The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.716 S Galena St.021A-84. .4â€ž. 1 HEMMETER 1984 A- .. r 4Â»11 OCI la- 14 - 11 ~ 1 11 1 7 li . - - 1 ........ 4 1 8 1 1 1 1' ..7 1 1 1 1 4 1 & 1 N 1 , 1 k 1 ~1 \ 1 1 0 1 t 1 1 \ \ A \ \ & . 1 \ It l!\ \ 1 1 1 \ %\ -IL . , --. 1 1 \ i 1 , ..4.r \ \ 1 1, i \ \ -.3-\.3.27I~ r \ 1 Cori 0 4\ G /\ 3:'.1 E r \\ A -- 1 1// ;\ 1 4 R % R~ 24,2 1 \ 1--, . 1 , / / 1 --\-- \ 1/ \ 1 - \ 1 .\\ \ \\\ , 1 ~ , / I %\\ \ \ 1 2 1 / i \ N \ \ I 1-- 1 1 . , / , \ l// 1 ET . \\, \ i \ \ % il \. 1 11; 1 \ 1 4/ i. i / 1 \ I \ 1 \ 1 i 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ 1 0 \ 1 F ----Â·--\ \ 1 j, i f / \\ .\\\ 1 / \ \ \ lili I \ \ 0 \\ \ 2--64 1 4 \ x\ \ 1 \ 1 ' 1 0 / f '' 61 1 / P.\29 1 \ ~ 1 1 \ , \ \ \ -4 1. \ \ 1 \ \ 1 \I \ / \ \ 1 \ \ \ \\ 1 J \ \ /1 \ \ 1 \ \ 1 \ \ I--, \\ 6 \ / 0 4) \ \ -0 \ \\ 1\\\\\\\ :O \CD 1 1\ - I \ \ 1 / \ 1 - 4Â« - . N . . #- --==tr==22 - \ I , I \\ \ I :/1 It 1 i 4 - N. 1/ .:\ / X \ \ N %- . U .7 '' \ / -- Arp % , i \ Mi k \ \ N ... .,0.-/.~-Â».~ , \ --- /\ j 7/34 --- i , - I \ \./7 , - %.- -- - 9'41 f crlÂ¥. 21. / 516*-i- - - h 9234\ - -- i .,0.0/1 \\ -- -- U.. \ - -14 1 - --- ------ # N- 1 '.' - - 4 1 4-------- -- fooz. NJU__ - -1 /7 - 1 0 *u-7 -1. 94 -1--- - ... ---734~3 j \1 --- O -7 1'' Â»2\ I . / ' 4\ \C _ --- 0, \ 1 . \ 1 - - meal ' --- | <414- 3'Ol-_.udi. ,F I 1 1 - I --- 4 - . 3-, -W .......11. % - - ~ i . 47%/ - -- 0 7 -- - . N - 25.39 -- 4Mpt. 4f ... '' t\\ \ 0 7 -114 - - 0 ~n,-1 B 42*r,bAD- --- - 0 + 2:24 Ad\\ - - - u - - . 1. 1. ,-,â€ž.- .... . \ - A - ..4--44 .4 /Â»AÂ« -- - 0 404 -7 1 - %-- A#Â· ' \ ------- h \ M Â·. - - N \ --1-T -\ - 1 4/ 4--4 - --\ - - 1 L fe \ N \ \ \ 1 t 1 Z.V I 1 2+ 1 - - %- $ \ I .1 , N -\ 92374 \\ \3\ 41#- -- # -~Mi------ -. Â· --il= Ip- -I ~- \ \ I \.\ - // 1 L *12 .1. If,0- / 0 /2 /7 - 4 \ -/%-Ii - -- \ - 9 -- -/ \ ... 17 ' M- --------- il-I. ~2 \ \ - N- , 1-4 + \\\ --- 1 1 Lvt 1 5 +17 1 - -Â·Â·t. - I \' h 0 -\ 1 - -- - , --.----1 \ $ \ \ 1 2-\ ---- ----- \ \ 1 -- .dll- . 1 q \ / A- - f \\,4 . 4 *- \ --- - --1 1 \4 -\ \ . 3 -- N N --N --- - - 77-Â·r ) -- - . . 1 1 , 1 -/ 1 Ud . --- \ i /%\ -- - -- - ---00- / r. ---'d,J \ 1,2 \ -- f. i \ -4- :\ \ ./ lili ------ --- - - h .11 -- .... -442â„¢-4..... .1%.- \ r - 0 \ -- V. , - 2-5,47+ 1 -120-4-x >> ---0 x-Ifi>-~4-21% -\-- - ---- -w .*3243-----1=1.-- f - . 1 / -- , 4 ji'.f *-Â·. %'* -I ~--*-- , \\ \ \,r\ \ // - - - -- - .4.- - 1- , 1 1 1 i 1 6 - -- -/\\ --\- 4 C <~32 4411301Â«24922203---4. -~Â· -s*=-na - 46- 1 ~ i _ -- 31; E-- 1 0 ' \ - 2% 1 - -,4 Iii ---- - 1 \ bc "30 / 3.-2 -- 1 1 i \\ 7\X --- --- - - --- -Â·- F \.--- 1\ -- -- a..4 \41 \\-20 -0-\0...>CÂ»eÂ»-U- -- ----- / / .. \ Vt.Ad ,, / C / ------ ~ --- i Ny-jinari=_ ----- --<---2--- -- ~ -- - --6 -- \\ \\ I \\ -- f - I \\ ..- --r~~Â»Â»A\-X\~Fr~-2 - ---- \ I --- -- \ E- -2 +26<k.- X ,-7. , ,/ \-i i: â‚¬ \ -- */3>-f, \04~~ - A-l.-I k. 6-2 -- \ N -- - - -- h - 0 -0 % -I -I \\\ \ U j a...., -3 - \ - N ..1- -\ - 6 -J - \\\\ 11 X % ---- . 6,# - N I % - - t. C- - --- % -- - -- . \ N \ \ \ \2421 --- \\ . N - -,1572- Â· tz, f -- - ~ --~--- ---- ----------~------= - ---- -------- --- --- ----- - -- -- - - \ 1 \\ \\ %-N *--- -N- , - - - + - \ /2 \ r, */* '.2 - N \\ ... Le ~ \ --- - - ibleD h \ \ \- - e -: )##67- -- - 6, t.741' ' - -I-- h 4 323:>.7 ~ trÂ· - '-2--~~x-w.---w---2214 -- -1.- - Â»31/1 +4 \ ---- - -- . -1-- ---2 -- --- -- :8 - 01 .4 4 9..... 1 E.: i Â·44Â·{: rl My. Hemmeter Garden L.andscape Architects: Landscape Pkn Design Workshop, Inc. 710 East Durant Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925 Â·8354 9E1] i f. scale: 1" : 10' 2 *10 date:september 1984 pg= 01~ 0 9 10 ~t'o .. .. 2=11.4. 1 ....> : ' :Lea~Â£.'i.-:Ix -119@- - . 16 I â€¢ z r '.l. + I 0 1 $,. 4 4::& i i ' I .1, 4 0 4 .* - 6 Â· A - FOUND REBAR 8 CAP -T,Â¢ ELEV. 7994.5 ' 1 00 (D : 1.1 .R I-/ lili . (61 f 4///// L ,r ,. 4/ 1 / t , 1 \ ff f * 8000 1 1 8004 'b O.43 0/ 2 i b 60 A 0 4 % t tAle -a PO l 8008 ' 6 \ ; SET REBAR 8 CAP~ 4 1 241 1 h l //\ / /4 6. 3 ! r) T BURIED CABLE /, d O O :4 TELEVISION 1~ 10 70 4% 3~ â‚¬ M lie IM e 1 e lfÂ· , 04 1;\A . 800(1\.f / // f / 1 9/1 rj.. 1-0 . i - r / / 5 /3/4 h r. . *i" Ab / 9 2-0 \ i 6 7,0 0O 9 h <40010 1 1 Z ~80 16 1" = 10| 3/K-/ 4 I 1 hj i , 1 <v NOTE : DENSE BRUSH THROUGH- ---8020 OUT LOT 1 / 8004 4 , -I Z U') LU 1 O 1 O 1- 0 0 0 H 1 I k r. b ' f \ 8008 ELEV. 8027 fo , ELEV. 8009.81 ~ 740 30' w /1, 1 1 C12-SET REBAR 8 CAP 60.00 & -0 SET REBAR & CAP-@P cy 0 0 0. % TO THE LIENHOLDERS AND OR THE OWNERS OF THE PREMISES SURVEYED AND TO STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY: THE UNDERSIGNED DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS THIS DAY MADE ON THE GROUND OF THE PROPERTY i ' LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON AND IS CORRECT, AND THAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS1 SHORTAGES IN AREA, BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS, ENCROACHMENTS, OVERLAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME, EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. DATED THIS THE - DAY OF 0 0 h .\. ..O, JOHNSON - LONGFELLOW 8 ASSOC., INC. -- of..204 0 0....1. ===22~ - :77 n 4- . 1, HAROLD W. JOHNSON ( JOHNSON - _ BY .,-/7 CJ- t- D :20 ,~ HAROLD W<JOHNSON 4 . - LONGFELLOW 8 ASSOC., INC.,) A COLORADO . , 0 :0 40. C.2 REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR, DO HEREBY , CD:. 0 .EÂ·8 6 & 93.-1 J CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE 42...b.:le UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND REVISED 11/9/73 ADD TOPO.1 ELEVS. , CHANGE SKI TRAIL THE ENTIRE LO T WAS FOUND TO BE - BELOW ELEVATION 8040.00'. TOPOGRAPHY MAP SAID SURVEY IS TRUE- AND ACCURATE . i TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND LOT 5 :./. BELIEF. -4,4 .-2 S:.:1Â£/9/3' JOHNSON - LONGFELLOW 8 ASSOC., INC. i--47.:Qb'Elip.fl. .=f ,#*- D ..4 TIPPLE WOODS SUBDM , 0: e' JOHNSON - LONGFELLOW 8 ASSOC.. INC. HAROLD W./JOHNSON ' i ss I 1 :7 4.0. PO BOX 5547 WEST VILLAGE, COLORADO 81615 $ It , b 'â€¢v SUR:'' 45 I 1, 44 -r- Ance - ,--9 " $ , 19 I 12 - . , 4 I i 4-y EL-ex/, 7994.5 a 1 L 9=Â»Vt)9 â‚¬:F"-4 == ". e.4 J,J- - I U 4 0 0, f '' ,- 0 .. ... , (0 4 0 > 0 , C . 2 0 ... S.-- V 5 4 0 8 / b ... 4 I r , 0 0 7 -- 2 .. 0,4 -4....L: I 1 . . ' ". 4 . I . J 0 e 41-.9*.......A 0 ' I#Immilmall'll'In'll'le'lill'll'll'll'll//2//Ill/A lillilillib 4 > A...........1...............1 y-Â·-A ~ I S... . 4 S re 5*.S - J 0 2 --O - Â¥ m a 4 6. > Ill . 0 - LL . .. A Ul 0 Z lu 0 . A 0 Ul e 4 .1 1 4 't; 4, . . A :. A 1.:1.- . 4 0 N 4 . ' 6 0 - L. 441-0, 1 r 1 1 11 1 1 1 . '6 - , e.-29/8 12 12! - low 8-0* 44.1-Oil 15'-cy 02* 401- If -46 2-Cult E- 29# St . 1 ..0 7 ' Â·29 27292 12'- OK NIS. .5-/-Oz' 4*, 4.04 gy 27-0# ae' +/-//32' 3~4 3-~-63' Â·;2t:f,2, ' 592? 12'- 04 141 1534' -V 0. '. . ~ .1 1 .. 01 Â· 5 C,1 1'. 8 , 6*6 , j %. : 1 ..A /0'55Â£3*5 62=21 7 -i &3tp; 02 ~ 2% 1.V . - 1 . -3 F Â· 3 9- .. $'' I. 3 :. EDSâ‚¬ g 02 2% - 61 . ril 4 1 /2 77' i ).'f /1\ L GASEP pl'AU- 9/EME 1 1 /4 1 BETAt N I NG j 1 epee 1 44. _ Yl'*,6.6 -5 --- j i . Â£4 ;k ,. t, V P â‚¬ cohâ‚¬. sc.*AO 02.- . 40 \\ 5 2 Â· in - +1Â· -,HS -4Â®1 1 1 , , 1 1 19.â€¢ , 11 4 0 C 0 4 4 11 I aEDE>OM BATH BATH -ED[ROOM 20) 202 ./ \ -208 207 \ t * hri--4 - 9 1 -_- 3 1 5,1-1 LÂ« <8 - f ez:ke -05- 0 ~ .570/RAG* 4 -/04 -10 6 ill 1 , 4 4 ' 0 .. r#- *10 n . I 42--Bor*JKÂ·, 234- i. A * . f \17 1 ' 1, 4 1 0 - 2 11. L , -0 - 4 - 7 #-V~~ . ~ . 64 1 1 ...1 q= 1 -1.- k ; -1 ki m.., 714 , 5 - 2/2 . F / 94 6* -/ 7 . ' 67 2 - - ' .1\ D41 1111>Ta~* i~ ~ . d < I ~AIR//i DETA/4.5 p 882 ~ - ~- 93%~T-- 11 i ...+ 1 164Hek ,Â¢5,2 ' -----1 41 qt-Â»â€ž7 1 . 1 11 1, .f--3 L./Neop --4 8 i 39 0 1 -9-CAB. OVER 1 1 I E N . 1 1 . AFL + 1 p, 2 'I.1 +-4- 1 1 31 1.l _ -1 - \441 1 Al, 0 -DiN.SHT, A- 4 ; L..." F -- -7 I 1.li' 1 1 1 118 4 - - 1 1 1 91 .1 â‚¬2220 1300,6,1 1 ENT. hAL-4- I ' 6 *.0 111 1 5 1 111 1 - III{ .1 01 - 21)~ HALLÂ· ' 45/VTRY 4 9 1 0~ 11 -1 1 /0/ ~ 103 4 - i 4 2613 UFO -r-_071, .*6..1 206 ; i. - --' 1 NI/' t 1 1 9 1,#--.- it :.1 r ./2 -- 4.- i, 1 1 TE--1~ --- --- 1: i.~- Â· Â·~. ~ 1 f -1,291.%iy,419 -1- - i i 4 ~ 4 17 F r, 1 , 4Â£823= 1 1 1. 1 1 , 111 r4 -LIt -- - --- --- 1% ... 4 -0. 4, 4- -w- . 4. L k -4- v -r.~1 i i --~ , 44, 1 51 7 - A C t "7 0 1 . 1 Ni' 1 tr) 1 11 \ 1 1 MECHANICAL I. [pi' 240Â»st Â· M- c. 3 1 1 /06 h 2.0 -1 T 5 - 0/7 --45-6 9 MASTER BEDROOM; 2 4 k I 41 --I *i 204 - 3 1 -740*' 0Â·agH -pÂ·Â·Â·-49 -----,@82Â£ OÂ«IRKROOM / WORKSHOP J -734._ WING PFAL11 V %< ~22 - ' - --- ik ' /02 - 07 . 1\NX / 1 1 r. t. 1 .1 L 1 , 7,45- . 7 0 E-0 - -- EXTE~<re>, * 1 23 . 8 + 1 1 1- 1 f I e '4457-ER 247Â» C) ----"- --- -+.--- % 03 - O + 10 9 2625- - ----I 4 1 < ~ -4--KL--1 4~ 4 I h -- 1 - 1 1 1 L O- . ._ *lf u " 11- i -- h ' ~[1 1 -. 1 1. i Ki' . . , 4 ./. . 1 1 1 , 01 / c 1,Â·2 1 LS Â· C I I ' 8 - h .7 1.- 11 2.2 6 ~i-5/2 Â·5'2 3t -OR \01' .10': 4 '2 -ON:ms. .ge,211' Â·54' f'-4-\\ 44' 14Â·1!2 9 - 04 101 6 | 6 1 1 -96 - 136 64/a . '.5'-11' St - 10 1, 1 ' Â· Â·Â·1- 't 155UEDÂ· .. J54 i on ~ \ . 5.0,1 t J 7 ' - 0 4 1 . L/A/2 0/~ 0 1 - ---Â·CSUL-:0/NG OVER ' 41} -all i ---- 1 / 1 ~2\ MIDDLE LEVEL IPLAN -__a_ ~'211*~ LQWER LEVEL PLAN 1 --9---- - - 4. 0111111111!N My- O, , 1 1.Â« --- 011'11'11'lit,4 31 \E>LAN ljORTH . 2-4 = 11.-04 8 \ \fLAN 1\1*FRD.4 374" - t -6 ,-1 ,-I f LOWER & MIDDLE LEVEL PLAN i.f' . tÂ· S. Â·= Â· +:.,IÂ·*4cÂ»Â·h'Â£Â·dh f 4'3 1-1, .46 . , . 2<1f,40*41Â¥ i,". . ' .2 :49-3,4~1. . . ~. -,% ... 1 5 Â· ~@*;qUI â‚¬9' 2. 4 /, '' ,~ AUL'Â»i 227% . . rTprm./1.F P......F I . I . 1 + 4 - . ~191 /7 I ., A LU...AP 1. f . I. ~r. I ..*4/9 1 11 3.... / XII *m 4 1 4+ f, 11 ah Â¢\ 11% . O IN 4 G ~ ' Z .4 - 1%</ Â¥\, 77 :<L \ 2 4 1 34 Iii 1 141 16 Irl l&l r:-1 / 4 4 ' Im 1 \,/ 1 ....1 1 Im 1 1/ .4 11 - %7 Lf--f - j -I-- ---- - I.-1 ---9 --- 5-78'*4=Pir â‚¬*-Â·-AB-~VE 0~-_i~ ~1 - ./1-0 11 - . 8 - 0% I 27/-O u . -- I . .14" J'-692'4% P*** U' - 9>*' 6 1-CPI ... ..: .. N . .4 A ./ I. ..6 11 . - 4 .. .. 11 41 7 41 f-EL/ N.\ /0 g SC 0 -11 *134 - 21:W V - I. 1:11 1,-- / m ./ ...i--- 3-- Â·4 -: 7 . M Ct lu Ta ~ ' , (Ly U, N.J 1 1 1\ I R 0 0 1* 11 m 2 - -L i -F#9 1 1 R I i Ill h 1 - --- 9.- 1- 0 1 0 - ..1.-Â· ~ 1.- .3 --].-1..i- .,- ; 14 1-i 44-4-Â·- -4..: -4- 8 0 -0 4 1 .......:.5 _... Â·Â·Â·r -Â·"-- r-'~4 ---~--~" -. -& 0 '.!1. 1-/1 : ' 1 - -0 - 01 ,--. r ---=42./r~- r- i i : i : 1 1 I : ! Â·Â·Â· .. 1 1 . 2:th ,Â·* i.+ B % m T -4 i . 1 ...4- 1, ...... --,-- . L ' I. 1 Z kn I i ' 1 iLl ' 4- 4 - 1 liu b 14 :4 34 . er 1 -1--1 &-4-.-1 ----12>C-f- 12 . -1/t---4-1 1 - - 1 1 1 , 9- p bl 1 Al 01 - - 11- Ill f K 1 161. 1 T.R 1 -4~--.- -11 It O 1= IM 0 .4 1 Ill v 4(11 --44 5 6 0 \ 0 I >,1 P .3 I &1 - ~ r- / *4 8.~4 1 226*0 k , 11 1 -152<. -- 11[0 11 -2-,2,3-4 6 1Â·91 1 1 - - 1 9 ~ 2.- . 1- 3 1 -6. 4 L -3 Je . 71 -0 63// 6,20# 1 -4- - 9 4 --1 lor. Fa- 1 - - 1 *2 2~ v b .. ..i 1 1 -- K 01 1 1 1 1 1 -- 1 ----- 3 1 Ve Â· --- Â·l -- =- A \ / 1 / .Â· .31-1/ Â· eÂ·Â·--1 :tk 1 1 1 1 '--.. 1 I r'LI k. - Â·1. .... 71 -1 ru, H 4--1,Â« Â· . i IN ! 1 1 e X4433Â£filde,0, 1 1 1 -il - Jk J -42 1 . 1. 001 -P 8 5,-4/2 5$*\'-66'52. 3#-4yar *2 --RI Â·.1 1 1-t 94-*3'1 12 -ou 1 2 -011 N k I . : ohi 7/-0, 42 -3 * , ~f- 44 %4 -- 1 --- 7 I C . tr_-6 9 4-4 - 4 1 .5 I 1 4 0 1\ 0 ~41 . 7. \ 1 11.. 213 h3 9140 . 3 ! 14 1 .14 1 1 1 \Â».1 f ~ rn ;A j V 1 b 4 Â«~A JU Ft-f~- I. . 1 A - .. A - . . ..... . A . Ablbki 41 -O'1 3ff' %4 24;Ki SNÂ¥ld .8/Â£ 9 13A31 bladdn 1020â‚¬51 0 0 4 7 / 4 I & 7 -- #G 1 . 4. I 11 , - - --- - --- 'AJ & . Wh. 1 p ZE 1 .M .- 1 -T.O. pCÂ¥wOOD . . EL.4 120'-7,4 b & LIVING 7.0. PLYWOOD -- -EL.=1174-81 - "FX34 0 FIG , : Ma FG. RG. EGÂ· 4 . i Pi - 70. PLYWOOD Â·Â·Â· Â· a ENT/RY' 1 1 -- - - - .--- -i- / 1 111 1 .,TO. PLYWOO.P ' \~ Â· TV 9 BEL.= 106'-10, -1, t -- -7;-- - ~ . ~l .1 1 , L ' . 1n#1-2 L 1 - - - -i- - -- -+ T j L.4 / ' -------- -t--â‚¬2734//VNG 1/042- 1 - 1 4 X +~13 I v -4- --- \ - ~ Ta FLY-\A/oop _ , 1 X 1 4 - 1 )< ' - r -. --' i 1.1 ID h . 1 1 1 . 11_ -____ --fft --1-t , 2- - -t SOUTH ELEVATION 0 0 1 1 U -t . NORTH ELEVATION 4 rr===t<U ///41-4-1 -/ k. lil h 11 11 1 1 .\ /f// / / f \\ p. fly' 7 7 - 1 0-1- - r.<1 i Ait-Â·-7/ 1 -7007-- Y L 71Â¢ BF' --7 . 02.- -- -_._- 1 LÂ« } . 4-3 X 11 \ 1 !0 4 09 . 0 ma 1 Pa i N 4 Fa Pe re. Pe | 1 = 1 - - \2%,1 , 1 - C --1 b UN To. PLYWOOD ji /- L $- r L,1 ({31_ r---- - ---- --Â· - --- - EL, Laot-734Â¢ WL: -TO. /31 KWOOD . . ~ ,--2 -- ..â€ž... V -w- jh - luc:-1 ! 1 1 1 )\27 1 1 rjeL.-HT'-aN --~.." ga. 66. 4--// 7 - <wooD aIPING CT>92) - 1 1 lit <% 1 . . RG. P.G. -G //ltd EX/-#-7-6/ a~~.~ Ll - -- \4 elÂ«:)83 CTÂ¥/2) rh + ' 1 441Â· I -al.*. .: - - ----~-T< 5-ibAie (7-7'7?) --L- . T. a PLY*ODD Â£ >d )4- I .&. -... ' ' I -EL.Â·Â®Ni 6494" . --\4, /./ i. ' / PltÂ·4/5Pf GRAPE LTYM /-- l ~- -~ - - -- 4 Â£Â·*.6721 it - h'U..1**L'i // 7 1 +-2 1 1- - r . ATO. PLYWOOD L. ._ 3941 1 4 V. 6/V iball~~4 , 1 r Â®\ - CR/(38/Na Crym) C Al' -BW 7 . -57*25 43~276/0-- ---U X 1 , 4-1 6 -_ AT -2 L .-. t - - - ---- - 1 U -1- 0 Col-- arp) t Â· 4-93 , " 1 \ /05Â£20. 4 ..TO PLYWOOP \ 70 PLYWOOD 1\ . 122 /690'-04 .. , 1,Â·, f | | EL.- = )2~25 /42, i -- fl 11 1 1 \ -Â· 1 1 -'J . 1,1 1 F . 4 1 .