1)ri (1) 04 •ri O U U) •ri -14 v tp 4J 41 v U 1~ l4 r 1 $ >~ r-i U r i m a) rt3 �:l rO 3 U -,� L 4J U C -H O 4J v cU ri •ri f4 U) A v rO m En v U) (0 -ri 4J -H 14 cn A 3 C4 3 > N O r-1 E rO rd U) 44 A l4 -FJ C v E1 O v 4-4 U 14 .� 4J C 04 14 34 v 4J >i E v l4 >~ 44 O C • rO O -ri .0 rO x v -A co rd r. O ::1 0 44 s~ r-i O > O ri o in v rn v r-i 3 U a) v 4J -ri H c: U) 44 v r-1 U Q+ FY4 Q) An 3 v E E10 o � v 1~ s~ � -H4 to En O rid � rn 44-1 � -ri U ro •ri �4 v 3 14 -ri l4 U rd - r-i v ro ro cn ri r-1 > (n r-I •ri Q, ::) C x r~ 1.4 s~ a) rO 4J Q, U 4J -ri l4 3 E cn • rd ri -1 v -ri v 3 A rd U 0 44 • ri Q, • r 1 .. >~ rt1 C v l4 l4 a) U) r I E r-i rd ri 0 l4 > > rO • ri 4-4 a> 14 o U 0 41 v .0 rd ro v 0) 3 3 r 1 Qa v= v U 41-4s~a00U NU - (naE4 a)•riE N arlQ+U ri O A ro rd l4 rl rO U) v 0 A �4 rd O x U) u1 s~ Q ro r- s4 > > l4 rl a Q) r~ 1~ rO a) r0 1-1 o v 1- 4J U v v 4J �A U 0 � O ri a) 41 0 -1 > :3 ro v a v v -4 4J rl r-1 1:4 S 4 ri —1 v = r-i 4J 4J 0 ri C v a) rn ri 14 U Qa > v rO r-4 ro Q. rO 34 04 x > L 3 r-4 Oa ro � U) a) v v A a �3 C a) ri a) -r-I E o a) A E E 04 0) A C •ri .0 rO C • v v 4J v v rO >, 4J 3 .1-. -r•1 ro v •H %. •r! X� 4J a) > rC • r1 ri rO X A 1-- 4J $~ t3, N r-•4 >, cn .C: ri v U 41 v x 4J a) rl O3, A 3 a) 4J v U) �J v C: Q+ s~ 41 -1 S1 rn v rO .0 •ri 41 rO U l4 0 r-1 -ri • -r-I -4 4J - .c.' 0 U] -ri l4 Qa rd -1 ri r I -i r-♦ -i 4J > N I o 1~ a -4 rd r1 Q 3 v rn U U1 0 4J U E v rO o ro m O ro • 4J v -ri -ri r-♦ rd :4 rd '0 U •ri -ri C rO >s 4-1 -ri .0 r-1 44 v -ri 4J l4 U) 0 > .�." C .0 v fu a) 4J (n > -r-I r- C > C a) E1 •r•i tyl w 1-1 v s~ R4 a)3 A 4-) 4-1 .H m U) U) (1).0 r- -rl (n U) rd -1 rO A Qa s~ ::I rO C-. �3 (1)rO > O E r-i ri rd 14 �l (1)N G A 4J a)> 4J rO >1 r-i 1-1 Q)cd O A v -ri 4J v 0 ri 0 rO ro 3 - r-i v rO r i 0 4J -1 a) 1~ i. r-1 rl >, -ri 4J rO 14 !n �4 0 rd 4J 4J U v v ro 4J a) ro ro U 3 l4 v v -r-i >~ - r-i 4J rd C; v OT - 4J C: :� v 4J E z a) •rl rO 4-1 uJ a) v ro �(-. U -ri ty) m A E r-1 0 $ "1 %4 a) r-i U) l4 •r1 4J v r-4 ,.C' U) v rd C rd 1~ 4) rd 14 Q) r.:w 4J A U -H -irO C � Q)4J rO r-i U) -H 4J C A l4 Q)ri 44 v A • ri U) 44 rl l4 v U) �4 S4 0 S~ Or 0 i4 Q v a) rd v rd c0 tT -r-I OT rl • ri OP U) 4-1 rO ro 0 r4 rd C .0 -4 a) 0 0 14 r0 -r1 U (S r-1 3 14 S-I 41 U) l4 -1 l4 C-' •ri r1 ro —1 '.0 1-4 -ri Qa M 4J r0 1.' 4-4 4J U) v > 0 v 04 v •ri 4J r-1 •. 0 -ri 1~ a) -ri r-i E r-i r-1 Or v 3 ro -r-I -ri 4-1 a) 1~ - v Qa rd v ri > la •ri >, 1 U) •rl C A N A tv 3 0 v 3� l4 m v v A E O UO O 04 44J M m cvn A r-1 O m -H ro rd - • ri -ri C 4J • ri rd r-1 4-4 r-r C 4-) O O r-1 • ri >q (n � rd • ri C C • ri E C C � 4J 0 rd 4-1 N ri 0 4J 0)0 rd l4 3 -i U) 4-1 4-1 0 4-) a) a) 14 4J E) 0 -ri l4 0 -rl CQ rd •r-1 U - ri -r-1 O > 4J E 44 •-1 A r0 I 4J r0 OP 0 A ::$ fli r4 -ri U 4J r-4 •ri a U) i4 v (n U 3 14 U) rO 3 U >1 !`" rO 4J a) 4J ZI •ri 4J •ri M rd 4J cn �4 -i r-i Q, •n r-4 C = rO �4 rO C -1 0 �4 v 4, v 4J U U _q m rd > v 41 rd CT O rd m O o r ♦ v r) rO • ri r-i v 0 v rd a) r-i ra O U rO 0 1~ v rd 4J t4 rO 1- l4 r~ -ri > -rl �4 l4 r0 A OP v r» }4 ri 34 m. 'i -P U) ZT v 1~ v 4J > v 4J v v 0 4J -r-i l4 a l4 Qa Q. 3 r- cn :3 l4 •ri l4 •r-I U) ro 3 - U co �4 1~ 3 l4 ri v rcl U) C 04 N cn rO v v 04 H •ri O r-i 0 C v C rd C: v v 14 O -ri 0 r-q v A v 4J ri v r-1 4J v 4J N a) rl -1 L." Qa U r� of 4J tJr v M rO N }4 4J r-1 C'. -4 r-4 44 U v rO C rO �4 s~ • ri X A ro C; rc~ r-4 -r-I 3 X s~ 0 v X U l4 -ri s~ -ri •ri C; 0 3 ri -rl v i4 ,� Z a) C !~ 0 v Cd W E1 E ri F4 CO 3 M v -ri U S4 W (d ro U) rd N rO v U rd rd 3 14 0:4 E1 m 44 --1 rd .C. 44 A A U A U v 1.4 CT U) co 0) UI v 4J ri rd O C Z • 1 4J r- -ri 4J Qa 4-) [ r♦ -r-I r-i .0 ri s~ > tT ri •ri 4 -P >~ E rl U U) U) -ri v � 3 rO 41 E 44 • H rO _4 • ri 0) a) U) a) N r-•I • ri r-I 0 C 0 >r rO U C in x 0 1-. rC r0 a •ri v rO -P U .ri rO 14 •ri A z -ri r0 C -r-i 4J E 4J H r1 r- �4 rs Z 4-4 CO a) ro > > f~ rO ro 4J •ri v 0 A C 4J rO rO U) 4J 0 4J -4 3 rO W C: v ::J 4J U 0 v C ri v - v is 14 s~ •ri O C o �4 v A (n 44 14 U) C m 4J 4-1 •C: 9v U) v C r-i r0 v �4 •ri r4 0 rd ::5 O U 0 41 • ri Q M U) A a) ri 4J 4J S-I cn rd O x A v O rO 0 z v A 4J r1 X cA v C.' • ri C UI En x 4J 44 l4 C r-I 14 -,.i �4 i4 .0 rd a) C 0 U 0 ro l4 S~ S4 4-4 •ri •r1 Q4rO Q. a) >1 CP l4 ri N 0 b v O m U) 4-1 � rl ri -4 >, Q)r--40 a) 4J l4 rO 34 Q. S~' v 0 v A v -14 r1 4J 4.1 a) r-♦ U -ri rd rd -H Q) m C) 1-1 r1 .0 � -4 0 1-.' .0 r-♦ rd x 0 (n U li Qr Q l4 Q � v rd b� 4J A -ri ro rd Qr 4J 4J 0 o U l4 O rd 4J Q, U C 3 .0 U v C cn v v U rl •ri 0 4-4 4-4 r-1 rd >1 U) •ri 44 4J 4J -ri .0 4J : 4J 04 �." U �4 0 r--I a) 4J 4J 0 1~ cn •ri 4-4 4J r4 C. 4J .0 m Q)RO C)a) v •ri 44 U m a) 10) 3 'rl -A Q) l4 (.- 1~ U U ri 3 C 3 - -r-1 ri .0 U C". C - > 04 1~ •ri r0 4J rd cn -ri v v 41 U 0) �A X 4J M -ri v fJ) a) 0 0 v o. r. v •ri rn ri C: 0 v 54 •nrO -1 •ri En v 44 a) 4 > 4J 3 l4 -H 4J 0 rO r-I A m l4 • l4 v � ri ri 0 U ;3 rd v 0 U) U) N S~ rd • rl • ri �l v 0 ra C -P rd U) v ri 4J m • ri �3 4J U1 0 U1 • ri rd • ri -r4 U) U cn a) z> (n rti r-1 v O A rd • ri U�J �4 U 3 in 3 4J C: 4J o ri E v 4J Q. o v rob >� v r; 4J ri v x v rO 4J rO E 4J 4-4 x 4J 4-I v 4J 4J -r-I v •H r0 4J cn v o >s a) O U O 4J •ri ra rO ,C > 4J 4-I >~ -ri v 4J c 4J E 4J r- r-♦ U v (0 •ri a) rd 1~ r-i r1 4J S4 0 rd rO -C C d 4J a) cd • ri a) rn - S 4 rO -4 • ri 4-4 • r1 t~ U 0 rO 4J v H C l4 E rO v 0 rO a) v •r1 a) U ::3 0 4J rn • ri a 3 r-I ro E a u) 4J rO cn o l4 l4 r. a U 3 �4 "i Q) A •ri r� -r-I ri E a) r-f 44 Q4 w ri •ri r1 C4 rd E rd a rd O r0 > A 4J v Z Q -ri -rl ro v O 0 E-+ 3 -4 •ri E v 44 - >1 44 •ri E 0 C C > E S." r-1 H C rl c 14 rO v 4J i4 't?' r 1 v r-1 0 rO v • ri 4J 0 Oa 0 4J l4 v a 0 >1 3 4J rO 1~ .�"..0 v ri f V -P ..a ri rO O1 (n U • ri 3 a) v - v > U -ri 4J C; v r0 E1 bi r-1 -1 U 4J • ri >, r0 U) r0 4J v 4J 4 �l 4J .0 a) 4J -ri 4J rd rd C -r-I v -ri CO a) 3 4J C •ri r0 N 4J C. v C 4J rO 2 rd r-1 U E1 >T v v 3 l4 C r1 A ro E E r0 rI v v v ri ri Q l4 E X .Q H r I E �4 •- > l4 4J v rO H r-1 A •r1 U �" •ri r-♦ '3 C r-I rO 4-1 O C C3 rd •r4 rd 4J FC 4-1 rd a) E1 r0 (a O C t7% U) r-i rO O C U) 0 •n rr, w r-i > k U U) U U) C > 4J i-1 �-1 -ri 4J U) rd a) a) -ri 0 - v 0 «3 E1 4J ro Q) rd a) a) G o- 0 •H v ro 04 4J a) Q) (0 E 3 A 4J c rd 1• + E 3 s~ ::IE �4 • n ro ri r-♦ 0) Cl a rn Q, N a)E O 41 -1 .0 O rd E O ro (n Q) v 0 Er-4 4J 0 < U) a) E Q) r. l4 a) r4 ro4J • ri U ri a) r-i 0 l4 r-i -r rC 0 4 l4 >•i•ri >i•ri l4 i rd A 0 .0 0 1~ 4J � � r-i 4-I rO -r-I 4J (0 rl C:E1 u C4 > E4 4J E1 Qa x X m U) Q. w X E1 U E-+ U •ri OA -ri 4J M O Rl 3 rd 44 f< 4J v Q) (a (a 00 a) �4 m .-. 4-3 1 0 1 �3 ry tr ro U m -,A 4J aJ S~ Q) -r.1 •r-i +-) 1~ Q) U Q) rI S4 S~ k S4 rI +) (1) Q) N •r-I 0 ro Q) ra S~ 4-3 -P Q) •,1 +-) 04 1-- 0 �4 r1 4J m U) +) U .0 4-I 4 -r-1 t~ -r-I ri U 0 U 0 •IJ aJ (1) : ro •r-I rO A ri ro tT Q) �4 1~ 3 ro >v A r-: A �l Q) Q) 4-) -,q U •ri aJ aJ U S~ r U) C •r-I 4-S • r-I r-4 U aJ ro 0 :1 ro �4 Q) m Q) >4 ra Q) •r-1 s- S4 O rO Q) • n S4 0) r� ri 4J • H Es 4J 0 4-J O Q) 1~ �J A -r-1 4-) O m 1:-: ro �j > -14 4a 0 cn s; U •ri Q) S4 04 4J S4 O C A r9 U 44 Q) Q) Q) .0 r O Q) >. 4J > ro t7) Ei Q) 0 ro > �4 1- -H 14 .I~ U Q) •rl ro •r•1 m is 0 4J 4-) El) +1 m Q) S- 44 • (L) U :3 ro m 1~ .r� -r4 m m 'C' a) 41 v is O r-A +) 4-) m 4J r1 Q) H U -r-I U -rq O m Q) 4-I ri Q) m ro 1. -r-i s4 •• Q) i-) -r-4 !~ Q) >Y 4J X SD4 Q) }4 rO r-4 Q) (1) Q) x �4 U) 4-4 4-4 r 4 rl Q) ; �4O 0(1)ro -H 4-1 4J�4v a) .c :� ro � •r•I 1~ �3 Q) �4 ro 10 m dJ m s~ 3 tr 4-4 > •r-1 ro H •-I ro A - r-I En a) m .> Um$ 3� �:: 41 ro m (n s~ • H Q) ro 0 4-4 0 m A tT (0 E • r-I r. ri3 Q) C U s~ s� �4 s~ 3 O r I ro -H 0 0 S- Q) rO -P w ro Q) E 4-) O z r r1 1= r-1 -H +) C Y 4 Q) -H is 0 -11 -r-I >4 �11 4J 0 rd 14 -P -r•I S4 ::I �4 aJ 44 4-1 r� z ro m 4-4 A m rs Q) s; 0 ro +1 �l Q) (1) �j d-) Q) H 4-1 U -i ro t7T is �4 0 •r-I m 0 4-) Q) ro t~ 1. :1 m s~ 41 m 4J > >, •r-1 -,1 aJ O 04 m ro rI Q) sd 4J 4J U Q) 4J f4 Q) ro S4 04 >~ ro ?4 m�l +1 :3• H U ro U (1) �4 ro •r•I �4 s~ O > s~ 3 —1 v �4 .00 +Jx+)0AQC00�l r-' IC I P 04 U) Q) m U ro Q) U S- U +� a� v . >1 �4 W r-1 41 r ro 0 S4 ro 44 >1 O r-S :� 4J 34 O O O O �4 i S 1~ -H Z O (1) O t7) r•1 r3 r-I ro Q) -1 Q) >1 > r-1 >1 Q) +1 m m U Q) E 0 .s~ S4 -H 44 Q) 4J C11 U m .14 H � Q) U aJ 1~ m s~ • ri 41 ::5 (1) >1 > r-1 0 m rU H 14 �4 U 4-) A U R. r� .11. >, U) Q) s~ • ro tr +-J Q) U (1) • H rz Q) +) -P ro �4 ro is r-1 C m c Q) m : +1 O Q) -H •r-i rz 0L S. U r-I r� • I-) Q) 4-) ro U �4 3 1: k 44 -H U 0 rd 0 S4 to r I 4a Q) 0 r-1 >i-H U f~ �-I ;� S~ 0 r4 (1) U O O -r•I S4 4-4 ro 04 4j -r-I i4 ro 4J r-♦ •r•I Q) �4 ro CO -,A >+ U A �4 m A> > i �4 4-) m S4 S 4 Q) :� ro U Q) Q) • r•1 r-1 ro • Q) In U L: 4-4 ,(i4 Q) O > i4 4J (1) ri (n ra Q) ro 0 0 +-) 4J m S: U 0 ror� �4- 3 U m m m�5 O m w 04 41 ro m 0 4J (1) ro >1 S~ r 1� ­4 rl7 Q) S~ �4 i~ +- H 01 m .0 Q) O Z r I ro r� 04 0 r I Sj 4J A U• H �4 -r-1 -r-1 ro (1) >1 rl m •r-1 0 r-1 •ri 1D. �4 3 la rd m $-� -ri �4 �4 1-4 Q1 3 -1 4J m (1) ro• ri m ro A 0 0 0 > -i Q) t7) U) 4J �4 Q, > (1) �4 •r•I rl A U •ri ro •ri >4 C. c ro 0 O 9 O 41 m 0 r� 4J Q) 3 -r-I E� • r-1 0 '0 �4 1 a ro �4 U is 4-1 ro In r1 1~ z 41 r•-1 :~ 04 >ry E S4 0 • r 4 O r1 �:j m ;� 3 0 m S. 4-4 ro (n Q) ro -i r-I Q) Q) t7T 44 ro U -r-S -ri :j 4-) U 0 ro S~ >4 1•4 Q) Z 4J -- m �4 O A s� U r{ r i A •r-I A�4 9 m Q) m +1 O (1) A ro s~ tr ro r•i 0 () a r-1 41 U .c A Q) 4-) r r-1 3 -r-I r-1 >~ r I U tT 04 m m :J +-) (n 41 •r•I (1) Q) r1 ro r-I -H O ro Z:J Q) -H 0 4-4 .r-I ro a m A .11 Q) r •r-1 4J 4J ro > A 0 m 1: m 3 (1) 10 •r-1 4J Q) U) (1) is 4J .r•1 -r-I >•1 ro r1 X: m rI Q) Q —4 U 0 S-I C •r-I A W (1) r� r-1 rC Ei rO E 0 H aJ -H 3 4J 1:: c 3 •I) -•-1 S: C. A r� Ill -r•I r-•i ro ru 3 r-1 tr 0 • 41 E Q) U 3 ro ro aJ 0:4 is m ro +1 I~ ro 0 -r•1 Q) 1~ H 1~ i4 s~ Q) ri ro m �4 (1) ro (1) rO ro 1-1 (1) 4-1 -r-I 4-4 ro n >v S4 m Q) $ A s:: r I :3 r0 4J ro aJ ro 34 ro 0[ ro 0 �4 0�4> ro +1 0) >: 0 U 4J �:$ I~ S4 S:� ri 0 •r-1 91 A U is 1~ Q) m rd m m ri 0 r-I ro is 04 O O r-I aJ z ::I Q) S:� • H • r•I ro -r-1 ro S~ m U O U ro � U �-I 4-) --1 rd •r•1 0 m 4'. ro CO S4 OJ ro ZP r- 4J !~ Ei Q' • 44 F. 3 r•-1 ro Q) aJ �l ::j 0 H (1) CO 4J 3 r. +) U O O ro U • H aJ rO i- (n (n r1 Q) S 4 Q) aJ Q) Q) 0 - 11 m • ri E-r S4 -1 ::1 Q) Z •rq 4-4 -H -H 0 C: ro C. X �4 44 >~ 34 S4 •r-1 :1 Ua aC Wro ro-- 0 > > U E4 > P Q) U O E)AaJ rcA U r0 U 90 �4 4J O 14 r-A ro O R. U ro r+ ro Q) i4 A (1) > rl Q) r I m •r-1 3 m � Q) 0 rc3 U • r-1 ::l -r•1 JJ H ro U 3 -N S~ S~ r-i m Q) Q) m O r m ro U) m U H a A ro :Jr♦O U) �4 .� Q) 41 C) 4J HEo v U S� Q) >4 Q) 4-1 Q) m o r. 0 HYMAN AVE. ELEVATION 0 5 10 20 Mills,, � lid s gNIMNMINNININHNIN111HIN� MILL ST. ELEVATION 0 5 10 20 INIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIHIINIIIIItHN1111NNlIIgIMI�IIINIIN�NN111NIliIINIINIIIIINIIN C- -s- GD 0 1 9 ` J � c 3 � 0 Q o � U z � m Q a Q Q I 11 EXISTING 0 5 10 20 MILL ST. it a r Z Q � a Q I z ` v aQ a sash .91iunuzuzo� : uo-gre-nIVA[I U) v v z v U v rd r-1 ra U r4 rd v I r--I ra 4-) O v •n � O z y4 .H a> v v 'C{ U) �4-) 3A O rq 4-) ­4 a)ro v 4J s4 E) is v v rd ri ro -P �4 v U - r1 O � U 0 -r1 U) 41 v :� m ri rd ra O v O rd v U v � U v Ei ra � H O r W •r-i E O H r1 'O v • rI PZ (n rd b) co U ;:$ ° � •14 z x v cn � E-i 4J O E o ro F O > E ra U ra CO Ei a) C: ri -H -r•I }4 • 3 E-4 v 44 44 U :1 4J O U) U r-i U 4-4 -H �4 U v .,~ 4J H ra -r-I O U v U I~ • 4-4 1~ ..O Q)EM-0r-4-,03-1 a v >~ >~ -,1 O -1 ro M O 4J A 3 v M 4J - C U U 0 -P Ul •rl rd O O r I r I s~ a) - rO v -14 r--1 » r-1 x 4J �4 S4 rO 4J N ra v •r4 O m 0 m C O Q 3� m -1 U�� 44 v -r1 >~ ra v •r•i O ra U O E 4J O O �4 3 rO 14 04-H4J -H a O rd 4J U cn (a rO A r-r rd a (o •r1 v rd 5:: (0 v ra :j �c .+ a) rO O r-i U) A r-+ 3 4J v r, U r-i v r0 a) v -14 ca I~ ra v -14 U) v rd ._ cn > U) 4J U) 3 ::I v 4J cn v >~ ra r-I cn O >~ 4J O 04 ra- NA U r0 0+ v -H 4J U O • U —4 v a) .C� 4-) O U rn ra >1 ra -n U) 4J 4J ra rO r-1 -r-i rd 04 r-i Q Ov O Z (1) 4-) ?, • ri v� -.4 O Qa r4 U r0 U r-1 f- Z v -r1 I. U) -11 -H v -r-I Cn Ur-4 17) 4-4 (1)•ri Z U) 104 �4 ro r-I •r1 1~ O 04 4-) 3 o a)) U� ar--4 v •r-1 O U a) O 0 -H �4 t:7) v 4J U) ri 3 v (a > N r4 -r1 04 4-4 fn En 4 v �4 4-)Z7) U > O O >1 4J S4 v • r1 C r� S 4 • r4 1-4 co cn C7) > •r1 •ri v rX4 4J -r1 -H 4J - v v - U U) . -r-I S4 ra v v }4 34 ;:I 4J tir) 44 -r1 4J v 04C s4-r•I v 0 ON v �4 4 4J U) 4J M L*4 U) 3 A CO rO Q4 r-1 ro U 4) �4 U v vE •n E Oo �4 U a rcl a) (1) 4J O a �O rI 04 3 v O 4J 4J �4 4J O 4-4 v 4J iP k � v • r-I 41 A rn v •ri v 1~ 0 O a 4J E ro v —i U) ro v v H ai v a� 04 Ei cn cn V) rd 4J v s~ v v ra cn 111 44 N v � O O O i, 44 v 0 v Q- r-i >~ - -r O O A 1 04 04 O r 1 ra E 4a O a 4J r-I v 4J v -HE U) 104AU�4 �4JvvE v0IT s~ ra ::I v s~ 0444 -r-1 f4 U V (S U) v cn ;I -r-1 v v U O -IJ I4 �J IS 4-4 �4 �4 ra --i 0 -,1 -r1 4J 4J a .� [ ,1-- 4-4 U 4J r� 4J vv o a,o E r.rd-i v U U) E 41 O v a >1 4J 4J 0 4J 3 O O s~ ri ra r-i ra A H �J r-A v 4J v P —1 O ra -4 En E •r1 rd ra E ol v 4a v (a r-1 E U) v 4-) p., ra (a -r1 �4 v v U z r-1 • ri x +~ O rd �" v U rO U a) 4J 4J -,A +J W •H SA (n �O O ro 4J ro E En o a) S] v U 41 O U) U) (n tsAVU)-E A U 44 -r-I r-i -r1 O ::j v U) • .�. -r-I rO ra r4 (n .Ci • -H U) 3F-: E C 4 4J !n rO O v ra 4J O 4J U v U .� -A r� 3 C) r- v"1 rd ,� W rO E c� -° •) 0-3:c•0)v0 4J i4 U) O U) 4J (n ,.C. ,?r •r-I CL r- - ra v 3 -i rO O U) rO o �4 A v rO U) U)4J vC) v4)44J M -14 �4 "I U) l0 1� 4J (a .C: a) i~ ra % v r-: •r1 E C E-r �)+ a 4 rn i;Jl-r-I 3 -ri 'H (n U) 4-) 4-) U) U -r-I v �4 a�J v U) 0 i4 ra +� O U r-i 4~ ra 4J H • r1 O rd U A rI �4 U v 4-1 s4 0O O rd E v U v v .+~ >~ 44 4, O v 4J 4J M 4J f~ 4J v 4J � s~ rO }4 •rl v v 4-)rnv U,r� v ri 4J a, r4 x ­4 �4 v3v� U) 41 -rI U U) v v 4J •n •r4 0 to ra U 4Jv0Cr 4J -P -r-I rO C Z 4a C O h1 O ra N b) 4J rO 4-4 a) v O �4 N 4J � In tDI M (1) a r1 r1 Rf Z Z v O S~ v •14 —4 v r-I O A 4J U) U) I Ic: v m r_ z r-4 ra v aJ > N 4J -r1 O r-4 v 3A v v U) •11 -H r-1 04 Z rO U v v 41 3 r 1 ra .C: .,i >1 a, s~ 4J i~ �4 A rn A u) v --i v ri �4 4J v m 44 124 (n ra a) ri A•r4v0v>.C� -M rO r-1 v $4 4J rd -ri v 4J v >, v �4 v 41 > -rqvv°zw�aa))rn > r0 Q)4 E rd v try E ::5•H U ca C 4J v v X' r-I U) (a v -r1 ra A 4J v C v 04 L: U) is Ei i4 L: —i -r-1 34 U) • r•1 ::s 3 O O A E r-1 O 44 E --1 0 v r4 v 4 O U) rd ,� ra rO 41 a) U) l0 U) S:� 41 -r1 ri v �4 4J O O U O v rd ;:) Z Z 04 U t:;) �4 O O d E� w U) —4U r -i R, 4-4 4J 4J • H- r-I r-1 r i 04 v > 4 r-4 O 44 E S4 v ra M M 4J v U H v f.' Cl, M �4 U U) U O 4J d v v a) 4-I v f 4 4J r-i ?, -n O O a, 0 v 0 0 41 U) 4-1 �4 •r•1 4J —4 �4 U) v 4J O Ra 04 4J 54 0 >4 r° v O 34 �4 ra X. � U > -r•1 v 44 4OJ 4J UO U dO Is-. r0 -Q � U) U) r-�4 � .0 4J ra 4J 4J r-1 a r4-J4 c .U) �C. C: 4 O O rS A 4J v 4J O :� 4J $ 4J 0 F EXISTING HYMAN AVE. • 59 Recorded at Reception No. o'clock .m., Recorder. THIS DEED, Made this 1st day of August, 1985, between Mountain Enter- prises--80B, a joint venture comprised of Mountain Enterprises, Inc., a Colorado Corporation and Trend Venture Corporation an Oklahoma Corporation, of the County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, previously known as Trenson Corporation, of the first part, and John Brett Gillespie, whose legal address is: 2101 Emma Road, Basalt, Colorado 81623, of the second part: WITNESSETH, that the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of Thirty four thousand six hundred seventy and 00/100 DOLLARS ($34,670.00) to the said party of the first part in hand paid by said parties of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns forever, all the following described lot(s) of land, situate, lying and being in the Town of Aspen, County of Pitkin, and State of Colorado, to -wit: Unit A-302, THE TOM THUMB BUILDING CONDOMINIUMS, accordinq to the recorded plat thereof, and Condominium Declaration recorded April 15, 1982 in Book 425 at Page 202 of Pitkin County Records, City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, and State of Colorado. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said party of the first part, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with the appurtenances, unto the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns forever. And the said party of the first part, for itself, its heirs, executors, and administrators, does covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the said Parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, it is well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments and encumbrances of whatever kind of nature soever. Any and all taxes due for the year 1985 and being due and payable in the year 1986; Terms, conditions and restrictions as evidenced in Notice of Historic Designation Recorded in Book 295 at Page 515 of Clerk and Recorders Office, Pitkin County, Colorado; Terms and provisons of Resolution No. 6 (Series 1973) recorded April 3, 1973 in Book 274 at Page 217, Clerk and Recorders Office, Pitkin County, Colorado; Terms, conditions, provisions, and obligations contained within Condominium Declaration for The Thumb Building Condominiums recorded April 15, 1982 in Book 425 at Page 202, Clerk and Recorders Office, Pitkin County, Colorado; Terms and Conditions in Statement of Exemption from Definition of Subdivision, recorded June 29, 1982 in Book 428 at Page 610, Clerk and Recorders Office Pitkin County, Colorado; Any tax assessments, fees or changes by reason of inclusion of the subject property in Aspen Fire Protection District, Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District, Aspen Street Improvement District and Aspen Valley Hospital District and the above bargained premises in the STATE DOCUMENTARY FF-7 rV �. o AUG 9 In /7 -� oZ: Cn+ quiet and peaceable possession of the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, the said party of the first part shall and will wARRWr AND FOREVER DEFEND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has hereunto •1vj*' hand and seal the day and year first above written. s A�$� ,,,�, •� MOIJNrAIN ENTERPRIS(3-80 B By: Mountain Enterprises, Inc. .` B (TCARPORATE SEAL) ames A. Bag ey Pr sident Attest: By Trend Venture Corporation .... By _7 David Rainbolt, President STATE OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF OKLAHOMA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -� day of , 1985, by James N. Bagley, President of Mcuntain— thterpr ses Inc. ,,,. A:'k$gmajrsion expires ' •" Wi trtes.�ti hand and official seal. U 3L •,; Notary Public STATE OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ss. COURrY OF OKLAHOMA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this of , 1985, by David Rainbolt, President of Trenson Inc., prey, sly known as Trenson Corporation. i,i''cm►nissioexpires r . •, V ••Wjf� my hand and official seal. r a 4 ' �.' 4N�otryvPubl� torq :. * ' •• RAJ .. ••� �'`- 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN RATINGS BY P&Z The P&Z reviewed the following pru;;,-,�t and rated each of the design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth Management Ordinance. 1. PROJECT: REVIEW DA P&Z REVIEW P&Z MEMBER Atoll Q) t% C-11 �s co � GROUP RATINGL- PLANNING OFFICE RATING (, %,C.Y,�J .0 I �,-D /•�/�� l uN�AJ(a C)f ��, 'To 7A L ' ` IRDtUt mxi, THE CO'"113INED RATINGS OF THE P&Z AVERAGES 1 2 2 4 E 6 7 A MANAGEMENT PLAN RA i i i','CS 67 HPC The H.P.C. reviewed the following project and rated each of the design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth Management Ordinance. PROJECT: REVIEW DAT HPC REVIEW Pam' �rP 41 O / pv 40 IR HPC MEMBER I APA7, . 0- GROUP RATING PLANINING OFFICE RATINGlC 7 J �� / ��_�_/ • - T THE COi,iBINED RATINGS OF THE HPC AVERAGES ` �.� 9. HPC GROWTH MANAGCM_NT EVALUATION FORM - Ratings of projects within the commercial one zoning districts shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - i;dicates a totally incompatible design 1 - Indicates a -�a nr design flaw which creates a major conflict with structures in the historic district or with the ui-'- environment in the other areas outside the historic u;-; ct 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an acceptable design The following design elements shall be rated accordingly: Massing - (maximum 3 points) considering the massing, type of roof, and overall compatibility with the historic scale represented in the vicinity of the project. Exterior Building Materials - (maximum 3 points) considering the application of historic building materials and their use on all facades of the structure, avoidance of garish, reflective or other disruptive materials. Architectural Detail - (maximum 3 points) considering overall visual impression given by fenestration and the use of building detail near windows, doors, corners, roof lines and at floor level. Color - (maximum 3 points) considering the compatibility of colors and the variation in color when necessary to maintain historic scale. Architecture - (maximum 3 points) considering the use of compatible contemporary design as opposed to the imitation of historic architectural features. RATE the above five (5) design elements below. Please comment on the strong and/or weak factors affecting each of your ratings. Project Name: Date: Design Element: a) HAS b) EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL - 2 - Rating IL-3 c) ARCHITECTURAL DITAIL Comment: d) COLOR e) ARCHITFrTIIRF n Rating Rating , `. i TOTAL Rati ng V Name of person submitting the above rating - 3 - 10. -P&Z Growth Managempitt Quality of Design Evaluation Form - Projects witTi n the Commie al �Dv _�2 CC and Commercial Une C-f) zoning districts shall be assignee; points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally i ncomp(A'`-; �.1 e design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an acceptable -design Rate the following features accordingly: a) Architectural design - considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater- ials) with existing neighboring developments. RatingC.---?. 7 b) Site design - considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. ^ Rating c) Energy - considering the A e of insulation, so$4r energy devices and efficient fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rati ng C-3,10�1 d) Amenities - considering the provision of usable open space and pedestrian and bicycle ways. Rating �, Q - 4 - e) Visual Impact - considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. - .. --) q 11. P'Z Growth Management Community' Con�nercial Uses Evaluation Form Projects within the CC and C-1 shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com- munity's residential population with only incidental tourist use and no tourist housing being anticipated. Rate the following features accordingly: a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. b) Rati ng, rieaicai ana uzner bervice iieeas - considering the extent to wnicn the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. -5- Rati na / U 12. NET POINTS HPC AVERAGE RATING ��W INDIVIDUAL P&Z MEMBER RATING NET RATING V. z 13. BONUS POINTS (not to 20% of the above net rating) provided the project merits recogniLlu,. to its outstanding quality. f� BONUS POINT �J �dOP y' 14. T TAL POINTS NET RATING'_ BONUS RATING TOTAL POINTS 31• 7 NAME OAF PERSON SUBMI/JTTTING THE ..AB0 E /RAA. - 6 - _0 hefjnlar Mooting Aspen Ci.t} Council January 23, 1978 Councilman Wishart moved to adopt'Resolution #2, Series of 1978; seconded by Councilwoman Johnston. