Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.1000 E Hopkins Ave.A19-95VALLEY HI INSUBSTANTIAL 2737-182-01-003 AM A19-9595 '�U Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 City Land Use Application Fees: 00113-63850-041 Deposit -63855-042 Flat Fee -63860-043 1iPC -63875-046 Zoning & Sign Permit - MRO11 Use Tax County Land Use Application Fees: 00113-63800-033 Deposit -63805-034 Flat Fee -63820-037 "Zoning -63825-038 Board of Adjustment Referral Fees: 00113-63810-035 00115-63340-163 00123-63340-190 00125-63340-205 County Engineer City Engineer Housing Enviromental Health Sales: 00113-63830-039 County Code -69000-145 Copy Fees w ^500 Other _ -- -�-- •I'otal����-� Name:y'b _�-'9 _ Date:-���✓Check:��o Address: +4 Project: �L _ a /6 Case No: _ Phone: Z _ 7- 1) No. of Copics CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 0 21 95 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: 2737-182-01-003 A19-95 STAFF MEMBER:- LL PROJECT NAME: VALLEY HI INSUBSTANTIAL}AMENDMENT Project Address: 1000 E. Hopkins Ave. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Legal Address: APPLICANT: Jeff Yusem Yusem Corp. 920-2186 Applicant Address: 220 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen, Colorado 81611 REPRESENTATIVE: Gibson & Reno Architects 925-5968 Representative Address/Phone: 210 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- FEES: PLANNING $ 425 # APPS RECEIVED 1 ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED 4 ea of 2 HOUSING $ ENV.HEALTH $ TOTAL $ 425 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO DRC Meeting Date ------------------- ------------------- REFERRALS: City Attorney City Engineer Housing Dir. Aspen Water City Electric Envir.Hlth. Zoning Parks Dept. Bldg Inspector Fire Marshal Holy Cross Mtn. Bell ACSD Energy Center School District Rocky Mtn NatGas CDOT Clean Air Board Open Space Board Other Other DATE REFERRED: i INITIALS: DUE: ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ ------------------- FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: , L 1� INITIAL: City Atty ty Engineer Zoning E Health Housing Open Space Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: MEMORANDUM TO: Stan Clauson, Director Community Development FROM: Leslie Lamont, Deputy Director RE: Valley Hi Insubstantial PUD Amendment DATE: March 31, 1995 SUMMARY: The applicants, Yusem Corp. and the Valley Hi Development Trust, seek to amend the Valley Hi PUD/Subdivision to relocate the driveway and garage access, alter the parking garage, and reconfirm the zero rear yard setback for the first floor of the building. LOCATION: 1000 East Hopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado ZONING: R/MF with PUD overlay APPLICANT: Jeff Yusem and the Valley Hi Development Trust REFERRAL COMMENTS: Please see Engineering and Parks Department referral comments, Exhibit A. STAFF COMMENTS: The Valley Hi Development Trust received a subdivision/PUD approval in 1991 to redevelop a multi -family apartment complex. The approved plans included the development of four free-market townhomes and four fully deed restricted affordable dwelling units. The AH units are proposed on the rear of the building facing the river. The site design also includes a below grade parking garage for 12 cars. Access to the garage was originally proposed directly off of Hopkins Avenue with the garage door in front of the building facing Hopkins. The Engineering Department stipulated, in the 1991 approval, that the grade of the garage ramp could not exceed a 12% grade for a 20' distance from the property line. Recently a potential developer discovered that the approved garage access could not be achieved without exceeding the 12% grade requirement. As a result, the applicants propose to realign the driveway and reconfigure the parking garage. Staff has determined that this change to the approved plans is an insubstantial amendment to the