HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.700 Main St.50A-87'PUP fi - 1-7-
CASELOAD SUMMARY SKEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: //-�)///yz PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE: 24,51 cea 0a2l ` D -
y� �% ,J nl , f'�y� STAFF/ MEMBER:
PROJECT NAME: It,V -Mdi n l�,C�ji dtt d( (111 � 1'��C{
Project Address:
REPRESENTATIVE: C-:� I O C DY)
Representative Address/Phone,.-
PAID: ESQ NO AMOUNT:
1) TYPE OF APPLICATION: /
1 STEP: 2 STEP: V
2) IF 1 STEP APPLICATION GOES TO:
P&Z
CC
3) PUBLIC HEARING IS BEFORE:
o P&Z + CC N/A
DATE REFERRED: INITIALS:
REFERRALS:
City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District
City Engineer �� Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas
Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW)
Aspen Water �- Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ)
City Electric Fire Chief B1dg:Zon/Inspect
Envir. Hlth. �— Roaring Fork Roaring Fork
Aspen Consol. Transit Energy Center
S.D. _r Other
FINAL ROUTING:
City Atty
Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
DATE ROUTED:
City Engineer
INITIAL•
�i
Bldg. Dept.
APPLICATION FOR GMP RESIDENTIAL ALLOTMENT
December 1, 1987
Submitted to: City of Aspen Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
925-2020
Applicant: Fine Associates
IDS Center, Suite 1916
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(612) 332-2561
Attorneys: Gideon Kaufman
Law Offices of Gideon I. Kaufman, P.C.
315 E. Hyman Avenue, Suite 305
Aspen, Colorado 81611
925-8166
Architect:
Landscape Architect:
Civil Engineers:
Planner:
Leonard Parker & Associates
430 Oak Grove
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403
(612) 871-6864
Hagman Yaw Architects Ltd.
210 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
925-2867
Design Workshop, Inc.
710 East Durant
Aspen, Colorado 81611
925-8354
Rea-Cassens & Associates, Inc.
4388 South Windermere
Englewood, Colorado 80110
789-4428
Joe Wells
608 East Hyman
Aspen, Colorado
925-6866
•
0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page #
A. BASIC INFORMATION
1
1. Project Information
1
aa.
Water System
2
bb.
Sewage Treatment System
2
CC.
Storm Drainage
3
dd.
Fire Protection System
5
ee.
Total Development Area - Type of Units -
Proximity to Schools
5
ff.
Traffic
6
gg.
Location
7
hh.
Location Relative to Retail
and Service Outlets
7
ii.
Adjacent Uses
7
jj.
Construction Schedule
8
2. Site
Utilization Maps
8
aa.
Energy
8
bb.
Landscaping and Open Space
9
CC.
Zoning District
10
B. REVIEW CRITERIA
10
1. Availability of Public Facilities and Services
10
aa.
Water
10
bb.
Sewer
10
CC.
Storm Drainage
11
dd.
Fire Protection
13
ee.
Parking Design
13
ff..
Traffic Analysis and Road System
14
i
2. Design
Quality of
aa. Neighborhood Compatability
bb. Site Design
CC. Energy
dd. Trails
'
Green Space
ee.
'
3. Proximity to Support Services
aa. Public Transportation
bb. Community Commercial Facilities
4. Provisions for Employee Housing
5. Bonus Points
MAPS
Vicinity Map
Zoning Map
Location Map
Map
Transportation/Circulation
Existing Conditions/Survey
Utilities Map
Context Map
Site Concept
Garage Level Plan
Main and Spring Building Elevation
Site Sections
'
Preliminary Unit Floor Plans
'
ii
1
Page #
15
15
17
20
21
22
23
23
23
23
24
Map #1
Map #1
Map #1
Map #2
Map #3
Map #3
Map #4
Map #5
Map #6
Map #7
Map #8
Map #9
and 10
•
•
Illustrative Site Plan
Landscape Plan
Fire Marshall Letter
iii
Map #11
Map #12
Exhibit 1
F
• •
A. BASIC INFORMATION
1. Project Information.
This application for GMP allotment under Section 24-11.4
of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen (hereinafter "the
Code") seeks an allotment for fourteen (14) free-market
residential units to be built in conjunction with one (1)
one -bedroom low income restricted employee unit on the
northeast corner of Main Street and Spring Street. Three
units have existed on site and will be reconstructed pursuant
to Applicant's plan for improving the Property and per
Section 24-11.2(a). The property is bordered by the Concept
600 Building and is across the street from Original Curve
Condominiums. This land is located within the RMF PUD zone
on a total area of 60,016 square feet.
The multi -family units are being configured into three
(3) separate buildings connected by a common underground
parking structure. The majority of the units are located
near the northern perimeter of the site, back from Main
Street. This siting enables the project to reduce its visual
impact, to create views of Aspen Mountain, and to permit a
large landscaped open space area within the interior portions
' of the site. The cottonwood trees at the corner of Spring
and Main are being preserved, and a park -like open space area
is being created at that corner.
In order to preserve the natural quality of the
embankment of the Roaring Fork River, none of the units step
down to the river. Almost all required parking is being
' placed underground. The building cluster closest to Main
Street has been positioned to create a scaled down transition
from the Concept 600 Building, and to enhance the open space
' experience of the site. By staggering the units at the
corner of Spring Street and Main Street, the park -like
quality of the corner which has been historically defined by
the tall cottonwood trees has been preserved. Similarly, the
stepped back configuration on the east side of the property
opens the Main Street view towards Herron Park and the
mountains beyond.
Great care was taken in our site plan to blend with the
existing development in this transitional neighborhood. The
total FAR for the project will be less than what is currently
permitted by the Code, and while fifty (50) bedrooms are
permitted, only forty-five (45) are being requested. A
tremendous amount of work has gone into the open space and
landscaping concept of the project and, as a result,
approximately thirty-two percent (32%) of the site will be
covered with buildings. The site plan has been configured to
create a significant and continuous landscaped interior open
space between buildings. A swimming pool and recreational
building highlight project amenities. The applicant is
- 1 -
concurrently applying for Conceptual P.U.D., Conceptual
Subdivision, Mandatory P.U.D., Stream Margin Review, and
Special Review for Exempting Employee Housing from the GMP
Process.
'
aa. 24-11.4(a)(laa) Water System.
The existing water system in the vicinity of the site
includes a 6" cast iron main in the south side of Main
'
Street, an 8" cast iron main in the east side of Spring
Street, an 8" ductile iron line on the north side of the site
which serves the Creektree condominiums and a 6" cast iron
'
main located in the north side of Main Street which presently
dead -ends approximately fifty (50) feet east of Spring
Street.
The Director of the Aspen Water Department estimates
that the water pressure in the 6" mains is approximately 100
P.S.I., and in the 8" main is approximately 110 P.S.I. The
'
Director has confirmed that more than adequate capacity,
including storage treatment and delivery capacity, remains in
the existing system to serve the eighteen (18) residential
'
units proposed. Based on discussions with the Director, and
as calculated below, the demand at the project has been
estimated as approximately 6,2.50 gallons per day (g.p.d.).
The system capacity at this location is in excess of 50,000
g.p.d.
'
Residential Units Population
2 4-bedroom units @ 5/unit = 10.0
6 3-bedroom units @ 4/unit 24.0
'
9 2-bedroom units @ 3/unit 27.0
1 1-bedroom unit @ 1.5/unit = 1.5
62.5
The estimated water usage is 100 gallons per person per
day (g.p.d.); estimated peak water usage is therefore 6,250
per day.
bb. 24-11.4(a)(lbb) Sewage Treatment System.
The site is serviced by the Rio Grande collection system
'
of the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. An 8" line
dead ends in the site from Spring Street generally opposite
the alley behind the Concept 600 Building. The collection
line extends north to the end of Spring Street, and then
'
northeast through the park, connecting to the main trunk line
to the sewer plant on the opposite side of the river.
Conversations with District personnel have confirmed
that there are very few service connections to this line, and
that there is more than enough capacity remaining in the
' - 2 -
1
• •
i
system to service the project. The peak demand generated by
'
the project is expected to equal water usage, calculated in
aa. above, or 6,250 day (g.p.d.)
paragraph gallons per
CC. 24-11.4(a) (lcc) Storm Drainage.
'
1. Existing Conditions. The site topography
presently directs surface drainage to two major watershed
areas. The western two-thirds of the site generally drains
'
to the southwest, west, and northwest at slopes of 4% to 8%.
Grasses and weeds cover a significant portion of the area.
'
Four structures (along with associated vard landscaping and
paved or gravel driveways) are also found on this end of the
site. Surface flow is collected along the curb and gutter on
Main Street and Spring Street, with a concentration of
'
run-off occurring at the northwest corner of the site. This
drainage presently flows across Bleeker Street, down an
embankment adjacent to the Rio Grande Trail and into the
'
Roaring Fork River. On -site erosion appears negligible, but
erosion is occurring off -site as the water flows to the
river. The 36" storm sewer line located under Spring Street
'
is undersized for current city storm loading requirements.
The eastern one-third of the site is characterized by
surface flows to the northeast and east at slopes in excess
of 25%. Existing vegetation consists mainly of cottonwood
trees and small riparian shrubs and grasses, with many areas
of the embankment showing erosion. A major portion of
drainage from this watershed flows directly into the Roaring
Fork River, although a small amount flows towards the
northeast before ultimately emptying into the river.
'
River levels for a 100-year storm event vary in
elevation from approximately 7,884 feet to 7,893 feet along
the eastern edge of the site, which is a difference of 24
1
feet to 15 feet from the flood elevation to the top of the
embankment. Preliminary calculations for storm water
detention volumes generated on -site during a 100-year storm
event show a range of 1,500-2,500 cubic feet.
In summary, the existing negative drainage factors in
the area presently include: (1) off -site erosion adjacent to
'
the northwest corner of the site and on -site erosion along
the river embankment; (2) an orientation of site drainage
'
toward street sewer systems which are under capacity; (3) an
existing storm sewer line adjacent to the site which is
undersized for current city storm water loading, and (4) a
lack of curb and gutter along Main Street adjacent to the
'
southeast corner of the site which allows some street surface
flow direct access to the river.
1 2. Proposed Drainage System. The major drainage
concept intends to: (1) accommodate City of Aspen
- 3 -
17
regulations on drainage and correct site and area drainage
problems. This will be accomplished by providing on -site
detention for all site drainage within the developable
portion of the site; (2) re -orient the drainage pattern of
the site so that water is effectively collected and routed to
the east, thereby eliminating the negative impacts in the
Spring Street area; (3) release detained storm water through
a percolation sy.3tem which would allow indirect access back
into the river and provide sediment removal through
filtration; (4) eliminate the use of the Spring Street storm
drainage system so that the burden on an already undersized
system would decrease, and (5) provide for approved
techniques and considerations to minimize the erosion
potential during construction, especially as it relates to
the flow of pollutants or sediment into the river.
The proposed system will rely on an integration of
several elements to effectively address the present negative
drainage issues summarized previously and the complex
drainage requirements related to site development. Specific
elements include: (1) surface drainage; (2) shallow
subsurface drainage; (3) deep subsurface drainage; and (4)
gutter flow modifications.
A. Surface Drainage. Surface drainage will be
directed, channeled and collected through surface grading.
Collected water will be picked up in hard surfaced areas and
in sodded or planted areas with area drain inlets. The
collected run-off will be routed via underground piping to
detention structures at the east end of the developed area.
The structures will allow percolation of the stored water
' down to the water table and subsequently into the river.
Capacities will be designed to meet 100-year storm event
volumes. Underground detention structures will allow
overflow volumes (in excess of 100 year levels) to be piped
directly to the river. Run-off from all building roofs will
also be collected in this system.
B. Subsurface Drainage (3-5' depth). A common
system will be used to drain all recessed patio areas and the
area above the parking garage roof. Area drains will be
' located in the patio areas while a layered drainage system
will be integrated into the design of the roof structure
directly above the slab to direct water away from the
' structure. Drainage from this system will be collected and
piped to he underground detention structures described
previously.
' C. Subsurface Drainage (10-15' depth). Drainage
within the parking structure will be collected in a trench
drain at the west end of the floor area, routed through a
' sand and oil trap, and stored in a dry well structure at the
west end of the site. Stored water will be fed to the
detention structure at the east end of the site, and overflow
' - 4 -
will be piped to the river (in the event of possible flooding
from high water on Spring Street).
Footing and foundation drainage for the garage
floor and basements will be collected in a system of piping
and gravel underlying those areas. Water will be ultimately
detained on the east side of the site in a similar fashion to
the upper level subsurface and surface drainage. If studies
indicate that the presence of a high water table will
conflict with lower level collection and storage, pumps will
be utilized to elevate the water to underground structures
above the water table.
D. Gutter Flow Modifications. Curb and gutter
will be added along Main Street where direct flows of water
from street surface access the river. The curb cut at the
garage entrance on Spring Street will also be carefully
designed so as to limit the potential flooding of the garage
by on -street water flows during peak storm events when the
existing undersized storm sewer will not contain all run-off.
dd. 24-11(a) (ldd) Fire Protection System.
There are presently three (3) fire hydrants around the
perimeter of the site. They are located at the southwest,
northwest and northeast corners of the property. The fire
hydrant locations are delineated on the Improvement Survey.
The parking garage will be equipped with an automatic fire
sprinkling system.
The project is within four blocks of the downtown Aspen
fire station. Response time is expected to be less than five
minutes. The district has the ability to service the project
without establishing a new station or the addition of any new
major firefighting equipment.
ee. 24-11(lee) Total Development Area - Type of Units -
Proximitv to Schools.
Total development FAR area permitted is 50,497 square
feet. Project will utilize less than permitted square
footage.
Employee Housing:
One one -bedroom low income restricted unit will be
built. While low income rent will be charged, employees of
the project will be given occupancy priority even if their
income exceeds the low income guidelines. A parking space
will be provided for the employee unit. Cash -in -lieu
payments for fifty percent (50%) low income employees in the
amount of $685,000 will be made on a pro -rated basis as
building permits are issued.
- 5 -
[I
Free-market housing will be 17 multi -family units. The
' sale price will be market, and the rental price will be
market. There will be on -site parking for each bedroom of
free-market units.
' The upper and lower elementary schools are within one
mile.
' Distance to the middle and high school is 2 miles.
The nearest school bus pick-up point is located on the
' corner of Hyman Avenue and Original Street.
ff. Section 24-11.4(a) (lff) Traffic.
' The project location at the corner of East Main Street
and South Spring Street provides excellent access on existing
paved streets with adequate capacity. Vehicular access to
' the site will be from two locations on Spring Streec. The
entry for short-term parking, drop-off, pick-up and service
vehicles is 100 feet from the intersection of Main and Spring
to avoid turning movement conflicts. The parking garage
entry is located approximately 200 feet from the Main and
Spring intersection. An existing potentially hazardous curb
' cut on Main Street will be eliminated.
The daily vehicular one-way trips generated by the
development on an average winter weekday (February -March) is
' projected to be 47, or 0.50 of the 1986 annual average daily
traffic (AADT) as projected for Main Street by the Colorado
Division of Highways. The peak hours would coincide with the
' morning and afternoon ski traffic peaks, and would be
expected to occur primarily on Main Street. The peak hour
volume from the project is projected to be 7 vehicles per
' hour. None of the above projections include an_y credit for
traffic currently being generated by existing uses.
Therefore, net increases will be still smaller.
Parking will be provided in the ratio of one space per
bedroom with 41 spaces in a below grade parking structure and
4 surface spaces.
(1) Parking. The project will accommodate all
parking on -site, and will not add parking on Main Street.
' Site location will encourage bicycle and pedestrian rather
than automobile traffic. The site is within easy walking or
bicycling distance of all essential neighborhood commercial,
and retail services, as well as skiing. Bus routes are
adjacent to the site.
No reduction in the off-street parking requirement is
' proposed. All but four (4) parking spaces will be
accommodated underground. The caretaker/manager residence
will have parking for its vehicles. Parking will be
' available for visitors and/or service vehicles. No parking
- 6 -
U
on open space areas will be allowed. This, along with
underground parking, will minimize any visual impact of
parking.
(2) Auto Disincentive. The Applicant proposes to
provide a shuttle service for early morning and late
afternoon operations during the ski season for the purpose of
providing skier and shopping access to the core areas of
town. The Applicant proposes no summer shuttle service due
to heavy pedestrian activity in the City, close proximity to
the town, and use of bicycles. The project's close proximity
to the downtown will serve as additional auto disincentive.
The site is only four blocks from the Hyman Avenue Mall, and
the majority of the commercial core is within reasonable
walking distance. Both the Snowbunny and Highlands bus
routes provide service twice an hour each from the
intersection of Spring and Main to City Market, Little Nell
and the Rubey Park bus depot. The shuttle van will be
available to complement public bus service. These auto
disincentives indicate a relatively low auto use factor.
gg. 24-11.4(a) (lgg) Location.
The site is two miles from Aspen Valley Hospital, and
five miles from Sardy Field, the airport. The property is
only a few blocks from the Aspen Mountain Ski Area, and is
across the street from a bus stop. The site abuts Herron
Park. The estimated increase on public facilities is
minimal, and the capacity of these facilities is more than
sufficient to absorb any minimal increase.
hh.
24-11.4(a) (lhh) Location Relative to Retail and
'
Service
Outlets.
The
to the
proposed development is within easy walking distance
downtown core, and retail outlets including City
Market.
Existing commercial facilities are one block away.
Because
public transportion is so accessible to this project,
'
as well
as bike trails, automobile use for retail trips will
be less
frequent than it would be for other areas. The
proposed
development will cause little impact and will not
increase
the demands on existing retail and service outlets.
ii.
24-114(a) (lii) Adjacent Uses.
' The proposed development is fully compatible with the
surrounding residential and commercial uses in the
neighborhood, and will compliment the existing uses. Its
' multi -family character fits in nicely with the other
multi -family and commercial development in the neighborhood.
