HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.Ute Mountaineer 318 S Mill St.04A-87 CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen 73'1-/8d-/6-003
DATE RECEIVED: a/9h87 CASE NO. O /
DATE RECEIVED // /C//OMPLETTE : /� /- STAFF: '-- ��
PROJECT NAME: cafe. /ounfQ/nter 8111° GX PY17/O1/20/7
APPLICANT: -Bob wade.
Applicant Address/Phone: 3 /8 S. /y/// Si. Aspen, CO 876// 5-'x784'9
REPRESENTATIVE: &roeme Alpa.nc
Representative Address/Phone : p.0 Bak 4'1S4
Type of Application:
I . GMP/Subdivision/PUD
1 . Conceptual Submission 20 $2,730 .00
2 . Preliminary Plat 12 1 , 640 .00
3 . Final Plat 6 820 .00
II . Subdivision/PUD
1 . Conceptual Submission --. 14 $1 , 900 .00
2 . Preliminary Plat 9 1 , 220 .00
3 . Final Plat 6 820 .00
III . All "Two Step" Applications 11 $1, 490 .00
IV. All "One Step" Applications 5 $ 680 .00
V. Referral Fees - Environmental
Health, Housing Office
1 . Minor Appl ications 2 $ 50 .00
2 . Major Applications 5 $ 125 .00
Referral Fees-
Engineering
Minor Applications _ _ ___ _ _ _
80 . 00
Major Applications 200 . 00
e CC MEETING DATE: PUBLIC HEM/I/NG : YES CI
DATE REFERRk.D:* )C; 19?
REFERRALS :
`// City Atty Aspen Consol . S. D. School District
City Engineer Mtn. Bell Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
Housing Dir. Parks Dept . Statefiwy Dept (Glenwd)
Aspen Water Holy Cross Electric Statefiwy Dept (Gr.Jtn)
City Electric Fire Marshall Bldg: Zoning/Inspectn
Envir. filth . Fire Chief Other :
Roaring Fork Transit Roaring Fork Energy Center
FINAL ROUTING : DATE ROUTED: "); 'I" ") 1= INITIAL
City Atty City Engineer \,/ Building Dept .
Other : - _ - Other :
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION : (C_71 _ !,/(!t_er
CASE DISPOSITION: (-litre- t'iU Yrc"- , r rc'r Grit' F bran /f'lr V;ew Plun
■
Reviewed by: AsperTR> City Council
Imo\C C +-- - 1 ;_ -'-- cA i w v t e c` e C NA
' c c rm _ c_�c.-
C ��� r ��_ c � c-1,c-L 1- c: n
Tc� � G1 <
i K m T V\ I C --r ,. C 1 f'_•.(T P c L- U' C' YE
C� ec-� .�\ 1 t `1 Tlr, �rw 't - .C= (l
L�✓'�.2.(_ � G ; k (c� ‘j" c r 1 (, /--. I C^ c,
e .\ 11 \ � 7c
11 - , I h. e E-= t .. Y''.- - "Th c'
YV\\7 T l L (7 i ten_.1---A Y t -C:- \ y 1'V\ - r.. .
t"'
f.. Y c -> `_ 1_Y C_ Z r._.�
_Z , I L.c- �_L-4-Y p A cr S 1 ab>c (c. ( ,4. mac.-_ Yr
rec. i i_•( I1-1r_ b.a. , ic1.r ,7c
Reviewed y: Aspen P&Z City Council
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Glenn Horn, Assistant Planning Director
RE: Ute Mountaineer GMP Expansion/Mountain Viewplane
Revision
DATE: March 17, 1987
BACKGROUND
APPLICANT: Bob Wade, owner of Ute Mountaineer.
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: Graeme Means.
LOCATION: 318 S. Mill Street, the south 34' of Lots A & B, Block
89.
ZONING: CC (Commercial Core) .
LOT SIZE: 2,040 square feet (maximum FAR without special review
is 1 .5:1 or 3060 s. f.)
BUILDING SITE: 2,232.