final PUD/subdivision development plan. Please see new site plan, Exhibit B. The applicant proposes to enter the garage from the rear of the building using an alley right-of-way that exists behind the building. The new driveway will be constructed on the east side of the proposed development extending down the side yard along the property line, turning behind the building to access the garage in the back of the property. Although the drive will wrap around the outside of one of the affordable housing units, the actual drive will be slightly lowered below the surface to mitigate surrounding one of the affordable units with a driveway. Pursuant to Section 24-7-907 an insubstantial amendment of an approved PUD plan may be authorized by the Planning Director provided that the amendment does not: a. change the use or character of the development; RESPONSE: The realignment of the driveway and garage access will not change the use of the proposed multi -family development. However, if the driveway, as it turns the corner at the rear of the building, is not sunk below grade the affordable dwelling unit on that corner of the building would be greatly impacted. As the driveway turns the corner of the building and into the garage it wraps around the front of the AH unit and its small outdoor patio area. Staff has recommended that the drive be sunk into the ground, to the greatest extent possible, to lower the profile of autos using the driveway. b. increase by greater than 3% the overall coverage of structures on the land; RESPONSE: There is no increase in structures. However, a longer drive will increase the impermeable surface of the parcel. Historic surface run-off and any increase in surface run-off must be maintained on -site. C. substantially increase trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities; RESPONSE: The is only a realignment of the driveway. The number of parking spaces and dwelling units will not increase. d. reduce by greater than 3% the approved open space; RESPONSE: The open space requirement for this zone district is 35% of the parcel. It is unclear from the submitted plans whether this development complies with the 35% open space requirement. Although there is a PUD overlay for this particular parcel, a variance for open space was not requested during the original review and approval. In addition, a specific open space plan was not approved during the original review and approval. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant must confirm that this development complies with the open space requirement of this zone district and a "rear access area" and "parking areas" cannot be used as open space. e. reduce by greater than 1% the off-street parking and loading space; 2 RESPONSE: The area that will be used for the driveway is the side yard of the proposal. The reconfiguration of the parking garage will not decrease the amount of parking that is required of this proposal. f. reduce in required pavement widths or rights -of -way for streets and easements; RESPONSE: N/A. g. increase greater than 2% the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings; RESPONSE: N/A i. create a change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting of a further variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements; RESPONSE: Although the new driveway and garage access do not change the representations of the previously approved proposal, it does provide an opportunity for the staff to further review and fine tune the proposal and the recorded plat. The Parks Department has been working with the applicant to identify a better trail easement on the property. The current easement is on very steep slopes and would require the elimination of mature vegetation. An alignment in the alley or closer to the alley would facilitate a better trail. However, the realignment of the driveway uses the platted alley. The applicant has