The development pattern blends with the existing development
' patterns of the neighborhood.
jj. 24-11.4(a) (ljj) Construction Schedule.
It is estimated that the improvements will begin in the
summer of 1988, and that construction will be completed in
1989.
2. Site Utilization Maps.
' The information contained in this section supplements
the maps and plans submitted within this application.
' aa. 24-11(a) (2aa) Energy.
The Applicant is committed to minimize energy
consumption. In the 700 Main project, energy provisions have
' been carefully evaluated and integrated in order to insure
that expenditures of energy are minimal and benefits gained
are optimal. An example of the energy saving techniques that
will be utilized are as follows:
(1) Building Orientation and Solar Utilization.
' The majority of building units have major view and glass
orientation to the south. Special glazing will minimize heat
loss, as described below, during the colder months. Operable
windows will provide ample cooling and through -ventilation
' from north to south during the warmer months.
(2) Glazing. Non -south glazing will be low E
' double -glazed insulating units in order to minimize both long
wave radiation and conductive heat loss. Significant amounts
of glazing will be placed on the southern face of the units
' to insure maximum solar gain and daylight.
(3) Insulation. Insulation values for exterior
walls and surfaces are designed to siqnificantly exceed
' minimum energy standards. The project will provide R-38 or
better in the roof assembly, and R-25 or better in the
exterior walls. In addition, rigid insulation will be used
to insulate the perimeter foundation walls of the townhouse
units at a value of R-12 or better.
(4) Mechanical Systems. Each unit will employ
state of the art mechanical systems, including ninety percent
(90%) efficiency or equivalent hot water boilers for both
domestic hot water and space heat at the building perimeters.
' This will be done even though this type of system is more
expensive to install than a conventional space heating
system. This system will, however, use substantially less
' energy. The need for cooling on this project is minimal, and
operable windows to maximize through ventilation is
contemplated.
' (5) Fixtures. Low consumption water closets and
shower heads will be installed throughout the project. The
' - 8 -
swimming pool and hot tub will be heated by high efficiency
boilers, and will be insulated by roll -out pool covers
employed during periods of non-use.
(6) Infiltration. Vapor barriers will be provided
1 at all exterior walls and roofs on the indoor side of
insulation to help prevent air infiltration and humidity
loss. All doors, windows, electrical outlets, and
' penetrations at the vapor barriers will be sealed and
insulated.
' (7) Party Walls. Great care has been taken to
maximize the extent of party wall sharing, thereby reducing
all forms of heat loss. This has been accomplished by tight
clustering of the units, and is deemed a major contribution
' in securing optimal energy performance for each unit.
(8) Fireplaces. There will be no woodburning
' fireplaces in the project. This is a strong commitment by
the developer to address Aspen's No. 1 problem - air
pollution.
' (9) Parking Garage Exhaust. Exhaust fumes from
the parking garage will be mechanically removed through a
ventilation duct which will exhaust at the roof level of the
' north building cluster.
bb. 24-11(a) (2bb) Landscaping and Open Space.
' Proposed landscaping and screening attempts to preserve
natural terrain and open space. All utilities will be
' underground. Approximately thirty-two percent (32%) of the
site is covered with building footprints, which means the
remaining sixty-eight percent (68%) of the site will have an
open feeling. Proposed open space exceeds the present Code
requirement, and under proposed regulations, open space could
be as high as 55%. The green space �s divided into two major
categories.
' (1) The interior courtyard and swimming pool area.
This area is primarily for resident use.
(2) The extension of the river park environment
along the south edge of the site adjoining Main Street. This
is designed for both resident and public use. The large
' cottonwoods, which are unique to the site, will be saved.
All but four (4) of the forty-five (45) required parking
' spaces will be underground. This design feature will enhance
the feeling of open space. The interior courtyard will
provide for informal activities and access to the pool area.
' Plantings will be used to accentuate green space qualities
and provide visual interest. Most existing trees on site,
with caliper exceeding 6" will be relocated and integrated
' - 9 -
1
into the landscaping plan. The south side of the site along
' Main Street will serve as an extension of the river corridor
park area. The existing cottonwoods at the corner of Spring
and Main Street, together with cottonwoods along the river,
will be supplemented with additional trees, and native
' plantings. A new sidewalk will be constructed which, along
with adjacent landscaping, will visually buffer the building
from the street and increase the usable public space.
CC. 24-11(a) (2cc) Zoning District.
The project is in the RMF P.U.D. District. The
surrounding uses are multi -family and commercial.
B. REVIEW CRITERIA
t1. Availability of Public Facilities and Services.
aa. 24-11.4(b)(1) Water.
Based on discussions with the Director of the Aspen
' Water Department, the capacity of the existing water supply
system is more than adequate to service the project. The
most significant problem in the water system in this area is
' the absence of adequate isolation valves. Isolation valves
enable the Water Department to avoid interruption of service
to other properties in the event of a problem in the system
adjacent to the site.
' In order to improve the quality of water service in the
area, the Applicant proposes to add an isolation valve in the
Main Street line adjacent to the hydrant at Spring and Main.
A second isolation valve will be added in the Spring Street
main. Another improvement to the water system proposed by
' the Applicant is to extend the 6" deadend line on the north
side of Main Street to the east in order to provide a new
hydrant at the southeast corner of the site. An interconnect
will also be installed under Main Street to the 6" line on
' the south side of the street in order to loop this segment of
line. All of these improvements will significantly improve
the quality of water service in the area.
' bb. 24-11.4(b)(1) Sewer.
' An 8" line of the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation
District's Rio Grande Collection System is located on site.
This line extends north in Spring Street and then northeast
to the District trunk line north of the river. The capacity
' of the sewer system is more than adequate to accommodate the
demand from the project, estimated to be 6,250 g.p.d.
Approximately 300 feet of the system north of the site is
' plagued by infiltration resulting from broken pipe and root
intrusion problems. In order to improve sewer service in the
area, the Applicant, based on discussions with the Sanitation
' - 10 -
F
1
District, will slip line with plastic pipe the last segment
of the Rio Grande Collection System leading to the trunk line
(approximately 300 feet). This will eliminate infiltration
which has been a problem in the past, and will also have a
positive effect on capacity of the line because of the smooth
surface of the new lining.
CC. 24-11.4(b)(1) Storm Drainaqe.
1. Existing Conditions. The site topography
presently directs surface drainage to two major watershed
areas. The western two-thirds of the site generally drains
to the southwest, west, and northwest at slopes of 4% to 8%.
Grasses and weeds cover a significant portion of the area.
Four structures (along with associated yard landscaping and
paved or gravel driveways) are also found on this end of the
site. Surface flow is collected along the curb and gutter on
Main Street and Spring Street, with a concentration of
run-off occurring at the northwest corner of the site. This
drainage presently flows across Bleeker Street, down an
embankment adjacent to the Rio Grande Trail and into the
Roaring Fork River. On -site erosion appears negligible, but
erosion is occurring off -site as the water flows to the
river. The 36" storm sewer line located under Spring Street
is undersized for current city storm loading requirements.
The eastern one-third of the site is characterized by
surface flows to the northeast and east at slopes in excess
of 25%. Existing vegetation consists mainly of cottonwood
trees and small riparian shrubs and grasses, with areas of
the embankment showing erosion. A major portion of drainage
from this watershed flows directly into the Roaring Fork
River, although a small amount flows towards the northeast
before ultimately emptying into the river.
River levels for a 100-year storm event vary in
elevation from approximately 7,884 feet to 7,893 feet along
the eastern edge of the site, which is a difference of 24
feet to 15 feet from the flood elevation to the top of the
embankment. Preliminary calculations for storm water
detention volumes generated on -site during a 100-year storm
event show a range of 1,500-2,500 cubic feet.
In summary, the existing negative drainage factors in
the area presently include: (1) off -site erosion adjacent to
the northwest corner of the site and on -site erosion along
the river embankment; (2) an orientation of site drainage
toward street sewer systems which are under capacity; (3) an
existing storm sewer line adjacent to the site which is
undersized for current city storm water loading; and (4) a
lack of curb and gutter along Main Street adjacent to the
southeast corner of the site which allows some street surface
flow direct access to the river.
2. Proposed Drainage System. The major drainage
concept intends to: (1) accommodate City of Aspen
regulations on drainage and correct site and area drainage
problems. This will be accomplished by providing on -site
detention for all site drainage within the developable
' portion of the site; (2) re -orient the drainage pattern of
the site so that water is effectively collected and routed to
the east, thereby eliminating the negative impacts in the
Spring Street area; (3) release detained storm water through
a percolation system which would allow indirect access back
into the river and provide sediment removal through
' filtration; (4) eliminate the use of the Spring Street storm
drainage system so that the burden on an already undersized
system would decrease, and (5) provide for approved
techniques and considerations to minimize the erosion
' potential during construction, especially as it relates to
the flow of pollutants or sediment into the river.
' The proposed system will rely on an integration of
several elements to effectively address the present negative
drainage issues summarized previously and the complex
' drainage requirements related to site development. Specific
elements include: (1) surface drainage; (2) shallow
subsurface drainage; (3) deep subsurface drainage; and (4)
gutter flow modifications.
A. Surface Drainage. Surface drainage will be
directed, channeled and collected through surface grading.
' Collected water will be picked up in hard surfaced areas and
in sodded or planted areas with area drain inlets. The
collected run-off will be routed via underground piping to
detention structures at the east end of the developed area.
The structures will allow percolation of the stored water
down to the water table and subsequently into the river.
Overflow capacities will be designed to meet 100-year storm
' event volumes, and will be piped directly to the river.
Run-off from all building_ roofs will also be collected in
this system.
' B. Subsurface Drainage (3-5' depth) A common
system will be used to drain all recessed patio areas and the
' area above the parking garage roof. Area drains will be
located in the patio areas while a layered drainage system
will be integrated into the design of the roof structure
directly above the slab to direct water away from the
' structure. Drainage from this system will be collected and
piped to the detention structures described previously.
' C. Subsurface Drainage (10-15' depth). Drainage
within the parking structure will he collected in a trench
drain at the west end of the floor area, routed through a
sand and oil trap, and stored in a dry well structure at the
west end of the site. Stored water will be fed to the
detention structure at the east end of the site, and overflow
will be piped to the river (in the event of possible flooding
' - 12 -
from high water on Spring Street).
Footing and foundation drainage for the garage
floor and basements will be collected in a system of piping
and gravel underlying those areas. Water will be ultimately
detained on the east side of the site in a similar fashion to
the upper level subsurface and surface drainage. If studies
indicate that the presence of a high water table will
conflict with lower level collection and storage, pumps will
be utilized to elevate the water to underground structures
above the water table.
D. Gutter Flow Modifications. Curb and gutter
will be added along Main Street where direct flows of water
from street surface access the river. The curb cut at the
garage entrance on Spring Street will also be carefully
designed so as to limit the potential flooding of the garage
by on -street water flows during peak storm events when the
existing undersized storm sewer will not contain all run-off.
dd. 24-11.4(b)(1) Fire Protection.
There are three fire hydrants around the site's boundary
- one at each corner with the exception of the southeast
corner. The Fire Marshall has confirmed that water pressure
in the area is more than adequate to provide fire flows to
the site. Fire flow capacity is estimated to be in excess of
3,000 g.p.m.
In order to improve fire protection in the area, the 6"
water lire in the north side of Main Street, presently a
deadend line, will be extended to the east enabling a new
hydrant to be put in by the Applicant. An interconnect will
be installed under Main Street to the 6" line on the south
side of the street in order to loop this segment of the line.
The nearest existing hydrant to the east of the site is
located at the southwest corner of Hopkins and Original.
Therefore, the new hydrant provides improved protection to
other projects in the area such as Original Curve
Condominiums and Larkspur Condominiums.
In addition, the hydrant at Spring and Main, which is
substandard, will be replaced by a 3-nozzle 5" VO hydrant.
The nearest hydrant to the west of the site on Main is at
' Galena, so the increased dependability resulting from the
replacement hydrant at Spring and Main will improve service
for the area. The parking garage will be equipped with an
automatic fire sprinkler system.
' ee. 24-11.4(b)(1) Parking Design.
' This project has accepted the challenge of parking.
Understanding that the City of Aspen has major parking
problems, this project has chosen to provide all required
' parking. In order to eliminate the visual impacts of
- 13
1
parking, almost all required parking will be placed
underground. Only a few spaces will be located on grade in
order to accommodate guest and service vehicle parking. No
reduction in parking requirements is requested either for the
free-market or the employee unit. Great care has been taken
'
to insure ease of access to the underground parking by its
location and a snow melted ramp. The entrance to the
underground parking garage has been placed off Spring Street
to minimize traffic impacts, and for clarity of location.
'
The access ramp is snow melted for winter safety. Even
though this project has close walking proximity to the
'
downtown and skiing, as well as a shuttle service, the
Applicant is providing all required parking, demonstrating a
sensitivity to Aspen's need to relieve parking congestion.
ff. 24-11.4(b)(1) Traffic Analysis and Road System.
The project location at the corner of East Main Street
and South Spring Street provides excellent access on existing
'
paved streets with adequate capacity. Vehicular access to
the site will be from two locations on Spring Street. The
entry for short-term parking, drop-off, pick-up and service
vehicles is 100 feet from the intersection of Main and Spring
to avoid turning movement conflicts. The parking garage
entry is located approximately 200 feet from the
'
intersection. An existing potentially hazardous curb cut on
Main Street will be eliminated.
The daily vehicular one-way trips generated by the
development on an average winter weekday (February -March) is
projected to be 47, or 0.5% of the 1986 annual average daily
'
traffic (AADT) as projected by the Colorado Division of
Highways. The peak hours would coincide with the morning and
afternoon ski traffic peaks, and would be expected to occur
primarily on Main Street. The peak hour volume is projected
'
to be 7 vehicles per hour. None of the above projections
include any credit for traffic currently being generated by
existing uses. Therefore, net increases will be still
'
smaller.
Parking will be provided in the ratio of one space per
'
bedroom with 41 spaces in a below grade parking structure and
4 surface spaces.
'
The Applicant proposes to provide a shuttle service for
early morning and late afternoon operations during the ski
season for the purpose of providing skier and shopping access
to the core areas of town. The Applicant proposes no summer
shuttle service due to heavy pedestrian activity in the City,
close proximity to the town, and use of bicycles. The site
is only four blocks from the Hyman Avenue Mall, and the
majority of the commercial core is within reasonable walking
'
distance. Both the Snowbunny and Highlands bus routes
provide service twice an hour each from the intersection of
'
- 14 -
Spring and Main to City Market, Little Nell and the Rubey
Park bus depot. The shuttle van will be available to
complement public bus service. These auto disincentives
indicate a relatively low auto use factor.
The project site is optimally located to take advantage
of existing major streets without substantially altering
existing traffic patterns, overloading available capacity, or
creating increased maintenance.
2. 24-11.4(b)(2) Quality of Design.
aa. Neighborhood Compatibility.
The existing buildings and development which surround
the project site form a highly dissimilar neighborhood
context. Individual structures have a diverse architectural
character, scale and use, a condition which results in little
or no fundamental cohesion and no sense of a harmonious
neighborhood character. The Concept 600 Building, Eagles
Club and Original Curve Condominiums exemplify the divergent
nature of the surrounding architecture.
The project site, however, has traditionally formed an
important open space node which, from the viewpoint of
movement along Main Street, demarks a perceived break in the
fabric of surrounding development. The unique nature of this
site is essentially a function of its open space
configuration. The site provides visual relief to building
development along the Main Street corridor and similarly from
the multi -family development which characterizes the Original
Street (Highway 82) approach from the east. The site's open
space along Main Street follows the abrupt and monolithic
profile of the Concept 600 Building, but then flows
pleasantly to the natural embankment of the river and Herron
Park.
In terms of Neighborhood Compatibility, a primary
development objective is to preserve the best qualities of
this open space for users, pedestrians and motorists alike,
rather than to simply extract an architectural character from
the divergent nature of its built surroundings. The
development of the 700 Main Project seeks neighborhood
compatibility of a higher order - that of being a
responsible, concerned urban design element. An important
factor in this approach is to enhance the transition from the
built environment of the Main Street corridor to the more
natural, riparian qualities of the Herron Park environment.
Because the project site neighbors Herron Park to the east,
the sensitive treatment of the embankment edge condition is
an objective of the site development in the context of
neighborhood compatibility.
- 15 -
' To reduce project massing and building
g scale, the units
' are configured in three separate building clusters, with the
majority of units located at the north edge of the site away
from Main Street. At the portion of the site contiguous to
Original Curve, the units are located approximately 165 feet
' away from the Main Street curb. The building cluster closest
to Main Street has been positioned to create a scaled down
transition from the Concept 600 Building, and to enhance the
' open space experience of the site.
By staggering the units at the corner of Spring Street
and Main Street, the park -like quality of the corner which
' has been historically defined by tall cottonwood trees has
been preserved. Similarly, the stepped back unit
configuration of the east side of the cluster opens the Main
' Street view to Herron Park and beyond. The swimming pool
deck and one story recreation building have been lowered
partially below grade and, together with the existing earth
' form, provide an open space vista from Main Street.
A large City right-of-way bordering the site along Main
' Street, keeps the closest building over 35 feet from the
curb, with the average building distance 48 feet. With over
300 feet of site frontage on Main Street, building
development has been kept to only 110 feet, or about 1/3 of
' the site frontage. The building cluster along Main Street
has been purposefully staggered at the ends so that from
movement patterns along Main Street, generally, the massing
' of only three units can be seen at the same time.
Additionally, the height of this cluster has been lowered 2
to 3 feet below allowable height, in most instances. To
' further reduce apparent massing, and to extend open space
from Spring Street continuously through the project site, the
front and rear building clusters have been separated by
approximately 70 feet. To preserve the integrity of the
' natural river embankment which perceptually defines the
westerly view from Herron Park, all units have been
positioned back from the river's edge.