- .1 1 Â·t- ,- '-1 / 24 ' - ~ -r-- --Il / ' WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION ~ __ EXTERIOR ELEVATION 0%09%444 tron =L. = 1 6-7.0/22 1 le LE- 1 BUILDING SECTION "C" - - BUILDING SECTION 1 -9 1 ll' 1// m 7 I. M - 0- 6 / 111 i 0 1 11 --lim-~~k - .... 4 - . 01 IN.....I.-I'll./1 ,= . //12 /61% ... 0 -r -Ill.. -11] m L '. 0 4 -6 1 - 2 ..=- * . c >0 - 1 - 4/ . .. I . 2 & ... . 8/3..9./1/~Il".ill//1/9 -iT to ~1 :I'll/'ll 4 I Iillillillillillillillillillillillillillillillillillilill 1.1.1 I.# . - imm.Mill./.I - 2 S J -1 - ,- . 4 !lillift a/0.11101---1-I---- - a . 1 0 0 . . D . : 1 0 A -~ -- > J ...Aillip.....All/A m 4 U I 0 m - - * 1 m 11.~1 a - -.1,11=1"",Ii 4 .1-.111 I - Ill 7 4 Ill . 12~ 1~1 , .. . el~-1/1 0 IL Ill - 0 1--- Z ' , 1Â·21-Â·44* f }/A f~ Att~ I'l 0 Ul .1.................. m -. a>3.Â¥*:15 -2, m fÂ·~. 4$/* - i \. 4 ... 1 - CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET 4 ' 1 City of Aspen CASE NO. 021 8 -94 STAFF: 06-4 2- PROJECT NAME: ~nrn Ar 23 8040 Grrerl) i 0-Â£-Pril-i pkil APPLICANT: C.hustop<li l-Unvy!,der Phone: REPRESENTATIVE: 1-laci rÂ·,t dÂ», I b..4, Our AN,grk L+CO Phone: 9 D-4 - 39 L-7 , 0 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (FEE) I. GMP/SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step) 1. Conceptual Submission ($2, 730.00) 2. Preliminary Plat ($1,640.00) 3. Final Plat ($ 820.00) II. SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step) 1. Conceptual Submission ($1,900.00) 2. Preliminary Plat ($1,220.00) 3. Final Plat ($ 820.00) III. EXCEPTION/EXEMPTION/REZONING (2 step) ($1,490.00) IV. SPECIAL REVIEW (1 step) ' ($ 680.00)~ 1. Special Review 2. Use Determination 3. Conditional Use 4. Other: 00+0 GEOfflil'At. C . P&Z MEETING DATE: 317 3 CC MEETING DATE: DATE REFERRED: 5/31~ &4 91) REFERRALS: , ~' City Attorney Aspen Consol. S.D. School District 90' City Engineer Mountain Bell Rocky Mtn. Natural Gas Housing Director Parks Dept. State Hwy Dept. (Glenwood) Aspen Water Dept. Holy Cross Electric State Hwy Dept. (Grd. Jctn) . City Electric Fire Marshall V'~Building Dept. Environmental Hlth. ~ire Chief Other: FINAL ROUTING: - DATE ROUTED: -4 134 v/Eity Attorney ~ty Engineer ~Building Dept. V' Other: 4-\1Â·4- eÂ¥/0- 132 it ~ther: 1-1 rf JJrf-- 1 4 U i 'f FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: 1><11 H k I I l l I I l l I DISPOSITION: CITY P&Z REVIEW: li)/ld .1-39\~-oveti 1\ 9 lk,\/ , 1 C- p.1. gl 1 1 1. 1 .0 6< ..; |Ao cift- wiii 4, c. -*-- 1 ; vÂ·.Â· Â·-1 0 :-1 - I .7 1 L3 , 3.-, c.l 1 <T - C 22-4-Q-- \Aoir- 110-21 Â· RAÂ£14- .po L.Anvi U.Â· -3 4 .Â· CE:, .t 1 1~. elÂ·O e LL ,&114li.2- rirt. \"'Avi,.e--l Â·4- ALLE Q._ cle.Â·G46 e Xy-*./ :0 1 1-'- 1-~4:7 31 A 0kri:-*,4- ::--r- Â£.11 A 0, 16 6.T- In. U.-2 ,- 'p... ..' I-.. .1 \ k-â‚¬uk.gl# '-A w 0,-2.1--, 61 ., A.FIERL-Q.b e L.-1 , -3 >4 ne_â€ž.2, /*44-- (ccess s-\3_1 7- n:ult 69- Gu- tt- 01 -4- AL.-cova bw: --1- eJ 0-~ -Â· -4 ld. Â·i:--tÂ·vlxhi...131.v-47- 9 0 V. Lub .f,' fic-_ L,o:Le ro~loi,40-1- h,Â·rla ft (<,7.-1 01 4&.O bt,~~~1 rl-Ft- /073-fr t d /11.1- kir- So, Â£ 1_<_cl-S rcu O-1- 6.-u- P-'-r,=L~or'-r.Â· 0.1 4:*., cn-- I.0 <LOÂ·,A - 17-â€ž1.-1:1 10,41 P (Ok'l C.-I/~ C.Â·*3Â·v--{-4 v'-1,0,0\9 617- 501 65. CD. IA O.IC C.0,+0*.r,.,Of'10.~-e~,1 4-1,19 OA.irric, 4,4-0 2 yfia i.vir,Â·.11 Â·-5.- 5&1215*41 / 1 'Â·:4 |CkÂ·â€¢',cr! Nit51(3; /Y-) to('<1,4,21 ':''r.U â‚¬rf-- 10( c.-t-nA.~ .bef ecl ark Â·Sch, 01 a E .tr'.14, i.h i p j cÂ»40.-r- n."0-; r. 0 % 42. U:>Â¥.11 Â»-4,.fil_k kuâ‚¬~ 60_-1 1 ..Â·.c \ ril'-10'.2,..t -1-5 L.0 1.1 C I l q_ i n Criall!1 ,-,~ ra crd( rti p. 0_RO. -fku cs %*4111 29. 'A - Gar-41.Q_.5 1-0 16<r 26- 61-IC--1-- reS ..c (21-lo--r, 0-1- .1 ll.A- e__Co tfirk IL, 7- \/ -,1 Ordinance No. f P&Z REVIEW: ' COUNCIL REVIEW: Ordinance No. ' P&Z REVIEW: COUNCIL REVIEW: Ordinance No. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office RE: Hemmeter 8040 Greenline Review DATE: September 18, 1984 You gave 8040 Greenline approval to the Hemmeter residence on July 10, 1984, with the following conditions: 1. The ultimate buildout will be limited to 13,475 sq.ft. 2. The Water Department must perform flow and pressure checks on the fire hydrant and if a deficiency exists, a water pump or other remedy must be installed. 3. A new fire access stair must be built at the southwest end of the structure and a new fire hose cabinet installed at the hydrant location. 4. Further soil tests must be performed prior to construction which confirm that the soils can accommodate the additional expansion. 5. Revegetation and landscaping plans must be completed as soon as possible following construction. 6. Drywells must be installed to handle increased roof runoff. 7. The applicant agrees to pursue reduction of the elevator tower or further mitigation of its visual impact. Since the approval, design changes have been made which the Planning Office feels you should review. The first two points in the letter from Larry Yaw (attached) respond to Condition 7 of the approval and concern expressed at the meeting for the visual impact of the entrance bridge. As outlined in the letter, the elevator tower height has been reduced by 6 feet. We would like confirmation from you at the meeting that the new location is considered preferrable. The bridge from the elevator tower to the house has been reduced in length from 87 feet to 50 feet, the number of bends in it have been reduced from two 90 degree angles to one 27 degree angle, and one pylon has been eliminated. The applicant has decided to increase the floor area of the structure to the maximum set in your July 10 review (13,475 sq.ft.). Of the additional area, the applicant submits that only 612 sq.ft. is visible. The drawings and the landscaping plan will be presented at the meeting for your review. PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION If you feel that the alterations in the elevator tower and bridge, the additional floor area and the landscaping are in keeping with your earlier 8040 Greenline Review, we recommend that you approve these changes subject to the same conditions and the documentation and plans be added to the 8040 Greenline Review caseload file (Case #21-84). -6 A\ OCT 111984 MEMORANDUM IJ \\1 TO: Jim Wilson, Chief Building Official FROM: Bill Drueding lik-Â·~ DATE: October 9, 1984 RE: Hemmeter Residence' As you may recall, on June 18, 1984, we were escorted through the Hemmeter residence. I made a bedroom and dwelling unit count. At that time I observed two dwelling units and six bedrooms. I passed this information on to Planning. After looking at plans, things just were not adding up, and it appeared chat there would be an addition of two bedrooms requiring Park Dedication Fees, and additional parking. I passed this on to the architect who stated there were already eight bedrooms existing. On October 9, 1984, I met with Welton Anderson to reinspect the residence. This time, I observed the folloking bedroom and kitchen count: 3d floor - Master bedroom, 1 full Â·kitchen 2nd floor - 3 bedrooms, one(1-bedroom full kitchen apartment) 1st floor - 3 bedrooms, one full kitchen Total, 8 bedroom "tÂ·riplex" As you may recall, those representatives showing us the residence did not appear to know the house. I do not believe anyone was trying to deceive me, but the odd configuration of the residence caused an inaccurate showing or viewing of the residence. The zoning here is mixed, R-15, L-2, and C. If, as I feel we should, use the R-15 zoning category as the predominant zone, then the existing triplex would be a non-conforming u'se, not allowed any expansion witout a variance. I explained this to Welton Anderson, who stated he would immediately begin the employee unit exemption from GMP process which would then solve the problem. A similar exemption process was used in the Donna Curton-Madson approval. At this point, I'll be waiting for reactions from the Planning Department. Copiesj1 LE.lanning Department_--../ Patsy ewury- Paul Taddune, City Attorney File i r ,S4 021 A HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD 29 May 1984 Planning and Zoning Commission C ity o f A spen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Christopher Hemmeter Residence Elevator and Bridge System Application for 8040 Review Dear Commission Members: Following 8040 Greenline review and approval for an extensive reno- vation of the former Blitz residence, the present owner, Mr. Christopher Hemmeter, has completed the construction approved by P&Z and the Planning Office. All finished work was completed with strict adherence to the representations made and accepted during the Greenline review. Since the initial construction by Mr. Blitz, the only available source of pedestrian access to the house has been by means of an existing elevator tower located between the Durant Condominium buildings which connects to the house by a complex series of bridges, stairways and pathways. Because the various elements of this access route, particularly the elevator, are unsafe, visually unattractive and in a general state of disrepair, we seek 8040 approval for an upgraded access system to the Hemmeter residence. Additionally, we seek 8040 Greenline approval to construct an addition of approximately 3900 sq. ft. to the existing house comprised of bridge entry hall, private office, guest lounge, master bedroom expan- sion, and mechanical support space. The land parcel on which the improvements would be constructed is described as Lot 14, Block 2 of Anthony Acres Subdivision, and is located adjacent to and above the Durant Condominiums and borders the Little Nell portion of Aspen Mountain. Mr. Hemmeter proposes to upgrade the existing elevator tower and to replace its extensive system of interconnecting walkways, bridges and stairs with a new simplified single bridgeway for safer and more direct access to the house. The new connecting bridgeway is designed to 210 SOUTH GALENA SUITE 24 ASPEN COLORADO 81611 303-925â€¢2867 %111111111111111111111111111 ,TUL, HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD Letter to Planning and Zoning Commission 29 May 1984 Page Two considerably reduce the visual and functional complexity of the verti- cal system necessary for pedestrian access to the house and will have snowmelt walkway surfaces to enhance access safety. The accompanying drawings indicate both the existing configuration and those proposed for Greenline approval. The drawings are referenced in the following response to the 8040 review criteria set forth in 24-6.2(b) of the Aspen City Code. 1. Whether there exists sufficient water pressure and other utilities to service the intended development. Response: The elevator requires no water and the house has sufficient water pressure. Other utilities required for the elevator currently exist. All existing and relocated utilities will be under- ground. 2. The existence of adequate roads to insure fire protection, snow removal and road maintenance. Response: All related issues in reference to the house were approved and committed to in the initial 8040 approval. The new bridge system will not adversely effect roads, snow removal, road maintenance or fire protection. Previous fire protection requirements as described in the memo- randum from Alan Richman, Planning Office, to Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, were previously con structed. 3. The suitability of the site for development considering the slope, ground instability and possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. Response: The new earth covered walk is located at the same ele- vation as the first floor of the residence, and the new construction, including retaining walls and new landscaping, will stabilize any hillside disturbances. This will be done in accordance with the recommendations of a licensed Soils Engineer's analysis and all disturbed areas will be revegetated. Retaining walls are designed to provide more slope stability than currently exists, and stepped planting areas will enhance both the site appearance and its stability. New landscaping will provide increased stability on the embankment above the elevator and to the south of the house. ' L *ip/Alli."/I' HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD Letter to Planning and Zoning Commission 29 May 1984 Page Three 4. The affects of the development on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion and con sequent effects on water pollution. Response: The new bridge and covered walk will have minimal effects on the watershed, runoff and drainage since the majority of the con struction is above ground, the below grade portion will be adequately waterproofed to provide ground water drainage around the structure. Surface drainage will be rerouted only at the addition and will blend with the natural slope at the south of the house. Soil erosion will be prevented by completed revegeta- tion and retaining walls as described above. The new vegetation will control soil erosion at the top of the embankment. Any and all preventative measures necessary to minimize and arrest erosion related problems incurred during the construction phase will be taken. Construction is anticipated to be completed within a ten week period and is scheduled to start in mid-July of 1984. 