The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.277 Silverlode Dr.A052-97A LAC, -8 ie----9/A 27 -1 5 -, Ne i (0 1Â·cr) 1 ('CA '33. 13 ly 3 u -l / 2737-074-30-010 1-0 1-/0 .1~ Fuchs 8040 Greenline/ininor - I'laf+10 r \1 *MJ O 0 /P_. *R 91 + 5,led ock Dr, C:\SELOAD !1102,< PARCEL ID:|2737-074-30-010 DATE RCVD: |06/24/97 # COPIES:jTE- CASE NOjA052-97 CASE NAME:~Fuchs 8040 Greenline PLNR:~Chris Bendon PROJ ADDR:~Lot 10, Silverlode Subdivision I CASE TYP:~8040 Greenline STEPS:j OWN/APP: Fuchs, Ricki & Peterl ADR~25 Montain Trail C/S/Z:~Stanford, CT 0690 PHN:~(203) 329-9086 REP:|Richard Klein ADR:~P.O. Box 737 C/S/Z:|Aspen, Colorado 81 PHN:|920-1752 FEES DUE:~ 1080 +110=1190 ~ FEES RCVD~ 1080 +110=1190 STAT:F REFERRALSICity Eng, Parks REF:|06/30/97 BY~RH DUE:~07/09/97 MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED 07/15/97 P&Z in, . 1 - ~1 DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| BOCC\CC: REMARKS| PZ: Ord. #97,14 BOA: CLOSED:~10/03/97 BY:|SH HRG OFF: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMIN: ELOAD SUMMARY SHEET - CI )F ASPEN DATE RECEIVED: 6/24/97 CASE # A52-97 DATE COMPLETE: STAFF: Chris Bendon PARCEL ID # 2737-074-30-010 PROJECT NAME: Fuchs 8040 Greenline/MinepÂ·Plat-2 Project Address: Lot 10, Silverlode Subdivision APPLICANT: Ricki and Peter Fuchs Address/Phone: 25 Montain Trail, Stanford, CT 06903 (203) 329-9086 OWNER: saa Address/Phone: REPRESENTATIVE: Richard Klein, Architect Address/Phone: Box 737, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-1752 RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Applicant Other Name/Address: FEES DUE FEES RECEIVED PLANNING $1080 PLANNING $1080 # APPS RECEIVED 14 ENGINEER $110 ENGINEER $110 # PLATS RECEIVED 14 HOUSING $0 HOUSING $ GIS DISK RECEIVED: ENV HEALTH $0 ENV HEALTH $ CLERK $ CLERK $ TYPE OF APPLICATION TOTAL $1190 TOTAL RCVD $1190 One Step At', - - s"!IMT--5 - 6 L//- 1 111Â»4 P&2 O 041 15- E]Yes '@NA CC C]Yes [ZINO CC (2nd reading) E]Yes CINO REFERRALS : U City Attorney El Aspen Fire Marshal U CDOT El City Engineer (DRC) m City Water U ACSD Il Zoning El City Electric U Holy Cross Electric U Housing Â£ Clean Air Board U Rocky Mtn Natural Gas m Environmental Health U Open Space Board m Aspen School District *Parks Il Other: Il Other: DATE REFERRED: ~30 INITIALS: 1~lf- DATE DUE: ~~ 1 APPROVAL: Ordinance/Resolution # rÂ·43 4 91.14 Date: Go 11 Lâ‚¬ 1913- Staff Approval Date: Plat Recorded: Book , Page CLOSED/FILED nATE: 9, R.OIl- INITIALS: l)~bW ROUTE TO: 044* g Da RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE APPROVAL OF AN 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW TO INCREASE FROM 80% TO 90% THE PERCENTAGE OF ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) THAT CAN BE BUILT FOR THE FUCHS RESIDENCE LOCATED AT SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION LOT #10 (NO ADDRESS), ASPEN, COLORADO Resolution #97 - ML WHEREAS the applicant, Ricki and Peter Fuchs. represented by Richard Klein, Architect, has requested to increase from 80% to 90% the percentage of allowable floor area ratio that can be constructed on Lot #10 of the Silverlode Subdivision (no address); and, WHEREAS the Silverlode Subdivision approval. City Council Ordinance No. 52. series of 1994. Section 1, states 80% of the allowable floor area ration (FAR) can be built by right and up to 90% of the allowable FAR can be built with an additional 8040 Greenline Review approval from the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission; and. WHEREAS The Planning Staff reviewed the development proposal pursuant to all applicable Municipal Code Sections and recommended approval. with conditions: and, WHEREAS during a hearing at a regular meeting held July 15.1997. the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission considered and approved by a 6-0 vote the application with the conditions recommended by the Community Development Department. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: That the 8040 Greenline Review for the Fuchs property, Silverlode Subdivision Lot #10 (no address), is approved with the following conditions: 1. The use of highly reflective materials on the western facade shall be minimized to the extent practical. 2. Exterior lighting shall be downeast. The owner shall limit the use of exterior lighting for ornamental purposes to the extent practical. Ifthe driveway is to be lighted, the owner shall use low, downcast lighting on the west side of the driveway. 3. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the County Clerk and Recorder. 4. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on July 15. 1997. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANN~NG AND ZONING COMMISSION: 0-114 04%95Â·082 1Â» @hy Attorney v JasmineJi00*, Vice-Chair 1 Ke,RE ATTEST: Â·Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 3 1{14 44 W. Â£464 9591 .4 *041 4 54 44 4- 44* h / g U - v 35.- -: t, YMJ 0,7 4Â£ 005 4 cz,~ in . Â£6 ]A-- wmt \*al, - tt 461- 01&6 T KI 0 ro PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JULY 15. 1997 Jasmine Tygre, Vice-Chair, opened the Regular Aspen Planning & Zoning meeting at 4:30 with Steve Buettow, Bob Blaich, Roger Hunt, Tim Mooney, and Dave Johnston present. Sara Garton and Marta Chaikovska were excused. Other Staff present were David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney, Amy Amidon, Chris Bendon, Mitch Haas, Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Department, Rebecca Schickling, Parks and Steve Aiken, Golf. ........... LOT 10 SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION. FUCHS RESIDENCE 8040 4 GREENLINE,EVIEW Chris Bendon, staff, explained that applicants, Ricki and Peter Fuchs, requested 8040 Greenline Review. He noted the character and resource ofthe mountain side was the criteria that applied. Bendon stated the use of the flashy or reflective exterior materials would affect the scenic resource as would the use of exterior lighting. The conditions of approval restate the reflective material concerns and that exterior lighting shall be low downcast. Richard Klein, Architect, presented a model and discussed materials to be used such as stucco, a non reflective metal roof, anodized flashing and specific lighting (non-reflective) relocation from the DRAC hearing. Roger Hunt asked i f the addition of the garage increased any bulk or raised the height o f the house. Bendon stated a DRAC variance was granted from Ordinance 30 with a defined building envelope. Tim Mooney questioned the additional 430 square footage being pertinent to the quality of living in that space. Klein said the Ordinance did not specifically state that 80Â°/0 was maximum but allowed 90% FAR with 8040 Greenline Review. He said the lot was narrow and the client wanted to maximize the tight space o f that lot. If square footage was decreased, it would be in the back ofthe house and not have a visual impact on the community. Dave Johnston questioned the 90% FAR option. Bendon said the lighting and materials addressed the issues, but did not change the footprint ofthe structure. MOTION: Roger Hunt moved to approve the 8040 Greenline Review for SilverLode Lot#10 with conditions 1-4 outlined in Community Development Memo date July 15, 1997. Dave Johnston second. ALL IN FAVOR, APPROVED 6-0. 