agreed to continue to work with the Parks Department to identify a better trail easement. Similarly, the Engineering Department has identified several public improvements that were not addressed during the original subdivision approval but are relevant for this proposal. Please see the Engineering referral comments. The applicant has agreed to comply with the requirements as outlined in the referral comments. Finally, if the applicants request a PUD variance for open space due to the realigned driveway and/or the proposals inability to provide 35% open space, a substantial amendment to the PUD is required. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the insubstantial amendment to the Valley Hi PUD/subdivision development plan to realign the driveway and the entrance to the below grade garage with the following conditions: K. 1. The applicant shall file an amended plat indicating the new driveway alignment and access to the garage. This approval shall be void if the amended plat is not recorded within 180 days. A certificate of occupancy may not be issued unless the amended plat is recorded. However, the applicant may be issued a building permit consistent with this approval and previous approvals prior to the recordation of the amendment plan. 2. The applicant shall continue to work with the Parks Department to identify a new trail alignment to avoid destruction of mature trees and maintain the privacy of the residents. The new trail alignment shall be depicted on the amended and recorded plat as well as a 20 foot construction easement for the trail. 3. The applicant shall allow the City to access the parcel for trail construction if the project and trail are being constructed at the same time. 4. The recorded plat shall include: a. amended site plans; b. a note that encroachments shall be removed at the time of development; C. compliance with the requirements of Section 24-7-1004.D; d. top of the bank; and e. a legend and all improvements labeled. 5. Prior to the issuance of any building permits the applicant shall sign and record a sidewalk, curb, and gutter agreement. 6. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall replace the street light with a standard City antique street light. 7. All utility pedestals or other equipment must be installed on an easement provided by the applicant and not in the public right- of-way. 8.. All conditions of approval that were outlined in Ordinance 8 (Series of 1991) and Ordinance 13 (Series of 1995) shall remain in effect. 9. Prior to the issuance of any building permits the applicant shall comply with all dimensional requirements of the zone district unless varied through a substantial PUD review and approval process of Board of Adjustment. 4 10. The approval of the realignment of the driveway does not constitute a variance to the open space requirements of this zone district for this project. 11. The applicant shall lower the driveway to the greatest extent possible to buffer the access from the view, both inside and outside, of the affordable housing unit. 12. All representations made in this application and exhibits to this memo shall be adhered to. I hereby approve of the insubstantial amendment to the final development plan of the Valley Hi pursuant to S ct'on 24-7-907 of the Municipal Code . * - r Stan auson, irector Community Development 5 MEMORANDUM Mw 199S TO: Leslie Lamont, Deputy Planning Director cC' THRU: FROM: George Robinson, Parks Director Rebecca Baker, Parks Department AA DATE: March 24, 1995 'aF NAP RE: Valley Hi Insubstantial PUD Amendment l ! We have reviewed the application for an insubstantial PUD amendment for the Valley Hi development and would like to include the attached memo as an exhibit for the amendment. Staff met with Jeff Yusem and Augie Reno to discuss the possibility of realigning the trail easement to accommodate trees for the trail construction. It was agreed that we would meet again in spring to stake out a better alignment for a trail to avoid the destruction of mature trees to the greatest extent possible while still providing some privacy for the residents in the employee units along the alley. If this is the case and the trail is realigned outside of the dedicated easement then we would like to have an amendment to the plat reflecting this change to ensure its legality. F Lb 1'r ' 95 03 = 26PM G I13SON & RENO P . 