5. The possible effects on air quality in the area and city wide. Response: No affects on air pollution are anticipated by the elec- trical traction type elevator to be installed. 6. The design and location of any proposed structure, roads, drive- ways, or trails and their compatibility with the terrain. Response: The upgraded elevator and new bridge system will â€ž significantly lessen the impact of the existing vertical access system on the site and surrounding area. The visual impact from the neighbors and especially the Durant Condominiums is con- siderably reduced by the simplification of the bridge system and the use of materials that match the remodeled residence. (i.e. stone veneer, wood siding, cedar shakes, lighting, etc.) The new bridge system softens the visual confusion from the Durant Condo- minium area and will not be visible from town. The new proposal also simplifies and raises the bridgeway above the skier path, eliminating possible clearance problems. 7. Whether proposed grading will result in the least disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. Response: The new addition and bridge work were designed to HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD Letter to Planning and Zoning Commission 29 May 1984 Page Four create the least amount of disturbance to existing grade and vegetation. The existing vegetation consists primarily of scrub oak. Minimal excavation beyond addition perimeters is planned, with replacement of soil and vegetation that will compliment the existing. 8. The placement and clustering of structures so as to minimize roads, cutting and grading, and increase the open space and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. Response: The elevator and bridge system are grouped together for minimal site obstruction. The new design will preserve and create new valuable open space between Aspen and the bridge system. Most important, the new proposal will visually clear up the area and thus enhance the scenic resourceÂ® Also, the new vegetation, evergreens, and landscaping will add to the visual amenity of this particular area of the mountain which is currently characterized by diseased Aspen trees and scrub oak. 9. The reduction of building height and bulk to maintain the open character of the mountain. Response: The height and bulk of the new bridge system are at minimal dimension to provide level bridge access to the house and to provide adequate space for equipment requirements. Approxi- mately 18 feet will be added to the existing elevator tower which will provide level access to the house at its lowest floor level. The height increase of the elevator will not block any views from the Durant Condominiums or surrounding area not already limited by the existing house location. The direct bridge access simplifies the stairways, etc., such as currently exists, and permits access by elderly, handicapped, luggage carriers, etc. Respectfully submitted, Ha~man Yaw Architects, Ltd dakY Larry Y *v j A 1 4 PrincipaR~ \~ LY : sv ~1!11-1 j HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD 28 June 1984 Ms. Colette Penne, Planning Officer Planning Office C ity o f A spen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Christopher Hemmeter Residence Hemmeter 8040 Greenline Review 29 May - Hearing scheduled for review by the Planning & Zoning Commission on 3 July Dear Colette: Pursuant to your conversation today with Michael Thompson of our office, we are hereby addressing the concerns of Aspen's Planning and Zoning, Engineering and Fire Departments. At this time, in order to expedite things for your review, it seems best to respond to each point in the memorandums in the order they arrived in the mail. We enclose copies of this correspondence for your reference. A. Letter to: Colette Penne from: Steve Crockett, Chief Aspen Fire Department da ted: June 19, 1984 I tem 1. In order to verify the capacity to meet the fire flow require- ments from the existent fire hydrant, we will need to monitor the flow and pressure at the hydrant. In a conversation today with Mr. Jim Markalunas of the Water Department, he stated that this could be done by his department for a fee. We would know at that time whether the water supply and pressure were sufficient and could seek a remedy if it were deficient, such as installing a water pump to boost the pressure. Item 2. Regarding fire protection requirements - specifically roads and fire protection access: Jim Wilson, Bill Drueding, Michael Thompson and myself visited the Hemmeter Residence today. During our discus- sions, the needs for a new fire access stair at the southwest end of the building and for a new fire hose cabinet at the 210 SOUTH GALENA SUITE 24 ASPEN COLORADO 81611 303â€¢925~2867 ~ffi-i i 11.- ... I . HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD Letter to Ms. Colette Penne 28 June 1984 Page Two hydrant location were agreed upon. Fire access at the northeast end of the residence exists as previously proposed. This office gave assurance that this equipment would be installed, the water flow be verified, and that approved access will be provided at the southwest addition end of the structure. This access would be gained from the existing ski path below the residence. Given the proper scheduling, this remedial work could proceed with the commencement of construction. B. M emo to: Colette Penne from: Jay Hammond, City Engineer Jim Markalunas, Water Department dated : June 25, 1984 Item 1. The concern regarding water quantity to supply additional demands has been addressed. Additional water fees and costs of meters (if required) would be borne by Mr. Hemmeter when they are established by the Water Depart- ment. We can assure the Water Department that disruption will not occur with their services, given their assistance in locating it for the Contractor so he can avoid it. Item 2. This has been addressed. A copy of the Hold Harmless Agreement is enclosed (see legal attachments) . Item 3. The retaining walls and foundation have been designed by our consulting structural engineer, Anderson & Hastings, P.E., of Denver. They are basing their calculations on the former soils report from Chen and Associates, Soils Engineers, from the former construction commencing in 1981 (4000 P.S.F. allowable soils pressure) . In addition, these allowable soil bearing pressures and general stability of the site will be verified by further soil tests by Chen and Associates after excavation begins. We do not anticipate any problems in this area of the construction. Item 4. Per a telephone discussion with the Engineering Department, it was established that we are unable to connect to the existing City storm sewer system because it is already over capacity. This office was furnished the City's criteria for calculating storm runoff and on-site storage calculations to HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD Letter to Ms. Colette Penne 28 June 1984 Page Three deal with the runoff increases due to the addition of impermeable surfaces (roofs and terraces) . Acceptable on-site water disposal was discussed with Bill Drueding. This will be accomplished by appropriately sized dry wells located on the property. C. M emo to: Colette Penne from: Bill Drueding, Zoning dated : June 26, 1984 Item 1. Jim Wilson (Fire Marshal), Bill Drueding, Michael Thompson, from our office and myself visited the Hemmeter Residence today to walk the site, review the interior of the residence, and to identify any problem areas with regard to the building permit process. During the discussion, it was established that based on the criteria furnished to the Planning Department, we were well within the allowable square footage limitations set by the lot size. The required square footage deductions based on the steepness of the slope were taken into account. The calcula- tions were made by Survey Engineers, Inc., of Aspen. Item 2. Property setback requirements were reviewed by Bill Drueding. Legal easement agreements (copies attached) explain the situation at the elevator and bridge at the lower portion of the property. Copies of the survey of the property by Aspen Associates furnished to Bill Drueding verified that there were no setback violations at the pro- posed addition. Item 3. This was discussed with Jim Wilson in our meetings today at the Hemmeter Residence, and it has been addressed. We hope this meets the City's concerns with Mr. Hemmeter's application for both the 8040 Greenline Reivew as well as the timely issuance of a construction permit. Because of the construction time limitations imposed on us by the sea sonal use of the only available access road, we believe it imperative that we remain on schedule for the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing July 3, in order to complete the construction within our allowed time frame (October of 1984). To not do so has serious financial implications. Consequently, any additional mi-, AA . THI 'llil HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD Letter to Ms. Colette Penne 28 June 1984 Page Four criteria your office may require will be handled expeditiously. Please call me if I can be of assistance, or if you have any questions. Sincerely, Hagman Yaw Architects, Ltd t. A ~,1 j /culk Â£*V - Chad Kirk, Architect, AIA CK:sv Enclosures CC: Christopher Hemmeter (w/ enc.) Steve Crockett, Chief, Fire Department (w/ enc.) Jay Hammond, City Engineer (w/ enc.) Jim Markalunas, Water Department (w/ enc.) Jim Wilson, Fire Marshal (w/ enc.) Bill Drueding, Zoning (w/ enc.) Bill Harriman, Contractor (w/ enc.) Nick McGrath (w/ enc.) p '' r?,d p.-t 74. HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, U D 1<Â«" i *c<1 >1271 6/ 3 )'1 A A 1 J Arv- 1.Cr_Cib~L- ...1 ' 'f 1 11 4/ 3 July 1984 Mr. Bill Drueding, Zoning Officer Aspen/Pitkin Building Department Hopkins Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Hemmeter Residence Dea r B ill: Enclosed are prints of floor plans indicating square footage take-offs, and a revised summary of square footage in the existing residence and the new addition. Please note that on sheet A 5 we have deducted 1226 sq. ft. for those areas that exist as subgrade space, per the Aspen Code, Section 24-3.7(e)(3). SUMMARY i iÂ· -:<J it :4 ~.- f ~ 4- ' /Â· % ' ,/ eÂ·/+5-7 Â· l; Existing Sheet A 4 Floor Plan Level One 1966 S.F. /166 Sheet A 5 Floor Plan Level Two 1841 S.F.4 960 15-27= 3005 Sheet A 6 Floor Plan Level Three 2551 S.F. 2â‚¬51 Total 6358 S.F. 794â‚¬ Proposed Sheet A 2.1 Plan Level 1 1770 S.F. + 14-4 r 16[ 14 Sheet A2.2 Plan Level 2 989 S.F. ... - 1 81 Sheet A 2.3 Plan Level 3 1317 S.F. 1 31 -7. Total 4076 S.F. 41 4,0 Existing Total 6358 S.F. Proposed Total 4076 S.F. 11,7 69 GRAND TOTAL 10,434 S.F. There have been discrepancies with these figures in the past in measuring floor area for floor area ratio and allowable floor area. Your department records show a considerably higher figure in the existing residence, which were calculated on the basis of gross square footage without allowable deductions. With that in mind, we would like to make certain that these last revised figures are 210 SOUTH GALENA SUITE 24 ASPEN COLORADO 81611 303â€¢925-2867 f , . It:-Wa,U ttlir HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD Letter to Mr. Bill Drueding - 3 July 1984 - Page Two acceptable to your department, and if not, adjust them accordingly for your records. - Please call if you have any questions, or if it would help if I stopped by your office in person. Sincerely, Hagman Yaw Architects, Ltd lL-*-' (GLL . Chad Kirk, AIA CK:sv CC: Chris Hemmeter N ick MeGrath File 7Â· 2 6 ,- 4,6. 0-21 fitirâ€žiw~43 duc /Â«43 c V fA A L - A Â»344 4 --1-1 4 --3 1/ U - Ut- tÂ»tt k -- *t , 1-15/1 .16 9 7- L- MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Alan Richman, PlanningÂ· Office RE: Hemmeter 8040 Greenline Amendment DATE: July 14, 1981 Zoning: R-15 Location: Lot 14, Block 2 of the Anthony Acres Subdivision, on the lower portion of Aspen Mountain above the Durant Condominiums near the top of Galena Street. Lot Size: 78,408* square feet (1.8 acres) 4 Background: On February 10, 1981, you granted 8040 Greenline approval to Chris Hemmeter to remodel the Blitz House. ,The conditions of your approval were as follows: 1. That the applicant install the following fire safety measures: ' -- -A&19:lag-1 tairs at both the northeast and < ST-A/Â£- To -*g= suar ~(17--south\Â·/~ends of the structure to allow O k.1 to UTH u.)