HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.890 Roaring Fork Rd.A123-00
r-,'
, \
CASE NUMBER
PARCEL ID #
CASE NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE TYPE
OWNER/APPLICANT
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED
BY
,...,
A 123-00
2735-121-04005
Amendment to Lauder Stream Margin Exemption
886 Roaring Fork Road
Sarah Oates
Stream Margin Exemption
Leonard Lauder
Design Workshop
10/23/00 '
Approved
1/3/01
J. Lindt
,-.,
CASE NUMBER
PARCELID#
CASE NAME
PROJECT ADDRESS
PLANNER
CASE TYPE
OWNER/APPLICANT
REPRESENTATIVE
DATE OF FINAL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
PZ ACTION
ADMIN ACTION
BOA ACTION
DATE CLOSED
BY
;"""
A123-00
2735-121-04005
Amendment to Lauder Stream Margin Exemption
886 Roaring Fork Road
Sarah Oates
Stream Margin Exemption
Leonard Lauder
Design Workshop
1 0/23/00
Approved
1/3/01
J. Lindt
."-..,,
"-..,,
,
.
,,-..,
,-..,
NOTICE OF DECISION
TO: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director
FROM: Fred Jarman, Plannerff
RE: Lauder Amendment to Stream Margin Review Exemption
DATE: October 23,2000
SUMMARY:
The applicant, Leonard Lauder, represented by Suzanne Richman, requests an
Amendment to a Development Order for an administrative approval for Stream Margin
Exemption on June 15,2000 for Lot 3, Second Aspen Subdivision located at 886 Roaring
Fork Road, Aspen, Co 81611.
PREVIOUS LAND USE ACTION:
~ The Community Development Director approved a land use application for a
Stream Margin Review Exemption for the Lauder Remodel located at 886
Roaring Fork Drive with conditions on June 15,2000;
~ The Community Development Director approved a Notice of Decision for an
Amendment to the prior Stream Margin Review Exemption for the Lauder
Remodel located at 886 Roaring Fork Drive with conditions on July 10th,
2000;
NATURE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
The applicant requests to change a portion of the surface of an existing deck from wood
decking to a sandstone on concrete surface that will be snowmelted and replace the
existing hot tub with a slightly smaller hot tub in the exact location as the existing hot
tub.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The applicant requests an Amendment to the Development Order for a Stream Margin
Exemption that received approval by the Community Development Director on June 15,
2000. The proposed project will change a portion of the surface of an existing deck from
wood decking to a sandstone on concrete surface that will be snowmelted and replace the
existing hot tub.
The portion of the deck proposed for new decking material consisting of an impervious
sandstone on concrete is located within the Stream Margin; however, the entire deck has
existed in is location prior to the establishment of current Stream Margin Review Criteria
in Aspen's Land Use Code. Staff interpreted this proposed development to be consistent
with Stream Margin Review Exemptions (Section 26.435.040(B)(3)), which states:
The expansion, remodeling, or reconstruction of an existing development
provided the following standards are met:
,-.,
,/
,r'\
The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the floor area of the
existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area
calculations by more than twenty jive (25) percent. All exemptions are
cumulative. Once a development reaches these totals, a Stream Margin Review
by the Planning and Zoning Commission is required; and,
The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit
would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code.
The development is located such that no portion of the expansion, remodeling or
reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is the existing
development;
(a) The development does not fall outside of an approved building
envelope if one has been designated through a prior review; and
Staff finds that the proposed change of
the decking surface is consistent with
these criteria in that the proposed
development is a remodeling of an
existing development that does not fall
outside of an approved building envelope
and therefore is eligible for review as an
exemption to Stream Margin Review.
It should be noted, as part of this
proposed deck resurfacing, that the
applicant will remove a large steel box
type structure, which houses the
mechanical equipment serving the
existing hot tub. Staff required the
applicant to consult with the City of
Aspen Parks Department during a site visit to determine the best practice necessary to
remove the box while maintaining the condition of the slope. The applicant is required to
ensure this removal to take place according to proper procedures in order to protect the
integrity of the top of slope regarding its sensitive riparian nature as a condition of
approval. The deck shape, size, and location will not change as a result of this
development. Staff followed up with the Parks Department after the site visit was
conducted to insure proper conditions were incorporated in this Notice of Decision
relating to the slope conditions.
a -
margin setback on NW portion of property.