1 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION JULY 15. 1997 LOT 10 SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION. FUCHS RESIDENCE 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW 1 HPC-FAR BONUS CODE AMENDMENT 7 MULTI-FAMILY CODE AMENDMENT ................................................................................................................2 CITY PARKS & GOLF MAINTENANCE FACILITY FINAL PUD. AMENDMENT TO THE OFFICIAL ZONE DISTRICT MAP. CONDITIONAL USE. SPECIAL REVIEW & RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS VARIANCE 910 GIBSON. LOWENSTERN CONDITIONAL USE FOR DETACHED ADU (PARCEL ID# 2737-074-90- 211 5 POMEGRANATE REZONING. 39100 HWY. 82. ASPEN ..................................................................................... V FARMERS MARKET TEXT/CODE AMENDMENT ............................................................................................., 8 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development ,Director---~M Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Directorl 1 FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner 14 RE: Silverlode Lot #10. 8040 Greenline Review DATE: July 15, 1997 SUMMARY: Ricki and Peter Fuchs, applicants, are requesting an 8040 Greenline approval to increase their allowable square footage from 80% FAR to 90% FAR for a single- family home to be built on Lot 10 of the Silverlode Subdivision. The original subdivision agreement allowed 80% FAR to be built by right and 90% FAR to be built with an 8040 Greenline approval. This extra 10% results in approximately 430 square feet of FAR. The applicant is not changing the approved building envelope or any other aspect of the original approval. The applicant was granted a DRAC waiver for the placement of the garage May 22,1997. Staff recommends approval of the 8040 Greenline Review, with conditions. APPLICANT: Ricki and Peter Fuchs. Represented by Richard Klein, Architect. LOCATION: Silverlode Subdivision Lot #10. The property is above elevation 8040 and is subject to the 8040 Greenline Review if more than 80% FAR is proposed. ZONING: AH1-PUD. Free-Market Residential portion of subdivision. LOT AREA (FOR PURPOSES oF FAR): 2 ' .418 acres = 18,186 Square feet. FAR: 80% of FAR = 3,442 square feet, pursuant to subdivision approvals. Applicant is requesting an increase to 90% FAR (3,872 square feet) through 8040 Greenline Review. 1 CURRENT LAND USE: Vacant PROPOSED LAND USE: Single Family Free-Market Residence. PREVIOUS AcTION: The Commission has not previously considered this application. REVIEW PROCEDURE: 8040 Greenline. The Commission shall approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove the application at a hearing. BACKGROUND: The Silverlode Subdivision was approved in Pitkin County, vested, and subsequently annexed into Aspen during a period of City Code revisions. Therefore, the subdivision has a mixed set of development standards. The subdivision approval specified a floor area for each site. This approval also stated the applicant could build up to 80% of that FAR by right, and to 90% with an 8040 Greenline Approval. The project is subject to "Residential Design Standards" except those which affect the calculation of floor area. The applicant was granted a variance for the placement of the garage by the Design Review Appeals Committee. STAFF COMMENTS: Review criteria and Staff Findings have been included as Exhibit "A." Agency referral comments have been included as Exhibit "B." The application has been included as Exhibit "C." RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the 8040 Greenline Review with the following conditions: 1. The use of highly reflective materials on the western facade shall be minimized to the extent practical. 2. Exterior lighting shall be downcast. The owner shall limit the use of exterior lighting for ornamental purposes to the extent practical. If the driveway is to be lighted, the owner shall use low, downcast lighting on the west side ofthe driveway. 3. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record this Planning and Zoning Resolution with the County Clerk and Recorder. 2 4. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the 8040 Greenline Review for Silverlode Lot #10 with the conditions outlined in the Staff memo dated July 15, 1997." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit "A" -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit "B" -- Referral Agency Comments Exhibit "C" -- Application 3 Exhibit A Review Criteria and Staff Findings: 26.68.030 8040 greenline review. A. Applicability. The provisions of 8040 greenline review shall apply to all development located at or above 8040 feet above mean sea level (the 8040 greenline) in the City of Aspen, and all development within one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040 greenline, unless exempted pursuant to Section 26.68.030 (B). Staff finding: The property is within this area and is not eligible for an exemption. C. 8040 greenline review standards. No development shall be permitted at, above, or one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040 greenline unless the commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the city. Staff finding: The parcel is approved for development at 80% of the FAR. Increasing this FAR to 90% without changing the approved building envelope will not change the site's characteristics or development potential. No known toxic soils exist on the site. 