Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.Whale of A Wash GM 415 E Main.1983 PROJECT PROFILE 1983 COMMERCIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMISSION 1. Applicant: George Parry and Bill Poss 2. Project Name: Whale of a Wash 3. Location: 415 E. Main Street 4. Parcel Size: 3,000 square feet 5. Current Zoning: CC 6. Maximum Allowable Buildout: 5,100 square feet; 1 .5: 1 plus .2:1 bonus by special review 7. Existing Structures: The existing 1-story laundry building consists of 2,400 square feet of commercial space. 8. Development Program: The proposed expansion is to be located on top of the existing Whale of a Wash Laundry between the Epicure Plaza Building and the Oasis Service Station. The ground floor is existing commercial space of 2,400 square feet, the second floor will consist of 900 square feet of office space on the Main Street facade, and 900 square feet of accessory residential space on the alley facade with an additional 900 square feet above it of residential space • (the third floor) . 9. Additional Review Requirements: Special review for FAR bonus ; HPC Approval ; Subdivision Exception; Deed Restrict Employee Units. 10. Miscellaneous: Two 2-bedroom employee housing units are included in this submission and are located off-site in the Hunter Creek Properties project. The total square footage of the housing units is 1 ,680 square feet . The appli- cant already has a GMP allocation to build 2,700 square feet of commercial space. If this residential allocation is granted, the applicant will only build 900 square feet of commercial space. 605 EAST MAIN STREET/ ASPEN, CO. 81611 / 303.925-4755 January 13 , 1983 Collette Penne Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Dept . 130 S. Galena St . Aspen , Co . 81611 RE: GMP Application Amendment Application December 1, 1982 415 E. Main St . Project As you are aware, the Main St . Project has received approval for development allotment under the commercial GMP process during the fall of 1982. That application included two employee units which are to be deed restricted under the moderate income rental category . As we have outlined previously , my intent is to build an accessory 2 bedroom residential unit allowable under the CC Zoning category . Under the present zoning code it appears that in order to build this accessory residential unit we must also compete within the residential GMP competition. Under the residential GMP competition we would be required to deed restrict one of these employee units under the low income rental category. Please amend my application dated December 1 , 1982 to include; 1 of the 2 employee units shall be deed restricted to low income rental guidelines under this appli- cation. It should be noted that if we were also to receive residential GMP allotment , we would have to decide under which category (commercial or residential ) we would be developing the project . If you require any additional information, please don 't hesitate to call . Regards, • j 11 tepee.: William John P ss s : architecture and planning PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS Project: Whale of a Wash Date: January 7, 1983 1 . Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 12 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general . 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating 1 Comment: A 3" line serves the building and is connected to a 6" water main in Main Street. The City Water Department has indicated that the impact will be minimal and can be handled. b. Sewer Service (maximum 2 points) . Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the wastes of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the develop- ment without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating 1 Comment: The building is served by an 8" sanitary sewer in the alley. The Sanitation District can accommodate this project. c. Storm Drainage (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. Rating 2 Comment: The project proposes an on-site drywell under the parking area which will improve the present drainage into the sanitary sewer. - • page Two Residential GMP Scoring d. Fire Protection (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. Rating 1 Comment: Apartment and office space should be protected from the ceiling of the laundry. There is a 3 minute response time. The domestic line must be connected to the fire line. e. Parking Design (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off-street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. Rating 2 Comment: Parking is not required for the commercial space and the 3 spaces exceed the requirement of 2 spaces. f. Roads (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. Rating 1 Comment: There is no additional upgrading of road system proposed or necessary. The present system is adequate. Subtotal 8 2._ Quality of Design (maximum 15 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 -- Indicates an excellent design a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum 3 points) . Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. Rating 3 Comment: The completion of the building in this fashion completes this portion of the Main Street streetscape and increases its compatibility. Page Three Residential GMP Scoring b. Site Design (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. Rating 2 Comment: The fact that this is a 3,000 square foot parcel in the CC zone limits the ability for the applicant to be highly creative. However, the courtyard and street trees with a new sidewalk paving pattern will be assets. c. Energy (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating 2 Comment: Standard Code requirements will be met. d. Trails (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. Rating 2 Comment: The proximity of this project to parks and trails makes these amenities very accessible. e. Green Space (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. Rating 2 Comment: The courtyard will be an amenity for the residents and the constraints of the parcel do not allow more. Subtotal 11 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a. Public Transportation (maximum 3 points). 