HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.1095 Ute Ave.A074-98 •
•
•
CITY OF ASPEN PL CASELOAD INDEX
tPARCE,,J 2729-292-01058 OA 9/10/98 2 A074-98
1CASE 1095 Ute Avenue 8040 Greenline Exemption
PROJ ADO 1095 Ute Avenue I 8040 Greenline Exemption
OWNIAPPJ Davis, I.G. 1 1095 to Avenue 'CT- Aspen, CO 81611 I
RE: Kerr, Roger 406 H Pacific Avenue C Aspen, CO 81611 925-8289
,,,FEES it 450(d) j EES RCV1?:450 •
I 11111
M. ' ;,,. ,._. 'ii ', DATE OF FINAL ACTION:
RE6eiA" '' CITY COUNCELt.
CL OS 3
PLAT 111111111111111111111111
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Julie Ann Woods, Interim Community Development Director
FROM: Mitch Haas, City Planner
RE: R.E. Davis Property (1095 Ute Avenue) 8040 Greenline Review
Exemption. Parcel I.D.No. 2729-292-01-058.
DATE: September 23, 1998
SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting an 8040 Greenline Review exemption to construct an
underground storage and laundry room addition to the existing building on the site. This
application represents an amendment to a previously approved (8/24/98) 8040 Greenline Review
exemption.
Community Development staff recommends approval of the R.E. Davis 8040 Greenline
Review exemption with conditions.
APPLICANT: I.G. Davis(owner), represented by Roger Kerr and Associates.
LOCATION: The property in question is located at 1095 Ute Avenue, which is on the south
side of Ute Avenue.
ZONING: Moderate-Density Residential (R-15/PUD).
CURRENT LAND USE: Single-family Residential in a duplex(2 units).
BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval to construct an underground storage
and laundry room addition to an existing duplex. The revised request alters the location and size
of the underground utility room, and adds a porch and entry to access the new elevator. As the
site is within 150' of the 8040' topographic contour, the addition is subject to an 8040 Greenline
review. The applicant had two (2) 8040 Greenline Exemptions approved, but would now like to
revise the application and, thus, the approval. The current request is still for purposes of
constructing an underground laundry and storage/utility room, but at a different location and
size. It also adds an elevator from the utility room to the main floor. The applicant represents
that the changes result in an additional 162 square feet of floor area. The proposal has been
reviewed against the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.58.040 and found to comply
with said requirements.
STAFF COMMENTS:
Section 26.68.030, 8040 Greenline Review
Because development is proposed within one hundred fifty (150) feet of the 8040 greenline, the
proposal is subject to review under Section 26.68.030 of the Land Use Code. Section
26.68.030(B), Exemption, states that"the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing
development shall be exempt from 8040 greenline review if the following standards are met:
1. The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the
floor area of the existing structure or increase the amount of square
footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area
calculations by more than twenty-five (25)percent; and
1
• •
RESPONSE: The applicant represents that the existing structure has a floor area of 3,678 square
feet. The allowable floor area for the property is 5,121 square feet less a 25% reduction for
slopes in excess of 30%, resulting in an allowable FAR of approximately 3,840 square feet
(subject to verification by the City Zoning Officer). The proposed addition would add 162
square feet(4.4%)of FAR floor area to the existing structure. Relative to increasing the amount
of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations, the
proposed addition would contain 400 square feet (10.8% of the existing floor area where up do
25% is allowed). Therefore,the proposed addition complies with standard number 1 for an 8040
greenline exemption.
2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which
a permit would be required pursuant to Section 15.04.450 or the
applicant receives a permit pursuant to said section; and
RESPONSE: The previously proposed addition would have required removal of trees for which
a permit would be required, and the applicant had applied for and obtained the necessary permit
from the Parks Department. This revised plan, however, eliminates the need to remove two of
these trees.
3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any
geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion and
sedimentation.
RESPONSE: Due to the addition's proposed location behind the existing building and deck, it
would not be affected by any geologic hazard, nor would it result in any increased erosion or
sedimentation. Existing drainage patterns will be maintained. The application represents that
the structure of the addition will be designed and certified by a licensed structural engineer, and
that the construction will be supervised by said engineer and the architect.
REFERRAL COMMENTS FROM ENGINEERING: The previous application was reviewed
by Chuck Roth and Nick Adeh of the City's Engineering Department, who offered the following
comments:
• The application did not include an improvement survey. It appears from the site plan that
there may be an illegally wide driveway/curb cut which would have to be remedied prior to
the issuance of any further building permits. It should be a condition of approval that an
improvement survey be required as part of the building permit application, and that said
improvement survey indicate the approved building envelope and a driveway with a
complying width.