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Van Ness, aye; Wishart, aye; Parry, aye; Johnston, aye; Behrendt, aye; Mayor Standley, aye. Motion carried. The City Clerk swore in the Councilmembers as Commissioners of the Housing Authority of the City of. Aspen, Colorado. Council scheduled a special. meeting for organizational purposes for Monday, January 30, 1978, at 5:00 p.m. COMMERC71AL APPLICATIONS TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN Kane told Council there really isn'-t a requirement: for Council to review these. In light of the long suffering process the applicants want through, with HPC and P & Z, for Growth Manzgu,xnnt benefit of Council, Kane asked if they would listen to the presentations. Kane stated Plan - C0.ffFTcrcial that the process developed two very good projects. Both of those received almost t:he applicati.cn maximum points in the categories. With a required 21.6 points average, the Aspen Grove building addition received 31.46; the Pit'k.in Bank received 32.02. These projects are assigned points for solar, site design, visual impact, services related, etc. When P 6 'l, received those applications, they had already been reviewed and assigned points by the IIPC. Bill Clark presented a scale model of the Pitkin County Bank, which is located on the northwest corner of Hyman and hunter. It will be a two story building, total height of 24 feet, 16 feet less than the maximum allowable. The building occupies 67 per cent of the site, which is 33 per cent op,,n space, 8 per cent more than is required. The FA., Pitkin County is 500 feet less than maximum. The building will be brick, which was selected to blend Hank in v,4 th the Aspen Plaza building. Across the front will be a'30 foot atrium. The design is expected to be 50 per cent solar efficient. Clark stated the remaining three lots will be developed ultima-tely, and will be developed at the same scale. There will be pedestrians walkways created. Clark said the direct costs associated with the HPC and GMP aspects of approval acids about 2 percent to the cost of the building. Frank Woods, .Aspen Grove building, said they did not have employee housing because they are in a view plane. The ground floor will have a Lace lifting; they are taking down the Victorian details. This will be a sedate modern building of brick. They will not: Aspen Grove go into the garden with any new construction. The second floor has walkways all around Buildinca and will be essentially all store fronts. There will be a pedestrian walkway on the east side of the building. Woods presented plans for the addition. Councilwoman John{ston moved to read Resolution #1, Series of 1978; seconded by Councilman Wishart. All in favor, motion carried. RESOLUTION #1 (Series of 1978) WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 48, Series of 1977, Section 24-10.5(e) requires that the City Council by Resolution provide annual development allotments; and WHEREAS, by RFsolution dated January 17, 1978, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has completed detailed reviews of two Commercial projects Peso. #], 1978 filed for the individual 1977 commercial allotment of 24,000.square feet; and Approv:uig WHEREAS, these two projects in combination do not exceed the stated Conrnrcial quota; and ' Applications to WHEREAS, a special meeting, on January 10, 1978, the Aspen Planning' and Zoning Commission did conduct a duly notice public meeting to consider applications under the Growth Management Plan, and at that meeting did consider. the Aspen Grove Addition, a project of some 9,255 square feet and the Pitkin Center., a project of 8,5.30 square feet for a total of 3.7,785 square feet; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 48, Series of 1977, requires that sixty per cent (60%) of the total available points be assigned to each application to be considered further, and this sixty per cent (60%) constitute 21.6 points, and the Planning Conunission, at its January loth meeting did assign 31.46 points to the Aspen Grove Addition and 32.02 points to the Pitkin Center; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 48, series of 1977, provides for an opportunity to protest findings of the Planning Commission in their review of growth } management applications, and to date, no challenges have been made and no he the challenges can reasonably expected since all applications under Ordinance were approved, i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIh OF -THE CITY OF ASPEN, t COLORAI?O: 'Pt;at the Aspen Grove Addition and Pitkin Center be granted the full square footage allotments sought in their applications presented before the Planning Commission under the guidelines of the 1977 Commercial allotment, and that each of these projects be authorized to proceed further with any additional_ approvals needed by the City of Aspen to secure building permits. councilwoman Johnston moved to approved Resolution #1, Series of 1978; seconded by Council- nan Wishart. All in favor., motion carried. )RDINANCE 446, SERIES OF 1978 - Salaries layor Standley opened the public hearing. There were no comments. City Attorney Nuttall ,ointed out.that this incorporated certain changes agreed to at the last meeting. These .,ere published to give people a chance to comment. Mayor Standley closed the public Ord. 46, 1977 fearing. Salaries / :uuncilman Parry moved to read Ordinance #46, series of 1977; seconded by Councilman Van t„ less. All in favor, motion carried. /� RECORD 0E' PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves ,MM M C. I. MWIM c a a 1. Co. (dd) Any major street or road links and school sites, pathways, foot, bicycle or equestrian tr'a�ils, ;reenbelts. (ee) General description of surrounding existing land uses and identification of zoning or historic district boundary lines, if any. (b) Tile Planning Office shall evaluate all development allot- ment applications during the early weeks of January, reject those that are ineligible under Section 24-10.3(c) and present its recooni-Indations to the Planning and Zoning Commission no later than February 1st of each year or at the Commission's first regular meeting subsequent to that date. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review all applications taking into consideration the following criteria and point schedule with respect to each of the following areas of concern: (1) Quality of Design (exclusive of historic features) (maximum 15 points). The Commission shall consider each.application-with respect to the quality of its exterior and site design and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the follovring formula: 0 - Indicates a totally deficient design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design The following features shall be rated accordingly: (aa) Architectural design (maximum 3 "points) con- sidering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building materials) with existing neigh- boring developments. .(bb). Site design (maximum 3 points) considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergroundinn of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. (cc) Energy (maximum 3 points) considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices and efficient firenlaces to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. (dd) Amenities (maximum 3 points) considering the provision of usable open .space and pedestrian and bicycle ways. (ee) Visual"Ir.ipact (maximum 3 points) considering the scale and location of buildings to maxi- mize public vieuls of surrounding scenic areas. RECORD OF PROCEF:DJNGS - 100 Leaves (2) Historic Features (maximum 15 points).' The Commission shall refer applications for allotments within the CC and Cl zone districs to the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) and accent its evaluation with respect to the comnati- bility of the oro.ject t,lith the historic character of the Aspen Connunity and the Historic Preservation Committee 01PC) shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following forumula: 0 Indicates a totally incompatible design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw which creates a major conflict with historic structures in the vicinity 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an excellent design. - The following features shall be rated accordingly: (aa) Massing (maximum 3 ;points) considering the massing, type of roof, and overall com.patibility with the historic scale represented in the vicinity of the project. (bb) Exterior Building ;Materials (maximum 3 points) considerinn the an-;)lication of historic building materials and their use on all facades of the structure, avoidance of garish, reflective or *- other disruptive materials. (cc) Architectural Detail (maximun 3 points) considering overall,visual impression given by fenestration and the use of building detail near windows, doors, corners, roof lines and at floor level. (dd) Color (maximum 3 points) considering the compatibility of colors and the variation in color when necessary to maintain historic scale. (cc) Architecture (maxirurm 3 points) considering the • use of compatible contemporary design as o;i?osed to the imitation of historic architectural features. (3) Conununi ty COirri?rerci al Uses (maximun G -)oi nts ). The Coru,.ti ss i on shall consider, with respect to coil structi on of cor;11110rci al and office snace within the CC and Cl ._one d i Stri ct s , the uses trhi ch MT to occunv the dcvel oo- nr(1nt. aril thn k'Xt.0111" to which t:he LiLwelo",.r011t %q"l house its cmplo`ees on site. The Coi!mlission shell evaluate the probability of its su0;)lying corrrrercial and office uses to satisfy the needs of the residents of the corrr..unity as opposed to being designed to accor.tmodate the area's t0Lll'iSt needs, and t,,ith respect such uses shall assign noints acc(,rding to the following formula: RECORD OF PROCE17DINGS 100 Leaves 0 inrlic;r es nNnj, r' tnt tl1 ✓ 1(�Cl'inry in ;,ny -- -- - -- a( _ housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project.with its slain emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 = Indicates a project which is designed alrlost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com- rluniL., residential population with only incidental tourist use and no.tourist housing being anticipated The folloliing uses shall be rated accordingly: (aa) Emplovee Housing (maximum 3 points) • consi�derina the extent to �•rhich the project supplies housing for en?loyees r.enerated by the oronosed cowi2rcial uses. (bb) Medical and Other Service Needs (maximum 3 points) considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office soace; as well as banking, annliance supplies and repair, grocery, hard- ware, drug store, laundry; itnd similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine. trade and service needs of the community. (4) The Commission may, 1-.,hen it shall determine that a project has incorporated the criteria of Section V10.5(b) (1), (2) and (3) and achieved an outstanding overall desinn ►�eritinn recognition, award additional points not exceeding 20;3' of the total points awarded under Sections 24-10,5(b) (1), (2) and (3).. •(c) The Corli7ission shall consider all eligible arlolications at a pu111 is hearing at the close of r1hich each meriber of the Corilmission shall identify the number of ?oinL.s assinned by him under each of the criteria outlined in Sections 24-10.5(b) (1), (2), (3) an,,! (4), and the total number of points awarded by all mc;•lbers, divided by the nur.iber of members voting., shall constitute the total points award d to the project. !Illy pro- ject not receiving a Rlinifllulil of 60" of the total points available under Section 24-10.5(b) (1), (2) and (3), or a minimum ofof the -joints available under each of Sections 24-10.5(b) (1), (2) and (3), shall no longer be considered for a development allotment and the anplicatiton shall be considered denied. (d) All projects shall be ranked accordinri to the total paints receive! (highesf to loi•rrst) and the ranking thus establ i shcd by the Conlcli ssi on shall 1- be forwarded to the City Council on or before i'larch 1st of each ,year. - 13 - r PROGRAM NARRATIVE FOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN EVALUATIOII REPORT 7. a. THE PROPOSED ADDITIONAL WATER FACILITIES FOR THIS PROJECT CAN ADEQUATELY BE HANDLED BY THE lelt1 ER SUPPLY TO THE -EXISTING HULLOING. T14E SOURCES OF r, ADDITIONAL USE IKOULD BE ONE TOILET, ONE S;'iALL LAVATORY AND ONE SINK FOR CRAFT 9'1 RELATED ACTIVITTLS. ALSO DUPING CONSTRUCTION AN EXISTING BATH TUB WOULD BE RE14OVED. THESE FACILITIES BY THE VERY NATURE OF THE PROPOSED USE OF THE ADDITION, THAT BEING, CRAFT STUDIO USED D'JRIIIG' BUSINESS HOURS F OULD NOT PLACE A SIGNIFICANT. ADDITIONAL DIPACT ON TH MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM. b. THE FACILITIES FOR THIS ADDI?ICiI ARE LMALL IN SCOPE, THOUGH ADECUATE, CAN BE ADEQUATELY' HANDLED BY PLUMBING AND SEWAGE SYSTEM OF THE EXISTING STRUC— TURE. THE ADDITIONAL PLUMBING WILL SHARE EXISTING PLUMN NG WALLS. AS STAT— BD III TFE PREVIOUS . ITEM THE FACILTIES FOR THIS PROJECT POSE NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TO THE CO'�Fi 11DIITY SEWAGE SYSTFY.0 C• THE ROOF, .350 SQUART FEETt WILL COYSTITUTZ THE OailY SURFACE DRAINA(M. CON— SMCTION OF A PARAPET WALL W THE WEST SIDE OF ROOF WILL DIRECT DRAINAGE TO THE' EAST SIDE OF BUILDING TO CREATE WATER SUPPLY FOR GREEN AREA( APPLE TREES9 RUSSIAN OLIVE TREE, LAM AND NUMEROUS FLOWER BEDS). d. LOT SIZE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SITE IS 30.16t X 100.00t, Tl-E ADDrrICuJ"AL INTERNAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE PROJECT WILL BE 540 SQUARE FEET. THE EE14 STRUCTURE WILL USE UP APPROXIMATELY 150 SQUARE FEET OF EXISTING OFTEN SPACE, TAKING INTO CONCIDERATION THE NEW CONSTRUCTIC U THE LOTS REMAINING OPEN SPACE WILL STILL BE A VERY REFRESHING 40% = 45% OF THE TOTAL LOT AREA. _ . ,... , . _ ..:. ,.. y- +a� ��.-�w— ^-mac �e — : -;---r. z ._--s�-,�►+�-. ^ 0 In 1� •J 7 Y • o. SINCE THE PROPOSED CO^,STHUCTION OF Tfir.. CRAI r STUDIO IS ADJACE14T TO THE EX- ISTING RETAIL SHOP I C;Jt NOT FORESEE ANY INCREASED TRAFFIC VOLUMF. GR tJF;ED FOR ADDITIOIIAL PARKING. I ESTIMATE THE PRINCIPLE DAILY USEAGE OF TILL STRUCTURE 11OULD CORRLSPOfND TO THE HOURS OF THE RETAIL STORE WHICH ARL 10:00 AXI. - 5:30 P.M.6 i. THE INTENDED. USE OF BUILDING IS TO SERVE SOULY AS. THE INDIVIDUAL CRAFT STUDIOS FOR DUANE AND MARGARET JOHIISON. DUANE*S STAINNED GLASS STUDIO •WOULD FE ON THE LOWER FLOOR AND MARGAP=tS. ENAMALING STUDIO WOULD BE ON THE SECOND LEVEL. THEIR ATE NO INMI LED PROVISIONS IN THIS APPLICATION THAT THIS BE USED AS OP TO BECOIE USED AS A RESIDENTIAL OR RETAIL UINIT. THOUGH NOT INTENDED BY THESE APPLICANTS, THE POTENTIAL FOR EITHER RES- IDENTIAL OR fSTAIL USE 13 CIEARLY POSSIBLE WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL BUILDING . CHANGES. g. PROPOSED TDDITION IS SURROUNDED BY HEAVY COMtZRCIAL AND RI ETAIL ESTAB- I.ISH14E:NTS. PROPERTY IS MADE UP OF THE HUTCH CLOTHING STORE AIID THE VdLD- WEED SHOP RETAIL STORE. THESE ARE BO`JNDED ON THE EAST BY THE BA14K OF ASPEN AND LA COCI"IO RESTURANT TO THE "iJEST, THE MINER'S BUILDING IS ACROSS AURY TO THE NORTH AND THE RILL STREET STATION COMPLEX TO TI-T; SOUTH ACROSS HOPKINS AVENUE. h. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE WILL BEGIN WITH ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. ANID SUBSE-Wll;NT ARRIVAL OF -FAVORABLE SPRING WEATHER WITH COMPLETEON DATE OF JUNE 1; 1978. 0 -;qg..,.w. fir....... _--.�..,,_-;,.'��,..�..*•..�.��..,..�..y„�..:._..,...,..,,•--Fr^'----°--�"��•;'•,. - .. ---•- -. .. v GROWTH `i!lflAGEMBIT PLAN EVALUATION REPO* C0i1iERCIAL SCCTION 1. Project tdarne. ?9IFT Is I 2>1-b Lly 2. Location: 3. Parcel Size: 3o•Ih ` 1(�IJ•t�c�` __ __ 4. Current Zoning: Zoning under which application is filed: �C- Maximum buildout under current zoning: Proposed zoning: CC . 5. Total buildout proposed: 6. Special procedures required: View planes: Stream Margin Review: Special Review: Historic District Subdivision (condominiumization): PUD: _ 7_ Program Narrative and associated graphics to describe the proposed project's impacts and other data. (to be submitted with this application) a. Existing crater system, excess water capacity, location of the nearest water main and estimated water demand of the building. b. Capacity of the sewage system, location of the nearest trunk line and estimated sewer demand of the building. c. Type and design of surface drainage. A. Development summary including lot size, internal squaj,e footage and open space. e. Estimated daily nu:iber of vehicles generated by the development and estimated increase of traffic volume on adjacent streets, number of on -street and off-street parking spaces to be supplied, location of public transportation stops and routes, other auto disincentive techniques incorporated into the proposed developriient, and hours of principle daily usage of the development. f. -Proposed uses for the structure and potential alternative uses (by general category of use) without substantial building changes. g. Types of land uses adjacent and in the finmediate vicinity. h. Construction schedule and schedule for phasing' of construction if applicable. $. List of drawings and maps submitted for review: C i� c, r",) i 6 C 7 0 ,�,. -yt-�- m Submittal Date: _.►�Iln��.)ft�' � a� , i ! 1f� Regular Meeting t • • Aspen City Council April 24,'1978 ORDINANCE; #8, SERsES OF 1.970 - Appropriation for. Rcf-ind Park Dedication Fees Councilman Behrendt moved to read ordinance 48, Series of 1978; seconded by Councilman Isaac. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE 08 (Series of 1978) AN ORDINANCE MAKING A SUP PLEMENTAJ, APPROPRIATION FOR $120,000 FROM UNEXPENDED PR70R -YEAR SURPLUS FOR THE PURPOSE' OF MAKING CERTAIN REFUNDS OF I'ARK DEDICATION FEES was read by the city clerk City Attorney Nuttall told Council the'pu-pose for this was to make sure the City refunded park dedication fees by proper channels. Ms. Nuttall said each case will be considered on its merits. There will have to be do..^umentation on each refund. Councilman Isaac moved to adopt Ordinance #8, Series of 1978, on first reading; seconded by Councilman Wishart. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Van Ness, aye; Wishart, aye; Isaac, aye; Perry, aye; Behrendt, aye; Mayor Standley, aye. Motion carried. Councilman Behrendt moved to adjourn at 7:25 p.m.; seconded by Councilman Tsaac. All. in favor, motion carried. Kathryn P. Hauter, City Clerk Special Meeting Aspen City Council April 25, 1978 Mayor Standley called the special meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. with Councilmembers Johnston, Isaac, Van Ness, Behrendt, Parry, and Wishart present. Present from the: staff were Karen Smith, Richard Grice, Joe Wells, Tom Jones, and City Manager Mahoney. Mayor Standley sta-Led this is a special meeting to deal with growth management plan appeals for residential and the allocations for the lodging. Ms. 'Smith had put together a procedural memorandum. Each applicant will get ten minutes to make a presentation, and there will be 1.0 minutes.for Council to ask questions. Applicants will have the right to use this 20 minutes any way but that is an absolute time limit. Mayor Standley pointed out that Council was not here to debate the growth management plan; it is a fait accompli and has been adopted by ordinance. Applicants will deal with specific issues, if they feel they were treated unfairly by P & Z. The order will be (1) 500 Galena/925 Durant, (2) Six StuCio Units, (3) Goodnough, (4) Van Horn, (5) Cooper & Original. The Council will take action after each appeal. Before this, Mayor Standley said the lodge allocations should be addressed. Councilman Van Ness moved to have the planning office draft a resolution -recognizing the allocation of the lodging appropriation of 44 units for Council's consideration Oil May 8; the allocation was recommended by the P & Z and is consistent with the growth management plan; seconded by Councilman Isaac. There were only two applicants for the lodging allocations; Aspen Inn with 36 units and Mountain Chalet with 8 units. Councilwoman Johnston pointed out that these are more units than are available under the growth management quota. Ms. Smith told Council there are 36 units available for 1977 and 1978 allotment. Council has the authority to grant an additional. 33 per cent of that number. This additional allotment must come out of the total for future years. Joe Wells told Council one of the advantages of giving these extra units is that both applications propose a significant number of employee units. There is a limited build out remaining in the lodge district, and there is a possibility there may be no competition in the future for units and it may be likely not to get employee housing. Both the lodge units and the employee units come out of future quotas. The total unit allocations are 36 lodge units and 24 employee units for the Aspen Inn and 8 Lodge and 8 employee units for the Mountain Chalet, for a total of 76 units. The extra units will come out of future allotments spread out over five years. All in favor, motion carried. 500 S. Galena/925 Durant Larry Yaw, representing this project, told Council this is a 29 unit project with 13 units low income housing. The project was specifically designed with commitments and provisions consistent with the growth management plan criteria to get 42 points. The P & Z rated this at 38; one point less than necessary to qualify. Yaw stated he could demonstrate inconsistencies with the application and the scoring. The appeal is bused on one member's scoring that was so inconsistent as to be blatant, and based on the overall scoring is inconsistent with the information and criteria presented. Yaw stated they contended that Baranko had to necessarily disregard the growth management criteria and submission to have arrived at his score; the average P & Z score was 43, Baranko's was 29. Yaw requested that Council award the additional 11 points asked for or to simply strike Baranko's score from the record. Yaw pointed out this project was awarded a 1.8 for water service; they believe a 2.5 is deserved. There is a 6 inch main, test pressures exceeded 90 psi with a flow -of 2,000 gallons per minute. In engineering judgment, this is more than ad( -equate service for the project. For sewer the project: was rated a 1.4; Yaw stated a 2.5 .is deserved._ Thq sewer stated there was a bottle neck in Mill street line; this has been corrected. These projects only add .3 per cent to the overall capacity of the treatment facility. For stroni drainage this project rated 2.8; 3.0 is deserved as all storm drainage will be handled on site and there are no foreseeable deficiencies. 