HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.401 E Cooper Ave.44-81Park Place, Subdivision PUD
Special Review
,JOV,z&-Ia41i z. I
PI
IUI
j
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Jack Johnson, Planning Office
RE: Park Place nar9 Plat (PUD)
DATE: June 22, 1981 APPROVED AS TO FORf�j
/
MOTE: This application is companion to the Park Place Development
Subdivision Exception and Exemption
Location: Lots A, B, C and D, Block 90, City and Townsite of Aspen
(located between the Guino Meyer Building and the Mill
Street Mall on Cooper Mall).
Zoning,: CC - Commercial Core (HP Overlay)
History: The HPC reviewed and approved changes to the facade of
the building on May 4th. The City Council approved the
facade changes and a slight shifting of the footprint of
the building on May llth, and in so doing reaffirmed the 1981
commercial GMP allotment for the Park Place Building.
Background and
Applicant's
Request: On November 24, 1980, City Council, upon recommendation of
the P & Z, approved a GMP commercial allotment of 3,800
square feet for the Park Place Building proposal.. Addi-
tional approvals necessary in order to further the Park
Place Building proposal as conceptually approved include:
Sec. 24-8.3(a) - Final plat approval under PUD (PUD necessary to consider
waivers to the structural encroachment into the Uheeler
Opera House and Wagner Park viers planes and a reduction
in the total 250/0 open space requirement as per Code).
Sec. 24-3.4 - Special review to utilize additional .5:1 FAR bonus in
CC zone district (may be considered provided the residen-
tial space is in accordance with adopted housing price
guideline's for low, moderate or middle income housing).
Sec. 24-4.5 - Review by P & Z and Council to determine appropriateness
of parking needs for four one -bedroom employee housing
units. (Applicant requests that no parking requirements
be imposed on this project.)
Sec. 24-11.2(g) - Exemption of the four middle income deed restricted em-
ployee housing units from GMP pursuant to density bonus
provisions of the Municipal Code (Sec. 24-3.4 as requested
above).
Referral Comments: Rock Mountain Pdatural Gas - A meter and service line to serve
the Aspen Leaf Sports is located at the southeast corner of
these buildings. This would facilitate the moving of the unit.
City Water Department - Water is available to this site from
an existing 3/4" line. Connection is permitted upon applica-
tion for a tap permit and payment of P.I.F., less credit for
existing service.
Aspen Sanitation District - No problem foreseen in providing
sanitation service to these additional four one -bedroom apart-
ments.
Memo: Park Place Preliplonary Plat (PUD) •
June 22, 1981
Page Two
{
Attorney's Office - Employee
income level; the Council is
level and has demanded low or
housing must be dealth with.
housing requested is middle
hesitant to grant the middle
moderate. Parking for employee
Prior to acceptance of final plat, applicant must enter into
a subdivision/PUD agreement as required by Sections 24-8.6
and 20-16(c), including an open -space and common facilities
maintenance agreement required by Section 24-8.19, if applicable.
I cannot find any authority for the City approving a plat
which is not final, contingent upon the final plat being pre-
sented after the improvements are in place. I note that
Section 24-8.26 sets forth the guidelines for amendments to
the PUD plan.
Under Section 24-11.2(g) all employee units constructed in
the commercial, office and lodge districts pursuant to the
density bonus provisions are exempt from the Growth Management
Quota System provided the housing units are constructed and
deed restricted in accordance with the provisions of Section
24-11.4(b)(3).
Pursuant to Section 24-3.4, in the CC zone a .5:1 bonus floor
area ratio may be considered by special review with .2:1 addi-
tional commercial space if .3:1 of the space is approved for
residential space in accordance with adopted housing price
guidelines for low, moderate and middle income housing. I
note that the application seeks a .J-1:1 ratio rather than .5:1.
I see no authority in the code for extending the ratio unless
P & Z or the City Council, as a matter of policy, decides to
afford some leeway by rounding off fractions.
Engineering Department - The structure will require variance
of both open space and height limitations in the CC zone sub-
ject to view plane restrictions. At the time this site came
in for GMP allocation, this office was concerned about adequate
trash facilities, but the current plan seems to address these
concerns.