• With the building permit application, the applicant will need to confirm that the current and
proposed levels of improvements were/will be constructed within the approved building
envelope, including the proposed extent of excavation.
• The building permit submittal/application must include provisions for retaining drainage on-
site during construction and avoiding sediment transport onto public rights-of-way.
The subject site does not have a designated building envelope; therefore, the language contained
in the Engineering memorandum is being interpreted to refer to the areas of the site that fall
within the required front, rear, and side setbacks. The language contained in the recommended
conditions of approval(below)reflect this interpretation.
2
•
• .
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the R.E Davis 8040 greenline review
exemption application dated 9 September 1998 (Community Development Department Case
#A074-98)with the following conditions:
1. An improvement survey shall be required as part of the building permit application, and
said improvement survey shall indicate the required setbacks as well as a driveway of a
width that complies with City standards.
2. With the building permit application, the applicant will need to confirm that the current
and proposed levels of improvements were/will be constructed within the required
setbacks, including the proposed extent of excavation.
3. The building permit submittal/application shall include provisions for retaining drainage
on-site during construction and avoiding sediment transport onto public rights-of-way.
4. In the event required,the applicant must receive approval from:
• The City Engineer for design of improvements, including landscaping, within public
rights-of-way;
• The Parks Department for vegetation species, tree removal, and/or public trail
disturbances;
• The Streets Department for mailboxes and street cuts; and,
• The Community Development Department to obtain permits for any work or
development, including landscaping, within the public rights-of-way.
5. The structure of the addition will be designed and certified by a licensed structural
engineer, and the construction will be supervised by said engineer as well as the
architect.
6. The building permit application shall include plans which verify to the satisfaction of the
City Zoning Officer the existing amount of floor area in the structure as well as the exact
amount of floor area proposed with the additions. The maximum allowable amount of
floor area for the subject property shall not be exceeded, and the addition shall include
no more than 162 square feet of FAR and no more than 400 square feet of area exempt
from floor area calculations.
7. The building permit application shall include all necessary tree removal permits, if any,
signed and approved by the Parks Department.
8. All material representations made by the applicant in this application shall be adhered to
and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by an entity
having authority to do so.
EXHIBITS:
COMMUNITY APPROVED rt
Exhibit"A"- Submitted Application
APPROVED BY: SEp p 31998
�,E_
u, ,IU
vrtti,tiVl
CITY OFASPEN
Vi 0/9
J�f e Ann Woods, Date
,�terim Community Development Director
3
Roger Kerr Od Associates • Architects
406-H pacific avenue aspen, colorado 81611 303 925-8289
9 September1998 E
Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director Page 1
c/o Mitch Haas, City Planner
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Department
506 East Main Street
Aspen. Co. 81611
Re: Exemption. Parcel I.D. No. 2729-292-01-058
Davis Property, 1095 Ute Avenue, Aspen, Lot 15
Zone: R-15 Lot Size: 18,366 sq. ft.
Dear Julie Ann Woods:
This is a revision to the previously approved exemption
from 8040 Greenline Review for a proposed underground
storage and laundry room addition to the existing building. The
revised submission alters the location and size of the
underground utility room. It also adds a Porch and Entry to
access a new elevator. The change adds 162 sq. ft. of F.A.R.
After reviewing F.A.R. calculation methods with Sarah Thomas
the actual existing F.A.R. is 3678 sq. ft. (The previously
submitted existing F.A.R. calculations incorectly counted
volumes exceeding 10 ft. at a 2:1 ratio.)
The expansion conforms to all three conditions of "Review
Standards for Exemption from 8040 Greenline Review" as
described below.
1. "Development does not add more than ten percent (10%) to
the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total
amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are
exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five
percent (25%)." The existing structure has a Floor Area Ratio of
3,678 square feet. The proposed addition adds 162 square feet
of F.A.R. (4.4 % of existing floor area). The increase in area
exempt is 400 square feet (10.8% of floor area). The allowed
Floor Area Ratio for this property is 5,121 square feet less a
25% maximum deduction for slopes greater than 30%. The
reduction causes a net allowable F.A.R. of 3,840 sq.ft.
•
• •
Julie Ann Woods
9 Sept.1998
page 2
2. "The Development does not require removal of any
tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to section
13-76 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said
section." Per your departments request a tree removal
agreement has been executed with the Parks Department and
has been copied to you as part of prior correspondence. This
revised plan will eliminate the need to remove two trees.
