HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sm.Lee 1106 Waters Ave.32A-87 S •
4
�.. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
( City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 9/8/8'7 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE: �``��`s`1 oZ 737/er/-o2y O09a 3074-
/ STAFF MEMBER:
PROJECT NAME: L e Atzt-J/r1 Re V/ e LI)
Project Address: //06 /Woe/e Stioe,r)•APPLICANT: fiQ f Q S. �� A. a c�2�/�Q ,(W Applicant Address: 3 0 , ; . i,
REPRESENTATIVE: `SL(/9/)I !/an
Representative Address/ hone: 730.4- 8S/,PS Aye, S- 69s6?
TYPE OF APPLICATION: v?/-40q ryj
///a r/ /v / e ci P c✓
PAID: YES NO AMOUNT: 4- 447. oo
1 STEP APPLICATION:
P&Z MEETING DATE: (--A • L k \ C -1 PUBLIC HEARING:` YES 0
DATE REFERRED: `7 -7- P- INITIALS:
2 STEP APPLICATION:
CC MEETING DATE: PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
DATE REFERRED: INITIALS:
REFERRALS:
V/ City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District
✓ City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas
Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy Dept(GW)
Aspen Water Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ)
City Electric Fire Chief Bldg:Zon/Inspect
Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Roaring Fork
Aspen Consol. Transit Energy Center
S.D. _ Other
FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: f O iO 71 INITIAL:-fiL .—'
City Atty City Engineer Bldg. Dept.
( Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: C►'"UWIL}
•
4
CASE DISPOSITION
LEE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW
On October 6, 1987 the Planning and Zoning Commission approved
the Lee Stream Margin Review subject to the following conditions:
1. Revised foundation and site coverage plans shall be pre-
pared which continue to leave the steep slope of the River
bank undisturbed and eliminate the need to remove more than
the four cottonwood trees identified.
2 . The applicant shall replant, or replace with new trees the
four cottonwood trees prior to occupancy of the addiion. A
-revised site plan showing relocation of three cottonwood
trees, specifying the caliper at a minimum of 2 1/2" - 3" ,
and planting one blue spruce a minimum of 8 ' tall shall be
submitted to the satisfaction of the Planning Office prior
to issuance of a Building Permit.
3 . The lower deck shall either be removed or anchored for the
purpose of not breaking loose in case of a flood. Design of
the anchoring shall be approved by a professional engineer
and it shall be installed prior to occupancy of the addit-
ion.
4 . Excavation and construction techniques shall be specified in
the Building Permit application to ensure to the satis-
faction of the Building Department, that no undue distur-
bance of the stream bank or to the Roaring Fork River will
result.
sb. lee. sm2
VANN ASSOCIATES
Planning Consultants
September 8 , 1987
Mr. Steve Burstein
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Lee Stream Margin Review
Dear Steve:
Please consider this letter an application for stream
margin review for the expansion of an existing single-
family residence located at 1106 Waters Avenue in the City
of Aspen, Colorado. The application is submitted pursuant
to Section 24-6. 3 of the Municipal Code by Mr. Harlan Lee,
the prospective purchaser of the property. Consent to the
application has been obtained from the property' s current
owners, Mr. and Mrs. Luis Sneider, and is attached hereto
as Exhibit A. A commitment for title insurance from
Stewart Title Guaranty Company evidencing the Sneiders '
ownership is attached as Exhibit B.
Project Description
As the accompanying improvement survey illustrates, the
Applicant wishes to construct an approximately 400 square
foot addition to an existing two story residence located
on Lot 12 of the Calderwood Subdivision. The existing
residence contains approximately 2 , 100 square feet while
the lot, which is zoned R-15 , contains approximately 8,700
square feet. While the existing residence may constitute
a non-conforming structure, the proposed addition will
comply with all applicable area and bulk requirements. In
addition, the resulting 2, 500 square foot structure will
be well within the maximum allowable floor area of ap-
proximately 4 ,000 square feet which is attributable to the
lot in question.