In terms of height limitation:; and open Space, these con-
cerns were viewed at the time the applicant submitted the
proposal for GMP allocation, The structure, although
stepped and reduced along the Cooper Street frontage, still
extends slightly into the existing view planes. The design
also results in minimal open space, much less than the
25% required in the CC zone. The resulting design, however,
represents a compromise between less open space and less
overall bulk to accommodate the view plane limitations as
much as possible. A stepped design with the second story
located to the southerly portion of the site serves to
reduce the visible bulk significantly, and while the pro-
posed structure does protrude into the applicable view
planes, the actual portion of the structure visible from
the view plane base points will be minimal due to existing
structures which now obstruct the view planes substantially.
The Wheeler Opera House View Plane, for instance, which
creates the greatest intrusion on the site, is already
blocked by the Golden Horn. As a result, the Engineering
Department has no problem with the necessary variances under
P.U.D.
Having reviewed*the final platfor the Park Place development
revised on May 22, 1981, we find it to be complete. Per our
discussion with Paul Taddure, JLeplat as submitted should be
recorded prior to issuance of the but ding permit. Recorda-
tion would require addition of the required certificates and
submittal of two mylar copies to this office.
Memo: Park Place Preliminary Plat (PUD)
June 22, 1931
Page Three
Planning Office - In addition to the 8,800 square feet of
commercial space granted through GMP, the conceptual plan
for the Park Place Building proposed 3,032 square feet of
employee housing space° The four one -bedroom employee
units, approximately 750 square feet each, will be deed
30 �2. V �q 1�d restricted to the middle income guidelines of the City
according to this proposal. The P & Z and Council generally
�j promote employee housing restrictions at the low and moderate
income levels as opposed to the middle income level. Extra
points were awarded due to the inclusion of a housing com-
ponent in this commercial GMP application, however, points
were not tallied on an income level basis.
Waivers to the height restrictions in the Wheeler Opera
House and Wagner Park view planes is necessary in order to
accommodate the second story employee housing component of
this project. These view planes are partially obstructed
in this vicinity already; therefore, this tradeoff appears
worthy.
The applicant proposes to utilize all of the available .5:1
FAR bonus (if granted) for employee housing with no increase
in commercial square footage (as permitted by Code; 2:1
to commercial if .3:1 is.deed restricted residential) in
exchange for waiving the 25% open space requirement of the
CC zone district. Little open space exists along the store-
front section of the Cooper Street Mall. Wagner Park and
Rubey Park are in close proximity.
:Special review of both the additional .5:1 FAR bonus request
and appropriateness of parking needs for the four one -bedroom
units is necessary. The FAR bonus will permit the construc-
tion of the second story employee housing. The need for
parking must be determined; however, location on the down-
town mall and being adjacent to the Rubey Park transit
terminal are both strong considerations for a waiver to
parking requirements. The Special Review Criteria in Sec.
24-3.5 have been assessed and indicate no significant
problems.
An exemption from GMP for these four one -bedroom employee
units seems appropriate. A determination as to whether
middle income guidelines versus low or moderate guidelines
may be an outstanding question.
Planning Office
Recommendation: 1. Approval of the Final Plat (PUD) including waivers to
the Wheeler OoPra Houseand Wanner Park view places, and
a waiver to the 250 open space requirement in the CC zone.
2. Approval of Special Review to utilize additional .5:1 FAR
bonus in the CC zone for four deed restricted employee
housing units.
3. Approval of Review to waiver parking needs of the four one -
bedroom employee units.
4. Approval of the Exem tp ion of four one -bedroom employee
housing units from GMP.
P & Z Action: At their regular meeting of May 19, 1981, the Planning and
Zoning Commission approved the Park Place Preliminary Plat
(PUD) and recommended approval of items 1 through 4 as listed
under Planning Office Recommendations. Additionally, the P & Z
recommended that the four employee housing units should Je deed
restricted at the moderate income guidelines.