' The project has an approximate building coverage of only
32% of the site with the remaining 68% of the site
' undeveloped. To enhance the landscaped pedestrian quality of
open space, all required parking, except 4 guest/service
spaces, has been located underground.
The exterior character of the project has been developed
in an architectural context closely related to Aspen's
Victorian heritage. The articulation of building surfaces is
1 designed to relate to the sense of permanence, materials and
period forms which characterize Aspen's central core.
Individualized unit scale, roof forms and residential
' detailing of exterior forms create a scale and visual
relationship to the residential character of nearby
I - 16 -
neighborhoods. The gable roof forms characterize and give
identifiable scale to each building cluster. Paned windows
in varied opening shapes are employed to create visual
interest, but within a cohesive design idiom.
In addition to a site plan which architecturally
staggers and delineates each unit with individualized
expression, the building massing is further scaled down by
provision of the following: (1) contrasting flat and gable
roof forms to provide visual interest; (2) minimizing Main
Street frontage and placing building footprints significantly
back from the Main Street setback; (3) reducing vertical
building surfaces 2 to 3 feet below allowable height, in many
instances; (4) using offsetting vertical building surfaces;
(5) using partially subgrade lower levels; and (6)
articulating window, balcony and exterior design elements.
The building surfaces which face Spring Street are
reduced in scale. Similarly, the unit closest to Herron Park
employs a projecting dormer element to articulate and reduce
apparent facade size.
' The site plan has been configured to create a
significant and continuous landscaped interior open space
between buildings so that each unit has a spacious individual
' guest entry located at mid -level from the common open space
courtyard. Each unit also has a convenient individual entry
from the subgrade parking garage.
' The multi -family approach iltilized for this project is
ideally suited for this unique rite, providing a convenient
' option for pedestrian oriented, close -in living. While
appropriate in both appearance and scale to its built
surroundings, the project not only provides a compatible
prototype, but greatly enhances an important Aspen location.
' bb. 24-11.4(b)(2) Site Design.
The site plan has been configured to maximize open space
for the use and benefit of project residents as well as to
create a public open space amenity in the context of urban
' design. Comprised of 17 free-market units and 1 employee
unit, the site plan has been configured using three separate
building clusters of attached units. The majority of units
are located in the northern perimeter of the site away from
' Main Street, thereby reducing visual impact, creating views
to Aspen Mountain, and creating an interesting, large open
space design.
' The building cluster located nearest Main Street is
designed to: (1) create a scaled down building transition
' from the Concept 600 Building (41 stories); (2) preserve the
tall existing cottonwood trees at the corner of Spring and
Main Streets, and create a park -like open space setting for
' - 17 -
pedestrian use at that corner; and (3) preserve the open
space and view from Original Curve to the river embankment
Herron Park and beyond.
In order to preserve the natural quality of the
embankment of the Roaring Fork River, development has been
kept back from the edge.
' The landscaped pedestrian quality of the project's open
space has been made possible by placing required parking in a
below grade parking garage. The only exception to bel^w
' grade parking is the provision of four (4) spaces for
guest/service use located off Spring Street. The project
provides all required parking spaces internal to the site.
The vehicular entry to the subgrade parking is located at the
' northwest corner of the site, and is accessed from Spring
Street to minimize traffic impact on existing streets and for
clarity of orientation. The access ramp is snowmelted for
' winter safety, and screened from public view by landscaping,
as well as being located under a unit.
' The parking garage is designed so that individual
dwelling units may be entered directly from their parking
locations in the garage. Access to the pool and recreation
area is provided directly from the enclosure of the garage by
' both stair and elevator. In inclement weather, residents and
guests alike may walk to the pool or other units in a totally
protected environment.
' The employee unit has been located near the formal entry
and parking garage entrance off Spring Street for purposes of
' visual control and convenience. This location will help to
provide for receipt of mail delivery, guest services, and
information. The site perimeter has been carefully treated
to enhance the quality and public amenity of the project.
A new 5 foot wide sidewalk and curb will be provided
along Spring and Main Street. This conventional sidewalk
' will extend along Original Curve, beyond the project
property, across Neal Street, then down the south side of
Neal Street to create a pedestrian connection to the No
' Problem Bridge. This sidewalk will greatly improve the
safety and quality of pedestrian and bicycle movement from
Herron Park to Main Street and other downtown locations.
A small public rest and conversation area will be
provided by the Applicant in a landscaped environment on the
City right-of-way near Original Curve, as discussed with Bill
' Ness of the Parks Department. This "vest pocket park" will
be located in a landscaped area adjacent to the sidewalk with
good solar orientation and excellent views of both the
' Roaring Fork River and Independence Pass. Similarly, public
seating and upgraded landscaping will enhance the public
enjoyment and park -like quality of the existing "cottonwood
' - 18 -
I
grove" at the corner of Main and Spring Streets.
To reduce apparent building height along Main Street,
and to deflect street noises from the interior of the site,
the existing natural earth form will be landscaped and
extended along Main Street in front of the adjacent building
cluster.
It has been determined from meetings with BFI Waste
Systems that two (2) 2-yard capacity dumpsters will
adequately serve refuse generated by the project. With the
approval of BFI, the dumpsters will be located in a below
grade garage location, and will be lifted by a sidewalk
elevator device to an accessible paved area during the actual
time of garbage collection. In addition to providing a dry
and manageable refuse collection system to project owners,
this system will virtually eliminate the visual presence of
on site refuse. The garbage collection point is positioned
on Spring Street so that the garbage collection vehicle can
park and not block traffic.
' Structures located on site will be made available
through timely agreement with Applicant for removal and
reconstruction.
An existing group of electrical transformer boxes are
presently situated in a visually prominent location in the
public R.O.W. on Spring Street. Because they are visually
' unattractive and constitute a physical obstruction to the
proposed Spring Street sidewalk, the Applicant proposes
relocation of the transformers at its own expense to a
' landscaped site location agreeable to the City Engineering
Office, and in accordance with City design standards.
A dominant feature of the site design is the landscaped
'
open space which connects the Main Street landscaped parkway
through the interior of the site to Spring Street. After
deducting actual building footprint coverage, the remaining
undeveloped space is 68% of the site area. The open space
'
calculation by present zoning calculation methods exceeds the
35% requirement for the RMF zone. Calculated under proposed
standards, the open space factor for the site is
'
approximately 55%. The open space between building clusters
is approximately 70 feet wide to provide solar orientation
'
and views and to provide an internal landscaped courtyard.
The interior portions of the site have been restricted
to pedestrians use only, and a landscaped pathway system has
been provided to link individual units with other units, the
'
Spring Street entry, pool and recreational building, and to
the sub -grade garage.
- 19 -
Located at the southeast corner of the site, a pool and
' common recreation space provide an excellent site amenity to
the project. The pool deck and enclosed recreational space
(1 story) have been sunken partially below grade for privacy
' and wind protection. This design allows for views of the
open space from Main Street and Original Curve. Pool area
development has been setback from the embankment edge to
' preserve the natural quality of the edge as seen from Herron
Park. The pool area is set in a generously landscaped
environment and located for optimum solar exposure.
Native landscape materials have been used throughout the
site to enhance the concept of the extended river green
space. Plantings of indigenous trees and shrubs have been
located to selectively buffer and screen the buildings and
t
pool area from Main Street, to screen the north side of the
site adjacent to the private driveway. Hardy ornamental
trees and shrubs provide summer shade and winter interest in
the interior courtyard area, and are used to accent the pool
space and resident gathering and seating areas. Most
existing trees over 6" caliper will be relocated on site.
Turfgrass and groundcovers dominate the ground plane of the
open space areas, while flowers will be used to highlight
special locations. Paved courtyard and walkways will be
'
incorporated into the landscape design.
CC. 24-11(a) (2aa) Energy.
' The Applicant is committed to minimize energy
consumption. In the 700 Main project, energy provisions have
been carefully evaluated and integrated in order to insure
' that expenditures of energy are minimal and benefits gained
are optimal. An example of the energy saving techniques that
will be utilized are as follows:
' (1) Building Orientation and Solar Utilization.
The majority of building units have major view and glass
'
orientation to the south. Special glazing will minimize heat
loss, as described below, during the colder months. Operable
windows will provide ample cooling and through -ventilation
from north to south during the warmer months.
'
(2) Glazing. Non -south glazing will be low E
double -glazed insulating units in order to minimize both long
wave radiation and conductive heat loss. Significant amounts
'
of glazing will be placed on the southern face of the units
to insure maximum solar gain and daylight, and to minimize
'
heat loss on the other sides.
(3) Insulation. Insulation values for exterior
walls and surfaces are designed to significantly exceed
minimum energy standards. The project will provide R-38 or
- 20 -
better in the roof assembly, and R-25 or better in the
exterior walls. In addition, rigid insulation will be used
to insulate the perimeter foundation walls of the townhouse
units at a value of R-12 or better.
'
(4) Mechanical Systems. Each unit will employ
state of the art mechanical systems, including ninety percent
(90%) efficiency or equivalent hot water boilers for both
domestic hot water and space heat at the building perimeters.
'
This will be done even though this type of system is more
expensive to install than a conventional space heating
system. This system will, however, use substantially less
'
energy. The need for cooling on this project is minimal, and
operable windows to maximize through ventilation is
contemplated.
'
(5) Fixtures. Low consumption water closets and
shower heads will be installed throughout the project. The
swimming pool and hot tub will be heated by high efficiency
boilers, and will be insulated by roll -out pool covers
employed during all periods of non-use.
'
(6) Infiltration. Vapor barriers will be provided
at all exterior walls and roofs on the indoor side of
insulation to help prevent air infiltration and humidity
loss. All doors, windows, electrical outlets, and
penetrations at the vapor barriers will be sealed and
insulated.
'
(7) Party Walls. Great care has been taken to
maximize the extent of party wall sharing, thereby reducing
all forms of heat loss. This has been accomplished by tight
clustering of the units, and is deemed a major contribution
in securing optimal energy performance for each unit.
(8) Fireplaces. There will be no woodburning
fireplaces in the project. This is a strong statement by the
developer to address Aspen's No. 1 problem - air pollution.
'
(8) Parking Garage Exhaust. Exhaust fumes from
the parking garage will be mechanically removed through a
ventilation duct which will exhaust at the roof level of the
'
north building cluster.
dd. 24-11.4(b)(2) Trails.
'
The project site presents an opportunity to provide a
sidewalk link to the pedestrian crossing at No Problem
Bridge, and thus achieve a new and safe pedestrian access to
Herron Park from the project site, as well as from downtown
Aspen.
To benefit the public trail (sidewalks) system, the
Applicant commits to not only extend a sidewalk and gutter
'
- 21 -
I�
P,
along the Original Curve portion of Main Street beyond the
project, but to create further extension of sidewalk curb and
gutter along the south side of Neal Street to the pedestrian
crossing at No Problem Bridge. This will be built in
accordance with City of Aspen Design Standards. The City
Engineering Department recommended the Neal Street portion of
sidewalk connection in conjunction with bridge reconstruction
several years ago, but was unable to fund the project due to
budget constraints. The Engineering Department continues to
feel that providing this sidewalk will be a benefit to public
safety, is an excellent design, and agrees that public
interest would be served by the Applicant's construction of
the sidewalk.
ee. 24-11.4(b)(2) Green Space.
Under the plan and proposed Code changes, approximately
55% of the site will be open space. The project's green
space is divided into two major categories: (1) the interior
courtyard area and the swimming pool area which are for
resident use; and (2) an extension of the river/park
environment along the south edge of the site designed for
both resident and public enjoyment.
The interior courtyard will provide for informal
activities, access the pool area and will include pedestrian
circulation. It will have an inward orientation for privacy,
but with some views to the mountains and the park. Plantings
are used to accentuate green space qualities and provide
visual interest from upper floors. These plantings will be
carefully located to preserve the view corridors outside the
site.
The landscape design extending along Main Street derives
from the naturalistic open space of the river and park. The
area will capture views to the river and park, provide a
natural setting, and permit the visual extension of open
space to the park.
The existing cottonwoods at the corner of Spring Street
and Main Street, together with the cottonwoods along the
river, will be supplemented with additional trees, native
plantings and berms along Main Street frontage. A new
sidewalk, in conjunction with the landscaping, will visually
buffer the buildings from the street and increase the usable
public space. The new sidewalk will provide safe access to
Neal Street and Herron Park. A small river view sitting area
will be built on the road ROW at the southeast corner of the
site along the new walk. Benches will be built for public
use of the green space at the corner of Spring Street and
Main Street as well as at Original Curve.
3. Proximity to Support
Services.
aa.
24-11.4(b)(3)
Public Transportation.
The
project is
located within two (2) blocks walking
'
distance
of an existing
City or County bus route.
bb.
24-11.4(b)(3)
Community Commercial Facilities.
'
The
project is
located within two (2) blocks walking
distance
of commercial
facilities in town.
'
4. 24-11.4(b)(4)
Provision for Employee Housing.
The
employee housing commitment for the project is as
'
follows:
Resident
Generation:
'
9
2-bedrooms
@ 2.25 people/unit = 20.25 people
6
3-bedrooms
@ 3.00 people/unit = 18 people
'
2
4-bedrooms
@ 3.00 people/unit = 6 people
44.25
Credit for
existing
"replacement units"
2
3-bedrooms
@ 3.00 people/unit = 6 people credit
1
2-bedrooms
@ 2.25 people/unit = 2.25 people credit
8.25 people credit
Net new
free market
residents is 44.25 less 8.25 or = 36
iTo
qualify for 10 GMP points:
Net New
Residents
36.00 -50%
'
Employee
Commitment
36.00 -50%
72.00 100%
' The employee housing commitment in each case will be
satisfied in part by building on -site one employee unit of
one -bedroom size for a credit of 1.75 employees.
' Employee Commitment 36.00
less credit -1.75
Cash -in -Lieu employees 34.25
Cost @ $20,000/employee: $685,000
' Applicant shall construct one (1) 1-bedroom low-income
employee unit on -site as shown on the plan. The 1-bedroom
unit shall be restricted to the low-income rental or sales
' guidelines, and shall be at least 500 square feet. Applicant
reserves the right to give employees of the project first
priority to occupy the unit even if tbei�_income exceeds the
guidelines. Occupants shall be selected by the developer or
C�
successor in interest of the project. The rental or sales
price guideline for the unit shall be adjusted to the
low-income guidelines in effect at the time of issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the unit.
The cash -in -lieu payment for 36.00 employees at the
low-income guidelines of $20,000.00 per employee totals
$685,000.00. A payment of $48,929.00 per free-market unit
shall be made at the time of issuance of a building permit
for construction of each residential unit, excluding the
three (3) reconstructed units. The payment amount shall be
adjusted to the low-income cash -in -lieu guideline in effect
at the time of payment.
Applicant reserves the right to continue conversations
with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority to explore
other alternatives allowed by the Aspen Municipal Code to
fulfill his employee housing commitment. In the event there
should be a disagreement with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing
Authority over the employee housing proposal, the Applicant
commits to fulfill his 50% employee housing commitment for
the GMP scoring in a manner acceptable to the Housing
Authority.
5. 24-11.4(b)(5) Bonus Points.
This residential site is unique, and the project has
responded to the challenge of the unique site. This project
has created improvements which benefit not only the residents
of the project, the neighborhood, but the City in general.
The Applicant should be granted maximum bonus points for its
outstanding overall design meriting special recognition. The
project has incorporated the criteria of Section
24-11.4(b)(1)(2)(3) and (4). The project is compatible with
the character of the neighborhood. As a matter of fact, it
is situated in a neighborhood with diverse architectural
character and scale, and rather than follow the monolithic
definition of the Concept 600 Building, it has chosen to set
new standards for the neighborhood in architecture, scale,
open space and size.
The
following items
are being provided to benefit the
'
community
and demonstrate
an outstanding overall design
meriting
recognition and
bonus points:
(1) Applicant
is providing two isolation valves
extending
a deadend water
line, providing an interconnect and
looping,
all of which will enhance the City of Aspen water
system.
(2) Applicant
is providing one new fire hydrant,
and modernizing a second
fire hydrant. This, along with
1
improving
the City water
system, will enhance fire protection
for the neighborhood.
'
- 24 -
(3) Applicant is slip lining a portion of the
' off -site sewer line to correct an existing infiltration
problem and, in effect, enhance capacity.
'
(4) The Applicant is initiating
techniques that will enhance storm drainage
storm drainage
in the area, and
will eliminate some direct flows to the Roaring
Fork River.
'
(5) The project is undergrounding almost all of
the parking, eliminating the visual impact
of cars, and
providing all required parking.
'
(6) Responding to the tremendous
challenge that
the community faces with pollution, the
project is
'
eliminating all woodburning devices.
(7) The Applicant is providing park -like settings
and seating for the public on the corner of
Spring and Main,
'
and on Original Curve.
(8) Applicant is providing new
sidewalk links
off -site to the south side of Neal Street
for pedestrian
crossing at the No Problem Bridge.
' (9) Applicant will move, at its expense,
electrical transformer boxes which now sit prominently in the
City ROW to a new screened location.
' These nine examples typify a project that has been very
carefully thought out, and successfully balances the needs of
the developer and benefits to the neighborhood and the City.
This project is unique and is truly able to improve the
neighborhood, as well as the City, in these nine concrete
ways as well as others, and is, therefore, deserving of
' maximum bonus points.
/LAND2/finegmp.app
25 -
n
lu
l
F
11,
a
J
Q F
W U
> QY
D> tQ
uQ ma
ao 00
02 W2
�0 20
m0 00
Im Nm
I
f > W W W W I
III It U > a a W I
2 W 2 Q I
t < 0 Q W f Q Q
a 0 Y
2 F a
+ . a
F,
�o I I. 0 n
Q II�,
m II 112
�Z'
-—Tanadaan. o-n-ao-o_a_aao o an-b-onao.�og
\ I 1'
If o to �c II i
` to
a{ i I 10
Ip
� tP
tool
1 F° I J
o a IF.