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects on water pollution. Staff finding: The applicant is not proposing to alter the building envelope. Staff believes the development of 90% FAR would have essentially the same affects as the development of 80% FAR. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the city. Staff finding: The increase form 80% to 90% FAR would not affect air quality. 1 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. Staff finding: The road for the subdivision is already in place. The applicant has modified the proposed driveway access to minimize the extent of retaining walls necessary. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. Staff finding: The subdivision approval specified a building envelope for this property. No disturbance is allowed outside of this envelope with the exception being for driveway access. The applicant is modifying the approved access to minimize the amount of disturbance required. 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space, and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. Staff finding: The subdivision is approved. Clustering, roads, and open space are mute points. The extent of cutting and grading was determined when the subdivision was approved. The establishment of building envelopes designated the area for on-site disturbance. Increasing the FAR for the site would not change the building envelope and would therefore not affect the extent of cutting and grading on-site. Staff believes the cutting grading issue is also a mute point. Because the development is already approved, much of the scenic resource has been affected. It is true that a larger house could further erode this resource, but it's extent may be insignificant considering the subdivision is approved. Staff believes that the view from town and the view from Aspen Mountain should be the primary concern. Considering these views, it is not necessarily the bulk of the structure but the exterior treatments that the Commission should consider. Some of the most noticeable exterior materials are those that are highly reflective, like polished copper. The Commission should consider limiting the applicant' s use of highly reflective materials on the western facade (town side) of the house. Some of the most noticeable exterior lighting treatments are those of the driveways and ornamental lighting of architectural and landscape features. The Commission should consider limiting the applicant' s use of light for ornamental purposes and encouraging the applicant to light the driveway with low, downcast fixtures located on the west side of the driveway. 2 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character of the mountain. Staff finding: The development has approval for 3,442 square feet of FAR. The applicant is asking to increase this floor area to 3,872 with the 8040 Greenline Review. The maximum building height for the property would not be affected by this approval so essentially the extra floor area would increase the bulk of the house. As expressed in response to criteria #6, the Commission should be less concerned with the exact square footage of the house and more concerned with what the applicant intends to do with the square footage. More specifically, how the increased FAR influences views from town and from Aspen Mountain. In Staff' s estimation, the applicant's exterior treatments allows the house to blend with it' s surroundings as much as it would with less FAR. The proposed conditions outlined in criteria #6 may actually reduce the house' s impact on the mountain as seen from town. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. Staff finding: The development can be serviced adequately. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said roads can be properly maintained. Staff finding: Roads for the subdivision are already in place. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. Staff finding: The applicant already has adequate access. The modified driveway design will not limit the ability of service or emergency vehicles to access the property. 11. Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan map is dedicated for public use. Provide access to natural resources and areas of special interest to the community. Staff finding: The increased floor area request does not affect access to public resources. 3 049< p b 1MEMORANDUM To: Chris Bendon, City Planner Thru: Nick Adeh, City Engineer~* 47 From: Ross C. Soderstrom, Project Engineer 26- I)ate: July 2,1997 Re: Fuchs 8040 Greenline Review & Minor Plat Amendment Physical Address: 277 Silverlode Drive, City of Aspen, CO Legal Description: Lot 10, Silverlode Subdivision, City of Aspen, CO Discussion: There are no proposed changes or additional site impacts outside the established building envelope so the city Engineering Dept. has no comments. The proposed changes to the building and previous approvals should be explained in notes added to the revised plat for this lot. The revised plat should be recorded prior to building permit issuance. 1 OF 1 DRCM1597.DOC MEMORANDUM To: Chris Bendon, City Planner Thru: Nick Adeh, City Engineer~* 47 From: Ross C. Soderstrom. Project Engineer PCS- Date: July 2,1997 Re: Fuchs 8040 Greenline Review & Minor Plat Amendment Physical Address: 277 Silverlode Drive. City of Aspen, CO Legal Description: Lot 10. Silverlode Subdivision, City of Aspen, CO Discussion: There are no proposed changes or additional site impacts outside the established building envelope so the city Engineering Dept. has no comments. The proposed changes to the building and previous approvals should be explained in notes added to the revised plat for this lot. The revised plat should be recorded prior to building permit issuance. 4100.40, Ciw 144 1 OF 1 DRCM1597.DOC DRC, 09:29 AM 30/6/97, DRC - Fuchs 8040 To: DRC From: Christopher Bendon <chrisb@aspen.co.us> Subject: DRC - Fuchs 8040 CC: Bcc: X-Attachments: Hi Everyone, I am referring a project out for an 8040 Greenline review. It is only an amendment to their original approval, so I am only sending it to Engineering and Parks. The single family house has approval for 80% FAR and they want to increase it to 90% FAR. No changes to the building envelope are proposed. The house will be sprinkled. It is a Silverlode lot so Housing has been mitigated. If you have any further questions, you can raise them at DRC, or reach me at 920.5072. Printed for Christopher Bendon <chrisb@aspen.co.us> 1 ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and RICKI AND PETER, FUCK<, (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for WEW RENDENCe. 