P.O. Box 8485•Aspen, Colorado 81612.303/925-6958
• •
Mr. Steve Burstein
September 8 , 1987
Page 2
It should be noted that the property in question was the
subject of a previous stream margin review application.
Approval was granted in April of 1978 for miscellaneous
additions to the existing structure. A condition of that
approval was the granting of a trail easement along the
river bank in the event one was required by the Trail
System Master Plan. No provision for such a trail was
apparently contained in the Master Plan and no easement
was dedicated as evidenced by the attached title informa-
tion.
Review Requirements
With respect to the specific review criteria of Section
24-6. 3 (e) , the following comments are provided in support
of the Applicant' s request for stream margin review
approval.
1. As the accompanying improvement survey il-
lustrates, the proposed addition is located well beyond
the 100 year flood boundary.
2. To the best of the Applicant' s knowledge, no
trail has been designated across the property in question.
3 . The Roaring Fork Greenway Plan contains no site
specific recommendations with respect to the property in
question.
4. The proposed addition is expected to utilize a
caisson and bond beam foundation in order to minimize
slope disruption. In the event detailed soil analysis
requires a different foundation technique, the Applicant
will submit excavation drawings to the City' s Engineering
Department for review. Appropriate safeguards will be
used during construction to prevent sedimentation of the
River, and all disturbed areas will be revegetated. While
the addition may require the removal of two ( 2) or three
( 3 ) existing cottonwoods, no significant alteration of the
River bank will be required. Appropriate permits for the
removal of the trees will be obtained as required.
5. The proposed addition will have no adverse
effect upon the natural changes normally experienced by
the Roaring Fork River. As noted previously, all dis-
turbed areas will be revegetated to preclude erosion and
. .
Mr. Steve Burstein
September 8, 1987
Page 3
appropriate safeguards will be utilized to prevent pollu-
tion of the River during construction.
6. No alteration or relocation of the water course
will be required as a result of the Applicant' s proposal.
7. To the best of the Applicant' s knowledge, no
federal or state permits are required to construct the
proposed addition.
Based on the above, the Applicant believes that the
proposed addition is in compliance with the intent and
requirements of Section 24-6 . 3 and, as such, will have no
detrimental impact upon the Roaring Fork River. The
Applicant, therefore, respectfully requests stream margin
review approval for the construction of an addition to the
Sneider residence as depicted on the accompanying improve-
ment survey.
Should you have any questions regarding our application,
or if I can be of any further assistance, please do not
hesitate to call. As the Applicant wishes to commence
construction as soon as possible, any assistance you might
be able to provide in expediting our request for approval
would be sincerely appreciated.
Very tru yours,
V, ASSOCIATES, C.
ge( ,f
Sunny V.:Fn, AICP
SV: jlr
Attachments
cc: Harlan Lee
• EXHIBIT A
Mr . and Mrs . Luis Sneider
3844 Wild Oats
Bonita , CA 92002
September 1 , 1987
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Sir ,
As evidenced by the attached Commitment for Title
Insurance from Stewart Title Guaranty Company , we
are the owners of Lot 12 , Calderwood Subdivision ,
Aspen , Colorado . We have entered into a contract
to sell this property to Harlan Lee of Harlan Lee
and Associates , Marina Del Ray , California . This
contract is scheduled to close October 21 , 1987 ,
although by mutual agreement between Mr . Lee and
ourselves , it may close earlier .
By way of this letter , we give our consent to Mr .
Lee ' s submission of an application for stream margin
review on Lot 12 , Calderwood Subdivision . We under-
stand that the stream margin review puts us under
no obligation , and that any approval resulting from
this review will run with the land to any owner of
the property .
Sincerely yours ,
igamp:
0 = �� . / /
Luis Sneider Syl =?a Sneider
. • -
•
•
., • EXHIBIT B
SCHEDULE A
Order Number: t) Commitment Number:
Effectrre date.