2391 Special Meeting Aspen City Council April 25, 1978 I ' On fire protection the project was rated 2.2; Yaw is requesting 3.0. There are hydrants within 200 feet, and they have provided a new hydrant adjacent to one element of the project. The structures will be completely sprinkled and smoke detectors will be in each units. On parking they received 2.4 and are requesting 3.0 points. There are 29 cars required to be parked and only 7 will be within view of the streets; there will be a parking garage. In terms of public transportation, each of the projects is within 350 feet of bus service. In terms of police protection they received 1.2 points and are requesting 1.5.based on the fact they are within 1 minute of the police station. Also the project has committed to hire and maintain a security system. On childcare facilities, the project received a 1.4 and because they plan to provide them on -site, Yaw is requesting 2.0. These facilities will be consistent with state day care facilities. Recycling got 1.6, they will provide this and exceed the level of service provided in that neighborhood and request 2.0. On handicapped they received 1.8; the project was specifically designed so that all but six of the units can be reached by wheelchair, they are requesting a 2.0 Yaw said in total they are requesting 5.9 additional. points to the amount given, bringing the total up to 43.9. Ms. Smith told Council there was a comment from the water department stating these were somewhere between negligble and moderate impact, they felt 1.8 was not far-off. Sewer service - they feel that scoring is correct as there is a substantial overload on the Durant transmission line, so the Durant portion of the project was downgraded. Ms. Smith explained this was scored as if either of the sites had sufficient deficiencies, the total score was down graded. The transportation score is correct at 1 point as they are not directly on a bus line. The planning office had recommended 2 points on handicapped. Councilman Parry questioned the criteria used for judging police protection. Ms. Smith said they had not received any response from the police department. Councilman Behrendt asked how the child care would be maintained. Ms. Smith said this would be tied down in the subdivision process. Mayor Standley asked if 925 Durant would be totally employee housing. Yaw said they are 12 studio units, 450 square feet, at $175 per month. At 500 S. Galena there will be a manager's unit to be rented at $175. Ms. Smith said this needed to be tied down through the housing authority. Councilman Behrendt moved in storm drainage to change the points to 3.0 giving an additional .2 and in handicapped raise -the points to 2.0 giving an additional .2; seconded by Council- man Parry. All in favor, motion carried. Councilman•Parry moved the points be raised on childcare facilities from a 1.4 to a 2.0; seconded by Councilman Behrendt. All in.favor, motion carried. Councilman Parry moved the recycling facility be changed from 1.6 to 2.0; seconded by Councilman Van Ness. Ms. Smith stated the planning office awarded full points only if there were some outstanding feature about the project. Normal or adequate level of service received only l'point. All in favor with the exception of Councilmembers Johnston and Wishart. Motion carried. Councilman Isaac moved to change the energy average points to a 3.0 from a 2.8; seconded by Councilman Parry. Councilman Behrendt asked why. Councilman Isaac pointed out they are putting in solar heating, lining the windows to accept the sun light and are doing more than necessary. All in favor, motion carried. Mayor Standley announced the scoring on this project has been modified to bring the total points to 39.6 without the bonus. Andre's/Six Studio Units - David Hauter, representing Andre Ulrych, said this seems to'be an ideal project, six studio units, close to downtown. The project is small scale and should have no impact on services. There are two existing homes on the site, so this will only be an increase of four units. This should be a pedestrian project in terms of location. Hauter pointed out that small projects are penalized in the categories of community support. These units will be large, low cost long term housing studios. Hauter stated there were inconsistencies in scoring. On sewer they were only given 1 point. and request a total of 2, as the Mill street bottleneck problem has been corrected. On storm drainage they are requesting additional .2 points for a total of 3 as all the storm drainage will be handled on site. On roads they are requesting an additional .2 for a total of 3 as the project is located within 3 blocks of downtown; there is no foreseeable problems with the roads and there is a sufficient alley. Under public transportation, this project is within half mile of ski hills, downtown, Rio Grande parking, and they are requesting an additional .2 for a total of 2. Under police protection, Hauter pointed out this project is three blocks from the police and fire station and the response time: is 30 second to one minute. This project is small and connot provide space for a childcare facility on site. On bicycle paths wthis project should rate 2 points; it is very compatible to bicycles and living there would not require an automobile. On Recycling, the project will have separate containers for glass, aluminium, organic material. Hauter requested .8 points for a total`of 2.0. In terms of handicapped, they request a scoring of .2 additional to be consistent. The commercial support proximity is covered on the location. This is a totally pedestrian oriented project and should receive an additional .4 points. Hauter said they did not feel four units will impact - the existing system. Ulrych pointed out these are all garden level units. Councilman Behrendt moved that the applicant receive 1 point for sewer for a total of 2 points, receive an additional .2 for storm draina_u_e and an additional .4 on commercial support proximity; seconded by Councilman Parry. A11 in favor, motion carried. Councilman Isaac moved to award 3 points on roads instead of 2.8 for an additional .2; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried. Special Meeting Aspen City Council April 25, 1978 Councilman Parry moved that for bicycle paths 1 additional point be awarded as anything in the City like this actually a bicycle path. Motion DIED for lack of a second. Councilman Wishart moved to add .2 for handicapped design features; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried. Councilman Van Ness moved to add .4 to police protection to bring it up to 2.0 points; seconded by Councilman Parry.. Everyone opposed. Motion NOT carried. The Ulrych - Six'Studio apartments is now recorded at 38.8 points. Goodnough Apartments - Vivian Goodnough entered into the record a letter from their attorney Leonard Oates. The Goodnough project, consisting of 9 units was awarded 35.4 points. Ms. Goodnough entered a written challenge to the scoring by the P & Z. Ms. Goodnough challenged the assessment of points under 24.10-4, relating to moderate and middle income housing. At the presentation, the Goodnoughs had stated that the three top story units would be condominium units under deed restriction to local owners. By this fact, they feel they are entitled to an additional 3 points. Six units will be rented in the moderate income range of $300-$450 per month. Additionally, one unit will be rented at a substantially lower rate for a caretaker. Plus the three top story units which will be sold, the total housing score should be 4 points. On roads, they feel they are a much less crowded area than the other project, and are not situated on a hill. They have few units. This project is a definite auto disincentive due to its proximity to downtown. There are roads on three sides of the project. They ought to get full points for roads. On energy, they will have individual electric heat, and it will also have a passive solar, the fire places are all glass doors, 90 per cent of the windows face south. Snow build up will further insulate the units. On police protection, they received a 1 and Ms. Goodnough compared scores on other projects. Ms. Goodnough pointed out this project is within 5 blocks of the police station, and Chief Hershey said the project could easily be handled by the existing force. Call time would be 2 minutes, the project is exposed on three sides and well -lighted. There will also be a caretaker living there. Ms. Goodnough stated they feel childcare facilities in the area are adequate. They are closer to the bike path's than anyone else and they received a 1.2., They are one and a half blocks from City Market. On recycling, they were marked 2 by the planning office and received a 1.6. Ms..Goodnough asked for a .4 there. On handicapped, they stated they would provide ramps, if necessary. On commercial support facilities, they are asking for total 2.'0, an addition of .2 points because they are very close to the commercial district and all the roads are very flat, and there is a bus stop on the corner. Ms. Goodnough objected to•the planning and zoning commission evaluating the projects 500 Galena and 925 Durant as one. The objection is that these are two separate and distinct project separated by one -quarter mile distance. This is to the detriment of small projects. The planning office had interpreted this in order to allow employee housing. Ms. Goodnough said ber interpretation of the ordinance in no way allows split projects. The effect of the position taken by the P & Z•will be to enhance larger undev- eloped which may be placed in the free market category thereby depressing the price of smaller properties. This will create an anti -competitive situation. Councilman Behrendt asked about the points for sewer. Ms. Smith stated they had received a very negative comment from Heiko Kuhn, as the project feeds into the Durant line which is very over loaded. Jim Markalunas recommended this as moderate impact on the water system. As far,as the housing, Ms. Smith said this application consisted of six moderate income units before the deadline. Councilman Parry moved to change the commercial support proximity from 1.8 to 2.0, raising it .2 points, recycling upped by .4 to a 2.0; bicycle paths increased by .4 to a 1.6; increase roads by .3 and energy by a .5'; seconded by Councilman Behrendt. All in favor, with the exception of Councilmembers Wishart and Johnston. Motion carried. Councilman Parry moved to raise the housing from 10 to 14. Motion died for a lack of second. Mayor Standley closed the discussion on the Goodnough apartments with a total amended points to 37.2 Van Horn. Russ Pielstick, representing Van Horn, told Council is project is only land subdivision, and land subdivision does not fit into the review as well as other. They have been trying to bring about this subdivision since 1972, working with sewer and water. Pielstick explained they would have an 8 inch water line which would close the loop on Riverside and upgrade the system, and that was what Markalunas recommended. On sewer, they have been working with the engineers, but they were down graded on points because the planning office thought they would need lifting stations because of the.elevations. Pielstick explained that for storm drainage the parking and access roads would be gravel or perforated paving; the foundations will be required to have perforated pipe collection so that the pipes flow into a dry well. Fire protection was marked down because in inadequate water pressure, but they have an 8 inch looped line coming from a 12 inoh main. For parking design, all they can do is require all owners to have adequate parking. They are not designing the sites so they cannot designate where the parking will be. With roads there is a problem; however, they worked out an easement through Callahan subdivision to the highway. in a land subdivision, Pielstick stated he did not know what to do to gather points. Pielstick stated for transportation they are beyond the 525 feet from a bus route. The police protection, with response time and this subdivision with minimal effect, it should not affect the existing level of service. Childcare - Pielstick has broken down the census in terms of age groups and they would expect to have one child under the age of 5 in the subdivision, and they felt it would he excessive to have childcare facilities. 2393 Special Meeting Aspen City Council April 25, 1978 Pielstick told Council the bicycle path runs right through the bottom of the site, and j' they should have gotten maximum points for this. Recycling in dealing only with a land subdivision, it is difficult to figure out what they can do in this category. In handi- capped design features, all the sites are at grade and they should have gotten the maxi- mum. In housing, Pielstick stated they were judged very fairly. They are providing a covenant restriction which says there must be a low cost apartmbnt in each unit. Pielstick reiterated the fact this was a ]and subdivision gave them some difficulties because'they do not have the number of parameters to deal with in design in order to bring about the required point total. Pielstick suggested that in the future the land subdivi- sion should be evaluated on a different schedule. Ms. Smith told Council on sewer the planning office had gotten the comment of substantial impact because of the possibility of lifting stations. On water, they got- the comment of moderate impact because the City may have to construct the water line. Tom Jones noted the initial application did not make the storm drainage arrangements clear, that there would be penetration into dry wells. Councilman Wishart said that perhaps land subdivi- sions should be handled differently. Ms. Smith said the P & Z agreed this should be given consideration in future ordinance amendments. This was considered originally when the ordinance was drafted, but it was thought that such things as recycling, parking, solar energy could be shown and deed covenanted along with the sale of the lots. Councilman Behrendt moved to recommend raising water from 2.4 to 3.0, sewer ought to be awarded 2.0 points (increase .6) increase under fire protection .4 points to 2.0 and increase bicycle paths .8 to 2.0 points; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried. Councilman Isaac moved to give the benefit of doubt and raise childcare to 1.0, adding additional .2; raise recycling .2 to 1.0, and raise handicapped to 1.0, up .2; seconded by Councilman Wishart. All in favor, motion carried. Mayor Standley stated the Van Horn application has been modified to 34.0 Cooper & Original - Chuck Brandt, representing Cooper & Original, told Council this pro3ect is within 135 feet of City Market, is on a bus line, within 3 blocks of the center of town, it is as near police and fire as any of the applicants, it is the only applica- tion that includes a solar system, childcare facilities are in the vicinity. Brandt stated those general points should give rise to consideration of the scoring by P & Z. Brandt stated his client objected to the treatment of two separate projects as one. Mayor Standley stated discussion of other projects is not an appropriate subject. Brandt should keep his comments to his project. The appeal is on the basis of the application. Brandt said this would be a discussion of the system, and this is a comparative system in that there is a ranking for the points. Brandt stated the treatment of two buildings as one project, that application should stand or fall on its individual merits, treating the employee housing project and the free market project as two separate projects. In terms of competition aspect, the R/14F district is at a disadvantage when the implementation ordinance is applied. The high price real estate prices in R/MF preclude true employee housing. The developer cannot afford to provide employee housing along the criteria addressed. Brandt stated the fact that these employee units can be sold off in a few years ought to be considered. The R/MF zone is for intensive housing for employees, and there is a transfer of density from the R/MF area to lodge area by two of the applications. This deprives the applicant who owns a single parcel of land of adequately competing. This can be avoided by insist- ing that multi -family dwelling in the lodge district that preclude R/MF development be subject to six month rental restriction. Councilman Parry questioned the scoring on water and sewer as this project is in the same areas as other projects. Ms. Smith stated initially Heiko Kuhn commented this project would have substantial sewer impact because of the Mill street bottleneck, which has been taken care of. This project should receive the 2 points. On'water service, the comment was there is nominal pipe and the existing main is seriously overloaded. Tom Jones said - the site is presently lower than the street. Some garden level units are proposed and he could foresee a possible problem with water and a flooding problem. Councilman Behrendt moved to raise the points for sewer service by .8 to 2.0; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried. Councilwoman Johnston pointed out the planning office did not allow any points for hous- ing; there are two points on the tally sheet. Ms. Smith stated there was no employee housing indicated on the application. The majority of P & Z scored this at no points. Councilwoman Johnston moved to lower the housing by 2 points; seconded by Councilman Isaac. All. in favor, with the exception of Councilman Parry. Motion,carried. Councilman Parry moved that the water service by raised by .4 and the fire protection be raised by 1 point; seconded by Councilman Van Ness. Councilwoman Johnston pointed out that upgraded the water system was not part of the original application. Mayor Standley said this constitutes an amendment, it cannot be considered, the motion is inappropriate. Councilman Parry moved to raise the commercial support proximity .2 to 2.0 points and to raise energy .2 to 3.0 points; seconded by Councilman Behrendt. All in favor, motion carried. Transportation modification. Council addressed all the applications on this because the criteria is very spec fic 2 points on existing .route, 1 point within walking distance (520 feet), and 0 for outside established service area. Top of Mill is 700 feet from service, but is not appealing so it cannot be amended. 500 S. Galena, 925 Durant got 1 point should stay as is. Ulrych stayed the same; Goodnough stayed the same; Cooper & Original was raised from 1.8 to 2.0; Van Horn was lowered from 1 point to 0 points. Special Meeting Aspen City Council April 25, 1978 Mayor Standley stated 500 Galena/925 Durant is not 39.6 which now qualifies it for the II growth management plan. P & Z's recommendation is that Council apply the 20 per cent bonus to allow up to 65 residential units. There are only three projects over 39 qualify-' ing points. Without the bonus 500 Galena/925 Durant qualify by right for 16 units, and if Council grants the 20 per cent quota bonus that would allow 65 units. Councilwoman Johnston said the quota for residential is 52.; anything built on a single family dwelling lot counts toward that quota. Councilwoman Johnston asked if any count had been taken of building permits to be subtracted. Ms. 4!:,ith said this'was taken for 1977 and subtracted from the quota. Ms. Smith told Council the ordinance allows Council to grant in excess of the maximum number of dwelling units as much as 20 per cent, provided that any such excess development be offset by reduction in successive years, over the next four years. Councilwoman Johnston pointed out this.quota is established by percentage, and asked if this percentage of growth quota had been reduced by the number of single family units already done. Ms. Smith stated the quota annually of 39 was not reduced by anything other than the actual build out in any year. They do not know what has happened in 1978 yet. Councilman Behrendt moved to table the considerations of the awarding of bonus allocations until May 8 Council meeting, and have the planning office and city attorney bring a clarification to Council to consider at that time the awarding of the bonus units; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried. Councilman Parry moved to instruct the planning office to draft a resolution approving Top of Mill and Park Central•West for 1977-78 growth management allocations; seconded by Councilman Isaac. All in favor, motion carried. Councilman Parry moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:50 p.m.; seconded by Councilman Isaac. All in favor, motion carried. Kathryn S. tauter, City Clerk t July 21, 1960 CERTIFIED MiNIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTLD Asp -Vail Investments Box 666 Telluride, Colorado 81435 Mr. Donald Ball 415 East Hyman Aspen, Colorado 81Gll Gentlemen. This letter is written as a courtesy to remind you that you are in jeopardy of losing your allocation under the Growth Management Plan for the construction of a 5,455 square foot addition to tiie Tom Thumb Building. This allocation will expire on July 29, 1900, unless you take steps to preserve your rights. Specifically, Section 24-10.7 (renumbered this year to 24-il.7) of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, Colorado, requires that you submit plans sufficient to obtain a building permit on or before February 1 1980. You made initial coitipliance. You submitted plans.on January 31, 1980, to the Building Department and paid the appropriate fee for a "plan check". The plans acre approved on March 11, 1980. As of this date, you have not paid the fee for a building permit and a building permit has not been issued. Under Section 303(c) of the Uniform Building Code, 1976. edition, you have only 180 days following the date of -application to secure a building permit. Failure to secure a building permit by July 29, 1980, will cause your application to expire and will, additionally, cause your Growth Management allocation to expire., You have two available courses of action. First., the building official may extend the time in which you may acquire the .buildin: permit for a period not exceeding 180 days upon your written request "shoeing that circumstances beyond the control of the appli-:ant have prevented action from being taken", or, you may pal the appropriate fee and obtain a valid building permit. Yours very truly; 1 1 Ronald W. Stock City Attorney CC. Karen Smith 0 0 Tbrr, 7kun1h /A.'3c)3 �(AcCuc�S -1,C( k T3 h v (I(L CAI a c J 23,3 g,5 `ID s.3s t3ai- Kt 2 3, S i-� 1 3�, 14"ts VeCL 12 `d w CONDOMINIUMS u0 301 UPPIKk, PLAN &n m C H.8.1 �D - r 01 C N. 8-1 N G 5 5' 'A>5 14'8 C.H.8 1 9 Ln G H.10 0 65 O � 4 85' 4: q- 302 5 3 C H. 10 0 m 30 N Q 5 O 1 14.45 40 39 w m 075 CH 93 Lo B-301 - QD CH. 805 5 1 0> f � • 53 L1 0 9 � 1940.3w 30 3 -- • r i 7hvaLb ,4 3(5-1 �l F3�k-ems F-1-0IR V_Qcorota-:�, 06�ce �4 Pore-tictyj- oj1 C,ammerc�- j - vnlL� /s, _.._---- ._ . -4 MendrpA ply+ v i-�- Q � c 3� I-Ita- t5'k_,570Q/pq ty-I - ,Q -30 roi ,',low 14� re dQUaes. aS�'LQg-7 F-;!IOB4 c A'304 ib no+ a .S (v_ 6 w► i E- 0. T. 4V _ A-3D3 gpprvLed -..-A r_3 0 3LA - 3 a4_7- - --- --- �1- --- A - 30. A X ` 6 a?Qrou b v nK- "us" {% b AJ o LAa C, Wed. co. LAct have fir\ par-f- of Q.30.'r A304 = (o3(o sf- -t% size— 'l-3O4• 0 0 Torn T�uwVo A-303- t&,tq6r x 1-4 r- 5 -7 ,4 d, Ualu�l ► J510 14 46 1 -fir . jI` it ti .- 11- / 13, 2 s.q Ll -?3 41c, 0 ri r `1 I j L. �cunit.0 3�r? ?sf 1a�2 1 2- OK .5 3 � . 02 s � cp prowl __. t10t CLnSlTc)CO Fi 1 I 3 are Dripr`�f� V(1 �r1 dab. 3,..!22 C ndom1 0 1.L)o►A i wfton C.._ 47 r sixes 172 goes Oxa w o.0 rasa, sssatr Ottke SvMtr ta.•s'rttKen•QYIs. t;at REAL ESTATE PURCHASE CONTRACT 114y_28, __ _. Iv 85 1, or we, hereby agree to purchrue the following described real property, to —it. Sour Unit A302 _-! 9UQ Battle_Flaza_Condominium Building_ to-- CiSVof Aspen,_Countof Pie in xx,t Accord to the_rec�ed_plat.—___ thereof, subject to all -condominium _declarations, restrictions a o_ns and all Pitkin _County, Colorado employee housing deed dedications and restrictions and employee housing regulations. �------- — — - - together with all the improvements thereon and the appurtenances, if any, thereunro belun, n,K, including _ _None _ IF the adneral right/, and subject to ex,song z.,nmg ordinances, restrictions and casements. We agree to pay, for said real property, the sus of Thirty Four Thousand ,_ Six _Hundr_e_d_Seventy -and no/100 —-------- —'---ollare ($ 34,670.00 ), payable as tollo- Tl,c sum of 3 467.00 —which is herewith deposited with._ Mountain Enterprises B.OS _._ Agent f; as agent_. receipt of which is hereby acknowbdged, to be applied on the purchase price xXX"Xx&3"XXXigxxxxxxxxxxxggXX2 cash at closing together witXXxt*xXaEXXXX�iDGYsj1, and dir balance, if any, " follows; h all ordinary and usual_closing costs. The caller, rithimli a-ys from the acceptance bsreof, shall furnish/ aY G,16x2�c KX�cxLforDr tit le insurance KArCXXXKXKKE4}iXX cstrndcd to this date, shoring a good title, In the seller >)[I[ j }:y( X�S!