47 Ler \0 1\LVERLoptÂ· 40&01\HDoW , AVEN (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 1,0 40 gi v 1 E 14 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 43 (Series of 1996) establishes a fee structure for Planning applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because o f the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT's application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. - 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY' s waiver of its right to collect 6111 fees prior to a cletermination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ | l1O ZEâ€¢ which is for 1 hours of Planning staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY- for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT 5 ~ i PRE Sly-FATIVE. Bydd -4. I Stan Clauson Community Development Director Date: U , 1 9, . 41 -1 1Mailing Address: 86* -116-1 Aff'"' (_6 1#>1 41-2- g:\support\forms\agrpay=doc 1116,97 .... Notes: ~b â€¢ Lot Number-There are 15 lots with 5~~de was also granted vested â€¢ Estimated Gross Size-The ..... . I plat numbers as shown in the riatili~ 1994 50 that the buyer can maximum FAR of a SilverLode home Ble rendering. bulm,rhome that takes up 80% of that can be built is restricted to ....... 1 -A -lk able FAR without having to 90% of the available FAR. The gross â€¢ Address-All SilverLode hoili sites >1*- -151; 14!~r,~ps to the Aspen 8040 size in $q. ft. shown here is .... are located on SilverLode My# 0 6 -1'I'$" ~G.~~~*& Review process. Buyers representative of the more â€¢ FAR-SllverLode has bee44116,Râ€¢d =46Â¢1;Alliar with Aspen regulations conservative 80% FAR. The actual 0 0. vested rights by the Clhlif'~J~~% ~~ ould contact a local architect. size will differ based upon the which allows the buyer tÂ¢il*li#tii Y 3Â¥9 individual home design. home that can take uptfal'â€¢wfail tv 541.290 the a119kable floor are inÂ¥*11). 5 The all*able FAR foâ€¢â‚¬35#Vla@,e is Lt .' . 1...0 j land use go dif~~or to Maj: 1\\\iT -1 al OrdidÂ®<e 30, which will,reduce the : 4 . 0 1 allow,AFAR onm#rtain sites in ~~\,~,'~2' , ;,r,~~ .,e..~ . . 2 ' 44 11,0- 41-9',â€¢Â·i'*-94 -29'.'N'I- . 0 .A.9Â·:4~.u.â€¢Â·Â·Â·Â·â€¢â€¢4'4,4.t. .".*;9*â€¢~.4Â·:ttÂ¥.P", . :.64,I~,I , 02..:.'2,%13:TÂ·W#15 -.6~4.Af?t.Â·18,?66(12*fli~~3,45,2.* ~,*ty - KEYÂ®Fts' 4.1 >2'- t~ A'>t &2:43Â·Â·1449Â·,~tioc -:Cr:Fli i-66 I:,fJO.ri~1343~ i: ; ~ , . 0 4..VIN , f f,/ i $ D 11 1 h , , ' -tÂ·.ri f p .t /1 , 44.- 9.4 .420\\11,1 lk' '.\ Nt.~Â· 2 :1 ?Ii t\,I/, 1 ..1 ... b. 9.-61Â·4413-481Â»94%11,?11430.8~Â·3425-44'i*; ~~~ 4 - itiONENAF;73-..(.Â·~tÂ·~14*.11,7659*9 .,.;;3,44'~ Â·Â·Â·,Â· 11* h 1 73 ...... f.-1 '41:.... ,t 30*t43Â¢4155 . .'~33 .:i-Â·15;6,4645<~:..~-.3,3.BO~JXwj~$~;oÂ¢9,,~.~Â·: {11 *f/1 1.-- 4112- .ye'. Â·L,Â·.Â·.32~~Â·F.Â·Â·2;.C :, , k. '* **4 Â£ 4*'~,,~:~,C~,|Ifi~,d-*,gE , ~ %1.42 / F , -\'. * 1./1 1 '.4 r./ Terms andlÂ¢66 ditions jut;, t;..7):%*41,4551 :,.f iz-?,Â·12,4314.....IJA)3M1Â·114.~i:%~44f',Â·ti~ti,MA,:r. , P, \ @f '1,;f ./ . 1 . j,\,\ %1..-/4/ fil\,jÂ· 4.LES.//./// 1.1 31.13:, 9 ifT-*i-~ (f>--~~133ji ~~~;~-~3'/j~~~ fij~Â¢{Aff*fttf#2~~4 -4~ 1 , \ .Â·. IN".~-' , 7 -Lu,- ,< Â·tt-'.::51 Q. : 0." c ...2 .sill:Â».1 1. ,% .S .31,1,19-tÂ·*,:Â·iÂ·12,4**,*151/f1#Air.ME, 0Â©\\,\â€ži~/111$*L' All closihbs..4(11 bÂ¢pÂ¢ld at , 3(/ .1 1,Â·'/ f -~Â· 9 Â·Â·Â· ~Â·:Â·~Â·..Â·~ja95 - .9*:iiÂ·fil:5.390:47:-41'. 1-2-3,2? EF.~*i~. 4~~#4:4.:4 Nit~~''~.â‚¬-3-9 -4~.1 a*lill; ~~1~'4 "- V.t.:1...7 i I h 1 6.410Â·~iff;jitiP :Â·,.s:18,18Â§ ~:,-Â·r.t#-*4,44**4%<M#*7 . ~ :** . . tr' f ./.' ~I' ' .. .0/' I. 4 41\, t., Land Titlki~j~1~~~intee Coinpanp,In Aspen. 6'3Â·...'/ .: A C ? 1,Ef:F'.'.4.:4?9,qi*gy,3>-Â·,13439 ffi~Â·~ ~-) 9*~..13:11.11 2 4 , 11 -. 1 1 i... ... -3 I .tr, K *"*1.2357Â¥*Â«1115372%79 42:3 0704Â¥4 0 1 ; Â·. h r <4 ;J- 4-4 *.6 t-11' ' 23* -*-740 FEFi 1-34-0,- ~ Iff +:~ ~ ~f 3.baF**iAr .-r 1/1 1.-trA 2Â· ,:L-,tiki#201.t..1- :Â· 19,565 7 fl 104,4 . I 26,1 - 1 3,520-04'ikigigiumA; 4 gmt' 1 hi 14 4 ..... I- . Ji 1 i i l , 1 1, Â·....,..â€ž;,â€¢ '. itÂ·.%'Â·Â·Â·'~0 '. Â·~Â·.~41.~ ' ' ''~ ~~~ '' ' '~ ~ ~' ''~ '~ ~~~ ~~''~ ~~~ ~~'~ ~~ ~~~' ~~ ~~~0~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4--*Â¥ 30,634 /~: r4,1403%-4: 3.1-*5*102 - - 4 6315 0/~~t 3 200 - /41 k '.... 4 .,1 f hi:, -Â· dfie . 1 . .. n:â‚¬1,1 . 00,0 , 5 4 + 10 lei=q aw; *OSO 80*0 . 16=4 0 80801 Ililli . 1?0 - 2--1--- ----' i 1 11 SCALE - . 1 - '...... - A.......10.-761. U /Wff 46 ' Â· 4=1-Hm, A. i ! t C .51,1 ~ ,;lij:,/2/,Â·P\4 ' .Â· 1 ' 4 0 .- L. 2-22:r,<1'11"1">:#i.--1. / 11.11.1 1 / V--. ...0/.>an 'DITA , .r 4 ,- 'll .... 1/,7 111 0 5*914//li ~ti <-223 -~ 1 . / 2 1 - /1 / 1 - / - / 4 ./ , 1 - .., P ,<\2-4 4. 1 .,1 , 1, i .7-2 A , 1 1 1/ \/=57\. , . i If %'FlÂ« P. U,~ f $79 ./ 1 \ \1/ .4 f '1\, l~ , . 'PI $1<93 k k 1- 11 ' 1. -1 - 1 ....1 . &9 Â· 1 - .< 4 's-7 I ..'ll L- / 4 ly i : 1 '! i ' I 9 U I. . 4.:r - , 0 - , I 1 7-9,05 j I .4-1 1 1 . ' 1/WA 0 1 4,4 . -..1 ;, 17 2 Ce,9,1. 2/' 1 - 2 4, W new entryway winding through the ~~ --- gh the historic Molly Gibson mine site . 132Nlf)01Â·kT ' I- - 7 Â»--ZIJ Fil--'' -*-2/4*,/&f:2:\ L ind Smuggler Mtn. Road. i 1 1 ATTACHMENT 1 44*4 NAR LANI) USE APPLICATION FuRM Project Name fuct,1 RUIDENC E Project Location Lo-r \0 1\LV ERLODE 4USDIVIS\OB ASPEN CO . 161(eli (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Present Zoning A H Lot size 0 +Ib AC = IBI $(0 59.FT. APPLICANT RicK, Allt PETER FUCH< Phone # '206. $ 2,4,9 04*0 Address 'ZE MourrAIN TRAIL 0 4-rAW FORD, CT O(0906 REPRESENTATIVE 'Ract* RD KLEIN , ARCWTECT Phone # 9-10'1'20' (191 Address 60>< 141 Mfit: Co Â· blete Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use El Conceptual PUD U Conceptual Historic Devt. Condominiumization gl Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) El Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal U Conceptual SPA m Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment m Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) m Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption U Special Review U Historic Designation Lot Line Adjustment U Subdivision . 