Auaust 19 . 1987 At 8 : 00 A. M.
2. Policy or Policies to be issued: • Amount of hist/rams Premium
A ALTA Owner's Policy 490 , 000 . 00 $ 1 , 257 . 00
Proposed Insured:
Harlan Lee and Associates
• Tax Cert .
0 5 . 00
B. ALTA Loan Policy •
••
Proposed Insured:
. •
C. • $
3. The estate or interest in the land deecnbed or referred to in this commitment and covered herein Is fee simple and Ode thereto is at the effective date hereof
,st.dln-
Luis s Sneider and Sylvia Sneider aka Slvia Sneider aka Sylvia
Letzarek. aka Sylvia Sneider Leizorek
4. The land referred to in this commitment Is described as follows:
Lot 12.
CALDERWOOD SUBDIVISION
County of Pitkin. State of Colorado
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
Page 2 STE1VART TITLE
GUARANTY' COMPANY
1652 (29.4
. .
-----
•
.
i • .
. .
. .
SCHEDULE B — Section 1
Order Number LI 1(1 3 Commitment Number:
•
, .
. • -
Requirements
•-:- .
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest
to be insured.
. . . . •
Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record.
to-wit: .
. .. - .
_ .
. .
1 . Release of Deed of Trust. dated June 26 , 1979 , executed by Luis .
. .
. _ Sneider . Sylvia Leizarek. to the Public Trustee of Pitkin
County . to secure an indebtedness of $200 , 000. 00 , in favor of
First Western Mortgage Corporation of Texas , recorded_July 7 . _
1979 in Book 371 at Page 736 as Reception No. 215902.
NOTE: The beneficial interest under said Deed .of Trust-was . .
:., assigned of record to Fort Worth Mortgage Corporation, Fort
Worth. Texas by First Western Mortgage Corporation of Texas
• ,
recorded July 2 . 1979 in Book 371 at. Page 742 as Reception No.
• 215903 .
NOTE: The beneficial interest under. said Deed of Trust was
assigned of record to Crawford Savings and Loan. Association,
Chicago, Illinois by Fort Worth Mortgage Corporation recorded
• August 16 . 1979 in Book- 374 at Page 294 as Reception No.
• 217187 .
2 . Trade Name Affidavit and Partnership Agreement of Harlan Lee
..N. and Associates , disclosing the names of the partners and the
other information required by ' 63 CRS 141-2-1 ( 1 ) , evidencing
the existence of said partnership prior to acquisition of
• title.
. .
. • •
3 . -Deed executed by Luis Sneider and Sylvia Sneider aka Sivia Sneider
aka Sylvia Liezarek aka Sylvia Sneider Liezorek, • vestinglee title
in purchaser( s ) .
NOTE: Deed must be signed by each name shown above, and- each .-
signature properly acknowledged , exactly as spelled above. This
is necessary because of discrepencies in previous conveyance of • . .
.. the subject property.
• .
„ . .
. .
. . . . • . . . ,
. .
. . . . . . . •
. - .
. . . ,
. . . _
. .
. . . .
• , . _ .
. . ,
. , .
• . . . . .
. .
, . .. . . .
• . . .. .
, •
• . . . . .
. .
. • , .
•
. . „
_ . .
.. • .
. . . . . ,,
. . .
.. , . .
. . .
• • „
. . .
• . • . . . . .,.
. . . ... .
. • .
• •. • — . . , .
. . .
•
. .
. ,•
. • - ,
. . .
. ' . ' . • •
. .
' . STEWA RT TITLE -
. . . .
..
p.,..., 3 GUARAPCTYCOACPAWe .
_ _ - _- .._____—.—_______._. _ _ ....__...�... <alsrirv*h .'."'-".k..2'.'Y!tTkYr.!'�:^4!;✓:`.q,?.;V1.''p lk.'^S:v ._r'>,>'M.'.w'.r::— �.aFwt.. >i�'Rf.::Y. .u.-..:.u.r::: .YSi .v:,..rxx. '1 -.+::It.. A..'...M.