}ifC'�i free and clear of all bens and encumbrances, except as hsteinabow provided.x�txl�,}��xhFXlc�Ex7t�CXx*kxi�X kkt wxxgcxxwA*xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxacxxxxx*xxiexxA,*x xx�t>cx�x� � In case such defects in the title cannot be so corrected te(thJn the time specified, �thts cont!cts sh:dl become null and v.,rd and the deposit returned forthwith, unless the buyer elects to walvi puch��t�objeectioons. The tide shall be conveyed by Warranty Dead AndUtVLgf ihall IDPylo�t e hou, in� ry�tr114ons a eneral axe an p•cra ssesiments to the eaitndar year. All General Taxes and Special Assessment liens payable during the calendar year of. _..1985 _...shall be pro -rated on the bests of said calendar year between buyer and seller at the time of dosJng. If the amount of the General 'faxes cannot be ascertained such proration shall be on the basis of the tau" paid for the preceding year. Rents, interest, insurance, water, gas, and electric bills, apartment expenses and sa l.,rics, ii anv, art- to he aJtusted to date .,f closing "r, the basis of thirty days to the month, the seller to have the last day. Rents delinquent more than thirty Jays, arc to be cullects•d by the seller and are not to be adjusted The seller agrees to deliver the property and the improvements thereon in their present ;,,nJ,t,on, ordinary wear and tear escrptvd. This sale Is to be closed on or hot* Junta 30 _ -_ ig 85, unless the time of closing is extended bs written agreement, apossession of said real property will be ,;t,tn on or before_JUne IG, 19S5__ If the buyer wronsfuUy refuse• to clew, the sanww money U to be forfeited as hquid:ucd dam.tgrs to the caller; one half paid rct.un. d by the Agent so apply on his proftsaional services, and One half paid to the seller, but the seller may at his option seek specific performance If the pUer's title fails, and cannot be perfected as herein provided, the seller shall be liable for the Agent's commission This Is the entire contract between the parties, when accepted, and neither party shall be bound by any verbal representation altering the terms of this offer and agreement. The foregoing Offer b trade object eo ' acceptance in writing hereon by the seller within____N/A ___days from and after this date, and the return of anexecuted copy to the undersigned. If not so accepted the said deposit is to be returned to the Buyer. Time is the essence of this contract and is so considertsd by the Parties. This contract shall be binding upon the heirs, esecutors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. This contract, when accepted, may be assigned. This is a legally binding contract. If not understood, seek competent advice. Buyer . ~ Rec�svtd the sum of Buyer.�_//_ to be held and applied in accordance ,.rth the terms and conditions of the furegoing offer. Dated this....... 2-?,,_____day of _ 19 v Kua�� ,• ,��sPs�d6 ---- By— ;'jilG! I, or we, accept the foregoing offer and agree to tell the above describ1�7� property (l,r ,,rms and Condruuns herein state,!, .,,s,i agree to pay the above Agent the regular commission of Dated this, day of- .__ __—_.-_.19_ _.._ Srllet Scllct ftla0 - 0 RFSOLUT I ON' 01' THE AS['f:fi PLAldl INO AND ZONING COMMISSION REGARDING 1978 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN `ALLOTMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, in accordance'aith Ordinande ;48 Series of 1977, February 1, 1978 'was established as a deadline for submission of 1978 aplil -i cati ons for residential, lodging, and commercial development within the City of Aspen, and WHEREAS, in response to this ordinance three commercial projects were submitted for a total of 6,639 square feet of commercial space within the 24,000 square feet of commercial space available in 1978, and WHEREAS, duly noticed public Hearings were conducted .before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission on March 14, 1978 and before this Commission on April 18, 1978 to consider the Growth Oanagement applications and eval- uate and score these applications in conformance with.criteria established in Ordinance #48, Series of 1977. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Commission. hereby evaluates ranks and scores the projects submitted in the following order: Total Total P&Z Average HPC Averay. . WIO Bonds Bonus W/Bonus 1, Tom Thumb Building 18.52 13.4 31.92 4.9 36.82 5455 sq.ft. 2. -The Hutch 12.42 6.6 19.02 2.18 21.02 576 sq.ft. 3. La Tortue 10.62 6.7 17.32 .56 17.88 608 sq.ft. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that: 1. This Commission recommends that all three projects be approved regard- less of the fact that two projects, The Hutch and La Tortue, did not achieve a minimum of 6OZ of the available 36 points (21.6) points without bonus or 30Z of each category. Both the Hutch and La Tortue failed to recieve 300 or 1.8 points in the category of community commercial• uses (The Hutch received 1.52-points and La Tortue received 1.12 points). Because the two projects were vary small additions to existing small buildings, the projects were unable to provide employee housing or supply professional or service oriented space. The Commission fools that Ordinance 148 also had an unfair ponali:inch effect on small projecAn the area of architectural ai`!{sit:r. design. The Commission, therefore, recommends• that Council consider a special ordinance that would amend Ordinance #48 to drop the requirement that projects must receive 30% of the total points in the category of community commercial ser- vices, which would have the effect of allowing La Tortue and The Butch to build this year. This is arIpropriate in Q 978 also because only 25% of the total available allotment was applied for. 2. That consideration -be given to an amendment to Ordinance 048 which would deal with the discriminatory effect which the ordinance appears to have on small projects. One proposal might be to!exempt small projects (under 700 square feet) from review under the growth management allotmient system, but provide that any such buildout be subtracted from%the following year's allotment. Another solution might be to change the category of "community commercial services" to a bonus point category only and still require review. 3. That the unused allotment for. 1978 At be carried over•to subsequent years, as it could raise the possiblity of an imbalance in commercial build. - out in the following year or in any of the next four years. Rather, the Commission recommends that the allotments be reviewed after a five year period. 4. That theICorimission has again recognized certain flaws in the working of the ordinance and has requested proposed amendments from the Planning . Office to provide more definitive criteria for architectural design, site de- sign, and amenities, among other matters. l Dated this `�.� t ^_ day of Play, 1978. rz MI -Collins, Chairman Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission ATTEST: Sheryl Sinmmen Deputy City Clerk ..hr dlCfw r..rn'« b 1;1 Unilo =".cnL r.lc l•r / , %H .t cnn �u.,ta wxce�xCeuur_tion in the aLl:,tmPnt3 over the na,xc t by roLIOWNt The allotment for 1979 shall be reduced by 12 or rettuc.,, A . 27 39 to b• The allotment for 1980 s::all be reduced by 12 or re uced ercm 39 to 27 c• The allotment for 1981 shall be reduced by 9 or reduced from 39 to 30. , I,od in Section ccr.struction in excess of the 36 lodge unit Counci ::2reby authorizes allotment for 1977 and 1978 in corciance with Section ?t by a (a) which authorizes an increase in the 1==ae development allotment by as much as I 33 per cent, or up to 47 units. 2. Lodge development allotments are hereby awarded to the Aspen Inn (36 units) and the Mountain Chalet 18 units) for a total of 44 units. 1 3, That the 32 employee units i�spen Inn = 24; Mountain Chalet = 8) iJ proposed as e. matter of FAR bor. in thiovidednfordistricts ordinanceX448. from the Growth Management Plat: as is p 4. Given the 8lodge 18 unit allc`-.entdavailableyin 1979 unitee btonzero, oand il = ` hereby reduced the 1981 the 1980 1.8 unit allotment ttotze`o'and Mountai. Chaletreduced eshall belphased as 14. 5. That the Aspen Inn prof projects Growth Management represented in their aapliapprc;alsand neededthe by the sCity ato securebuildingconsiderations may apply for any further app_ permits. ereby directs the AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that it h al with Planning amendmentsance No. fthe ePlanning rand gZoning l � Commission Resolution. Councilman Behrendt moved to adopt Resolution #11, Series of 1978, as amended; seconded ! by Councilman Van Ness. All in favor, :notion carried. al ent 2. Commercial Allotmand LaThis is Tortue.toMa�cr1der the Standleycsltaatedlhe would mallow o10 mitnutesbfor Commercial building, the Butch, Allotment the proponent to make a presentation to Council, and 10 minutes of discussions. Counci - woman Johnstonsaid she understood the plan care ofning f the small operations ice feels the best athat can y to so vintno problem is way come to the points. Two in the takin3cial projects are very small. Mayor Standley i pointed out these two were 576 and 608 square feet. d r Ms. Smith told Council that to deal with this immediate problem, the planning office had asked the city attorney to draft an special commerdialnce that would service categoryeRthatdalance 48 to drop the requirement under the community r cent of that category. These two small projects received projects must receive 30 peity 30 per cent of each category except corrun th saideshouldservices lf Council passthisordinance, housing and professional services. Ms. SmiNo. 10, then they could amend this resolution and allocate development to those other h two projects. 1 � Councilman Behrendt moved to waive the appeal process on the Hutch and resolution Tortue be acknoeaedoiaglowthe HutchCouncil andintends Tortue toVmakeordinance developmenOt;ssecondedo that ebylCouncilwomannJohns- amend protest ton. City Attorney Nionawaspointed d to deletepCouncil waivingwtheeapplicant'stright to not Council. 1 _. appeal. All in favor, motion carried. j Councilwoman Johnston moved to read Resolution #12, Series of 1978; seconded by Council-y f man Parry. All in favor, motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 12 (Series of 1978) IlReso. 12, 1978 ce with Ordinance No. 48, Series of 1977, February 1, ercial WHEREAS, in accordan 1978, was established as a deadline for submission of 1978 applications for residential, lodging ctomthisaordinancemthree ent 1commercthin ialhe Cprojects ity of swere and A WHEREAS, in responsea` submitted for a total of 6,639 square feet of commercial space within the �y 24,000 square feet of commercial space available in conducted before the Aspen r uand �. WHEREAS, duly noticed public !earings were conducted j Historic Preservation Commission on March 19, 1978, and before the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 18, 1978, to consider the Growth Management tons and evaluate and score these applications o 77aaformance with applica i , criteria established in or No. Co Series o resolution Commission did by evaluate, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning sub -.fitted in the following order: Total i! rank, and score the projects tal Bonus W Bonus PSz'Average HPC Ave.aae W/O IIonus J 1r 1. Tom Thumb Building - 31.92 4.9 36.82 1 5455 sq.ft 18.52 13.4 P 2. The Hutch 6.6 19.02 2.18 21.02 576 sq.ft 12.42 17.88 3. La Tortue 10.62 6.7 17.32 •56 ! 608 sq.ft and. M.-otingL_ Awmk �.3pen City. Cr�,ancl..._._ a.. 41 bdivision anption of bdivision nceptual rowhead bled WHEREAS, the Aspen C:t7 Council did consider appeals at their M;,•, y meeting and as provided .n Section 24-10.5(e) Ordinance No. 48. did amend the points awar:ed to the two protesting applicants as follows= WIO Bonus 1. Tom Thumb Z. The Hutch 3. La Tortue and, WHEREAS, the Hutch and La Tortue did not achieve either a minimum of 50 I..r cent of the total avalia_-_'_ 36 ooints or 30 per cent of each categorv, and; in accordance with Sect_cn 24-10.5 (c) , are not eligible for development allot.r:,•�ir_ NOW, THEREFORE, BE -SOLVED that the Aspen City Council hereby allocates commercial development allotment in the amount of 5455 square feet to the Tom Thumb building application in the year 1978 and that this project is authorized to proceed further with and additional approvals needed by the City of Aspen to secure building permits. AND BE IT FURTHER. RE-73LVED THAT: 1. City Council reccznizes the unanticipated discriminatory effect that Ordinance No. 48 has cn small projects and small additions and, pursuant to the recommendations of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission hereby directs the City Attorney and Planning Office to draft a special ordinance that would amend Ordinance No. 48 to delete the requirements that projects must receive 30 per cent of the total points in the category of communicty commercial services. 2. Council will reconsider the Hutch and La Tortue for development allot- ments when and if suc^ ordinance is adopted. 3. That the unused 1978 allotment of 18,545 square feet and the unused 1977 allotment of 6215 square feet, for a total of 24,760 square feet be carried over to 1979 for possible distribution at that (or a later) time, unless Ordinance No. 48 is a^ended before 1979 revising the carry over provisions. It is also noted that, should the Hutch and La Tortue applications be approved, that the carry over allotment will be reduced by the equivalent amount. 4. Council hereby directs the Planning Officer to propose amendments to Ordinance No. 48 to the Planning and Zoning Commission including alternative means of dealing with the discriminatory effect of the ordinance on small projects and more definitive criteria for architectural design, site design and amenities among others. Councilman Van Ness moved to adopt Resolution #12, Series of 1978; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried. SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION - Kopf Richard Grice, planning office, told Council this is a request to crate a separate 6,000 square foot lot out of five city lots. The applicants is requesting approval to separate lots O and P, Block 56, from lots Q, R, and S where their house is located. This is in the R-6 district and both lots would be fully conforming. Grice told Council this was coming in under Ordinance #3,1978, which allows a lot split exemption from the GMP provided there was an existing dwelling and they were creating no more than two lots. The City Engineer has no problems with this. The P & Z recommended exemption from sub- division regulations subject to the payment of a park dedication fee, which would be required before building permit. ! .I Councilman Behrendt moved to acprove the subdivision exemption; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried. j CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION - Arrowhead $ �� Karen Smith explained to Council this is a'request for conceptual subdivision approval, and will result in the removal of two existing dwellings and the reconstruction of four new dwelling units. For that reason it is exempt from the GMP but not from subdivision regulations.• This project did co to P & Z and received their approval. The city engineer has problems with the alley access and parking. The engineer is requesting that the engineering changes be a condition of approval. Ms. Smith brought up Ordinance #53 and the employee housing impact. Mark Danielson, housing office did substantial research and there are employees housed on this site. Danielson advised against condominiumization because there was no firm commitment to employee housing. Reconfiguring the units was suggested to provide for employee units rather than four large free market units. P & Z's thinking was that they could address this at the preliminary stage. Ms. Smith pointed out that Ordinance #53 does require housing be addressed in the first phase o= approvals. Danielson stated there would be employee displacement in two if not three of the units. Danielson stated there would probably be tenant displacement from the point of view of high price paid for the land so that the investor could cover his costs. Ms. Smith stated the attorney for the applicant was not present and would like this tabled to May 22. ! Councilman Van Ness moved to table this item until May 22; seconded by Councilman Parry. Councilman Behrendt suggested t^at Albie Kern be advised of Council's concerns before the next meeting. All in favor, motion carried. ! ORDINANCE #8, SERIES OF 1978 - Park Dedication Refunds Mayor Stanldey opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Standley closed 1. 8, 1978 the public hearing. �k Dedica- i >n refunds Councilman Behrendt moved to read Ordinance #8, Series of 1918; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, with the exception of Councilwoman Johnston. Motion carried. 11 . A Z z/ • • Regular Meeting Aspen City Council May 8, 1978 3. The difference between the 65 units approved under the 20 per cent i quota excess and the 54 unit allotment for 1977/78 or 33 units shall be offset by a reduction in the allotments over the next three years as follows: a. The allotment for 1979 shall be reduced by 12 or reduced from 39 to 27 b. The allotment for 1980 shall be reduced by 12 or reduced from 39 to 27 c. The allotment for 1981 shall be reduced by 9 or reduced from 39 to 30. Lodging Section 1. Council hereby authorizes construction in excess of the 36 lodge unit allotment for 1977 and 1978 in accordance with Section 24-10.3(a) which authorizes an increase in the lodge development allotment by as much as 33 per cent, or up to 47 units. to the Aspen Inn (36%Q;. 2. Lodge development allotments are hereby awarded units) and the Mountain Chalet (8 units) for a total of 44 units. = 8) vw'l 3. That the 32 employee units (Aspen Inn = 24; Mountain Chalet a matter of FAR bonus in the lodging districts be exempted .1 proposed as 9m 448. 1i from the Growth Management Plan as is provided for in Ordinance 4. Given the 8 lodge unit excess and 32 employee unit bonus, Council hereby reduced the 18 unit allotment available in 1979 to zero, and 14. J)L 'i the 1980 18 unit allotment to zero, and reduced the 1981 allotment to 5. That the Aspen Inn project and Mountain Chalet shall be phased as represented in their application and that the first phase of both projects building Growth Management may apply for any further approvals needed by the City to secure considerations permits. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that it hereby directs the Planning Office to propose amendments to Ordinance No. 48 to deal with recognized flaws in the workings of the ordinance all as mentioned in the Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution. Councilman Behrendt moved to adopt Resolution #11, Series of 1978, as amended; seconded by Councilman Van Ness. All in favor, motion carried. 2. Commercial Allotment. This is to consider the commercial allotment for Tom Thumb building, the Hutch, and La Tortue. Mayor Standley stated he would allow 10 minutes for the proponent to make a presentation to Council, and 10 minutes of discussions. Council- CCoonviecnalt woman Johnston said she understood the planning office feels the best way to solve the problem is to draft a new ordinance taking care of the small operations that can in no way come to the points. Two of the commercial projects are very small. Mayor Standley pointed out these two were 576 and 608 square feet. Ms. Smith told Council that to deal with this immediate problem, the planning office had asked the city attorney to draft an special ordinance that would amend Ordinance 48 to drop the requirement under the community commercial service category, that all projects must receive 30 per cent of that category. These two small projects received - 30 per cent of each category except community commercial services - points for employee housing and professional services. Ms. Smith said should Council pass this ordinance, No. 10, then they could amend this resolution and allocate development to those other two projects. Councilman Behrendt moved to waive the appeal process on the Hutch and La Tortue acknowledging the Council intends to adopt Ordinance #10 so that resolution #12 can be amended to allow Hutch and La Tortue to make development; seconded by Councilwoman Johns- ton. City Attorney Nuttall pointed out the applicants should waive the right to protest not Council. The motion was amended to delete Council waiving the applicant's right to appeal. All in favor, motion carried. Councilwoman Johnston moved to read Resolution #12, Series of 1978; seconded by Council- man Parry. All in favor, motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 12 (Series of 1978) WHEREAS, in accordance with Ordinance No. 48, Series of 1977, February 1, 1978, was established as a deadline for submission of 1978 applications for residential, lodging and commercial development within the City of Aspen, and WHEREAS, in response to this ordinance three commercial projects were submitted for a total of 6,639 square feet of commercial space within the 24,000 square feet of commercial space available in 1978, and WHEREAS, duly noticed public hearings were conducted before the Aspen r Historic Preservation Commission on March 14, 1978, and before the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 18, 1978, to consider the Growth Management applications and evaluate and score these applications in conformance with criteria established in Ordinance No. 48, Series of 1977, and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission did by resolution evaluate, rank, and score the projects submitted in the following order: Total Total P&Z Average HPC Average W/O Bonus Bonus W Bonus 1. Tom Thumb Building - 5455 sq.ft 18.52 13.4 2. The Hutch 576 sq.ft 12.42 6.6 3. La Tortue 608 sq.ft 10.62 6.7 and. 31.92 4.9 36.82 19.02 2.18 21.02 17.32 .56 17.88 i ReZo. 12, 1978 Commercial q- q; 23199 — -- - Regular_ Meeting-- WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council did consider appeals at their May 8, 1978, meeting and as provided in Section 24-10.5(e) Ordinance No. 48, Series of 1977, jdid amend the points awarded to the two protesting applicants as follows: i W/O Bonus 1. Tom Thumb 2. The Hutch I 3. La Tortue and, WHEREAS, the Hutch and La Tortue did not achieve either a minimum of 60 per cent of the total available 36 points or 30 per cent of each category, and, therefore, in accordance with Section 24-10.5(c), are not eligible for development allotment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aspen City Council hereby allocates commercial development allotment in the amount of 5455 square feet to the Tom i Thumb building application in the year 1978 and that this project is authorized ' to proceed further with any additional approvals needed by the City of Aspen to secure building permits. AND BE IT FURTHER. RESOLVED THAT: 1. City Council recognizes the unanticipated discriminatory effect that Ordinance No. 48 has on small projects and small additions and, pursuant to the recommendations of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission hereby directs the City Attorney and Planning Office to draft a special ordinance i that would amend Ordinance No. 48 to delete the requirements that projects must receive 30 per cent of the total points in the category of communicty commercial services. 2. Council will reconsider the Hutch and La Tortue for development allot- ments when and if such ordinance is adopted. 