/ r lol
�h �o Ipl10
_--r-f-T- 11Tol p I I.
uII I 1 /$ �I I
m II • I I L pot
V.
101 1
-
p o
r-=--------p--- ---, r---"-----------�
I o 0
a I I p o I ( r--- 11
a 11' 3 0
n, Io 0I 1 nl a 11
¢ o• o
-- -- - - --
I I r `----p------x-------JL----- I
I� °r----
W I.I, o
o 1 aJLn
Z
_0
I�
Q
0
J
oa
_Z
Z
N
Map 1
�I
Ij
0
F > 0 W W W z
> J ( ( Q
t • ( Z Y z Q r J W
` < o a xp m f 0
i
- 1 1 `/�� �' ( ••• it (� r �i� �J .. Q
0 _
zz
1� I
! 01
slz
3
4mmnm-rmwn '411fllinlldflll III E
' �• v I' W
ZS
W � _
i
••� QI I I II l I lllllllum 111 lPimlllllllllllll.if IIIII
x
Q I t.
. f I
` is •
Z
O
J
CU
cc
II1
LJ
Map 2
Map 3
.1
���' � r"-.1'Illll li\1111�� - ,Wyr •nn�Jpllll�� IIIIUIIII�u.nmauol// i�Illl//
ul�lomuumallllll �lllhllllla ••.
/ m,ulWll ♦ • ,
i
I
a,��lllli,,,."III'��HIld1N�IV��� ��iiNl►i�it��� ���,�,%/� _
MA I
-ink
'�.
�► _ alllllll
/
,•va ill= = , — -,"'III! a • ,�' _= I r /,
i I 0
� � � ==►11MI�= ,nil _�' w�S��i - . 11 ` /
Ff
;r-
I PONT
UNIT UNIT
UNIT
� 1 1 T �C
:�T
�ABO E NR tUNIT /
�B)vl
Ii PARKING STALLSram_
I BR EXERCISE
UNIT ROOM / • i
STAB AND ELEVATOR
TO POOL AREA ABOVE
Lz
----------------
o
•aa
J\\�� o
------------
------------
700 MAIN
N
1+
W E
S
GARAGE LEVEL PLAN
14.
Map 6
S
3
R
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
SPRP,C STREET
700 MAIN
I
ik�,/y 25 (EIGHT LHl7
-LJLJu -
Y
r. !z
SUBQADE PARKING I ROARING (ORR RfL'(R
L•
SECTION THRU COURTYARD
O S 10 20 40 60 100 1S0 200 250 �'^� ""
-- Map 8
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
IA�LLTE.EPLACES SHALL BE GAS APPLIANCES
COMMUNITY ROOM / POOL PLAN
700 MAIN
S It, HI w 40
STAIR & HEVATOR FOYER COMMUNITY
TO _AR AGE LEVU Roo.
A.��
..
}ice��►�'
N
1 W E
S'
PRELIMINARY UNIT FLOOR PLANS
- --- -Map 9
EAGLES CLUB
.1
GARAGE CREEKTREE CONDOMIN0.IMS
ENTRANCE
3 BR 3 BR \,
BR
C.T. .•'
7 BR 1 2 BR
1
I SIR
" t , I r`-jli
•AND$CAPE /
ARdL PARKMIG AL r f .,�. /
Iry OPEN SPACE
of .
�h
f
2 BR - ,e RECREATION BUILDING 4
2 BR
2 BR
HERRON PARK
2 BR 2 BR
cud
- tr
L PUBLIC OPEN SPACE/ r I ti
l
SEATING AREA
MAIN STREET'
RIVER OVERLOOK/ - y`
-- - — - PUBLIC SEATING AREA �
N
700 MAIN
THE LEONARD PARKER ASSOCIATES•ARCHITECTS
_-# _- i- . l L 7- t 7
W
S
ILLUS I RA.TIVF SIT-F PI AN
CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION/PUD
DESIGN WORKSHOP INC.- LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
yn �n w
Map 11
� l
TE FO IL'fi�SCA PEA
ART
STONE/CONCRETE, , 1,
I PAVING
i • ' ..
t p D ..,..:..• , .. f,.... r
` �•fi • • v�RE5P
CONCRETE SIDEWALK 4 • �'
— CONCRETE/STONE SEATING CUBES
MAIN STREET
CONCRETEISTONE SEATING CUBES+' ,
LEGEND TYPICAL PLANT & PAVING MATERIALS
CO EXISTING VEGETATION (COTTONWOOD) NATURALISTIC OROUNDCOVER I I GAL CONT
®. LARGE TREES IJ' CAL. US) HALLS HONEVSL0CKLE - LONICERA JARYILA
PAXSTMA PAXSTMA MYRSNITES
COTTONWOOD POgILUS SPP SWEET W000RUFF GALUA 000RATUA
O ORNAMENTAL TREES 12 CAL BABI ENGEL.—IVY PARTHENOCSSS CNOUEFOLM
ASPEN MP.JLUS IREWLOGES FORMALIZED GROUNDCOVER 1: I,.POTI N
90Cnv MTN MAPLE ACER GLABRUM
:REEPN AINICNIA MAI.ONA REPENS
SHUBERT CHDXECHERRv PRUAJS'WG ANA SMJBER, MONEVWORT LVSMAC—NUMMULARM
Q EVERGREEN TREES lu Ir RABi PERIW-LE VNCA MINOR \ �'
Wn,E ER AGES CONCOLOR nflillHCN ARCTOSTAPHr UVA URSI
BLUE SPRUCE PICEA PUNOENS CREEPING POTENTILLA POTENTLLA VERNA NANA y\/ E
SHRUBS 's GAL Co., I PERENNIAL FLOWERS/ACCENT - I Al.GCONT I
REDTwIG DOGWOOD COWAIS StOLONFERA f.OLORAGENW TURFGRASS
POTENTILIA POTENTLLA TRUTICOSA
TRAORANT SAIAC RHUS ARCIA—A REVEGETATION PLANTINGS - GRASSES t GROUNDCOVERS S
WOODS ROSE ROSA WOOD MODULAR PAVING
RVGOSA POSE ROSA R1100SA
ALPNE CVRP-T RBES ALPNIAX 0 EXPOSED AGGREGATE PAVING
'MOO PINE PM 5 MJGIX)
NUtE EXISTING EVERGREEN TREES WILL BE MOVED IAS ROCnv S1IL •
CONpTKN15 ALLOWI TO THE SOUTHEAST AREA Of tHE SItE
700 MAIN LANDSCAPE PLAN
THE LEONARD PARKER ASSOCIATES -ARCHITECTS DESIGN WORKSHOP INC -LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
nl N ul n �n m ILI I!I lug IKI I .I ,I.
_- MI
Map 12
•
•
EXHIBIT
November 20, 1987
Mr. Michael Thompson
Hagman Yaw, Architects FIV;' V 2 4 1%
210 S. Galena St.
Aspen, Co. 81611
Re: Original Curve Project
Dear Mr. Thompson:
I have reviewed the site plan of this project and find it well
within a three minute response time for fire department
operations. The addition of a new hydrant as you suggested, would
enhance fire protection East and South of the project. The
closest hydrant South of the project is at Hyman and Original.
Have a Fire Safe Day,
Wayne L. Vandemark
Fire Marshal
Aspen Fire Prot. Dist.
1
n
1
n
1
601
1
• 0
APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION/P.U.D.
December 1, 1987
Submitted to: City of Aspen Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
925-2020
Applicant: Fine Associates
IDS Center, Suite 1916
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(612) 332-2561
Architects: Leonard Parker & Associates
430 Oak Grove
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403
(612) 871-6864
Landscape Architect:
Civil Engineers:
Planner:
Hagman Yaw Architects Ltd.
210 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
925-2867
Design Workshop, Inc.
710 East Durant
Aspen, Colorado 81611
925-8354
Rea-Cassens & Associates, Inc.
4388 South Windermere
Englewood, Colorado 80110
789-4428
Joe Wells
608 East Hyman
Aspen, Colorado
925-6866
Attorneys: Gideon Kaufman
Law Offices of Gideon I. Kaufman, P.C.
315 E. Hyman Avenue, Suite 305
Aspen, Colorado 81611
925-8166
C�
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
I.
Project Description
1
II.
Project Site
2
III.
Application Requirements
3
IV.
Conceptual Subdivision
3
V.
Conceptual P.U.D.
5
VI.
Stream Margin Review
6
VII.
Mandatory P.U.D. Review
7
VIII.
Common Park and Recreation Areas
10
IX.
Architectural Review
10
X.
Landscaping Plan
10
XI.
Off -Street Parking
10
XII.
Reduction for Slope
10
XIII.
Open Space and Common Facility Maintenance
10
XIV.
Special Approval of Deed Restricted
Employee Housing Units
11
MAPS AND EXHIBITS
Vicinity/Location/Zoning
Map # 1
Conceptual
Subdivision/P.U.D./Site
Map #14
Landscaping
Plan
Map #15
Conceptual
Grading Plan
Map #13
Special
Review Conditions
Map #13
Title
Commitment (Ownership)
Exhibit 1
Letter
on Density Reduction
Exhibit 2
Joint
Application Consent
Exhibit 3
i
u
i
EXHIBITS
(continued)
Utility Letters not addressed in GMP section:
(a) Electric Exhibit 4
(b) Telephone Exhibit 5
(c) Cable T.V. Exhibit 6
ii
F
I
1
P.U.D. AND SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
FOR 700 MAIN PROJECT
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION.
The Applicant is proposing seventeen (17) free-market
residential units, plus one (1) employee unit. Three (3) of
the free-market units will be replacement units. The
property is located on the northeast corner of Main Street
and Spring Street, and is bordered on the west by the Concept
600 Building, on the north by the Eagles Club, on the east by
the Roaring Fork River and Herron Park and across Main Street
by the Original Curve Condominiums. The land is located
within the RMF PUD Zone on a total of 60,016 sq. ft. The
multi -family units are being configured into three (3)
separate building clusters. The majority of the units are
located near the northern perimeter of the site, away from
Main Street. The multi -family project is in conformity with
its underlying zoning. It seeks no variations through the
P.U.D. process, and its size and scope fits nicely in the
neighborhood, which is a mix of multi -family and commercial.
Great care has been given to the organization of the site
plan to complement the development in the area, and to
provide a graceful transition between this project, the
surrounding projects and the river and park.
Involved in the design of the project are several
significant beneficial features:
(1) Applicant is providing two isolation valves,
extending a deadend water line, providing interconnect and
looping, all of which will enhance the City of Aspen water
system.
(2) Applicant is providing one new fire hydrant,
and upgrading a second fire hydrant. This along with
improving the City water system will enhance fire protection
for the neighborhood.
(3) Applicant is slip lining a portion of the
off -site sewer line to correct an existing infiltration
problem and, in effect, enhance capacity.
(4) The Applicant is initiating storm drainage
techniaues that will upgrade storm drainage in the area, and
will eliminate some direct flows to the Roaring Fork River.
(5) The project is undergrounding almost all of
the parking, eliminating the visual impact of cars, and
providing all required parking.
(6) Responding to the tremendous challenge that
the community faces with pollution, the project is
eliminating all woodburning devices.
- 1 -
(7) The Applicant is providing park -like settings
for the public on the corner of Spring and Main, and on
'
Original Curve.
(8) Applicant is providing new sidewalk links
off -site to the south side of Neal Street for pedestrian
crossing at the No Problem Bridge.
(9) Applicant will move, at its expense,
electrical transformer boxes which prominently sit in the
City ROW to a new screened location.
'
Applicant believes this project, with its many
beneficial components, and with its thoughtful site planning
and architectural design, meets the criteria for PUD and
'
subdivision approval.
II. PROJECT SITE.
The site is located on the corner of Main Street and
Spring Street, bordered by the Concept 600 Building, the
Eagles Club, across the street from the Original Curve
'
Condominiums, and across the river from Herron Park.
Comprised of seventeen free-market (17) units, the site plan
has been configured using three (3) separate building
clusters of attached multi -family units. The majority of
units are located in the northern perimeter of the site, away
from Main Street, thereby reducing visual impact, and
'
creating views to Aspen Mountain. An interesting large, open
space design with an interior courtyard separating the
housing clusters and a generous amount of open space along
'
Main Street is being provided.
The building cluster located nearest to Main Street is
designed to create a scaled -down building transition from the
Concept 600 Building which is over four (4) stories high.
This site design preserves the tall, existing Cottonwood
trees at the corner of Spring and Main, and creates a
park -like open space setting for pedestrian use at the
corner. In order to preserve the natural qualities of the
embankment of the Roaring Fork River, development has been
kept back from the river's edge. The landscaped, pedestrian
quality of the project's open space has been made possible by
placing required parking in a below -grade parking garage.
'
The only exception to below -grade parking is the provision of
four (4) on grade guest/service parking spaces located off
Spring Street. Access to the pool and recreational areas is
provided directly from the subgrade garage by stair and
'
elevator as well as by pedestrian access from the courtyard.
A small, public rest and conversation area will be provided
by the Applicant as discussed with the Parks Department on
the City right-of-way, in a landscaped environment near
'
Original Curve. This vest pocket park will be located in a
landscaped area adjacent to the sidewalk, with good solar
'
orientation and excellent views of the Roaring Fork River and
Independence Pass.
- 2 -
I
A unique design for garbage has been incorporated into
the site design. Two (2) two -yard capacity dumpsters will be
located in a below -grade garage location, and will be lifted
by an elevator to an accessible paved area during the actual
time of garbage collection.
The existing group of electrical transformer boxes
presently situated in a visually prominent location on the
public right-of-way on Spring Street will be relocated to a
landscaped site.
A dominant feature of the site design is the landscaped
open space which connects the Main Street open space frontage
to the interior of the site and through to Spring Street.
Only thirty-two percent (32%) of the actual site is covered
with building envelopes. The )pen space between the building
clusters approximates seventy feet (70') in width, which
allows solar orientation and views, as well as internal
landscaped space.
A project featured amenity is the pool and recreation
space. The pool deck and enclosed recreational space have
been partially sunken below grade for privacy and wind
protection. The pool area development has been set back from
the river embankment to preserve the natural quality of the
edge, and is seen as an open space extension of the Herron
Park vista.
III. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS.
The Applicant seeks simultaneous approval of the
' following submissions: Conceptual Subdivision pursuant to
Section 20-10; Conceptual P.U.D. pursuant to Section 24-8.7;
Mandatory P.U.D. pursuant to Section 24-8.13; Stream Margin
Review pursuant to Section 24-6.3; GMP Approval; Special
Review for Deed Restricting Employee Housing Units and
special review for two (2) four -bedroom units in the RMF
Zone. The proposed employee dwelling unit may be exempt from
' GMP pursuant to Section 24-11.2(f) subject to approval by
Council based upon recommendations by the Planning
Commission.
In order to facilitate Planning Commission and Council
review, the remainder of this Application is organized
1 according to submittal requirements of the various
applications.
IV. CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION.
' A. As stated in Section 20-7, the purpose of
conceptual review is to authorize further study on the
' project. The information that we have submitted justifies an
approval in the conceptual stage. The suitability of the
land for subdivision required in Section 20-9 has been proven
' for this first stage, and if additional information is needed
- 3 -
we will be happy to provide it. The land being used for
' development is basically flat and easily accessible, both
from the street and for utility purposes. All parking will
be provided on -site at one (1) space per bedroom with the
majority of the parking underground. B. A vicinity map of a scale of 1- 400 is found in the
application. The map shows the projectes location with
' respect to the downtown core and public support facilities.
The project's proximity to the commercial core, neighborhood
commercial centers, and the base lifts of Aspen Mountain will
' encourage more pedestrian and fewer auto trips. Public
safety support has easy access to the site.
C. A sketch plan of the proposed development is
' included. Relevant subdivision considerations are
illustrated on the plan which shows access to the property
off Spring Street. Parking of one (1) space per bedroom is
' provided almost entirely underground, with no parking on Main
or Spring Street required. The multi -family units are
oriented to maximize views, open space, privacy and solar
' gain. The natural Cottonwood trees are being preserved, and
existing trees over 6" caliper on the site are being
relocated to complement a detailed landscaping plan. All
' utilities are readily available to the site.
D. Tabulation of Data.
' (a) The projectes proposed name is 700 Main. The
land mass of the project is 60,016 sq. ft., all within the
City of Aspen.
' (b) Density calculation formulas show a total of
50,497 square feet of developable land, when slope and land
' under water are deducted.
(c) The number of free-market units will be
seventeen (17), including three (3) reconstructed units.
1 (d) One (1) employee structure of one (1) bedroom
will be constructed.
' (e) Total FAR calculated from Section 24-,A
allowed is 50,497 square feet. Less than that square ;-..otage
' will be built.
(f) Total projected population is approximately 45
people.
E. Disclosure of Ownership.
' See Exhibit "1".
�I
�I
L
•
V. CONCEPTUAL P.U.D.
A. RMF P.U.D. zoning requires a project to proceed
through the Planned Unit Development process. This process
allows flexibility in the strict application of zoning
district requirements, encourages appropriate design for the
site's topography and unique qualities. This process also
encourages site and architectural design which enhances the
site's existing assets. Because of this, three (3) cluster
buildings are being constructed, each taking advantage of the
site's unique qualities, and each sensitive to the site's
limitations. The Main Street cluster has been purposely
staggered at the ends so that, from movement patterns along
Main Street, the massing of only three (3) units can usually
be seen at the same time. Additionally, the height of this
cluster where possible has been lowered 2-3 feet below
allowable height. The majority of the units have been placed
at the north edge of the site awav from Main Street. At the
portion of the site contiguous to Original Curve, the units
are located approximately 165 feet from the Main Street curb.