APPLICANT' S REQUEST: The applicant is requesting an exemption
from the commercial Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) for the
purposes of expanding the Ute Mountaineer retail store by 500
square feet. Section 24-11 .2 (h) empowers the Planning and Zoning
Commission (P&Z ) to grant exemptions from GMQS for up to 500
square feet if the P&Z finds that the expansion has negli-
gible growth impacts.
Figure 1 depicts the existing west facade of the Ute Mountaineer,
while Figure 2 depicts the proposed facade. The applicant is
also requesting permission to be exempted from the Wheeler Opera
House Mountain View building limitation because the proposed
additional gable (see Figure 2) will intrude approximately 13
feet into the viewplane.
STAFF REVIEW
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT: The Ute Mountaineer site is significant-
ly impacted by the Wheeler Opera House viewplane. Given the
viewplane limitations, the maximum height on the site should not
exceed 12 feet. The existing building is approximately 17 feet
high and intrudes into the viewplane by 5 feet.
The Engineering Department recommends that the existing dumpster
be relocated into the open area east of the building to improve
access into the alley and improve maintenance.
PLANNING OFFICE COMMENTS:
GMQS Exemption - Section 24-11 . 2 ( h) permits the P&Z to grant
minor commercial expansions up to 500 sq. ft . , when it is
determined that the expansion will have minimal employee genera-
tion, minimal parking demands will be created and that there will
be minimal visual and service impacts. If you have shopped at
the Ute Mountaineer you will recognize that the existing space is
very tight and that an expansion could occur without any growth
impacts resulting. The applicant does not intend to hire more
employees as a result of the expansion. The additional space
will simply improve the shopping atmosphere in the store. The
staff does not anticipate parking or service related impacts from
the expansion since this site in located on the mall where
parking is inappropriate and since a full compliment of services
are already provided to the building and will be unaffected by
its expansion. In our opinion, the west facade of the building
will be improved by the remodel.
Wheeler Opera House Mountain View Limitation - The Planning staff
has visited the site and stood in front of the Wheeler Opera
HOuse to project the visual impacts of the proposed expansion on
the viewplane. The existing gable of the Ute Mountaineer already
protrudes approximately 5 feet into the viewplane. The addition
will be approximately 8 ' higher than the existing gable. In our
opinion, the Golden Horn building, not the Ute Mountaineer is the
building which has the greatest impact on the viewplane . The
Golden Horn building is much higher that the existing Ute
Mountaineer and will also be higher than the proposed addition.
We encourage you to visit the site to observe for yourself how
the view is already obstructed.
If the P&Z is uncomfortable with permitting the applicant to
construct the new gable, a compromise would be to limit the
height of the building to be no higher than the existing gable.
However, it is the applicant ' s and staff ' s opinion that the west
facade of the building will be more appealing with the new gable
(see Figure 2) .
PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Office recommends approval of the request for a
commercial GMQS exemption and recommends that P&Z recommend that
the Building Inspector grant the applicant an exemption from the
Wheeler Opera House viewplane limitation. Additionally, the
following conditions are proposed :
1) The dumpster will be relocated from the south alley to
2
the open area behind the building.
2) Any additional expansions of commercial space will be
subject to the commercial GMQS.
GH.UTE
3
- 0 _ - - (m
-- - -
� +
' I
I %
11
n 1 -�___-_- '1
11
___
1
1
•
TLJIIIII
\ (A
a .Q
3 �,
N
I 47
•
0
. !
/
} 1
!
/-
/ / .
1
1 r
„
ri
1 1
, ,
4I
I
:I
I
i I I
11'
I 1
„..... , ,.._ .. _
;
. IT H
I
ti 1
. !
, I ,, . . 1
.4-- /
II
II' //:
1
i ;
1
; 11
\ ,
rf
H ,
,
,
,,,- _ , ,
, \..
7 N
/ //4 ..„
,
li IMIN , -
3 !
N-
i s
ri 1 N 1
\\
1_J_/
, I . I
L . .
r\i
Q ......./
1 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Attorney
City Engineer
FROM: Glenn Horn, Planning Office
RE: Ute Mountaineer GMP Exemption
DATE: February 20, 1987
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted
by Graeme Means on behalf of his client, Bob Wade requesting GMP
Exemption for an expansion of the Ute Mountaineer. The applicant
would like to remodel the entire building, demolish and recon-
struct about 375 feet of existing space on the second floor and
add 500 square feet to the second floor. The property is located
at 318 S. Mill Street and is zoned CC.