Memo: Park Place
Preliminary Plat (PUD)
June 22, 1931
Page Four
City Council
Action:
Should City Council concur with recommendations of the Planning
and Zoning Commission the appropriate motion would be as follows:
"I move to approve the Final Plat (PUD) including waivers to
the Wheeler Opera House and Wagner Park view planes, and a
waiver to the 25% open space requirement in the CC zone,
and approval of Special Review to utilize additional .5:1
FAR bonus in -the CC zone for four deed restricted employee
•
housing units, approval of review to waiver parking needs of
the four one-bedroorl`loyee units provided employee units
are restricted to�� income guidelines, and approval _
of the Exemption of four one -bedroom employee housing units
from GMP, subject to the following conditions:
1. Prior to acceptance of Final Plat, applicant must enter
into a subdivision/PUD agreement as required by Sections
•
24-8.6 and 20-16(c), including an open -space and common
facilities maintenance agreement required by Section 24-8.19 '
if applicable, and
2. Recordation of Final Plat prior to issuance of a building
permit."
Calms
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
1. DATE SUBMITTED: `poi
Z. APPLICANT: --ril r' =Park _P caee
No."/"/-R
STAFF: Mi c k doh ►ISO vL)
) e_l ap ryVy%I- company
3. ° REPRESENTATIVE: Ipl�neul' u [�Gt � ► T-)!nQ ld I -
4ee20 East-
Aspru
967S -cm?
4.
PROJECT NAME: —Pat, k P
lQ C e— Sulod •
PUb '4is4e�
5.
LOCATION: IiQCaiIt Sim )J1_-
lWe_erl Gut ►i o
e.r &AI i (I
e Lem k6u E (&
r
at 1
6.
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
Rezoning
Subdivision
Stream Margin
X P.U.D.
Exception
8040 Greenline
Special Review
Exemption
View Plane
Growth Management
70:30
Conditional Use
HPC
Residential Bonus
Other
Lee �yj2gr;nq
E�tw�rits
�ir�
7.
REFERRALS:
TU �l C.r>v1l�f' 1� C.t._, 1�n
I
Attorney
Sanitation District
School District
Engineering Dept.
Mountain Bell
Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
Housing
Parks
State Highway Dept.
Water
Holy Cross Electric
--Other
City Electric
Fire Marshal/Building Dept.
3. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:
0 & 0
9. DISPOSITION:
P & Z Approved
Denied
Council X Approved X Denied
Date
Date June 22, 1981
City Council approved Park Place Final Plat (PUD)
Special Review for .5:FAR Bonus
Waiver of parking needs
Exemption from GMP for Employee Housing
subject to:
1. Prior to acceptance of final plat, applicant must enter into a
subdivision/PUD Agreement,
2. Recordation of a final plat prior to issuance of a building permit.
10. ROUTING:
Attorney Building Engineering Other
•
PARK PLACE
MANHOLE, INV. 7911.3
N 88'2'L' W
lV 5500911'W
12c).
pia C'I Ply
� WATER M41/y
ELE A ION = 7922.57
.L,OW^ME LIElGHT - 7941.0
P05L
r`r
-A, PIPES \
r
fCfPHONE $
T v.
NOTE % APPROX. LOCATION OF UTILITIES A5 PER UTILITY COMPANIES.
TOTAL AREA 8419 ± SQ. FT.
L
• •
POWER -I Rf�FI`.'OFtMFR_
TO INE N&MOVED
91- TELE. F-r-ES'TAL
OWNER- SUBDIVIDER - THE PARK PLACE DEVELOPFMENT COMPANY.
620 EAST HYMA N AVE,
ASPEN, COLORADO. 81C-11.
925 - 2122
5WI9S GIFT SHOP
J
GtZ055 5ECTIOH OF PROf'ERTY
ENTIRE PfZOPERTY COVERED 6Y WMEELEP, OPERA I-I0U5L VIEW MAMF-.
WAGNER PARK VIEW PLANE
WHE VIEW PPERA HOUSE
tN
O 5 10 20 Jo 40 130 FT.
SCALE ' I' = 10'
5A515 CIF 6Ef NGJ: FOUND, Kfr- 1K e CAF, L.5. 9I54 AT N.W.