Proposed new decking will occur on lower level
The Community Development Director approves this amendment to a Stream Margin
Review Exemption for Lot 3, Second Aspen Subdivision located at 886 Roaring Fork
Road, Aspen, Co 81611 with the following conditions:
,r-,
,'-'
1. That the applicant replace the existing hot tub with the one indicated in the letter
submitted to the Community Development Staff which is described as a
rectangular (90"x 90" x 35.5") Marquis Spa: Euphoria Model to be located in
exactly the same location as the existing hot tub;
2. That the applicant shall restore the bank area to natural vegetation native to this
area. The applicant shall specifically use shallow-rooted and deep-rooted
vegetation in order to maintain the integrity of the slope following the removal of
the existing mechanical box serving the hot tub. The applicant shall specify the
erosion control matting (excluding use of Excelsior), in order to protect the
existing slope and use boulders to maintain the integrity of the slope. The erosion
matting shall be placed on at least 8"oftopsoil and trimmed to fit around the
boulders. There shall be no air gaps between the matting and the soil;
3. There shall be no development other than approved vegetation below, or within
15 feet of the top of slope. The existing development in this "no development
zone" may be maintained and reconstructed but cannot be expanded;
4. The hot tub shall be drained through the sanitary sewer, not overground, and not
to the river;
5. That the applicant complies with the new City of Aspen Lighting Code.
Specifically, any newly added outdoor lighting shall be downcast and not directed
towards the river; and
6. That the applicant shall record this Amendment to a Development Order for an
administrative approval for Stream Margin Exemption on June 15,2000 for Lot 3,
Second Aspen Subdivision located at 886 Roaring Fork Road, Aspen, Co 81611
in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorders Office prior to the application for
building permits.
~VIEW PROCEDURE:
26,435.040(B) Stream Margin Exemptions. The Community Development Director
may exempt certain types of development within the Stream Margin Review area.
26,430,090(A) Insubstantial Amendment of A Development Order.
An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order may be authorized by the
Community Development Department Director. An insubstantial amendment shall be
limited to technical or engineering considerations first discovered during actual
development, which could not reasonably be anticipated during the approval process. An
insubstantial amendment shall include a change to the design of approved off-street
parking or to the configuration of a trash/utility service area. An insubstantial amendment
shall not include:
1. Any increase in a dimensional requirement established by special review.
2. Any decrease in the number of off-street parking spaces established by
special review.
.'
~.. .
,-..
/..~\
.
3. Any decrease in the size of a utility / trash service area established by
special review.
4. Elimination of any represented feature, such as prOVISlOn of a trash
compactor or the number of trash bins, which was approved by special
review.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DECISION
The Community Development Director finds this Insubstantial Amendment to a
Development Order to be consistent with the review criteria, and hereby approves the
amendment on this ~st- day of October, 2000 contingent upon compliance with the
conditions stated herein and required for this approval.
_M~ANm^l'"", 11 6 -p
Applicant's Signature ot Agreement
\J~ 0, f9.&- ~
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
,.~ ,'""'
1:20 En::;l \iaillStn'ct
:\~!H'll., <':oiorndo
HiCd j
'j'(,!pp!l(!!W
W!()1):2:)-W'1:)-+
Fili'silllj!e
()"?O \):20-1:~:r?
.\ii)wjlH'n;IH'
D(,1I\"('1"
!Hf'k:wO! in]I'
~ .;~k(' TdlOl'
t)!Hwnl.\
:'';'iilii: F:'
Siil! hildo
\'ild
,-..
,,-,
Design W(lrkshop, Jnc.
Landscape Architecture
Land Planning
Urban Design
Tourism Planning
09/28/00
Ms. Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
c/o Mr. Fred Jarman
City of Aspen Community Development Department
130 South Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Fred:
Re: Amendment to Stream Margin Exemption for Lauder Residence Remodel,
# 886, Roaring Fork Drive
Thank you for your help in preparing this request for an amendment to the Lauder
Residence Remodel, Stream Margin Exemption. We have enclosed five copies of the
application, and a check for $487.50.