Please review this application and return your comments to this
office no later than March 3, 1987 so we have adequate time to
prepare for its presentation before P&Z on March 17 .
Thank you.
r
ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 S. Galena Street
pen, CO 81611
t(
30(3) 925-2020
Dat try Opt /q r
4 n,�L, A� I' ' I
.y
41 i - 45) 5( > Li
RE: ' ' _ 7 " ': " '
/
�t7 fX
Dear 21,Atc yCy
This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its
preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined
that your application IS NOT complete.
Additional items required include:
Disclosure of Ownership (one copy only needed)
, Adjacent Property Owners List/Envelopes/Postage (one copy)
Additional copies of entire application
Authorization by owner for representative to submit applica-
tion
Response to list of items (attached/below ) demonstrating
compliance with the applicable policies and regulations of the
Code, or other specific materials
J A check in the amount of $
A. Your applicatiofi 4s complete and we h ve scheduled it for
review by the —t on pout) i 7 . We will
call you if we need any additional information prior to that
date. Several days prior to your hearing, we will call and
make available a copy of the memorandum. Please note that it
IS NOT your responsibility to post your property with a
sign, which we can provide you for a $3 .00 fee.
B. Your application is incomplete, we have not scheduled it
review at this time. When we receive; the materials we have
requested, we will place you on the nepct available agenda.
If you have any questions, please call F l& ; J(} (,IL ------1
the planner assigned to your case.
Sincerely,
AS EN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE
u fc_ey-
ASPEN*PITI \I REGIONAL 1001E JO =v ENT
606 East Main Street Aspen, Ca x1611 < <31926-6973
11 Fe
BUILDINGINSPECTIn�HECKLIST I
Inspection Reinspection Partial Com•lete Permit No.
Steel _ Electric _ Plumbing Heating _ Building Pc
Footings _ Temp _ Underground _ Rough R-Frame
Caissons _ Underground _ Waste&Vent _ Flue _ Insul.
Wall _ Swim Pool _ Water Pipe _____ F. P. Flue Drywall
Struct Slabs _ Rough _ Gas _ Glass Door _ Special
Damp Proof _ Service _ Final _ Combust. Air _ Mobile Home _
Foun. Insul. Final _ Fire Final _ Final _
Sprinklers
Found. Drain _ Stove Type _ Zoning cg—
FIRE LIFE& SAFETY Kitch Hood
Accepted Rejected Reinspection Fee$30.00 Yes No No. Bdrms.
(You are ordered to make the following corrections on the construction which is now in progress at the address below)
LA 17L: RAD L,aitr -
1 I
! i ! 1 4j■ t.. 4 ti / V kyu cz-ca
.),\3\r7 c.QA NIA 1' . R. z, u 4 $-P-ttrt,. u,-e . d��eI. ,�G
I 3 r.4-.12 , ,
0� 4 !� fa...-. ��irr . AS
\
)
E0,aszs sL `_9.iti, s )22- -t vvv-4e..- X-C _N--o—sz
Instructions to Inspector 1
Kitchen Tub Shower_ Lay._W.C. Ice W. Bar Tub/Shower_Jacuzzi
Bidet Hose Bib_ Laundry Clothes Washer_Hot Tub_D.W._Jacuzzi w/Shower
CO_q Coy,nty_T irrle f,[rival Time of Departure
Address Q At O)J ` 4s9 V [Cl Phone Job Office
Subdivision :� B toe C`S (ham Request Rec'd
�� Date Time
Contractor 6 t� \IVY w -, Requ st f r T W TH F A.M. P.M. 'me `' C
Owner Inspected Date �' Inspector i
Rev.4/86 6_-----(
MEMORANDUM
TO: Glenn Horn, Planning Office (�
FROM: Jay Hammond, City Engineering `AH CD
DATE: February 26, 1987 /V►
RE: Ute Mountaineer GMP Exemption
Having reviewed the above application for commercial GMP
Exemption for a 500 square foot expansion of the Ute Mountaineer,
and having made a site inspection , the City Engineering
Department would offer the following comments:
1 . The Ute Mountaineer site is significantly impacted by the
Wheeler Opera House viewplane. Calculations for the site by Jim
Gibbard of our office would indicate a height limitation of
around 12 feet on the site, a height already exceeded by the
existing structure.