1 • 0 MEETING NOTES PROJECT: Valley Hi / 1000 E. Hopkins DATE: 1/16/95 START TDIAE: 10:00 STOP TIME: 11:00 AT-IENDEES: Jeff Yusem, George Robinson (Parks) NOTES: Discussion of placement of future trail along river crossing in back of the Valley 141 Property. Jeff & George discussed the placement & constraints of the trail location. 1. If the trail is in the Alley right-of-way as it enters the property from the west, it will heavily impact the privacy of the resident housing units to be located here. Dave Tolen has expressed a desire to avoid this. Also, there is no dedicated connection of the alley with the trail easement below. 2. Therefore, George said if the trail is constructed they will stay within the easement as much as possible, as permitted by existing mature tree locations, of which they want to save as many as possible. A spring time site inspection will be made by George & staff to refine this preferred location. 3. furthermore, Jeff said that if the trail is constructed the while he is developing the property, he will allow free access of construction vehicles to the trail for the purpose of construction. COPIES TO: Jeff Yusem, rge Robinson . 8 o b s owd e n Kerry D BY: avid Gibson, AIA Post -it" Fax Note 7671 Date va90esl Tqfrom ColDepL Co. Phone >t Phone >� Fax 0 C F0 5 / - Fax x MEETING NOTES 210 E. HYMAN N. 202 ASPEN COLORADO 81611 303.92S.5968 FACSIMIUE 303 925.59193 P.O. BOX 278 117 N. WILLOW No 2 TELLURIDE COLORADO 81435 303.728-6607 FACSIMIUE 303.728.6658 • • ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 920-5090 FAX 920-5439 MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineer Parks Department FROM: Leslie Lamont, Planner RE: Valley Hi Insubstantial PUD Amendment Parcel ID No. 2737-182-01-003 DATE: March 7, 1995 Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Jeff Yusem. Please return your comments to me no later than March 17. Thank you. March 24, 1995 Ms. Leslie Lamont Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Engineering Referral Memorandum Valley Hi/1000 E. Hopkins Street Insubstantial Amendment Dear Leslie: 1 4 i DAVID MAR GIBSON. AIA AUGUST RENO, AIA SCOTT SMITH, AIA A 7 GI iIII I am in receipt of Chuck Roth's memorandum of 3-16-95 regarding the Insubstantial P.U.D. Amendment. I shall respond to his points in sequence. 210 E. HYMAN 1. P.U.D. Plat. We herein submit a copy of the 1991 No 202 recorded plat, for your records. ASPEN 2. Eneroachmentc. We agree to remove existing fences COLORADO and trash areas which encroach into public right-of-way 81611 as part of our proposed improvements. 3. Storm Runoff, We agree to comply with applicable 303.925.5968 Municipal Code requirements which require that only FACSIMILE historic storm runoff leaves the site. 303.925.5993 4. Sidewalk, Curband Gutter. We wish to construct curb gutter and sidewalk improvements as part of the Project, and will do so in consultation with the P.O. BOX 278 Engineering Department, and in accordance with City 117 N. WILLOW Standards. If, however, such improvements are not N° 2 executed as part of this Project, then the Applicant agrees to enter into an Agreement with the City to fund TELLURIDE such future improvements. LORADO CO81435 303.728.6607 FACSIMILE 303.728.6658 • C: March 24, 1995 Leslie Lamont Valley Hi 5. Driveway,_ Any retaining walls in excess of 30" shall be provided with a safety railing. 