1*406.dap Amendment M l.0. T..rr Lot Split Il Temporary Use El Other: ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream El Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Expansion Mountain View Plane Description of Existing Uses (number and type of existing structures; approximate square feet; number of bedrooms; any previous approvals granted to the property): Exti-nwer 'REiIDENTAL LOT ' ?Ropoti.D RESIDENCE OF 4 BEPRootÂ¥7 0 APPRe* 4,9000 54.PT- 1FAM . t>RAC Arp;OV AL OF AAFLAM. VABwNCE â€¢ Description of Development Application: 0040 Relew 8143.'D SINCE tâ„¢*sED BUIPENCE. A ALMÂ¢61 10 7 4 Allowl,0 'AR . Have you attached the following? --Respense-lu Allailuiiwit 2, Diliibilbiallul Requirements Form 0 â€¢ Response to Attachment 3, Minimum Submission Contents â€¢ Response to Attachment 4, Specific Submission Contents â€¢ Response to Attachment 5, Review Standards for Your Application â€¢ ARC+HT eclu B 4 6 K Ev I iN COM M 17r LE LE, 10. '0000Uum ATTACHMENT 5 4 Minimum Submission Contents for All Development Applications All Development Applications shall include, at a minimum, the following information and materials. 1. The applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 5. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the Development Application. attach2.applications City of Aspen May 8, 1997 Aspen Colorado Applicant: Ricki and Peter Fuchs 25 Mountain Trail Stanford CT 06903 (203) 329-9086 Representative Richard Klein, Architect Anderson Klein Architecture interiors P. 0. Box 737 Aspen CO 81612 (970) 920-1752 08 PAY '97 16:05 At SEN CONSULTING 071 4385388 P.1 City of Aspen May B, 1997 Aspen Colorado I hereby authonze Richard Klein of Anderson, Klein Architects and Designers to represent me in discussions regarding our property at Silverlode in Aspen 2-6 PETER H. FUCHS June 23,1997 Attachment 3.2 response Lot 10 Silverlode Subdivision, Aspen CO 81611 Street address has yet to be determined. LAW OFFICES FREILICH, MYLER, LEITNER & CARLISLE A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS iN COLOR,ADD 106 SOUTH MILL STREET. SUITE 2()2 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 DAVID J. MYLER, PC TELEPHONE F MICHAEL HOFFMAN (9701 920-1018 Al.AN 1.SCHWARTZ. FACSIMILE OF COUNSEL. (970) 920-4259 May 8, 1997 Mr. Richard Klein Anderson - Klein Architecture Interiors, Ltd. 465 N. Mill Street, #3 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Title to Lot 10, SilverLode Subdivision Aspen, Colorado (the "Property") Dear Mr. Klein: I respond to your recent inquiry concerning title to the above-referenced Property as follows. On January 31, 1997, Peter H. Fuchs and Henricka A. Fuchs, as joint tenants, took title to the Property as grantees under that certain General Warranty Deed from Williams Ranch Joint Venture ("WRJV'). The grant from WRJV was subject to "general taxes and assessments for the year 1997 and subsequent years, and subject to easements, reservations, restrictions, covenants and rights ofway of record, if any." The title insurance policy issued to Mr. and Mrs. Fuchs described 24 separate exceptions to title, including the standard exceptions included in all such policies. I have attached a copy ofthat list to this correspondence. I am not aware of any additional liens, encumbrances or conveyances which have taken place since January 31, 1997. Please feel free to contact me if you need additional information concerning the Property. Sincerely, FREILICH, MYLER, LEITNER & CARLISLE Ck# Ck E. Michael Hoffman IN MISSOURI IN TEXAS IN CALIFORNIA FREILICH. LEITNER & CARLISLE FREILICH. MORGAN, LEITNER & CARLISLE FREILICH, KAUFMAN, Fox & SOHAGI KANSAS CITY. MISSOURI DALLAS, TEXAS LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA ALTA COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B-2 (Exceptions) Our Order # Q371490 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Standard Exceptions 1 through 5 printed on the cover sheet. 6. Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office. 7. Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land. 8. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any. 9. THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER / SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. 10. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES JAS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED December 22, 1909, IN BOOK 136 AT PAGE 365, RECORDED MAY 20, 1949 IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 162, AND RECORDED DECEMBER 24, 1902 IN BOOK 55 AT PAGE 116. 11. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE JUNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED November 22, ~1910, IN BOOK 136 -AT PAGE 373, AND RECORDED DECEMBER 24, 1902 IN BOOK 55 AT PAGE 116. 12. PERPETUAL RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENTS TO EXTEND OR DRIVE LEVELS OR TUNNELS 6,'THROUGH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SET FORTH AND RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED MARCH 30, 1895 IN BOOK 131 AT PAGE 425. 13. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS CONTAINED IN AGREEMENT c./RECORDED AUGUST 30, 1988 IN BOOK 572 . m n m f" 72. 21 1 1.~271(Â£1, 14. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS CONTAINED IN ~~,Â·/INSTRUMENTS RECORDED JANUARY 25, 1985 IN BOOK 480 AT PAGE 494 AND RECORDED APRIL 2, 1986 IN BOOK 508 AT PAGE 312. 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, OBLIGATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS CONTAINED IN ~RDINANCE NO. 94-15 RECORDED JUNE 27, 1994 IN BOOK 754 AT PAGE 194, AND RESOLUTION NO. 94-110 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 9, 1994 IN BOOK 760 AT PAGE 909. 16./EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH ON THE PLAT OF ~ SMUGGLER MINE SUBDIVISION RECORDED MARCH 15, 1995 IN PLAT BOOK 36 AT PAGE 77. PAGE 4 A L l' A COMMITMENT SCHEDULE 8-2 (Exceptions) Our Order # Q371490 17. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS CONTAINED IN ORDINANCE /NO. 07, SERIES OF 1994, RECORDED MARCH 15, 1995 IN BOOK 776 AT PAGE 299 AND 31 EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED MARCH 15, 1995 IN BOOK 776 AT PAGE 301. 18. TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVIDER'S AGREEMENT AS CONTAINED IN ~*'tNSTRUMENT RECORDED March 15, 1995, IN BOOK 776 AT PAGE 307. 19. RESERVATION BY WRIGHT & PREUSCH MINING, LTD., OF ANY AND ALL SUB-SURFACE AND MINERAL RIGHTS BELOW 50 FEET BELOW THE SURFACE; HOWEVER, SPECIFICALLY ,WITHOUT ANY ACCOMPANYING RIGHT TO USE OR IN ANY WAY BURDEN THE SURFACE V ESTATE TO OBTAIN AND USE THE BENEFIT OF THE OWNERSHIP OF THE SAME, AS SET FORTH IN DEED RECORDED MARCH 22, 1995 IN BOOK 776 AT PAGE 880. 20. EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH ON THE PLAT OF ~~SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION RECORDED MAY 9, 1995 IN PLAT BOOK 37 AT PAGE 3, AND APPROVAL RECORDED MAY 9, 1995 IN BOOK 780 AT PAGE 368, AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECORDED MAY 9, 1995 IN BOOK 780 AT PAGE 369. 21..HERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ANNEXATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN c~/ WILLIAMS RANCH JOINT VENTURE AND THE CITY OF ASPEN RECORDED May 09, 1995 IN BOOK 780 AT PAGE 370. 22. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER ~CLAUSE, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED May 12, 1995, IN BOOK 780 AT PAGE 755. 23. yâ‚¬RMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED February -22, 1996 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 390141. 24. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENT AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 12, 1996 AS RECEPTION NO. 395888. PAGE 5 6/ * 0 (462629758.29062,149782516341 parRoom. 6 -- --- - ~4.j...'.i,-,dy:-45337090,411.07903 - -- . . dist:41452916 32 9\ j /6.7 0 y g .- ryl, 01- 21 - 2 f -9 I l -0 f %0 0 1 fo L r 10 4 W l' = 1 1 'J Â»? % F 9 o kfil'jf 19/04 91 {: r 1 4 93 00 2 e 5 < 01 /0 7 JV.,1> )4 fl ~ Â» 4 , f 0 0 Y 0 91 0 f 9 s 4 1,> f// b â‚¬ 4 0 0 rÂ·, 0 - C < 4. '1 6 I hi 1--f I~ Fl , 0 June 23,1997 Attachment 3.5 response Re: Lot 10 Silverlode Subdivision, Aspen CO 81611 The Silverlode Subdivision has already been through 8040 greenline review for projects which do not exceed 80% of max. FAR. The proposed project has an FAR of 3869.6 sq. ft. which is less than the allowed 90% of max. FAR which is 3872.0 sq. ft. This is an increase of only 384.8 sq.ft Response to section 26.68.030.B 1. na. 2. it does not. 3. it does not. Response to section 26.68.030.C 1. it does and is a piatted subdivision. 2. the platted subdivision does not and the proposed residence does not increase any adverse affect. 3. it does not. 4. it does. 5. the proposed grading minimizes the grading required for driveway and residence. 6. na. 7. design is per ordinance. 8. they are. 9. this is an approved subdivision. 10. there is and the project will have a sprinkler system installed. 11. na. ATTACHMENT 74 Specific Submission Contents: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption Approval By Planning Director The request for Planning Director approval of an Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption shall contain the following items: 1. A written description of the existing conditions on the property which are requested to be altered via the amendment or exemption. 2. Such site plan drawings or elevations as may be necessary to adequately evaluate the proposed amendment or exemption. 3. A listing of all previous development approvals granted to the property, with the approximate dates of said approvals. 4. A copy of any recorded document which affects the proposed development, including but not limited to recorded plats, agreements and deed restrictions. If changes are proposed to said recorded documents, these should be "red-lined" onto a copy of the original document. at3.insubstantial June 23,1997 Attachment 4 response Re Lot 10 Silverlode subdivision, Aspen CO 81611 1. The proposed driveway was reviewed by staff and by DRAC at the time of discussion concerning a garage variance to Ordinance 30. At that time DRAC felt that the proposed driveway reallignment was appropiate 2. Staff has indicated that it is now appropiate to submit an engineering drawing for a minor Plat Amendment. 3 DRAC approval for an Ordinance 30 variance for garage setback. May 15,1997. 4. Plat drawing to be submitted. ATTACHMENT ~1 Review Standards: Development Application for Exemption from 8040 Greenline Review The expansion, remodeling or reconstruction of an existing development shall be exempt from 8040 greenline review if the following standards are met: 1. The development does not add more than ten percent (10%) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calcuations by more than twenty-five percent (25%); and 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section 13-76 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said section; and 3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion and sedimentation. June 23,1997 Attachment 5 response Re: Lot 10 Silverlode subdivision, Aspen CO 81611 1. na. 2. no existing trees on site will require a permit for removal pursuant to section 13-76. 3. Lot 10 is located in the Silverlode Subdivision, is a platted lot and development will not increase erosion and or sedimentation. . Ma> 9,1997 r Christopher Bendon, ASLA Planner Aspen/Pitkin Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Lot 10, SilverLode Subdivision Dear Mr. Bendon, We would like to inform you that we have reviewed Preliminary Drawings for a new residence at Lot 10, SilverLode Subdivision ( a subdivision developed by the Williams Ranch Joint Venture and subject to WRJV Architectural Review Committee). We have given preliminary approval to the applicant. We would also like to note that in relocating the driveway and siting the residence, the development minimizes impact to the site and the design is such that rio retaining walls will be required. We encourage the Planning staff to give favorable review to this project. Thank you for your time and attention, Sincerely, -*34209- Thomas G. Stevens Project Manager, Williams Ranch Joint Venture & WRJV Architectural Review Committee 312 E, Aspen Airport Business Center, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-6717 FAX: (303) 925-6707 BEGA f Single or twin bollards with asymmetrical light distribution. Impact resistant. heavy oressed O CD glass lens. Internal twin rerlector optical system. Stainless steel socket head screws. Wiring C access door. Anchorage system with round baseplate allows bollard to be rotated for perfect 2-Â· --c~:4 12,6~ 4 alignment. Color: Black or white. â€¢BÂ· .Bâ€¢ Lamp Lumen ABC 8691S Single 1 50W EÂ·17 HPS 4000 10 W 101/4 47* 018 8691 MH Single 1 100W ED-17 MH 8500 1074 1074 4714 < 8692S Twin 2 50W EÂ·17 HPS 8000 137/8 1014 471/4 8692MH Twin 2 100W ED-17 MH 17000 1378 1074 4774 896A Anchorage for 8691, 8692 - supplied 2 133 Â·2:52Â·~I .Â·123Â¢tÂ· rieD - BEGA Â·b:--.....Re 2*qUA'%&Â·4*44*44 1.ritit~~~~- . Â·t Â·_I .