The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcoa.lu.pu.Hotel Jerome Employee Housing.52A-86/7ofB/ fero7) e -2737--/8/:3/-55�8 I" 'A 04/ /z u ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303)925-2020 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES City 00113 - 63721 - 47331 -52100 GMP/CONCEPTUAL - 63722 - 47332 -52100 GMP/PRELIMINARY - 63723 - 47333 -52100 GMP/FINAL - 63724 - 47341 -52100 SUB/CONCEPTUAL - 63725 - 47342 - 52100 SUB/PRELIMINARY - 63726 - 47343 -52100 SUB/FINAL - 63727 - 47350 -52100 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS - 63728 - 47360 -52100 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS REFERRAL FEES: 00125 - 63730 - 47380 - 52100 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 - 63730 - 47380 -52100 HOUSING 00115 - 63730 - 47380 -52100 ENGINEERING SUB -TOTAL County 00113 - 63711 - 47331 - 52200 GMP/GENERAL - 63712 - 47332 - 52200 GMP/DETAILED - 63713 - 47333 - 52200 GMP/FINAL - 63714 - 47341 - 52200 SUB/GENERAL - 63715 - 47342 - 52200 SUB/DETAILED - 63716 - 47343 - 52200 SUB/FINAL - 63717 - 47350 - 52200 ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS - 63718 - 47360 - 52200 ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS REFERRAL FEES: 00125 - 63730 - 47380 - 52200 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 00123 - 63730 - 47380 - 52200 HOUSING 00113 - 63731 - 09000 - 52200 ENVIRONMENTAL COORD. 00113 - 63732 - 09000 - 52200 ENGINEERING SUB -TOTAL PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 - 63061 - 09000 - 52200 COUNTY CODE - 63063 - 09000 - 52200 ALMANAC - 63062 - 09000 - 00000 COMP. PLAN - 63066 - 09000 - 00000 COPY FEES - 63069 - 09000 - OTHER Name:_ Address: Check # Additional Billing: SUB -TOTAL TOTAL Phone: Project: — Date: — # of Hours: CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET 73 73/ SIT City of Aspen 0 DATE RECEIVED : 3 e CASE NO. DATE RECEIVED COMPLETE: STAFF:6 i PROJ ECT NAME:. 170 7'-e JP ro M e- fi ,h t-, f LMPLC APPLICANT: o Applicant Address/Phone: e�6j //// e t REPRESENTATIVE: TP_rry /gpve�/ Representative Address/Phone: oZO-,;2-DO/> Type of Application: I. GMP/Subdivision/PUD 1 . Conceptual Submission 20 $2, 7 30 .00 2. Preliminary Plat 12 1,640 .00 3. Final Plat 6 820.00 II. Subdivision/PUD 1. Conceptual Submission 14 $11-900.00 2. Preliminary Plat 9 1,220.00 3. Final Plat 6 820.00 III. All "Two Step" Applications 11 $1, 490.00 IV. All "One Step" Appl ications 5 3 $ 680 .00 �foS. D oReferral `- Fees - Environmental Health, Housing Office 1. Minor Applications 2 $ 50.00 2. Major Applications 5 $ 125.00 Referral Fees - Engineering Minor -Applications 80.00 Major Applications 200.00 P&Z CC MEETING DATE: �,� PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO DATE REFERRED: ,`� ��`` INITIALS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- REFERRALS: ✓./ City Atty Aspen Consol. S.D. School District City Engineer Mtn. Bell Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas v Housing Dir. Parks Dept. State Hwy Dept (Glenwd) Aspen Water Holy Cross Electric State fiwy Dept (Gr. Jtn) City Electric Fire Marshall Bldg: Zoning/Inspectn Envir. Hlth. Fire Chief Other: Fork Transit Roaring Fork Energy Center ------------------------_-Roaring -------------- ------------====rt"�� -------------------- FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTEu� /^t1(`.;. �!� (IN ITIAL:%LJ City Atty City Engineer Building Dept. Other : ` � FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: Y6 `J Other: CASE DISPOSITION: �ity Reviewed by: ,spen P&Z g Co lu cil f % C, i�� (j,,:1�, I r-:.ts.i+( l�.;y�.��'� / t %"�� . I ��J �i !,�l.�.ry�,;•t,} .d'wt�/`ti�wi %1 �� ,•': h r .�'-�n�l �hp/1. 'w 4'� oil, Q�-'1+r,¢9•y� L 1 n - ^%ti J7 #✓ �,^7 Iy� /yF1l� �M Revi m.lcc! E—: Aspen P&Z City Council • • RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves ------------------------------- Resolution No. (Series of 1987) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ASPEN, COLORADO GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF CORTINA LODGE EMPLOYEE UNITS FOR ON -SITE HOTEL JERONE EMPLOYEE UNITS WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 8, Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development Agreement; Hotel Jerome - Renovation and Addition, the Hotel Jerome Limited Partnership (hereinafter "Applicant") did submit a request for elimination of the appli- cant's on -site employee bedroom requirement in exchange for provision of additional Cortina Lodge employee units, which may be acceptable to the City; and WHEREAS, the Housing Authority reviewed the proposed employee housing substitution and recommended approval on December 10, 1986; and WHEREAS, on January 12, 1987 City Council reviewed the proposed employee housing substitution and did pass a motion granting its approval subject to the condition stated below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Aspen, Colorado, that it approves the substitution of Hotel Jerome on - site employee housing units 1,2,3 and 4 with Cortina Lodge units 6 and 7 subject to the following conditions: 1) Units 6 and 7 of the Cortina Lodge shall be deed restricted to the low income employee housing guide- lines for rental use for Hotel Jerome employees. Deed restrictions shall be filed to the satisfaction of the City Attorney with the Pitkin County Clerk and Record's Office prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Hotel Jerome Addition. 