The previous approvals are titled: Stream Margin Review Exemption Application for
Lauder House Remodel at 886 Roaring Fork Drive, submitted by Cottle Graybeal Yaw,
Architects and Approved by Community Development Department Notice of
Decision, dated June 15,2000 and amended on July 10,2000.
This request is for changing the surface of the existing deck, which is partially located
in the stream margin setback. It will be changed from a wood surface to a sandstone
on concrete surface that will be snowmelted. As mitigation for the possible additional
impact this may cause in the stream margin, we propose to remove the existing
structure at the top ofthe bank, and reclaim the slope as per the attached drawings.
Responses to the stream margin review criteria are consistent with the Stream Margin
Exemption except for the following;
The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope if one has
been designated through prior review.
DESIGNWORKSHOP
I"""'.
1"""'.,
The areas to be reclaimed and to be resurfaced are located within the 15 feet
setback. However, as we discussed, the positive outcome of removing the structure
and restoring the slope to a natural condition will outweigh possible impacts of the
new deck surface. The shape and size of the deck will remain as is.
We have also noted that the hot tub must be drained through the sanitary sewer.
Specific details for the removal of the structure and restoration of the slope are shown
in the attached plans and sections. The work will be performed in such a way as to
minimize any disturbance to the existing bank.
We have asked Stephen Ellsperman, City Parks, to review the proposed restoration
with us. Please contact him for his comments and recommendations. Thank you for
your clear directions and general assistance with this application.
Yours truly,
?u't.Mf..nU J2.ic1tM1~
Suzanne Richman
.
Attachments
.,:
'a:
w ~A
Cl ii'5
g ~ ~~
e; fl5 =:z:. ~
~ 'j ~ - ~
~ >< lJ- ~~ t:
~~J ~- i~. ~
':I. \9 ~ ~, \
~ 1JI :;:)I,j'\
~ > ---
~ '!i- -~---~ --=- - -- "
ll; J ," 11 ,<,
It .~ ~~-- ij( ,/;
!: :.~ .-
~ 'QQ.~ ~ ~ I ~
~" ~ t: I~
a .r; ~ ~: ~
r: ~ ILl 0 loe
~ ~ .~ ~ :
ill -,:. tu
~ ~ ~l~-=-..-,:
8 j; '~-','
~~~/
c(\
If"
~
~
13'
,
~~
-Q;"
'~~
~
t~ j
~
'.:7
;;
lri
';t
u...I.
~
'~
Gi
1IJ
~ 9
\1'1
\:T
..:;- r::
.E 'F.
!1\ ill
'i&
.-
,.
,/
,/
/-- -
.I I
,/
/
,/
,/
,/
'-
~
IJJ
S
\l'
~
~
- ~
/1
,/
,/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
~
~
I
I
,
on
IS"
~
~
-:>
l~ ~
? ~
b ,--.. '-S'
otl'E 0 fr ~..:s-
~ z
.0 =:) E; 'Z
" 'r-: ~.t:
.- 0 2:
Po (f\ ~.:t
~~ ~ 0:::. ~ ~ x
0
"--' ~
0 0:::. (S
IJ'" l:' w g~~ ...
r:. 0
'1- ~ Z
l[} m Zi:t
... 'x =:) -
IU -
-
-
-
<
-
-
~
13
~
IiI
11.1
}: ,
'~ ,/t--
'I""'-"l_ !~) [
'"." ','1 I
,:- -- .,,::~"..J' r
""-:-"" '.,'. .'1
!" i"" i,~: ,,~
'I ;.., _ ,...
-y
>~'l',l
II .
"'(t,
-.f-'
,1
4 _
- .. -
...
...
~
..
'"
..
Lll
~
~ '/=
-'~
\.J
frl
.~
tIl
r
rt
.J ~
l.l.\ ~
8 ~
<:::::.
]: ~ ~ N
g}. ~
~ ~ o.
'J:~
~ LI- ~~
~ 0 \J\ of.