Â· :--Â·n#--r:Â·4Â·ft=M.,Â· 2Â·%Â· * 7' -,*': ~y 1~ ' 9&8'===-T Wall mounted quarter sphere 1 ''9:+5:rE..:,ta'4.- i1-23...-1,1"fE.- O 3 -' 11 31 B aL<>18, B luminaires with die cast ~Â¢~23/~ aluminum back plate. rA~ -0~'~I L~' T (f.L Three-ply opal glass diffuser. lili . I Â· A Â· Â·CÂ· Color: Black or white. Lamp Lumen A B C ~ 3174 Wall 1 60W AÂ·19 890 1074 572 5~2 3175P Wall 1 13W PLC 860 1OW 5~2 5W ..te.* :' .1 3176 Wall 1100WAÂ·19 1750 133% 71/2 7Y2 960~'ary'* .2 " 4...11 1 . -- 3177P Wall 1 26W PLC 1800 13*4 7y2 772 ----7---1-- H .* Â·..... 22*... \97\* . \\ C . 0â‚¬~ -- :UF _ 1 Wall mounted quarter sphere ~ 8 51 (331 1 luminaires with die cast aluminum shield for direct or indirect / . 4 A. 7 -c . illumination. 1 Three-ply opal glass diffuser. Color: Black or white. -~ Lamp ---- Lumen A B C 3069 Wall h 6ow AÂ·19 890 8% 434 578 ffit ~---. 3068P Wall 11 ELELC 575 8% 4% 576 i . 3071 Wall 1 100WAÂ·19 â€¢ 1750 10% 51/2 694 . 3078P Wall 1 18W PLC 1250 10% 5 92 6% 73 .1 4.3 4- - 11 2 -r ie V938 EL ./.1.-4*#-=i--- . 0 ' f. )i...Â»Â·. Â£ 1%01*1/Avi'.8.7/.-41#.bmil INS'UM \ NyÂ»:rfEÂ·'mwIM-29 1 -~el01.1 -. i 99 / i -/ . Â· f Vt>â€¢. . 1 B , *fil 142.1 N. 0 - 36 3/. . . f '1 d \ \ -m- Immit//29. I "711 32Â·~.Â·51 1 --I~ 0/::po -I'll//Al-/:6= 1*1 It 1 -r \1 1 -'.Â©*21*.2-/G-â€ž 1 Ilyall ' '02[-183 :41!M N ~ # lonpojd xmns - (Aluo /\03 L) \44~-1/ .M- j .-*m'~236~ j~ eiqelieAe aje sdwel penb ~1 . lf- 1 --'// -dwl:.)*.awn,9- NE'.- -/Val:, 102 '-id jUDOSaJOn J loedu]03 M98 pue \EmA ..11 . /\ABL 'ME L Joj Slseiieq DIUOJE)013 Â·Du,Alioads 01 Joud .4/.izerpfillilililillillilillizil*...1// 0/\Ileluasajdabl V938 ieool JnOA \ ' 9, ?al~ r=)~~f ~ -~2\4.4, wi'M ANICIelleAe XJIJa/\ sabed asal.11 14 \ i.-1?Af-,00#/IMI'.Prd......... Al 1.. J.,DgeRF~.va- .- uo UMOUS slonpoid paloalas Joi 4 *jj aiqellene me Slselleq :IdH AZZE ~,\ \ ..42222..a,WB..A 4*9(MIN -A .c .lddi~~y A A / ILI~~%/ 4 ~~~i&0~~ 1 Â·Â·*Chf.4 â€ž943 - suoileool le/A JO} elqelins 'pasoloue Alind suolleoildde Joual)<3 JO JOIJDJUI JO:I seD,nOS 1454 luaosajonii loeduloo 10 Juaosepueoul -su]Jot Buill.Ifill 3Jnd luasedd 01 t.,unuitunle pue sse16 6uiuiqujoo sejieuituni IieM 1 selellds Jepenb - seau!wni Ile/\A A j -Â· Ck -. ' d' 4 . 12 ANDERSON KLEIN ARCHITECTURE â€¢ INTERIORS POST OFFICE BOX 737 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 303-920-1752 ' POST OFFICE BOX 521732 SAlT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84152 801-560-3275 >/-30 1 .1 1 Â«f-/:1\ 1% 1 \ \\ \ \\\ 111 Ic I 1 7- 1 1 \ Fuchs Residence /4 9 P -R i \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ C Â®060 --1~ // \\\ & 1 ~ ~ ~ \ Lot 10 \\\,li /1 / \\lilli / 1 \ \ 1-\ r // 1 1 Silverlode 1 < ~ \ Subdivision - 1 9,050 1 1 , C/\ 1 1 \ Â«LÂ«-' i\ Aspen, CO 81 611 N \ c j> /// \\\ h \ r \4\ 1 ) \ , 11 1 (\ 4 1\/ / / 1/ \ \ 1 \ \ / -ru/d . AlLâ€¢dil, \\ 11 \ 1 / fil \\ \ 1 ---EN COUNroak 6-14Â£ ~ ~ ~~\6 . . .41 2 w e. i# 119% 4 c ; , 5>/1*7144 4, U -T'de. L tAR-- / 44,44Â£ 44-97,1-q~k /7 < ~ \ \\ i \\ . 9- = 40~,1 &4- Â¢ ets.ce. 11- 1 1 1 / -/(21''I'-5 4 E. f-L-* 9,0 4 0 f.j\ \ \ \11 / %- w i r--r ,-6 + 0 0301 \\ \\ \ \ \ 4 0 0 I 1 01 1 / 1 \ , __f_- i iti: ~ I 9 F Ty. ~~- V-- / J U Ft ILIÂ¢- FL -4 $ 0 1 1 ~ \ 11â€¢1.-e i. , AcK f, r.cit \ \ \ 0 9 -f- 4 1~ 1 1 // 4 1*1% / 1 \\ 1 \ \ 9 % i / IS SUE 1 i i 1 2 - -- 1 1\ \ 1 / ~/ l 1,09%.1, 7 ~/ /,/4 r j 1 R V V 1 S \ 0 N -- =4-6ott_- \ / 71 7 lieÂ· fâ€¢llâ€¢ 4.- i / 1/ /11 f 1 1 1 1 / -< - - -' -- -*UN*1~14 \ \ 1 1 1 t / / Â¥4 -- \ 1 1 ~1 ~P/ / DRAWING ~-Y Â£-9-2 4-7-071-AJA.-9~4~~-~t lTGy&*44 E MEUT I \-/ 1 1 43' 1 1 4 /3- \ -----1 1 1 j \ // 1 1 \C 4 11,L rLAN \ , \ t// /~1/ J 1 1 1 1 \4, â€¢kto , 1 6-3--1,4 4-44-7-<0~-GÂ· 4 -pINA'LL 1&.,64 E.Mek'-t --lr.-4-/ / \1 . it trf/-1 -4- 3- 1 1 1 / Â®090 95060 JOB NUMBER 1 17,1 DATE ~~ Site Plan 1 *14 11 19 Â· 11 Scale: 1" = 10'-0" '~ l~7 S H E E T 1*r,JE-61 â€¢1'103-71,1 ---- OkÂ»* A 1.1 1 \ 11Â· ' 579208 ANDERSON KLEIN ARCHITECTURE â€¢INTERIORS PO ST OFFICE BOX 737 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 303-920-1752 ~t- POST OFFICE BOX 521732 NALT IAKE CITY, UTAH 84152 8 01-560 -3275 4. t.j 11 e 1, IN V , ' .. - t.' 1 1 & '. 1 - \ t ~Â« \ 1 . 2 1' 5 -1 1 \/ i 1 \ 0- 1 1\ E. 1 Â· . ..1 i Fuchs Residence Â¥ f \ 1 . 0000 1% -- / i Â· ,,2 & $ . --g .f ' 1 Lot 10 . 1, ' -/(/Â·1 \ -. /1\1 1 -- X Th/// U.-- A - -W,/ w / 1 44/+5.5-\1'.;.1tl 1 .. 1 Silverlode t i.* . 1 / 11 774, -- r IÂ· - 1 :. I . b Vii /1 '1 Subdivision 9050 f , .1 . I .1 1 , --- ; 6 -- 2 - .- 1 \ \ i / - , \/ 6 , \ 4 1 - --~ c Aspen, CO 81611 1,/ 1 .. /1 4 1 1 \ 1 i. f . \ \ 1, . 1 1//tÂ« 1/4-21/715'i,--6~-- - - - ~\\ 1, / i .1 4 - \ A . 1 1 \ \\ i, / / 1 L 4, 1. 1 1 / : 1 4 IN i 1 % 1 1 / / i , / . . , ram __3 U_id . 0~Fâ€¢ C 1 57 , / / T it< 1 1 1 1 . 1 i \ ... I - Mel, I \ Â·.91(41.1 1 1 1 . / 4 ...A~' â€¢,4*' . 1 ... . - - -+EU 4,9 U N -'r O 11 L 1.-1 NIL d / , . 1 t \ & < < --~--16>'141'wal c.0-r,up. Libe- Ira-,1. . 1 1 :.- / .1 Â®,Ii-Ie,E 96*- 9,44,~ 00Â· V- \ / Â£ N - Pr f- L -* 21 0<90--- ' 1 / 6- - 91.41' ~/ \0 5 : ttÂ·Fl'' 18 4 c 11 0, r = 11 4 ' 9 Â°'ig ' It " Hi Â«f/\/ 1 1- ' -t ~ ' 19 - & i j Z i ' i 1 1 -- 080 4 c / f \ SSLIF t ir 1 1 99'i 1 1 1 \ 1 / 60 9,9 -'- ' \ j / /7 L / 1 14 \\'' r 1 j \ /11,1 14 , \ 1 L li / 4 . y ltvl /\ 1 \ F t 1 \ REVISION ,-1 i 1 1 . 1.... 1 1 4 , -lf r .1 p / /'\ ~110.-te/0_ t Â· -74/ // I 1 li 1 (-Lit- r + r 2.t ailtÂ¥ 41Â·41_ 1// tp- . / t\If 1 + f K, / 1 ! r , 1 \ -__GEÂ«L'-32 1 17 1 11 \ 1 1 *P-14.24.-* 8 // / i : ' C 4-0,7 h / ' Flt 1 t j f,--1 i V ~- S Uke th~ et ~EN # E L # r F - / A . 1 \\ 1,1 \11 1 - E- / 21 ~ t' ...t)'Al /7 , f /4 k f / 1 1 i Trri 1 Vi 1 ' 1 If i ,$ 1 / , /.1 1 \ 1 111: -4 2 --: 1 Â·. j L 83,9.' - P / DRAWING e 1 + 1 / 1 i il./. /-'0 E P B A T f. 1. U /6 (2 It 44 4 Up U -7 Â£ L Ill- & 44 2 N.1 EUT / . - , / 1 1 1 / /.?li ? i , f , , 1+ I ~ *k_ A. F - , i -0 1 + b 1, 1 1 , It \ / / 1 -' / 413E 1- LaA i / i i '1 \ 1-24 1 1 :fÂ· k. 1. k r i 1 7 /1 '4 A --1 / 11 -1 .'' t. 1 1 6* j 1.4- 2 \4 '1 ' ' : 1/1.*' i / 3 --c, GOALAA,vEN -pdANEL RAâ€¢,lf-Mek]1 , , 1 1 f Â¢ - . 1,9 /\ . '1 1 t .1 -It\: ji -4 ~ j 1 1 - - 3 --Â¥ .--- --- 1 , 1 1 Â·----*-r- -*1460Â· 1~Ti-2714 : f Frl. . 49, 1 , 00-10 Â·ti - - 'Â·-- F * 0 6 0 ' 8'060 42 1 JOB NUMBER , 1- 1 r 11 4 1 0 I 1 -Al DATE ~,--~ Site Plan e 0 4-3 1 11 Scale: 1" =10'-0" < , SHEET tiv 1 \ f. >4 J f fÂ· 0 -J ~.fl-_alâ€¢ r-- 1 'J ? 't*. , \ 1., , - 1 e 1 \ r 1 t , 493.. 4 +i ~ Â¥+8'pu 'Al/* Â·Â· . 5/9208 ID , i 01 '~3.5 j TV 1*3.6 ANDERSON 1 1 1 5.4 / KLEIN 21'4 194-0- 15Â·0 // 5 6 2Â· 9Â·1Â· 5 2-3'-1Â· 5 1/2 14 S 1/2~ 7-81/2- 3 7 1 04 1/2. 