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. Rating 3 • Page Four Residential GMP Scoring b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum 3 points). The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permitrthe evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. Rating 3 • Subtotal 6 4. Employee Housing (maximum 40 points). a. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent). Rating 16 Comment: A 2-bedroom employee unit will he deed rectrirtpd to the low- income category. Of the 5 total hedrnnms, th's Nepresents 40% or R increments of 5% for 16 points b. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) . Rating 4 Comment: 1 bedroom in the employee units Will be deed restricted to moderate income The employee housing in this category represents 20% or 2 increments of %.l0 for a in pot count of n c. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent). Rating Comment: Subtotal 5. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum 10 points) . Rating Comment: F Page Five Residential GMP Scoring 6. Bonus Points (maximum 7 points) . Rating • Comment: Points in Categories 1 , 2, 3 and 4 45 Points in Categories 5 and 6 TOTAL POINTS 45 Name of P & Z Member: Planning Office • S C) P 2T �l O- 0 CT J� P.' ti • D C" O o ' o o� •4 a a 4 10 CI ° �4 T P O O ti•n 4 Q. �' T a - J pp h • a ay Is p0 Ta 0 a ti �a p O T Z p ^ r� 2T p<" T n '0 i y � y G J p J C n ° � n• c C m m 3 n f W �• 1 2 $ ^Y H rb G h Q.AVAicv/ Cl T n � y 7• /11Al C/A , ItAv / /ki/.../..% • A / i 7, / / /4b-, /A/y, ....... /LI ,, (0 cb cu k, /.../Aii.AI m N, r,„ c„ ..., //A/4 i/A.//1%..... -0 ......-7 /197 co --f N 4-) /113 //A)A / r4-.s. "-t, e; i GI tn /•/ Ao y 0 .2 m ---/a le �a IA./ ?o � A° I H O cn /1y...1N o AD F. / ,/ 0 cy, /N// /1\) / ::..--... Co O i4T • m t N al cm • W T, CO "0 n Q a co oo N m O uci '""1 3 3 r O O A VI O . 0 0 0 0 C X -I r,l I -o 0 r 0. m { m °T 2 C o MI Cr -t, o rn Cr 0 x - _`< `o z r In O .-, j O O C rr --I Cr 3 • 5 z Z z 0 *.y B Cr `< z o m a -I y C N O f") 7 y Q r n - �..) . (DD O tp "0 "CO m •n .0 r -�-i _ C - N 0 7 0 p IT m Cr 'S rr 1 CI G') J a Cr --1 _o o -. o C y O x . Z rn 0 A C y -a. rD N N 7 N --4 C 'n C Zna t I r-• .I o 0 m al cn t0 A a a CD 3 I- r- a m z 4 m Cr a v r } r 4.-- y kc = rn N C m � � w 'I cu to ID N k01 1\. . ' r �A m N CD 41 ....._ .11" k O �� u laM t/, ➢-i CO * * ' V n , w a UV CA UV 3 a � O CD - .. — H (McfrJ m . N cA o �� r. Is 0 • O w a j� a- 4/ . n) < W 8 P m 1' PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION � ' n RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS PROPOSALS / Project: UU &t / ;*;;-.5 v fr'� s Date: I/IV /g 1 . Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 12 points). !!! The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general . 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum 2 points) . Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating Comment: b. Sewer Service (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the wastes of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the develop- ment without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating / Comment: max: c. Storm Drainage (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. Rating /v Comment: Page Two Residential GMP Scoriny d. Fire Protection (maximum 2 points) . Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. ' Rating Comment: e. Parking Design (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off-street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. Rating Comment: f. Roads (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. Rating / Comment: Subtotal 5 2. Quality of Design (maximum 15 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall• rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 -- Indicates an excellent design a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum 3 points) . Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. Rating v/ Comment: Page Three Residential GMP Scoring b. Site Design (maximum 3 points) . Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the • arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. �/ Rating '2. Comment: c. Energy (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating ,(/7/ Comment: u. Trails (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. Rating le Comment: e. Green Space (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. Rating Z Comment: • Subtotal Ar if/ 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum 6 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a. Public Transportation (maximum 3 points). 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. Rating Page Four Residential GMP Scoring b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum 3 points). The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. Rating Subtotal __ 4. Employee Housing (maximum 40 points). a. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent). Rating Comment: b. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) . Rating Comment: - c. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent). Rating Comment: Subtotal 5. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum 10 points) . Rating Comment: Page Five Residential GMP Scoring 6. Bonus Points (maximum 7 points) . Rating Comment: Points in Categories 1 , 2, 3 and 4 Points in Categories 5 and 6 TOTAL POINTS 4C Name of P & Z Member: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS 2 Project: (� �� fL6 (12F - U 1 \ Date: ` 1 e [u� 1 . Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 12 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general . 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating Comment: b. Sewer Service (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the wastes of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the develop- ment without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating / Comment: • c. Storm Drainage (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. Rating Z Comment: Page Two Residential GMP Scoring d. Fire Protection (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. Rating / Comment: e. Parking Design (maximum 2 points) . Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off-street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact; amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. Rating Z Comment: f. Roads (maximum 2 points) . Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. Rating Comment: • Subtotal 8 2. Quality of Design (maximum 15 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 -- Indicates an excellent design a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. Rating 2- Comment: r(/es; /)0T immom M Strad- Page Three Residential GMP Scoring b. Site Design (maximum 3 points) . Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities , and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. Rating 2. Comment: c. Energy (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating 2 Comment: ci. Trails (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. Rating Z. Comment: e. Green Space (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. Rating �- Comment: Subtotal /d 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a. Public Transportation (maximum 3 points) . 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. Rating Page Four Residential GMP Scoring b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum 3 points). The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. Rating 0 2 Subtotal C7 4. Employee Housing (maximum 40 points). a. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent). Rating 8,7 • Comment: b. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) . Rating Comment: c. Middle income (2 points for each 15 percent). • Rating Comment: Subtotal 5. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum 10 points) . Rating Comment: Page Five ' Residential GMP Scoring 6. Bonus Points (maximum 7 points) . Rating Comment: Points in Categories 1 , 2, 3 and 4 Points in Categories 5 and 6 TOTAL POINTS Name of P & Z Member: J1 jet g?"2z._ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION ��,,((�� RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS Project: l�V i,(a �� —� 11k `�'/-1 Date: JV 1 . Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 12 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general . 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum 2 points) . Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating Comment: b. Sewer Service Cmaximum 2 points) . Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the wastes of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the develop- ment without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating 1' Comment: c. Storm Drainage (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. Rating Comment: Page Two Residential GMP Scorinr d. Fire Protection (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. Rating Comment: • • e. Parking Design (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off-street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. Rating Comment: f. Roads (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. Rating Comment: • Subtotal CA 2. Quality of Design (maximum 15 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 -- Indicates an excellent design a. ighborhood Compatibility (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. Rating 2i Comment: Page Three I Residential GMP Scoring • b. Site Design (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. Rating Comment: c. Energy (maximum 3 points). • Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. (IA_ Rating 75 Comment: F IA_Ie� I � 1I �l CT w & VM7ZA7 (7 d. Trails (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. Rating - Comment: e. Green Space (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. Rating -'7-/ Comment: Subtotal ( I 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a. Public Transportation (maximum 3 points). 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. Rating Page Four Residential GMP Scoring b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum 3 points). The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. • 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. r . 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. Rating -II Subtotal l() 4. Employee Housing (maximum 40 points). a. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent). • Rating Comment: • b. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) . Rating Li Comment: c. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent). • Rating Comment: • Subtotal 5. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum 10 points) . Rating Comment: Page Five ' Residential GMP Scoring 6. Bonus Points (maximum 7 points) . Rating Comment: Points in Categories 1 , 2, 3 and 4 L' c) Points in Categories 5 and 6 TOTAL POINTS L( Name of P & Z Member: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION / p / /// ///III RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS Project: 01)4\4ft- I ab L Date: €/ r/? Z 1 . Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 12 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: D -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public • expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general . 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating Comment: b. Sewer Service (maximum 2 points) . Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the wastes of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the develop- ment without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating 1 Comment: c. Storm Drainage (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. Rating 2. Comment: Page Two Residential GMP Scoring d. Fire Protection (maximum 2 points) . Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. Rating Comment: e. Parking Design (maximum 2 points) . Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off-street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. Rating 2.. Comment: f. Roads (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. Rating Comment: Subtotal Ck 2. Quality of Design (maximum 15 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 -- Indicates an excellent design a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of • size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. Rating 3 Comment: Page Three Residential GMP Scoring b. Site Design (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. Rating 2 Comment: c. Energy (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating 2 Comment: e J s �-deAt F sr/pu' v w' d. Trails (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. Rating Comment: e. Green Space (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. Rating 2 Comment: Subtotal 6l 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum 6 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a. Public Transportation (maximum 3 points). 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. Rating 2 Page Four Residential GMP Scoring b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum 3 points). The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. Rating 3 ' / Subtotal �-o 4. Employee Housing (maximum 40 points). a. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent). Rating IC( Comment: b. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) . Rating y Comment: c. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent). Rating Comment: Subtotal 5. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum 10 points) . Rating Comment: Page Five Residential GMP Scoring 6. Bonus Points (maximum 7 points). / Rating 2- Comment: _; OtCGtB s%4 Points in Categories 1 , 2, 3 and 4 Points in Categories 5 and 6 TOTAL POINTS Name of P & Z Member: ' 1 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS Project: (Lihah of W4 (PR J Q� Date: / 1 . Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 12 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general . 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum 2 points) . Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating • Comment: b. Sewer Service (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the wastes of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the develop- ment without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating / Comment: c. Storm Drainage (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. Rating _ Z Comment: - Page Two Residential GMP Scoring d. Fire Protection (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. Rating Comment: e. Parking Design (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off-street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. Rating 2.. Comment: f. Roads (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. Rating 1 Comment: • Subtotal 2. Quality of Design (maximum 15 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 -- Indicates an excellent design a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. Rating Comment: Page Three Residential GMP Scoring b. Site Design (maximum 3 points) . Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. Rating • Comment: c. Energy (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating Zosee Comment: U. Trails (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. Rating 1 Comment: e. Green Space (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. Rating Z Comment: Subtotal 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a. Public Transportation (maximum 3 points) . 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. Rating Page Four Residential GMP Scoring b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum 3 points) . The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. Rating 3 Subtotal 62 4. Employee Housing (maximum 40 points). a. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent) . Rating /6, • Comment: b. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) . Rating y Comment: 1 c. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent) . • Rating Comment: Subtotal 20 5. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum 10 points). Rating Comment: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS Project: (`// " 7 ��., f t / �� ��- // Date: 1 . Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 12 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level of service in the area, or any service improvement by the applicant benefits the project only and not the area in general . 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs of the proposed development and, if a public system, its ability to supply water to the development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating Comment: b. Sewer Service (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of the sanitary sewers to dispose of the wastes of the proposed development and, if a public sewage disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the develop- ment without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating l Comment: • c. Storm Drainage (maximum 2 points) . Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. Rating -"-' Comment: • Page Two Residential GMP Scoring d. Fire Protection (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment to an existing station. Rating Comment: e. Parking Design (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off-street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. Rating Comment: f. Roads (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. Rating Comment: Subtotal 2. Quality of Design (maximum 15 points) . The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 -- Indicates an excellent design a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum 3 points) . Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. Rating 7) Comment: a Page Three Residential GMP Scoring b. Site Design (maximum 3 points) . Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities, and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. Rating >>-% Comment: c. Energy (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating L— Comment: 6. Trails (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. Rating - Comment: e. Green Space (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. Rating Comment: Subtotal /7 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: a. Public Transportation (maximum 3 points). 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. Rating . ) - Page Four Residential GMP Scoring b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum 3 points) . The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. Rating Subtotal (i 4. Employee Housing (maximum 40 points). a. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent). • Rating Comment: b. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent) . % Rating Comment: c. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent) . • Rating Comment: Subtotal 5. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum 10 points) . Rating Comment: Page Five Residential GMP Scoring 6. Bonus Points (maximum 7 points). Rating Comment: Points in Categories 1 , 2, 3 and 4 / -) Points in Categories 5 and 6 TOTAL POINTS Name of P & Z Member: [ r PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION EVALUATION RESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS ,� 7.<, Date 2� �� Project: 1 . Public Facilities and Services (maximum of 12 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its impact upon public facilities and services and shall rate each development according to the following formula: 0 -- Project requires the provision of new services at increased public expense. 1 -- Project may be handled by existing level iject n only area, ornany service improvement by the applicant the area in general . 2 -- Project in and of itself improves the quality of service in a given area. a. Water Service (maximum 2 points) . Consideration of the capacity of the water supply system to provide for the needs watere to r thesdevelopmenntewithout system uextensions mbeyond atthose to supply normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating _L Comment: b. Sewer Service (maximum 2 points) . Considraion of the wastese of t the pr posedadevelopmenthand, ifaaypublics sewage sd the disposal system is to be used, the capacity of the system to service the develop- ment without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer, and without treatment plant or other facility upgrading. Rating Comment: c. Storm Drainage (maximum 2 points) . Consideration of the capacity of the drainage facilities to adequately in dispose of the surface runoff of the proposed development without system extensions beyond those normally installed by the developer. Rating Comment: . Page Two Residential GMP Scoring d. Fire Protection (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the ability of the fire department of the appropriate fire protection district to provide fire protection according to the established response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment .to an existing station. Rating / Comment: e. Parking Design (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the provision of an adequate number of off-street parking spaces to meet the requirements of the proposed development and considering the design of said spaces with respect to visual impact, amount of paved surface, convenience and safety. Rating Comment: f. Roads (maximum 2 points). Consideration of the' capacity of major street linkages to provide for the needs of the proposed development without substantially altering existing traffic patterns or overloading the existing street system or the necessity of providing increased road mileage and/or maintenance. Rating Comment: Subtotal Fs- 2. Quality of Design (maximum 15 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to the site design and amenities of each project and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: 0 -- Indicates a totally deficient design. 1 -- Indicates a major design flaw. 2 -- Indicates an acceptable (but standard) design 3 -- Indicates an excellent design a. Neighborhood Compatibility (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the compatibility of the proposed building (in terms of size, height and location) with existing neighboring developments. Rating Comment: I .- .. Page Three - Residential GMP Scoring b. Site Design (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the quality and character of the proposed landscaping and open space areas, the extent of undergrounding of utilities , and the arrangement of improvements for efficiency of circulation and increased safety and privacy. Rating Comment: • c. Energy (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the use of insulation, passive solar orientation, solar energy devices, efficient fireplaces and heating and cooling devices to maximize conservation of energy and use of solar energy sources. Rating Comment: d. Trails (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of pedestrian and bicycle ways and the provisions of links to existing parks and trail systems, whenever feasible. Rating 17 Comment: e. Green Space (maximum 3 points). Consideration of the provision of vegetated, open space on the project site itself which is usable by the residents of the project and offers relief from the density of the building and surrounding developments. Rating Comment: Subtotal / 2 3. Proximity to Support Services (maximum 6 points). The Commission shall consider each application with respect to its proximity to public transportation and community commercial locations and shall rate each development by assigning points according to the following formula: • a. Public Transportation (maximum 3 points). 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from an existing city or county bus route. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of an existing city or county bus route. 