3. That the unused 1978 allotment of 18,545 square feet and the unused 1977 allotment of 6215 square feet, for a total of 24,760 square feet be carried over to 1979 for possible distribution at that (or a later) time, unless Ordinance No. 48 is amended before 1979 revising the carry over provisions. It is also noted that, should the Hutch and La Tortue applications be approved, that the carry over allotment will be reduced by the equivalent amount. 4. Council hereby directs the Planning Officer to propose amendments to Ordinance No. 48 to the Planning and Zoning Commission including alternative means of dealing with the discriminatory effect of the ordinance on small projects and more definitive criteria for architectural design, site design and amenities among others. ! Councilman Van Ness moved to adopt Resolution #12, Series of 1978; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried. i SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION - Kopf Richard Grice, planning office, told Council this is a request to crate a separate 6,000 Subdivision square foot lot out of five city lots. The applicants is requesting approval to separate Exemption lots O and P, Block 56, from lots Q, R, and S where their house is located. This is in the R-6 district and both lots would be fully conforming. Grice told Council this was Kopf coming in under Ordinance #3,1978, which allows a lot split exemption from the GMP provided there was an existing dwelling and they were creating no more than two lots. The City Engineer has no problems with this. The P & Z recommended exemption from sub- division regulations subject to the payment of a park dedication fee, which would be irequired before building permit. �l II Councilman Behrendt moved to approve the subdivision exemption; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried. CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION - Arrowhead Karen Smith explained to Council this is a request for conceptual subdivision approval, and will result in the removal of two existing dwellings and the reconstruction of four Subdivision new dwelling units. For that reason it is exempt from the GMP but not from subdivision regulations. This project did go to P & Z and received their approval. The city engineer Conceptual has problems with the alley access and parking. The engineer is requesting that the Arrowhead tabled engineering changes be a condition of approval. Ms. Smith brought up Ordinance #53 and the employee housing impact. Mark Danielson, housing office did substantial research and there are employees housed on this site. Danielson advised against condominiumization because there was no firm commitment to employee i housing. Reconfiguring the units was suggested to provide for employee units rather than four large free market units. P & Z's thinking was that they could address this at the preliminary stage. Ms. Smith pointed out that Ordinance #53 does require housing be addressed in the first phase of approvals. Danielson stated there would be employee displacement in two if not three of the units. Danielson stated there would probably be tenant displacement from the point of view of high price paid for the land so that the investor could cover his costs. Ms. Smith stated the attorney for the applicant was not present and would like this tabled to May 22. Councilman Van Ness moved to table this item until May 22; seconded by Councilman Parry. Councilman Behrendt suggested that Albie Kern be advised of Council's concerns before the next meeting. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #8, SERIES OF 1978 - Park Dedication Refunds Mayor Stanldey opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Standley closed Ord. 8, 1978 the public hearing. Park Dedica- Councilman Behrendt moved to read Ordinance #8, Series of 1978; seconded by Councilman tion refunds Parry. All in favor, with the exception of Councilwoman Johnston. Motion carried. F J61. - r • Regular Meeting _ Aspen City Council May 8, Councilwoman Johnston moved that the lease agreement be subject to the Paragon not having loud speakers at the front of the Paragon directed at the mall. Motion died for lack of a second. Councilman Van Ness moved that if the Paragon exceed state statute decibel level, their lease can be cancelled; seconded by Councilwoman Johnston. All in favor, motion carried. Mayor Standley asked the city clerk to make sure the Paragon was reporting their percen- tage of food sales to the City. SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT - Aspen Leaves/Aspen Center for Environmental Studies Mayor Standley told Council this is a request for a liquor license for July 9 from 6 to Special Event 9 p.m. It will be held in Mrs. Paepcke's garden and will be a benefit for Aspen Leaves Permit Aspen Leaves/ and ACES. ACES Councilman Behendt moved to approve the special event permit for July 9; seconded by Councilman Van Ness. All in favor, motion carried. Council asked that the special event on Sundays be checked out. CHAMBER PICNIC - Request for use of Plum Tree 1 Jeti Fox reminded Council last year the Chamber had a picnic at the Plum Tree and they Use of Plum Tree would like to do it again on June 3. They would like to use the golf course, tennis Chamber Picnic courts and ball field. If there is no golf course, they would like to use the putting green and driving range. Councilman Behrendt moved to let the Chamber of Commerce use the Plum Tree on June 3; seconded by Councilman Van Ness. All in favor, motion carried. ti IDCA BUS REQUEST Mayor Standley told Council this is the same request for bus service as in years past, Bus Request _:bus service to the tent, and for the tours. There will be no picnic this year. IDCA = Councilman Behrendt moved to instruct H. J. Stalf to work this out with the IDCA; seconded _ by Councilwoman Johnston. All in favor, motion carried. i = WHEELER OPERA HOUSE COVENANT _ Councilman Behrendt asked if these covenants were terribly constraining. Jenifer Carr Wheeler Opera told Council these have to be signed for the $35,000. The restrictions are if the City House covenants _ were to decide to divest itself of the Wheeler, The Colorado Historical Society has first right of refusal. It the City were unable to maintain or operate, the Colorado Historical ;I Society would take over. Finance Director Butterbaugh said she had problems with parts, such as the City is the contractor with the Historical Society and any contract over $10,000 requires the contractor to be bonded. The contractor has to pay minimum wages, all advertisements have to meet with non-discriminatory terms, etc. Ms. Butterbaugh said she would feel more comfortable if the staff looked this over. '- Councilman Behrendt moved to table this item until the meeting May 22 and have the staff = review; seconded by Councilwoman Johnston. All in favor, motion carried. Councilman Parry came in. GROWTH MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS Growth Management 1. Residential and Lodging Allocation Resolution. Joe Wells, planning office, had considerations - submitted a memorandum to Council c arifying these allocations. For these allocations, they are using 1977, 1978, part of 1979, part of 1980 and part of 1981. Mayor Standley Losgden- tia� ar�� - questioned how far into the future can be borrowed against. Mayor Standley said he would Lodging -. like to have the city attorney prepare a resolution saying that no allotment over a cer- Allocations tain period can occur. If the allotments borrow up to 1981, then there is no borrowing until 1981. City Attorney Nuttall pointed out there are a number of loose ends in the _ GMP that will have to be cleaned up. Councilman Van Ness moved to read Resolution #11, Series of 1978; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried. Councilwoman Johnston said the Council must address the point of previously built single family residences, which should be counted against the allotment. Ms. Smith reminded Council there was an administrative delay through 1977 and to have counted the 1976 devel- opment against 1977 was thought to be unfair. Ms. Smith stated the 1977-78 allotment was 54, consisting of 39 and 39 minus 24 build out on already subdivided lots in the first 9 months of 1977. There were 22 units built out after that. One way of dealing with this discrepancy is to count the remainder in 1977 and subtract from following year's quota. The Council could subtract 7 per year from the quota for 1979, 1980, and 1981 from the 39. Ms. Smith pointed cut the 20 per cent bonus the Council can allow, which is 11 units, will be subtracted from following years and is also spread over three years. If the bonus is allowed, there will be 28 units allocated in 1979. Councilman Behrendt questioned the result of the employee units in lodging being exempted from the GMP. Ms. Smith explained that the employee units are counted as one lodge unit, the quota is reduced by that amount plus the excess approved over the allotment. The future year's allotment will be reduced to zero by counting it against the total build out. Mayor Standley pointed out if Council asked the city attorney to draft an ordinance not allowing to borrow more than two years, the net effect would be for the next two years there would be absolutely no lodge units built in Aspen. 0 • SUBDIVISION/GROWTH IMNAGEMENT EXEMPTION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this day of March, 1982, by the City of Aspen and Mountain Enterprises-80B (herein referred to as Owner). WHEREAS, Owner has submitted to the City for approval, execution and recordation a final Condominium Map (hereinafter "Map") depicting the condominiumization of the Tom Thumb Building Condominiums situated in the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, more particularly described as Lots K and L, and the North 14 feet of the West 12 feet of Lot M, Block 88, City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado; WHEREAS, on February 8, 1982, Aspen City Council approved Owner's application for exemption from the definition of subdivision for the purposes of condominiumization and, for exemption from Growth Management Plan for the three employee units contained within The Tom Thumb Building Condominiums and the parking spaces therefor, subject to the condition that Owner agree to all matters contained in the aforesaid approval and within this agreement, and WHEREAS, Owner is willing to acknowledge, accept, abide by and faithfully perform all of the conditions and requirements imposed by the City, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants herein contained, and the approval, execution and acceptance of the Condominium Map for recordation by the City and its grant to Owner of the exemptions from the definition of subdivision and from Growth Management Plan requirements, it is mutually agreed as follows: • • a 01-ts A w I. DEED RESTRICTIONS Owner agrees that those residential employee units designated on the Condominium Map will not be rented or sold, except in accordance with moderate income guidelines established by the City of Aspen pursuant to Resolution No. 81-44, plus increases as are permitted by those guidelines and pursuant to any subsequent amendments thereof. II. MINIMUM LEASES Owner covenants that the three residential employee units within the project shall be restricted to six (6) months minimum leases with no more than two (2) shorter tenancies in any calendar year. III. WAIVER OF PARKING FOR EMPLOYEE HOUSING The requirements of Article IV, Chapter 24, Aspen Municipal Code are waived by the City and are deemed inapplicable with respect to the employee housing units contained within the subject project, as designated on the Condominium Map. IV. EXEMPTIONS GRANTED The City agrees to grant the exemptions requested by Owner from the definition of subdivision under the Aspen Municipal Code for the purposes of condominiumization and from the provisions of Growth Management Plan for the subject three residential employee units within the project, all as set forth on the Statement of Exemption of even date herewith. -2- • V. COVENANTS RUNNING WITH THE LAND The conditions set forth herein and imposed with respect to the approvals granted by the City shall constitute covenants running with the land, and shall be binding upon the Owner and the Owner's heirs, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been duly executed this day of March, 1982. MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISES-80B, MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISES, INC., a joint venturor, By: James Bagley, President CITY OF ASPEN By: _ Herman Edel, Mayor STATE OF COLORADO ) ss COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of March, 1982 by James Bagley, President of Mountain Enterprises-80B, Mountain Enterprises, Inc., a joint venturor. My Commission expires: Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) ss COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of March, 1982 by Herman Edel, Mayor, City of Aspen. My Commission expires: Notary Public =10 STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONDOMINIUMIZATION AND EXEMPTION FROM THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR EMPLOYEE UNITS AND PARKING SPACES THEREFOR WHEREAS, Mountain Enterprises-80B, a joint venture, is the owner of a parcel of land situated in the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, more particularly described as Lots K and L, and the North 14 feet of the West 12 feet of Lot M, Block 88, City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado; and, WHEREAS, applicant has requested an exemption from the definition of subdivision for the purpose of condominium- izing the building on the subject property (said building commonly known as the Tom Thumb Building Condominiums) and for an exemption from the Growth Management Plan for the three employee units contained therein, including parking spaces therefor; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission at its meeting held on January 19, 1982, determined that such exemptions would be appropriate and recommended that the same be granted, subject, however, to the conditions mentioned hereinafter; and, WHEREAS, the City Council determined at its meeting on February 8, 1982, that the owner's requests for such exemptions was reasonable and proper under the circumstances, THEREFORE, the City Council of Aspen, Colorado does hereby determine that the owner's application for exemption from the definition of subdivision for the purpose of condominiumization is proper because the owner's proposed subdivision thereof in connection with condominiumization is not within the intents and purposes of the subdivision ordinance and does, for such reason, grant an exemption from the definition of subdivision for such action; and further determines that the owner's project is entitled to an exemption from the Growth Management Plan for the three employee units and parking spaces therefor, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the foregoing exemptions are conditioned upon the owner's compliance with the deed restrictions as contained in the Subdivision/Growth Management Plan Exemption Agreement between the owner and the City of Aspen, dated March , 1982. Dated this day of March, 1982. Herman Edel, Mayor I, Kathryn S. Koch, do hereby certify that the foregoing Statement of Exemption from the Definition of Subdivision for the Purposes of Condominiumization and Exemption from the Growth Management Plan for Employee Units and Parking Spaces therefor was considered and approved by the Aspen City Council at its regular meeting held 1982, at which time the Mayor, Herman Edel, was authorized to execute the same on behalf of the City of Aspen. Kathryn S. Koch, City Cler -2- Th• peloled porllon of thl■ term approved by the . Colorado Real Erl�te Commluloe (99-60-7.71) STATEMENT OF SETTLEMENT i'• SELLER'S ❑ PURCHASER'S PROPERTY ADDRESS Unit 302 Tom Thumb Buildino Condominiums, P.s en, CO. SELLER �lountai n Enterprises 80D PURCHASER John Brett Gillespie i SETTLEMENT DATE August 1, 1985 DATE OF PRORATION July 31, 1985 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Unit 302, Tom Thumb Building Condominiums, Aspen, CO h Debit Credit 1. Selling Price 34,670 2. Deposit, aid to 0 3. Trust Deed payable to 4. Trust Deed payable to 5. Trust Deed payoff to 6. Interest on Loan Assumed 7. Title Ins. Premium 8. Abstracting: Before Sale 9. After Sale 10. Title Exam. b 11. Recording: Warranty Deed 12. Trust Deed 13. Release 14. Other 15. Documentary Fee 16. Certificate of Taxes Due 17. Taxes for Preceding Year(s) (198.36 = 365 x 1.81 days = 115.12 18. Taxes for Current Year 115 12 19. Tax Reserve 20. Special Taxes 21. Personal Property Taxes 22. Hazard Ins. Prem. assumed - Policy No. Co. Yr. Term Expires Premium $ Days Unused at 0 per day 23. Premium for New Insurance 24. Hazard Ins. Reserve 25. FHA Mortgage Ins. Assumed 26. FHA Mortgage Ins. Reserve 27. Loan Service Fee (Bu er) 28. Loan Discount Fee (Seller) 29. Interest on New Loan 30. Survey and /or Credit Report 31. Appraisal Fee 32. Water and /or Sewer 33. Rents 34. Security Deposits 35. Loan Transfer Fee 36. Loan Payment Due 37. Broker's Fee 38. Transfer 0 39-- Fee 1 2 ----Closing Sub -Totals 34 3- 582 .12 Balance due to/from Seller 31,341. 80 Balance due to/from Buyer TOTALS 24.923 Q2 34 O n The above figures do not include sales or use taxes on personal property APPROVED and ACCEPTED Purchaser/PATHTW Broker PnrcheaerlSeller �� By No. SS 60-7.71. S'TATF.MFNT OF SETTLF,MF, rr B, and NblkhinR. 5R25 W. 64h Ave.. LJkewixxl, CO 80214 - (303) 233-6900 12-94 11CR6EME N7' ►-'. w .00 m s- b. C-> == �m _ A THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this �- day. of'a ,1985, by and between John Brett Gillespie of the County'of Pitmen,' State of Colorado (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), and the City of * Aspen, Colorado (hereinafter the "City"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the Owner has purchased that real property located'at ���„ �� (hereinafter. Unit"), re specifically describe asfollows: Unit 302, Tom Thumb Building Condominiums according to the record of plat thereof and Condominium Declaration recorded April 15, 1982 in Book 425 at Page 202 of Pitkin County Records, City of .Aspen, County of Pitkin and State of Colorado. WHEREAS, Owner acknowledges that the Unit is subject to the'. control of. the City for the purpose of addressing the moderate income housing needs of the area and the parties desire to insure that, on resale, the Owner's Unit is again made available to satisfy the need for moderate income housing in the City of Aspen. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, paid in hand by the City to the Owner, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. At any time Owner intends to sell the Unit, he shall notify the City or its designee, in writing, of his intention to do so and deposit with the authority an amount equal to .1% of the estimated - value of the Unit. The Housing Authority shall advertise the Unit for sale by competitive bid submitted by qualified purshasers (as herein defined). Subject to the provisions of this Agreement, Owner may accept the highest bid; or, in the alternative, reject all bids and retain ownership of the Unit. If the Owner sells the Unit, he shall pray the City an amount equal to two percent (2%) of the sale price less the amount of deposit previously made. If the Owner rejects all bids he shall forfeit his deposit. 2. "Qualified purchasers" are those meting the qualifications of the City which qualifications shall.be established by the City Council, taking into consideration employment, length of residency, financial stability, net worth or assets and maximum income, and any and all other criteria adopted by the City reasonably calculated to determine eligibility for middle income housing and ability to finance the same. In no event shall any qualified purchaser submit a bid .for an amount which would result in his assuming obligations in'excess of any ratio liability/income established by the City.,, 3. In no event shall the sale. -price of the Unit exceed`the'total of 6% or the CPI whichever is .less: .a. The Owner's purchase price plus an increment equal to six. percent (6%) of the purchase price .per annum from the date of purchase (pro -rated for each whole month for any part of a year; or b. An amount (based upon the Consumer Price Index, A1l'Items, U. S. City Average, Urban Wage EArners and Clerical. workers (Revised), published by the U...S. Department 'of Tabor, Bureau of Labor Statistics) calculated as follows: Owner's purchase price x Consumer Price Index last published prior to the date of the notice of desire .to sell - Consumer Price Index current at the time.of purchase by Owner. c. Plus the value of capital improvements made* to.the Unit subject to the following limitations: r 1. The value shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the purchase price for.each whole year,the Owner has owned the Unit, whichever is less. 2. Value is to be determined by cost less depreciation (based on a standard schedule of depreciation) or by appraisal made by an appraiser mutually acceptable to both the City and Owner. In the event an appraisal is made, the cost thereof shall be assumed by the Owner; plus d. i The -present value of the Owner's pro rata share... of capital " improvements made to the common elements and assessed to the Owner by the homecaner's association; the value to be determined by mutual agreement of the parties or by an appraiser_ mutually acceptable to the parties. .(The cost of such appraisal shall be borne by the Owner);:...plus e. The Cost of any public improvements for which assessments were imposed by any governmental or quasi -governmental agency which have been paid during the period of ownership. In the event that a bid is received equal to or in excess of the maximum resale price herein established, the Unit shall be awarded to such bidder at said maximum price; and in the event two or more such bids are received, the winning bidder shall be selected by lottery and, again, the Unit sold to him at no more than the maximum resale price. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the Owner from rejecting all bids and retaining ownership of the Unit. 4. No Owner shall permit any purchaser to assume any or all of the Owner's customary closing costs, nor accept any other consideration such as to increase the purchase price above the bid price or maximum sale price or so as to otherwise induce the Owner to sell to said purchaser.. 5. The following transfers of any interest in the Unit, unless adopted to avoid the provisions of this resale Agreement, shall be exemption for its provisions: a. A transfer by operation of law of a deceased person's interest to the surviving joint tenant., b. A'transfer of an interest by will or inheritance. c. A transfer by genuine gift without any consideration thereof_. d. A transfer of an interest to a trustee for the benefit'of the Owner or the Owner's spouse or issue:. e. A transfer by operation of law of an interest of an Owner .to any other co-owner (or cc -owners) where such. co-owner (or co -owners) holds title on the date of such transfer as tenant -in -common or as joint tenant. f. A transfer of an interest by Treasurer's deed pursuant to a sale for delinquent taxes; or by a sheriff's or.public or private trustee's deed pursuant to a judgment execution or foreclosure sale, but only for debts constituting a. purchase money mortgage or incurred for those reimbursable capital improvements described in Sections 3b and c. Provided, however, anything above to the contrary notwithstanding, in the event that the Unit shall be transferred in any manner described in paragraphs a through f, the transferee, his grantees or successors in interest, shall be bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement in the sane manner and degree as if no exempt transfer had occurred. 