The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.235 Silverlode Dr.A029-001 MN Wrt-1 Ul V W ? t U . L x 692 Silverlode Residence 8040 Greenline 7-074-30-012 A029-00 PARCEL ID: |2737-074-30012 ~ DATE RCVD: ~3/9/00 # COPIES:F-- CASE NO~A029-00 CASE NAME:~Erb Residence Addition PLNR:~ PROJ ADDR:~235 Silverlode Drive CASE TYP:~8040 Greenline STEPS:| OWN/APP: Mary and Lee Erb ADR~8401 Greenwood Driv C/S/Z: ~Longmont/CO/80503 PHN+303)652-3600 REP:IDavid Brown ADR:~119 S. Spring C/S/Z: ~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN1925-2100 FEES DUE:~ 1155D FEES RCVD:|Â»11=Need'â„¢mit ,/325 STAT: F REFERRALS~ REF:~ BY~ DUE:~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED | DATE OF FINAL ACT~Mil 4/ AFCD CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ PZ: Re -70 . 19 - 00 - BOA: CLOSED: I 4/1 4/(0 BY: 13 L,U<(Ill f DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):~ ADMIN: I. DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights". of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after tle third anniversary of the effective date of this Order. unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075. or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date o f this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Mary and Lee Erb. 8401 Greenwood Drive, Longmont, CO 80503 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lot 12, Silverlode Subdivision Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property 8040 Greenline Approval Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #19,4/18/09_ Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) April 29,2000 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice ofapproval.) April 30,2003 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 29th day of April, 2000, by the City of Aspen Community Dexelopment Director. 4 1. _.2- d ~O. I - J,lie Ann Woods, Community*evelopment Director PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24. Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lot 12, Silverlode Subdivision, by resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission numbered 19 of the series o f 2000. For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. s/City of Aspen Account Publish in The Aspen Times on April 29,2000 RESOLUTION N0. 19 (SERIES OF 2000) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING THE 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW FOR THE ERB RESIDENCE, 235 SILVERLODE DRIVE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-074-30-012 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Mary and Lee Erb, represented by David P. Brown of Stryker/Brown Architects, for an 8040 Greenline Environmentally Sensitive Area review for a 370 square foot addition to an existing single family residence, at 235 Silverlode Drive; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is approximately 11.537 square feet and is located in the Affordable Housing-Planned Unit Development Zone District: and. WHEREAS, City Council Ordinance No. 52, Series of 1994 granted final review approval for Subdivision, Planned Unit Development, Growth Management Quota System Exemption. and Vested Rights for the Williams Ranch Project. including the Silverlode subdivision; and. WHEREAS, the subject house and proposed development are located at an elevation of approximately 8080 feet above sea level and within the review authority of the Planning and Zoning Commission. pursuant to Section 26.435.020 Environmentally Sensitive Areas: and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve development at or 150 feet below the 8040 Greenline in conformance with the review criteria set forth in Section 26.435.030(C) 8040 Greenline review; and. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department recommended approval with conditions; and. WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 18. 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a seven to zero (7-0) vote, the 8040 Greenline Review for the Erb residence with conditions recommended by the Community Development Department; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions. is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION as follows: 111111111111mi lilli 111111111111111111111111 lili Ill 443134 05/09/2000 03:21P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO .. Section 1 That the 8040 Greenline Review for the Erb residence 235 Silverlode Drive. to add 370 square feet of floor area to the northwest corner of the existing house. is approved with the following conditions: 1. All prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit: a. The primary contractor shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. b. All tap fees, impacts fees, and building permit fees shall be paid. If an alternative agreement to delay payment of the Water Tap and/or Parks Impact fee is finalized, those fees shall be payable according to the agreement. c. The City Engineer shall approve the grading and drainage plan for the parcel and proposed addition. 3. The building permit application shall include: a. A copy of the final Ordinance and recorded P&Z Resolution. b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d. A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department and any approval from the Parks Department Director for off-site replacement or mitigation of removed trees. if applicable. e. The building plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire suppression system approved by the Aspen Fire Marshall. 4. No excavation or storage of dirt or material shall occur within tree driplines. 5. All construction vehicles, materials, and debris shall be maintained on-site and not within public rights-of-way unless specifically approved by the Director of the Streets Department. All vehicle parking, including contractors' and their employees'. shall abide by the 2 hour residential parking limitation of the area. The applicant shall inform the contractor of this condition. 6. The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. 7. Before issuance of a building permit. the applicant shall record the Planning and Zoning Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. 8. The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 443134 05/09/2000 03:21P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 2 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 9. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code as they pertain to utilities. 10. The Applicant or owner shall mitigate any public impacts that this project causes, including but not limited to utility expenses and sanitary sewer and water lines. Section 2: All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3: This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection. sentence. clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity o f the remaining portions thereo f. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on the 186 day of April, 2000. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: /1 1 J - b L Ut 9.---164:aw 4vg City Attorney pert Blaich, Chair ATTEST: 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 443134 05/09/2000 03:21P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI Â«'16/CEL Flffirrat, 3 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO J*e Lothian, IÂ»uty City Clerk cy.*iek STRYEER/BROWN ARCHITECTS, PC 300 SOUTH SPRING STREBT ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-2254 FAX: 925-2258 ' N arn'Er B / / /%.. :. L ~/ 68 3 /0 / , , 08 '' 1 i ' ' -49:y,42. < / ADDmof : ' AEA OF NEW i , 1 71; 'A , -~>Â»A*ju- f ,/6 /4-4 / / ' 1 , , ~01 - 711 - . ; ' , i (j l~\ \\.t / 10,14 Â«, 4 41:, ~~ 1 C : 11 11\ 1 '1 - 'h 0, t..1 , '"/ ' 1 ./ , 1 1 ; IAÂ·11.40â€¢LiE,â€¢I l | 'pu-' / It 1 1 , .. 1 1 1 1 1 0 '/ 1 5/ 1 I j 1 1 1 Al \12 1/1 1 1 i 1 1 1 \\ 1 ; 1,1 l (-31#11 4 17 ; 1 1 -1 --- I %\21 4 '1 \ C 11 1 1 11Â· 1 912 1 i \ C , 1. + liI 6..' 4/. / ..... 1 / ==j- 1 c 4-Wex-n- l. - 0 : f 7 t . SILVERLODE A ' ' 5 "jrw 1 '1 I. .41611.~W 1 4 \ i 1 SUBDIVISON ; A \ 1 :, . . . 1 'Â· ----- L , : C i *a#.. 1 \ in LOT #12 . 1 71 1/ //1)/, ~ ~~~~~ j ~t ~-1-4.- ~ ~ ASPEN,COLORADO 1 <1 A / , Â£ C j / < l \ SILVERLODE DR]VE 1 AN/// , OWNER: , \ 1~' 11,11 -- \ Mary Ann and Lee Erb 1 ASPEN. CO. 8161I h. #6 DATE: ISSUE: 1 / ~ ~ ~- - 28 FEB. 1997 PERMIT SET - 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCEN SET ./ 14 Feb 2000 Addition liN\\ /6 -' --- .- -44 T F.r I Ila. 1 1 I i , :i N 1 n 1 ./ I ....90 .'3 C 'ji i ' 3 / l . 78 , I C ....1 .--- N '79'04Â» P f , , /01&61-2.- i Â»/ 1tvr SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" j SITE PLAN 1 SITE PLAN A 1.0 SILVEKLOAD DRIVE 42'-6" ld) 1 Â« K-o,0 ( f ) 14'-9 1/2' (~ 5'-81/2- (!F; 8,-G /'(f, 91-6,1 . 7 1.6. . .BaliLDERRETANING t.. '. . .6-lkÂ·1'-11/r 1 WA[I -4. / - 1 - C 2.0~1* wwmLOVER i , STRYKER/BROWN GRAVEL Fli~L - I)421AGE Â·I , ARCHITECTS,PC '58: , Â· 58 CONNECTFJO TO ' 4 PERIMETERDE.Â·WN M I Â· 119 SOUTH SPRING STRBET - j ASPEN, COLORADO 816]1 , ~ LIGHT Â· ~ (970) 925-2100 FAX; 925-2258 i LVELL1Â· New Wilb, typicad | , .- ) EL 04'-0" i f Newk-dilion 1 te CONCRISTE Â·--1 d b APRON N Â·Â·. DRYT9*L- 6'-2" ~0 AREA OF NEW â€ž 9121' FOUND - . WALL IGARAG[' 1 f . Â·Evi"ng /,111"dation I ADDITION i .Na =ir=- - 7, 442 7/ 1 "AL.-- , 5 4 / *ELÂ· 10' U . STORAGE ' ~ ROOM 1 , 4--j--- - - - 1 . .*RAGE - ;_ ~ Â·~- 108 i. 1 16 4 EL, 100Â·-D" t~ 91 - 67*2 i Et r.4 -1 1 \ 2 IHR. ENCLOSURE -Â·. cut Â«i,#8 ' OTE I GYP. B -1. v . 1 few//M.Â·,U -1. 3. | Â·-#.1Â·D.TO ./ .'AILL & CI.C. 4.-- /h- .- f ing'Unew :I *68 decl' 05 31 i .xPRYWELL -- Â·> ir ' 52 WagN:&*er ! , -Â· Â·__ TOPRYWELL -.Â·., 1 2 N / / 1 6 >< I I '-Fa -6 18~~ 2/3" I j 6-- ..3Â£ Baial 1 FT-T=-& -LP---1 17T 11" -=19 I ' /10 - 6, 106'. cawl..ce [-1..1- 1- Â«Aff f #741 -14 J I okj below bath above i 1111 .1.~ 4 8- .../ 0 1'-01/2 g 23'-31/2" ~ '-71/4 /Â»sl01/2Â· % i< MUD U-/ i EL. 99'-0" _ 718" up I I ' -4- !1Â·Â· 14" - ROOM A 6~6'*~Â· -9 I ~ , 'W' , Â·I i tr =#i'-O lf#, Â¥ 1-> 20 ~ .P = 8072'-0" 100A I / I ENTRY 11ALL \\/1 Ni 'i !' _6 4- - __4-f--= ~ 100 :12% 1 4 f ~172: to /4/ 1 it :01 , L_ 1-~miB ..1 M 0.8,|Â·1=. t... (31//7 h SILVERLODE 9'-8" : .m=l-377?LAUNDRK--322 Q~~ i SUBDIVISON 6 1 + U 1 13'17" 106 1 LOT #12 '14 1 N 1HR. ENCLOSURE h Ifi> F- m- bi 1 = 1 ----nE].02Â£-2 TYPE X GYF. BU.- 4 H O 9 ~ ~DOM WALL & CLG. 51 I ' 101 GREVE. i ASPEN, COLORADO r=:42::~-1 PER 000 1 .,-, FORLAUNDRY 1 i VENT DRYER f - Â·Â· SPACEAVAILABLE 296==L ; , ~. ,': CHUÂ·IR 1 BATH ' - I 1 OWNER: 101 A i Mary Ann and Lee Erb 1 .'' i ri) AL | --- h Â·' txle# ASPEN, CO. 81611 i in 1 '41>1 1 --r-.-irl -1. 1 1 1"- 1 1 \1 I V 1 47 BATi 1 A/-7 1 2- *73& ' t i \ \ CN /':1/ 1It 'J 1O3A NI 4-1. ., 1'10.--1.- - â€¢01-Â·-- rt i<?9 ) /BEDROOM Â» 1 1 L _ _ _ _ _2,131 - U L - ----- \\ , ,/' 104 1 28 FEB 1997 PERMIT SET 11 MAR. 1997 ZONING SILVERLODE DRIVE 1 0., f 1,12 1/ \: 1 -t- 18. DATE: ISSUE: 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCTION SET H .t I 14 FEB 2000 MEDU ROOM --" i ! i ADDmON \ . '03,1 Â· 5 uP W \ 2R@6 *1> . 1 1 i 17@11" 9 6 --- 1 1 r, 1 1 1 1 4 P ' fat 1.1 1 4 'tht; p \1'11 '21.- \ 11 1 40Â® 1 ./ 1 O--I BEDROOM - 2- 4 6- ! 103 -j/*%- il 1. CLST. 1 CLST 4_-3 92 1 111 1038 1048 ... I LIGHT <39Â·1 ~ CONC WALL , F ~ - .=.p....r Â£ - ' ... I i 1'62 - - A--eNNEXCITO < 1.- ~tÂ© c.Â· zz ! 1 PHRIMErlR DRAIN [ 1 AS.97 , \ 1 1 1-.- St- -lia-1 - -/--4 13'-43/4,1 --- 4) i 1 i 1 , SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" 1 k// 1 1 1 1 1 (d 18'-9 1/r ~ 3 23'-81/2' ' FLOOR PLANS ~ 42'-6" i l - ic) 'D) (t ): F (A) LB, Al.1 rn LOWER LEVEL 19'-10" 17-11" 6'-10" 6'-10" 74% f 11'-0" 16'-10" 16'-0" 10'-10 1/2- 9'-10" 17'-2" 7-93/4 2 AREA OF NEW -4. ADDITION 1.' Â¢ ' (B) k Ailbp .'C) (D) (E,~ ip, v I I (0, STRYKER/BROWN 1 1 1 i -1< 108 )/ -r=zI/ ARCHITECTS, PC -b 119 SOUTH SPRING STREET _*391'_. -1 1--3/,/ 1 it â„¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970> 925 - 2100 FAX: 925-2258 .:Â· QUI==. 21=-1 ~ --- 1 121UC-- _.....__i........... . ..~Â£ .-Ir~-1- ---54 1 Remove exismg coll,u beam81 replace with heavy Umbe, colt,r be,- perS.....1 I-- --- ..r,2 12 3 I t,Â·2 -:---' ---- 51 - r 7 z u z= 4 41-2 I ' <f,5 / Ir E / 4 1 } * -? ; I New fouadationw/1 1 E>/// Er/"t w.U 1 ' 1, ~ ' - - New 2>.6 exierier wall on / A."dation wid' 4-7 ..4 I i I I '1 t-.-"Â· .66(h _ 0 1 I 1 I ! I 12-2 FIEAÂ¥L A7(~R Hill GAS LOG K]T. r 11 1 1 It lili - 40 "\ i 2 ' i 4 EL, 115* . 4 2 ~ ff.' 10, 1 LIVING iM. ' ' 1, 1 91 r vautted<'111110 0 + 1 13.1 : ABO~7 ,bove ok'Cg,n~- A - - -' below floor . i 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 15;Â£_31EL,r.=26Â£-+2211.!flt*_1.34-__- = ft 1 1 1 1 1 1 / '4 - i ' / 11 zo. i ' i ! 1 1 1 J..... 41 i l 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 'i i i I I I , I DN -UP | i.-' f>?) Ul J M ; 205: 11 2 FROM ROOF ABOVE I i DOWNSPOM 18RÂ® 6 2,13"/ h - SVEEE) 17I' 9 1~' bI11- IL- ~ - 4-k 5 demo emting waU yep SOUND INS. AS REQÂ·D., â€ž .- -t+99'-0" A;OVE : aied -14 1 - 1 door 11( 2 1-L=, i -1.Ead -414' < -- 1- rn "~ ' ~ ~ A- EL. 110'.0'1 - ~ ' -*V 4 *t 109'-9'Â· ~ , i) iÂ® I [Â©iff Â· i *7, ~ N,j) 1 7 -U-8082<48 re\] 1 1 I (El - - -1 21 r~fr- .- -1 -4- -- .,I. -~4~Â·~. :13'-le ur 1 . . STONETr[.2 --\ [ /----9 . DOWNSPOUT 1--i // (f ~ --; 1 / ~~SION F . AW?, 1 1 DECK 4 2-11-7 i DINING 1 D/W KITCHEN __L 1 1/ . 1 SILVERLODE 205 4 '(200) 2 203 ...- 202 1 ---' 1 1 / 1 ..KI / 1 5 4. 1...41 1 - 4 1 1 - 1 Â¥109'-sâ€ž ~ 1 109 -11" Â·* ~\ ~U -* ~Ah.1* V SUBDIVISON | ----lu-01 -~ -, s ~ LOT #12 1 1 4 5.----j i , i Wic ! I 1 1 1 1 Â«111 - - 1 SILVERLODE DRIVE i i ~.L -2'Â£_ ......21Â£.-_.*11' 4 1 ASPEN COLORADO 434 1 1 1 Â£! 1 -1 -7 --- ------- --- -4--30- - -- -------.... --Â»---1 1 89 ; OWNER: 1 i Mary Ann and Lee Erb i i -lifj i ASPEN, CO. 8I 611 = 11 1 I i i L 1 ;42-~~ 1 - . .5 .- - - . -1 .-.- . -.- .+*.- -- .-.