2 . I have not found anyone in this office who had indicated the
acceptability of the dumpster location in the alley. We would
recommend a condition to relocate the dumpster into the open area
east of the building. Recent inspection indicates that the area
is not maintained for parking. We would recommend relocation of
the dumpster to improve access into the alley and ease our
maintenance constraints.
3 . With regard to remaining impacts pertinent to Engineering in
the GMP criteria, we see no problems with this application.
JH/co/UteMtGMPExemp
0 0
y #
c.,
4 �
,:
< t C V Le wt +
GRAEME D MEA i
BOX 4956 ASPIN Co S16 81987 � i,!i 18 February 1987
TELEPHONE E 303 925 91
Planning and Zoning Committee
120 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Members Planning and Zoning :
As per section 24-11 .2 of the Aspen City Code, we are requesting exemption
from the GMP for a 500 foot expansion of the Ute Mountaineer. Our plans
include a remodel of the entire building, demolition and construction of
375 feet on the second floor, and addition of 500 feet to the second floor.
The plans attached outline the exterior changes to the building. At the
moment, we are going through the process of HPC review.
As regards the visual impact of the proposed changes, our intentions are
to retain the existing image of the building to a great extent. The existing
gable on the West facade (facing the Mill Street mall): stands out clearly
from the surrounding, flat roof buildings. Although this roof system will
have to be totally reconstructed, we would retain almost exactly the present
gabled roof outline. Furthermore, we intend the new west facade to be
constructed of wood, as it is at present. The additional bulk on the second
floor is set back 30 feet on the left side of the building and 12f feet on
the right side. Addition of a gable end to the second floor of the building
reflects the original. For these reasons, we feel that the atmosphere on
the mall in front of this building, while being considerably upgraded, will
not differ spatially from the present situation.
The additional square footage we are requesting will be used to ease the
crowded situation which presently exists throughout the store. For those
familiar with the building, you will be aware of the extremely dense concentration
of merchandise and customers on the retail floor. Similar overcrowded
conditions exist on the basement level (storage) and the tiny loft (office) .
We can thus very honestly state that the additional square footage will
not result in the generation of new employees. The new space will be used
to provide improved office space, additional merchandise storage, and to
relieve congestion on the retail floor.
Consequently, there will be no increase in employee parking or in trash.
There currently exists one parking space behind the building. I have
informally asked the City Engineering Department and Tony Vagneur of
BFI if there is any problem with the dumpster in the alley. Both stated
they were not aware of any problems.
We hope to start construction in early April and, because this is a retail
store, hope to stick to a very tight construction schedule in order to reopen
as soon as possible (hopefully mid-May) . Therefore, I would think this
disruption to the mall would come at an optimum time of year to all concerned
and thus cause as few problems as possible.
In considering this application, we would like you to take into account the
extremely valuable service this store has provided to the community over
the years. Visitors and locals alike come here for items carried by few
or no other stores in town. The image of the Ute Mountaineer is a very large
and necessary part of our vision of Aspen. We would also like you to consider
Letter to Planning and Zoning Committee
18 February 1987
Page Two
that the remodeling of this building will require that the building be significantly
upgraded from the fire safety standpoint, with resulting benefit to the community.
We ask that you grant this request in order to allow us to improve and modernize
one of the most stable, valuable, and respected businesses in this community.
Sincerely,
Graeme D. Means
GDM:ala
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PROJECT: Ute 1l11Dbntdlne2r "nor ion,Alfw„1 expirr,: s,
APPLICANT' S REPRESENTATIVE: GroiLw, Meaiiec
REPRESENTATIVE' S PHONE: RZ , ' y5J
OWNERS NAME: I,ob .