3. "The Development is located such that it is not affected
by any geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion
and sedimentation." The addition will not affect any geologic
hazard or result in increased erosion and sedimentation due to
it's location being underground. Existing drainage patterns will
be maintained. The structure of the addition will be designed
and certified by a licensed structural engineer. The
construction will be supervised by the architect and structural
engineer.
Let me know if you need any clarifications or further
information.
Sincerely yours,
By Roger Kerr, Agent for I.G. Davis
1E3_6%12 J7/ A
k'A0 '
O. N
•
I'll •
N. -
. . .
,- • ." ,. .•
• a �� `e�`1 3' ��,;fib — d•
` `},' � .L :- ��' ; —' '90°0
. tp
�,�, �teg tom:...., - tom, o, I / r•• •.4 1.., -- -••--- *-- - . • • \ -*
j .r 7 �. Qy�•
/ ./- // .. _/ '.. . . lei, j. r,.. A5 ''° �•. i_________Ir,
z.o �" 1 1J111•CO
I CO CO
. ' .. i . ITIFI
CO ybhti
1 v z'' �10�`'. -co o
gf•B
oQo9 ; ! 1 �� / o o
p' , N � 1 ....•
�p0�' I r'i ..
/. ` .. / ! - sea°
lO � \ �� / . z5e nP■
V
P^ / /
— 0 -- Q P7
/ , 2e/ 3',P
/
•
\ 6gu
N6h
•
•
6BZ8-G 6 EOE 1.1.91.8 'oo 'uedse It# '•eAe o!J!Oed
segeiposse pue • J,uaj JaBo,j '
•
1
.
• •
f • •
--- ... . . .,..
.. •
.-. --•;-
. _ k
....-- N ,s .. ilk - u.-•\-
.:. , ir
MP
i mINF ....
1,
. . 04.11p,,. •
• .4ar."..,,r, -.„....,.,.. ..‘ : . . i ._
,44t s.., ..,. ...„ ...il,,,•;,.... ., ,
& ; .
Ai■--i ' 74 • i , \
(, --14 . '- 1 --
,,(,\ 1 i 1 l■
' .k's..,
, IP ,,,,,rar.).....,.4 , . • ,
. I., ....‘..r. 4,. ,.
., . ..,,,, — • . —1.1w.:- AIN -- '
1„,,,,. .,„..,....,,.....1.,.....„:...... ... .. .P _.:#\°
0------
ee
f\t\I\ v :, ,
thisr. 1.1--_-_ — . . fq
)1t.., •-, ------ " - • --• - -• -:--i -ro. -\c''\
• .'-:. ,
• .
4 . tii0,11i-j1, . P. ' -‘.• - '- -. - '‘\\, ',,---ce
. -• , , ,,
1,
. ., .,-
I\ ]
N
too
.---t
`4 .
4•4
1 0...,
-- — 4
N.
■-
i1,,
74 1
[
. ) ..4. 1.
i.t
.0 .
. .
• •
0 • . -
y �'
,..7 •
�V ri
itl •1 O li \l‘
..,-,,,,,z„....„
...,„:4,,,,„:,,,,.,
\\V\q,��.�i�}_(�T1-�. ':�Y......`.„sr'F2`....: 3.c:,.y:: `f:`u7f. ,„ ,,
.S'7r��Ly�trrr�T $Erflx:ysffi rrd p 'l
r y x r t ✓r r ;o E �r 4k
4 /. . .,b1 Ii X52 tea rs�3 5 :' str'n3,` a7Y.. f iN.,0 :' I ., �J \` 'i
.H V / K 'krc ` iS,hii ^��i+ i�F tt '.C� {.so- �:;. 1 '10
. t
• x# _ rr 'Yr°!'•� ;�ai' rag £N yr 4m5•/ ...—L 1 s V ,,g,
1,111.41::: 3 k> '€ ' I �,
/ ,3E .. 32y k h :.;:::::,*:,5.:-...-%.„ s
�,,,� £�Y x E _ 1
• .�sy o �” . : + xa �' Mtn 4 �r fi\ t.3.Q � \ _� I_ -� 7 -.7 11 '\
♦ �`� T�x�arr ' t is.4 i`3\x�• yF9
- _:-mg,....-$4440.0., ::80::A::::::::::::,.:::::::§34.iy....:-..-...4.440mmegegt . ,- . - , A 7 , i t r S: .' I ��
4 — (.,• „1.,. . i : ii.I., ;11.94mailip,,,"aptit )
•;:l':ri:Ii.:,:.-:,,,- ...„.,..!.::.:!;.,,i1.77:!:.:‹ H>,..