-.r ' 1 -- CL. 1 1 1 1 , 31â€¢1.4 - DATE: ISSUE: 1 1 i - ' < - 1 BUff.7-IN CABNE)RY - Â· 10 28 FEB. 1997 PERMIT SET ~ 109'-9" ~ - 11 MAR. 1997 ZONING L- - 11*- , DECORA DVE 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCHON SET 1 GAS APPLIANCE h i I I BYHEAINGLOW i $ 14 FEB. 2000 Media Room Addition 0000 GDV. b Vt/1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 I i I 24,81Â°41 i ,Â· a.,4 ' i LIBRARY i 11 204 \ r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 1 1 ! \ 1 1 :59 i *%04 ' '\ fi j 1 /5 >. 1 - i 541â‚¬_L_* ..._-___ 1 \ 91 \ - i 1 -23'g---- -- --- 1 1 Â·A- 1 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" V 1 i \-4'- 1 1 1 1 , 1 [ FLOOR PLAN (A'' u B ([D (E ) LF> U rih MAIN LEVEL A 1.2 3'-11 1/1. , 1 7-10" ' 1Â·-91 1 17-11 AREA OF NEW --x. ADDITION F. G 1 STRYKER/BROWN ARCHITECTS, PC 1 ' 1 i 19 SOUTH SPRING STREET $ 0 2,4. t Cj (D) ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 1. ., 1 -A-5*7 -. 7, 1 11 (970) 925-2100 F A X: 925-2258 1 , t 1 262/ / 4 \ >62-49.4----53-,tr ..L--l- ' E---4----------- ; , ~ 6'-10'/â€¢': rb7Jr VI-- f---45, 4+ MY~ + 1 79-=PE_Ee:E=22=-=al,~--~~I 1 1 1 : 1 7--Gl:â‚¬;Aa:L=: '?I--7,2- E..P-2 ~. '. Il~Cate W~dow | \ 1 fr owle' "m I i C 1 2. EL.. 1~Fâ‚¬. --- . 1 - -1./1 1 1 f 1 i -- i --- ..-1 F--.I W)-1/-'E" +3.1,1 1 1 \ 1 11 4 \ 31(.\*1 , iS I 1 1 1 + i 42 , I 1 1 1 1 1 11 - 11% ! ! li 1.- i DN 1.-i.-, -P: I 1 1 r VEST ULE , CLST. 1 1 ,[1 - 304 i 1 . 7, lij 3.)14' . 11 1 1 1- 2 f <5 i ./Sob i m 1.,d:JL=-1199#". 1-06 -7 1 1 3 b, M 41 =80924â€ž N - FLOOR DRAIN ~ ~' m :{71-~ 80-1 /1 1 - \ (301) I I ==t= 4 4 â€¢ - 18- AFF R eINCH ~~1Â»4 ___ SILVERLODE 1 (Al'Al I Â·1 1 14| 19% 1 SUBDIVISON I 26 6 13.1 Â»i) 1 1 / 0\; 3951 M I - 1 1 1 DECK . ' , MASTER 1-Â· r*BATHI j, i BEDROOM %... 303 \ /4 i LOT #12 302 i 301 SILVERLODE DRIVE 1 1 ASPEN, COLORADO 1 1 1 OWNER: 1 5.1 11 2 i r SPACE AVAILABLE -- ;~Â·~ fE-ic>-4 ir,[, - -.d-~ 1 Mary Annand Lee E . 1 h ASPEN, CO. 81611 PORLAUNDRY 1 1 A <.1 ]> | I CHUIE liFe Â« 1 1 1 29 2 .. 1--1 5 1 Â«11 Em-1 1 * 2 -1 %) r L < 7-9 1/r~ - D ~-1 Nk--' ~ | 41\ . 6* ' i 1. i_ ... -- 1#61" 11 , . DATE: ISSUE: I 10'.2 1/r i 1 4--1 26'-1" i i 1 28 FEB. 1997 PERMIT SET /11 "j i:, 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCnON SET 14 Feb. 2000 Media Room Addition i '! ill! 1 1 1 1 \ 1 1 1 --f- 1 1 1 . 1 3-- 1 --- 1 1 l 1 1 -- 1 1 li l 1 it i ; 1 1... .4 4.) i \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ././- * - 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 -s. C <. 1 1 1 -A=.-1 1 1 --- 1.2-1 1 1 1 1 ..j - - 3 1- - 45. , 1 ' - I.- ' 1 1 . 1 -- ''..1.-~j 16. 1 143.97 1 \ 1 2-41 lili ' '' | i i 1 1 (Al-OF , 1 , ' 1 1 Â®' 7/ 1 It SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" I i 1 1 1 FLOOR PLAN , 1 1 1 DIL) (B * CE . (t 1/ 3 rih UPPER LEVEL A 1.3 (Al.37 Il-Li 6'-2 1/r , 3,4 3.-0' f 3.-0" 1. 6 21/2. 1 , 2'4'~-, 1 STRYKER/BROWN ('A) 'B) 33; (D) CE 1 , F 9 ARCHITECTS, P C 1.- 1 Ut tf-,0 t-j_ 14-1 _ 119 SOUTH SPRING STREET i k t- Lf 1-4 - (' O.~ ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 1 , 11? -1 tx -13, 1 (970) 925-2100 FAX: 925-2258 9 1 1 . i , -,0----C~T .li 12/12 12/12 | i . ---2 ! / 18-1 4 frft-4-1-7-- - -- lowNG,our Â·---------4-------'-"- 1 Â· -- DEÂ«2.-K ~6el6#Te#4 Lf's, r i A i '901 BELOW ~ 2/12 1 - AREA - OF NEW ADDITION 11+13+041- .171'-34.~ff i - Â»_I 1 12/12 , i Â·Â· CE{CKET 1 1 4Â» i 1 5/i2 1 1 ~\ \\ < - I i I i l.li'\ Flabbing 1 \127 ' OidkeÂ¢ 1 1 1 :\ , -- 1\ i ' 12/12 -- RIDGEVENT - -I GurnI -- - -- - 1 12/12 12/12 DlowdUARDS -~ 1 rf 11 1 \ i i i f i iii i_ t -1 i ~ ROOPDRAINJN - j - . __._. ~ Ar-7h--z-ziy_.~ -43 Â·- - -RAN[ WAGRAÂ·]11- -Â·~ . | _ 1 DECK PLAT ROOF --~* < --/ M.OW 1%qi,ope: 1 /4Â·,11Â·*MIN. ~ M---1- 1 1 3/11 - --> / ------4----Â»44- -----~--'-'-- --~- ------~- -fip - ...r, i ' / 1 -- 6'12 2'7 1 09) 1 11/ i 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 v 6/12 -w.- i I SILVERLODE /12 ~ 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 1 1 I | 12/12~ =yeÂ«693â‚¬2221 SUBDIVISON 1 1 <5532/ A DEA E LOT #12 3/12 ~ BELOW 4/12 Â· / '032.-3-31. ! ---- - SILVERLODE DRIVE , 12/1-2 ! ASPEN, COLORADO 1 1 41 1 $54-Li ! 1 1 =rEFFE~> OWNER: 1! i 1 Mary Ann and Lee Erb 1 1 / 1 3/n \Â»e ASPEN, CO. 81611 j 1 1 1 RUDGE VENT -Â·--, | j mot /GUARDS -~ 1 __trtI?39*32_ +==+=4==IV==1=.+=9 - 1 / DOWN SPOUT----0. | '' i DATE: ISSUEÂ· jA------- 21:9*MiÂ· 1 PARAPETWAIL -- 4 FlATRooF --Â· --1 --> 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCHONSET 28 FEB. 1997 PERMIT SET Â·SEE /'All -SEE 2, *2.0 ~ ~ SLOPE: 1/40'/14Â· i -- +14 \\ 14 Feb. 2000 MEDIA ROOM ADDmON 1 Ii-g 1 i -Â· -- EXTENTOF 1 v ' \ , /.-- RIDGE VENIL-~~333-EZEf~- J---------1 1\ 1 ~ DECK l~ BELOW -CS---' 1 1 -'r L ' 1 1, 1 2 1 4 1 1 i , f 1 10/11# 14 1 - 1 1 1 K---1 - 1 t - 11 . 1 1 F- DOWNSPQ.g_--- -k --- -- 1 1 ' 1 -44- \ -- / UGHT 1 0- 1 1 WELL 1 _-- ' 3 1 '1 1 2.---- 1 i Ii I i ! \ 1 SCALE: 1/4'61'-0" 1 , , 1 , 1 +4 1 ROOF PLAN 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I iii 1 1 31 1 (f) 1 1 1 A 1.4 i i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 A , (6 ~6)(F) 1. 1P ) CA) i B., h>\ ROOF PLAN (Al.4) 12/12 .0 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHY LOT 12, SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT THEREOF FILED FOR RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 37 AT PAGE 3 AND FIRST AMENDMENT THEREOF RECORDED AUGUST 20, 1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 97 COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO ~ \... 1 \ \ i 1 ' h m ~ g STORM INLET O \ \ M \1 U) 4 WING WALL r-/ 1 \ -4 /1 1 -----1 \ o BUILDING / ~ A ENVE~LOPE - --~ 2 -11 \1~ U1 T/ / #5 RE~AR 04)422 e 00 4 223% N 5 1 2 8 2 8 5 /174 0 g 01 00 0 FOUND \ E / 5 \11 0 An' 1/ \ 1 / / / J tt 8~ 4\,so bLD.Adtr- i ) i \ - 6 1. 01 1 _____{__l 3- 1 7 1 \ - GRAPHIC SCALE -r ---4 L 71.6-3 F 4/ 11 .1 Â° EBAR & CAP LS #20632 24.9' h \ 0/ (IN FEE) 6 \ 4 \ linch 0 10 a Z \ .1. I 7.9 . 4 In L ED , \ 11 PINE/ 1 .:*Câ‚¬-/ * O m . i3 4 3//1/ Era i \ 9 0 4 0-00 /3 r t J . I . A \ 4 / /1 // io/ 00=3Â£ -- 10.2' I l~ ~ 1(. -i QI \1/,\ 1 4 . / MULTI-LEVEL I 1) BASES OF BEARING FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N 00Â·01'06- W BETWEEN A REBAR AND CAP. LS#20632, AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 10 AND A REBAR AND CAP, LS120632, A = 31Â°19122" R , 901.r to 1 4 WOOD FRAME ./<Fy/ AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF L01 14. 2) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS. RESTRICTIONS, R = 214.7% 3) DATE Of SURVEY WAS FEBRUARY 21. 2000 HOUSE COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR IN PLACE. L = 117.4~ 0 1 f / 1 9 L q 4 2,3, 4) CONTOUR INTERVAL EOUALS TWO (2) FEET. ~~~ CB = N 03Â°25'0 " W ~ 11 0 K-31 4 LOCATED ON SILVERLODE DRIVE EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF I M) - 21 .8 41< 5) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON A TEM, AT AN EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT, 1 CD 1 F LOT 12 HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 8052.26 C = 115.9Z 8.8' 1 1Â§' 1 5 g~~8068 -ha, 1 01 ' 2 8' 1 PINE ' 1- I IN 1 ~ CONCRETE -1 8@66 -l- P ( . 9 \ $ A 1 [DRIVEWAY ,f*#-- 1 1~ ~ -oÂ·~ WINDOW, en W ~- EELL ~4 0/ h 243 01 \ t- 8088 - 0 1 1 1 13.8' , ./ -U- - 8086 - 1 RET#NING 2 pr,1,0 11 ~9061Â¢ - f \ i \\(+ 0 7 - - \ j WLL 1 )L~--~z< 75~- 73.53- -~ ~z- /1Â«8084 1 1 1 --- \'PINE 1 r- j ~-14\4 \ \ 1 / IN \ \ \*91-1 Â»3 Ly h i SHARED I / 1 VrNEJ /1 1 0 \ ~ It --i ~ lit UTILI Y & 1 ENTRANCE - - -BRA\\Nr-/fir- l (LOT /13) 1~ . J L~. '*%~-~-1- -27// 4 -21& 2- \\\ â‚¬ \ L #5 REBAR 3 ~f . 7. / FOUND '112 733 3 \ 4Â· . .70 1 1 " ' GA~, \u ~ 94~'fER ~ 1 1 24"0 CMP "Â·. - - 4 , PIN* ipINE CP k) flf// f Â· l i - â‚¬69'/4 t) 1 IMPROVDENT SURVEY STATEMENT O mE CP 0 Q) -33 -~ f?iâ‚¬--~ A -- # 1 HERESY STATE TRAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED EY HIGH : #KIll m COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC FOR STRYKER-BROWN ARCHITECIS. e K JER I - 1 1 ff 9 4 3/ M / M T =M 1 FURTHER STATE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRi8ED PARCEL ON THIS DATE. FEBRUARY 21. 2000 EXCEPT Un UTY CONNECTIONS, ARE 2.? 41 i j PINE . 1 y# < ENTIRELY VATH+N THE SOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL . EXCEPT AS SHOWN. THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRUBED PREMISES BY E i &9 4 8"1 IMPROVEMEN TS ON AN Y ADJOININC PREMISES. EXCEPT AS INDICATED, AND ZO 0 / L RETAINING THAT THERE IS NO APPARENT EMDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING ~ ~ ~ ~~ W PINE\ Lf j - STATE THAT I HAVE EXAWNED IE n TLE COMMITMENT PREPARED 8Â¥ PITKIN OR BURDENING ANY PART Of SAID PARCEL. EXCEPT AS NOTED I FURTHER / WALL . Ct J Z i It - -'Or-- (Al COUNTY 111Â£, INC. (CASE NO. PCT14578) DATED AUGUST 26, 1999 AND FIND / . HEREIN TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BEUU ALL EXCEPIONS TO TITLE mAT AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE SHOWN R W @* i /4 \ 0) FIRE HY[bRANT \ ~RANK W. HARRINGION, L S. NO 19598 %# Eff ' T. B.M. j 1 1 \ / /1 | Â· PROJECT NO. 99737.02 SHEET 1 OF 1 18 NOISIA36 AHdvaDOd01 ON Â¥ A]A i N]AliONdÂ¥11 AV/*3AIND 9909 00/62/2 317 C L -ZOÂ£66:373 *6 (0Â£6)78 9Â£99-96 (0Â£61}W J: \SDSKPROJ\99\99737\DWG\99737-12.DWG Tue Feb 29 14: 25.57 2000 2809 STRYKER/BROWN ARCHITECTS, PC 300 SOUTH SPRING STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-2254 FAX. 925-2258 0 4, A 4 0 1.9 1 -lA. D '~ D) '.p 4 1 C /2/:Pe' 1 1 . . : 1 Jl ... De] Pb~E Il l 1~41> Â£'--- 52-1- ADDITION W.,Or r-//Tl / I ./. ' || - ------ -----~ ~--- -,-11 rtir-.vT-~11 ~ I~-- Â«24, ,/ 811 9 11! %8LloN 4 Â·"tÂ·-'' 'i[45*Â« , . 11â‚¬L .,1 . a / AWW W C 7â€ž7, 4 - 1 a,&,17,6=F 0/' 4, / I .1 -3Â£./.01-1 C Â£@84414 ...I, 4%----*xy' t" -- 1 -1 1-1 EPÂ»L- lie - - 1 .:.: --21 r Z.Ll.'%4.1,- I , - â€ž,e-,e.Â·i.,- ~ 11.-1 12~Eataâ‚¬ - ~_ 1.-. 4 . 1.~â€¢ 91 1 ...te'*m,4 b_" m.=.-m , 0 aa : 1_ I + F *t ~r-F -- t'--"1129'nal,1,1--a 1 - #211 / + .%22;t-.i -1.2.-LU - - #a#- 1 - I. --~-Gj-Â·ual .- . ' ; 1 24 f 1.,4. - 1 11 ~ ~ lt~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~4[[p ' El T El El-- 21_22 1 1 Â£ E-I'll / ~ r. - - _.M.'.... + ViEÂ« airn-F /21 H*#r ELEVATION rih ... ELEVATION 43:9/ SILVERLODE SUBDIVISON LOT #12 SILVERLODE DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO OWNER: MAX OF ASPEN, LLC. ASPEN, CO. 81611 + m e f 0 0 'w YA w I ~ i ' 1 , L 1 1 1 1.:/ i I , 1 11 1 X E A' 1 - 9 ' DATE: ISSUE: 28 FEB. 1997 PERMIT SET 1.1,1.---7 v ---- 4 11 MAR. 1997 ZONING 1. .i- 1/1 v ~,i 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCnON SET 1 - NEW IMAi_._...._ We-1 -- .mi j 11 - -1 Y ./. Â¥~~- E*'ll.4, .Z:,GI -12311 1-â€¢-r~ _jT 4 --mis. i,111~:6==UT rf 1 *U~**t@YF?*Wit--12-* IZIUT. 2#4*1~=811- . -~M/ 1 -0â€¢*- -- M:itrrn-IIcx n mman C -1,-Â·cm--ki~--- 118*WE~-Â· '-- - 24 W==-4=UU#V,141 1../ 4,4 1 1 --' ~. [0*kgrm[**&4/4 AGie,Â· |~|~~~ . ---- --~~212~~ 9Â» 52-J.49.ftgm-~- ; ,-PH i' 1 fa*11â€ž I t.ob,1.. 1 1-/ .-- - GUi~ 9 1 1 1 1 1 --- , 1 0 11- -.-i-- @11 1 1 1 1 1 =.'Â£ 1 11 11 0..4" I ~DmON ' . . - 11 $ .. . ... -Il- ' ...Me'.// *Â·4%2Â·~7- L.- j Â£4842*A 3 I .- SCALE: 1 /8"=1'-0" NofÂ® EXTERIOR ELEVATION rih *20 ELEVATION rih EAST ELEVATION 439/ A 2.1 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce 0hlson, Deputy Director \)R'o FROM: Nick Lelack, Plannel,~ RE: Erb 8040 Greenline Review - Lot 12, Silverlode Subdivision - Public Hearing DATE: April 18, 2000 APPLICANT: Mary and Lee Erb REPRESENTATIVE: David P. Brown, AIA 'f7077-- --Bacti- i Stryker/Brown Architects r..... ... '.-. . *.3.A l -1 t.. ... .,~ A. .., 4 2 LOCATION: . - 235 Silverlode Drive Â· Â» .4 Lot 12, Silverlode Subdivision . & ...0 - ./ V ZONING: :f An-PUD 7 ' 1% . .. 1..@I CURRENT LAND USE: T e proposed 370 square foot addition would be Single Family Residence located behind the garage, partly visible from Silverlode Drive and town. PROPOSED LAND USE: Single Family Residence SUMMARY: LOT SIZE: The Applicant is requesting 8040 Greenline review 11,537 sq. ft. approval to add a media room and a powder/bath room on the northwest corner (rear) of the house FAR: shown above. The foot print of the addition is Existing: 3,467 sq. ft. approximately 230 square feet and the floor area is Proposed: 3,837 sq. ft. about 370 square feet. The residence is located at an Allowable: 3,837 sq. ft elevation of about 8080 feet above sea level. This is a one-step review before the Planning and Zoning Commission. 1 REVIEW PROCEDURE Development in Environmentally Sensitive Areas - 8040 Greenline revie-w: Following the receipt of a recommendation from the Community Development Department, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall by resolution approve, approve with conditions, or deny a development application in an ESA. ~TAFF COMMENTS: Mary and Lee Erb ("Applicant"), represented by David P. Brown of Stryker/Brown Architects, is requesting approval of an 8040 Greenline review to add a media room and a powder/bath room on the northwest corner (rear) of an existing house located at 235 Silverlode Drive. The foot print of the addition is approximately 230 square feet, and the floor area is about 370 square feet. Approximately seven (7) feet of the addition would be visible from Silverlode Drive and from town. The residence is located at an elevation of 8080 feet. Section 26.435.030,8040 Greenline review applies to all -< 1 + .~ development located at or above 8040 feet above mean sea level (the 8040 Greenline) in the City of ..... .. ..9,~ - Aspen, and all development within Ib 1-1.6 Â·44:.4-:MA.--I- one hundred fifty (150) feet below ;, .,' 214.-*k-*?AE>~ the 8040 Greenline. Ordinance ~ No. 52. Series of 1994, approved 2 /44- the Williams Ranch/Silverlode i Subdivision. Condition 11 of this (I' ,/ 5$67~ Ordinances states that "The . Â· . *, .: . 4 ; 1% allowable floor area for the free The addition would fill in the northwest market parcels shall not exceed corner of the house. 