SUMMARY
1. Type of Application: GAP Er.ehp+0rjo Sh„II (mmnwe,i„I Prolecf
2. Describe
action/type of development being requested:
e"uilr to ijen (c * .1;p4ce 'he}f;) i4 £ t
I,w
kir '6 "a1, cr44 �s K11i1D is
rnaLAwc4i .Ire 5Dostf+.
3. Areas in which Applicant has been requested to respond, types of
reports requested:
Policy Area/
Referral Agent Comments
HPC — &h424 Fin.l GrPIr U4i �y �Pf bftitLty ;m CC Hs1v.,0;,+,!i�:0;N41 ,m(Dfc
NDJ5in, ti���� -r. Af -1,j J,M. ,.tea/k is)tiLl Q*fDy . �><riblat,n1
?.,t1 .q.,,f emgk144, o zc..c.e('• -}
Zoniq� VI �ltId - Ati� t�J� (aL� e1Lls e. +L—t' fin �?41 -,.w" d,z), i ' .
Tr/Sh collet-fhn Lit;li•1Ies , C01)s7hal (:0 ri,/,‘r,ow
C }i AttarntJy — 0.1,-■be„6:p a,„•,I e, c� � vcrittAhn
nth Onmvet,: hr,i+) _ �dn;7,.�t",r �a/;i,e
4 . Review is: (P&Z Onl ) (CC/BOCC Only) (P&Z then to CC/BOCC)
5. Public Bearing : (YES) (N01
6. Did you tell a licant to submit list of ADJ PROPERTY
OWNERS? (YES) pNO) Disclosure of Ownership: : (NO)
7. What fee was applicant requested to submit: %kV AM) lq(€1,inv(rit
8. Anticipated date of submission:
9. COMMENTS/UNIQUE CONCERNS: IVaN nr1C01rn1n �D�, d`I 13•�(a) kaS}'
��y4p ) �y�,� y / y: 000
it t• t t) 1,c i:t�_ L . No coon-f4101? r I ( 11Unpe to" alleyseah fn cM4)-50 )w
Yfi%du IA-Jh7 -*pAQ,,t. AUinJ Y• ol:birk 14,1 1t,I�aai ( , ,
'(l/•1 >.)':(' : Ui)'A1 L ,s. - �1 a4Thl :ails/An .�off' �1-�'1:� 4�ir L'E-!�' •' ,
I
Need to 5c
- EIS-.- i n-Cittan 51 in-
- Letter
Vov,1 in,10 4, s
I I i10
-1 ,fr4sk 1.'krr4rsli
,,11
- 1 ??z ,s�sM sha..�n�lvfpr'hlsL”
i
as) f -)IS 4/c<
CITY OF ASPEN
130 south galena Street
aspen , colorado . 81611
303-925 -2020
LAND USE APPLICATION FORM DATE SUBMITTED 9/7/3 8 /
FEES Cad
/ 1
NAME 22 !3_(iJ�DkQf= — ---- --_ / i I �l ( 4&JS - &tip t rit r
ADDRESS "J1 SS_ Sc . ,�}'(I0_414iT—�L - --- i) - 4- /55-67 As Dot.{
PHONE 945 swY- 9,�" _ (, a - c;/3V I
NAME OF PROJECT . �f� /!2)4/41.74lgg R_:2„__---____--
PRESENT ZONING _ CC
LOT SIZE L(? 3 --!1`-04-0 F r---- --
� /3
LocATlo�a �l� scL. ��'ilcL `�f--,_��?��L _ t�}�-.Svu17f��i- oG /�]' , atockS9
( indicate street address , let and block number. May require legal
description. A vicinity map is very useful. )
CURRENT BUILD-OUT °',J�3 _ — _ sq . ft. L /Name-- _ _ units
PROPOSED BUILD-OUT �j sq. ft . C'��yljy units
DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING USES k7fmlL .SToILit own* 145ScQ1e41E/J Swct4
4-/VU OPPicF
DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE PROPOSAL T .-_/Zt2 Q V t— J/J A-t) s CI pi- l o
/9&/75tkT &!J/ Cfglz2 __t 5rnrzA10- Ifm O /Mm-/L
5TAGtZ-. poor_ is h/o ���ti ��rz-- Ce7Y v�� J iiSr /t-11v13 NU
/P/C0/y/4-sg /.J_WOin 3fiw U__ctocyiz2S-
TYPE OF APPLICATION - ---Pi 2 ,GIOPiZuv A-L1 QMPramp tick/
APPLICABLE CODE SECTION (S) .4- -//_ �. 65)
PLAT AMENDMENT REQUIREll ____-_--____-__ YES - _ NO
DATE PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE COMPLETED // /3;7
AITACHMENTS: 1. All applicants must supply Proof of Ownership in the form of a
title insurance commitment or statement from an attorney indicating
that he/she has researched the title and verifies that the applicant
is the owner of the property (free of liens and eucumbrances. )
2 . If the process requires a public hearing, a Property Owner's List
must be supplied which gives all owners within 300 feet in all
directions in some cases and adjacent owners in some cases.