51.r 14Â·-61/2' 5 2 ARCHITECTURE 71 - " INTERIORS, LTD 02110 1 L,r â€¢â‚¬ ~ 6 â€¢-101/2â€¢ 42Â·6* , 5'Â·t' 1.3-0Â· 1 Â·10 1/243Â·Â· 3 3/16Â· 9'-4 3/16- 5 Â·.2 465 N. MILL STREET, #3 r[ r . / 4. '. 2--7 -- ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 2Â·-0 1/2~'-6 1/< e De 970 Â·920 '1752 p FAXÂ· 920 Â·3920 1 4 7 2 --ati : 4 r. --1 11 el 1 - - -,-18 F---- . I ..4. --\ 1 07/ 1.- 1'' 991x . =Â® U h I 11 1 11 L.---,-------- -------............. - -2= 2-ft_fia- 6 34?Xyf 3 0 - - -- --- - - 1 / 1 r 4,4 1 Masterbath Nt 1 11 ~'5'*etz ~4& L... -- -- -- . **/ Â¥ 1 1 L.__ _4-~ L_-Cl~ExyLbv --~Il/f 1 , -U--1 \4-1-1, . 1 11 i| 11 , 1, /1 1-1 1 ,; * - 'tk' 4L - - - "' ~ E- " , i' .---' 4- I - '9 H 13 : _1 1 ..11 'll- 1 .. . 5. . IllÂ·/,ir .Â·~1Â· S'. 1,7 - 1, 11*.- --**,1 .---1~2 0, i 17 -2 -1- -7 -1 1 - 01 fL~4 1 -\ 7=11 ~ ~P-Il>J.% - ) - 4 --- i Kitchen / r-----11 ' â€¢ - 1 1 . / 1 4 1 \ 41.-4 . 1 1 .0 3/10 1 1 1 -- 11 1 4 13.. 1 12Â·e -r- --, T-1 CL ./ -------417Â£ : ./ .1 - 11 1 1 1 I , I. , / //// ~ ~ -1[*1 L- .... ./ . 0 r.,1 \ . /1 14'ster Be#orn + b'7'-~Â£-7f- A '' C ~ b. , -Il_ I ' 2-4 ' Â· , 1 - / r- â€¢, ' 1 I / 1.:L-=.1 \IN / 1, I I. I I:. Fili. F.or , 1 i 1, -1 : :% 0...9 : 1. 1/719/+ ..1 0 4 4/ / I i ---------~- --1 , , I 48.7 1 - | Fil I ... .2. 1 , 1 1- O & -11 1--1-1 4-- XE Z~.6=5~~222582EL___Â»215 Living , Al 1 .1 61 3 '' 4 m , 1 - h 816:.. --- Fuchs Residence \ 0 11 1 - Eli 0 & 4 r - . Ter,/c.I' i % ~ =.~ 11 1 -- r 1 L _ 1.-1 , I ./ 1 0 0 0 0 Lot 10 Silverlode 3-4 1/4- 81-10 1/4. ,-1 7'-0 1/4- r 7'-01/2Â· T, r.01/4. 1.-5 1/4â€¢ 5 -7. 8. 5'-7. 1%5 1/4 Subdivision â‚¬ f ' . a . I .4 ~ /1/' 5 1. r 15'41/2Â· S 1,2. ZY-1 â€¢ 51.-r 14 6 1/2â€¢ 5/rr 3Â·-6 1/2- , ,/2. 7 7" Aspen, CO 81611 16'Â« 24'4Â· 1 S'Â·0Â· 4 0Â· / 4 L._1 I . .1 C CZZ [-22 C-Z Roof Plan - Upper Level Floor Plan . (<3-, Scale: 1/~ = 1,nâ€ž Scale: 1/~'= 1- " 1 9 L 1_ 1 /1 el '11 23 A3.57 ~A35 1 ~/%3.6,' . . *33 ~A3 62- V A3.6/ . V , f 1- 1 0 0 N/ 4 19. 1 1159 â€ž 6 3/41 ~ , I I. 'f I . * 3/. .Â« Â·rl /Â·i t./ .1. .... s. ' ISSUE f / f f f - , "' ~~f~ 21Â·. 15Â·-0. ./ 4-9/ I I 741'4â€¢ ) 12Â·-1 1/4- 1 1 1/2' 4.-1. 1,1/2- 1 24 1/2â€¢| r.,Â· 1Â·.1, I ' i 19Â·8' r 1,-4Â· 0Â· 14 -4Â· r 3Â·-1â€¢ 8â€¢ ,Â£-4--Li--4 1 , ' it <3> ) 1) 1 3 r --"91 .' .. 1.--3 ' REVISION 11Â«71 IE> L 2 -1 ' ' 4 % 4. Z 1 0 /.-- Rk# , 1 A J i ~Â·lf St ' sÂ·, i.'r cx I r- C :.1, /1 J Bedroom 4 . 0 8 35 17 . I D.k -f*Zu* ) 77 Laundry \4 Room 114 74\ : 1 , 2~\3414 --1 I rr . 4 0 /'UN 1 Bath 4 O Ftl -----11 W k -1.- t-- 1/r- . r.,iÂ· 1 -iÂ·-0 inÂ·-Â·52Â·J-TT~-4 .0- _ i 22-4.2 11 1 -4--.Â»- rbk_ al - Ld.1/1 1-7 ./ : Ill * - I ' ' :- rf) Wed-k:/ 9 --Â£ 1~-2 el/*40-u'Jol-=ET=Uiliff~4 ~~- fri-rtioo = i--3- - - 11 1,1 t! b 10 1 CU] - - 4 : .-7 1/r - Uy --1 4 1 4 * 2,0 -wâ€¢ â€¢-1â€¢-- i:+ - 1.r-r Fir,+ . 12) , p. 1 - 0 1 1 - ' -4-1$2 1 ~ ' , (24) l*\ 44 : A 1' ... 1/2 Â¥ DELe , h'n LJ up ,. 6 , Stal -3-=14 02- r I 1/2 Bath . - 1 . /17 ,-B- ---- ---I--- , - . O Cll -7 [TA? - Hallway 6--111 P 14 k,\Â·-2 - ---- b~ f U -1.- 1 5 1 --lÂ®1.10 1) R A-W I N G r 7------9 - 3Â» - A-/1-h- r=Ch=~~==---LE=- 0--t .Â» 1--2 f 1 --1 1 ' % . 7.3 .i - - 18,0 ' A r I H.11 -r r ./ .1 I N 11.- =1 - L / Gilir A . . 9 41 IV- 0 \ r, 6 F-' Roo~ _1_4- L.~_-919 k.Â· - - _2â€¢28 - '~_1-1 r ~ ~ 1 1 ..r--n-,a*e' 15 . ': 0 8,09. St".90 1 ~r--I,__4 11 J 1-4 ==L-- C! - I . TO ./ Mud Room ' 1 L) 1 ~ i /2- r.1 1 09-A- - ,- 'Pn--7__tr ' -1 - T . * 76*f - 0,) Lt.-r- - -4 &9 TT--~- -4 - 1 NE e qi Guelt BÂ«400,1 i ~ '' / -, -r: b n / \ 1 ' 4, '1 1-1 5 1// 14,-4. .17 1 .Â·../r . e -S Bedrol,13 1 2-4 71-7 TV/LIbrary , b Entry 03.77 4 Gamâ€¢ Room I ' , 1 I , / Al, 1 ,1 1 . L k Z 1127, A - 1 1 1 Dit , ~-9 1/2Â· ; 1/2 ..1Â· 1 1 E /4 i /3 -. TI 1 ,-**k# A= I ,:* t. : S,4- .- 1. "'r --- --------------- -NJ ----- A /- -7503 e i 4 11~~~~- -I I 6 â‚¬) P.k. 4 m - 1 . To- - JOB NUMBER 11 = ill:' \11 , ~, ., 9701 = 5Â·-4â€¢ 10â€¢ 24 -4Â· r 1 3 - 1, 14 7 2 j /\ [1 1) A '11 E / 7137 ..,r . 154,2,--- B ' 474 Â· 11 . r r \ :----1- - U 1 1 ..r -111/4. .1 0 . S H E " T 4 . . . .. , . TI -- . .Rt " -1 U * 4â€¢ 1 â€¢,r lSÂ·â€¢1 1/2 sIr -â€¢7 -Rhz.'Â· ~~. 1/2 20Â· I /4.79< 1 i; , I 71 -11 .. 14 1/r 1,-Ilir 8. 2Â·-4' le-0' 2Â·-4- 8 4 4 . , 1 ' ...... 244~ .1.e 25Â·* 4.-0- I .4 4. *. A , C.-3 CU /-/ .- mEi C= r=41= Entry Level Floor Plan c---. Garage/Basement Floor Plan ~ North I i Scale: 1/8" = -1 1 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" Â·2/ t..2 ' 1 .2/1 01.E ' ' 9-.5 #, &6 G.9 7*-6 1/2- 5 1/7 .. 2/ 1 9-IZ ANDERSON KLEIN ARCHITECIURE â€¢ INTERIORS POST OFFICE BOX 737 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 303-920-1752 POST OFFICE BOX 521732 1 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84152 801-560-3275 9 4 4.- Nuy _EL . /1 1 . 1 . e 0 0 0 0 AA - 1 Â® /\ 1 -â‚¬06- 1 3 / * ' 5 A / \ - 1".....lili....9 23 1=4(Â« 424.4 EL##ix 1 11 . -- -- _* -RUE' _115-51-- - i I i KI 6-011 .r... L 6. A L. 1 n !1 11 Il Ill~ 15/ D.L- ~~'~*1[24~.- I /4 / 0 7 $ ihÂ£r-, M 1~gL --- W - rs=?11 -1 - 0> - -- f.>:Iwild 1 - '111 '. 1 . -,1~ râ€¢r-IL- -- . 9- -1 - r . 1- f - .- Tflat f ~ -r - - -- , rrn,ir#7~-11â€¢a -4. / MIC:11 6 Lâ€¢Â· L 6 . * / 7/1 Laâ€¢ iL Fuchs Residence T A I I . O --â‚¬ -1 1 4- KE-lau. --1 - :04-9Â£ .. 1 kz*]CE-112.tze=L-2Iti-ht-i~ 11 1 11 11 Ij L 0 1 1 1 1 lip 0 Lot 10 - - ---- 1 Silverlode *- -~.:LC-~~~~111./.5- -_------ -- --cit - -- -Â· i - -- ~~. ~~4 1 , 1 1 1,1 1*4_ _ 1 Subdivision 1 1' i 1 1 1 -+ Aspen, CO 81611 71 West Elevation ~ South Elevation *, call - l~ bil -0 11 -, 11 O CA L E. . 1 /, 11 .1.-0,1 0 . 0 . 0 0 ...... 13 '4 6 4 4 .C 6 1 1 k) Ill 11- ISSUE 1 'XMX- 1 3-41 --t Â»941\1\ 'T' REVISION T t 4 en 0) 05 0) 0-> <:9 ~1 ..,7... â‚¬> ,/-=* ...-*Il--I. 0 PH - // 1 0 1 1 ... : 1 lie 4k.lili . 7 E.C - -.0 71 - --_- _ - , W, 1,1 r. r. . 1'- -- rrit 1 -1 1 -- - - , Of... . E ./6 11 11! - -p <T> 8 0 -1.. e 0 - -- a 00 --- 1 - r-i 0 - ~__~ ; Nv_-Uumu~~1-k= _ -_164 - _ D R AW ING ---- 1- - - --- 9 4.- F J 0 0 ILPINcil & LAÂ¥(411'4--- 7 Li / / w o I -1- 0 Â£ t.:r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 --- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 4, f.: C.;N:,-h=.ULE.L. k M e r.- 9 a . 1. I 6 1 . 7 FL .... - --2 ,6 91â€¢râ€¢Â·10 11 7 u â€¢01-1 U--- -*i. 6. --di -__-_---_- --3 L---4 1.-1 41== 1- 1== 1 () B N l' Al B li It 110, . --... . -----.-- .... ----,-. 7, East Elevation Pil North Elevation D A T E 2 - 6, . 191, -- - 7 1-3 ZILL- - SHEET 3 .. ..