90% of what is permitted in the AlI zone district. If the proposed floor area for any free market parcel is over 80% of the permitted floor area for the AlI zone district, then a complete 8040 Greenline Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be required prior to the issuance of any building permits for the lot." This parcel currently contains about 3,467 square feet of floor area, which is about 85% of the maximum floor area allowed for this lot in this zone district. The proposal is to increase the floor area by 370 square feet, or to 90% of the maximum allowed in the zone district, which is the maximum allowed for this free market parcel. Community Development Staff believes the proposal meets the review criteria for development in this location and will have only minimal environmental and visual impacts. 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending approval of the Erb 8040 Greenline review to add 370 square feet of floor area to the northwest corner of the property with the following conditions: 1. All prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect. 2. Prior to issuance ofa building permit: a. The primary contractor shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. b. All tap fees, impacts fees, and building permit fees shall be paid. If an alternative agreement to delay payment of the Water Tap and/or Parks Impact fee is finalized, those fees shall be payable according to the agreement. c. The City Engineer shall approve the grading and drainage plan for the parcel and proposed addition. 3. The building permit application shall include: a. A copy of the final Ordinance and recorded P&Z Resolution. b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d. A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department and any approval from the Parks Department Director for off-site replacement or mitigation of removed trees. e. The building plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire suppression system approved by the Aspen Fire Marshall. 4. No excavation or storage of dirt or material shall occur within tree driplines. 5. All construction vehicles, materials, and debris shall be maintained on-site and not within public rights-of-way unless specifically approved by the Director o f the Streets Department. All vehicle parking, including contractors' and their employees', shall abide by the 2 hour residential parking limitation of the area. The applicant shall inform the contractor of this condition. 6. The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. 7. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record the Planning and Zoning Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. 8. The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction. 3 9. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code as they pertain to utilities. 10. The Applicant or owner shall mitigate any public impacts that this project causes, including but not limited to utility expenses and sanitary sewer and water lines. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the Erb 8040 Greenline review for an addition to the northwest corner of an existing single family residence at 235 Silverlode Drive with the conditions in the draft resolution." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Development Application C:\home\nickl\Active Cases\8040 Erb - Silverlode\8040 memo.doc 4 EXHIBIT A ERB 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS 26.435.030 8040(C) Greenline review standards. No development shall be permitted at, above. or one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040 greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the city. Staff Finding The parcel is developed with a single family residence. This proposal is to add a media room and powder/bath room to fill in the northwest corner of the residence, which would be partially sub-grade. The footprint of the existing house would be expanded by approximately 230 square feet, all within the established building envelope. Staff believes the site is suitable for this addition because it is has a gentle slope and located in an undeveloped corner of the residence within the building envelope. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects on water pollution. Staff Finding Staff does not believe the development will have any adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion, or have consequent effects on water pollution. The City Engineer will review the grading and drainage plan for the site and proposed addition prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the city. Staff Finding Staff does not believe this project will have an adverse affect on the air quality of the city based on the limited size and footprint. 5 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. Staff Finding Staff believes the design and location of the proposed development are compatible with the terrain on the parcel. The proposed development is located within the established building envelope, on a gentle slope, and in the corner of the existing house. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. Staff Finding The project will require only minimal grading, and very little natural vegetation exists in the area proposed for development. In addition, disturbance to the slope and other natural features will be minimal. A condition of approval requires that no excavation or storage of dirt or material shall occur within tree driplines. 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space, and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. Staff Finding The proposed .addition is to fill in an undeveloped corner of the existing house, which limits cutting and grading of open space on the parcel, and preserves to the extent practicable the mountain as a scenic resource. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. Staff Finding The height and bulk of the addition will blend in with the existing house, and minimally affect the open character of the mountain. Locating the addition to the rear of the existing house and partially below natural grade would minimize the visual impacts of the project. 8. Sunicient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. Staff Finding The property is serviced by all public utilities. Adding a powder/bath room will minimally affect water pressure and other utilities to the residence. A condition of approval is that all tap fees, impacts fees, and building permit fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits. A second condition of approval requires the owner to mitigate for any 6 public impacts that this project causes. including but not limited to utility expenses and sanitary sewer and water lines. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said roads can be properly maintained. Staff Finding The proposed development will not require the addition or expansion of the existing road network to the property. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for Jire protection and snow removal equipment. Staff Finding A condition of approval is that the building plans demonstrate an adequate fire suppression system approved by the Aspen Fire Marshall. Snow removal is not a relevant issue for this project. 11. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Trails Plan are implemented in the proposed development, to the greatest extent practical. Staff Finding Staff does not believe the proposed development conflicts with the AACP or Parks/Recreation/Trails Plan. 7 RESOLUTION 30. ~g~ (SERIES OF 2000) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING THE 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW FOR THE Elli RESIDENCE, 235 SILVERLODE DRIVE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-074-30-012 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Mary and Lee Erb, represented by David P. Brown of Stryker/Brown Architects, for an 8040 Greenline Environmentally Sensitive Area review for a 370 square foot addition to an existing single family residence, at 235 Silverlode Drive; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is approximately 11,537 square feet and is located in the Affordable Housing-Planned Unit Development Zone District; and, WHEREAS, City Council Ordinance No. 52, Series of 1994 granted final review approval for Subdivision, Planned Unit Development, Growth Management Quota System Exemption, and Vested Rights for the Williams Ranch Project, including the Silverlode subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the subject house and proposed development are located at an elevation of approximately 8080 feet above sea level and within the review authority of the Planning and Zoning Commission, pursuant to Section 26.435.020 Environmentally Sensitive Areas; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve development at or 150 feet below the 8040 Greenline in conformance with the review criteria set forth in Section 26.435.030(C) 8040 Greenline review; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 18, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a_ to_ 09 vote, the 8040 Greenline Review for the Erb residence with conditions recommended by the Community Development Department; and. WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION as follows: Section 1 That the 8040 Greenline Review for the Erb residence, 235 Silverlode Drive, to add 370 square feet of floor area to the northwest corner of the existing house, is approved with the following conditions: 1. All prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit: a. The primary contractor shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. b. All tap fees, impacts fees, and building permit fees shall be paid. If an alternative agreement to delay payment of the Water Tap and/or Parks Impact fee is finalized, those fees shall be payable according to the agreement. c. The City Engineer shall approve the grading and drainage plan for the parcel and proposed addition. 3. The building permit application shall include: a. A copy of the final Ordinance and recorded P&Z Resolution. b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d. A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department and any approval from the Parks Department Director for off-site replacement or mitigation of removed trees, i f (18*>Ii (*1*Lâ‚¬-- e. The building plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire suppression system approved by the Aspen Fire Marshall. 4. No excavation or storage of dirt or material shall occur within tree driplines. 5. All construction vehicles, materials, and debris shall be maintained on-site and not within public rights-of-way unless specifically approved by the Director of the Streets Department. All vehicle parking, including contractors' and their employees', shall abide by the 2 hour residential parking limitation of the area. The applicant shall inform the contractor of this condition. 6. The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. 7. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record the Planning and Zoning Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. 8. The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction. [4840 1 9. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code as they pertain to utilities. 10. The Applicant or owner shall mitigate any public impacts that this project causes, including but not limited to utility expenses and sanitary sewer and water lines. Section 2: All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded. whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3: This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity o f the remaining portions thereo f. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on the 18th day of April, 2000. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Robert Blaich, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk Go Il 04/04/00 TUE 12:43 FAX 970 925 2258 STRYKER BROWN ARCHITECTS 0001/001 brown ARCH IT I CTS r-ACES.U.& TRANSMITTAL PHONE NOTES MCCTING NOTES JOBSITE VISIT TO: N{ CE- (_24ACE- 72 0 .%433 rAOM: -CaÂ» 2(1 242(544 DATE. ./1- , 00 RE! EAD racce=CE LD.T- 1-2- 49Â¢U/22.L~X 418,.P. faL CaEL 9(ft ta 40.C l.m- 9(-22 1 It P.51 cl:- 11- /*. 2.orÂ·*Ne O:Ficâ‚¬*- *WW- 04725 : /13 8 *7 9- RWAx-*if NU~ 80+0 PeÂ£*AFEC> lf- f>+ 7 1â‚¬h <Dp A*aa,2 nAL > '99*-7 4(* UP * gb % 9D % 3 D-1 > X .l .0 0 7 RD t. ' 4 . ~1~(Eit) STAVKERIROWN.COM 1 10 SOL Ir-4 SPRING STREET ASPEN, COLONADO 01 el 1 FAC.51\AILe 5)70 024.9268 'reLEPHONI â‚¬)70.925.2100 Erb Addition, 235 Silverlode Drive, Aspen 8040 Greenline LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: Erb Residence Addition Location: 235 Silverlode Drive Aspen, Colorado Parcel No. 273707430012 Lot 12, Silverlode Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado. APPLICANT: Name: Mary and Lee Erb Address: 8401 Greenwood Drive, Longmont, CO 80503 Phone #: 303.652.3600 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: David P. Brown, AIA Stryker/Brown Architects, pc Address: 119 S. Spring Street, Aspen, CO david@strykerbrown.com Phone #: 925.2100 fax: 925.2258 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): 0 Conditional Use 0 Conceptual PUD 0 Conceptual Historic Devt. 0 Special Review 0 Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) 0 Final Historic Development 0 Design Review Appeal 0 Conceptual SPA 0 Minor Historic Devt. 0 GMQS Allotment 0 Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) 0 Historic Demolition 0 GMQS Exemption 0 Subdivision 0 Historic Designation X ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Mountain View Plane 0 Subdivision Exemption (includes condominiumization) 0 Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion 0 Lot Split 0 Temporary Use 0 Other: 0 Lot Line Adjustment 0Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) The existing house is a three story single family residence with at-grade walk out conditions on the first two levels, both of which are partially buried into the hillside. It was built in conformance with Ordinance 30 design guidelines in place at the time of the permitting. The house was completed in 1999 and is smaller than the adjacent homes on lots 13 and 14. At the time of permitting, it was built 1100 sf of FAR below 100% of the allowable FAR. The house obtained no variances or special review permits. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) The addition will provide for a partially buried media room, with an adjacent (existing) powder/bath room on the northeast (away from the street) corner ofthe house, and a completly buried small storage room. The 370 sf addition is equal to approximately 11% ofthe existing space. The less than one story addition will be extremely difficult to see or notice from any public location, and hardly noticable from even the adjacent lot to the north. The addition will create no hazards, is not in a hazardous area, rather it is within an approved building envelope within a subdivision approved by the City of Aspen. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $1325 ,-0'bre-Application Conference Summary Â®-Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement LÂ®Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form 60"Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents c.@' Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents -Gliesponse to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application Refer to item 2.7, Response to Review Standards, Attachment 5 is actually an outline of the review process. Erb Addition, 235 Silverlode Drive, Aspen 8040 Greenline CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY* PLANNER: Nick Lelack, 920-5095 DATE: 3/7/00 PROJECT: Erb 8040 Greenline Review REPRESENTATIVE: David Philip Brown, AIA Stryker Brown Architects OWNER: Mary Ann and Lee Erb TYPE OF APPLICATION: 8040 Greenline Review DESCRIPTION: The proposal is to add a media room, small storage area, and shower to an existing powder room behind an existing house on Lot 12 of the Silverlode Subdivision. The addition consists of approximately 370 square feet. Land Use Code Section(s) Section 26.435.030,8040 Greenline Review; Review by: City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. Public Hearing: No, only a public meeting is required. Referral Agencies: Engineering, Parks, Fire, Water, ACSD Planning Fees: Planning Deposit Minor ($1155), covers six (6) hours of review time Referral Agency Fees: Engineering, Minor ($170) Total Deposit: $1325.00 (additional hours are billed at a rate of $195/hour) To apply, submit the following information: (Also see Section 26.304.030, Application and Fees) 1. Contained within a letter signed by the applicant, the applicant's name, address and telephone number, and the name, address, and telephone number of any representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. See attached letter 2. The street address, legal description, and parcel identification number of the property proposed for development. 235 Silverlode Drive Aspen, Colorado Parcel No. 273707430012 Lot 12, Silverlode Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel proposed for development, consisting of a current O.1 Erb Addition, 235 Silverlode Drive, Aspen 8040 Greenline certificate from a Title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. See attached Title Committment. 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. See attached Vicinity Map 5. A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. The site plan shall depict, at a minimum, the following information: a. The boundary of the property for which development is requested. b. Existing and proposed improvements. c. Significant natural features, including natural hazards and trees. d. Existing and proposed grades as two foot contours, with five foot intervals for grades over ten (10) percent e. Proposed elevations of the development. See attached Site Plan f. A description of proposed construction techniques to be used. Construction techniques to be used include excavation, concrete foundation walls, wood frame construction. 6. A site improvement survey certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado, showing the current status of the parcel including the current topography and vegetation. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Director if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) Survey attached. 7. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. See attached Description 8. Additional materials, documentation, or reports as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director. 9. Signed fee agreement See attached letter of Agreement 03- Erb Addition, 235 Silverlode Drive, Aspen 8040 Greenline 10. 14 Copies of the complete application packet and maps. HPC = 12; PZ = 10; GMC = PZ+5; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 1/ea.; Planning Staff= 2 11. Copies of prior approvals (Resolutions, Ordinances, Agreements, Covenants, etc.). See attached Ordinace 52.1994 and Silverlode Covenents In the event that you should have any questions regarding the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact Nick Lelack of the Community Development Department at 920-5095. * The foregoing summary is advisory only and is not binding on the City. The opinions contained herein are based on current zoning and regulations, which are subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not, in any way, create a legal or vested right. O 77 Mar-08-00 06:18P Lee and Mary Ann Erb 303 652 1602 P.02 Agreement for Pavment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Mary Ann and Lee Erb (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOI.LOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to ClTY an application for Erb Residence Addition, 235 Silverlode Drive, Lot 12 Silverlode Subdivision, Aspen, Co (hereinafter, TIIE PROJECT)- 2, APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of' Aspen Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 1999) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment ofall processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the propoxed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent ofthe costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefiled through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application, 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient ul formation to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5, 'Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $1325.00 which is for Six hours of Community Development staff time, and ifactual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of tile application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By: -~ 63-- k*,b .Iulie Ann Woods J . 1 5- 41-0 Community Development Director Date: Mailing Address: 840I Greenwood Drive Longmont, CO 80503 l. l Erb Addition, 235 Silverlode Drive, Aspen 8040 Greenline ATTACHMENT 2 MINIMUM SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ALL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 1. Contained within a letter signed by the applicant, the applicant's name, address and telephone number, and the name, address, and telephone number of any representative authorized to act on behal f of the applicant. See attached letter. 2. The street address, legal description, and parcel identification number of the property proposed for development. 235 Silverlode Drive Aspen, Colorado Parcel No. 273707430012 Lot 12, Silverlode Subdivision, Aspen, Colorado. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel proposed for development, consisting of a current certificate from a Title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. See attached Title Policy. 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. See attached vicinity map 5. A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. See attached site plan. 6. A site improvement survey certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado, showing the current status of the parcel including the current topography and vegetation. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Director if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) See attached Survey. 7. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Refer to attachment 2.7 8. Additional materials, documentation, or reports as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director. 2.6 Mar-08-00 06:18P Lee and Mary Ann Erb 303 652 1602 P Mary and Lee Erb 8401 Greenwood Drive I.ongmont Colorado 80503 303.652.3600 leeerb@concentric,net MEMORANDUM 10: Nick Lelach, Planner City of Aspen Department of Community Devlopment DATE: 3.8,00 RE. Addition to 235 Silverlode Drive, Lot 12, Silverlode Subdivision, Aspen NOTES: We are applying for permits for an addition to our residence in Aspen. Please be advised that David Brown Stryker/ Brown Architects 119 S. Spring St, Aspen, Co, 925-2100 is our designated representative for the process of obtaining approvals for 8040 Greentine review from the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. Furthermore, we agree to pay the fees required by the City of Aspen for Planning Review, City Engineering, Plan Check, Building Permit, and Water Tap. A check for $1325.00 is attached. We have paid "plan check" and "energy review" fees of $745.32 to the Department of Community Development at the time of application for a permit, Sincerely, C 1.515,227 C\AA Mary Ann and Lee }irb COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: August 26, 1999 at 8:30 AM Case No. PCT14578C2 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 2,900,000.00 Premium$ 2,645.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Re-Issue MARY ANN ERB (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 1,250,000.00 Premium$ 100.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Companion TO BE DETERMINED Tax Certificate: $10.00 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: MAX OF ASPEN, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOT 12, SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION, according to the Subdivision Plat thereof filed for record in Plat Book 37 at Page 3 and First Amendment thereof recorded August 20, 1998 in Plat Book 45 at Page 97. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG. 1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 970-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules 970-925-6527 FAX A and B are attached. AUTHORIZED AGENT 2.aCL SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: 1. Release of the land herein from the effect of Financing Statement from MAX OF ASPEN, LLC, debtor(s) to PITKIN COUNTY BANK AND TRUST, secured party, filed March 25, 1998 as Reception No. 414871. 2. Release by the Public Trustee of the, Deed of Trust from : MAX OF ASPEN, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY to the Public Trustee of the County of for the use of : PITKIN COUNTY BANK AND TRUST original amount : $ 1,200,000.00 dated : March 12, 1998 recorded : March 27, 1998 reception no. : 414957 3. Duly executed and acknowledged Deed, From : MAX OF ASPEN, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY To : MARY ANN ERB 4. Copy of the Registration duly stamped by the Secretary of State of the State of COLORADO evidencing registration of MAX OF ASPEN LLC and Trade Name Affidavit or Certificate of Authority of MAX OF ASPEN LLC evidencing the names and addresses of the Members and/or Managers authorized to act on behalf of said Limited Liability Company. 5. Duly acknowledged certificate of the authorized Managing Agent or Board of Directors of SILVERLODE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION certifying that there are no assessments for common expenses which remain unpaid or otherwise constitute a lien on the subject property. 6. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1990) has been paid or exempted. 7. Certificate of nonforeign status executed by the transferor(s). (This instrument is not required to be recorded) 8. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale, Notice to County Assessor as required by H.B. 1288 has been complied with. (This instrument is not required to be recorded, but must be delivered to and retained by the Assessors Office in the County in which the property is situated) 9. Completion of Form DR 1079 regarding the witholding of Colorado Tax on the sale by certain persons, corporations and firms selling Real Property in the State of Colorado. (This instrument is not required to be recorded) 7.36 SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patents recorded December 22, 1909 in Book 136 at Page 365, recorded May 20, 1949 in Book 175 at Page 162 and recorded December 24, 1902 in Book 55 at Page 116. 8. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States as reserved in United States Patents recorded November 22, 1910 in Book 136 at Page 373, and recorded December 24, 1902 in Book 55 at Page 116. 9. Perpetual right of way and easemants to extend or drive levels or tunnels through the subject property as set forth and reserved in deed recorded March 30, 1895 in Book 131 at Page 425. 10. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Agreement for Access and Slope Easement recorded January 25, 1985 in Book 480 at Page 494 and Amended Agreement recorded April 2, 1986 in Book 508 at Page 312. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Mutual Road and Utility Easement and Right of Way Agrement from Spruce Street to Smuggler Mountain Base Operations, recorded May 25, 1989 in Book 593 at Page 352 and re-recorded May 26, 1989 in Book 593 at Page 429. 12. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Ordinance No. 94-15, Series of 1994 by Board of County Commissioners recorded June 27, 1994 in Book 754 at Page 194. 13. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, recorded September 9, 1994 in Book 760 at Page 909 as Resolution No. 94-110. 14. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Ordinance No. 07, Series of 1994 by Board of County Commissioners recorded March 15, 1995 in Book 776 at Page 299. (Continued) 2.2'c SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS - (Continued) 15. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of Smuggler Mine Subdivision, recorded March 15, 1995 in Plat Book 36 at Page 77. 16. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Easement Agreement recorded March 15, 1995 in Book 776 at Page 301 and February 22,1996 as Reception No. 390141. 17. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Smuggler Mine Subdivision Improvements Agreement recorded March 15, 1995 in Book 776 at Page 307. 18. Reservation by Wright & Preusch Mining, Ltd., of any and all sub-surface and mineral rights below 50 feet below the surface; however, specifically without any accompanying right to use or in any way burden the surface estate to obtain and use the benefit of the ownership of the same, as set forth in deed recorded March 22, 1995 in Book 776 at Page 880. 19. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plats of Silverlode Subdivision and Williams Ranch Subdivision, recorded May 9, 1995 in Plat Book 37 at Page 3 and First amendment thereof recorded August 20, 1998 in Plat Book 45 at Page 97, and U.S. West Approval recorded May 9, 1995 in Book 780 at Page 368, and consent thereto recorded August 20, 1998 as Reception No. 420942. 20. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Williams Ranch - City of Aspen Annexation Agreement recorded May 9, 1995 in Book 780 at Page 370. 21. Those terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions, assessments and all matters as set forth in Declaration for Silverlode recorded May 12, 1995 in Book 780 at Page 755 and First Amendment thereto recorded November 5, 1998 as Reception No. 424224, deleting therefrom any restrictions indicating any preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 22. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Common Driveway Easement & Agreement recorded August 12, 1996 as Reception No. 395888 and Termination of Common Driveway Easement and Agreement recorded February 5, 1997 as Reception No. 401545 and September 7, 1999 as Reception No. 435254. 23. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Termination of Common Driveway Easement & Agreement recorded September 7, 1999 as Reception No. 435254. â‚¬.ac[ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - AND DISCLOSURES The Owner's Policy to be issued, if any shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B-Section 1. (2) Water rights, claims or title to water. (NOTE: THIS EXCEPTION WILL APPEAR ON THE OWNER'S AND MORTGAGE POLICY TO BE ISSUED HEREUNDER) Pursuant to Insurance Regulation 89-2; NOTE: Each title entity shall notify in writing every prospective insured in an owner's title insurance policy for a single family residence (including a condominim or townhouse unit) (i) of that title entity's general requirements for the deletion of an exception or exclusion to coverage relating to unfiled mechanics or materialmens liens, except when said coverage or insurance is extended to the insured under the terms of the policy. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanics' and/or Materialmen's Liens executed by the persons indicated in the attached copy of said affidavit must be furnished to the Company. Upon receipt of these items and any others requirements to be specified by the Company upon request, Pre-printed Item Number 4 may be deleted from the Owner's policy when issued. Please contact the Company for further information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing contained in this Paragraph shall be deemed to impose any requirement upon any title insurer to provide mechanics or materialmens lien coverage. NOTE: If the Company conducts the owners or loan closing under circumstances where it is responsible for the recording or filing of legal documents from said transaction, the Company will be deemed to have provided "Gap Coverage". Pursuant to Senate Bill 91-14 (CRS 10-11-122); (a) The Subject Real Property may be located in a Special Taxing District; (b) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained form the County treasurer of the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent; (c) Information regarding Special Districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor. NOTE: A tax Certificate will be ordered from the County Treasurer by the Company and the costs thereof charged to the proposed insured unless written instruction to the contrary are received by the company prior to the issuance of the Title Policy anticipated by this Commitment. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule B-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT14578C2 A and B are attached. 7.38 ~yker brown ARCHITECTS 119 SOUTH SPRING STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ( Phone ) (970) 925-2100 (Fax) (970) 925-2258 ( e-mail ) sba@strykerbrown,com 9- 35 19 / \\ Silver Ki Or :4.0. i VL J 4* 2, 3, *+F ,/ 9~ â€ž~~~~;~ 2444- 4,40, MountalnviewD,fg,0&\ 1.-- 44% t. Rd \:% ( se #04 1 N sierra 16 -<33./.=uÂ« s.w.eÂ°(w /*&6 .-I C At i - 4 40 1 4 qu Â« Erb Residence ali:j Music Y :f Tent l liJoidD,0*4 ~-4 ~T ~ ' Not drod may bÂ¢ shown or i j 82 0, mud in st,eet guide. Seme ro, G/fies~sg~ Hamm '4 Addition rICt Lake \00 , 5 Hunter 0 $ p,ivate, proposed, o~ under cons' 4 .1 /'.2 GoN Course' ~Â· Â° . C /4 y /2 4-4- i 1 01 Silverlode *#G* 1 0%,1 6 / - Subdivision . 14 4,2, T22<' 2 1,4. .....,i 2 /4.2 Mill ,â‚¬%24#31 1 Â» i &40:%/. 67 U 814 ranel & - 9/ e N 0 = :2/ A. *.r 9.0*UA~, Lot 12 2 Of i e 44 , I ,57 1 7 z 4 mal I : .if 04!,4,0:rip,E/,4% X (\ C 1,"mroae p. 1 ' c, 15 i <r 'Latkipurt~~ qi, 482 Durann~~ ~ 1 -1*-~~0 2~~4~~~~< / l 4 Aspen 0 4/ . 4Mall' 4 : f ilzE:FLE:i;*i +2/ Ul J L 235 Silverlode Drive ASPEN, COLORADO West Summit .c â€¢ ~**'ff--tjr,4.1, t'â€¢Â·. I *0 'NL~Â£f*; 7 22% r---7611 tjf50 Ute 'Ld ,41*Ed, 1/ ./1&3-ih CITY of Aspen wâ€ž p, 9 4 .15 >IapV~JE27. A 8040 Greenline L 4-~&$ fvlaw)/2 .49 SUBMISSION ' Lf. 1,~ya*, Vibb#Â°Â¥ A 3.8.2000 These documents have been prepared specifically for this zoning approval for theErh Addition. They are not suitable for use for building permits submission, on other projects or in other locations without the approval and participation of the Architect Reproduction is prohibited. Â©2000 stryker/brown ARCHITECTS AREA MAP 2.4- Erb Addition, 235 Silverlode Drive, Aspen 8040 Greenline ATTACHMENT 2.7 Written description of the proposal and explanation of how the proposal complies with the review standards: The addition will provide for a partially buried media room, with an adjacent existing) powder/bath room on the northeast (away from the street) corner of the house, and a completly buried small storage room. The 370 sf addition is equal to approximately 11% of the existing space. The less than one story addition will be extremely difficult to see or notice from any public location, and hardly noticable from even the adjacent lot to the north. The addition will create no hazards, is not in a hazardous area, rather it is within an approved building envelope within a subdivision approved by the City of Aspen. REVIEW STANDARDS: 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW (26.68.040) No development shall be permitted at, above, or one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040 greenline unless the commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the city. The parcel is within an approved lot and building envelope within a City of Aspen approved subdivision. It is a minor addition to an existin home. The parcel is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. The EPA and City of Aspen did extensive research during subdivision review and found the site free of hazardous or toxic soils. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequential effects on water pollution. The addition will only add about 230 sf of roof area to the existing structure. An existing dry well detention system is in place and the addition will be added to it. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequential effects on water pollution. The existing site was effectively stabilized during its original development by construction of retaining walls, landscaping and compaction of backfill used in construction of the existing home. 2.7 a- Erb Addition, 235 Silverlode Drive, Aspen 8040 Greenline 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the city. No additional use or users will be brought into the airshed. The proposal is for a media room (partially below grade) for the home entertainment system of the Owner, and a small storage room (below grade). The media room may permit the residents to stay home more often, rather than travel to entertainment venues in the region. This will reduce traffic and improve the air quality in the city. Because of the storage room to be added, an off-site storage facility will not be required, which will reduce traffic and improve the air quality in the city. 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. The design and location of any proposed development is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. A significant portion of the addition is below existing roof and much of the addition is below existing grade. There are no roads or trails proposed. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. Grading will minimize, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. Efforts will be made to retain a natural aesthetic to the landscape beyond the footprint of the addition. 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space, and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. The small 330 sf addition partially above grade is tucked under and against existing structure, limitting cutting and grading, maintaining open space, and will preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. The small 330 sf addition partially above grade is tucked under and against existing structure, set into the hillside, thus minimizing the bulk and height of the addition. The character of the mountain will not be affected and will be maintained. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. The only additional plumbing proposed is a single shower. 2Â·76 Erb Addition, 235 Silverlode Drive, Aspen 8040 Greenline 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said roads can be properly maintained. Silverlode drive is in place and properly maintained. No additional roads, or driveways are proposed. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. Silverlode drive , the site driveway, and site parking are in place. Adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment exists. The existing home is and the addition will be sprinklered for fire protection. 11. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Trails Plan are implemented in the proposed development, to the greatest extent practical. This is not really applicable. There is no impact on trails, or recreation, or parks by this addition to an existing home within an approved building envelope. '2./c Erb Addition, 235 Silverlode Drive, Aspen 8040 Greenline ATTACHMENT 3 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW 1. A plan of the proposed development, which shall depict at a minimum the following information: â€¢ The boundary of the property for which development is requested. â€¢ Existing and proposed improvements. â€¢ Significant natural features, including natural hazards and trees. 2. The plan shall also depict: â€¢ Existing and proposed grades as two foot contours, with five foot intervals for grades over ten (10) percent. â€¢ Proposed elevations of the development. â€¢ A description of proposed construction techniques to be used: the proposed addition will be built of wood framing on concrete foundation. Please refer to attached site plan and survey. 55.0 ATTACHMENT 4 REVIEW STANDARDS: 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW (26.68.040) No development shall be permitted at, above, or one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040 greenline unless the commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the city. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects oh water pollution. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the city. 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space, and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said roads can be properly maintained. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. 11. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Trails Plan are implemented in the proposed development, to the greatest extent practical. Please refer to item 2.7 which also requires a response to the review standards. 4.0 Erb Addition, 235 Silverlode Drive, Aspen 8040 Greenline ATTACHMENT 5 One Step Review by Planning Commission 1. Attend pre-application conference. During this one-on-one meeting, staff will determine the review process which applies to your development proposal and will identify the materials necessary to review your application. 2. Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting, you should respond to the application package and submit the requested number of copies of the complete application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. 3. Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, staff will review the application, and will notify you in writing whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the information you have submitted is adequate to review the request, and not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. 4. Staff Review of Development Application. Once your application is deemed complete, the review by the Commission will be scheduled on the first available agenda given the requirements for public notice. Staff will refer the application to other agencies for comments. The Planner assigned to your case or the agency may contact you if additional information is needed or if problems are identified. The Planner will prepare a review memo which addresses the proposal's compliance with the Land Use Code and incorporates the referral comments. The Planner will recommend approval, denial or tabling of the application and recommend appropriate conditions to this action. You will be called to pick up a copy of the memo and the agenda at the end ofthe week before your hearing, or we can mail it to you if you so request. 5. Planning Commission Review of Development Application. Your project will be presented to the Commission at a regularly scheduled meeting. The typical meeting includes a presentation by staff, a presentation by you or your representative, questions and comments by the review body and the public, and an action on the staff recommendation, unless additional information is requested by the review body. Final approval of any Development Application which amends a recorded document, such as a plat, agreement or deed restriction, will require the applicant to prepare an amended version ofthat document for review and approval by staff. Staff will provide the applicant with the applicable contents for the revised plat, while the City Attorney is normally in charge of the form for recorded agreements and deed restrictions. We suggest that you not go to the trouble or expense of preparing these documents until the staff has determined that your application is eligible for the requested amendment or exemption. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is submitted. 6. Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received final approval of your development application, you may submit a building permit. Your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code and will be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks, parking, open space and the like). Fees for water, sewer, parks and employee housing will be collected if due. 5.0 381193 B-780 P-385 05/09/95 02:58P PG 16 OF 84 ORDINANCE NO. 52 (SERIES OF 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN GRANTING FINAL REVIEW FOR SUBDIVISION, PUD, GMQS EXEMPTION, AND VESTED RIGHTS FOR THE WILLIAMS RANCH PROJECT TO CONSTRUCT 35 DEED RESTRICTED AFFORDABLE -HOUSING -UNITS AND 15 FREE MARKET LOT ON A PARCEL LOCATED IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH PM WHEREAS, the Smuggler Consolidated Mines Corporation ("Applicant") , represented by Tom Stevens and Gary Wright, submitted an application to the Planning Office requesting approval of the Williams Ranch development which consists of 35 deed restricted affordable housing units, 15 free market lots, Planned Unit Development, Subdivision, Rezoning, GMQS Exemption, Annexation, 8040 Greenline Review, and Special Review; and WHEREAS, the Williams Ranch property is located immediately adjacent to the City of Aspen in the AF-1 zone district of Pitkin County; and WHEREAS, the Applicant did file on December 12, 1991 with the City Clerk of the City of Aspen a Petition for Annexation to annex the subject property to the City of Aspen, and WHEREAS, on January 13, 1992, City Council did adopt Resolution No. 4, Series of 1992, finding substantial compliance with Section 31-12-107(1), C.R.S.; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 12, Series of 1992, at its regular meeting on March 23, 1994, did find and determine, following a public hearing, said Petition for Annexation to be in substantial compliance with __31-12-104 and 31-12-105, C.R.S, and 381193 B-780 P-389 05/09/95 02:58P PG 20 OF 84 C. The Master Deed Restriction shall be filed and approved by the Housing Office within 180 days of City Council approval cf the project. d. Ten of the Resident Occupied "RO" units shall comply with the RO requirement for the City of Aspen in the 1994 Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Office 1994 Affordable Housing Guidelines. The remaining five RO units shall meet all the requirements of the Housing Guidelines, except there will be no asset or income limitations for these residents. 6. The turnaround at the intersection of Freesilver Road and Williams Ranch Drive shall be redesigned subject to approval of the City Engineer and the Fire Chief. Alternately, the applicant shall install residential sprinkler systems in all residential units. 7. Lots 1 - 15 shall have a residential sprinkler system installed and these shall be indicated on the building permit drawings. 8.. Development on Lot 15 is limited to eighteen feet in height (plus five feet to the mid-point), as calculated by Pitkin County's Land Use Code. All other lots are subject to the 25 foot height limitation of the City Of Aspen, and are calculated using Pitkin County's definition for height. 9. The water pump serving the upper lots shall have adequate records of pump maintenance and servicing available for inspection by the Fire Marshall. 10. The emergency access road shall be a minimum of 20 feet wide and maintained in a passable condition on a year round basis. The improvements agreement, declarations, and covenants shall specify that snow removal will be provided by the Homeownerts Associations for the emergency access road. 11. The allowable floor area for the free market parcels shall not exceed 90% of what is permitted in the AH zone district. If the proposed floor area for any free market parcel is over 80% of the permitted floor area -for the AI[ zone district, then a complete 8040 Greenline Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be required prior to the issuance of any building permits for that lot. In the 8040 Grennline Review process, particular attention shall be focussed on requirements 7 and 8, which provide for the preservation of the mountain as a scenic resource and design to blend into the open character of the mountain. 12. Lots 1 - 15 shall have an engineer evaluate the site 5 CODE SUMMARY )OW.Â§CHEDÂ§IKE __ __ __4.1.ddogr,0.6* -!=9-I _12 | SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION [.ar I ' PROPERTY: LOT 12, Silverlude Subdivision, I Ide windows and associated items per plans, elevations and specifications. vindow unit frames to be clad finish, vefify color with architect. 235 Silverlode Drive, Aspen, Colorado ]Iazing types refer to mech. eng. specs. }perable windows to have insect screens. JURISDICTION: Cily of Aspen fy all rough openings in field pnor to window fabrication. ions shown are Simulite K-Bar (faux divided lights) BUILDING CODE: 1994 LIBC fy hardware type and finish with architect. Occupancy R-3, single family residence r to door schedule for exterior door. Type of Con,;truction V-N window are specified as Kolbe & Kolbe. TYPE NOMINAL SIZE MODEL HEAD HT. SILL HT. REMARKS __~__~ Minimum "R" Values for this structure: WXH NUMBER Exterior Walls: R-19 insulation EASEMENT (FIX) 2'-0"*2'-0" KCW12 9'-0" 4-LITES, slmule Roof: R-38 insulation batts CASEMENT 2'-0"*4'-0" KCW12 9'-0" Crawl Space: R-19 batts DOUBLE HUNG 2'-69(5'-0' 24 X 32 5 0" Pair-SEE ELEV. Slab: R-19 (3"rigid) B.U;ement W R-32 (3*'rigid +R13 batts) OLOR SHALL MATCH EXISTING WINDOWS Exterior Glazing: R-3 (low-e squared) Source of heat energy: Natural Gas/ Forced Air + radiant slab ZONING: AH/ PUD -Single Family Site Area: 11,537 SF (Ref: Subdivision Plat) FAR 4153 SF allowed FAR Setbacks: meets and bounds front, envetope per survey 20 Ft. south sides, 10 Ft. north side, 18 Ft. rear,per PUD Maximum Height: 25 Feet per Ordinance 52-1994, PITCO method to calculate IR SCHEDULE window/door schedule LOT 12 iide doors and associated items per pl@rs and specifications loor's rails, stiles and panels to be coorinated Mth various maken. Verify with shop drawings. oottom rails 12" nominal, ccorinated with various supplier5 /ide all doors with hardware and lock set per owem's specification. plans forÂ· paired doors and door action. ify all rough openings in field prior to fabrication. 3*terior doors to have threshold & weather strip. - - - INDEX TO DRAWINGS: MAKER NOMINAL SIZE MODEL REMARKS WXH NUMBER LIBERT-Y 3-0 X 6-8 MATCH EXISTING DOORS PANEL STYLE AND HARDWARE (BALDWIN) USERTY 2'-6"*81-0" RELOCATE EXISTING DOOR AO.1 INDEX, GEN. NOTES, ZONING LIBERTY 4'-6"18'-0" PAIR SLIDERS UBERTY 2'-6"*8'-0" POCKET WINDOW & DOOR SCHED. USERTY 2'-6"x8'-0" POCKET LIBERTY 2'-6"18'-0" SHOWER, TEMPERED GLASS u VERIFY ALLMAX OR S~LAR FRAME W/ A 1.0 SITE PLAN OWNER UBERTY 2'-6"*8'-0 MATCH EXISTING DOORS Al.1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN UBERTY 2'-6"18'-O INS. GLASS UPPER PANEL, WOOD LOWER PANEL A 1.2 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN UBERTY 2'-6"*7' -0 MATCH EXISTING DOORS Al.3 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A 1.4 ROOF PLAN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A 2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A 2.2 far EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS S.1-4 STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS Al-A4 EXISTING DRAWINGS, PLANS, A SUMMARY .... Lot. SECTIONS, ELEVATIONS, DETAILS -- -1 AcluAL . --0'F--14 IAI. All/AL. .... -m -al .I][0 --Em(~ -. -00 Boo 1*00 15.100 1.1/ 1,0100 I.*....1.-I....... 4.00 0m,oe .... 1.1. 106030 213,09 N. .%..0- 0/ 000 12,00 <00 -IC,00.- ./ coo 0. le.. 1.1. 1,310 n.. 21.- 1~90,00 .1100 13,al, 1MB,21 m.. "./O -{-*lut/FAR-,23.0 - -liE - - 0- Ill 8 NA NA PU NA 1 (31.--0111,3.7. 110. 85 =ZE GENERAL NOTES: (SilveriDdle 12,13,14) STRYKER/BROWN 1 The contract documents consist of the Agreement, the Drawings, and Ihe ARCHITECTS,P C Specifications, which are cooperative and continuous. W ork indicated or reasonably 300 SOUTH SPRING STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 implied in any one of the documents shall be supplied a: though fully covered in (970) 925-2251 F A X: 925 2258 all. Any discrepancy between the parts should be reported to the Architect immediately --74 '. 2. Contractor is respon,Gible for checking all contract documents, and field conditions \ 1 for accuracy and compatibility and for confirming that the work is buildable as 4 shown before proceeding with construction and placing orders for fabrication. If / there are any questions regarding these or other coordination questions, the Contractor is responsible for obtaining a clarification from the Architect before Au i Cle- proceeding with the work in quahon or any related work. The Contractor (and his i' 4'1 / 227 Sub-Contractors)are rebponsible for shop drawings necessary for the assembly of component eIements. 3. The Contractor shall subrnit al! proposed substitutions to the Architect in writing with sufficient information, samples and difference in cost. Substitutions must be 7 approved in writing before they may be used. If the Contractor , the Owner or the Owners'representative substitute a material, revise a construction detail, method of attachment or in any way alter #e work 80 that it does not conform with these documents without the Architect's written approval, such action will relieve the Archited of any responsibility of liability as to the aesthetic effect subsequent failure, property damage, personal liability,errors and /or omissioni, L .4 og- 4. Dimension.6 shown on drawings are to face of stud and face of concrete typical, (except as noted and except for interior elevatioru; which are to fi nish surface). Do 91*6_FL not scale the drawingt dimens,ons govern. Large scale details govern over small / sca\e deans. , 5. TvpicaL means similar for all conditions, unless otherwise noted. 6. Details are usually keyed only once (on the plans or elevations when they first occur) and are typical for similar conditions throughout unless otherwise noted. 7. Provide blocking in partitions as required for all millwork and accessory items ---\ attached to walls. General contractoris responsible for coordinatlon of the various <//- \ 64, trades. 8. The presence of the Architect on the job site does not imply concurrence or approval h of the work. The Contractor shall call specific items to the attention of the Architect if he wishes to obtain Architect's review 9. The Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining all required permits. 10. Mechanical, plumbing, fire alarm, fire sprinkler , smoke detector, telephone/TV and electrical subcontractors shall provide design/build eervices, in accordance with the criteria of these documenb and the Mechanical Engineer , for their respective speciality and are responsible for obtaining permib for their work . SILVERLODE 11. The work of this project is based on the foUowing documents provided to the Architects by the Owner . The Contractor is required to conform to all conditions and requirements therein SUBDIVISON a. Land Survey by High Country Eng.jeers, Glenwood Springs, Co. Project Number 96073.01, 1/23/97. b. Soils investigation by CTI. TliOMPSON,234 Center Drive, LOT #12 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 (303) 945 2809. Subsoil Study is SILVERLODE DRIVE dated . All recommendations of the subsoit - ASPEN, COLORADO study are to be followed and included in these documents by this refaence. 