3. Number of copies required (by code and/or in pre-application
conference. )
4. Plat by Registered Surveyor Yes \ No
ALTA Owner's Policy — Form B — Amenxled 13-17-70
001B
r „.P �}" gy` y�p��p� ,
et,,,, ,,AOr:.. '• '' '1 • i '. b- ] .•%A-31 r.Y. . V` 'z, an. -e `YX4. j +t}�5 : i itip,.s ? g' _\ :V
POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY ,
V
) i f
l llr
S '1` E `VA1; '1` 'I` I 'I` LF tt
GUARANTY COMPANY 1 t
t -
. : plat
:1 SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND i '
THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, STEWART TITLE GUARANTY + it";I
; .� COMPANY, a corporation of Galveston, Texas, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in " ,T
Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs, attorneys' ` {1''
1
ti• ,II •
> fees and expenses which the Company may become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by the insured by rit t'.
{r, t' reason of: t
1, Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein; t
?yy 1h
2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title; t .�,
7r
a - " 3. Lack of a right of access to and from the land;or
q
0' 4. Unmarketability of such title � °
3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused this policy to be signed and sealed by its t
• duly authorized officers as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A.
I
1 r i, a''F,
r
w�,1 $ t
it STE'WA 12'!'TITLE
? a.;p
1 GUARANTY COMPANY T
. +', Countersigned: q 9 • k
Yli .cr oR OR :At. Q
In "v. 4tmia n o �_ ll
)1 a 7 9 0 8 rod Chairman of the Board It,
e
,I / texas — G Y
LM1 ar
a ,I Au orized Cs— =r• President '
}
k
.0iT ; cll.
' EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE t,,
4 �.1 The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy: 4 r
�'s 91. 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to budding and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or t
" s Y 9 9 9 9 9 9 e 9
prohibiting the occupancy,use or enjoyment of the land,or regulating the character,dimensions or location of any improvement now or ,
r rr ,� hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land,or the effect
i, of any violation of any such law,ordinance or governmental regulation. 40S•)(1.•
d 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public St r,:
3 ' records at Date of Policy.
. yt') 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims, or other matters (a) created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant, lbl not It
�s ea known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date ',
{ `• such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company !h
; prior to the date such insured claimant became an insured hereunder; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (dl 44L2
. 8. attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured
i claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy.
_ -}I
--_ —
d5i . ,y Poi cy Serial No. O Le. .Y ra , y _ yr# t4My'f /1
AL IA OWNER'S POLFLV — Amended A0/1I/70
SCHEDULE A
Order No.: 9389—C2 Policy No.: 0 356797
Date of Policy: APRIL 17, 1980 AT 4:54 P.M. Amount of Insurance: $ 425 ,000.00
1. Name of Insured: B & K LAND COMPANY, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is:
IN FEE SIMPLE
3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in:
B & K LAND COMPANY, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows:
The South 34 Feet of Lots A and B, Block 89,
CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN,
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
Page 2 S'1'E«A 1i'1"1`1'1'1.E
GUARANTY COMPANY