6. Trail Fasement. The Applicant agrees to grant a 15 ft. trail easement coincident with the 100 year floodplain and located as determined by mutual consent, and a 20 ft. construction easement, to be utilized only during the construction of the project. 7. Street Light. If the City supplies a standard new "antique" style city street light, then the Applicant will provide a base and will erect the light, in the approximate location of the existing street light directly adjacent to the front lot line. 8. Utilities. Any new pedestals shall be located off of public right-of-way. 9. Previous Conditions of A1211roval. These remain in effect, as applicable. 10. P.U.D. Amendment. There is no change to the recorded Plat. The originally -recorded final Valley -Hi Plat of 1991 shows only a building footprint location, and does not depict any site improvements. We do not propose to change the footprint, and therefore the Plat of 1991 remains true and accurate, and does not need to be amended or refiled and remains in effect. Our P.U.D. Amendment shall consist in the supporting materials which we have submitted. 11. Plat Title. Name shall remain "Valley Hi". • March 24, 1995 Leslie Lamont Valley -Hi 12. Work in Public Right -of -Way. The Applicant shall consult with Engineering and Parks with regard to work to be performed in the public rights -of -way. 13. Alley Right -of -Way. At this point in time, we have no conclusive proof of any change of ownership to the property and do not wish to establish any new property description at this time. I trust that you can now finalize the Amendment which we have requested. Please call me if you have any questions. I will be out next week, but Rick Neiley can answer any questions. Augie will be in beginning Friday the 31st. We need this Amendment in order to finalize the land transfer to Mr. Yusem, and I hope that you will assist us in expediting our application. Thank you for your consideration. A tfully Su ted, David F. Gibson, AIA encl: 1. Original Plat Map 24" x 36" cc: Chuck Roth, Engineering Rick Neiley, Esq. Kerry Dunn Jeff Yusem Bob Bowden 0 Krma u ozr 1 JArro USE APPLZO=C0 FOF`z (indicate street address,- lot & block number, legal description uhere appropriate) 3) Present 7onix-9 iZ M 4) lot Size i � �� f 1i +e'r�► .• I � � 7) lype of Application (please check all that apply): — conditional Use Conceptual SPA Coral Historic Dev_ Specia7 Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev_ 8040 Qeenli.ne tual PUD Minor Historic Dev- Sham Final PUD Historic Demolition Motmtain Vier Plane Subdivision Historic Desigrlaticn [o�mini���tian' 7!ext,/Map Amend�t (r��6 Allotment r-ot Split/lot Tine Aajust��t � G":�S Ex=pt ion �- '�rn cv�.a�-vet' � �u D,� Tins+tifi`a � 8) Description of P]ri stm Uses - (ramp er and type of e-,cLstax j st2alctLlres, apprnoamate sq_ ft ; rnant�*- of bees: any p�vlaLs approvals granted to the pY)- ' f1'O 't Fee �-�U•!3U! 1tt St ou >��V� ��A'r Tr'�F� OR�I ����- � 9) Description of Development Application -7z> RECa wrir2e— Iv M _1N►SH� ongyu tj& 6r - PM 44% AS S�LcrN - - - - 10) Have you attached the follOwimr to Attactmx2nt 2, Minim m s dimission Ocintents nesportse to Attactunent 3, Specific 9�Ssion Contents Rasponsc to Attacmeat 4, PLevies4 Standards for Your Application LL XL- �� �� 26 RDVNC�l ' X ' CHISED IN RfY--K -- -l920 JN n PAR AR, • FOUND FEf w L 5 20� !WAPivlblCN HA-P (441 • • (QQ Cowes.. tOL,eE- P� SENT BY:Neiley & Alder ; 2-21-95 ; 15:25 Neill & Alder-+ 0 9255993;# 2 CONSENT AND AUTHORIZATION TO PROCESS LAND USE APPLICATION The undersigned owner hereby authorizes Gibson & Reno, Architects and Jeffrey Yusem to process on its behalf an appli- cation for insubstantial amendment to P.U.D. for the Valley -Hi Apartments, 1000 East Hopkins Avenue. This authorization includes any and all necessary applications which in any manner deal with said property. DATED: 'W'q l VALLEY -HI DEVELOPMENT TRUST, a Colorado general partnership BY: A RALIAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, Its a al Partner By har Y. Neilsy, Jr., Secretary and authorized agent for Valley -Hi Development Trust • 1 • 74'12'00"E 4501 E A.A.T. LINE ��EA$ENENT N"-17e 4p'w 2F 09 I 0%il\'n'� r- 1 1^ c "t a ;r o z '^ A W.fi y 1 b r N o � v, ..