The existing curb cut on Main Street will be eliminated with
access coming from the safer and less utilized Spring Street.
A sidewalk which will link the No Problem Bridge is being
proposed to create a trail linkage in the area. All utilities
will be underground. In addition, an existing group of
electrical transformer boxes presently situated in a visually
prominent location on the public right-of-way on Spring
Street will be relocated to a landscaped site in a less
prominent location. The site will be landscaped and will
enhance the appearance of the site. Solar orientation is
being utilized. All but four (4) parking spaces will be
underground.
B. Ownership of the P.U.D.
The Developer plans to sell the free-market units being
built. A total of seventeen (17) free-market units will be
sold. The employee unit will be rented by the developer to
qualified employees.
C. Variation.
While the PUD allows for variations from the regulations
governing open space, maximum height, trash area, external
and internal floor areas, and the number of off-street
parking and set backs, this project is not requesting any
variations. The PUD plan utilizes clustering techniques.
The clustering technique being used enables open space
between the buildings to approximate 70 feet. This provides
solar orientation and views, as well as internal landscaped
space, and a continuum of the open space from Main Street to
Spring Street.
- 5 -
D. Site and Landscape Plan.
See Map #15. The Site Plan for 700 Main reflects a
layout that is responsive to the terrain and the unique
nature of the site. The buildings are carefully sited with
respect to general setting, orientation, and surrounding
development. The Main Street buildings are set back,
staggered, and of lower profile than neighboring
' developments. The majority of the buildings are placed in
the back, away from the Main Street view corridor.
Development has been kept away from the
' river's edge to protect the views from the park, as well as
protect the riparian vegetation.
' E. Elevations.
Elevations have been included on Map "7". These show
the Main Street and Spring Street elevations, and are of
' sufficient detail to appraise the commission of the exterior
design, bulk and mass of the development and its relationship
to the terrain, as well as neighboring projects.
' VI. STREAM MARGIN REVIEW.
The intention of Stream Margin Review is to guide,
develop and encourage appropriate use of land in proximity to
designated natural water courses. To promote safety from
flooding, to prevent impediment of natural water flow, and
' insure provisions for adequate protection and preservation of
the designated natural water courses as important natural
features. While the project is totally outside of any
floodplain, review is required because some development will
fall within 100 feet from the high water line of the Roaring
Fork River. Enclosed is Map #13 which shows a boundary of
' the property including 2 foot contours at 5 foot intervals
for grades over ten percent (10%). Proposed building
locations and existing trees are shown.
' Review Criteria #1.
No development will be located within any flood hazard
' area as designated by U.S. Corp of Engineers. This is shown
on Map #13.
' Review Criteria #2
There is no trail designated by an approved trail plan
within the development site.
' Review Criteria #3
' The Roaring Fork Greenway Plan is being complied with.
1
Review Criteria #4.
'
Since our project does not approach the stream bed or
floodplain, no slope grade changes will be made that will
produce erosion of the stream bank.
1
Review Criteria #5.
Even though no construction will take place in the
'
floodplain or within 50 feet of the river, temporary
construction barriers will be required between disturbed
'
sites and the river along the project line. No developed
flows from paving will be allowed to directly enter the
river.
I
VII. MANDATORY P.U.D. REVIEW.
1. Utilities.
'
The utilities required to serve this project include
sewage, water, telephone, gas, cable T.V., and electric. All
'
of the utilities are available to the site. All of the
utility companies indicate that there is sufficient capacity
available to service this project from the adjacent
facilities, as shown on Exhibits "4" through "6". This
'
project lies within the service area of the respective
utilities, and does not present any significant off -site cost
to any of the utility companies.
'
2. Roadway System.
'
There exists adequate public roadway system to the
project boundaries. The Fire Department has indicated a
response time of three minutes or under. Most parking will
be underground. Fire and emergency vehicles can easily
'
respond to any emergencies in the project. The homeowners
will be in charge of all snow removal and maintenance of the
internal paved areas.
'
3. Suitability the Site for Development.
of
Chen & Associates has completed a subsurface analysis of
'
the site, and finds the soil and ground stability suitable
for development. There are no rock fall or avalanche dangers
'
associated with the site. The steep slope areas will not be
developed. The soil condition will support the proposed
development.
' 4. Effects of t Development on the Natural
Watershed, Runoff and Drainage.
' Rea, Cassens & Associates has prepared a drainage plan
according to City of Aspen regulations, and historic flow
patterns and runoff amounts are maintained on -site in such a
manner as to have no adverse impact on neighboring landowners
or on the Roaring Fork River.
5. Air Quality.
'
The location of the project, within easy access to major
facilities, the commercial core and public transportation,
'
will encourage walking and discourage automobile use. The
close proximity of the project to bicycle trails will
encourage bicycle use. No woodburning fireplaces will be
utilized in the project. Any driveways will be paved.
'
During construction, fugitive dust will be controlled, and
revegetation of disturbed areas will be done after
'
construction.
6. Site Design and Terrain.
'
The site is located on the corner of Main Street and
Spring Street, bordered by the Concept 600 Building, the
Eagles Club, across the street from the Original Curve
Condominiums, and across the river from Herron Park.
'
Comprised of seventeen free-market (17) units, and one (1)
employee unit, the site plan has been configured using three
'
(3) separate building clusters of attached multi -family
units. The majority of units are located in the northern
perimeter of the site, away from Main Street, thereby
reducing visual impact, creating views to Aspen Mountain, and
creating an interesting large, open space design.
The building cluster located nearest to Main Street is
designed to create a scaled -down building transition from the
Concept 600 Building which is over four (4) stories high.
This site design preserves the tall, existing Cottonwood
'
trees at the corner of Spring and Main, and creates a
park -like open space setting for pedestrian use at that
corner. In order to preserve the natural qualities of the
embankment of the Roaring Fork River, development has been
'
kept back from the river's edge. The landscaped, pedestrian
quality of the project's open space has been made possible by
placing required parking in a below -grade parking garage.
The only exception to below -grade parking is the provision of
'
four (4) spaces for guest/service parking located off Spring
Street. Access to the pool and recreational areas is
provided directly from the subgrade enclosure of the garage
'
by both stair and elevator as well as pedestrian access from
the internal courtyard. A small, public rest and
conversation area will be provided by the Applicant as
'
discussed with the Parks Department, on the City right-of-way
in a landscaped environment near Original Curve. This vest
pocket park will be located in a landscaped area adjacent to
the sidewalk, with good solar orientation and excellent views
'
of the Roaring Fork River and Independence Pass.
I�
I
A unique design for garbage has been incorporated into
the site design. Two (2) two -yard capacity dumpsters will be
located in a below -grade garage location, and will be lifted
by an elevator to an accessible paved area during the actual
time of garbage collection.
The existing group of electrical transformer boxes
presently situated in a visually prominent location on the
public right-of-way on Spring Street will be relocated to a
landscaped site.
A dominant feature of the site design is the landscaped
open space which connects the Main Street open space frontage
to the interior of the site and through to Spring Street.
Only thirty-two percent (32%) of the actual site is covered
with building envelopes. The open space between the building
clusters approximates seventy feet (70') in width, which
allows for solar orientation and views, as well as internal
landscaped space.
A project amenity is the pool and recreation room. The
pool deck and enclosed recreational space have been sunken
partially below grade for privacy and wind protection. The
pool area development has been located to preserve the
natural quality of the river embankment, and is seen as an
open space extension of the Herron Park vista.
7. Grading.
The site plan for 700 Main reflects a layout that is
responsive to the terrain. Buildings are carefully sited
with respect to general aspects, orientation, and soil
conditions. The proposed grading takes into account the
terrain and other land features. This is demonstrated on the
Conceptual Grading Plan shown on Map #13.
8. Placement of Building Height and Scale.
Three (3) separate, clustered structures are proposed
for the site. The building cluster closest to Main Street
has been reduced in height and scale from the neighboring
multi -family building in order to minimize its visual impact
from Main Street. This enables an open space feeling to be
magnified, both to the Spring Street side, as well as the
Herron Park side. Cottonwood trees will be preserved. A
parklike setting will be created at the corner of Spring and
Main, and additional landscaping and planting is contemplated
on Original Curve which will continue the landscaped open
space feeling from Herron Park. Even though the Mandatory
P.U.D. allows variations, no variations are being sought in
any of the bulk requirements of the Code. The project
respects the integrity of the Roaring Fork River, and no
development is being undertaken which will step down to the
river.
=01M
7-1I
L
VIII. COMMON PARK AND RECREATION AREAS.
Extensive open areas will be provided. This common area
will be maintained by the homeowners. The developer will
make extensive landscape improvements within the project, at
its entrance and along the right-of-ways. In addition to
specific improvements which are for the use and enjoyment of
project residents, it is envisioned that the pocket park in
the City right-of-way will enhance the view and usability of
the right-of-way for City residents.
IX. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW.
Architectural drawings and sketches indicating mass and
height are included within this Application, and will be
supplemented pursuant to Section 24-8.9(c) at the time of
preliminary P.U.D. We feel there is harmony and proportion
of the buildings with each other and with surrounding
buildings. Building design has minimized disturbances to the
natural terrain and maximized the preservation of the
positive natural qualities of the site.
X. LANDSCAPING PLAN.
' A more detailed landscaping plan will be provided at
Final P.U.D. See Map #15 for conceptual landscaping.
XI. OFF-STREET PARKING.
' Off-street parking will conform with that required by
the Code, and no decrease in off-street parking will be
t requested for free-market or employee units. In addition,
the majority of parking will be placed underground, and four
(4) spaces will be placed on grade to accommodate service and
' guest parking. There is good public transportation available
in the area, and the proximity of the P.U.D. to the
commercial core, and recreational facilities of the City will
further reduce the need for cars.
' XII. REDUCTION FOR SLOPE.
' Reduction in density for slope, as well as land under
water has been taken into consideration in our density
calculation. Based on this calculation, 50,497 square feet
of net developable area is allowed as shown on the Conceptual
P.U.D. Map and letter from Alpine Surveys.
' XIII. OPEN SPACE AND COMMON FACILITY
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT.
The Applicant will be working with the City Attorney and
' Planning Office to develop a formula to satisfy both parties
on the open space and common facility maintenance agreement.
- 10 -
It is anticipated that this document will be prepared between
'
the preliminary and final phases of P.U.D.
XIV. SPECIAL APPROVAL OF DEED RESTRICTED
'
EMPLOYEE HOUSING UNITS.
One (1) one -bedroom employee unit will be constructed in
conjunction with the project. This unit will provide housing
'
for up to two (2) employees. By deed restricting this unit
to low-income rental guidelines, the City will gain
additional low-income housing, and the project will receive
housing for its employees. We believe that there is a
'
community need for this type of unit, especially in this
location. The number of bedrooms and size of the unit is
necessary for the City of Aspen at this particular time and,
'
therefore, an exemption from the GMP is appropriate.
/land2/finepud.agr
1
n
J
Q
h
W
0
_U
Q>
OQ
mQ
U(
C
00
0
3
m0
3 2
00
Im
Hm
i
i
I
a
i
(
>
(
>
Q
w
m
m
z
J
r
m
n
2
a
I
m
m
�
G
Q
3
2
0
0
ff
ad
I.
JU
•`• i �—�—__==�------'•— - gat
I12 I .
t
I I d
rTl
CL
a I I I I — I I (; ry
U
IL
Io
Io
OOP IO
loll E
o �u (
I v
10
of —
I I
j9I
Y
101
II I I lol, I n I I I f
101
u I I o o o I I p -
1 0• o � I I � (�-
1I o o I I I r
� ¢, I I o• .0
r�----o---�,-----µ-------JL--------}
r i I o. cod m,. ; --ii �1----------II .' r--- r----
a Y i
i m
I I 1 I1 �� 1 I I 1 I
_0
U
0
Z
Z
N
Map 1
EAGLES CLUB
GARAGE '.+� �, '�! ^ 'y 'I _ CREEKTREE CONDOMINIUMS \
ENTRANCE
3 BR 3 BR r'
J BR ` \
C.T. J BR 2 BR
3 BR 2 BR
2 BR
2 SR
ITE F A
-�
L e eR
APE
AR AL PARKING a � y
L_ •^� i f'p OPEN SP.ACE Q�
7 l7t •.. _ _. �� •�' •7 _ '' J `.
O
2 BR RECREATION BUILDING 4
= 2 BR
� 2 BR
3 BR
4 BR
�� YHERRON PARK
Z r +I 2SIR A• — I/
OC BR J 3
G
1
--
PUBLIC OPEN SPACE/
SEATING AREA � _`^•+� -
MAIN STREET
RIVER OVERLOOK/
PUBLIC SEATING AREA
\ N
W—
S
700 NIAIN ILLUS I RA.TIVF SITF PLAN
CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION/PUD
THE LEONARD PARKER ASSOCIATES -ARCHITECTS DESIGN WORKSHOP INC.- LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
Map 14
�
W
v
Y
I
L$TONE/CONCRETE
Z
I
_
1,
PAVING
y
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
— CONCRETE/STONE SEATING CUBES
q
MAIN STREET
CONCRETE/STONE SEATING CUBES —
LEGEND - TYPICAL PLANT & PAVING MATERIALS
EXISTING VEGETATION (COTTONWOOD)
® NATURALISTIC GROUNOCOVER I I GAL ONr
®i LARGE TREES ]'CAL. 866)
RALLS I.OFEVSUCXLE LONICERA JAPONCA '
cGrip+W000 M US SPP
RAXSTMA PAXSTMA MYRSMTES
SWEET WOOORIfF - GAL./A. GDORATUM
O ORNAMENTAL TREES 1 f.AL. 8181
ENGELMANNNV PMTI+ENDGEISUSCNOI.EFGUA
ASPEN POPULuS rREAnxGOEs
FORMALIZED GROUNDCOVER I? Ir.POT,
N
ROCK• MTN MAPLE A(.EA GLABRUM
CREEPING.AROMA MAROMA REPENS
SRJBERT CNOA ECRE FRJMJS VNGT+IANA SHUBERT
MONEVWORT LVSMACMA NUMMUL ARIA
Y^T
O EVERGREEN TREES ID I2' BAB,
wrE fR ABES COr+COLOR
LEVNCA LM+DR
AN I_OA MCTOSTARHVLOS UVA tRS1
V �\
BLUE SPRUCE RICE. _GEIS
CREERND ROTENTLLA - ROTENiLLA VERHA NMA w
E
SHRUBS 5 GAL CONT'
PERENNIAL FLOWERS/ACCENT I I GAL CONT I
REOTWIG DOGWOOD CORPA STOLONRERA ^OLORADE'+15
TURFGRASS
POTFNTLLA POIENTLLA rRUTICOSA
FRAGRMI SUMAC RIDS AROMATCA
REVEGETATION PLANTINGS GRASSES / GROUNDCOVERS
5
WOODS ROSE ROSA WOOD
MODULAR PAVING
RUGOSA ROSE ROSA PUGOSA
ALRNE TA,RRANt REFS AU•r+UM
EXPOSED AGGREGATE PAVING
MUGO PNE PrA/5 MUC q
NOrF ETISl N(: Evf RciREEN 'BEES WILL 8E MOVED IAS ROCAv SOA
700
MAIN
/.UNpTAJNS ALLOW) TO rHE SOUTHEAST AREA OF rRE Ytt
LANDSCAPE
.PLAN
THE LEONARD PARKER ASSOCIATES- ARCHITECTS
DESIGN WORKSHOP INC.•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
Map 15
7 v ooa. 1 )aot
:r
I
I
I
U ' \
/ I
dCL
:� M
INN
:::z c...c
/ I
\)awTws
)apc
q0
MAIN STREET
/ I
LEGEND
--�a,o-- EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR
TOP OF WALL
BOTTOM OF WALL
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
------ STREAM MARGIN REVIEW BOUNDARY
NOTE: ALL CONTOURS ABOVE 7900
ARE AT A ONE FOOT VERTICAL
INTERVAL, ALL OTHER CONTOURS
ARE AT A TWO FOOT VERTICAL
INTERVAL.
700 MAIN
THE LEONARD PARKER ASSOCIATES -ARCHITECTS
i_J t—J L -1 t ! L f
ryl
_ `� I lfi I l
lo� �� t
/wi I III 11 �
nib
1910
I � I
� 11111 111� \�
e.z
\\\�sL���\�\
1
1
\` N
\ W - -E
S
CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
SPECIAL REVIEW CONDITIONS - STREAM MARGIN REVIEW
DESIGN WORKSHOP INC.- LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
Map 13
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
12
14
0
0
0
11
13
R
M
M
M
M
Ld"ers Title Insurance Corporation
' National Headquarters
Richmond, Virginia
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
SCHEDULE A
1'Elfective Date October 9, 1987 at 8:00 A.M.
IPolicy or policies to be issued
(a)
19 ALTA Owner's Policy —Form B - 1970 (Rev. 10- 17-70 & Rev. 10.17-84)
tALTA Residential Title Insurance Policy-1979
oposed insured:
FINE ASSOCIATES, A MIMNESOTA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
) ALTA Loan Policy, 1970 (Rev. 10-17-70 & Rev. 10-17-84)
roposed insured:
Case No _PCT7123287
(A) Amount $
(B) Amount$
Amount S
f
�c) Amount $
roposed insured. TAX CERTIFICATES
3 Title to the in fee simple estate or interest in the land
�escribed or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in:
PARCEL (A)-DORJIliY MARIE MBQELSEN, ARDITH LQTISE WARE, AND ALI(E JUAMM GMjZG0S
' PARCEL (B)-ALBERT W. BEVAN, JR.
41he land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
' SEE EXHIBIT "A" A17ACfED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
Fo,m No 91-88 (SCH. A)
WHO
$ 5.00
PI*Jn County Title, Inc.
fi()1 E. Hopkins
Asp*n, Colorado 81611
Commitment No. P(7-1737-87
Schedule A —Page 1
This commitment is invalid unless
the Insuring Provisions and Sched-
ules A and 8 are attached.