6. In the event that any Unit burdened hereunder be sold and . conveyed without compliance herewith, such sale shall be wholly null and void and shall confer no title whatsoever upon the intended purchaser. Each and every conveyance of the Unit shall, for all purposes, be.deemed to include and incorporate by reference in such instrument of conveyance, even without reference hereto, the covenants herein contained. -2- V A . 7. In. the event that the Owner desires to lease the above described Property, Owner shall give written notice of such intention to the City which shall have, for a period of thirty (30) days . subsequent to receipt of such notice, an option to undertake the'.rental of the Unit for the term described by the Owner (not to exceed.a maximum of. three (3).months each vear as referred to in Section 8 of this Agreement) and at a rental not to exceed the monthly expenses for the costs of principal and interest payments, taxes, property insurance, condominium assessments, utilities, plus an additional Twenty Dollars ($20.00) and a reasonable (refundable) security deposit. All rental proceeds.shall be payable to the Owner.. Nothing herein shall be construed to require the City to indemnify..the Owner -against any losses attributable to the rental including (not by way of limitation) non-payment`o.f- rent or damage to the premises, nor to require the City to provide for the rental of the premises underthe provisions of this paragraph. 8. The Owner agrees that, in the event he changes his domicile or ceases to utilize the Unit as his sole and exclusive place of residence, he will offer.the same for sale pursuant to the provisions of the Agreement. The owner shall be deemed to have changed his domicile by becoming a resident or accepting permanent,employment elsewhere, or residing in the Unit for fewer than nine (9) months per ,year. In the event that the City shall have probable cause to believe that the Owner is violating the provisions of this section, it may inspect the Unit during reasonable hours to verify occupancy by the owner. 9. In the event any person with an ownership interest acquires such interest without intending to use the same as his sole and exclusive place of residence, and he shall dispose of his interest within one (1) year of acquiring the same, then all other persons with an ownership interest shall simultaneously offer the samefor sale pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement, and the Unit shall become available for purchase pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs 1 through 4 (above). 10. Any notice which is required to be given hereunder shall be given by mailing the same, certified mail, to any address provided herein or given as the current mailing address of the party. 11. The provisions of this Agreement shall be covenants running - with the land, be binding upon the Owner.and the City,, his or its heirs', successors and assigns (and enforceable by any'of them) and. shall run for the period of the life-ofthesurvivor.'of the members of the present City Council, plus twenty-one (21) years., 12. The term "Owner" as used herein shall refer .,to'any•and,all persons (without regard to number or gender) or entities having an ownership interest in the. condominium unit which is'the subject of•this Agreement. 13. The Owner acknowledges and agrees that the City'may assign:-, responsibility for enforcing, administering and implementing the terms of this Agreement to such housing authority, housing office or housing agent as it may designate and that, in such event, the.term "City", as used herein, shall enco.rmass any entity or person so designated.' 14. At the time of any sale of the Unit pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the Owner shall provide (at.his,cost),title insurance (or other evidence of title); and any taxes, assessments, utility:;.•.'` bills, etc., shall be pro -rated to the date of closing: Each party.to the transaction shall assume his customary closing costs. 15. There is hereby reserved to the parties hereto any and all remedies -provided by law for breach of this Agreement or any of its terms. 16. The Owner acknowledges that he has read and •fu'l understands and accents the terms and conditions of this Agreement.limiting the resale and rental of the Unit; and .further acknowledges that,he..is. -3- IN.C��S��,� F,1Gf.U;f� relying.`upon no -oral representation's" qualifying or limiting the terms h f .. IN.WITNESS}WHEREOF; the parties hereto have executed this instrument on -the day and year above first written. Owner :,Owner Co (a . (.Mailing Address):, STATE OF COLORADO ) ,.+:,:• ' ... :' �' ss. r ' `;• COUNTY OF PITKIN' ) t'.;• ;,.;' ; The for oing was acknowledged before. me this Sda• 'of 19 8 5 , '. by y WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. � h. cohi lssion,expires: ND • t.:7 )• .. ����1-� sue'../. ' � Talb , Notary Public. o ACCEPTANCE BY HOUSING AUTHORITY-`* �:!:,�• ;�`'. .• The foregoing grant' and its terms. are acceptd`�b:..The'15itkin •;: County Housing Authority. ASPEN/PITKtN COUNTY 14OQ8Itt -AUrH. ' .r ,,�^M �1.•IIIh\ �'' •• ... 1�1- :gip ' f p" , ••.\� (Title (Mail inq_Addgess).. n\ STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. , COUNTY OF PITKIN )„ Th foregoing instrument was 4cknowlledg�ed before,me this.__' day of , 1985, by lrn "}"�S ;• Witness my hand and official seal. n 'A N to Public My commission expires: �_ITS'— T51 t.'`. ir �r N JAI Reor)rAed at o' clock 0. , = M 00 Reeeotion No. xr � STAIR OF Cu.ORADO Cr) so. "%Fjtvm 0M cam" OF PITMN ) 7419 Lw06011M, Marie this 29th day of MovWdW, in the Yost of our GorA one thousand nine hurdred and elghty-five, letween Obuntain Nnter- priaea-We, a joint venture coamptised of Mountain enterprises, Inc., a Colorado Corporatinn and Trend Venture Corporation an okldww Corpor- ation, of the County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, forwrly known M Transom, Inc., of the first part, and T. Mlidtsal Rantser, wtoose legal address isr 6501 Vista Dal Mar, Playa Dal Ray, California, 90293, of the second narto WI11fl1SS6'141, That the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of Two Hundred Eighty 1ho card and no,/100 Dollars (j290,000.00), to be paid by the said party of the second cart unto *arty of the first part, the reosipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, has granted, bargairMA, 8O14 and conveyed, end by these presents does grant, ber7ain, Bell, convey and conftrs, unto the said Marty of the asamd part, his heirs and sesigns forever, all the fol- lowing described lots) of lard, situsts, lying and being in the Town of Aspen, County of Pitkin, and State of CDloradro, known and described is follows, to-vitn Unit A-101 and Unit ti-303, THE TCM imm SUmtw CDMOOIINIUIM, aocordinq to the recorded plat thereof, and Oxdominium Declaration re*wded April 15, 1962 in Rook 425 at Page 202 of c� = Pitkin County peocrds, City of Moon, Ownty of Pitkin, and State - of Colorado. c To3WI dER with all and singular the tensasnts, herditasente and 6pourtranows thereto belonging, Or in anywise appertaining, and the rloversion and reversions, romainder and remairders, rents, issues and t rirvfits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and equity, of, in and to the sbova bargainad promises, with the herodita- m ent.s and appurtenances. 10 RWZ 4M 10 w D the said promises above bargained artd deocrib- ad with the appurtenanwes, unto the said parties of the second part, i their heirs and assigns forever. Md the said party of the first part, i for itself, its heirs, executors, and adeministrstrxn, does covenant, grant, bargain, and Was to and with the sold parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ansesling and delivery of these presents, it is well seized of the promises above oonweyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the sac in manner anti form as aforesaid, and that the saw are free and clear from all former and other grants, bergadna, sales, liens, taxes, asseemaonta arxi ewrm- brances of whatever kind of nature soaves, legs and except es follows, t"itt Arty and all taxes due for the year 1985 and being Aus and psysble in the year 19661 Unit 4-101 being subject to a first Deed of Trust r,syahle to security Savings Msociation, Texarkana Texas as recorded in Rock 472 at Page 923 and r,n-reoxdd in %xit 473 at Page 591, Clerk and Recorder Office, Pitkin County, Colorado, and any tax, assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service, or for any other special taxing district) Terms, conditions and restrictions as evi- denced in Notice of. Historic Designation 1WOOCAe4 in Rook 295 at Pow 515 of Clock and Rsoxtifers Office, Pitkin Crwnty, Colorado) Terms aM Prwisiona of Asoolution No. 6 (Merles 1973) recorded kwil 3, 1973 in Book 2.74 at Pop 217, Clerk and Recorders Office, Pitkin County, Colo- redo) Terms, conditions, crwisions, and obligations contained within Cmndoeiniun Osclaration "or The Tram thumb euildi%g Condcrainiu s record - el April li, 1962 in Rook 425 at Page 202, Clerk and Rsoof to Office, Pitkin County, m:Acrado) Termu nvd Conditions in 9tatotertt Of mts+P tion from definition of witxdivision, recordaci June 29, 1962 in Book 426 at Page 610, Clerk Ar►l Reorders Office Pitkin County, Colorado) AtNr- vations anted exnootions as contained in the need(*) from the City of Aso►n orovidiml as follows: that no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of qoM, silver, cinnabar ed copper or to any valid mining claim or rY)siession r11 60 1 n_ 11moordd at o'clock _.M., J► Q! 7p Reoeotion No. + :order MTN Or ax4MW xf es. memo oleo or Tm" C"M or PITUM 1 'fRlt rowor s Made this 29th day of November, in rthe year of our lord One thousand nine huMrd and eighty-five, between T. Michael Rantser party of the first pert, ad the Public Trustee of the County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, party of the Roopnrd part, MI'INMISMo MT WNEW S, The said first party has oseaAad his promiseory note bearing eon date harewith foc the principal sum of One Rurdred Seven- ty-two Thousand and no/100 Dnllare ($172,000.00), dyable to the order of the ICUlfWM eMllilllRUWIM, 2nd floor 400 e. R"al, Aspen, Colorado 61611 a joint venture om odd of Mountain entemises, Inc., and Trend Venture Corporation focwarly known as llreneon, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "JOINT veimn," interest free, said principal dus and payable on March 31, 1966. *M, MUNW, 'he acid party of the first part is desirous of seourinq the wpoent of the principal of said prosissory, note in chose hand* sower the said note Or any Of tiles may be. ", Tfli0W=, I%* said party of the first part in consideration of the premises, and for the purpas aforesaid, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the said party of the second part, in trust forever, the following dsacribd property, situate in the County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, to -wilt unit h_101 The Tom Tfhtsab Building Condominiums hopording to the Plat thereof and the Condominium Declaration reaordd koril 15, 1962 in Book 425 at Page 202 Pitkin County, Colorado Together with all and singular the herditaments and apptatenanoa, there - unto belonging, x in anywise sopertainirxl and the reversion and raver sions, remainder and ressinders, rents, issuss and profits thersoft and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever, of the said party of the first part, either in law or swity, of, in and to the above bargained oresiaes, with the herditaments and appurtenanasao To Raw and To Rold the said premises above bargained and described, with the ap- purtatanoes, unto Mountain tnterorises-SM, the said party of the uoxd part, its heirs and assigns foravert but subject to all restrictions as to the use of said premises imposed by for, r conveyances thereof, and togeth- er with and subject to existing eseements and rights Of wayt AND WKNR 6, First Party adumledges and agrees that the above deserihsd real estate is not "hgrieultural Real Retste" so defined in Arti- cle 19, Chapter 115, 1963 CM, as aesnA*dt MD WRRRAS, Said party of the first cart is desirous of securing the payment of the ofineical and interest and all other wine dus under the term and conditions of said note and this dad of trust, in whose hands sower the said rate Try be, and is also desirous of securing the oaytment of such additional am which may hereafter be advanced by the holder of said note to the first party or to the then owner of the property herein- wme described, and evidenced by rotes, drafte, own aecount or otherwise. Therefore, party of the first cart covenants and agressn 'Mat the ntakirrl of vetch advances shall he optional with the Folder of said note. Rhat at no time shall advanaee on the original rote ad additional .r Q AA r OlOdc �► 5� 7 CQn L't� r 1V ; son '^d at o -- V 1Mc n No. m. der Cq 9 *m of CONomt00 ) �•► 1 aa. ONln Q 17N;Ib'f 2 i0 C xwm or PITKIN 1 CD ,Id DOWM, Mobs this 29th day Of Novrn I in the year of our turd Ong thousand nine hundred and cighty-film, between T. MiCh"I Kantser Carty of the first out, he Public Trustee the Second��0 U tY Of fitkin and state of Colorado, party of MT WNWN, The said first party has esewted his pro,eieeorY note bearing even date herewith for the VrinCiPll the ocberf of the Ir 14" N send and no✓100 Dollars (6S4►000.00)► Wlab Of I the On r Of t e N Inc' fMIS;w address i a joint venture 01. WOW, O �n� Colorado 6161" and Trend yenta abOmM t lid Iloor 400 i. s Trendoon, Inc., hereinafter referred wnturs Corpormm,tlon foenmarly mown to as 'JCllft VMAJRNr' with intsrest an the unpaid balance Of said princi- id pal sums until paid at the rate Of •lawn and one hats endlt .S6lin arsator interest upon May 29 and Novssbw 29 of each auooeedin g _ five (S) yew conanoinq Nall 2fr 1966. Principal tAbe and �100 �D011w6 installments in the mount of tight 'souwd (66,000.00) each, the same being payable an November 29, 19m16, Nownabsr incipal 29, 111m17, NNow0b" 29, i"If No'wd' r 211, 1909► ir100inal�Dollars Installment in the sum of twenty Too '�s� twelve (12) ($22,000.00) due On Novwbsr 29, 1W, being Coymble every months. No, 1INF&W, VW said party Of the first part is desid� rous hands curing the oeynant of the principal of said proaiamery s aoever the said rote or any of them may be. WN, 4npgpoNr TM said party of the first Cart in -rentConsideration r of the crwiamer and for the aAW" eforasaid, doss sell and convey unto the hold party of the aaaond aartr n tract forever, the follwing described proWty, situate in the County of fitkin and stew of Colorado, to -wits unit h-107 Tha Tom 1hunb Building Condominiums h000[dinng to the plat thereof and the condoainium Declaration naorded Wril 1S, 1962 in Book 42S at Page 202 ►itktn County, Colorado Together with all and singular the hered to o� 94 the r�rs�ss'� trsver- unto belonging, ar in anywi appertainingtits therooft and all sips, remainder and rsmainden, rents, issues and profits of the the estate, right, title► interest, claim and den �� 1n and to the said party of the first part, tither in lame or equity► ennana n '!t lNthe above bargained prenaiass► with the hat itweents and �t with the a e and To pole the said arsaiess above bargainsd and dsomibed, purtsnanasr unto mountain fnte,rprises-901, the said party of the seaonb tart, its Min and assignsimposed forever fK r�wanas thereof, tOgath- to 911 restrictions as to the use of said promises innpOaeb by or with and subject to esistinq easements and rights of waY1 %W r4iltMAs, first Party admowleAges and alto" that the above described real estate it not •ugriaultural Real estate" as defined in %rti- cis 19, Chapter 116, 1663 CNb, as amended► MpWRBMM, Said Carty of the first Cart is desirous of securing the ay'msnt of the oincipal and interest aft' all other susss ue dunder the twos and Conditions of saiA note and this dad of trust, in "lose hods sosysr the said note way be, and is also dasirs:s of seeming holwbocaot nt WINS of such miditional s which �msy hereafter be advanced by _ sa1A rots to the f trot arty or to the then amsr of the pr «r otherwise irr shr�va Asscriw, and evidenowi by notes, drafts, Open acCount Therefore, -arty of the first uort aTlenants and press, That the making of such afvanoes shall be ootlonnal with the holder of sold rots. That at no time shall sAvanoes on the original Rots and aMitional G hold under existing lawai and provided further that the grant hereby reads is held and declarer to be subject to all the condition, limita- tions and restriction ox ained in Section I386 of the Revised Stat- utes of the United States, so far as the same are applicable thereto. fwss and except apecifically hereto an Unit 4-303, all employee homing dedication, restrictions, rules and raqulatiom applicable thereto and contained therein, within Pitkin County, Colorado, the saw being of record or otherwisep and the above bargained promises in the quiet and osaotable possession of the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assign against all and every person or parsons lmrfully claiming or to claim the whole or any cart therof, the said party of the first cart shall and will psrjw*jfr AND /OMM 09rM. p Ill MITMOSS OUM", the said party of the first cart has hereunto ii • and seal the day and Vow first above written. �. MOLUMN WRIM RISSB-60S -+ byl gonntain Sntervrises, Inc. O � S1►t O'W4' '1k. away* Pffin X1IMI By 'rend Venture On ax at ion Loetsscly lvxown����'� Inc. i011VTO R&InNorf7Tr-WffMnt V" a oolaNDo ) Be. aotW fr or Pro= ) 'ihe toepoin g insteussnt w admmledged before in this a1 day of &OAOM 444, 1965, by Jan 4. Ssgley, President of amain lintairprises, Inc. t Lon aspltres �land aN . ..A 'ir 91M or COMM ) ) sa. 9 COMM CP al AMCM ) The foregoing irstrussnt was At ledgsd before as this 'y of , 1"S, by David Rainholt, Presi of Trend VIOnturt Onvaraticn,-rotmnrly )yarn a ftom on, Inc. r p nxNVI official 0181411. .. i row r rqn r•Not LQ ALL .. A�t � y 1m WAIN 509 '%455 'M?Ia" Wo7 1.6719E THIS KAtM00mr wade this 29th day of N'�ve'hber, se and between Mountain Enteroria $OR, 1995, curd executed a joint venture between Treby nt Venture Carvocation, fonmarly brown Y Treason, Inc., cued Mountain EnterpriGQ8, Inc., hereinafter referred to Y Seller curd T. MounNJ tain refeXsntrred of 6501 vista Dal Mar, Playa Del Msy, California, hereinafter referred Co Y Buyer. titI TNE999TH r TRW. Buyer is the now Owner of Unit 4-101 The 'lbw Thumb Buildinq Condawiniume, curd City of Aspen, Bounty of Pitkin, State of Oolorado, CAB, said Unit A-101 between ►contain Snterprlsis abject to " Law Agreement by and as Inc. and T-Man, Inc. the same being sublet to Footloose Moeaseina, and Buyer has, in pact, purchased said Unit 4-101 through the owisaoh execution of a or nots payable to Seller, and WmFtm, Seller has extended such credit to Buyer, and Buyer has uaaosotad said credit [Tram Seller, interest free with the understanding that Seller shall receive all rental free from such lets during the tam of said Pr'oaissory note, NON '"EA"IS, for and in aonsiAeration of the qutual herein, the mutual bomfits derived herefroma and "jam and *at forth , consideration each provided unto the other ' other gvaluable y cu which being duly acknowledged by the execution hereof, and suit fficiency eed aof sfollo, to-witr (1) Buyer does hereby sell, Ysign transfer and all right, title ud/Or interest in and to that I,a� �h' "1CO Seller day of August, 1081 by and between Mountain Rot Agreement dated tOth Inc. for the lease of Unit A-101 the 'lbw Thusb Building C SOB and r-M an, Of Aspen, Atats o[ Oolocad� now being sublet to Candaminiuw, City 1 d/b/a Pootlooee Mxrasins, bgar Steve De cowela (1) Seller does hereby agree Lessaa, all costs, xpense, utili to oeey, and/or pause to be pe1A eties, insurance t by the asaeaaalents assessable as against and mndowinium against said Unit A-101. Of (l) Upon 'Mover's oeywent of that Dead of Trust securing the oawment Buyers One HuMred Seventy-two Thoueend and W100 (5171,000,00) indebtedness,M}e11eT shall (oilers sell, assign, transfer and co" unto Buyer all right title and interest in and to that Lease agreement 14 specifically described within paragraph (1) above. Buyer •l'")if feC aLIM a W W_ C ao O L it y mQ ZK Seller Mountain Enterprises fl0s By Mountain Enter , prises Inc, W Q = Z tea., 7 rb.ar•fei al -- ------ �,'cinck_-.m. r ___ -------„r» ------ lroprder. rtr.ceot ion Ho. ------------- ter_---- -~_ rnt TH1ti DEPP, +lad, this tvc Any of ruxlust, 19N5, between rpriseirt Inca., a orities-804r a joint verture cpmpris"xl of Mount++ln qan OkI ices, ion nlorario G) ofathnnCoand anty d TPitkinranA gtatetof Coloraado' P)rcviasely G1rpofation, ,ratlon, of the first cart, and John AMU Kmwn sa Tre ")n C.ortr Rasalt., Coloradrs ,illesbie, wtr�`se legal address ins 1101 Penns tar,aA, 81623, of the seconi oartr WI INt:+'3r,, , that the said party of the first party for arkl /1 oonrsiAPrattOn of 'thirty four thousand six hundred seventy and 00/100 M,IARS (534,670.00) to the said Carty of the first part. in henl rsatA by said parties of CM s�!axxt part, the receipt whereof ie he or c-r,nfeaaeci AM acknawled�ledr hag granted, tmrgaine'1, sold and onfi sd, a� yy theeo presents c4�r!s grant, bargain, sell, convoy aril oonfirn, iiqns unto the saiA parties of the second part, thn�rl ism u&tArld @, lyirn and forev"!r, all the followinq Aescritsed lots) being in the Town of korsen, CfxnsCv of Pitkin, and State of Colorado, to -wit. v ��� 'iMMA ilJttJ�:� Cr),pOMTNI:3W4, ac�rdim V> the unit 4-302, Trl• ron,"iniun Declaration recorded knril recorded plat thereof, 702 0[ Pickin County AeeorAs, City of 15, 1992 in Rrx)k 425 at pWM state of ckinrOlOC u Moen, County of Pitkin, an Tcx;E[NBR with all aril sinqular the hereditWw'nts aril appnten&"el r rnretn tr.Irxtgi^q, or in arsywise apperteining, arxl the reversion snd reversions, remainder NA ren►airders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, first,pint,reit' C innlaw "xclemanA �hatsryv"r of the said Carty of .yuity, of, in And to the above hargained premises, with the r.erwlitanr`-nts and aopurtenanoas. lD HAVF 4P[s M MOM the said premises above bargained and Of the first rlescritseA with the aprsurtenences, unto the said rsartiea of the �eQ^ part, their heirs ar+7 assigns forever. And the said party g, does pert, for itself, its heirs, executors, AnddwithithetSaid rnsr"" of the covenant, grant, bargain, + ai seoorsri p:rt, their heirs aril assigns, that at the tiny at the a^sealing es and deli.,ery of these Presents, it a�luteiarvi indefeasized of the blcsestate p uprsveY!r1, a» of good, sure, Pt' ,mA has rp-A right, full fr,wer "f inheritance, in law, in fee simple, the sass in nrersner arvi a�rthority to grant, bargain, sell crud convey srkd fern as ofpreseiA, Wyi that the sane aro free and clear fr' all frvi ff and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, asse'saments and rnamhranc�s of whatever kind of nature eoever. ina due am Any and all taxes Aue�itions aril restrictions the year 198s am an evidenced in in the year 19S61 Terms, Wotioe of Historic Designation WOrArd in Co or2�tat•M� NO o Clerk and RacorAers Offior!, Pitkin COUnty, 1913 in prpvlso^s of gesnlutioClNok anrl(series Recnrdere3D[CicerBePditkPniCormty, q�c 274 at Page- 217, islrsns, and C*' Patlons chntalned CA)lorado; 'Perms, orxvlitions, Prov rorxlrsmini�tma within rondr"Iniun Declarations for The Thumpmleh n2, Cim r,scv,rdwl April 15, 1992Cn WX)ksi42Sl�arnsP"x CoMitieone indgtAt,"'*ntaOf Mf ico, Pitkin csunty, 29, Pys4on 2H atrPa1M510,tClerkf and Rec(.,)rders off ce Pitkin CousntY, n rolxaist kny tax assessswnts, fees nr etsangsa tN reason of incluaicsn of the 014,ject ^rop"r!y in Moen Fire Protection District, hsPen epr.rppolltan aanitstion District, Aspen quest ImP"(WOma^t District and District arri the above tsargainwi oremlees in the ksrsrsn Vall�/ F4,soitel ,1ATE DOCUMENTnRY LL v v'1 � 011' ray rari�+r�r.S1�'iw►tr►.,� . ., ,4uiet. &M rr_aceable p-aPssion of the Anti part i.