$75. LL9 I1 �. 4j 00 FOUND I 24 s / I I f1E6AR w1 CAP t wl CAP I $ / Wp 710RY % Nqu E I r CONC ►WICK y u R it W ,1 X Hi 3 x W Q1 J 'gyp 6° o MoN�S�O CooPEya �o P►e o PC-r�r� m S t -ra �. 1 v E t P A N K I M O S7S_'_51'32'E 1604 FLD. 475'06'12'W 4496 _ 5T5°0911 1000 N75'09RLBAR 11"W 45.00 Nf CAP FOUND L'AR WI CAP 1 HEOAR WI ;AP LS 666C LS6666 i i/�/9it,pSGv �' n'/� — ; v-96 %ieo �✓ � ^, • • PROJECT: 1000 E. Hopkins Subdivision DATE: 1/20/95 START TIME: 2:30 STOP TIME: 3:00 ATTENDEES: Stan Clausen, Planning Director Leslie Lamont, Deputy Director Dave Tolen, Housing Authority Director Dave Gibson, Gibson & Reno Architects The purpose of the meeting was to examine various minor changes proposed to the development and to determine their acceptability in the context of previous approvals given. 1. PARKING RAMP DESIGN As originally proposed, the ramp entering into the front of the building is not approvable under current City codes requiring a maximum 12% slope. Therefore, an on -grade driveway along the east property line servicing the garage is proposed. This solution is found acceptable with the following conditions: a. A retaining wall up to 30" high may be required at the bottom of the ramp. b. The driveway in the alley shall be depressed at least 2' below floor level of the resident housing unit (to the extent permitted by the Sanitation District re: the existing sewer line in this area). C. Landscaping buffer will be provided between the driveway and the nQrth elevation of the living unit. 2. RESIDENT HOUSING DESIGN The four 2-bedroom units facing the river were reviewed and found to be acceptable as proposed with the following conditions: a. Each unit must contain at least 750 S.F. net area. b. Each unit is at least 50% above existing and/or finished perimeter grades. MEETING NOTES W4. GIBSON - RENO A R C H I T E C T S III 210 E. HYMAN No 202 ASPEN COLORADO 81611 303,925.5968 FACSIMILIE 303.925.5993 P.O. BOX 278 1 1 7 N. WILLOW No 2 TELLURIDE COLORADO 81435 303,728.6607 FACSIMILIE 303.728,6658 M January 20, 1995 Meeting Notes 1000 E. Hopkins Subdivision Page 2 3. EXTERIOR DESIGN MODIFICATIONS In addition to the changes above, other exterior variations are proposed from the 1991 Plans, including window design and placement, exterior materials, and architectural character. It was agreed that such changes are within the spirit of the original subdivision approvals and are acceptable. 4. SCHEDULE EXTENSION The request for a Schedule Extension of vested rights from June 10 to Nov. 10 to permit time for Building Permit plans to be developed has been received by Leslie and has been scheduled and reviewed for consideration by City Council action on February 27, 1995. 5. MISC. ITEMS a. Leslie determined that the 4585 SF parcel north of the alley is not considered to be part of the Development, for the purposes of calculating floor area and other bulk and area requirements. b. The proposed driveway and landscaping -related improvements proposed in the alley property are appropriate uses of this area. Res tfully mitted: David F. Gibson, AIA cc: Leslie Lamont Dave Tolen Rick Neily Jeff Yusem Kerry Dunn Bob Bowden Carl Linnecke 112 A"Ey - JBLCP2* 25 llvv � f (oi bNr N, 75�o9' ie- _a - - . T 4AFLA45elGARLSN Lr.VEL. ' Q... ISir- PLOOP .. G.EVEL- ... ... _._. __... Q r-, /00 ON- Ftm2 LEVEL - e uo'-o- ,�' Raa� DEcx caeL- �. _ d -Pyr -13 v b - r j a�. T LrNE. N.-7S° ' //'.. /55. M' _- - •i" Asa-. �� � S:a li 5=6� IV-2 � ./io G'-O' jai'-o' l5'-c- Id g o {! r �9._G.. �'-oy ®'-p' d!-p" /1•-z•' ��b u'. a- N o P r< i N s A v r=:-. • • 51 TE 171.