â‚¬25- ekl D o F access to the fire hydrant on the northeast property line; and peoposâ‚¬0 AD 0/7-1011 - A fire box in the vicinity of the fire hydrant \ on the northeast property line supplied with \ one (1) - two and one-half inch (2-1/2") to one 1 and one-half inch (1-1/2") grated wye, 200 feet I of one and one-half inch (1-1/2") single jack ~ hose, two (2) - one and one-half inch (1-1/2") / . ~ adjustable nozzels and one (1) - forceabl~ bar. 2. That tlie applicant mitigate the inipacts associated -rn Â¥56- p /201,0 673 with grading and construction activities through erosion controls and temporary and permanent land- scaping of the site. 3. That the applicant execute any documents deemed necessary by the City Attorney to provide a hold harmless clause for the City with regard to fire , protection. Since the time of that approval, the applicant has pre- pared several alternatives which have been discussed informally with the Planning Office. The applicant has now come forward with a revision which differs sufficiently from the design you approved to require another review by P & Z. We have attached, for your information, a copy of the applicant's proposal and architectural renderings of the exsiting house, the proposal you have previously approved and the current proposal. Review Criteria: Section 24-6.2 of the Code establishes nine criteria which an applicant must address in an 8040 Greenline request. These criteria include the following: 1. Existence of sufficient Water pressure and other utilities. 2. Existence of adequate roads for fire protection and snow removal. . Memo: Ilemneter 8040 Greenlinc Amendment July 14, 1981 Page Two 3. Land suitability as reaards slope and ground stability. 4. Impacts on runoff, erosion and water quality. 5. Effects on air quality. 6. Design quality and compatibility with the terrain. 7. Impact of grading on terrain, vegetation and natural features. 0 8. Minimization of new cut and grade, preservation of open space and scenic value. 9. Reduction of building height and bulk. During the previous review, as well as during earlier reviews, the issue of fire protection has consistently been a major point of discussion as regards this house. Your previous conditions of approval would appear to have taken care of this concern, as well as those criteria involving erosion and grading. Therefore, the major issues pertaining to the current amendinent i nvol ve cri teri on 6 - des i gn quality, and criterion 9 - reduction of building height and bulk. The,Planning Office believes that the design concept forÂ· the Hemmeter remodel is generally consistent with the. intent of the Code. The architect states that the proposed changes attempt to "create an architectural horizontality which will visually break up and thus . reduce the apparent building mass". Visually, the proposed building offers relief by eliminating the barn siding, extendinO the roof and by changing the window design. The addition of the stairs alongside the house should also substantially improve the fire fighting access required at the previous review. The main concern ofÂ·the Planning Office is with the increased size of tlie building being proposed. The applicant has provided the Planning Office with the following statistical summary of the expansion: Proposal Approved by Existing P & Z on New Residence ~ 2/10/81 -Proposal ' Interior-space 6104 sq. ft. 7725 sq. ft. 7230 sq. ft. Exterior Deck 1200 sq. ft. 1600 sq. ft. 3700 sq. ft: Total sq. ft. 7304 sq. ft. 9325 sq. ft. 10930 sq. ft. As youÂ·can see, you approved a proposal for a house that was approximately 2000 square feet larger than the existing residehce, of which almost half of tile addition to the interior was to be in an underground exercise room without visual impact. The new proposal curtails the proposed expansion of tile interior oven further while continuing to propose an underground exercise room. However, the now proposal includes 2500 square feet of clock space beyond that Which currently exists, fully 2100 square feet above that which you previously approved. The Planning Office is in general agreement with the applicant's design concept but is concerned about the magnitude of the docking LLing proposed in light of . . Memo: 1[ommeter 8040 Greenline Anendment July 14, 1981 Page Three criterion 9, "The reduction of buildiiig height and bulk to maintain the open character of the mountain". An addition of 2500 square feet of electing to the existing house does not appear to be in keeping with the intent of the 8040 Greenline review criteria. The Planning Office recommends that you require the applicant to reduce the magnitude of the expansion of the exterior decks proposed for tlie Hemmeter residence. Planning Office Recommendations: The Planning Office recommends that you amend your approval of the Hemmeter remodel by adding the following condition to your three previous conditions of approval: 4. The applicant agreeing to reduce the magnitude of the expansion of the exterior decks by eliminating those portions which are most visually obtrusive from town and theÂ·ski slope. MEMORANDUM TO: Colette Penne, Planning FROM: Bill Drueding, Zoning Officer (,/U-'~ DATE: June 29, 1984 RE: Hemmeter Residence 1040 Greenline Review On June 18, 1984, I made a site inspection at the above residence. The following are the comments I have from that inspection: 1) The building contained a three (3) bedroom main house and a two (2) bedroom caretaker unit. This is a duplex which would be permitted anyway in the R-15 zone. This zone was indicated on the building permit for the last remodel. 2) The building permit issued September 17, 1981, indicates the building floor area to be 8890 square feet. A 3900 square foot addition would place the total floor area at 12,700 square feet. The applicant, by a calculation of the 3 zoning categories in which this parcel is located, indicates a total F.A.R. allowable of 14,261 square feet. 3) For this project, and any future construction, the allowable floor area should be determined by the Planning Department and P&Z. They should also determine the zoning category to be used for building and setback purposes. If the R-15 zone is determined I do not foresee any problems with this project. CC: Patsy Newbury, Zoning Official Jim Wilson, Chief Building Official Chad Kirk BD/ar St FIÂ©Iny[,1, -1Fj SEP - 4 1984 . 1 . *Ell ,~1!ILLL.N!:1!,bild.1 ~ HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD 30 August 1984 Mr. Sunny Vann and Ms. Colette Penne Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Sunny and Colette: Pursuant to Welton's discussions with you both on 30 August 1984, we request that you schedule us for the September 18th P & Z meeting so that we may have the opportunity to present the changes made to the plans for the Hemmeter residence additon the commission approved on 10 July 1984. The changes are as follows: 1. The elevator is pushed back into the hillside approximately 18 feet and reduced in height by 6 feet (12 feet higher than the existing, not 18 feet as approved) . Together these changes address the commission's request that options to reduce the size and impact of the new elevator tower be explored. 2. The length of the bridge from the elevator tower to the house has been reduced from 87 feet to 50 feet and has one 27 degree angle turn at mid-point over one pylon as opposed to two 90 degree turns and two pylons. This change is also in response to the commission's concerns. 3. The addition has grown so that when complete, the house will be at the maximum buildout approved by the commission on its July 10th meeting; 13,475 sq. ft. Much of this additional square footage is invisible (for example: the east, uphill retaining walk wall at the lower two levels which are totally underground, was moved out 4 feet to the east because the house elevator pit couldn't be drilled as close to the existing walls as we first thought, adding nearly 1,000 square feet) . 210 SOUTH GALENA SUITE 24 ASPEN COLORADO 81611 303â€¢925â€¢2867 1 6./.1111;111]11.....16 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD Letter to Sunny Vann and Ms. Colette Penne 30 August 1984 Page Two However, three small areas, totalling 612 square feet may be visible from certain vantage points and drawings will be presented to the commission outlining the visible changes to the addition. We appreciate this opportunity to familiarize the commission with the changes to the plans approved in July. Very truly yours, Hapman Yaw Architects, Ltd Larry Ya~A.~ . Principal ~ LY :Im liI Iii -Cof / (ONDOMINIUM RENTAL MANAGEMENT, INC, 747 South Golena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 Managing Agent for â€¢ Fasching Haus â€¢ Fifth Avenue (303) 925-2260 â€¢ Alpenblick â€¢ Tippie Inn â€¢ Durant â€¢ Tipple Lodge July 3, 1984 Larry Yaw Hagman, Yaw, Architects, Ltd. 210 S. Galena, Suite 24 Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Hemmeter Residence Dear Larry, At your request, we forwarded your proposed plans and letters to the Durant Board of Managers who have, in return, provided us with their thoughts, which are summarized below. 1. There is unanimous concern that construction workers, material, and noise would be a nuisance to owners and guests of the Durant. Parking problems in the prior construction period were numerous. We ask that reasonable precautions be taken to mitigate these impacts. 2. While the elevator shaft is owned by the Durant Condominiums, there has only been an easement granted to the residence for the elevator. We would like to ensure that Durant owners could use the elevator provided they share in covering operating expenses. 3. There is significant concern over the proposed new height of the elevator tower as it relates to the aesthetics and proportions relative to the rest of the Durant Buildings. The Board does not wish to have the tower any higher than it now is, but has no problem with the proposed 3900 foot addition or even covering of the walkway. 4. There is concern about possible future parking problems if addi- tional parking spaces are necessary for the home addition. It is our understanding that there are now two parking spaces allo- cated for the residence. If you would like further discussion, you may contact Dick Moore, President of the Durant Condominium Association, in Denver at (303) 77811703. 1 1 Sin c~rely,. ~ ~ ~Â·4 8 OLA Lee 69*i her Manager cc: Planning & 7oning Commiosion v~ MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office RE: Hemmeter 8040 Greenline Review DATE: July 10, 1984 LOCATION: Lot 14, Block 2, Anthony Acres Subdivision (Borders Little Nell on Aspen Mountain and is just above the Durant Condominiums) ZONING: R-15 PUD, L-2 and C - Conservation APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant requests 8040 Greenline Special Review approval to add a 4000 s.f. addition to the residence, to upgrade the elevator tower (which increases its height by about 18 feet) , and to build a new bridgeway system from the elevator to the house. PLANNING OFFICE REVIEW: The Hemmeter parcel is approximately 60,600 s.f. Three zones exist on the property - L-2, R-15 PUD and C - Conservation. The existing structure is situated on the R-15 and L-2 portions of the property and conforms with R-15 setback requirements. The structure includes a caretaker unit and is therefore classified as a duplex. It cannot be extended into the conservation zone because a duplex is a non- conforming use in that zone. Allowable floor area of the structure can be determined in a number of ways (see attachment). Since the R-15 portion of the property is a mandatory PUD, slope reduction must be applied as per the formula in Section 24-8.18 of the Municipal Code. The area of the R-15 PUD portion available for floor area calculation is reduced by this appli- cation from 29,500 s.f. to 4,620 s.f. Allowable building size (for a duplex structure) on this portion of the property is 3,186 s.f. The L-2 portion is 10,289 s.f. and at a 1:1 FAR would allow 10,289 s.f. of buildout. Since a duplex is not an allowed use in the Conservation zone, it is questionable whether that portion of the lot should be included. The approach suggested by the applicant is to apply the R-15 floor area ratio calculation for a duplex structure to the conservation area, allowing another 5,272 s.f. of buildout. The two scenarios are as follows: â€¢ . r Page 2 Floor Area Ratio L-2 10,289 or L-2 10,289 R-15 PUD 3.186 R-15 PUD 3,186 13,475 Conservation 5,272 18,777 Exact figures on current buildout have not been verified by the Building Department, but will be prior to your review of this case. Even using the maximum figure from the 1981 building permit of 8890 s.f., however, this 4000 s.f. addition will not exceed the 13,475 s.f. floor area ratio limit set by the more conservative scenario. The project architect has submitted alternate floor area figures which are less than the 8890 s.f. indicated on the building permit. Section 24-6.2 of the Code sets the review criteria for all development within fifty (50) yards of the 8040 greenline within the City of Aspen. The criteria are: "(1) Whether there exists sufficient water pressure and other utilities to service the intended development; (2) The existence of adequate roads to insure fire protection, snow removal and road maintenance; (3) The suitability of the site for development considering the slope, ground instability and possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers; (4) The affects of the development on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion and consequent effects on water pollution; (5) The possible effects on air quality in the area and city wide; (6) The design and location of any proposed