0 0 0 2) All conditions of approval stated in Council's December 9, 1985 approval of the exemption from the Growth Management Quota System for the change in use of the Cortina Lodge and subdivision exception for the purpose of condom iniumizing the Cortina Lodge shall be met prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Hotel Jerome Addition, including but not limited to the following: upgrading and improvements to the Cortina facility and grounds, employee housing deed restric- tions of all units, and recordation of a condominium- iz ation plat. Dated: , 1987. William L. Stirling, Mayor I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk of the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting to be held on the day of , 1987. Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk SB.007 0A h' 1' i' , ( - • 0 TO: Aspen City Council THRU : Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office �, RE: Hotel Jerome Employee Housing Substitution and Guest Parking DATE: January 6, 1987 SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of Resolution y , (Series of 1987) , substituting units at the Cortina for on -site employee housing units. However, use of the Rio Grande parking lot for Hotel Jerome guests is not supported by the Engineering Department or Planning Office as presented. APPLICANTS REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of substitu- ting 4 on -site employee bedrooms for two 2-bedroom units in the Cortina, and use of the Rio Grande parking lot for overnight guest parking of up to 25 cars until the garage is built. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: City Council approved an amended Planned Unit Development agreement for the Hotel Jerome renovation and addition on July 28, 1986. The Cortina employee housing conver- sion (GMP exemption for change in use and condominiumization) was approved on December 9, 1985 by Council. BACKGROUND: Article 8 of the Hotel Jerome PUD Agreement described the Jerome employee housing program as follows, in part: "With regard to Phase I, Owner hereby agrees that Rooms No. 111", 11211, "3" and "4" in the hotel annex, as such rooms are designated on the amended plat, shall be and hereby are restricted exclusively to use as employee housing under and in accordance with such City of Aspen employee housing use, occupancy, rental and sales price guidelines as may be in effect and applicable from time to time, sufficient to house four (4) employees of the Project and restricted to a maximum occupancy of one (1) employee per bedroom. . . . Further, should Owner secure more units than are necessary to house fifteen (15) employees off site, Owner's on -site employee bedroom requirement for Phase I (i.e., the annex Rooms No. 1,2,3 and 4) shall be reduced and deed restrictions released by the exact amount of housing as may be acceptable to as reflected by resolution of the City Council. " • A number of conditions were set by Council in approving the Cortina's conversion to an employee housing project. Included were: employee housing deed -restriction of all units, some to be reserved for future employee housing needs, restriction that units be rental and not for sale, and a schedule of improvements to the grounds and facility. PROBLEM DISCUSSION: A. Referral Comments: 1. Engineering Department: Elyse Elliott stated in a December 17, 1986 memorandum that the Engineering Department is not inclined to restrict a portion of the Rio Grande parking lot for the sole use of the Hotel Jerome's guests because it is a public parking lot. Further mentioned is that if the construction workers would park in the Rio Grande as was required in the original review of the Jerome PUD, it would make more neighborhood parking available. 2. Housing Authority: Approval for the requested off -site housing substitution was recommended by the Housing Authority, as documented in Ann Bowman's January 5, 1987 memorandum. 3. City Attorney: The City Attorney stated in his December 22, 1981 memorandum that the necessary documents reflecting the employee housing approval should be recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office. B. Planning Office Comments: The employee housing substitution consists of deed restricting two 2-bedroom units, both approximately 228 s.f., in the Cortina instead of four 1-bedroom units, containing approximately 229 s.f. each, in the Jerome. The formula of employee generation and employee housing obligation was calculated for the 1983 Jerome PUD Agreement, and carried forward in the amended PUD plan and Cortina conversion approval. This formula will not change by the proposal, although the quality of the Cortina units is probably less than the on -site units. The Housing Authority has continued to support the dormitory use of the Cortina. It is reasonable to expect the Cortina to provide decent accommodations at low rents (less than $90/month) for Jerome employees. In total, nine units of the Cortina's 17 units would be deed -restricted for Jerome employees. Corrections of deficiencies, upgrading and improve- ments to the Cortina set in Council's conditions of approval must be accomplished prior to recording the Cortina condominiumization plat and issuing the Hotel Jerome Addition's Certificate of Occupancy. Please also note that the change in use of the Jerome units to 0 0 offices for the hotel is exempt from GMP and not subject to review as the Hotel is a designated historic structure. The applicant's proposed short-term parking arrangement consists of reserving up to 25 parking spaces in the Rio