•g of the sooml owl., their hoirs mA assiynq against all and everV Mrson or oerwxis lawfully claiming or to C'aim the whole or any pert therMIftPho, said party of the first oart shall aM will WARRANT Ate F ;1K' IN WI'PQFS4 WKgRFX)F, the aal,i party of th' first pert hari t.er..«intn {et hiy hand and ie+l the Jay and vear f first above written. ^5•.�rt, .� wetMrAIN Ft4WRPRI9h:5-80 B i} RV; poilntAin Fnternrisms, Inc. \;Rlr�r.Afti i{P:AL) � A. Bag ey Pr 4ti By Trerxl Venture Coronation MY from, Ramon x' tT , mores ent RI A i v, OF ( AHOM 1 aXJA K OF OIIIJ►HOM 1 Ii Th ornlirkq instrument was aciaawledyed before ms this day oC wf , 1985, �v Jwllse A. Bag1eY• President of *tcxin�aG� Fntertxc. !~y sSnnlil4aton expires V :� ' w��ns�L+dy hand and OPTC a sea i ary PM is rrAT3 op OKIAW AA ) ) ss. nxl�M OF OKIAHOMA 1 The (ore5oinq instriment was aclunwlw19ed hefurs TA this _ of , 1985, by David Rainholt, President of Trenson aT—xa+ orev s y n as IYenerxt Cnmorut ion. I*,BowingJA'expires ` Wjj�%t14q my hand and of?Tj aT se Ca (81J1G)'� a F.� N ry t�i1 c J ' �• Ott 1 • Tla prlalad port 6a of /AInform approved by tko • { Colorado Real Estate Commission (99-60-7.71) STATEMENT OF SETTLEMENT SELLER'S ❑ PURCHASER'S Unit A-101 and PROPERTYADDRESS Unit A-303, 400E Hyman, -Aspen, Colorado 81611 SELLER Mountain Enterprises 3%, PURCHASER T. Michael Kantzer ' SETTLEMENT DATE Plovember 29, 1985 DATEOFPRORATION t1ovember 29, 1985 ` LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Unit A-.303 and A-101 The Tom Thumb Building Condominiums City of Aspen, State of Colorado according to the recorded plat thereof. De,bk Cr*dtt 1. Selling Price 2. Deposit, aid to 3. Trust Deed payable to 280,000 00 10,000 54,000 00 4. Trust Deed payable to 172,000 00 6. Trust Deed payofT to 6. Interest on Loan Assumed (�Itaer Insurance) 7. Title Ins. Premium 80100 8. Abstracting: Before Sale 9. After Sale 10. Title Exam. b 11. Recording: Warranty Deed 12. Trust Deed 13. Release 14. Other 30 00 15. Documentary Fee 28 00 16. Certificate of Taxes Due 17. Taxes for Preceding Year(s) 282 75 18. Taxes for Current Year 19. Tax Reserve 20. Special Taxes 21. Personal Property Taxes 22. Hazard Ins. Prem. assumed - Policy No. Co. Yr. Term Expires Premium Days Unused at operday 23. Premium for New Insurance 24. Hazard Ins. Reserve 25. FHA Mort a e Ins. Assumed - 26. FHA Mortgage Ins. Reserve 27. Loan Service Fee (Buyer) 28.. Loan Discount Fee (Seller) 29. Interest on New Loan 30. Survey and/or Credit Re ort 31. Appraisal Fee 32. Water and /or Sewer 33. Rents 34. Securit De sits 35. Loan Transfer Fee 36. Loan Payment Due 37. Broker's Fee 39. Closing Fee SO LO Sub -Totals 281,583100 1 236,591 41 Balance due to/from Seller Balance due to/from Buyer rrnTA r A 281 538 00 281,5881 49 The above figures do not include sales or use taxes on personal property i 1 Purchaser/Seller APPROVED and ACCEPTED Broker Purchaser/Seller 0 No. $.564-7-71. STATEMSNr of SE`M.FMFM Bradford AubllaAln f. 5A25 W. 64A A.e.. Lakewood. CO W214 - (0J) 2)J-6900 12-1 • - • Recorded at o'clock m., Reception No. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. WARRANTY DEED COUNTY OF PITKIN ) Recorder. THIS INDENTURE, Made this 29th day of November, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and eighty-five, Between Mountain Enter- prises-80B, a joint venture comprised of Mountain Enterprises, Inc., a Colorado Corporation and Trend Venture Corporation an Oklahoma Corpor- ation, of the County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, formerly known as Trenson, Inc., of the first part, and T. Michael Kantzer, whose legal address is: 6501 Vista Del Mar, Playa Del Ray, California, 90293, of the second part: WITNESSETH, That the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of Two Hundred Eighty Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($280,000.00), to be paid by the said party of the second part unto party of the first part, the receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the said party of the second part, his heirs and assigns forever, all the fol- lowing described lot(s) of land, situate, lying and being in the Town of Aspen, County of Pitkin, and State of Colorado, known and described as follows, to -wit: Unit A-101 and Unit A-303, THE TON! THUMB BUILDING CONDOMINIUMS, according to the recorded plat thereof, and Condominium Declaration recorded April 15, 1982 in Book 425 at Page 202 of Pitkin County Records, City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, and State of Colorado. TOGETHER with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the heredita- ments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and describ- ed with the appurtenances, unto the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns forever. And the said party of the first part, for itself, its heirs, executors, and administrators, does oovenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, it is well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargaitns, sales, liens, taxes, assessments and encum- brances of whatever kind of nature soever, less and except as follows, to -wit: Any and all taxes due for the year 1985 and being due and payable in the year 1986; Unit A--101 being subject to a first Deed of Trust payable to Security Savings Association, Texarkana Texas as recorded in Book 472 at Page 923 and re -recorded in Book 473 at Page 591, Clerk and Recorder Office, Pitkin County, Colorado, and any tax, assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service, or for any other special taxing district; Terms, conditions and restrictions as evi- denced in Notice of Historic Designation Recorded in Book 295 at Page 515 of Clerk and Recorders Office, Pitkin County, Colorado; Terms and Provisions of Resolution No. 6 (Series 1973) recorded April 3, 1973 in Book 274 at Page 217, Clerk and Recorders Office, Pitkin County, Colo- rado; Terms, conditions, provisions, and obligations contained within Condominium Declaration for The Tom Thumb Building Condominiums record- ed April 15, 1982 in Book 425 at Page 202, Clerk and Recorders Office, Pitkin County, Colorado; Terms and Conditions in Statement of Exemp- tion from Definition of Subdivision, recorded June 29, 1982 in Book 428 at Page 610, Clerk and Recorders Office Pitkin County, Colorado; Reser- vations and exceptions as contained in the Deed(s) from the City of Aspen providing as follows: that no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession 0 • held under existing laws; and provided further that the grant hereby made is held and declared to be subject to all the conditions, limita- tions and restrictions contained in Section 2386 of the Revised Stat- utes of the United States, so far as the sane are applicable thereto. Less and except specifically hereto on Unit A-303, all employee housing dedications, restrictions, rules and regulations applicable thereto and contained therein, within Pitkin County, Colorado, the same being of record or otherwise; and the above bargained premises in the quiet and Deaceable possession of the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part therof, the said party of the first part shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said party of the first part has hereunto set his hand and seal the day and year first above written. ATTEST: PORATE SEAL) 1' . ATTEST: �� �&7& ( CORPORATE SEAL) STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF PITKIN ss. MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISES-803 By: Mountain Enterprises, Inc. `,7 By: a-nes A. Bagley, s' ent By Trend Venture Corporation formerly known as-\Tren�soonn Inc. By: 4�'� Z av'iaim o r�si ent d The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ­� / day of 1985, by James A. Bagley, President of Mountain Enterprises, Inc. My commission expires Witness my hand and official seal. (SEAL) Notary Pudic 03 Address Telephone STATE OF OKLAHOMA ) •) ss. COUNTY OF OKLAHOMA ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this o2day of 1985, by David Rainbolt, PresicTen of, Trend Venture Corporation, formerly known as Trenson, Inc. My commission expires �P�� 16, /g0'1, Witness my hand and official seal. (SEAL) -2� Notary Public yU Address '73/-7 Telephone -2- GROI.111.1 MIANAG`rIL T PLAN RATINGS BY !'&Z. The P&Z_ reviewed thr�, following project and rated each of the design and community co;�,mercial elements as specifies: by the growth Management Ordinance. • PROOECT: REVIEW DATE: T r- v P&Z REVIEW PI a *r _ 3_ , 1 MEMBER � / r 3 2 S 2.9 OUn RA1'INtaT_-_.__�� PLANNING OFFICE RATING 7a ' ;T.414,1 THE GUMBINED RATINGS OF THE Pf>Z AVERAGES 33• a9. GR0HI11 (.11'.0T 1'I A I j RA1,11i61; fly 1'&1. The 1151 nevi eared tt,(� foi loti'ri ny project and rates} each of the deli rtn and crjj 1ip1UrEi ty co:. rc i al as sp^cif •i ed by the Growth 1111,na.9, ,-ment Ordinance. • RROJI %.,REVY1.11 DATE: I � �•T C' !y �~ r 610 E. PLANNING OFFICE R/iTlP';G THE T,' QED (,Pj I l���, . C)F p;r- D 7 P,,%,N-&ti^rs /d . 6 Z .,�! 17 S A M . GKi11lTE; faa,f'(,GI i'��.:i'; i'I:ftid 1"Al INGS BY J%z The PR revielwcj the follo),rinci [)-InJect- and rated each of the design and runmuni ty corijrnerc i a] � l cra::�i s as specified by the Growth Mariagc rent Ordinance. • PRQJ%CT: REMI) DATE: /%z /V( G�- ."4 ell- P,lxZ ilLV I E14 F) / Cc fo N ,Y Aq F • E iEi•iEiEl� i . 5. 7. Aug I t'E.�'�f,�^�II,G of-; TCL RATING � i /b9 1 , ' 2�/G _ I �I THE Co';GINE:D (1ATIN"S of THE P 7.. AVERAGAFS 2� rc6 2/,2, IVID MEMORADUM TO: FROM: RE: DATE: P & 7. and HPC Planning Office, John Stanford Growth Management - 1978 Correnercial Projects Review & Point Allocation March 1; 1.978 Three commercial projects are proposed for 1978, all of which are additions to and renovations of existing commercial properties. Together the 1978 projects total 6639 additional square feet to the commercial core - consid- erably less than the 24,000 square feet permitted by Ordinance 48. The in- crease is listed by project as follows: Tom Thumb Building 5455 sq. ft. La Tortue 608 sq. ft. The Hutch _ 576 sq, ft. Total 6639 sq. ft. The Tom Thumb project is a major renovation of that property. It includes complete refurbishing of the tt,ro buildings that front on the Hyman Street Mall and demolition of the smaller structures to the rear of the lot to be replaced by a new commercial structure with housing. The applicant has submitted a complete application presented in brochuer form. The remaining two projects are considerably more modest in scale. The coninrercial tenants on the properties are the applicants, and they have de- veloped their individual proposals without the professional expertise of planners, architects or lawyers. Therefore, their presentations are con- siderably 'less-s refined and ambitious than that of the Tom Thumb proposal. (Modest presentations should not be downgraded as long as their applications are complete.) The recommended point allocation of the Planning Office is as follows: Project HPC P & Z NET ' BONUS TOTAL =, Thumb 13.6 16.6 30.2 1.5 31.7 La l orLu.: 9 :1 9.3 18.4 0 18.4 The Hutch 8.5 10.9 •20.4 0 20.4 The code requires that each project acquire at least 60110 of the.total avail- able points. Sixty percent of the available 36 points (exclusive of bonus points) is 21.6 points. La Tortue and The Hutch do net qualify to be con- sidered for a 1978 building permit. It is r•econiniended however, that the scores for all three projects be forwarded to City Council 1ti1;10 can choose to exempt the low scoring project by special ordinance since the total 1978 proposed square footage is only about a quarter of the annual increase per- mitted by the code. , Due to the small increase in proposed comnrorcial square footage the Planning Office has processed referrals in a less formal and time consuming manner by revier;,ing the projects with each affected agency. Essentially, Uiv. increase of 6639 square feet. within the commercial corn rill not create any signifi- cant ir►pacts on uti l i ti CS , Streets, traffic: and parking, public transporta- tion, drainage or l�,1nduse. The Planning Office recommended points are attached. (;I'0,1111 It/tl;!,(;111!11 VIIJ 1111d 111;! I Oi"S - 1' �t. i11�i , n( n i� c L', +,�1 flit, th(r ' _ col'l:il+'1 ( 1 o 1 oll!.• "on I (t I -`� Lr I (. L': "ha 1 I h(. i 't" 1'1111-d 1 I[,,, ;1(,(.( 1d i 1l!J to the loll(n•1i1l!1 iol-111u1,1: { �� U IndicaLes a totally incompiitiile d(!, i!ln t'"t 1 - Indicatu% a winr clesign flow Olich cre;Ae� it major conflict with hib% ,,• structures in W historic di stri t I: or tri th t.ho uclmi. (•Ilv-i r()nuierrt •i it the other areas o9t: s•i de the historic d W r i ct: 2 - Indicates an acceptable (hut standard) ( ;ign 3 - OWN- art acccp LiA! 1 e design The fol l ot•li,tg design el event s shall be rated accordi noly: i•9assing - (maxirmtilr 3 ,joints) consideriny1 th^ massing, type of roof, and Werall compatihiliiy r•r-it:la the Idst:oric scale represented in the vicinity of the rn-oject. Exterior Duildinq Haterials - (maximum 3 points) considoring the application' of historic bu-ildin,, r:l t riai:; ;and their use on all facades of the structure, avoidance of garish, reflective or other d'Isru13ti'Je i?laL�'t'ial Architectural Detail - (maxamu:,,i 3 points•) consideri►-i�! overall visual ii'pression (liven by untra.tion and Uw use of building detail near windows, doors, cornets, roof lines and (it floor level. Color I (maximum v points) considering the colap�iti bi l i ty of col ors and the variation in color when necessary to r,iaintain historic scale. Architecture - (maximum 3 points) considering the use of compatible contemporary design as opposed to the imiitot-ion of historic «rchi tectural features. RATE the above five (5) design elements below. Please comment on the strong and/or weak factors affecting each of your ratings. Project tame. r � Design Element: a) MASSING / .c! . ` . Rating (:�,,.7 7- - Col'imL-'nt:•• _..� ..'�.�. _ -L .4 .� � L•�. � ='�a:( :11:�.� �f.l��5�a- ..li-• � ... �—' ------ (,t1II.111i;;; F;1T! I;IAL Rat ing M / �••��- . CUllllll('.rlL• �!_L/ `� _�w�i!(%^(� /J" t :rr L,�C �J.� �/. /f•` (f.-� rliy�/ in - z4 el;l'-/ f/ lyl lC,° '!'l�►'tE V �.[a /c�[(.[.i:y/// 2iy {fit /:.�.{.l i /- !.7 ✓. .") :i1 c'��J COLOR Rati I., q Comment: �_,.f J✓.- �% LY- .i tom!' /1 /� / / 1 /- t.- / 1 �- -- J/. l: t �I//fit •y / / � /' /!'' / %/ / / i / G'i� 11�,;r, "/_,i� ,` V� / �� ; ��7'! �.i'/\•!(t r/ `�ii/ i � .�6;,1 JL/ �� '�?• i1_'v�''i 1 /�(..��J,,.:i' �.L--.�_"`.�� •/`/ �'/r --`--- •-- �/ �'_ Ii:'(?-Y'!t�!-[ ram._ C � � TOTAL Rating T.lanle of person submitting the above ra.t•i ng r 1'.1,1111-11.ioll (.I,( t In - 111-o d idi I be a%, -I iow. (I. I If% ;I C('o rd i I I!) Im tllf.� I o I fo)-.111 I 11 a 0 - 111dic;II.c'. a toUCHY de"i(jil 2 Jndicatc!, all accf.-ptable (but -talld;,trd) i 5 r-I nolct tcs an ac(xj d(:s Rate the fo*I'1o,,,Jng fc,-.I:urw. a Arc h i 1, ec t orij.] dr-, ri -- C on 1 (1(: 1- i nil tI I e cw!ipa t i 1) i I i Ly of ill I e pro )o., d bu i 1 d i tyj ( i I-, tr., (if size, ze I-w i fit c-Ci. t i (,n rnd building 111'a Jals) with existing ric-iq,hbor-in,I d(.-velop-T.ntsl. R a t i ng Co:nment b) Site design :cons-idering fhe q, ;,jalitv and characl"er of the proposed landscaping and open Space are&s, thek­ - I eXtCl-11- Of Ul1dr'I-'Ii-0LI:1di!1g Of Ll t i I 'i t i C_' S , a. n d t I i e a I- i-- a n y erilr-, n t 6 1 i i,lp re v eT,-i en -I-, s f o I- e f fi c i - n cy of C1rCU10''1'0111 (-iI'1C1LLCI-iI1g access for service v(.-,hic1es) c-ind inc)-eased safety C11-11d privacy. Rating Comment c Energy misideril-iq the L ke of iI1SLJ1,1ti0'11, SO ar enerqy devices and efficimit fireplaces to maximize consery tion of energy nergy and use of solar energy sources. Rating; Comment: d) h;ionil ics - cmisiOcHng the pi-ovision oif- Ill',-1111C, 01)(111 St"ICLI illId prdosit"It-m t-It"d !-IcYclo . wo.v". Ra t i nq Co-:rlo 1) 1 Ii c. ) V i'm.l I 411111f.l. wl" j df-r ill(I [11- !'uillf. Olid , I w., L 1, i I I f hl I i 'I d i im v I (if ,m t "(.t'lliu 9 W, . Col;cfl(.,rl 1. J/ V Growf.h M.'W1 mon 1. Ni-Iiial ir;n Fr) Project!; within the CC zind C-1 shall be r)oints according to the fol lovi'iiiql fon!iul;j: I I i 0 - J"(Hcat(2')- a, pl^o,i.(-,ct tctallj� lac:'2!iq in any how,iiic or lis,es direCAed to stilyl.,,-ing rcs-ldeclts -- Indicat-u.-, a project with its rl.ain cnitphasis 011 tourist services vrith - little or no on -site ng 2 Indicatc- a project 110usil,c) and uses that will he relied, on lb�' both the 'Courist and rc,6idc,n-L-i0 pc) '1UlZitJC)11S 3 - 1l1diCE,tCS il DrOject which is dc,1-Jgne.,d alrloo't exclu�ivclly to sat-is-fy the needs of the co:-,I-- munitys res-iftntial population v.,-ith only illCidClItc-1 tourist use and no tourist hOL!Si11q Rate the. follov:'Ing fCLI-L'_Ures accordingly: a) Ermployc.c HOUSinci .- considering the extc.-ni, to which the project supplies housing for generated by the proposed con-r-,"r -i 1 uses Rating comnnent: 9 ZL b and (lthor Service Need.,; considering the c,.x.Olyt. to jNrilich VIC j)P0JCC'L SU[)j)!'i1,`, inedical , dental and similar professional office Sj)O_1 CT; ZICN tell as 1j);)liiWCe SLlj)j)liCS c11111 I m. Iscs d C, S i m'.':� I hZirdmire, drug store, Mj( Si ilar L and intended to servo the I'ClUtill(I trade alld Service Heads of flic cmimulli I.Y. a C Comment: • 17. III: f 110I111`.. • I11'C AV(.I;/t(;I: I?ll�f l f l�; J� INDIVIDUALf'�'//. 11111L'I:it w"l111E I&T RATING 61 � 13. 1�011IJ 1'�)I1;1 (rjol. to c:i�.': . ' 70� of the Edwo rlr.t rr:l; i rr �) 1,rov i rlyd the pro 'c: c i, urer i t:y r (-'C orJn,i t i �,,, ct,r; to i t ( ou t.;, tunc! i ►,n riu(; 1 i i.y NET PIVI I f IG c� (J• G0I'll JS Rrt•I .I f I ' 111t'•1E OF 1)ERS0:1 -SIJ3'lITIIG THE ADOV.E f;;,,TF1G:. / E Lk, 10 L, , rk u_A_ - f Ik-, I I I V- L/j k k'-kk_ I W ".1 P, 1. i I iii I I i,"" i yw( I I it 1", ou,(wd i 119 to 0 it Lotolly hlc-ol:11,ilL-i1,1h I I( I i ciii 1.(, i, it w j f ly. (If - ". i rlif 1 *1 i; w wh ; (:If c r, (-;I i, I. -, -, r- , of 1 1, 1 i c I. tri ',.If hi,Aorir. !Jrm Im-w, -ill thr, Iri-,1 r.) r - -i c: di!Aricl ' ov wilh Hw w,hui (-nviroiwir-nt alicr, 1.11(. hi.,Joric di,Jricl, 2 - iin ble bul. 3 - dc's-i(Ill The follouinij ulei:ic�nts Sh;!'Il be ratcd i.ccordiwily: i I It CCjrjS t I, 1,j � .,s I0 roof, and w,*--riAl the hitur-ic Scale rep I-C-S (.-n ted, illL I I e v i c: i n -i 1-1y o 'I t 11 e C) j (! C: 4. Ex te I, i o r Du i I d i 1-1(1 H;j t ur, I �t I s - (1.9-1, x -i 3 -i n t s ) cc) n,, i ii n-1 the a P p I i C �, L 'i on' o f I i i S tor -i c bu i ldi i i ;:,;.t t e. r i a 1 S i; il," r use On all fz:cades of thc- strud-ure, avoidla)iu, olf- gbrish, re-I'lective or disrubtive Architectural fktaij j)c)ijjts') collsi der-1 T I OV '2 1'b visual (jiven ijy floiwst,(ation and 1h,'_` U'z'' Of buildim". detail Ilea r 't-:-hndu.-Is , doors, corners, roof lines and at floor level. C0101- (1111OXiVIUM 3 point.-) consid-:?Hng the of col -S and the variation in color i,ihen rir-c'essary to elui rltai n historic scale. Architecture - (maxil-ua 3 points) cons idcring the Use Of co:!.,,;);,',, -i 1) -1 e coriteri,,poi,ary dr,-Slyn c-s oriposcd to the iml-itat"Icri of historic architeCtUrOtl featu'res. *f RATE the i I )nve five (5) lesion ele;-mnts Pleasc cof�,-Iient on Strong and/or weak factors affecting each Of your ratings. Project Nainc: Da te Design Element: Rati i. 71 I- x Iz 1 oi,%,ii',ii Ra t i fir] Cum;l."11 I ' c.) /.l'(ail�(i�r:'it�;•r..;. IIL I!'�I ;� R;Il:itl�) �,(_�� w ' �OI11111�'ll(:• _.� _1 ��.�•,.-..�'��.f.�.�+!'�r.•!'.'Ii�(,,/.�..:ii.f.�F-r�. �i�/.__---...__---__- d) C0LOR Rati riq e) ARClllTECTURL Rati rig \ Canner t : �� _'._-.� •.�_. "'� �-_,/ 1��/ _ C.; j •_:.•<C.l•� t`t._- � i /` } i " //"I,/ Z TOTS,! Rat i n(q �a t�ar•�e of person sub:,�i tf:i rlg the above rating t`�- � t'uU.(.•-- -' I�' .� �(� ��(r'�u� v j;G►`�`'`' �f�`'t'�t�,u,cu,�-1,Gr►'� .10. Irir� f',r'(r:l► ll ll 111 'rlr i, rh1,11 l � :r Ii� II('', Irirl ► \' 1 II,I �.Ifi1�. I ,i (1 ('(.l'� Z • ail Llllil ►.Ilr' L(IIn��,r•1 r.� (,(�(• (i,(,) illlrl Lrr,��ni"i (.Irl I (Ilti' )) %1111i11r1 t j/ districts nhall lw Obbign(•(I i•t,irl s arnwi'ilinr) to LIII' fu1lwing l ninula: 0 -• )II(Iic;1I.w, it tul.olly 'iilcwliwi ii,ln (I(.;"if)II 1 - ) ite:, a ma j ol. do-,Ji In f l ily, 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but f,tiindord) d(:s•ign Rate the iofloviijyj fra,tures itccor(i-inr;ly: a) Ar ch i tcc'ulra l (ias i gn - con° i dFri ng thq compatibility of the proposed bul Idinj (ill twimn of size, hair►lit, location and building I!I%Iter- lals) with existing nair11 boring duvelof1;1I('nts. Rati riO , • ,i b) Si LF' design - Considering the quality and character" of the proposed landscaping a.nd open space areas, the extent. of undergrounding of utilities, and the arran(:QI,ant Of 1C;pi'(Jv(ments for Yiiciengy 0-i circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating Comment: �(�/J�,�, � /� %.'�_l'/-_f! ''� �!!'�j�. �'.C/_��1 �•C�•i C'/�_C.CCc` ``-' '! c) Cnergy crns i deri ng the use of insulation, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Ra•t i n;; �, _�J d) , wn•itivs - considering the provision of usablo ojwn space find pc,-dostriiln ol"d hi(:yclo I I•I'1,i11twid to lil•ti.ill! 1(rt:.It II (if I'Ilildin'J•o i, IrUI vlr,;/:, C,)-w,l 111 i i.- ('��; -1 I :r I r • ,r'�c�r•ci(I l .. �, i•'•�. 1 .,,, L•i cn Inc r,I f roj(•cts within tht! CC and C-1 shOl he poi (its acc or-d i ng to the fol 1 orri ng formul i) :. 0 - Indicates a project totally Iac1,1n*g - in any housing or u. r, : (1i r•c ctecl t:Q sui)JAyi ng r.-eds of local reslck-lits 1 - Ind'icat:es a project 1•,ith its (rain ei-,pha'sis on supply•i 1-1(1 toui•-i st servi ccs v,-i th 1'i ttl e or I'la QIi--SitC 11CiuSin(II 2 Indicates a project: a;ith hc;us•inQ LArld uses that i 1 'I be rc:l i ed on by both t:he toui-i st and resi dont.i al prJJlul at i OliS 3 - Illdi c4i:cs a nroject which is designed al►'io t excl uc.i vely tO satisfy the needs of echo cor.i- munity's resi6c.ntial pcpulatiOn 1';-it11 only incidental tourist use and no tourist housing being anti c-i puted . R'itte the folloi;'-ing fctiturOS accordingly: a) Clliplo�*cc, HOUSinq - considerincg the extent to v,,hich the project. su(�pltc� hc�usinc; for eni;�loyees generated by th:! uroposeci cO:i:ir.�rcial uses, Rat ng Coint'.1EI1 t : • b) 1,16cl•ical and Other Service Needs - considorinq the ext.(.nt. to O)ic.h the project: supplies mod ic;ll, den t,,I and siIlliI'lr prof CS. siona1 Office space; its well as bL-mkinq, appliance stipplios ailcl repair, grocery, h� l'(i',;'ui'(', CIi Ug, Store, laulldl•v, i nd similOW 11-C� giletl and intended to SOWN the I-OutA110 tl-;Idr and sorvice heeds of tht` com"'1uni ty. . ' i�.lt�1t►_J ..�_•_I f IIIT AVI I1011' Illd )iIG c )IIIIIVII��f/'.I. 1'%•7 I;(ai!sl l'. I'.JII INC 13. BONUS POINTS (ntr►. to of t1w vc ncl ril i.-i nrl) - provided --- ---- ---------- _ ,,.. r 14. T01AL I'UIIITS JILT RATING B01;US' RAT l !!G TOTAL POINTS S Ir'A11C OF PERSON SUiIT1-I;<S THE ABOVE RATING: DA H VV 9. 11PC CROUTi►_ M/t►fn_GIMI-►1T I'M UAT1011 MIN - Ratings of -- -,tr'•ict.s n projects witfi then c�rrn(rcial une ion'di! shall bu ay.signed its according.to the following forni►10, 0 - Indidates a totally incompratible design � L�- 1 - Indicates a major design flaw which creates a major conflict with historic strucl.ures in the historic di stri cI. or wi th the urban envi ronment in the other -- - areas outside the historic district 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an acceptable design The following design elements shall be rated accordingly: massing - (maximum 3 points) considering the massing, type of roof, and overall compatibility with.