CORNER OF 5LOCK `IO e 'X' AT N.E. 60KNER LOT D, ELK.'10,
DATUM I'LANE , U.S.C. F G. 5. C NCI 1 MAKjf , f�T SW. CORNER OF
THE FITKIN COUNTY COURTI-IOUSE.
5UKV1T0r\'S CERTIFICATE
I, JAhff--D r RE5FR, HEREBY CEKTI Y T}4AT THIn MAP ACCURATELY
DEMCT5 A SURVEY MAbE UNPEr-\ MY ON
JX'( 24, 1�180 CF 1OT D A O A FQZTION OF LQR C, 15LOCK
'10, /L5iEN OKi&NAL TOWNSfTE, FITKIN COUNTf, CC>LOK^t7o
JAM i RESE� L.S. 9154
UST _ 11180
NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORA� LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE
ANY LEGAL ACTION SAD UPON ANY DEF�7 IN 71-11n SUfZVEY
WITHIN 51X YEAR -ID AFT1=1R YOU FIRST DI�)coVEIz --UCH pEFECT,
IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION EASED UrCN ANY DEFECT IN
TL115 SURVEY 8E. COMMENCED VURE Tl-1 l TEN iEATZ� FROM
TI-IC DATE. Or 114L CEKTIFICAT!C)N .SHOWN HERECri.
ALPINE SURVEYS
►'05T OFFICE 15oX 17-0
A5FEN, COLOKAM 61(of 1
5M 425.2(obP>
5UIRVEYED: 7 24 60 N.N.
I *' i Eo: 7.'50 b0 p.�.
REV151ON5: 1 78. 81 G.L.
4 9 • 81 G.L.
5 . 15 81 D.M,
5 22 • 81
TITLE-- TXDCi tl' Mf\P
RNTOfLOTS C & D
DLOCN 90
CITY 4 TOWNnITE OF h5FEN, COLOIWM
J06 MQ : 50-17-2
CLIENT , >=L.E10Hr-t\
•
J
•
rECFPHokE &
T, y
NOTE, APPROX. LOCATION OF UTILITIE5 A5 PER UTILITY COMPANIES.
TOTAL AREA 6WI) ± 5Q• FT.
PARK PLACE
OWNER- 5UbCIVIPER' THE PARK PLACE DEVELOPEMENT COMPANY.
620 EAST HYMAN AVE,
ASPEN , COLORADO. 81611.
925 - 2122
• •
221.
5WI9f> &F7 5HOF
II �'
.... ...... O
• •
- --- - --- WAGNER PARK VIEW
PLANE
WHEEVIEW PLAHOUSE
NE
IOO'---._ ----- ---- - >
CK(D55 SECTION OF PROrERTY
ENTIRE PROPERLY COVERED 5Y WNELLE - OPERA I-IOUf? VIEW PLNiE .
0 0
00
Z
g
• • O 5 /0 20 •50 40 '30 FT.
SCALE I' = 10'
13A515 or tErvvNGn FOUND; KEDAK e CAP, L.5. 9184 AT N.W
CORNER OF pSLOCK `10 e 'A' AT N.E. CLrNER LOT D >LK. 90.
DA71-1I`1 PLANE: U.'7.C. F G. 5. P NCI l MHR14, AT 5 W. CORNER or
IT4F- FITKIN CIOUNTY COLUZTNOUSE.
5UKVEVI 5 CERTIFICATE
I, JAMES F PE5FR, HEREBY CEKTI Y THAT TNIO MAST ACCURATELY
IDEPICTS A 5 KVEY n,,FX LINVER, MY 7UPERYI5ION ON
JULY 24, 10100 Cr LOT 0 AHO A 1'CiZTION OF LOT C, 15LCY-K
'10, ASPEN OR4GINAL/TOOWN5ITE, FITKIN COUNTY, COL.CN-ir�o
JAM 1- RES> -, L.S. 9104
ALJ U5T L-, 1980
NOTICE: ACLORDING TO COLOKA� LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE
ANY LEGAL ACTION MAJ.D UPON ANY DETEC-T IN Ta 11� 5UIZVEY
WITII-IIN 51X YEARS ikFTF-9 YOU FIKT DISCOVER SUCH gEFEL,T.