• ■ . •
•
. SCHEDULE B — Section 2
Exceptions
Order Number: (5 3 9 3 Commitment Number:
.,. The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the'
satisfaction of the Company:
•
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies. conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct
survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, tabor or 'material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law
and not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public
. records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires
of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment.
6. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any unredeemed
•
tax sales .
7, The effect of inclusions in any general or specific water
conservancy ,. fire protection , soil conservation or other
district or inclusion in any water service or street
improvement- area. •
8. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority
of the United States as reserved in United States Patent of
record.
9. Restrictive covenants , which do not contain a forfeiture or
reverter clause , as set forth in document recorded August 2 ,
1962 in Book 198 at Page 436 and document recorded December'
17 . 1.962 in Book 200 -at Page 263.
10. Easements for Underground Utilities Distribution system as set
• forth on Plat recorded in Ditch Book 2A at Page 285.
NOTE: Policies issued hereunder will be subject to the terms ,
conditions , and _exclusions set forth in the ALTA 1987 Policy
form. Copies of the. 1987 form Policy Jacket , setting forth
said terms , conditions and exclusions, will be made available
upon request. : •
•
Exceptions numbered _ are,.hereby, omitted. .
■ Page 4 STEWART TITT F
I
(PI ON∎lE CALL)
FOR -.11at// ' ■ATE /0/l 7 TIME //?4)--3 P.M.
M .-10.-T107
1TELEPHONEO ':
IIF
RETURNED
PHONE YOUR CALL
AREA CODE NUMBER EXTWNSION ,'
PLEASE CALL .
MESSA E A _�ilt>��/sa�.101ig!'. ` ,,,__.411_'/A A...? , .
.../ .
i WILL CALL AGAIN
I CAME
(9'L� TD SEE YOU
WANTS
T,�Op,SEE YOU
`/ SIGNED TOPS FORM 4003 '
Ill
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office
RE: Lee Stream Margin Review
Case Number 2737-181-24-002-32A-87
DATE: September 30, 1987
LOCATION: 1106 Waters Avenue, Lot 12, Calderwood Subdivision,
City of Aspen.
ZONING: R-15
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: Harlan Lee, contract purchaser of the
subject property, requests approval to build an addition of
approximately 400 square feet to the existing single family
residence. Present owners, Luis and Sylvia Sneider, have con-
sented to the application.
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION: Lot 12 of the Calderwood Subdivision
was subject to a stream margin review in 1976. Applicant Ben
Deane was given approval for construction of an addition and a
new deck, subject to preservation of as many large trees in the
new deck area as practical and with the advice and assistance of
the county agricultural agent to ensure their preservation, and
subject to granting of trail easements on the bank of the Roaring
Fork River provided that it is warranted by the Adopted Trail
System Master Plan. The deck was constructed with holes to allow
the trees to grow through.
PROBLEM DISCUSSION:
A. Referral Comments:
1. Engineering Department: Jim Gibbard noted in his
September 22 memorandum that the two or three cotton-
wood trees (over 6" in caliper) contribute signifi-
cantly to the stabilization of the bank. It should be
demonstrated that removal of the trees will not cause
problems with erosion in this area. In addition, an
existing small wood deck down the bank extends over
into the 100 year flood plain and should be properly
anchored, as determined by a Professional Engineer.
B. Staff Comments: The Planning Office has the following
comments in response to the review criteria of the stream
margin and flood hazard review in Section 24-6. 3 (e) of the
Municipal Code:
Criteria (1) :"No development shall occur within a special flood
hazard area unless it can be demonstrated that there will be no
increase in base flood elevation as a result of the, development,
as shown by an elevation certificate prepared by a professional
engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado. "
Response: The proposed addition does not occur within the special
flood hazard area; however, an existing deck, for which no
building permit was issued, is located in the flood hazard area.