-" 19 q 4/9s � I I I I I I I I I I IC: Leslie Lamont Frofn: William L. Lawrence, tsq. 3-1d-n 4:00pm P. [ of • • i e I .a mon t: City of Aspen Mai rch 1 4, 1 995 Jeff Yusem Yusem Corporat.ion 215 S. Monarch SLtec:t_ Suite 104 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: 1000 East IIopkins Avenue, Aspen, Colorado Ihar Mr. Yusem: 'PIIis .1ett.er- is in reference to the Amendment to Subdivision Agreemerit for 1.000 H'ast Hopkins /\venue, Aspen, Colorado. The Subdivision Aqreement was recorded in Book 633, Pas]e 833, Pi_l.kin County, Colorado. This letter is to confirm that the development as described in the Subdivision Agreemerit. and the Plat referred to therein, incIudinq the development. that. is within 100 feet. of the hiqh water line, has been reviewed and approved under the City of Aspen's Stream Margin Review Ret]ulat_i_ons_ The evidence of t_hi.s review anti approval is conLa i ned i n Ordi_naricc No. 8, Series of 1991, of the City of Aspen. e y truly yours, Leslie Lamont yusem\010.1tr TELEDYNE POST N39294 NE 1-to (TAM6RETIC4I R7Sf T tnr,� a — -----7?14-------------------� ------ EpG--- /,,r j �.� ' —_ 7900--�—_�' ±I I- ..... �y , ------ 5i --- FISHERMAN'S ------ --- — — R.--FLoQQ ,P—I,rq„Il:i ....._j-..� ,—} i•— �.---.�.r_(/{PPROXIMATF -- 15r TPA I L ••r.. _ _ r �•..•—...I•�•j.� ��'r �� — ----- °� M ---- -- 0 AREA 15855Q.FT. W --- Z EA5EMEN� ►'SCE!- 2 Q -- N 75-01' I I " W 165.32 :LOCK 0 • 7910} — /-------___ 7'1l2— SEY✓ER LINFE M.H. 26 I BLOCK 25 FOUND, 'X' CI - IN k 712 FCI-ND: RE2A L.5. 0 0 VICINITY MAP X' HOPKINS AVENUE 75' R.O. W UPDATE CERTIFICATE _, JAME5 f. K£5EIR, PO +-f CozTI1 I T {AT ON (_7ANL.I,VZ`1 30, 1 `1'15 A V I5 UAL_. I N 5 PECT ION WADS kA,,\D;F- C,' -fHE. PfZ0F1~KTq ittIOWN HEK��ON A.NC7 NO CHANGES WF-RE FbUN 2 EXCEPT A5 5H0WN F+FFF-K£ON. ALPINE 5URVE`(5 INC. I'J11 17A-Tr_' 0-/wES F. FPS fZ_ L.S. 01 t84 FINAL PLAT OF 1000 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE T [/T 0 5 10 20 30 -0 -90 Fr. SCALE • I 10' 15'�515 OF ffARING• FOUND CITY MONUMENTS, EiLOGK 32 PROPERTY DESCRIPT_I_C)N T )ND:PARCEL ONF_, 3AR�CAP, A PAF,CEL OF LAND 51TUA1ED IN E.A.A.T. AND MORE FULLY DESCR15ED s. 20151 A5 FOLLOW5� bEGINNINGAT THE 5.W COR.OF LOT 5, P5LK. 26,E-AA -T, THENCE N 14050'41" E 100.0 FT. ; THENCE 5 75'OT I 1 " E 135. 32 FT.; THENCE 5 14' 50' 41" W IG0.0 FT.; THENCE N 75"CT I I" W 135. 32 FT. TO THE ROINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL TVVO,- A PARCEL OF LAND 51TUP,TED IN EA.A.T. AND MORE FULLY DE5CKIBED A5 FOLLDYV5 OEGINNINIS AT THE 5.W. COR. OF LOT H, 13LK. 2G, E.A.A.T, THENCE N W -9D 41" E 21. I FT. t TO THE 19CINT OF INTER5ECTION WITH LINE 9-10OF SAID E.A.A.T.; THENCE ALONG 5gID LINE 574'12'E IG5.34 FT. t; THENCE 5 146.50'41" W 26.3o FT. i; THENCE N 75*01' 11"E K6. 32 FT. TO TH E FOI N T Of 13EG IN N I NG. • • SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, JAP'IE5 P RESER, A REGISTERED COLORADo SURVEYOR (L.S. l I84), HEKEP)Y CERTIFY THAT ON MT0DIEEK NO, VW7 , A 5UKVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER, MY DIRECTION FIND SUPERVISION OF THE HEKEIN DE5CRIP_,E.P RE,iL PKOPFJZTr IN ACCORDANCE WITH COLOKACO KEVISEID STATUTES 1973, TITLE 381ARTICLE 51, AND THAT TH 15 MAP fiCCURATELY AND 5U55TANT IA LLt' DEPICTS SAID 5UKVE 1; AND THAT 5AID SURVEY b> LA►-CES AND CLOSES WITHIN A LIMIT OF 1: 10, 0SO EX.F CUTER THIS W OF __ . _ , 119 _ ALPINE SURVEYS, INC. 13Y, MHES. F. RESEIZ L.S. '104 PLANNING DIRECTOR APPROVAL THIS FINAL PLAT GF THE 1000 FAST HOPKINS AVENUE TOWNI BUSES (5 APPROVED 13Y THE CITY OF Ai.5PEN DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING THIS DAY OF , Jill INC DIRECTOR 4° � C,P, CLERK & RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE 20151 THI5 FINAL PLAT Of THE ICX:) EAST HOPKINS AVENUE TOWNHOUSES WAS ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND KECONUER O THE COUNTY OF PIT 9I N, .5TAT E CIF COLORAGU, AT _ O'CLOCK — M THIS DAY OF , 199 I, AND RECORDED IN PLAT P-COK AT PAGE A5 RECEPTION No. CLERK AND KECOKDEF, FIT K I