• • IN NO EVD-IT, Mo.Y ANY ACTION 6ASFP UPON ^NY DEFECT IN
T1-115 SURVEY 8E COMMENCED NL RE Ti W-I TEN `fENtt') FROM
TI-IE DATE. OF TNE. CEKTIFICATIOI`I --I-OWN 141f-KEOf1,
ALPINE SURVEYS
F105T OFFIGE Cox 1790
A5PEN, COLOIeAM 61(0I I
," -925.240to
5LJRVEYMD, 7. 24 60
MAfTEV% 7 90 80 D&.
REV15101145; 1 • 28 61 G.L.
I+' 9' 81 G.L.
5 • I5 81 D. M.
s•zz a
T 17 Lt`: TOf OCoI� M/lf
MT Of LOTS C d D
MOM 90
CITY E TOWN5ITI✓ CT , BEN COLONILO
J015 NO. 80 - 97- 2
CLIENT : FLE1011M
CITY OF ASPEN
130 south galena street
aspen, colorado 81611
303-925 -2020
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 10, 1981
TO: Jack Johnson
FROM: Paul Taddune
:: 7717,
gg
:1
jul'i 11 :
RE: Park Place Subdivision/PUD Finai Plat Submission
Prior to acceptance of final plat, applicant must enter into a
subdivision/PUD agreement as required by Sections 24-8.6 and 20-
16(c), including an open -space and common facilities maintenance
agreement required by Section 24-8.19, if applicable.
I cannot find any authority for the City approving a plat which is
not final, contingent upon the final plat being presented after
the improvements are in place. I note that Section 24-8.26 sets
forth the guidelines for amendments to the PUD plan.
Under Section 24-11.2(g) all employee units constructed in the
commercial, office and lodge districts pursuant to the density
bonus provisions are exempt from the Growth Management Quota Sys-
tem provided the housing units are constructed and deed restricted
in accordance with the provisions of Section 24-11.4(b)(3).
Pursuant to section 24-3.4, in the CC zone a .5:1 bonus floor area
ratio may be considered by special review with .2:1 additional
commercial space if .3:1 of the space is approved for residential
space in accordance with adopted housing price guidelines for low,
Moderate and middle income housing. I note that the application
seeks a .51:1 ratio rather than .5:1. I see no authority in the
code for extending the ratio unless P&Z or the City Council, as a
matter of policy, decides to afford some leeway by rounding off
fractions.
PJT:mc
May 29, 1981
Aspen City Cduncil
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Park. Place
Dear Members:
We are hereby requesting 1 Plat approva of the
Park Place building under the Planned Unit Develop-
ment (PUD) guidelines established in Article VIII
of the zoning code of the City of Aspen. Enclosed
are five copies of the final plat showing the prop -
di J osed structure. At such ti m_ _ ;s the b ;:,li n i s
Acompleted, the improvements wi G;iiggPVPrl d
a—f srred�ST'�'t i,�ll be submitted fo �rd-
�r��. iTfg'ZSurpposes showing the location of.1t---�.�ual
im emen'"..�._ _ .
arc* The PUD procedure has been necessitated by the pen-
etration of the building into the Wheeler Opera
House and Wagner Park view planes and by the red-
uction in open space provided from the 25% require-
ment in the CC zone.
The proposed building was given has been given con-
ceptual approval and preliminary plat approval by
the Planning & Zoning Commission and was given
conceptual approval by yourselves on December 8, 1980.
The justification for the variances from the zoning
code may be summarised as follows:
1. The Wheeler Opera House view plane is so low over
the property that any two storey structure would
penetrate it. We have utilised the whole of the
second floor for .oje h� units and we
feel that the f' o the it f the four one -
bedroom units outweighs t e detriment of penetrat-
ing the Wheeler Opera House view plane by about 6
feet and the Wagner Park view plane by a little
less. The building has been designed to minimise
the penetration and the view planes are already
obstructed by existing structures so this penetrat-
ion will not be visible from the respective start-
ing points.