6 ~~
.~ 5
'F;
<( .- 1=. ~
cl. ~ ~ v ~
~ .....l % illt
3 trl ;rl
of. }: C::.\J'
W
D-
D-
~
Z
w
"':5
to
r
g~
U'\"2
Ij"
t;~
fut-
tr\.(L
u..1~
~
~~
{I L~
~
2:
<(
~
.lS...:"
\
,-...
i-',
NOTICE OF DECISION
TO: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director
FROM: Fred Jarman, Planner
RE: Lauder Amendment to Stream Margin Review Exemption
DATE: October 13,2000
SUMMARY:
The applicant, Leonard Lauder, represented by Suzanne Richman, requests an
Amendment to a Development Order for an administrative approval for Stream Margin
Exemption on June 15,2000 for Lot 3, Second Aspen Subdivision located at 886 Roaring
Fork Road, Aspen, Co 81611.
PREVIOUS LAND USE ACTION:
> The Community Development Director approved a land use application for a
Stream Margin Review Exemption for the Lauder Remodel located at 886
Roaring Fork Drive with conditions on June 15,2000;
> The Community Development Director approved a Notice of Decision for an
Amendment the prior Stream Margin Review Exemption for the Lauder
Remodel located at 886 Roaring Fork Drive with conditions on July lOth,
2000;
NATURE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT:
The applicant requests to change a portion of the surface of an existing deck from wood
decking to a sandstone on concrete surface that will be snowmelted and replace the
existing hot tub with a slightly smaller hot tub in the exact location as the existing hot
tub.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The applicant requests an Amendment to the DeveloPIT!ent Order for a Stream Margin
Exemption that received approval by the Community Development Director on June 15,
2000. The proposed project will change a portion of the surface of an existing deck from
wood decking to a sandstone on concrete surface that will be snowmelted and replace the
existing hot tub.
The portion of the deck proposed for new decking material consisting of an impervious
sandstone on concrete is located within the Stream Margin; however, the entire deck has
existed in is location prior to the establishment of current Stream Margin Review Criteria
in Aspen's Land Use Code. Staff interpreted this proposed development to be consistent
with Stream Margin Review Exemptions (Section 26.435.040(B)(3)), which states:
The expansion, remodeling, or reconstruction of an existing development
provided the following standards are met:
~
,.-,
The development does not add more than ten (10) percent to the floor area of the
existing structure or increase the amount of building area exempt from floor area
calculations by more than twenty-jive (25) percent. All exemptions are
cumulative. Once a development reaches these totals, a Stream Margin Review
by the Planning and Zoning Commission is required; and,
The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit
would be required pursuant to Chapter 13.20 of this Code.
The development is located such that no portion of the expansion, remodeling or
reconstruction will be any closer to the high water line than is the existing
development;
(a) The development does not fall outside of an approved building
envelope if one has been designated through a prior review; and
Staff finds that the proposed change of
the decking surface is consistent with
these criteria in that the proposed
development is a remodeling of an
existing development that does not fall
outside of an approved building envelope
and therefore is eligible for review as an
exemption to Stream Margin Review.
It should be noted, as part of this
proposed deck resurfacing, that the
applicant will remove a large steel box
type structure, which houses the
mechanical equipment serving the
existing hot tub. Staff agrees and requires
this removal to take place according to proper procedures in order to protect the integrity
of the top of slope regarding its sensitive riparian nature as a condition of approval. The
deck shape, size, and location will not change as a result of this development.
s earn
margin setback on NW portion of property.
Proposed new decking will occur on lower level
The Community Development Director approves this amendment to a Stream Margin
Review Exemption for Lot 3, Second Aspen Subdivision located at 886 Roaring Fork
Road, Aspen, Co 81611 with the following conditions:
1. That the applicant replace the existing hot tub with the one indicated in the letter
submitted to the Community Development Staff which is described as a
rectangular (90" x 90" x 35.5") Marquis Spa: Euphoria Model to be located in
exactly the same location as the existing hot tub;
,"-'"
r-.
2. That the applicant shall restore the bank area to natural vegetation native to this
area following the removal of the existing mechanical box serving the hot tub.
The applicant shall specifY the erosion control matting (excluding use of
Excelsior), in order to protect the existing slope and use boulders to maintain the
integrity of the slope. The erosion matting shall be placed on at least 8"oftopsoil
and trimmed to fit around the boulders. There shall be no air gaps between the
matting and the soil.