• is
Lawyers Title Insurance Cgrpordtion
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
SCHEDULE A cont'd.
••'MCI
A PARCEL. OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SE,,SW% OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST
OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. SAIL PARCEL IS MORE FULLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 18, BLOCK 21, EAST ASPEN; THENCE NORTH 75°09'II"
WEST 44.10 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 18 AND 17 OF SAID BLOCK 21; THENCE NORTH
36022'00" EAST 26.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 06°35'00" WEST 85.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 50014'11"
EAST 118.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY EDGE OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE SOUTH
52057'39" WEST 47.02 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY EDGE OF SAID RIVER; THENCE SOM 49°58'47"
WEST 21.71 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY EDGE OF SAID RIVER TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER
WITH ALL OF LOTS 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 (FORMERLY LOTS K, L, M, N, 0, P, Q,
R, S) OF BLOCK 21, OF THE EAST ASPEN ADDITION, TOGETHER WITH ALL OF THE ALLEY OF BLOCK
21 OF THE EAST ASPEN ADDITION, TOGETHER WITH ALL OF LOTS 6, 7, 8, AND 9 (FORMERLY F, G, H,
AND I) OF BLOCK 21, OF THE EAST ASPEN ADDITION EXCEPT A PORTION THEREOF LOCATED NORTH OF
THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TAT 6, THENCE
SOUTH 59018'00" EAST 56.37 FEET; THENCE SCUM 50°14'11" EAST TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE
EAST SIDE LINE OF LOT 9, WHICH NORTHERLY PORTION OF SAID LOTS 6, 7, 8, AND 9 WERE CONVEYED
BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 311 AT PACE 11 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS, TOGETHER WITH A TRACT
OF LAND LYING IN MAIN STREET 100 FEET IN WIDTH 50 FEET WIDE ON EACH SITE OF A CENTERLINE
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SCTTTH LINE OF BLOCK 21 WHENCE TEE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF LOT 18 BEARS SCM 75°09'11" EAST 59 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE ON A 7° CURVE
TO THE RIGHT TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF MAIN STREET WHENCE THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 9, BLOCK 28 EAST ASPEN BEARS SOUTH 75-09'11" EAST 12 FEET, MORE
OR LESS, EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF PREVIOUSLY CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF ASPEN BY DEED
RECORDED IN BOOK 223 AT PAGE 152 OF THE PITKIN CG IUNTY RECORDS DESCRIBED AS A
TRACT OF LAND SATED IN THE SE, OF THE SW, OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE
84 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL rERIDIAN, MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGIISLING AT A POINT FROM WHICH THE NW CORNER OF BLOCK 28, CE THE EAST ASPEN TOWNSITE
BEARS NORTH 75009' WEST A DISTANCE OF 186.3 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11039' WEST A DISTANCE OF
111.74 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75009' EAST A DISTANCE OF 28.3 FEET; THENCE AROUND A CURVE TO
THE RIGHT WITH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 55000' AND A RADIUS OF 176.18 FEET A DISTANCE OF 168.2
FEET; THENCE NORTH 75009' WEST A DISTANCE OF 142.8 FEET, TO PLACE OF BEGTI`RVING.
PARCEL, B :
LOTS I, 2, 3, 4, AND 5, BLOCK 21,
EAST ASPEN ADDITIONAL TOWNSITE,
Continued...
Schedule -Page -No.
Lawyers Title Insurance Orpordtion
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
SCHEDULE A cont'd.
More Fully Described As Follows:
Beginning at the Southwest Corner of Block 21 East Aspen Additional Townsite,
Thence N 14' 50' 49"E 120.00 Ft., Thence S 75' 09' 11"E 150 Ft. along the South
Line of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5, said Block 21, Thence departing from said line
N 14050'49"E 100.00 Ft., Thence S 59°18' 00"E 56.37 Ft., Thence S 50014'11"E
118.32 Ft., Thence S 52°57'39"W 47.02 Ft., Thence S 49°58'47"W 21.71 Ft.,
Thence S 14'50'49" W 100.00 Ft., to the South line of said Block 21, Thence
N 75009111W 2.31 Ft., Along the said South line, thence departing said line,
62.88 Ft. Along a curve to the right having a radius of 868.51 Ft. (The
chord of which bear N 51027'27"W 141.60 Ft.) to the South line of said Block 21,
Thence N75"09'11'W 164.75 Ft. Along the said South line to the point of the begining.
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5,
East Aspen Additional Township
City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado,
Formerly Known As:
Lots A, B, C, D & E,
East Aspen Addition to the City of Aspen
COUNTY OF PITKIN
STATE OF COLORADO
1
1
1
035-1-999-0040/2
A
Schedule -Page -No.
1 0 0
Lawyers Title Insurance Orpordtion
National Headquarters
'
Richmond, Virginia
1
SCHEDULE B—Section
Requirements
' The following are the requirements to be complied with:
Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest
to be insured.
' Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record,
to -wit:
' (1) Deed from DOROTHY MARIE MHOaaSEN, ARDITH LO)tJISE WARE and ALIOE JUANITA CAISEGOS
to FINE ASSOCIATES, A MINNESOTA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
' (2) Trade Name Affidavit or Partnership Agreement of FINE ASSOCIATES, disclosing the nacres of the
partners, and the other information required by '73 CRS 7-71-101 (1) (1) evidencing the existence
of said partnership prior to its acquistion of title to the land herein.
(3) Deed from ALBERT W. BEVAN, JR.
to FIDE ASSOCIATES, A MINNESOTA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
' (4) Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by
Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) has been paid or exempted.
' (5) Certificate of Nonforeign Status, signed by DOROTHY MARIE MIK ELSEN, ARDITH LMSE WARE, ALICE JUANITA
G9,LEOOS, and ALBERT W. BEVAN, JR.
This commitment is invalid unless
the Insuring Provisions and Sched- Schedule B-Section 1 -Page 1 -Commitment No. PCT-1232-87
ules A and B are attached.
Form No 91-88(E-1)
lau.)YE!"Title Insurance Corporation
NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
' SCHEDULE B—Section 2
Exceptions
' The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to
the satisfaction of the Company:
' 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which
' a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the
public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, im-
posed by law and not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in
the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the
' proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered
by this Commitment.
6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessments, charge or lien imposed for
' water or sewer service, or for any other special taxing district.
7. Reservations and exceptions as contained in United States Patent recorded August 29, 1958
' in Book 185 at Page 69 as follows: Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the
authority of the United States.
' 8. Terms, conditions, obligations and provisions of Letter relating r^ the use of driveway
from William R. Tiedt to Dorothty Marie Mikkelsen, Ardith Louise .;.:re and Alice Juanita
Gallegos as set forth in instrument recorded November 4, 1982 in Book 435 at Page 189.
9. Terns, conditions, obligations and provisions of Short: Form Options by and between Albert W.
Bevan, Jr., and Fine Associates, a Minnesota general partnership as set forth in instrument
recorded September 29, 1987 in Book 546 at Page 919; and Short Form Option by and between
' Ardith Ware, Dorothy M. Mikkelsen and Alice J. Mikkelsen and Fine Associates, a Minnesota
general partnership as set forth in instrument recorded September 29, 1987 in Book 546 at
Page 921.
H
' Exceptions numbered are hereby omitted.
The Owner's Policy to be issued, if any, shall contain the following items in addition to the ones set forth above:
' (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule B—Section 1, Item (b).
(2) Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing issuance
thereof; water rights, claims or title to water.
' (3) Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales.
Schedule B—Section 2—Page 1—No.
Form 91-88 82 Rocky Mt.
I
La"eft Title Insurance Corpolltion
I
7
H
National Headquarters
Richmond, Virginia
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, herein called the Company, for valuable
consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the
proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land
described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions
of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or
policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this
Commitment or by subsequent endorsement.
This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and
obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or
policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the
fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when
countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By -Laws. This Commitment is
effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date."
CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS
1. The term "mortgage," when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument.
If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other
matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in
Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved
from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon tothe extentthe Company is prejudiced
by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if
the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other
matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall
not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and
Stipulations.
Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties
included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss
incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or(b) to eliminate
exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered bythis
Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies
committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and the Conditions and Stipulations and the
Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are
hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein.
4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company
arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this
Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment.
Leuwrs'Bile ]nsu a poration
President
Attest:
Secretary.
Alpine Surveys, Inc.
414 North Mill Street
Post Office Box 1730
Aspen, Colorado 81612
303 925 2688
November 19, 1987 87-140
To Whom it May Concern:
I have conducted a slope study of the property
associated with Block 21, East Aspen Additional
Townsite. The results:
Total Lot Area 60016 Sq. Ft.
Slope Area Multiplyer Net Area
0-20 49776 1.00 49776
20-30 700 0.50 350
30-40 1485 0.25 371
* 40+ 8055 0 0
* Includes Area Under Water
Net Developable Area 50497
Sincerely Yours,
-L�ag �- FE Reser
JFR/ml
D(NIBIT
Suite 1916
IDS Center
eapolis, Telephone •
702 612 332-2561
FINE ASSOCIATES
November 1_5, 1987
EXNK
�.3 a
City of Aspen
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Land Use Applications by Fine Associates for 700 Main
Project
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
We hereby authorize submission of the Growth Management Plan,
Planned Unit Development, Subdivision, and Stream Margin Review
applications to the City of Aspen. These application
submittals, on behalf of Fine Associates, are for the "700
Main" project. Fine Associates is the holder of an option to
purchase the subject property.
Sincerely,
FINE ASSOCIATES, a Minnesota
General Partnership
as
Managing General Partner
WIF:rd
"NinaN
`3„
CONSENT TO LAND USE APPLICATIONS
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:
' THAT the undersigned, being the sole record owner of
that certain real property situated in the City of Aspen,
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, which is more
' particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference (the "Subject
Property"), hereby consent to the submission to the City of
Aspen by Fine Associates, of Growth Management Plan, Planned
Unit Development, Subdivision, and Stream Margin Review
Applications for the Subject Property.
' EXECUTED as of the / day of November, 1987.
' OWNER:
' ALBERT W. BEVAN, JR.
F
P
EXHIBIT "A"
' Lots 1,2,3,4 and 5, Block 21, East Aspen Additional Townsite,
City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado; containing
15,000 square feet more or less.
Formerly known as:
Lots A,B,C,D and E, Block 21, East Aspen Addition to the City
of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
I
ENIBIT
..3„
CONSENT TO LAND USE APPLICATIONS
iKNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:
THAT the undersigned, being all of the record owners of
that certain real property situated in the City of Aspen,
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, which is more
' particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto ._nd
incorporated herein by this reference (the "Subject
Property"), hereby consent to the submission to the City of
Aspen by Fine Associates, of Growth Management Plan, Planned
' Unit Development, Subdivision, and Stream Margin Review
Applications for the Subject Property.
' EXECUTED as of the :��) day of November, 1987.
I
OWNERS:
IARDITH LOUISE WARE
' DOROTHY MARIE MIKKELSEN
4J
ALICE ANITA GALLEGOS (now known
as Alice Juanita Mikkelsen)
IEXHIBIT "A"
' A parcel of land situated in the SE1/4SW1/4 of Section 7,
Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian,
' Pitkin County, Colorado, more fully described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Block 21, East Aspen
' Additional Townsite, thence N 14050'49" E 120.00 feet, thence S
75009111" E 150.00 feet along the South line of Lots 1,2,3,4 and
5, said Block 21, thence departing from said line N 14*50149" E
' 100.00 feet, thence S 59°18'00" E 56.37 feet, thence S 50014,11"
E 118.32 feet, thence S 52057'39" W 47.02 feet, thence S
49058'47" W 21.71 feet, thence S 14050149" W 100.00 feet to the
South line of said Block 21, Thence N 75009'11" W 2.31 feet along
' the said South line, thence departing said line, 62.88 feet along
a curve to the right having a radius of 868.51 feet (the chord of
which bears S 10018'25" E 62.87 feet), thence 145.72 feet along a
' curve to the left having a radius of 176.18 feet (the chord of
which bears N 51027'27" W 141.60 feet) to the South line of said
Block 21, thence N 75009111" W 164.75 feet along the said South
' line to the Point of Beginning, containing 45,016 square feet
more or less.
1
BMW
CONSENT TO LAND USE APPLICATIONS
IKNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:
'
THAT the undersigned, being all of the record owners of
that certain real property situated in the City of Aspen,
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, which is more
particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
'
incorporated herein by this reference (the "Subject
Property"), hereby consent to the submission to the City of
Aspen by Fine Associates, of Growth Management Plan, Planned
Unit Development, Subdivision, and Stream Margin Review
'
Applications for the Subject Property.
EXECUTED as of the day of November, 1987.
' OWNERS:
' ARDITH LOUISE WARE
DOROTHY MARIE MIKKELSEN
ALICE JUANITA GALLEGOS (now known
as Alice Juanita Mikkelsen)
1
EXHIBIT "A"
' A parcel of land situated in the SEl/4SW1/4 of Section 7,
Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian,
' Pitkin County, Colorado, more fully described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Block 21, East Aspen
Additional Townsite, thence N 14050149" E 120.00 feet, thence S
75009111" E 150.00 feet along the South line of Lots 1,2,3,. and
5, said Block 21, thence departing from said line N 14°50'49" E
100.00 feet, thence S 59*18100" E 56.37 feet, thence S 50014111"
E 118.32 feet, thence S 52°57'39" W 47.02 feet, thence S
49058'47" W 21.71 feet, thence S 14°50149" W 100.00 feet to the
South line of said Block 21, Thence N 75009111" W 2.31 feet along
' the said South line, thence departing said line, 62.88 feet along
a curve to the right having a radius of 868.51 feet (the chord of
which bears S 10018'25" E 62.87 feet), thence 145.72 feet along a
curve to the left having a radius of 176.18 feet (the chord of
which bears N 51027127" W 141.60 feet) to the South line of said
Block 21, thence N 75009'11" W 164.75 feet along the said South
' line to the Point of Beginning, containing 45,016 square feet
more or less.
I
Hagman & Yaw Architects
210 S. Galena
Aspen, Co. 81611
ATTN: Mike Thompson
To Whom It May Concern:
DCN101T
November 25, 1987
The City of Aspen owns the electric facilities in the 700 block
on the North side of East Main St.
At the present time there is 120/240 single phase power at this
location.
' Any upgrading of present facilities such as a transformer size
increase or change to 120/208 Three Phase will be at owners
expense.
' The City of Aspen Electric Department will do all hookups in the
transformer and charge owner for material and labor.
' The Cite of Aspen also furnishes the Current Transformers and
Meter Housing and will wire up same at no charge to owner after
inspection by City Building inspector.
Anzlw�
Donald K. Gilbert
Electric Superintendent
cc/.Tay Hammond
I
DG/ch
I
u
I
P. O. Box 220
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
November 17, 1987
Hagman & Yaw
A=: Michael Thompson
210 S. Galena
Aspen, 00 81611
Dear Mr. Thonpson:
Mountain Bell
A USWEST COMPANY
EXHIBIT
Pursuant to your request concerning the provision of telephone facilities for
the Original Curve Town Homes, located in Aspen, Colorado. I submit the
following information.
Mountain Bell is the serving telephone company in this area and will provide
telephone service to this project. However, the developer could be required
to enter into a Land Developers Contract with Mountain Bell and be required to
provide front end money prior to Mountain Bell's placement of telephone
facilities within this project.
I
Sincerely,
RAYMOND L. CARPENTER
Assistant Manager
RLC/sw
1
I C�
canyon cable tv
Mr. Michael Thompson
Hagman -Yaw Architects
210 S. Galena St. Suite 24
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Sir:
EXHIBIT
November 19, 1987
Re: Serviceability Confirmation
' Pursuant to our telephone conversation on November 17, this
letter will confirm that cable television service will be made
available to the proposed 18 Townhomes in the vicinity of 700
' E. Main St., Aspen, CO 81611. Such service availability will be
subject to our published rate schedule then in effect.
Please see that we are listed on your utility companies
' mailing list to insure that we receive liberal, advance notice of
the progress of this project. We will be happy to assist you in
the utility/CATV installation coordination to assure of a smooth
' process.
Thank you.
Since ely,
' J el y Bloomer
JKB/ar
Division Of United Artists Cablesystems Corp.