2. We felt that the provision of open space on the
Cooper Street Mall was to some extent made redund-
ant by the existence of the mall and that it was
more important to complete the line of buildings
620 East Hyman Avenue . Aspen, Colorado 81611 • Telephone: (303) 925.2122
336 Main Street, Suite 205 • Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 . Telephone: (303) 245-4868
Ma*91, 1981 •
Aspen City Council
Page 2
along the South side of the Mall. The new Park
Place building provides an excellent transition
from the Aspen Leaf Building to the Guido's
building and the South side of the Cooper Street
Mall will now be consistent with the North side
and with the Hyman Street Mall.
The final plat reflects these variances and reflects
no changes from the GMP approval apart from the
facade change which you approved on May 11, 1981.
We therefore__a5k_that Zou grant__final plat approval
w
tg'"__ P Park Pja a_.Jt�i ing contin en upon ur
providing eked final plat o ove-
rovidin a survey
me7Z= a? e '=ffm f e t e.
We are also requesting the following special review
items:
Z�•��'Z'^. 1. Exemption of the employee housing units totalling
3,032 sq. ft. from'the GMP. We have propose that
these unita_be_ deed. _restric. under?` e i e
income guidelines and it was on that b is t at
the submi sion was made u ommercial GMP.
Two of these units will be used by one of the
tenants, Unicorn Books, for their employees while
the other two will either be used by the other
tenant, Pitkin County Dry Goods, or by the First
National Bank in Aspen for their employees. These
units will help therefore to alleviate the empl-
oyee housing shortage in the City.
2. Granting the FAR bonus of 0.5:1 allowed in the CC
zone. All of the bonus is being utilised for empl-
oyee housing and none of it for additional bonus
commercial space as allowed under the code. We
are providing 3,032 sq. ft. of employee housing,
or O.S1:1 of the new buildout.
3. Exemption of the parking regirement for the empl-
oyee housing units. The proximity of our site to
the downtown core and public transportation at
Ruby Park clearly puts this project within the no
parking guidelines set out in the code. The Plan-
ning Commission tied this exemption to a reduct-
ion in the income guidelines from middle income
to moderate income.' We do not feel this reduction
is reasonable or appropriate. The commercial core
of the City is the most expensive part of the City
to build in, not just land costs, but also build-
ing costs due to the more stringent fire codes
and the more expensive materials used. It is app-
ropriate therefore that middle income guidelines
be used in the commercial core as it is a reflect-
ion of the very much higher cost of creating the
May 29, 1981
Aspen City Council
Page 3
housing. Furthermore we have provided more emp-
loyee housing than required under the FAR bonus
provisions of the code (0.51:1 compared to 0.3:1)
to the financial detriment of the project. We
feel it unreasonable to further penalise the
project by reducing the income guidelines from
the middle level which we have outlined from the
start. We feel the argument that middle income
housing is not "employee housing" is not valid;
current rental rates in the Aspen Block Building
are about 83c/sq. ft. per month and the building
is completely filled with local employees and we
have a waiting list of more "employees" who wish
to move in if any vacancy occurs. Current middle
income guidelines are less than this rate at 75c/
sq. ft. per month._
This letter and the final plat are more detailed
representations of the proposed Park Place building
as submitted through the GMP process. We ask there-
fore that you approve this final plat, together with
the three special review items listed above, without
reducing the income guidelines from the middle level.
We cannot agree with the Planning and Zoning Comm-
ission's actions in that regard. We feel that the
completed project will be of substantial benefit to
the Cooper Street Mall and the City of Aspen.
Sincerely
AJa�^''
Andrew Dracopoli
for
Park Place Development Co.
Enc. 5 copies of plat
Check for plat fee
•
u
•
•
•
TELE. PEGES7AL
t+IONE_ $
`T. y
NOTE; APPROX. LOCATION OF UTILITIES A5 PER UTILITY C0NAPANIE5.
TOTAL AREA 8419 ± SQ. FT.
ALPINE SURVEYS
F05T OFFICE I5(DX 1730
ASPEN, COLOIeiVI bI & 1 l
" 425 - 2lobt>
5URVEYED: 7 24
80
F,1�,,.