•
• •
. •
•
. I
1 KZ%
• . I
-,>-1 -,
' rk
' 4 :/•; I
c.i... •
• c5 . -,i!,
4•0'%*. Ai •,•3 1.1 '',il\i.
) 1 ,,...,_ - %11 •
1 N
7 43i •A. , :•-•'.: - 1, •
11 ‘(c)
. . • r1111111 I > LI
, I
, --)-
' H
. ..g• ' ......„... 11__. ..t,i._ _ : , .... _ _ 1
S I
: • : • ' i
1 \
1 'x4_ .-•
'.' ,..,,...,_ __,..
A .
a / ?1-
< ' .0 X
o -7--1 - - - - ---
. • ,
1.-.
Il z ,,, ,- 7-
. I.
A = _,- __.,_•,_
,•-----
V ' - •,. '. ,-. . .__ '
I
. LI -11-1 4 ,4'4 ------,
• ,,
y ---
...., , r ivil ‘- -'-
. , -
itfl' i ' /\ • •
-- •
... ---Iiiiii•-- -
v . .
. iltA AI IA .• 1‘
! !
• • o o
—4A
0 •
. . . -
--
>•%`=
• . ki ,,.
.„1
. , i. $ ,t.1 ......
-,.
,.;. 1.
......
..................
0 •
,I,...- . ..r
.i..,..
_____-_., ,.•.••
•
..... ....
......- . :
....... . ..- . .
,
1 • ,
..„
li
• II
ii
=-I I
. ....-.---- -------------
_Ill
/./
i
, .
1-- . . 41111141.
‘ r--:
r 1 _1.
s 1
Is„
1■• .1,....:%.i 4 tt 00000° .
. I ■ --' 41
•'',
. .
. I
•
•
. - .
. .
..
• 0
• • , . .-
ii
, ,,
,'1,, )
4- /,
Nt,,A
, / 1
ii 1
iP i &
i III -(in- PI
" r
I
�••. IPIIy
r .4. .
J i �r 1 '
. iink - 1 !illiVII,..--..,-. , v
` In . fi'11 ii,"Pif -
Il ii
Y
, 11 ili iiii _ 1,a, — - d
\ ' • r
/,',0 ...1.. , , f' A
1
,$)
i 111 )
1_ .4 — .,
1
,
it _1,...„, i
,.
\r, isi
, , . ,
1 ,,
i1 l
�/
II_ .
IA' Itf /
At /
• • . .
...1
cz: tki
'IS'. ..
- ,
......,. . 1):
. ..
.. -
,,„.
.,.
..„ • :..f
a-.-.,. ',..
„f•
s• c. \ ,, --L.. . . ,,,; - )
i 1
- .
- \ . -v-.., ,,.. •,_ ,• ,• ? .• ,
. •? ,
il• ,_ .• . . _. ,.,
'.s--k:-----, . i,-,,',..k>47'=". i,m4.. .1.m..f-1.--,J, 177:7:7-.-----------1 , _.
f..-=-77:-. • 1...5..5ags. ■ ■ ( 1
II .
t , 1 d = I
./
..f‘....,7,\Zt'IL ....!7.7r::;"—'12-m----! .‘''''.1 :-sl 1 •1 % i :1
. •
C./ ..,,.----,.s. 4:T',. ...=111111
,.;... .:=B# ;,=.-
,A.e.,:i;.',..1.11-1 -.-.. i
, / ,-..;•,--:-----
rs .\';i.;q k...:Y. I.MITOPP, . r ' `,`'''. ..""Ii.".";;;ii'il'i' "-- 11 • / _,
‘‘ '
.i,?.;;':?,1/4;,-; '',=.11E11 . ‘.!p=•=1 I •, (.. • ) \. .....-_- :
,,,,,,„.,„„, ...,-...,
_...'•_,4.,
%
\ ;.--_,N,,,. ...r.-,....v...—_, • .'zz.::::::::?.
I .
:107---7::`•,::-.-"= .„.■77:-air I ■.'kt.::;:'..' . f' ,
Moi? i,___.,...'