3. There shall be no development other than approved vegetation below, or within
15 feet of the top of slope. The existing development in this "no development
zone" may be maintained and reconstructed but carmot be expanded;
4. The hot tub shall be drained through the sanitary sewer and not to the river;
5. That the applicant complies with the new City of Aspen Lighting Code.
Specifically, any newly added outdoor lighting shall be downcast and not directed
towards the river; and
6. That the applicant shall record this Amendment to a Development Order for an
' administrative approval for Stream Margin Exemption on June 15, 2000 for Lot 3,
Second Aspen Subdivision located at 886 Roaring Fork Road, Aspen, Co 81611
in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorders Office prior to the application for
building permits.
REVIEW PROCEDURE:
26.435,040(B) Stream Margin Exemptions.. The Community Development Director
may exempt certain types of development within the Stream Margin Review area.
26.430.090(A) Insubstantial Amendment of A Development Order.
An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order may be authorized by the
Community Development Department Director. An insubstantial amendment shall be
limited to technical or engineering considerations first discovered during actual
development, which could not reasonably be anticipated during the approval process. An
insubstantial amendment shall include a change to the design of approved off-street
parking or to the configuration of a trash/utility service area. An insubstantial amendment
shall not include:
I. Any increase in a dimensional requirement established by special review.
2. Any decrease in the number of off-street parking spaces established by
special review.
3. Any decrease in the size: of a utility / trash service area established by
special review.
,-,
-,
4. Elimination of any represented feature, such as provlSlon of a trash
compactor or the number of trash bins, which was approved by special
revIew.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DECISION
The Community Development Director finds this Insubstantial Amendment to a
Development Order to be consistent with the review criteria, and hereby approves the
amendment on this _ day of October, 2000 contingent upon compliance with the
conditions stated herein and required for this approval.
Applicant's Signature of Agreement
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
Oct-02-00 03:30pm
.
From-Dosirn Workshop, Inc.
,~,
+1
T-121 P.01/02 F-704
~
Design Workshop, Inc.
Landscape Architecture
Land Planning
Urban Design
Tourism Planning
,
Facsimile Transmittal
To:
From:
Date: '
Fred Jarman
Suzanne Richman
10/02/00
Fax Number: ~ to 7'1.'7 i
Project Name: Lauder Remodel
Project #: 2308
Subject: Stream Margin
Copy To: File
Number of Pages: 2
(including this page)
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
Fred - I have just received the energy calculations that you inquired about in relation to the
Lauder's deck remodel. The attached memo shows the calculations and REMP for the entire
project including the deck.
Please include this memo with our letter submittal. Thank you.
This facsimile Iransmission (an<:llor accompanying documents) may conUlin confidential information belonging to the sender wbicb
is prot~, The information is intended only for the use of the individual or the entity named above. If you are nOt [he intended
recipie11l. you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying distribution or ti,e taking of any action in reliance on the contents of
.~:_~. :~i.formation is strictly prohibitc;:d. !fyou have received. this ttansmi,:;sioll in error, please imme-diately notifY us by telephone to
arrange for retUl11 of lhe documents
DESIGNWORKSHOP
Albuquerque' Aspen' Denver' Jackson Hole' Phoenix' Santa Fe' Tahoe. Vail' Santa Cru~ . Santiago' Sao Paulo
120 East Main Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611' (tel) 970.925,8354. (fax) 970,920.1387
www.designworkshop.com
Oct-02-00 03:30pm From-Desi,n Workshop, Inc. +1 T-121 P.02/02 F-T04
.. ,-'" J.<AUi1MILEU(A1'IISM~
Bob,
DATE October 2, 2000 NUMBER OF PAGES:
1
TO: b Schiller (INCLUDING COVER) BEAUDIN
co : CGY GANZE
c_mrG
FAX ER: 927.8578' '" i1'mlI'lDllS, lIlc.
\foiI_
P.o.llHlIII
: Dan KoelIiker lIoi1COll1U1
11Pll--
.... CSlDI....sISll
SU CT: Lauder Residence
~_l.'..; .' .