Grande parking lot for overnight guest parking. The use would be terminated upon completion of the 51 space garage in the Jerome Addition. The Engineering Department has not favorably received this proposal. Their concerns are the exclusively private use of public property, and the problem of neighborhood parking that is likely to persist. We also note that the current level of use of Rio Grande parking is high; and therefore, there may be added parking pressures elsewhere. If Council believes that the Jerome's use of Rio Grande parking lot is appropriate and will help solve parking problems, then we suggest that a user's fee be charged to the applicant. NOTION: "Move to approve resolution # L- attached." CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS: T- Coy Gat Wlf� STe�,/rr/D W�+'1-t Wau�b NID> �sTRiG T4 f-lo 4I 1vDe `s use `/' /4 reed„„ INOK `h I�S i Q � � ; �r .£ i �e,� ( 1 � we � �s%� � c i 0 �eie,✓i��t ' Pa�,�.r� 91d Ap✓WDC 1 W64CD Ift;,etc1,�,✓ U,,T/L —1k Gor' ft(,-(, Au«r 15 (iDtr/Le�o� SB.006 • 0 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves ---------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution No. (Series of 1987) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ASPEN, COLORADO GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF CORTINA LODGE EMPLOYEE UNITS FOR ON -SITE HOTEL JEROME EMPLOYEE UNITS WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 8, Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development Agreement; Hotel Jerome - Renovation and Addition, the Hotel Jerome Limited Partnership (hereinafter "Applicant") did submit a request for elimination of the appli- cant's on -site employee bedroom requirement in exchange for provision of additional Cortina Lodge employee units, which may be acceptable to the City; and WHEREAS, the Housing Authority reviewed the proposed employee housing substitution and recommended approval on December 10, 1986; and WHEREAS, on January 12, 1987 City Council reviewed the proposed employee housing substitution and did pass a motion granting its approval subject to the condition stated below. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Aspen, Colorado, that it approves the substitution of Hotel Jerome on - site employee housing units 1,2,3 and 4 with Cortina Lodge units 6 and 7 subject to the following conditions: 1) Units 6 and 7 of the Cortina Lodge shall be deed restricted to the low income employee housing guide- lines for rental use for Hotel Jerome employees. Deed restrictions shall be filed to the satisfaction of the City Attorney with the Pitkin County Clerk and Record's Office prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Hotel Jerome Addition. • 2) All conditions of approval stated in Council' s December 9, 1985 approval of the exemption from the Growth Management Quota System for the change in use of the Cortina Lodge and subdivision exception for the purpose of condom iniumizing the Cortina Lodge shall be met prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Hotel Jerome Addition, including but not limited to the following: upgrading and improvements to the Cortina facility and grounds, employee housing deed restric- tions of all units, and recordation of a condominium- ization plat. Dated: , 1987. William L. Stirling, Mayor I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk of the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting to be held on the SB.007 day of Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk , 1987. L-1 0 PERRY HARVEY P. 0. BOX 8720 ASPEN, CO 81611 Mr. Alan Richman Director Aspen/Pitkin Planning Department 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Alan: The Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development Agreement for the Hotel Jerome, Article 8, Employee Housing states that "...should Owner secure more units than are necessary to house fifteen (15) employees off -site, owner's on -site employee bedroom requirement for Phase I (i.e. the Annex rooms No. 1,2,3, and 4) shall be reduced and deed restrictions released by the exact amount of housing as may be acceptable to City as reflected by resolution of the City Council". It has become apparent that the top floor of the Annex be used as offices for the operation of the Hotel. To this end we have met with Ann Bowman of the Housing Office and have agreed to restrict two units in the Cortina Lodge to accommodate the four employees housed in the Annex of the Hotel. Specifically they are units 6 and 7 and the deed restrictions shall specify low income guidelines with a monthly rental per person of ninety ($90.00) dollars. This will benefit the City's low income inventory as currently the restriction on the Annex housing is only for Hotel employees and does not specify a guideline. I am herein requesting a hearing before City Council to seek approval for this change in the PUD by resolution of City Council. Also, I would like to address the problem of guest parking for the Jerome this winter. Because the Hotel addition is under construction guests staying in the renovated portion will be forced to park on the streets. During the public hearing on the Amendment of the PUD many neighbors complained about the cars of the laborers on the Hotel. This winter the inconvenience will be aggravated by the snow and the need for guest parking. We have instructed the workmen to use the Rio Grande Lot but much of the construction equipment will necessarily be on the streets surrounding the hotel. I would like Council to consider allowing the Jerome to use a specific portion of the Rio Grande Lot to accommodate overnight guest parking for up to twenty-five cars. This would be accomplished by the Jerome having permit cards for guest's automobiles and restricting those cars to a specific section of the Rio Grande Lot. Because the cars will be there overnight, snow removal for that area of the Rio Grande will be the responsibility of the Hotel. In the alternative the City could bill the Jerome for a portion of the snow removal. Any arrangement would probably work, as determined by the City Engineer. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Please find enclosed the application fee of $405.00. Sincerely yours, Perry Harvey PH/jd M E M O R A N D U M TO: STEVE BURSTEIN, PLANNING uFFICE FROM: ANN BOWMAN, PROPERTY MANAGER DATE: JANUARY 5, 198/ RE: HOTEL UNROME PUD AMENDMENT ISSUE: Does the amendment meet the Agreement for the Hotel Jerome w nlcn states "should owner secure more units than neces- sary to house f if teen employees off -site, owner, s on -site employee bedroom requirement for Phase I snarl be reauced and aeea restrictions releasea by the exact amount of housing as may De acceptable to City as reelected by resolution of City Coun- cil "? STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends approval of the amendment as it meets the previous criteria established and suggests that the appropriate deed restrictions be filed and releasea. HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval of staff Lecommendation. 1 0 • MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Burstein, Planning Office FROM: Elyse Elliott, Engineering Department' DATE: December 17, 1986 RE: Hotel Jerome PUD Amendment ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- We are not inclined to restrict a portion of the Rio Grande Parking Lot for the sole use of Hotel Jerome's guests. The Rio Grande is a public parking lot and should not be restricted for private use. The laborers on the construction portion of the Hotel Jerome continue to park on the neighborhood streets instead of in the Rio Grande Lot. If the laborers would park in the Rio Grande Lot, it would make neighborhood parking available. EE/co/JeromePUDAmend • CITY OF ASPEN 130 kouth galena street aspe, colorado 81611 D 303-9-_420 DEC 2 Z am MEMORANDUM DATE: December 22, 1986 TO: Steve Burstein FROM: City Attorney RE: Hotel Jerome PUD Amendment The employee housing request is dependent upon approval of the appropriate reviewing bodies, and we have no comment except to request that the necessary documents reflecting the approval be recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's office. The request for parking must be approved by the City Council, and we will defer comment until the Council has considered the request. We assume that any allocation of the Rio Grande lot would be short-term only. PJT/mc t MEMORANDUM TO: City Attorney City Engineer Housing Director FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office RE: Hotel Jerome PUD Amendment DATE: December 5, 1986 Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Perry Harvey requesting a PUD Amendment to the Hotel Jerome. Article 8 of The Amended Agreement for the Hotel Jerome, states that "should owner secure more units than necessary to house fifteen employees off -site, owner's on -site employee bedroom requirement for Phase I shall be reduced and deed restrictions released by the exact amount of housing as may be acceptable to City as reflected by resolution of City Council". The applicant would like to restrict two units at the Cortina Lodge to accom- modate four employees now required to be housed in the Annex of the hotel. The applicant would also like consideration of allowing the Jerome to use a specific portion of the Rio Grande Lot to accommodate overnight guest parking for up to twenty-five cars. Please return your referral comments to the Planning Office no later than December 23, 1986 so this office has adequate time to prepare for its presentation before P&Z on January 6, 1987. Thank you. ASON/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE • 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 925-2020 Date: �i RE: Dea r i This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that your application IS NOT complete. Additional items required include: Disclosure of Ownership (one copy only needed) Adjacent Property Owners List/Envelopes/Postage (one copy) Additional copies of entire application Authorization by owner for representative to submit applica- tion Response to list of items (attached/below) demonstrating compliance with the applicable policies and regulations of the Code, or other specific materials A check in the amount of $ V A. Your application ,is. omplete and we hav, scheduled it for review by the -�y'., on (;/ //.� "prior We will call you if we need any additional information to that date. Several days prior to your hearing, we will call and make available a copy of the memorandum.. Please note that it IS NOT your responsibility to post your property with a sign, which we can provide you for a $3.00 fee. B. Your application is incomplete, we have not scheduled it review at this time. When we receive the materials we have requested, we will place you on the next available agenda. i� If you have any questions, please call !1 !1 4_ J,i,iL1 i;y,_- - the planner assigned to your case. Sincerely, ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE ' 1