structure, roads, driveways or trails and their compatiblity with the terrain; (7) Whether proposed grading will result in the least disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features; (8) The placement and clustering of structures so as to minimize roads, cutting and grading, and increase the open space and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource; (9) The reduction of building height and bulk to maintain the open character of the mountain (Ord. No. 11-1975, Section 1)." L I 1 r Page 3 The proposed construction includes upgrading the existing elevator tower which is located between the Durant Condominium buildings and replacing the stairway/walkway systems with a single bridgeway. Drawings will be at the meeting for your evaluation. A site visit confirmed that the elevator tower will be only minimally visible from most vantage points. It will be visible from a few specific locations, but not particularly intrusive, in our opinion. The addition to the house will extend the southern facade and enclose most of the existing ground level patio on the east side of the struc- ture. The new area will consist of a bridge entry hall, private office, guest lounge, expansion of the master bedroom and an interior elevator. In relation to the review criteria, the following information is pertinent: (1) and (2) The elevator and walkway upgrading do not require additional water pressure. Other utilities for the elevator are in place and all existing and relocated utilities will be underground. The original 8040 greenline review provided for specific fire protection requirements (which were complied with in the construction). The applicant committed in this submission to have the City Water Department monitor the flow and pressure at the fire hydrant. If the supply or pressure was found to be deficient, a remedy (such as installing a water pump) would be used to boost the pressure. Also required by the Fire Marshall will be a new fire access stair at the southwest end of the structure and a new fire hose cabinet at the location of the hydrant. Also attached to this memo is a copy of the "hold harmless agreement" with regard to fire access, which protects the City. (3) The Engineering Department notes that the site is shown on geologic maps to be on an alluvial fan. They suggest that "it is not anticipated that the site is in danger of possible mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers, however, it is suggested that if the applicant desires further assurances in this regard, he obtain a professional consultant's opinion." The earlier construction was based upon a soils report from Chen and Associates, Soils Engineers which indicated 4000 p.s.f. allowable soils pressure. The retaining walls and foundation were designed by Anderson & Hastings, P.E., of Denver, who are structural engineers. Further soil tests will be performed by Chen and Associates for this proposed addition. Revegetation and new landscaping with stepped planting areas will be utilized. ... r Page 4 (4) Effects of this construction are expected to be minimal. The applicant's revegetation and landscaping commitments along with new drywells should mitigate any drainage increments resulting from the addition. (5) No air quality effects will be produced. (6) The addition to the structure will not affect roads, driveways or trails. The new bridge system from the elevator to the house will actually lessen the impact on the existing terrain and will raise the access system above the skier path to provide increased clearance. (7) As stated above, the new access bridge will lessen the impact on existing terrain. Minimal excavation is proposed and immediate revegetation is promised. (8) The new bridge system will simplify access to the house, both physically and visually. The new landscaping will be at least as effective as the scrub oak that exists. (9) The elevator and bridgeway will have minimal impact. As stated earlier, the additional height (18 ft.) of the elevator tower may increase its visibility from some vantage points, but not to a dramatic degree. The house is relatively bulky and the increase of 4000 s.f. cannot be considered insignificant. It is, however, placed in such a way as to increase the footprint in only the southerly direction, which is up the mountain. We do feel that a limit should be placed on the expansion capability of this structure, because its dominance of the view of this portion of the mountain could become out of scale. PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION: Provided that the Building Department verifies the architect's floor area calculations, the Planning Office recommends 8040 Greenline approval. We further recommend that you approve this 8040 Greenline special review with on the following conditions: 1. 4.--commitment- by-the applicant -to, limit ultimate buildout NI li k C barRA to 13,475 s. f. 2. The Water Department must perform flow and pressure checks on the fire hydrant and if a deficiency exists, a water pump or other remedy must be installed. 3. A new fire access stair must be built at the southwest end of the structure and a new fire hose cabinet installed at the hydrant location. . 1, 44 *4 Page 5 4. Further soil tests must be performed prior to construction which confirm that the soils can accommodate the additional expansion. 5. Revegetation and landscaping plans must be completed as soon as possible following construction. 6. Drywells must be installed to handle increased roof run- off. 4 -3 kg_ af)-p.9 ; e_fl- ,~L \ ~*r-t--Q.sl-0 ~.uu--~-0,-sL 46 Je 4 odbr -~-62'Jex-*- or.*-,4 AL.- Kif~*9~~~22 4~ 'fts Whlid ~I vnpa_c- 1, 24 2Â»6 v,K rÂ« bo- v J fal fer-ry 030â‚¬r m H.#752 791/2 LI C+LCUL,Â«7-7 ON S 1 /el 64 L--1 ZONE (NUT- N#NCrr~OPPY PUD I v. W O sLOPE geoucrl Â©NN~ 1 Tolul l~ol dy= U 61 Zone = /0, 169Â·76, 6 FAA- (L- 2 zo.,4) = 1: l x to,169.76 c.. ALLOW,~066 FAA (L-'2 Zx:UE) = 1/0, 24Â·72*4- 2-Â· R - 15 -ZONâ‚¬ C MALaw# PuD -ni easpt,E 5 ursotar -ru ac-z,f:,6 ~etxiCT-?'CrJ toefuCNED M secÂ· 1445Â· 16 loniue cot)6 ct. gre~5~Z~Â·l~ _AREA Â»/ SLOftS 05=PUCITO,J 0 -10 70 545Ft 0* 10070 - 0 20-30~ akye 5786.38 sp 3 t,O /0 r â‚¬894.19 -et 30 -44 euÂ¥& 6906.44 s.F % 267, - 17 26,36 > 40% %96 1 6,606.63 *P * 070 - _ 0 75&4 avect ctua,/c,6/e for FAA = 4610Â·5â‚¬ gÂ·F . c. 41(owqb/0 FAA (Piffle* 4,â€¢06,0,Â·4 1 1-100 +F' 6.2 . 65 % 36-1 . T3166,/2-4~ \- toe I j HamY\Â·-Jeg FAR CACCUL,â‚¬770AJ S 7/ 1 /84 ~. (UN664177W Ze/6 - 0\ 4. Not M*â€¢clitorb PuD fhevz feve Mo *(pe vecluotiOM 6. No FAR liptita,fieÂ« 04 C -20'L6 + ier. folAC catÂ©*Acdâ‚¬. uit ves v.Â£,St Vasty!0/2-Â£ a.loacud Ze""25 /6 R-15 c. Tbta,1 C#-1 dveK U C. Zoâ€¢01â€¢= 10,916.416,= 4 At low.ble FAA=( Dcf>lt* s|owâ€¢lavÂ·4 4110 + 100- IEVETE r 5 675 47 't e ..12~ = 4. CONesgvgrroN -2-ow â‚¬ Cq/c c.lod â‚¬ 46-6 L-'1 -zo,vij F?\A e I: 1 1 10% 070.42 6. 1-t774- ttl-OVABLEE PAP- 44 4 1 For/Liâ€ž, 10, 9%9 4 -7 6 3 166,|G 4 - __ _CoAÂ¥ rv.46,#1 f ort 1.-,~ 6 411 4-7 1 _ 7DW JIS, 740, 631-- - . LAW OFFICES AUSTIN MCGRATH & JORDAN 600 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE SUITE 2OS RONALD D. AUSTIN ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 J. NICHOLAS MCGRATH. JR. AREA CODE 303 WILLIAM A. JORDAN III February 12, 1981 TELEPHONE 925-2601 B. LEE SCHUMACHER Mr. Alan Richman Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Christopher B. Hemmeter Dear Alan: I enclose a copy of the hold harmless agreement protecting the city.with regard to fire access at the Blitz, now Hemmeter, house. As you will see from the agreement, and as Bob can tell you, it fully binds Chris Hemmeter and hence it is my assumption that further documentation would not be necessary on this issue. Sincerely, AUSTIN,0McGRATH & JORDAN By PL<.6/ Lit LIt J. Nicholas MeGrathr Jr. JNMj r/dw Enclosure CC: Robert B. Edmondson, Esq. w/enc. Gideon I. Kaufman, Esq. Mr. Jack Miller 6-FL..6 .tri -C Yu-Ur 4 0 EL ing.t..27 rlle. 1 . - ' k 5â‚¬454-rkkg " -1- *4'- ' S Ue, .,4, . .~%:,- 1#4*24*22Â«944'; -44)49-'-Â·'~."k/MCMW -4.4 4. .i =W.44: '1...I: -*34 r , I . 1. 4 , t. .- ta 4, 1 h '- I $ '~62*/pid.. . Â· t~594.<w* 4 9'e*0.4Â«.il z~t-~~~btfiÂ·%;*;i.Â·kâ‚¬#.-i--Â·:Â·- 1 - ' -- â€¢ h.442flaW'3-1,4. 1 2,E, 1-AL?41.mitecerÂ¥ed-1:01--PM-May.4 1979 Reception 1 - ;- ' 1-=rett, Banner Pecorder - *F **PJ â€¢ 1/ i./ I. 4 sz- r.< 3.56 1 -~ } . -6â€¢ ~ ~3 â‚¬J~t~.~ . 4 - - 5-12 JO / .r}90.1 ..'i<2*F: i k -6ee/%3747*I< --Â·râ€¢..,,i:Â·:'<,Â¥e.,0 Â· > AGREE>â€¢ENT g.34'23* 4 5 6 46- Â·'- 'Â· Â· â€¢ . i -* ~ ..2-31<~EXT BLIT~ fot~ ~hi~~elf, his heirs and aasign, hereby t.~ . ~Â· Â· Â· - r :111*W245852;Fm â€¢grieâ€¢'t,foreâ€¢r,Â· to hold-harmless cha City of Aspen with respecs . UEL=,2-=4 1- - I . Â·Â· , 2646224#~ ::03-in,Odâ€¢11â€¢gai reâ€¢ulcing from the City of A.apen's inability to 33~5942~5ZQ~frÂ·-4+3''~UNÂ·-Â·-t~U-."<.'-.- -: 4 extingui,4-&.firâ€¢ occurring at the premises described on Exhibic : ..fieft :14,+bPe*9.47 A. attâ€¢ched.hereto -and. incorporated herein by this- reference, where tr,-*42 ., 7 :i~~~ -t21,1 the.inabillty- to extinguish th, fire 1, atcribucable to a lack . - . S....% 7. - - h I - - ---7 ' , . 11.<-ir.â‚¬Â·S-iliAWS*~..;'*- - &-'.-Â· " Â·Â· ' 4.1 . . ; lit,FÂ¥ -- -4.-> --- ..:5 ... .2.4-1.1..Â»- 1. . 249?-0~Â·AdiqUati,TACCâ€¢,59-for- thâ€¢ purpose of. firefighting co the 8 1-. . 7,4 prdâ€¢ife/*4*Mâ‚¬*2rf'.-4 - . . - .-59- 2,@:249*47:35,41*~#'r. '-:-.'-'. D. ./. : - 4.9923Â©Dlitâ€¢diti=-A - 1*27; 1979. . pri --I I . a .42 247'Qi#imik&3.-=.111 1 -1 1 f~-gÂ«- 4~f Liti -- f-44 -TEA -I.,4.. .t.,85%7. k--r~,--- .,.1 2.t' 44(' j'.# F 0 4-*49 1--Â« *-<01 AL ROAERT BInTZ by hi: accdchey 4919 - le. i + N*:ir/Ntbwio J . . ,- fact "''' p Kat- r ~ I: bl. ..7~44<7*16/ , Vi -e in , c-Lin ri. - ~ 1:fle. 2:30*ar~ 1~ .--ovift>i~ is approved and accepted by the Cic'Â· of i 4. :2.-:.42-- -rh 40/ .t. A.,pe~42@&%3>39â‚¬Re-> % , - ./ ; I . -9. - n.. .f , -- i t: H '#: -/El:#. --Â· ~~~. 1 / , e ,/1 ./. ' , P : L .... --/. t t T 7 7 '4 1 "Al , I 1 - 1 STACY ~TANDLLY-.. 1 ~ 31Â¢94-:Â©se-~~i J.1-' 2.14&1~~41:6' 2 ' 6, ..2 I . 93-traiWIÂ·YAL:-. -Â·Â¢-l~j~â‚¬-<..*.- .... _ i._yaÂ·â€¢0419'?2,453.. ~ - 1.. 4 922.16 -Â·..... f *,A- L 422*-9-39 . Â· - 0244-j-~ 0 #av,vit- - . 5*221â‚¬MÂ·ef'-1 FLOLâ‚¬G' -- ' -23}Itgal,1....1 - r 1 - Pi 5 30~'.3 'FI STAT*0%'COLORADOÂ·u ) , -4'-42.4 rps..p,W/+Agi~*-1<1' 12:7:N:-9.:ROU.+ .K. 2/ > 2.. . 1 19Â©h i50%4**Â¥6% cou.rr: O,<PITKIN .- ) .-5 ' m ..P.#.*4./.2-IP. 7 - -4 '- 1 . â€¢'J ./ - 1 ...10 1, .*~ ...4-2.= Acknowledged, subscribed and sworn to before me thi, -- - -1 42~13*niEMi -2721fdayâ‚¬*f Avril. 1979. by Cideon Kaufinan. aE:orney Ln face 9 74&22~ fo,2-Robâ€¢re,Blitz.. - 2.-Â·43. - /ok Â£ -St t., 42'r 3 2*:1.94:,Â¢%&13 t..........,C ?:;11*260,mission expiris September 12, 1982. $ I_-4 :<4â€¢ 1 .*.19,6219462%*/ELit**-...:0â€¢ /Shf$1)114,41 my hand and official Jeal. : .. - 9-51:.4. Ir/ 64Â· ~ , . -15..W.4=fâ€¢Â©TAR......,4.:t . . 1.--A- A Â»affs#-6--%-0-0#~~~$vj~,2-Â£.,I-- -, - . acÂ».U.*i 344#.-~ . 4 .. df;S, - - - -Jur'Â·,4yfqhz,â‚¬00:jrit. ''-----~Â· Notary Public AgetA 4 ....6.?gc. 4.. b 1.74- -102 - - -- 1 ....f -'. - dÂ»,24 4%& 4. 2. f.fiÂ·*=4:T itja:* -0%0.05*j:.op *AÂ·. ..97.... ..1.. â€¢>..BF A . . 6, 6/</7 --:-4-- .:.:f *Â·2424*436.-/,Â·'.'1'; 'bf:t= ....= Ir 573 . 74Â· 1 Â«1-12} , L. -4-Â·.J: Â·r 7--:1'5.'.19':- ~ -p*'-~ t~..'j~10?bz -1,r .'..Â·â€¢ ./ #. I I k . 0:&22: n .. 91%Â·.Ir-, , A Â· 21 1%1 .4& 0 Â·' I g.*P Â· V 1*Gr - y Â·r # f F -b23 2--4- 14 ~ ~~ ~ t:;. ~4*:. I?-42.-f~,-i-+Atill*39ifil*f244Â¢i~~ -~ J V. .*gle~ I ...7 . .~~'~â€ž,â‚¬44.;/9. f r= â€ž1919~64i134 ~ :% 39 4 . P >--L, / f..2.â‚¬-1 - - ' Â· 'i-Â·. -I. '- I ' " .... Â· 1., 9,Â»a..pu.1 991'.t -- Â· 1 1.-4 â€¢4 Irr..Ul Cy â€¢ 7 -gr 2 1MR**84#*Fia :- 1 EXHIBIT- A 1.-t*t='99.2'" - - ~1,1-* - AGREEMENT TO ". . - r.i, :*<n..i~-'3 'iJ .Â·Â· -. ~ + I.- 1 . C .11 , It :r- ~ 4,32.Â·I.yÂ·r. 6 ..., ROBERT BLITZ AND THE CITY OF ASPEN r L '42/4,.....,1.-f j. 1 1 &084/.-/... - 446::Eii, Â·.. --..~Â· Â· . ' Ah#r'tawg.... .: 1 - JÂ¥.t;=9,1 - r*eft'~P-*1 --, 1.-.:Â· 1 - t.ta<.,1.:22.-- .. 9 . t 3*4 5.. ..~ k --t.-7.14,74 , 5 *249Â· , 482â€¢v. A#tbii'y? â€¢.Â·982"". - ., r = . 0~ 2Â¢5,-24 J.*,Aze.thar portion. 'ofÂ·ut 14. C , Mizi,/4/6 . 19,4.~'HC**ACIES SUMDIVI SI ON, 27..4.â€¢44 - 262 7 .C:!5~48*$Â¥2%*'.P,n.'.lying-Z.asterly or t.h. followi,Â·g de-.2 :bed line. to .Â·itt: T Â»....93:*al,*INÂ¢Iâ€¢t t>* Â»orthÂ·-1â€¢t Corner of said Lot 14, thence *AS...42. F Â· 45'.1"i~Wthk7*9305' Z.astÂ·.Â·122 foot along the Northerly lin. of s.id lot 14 - 15/.:/ALÂ·Â·D - - .1-th.nci ScuthÂ·15* 30' w..t and parallâ€¢2 to the Fant..rly line -f Â·Â· Iiâ€¢! - 7, ---/-/$/' I, I - I ; h-1* , . F Iet. 14:to thi S<x,thorly linâ€¢ of ,â€¢id kt 1 4. Â· -2 --c -=aÂ» Â·=-irEXCIPTING: thir. fro-3*ny portion of Parcel One, rÂ·â€¢reel. 7Â»0 ond 4 *-2-*eltrithje......Ide,crib-4.3 n Exhibit -AN First 3,upple-ent to - - - . ...,..-.,4,3,.antui D-rlâ€¢ration for the Durâ€¢nt, receÂ·Â·!ed rece-b-r to, .196*:in-Book 7445:â€¢t-Pâ€¢g. 102 of th- Pit>in Counly, Cajo:.,do r.Â·, -:Â·h. 712-*cÂ·fÂ·. ' .CiÂ«-of -Aspen, u 4930: i PluirLCounty, Colorado 7 Â·Â·LL, 7 Â·.-rth #**2 2 Â· Â·' 2~4 .