3 Rating Page Four Residential GMP Scoring b. Community Commercial Facilities (maximum 3 points) . The Planning Office shall make available a map depicting the commercial facilities in town to permit the evaluation of the distance of the project from these areas. 1 -- Project is located further than six blocks walking distance from the commercial facilities in town. 2 -- Project is located within six blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. 3 -- Project is located within two blocks walking distance of the commer- cial facilities in town. For purposes of this section, one block shall be equivalent to two hundred fifty (250) feet in linear distance. Rating I Subtotal (>/ 4. Employee Housing (maximum 40 points). a. Low Income (2 points for each 5 percent). • Rating /6 Comment: b. Moderate Income (2 points for each 10 percent). Rating j Comment: c. Middle Income (2 points for each 15 percent). Rating Comment: • Subtotal .2c 5. Provisions for Unique Financing (maximum 10 points). Rating Comment: • Page Five ' Residential GMP Scoring 6. Bonus Points (maximum 7 points). Rating 2 Comment: Points in Categories 1 , 2, 3 and 4 2/6- Points in Categories 5 and 6 TOTAL POINTS R— Name of P & Z Member: 744 7 605 EAST MAIN STREET/ ASPEN, CO. 81611 / 303.925-4755 January 13 , 1983 Collette Penne Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Dept . 130 S. Galena St . Aspen, Co. 81611 RE: GMP Application Amendment Application December 1,, 1982 415 E. Main St . Project As you are aware , the Main St . Project has received approval for development allotment under the commercial GMP process during the fall of 1982. That application included two employee units which are to be deed restricted under the moderate income rental category. AS we have outlined previously , my intent is to build an accessory 2 bedroom residential unit allowable under the CC Zoning category . Under the present zoning code it appears that in order to build this accessory residential unit we must also compete within the residential GMP competition. Under the residential GMP competition we would be required to deed restrict one of these employee units under the low income rental category. Please amend my application dated December 1 , 1982 to include; l of the 2 employee units shall be deed restricted to low income rental guidelines under this appli- cation. It should be noted that if we were also to receive residential GMP ' allotment, we would have to decide under which category (commercial or residential) we would be developing the project . If you require any additional information, please don 't hesitate to call. Regards, r �ehr�► William Jon Pass L 1131163 -J - -: C \ , a Jam} .+& 4 architecture and Inning e i t, i .: 2 t. alEvtt$ ' .c ¢�9 # � d --to Qu vac a t eST Y,4`sta w+o R a a T �. i 7 - cN.A.O.k t " (.1t"�' pitkin county 506\\� east main street aspen, Colorado 81611 TO: Alice Davis FROM: Jim Hamilton DATE: December 2, 1982 RE: 415 East Main - GMP I have reviewed the Parry GMP application for 415 East Main Street and have found the following: a) The applicant represents that the square footage of his existing deed restricted units are 900 square feet each, however, the actual square footage is 842 each. Therefore, a reduction in the amount of square feet of the free market residential unit will be required. b) In addition to the above, it should be noted that the units described as "deed restricted" are only restricted to resale and occupancy. In order to conform to the intent of employee housing, the rent scheduled must also conform to the square foot allowances established by Ordinance No. 23 (series of 1982) . The reason these units were not originally required to conform to the price guidelines was because they were viewed as units purchased by employers to house employees of the employer, presumably of an already established business. It was assumed that if this was the case, there would be no opportunity to "Robin Hood" the units from a new profit-generating project. In addition, these units were not financed by the County and therefore it was assumed the employer would want to at least break even on the monthly payment. Now, however, the applicant wishes to use the units to gain credit for commercial and residential development where it is both assumed and a necessary requirement that the units be in conformance with the square foot allowance of Ordinance No. 23 (Series of 1982) . 1 • MEMORANDUM TO: City Attorney Building Department City Engineer City Water Housing Director Aspen Metro Sanitation District Fire Marshall City of Aspen Electric/Holy Cross PLANNER: Alice Davis RE: City Residential GMP Applications DATE: December 7, 1982 Attached are three applications submitted to the Planning Office competing in the city residential GMP. The first project, 111 West Hyman Street, seeks to duplex an existing house located at 113 West Hyman. In addition, the applicants propose rezoning of the parcel to Employee Housing Bonus Overlay to complete 1 controlled one bedroom employee unit in the garden level of the new unit. The second project, Snowridge, seeks a growth management allotment for 5 free market units and 5 deed-restricted employee units on the subject property. The final project submitted, 415 East Main Street (existing Whale of a Wash) , seeks expansion to the already approved commercial space located at the same address. Specifically, the applicant is requesting a 2,700 square foot expansion to be used as a residential unit accessory to the 900 square foot professional office space. Please review this material and return your comments to the Planning Office by December 20, as these items are scheduled to go before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on January 4. Thank you. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO ( LU DATE I ti� L.— // �J. ?v �Z Dr/PT PROJECT I-\s E. Nell 1\ JOB NQ �wrrfl7 cF fir WA-coif) SUBJECT rt1 N "1 CSI'd'd tJ13IV 1sSl ✓J COPIES DESCRIPTION DATE 0I ewr Sv tSS/°t . 12 . x '<SZ (lA BY - CC �. ?emu( mu( (illiam john poss • architecture • aspen, colorado • telephone (303) 925-4755