' 201 Aspen Airport Business Center
Aspen, Colorado 81611 • 303/925-4098
PRE —APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PROJECT:
�UPrV(n� 1�-f�r��' , ,�ie.1 �(,�(� 6 ply
APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE: �tc t. ,,,_ {tf -,l�.I r�Vrn{ T fi�.�r I�u�rti M
REPRESENTATIVE'S PHONE: !Aft V6 6
OWNERS NAME: 1)
SUMMARY
1. Type of Applications
2. Describe action/type of development being requested:
.',<< w,� k•.rl I !,}�.. f,n.t1�,hil(� Uwt���,Irl�yw� r'=�(ut,ng fa Gf
�' Yi- I . , . : it r.,� _ .I'/�J ,yl'1� �.a o'lyt D�✓ll..riY1i4 tt•1�•t' !YNM � /'Ml� t'Y/ til. Ot/L.r
3. Areas in which Applicant has been requested to respond, types of
reports requested:
Policy Area/
Referral Agent
r
—
�ler ric
Review is: (P&Z Only)
Comments
IT, ,;rir r�,nL+l �j>Z . StaPApAS W-j CgVW'14'trv'A•.'6, sII rl
r5 �rvct�i r l fC a, l� J��UnM¢ 4o�1a al�u� v{1(M oat K p/ Sr�\Y
.. ^c, : �a.,.d r �,,�✓-I,h.r,� c,t rfr o iuUa�, d se�� �'voM+i PYp/MJ<pl � N'11+1 S�. /
!r++41{� 6�r,�.,,,�� llj,�, ih:iri.,t, (641_ Mora
p II 0 + � y, �,.� (v�►fl
11rk;��-,II uhttrh,III) (S Aff iu1I,Ily Plejkl)IfijeW'IKc, PI"ffinj ref)i,1+004 dy,1'41(
EVtfri,„' i �V,ti'�1`T To Nell St, rrAIIS PIA Elrlrr+tahrl fvr+l li,[JrrrD,u wrl� ('+Pf�
.: c�-J+,� "1'p ,>f;,!i.tll.„, I 1 �+., •W 0 U�/,+/I to Ce,y►hvM� 1� �' fX NIIIM-1 W.� .�A�r/rcif�„J
1,T s f,.. �,.�+,f�oN, l P��II'i[ S$fefy n�re�a
(CC/BOCC Only) C(PE.Z t�toBOCC)
Public Hearing: (YES)) (NO) I
1VD�i[C fal1I�rYMt Pty.ar(+.I for C +y(O"( 1 Cool,flrjSu�01)f1 IIp�IQI
Did you to applicant to submit list of ADJACENT PROPERTY
OWNERS? YES) (NO) Disclosure of Ownership: :(NO)
Conce,t.l$vb,Pevie4byeovhc,l
What fee was � ppl scant requested to submit:
8. Anticipated date of submission: (Jec2n,I,,� 1,117 3
I `9. C/7OMMENTS/UNIQUE CONCERNS: _ �, CpPiPs of �a,„Plefr oPpl fAL,ny [„froh ��onrr�h�l S,bd.,Pl/l �r+l6hl(��
7 ,l n/l..-' Dr
FD IC LhPVrl y �l- - �v;.+ Ctih2E...« �-J,f� j t., �(tC �M rI Ylti(1 VN 11K11� tl..fwu,
2-PI
.� in�PN C6.� ! ��� �.Pf '�� 1){ .�t'1>,-f��W ,!� `^'✓L"„ G V � S P e ,ON Cn�i„���r7/ Ir
EFT A
,
Tr,4 ST�lIye 7 o Allry vacatiok
r-rl,fA I+I 1A,L-(, t rC,?�f� ,; r ut ACC, rC61471 �I
� 1FC-s nr �. ho,T.r — I Gw,.Q_,t6 n/
, A.b� a GwA',n-IIcV
C,ty Aff . - 0wh-toWav>`A0"'z,rf1o1) et�, "v3' pt"t (f)'M�
!
Notes I �r��ti� �1�r��,� �cw, y���� c*r<cc� j PA.ti(rvw r� P%:>`. _#t�►�,c .
Z' Alley ��r�tivti, a+�o���l •�r,utV4 htr»:nw 4%.. n1 Paq �;n)PUa�
0
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I, hereby certity that on this;,-,)76_day of
198 , a true and correct copy of the attache Notice o Public
Hewing was deposited in the United States mail, first-class
postage prepaid, to the adjacent property owners as indicated on
the attached list of adjacent property owners which was supplied
to the Planning Office by the applicant in regard to the case
named on the public notice.
Nancy Caeti
r:
•
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: 700 MAIN CONCEPTUAL SUBDIVISION/PUD GMP APPLICATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on
Monday, February 22, 1988, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 P.M.
before the Aspen City Council, 1st Floor, City Council Chambers,
City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO, to consider an
application submitted by Fine Associates requesting 14 residen-
tial growth management allotments, one employee unit and 3
replacement units for a total of 18 units. These units are
proposed to be configured in 3 buildings at 700 Main Street,
between Spring Street and Original Curve.
For further information, contact the Aspen/Pitkin Planning
Office, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 925-2020,
ext. 227.
s/William L. Stirling
Mayor, Aspen City Council
Published in the Aspen Times on February 4, 1988.
City of Aspen Account.
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Attorney
City Engineer
dousing Director
k/Aspen Water Department
✓environmental Health
--Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
\Fire Marshall
Roaring Fork Energy Center
✓Parks Department*
Roaring Fork Transit Agency*
./2D n, "--L�
FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office
Cindy M. Houben, Planning Office
RE: 771 Ute Avenue Residential GMP Submission
Parcel ID# 2737-182-95-009
700 Main Residential GMP Submission*
Parcel ID# 2737-073-27-002
925 E. Durant Townhomes Residential GMP Submission
Parcel ID# 2737-182-61-003
DATE: December 7, 1987
Attached for your review and comments are the 1987 City of Aspen
Residential GMP applications received by the Planning Office. A
brief overview of the applications follows:
The requests by the four applicants for allotments are as
follows:
771 Ute Avenue = 8 units
700 Main = 14 units
925 Durant Townhomes = 4 units
Hearings for these 3 residential GMP applications have been
scheduled on January 19, 1988.
Please review this material and return your referral comments to
the Planning Office no later than January 7, 1988 in order for
this office to have adequate time to prepare for its presentation
before P&Z.
We also have requested clarification from all three applicants to
provide us with additional information that you may find missing
from the applications. If you have any comments on this, please
do not hesitate to let us know.
Thank you.
6
ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, 00 81611
(303) 925-2020
Date:
-;Z,„
l-'O Car\� \�
RE: 10-0 V,%A�
Dea r G `mow -,
This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its
preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined
that your application IS Ve complete > 6 A - ,-A `"FO"'"D `s NkAv-"
Additional items required include:
Disclosure of Ownership (one copy only needed)
Adjacent Property Owners List/Envelopes/Postage (one copy)
Additional copies of entire application
Authorization by owner for representative to submit applica-
/ do n
y/ Response to list of items (attached/-b-e-�) demonstrating
compliance with the applicable policies and regulations of the
Code, or other specific materials
A check in the
amount of $
_
A. Your applicatiop is complete and
we have scheduled
it for
review by the
`a C0
on kq
We will
call you if we
need any additional
information prior
to that
date. Several
days prior to your
hearing, we will call and
make available
a copy of the memorandum..
Please note
that it
IS NOT your
responsibility to
post your property
with a
sign, which we
can provide you for a $3.00 fee.
B. Your application is incomplete, we have not scheduled it
review at this time. When we receive the materials we have
requested, we will place you on the next Ala^vailable agenda.
If you have any questions, please call
the planner assigned to your case.
Sincerely,
ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE
• 0
CALKINS, KRAMER, GRIMSHAW & HARRING
A LAW PARTNERSHIP
INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
SUITE 3600
ONE UNITED BANK CENTER
1700 LINCOLN STREET
DENVER, COLORADO 80203
TELEPHONE (303) 839-3800
(TELE[ OPIF,R: 303-839-3838)
MARTHA G. PIGKE'IT
(303) 839-3702 FEDERAL EXPRESS
January 29, 1988
Ms. Cindy M. Houben
Aspen Planning Office
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE Public Notices for 700 East Main
Dear Cindy:
Please find enclosed the list of adjacent property owners and
property owners within 300 feet of the 700 East Main property.
This list was prepared and certified by Michael Veitch of Pitkin
County Title, Inc. My office has prepared the pre -addressed,
stamped envelopes from this list. Please note however, that
there are three condominium associations listed without
addresses. These are the Centennial Park, Aspen Main, and Spring
Street Condominium Associations. Barbara Schey of Stirling Homes
is investigating the proper addresses for public notices to these
associations. She will deliver to you on Monday, the
pre -addressed, stamped envelopes for these three public notices.
It is my understanding from the receptionist in your office that
your office will stamp the envelopes with your return address,
and mail the public notices. If you have any questions or
concerns regarding the enclosed, please do not hesitate to call
me.
Sincerely,
CALKINS, 7KER, GRIMSHAW & HARRING
Mar a kett
/mz-s
10324.001
Enclosures
c: Rich Luhman
Bob Kueppers
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
Thl* Ineuranoe Company
801 E. Hopkins
Aspen, Colorado 81611 DATE : JANUARY 27, 1987
(303) 925-1766
• RICH LUHMAN
• WHEELER SQUARE LAW OFFICES
315 E. HYMAN AVE.
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
Pitkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the State
of Colorado hereby certifies the following list is a current list of adjacent
property owners within 300 feet of the subject property set forth
on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, as obtained from the
most current Pitkin County Assessors Tax Rolls.
NAMES AND ADDRESS BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
DOROM MARIEuU(l E
•'1
ALICE JUANITA GALLEGOS
P.O.BOX 132
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ALBEFU W. BEVAN, JR.
• SANDERSON AVENUE
COLORADO SPRE4M, COLORADO :19
FINE ASSOCIATES
1916 IDS CENTER
nNEAPOL•IS, MINN. 55402
JEAN -PAUL AUBE
522 ALGONQUIN BOULEVARD EAST
TR4T1INS, ONTARIO, CANADA P4N187
MELVIN L. SQMMER
DORUM K. SOMER, TRUSTEES
P.O. BOX S-3
ASPEN, COL.ORADO 81612
STEPHEN A. GREENE
CLAW FICKE r
1407 HUNTINGPON DRIVE
RICHARDSON, TXAS 75080
RICHARD STAHURA
P.O. BOX 17101
PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15235
JOAQUIN F . MAYA
ISABEL. BIAYA
540 IEUCADE UDRA DRIVE
CORL CABLES, FLORIDA 33156
PARCEL "A'' SIJI= PROPERTY
PARCEL. "B" SUBJECT PROPERTY
CONTRACT INTEREST IN PARCELS "A" & "B"
SUBJECT PROPERTY
1 •I MIL' • 11 III/
1 1 MIL' •11 •III
/ •/' MIL' • 11 I' II
1 / MIL• • 11 / II /
1 I MIL• • 1/
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
1101 Inwranos compAny
601 E. Hopkins
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303)925-1766
NAMES AND ADDRESS
JOI LN L. LEPPLA
JOHN F . LEPPLA
4040 DAHL ROAD
MOUND, MINNESOTA 55364
PATTI WAKEFIELD
9501 SLktERHILL LANE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
I,. ' : FRED C . SCHULTE
�: « 224 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUE
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604
i; STEVE B. BROUGH
DEBORAH A. BROUGH
599 TROUT LAKE DRIVE
SANGER, CALIFORNIA 93657
ROBERT H. BORCHERTS
HOLDE H. BORCHERTS
1555 WASIENAW
ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48104 ,
L
L. ROSS
5637 BENT TREE DRIVE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75208
W.R. NEWELL
., MARY HELEN NEWER.
909 RUE ST. GREGOIRY
MJNTREAL, QUEBEC, CANADA
RITA M. DOUSSARD
2235 S. HOYT COURT
LAKEWOOD, C —ORADO 80227
DONALD R. HEYS
MARIE L. HEYS
2531 ESSEX
ANN ARBOR, MICHICAN 48106
MICHAEL A. O'NEIL
SALLY B. O'NEIL
1500 DIANMDID SELAMROM •TCJf+1M
DALLAS, TEXAS 75201
MARTHA FOSTER
3601 MJRTiE CREEK BOULEVARD
DALLAS, TEXAS 75219
BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
UNIT 204, CONCF,PT 600 CONDO
UNIT 206, CONCEPT 600 CONDO
1 / M71' •11 /:II/
UNIT 210, CONCEPT 600 C0 W
UNIT 301, CON= 600 COtW
1 I. M11' • 11 III I
1 / M • 11 I' II I
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
Title Inwranoe Company
601 E. Hopkins
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-1766
NAMES AND ADDRESS
BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
KATHLEEN A. MANN
UNIT 309, CONCEPT 600 CONDO
P.O. BOX 2057
ASPEN, .COLORADO 81612
JOSEPH A. MARCHETTI
UNIT 310, CONCEPT 600 CONDO
8532 W. BERWYN AVENUE
CHICAGO, IILINOIS 60656
DAVID S. SHANKS
UNIT 401, CONCEPT 600 CONDO
(r
T
#9 RIVO ALTO CANAL
LONG BEACH, CALIEUZNIA 90803
RAL.PH DORAN
UNIT 402, CONCEPT 600 CONDO
2500 WOODWARD WAY
ATLANTA, (EORGIA 30305
�:•
CON C. SHIRLEY
UNIT 404, CONCEPT 600 CUM
LEIGH L. SHIRLEY
7805 BRIARIDCE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75230
LINDA LEVIN WAAG
UNIT 406, CONCEPT 600 C NDO
P.O. BOX 1624
ASPEN, COLDRADO 81612
ROBERT H. MITQ=
UNIT 410, CONCEPT 600 CONDO
r
SUITE 222 v
5934 ROYAL LANE
DALLAS, TEXAS 77024
RICHARD P. COPPOCK
UNIT 407, CCINCEPT 600 CONDO
11603 PLEASANT' VIEW
P1NCKNEY, MICHIGAN 48169
CE0R E W. FOSTER
UNIT 305, CONCEPT 600 CONDO
PATRICIA C. FOSTER �
351 C. HALLAM POINT
BARRINGION, ILLRUIS 60010
RALPH C. DORAN
UNIT 209, CONCEPT 600 COW
ELIZABEIH B. DORAN
2600 WOUDWARD WAY
ATLANIA, CEORGIA 30305:
COTNHA, LTD. and
1614 KAIAKAUA AVE
-.
SUITE 201
HUUULU, HAWAII 96826
•
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
T1114 Insufamal company
601 E. Hopkins
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-1766
NAMES AND ADDRESS
JAMES J. AYLOR
PHILLIP C. NOIAN
JOHN W. CL.ARK '
CRAIG JOHNSON
EVANELIlNE JOHNSON
#505
8370 GREENSBORO ROAD
MdEAN, VIRGINIA 22102
i ..DAVID S. KIDDER
-3928 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD
:A. DAL7AS, TEXAS 75205
WILZ.IAM DAVID ARNETT.
BETTE LEE ARNM
4805 SOUTH KR-1BARK AVENUE
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60615
JERE MCGAFFEY Y
777 E. WISCONSIN AVENUE
4.MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN 53202
6QO FAST MAIN STREET i ASPEN, COLORADO COLORADO 81611
�.p ASPEN -600
P.O. BOX 3159
5 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
CONCEPT 600 COND94U N ASSOCIATION
P.O. BOX 12344
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
KLAUS F . OLERMEYER
P.O. BOX 130
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
CAILEN'B. SMITH
601 EAST BL.EEKER STREET �
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 1
NATALIE A. GIG40UX
251 TAINLER DRIVE
LITCHFIEL.D PARK, ARIZ &A'85340
CITY OF ASPEN
130 S..QAIENA STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
UNIT 409, CONCEPT 600 CONDO
UNIT 306, CONCEPT 600 CONDO
I
1 /'M •1/ /III
1: / M •11 /III
• ' M •/' 'MCI• • 11 f II I
UNITS 7 9, SPACE B, CONCEPT 600 CONDO
METES AND BOUNDS, CITY OF ASPEN
LOTS 6,7,8,9, BLOCK 20, EAST ASPEN ADDITION
LOT 1, GIG,,UX LYNCH SUBDIVISION
LOT 2, GImOUX LYNCH H SUBDIVISION
HERRON PARK,: OPEN SPACE, METES AND BOUNDS
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
71I14 Inwrano• company
601 E. Hopkins
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-1766
NAMES AND ADDRESS
BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
UNITED STATES ARMY CORP. OF ENGINEERS
ALL MATTERS CONCERNING AREA ADJACEW TO AND IN
ATTENTION : GARY L. DAVIS
THE ROARING FORK RIVER
-164 HORIZON DRIVE, ROOM 211
GRAND JUNCTION, CALORADO 81506-8719
(NOTE: APPLICATION MUST BE MADE AND HEARING SET IN
CONJUNCTION WITH ANY PITKIN COUNTY/CITY HEARINGS)
RICHARD W. VOLK
NLM UMS LOTS, OK AHOMA FLATS
SUITE 3600
5847 SAN FELIPE
.HOUSTON, TEXAS 77057
10 MJ LAVAGNTNO
NLNEROUS LOTS, OLQ AROMA FLATS
'., P.O. BOX 532
ASPEN, Oaa, ADO 81612
NELIGH C. COATES, JR.
LOT 1, CREEKTREE SUB.
C/O COA'IES, REID & WALDRON
720 E. HYMAN AVE
ASPEN, CO DRAD0 81611
CHARLEY EL.BERT TACKER
TRACT OF LAND, EAST ASPEN ADDITICN
EMMA IM TACKER i
115 NORTH HEAL STREET
ALSP , COLORADO 81611
i' FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES
LCJT 3, CREEKTREE SUB
700 E. MEEKER STREET
;. ASPEN, CALORADO 81.611
JEFFREY KALIENBERG
UNIT 733, CREEKTREE CONDO
FRED PHIIL PS
2925 MANSFIELD ROAD
P.O. BOX 3735
S[IREVEPORT, LOUISIANA 71103
DAVID E. BECKWITH
UNIT 735, CREEKTREE CONDO
C/O FOLEY AND IARDNER
777 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUE
LNIINAUKEE, WISCONSIN 53202
JOHN L. IANCASIER, III
UNIT_727, CREEKTREE CONDO
ROBERT P. IANCASIER
4300 TNTERFIRST ONE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75202
JOAN L. METCALF
UNIT 729, CREEK'iREE CONDO
P.O. BOX 8542
ASPEN, CCL..ORADO 81611
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
Thle InwranoA Company
601 E. Hopkins
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-1766
NAMG5 AND ADDRESS BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CREEK TREE CONDQyffN UM ASSOCIATION
CCrTDN AREA, CREE!= C W
NO-ADBRES -*i7 L- David E. Beckwith
c/o Foley and Lardner,
777 E. Wisconsin Ave.
STEPHEN M. PETERHANS Milwaukee, WI 53202
N%Z, BLOCK 27, EAST ASPEN
3415 BRIESTO61N COURT
WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNTA 94598
HAROLD A. THAU
UNIT B-4, LARKSPUR CONDO
I' P.O. BOX1171
WESTON, CONECTICUT 06883
.. RONNIE ROARK
UNIT A-4, LARKSPUR CONDO
2100 NEWTON STREET
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78704
I ..