--r r 7 4 - I Afili" '* â€¢Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·1#EffÂ·.. :. 4 i. , .49abÂ«-â‚¬.- r - ....-z'_a I LÂ· t B ' 2 *r. N#jA. 94 1:~'84 rf f >3&*14235 -. Â· . 4. .'- 6 Â·t I .# - . *I' - I - ~ri-~424.. u- .-Embl-B.: k . , . . i .-- 1 -- r *42,24'12-4.., , . .;. . i , ' P t 1,:7. . â‚¬ 4 -. 4 , 0 h./,7 Â£ t. t . 71- -=At I . * %17 . * 'Â·e-tt:4, -0-3*~,W:-1-<Pf:&6.,S.4 < - 14:441%/MAM*279-JU . 1- ...7 . .. . r. b. : |' I. t.* 57'. - .. AU-744 7 Â· 12.42Â» 1 24 fpfiu i 716 ,-1.C- .- I C =Â· -:WetÂ¢k. thhimn., plint-Ar beginning, ...r. .... . â€¢ k A.1 f f ; 1 & ~4>7 .3 . 1 I A#*199.12 2. t - .t D Â·â€¢â€¢.f~#V %*- .. - .... bet& 8 I Â·,-â€¢te'l~ hr.SMeNC.."=A=,L. - , L 4'w._*:./. . â€¢:7<fo#K J.I.--'. -IL + I, . I Lin * A - 74~,:r.Â·~ -'~' ~~~ ~~~~.A- -1.- ...1 . 6 -' . I:I F AL.9.,v - iMVF-.- r.. 4 . 1. '421 .h L,Â»e-1:0 .32..:* -9 44. i. -f#b'.9%'*..~, 2-2-turs?... ./ - . ir MW.Â£8 .. 9 1. rrtil. fÂ¥ Â·IEN '. Â·.r il N - 4 1 *4~71,4 . MEMORANDUM TO: Colette Penne, Planning FROM: Bill Drueding, Zoning LliD DATE: June 26, 1984 RE: Hemmetter Residence 1040 Review 1) From the information supplied by the applicant, I cannot determine whether the addition will be permitted in F.A.R. parameters. I need as built figures and lot size. 2) From proposed site plans (page 2) it appears that the rear of the building may encroach in the 10' rear setback. The proposed bridge also may have a setback problem as well as not located on subject property. A current improvement survey would be required to determine this. 3) Jim Wilson, Fire Marshal, must verify fire access indicated and he and I will do a site inspection as soon as the applicant can arrange this. CC: Jim Wilson, Fire Marshal BD/ar f VJC Â« 49 \J forr 169/ C -4 4 v MEMORANDUM TO: Colette Penne, Planning Office 1 FROM: Chuck Roth, City Engineering Department ~~- DATE: June 25, 1984 RE: Hemmeter 8040 Greenline Review Having reviewed the above application and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. There is sufficient water quantity to supply additional demands. It is anticipated that the water pressure would also be adequate, but if it is not, the applicant would need to provide his own source of boosting the pressure. Additional water fees as required by ordinance must be paid for increased service. Care must be taken during construction that construction equipment and materials do not interfere with operations of the Water Department. There have been problems at this site during previous construction activities with Water Department valves being covered over. The applicant must not encroach on pipeline easements. The approval must be conditioned on the granting by the applicant of a ten foot wide general utility easement for the buried electric wires and the pull-vault. 2. Fire protection is an ongoing problem at this site. The Fire Marshall and Fire Chief will be performing a site inspection. Approvals must be conditioned on compliance with their comments. An Engineering Department memo of February 4, 1981, itemized details of fire protection requirements. These will be verified. The architect is not clear on item 1 of that memo (attached), "exterior stairs at both the northeast and southwest ends of the structure to allow access to the fire hydrant . . ." At this time, I do not know if the fire hydrant has sufficient water pressure to allow for increased coverage protection. The City Attorney' s Office must verify the existence of proper "hold harmless" clauses as and where needed. 3. Regarding Sec. 24-6.2(b)(3), the Engineering Department has been told by the architect that the retaining walls and foundations will be designed by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado. The geologic hazard mapping shows the applicant's site to be on an alluvial fan. It is not anticipated that the site is in danger of possible "mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers, " however, it is suggested that if the applicant desires further assurances in this regard, he obtain a professional consultant's opinion. CR/co cc: Jay Hammond, Jim Markalunas Aspen/Pitkin Building Department MEMORANDUM pi 1 - TO: Alan Richman, Planning Office FROM: Fritz Bruggemeier, Engineering .Department /~ DATE: February 4, 1981 RE: Hemmeter 8040 Greenline Review After conferring with Willard Clapper, Fire Chief for the Aspen Fire Department, he and the Engineering Department feel the following comments should be considered as possible. requirements for 8040 Greenline approval for the above applicant. The applicant should be required to supply the following items due to the deficiency in access for fire protection. 1. Exterior stairs at both the northeast and southwest .ends of the structure to allow access to the fire hydrant on the northeast property line. 2. A fire box in the vicinity of the fire hydrant on the northeast property line, supplied with the following equipment: a) One (1) - Two and a half (2]i) to one and a half (115) inch gated wye. b) 200 feet of one and a half inch (16") single jack hose. c) two (2) - One and a half inch (16") adjustable nozzels. d) One (1) - forceable entry bar. The Engineering Department also feel that the Hold Harmless ' Clause to the City with regards to fire, which was a condition placed only upon the Blitz Subdivision Exemption by City Coun- cil's approval on April 23, 1979 (minutes attached), should be made a covenant on the property, so all future owners are made aware of the deficiency in access for fire protection. -2 . -h \LA'- â„¢/ / ~#l,em ~~~0~Unte4 * ike 22) 6~4*mall> /677 (EN) . i 420 E. HOPKINS STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TO: COLETTE PENNE, PLANNING OFFICE FROM: STEVE CROCKETT, CHIEF RE: HEMMETER 8040 GREENLINE SPECIAL REVIEW DATE: JUNE 19, 1984 After reviewing the Hemmeter proposal I,have two concerns which I feel need to be addressed further; 1) The need for the developer to demonstrate the 3900 sq. ft. addition's affect on the I.S.0. fire flow requirements.as they were originally calculated for the original structure. 2) I would like to withold further comments pending review of the Alan Richman, Planning Office to Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission memorandum regarding fire protection requirements, specifically with regard to adequate roads and fire protection access. --0-1,& .'ll -',I f;%1~i34 E T I - 9/ ~1 JUN 2 0 1984 ASPEN / PITKIN CO. -0 PLANNING OFFICE RENAME/piR P>Â«p- CAL CUL,rrT 010 s 0 2-2 20/Ve EFPECTIVe PheA *L ed-â‚¬7.Pt ~610<,1 cy!1042-~Copt. Stl4.64Â¢~ 0 -,2-00( 0 6Â£-ope '215 . 4-1 SF * I oo~v - â‚¬15Â·41 '19 --9)10 U.OPS 16(6.1 9 16â€¢F 6 50010 = 608.1 O ~30 - 4010 w.ope â‚¬.3/6.56 ar M 26% w 579./4 9 4-0 7 N.ope 6141. 63 af , 0 - 7tnPL ALEA AVAL#866 Ft,2 F> 2 = / Goâ‚¬Â· 73 Op Q. B * 15 -ZONE t MBFE APOA vi a-OPS- MAGENN 0-1.070 SLOPE 6 1 too 7 e = -0 10 -346 51.-CAE 5786,332>F * Solo - 2 814Â· /7 -30- 419'To acen E906.4461= 3 15-6 - 17 26,36 7 .0â‚¬73, ,S=545 16806.63 1 0 V o = 0 -- -T-07Â»L /KAGA 6VAU-.ASCE FOE F>'\B 4610. ss 1. 91 (C -O4.)SER.90~7T-l O,jh ZON_~e _ErFEcrrve -RÂ» 99 a.ore *Prprihj 0-109 0 S-Ope 10,609.9-1 221Â·(015)10 -- lot 609â€¢â‚¬1 10 - 307Â© scope 1041 Â·-71 ep- 8 607, -= / 0 1 I . 36 90-4070 9-ope 121 G. 69 51' B ts '/0 , 3 04. El N 407. 560 pe: 6,959Â·49 2.F , 070 = 'O -TÂ»TAL ,<u,t, 6. 4625 .. [ 17 bs,ID 757)'U- LANO AReA = 60. 668,6 6 7 /, 39 Agges I -- ) ZA Hel#AErER -641~- . ppâ€¢42 Ct'Â£ CUL/El-loUS 4 . PKTERNAL 7=AA A 6-2 206* FAR. It 1 = 1 6 0 2 71-3:, s. P 8 Â£-15 -ZON â‚¬ 2./NVE) APEA /7792 a.z,pe 2506!Crrou = 46'2.0.99 ALLOWED 2000 mE Â¥ 18 4 !610Â·Ss z 3 453.60 sp 100 92t074- L 7Â¤7?N- F>*B ACOOW ED /k) O 2 + P IS n 5256,3-3 Sp 6. ~ ~CO[4505â‚¬k@ 770/(/ ~ZOA/E ~ 100 FÂ»A LIM rr,n-tok) U E>/M 6 /VOGT- te=STPLCETUE> ADIJKE Krr -ZCU k.)6 rAW- (/6 5-/4 org it rubS .to -eF Con:598 UfT/OU -2-01015 As -5* PV,Afte : <702> ap + .2 9,39 0 9'los. 49 100 - 4300 +- 205 = Â«U 16 ,1-igjj -51 0-27- 1 J 6. TOTAL- @e#VAT,VE/) F>'\2- tiLDNEDO =--14714=1 -316.29 f77 146I /h 6. allyr-1 06 MOO SE 77\2 =- -719-3 EF PEOPOZED AODT17010 = t 49 0 0 -725:aL- 117 203> = Leze:>THAO--1 . Â£- C 40 9, 11-6 C. HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD [L[EFFIE[B Â®F F[BAR]%[mOFC[FAIL 210 South Galena Suite 24 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 DATE / JOB NO. G /31/7 184 (303) 925-2867 ATTENTION RE: TO 2.14/_,Aji FL\cor.\ /V/\14 14*v\Â»CTE-A:. ADDY-Uek) ~2/1/V,A//A/6 0~*77Â£3â‚¬7 0,777 r>F" /3,2)05'N WE ARE SENDING YOU m Attached U Under separate cover via the following items: [3 Shop drawings El Prints [3 Plans [3 Samples U Specifications D Copy of letter C] Change order [-1 COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 5/31 ) 8/4- 91'of>C AA/N>jEAS sU 2-ve>/ 1 fa- 6/31 l At SLOPE â‚¬â‚¬Duarl Ok) + /\AUcripta ~FlÂ«ft c/ricUL-Prntly:> THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: C] For approval 0 Approved as submitted m Resubmit copies for approval Blor your use C] Approved as noted m Submit-copies for distribution m As requested U Returned for corrections C] Return corrected prints D For review and comment [3 El FOR BIDS DUF 19 m PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS 61-6 ---'cÂ·*- -~ir,+ui_'944 9~ O-,9 - . - -22 lk,-,AM FAL B C#--4--a- A v -1/ 1 LAJEÂ«UÂ·-u,_ 6 t,LeÂ«jlt-2, 4_Â£4(.l,Â·= Â£4-4. - 46 9 f v 0 COPY TO SIGNED: PRODUCT 240-3 Inc. Graton Ma/ 01471 If enclosures are not as noted. kindly notify us at once. --9-LL 2#'llirl HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD ILIEFTE[m Â®F F[EAR}Â§[molrtrA~ 210 South Galena Suite 24 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 JOB NO. (303) 925-2867 ATTENTION REÂ·, TO At-LAN RE A MAN HAM,9\ fEI-E.4- A COITTON; 9.-AN N ) 96 FtrT--7 / E Â«47 ~17- /1,512123.V WE ARE SENDING YOU El Attached n Under separate cover via the following items: [3 Shop drawings [3 Prints m Plans U Samples C] Specifications O Copy of letter m Change order n COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 5 /3/1 04- 9.00â‚¬ AA#tjsls 31-1 Qx~N â‚¬6 ./.3,7 ' 14% :r-t*t â‚¬ e (i .1,00.4 r.u Â» tvt.j~?046- FÂ»/2- C.At_Ci. /LÂ» r'.4.9 ' ..i, THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: U For approval m Approved as submitted El Resubmit copies for approval â‚¬T For your use C] Approved as noted m Submit-copies for distribution - m As requested El Returned for corrections El Return corrected prints C] For review and comment El C] FOR BIDS DUE 19 m PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US RFMARKS 5451 --**tc-v -,--1*0/,â‚¬-Â«~45?4 2 / L/LÂ·vu U,tÂ»*+37. 1 + 541<,,vt,--didil fi/h fL 16 ( Al..â‚¬_-2.- i-(39' 4..1(3Â»-Â·01/ t.â€žLi.Â·0~2) --'1 2/7 >1#AA--> epaYCH-1-.~A~Av-0-+ f 1..-4--vt--> 0--d-,4-Â»......1* - 6/ ' COPY TO ~ ~ SIGNED: C Gie lj~ Id-Â·Â«C FICI-3 09*2@71~ 6,-, M- 01471 ;ru,s if enclosures are not as noted. kindly notify us at once. %; .Wi-.,1 HAGMAN YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD [LEFFIEÂ® Â®F F[BAES[0]OFFA[L 210 South Galena Suite 24 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 JOB NO. t:# 51 i ?94 (303) 925-2867 ATTENTION REÂ·, , TO ALL/*1 44-KE..1-4,MKHN Â·--fk.Fil'Vi;.1.4 CE'--2- -- ,,J ~, ~ .,p-:-I -T,-,A i -'li#--' 'v Â·11/*/6 -4.:or-Â·7..-F-- - f /7..1.. .971 32- r . ' V WE ARE SENDING YOU E Attached [3 Under separate cover via the following items: El Shop drawings m Prints El Plans [3 Samples m Specifications m Copy of letter C] Change order n COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION V .. 0,7 ! COL ,-- -,2~.7 -f... 41(,/Orl'.'.4 0 F=Â». ;c e-,ALÂ£3 'Â£ -fT: -4 1-* ~ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: U For approval C] Approved as submitted El Resubmit copies for approval E For your use [J Approved as noted m Submit___copies for distribution - C] As requested [3 Returned for corrections C Return corrected prints El For review and comment m m FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS / -- ly,-4 â‚¬.c-./rrgÂ·'42/ -k + 4 , 7 . , 4 .- 4â‚¬.EL f '72.-' {....76'-46Â£/t.. ./_, cLL) : - 0 â€¢ U..fi X.tÂ«12-â€¢ -4 -*1.111&40â€¢-/ t-U.,~- , a Â«.U--/ te-A/-1.U--1 lj COPY TO SIGNED: PRODUCT 24&3 Inc., Gloton. Mass. 01471 If enclosures are not as noted. kindly notify us at once. ~ U-WV f . U.,Lit L Â£ ULIL p '1 1/VIDLA V 1 ul.1.004 - B. PROPERTY TYPE: A COUNTY: 097 G. SIMUL. WITH NUMBER: UNPD. BAL. PRIOR C. POL. OR LIA, $ 160,000.00 H', PRIOR POLICY NUMBER: __911 911609 D. STAT. CODE: 4030 IS 1,139.75 REMARKS: Code Gross Prem. E. SPECIAL DR/CR CODE/S: 100.3.1.~$ 136.08 Code Gross Prem. Code 'Gross Prem. Code boss Prem. Code |Gross Prem. hy GF or File No.: A81-61 POLICY NO. 0 1 911684 Amount of Insurance: $685,000.00 Date of Policy: April 23, 1981 at 12:01 P.M. 1. Name of Insured: Christopher B. Hemmeter 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: (a fee, a leasehold, etc.) Fee Simple 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: Christopher B. Hemmeter 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows- Condominium Unit 2 liIGH ON THE HILL CONDOMINIUMS, according to the Condomilium Map thereof recorded in Plat Book 7 at Pages 85-87, and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for High on the Hill Condominiums recorded in Book 367 at Page 942. Pitkin County, Colorado Ar Port AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY. FORM B 1970 AMENDED 10-17-70 F [)RM 1M (CO) 1145[RT A toM 11 78H I - POLICY NO. 0 1 911684 File No. A81-61 (hy) This Policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the 'following: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspec- tion of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. The lien of all taxes and assessments for the year 1981 and thereafter. 