. . I ,
.:,. '"'.",,
GE:
request, here is the REMP snowmelt calcu1atien:
34,425/ 0.80(boiler efficieucy) " 1,300 sqUare fCCt snowmelt desired = 55,940,625 BTUIyr
55,94 625/3,412'* 2G* 0.07 = $22,953,37
The to 11.1 REMP fee for the desired 1,300 sqUlile feet ofhydronic snowmelt (including the en1ry
walk, II deck anc1li'onl deck) should be $22,9S'D7. '
.
Please call with any questions.
;
PI.! VERIFY RECEIPT 0)1 .ALL .PAGES. IF ANY ARE MISSING,
nE CALL <"0) 949-6108 .FOR RETRANSMISSION.
anne Richman. DW - 920-1387
, ,
-
t.;\BCQ ~VQllJ'AX.dDc
120 East Main Street
Aspen, Colorado
81611
Telephone
970 925-8354
Facsimile
970 920.1')87
Albuqu(~rquc
])(~nver
Jackson Hole
l-lake Tahoe
Phoenix
Santa Fe
Siio Paulo
Vail
,"""'"
,~,
Design Workshop, Inc.
Landscape Architecture
Land Planning
Urban Design
Tourism Planning
09/28/00
Ms. Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director
c/o Mr. Fred Jarman
City of Aspen Community Development Department
130 South Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Fred:
Re: Amendment to Stream Margin Exemption for Lauder Residence Remodel,
# 886, Roaring Fork Drive
Thank you for your help in preparing this request for an amendment to the Lauder
Residence Remodel, Stream Margin Exemption. We have enclosed five copies of the
application, and a check for $487.50.
The previous approvals are titled: Stream Margin Review Exemption Application for
Lauder House Remodel at 886 Roaring Fork Drive, submitted by Cottle Graybeal Yaw,
Architects and Approved by Community Development Department Notice of
Decision, dated June 15,2000 and amended on July 10,2000.
This request is for changing the surface of the existing deck, which is partially located
in the stream margin setback It will be changed from a wood surface to a sandstone
on concrete surface that will be snowmelted. As mitigation for the possible additional
impact this may cause in the stream margin, we propose to remove the existing
structure at the top of the bank, and reclaim the slope as per the attached drawings.
Responses to the stream margin review criteria are consistent with the Stream Margin
Exemption except for the following;
The development does not fall outside of an approved building envelope if one has
been designated through prior review,
DESIGNWORKSHOP
~.
1'""'\
The areas to be reclaimed and to be resurfaced are located within the 15 feet
setback. However, as we discussed, the positive outcome of removing the structure
and restoring the slope to a natural condition will outweigh possible impacts of the
new deck surface. The shape and size of the deck will remain as is.
We have also noted that the hot tub must be drained through the sanitary sewer.
Specific details for the removal of the structure and restoration of the slope are shown
in the attached plans and sections. The work will be performed in such a way as to
minimize any disturbance to the existing bank.
We have asked Stephen Ellsperman, City Parks, to review the proposed restoration
with us. Please contact him for his comments and recommendations. Thank you for
your clear directions and general assistance with this application.
Yours truly,
~'t,MfMb tic1wl1~
Suzanne Richman
Attachments
Oct-19-00 01 :OSpm
,-.
From-Des i in shop, I nc.
r""
+1
T-419 P.Ol/01 HZ9
Design Workshop, mc.
L:mdscape Architecture
Land Planning
U~an Design
To~uism Planning'
Memorandum
Date:
Project Name:
Project #:
Subject:
Copy To:
Fred Jarman, City of Aspen,
Community Development
Department 't u .. ,. 't ~1
I
SuzanneRichrnan,De~gn
Workshop
October 19,2000
886 Roaring Fork Road
2307
Stream Margin Amendlnent
File, Zanin ConstruCtion
To:
From:
Dear Fred,
Thank you for your prompt assistance with the minor changes to the Lauder Remodel Stream
Margin Exemption.
As we discussed in our telephone conversation, we propose to replace the existing octagon shaped
spa with a rectangular spa, to minimize site impacts and to conserve energy. We propose to use a
Marquis Spa. Model: Euphoria, size 90"x 90" x 35.5". This spa is a little smaller than the
previous spa. It will be located within the existing block walls in the deck.