12 MECHANICAL: OWNER: a. Provide a return air duct at the top of all vautted ceiling rooms. Mary Ann and Lee Erb b. The heating system will be natural gas fired, high efficiency boiler with vent ASPEN, CO.81611 through the 8ide wail. UPPER LEVEL: radiant floor heat and forced air MAIN LEVEL: radiant floor heat and forced air LOWER I.EVEL: radiant floor heat. 13. Refer to hydrology study for retention wells prepared by High Country Engineers, Glenwoâ‚¬xi Springs, Co. DATE: ISSUE: 14. 28 FEB. 1997 PERMIT SET Before begining work the Contractor shall submit to the Architect a letter from each 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCTION SET roofing material manufacturer '8 warranty department that states: 14 FEB 2000 Addition a. Ali contract documents relating to the roof system have been reviewed. b. All materials are physically and chemically compatible with each other and the system, as designed, iS witable for the specified warranty c, The roof contractor is an approved applicator of the material's manufacturer e. All materials, from the roof deck up (excluding metal flashings but including the roof materials to seal the flashings), are covered in the warranty f rhe address and the location of the building. 15. By initiating any work based on tlese documents the Contractor certifies that these documents are complete and appropriate for comencing and completing the work of the project. 16. The buildings of this project are to be fire-sprinklered throughout. Fire Suspression subcontractor shall corrodinate in writing with the Mechanical Engineer prior to commencing work and shall provide design/build services in accordance with the criteria of these documents and be responsible for obtaining permits for this work Locate enunciator panel per City of Aspen if required. DRAFTING SYMBOLS 41 \ ~~g,F BUILDING SECTION ASSEMBLAGE TYPE SEE A4.0 ZONING, SUMMARY, INDEX, (,~~ CONSTRUCTION DETAIL ~ -- ELEVATION MARK NOTES, SCHEDULES 100) DOOR TAG ( 7 ) BUILDING GRID LINE (Dj WINDOWTAG A 0.1 STRYKER/BROWN ARCHITECTS,PC 300 SOUTH SPRING STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 8,611 (970) 925 2254 F A X 925-2258 N 39'*1 [3 J~ f 1 54 *, .2.44 ' Eg / 63 ,' 76 ' /d :4 i , 1'' / ' * 1 4-65330*433 / ' ' A.. OP NEW / , , , /' / A....O/ ' I I , , .OUT,>29 / , I /1 , WAIL / 1 j liJ# , ic,',, L 1 / ; 1 1, U ; 1 . i 0 4 18 6 L - / ~ ( , 3 4- , 1 1// 1 -, 1 1 1 1 0% ' 0.1 ' , i/< 1 3 C i i k /;52 f Fli 1 ; =-El #râ€¢Yl.IV 1 , , -I-_11- t.90 111'1 ' 710' 4 f 1 4 +11!~~1 44: ,7 -'. ; 1 I \ C A 11\ '' 1 1 ,) ./ / 1 0/F' I./'ll . ' i j l .6 1 \\ 4 2.1 1 SILVERLODE i ''',1 1 1 SUBDIVISON . j kn 'r' LOT #12 I h~ N SILVERLODE DRivE %l _J '1 4 h , ASPEN, COLORADO 1 ''' 1 l,J<il / / , 1 111'', i 4,'i; 1 ,' i~ ~ j, 1~ 't 1 itt -i \ ' h |\~ 1 ~, ~~ Mary Ann and Lee Erb 1 1 Mill Tr g f ,~,1111 . i . , 1 ASPEN, CO. 81611 2: 9,51/ C i#';' ' ' , 4/i /1 - ,\: \ U. 111 ,# 1 4, / iliSM Z ~ \ 9 . d. DATE: ISSUE 1 1 1 1 1.-21 1 28 FEB. 1997 PERMI'T SE - -- Â· 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCTION SET 14 Feb 2000 Addition - .. -~ .... I / 8.1 1 0.0 . '4/~ ~Ji< I li lif . I. -*% W-- K 1 I A--:17.10 # *'. 7. 214 i i i .-- -- - , / 2 / r:. : 16111,~ '' 1 1 1 7,71 1,1 , 1 N..... 1 ; t .f I : i.. i 1./. L.._------- '~ / SCALE: 1 /8"=1'-O SITE PLAN /73 SITE PLAN A 1.0 SILVERLOAD DRIVE 42'-6" ~ t 4'-0', ~' 14'*g 1/r V 'E' 0 <" ']/ 3 4' 5-81?yft~ 8Â·-G~ L ---_ 7-Â· 0 , - }1'-11/2 4 EqER EFT.\IN{NG - ~ ' . Â·~ O 1 1 2 4 WA].1 1 1 '0.0 7 I FAR11{rnt {nUR ~ ~ STRYKER/BROWN GRAVIi m i 9 IRAINAGE ARCHITECTS, P C 513 CONNIGED 1Â·0 - 59~ i ~ PERIMErER DRAIN , 119 sOUTH SPRING STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ' ' LIGHT (970} 925 2100 FAX. 925 2 258 -Prd .1 11 i WELL r 1 & /\ New Wall t. plat 1.i El.. 04 -0' - 4 1 777 b| C ONCREVE ~! I i G r â€ž01 APRON ' , 4 58 6 31/r ,Â· All 6' 2" AREA OF ~ S'll' POt ND. -- -1 F , F.D 1'0 , 1 1- /1- - 1, f NEW WAL[ /GARAGE 1 1 DRYWELL F.viebng 1,1,1,â€¢dat~on I ADDITION 1 ~ AlÂ®7 1 6 X |*JOR TYP .aU JLÂ»E=/-na n./- 1 ~ k07 h. 1 ! 1 , * EL. 105 STORAGE ! ~~-- ----fj __ _ ~~ ~! GARAGE L ROOM 107 108 f /6 51 4-3.Uh r--11 - I - - - -f'Fi ! = < 1 Al.1 ' -_ Â· All : -1.- U I EL. 97'-6- i P =8069'-6" N 1 4 ..FiQ 1 6 1-/ 2 IH*. ENCI.OSURE M cut enttng DUAVN SPOUT FROM - e-- xy 1 /Yrn X G YF, 10 4 W 1.1) TO WAILL & CL.(; ~ /N ./tall new 30 * 0 8 Jo. 1 /Luidalirn'wall 1 i . Fl.AlÂ· RCAF -CONNEL-r hi 01. ,) \ 4 4.-0" I \ + - _ "DRY'F' , 5 6,-511/44 , r 1 1 i I -1 100/ 1[E==F=r -i ' ,I 1 0 n~~~'*18,10,2/3" --- 9- 1 171 1.11 '2Ah 4; 2 6., 4 1 4\ up 11,1 + 1 -\ ' : 3T 6- 11" 1 1 i| 1 4 1 Arl \\ 1 1 ' belowbath *ove i 1 1 2 : 476-- 4 L J b.:3 3i - -4 i - -Â·10 . I ...4,4 1 /7Â· _uzz I /12 6 -~v-1 --, 1 O 4 23'-31/2 -101/2 j 2 / :4 '47 1/21 ./ lin ' MUI) 1 r.4 1 1! UP I k .4 - BL. 109901'_- 17 UP ~ g 1 -'7 4EL' 9191-01 ROOM ~ e = 80?1,-06 2R *6" I 1 > 36 P =8072'-0 100A N AR *6"* )! 1 1 , < 1. j 4 IT" 11Â· I 1 1 I 'T@11"i i li~ - ; J 9 1 111 1 & ; ENTRY i IALL j ! L -_*.,-' 1 100 IA .-221 jah, | 1 1 1 101, / 9/ 1 = A I :,1.. - ~ -1~lif,Â· 4-4 4 Â·. i 10(}B / 4 18 8 - . 1 b T 1, Ali j I , All'' M SILVERLODE I H- i' up li .(".01/1 . 4 =Ill- 51*G./ i i Â·/ .-Â·-- ?LAUNDRY - MECI I. ' ZR@'6" 0 1> 1-1 I, 105 9 1/,5 \ (10/ 1 I 06 i SUBDIVISON IT 0 1111 1 1 4'-~4191 -6 ' " tb-, I / 9'.3 " '. il 9'-81 i 2- M - - KOOR DRAIN |~ tHR NOâ„¢ i- LOT #12 i i AIEDIA / -~ - - AL== - >. 60 -,Â»--- JEL.Ely__.__~I~ 1-YPE]GYP IDÂ· 4 I -1 0 BEDROOM WALL k C 1 53 SlLVERLODE DRIVE IL' C ~ b. . 11=-=16:j~.::11 PER CODE ~ I OR [AUNDRY a I BATH ' g~ ' =e=T --8 I J.. Â· , CHUIP -Â· ~ Â· 6 1 Mary Ann and Lee Erb 101A r OWNERÂ· 1 ' -- -,j-i'vir) L Â»1 H ASPEN, CO 81611 . r -1-1 , BATH ' f ' I rl i . in 2, r Il tl 41 1 8 1 104A /1 I 1 -EX 5 1 t 1 . 1 A f - . , UNA 1 1 4_~2-22=272_11 - O 4.._ -~ Â·Â·Â· . 1 4 ,) BATH AE--j~1 --V- d - Â· Â·,18- ~ 1 103A Y| --t-| /1& 2B 4. 1-- /BEDROOM ''1 1 to , 28 FEB. 1997 PERMIT SET ZONING h l A L j 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCTION SET 14 FEB 2000 MEDIA ROOM in ~_ r ' I 1 ~ ADDITION 103 UP ) \ U...EL. 10tl'.4- O 1 DR/,Val, ~ ~ ~ - 1- 3, ~ 1 1 1 ..1 i /16 t., 106'. craivispace I | 1 CLST. u - 02 + I IlÂ·' - ~ GREY BOX -4.11 r --11 VENTDR~ER 1 - 51â€¢ACE AVAIL.ABL.1( ~ ASPEN, COLORADO .. 5 5 : 1 24 l '0â€¢/ / DATE: ISSUE: I ' / 104 : 2.R(06" 4-,> , 1 IT(Â®11" r $ ' i 4~ 1 1 BEDROOM .4 6 i r a ST. p CIm -1- J , .5 ==al i-i) L i ~~ 1, 1038 4 104B , 1â‚¬ FLIGHT li~ 21 4~ i \ i H Â·Â·5.>1 CONC WALL - i â€¢ t X '5 5, .1 3 + f____~ ~ _~ 6,f | GRAVEI. Fill ' -CO~NEXCT TO - 1 -1 ; PER]METER DRAIN + 2 A . 9,3.0 1%-2-/-- \ 4*3.07 . \ ~ ~ -1 I r / 13'-4 3/4" ~ --1---- /1. .11-I -I-" I-- 1 1 Â·1.-4.z , (H) 1 SCALE: 1 /8"=1'-0" '1 1 ft Â· ' 1 .- .-__ 1829_1/E_ y 23'-81/2,1 1 J 42'-6" 1 1- --- ----Y FLOOR PLANS 4------- ---- -1--- Â·Â·-----Â·--- --~ P. (A j i 13, i. 4 11 1.'E J ~. LOWER I.EVEL A 1.1 19'10" 17'-11" 6'-10" 1 16'-10" 10'-10 1/2 12'-5 1/2 66'-0" 21'-5" 17'-2" 3/4- 1/1 1 77-9 3/4- ~ 5 6'-10" 06 -2- : 6'-0" IÂ»Â«. p- ---- AREA OF NEW . ADDITION A Â·81 1 K. .0 03 f E G C' / ~ 4.41 1 7-' 14.9 1/r 1 5-8 1/r - 1 -71417- - 7-1 1 E. 1 9.-6. 1 30.6. f STRYKER/BROWN l0 -1 I .2 -er:- i ARCHITECTS, PC 208, 1 9 1 119 St) U T H SPRING STREET t Â·0"- 20 3.:r f 3'4'. 4' lir' 1 ~ 410 y - 40:1(r'- -t -3'rq' f- 3'-81 f < 4.-lfr,,~ , f | * ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 (970) 925 2100 F A X: 925-2258 1 1-_ - 9 1 N 12â„¢r , I .41 11 1 : R,m,)ve ex'ting co/,1 be'in,4 } / Al L - - 1.~1 replace with heavy â€žinber MUR bemw 1 ' 0 RAT DECK 0 1 per s,rucurat __ ;B Wl STONE 1-2 , 1 i / _- SulfAC-10' - -7.-.- --4- -cr -/ ''i~)Mt- t~/-'~63__ 1 - Â· lit , p : f lixilf(i.6 Eâ„¢Â·nor waU ' C -- Neâ€¢.9 & 2*tefier wall 0,4 ~ New foundati. n w/1 on exten.,r face el 4 'f' I I I I i' 1 411 f hiu.idat,onÂ¥,all I 32-64&9=-5-:u -EVE-1-ac- 1 L 2 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 -lili i HEAÂ·Â¥LATOR ~ r ' -12'=21 -_-2 - . 2 1 C ' GAS I.OC KIT, 1 il I i I 1 1 1 i ~i--- . ' ~ ,} EL.,1~ir' ~ lili / 2 44'k 1 A I c . -~ " 1]IVING RM. Fil' 7 ~ vaulted Â£ eding -< 2 *{56 : 5 ''.+ Art , ABOU 1 200 lili' i, li 1 < f"% ' r *3.1 j 1 1 1 1 al,ove | 1 H 11 1 1 1 1 1 [22-1 ,"*-31191,Â· 2'-0"-4-2:-113/11*1_1'-f - â‚¬ 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 + 1 1 '03 1 ! 1 1 1 1 l ' I .,1 8 .-1/ 206, r - -3 1,Ep DN UP | 13 3 ZOE j i H f 205 â€¢, . Â· I 1, h -U DOWN SPOUT - 18R @6213 - -t -It- A Mium,ABOVE. t~Â·irl 17T @ 1~t' 7,-_ 3'zi' - 6-- J~8 - -t, !315_3/5 . b . Dipl; SOUND WS AS REQÂ·D 1 1 Found.Eonwall' 1 01 1 (207) / 1 KÂ«' I 9 demo e.,stin' walt M - -411 | atâ€žp, e>18Â¢1,45 1 6 P01VDER ABOVE - - 4 201 C \ 1,1,)WER . . rop. '99.. ./.Open* 27' ' & , l j ' be..6 4/ ,3,-: ,- - .-F : - , ' 4 EL 110'-0" 4 6 4,109'-9' f),17,1 1.kED, 1 TD)(Di, | c J 9 , Â·â€¢ a 8082'-0" 81. 1 ! 1 ~*BOVE 1.---, 2- t=Â£2. -Ll- ~ , 1 -2,3 5-14â€¢ 7- 9 --1 L 1 \ 1 1--- -- -- -- -- 3 DOWN Spour - ' , E ,} ~ k. 1 STONEULE , ~ / 1061"' 1 - 1 / i 1 DINING 1 D/W KITCHEN ~ i t ' 4.00 1 203 202 r - 1 SILVERLODE i I M 1 A.3.1 , I ~109'-8" 1 109 -11" + SUBDIVISON .,1 21 1 I \1 - LOT #12 ' ' 1 Wic 1 1 1 7 1 -SILVERLODE DRIVE | ' i ~ tr, I *La<-4-1-t--4-~11'-4 I ASPEN. COLORADO i il 1 -L ----1--- -- -- ---4-0---------- 12 --0 1 0 --7 i ' 1 I~..1 1 1 1 OWNER: 1 L - - - - - - -1 1,11 1 , J, 202 ~ i Mary Ann and Lee Erb 1 5 1Fil [_1__41in j I I l iEli , I ASPEN, CO. 81611 - 111 %1 t 1 1 1 PAli 1 (4 4 - | -- ----- - 4~~- 4 %4 5. 1 1 -- -- DATE: ESUE 1 i i i BUM 7-IN C.ABNE1Â·RY - 1. ''I~'I~ 28 FEB. 1997 PERMIT SET ': 1091-9 11 MAR. 1997 ZONING L- -- - - - ~~ =Ii=== DECORAr:VE -- 1 ~~ 1 GAS APFUANCE U 14 FEB. 2000 Media Room Addition 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCTION SET 1 BYHEATNGLOW U 8000 GDY. I U 11 9 0 % 1 1 1 ~ ii~ j,~~,~~ Sre,NE HEARTH 1 1 1 4 , El\BEU-,41 : 1 i 0 L 1 1 1 1 1 yuwl 1 1 1 1% e.4. i 1 ' 11 1 " C' 1 1 1 1 I i 51 1 1 1 L_ ------- $ '* â€¢ Â· 2-1014. 6 1 -- - -1 15 1- 1 i 6)- 1 . ---- - ' --Jr B .1 5'4 1/E _.' 4 2' M ' AM) ~__ _e~-~1-11 #--- : 30 9. - --- - --- - 1 H i Â· -~ SCALE: 1/4"=1 -U 1-1 1 1 L FLOOR PLAN Ah 'B (G , C') i D, 02 , C/in MAIN LEVEL A 1.2 413/ 6'-10" 1=-,-Ull 2 10" , 2,-9. 19'-19 AREA OF NEW - ADDITION ~__j/- E â€ž Gi ~ STRYKER/BROWN ARCHITECTS, PC | .0 119 SOUTH SPRING STRBEr iA ' C, D 4 AS PEN. COLORADO 81611 1 191 (20* 1 (970) 925-2100 F A X 925 2258 I 1 i-â€žn.4-- 4 -j 'rd.___ -1 --- -- - 9-8__- 1 :1 1 11 11 -13, --i= i ji~ -,I- - [Ube,le win<loW t 1 1 1- 1 frum powl' room i - 4 EL. 115'41 ~ below ~,i 1 - ; 421 , dt '1=7=75=- - 4 Xii / 4--- / \ 1 1 - in - 1 if/ 4 i t- ...r f- f /0, Ir ' 1 L . - 4 2.4-T DN I 1 1 r VEST~BULE , CLST. 304 1 .... - ---- ---- -- ---------- - --1 1 1 1 4 1 3 ! 2.- l.---- 1 1 n / / /4., EL 120'-0" i 9 f~ - Fl~OOR DRAIN ~ ~ 1 # 0 , Â·' 2 \1 ..~Â·ht ~ IN Câ‚¬~RHER ) 1 1 4/ $ _ _Â» ---..P~ 8-1'_- ... _ j-3,=Brl- 1-- 1-8' 743- -f 2 -21.---0 ----Ucket>-----/r ' f 300 i i (bo, 3 6, Â¥ 1 - =~ U 4 W 0 18 AFF INI r- ./- Ii- J==7 =-4 1 11.[C SILVERLODE 1 (Fl'El) Â· i A:'- -- _ . ! f ,-1 - 1 4 3 16. A.3.1 - , E-1,-21, 1 N 1, \ i ..AS.1,1 SUBDIVISON ' 1 1 J.- 2 ;; 1 DECK I MASTER P ~ BATH 1 - LOT #12 302 BEDROOM - lil - - 303 \ x iMI i - ---- --- Plm - - 191 1 301 SILVERLODE DRIVE ~ ~ i ASPEN, COLORADO L -- -- , |if al )~1' OWNER: SPACH AVA]LABLE - 1 0 1 1 Mary Ann and Lee Erb. PORLAUNDRY ASPEN, CO. 81611 1 I '11 I I aiurs , 11 h , i Ii-'1 :I --- - --121=:91--61~ I tai 181 I @fl 2 - n IG] 4 | 4 Ir 7-91/r ' 1 I .- - Â·-- -1*~161~r DATE: [SSUE: , 10-2 lizÂ· i i 1---1.. 1 2 261-1" i 28 FEB 1997 PERMIT SET i ! --- -- 1 1 1 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCTION SET ' ' 14 Feb. 2000 Media Room Addition 1 ! 1 ' 1 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 -- j 1 1 1 \ ~- 46) ' 1 1 1 1/ $ 1 1 I I JU- \ 1-1 1 1 1 11- ~ -2-- 1 _ _-_ _ 4- - - -- -- , - '5' 6- .-- 1 i L Â· - 1- 1 . :6.tai 1 1- 2.4 1 1 +H, ' 1' $ 1 i ! SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" ~ , i ' FLOOR PLAN il 1 11 A B A â‚¬1 4 E (F , 1 /97) UPPER LEVEL A 1.3 41.37 wit-,ZI 14'-3 39'-3/4 - 6-2 1/r 3'-0" j. 3'-0" ; 6' 1 1 ' .,/UDI-,8 STRYKER/BROWN G AR CH ITECTS, P C A) B; C D 1 . 119 SOUTH SPRING STRE /7 ASPEN, Col.ORADO 81611 ; 11 13-~ 1 f {97{)) 925 - 2 100 FAX' 925-2258 ]2012 I. 1 4 H , 12}L< >I ~~Id'NSFIL' 4 1 4 nut-j 1 41/ 14 4-4.-1, 1 1 L DIi<Â·I 0 -- -Â·- PAR,l'El WALL -- -- - 1 --- â€¢ BELOW + 4 ft,4.4 ;-4// 2/11 /X AREA ~116-*J 'i_J i ~~g~ j ~ c - OF NEW ADDITION al { 1 1 11 I- 1 14 1[14 1 1 I 1. 1 1 3.L _J l. + 1 ' 'A<ur]-1 ~~- '21 064 I ~ 12/12 CR[CKET 21 1 Rn/GE VENT - , 5 - " S ~ 141.hing T---r-------- ------ 1 1 1 T QN 1\TrÂ« 12 /12 4 RED(;E ~ENT i i v CurrEM ---i Â· ~ 1 A 14 12 12/12 i ----91 SNOW dUARDS --~ 1 ' , 1 - .__- _-i-u-- =-IÂ·-=-=.-=-14_flff57211--tt i I ~ HOC)FDRA[N IN -0 1. 1 1 EX-rE,n~OF T iT 1 1 DECK BEI OW A 5101'Â£ 1/4'71 -0â„¢IN.0 , ,-r + ~ ' * - - -- I .4/12 , 1 IN -1 .2-.Ill--al.af 71,442 | / 4-- -- -t= 16 A42Â· X 1-1-f -L ?// 2 1 4 1-+=4=4==-t-t-+ - 'A41; *2 j 1 '1 1 1 1/ SILVERLODE 1 1 | 12/12 SUBDIVISON 1 DE' K , Blit OV.' 4/12 I . 6,12 LOT #12 SILVERLODE DRIVE 12/U ASPEN, COLORADO 1 61 1 //31 6/12 \421 + 1 1 Mary Ann and Lee Erb , OWNER: 1 1!11 9Â»- 1 3/12 ASPEN, CO. 81611 1 1 --> \-4 1 1 i RIDGE VENT - -1 1 I i SNOW GUARDS -~ 1 i 1 4, 1 1 DATE: ISSUE: ~ - 911,1'1'ER'/ I t'ARUIT WAI -- â€¢~ RAT RI)OF -> -SEE 2, A20 28 FEB. 1997 PERMIT SET [DOWN SK)ul -SEE 1 / A10 SLOPE: 1/4"/1'4 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCnON SET 14 Feb. 2000 MEDIA ROOM 1 ~00+~----e-*A-+7'=41 \\ r ADDmON 1 --- 1 1 4-41 - , . . 4 1 . SNOW GUARDS - , 1 \ /1. ~- - EXTENT OF ~ 1 2/1' | , 10,11 I WATERPROOPING ~ J V i MEMBRANE ! -4-- -- RIDGE V*a-c.===ENEE~ ' f DECK ~ ssÂ»?32----T t 1 1 1 1 '1 BELOW 12.--*' 1 10/3, 1 1 1 A.1 ' i 4 1 -id- i \ 1 -1 -------1 i ~ 1 1 'xw,p sTq.. - -.-' - z ; i WELL l 1 --49- LIGHT ~ 1\ _--- , 1 ~ 9,01Â¥r'- 1- la : Â¤=Em=gm=1==2== 1 ~ SCALE: 1/4"=1 i 1, 'H 1 , ROOF PLAN , :G; 1 , i 1 11 i 1 1 1 11 1 1 4 5 C D F F <Th ROOF PLAN (Al.47 miE __ _ ~ U. 1 -...J- 1 - - - -111221, -4 .i-k --i- ...u __-bÂ·g 313.38 sq ft -- - I. STRYK-ER/BROWN / B ARCHITECTS,PC 6 .91 , _ 22 q. f 0 i '-' - T irr- -- * ' <. 