6. Reservations and exceptions as contained in United States Patent recorded May 20, 1949 in book 175 at Page 202 and as contained in United States Patent recorded August 29, 1949 in Book 175 at Page 298 as follows: right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises, ar right of way for ditches and canals constructed by the authority of the United States. 7. All of the minerals, mineral deposits, oils and gases of every kind and nature underlying sul ject property, together with the right of ingress and egress for the purpose of prospecting for, mining, and removing the same, provided the owners of the mineral estate shall not inte] ,fere with, or cause damage to result to improvements placed upon the subject property and in the event of mining or drilling for minerals, lateral support of the surface shall be provide that such activities shall not cause damages to improvements, as reserved in Deed recorded May 21, 1958 in Book 184 at Page 45. 8. Terms, conditions, easements, rights of way and restrictions, which do not contain a forfeiti or reverter clause, as contained in Protective Covenants recorded in Book 206 at Page 436, a: imposed upon subject property by instrument recorded January 29, 1965 in Book 211 at Page 34, 9. Easement for path across said Lot 14 as shown on the Condominium Map of the Durant Condomin- iums, recorded in Plat Book 3 at Page 376. 0. Any tax, assessments, fees or charges by reason of the inclusion of the subject property in Aspen Fire Protection District, Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District, Aspen Street Improve- n.ent District and Aspen Valley Hospital District. 1. Terms, conditions and obligations as set forth in Access and Utility Easement recorded January 31, 1978 in Book 342 at Page 838 as it affects subject property. 2. Terms, conditions and obligations of S tatement of Exemption from the Definition of Subdivisi< recorded in Book 367 at Page 935, which containe a right of first refusal in favor of existii tenancies. 3. Effect of Agreement between Robert Blitz and the City of Aspen whereunder Robert Blitz for himself, his heirs and assigns agrees to forever hold the City of Aspen harmless for any damage resulting from the City of Aspen's ability to extinguish a fire on the subject proper' where the inabili ty to extinguish a fire is attributed to lack of adequate access for the pu pose of firefighting, as recorded in Book 367 at Page 938. 4. Terms, conditions, restrictions and obligations as contained in Condominium Declaration for iligh on the Hill Condominiums, recorded in Book 367 at Page 942. 5. Trail easement as shown on Plat of High on the Hill Condominiums recorded in Plat Book 7 at Page 85. 6. Deed of Trust from Christopher B. Hemmeter to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County, Colorado for the use of Gideon I. Kaufman to secure $180,841.76 dated April 23, 1981, recorded April 23, 1981 in Book 407 at Page 437. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY, FORM B 1970 AMENDED 10-17-70 FORM l M (CO) SCHEDULE 8 13M 1077H ENDORSEMENT Attached to Policy No. 0 1 911684 File No. A81-61 Issued By USLIFE Title Insurance Company The Company hereby insures the insured against loss which the insured shall sustain by reason of physical, but not aesthetic, damage to improvements existing on the land at Date of Policy or constructed thereon thereafter resulting from the exercise sub- sequent to the Date of Policy of any rights to use the surface of the land under the mineral interest referred to in Exception No. 7&8 of Schedule B ("the mineral rights"), subject, however, to the following terms and conditions: 1. The insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an insured hereunder of any actual or threatened exercise of the mineral rights. 2. The Company shall have the right, at its cost, to take any action which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable in order for the Company to avoid or minimize the extent of its liability under this endorsement, including, but not limited to any or all of the following: (a) In the Company's own right, or in the name of the insured for the Company's benefit, to institute, prosecute and pursue to final determination any proceedings at law or in equity, or before any municipal, administrative, or regula- tory tribunal or board; (b) in the Company's own right, or in the name of the insured for the Company's benefit, to compel. tlic giving of security bond or undertaking by the person or persons from whom the insured is entitled by law to such security, bond or undertaking, and in the s,ame amount or amounts to which the insured would have been so entitled had this endorsement not been issued; and (c) to retain or be paid out of any such security, bond or under- taking, or out of any compensation or funds recovered by the Company or the insured, such amount as will reimburse the Company for all payments made to the insured by the Company by reason of the insurance afforded by this endorsement, to- gether with all costs and expenses incurred by the Company in connection therewith, including attorney's fees. 3. No rights, benefits or defenses are intended to or shall be deemed to flow or be made available to any person or entity other than the insured by reason of the insurance afforded by this endorsement, and the insured agrees that all of the insured's rights and remedies against third parties relating to the subject matter of this endorse- ment shall be deemed to have remained intact, in the same manner as if this endorsement had not been issued. This endorsement is made a part of said policy and is subject to the Schedules, con- ditions and stipulations Lhereill, except as modified by the provisions hereof. USLIFE Title Insurance Company Colorado Form 100.31 , .(#) Â¥114 / (i)wner) 11 y C h.Â·XIAL<-a ..0-- ASPER\TITLE COMPANY I ) SCHEDULE A hy GF or File No.: A81-60 POLICY NO. 0 i 911694 Amount of Insurance: $ 1,650,000.00 Date of Policy: February 20, 1981 at 12:10 P.M. 1. Name of Insured: Christopher B. Hemmeter 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: (a fee. a leasehold. etc.) Fee Simple 3. The estate or interest refirred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: Christopher B. Hemmeter 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: Condominium Unit 1 HIGH ON THE HILL CONDOMINIUMS according to the Condominium Map thereof recorded in Plat Book 7 at Pages 85-87 and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for High on the Hill Condominiums recorded in Book 367 at Page 942. Pitkin County, Colorado Aspen AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY, FORM B 1970 AMENDED 10-17-70 FORM IM (CO} INSERT A ICM 1178/ OLICY NO. 0 1 911694 File No. A81-60 (hy) rhis Policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason 01 the following: I. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. L Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. ;. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspec- tion of the preniises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. t Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. . The lien of all taxes and assessments for the year 1981 and thereafter. . Reservations and exceptions as contained in United States Patent recorded May 20, 1949 in Book 175 at Page 202 and as contained in United States Patent recorded August 26, 1949 in Book 175 at Page 298 as follows: right of the proprietor of a vein or lode 'to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises, an right of way for ditches and canals constructed by the authority of the United States. . All of the minerals, mineral deposits, oils and gases of every kind and nature underlying sub ject property, together with the right of ingress and egress for the purpose of prospecting for, mining, and removing the same, provided the owners of the mineral estate shall not inter fere with, or cause damage to result to improvements placed upon the subject property and in the event of mining or drilling for minerals, lateral support of the surface shall be provide so that such activity shall not cause damages to improvements, as reserved in Deed recorded May 21, 1958 in Book 184 at Page 45. . Terms, conditions, easements, rights of way and restrictions, which do not contain a forfeitu or reverter clause, as contained in Protective Covenants recorded in Book 206 at Page 436, as imposed upon subject property by instrument recorded January 29, 1965 in Book 211 at Page 344. . Easement for path across said Lot 14 as shown on the Condominium Map of the Durant Condominiut recorded in Plat Book 3 at Page 376. . Any tax, assessments, fees or charges by reason of the inclusion of the subject property in Aspen Fire Protection District, Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District and Aspen Street Impro, ment District and Aspen Valley Hospital District. . Terms, conditions and obligations as set forth in Access and Utility Easements recorded January 31, 1978 in Book 342 at Page 838.as it affects subject property. . Terms, conditions and obligations of Statement of Exemption from the Definition of Subdivisior recorded in Book 367 at Page 935, which contains a right of first refusal in favor of existins tenancies. . Effect of Agreement between Robert Blitz and the City of Aspen whereunder Robert Blitz for hin self, his heirs and assigns, agrees to forever hold the City of Aspen harmless for any damage resulting from the City of Aspen's inability to extinguish a fire on the subject property where the inability to extinguish a fire is attributable to lack of adequate access for the purpose of firefighting, as recorded in Book 367 at Page 938. . Terms, conditions, restrictions and obligations as contained in Condominium Declaration for High on the Hill Condominium recorded in Book 367 at Page 942. . Trail easement as shown on Plat of High on the Hill Condominiums, recorded in Plat Book 7 at Page 85. . Deed of Trust from Christopher B. Hemmeter to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County, Colorado for the use of Robert Blitz to secure $1,485,000.00, dated February 19, 1981, recorded February 20, 1981 in Book 404 at Page 620. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNEH'S POLICY, FORM B 1970 AMENDED 10-17-70 FOHM IM (CO) SCHEDULE B 13M 107711 File No. A81-60 ENDORSEMENT Attached to Policy No. O 1 911694 Issued by USLIFE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY The Company hereby insures the incured against loss which the insured shall sustain by reason of physical, but not aesthetic, damage to improvements existing on the land at Date of Policy or constructed thereon thereafter resulting from the exercise subsequent to the Date of Policy of any rights to use the surface of the land under the mineral interest referred to in Exception No. 7 and 8 of Schedule B ("the mineral rights"), subject, however, to the following terms and conditions: 1. The insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an insured hereunder of any actual or threatened exercise of the mineral rights. 2. The Company shall have the right, at its cost, to take any action which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable in order for the Company to avoid or minimize the extent of its liability under this endorsement, including, but not limited to any or all of the following: (a) In the Company's own right, or in the name of the insured for the Company's benefit, to institute, prosecute and pursue to final determination any proceedings at law or in equity, or before any municipal, administrative, or regulatory tribunal or board; (b) in the Company's own right, or in the name of the insured for the Company's benefit, to compel the giving of securitybond or undertaking by the person or persons from whom the insured is entitled by law to such security, bond or undertaking, and in the same amount or amounts to which the insured would have been so entitled had this endorsement not been issued; and (c) to retain or be paid out of any such security, bond or undertaking, or out of any compensation or funds recovered by the Company or the insured, such amount as will reimburse the Company for all payments made to the insured by the Company by reason of the insur- ance afforded by this endorsement, together with all costs and expenses incurred by the Company in connec- tion therewith, including attorney's fees. 3. No rights, benefits or defenses are intended to or shall be deemed to flow or be made available to any person or entity other than the insured by reason of the insurance afforded by this endorsement, and the insured agrees that all of the insured's rights and reme- dies against third parties relating to the subject matter of this endorsement shall be deemed to have remained intact, in the same matter as if this endorsement had not been issued. This endorsement is made a part of said policy and is subject to the Schedules, conditions and stipulations therein, except as modified by the provisions hereof. USLIFE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BY FIC.