Also, Stephen Ellsperman and I met at the site. Stephen commented that we are restoring only a
small segment of stream bank. We should specify the erosion control matting (not Excelsior),
protect the existing slope well, and use large boulders to help retain the slope. The erosion
matting should be placed on at least 8 inches of topsoil and trimmed to fit around the boulders.
There should be no air gaps between,the matting alld the soil.
Please call me if you have any further questions.
DESIGNWORKSHOP
Albuquerque ',Aspen . Denver' Jackson Hole' Phoenix' Santa Fe' Tahoe' Vail' Santa Cruz' Santiago' Sao Paulo
120 Easl Main Streel, Aspen, Colorado 81611 . (lei) 970-925-8354' (fax) 970-920-1387
www.designworkshop.com
1=
'a:
w ~A
t{ jil:5
5 ~ ~~
~ iD ~z CIJ
~ .~ ~ - ~
g ;( II- ~$ ~
~~ ~i i~. ~
l ; ~ ~i \
~ 'F- J.. _ _ -=- -=-~__
~ ..:::F H{=:~---
t( .~:; ~
~ :.~
w ~ '@ .J lw
~QQ llC ~ ~
~ ~ r: I~
?~ ~ ~: ~
r4 ~ uJ 6 ,gt
~ ~ .~ ~ :
pz -,:. Ul
~ i ~l~.;....-,:
8 )6.' " - - ~l- 1,\" ,
,~~~~ >
'~,I,:t;~ '
'"
'r(\
($'
,-
~
~ ..
'"
..
LU
lJ
lti
Iii
II.i
J:: :
_ 1".
'f"1.iT
',....'.....'11.'.." i
' ,. I
", 1'1 t
--"'"",3
.""..~''':'' -.,,~'., 'J
I.... "i,I'1 .1
'1t.,1 '
, L'.' t ,...
')l ',' l'
"11" "
II' \,
rl""
~1 r-"
,I>
0"
~
'::3
..s-
~
'j;
iJ\
~
f~ i
8
~
\:;7' ...
~ ~
'';Z
1-1-1.
~
--'-
f1
....... I'
/' '., '''. '."
.n: ":'1-1"
~;::::~:: /7+'~"::'~', ~.,' 1_,. '" ~,. '-"",' - ..~, t", ., i" ',_,', .,., I~ //;;
-, ... " '~.:,:',',"... :"~""'" 'r
,. ,"'~ ;,~:,,, ~~:". J~/ -,
~
" .""
..lj,>-3'
"(Q '5" :';r-',
1"''\1l '",",
,~ ","'. "\.,
/~. ), '"
"ip "., '
, ,
- ..J '
~~
~'" ,. ,::'e,;
.~ f?
a=
~
'i;
t&
lU
9
\l'I
-.:T
t:.
'F.
iI\
.~
~
ttJ
9
'"
<;"
..
<:'"
,
,;
,;
"'- - .
/
" I
;I
..;
;I
,;
;I
- .. - ,..
/1
,;
,;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
.n
<:r'
a:
~ -
.. -
g;
~
oJ)
~
-'1=
~'~
v
ft1
.~
tr
rt
oD'E
o
" 'F
.-
~
.1)8
..::;r
l;
'1-
r.J)
... 'x
I.W
<:
..J ~
tI.\ ~
8 I:::::
<:!::l
]:: It! gi ~N
tJ. ~ ~ ~-
~ il- ~~
~ 0 if\ of.
6 ~~
.~ 5
'F;
~ .- r::. ~
cI. ~ ~ ~ '1'1
~ -1 :r '\1\ ~
3 I:d ;rl r.u '"
of. ~ C::. 'J'
to'
r:
f}.J.
U\"2
...:T
t;~
w fut-
0- tr:...D-
O- u..1 ~
f- ~
Z :c ~
~"--~-z
\
Iii
?
b
~
(J\
~
o
1:
~
-;>
~
t::)
~
r- ~
~frtSl~
:=J ~ 2
o ~ ~ ~
0:::: ~ -< x-
C) tJ. cJ.. ~
0:::: '---' -:s
w C) ~
~ g~ ~
:=J OJ Z, ~
..
-
-
-
-
-
-