1 additional r 1 0-;'-4 - -- - 1 T, 119 SOUTH SPRING STREET IN | ~ ~ ASPEN, col.ORADo 81611 j storage I |~ 128.04 sqft~H,0 1 IL=*r==, 1ll (970) 925-2100 FAX 925-2258 542.04 sq ft I~1 ' ' forwmdow It \' ' N++444+4.-Â·Ul 1 MI. f X . -0Â· 2 below grade ~ i ~ ~ DoubJe FAR lkÂ· : 1 . ,/mcIECCECCU garage -~_~ -1 ' I i I~ head 191 11. "Â· .Ilttl~til 1 8 I | 1 Ht-+*HÂ·+H-11 Â»~ Â» -~ 1 4 " /.1/ 0 ' ~ ~ 839Â·02 sqft 4' Back fill 91 N i inaccessable u- - 1 existing 4 Il '4 8 --TE 4 W ~1- 1 - -11-4 64 + t 51 1 111 1 i " 1- . * 1 1832.08 sq ft fit--uum-"-51 5.tii ' _1 1 existing ---------- -Ir-------------1 Il f-=204 1 UPPER LEVEL 1 J 11 1 -1 1 1 1 WM 6 1 'I11 , 1 FAR PLAN 111 l- - 11 t. 1-1-1- t.-rrÂ·unt)/*---- SILVERLODE f --- -- -Wilt- ._ SUBDIVISON LOWER LEVEL FAR PLAN LOT #12 ASPEN, COLORADO SILVERLODE DRIVE 1-i-k-- -__J~ME_____LU'7_ 4__-"__ 1_1~:4.-.-E---411Â·-_ OWNERÂ· 1~ ~~ ~ ~~ f- Â£~- f ~' --T--'1.- f_I,[-f-I{-~--'~- ~'Lp ' Mary Ann and Lee Erb 1 :421~4 334.15 sqft ASPEN. CO. 81611 1 1/91,41// proposed addition DATE: ISSUE: 4 4. .b<. 9. 1 1 -~ - 11 MAR. 1997 ZONING 741/& , \ . Â£-- 28 FEB. 1997 PERMIT SET AREA SUMMARY 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCTION SET .4 1 2 9 .1 4 - M. ADDnlON 14 FEB 2000 MEDIA ROOM 0% _ ~ ** - - -mt@Et.*1~-- -- - f 1598.17 sq ft .21#.'Ul'.--/IFT _ 12000 m- - 1- .7 415.45 sqit -'/1// Frit<I.>fut/ existing -- * :- 590 UN 1 V ~&:':...WG@@iwi.-Fun@4W ~ ~ ~~ ~~-1- - 7 61..,62 *ea~@5, â€¢*Â¥~- ./ I /V<>41 El 1.1-* . Double FAR for i - I. Window Head +9' | ~0< XI lili 4 , ~ area - b.,h~/ ' Ill' I ' -9- -__ lam 1/j ./\ /\ lilli r -ec- C El 1 ~ 250Â«11111 3 - n -li~W'il</8.- =- 329.36 sq ft~ ~ 1- .aa.,au@@Gr ...... - - -- U . - Deck area v b<, 4 1 -7 1 ' ~ - 8 ...- 491Â«> L __ A_ m -I = /2. C. e. Â»4 rul_/ ....Aug , 240.01 sq ft _L _ ~M '4 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" 4 Double FAR for Window Head +9 , ~ FLOOR PLANS L 4 I - 19/43 9 . 1 \ ~ t, 61:Â£404\ ; Al. ' Al.5 MAIN LEVEL FAR PLAN STRYKER/BROWN ARCHITECTS, PC 300 SOUTH SPRING STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-2254 P A X: 925-2258 L.| L' , 'DI , B' t.t) 1 1 .., :71Â·Â©irÂ¢52.5 L .~ AU ' U ,-' NEW - ..--Ill 1 ....1 4 ./.U. ADDITTON E E-111 11-- iz... 54 4 4 4 1, rl lili. 1 11 2 /7 1 r f PLAT~UY 1~4% 'Caa . 4 fit / / //1 \ 27*27 M \11 TOA.1. '07.--4 .0 "'r. Al ' 1 Up,FR Bog! )ru -- * 1 -1 9, =21- 1 C 6. / 23Â·| 1 \ 1 . / 'Lur'll ..h,(I r lu ~::42- 44/4. 4, . - --1 y , -U-L j [d BET+3111 - 9 111-jIf --1 /: di, I +*9- ,Â·r- 9? "1 -r-lt-Rt**t ffil[-7 4 --1] MAA L[VEL + - - i le=se, ... . .. ro~Â·iw,r 4 -i f - 4&m'lly + 1 1/11--- . 1/: 1 \ 2 - ,Ah.UIYEk + 1Â»,C.uv. G.Ula.VE, - I ..O-./ TOC- W./ - -1 1 4/-1 7,$\.-<0~7 -Ch Â«071+ rn .00.1, ELEVATION /ih **SÂ¥ ELEVATION 439/ SILVERLODE SUBDIVISON LOT #12 SILVERLODE DRIVE ASPEN, COLORADO OWNER: MAX OF ASPEN, LLC. ASPEN, CO. 51611 0 q.1 if: 12, 6 + (4 1 6 J .' ''U 1 1 4 1 1 ./ A J to/ \ , qgÂ·ell-/I - _1- --- - , 1 1 ' DATE : ISSUE ~ i- --46 9-_ ~~I-2--2_~"----4------~---- ----- - i) .f--1 M Â»41 28 FEB. 1997 PERMIT SEr .,4.,-.4 $/' 11 MAR. 1997 ZONING ~D.-,d .5 'tÂ·53Â»4 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCnON SE -- I I .9-L* -ph ~I--Â»flf' - -- NEW 1 / 1-4-1 - 1~Wyg~fr.11.-A ADDmoN Â·-L / 254 -r <171..1]191~ 11 7 --49 -p* \ 1 1* 1 11 07.,r-r __~ ~-Jcilimb a- Â«i 11 ''-346 .2.- al NNI 1%28**r'., :lip 4 i. 1 -Â· 11.-Â·. Vere-k. -re=- 1 .. p 1 1 h .Â· Â·|Â· 'rÂ·Er- T.2-- ' 4 133201/-- / 0 I'll,11' 1 -L- i =1 -- 11117 zL '11 :rit41 --- :g' a IQI 'al f fIN-ti~An Â·Ii| 1 1 -21*lut + 1---1------ -- ---.----- -- 9. 1-- .._ --.. _ 1 ---"mull T OF-tw r *t . --' 1 11 ~-Tr- NEW , 1 ---2- 1 lili ADDITION . unlaull__ 1 , 1 ~~ _ _ * tOI.,9.. 1 1 , To..1-Â·, I *..v. ./92*E a. 3 7 ...... T...... SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" Nofmt EXTERIOR ELEVATION rih *66* ELEVATION rn EAST ELEVATION 49/ A 2.1 ST RY K-E R/BROWN ARCHITECTS,PC 119 SOUTH SPRING STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970)925.2100 FAX: 925-2258 styrkerbrnwn.am I.%5/ 4 pV ' 1 1 !1 . i , ~79~ i ' ' 11,Â« 1 1 Ty{Em __T: /5/ r'Tl , + =- - 2 he, LU i 04 ----~--- - 1.. ~-14.--3/~ - <~- -P -1 --. 4- ', u -94 / 42/.1 V.*~I.. -2+4/7,1 _ 1 /4.- lili 1 11 A BU h Â« 101..\w r .11-8 Wl E'EY--L'k/ -=- -:=:=c= ['F--=-~-c----2-22=-u~===;2,7 Frial'11_ ~~~Ci- Tor-*W,r :Im 10] lai 9 4 TI . rj' 7 -2 ==7 16.~----'Ul i - ---~- 6/4200 ft Qw. r..Z 'ic. 1 Il-1 =-- i 289/565 sq ft I . I . r '. .:-/W-'k -T .2 =2 r-- -n ~ ~ ~ ~~.~i below gradâ‚¬ I lf--30 nAlm 49/530 sqft 2 / I \*7 -'/. x' â‚¬ 14, . 4 660.61 sqft - . . . .~ , ~y'. h. TO- below grade 1.-/'r/l 1 East Elevation 7.0,-rÂ·Â·r i.clr -,r~ North Elevation SILVERLODE SUBDIVISON LOT #12 SILVERLODE DRIVE ASPEN. COLORADO 'Cl ~~~ ~~~ /0 1 Alâ€¢ , ' 1 1 9 Â£ 11 1111 OWNER: 1 1 ' Mag Ann and Ii,e Erb. 11\\ --------n------- - i . i Â·ASPEN, CO. 81611 1 1 1 1 1 1 lAi .4, ' '1 1 lA LUJ 1/till_f~~Iil~3.2-23I ;C J_-~ i E~Â£*-- /9Â¥Rf 28 FEB. 1997 PERMIT SET -*r 1.4. - DATE: ISSUE- CLAT#IrI 1 +/,/ I. '7p I lillil' 1 1 1 1 .45 V ~ ' | ~~~- k -- A~r~ON _ 1 F) 0 9%Â§ 11---1 11 1.1 2 + 07AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCTION SET 11 MAR. 1997 ZONING Unwr -1.- 4 --- 1 I B.j Wm e. - t 0% [FÂ« 11 'fl 1 \ ' --#Â¥Â®6 14 Feb 2000 Add Media Room 1If. 12'r 0 / 650 sq ft ~ 1- TE- 1--1 / . .Ag'.Ga'....*â€ž -1. 1 1 - . " 1 1 W .1/'-/I .. 1.---4- - - 2 2 77#JKT-0 -7 41/407 sqft r.*1.- /0 ' . I ./ i,-l e,-- 1 / 10 . 11 â€¢, , 4,~ : 1 -)- - - - L.1 -MA'16'M' 7- M*.-Unlit , ......... \ \ -2- -- - - . =---- - NT-1 Â·- 'Mr' 7-,-1-9-F-1-177TT ].i;. - - 7-4* A/M~,p-:' 1 4, L 2-_- .(1-M 1 1 7~,~ t.~â€žKIU~-L 10/636 sq ft = - -~3':".'< < 7'~-~< 5' A :>. ''Â·1~ .~>:~EÂ·.f ./353/420 sqft n.... South Elevation- h *. \ il C.u. fj 3.81 ag.fly- T Â£3.C- 1W~ 9 6.14 sq ft West Elevation SCALE: 1 /8"=1'-0" Below Grade Surface Area Total Surface Area % of Floor Area EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS / FAR north east west south north east west south exempt from FAR Upper Level 120' 0 na 0 Main Level 110' 26+ 289+ 0+ 41=356 sf 420+565+650+407=2042 sf 17.43% A 2.2 far Lower Level and Garage 100' and 97'-6" 449+660+10+353=1472 sf 530+661+636+420=2246 sf 65.54% 1Â¥i STRYKER/BROWN + A \Lu ARCHITECTS, PC 09 30 SOUT SPRIN STREE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-2254 FAX: 925-2258 ADD \T\%* \ N 89Â°41'13"E 117.64 nU.:1-0.:345/'66. , ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ' ' / 68 / 70 1 72 '76 1 78 1 8080 , 82 ; 84 , , , 74 , ,/ 86 1 88 /' 111' 1 1 / \ 6...4.,St /1./1./. i , \ 1 , I lilit' / / / , AREAOBNEW / / 1 1 1 , 1 //fl j / i / '\ 1 Esjqjeos394 1 I 1 1 It \/ , f I / , 1 1 1 t , f / / / 1 1 , 1 / L } .Â·,eme &2*29*3Â»-+44Yt 3 / / / 1 - -Ill d / / 1 \ / k. / I. , I '11/ 1 / 80.51 1 1, / / .OUL=R / / ,Ii / I'll' lit / j WALL / / ' li ' coN~ A;RON Â·- a,rpa wr 1 1 ' \- 1 7 1/ 1 / , \ / ./ / & iiI / / 1 / d t 1 1 E \ ' ' Ily/ , / 1 / :.2 , â‚¬ , 941~~ // -El 1 1 / LJ ' 1. . i.5 0 43 1 / -, 4 k 1 1 1 / 69.271 -* i // \ 1< 1, 1 1 4 1/4,\\ 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 , t. 1 1 11 1 /2 1 / 1 \ 1 -1 1 1 11 j Al GARAGE LEVEL i j 0 1 ~ 8069.5' 1 j 2. i 1 1 . 1 % r. / ... % 1 Â£ 1 / 4... / 1 1 1 Q \111 1 JIll 3.../// J' 1 ' r. 1 It 1 1 J I ~ 1 ' 1 / / 1 1 1 , 1 / 1 1 2~ 1 1 1 , \ A \11 4 4 1/ Iii 1 1 / V 1 1 1 1 f ll' /7 ///1 (/ 4 3 41------ I ~91 604 (r 111 j i .1 1 ' /1 // 9 O -~il I J j J # 1 ,1 11 1 '1 7 1 1 1 | ENTRYLEVEL 1 AX\ 1 Iii Ii, 1 1 11 t \8090 6,1496 0 â€¢B 4+ -4.3 -*702 14 1 1 \ f *8072 > ' SILVERLODE LOWER LEVEL, ~ 1 i \\\ 1 / --11/ ffe \ 1 1 / \ 1 1:-/ 6 1 1 , t \ / / 1 1 4 MIAIN LEVEL ~ \ 8082' f 1 1 1 \\ / It ~ < < 4~pE LEVEL SUBDIVISON 1 1 I 1 1 I : 1 \ L i \ 7 1 1 1 1 \ : LOT #12 1 If ' 1 1 ASPEN, COLORADO \ \ 1 \ / t< \ \ \ \ 1 11~/ 11 It\' \1 \ / 1 \ i 0 ~ /~ 1 OWNER: \ \ / 1 \ Mary Ann and Lee Erb 1 1 \ 1 1 ,li~~ ~ f j ~~ ~ ~1~ 1~111~~ \\\\\\\ \ M ' 1 \1#\ 1 ~ ~ 5 ASPEN, CO.81611 ll:, 1 i 'lf'\ ~ - ~ 188 rr \ \ \ l\ / \\ \ / 1 1 ....j \ F , 1 1 :1 / 24 1 \ / i t' \ 111\ \ 1 / 11 \ \ / I 1 4 1' \ C. 8062 1 -- - \ 1 DATE: ISSUE: .. - \ - I -- .i- 1 . lili - \ - 28 FEB. 1997 PERMIT SET I . / '11 1 1 /- 1 1 1 1 ! 1 . \-- \ + 07 AUG. 1997 CONSTRUCTION SET . - 14 Feb 2000 Addition / *- ~ 84 \\ 1, I. I. ./ 111 I. - I \ f i:1 3 1/ - lili I -- I I. I. - -+ /-UN .1 1 ---% - 00 82 ---- 1 I O L AL % ---- 8060 ~ + 2-1 1 6 \ \ 1 -- \ I 1 1 11 - I 1 \ 1- \ \Ji Ill \ -- -- 1 \ 8080 \ - 3 \ - .*---\\ 1 - It' i h \43 1 I - . 78 / \ \ -,7 -- -- -----*. 174 1 I.-0 --- h -0.--- -- I f ------ 70 l72 iw_0.-J.- I I *. -i. il. I // l ie / \ / 1 / ./ , \ I / 1 / I / ... N 79'09,44" 6 168 1 -A--0 - f - i \ 1 1 + I 112.71' , --1 1 --0- 1 , L...---- ---- l f \ I / SCALE: 1 / 8"=1'-0" SITE PLAN /'~~\ SITE PLAN 413/ A 1.0 W gÂ¢U Â·eT I i. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHY LOT 12, SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE SUBDIVISION PLAT THEREOF FILED FOR RECORD IN = PLAT BOOK 37 AT PAGE 3 AND FIRST AMENDMENT THEREOF RECORDED AUGUST 20,1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 All PAGE 97 te ./ COUNTY- OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 1 \ 'PA \ -Â«--a-/ \-3 - 94, - 00 4 +0 - ~-- ~-a--ui~ IÂ·Â·Kf 2- 1 9.9, <1 0 20 - \ 30 0 L-/-70BJECT Â·, L.,44 V 1 2 9 ~z ~- STORM INLET \ i o ASP~ 7-OPERTY~#. z E-|1 - m. \ < -1 r-WING WALL / i / 5 4 / 1// E- BUIRDING / Â· e . i JÂ»*-17 4 1 ~ / ~- ENVELOPE ~j,~\ PARK ~11 ~1' 1, \ /r li --_ 1 3 -464 /< CIRCLE 1 --' '': \ \ 1 JII<2 / (33 *\ 00 co O 1 0 0/0 0 co ' /(t) CP (093 % CO ,.1 00' ~4 4 -- -- 4 SMUGGLER . e; \, \ #5 RE~AR -Â·~Â¢44~ 0000 2 2/ MOUNTAIN RD. * ~ cn oo A-- l m_L/-11#82 ~ FOUND 47 0 0 00 ; ,. " ..0-AA, ,, 1 3 ~ l-- hjcoce 1 < 1 Ulf 1 ..3 - j 99411 Ef i \ 1 Xl -1 X Â£ LU--/ 1 1 \ 1 / f 1/2 k , I ./1 -/ 1 1 j / i ASPEN ( \ , , 0 1 MOUNTAIN 0/ to\' f / / . -1 1 41 < ' 1-1 \ / 19 , 0 - --72.92' 4- 1 - 6.. \ 4--4--1--------- 1Â«-9 g , a ~ ~t- \1 \\\ 1% 1 f i T~If~--7 zil ' 7-- *EBAR & CAP 9 1 l J / ',LS #20632 6 1- , 35-ft /9 - Â«11 4- /SER;V. / f Â£ 24.9' A r- VICINITY MAP 0 . 1 1 (13 /1 1 4 121 7.9' 4 ,\\ ra PINE~ 1 . 9 4 ID 11- .Ike ,: 1 A ~ u 9 0 . Â· I LL\K V 5 9 (\1 2 \ \ 1 \4, 4 0 04 / /1 / 4 Nh ...9 4 r- .... A 4 W Â·1 ' 10.2' '/6 " ~4.r i g r 9*822 22 4 - = 31 Â°19 122" WOOD FRAME i \ 1 lA, 1 a / \4 1 / i / t . MULTI-LEVEL 4 ----f%% 14 - HOUSE M 1 = 214.79 1 PAE ~* 4 12 4 4 4 L- 2 4 U j - r i 4 2.3' = 117.44 21.8, f 0 91 6 - 4 Â» = IN 03Â°25'0~" W 1 1 2~7-48068 -4, ~ 8.8' I = 115.9-h ~ 1. ~ 1 1 Â© rn I 4 4 4 2.8 \~ iA Â»Jie Ii@i -9 1 \ PINE 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 ~ 11 \=1 1 CONCRETE -4 )1 2451 ~066 -4- ~ ~/ < . \ 111.- -1 R *0 - de 1 DRIVEWAY ~I --1 -- 4 01\ k WINDOW ~ 07 WELL 41 -- GRAPHIC SCALE 1 - 4 1 1 28--LJ \ 9- 1) BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS SURVEY ISA BEARING OF 1 < C 8088 --- 1~ 13.8' N 00Â·01 '06" W BETWEEN A REBAR AND CAP, LS#20632, AT THE i ~ < ~ 1 ~906,~< -- ~~ i ~ - \ NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 10 AND A REBAR AND CAP, LS#20632, 1 ~ ---lk- - AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 14. 1 RETA/INING - i PRJE ~ 1 ' ~A - - 8086 --- ( IN FEET ) / a~ 1; 3/ * ~ 073.53 -__ __ ~ti V ........... 1 inch = 10 ft. 1 2) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, W~LI- i , ~~ - /1~ - 1 1 -- 8084 - 1 COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR IN PLACE. 1 \ i \14" 2 - // 7 - fit ~L 3) DATE OF SURVEY WAS FEBRUARY 21. 2000. 1 ' 4 \ 'PINE x - x) CZ~ --- */ / 692 -4-i- 4 9\ r I N 7- \\ ~12> 1~Ya :.t 4) CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS TWO (2) FEET. / - %11 19l I 1 3 / 49' i L 47,6, 4 - ...1-- *2 r 3.5 Url - 5) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON A TEM, AT AN EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT, LOCATED ON SILVERLODE DRIVE EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 1 1 // .-- L \ LOT 12 HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 8052.26. , SHARED <INEJ // 1 8 -1~~ kin AGE,___ ___ I ENTRANCE 4--- ---ij-ER Th \- 15- (20,0 1 , 1 -- - 1 3 Â»#5 REBAR 1 ---1 11 1 --112 71' )1 / FOUND 1-- C GAS. r , Uff. 6 AER / / ' 24"0 CMP - / <0 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENT / OP 0 ii 9- ~ 5 ., 2 / 1 HEREBY STATE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY HIGH c Â£1Â· ..3~ ~w / t> 4 0 C COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. FOR STRYKER-BROWN ARCHITECTS. / 0 (r, Ov / o I F P IN,%/ ~ PINE, .C~ O 2 mE / / R) 0 (33 2 / N . , 4 / -- | 1 I / 1 I FURTHER STATE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL 11* 4/ 4 2*0 / ON THIS DATE, FEBRUARY 21, 2000 EXCEPT UTILITY CONNECTIONS, ARE 47/ 21 1 1 11 58 2 0 ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL , EXCEPT AS SHOWN, \ \PINE \ , 01 TrIAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED PREMISES BY / V IMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJOINING PREMISES, EXCEPT AS INDICATED, AND 1 /1 L RETAINING O \ T-IAT THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING Â· OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL, EXCEPT AS NOTED. 1 FURTHER (no cp I / 1/Â·2Â· PINE \ 4/j J WALL COUNTY TITLE, INC. (CASE NO. PCT14578) DATED AUGUST 26. 1999 AND FIND C z STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY PIn<IN 9 2 2 &â‚¬ 1 . - -Â«Â»Â»N-~420-1Ilt,;4'. - ---Â·Al ALL EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE THAT AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE SHOWN m X l 1 /~ ~ HEREON TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. , r j \ 1 CO 1 L FIRE HY[b RANT BY: Fi,NK-QUATING*P~AN'Â§**Â·f,â€¢-2. .:3':... 41 1 9 41 4. 1 / T. B.M. l 1 01 11 1 uÂ». i 1 :Re 1 F 1 1 /1 990.3\.\40....23 f.* PROJECT NO. *02#RAWAVA 99737.02 SHEET 1 OF 1 4 8080 - 8082 -- 9809 obÂ°00 0 0 Emp 0(~bl01