<#SJJ.~~lt<kituU*Z ASPEN <+ITLE COMPANY Colorado Form 100.31 (OWNER) determined anc! no right of action s ccrite to an insured mentof anysuch - tgages any amount that otherwise would â€¢claimarbt until 30 days after such statement shall have been be payable hereunder to the insured owner of the estate or furnished. Failure to furnish such statement of loss or damage interest covered by this policy and the amount so paid shall shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy be deemed a payment under this policy to said insured owner. as to such loss or damage. 10. Apportionment 5. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims If the land described in Schedule A consists of two or more The Company shall have the option to pay or otlierwise parcels which are not used as a single site, and a loss is estab- settle for or in the name of an insured claimant any claim lished affecting one or more of said parcels but not all, the loss insured against or to terminate all liability and obligations of shall be computed and settlecl on a pro rata basis as if the the Company hereunder by paying or tendering payment of amount of insurance under this policy was divided pro rata as the amount of insurance under this policy together with any to the value on Date of Policy of each separate parcel to tile costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred up to the time of whole, exclusive of any improvements made subsequent to such payment or tender of payment, by the insured claimant Date of Policy, untess a liability or value has otherwise been and authorized by the Company. agreed upon as to each such parcel by the Company and the insured at the time of the issuance of this policy and shown by a Determination and Payment of Loss an express statement herein or by an endorsement attached (a) The liability of the Compmg under this policy shall in no hereto. case exceed the least of: (i) the actual loss of the insured claimant; or 11. Subrogation Upon Paymentor Settlement (ii) the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A. Whenever the Company shall have settled a claim under (b) The Company will pay, in addition to any loss insured this policy, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company against by this policy, all costs imposed upon an insured in unaffected by any act of the insured claimant. The Company litigation carried on by the Company for such insured. and all shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies costs, attorneys' fees and expenses in litigation carried on by which such insured claimant would have had against any such insured with the written authorization of the Company. person or property in respect to such claim had this policy not (c) When liability has been definitely fixed in accordance been issued, and if requested by the Company. such insured with ttie conditions of this policy, the loss or damage shall be claimant shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies payable within 30 days thereafter. against any person or property necessary in order to perfect such right of subrogation and shall permit the Company to 7. Limitation of Liability use the name of such insured claimant in any transaction or litigation involving such rights or remedies. If the payment No claim shall arise or be maintainable under this policy does not cover the loss of such insured claimant, the Company (a) if the Company, after having received notice of an alleged shall be subrogated to such rights and remedies in the propor- defect. lien or encumbrance insured against hereunder. by tion which said payment bears to the amount of said loss. If litigation or otherwise, removes such defect, lien or encum- brance or establishes the title, as insured, within a reasonable loss should result from any act of such insured claimant, such act shall not void this policy, but the Company, in that event, time after receipt of such notice: (b) in the event of litigation until there has been a final determination by a court of compe- shall be required to pay only that part of any losses insured tent jurisdiction, and disposition of all appeals therefrom, against hereunder which shall exceed the amount. if any, lost adverse to the title, as insured, as provided in paragraph 3 to the Company by reason of the impairment of the right of hereof; or (c) for liability voluntarily assumed by an insured in subrogation. settling any claim or suit without prior written consent of the 12. Liability Limited to this Policy Company, This instrument together with all endorsements and other 8. Reduction of Liability instruments, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire policy and contract between the insured and the All payments under this policy. except payments made for Company. costs, attorneys' fees and expenses, shall reduce the amount of the insurance pro tanto. No payment shall be made without Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on producing this policy for endorsement of such payment unless negligence, anci which arises out of the status of the title the policy be lost or destroyed, in which case proof of such to the estate or interest covered hereby or any action loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of asserting such claim, sliall be restricted to the provisions the Company. and conditions and stipulations of this policy. No amendment of or endorsement to this policy can be 9 Liability Noncumulative made except by writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto It is expressly understood that tile amount of insurance signed by either the President, a Vice President, the Secre- under this poticy shall be reduced by any amount the Com- tary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or author- pany fnay pay under any policy insuring either (a) a mortgage ized signatory of the Company. shown or referred to in Schedule B hereof which is a lien on the estate or interest covered by this policy, or (b) a mortgage 13. Notices, Where Sent hereafter executed by an insured which is a charge or lien on All noticesand statements permittedor required to begiv- the estate or interest described or referred to in Schedule A, en the Company hereunder must be given to the Company and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment under this in writing at its home office address, USLIFE Title Insurance policy. The Company shall have the option to apply to the pay- Companyof Dallas. 1 301 Main Street, Dallas, Texas 7 5 202. 4 . ,oox 462 05Â£475 ATTACHMENT -- KAUFMAN TO HEMMETER DEED DATED February 29, 1984. A PORTION OF LOT 14, BLOCK 2, ANTHONY ACRES SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO BEING MORE FULLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 14 WHENCE THE SOUTHEASTERI,Y CORNER OF SAID LOT 14 BEARS S 74Â°30'00" E 112.29 FEET; THENCE N 74Â°30'00" W 118.53 FEET TO THE SCUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 14; THENCE N 15Â°00'00" E 117.25 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 14; THENCE THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES ALONG THE SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINES OF THE DURANT CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY, S 40Â°03'00" E 54-95 FEET, N 49Â°57'00" E 78.15 FEET, N 35Â°29'00" E 73.27 FEET, N 54Â°31'00" W 51.42 FEET, S 75Â°00'00" E 53.31 FEET; THENCE S 15Â°30'00" W 237.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING 8 - Recorded at- .'clock M., RADM 462 -05247*1 Reception No. . Recorder. RECORDER'S STAMP THISDEED, Madethis 29th day of February , 19 84, between GIDEON I. KAUFMAN C. ofthe Countyof Pitkin and state of . ~-: Colorado, of the first part, and CHRISTOPHER B. HEMMETER 39 1 3 C whose legal address is Hemmeter Center, Honolulu, Hawaii 96815 / ofthe â‚¬f,Â»1Â¥ty-Â¢,+ -and state of Hawaii ~ , â‚¬e}orado, ofthe second part, WITNESSETH,Thatthe said part y ofthe first part, forand in consideration ofthe sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration -DO{.=**Pts-, to the said part y of the first part in hand paid by the said party ofthesecond part, the receipt whereof j is hereby confessed and acknowledged, ha remised, released, sold, conveyed and QUIT CLAIMED, and by these presents do remise, release, sell, convey and QUIT CLAIM untothe said party of the second part, his heirs, successors and assigns, forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said part y of the first part ha S in and to the following described lot or parcel of land situate, lying and being in the County of Pitkin and Stateof Colorado, to wit: SEE ATTACHMENT HERETO ' re 20 25 1/ crl 2--Al.Â£ DOCOMENTARY 'FEE om *.J 4/nt -- - r..3 . re 7< Â» â€¢) Â·Ir'L .... f i, b i )filÂ·iI.; a 'C'.J Cl , - OZ - 02 r 37 - >J rn 0 JO , 2--J n 1 Cr 11 ~ , rrtscrkrrewiza,-streetÂ·anel-*4*,Â¥1*,er TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, together with all and singular the appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging or in anywise thereunto appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever, of the said part y of the first part, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, bene fit and behoof of the said part y of the second part, his heirsand assigns forever. IN WITNESSWHEREOF,Thesaid party ofthe first part h,4 hereuntojet his hand ~ and seal the day and year first above written. % 2-4 f 44-- [REAL] i Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of dIDEON i.(KAUFMAN [REAL] [REAL] [SEAT,] STATE OFCOLORADO, f ss. Countyof Pitkin J The foregoinginstrument was acknowledged before methis 29th day of February ' 19 84, by' GIDEON I. KAUFMAN. 1 My commission expires 9 -.45.7 2-7 '19 j L-1. Witness my hand and official seal. r , /7 1.3 2. i '11,1 e- 4 ,-4.t/4 Yi c-4/2-â‚¬,Â« L - Notary Public. Notary Address: 67( / 2 , A.ta.-. St-, 1. 0 r /4 5 04.1 6. i l 1, ' No. 933. QUITCLAIMDE ED. Bradford Publi .hing. 5823 W. ft h Ave.. 1.akew<,od , C() 802 Id-(303)233 -6900 - 2-82 47% 1.261, 150Â©h 7 ga 7, 96 A/3 k1 CONDOMINIUM MAPOF 13 - HIGH ON THE HILL CONDOMINIUMS A= I *â€¢DTI -, OU -LE, .'.....O 0- -Me ~A.~~~a6~ ---Â¥~0- -~ 6~V 1- Â»--'-~-, *tA~~ :J .6,00 . Cl..../ .....H CO-0 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE I. c'.4-0 ....77 4 808Â£17 AL-j T Z .* --â€¢* 0â€¢ Co,4.*6~TIB.Lm,2*Â£191.ae-~Grr-11*1,1,â€¢~Nâ€¢ ..3 . Ct ........ C.-6..... .....â€¢ C....... I.A. I.'S '-Al o. 1-/ I./Leâ€¢â€¢IML_~11~â€¢..~1~0Â£2./'cr- i /â€¢ 0 â€¢AiD C.CÂ»â€¢,De-â€¢â€¢iu-â€¢ lato â€¢ -4â€¢__.2._ 5-1 0.--__Ll,I .- ... .....2.0 - el ... 1 1 ./O-- A 1/ 0â€¢ __.2-1Ikl~...~ â€¢'â€¢T a I ' C C~ Â¢>.-. DO CA. 1\ ,/ r~ ~-f- O T.-I 1 \N ....0...... C,- .... ./.,%.,c ..9 . W.. AC.-0-./DO.0 -"-/ M. 1~/I ________D-I c-,- r. 0-_tiljoll- 1 0..//111k--41.1.Zt â€¢1 .8,QL/~...~I/~//f~.~~/-.. ..1.. 1.. -1 ...0 ... OR0* '-I ...' 1 1 -Â¥ .O--'ll,0. zl \ i li 1* / -O 1 1 : (4 . Oâ€¢ ./1 1\ :1 \\\ Ir \\1 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE INfl ./. -1.. . lili.. 120 ?S ACCE 33 â€¢M[>cY,~,TÂ¥ --- â€¢ 35-2. L - 1 I./-0 - -IS-â€¢, a .CÂ·1/ â€¢Ato .....re..~ -WI-WIAL :....... -D U.0 '0 \Â«0.. i...Mini-~~ d ci N D,tc~â€¢,â€¢0 ......1, .. .-0-Â¥. -AT -Ill 0- t - L ,â€¢1.-4 El ....... t.-Â·Â·â€¢Â· {,3 >1 7 --44-ES#7 \ 4 2 S. J, Aâ€¢â€¢0 .01.- .Th...0 . luf, 4 ./ i -'. ._.w..1- I. _ lot 8,/O /â€¢râ€¢:â€¢1LT *.-m '~I .Câ€¢d Â· C..~ 0/Al... - Bit I â€¢<-I & - I C-Â·' . to ...1 I ... ..e-.4 1 or ....Â¥.44 '.. ..0 ... C 04 0 0 -â€¢ 4, U- L- Ir . --- +I,6-.,5â€¢.I .g*M,I< CM....,0... I. ... f.. tÂ·.'./Â¥10-5 0 5 r . I ~.....6 .Loo. ..t . I ' '. ' I I . ,~UL-/ 3 'V"CIAL e- 1.- .â€ž,L ..A'-r < 1 ; . r / e \ 4 ./. 9-0. . I. '-I C .....'.r . i. I W \ \ 11- ' 1 1 l- *-ATI -* 6 1 ap 11 1 6 CE 131 SCALE- O' 12 I ki . , ...C... .0 -u V. . 1 - Â·- I . 00â€¢ Â·. 1 3 6- 0 . E ' Gâ‚¬â€¢ I *â€¢ -- â€¢. 1. _ . Â· _2>-t_LÂ·22 B.i ......0 â€ž It ...A. i 1 . I. ./ 1 1 .'. * 11 .... lilli.. 1 LEGEND4NOTES / 1#1 ,~ EAnTE kl.Y , -~~ i . ~C T .....V Coll-OL ' ,/ t /9 / / p :*:Â· a.-1 Â·:D .Â·: C'F 2/0 // 9 1 TRAIL EASEMENT ACCEPTANCE 1 , 1 L t. -0 .. ..T 7- / / 1 19 --' i / Â·c.*bt-'~-: G'r< 2 r... ..~'. E 95" ENT AB '#7- m â€ž4., M A P .S ..â‚¬-2 5* ACC. E v â€¢t â€ž e W# '- / 1 , ./.â€¢VID ..... RCCORD Aspt. ' / ..0 -IC.. -0 01 0.0.-~ U...1- T-1. .0.g~V iii 1 - ....... I. -6.C. A.CREJ.9 '~--Â·L-:53. ......10.4 0...O 0-4 -/O-0- ..All rÂ·1----/1.- r 'C' <LC~A*04 E.L.*IN. It , ./3/ .C ./. a.. c~.Mâ€¢.â€¢c,Â·Â·Â· .......7 CLERKiRECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE 1! 1 I I.C.â€¢TID ./.-..-.-- . ./. 6,9./. 9, ..... ... ........ C. .... lilli O/ It ..... ..O