•the historic scale represented in the vicinity of the project. Exterior Building laterials - (maximum 3 points) considering the application of historic building materials and their use on all facades of the structure, avoidance of garish, reflective or other disruptive materials. Architectural Detail - (maximum 3 points) considering overall visual impression given by fenestration and the use of building detail near windows, doors, corners, roof lines and at floor level. Color = (maximum 3 points) considering the compati bi l i ty_ of colors and the'variation in color when necessary to maintain historic scale. Architecture - (maximum 3 points) considering the use of compatible contemporary design as opposed to the imitation of historic architectural features. RATE the ahove five (5) design elements below. Please comment on the strong and/or �•reak factors affecting each of your ratings. Pro.iect flame: r.i Date: Design Element: a) MSSING ��� Comment: Rating /� J b) EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL Rating - 2 - C� AI,Cil l i.0 i lll,ltl.. DETAIL , J d) COLOR Comment: Rating_% e) ARCHITECTURE Ratings r Comment: -"", ,�, - f f �: ` �� - ;�r"r. ,:. • t c? .i�r.' .�. 77, • r�.: TOTAL Rating , `7 ' (dame of person submitting the above rating V «. o Dw, i (JI I. I Vil.1 il"I ti (MA - PVoJ(!CLs 10 11W j ow(,, ri 01 - -f — it;/ , -- - ' --I* '011rl�' *(G-T) zollinq . ((,(,) and -, ( I ; W1,011-11 the olll1ll(!I-(. I ill Col'.. ( immoru'; ) districts shall k., assigned points bccordi-rig to the folj()vjjjl(j formula: 0 Indicates a totally ij-IcO;ljp�,,1Jblt, design 1 Indicates a major desirIn flaw 2 Indicates an acceptable (bul, standard) design 3 - Indicates an acceptable design Rate the followin(I features accordingly: a) Architectural design - considering the c'ov.lpatil)ility of the proposed building s of size, height, location and building mater- . (ill tel-11 j ials) with existing neighboring developments.. Rating Co mmment 11- b ) Site design - considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas; the extent of undergroundilig of utilities, and' the arranyetent of improvements for efficiency of service vehicles) and increased (including access for safety and privacy. Comment: :A A i Ra ti ng c) Energy - considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices and efficient fire-Places places to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. R -iti liq Comment: e, d) Amenities collsideri,19 the provision of usable open space and pedestrian and bicycle Ways. Comment: - A, _ e) Visuirl ]mpact orr,iderinq the scalo and locilin of buildin{j; to inaxindze pu) 7c view:, of ,.urrowndinri scenic area,), Conrrren t : _ t�, .� Rating . e%�* '1%,y.�_'tf �G� `J^ra47�.sr.� -'�/ C' � f,.. 4.,,.•✓' d'S ,e , ,;st! a 11. PU Growth Manaqe,nent Conniunil;y Commercial Uses Evaluation Form Projects within the CC and C-1 shall be assigned points according to the following formula:. 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking 'in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project %vith housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com- munity's residential population with only incidental tourist use and no tourist housing being anticipated. Rate the following features accordingly: ., . a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to i-rhich the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating Comment. /i`� ��; r/,. ' •,, �.: `:>:_.r;:/ b) Medical and Other Service Needs - considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trad+" and service needs of the community. COPMent: ) ' Rat ng a - 5 - • "12. NET PO11[T5 IIPC AVERAGE RATI i[G INDIVIDUAL V?4Z NEMBER RATING. 14ET RATING .<; J � _ 13. ['0111JS P0JNl S (not to exceed 20% of the shove net rating) provided the project merits recognition due .to its outstanding quality. BONUS POINT 14. TOTAL POINTS NET RATING BOLUS RATING TOTAL PO1 IdTS • '�I` NA E OF PERSON SUBMITUNIG THE ABOVE RATING: DATE �) .. . -6 9. HPC GROWTH MANAGEMENT EVALUATION FORM - Ratings of projects within the commercial one zoning districts shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw which creates a major conflict with historic structures in the historic district or with the urban environment in the other areas outside the historic district 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an acceptable design The following design elements shall be rated accordingly: Massing - (maximum 3 points) considering the massing, type of roof, and overall compatibility with the historic scale represented in the vicinity of the project. Exterior Building Materials - (maximum 3 points) considering the application of historic building materials and their use on all facades of the structure, avoidance of garish, reflective or other disruptive materials. Architectural Detail - (maximum 3 points) considering overall visual impression given by fenestration and the use of building detail near windows, doors, corners, roof lines and at floor level. Color - (maximum 3 points) considering the compatibility of colors and the variation in color when necessary to maintain historic scale. Architecture - (maximum 3 points) considering the use of compatible contemporary design as opposed to the imitation of historic architectural features. RATE the above five (5) design elements below. Please comment on the strong and/or weak factors affecting each of your ratings. Project Name:` ---__--_----_____-- Date: , Design Element: u; 1! .SSING 14 Rating _ b) EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL Rating Comment: 5 - 2 - ^ ` �N�� �� C\ 8KC||]TLClN{8L |)L180L Comm/ent -'--''---- ----------------�7----' d) COLOR [On02nt: Rating '----' '----- Rating e\ ARCHITECTURE Rating Comment:* � ' ` TOTAL Rating - Name Of person submitting the above rating - 3 - 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN RATINGS BY HPC The H.P.C. reviewed the following project and rated each of the design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth Management Ordinance. PROJECT: -- REVIEW DATE:-------- HPC REVIEW �O�O� 0.��~ J ,O�P�~• Q'. HPC MEMBER % _— GROUP RATING ., PLANNING OFFICE RATING --I H- ---I THE COMBINED RATINGS OF THE HPC AVERAGES r.J 10. P&Z Growth ManacLement Qualit of Design Evaluation Form - Projects wiitTiin the Commercial Core CC and Commercial One C-1) zoning districts shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally incompatible. design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 _ Indicate; an acceptable design Rate the following features accordingly: a) Architectural design - considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater- ials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating N ^ Comment: __. b) Site design -*considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating Comment: c) Energy - considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rati ng T2 .. d Comment: d) Amenities - considering the provision of usable open space and pedestrian and bicycle ways. Comment: Rating J U. 7 _ n _ e) Visual Impact - considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating � Comment: 11. P&Z Growth Management Community Commercial Uses Evaluation Form Projects within the CC and C-1 shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com- munity's residential population with only incidental tourist use and no tourist housing being anticipated. Rate the following features accordingly: a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating Comment: b) Medical and Other Service Needs - considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well -`as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed - and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating __LT Comment: 0 12. NET POINTS HPC AVERAGE RATING INDIVIDUAL P&L MEMBER RATING�� NET RATING' 13. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 2.0% of the above net rating) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. BONUS POINT 14. TOTAL POINTS NET RATING BONUS RATING TOTAL POINTS NAME OF PERSON SUBMITTING THE ABOVE RATING: - 6 - DATE //,C,- Ive MUNI tll),PA(;[.*IifJt'T I,LAJ� PA.] INGS by The PP!7 reviuvxr] the following project and ratel each of the (Icsign and ulmmunity co:-!i;ie)-c-jaj (. - pr ler,'ients as Is -cified by th-o Gruvith frlawlg(,,m(!nt Ordinance. • PROJECT: P"EvUll, DATE: P9.1 M, EjliB Lo R 4. 7. GIROUII RATTI'!�', Al ILI 145 "I ry "Y COtij ._ I L '� Z► d' Z 4 I Z� Z ��i 5 - �6� 3 got 3rq, 7 3 �_� 2� 3 �� �Z ' Z _ 3, �o / T,0 3�1�0 000 Zoe? Xgp 11-4 /7j 944 73 qz 1 PLANNING.11 01--FICE RATII,,!rj il k �i — THE CO."IBMED �,ATIN'GS OF THE PLU AVEI,'Ikt-:,FS ~F . �� 3. HPC GROWTH MANAGEMENT EVALUATION FORM - Ratings of projec s within the commercial one zoning districts shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw which creates a major conflict with historic structures in the historic district or with the urban environment in the other areas outside the historic district 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an acceptable design The following design elements shall be rated accordingly: Mussing - (maximum 3 points) considering the massing, type of roof, and overall compatibility with the historic scale represented in the vicinity of the project. Exterior Building Materials - (maximum 3 points) considering the application of historic building materials and their use on all facades of the structure, avoidance of garish, reflective or other disruptive materials. Architectural Detail - (maximum 3 points) considering overall visual impression given by fenestration and the use of building detail near windows, doors, corners, roof lines and at floor level. Color - (maximum 3 points) considering the compatibility of colors and the variation in color when necessary to maintain historic scale. Architecture - (maximum 3 points) considering the use of compatible contemporary design as opposed to the imitation of historic architectural features. RATE the above five (5) design elements below. Please comment on the strong and/or weak factors affecting each of your ratings. Project Name: Date: Element: a) MASSING Comment: b) EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIAL Comment: i M Rating Rat i l?" • c) ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL Comment: d) COLOR e) ARCHITECTURE Comment:' Rating Rating Rating 75�_ TOTAL Rating Name of person submitting the above rating - 3 - 9 . 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN RATINGS BY HPC The H.P.C. reviewed the following project and rated each of the design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth Management Ordinance. PROJECT: REVIEW DATE: HPC REVIEW CAP � \,% 41 HPC MEMBER GROUP RATING PLANNING OFFICE RATING THE COMBINED RATINGS OF THE HPC AVERAGES 10. P&Z Growth Management __ Quality__of Design Evaluation Form - Projects • wi thi e the Con►merc� al Core CC�andiComn�ercial One C-1 ) zoning --� --- districts shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally incompatible. design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an acceptable design Rate the following features accordingly: a) Architectural design - considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater- ials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating ',�r_ Comment: b) Site design - considering the duality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating ._ Comment: c) Energy - considerinq the use of insulation, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rati ng c? Comment: d) Amenities - considering the provision of usable open space and pedestrian and bicycle ways. Comment: Rating 3 _ n - e) Visual Impact - considering the scale and location of buildings Lo maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating :_ Comment: 11. P&Z Growth Management Community Commercial Uses Evaluation Form Projects within the CC and C-1 shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com- munity's residential population with only incidental tourist use and no tourist housing being anticipated. Rate the following features accordingly: a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating Comment: b) medical and Other Service Needs - considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Comment: - 5 - Rating 12. NET POINTS HPC AVERAGE RATING JZ`_Y INDIVIDUAL P&Z MEMBER RATING NET RATINa 1 Z 3ef - Z 6 ' 13. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20%_of the above net rating) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. BONUS POINT 6� S 14. TOTAL POINTS PIET RATING BONUS RATING TOTAL POINTS NAME OF PERSON SUBMITTING THE ABOVE RATING: DATE g - 6 - 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN RATINGS BY P&Z The P&Z reviewed the following project and rated each of the design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth Management Ordinance. PROJECT: REVIEW DATE: P&Z REVIEW P&Z MEMBER GROUP RATING PLANNING OFFICE RATING PLANNING OFFICE TOTAL �4w ti CO U v TOTAL INDIVIDUAL RATINGS AVERAT OF ALL P&Z RATINGS wi in i��nt. �uaFl3 itYr nfvt�(orm_ ) - Projects P&Z Growth Ma,i'�DsiC�� l,zoning�C(.) and omocrrial One G-1f�tTiCmmercia'or districts shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an acceptable deign . Rate -the following features accordingly: a) Architectural design - con'sidering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater- ials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating Comment: b) Site design - considering the quality and character of the proposed ` landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating Continent: c) Energy - considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. �J Rating G Comment: d) Amenities - considering the provision of usable open space and pedestrian and bicycle ways. Comment: Rating - 4 - e) Visual Irtp*- the scale , �� 1 e and 1 Otion of bui 1 di nqs to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating Cowmen t : 11. P&Z Growth Management Community Commercial. Uses Evaluation Form Projects within the CC and C-1 shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses- directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com- munity's residential population with only incidental tourist use and no tourist housing being anticipated. Rate the following features accordingly: a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rating Comment: b) Medical and Other Service Needs - considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating Coninent: - 5 - 0 12. NET POINTS HPC AVERAGE RATING �3 ' INDIVIDUAL P&Z MEMaER RATING - NET RATINIG O, 13. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the above net rating) provided the project merits rec�;gnition due -to its outstanding quality. B014US POINT �. 14. TOTAL POINTS NET RATING BONUS RATING TOTAL POINTS NAME OF PERS N SUBMITTING THE ABOVE RATING: It DATE - 6 - 10. P&Z Growth Mana ement' uality of Desi n Evaluation Form - Projects within the Commercial Core CC and Commercial One C-1) zoning districts shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an acceptable design Rate the following features accordingly: a) Architectural-desion - considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater- ials) with existing neighboring developments. Rati ng Comment: b) Site__design - considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating Comment: c) Energy - considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating G; Comment: d) Amenities - considering the provision of usable open space and pedestrian and bicycle ways. Comment: Rati ng 2. c9 - 4 - e) Visual Impact - considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rating_�� Comment: 11. P&Z Growth Management Community Commercial Uses Evaluation Form Projects within the CC and C-1 shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com- munity's residential population with only incidental tourist use and no tourist housing being anticipated, Rate the following features accordingly: a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proposed commercial uses. Rati ng Comment: b) Medical and Other Service Needs - considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating Comment: - 5 - 12. NET POINTS HPC AVERAGE RATING INDIVIDUAL P&Z MEMBER RATING NET RATING �, r 13. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 200/0 of the above net rating) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. BONUS POINT �! 14. TOTAL POINTS NET RATING BONUS RATING TOTAL POINTS OF PERSON SUBMITTING THE ABOVE RATING: DATE ,� • 6 0 9. HPC GROWTH MANAGEMENT EVALUATION FORM - Ratings of projects within the commercial one zoning districts shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw which creates a major conflict with historic structures in the historic district or with the urban environment in the other areas outside the historic district 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 - Indicates an acceptable design The following design elements shall be rated accordingly: Massing - (maximum 3 points) considering the massing, type of roof, and overall compatibility with the historic scale represented in the vicinity of the project. Exterior Building Materials - (maximum 3 points) considering the application of historic building materials and their use on all facades of the structure, avoidance of garish, reflective or other disruptive materials. Architectural Detail - (maximum 3 points) considering overall visual impression given by fenestration and the use of building detail near windows, doors, corners, roof lines and at floor level. Color - (maximum 3 points) considering the compatibility of colors and the variation in color when necessary to maintain historic scale. Architecture - (maximum 3 points) considering the use of compatible contemporary design as opposed to the imitation of historic architectural features. RATE the above five (5) design elements below. Please comment on the strong and/or weak factors affecting each of your ratings. Project Name: Date. Design Element: a) MASSING Rating � Comment: /'�.,.-�" ,��,,c"c -tw e.,.� �,gSeArct-d =iAtiln. -, b) EXTERIOR LBUILDING MATERIAL Rating Comment:.G� - 2 - c ) ARCHITI JURAL DFTAI L Rat ng 2 ► 3 Conurien t:q gffii.s�� p1-r ORn.� 'P. .T +— �u�..� w� et w T W OM 1�11, LSIT.tlorl�a► �.-C.+►� 1�i rt �E heal lbn . �m �+�K ��it. v+�ovr� ��-43r"��GiL�F3.��G.T o�" �If�r�aWt lo' C�^�'1"w �:OVtLT �t4�iiJJ►T�GN 1 S'� Fi.00rr N�1W IVY W�� TA�l�J �w.,� Z)Jn;:L S14"" 14 P.14 d) COLOR Rating, Co►,lment: P.. �.�� �s�.r4� 'A lumnwc—l-cowss -t'Awd r 1019 ,xa e) ARCHITECTURE w..j ( BM a., + r 'Fvc1-s 1.4 ? Rati ng 2 ,8 Comment: cea r- (:;�OcX2 ko:!j ` OJ�.►ti�s��. SAFr jj-CA) C[tIVf V s L,::lA►- TOTAL Rating \3,� Name of person submitting the above rating A., 1�U R - - 3 - 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. i. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN RATINGS BY HPC The H.P.C. reviewed the following project and rated each of the design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth Management Ordinance. PROJECT: �vr�P,,,� REVIEW DATE: rn/Sn,Gti. HPC REV I El,!~Q� HPC MEMBER aar, to n��T ►' r - ' N,, GROUP RATING Z , ► .(� __� PLANNING OFFICE RATING_ THE COMBINED RATINGS OF THE HPC AVERAGES 0 0 10. P&Z Growth Management Quality of Design Evaluation Form - Projects • witl—iin the Commercial Core CC and Commercial One C-9 zoning districts shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a totally incompatible design 1 - Indicates a major design flaw 2 - Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 Indicates an acceptable design Rate the following features accordingly: a) Architectural design - considering the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height, location and building mater- ials) with existing neighboring developments. Rating Comment: b) Site design - considering the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation (including access for service vehicles) and increased safety and privacy. Rating Comment: VIEW/ 6GVQ ` 1X67.)91.1q 1) Af-PCt�t c) Energy - considering the use of insulation, solar energy devices and efficient fireplaces to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating Comment: H 5P7//UC-) &° Afwcu€ Q I K) S UL,)7 (n/� d) Amenities - considering the provision of usable open space and pedestrian and bicycle ways. Comment: Rating - 4 - e) Visual Impact - considering the scale and location of buildings to maximize public views of surrounding scenic areas. Rati ng Comment: O 1 NE -_TWUUs17l0A-) I ti M ASS/�U Z 11. P&Z Growth Management Community Commercial Uses Evaluation Form Projects within the CC and C-1 shall be assigned points according to the following formula: 0 - Indicates a project totally lacking in any housing or uses directed to supplying needs of local residents 1 - Indicates a project with its main emphasis on supplying tourist services with little or no on -site housing 2 - Indicates a project with housing and uses that will be relied on by both the tourist and residential populations 3 - Indicates a project which is designed almost exclusively to satisfy the needs of the com- munity's residential population with only incidental tourist use and no tourist housing being anticipated. Rate the following features accordingly: a) Employee Housing - considering the extent to which the project supplies housing for employees generated by the proc)osed commercial uses. Rating 3 Comment: UNITS b) Medical and Other Service Needs - considering the extent to which the project supplies medical, dental and similar professional office space; as well as banking, appliance supplies and repair, grocery, hardware, drug store, laundry, and similar uses designed and intended to serve the routine trade and service needs of the community. Rating Comment: ac—rD(2s (!:n r1` lCr: - 5 12. NET POINTS HPC AVERAGE RATING INDIVIDUAL P&Z MEMBER RATING NET RATING 13. BONUS POINTS (not to exceed 20% of the above net rating) provided the project merits recognition due to its outstanding quality. BONUS POINT 14. TOTAL POINTS NET RATING BONUS RATING TOTAL POINTS NAME OF PERSON SUBMITTING THE ABOVE RATING: Gudko"A ,M O 1-9 -- - 6 - DATE 78 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN RATINGS BY P&Z The P&Z reviewed the following project and rated each of the design and community commercial elements as specified by the Growth Management Ordinance. PROJECT: RFVIFW DATE: P&Z REVIEW15) o �Q P&Z MEMBER 2. ----- — - -- -- 3. 4. 5. _- 6. 7. GROUP RATING it i I I I II 1 II I I PLANNING OFFICE RATING II I i I PLANNING OFFICE TOTAL TOTAL INDIVIDUAL RATINGS AVERAT OF ALL P&Z RATINGS _ _ PLAN RAIIINGS Illy IV Th,^, I'F,7_ revi (.,r,,ed the i of lowi ng project and noted each of the rcSinn and cromiunity CU; r;'rC.:i�il E'.lc'I:It!?I'ji r15 SpcCIfifG by the Grovi4h 1 4.. � - . / '. � -moo, ) . • I � '�` l•-f j i ^ i �- j �- ~ + !!+ � `� � ;- � ,• . , � , � � _ • . .,; �� G moo. 1 1 {'l.�,i�t�II�C OFl TCt" E<ATIi;G ,� (. + 9� tl�%�� j( 9vr, .2(e �iA��I �k Z— THE CO.IBINED RATING'S 01= THE F'&x AVERAIrIES • �71i.t• t'.? + h -3- J ("'.3 1, Cl 0 f OF I Zii'. I/- TH E fol pru.j(.f,: i. ;Ind' co: the 11F-z r. r;CI1 of thr-- or I N % I I c C, 10 J C T All, I'DUF11! T),"iTE: En H U W H I U cc Q Folm u Q I Z Q J a 0 0 =I MILL ST. 0 5 10 20 �q p ELEVATION molmlon 0 f'� HYM N AVE. ELEVATION 0 5 10 20 0 H '0 0 0 Q 0 >; V Z 'S S CL Q N rn� Q u Q I 0 Z Q J EL 0 U lm� L9 a I 0 z a J EL 0 U En U W H I U cc Q l� 0 Z Q J EL 0 U Clm H0 N �N 0 2 Q J EL 0 U 0 J, P�1 In �'� W m9N/_Y m to