N COUNTY, GOLOKAD�) NOTES 1. EASEMENTS OF RECORD CONTAINED IN TITLE POLICY � ARE DEPICTED HEREON 2.CONTOUR LINES T9,ACED FROM1 CITY All\ M-10TO NIAI'S "--5TF_WAT<T TITLE. OF A5F'I=N1 INC., OIZDfF� tom. `I6,02 C 2. WNHOUSES CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP AND DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN 13Y THE5E. PRESENTS, THAT VALLEY HI DEVEL:01"I-1ENT TRUST, CONSISTING OF THE TORPE.N GROUP AS A GENERAL PARTNER f THE AU5TRALIAN INVESTMENT CORTORATION AS A GENERAL PARTNER, RICHARD Y. NEILEY, 5ECRETARY, 6EING THE. RECORD OWNER OF THE LANCLS DEPICTED HEREON, DOES HEREBY PLAT AND DIVIDE SAID LAND5 INTO THE ICOO EA5T HOPKINS AVENUE 7OWNHOU5E5, AS 5HOWN AND DE5CRI5ED HER. ON, AND GxE5 HEREBY COMMIT AND fGREE AS FOLLOWS° 1. THE FIVE FCbT 1`15HEKHAN'5 EASEMENT A50VE HIGH WATER LINE, AND, 2. THEE, FIFTEEN FGOT TRAIL EA5EHENT A5 5HOWN AND !`TOTED HEREON . EXECUTED THIS DAY OF / 1111 VALLEY HI DEVELOPMENT TRUST RICHARD Y NEILEY STATE OF COLOKAM 5. s. COUNTY OF PITKIN THE F0REG0N6 GERTIFIGATE WAS ACKNOWLEfX D 5EFORE ME TH 15 _ [SAY OF , III I, BY AND RICHARD Y NEI LEY WITNESS MY HAND AND CFFIC IA L SEAL. MY C01-1 M 1 SS ION EXt-I F\E S NOTARY F'UEOC TITLE CERTIFICATE PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., A DULY LICENSED TITLE COMPANY IN THE 57ATE OF COLORADO, HEREP-,Y CEKTIFIE5 THAT VALLEY HI DEVELOPMENT TRUST 15 THE OWNER IN FEE SIMPLE CF THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED AND DEPICTED HEREIN, SU5'JECT T EASEMENTS, RIGHTS -OF- WAND ENCUMBRANCES OF RE*D. EXECUTED THIS DAY OF , 1-111. • PITKIN' COUNTY TITLE, •. PAY VINCENT J. HIGENS, PRESIDENT STATE OF COLORAGb z COUNTY OF PITKIN THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATE WA5 ACKNOWLEDGED 6FfORE ME THIS DAY OF , 1111 13Y VINCENT J. HIGENS AS PRESIDENT OF PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, IIyG. WITNESS MY HANDAND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMM153ION F-XPIRES NOTARY F'U13L I G PLANNING & ZONING APPROVAL THI5 FINAL PLAT OF THE 1000 EA5T HOPKIN5 AVENUE TOWNHOUSES IS APPROVED P5Y THE CITYOF A5FEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMP► 15SION THI5 —UAY OF , I111, A5 RFSOLUT ION SIGNED THI5 DAY OF , 1111. CHAIRMAN CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL THI5 FINAL PLAT OF THE 1000 FA5T HOPKINS AVENUE TOWNHOUSES 15 APPROVED DT THE CIT( OF A5PEN DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING TH 15 ----DAY OF , 1`il I. CITY ENGINEER CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL THI5 FINAL PLAT OF THE 1000 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE 10WNHOU5ES 15 APPROVED PAY THE CITY COUNCI L OF TtlE. CITY OF A5PEN ON THE _ DAY OF , Ill l A5 ORDINANCE No EXECUTED THIS DAY OF ,III). WILLIAM STIRLING, MAYOR A7TE5T,, KATH" KC)�:H, GITY CLERK NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upon any defect in this survey within three years after you first discover such defect. In no event may any action based upon any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of the certification shown hereon. Alpine Surveys, Inc. Post Office Box 1730 Aspen, Colorado 81611 303 925 2688 Surveyed Iv . I(- 87 5. N. Revisions 2. 11 - 9 I Drafted 1 11 EK 7.23 11 2.1.9h Title SU8DIV)SION PLAIT Job No 87- 14 3 - 3 Client VANN v f �---,--�- f /00 it's 121 a r _ 741d — — --- ,�. "- � — \ �. _ __ _ : sc }—__:___-- ss ~�-- sc,.✓irc tn /.,at7vnsc,a per� l9t- *I0a w.+uL. -- -- ---- - - — i O Il 3'8 It'- !� 8'- o g'-o" 5 • �T �'- >� 0 6 - 0' 3 =0' l5 - G �'- 0 8 - 0' l o '- G ---- 4 /-� o P K i N A v. PLA N t, 0 N I'— f �rk • • • 0 REVISIONS: JOB # : 7' Of - DRAWN: J-�FCr DATE: CHECKED: SCALE: %7 ^' COPYRIGHT 1 % V I_ i l V I� O Ur GIBSON - RENO A R C H I T E C T S III 210 E. HYMAN No 202 ASPEN COLORADO 81611 303.925.5968 FACSIMILIE 303.925.5993 PO. BOX 278 1 17 N. WILLOW Not TELLURIDE COLORADO 81435 303.728.6607 FACSIMILIE 303,728.6658 SHEET#: A/