1 1 N' .1' .-.. 1 • . • 1
:\`,N.t.',Z
_t_ , .,„,,r• ,..,„:„.:.,,..„,
_,_( ,k ,,r, - i• ;!:i 'J.,J,,,;.. i.1:.,.....:., : i;.,'., ‘, ki 1,t; t ill) urr •
1
.2 1
r- I Af'5 II , - ',i, ,' ,,: 11
V i ,
L-14 .,,w. ),_ ; 1::, '(-1 ..';,.:'4;' ''' ' .' ..''I.-. a . 02
', "'1 '''IP'..1■' V:;1'1 .'''.--, 1. I
w. ii
of ,Y
1 , • .
, tz,\A. i •: ,.... , ,• -, .-1-.4-. '; H'• ,4 :1•• • i , ' • 1 •
--4 4 --■ . . . ,. , . 1. — - 91
l.,, •• ME.1fr: ..,‘All,,.. ,, : •-,, . ?!. l• •.
7.vsk" —"-iiii"--- rrirt—tr'"-?-1;.".---...,
i i7j-Ii fi-1-•---- 1 WTI':
,::'f.;',:- .'-7.-1.111-11.0..;.:N.!,;,',.'_14,_._,
It--)..r-4,4miolmw..,,,,.___. , Ni.Nok
, , ,,,........,41111 ,,..,..:„„...„.........1p,
,, ;L....=1"''''F'-:
.1 s..—..... I= V.,—.:. .. 4; ;,.4 !ILt„,"1:::4:z..t..;.,),A;..-.',::,
;1=tim: %la ,ff—,_.--_-____ .. i 0 'ii::61:i-Zi...7. !::±.ill,'■.-,:` 1 III1_ fl
Kt .-:,,,z-z- .— vil:r..-,ir•-.....,w,. •v. .!.,,•::,,....,.„,.-•;:......-..:!:•,:i::.1::,•.,..
..,..,.‘ ...,,,?....:::.k.,....(,),-.,v,•a;L:.-----=1-r -------- ant-z=v— • : i
,•:t.__i ‘, ,..,,.;,) vD.,-2-,•:-,4 -,4,,,,,..,;,.::;ic,11,11iMI J11011111
..-....„. maill1111 , .•--...
, .,,„,,,,-,,..,.• .--:,%,:.,,,;,,r;.----. NE
4,1 ,.........„,
. 1 1 _ ...,... .
.
.
r , .
um'
,..
.
...... , ,: . .
.
.------7---7.7.----. - ..... .... ..g. --.7
4•-i)Ai'.;,-
.k.kA11111111111 GM_ IRE fitginumu • • i i
„..:...,,_.„....
.
\ramiiiiiii-I-Illom -ifiniii '' ImulifdriCT' •11
v 1
wkimi 1 inn r i —. • VT
-.,,,,..... ..._.--_-_,
'‘ . 1'MS/ill lin '. ,
.
,...,..___., 0
- ---, .. , .,–
il Mil
L.9.:. -:-f....._.__..
. . .
.1141
liiiii_•- IN MIN
.-.44-;-t-t
Mh-P-'.:-/:,.
4. , ■ A....w.iv/Nam • . -;, •
II .11. \ .7.. 54.1._iii. iv .,
.,.....o0°.-7 •
/I '
' \ ...-,AlitamMt9,i.1
\ 1P- s s -. ,...
...v._
- • . .
..>_._
. , \ \r) - ---. - 1
' ', '':,-,1111111M,t;ii-,0 (4,411411N, N, ,, '-. -) i,--Ns
- ,.,.. ,) .,,, \.• •
...„ . . , , , , . , ' -,,i2._, ,- r_c,-, , z:%
o..._, , ,..‘1,11
-, .. -.■ ' i , •:-'
I III *,-- , .
,,.. V, . ;'ez\,-..; .)1,.... N
----- 1 ,,., 14 y i ,. -..,,l, - .;
-, , . ),.. , - , .
...„,,., , .- ' ' , '-x:. iiik N. v ,r*,..-1,-, -*- f
, :"...,...,:‹ .t.. •:..... „,...:),,:,, •.1\ • . • ,. i
• „...., ..„,...„„.1..,. ..., s•(.., ,,,--, .... ri. -,,_
,,,,...., o,. .. , ,, ..., _, .„,,, o, 0
, Q
-- _Ii_ .. '' ''''' -.4, ,- ``
1
-n v.
\.\.j _. ka 1.,I,..(,-1, 4 i i, c ..,:.. v
,• ,,,. .,„. ,
■---_, -7 s _-z A:
c,.._.. .) •,c,1
-
-,t-
. I--
ma
0 0
•••,t . ' •■