DELPHINIUM ASSOCIATES
UNIT A-5, LARKSPUR CONDO
C/O LIDDEIL, SAP, ETC.
500 GULF BUILDING
"' HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002
i
EUGEINE SIEGEL ,
UNIT B-3, LARKSPUR CONDO
800 EAST HOPKINS AVE. #B-3
ASPEN, COL.ORADO 81611
- I
THOMAS TACONO
UNIT A-3, LARKSPUR CONDO
800 EAST HOPKINS AVE, #A-3
ASPEN, CO.ORADO 81611
LAWRENCE M. FRIETMAN
UNIT A-1, LARKSPUR CONDO
LYNN L. FRIELMAN
4042 HANOVER COURT
WEST ffi-CagTTELD, MICHIGAN 48033
UNIT B- I, LARKSPUR CONDO
11 1'II //1
11.1 1 I ! IMI :1
VAHE HOVSEPIAN
1871 MT. OLYMPUS DRIVE
LOS ANC=, CALIFORNIA'90046
DENNIS E. NIXON
RICARDO E. LONGORIA
A. FREDERICO E. LONGORIA
C/O INTERNATIONAL BANK 'OF CC144MCE
P.O. BOX 1359
LAREDO, TEXAS 78040'
0
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
TWO Indurrwnos company
601 E. Hopkins
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-1766
nAMr.S ANU AUDKESS
BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TIIfiIS J. AVERY
UNIT A-2, LARKSPUR CCYW
MARIE J. TR4-Z
800 EAST HOPKINS AVE. A-2
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
LARKSPUR CaM4E TIIRM1 ASSOCIATION
CUM AREA LARKSPUR CONDO
800 EAST HOPKINS AVE, #A-2
ASPEN, CaORADO 81611
GEORCE B. WOODS
UNIT 102, CENTlaUTAL PARK CONDO
ELIZABETH A. WOWS
IMIES WEST # I I
f.'. 2234 CULFSHORE DRIVE N.
NAPLES, FLORIDA 33940
R. BRADLEY JR.
UNIT 301, (ENIIIVIAL PARK C(XIDO
r :C/0 CBS TELEVISION
524 WEST 57th. STREET
�.
, NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK 10019
i
C HARLES E . HALL
UNIT 10 1, CENT NffAL PARK CONDO
P.O. BOX 10122
' ASPEN, CCIL.ORADO 81612
EDWARD R. CAMPBELL JR.
UNIT 203, CENTla IIAL PARK CONDO
OSCAR E . C L OYD
" 401 TEXAS STREET
SHRE'VE PORT, LOUISIANA 71 104
DAVID S. WILSON
UNIT 302, CENTENNIAL PARK CONDO .
ROUTE 3, BOX 90
MONM, VIRGINIA 24121
TEi lHAS J. NIXON
UNIT 103, CENTENNIAL PARK CONDO
C/O BRESLAUER, JACOBSON & RUIMAN
SUITE 1700
2121 AVENUE OF THE STARS
L.OS AN(£IF,S, CALIFORNIA 90067
ERMANNO MASINI
UNIT 201, (ENT1 IAL PARK CONDO
ALDA MASINI
830 EAST HOPKINS AVE. #201
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
.:. JEEtCPE K. C 7ISMAN y
UNIT 303, CFNIRWAL PARK CONDO
:. 1803.CALIFORNIA AVENUE
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90403
.. ROBERT BL.ALMN
UNIT 202, (ENT1MIAL. PARK CONDO
230 CENTRAL PARK SOUTH .
NEW.YORK CITY, NEW YORK 10019
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
Tllle Insurance Company
601 E. Hopkins
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-1766
NAMES AND ADDRESS
CENTENNIAL PARK C(M MINTUM ASSOCIATION
NO ADDRESS AVAILABLE
NIEL ROSS
P.O. BOX 2075
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
DOREEN ANDERSON
P.O. BOX 10635
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
JAY COOK , III
C/O BUSINESS PLANNING ASSOCIATES
2nd FLOOR, 260 FRANKLIN STREET
I.I BOSTON, MASSACHUITTS 02110
ROBERT L . SCHROEDER
JOAN C. SCHROEDER
53 PIMA COURT
BOULDER, COLORADO 80302
BAYARD HOVDESVEN I
P.O. BOX 3810
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
EDWARD L. THRASHER
P.O. BOX 7974
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
CHRISTTNE AUBATE GERSCHEL
P.O. BOX 2985
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ASPEN MAIN CONDMINItE ASSOCIATION
NO ADDRESS AVAILABLE
E RARE H ANN PLASSMAN
P.O. BOX 10754
ASPEN, • COLORADO 81612
COLONIAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
FIRST FEDERAL. SAVINGS'AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
OF THE FLORIDA KEYS
"? 510 SOUTHARD STREET
:. P.O. BOX 1488
KEY NEST, FLORIDA 33040. .
SHELBY J. TRAVIS
208 EAST 28th STREET, APT. 2G
NEW YORK CITY, NEW YOM 10016
BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
COMNDN AREA CENTENNIAL PARK CONDO
LOT A, BLOCK 28, EAST ASPEN
TI ' II 1 1' 11 I
UNIT 202, ASPEN MAIN CONDO
UNIT 303, ASPEN MAIN CONDO
UNIT 203, ASPEN MAIN CONDO
UNIT 302, ASPEN MAIN CONDO
UNIT 201, ASPEN MAIN CONDO
1 1 ' 11 1 111I
UNIT 102, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNU 110., ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
III
0
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
'ntlo Inwranoo Company
801 E. Hopkins
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-1766
NAMES AND ADDRESS
MARY JO BERSCH TT
P.O. BOX 1414
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
MARTHA JANE SUITS
P.O. BOX 8261
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
BARBARA BOIAND
i EARL BOIAND
1240 MEADOWSWEQ.T ROAD
GOLDEN, COLORADO 80+01
ORIGINAL CURVE #202 ASSOCIATES
C/O McMENAMY
<: II DEMISE COURT
LINCROET, NEW JERSEY 07728
.,I-..BARBARA BIRCH
APT. 4V
165 WEST 66th SI=
NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK 10023
TENT E. 0WARF
P.O. BOX 1028
TES URIDE, COLORADO 81435
THOMAS E. THOBURN
VIVIAN E. THOBURN
3206 SLKICLN(RAM LANE
COCOA, FLORIDA 32926
BURTON D. SMITH
J. ROBERT FISHER
C/O THE WRIGHT CONNECTION
17313 � SUNSET BOULEVARD
PCIFIC PALISADES, CALIFORNIA 902T
ETHEIYN DAROFF
1313 WILLIAMS, UNIT 905
DENVER, COLORADO 80220
JOAN SIEGE L
P.O. BOX 11214
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
EWALD RAINER
P.O. BOX 1225
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
UNIT 205, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 201, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 207, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 202, ORIGINAL. CURVE CONDO
UNIT 307, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 301, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 308, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 203, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 208, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
11110 Inwrana• Company
601 E. Hopkins
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-1766
NAMES ANU ADDRESS
LINDA LIVINGSTON DAVIS
1673 34th STREET N.W.
WASH11CIUN, D.C. 20007
PALMM C. CASEY
APT. 8
IC47 EUCLID STREET
SANIA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90403
WILLIAM R. DUNAWAY
P.O. BOX E
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
FREDRICK K. MARTINSON
P.O. BOX 3186
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
M7UNTAIN STATES CC MINICATIONS, INC.
P.O. BOX BOX E
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
DR. JOYCE M. CARLYLE
5 SUNRAY COURT
BOX 459
LR-TEIH, ONTARIO CANADA NOLISO 10
MARGARET CANTRJP
P.O. BOX 852
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
IEONARD CAVE
SANDRA GAVE
10217 OLDFIELA DRIVE
KENSIIVGDDN, MARYLAND 20895
MARILYN J. OBEREMBT
P.O. BOX 1730
PAWLEY ISLAND, SUM CAROL.INA 29585
GREG SHERWIN
1020 EAST HOPKINS AVE .# 1
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
VIRGINIA D. MURRAY
333 EAST 34th STREET
NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK`10001
GREG SHERWIN
BRIGITTE M. HILL y
1020 EAST HOPKINS AVE #1
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CONDO UNIT 302, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
CONDO UNIT 204, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 210, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 304, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 101, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 305, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 106, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 310, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 309, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 104, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 105, ORIGINAL. CURVE CONDO
UNIT 108, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
Tllle Insurance Company
601 E. Hopkins
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-1766
NAMN ANu AuuRESS BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
JOHN F. THIBODEAU UNIT 209, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
2420 GREYSOL N ROAD
DULZTIH, MINNESOTA 55812
DR. ROBERT WAYNE KRAKOVITZ
P.O. BOX 9618
ASPEN COLORADO 81612
A. FREDERICK UHLER
FRANC ES M. UHLER
P.O. BOX 49
WASHINNG110N, NEW JERSEY 07882
ORIGINAL CURVE COIIDC1!4M-U t ASSOCIATION
ATIFNTICN STEVE BAC H
940 WATERS AVE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
HU, SEID
1104 DALE AVENUE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
SPRING STREET ASSOCIATES
PI.0. BOX 1815
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612.
HENRY H. WULSIN
JOHN J. ATIGUE JR.'
' 442 SICIUM GAYLORD STREET
DWA R, COLORADO 80203
NEAL A. GRANT
DONNA R. GRANT
15000 NALL
STAN EY, KANSAS 66224
THE SPRING STREET C0NDCMIN`IUM ASSOCIATION
NO ADDRESS AVAILABLE
DON S . WES ERLIND
DORLA J. WESTERLIND
728 EAST HOPKINS AVE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ARCHIE McGILL
C/O THE DONALD J. FLEISOER CO. INC.
2nd FLOOR
710 EAST DURANT AVENUE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
UNIT 303, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
UNIT 206, ORIGINAL CURVE CONDO
C(M" AREA ORIGINAL CURVE
UNIT A C llERCIAL, THE SPRING STREET CONDO
UNIT B, CQ+ERCIAL THE SPRING STREET C W
UNIT C, D, CU41MCIAL THE SPRING STREET CONDO
1111 I •• 1 'II / 11/
UNIT 2, RESIDENTIAL THE SPRING STREET CONDO
Ca+UN AREA THE SPRING STREET CONDO
LOTS 17, 18 BLOCK 28, EAST ASPEN ADDITION
FRAC . LOT 12, LOTS 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 BLOCK 28
EAST ASPEN ADDITION
PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
Title Inwrrwnoe Company
601 E. Hopklns
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-1766
NAMES AND ADDRESS BRIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
HOPKINS AVENUE ASSOCIATES
P.O. BOX 740
ASPEN, COL,ORADO 81612
HUNTER SQUARE ASSOCIATES
IRVING BIERS
925 VIA CASITAS
GRFENBRAE, CALIFM41A 94904
GEORGE L. CARISCH
GERALD F. CARISCH
C/O CARISCH THEATERS, INC.
SUITE 212, 641 LAKE AVENUE
WAYZATA, K2MSOTA 55391
• I
TH34kS D. McCLOSKEY JR.
BONNIE P. McCIASI�.Y
`"•C/O RONALD D. AUSTIN TRUSTEE
.--`,P.O. BOX 7846
ASPEN, COIARADO 81612
HOPKINS STREET VENTURE
P.O. BOX 166
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
DAYTiON HEIDELBERG DISTRIBUTING CO. r
1518 DALTON STREET
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45214
ELLEN JUNE KUPER
624 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE
ASPEN, CAI.ORADO 81611
C MADO DIVISION HIGHWAYS
202 CENIENNIAL
GLEAM SPRINGS, COI.ORADO 81601
COUNTY OF PrIIQN
500 EAST MAIN STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611.
FRACT. LOTS K & L , N BLK. 103
LOTS 10, 11, BLOCK 28, EAST ASPEN
LOTS A,B,C, D, BLOCK 98 ASPEN
E 10' TAT D, ALL LOTS E, F, and G
BLOCK 98, ALL OF LOTS 5,6,7, BLOCK 29
EAST ASPEN,
LOTS K, L, M, N, 0, BLOCK 98, ASPEN
E � LOT R, ALL LOT S, BLOCK 98, ASPEN
E 'z LOT 0, ALL OF LOT P, BLOCK 98, ASPEN
ALL OF LOT Q W � TAT R, BLK. 98, ASPEN
CALORADO HIGHWAY 82
Laswers Ttle Insurance &rporation
NATIONAL HBADQUARTBRS
RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
SCHEDULE A cont'd.
PARCEL A:
CF THE SIM PRINCIPAL NERMIAN, PITKIN COM, COLOR". SAID PARCEL IS MjRE FULLyj
DESCRIBED AS FOLTJV-rN:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTLIF.AST CORNER OF LOT 18, K= 21, EAST ASPEN; THENCE NORTH 75009'11"
WEST 44.10 FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 18 AND 17 OF SAID BLOCK 21; THENCE NORTH
36022'00" EAST 26.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 06035'00" WEST 85.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 50'14'1I"
EAST 118.32 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY EDGE OF THE RIARING FORK RIVER; THENCE SOUTH
52057'39" IEST 47.02 FEET ALONG THE WF.SIFRI.Y EDGE OF SAID RIVER; TM4CE SOUTH 49°58'47"
WEST 21.71 FEET AL= THE WESTERLY EDGE CF SAID RIVER To THE POINT CF BEGINNING. TOGETHER
WITH AIL OF LM 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 (FORIMY LOPS K, L, M, N, 0, P, Q,
R, S) OF BLOCK 21, OF THE FAST ASPEN ADDITION, TbmmER WITH Am OF THE ALLEY OF BIAQC
21 OF THE EAST ASPEN ADDITION, TOXIHER WITH ALL OF LOTS 6, 7, 8, AND 9 (FO NEMY F, G, H,
AND I) OF BLACK 21, OF THE FAST ASPEN ADDITION EJ?LEPT A PORTION THEREOF LOCATED NORTH CF
THE FOLLa4ING LESCRUM LINE: BFGINtMC AT THE NORTIMST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6, THENCE
SOUTH 59018'00" FAST 56.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 50°14'11" EAST TO THE 1NIERSECTION WITH THE
FAST SINE LINE OF TAT 9, WHICH NORTHERLY PORTION OF SAID LOTS 6, 7, 8, AND 9 WERE CONVEYED
BY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 311 AT PAGE I OF THE PITKIN COUM RECORDS, TOXItER WITH A TRACT
OF LAND LYING IN MAIN STREET 100 FEET IN WIDTH 50 FEET WIDE ON EACH SIDE OF A CENIERLINE
DESCRIBED AS FOLIpWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SQTIH LINE OF BLOCK 21 WHENCE TTFE SOUIHEAST
CORNER OF LOT 18. BEARS SOUTH 75009'11" EAST 59 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE ON A 7° CURVE
TO THE RIGHT TO A POINT OF INIERSECTICN WITH THE SOUTH L E OF MAIN STREET WHENCE THE
NORTIIFAS'T CORNER CF L(TI' 9, BLOCK 28 EAST ASPEN BEARS SOUTH 75.09' 11" EAST 12 FEET, MFE
OR LESS, E)MT THAT PORTION THERFAF PREVIOUSLY CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF ASPEN BY DEED
RECORDED IN BOAC 223 AT PAGE 152 OF THE PITON COUNTY RECORDS DESCRIBED AS A
TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE SE, OF THE SW; CF SECTION 7, TI7WNS11IP 10 SCUIH, RANG£
84 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MORE PARTICUTARY DESCRIBED AS FMDWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT FRCM WHICH THE NW CORNER OF BLOCK 28, OF THE FAST ASPEN TUMITE
BEARS NORTH 75009' WEST A DISTANCE OF 186.3 FEET; THENCE NORTH I1039' WEST A DISTANCE OF
111.74 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57*09' EAST A DISTANCE CF 28.3 FEET; THENCE AROUND A CURVE TO
TIE RIW WITH A CENTRAL ANt;IE OF 55000' AND A RADIUS OF 176.18 FEET A DISTANCE OF 168.2
FEET; THENCE NORTH 75009' WEST A DISTANCE OF 142.8 FRET, TA PLta OF SEGLImm.
PARCEL B:
MATS 1, 2, 3, 4, AMID 5, BLOCK 21,
EAST ASPEN ADDITICIAL Tl7WN5ITE,
M- I-"9-0040n
Schedule -Page -No.
•
;pen, C6,815111
_ � _ •�.�-��,�..;�:;�••--•-tom; ,..,,�•
Colorado Division of Highways
-:202 Centennial
,a G #4�` Glenwood Sprii.gs , CO 81601
Ilk
vnf' Itkin Planning Office
S. Galena
en, CO 81611
FEB 8
FEB 2
gOA
Joan.Siegel
P. Box 1225
Asp n, CO 81612 FEB 8
.r lr,- r— F-- -r--r- T T r r- r r 1°�
g Office
en/Pitkin hlannin FE8
S. Galena u8
!r Q
I ��f 0/�SSFp �F
f Cam) Patti Wakefiel8-rho
9501 Summerhill Lane
Aspen, CO 81611
FEB 8
-r—.•• ■wattiammiguIrIce/ •
(e
� .�i 07. /�+�ie r,G�--
�iwL,�ETURNE4
TO
SENDER
FORWARDING ORDER EXPIRE[
Con C. Shirley and
Leigh L. Shirley
7805 Briaridge
Dallas, TX 75230
� `o ..,.
S.
viu
co 81511
Stepnen A. Greene and
Expi:F Clark Ficke
\t D 1407 Huntington Drive
Richardson, TX 75080
li�t�l�I{I�II��,I��l�i1��311l�t(