UFArTEt7: 7 ,50.80
D fK,.
REV151oN5 I 28
81
G.L.
4• 9�
81
G.L.
81
D.M,
5.22
a
PARK PLACE
OWNER- SUBDIVIDER - THE PARK PLACE DEVELOPEMENT COMPANY.
620 EAST HYMAN AVE,
A5PEN , COLORADO . 81(611.
925 - 2122
0
•
i •
27 5
9W19S GIFT bFiOP
..... ...•k.._.
� WAGNER PARK VIEW PLANE
WHEELER OPERA HOUSE
�— VIEW PLANE
� ram- m c4
s4
y
GK059 SECTION OF PROF EKTY
TNTIRE FROPER:;Y COVE-F S� BY WNELLEF, OPEIZP, F-IOUSL VIEW FLNYE..
D 5 O 2D 30 40 '!o F'f.
SCALE : I' - 10'
5A515 OF 5E^NNG5: FOUND; ff-D`1R i C&F, L.S. 9184 AT N.W
GCKNER OF MOCK 110 E 'X' AT N.E CAlZ LC;T PJ DLK. -10,
DATUM PLANE U.5.C. 4G.5. BENCH-t M^RI` i�T SW. CCKHER 17F
THE. FITKIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE.
5UNVMr%'S CEKTIMCATE
I, JAME-') F 1zE5EK, HEREE)Y CERTIFY -54^T THIS MAP ACCUKATE.LY
DEFICT'S A 5UKVEY MArX UNDET� MY .SUrF-RVISION ON
JULY 24, 11180 CIF LOT D ANO A PCKTICDN CIF LOT Cl 15LOC.K
CIO, A51"EN CIK4&NAL. TOWNSITE, MTKIN COUNT`(, C.Ov- 1-,At;o
dmza i s tESE.K, L.'S. 9154
ST 2�' 1`160
NMICE: ACCORDING 10 COLOFZ > 1.AW YOU MLU57 COMMENCE
AM LCOAL ACTION OEJD UPON MIY DEFECT IN 74415 SURVEY
• • k/ITNIN 51X YEAR5 AFTEIz YOU FIK.51 D ;P I VE.K ,5UC1-I PEfECT.
IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION 61&\t)f-V UPt�)N fWY DEFECT IN
11-11D SURVEY 8E COMMENCED nLKE 14-N4-1 TEN `fEAMC) FROM
THE MATE OF THE CEKTIFICATICDN JI-TOWN PZK1 0H,
T111-1`: T'X-r*r_A�jr X,Afl
rANT Of qto C E
DL OCI� 10
";-Y e TOWN5ITE OF An EN,
JOt3 NO.: 80-97-2
CLIENT ° FLlrl�n�i�
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Engineering Department
City Attorney
FROM: Jack Johnson, Planning Office
RE: Park Place Subdivision/PUD Final Plat Submission
DATE: June 1, 1981
Attached is the Final Plat Subdivision/PUD Submission by the Park Place
Development Company, Inc. for the vacant site between the Guino Meyer Building
and the Aspen Leaf Building on the Cooper Street Mall. This item is tenta-
tively being scheduled for review by the City Council on Monday, June 22, 1981.
Please respond with any comments by Wednesday, June 10. Thank you.
ar
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE `
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
LAND USE APPLICATION FEES
County
00100 —
63711 09009
— 00000
Subdivision/PUD
63712
Special Review
63713
P&Z Review Only
63714
Detailed Review
63715
Final Plat
63716
Special Approval
63717
Specially Assigned
City
00100 —
63721 09009
— 00000
Conceptual Application
63722
Preliminary Application
63723
Final Application
'rt
63724
Exemption
63725
Rezoning
63726
Conditional Use
PLANNING
OFFICE SALES
00100 —
63061 09009 — 00000
County Land Use Sales
63062
GMP Sales
63063
Almanac Sales
Copy Fees
Other
A,
Name:
Project:
ty, rya I
?J%
Address:
Phone: f��• �` z
Check No.
-{� 43
'
Date: 1
0
Receipt No. P J1 0