Following the Engineering Department's suggestion, this deck
should be properly anchored.
Criteria (2) : "In the event there is a trail designated by an
approved trail plan within the development site, such trail shall
be dedicated for public use. "
Response: The Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan: Parks/Recreation/-
Open Space/Trails Element indicates no trail along the west
(south) side of the River in this vicinity. A trail is shown on
the east side of the River, opposite from Lot 12 .
Criteria (3) : "All attempts should be made to implement the
recommendations of the Roaring Fork Greenway Plan prepared by the
Roaring Fork Greenway Committee. "
Response: The Roaring Fork Greenway Plan, prepared in 1973 , makes
general recommendations on the protection of the natural environ-
ment of flood plains and adjacent areas. Recommendation B. 9
states: "Strive to maintain the Greenway as a natural area by
keeping construction to a minimum. "
The south portion of Lot 12 contains five cottonwood trees that
would be effected by the new addition. Two trees, each approxi-
mately 4" in caliper and 20 ' tall, are situated on the flat area
south of the house, and would be removed. An 8" caliper cotton-
wood is located on the flat area at the edge of the bank; and two
cottonwoods, 17" and 11" caliper, grow on the steep bank. Staff
believes that it is reasonable for the two 4" caliper and the 8"
caliper cottonwoods to be either relocated or replaced alongside
the proposed addition. The two trees on the steep bank should
not be disturbed, as the addition can be designed to jog around
these trees and, with piers and cantilevering construction,
damage to the roots can be avoided.
Revised piers and cantilevered construction plans and site
coverage plans presented by the applicant make the situation no
better by requiring six trees to be removed (possibly two mature
cottonwoods on the slope could be saved) . This would remove six
of the eight trees on the south side of the lot within the
vicinity of the house and significantly alter the natural
hillside woods. The changed plans also bring the structure up to
the setbacks when previously it was to jog, leaving more of a
2
• •
side yard area. A revised site plan should be presented showing
the addition located in a way to require removal of no more than
three trees. Relocation or new planting of three trees in the
south sideyard should also be accomplished.
Criteria (4) : "Vegetation shall not be removed nor any slope
grade changes made that may produce erosion of the stream bank. "
Response: .Saving of the two trees growing on the bank and using
pier construction would minimize erosion of the stream bank. Loss
of a third tree on the bank shown in revised plans would appear
to further destabilize the bank. Excavation and construction
techniques should be used to ensure that no undue disturbance is
caused to the bank or Roaring Fork River.
Criteria (5) : "All efforts shall be made to reduce pollution and
interference with the natural changes of the river, stream or
other water course, and to enhance the value thereof as an
important natural feature. "
Response: As the addition is not within the flood plain, no
interference with the course of the river should result.
Construction activity should stay out of the River.
Criteria (6) : "Written notice shall be given to the Colorado
Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of
the water course, and a copy of said notice shall be submitted to
the Federal Emergency Management Agency. "
Response: The water course is unaffected by the proposed
development; therefore, this criteria does not apply.
Criteria (7) : "In the event a water course shall be altered or
relocated, the applicant and applicant's heirs, successors and
assigns shall provide maintenance to assure that the flood
carrying capacity is not diminished. "
Response: This criteria does not apply.
Criteria (8) : "Copies shall be submitted of all necessary federal
and state permits relating to work within the one hundred year
floodplain. "
Response: The Engineering Department indicates no federal or
state permits are necessary for the proposed development.
Planning Office Recommendation: The Planning Office recommends
approval of the Lee Stream Margin Review subject to the following
conditions:
1. Revised foundation and site coverage plans shall be pre-
pared which continue to leave the steep slope of the River
3
bank undisturbed and eliminate the need to remove more than
the three cottonwood trees in the building envolope.
2 . The applicant shall replant, or replace with new trees, the
two cottonwood trees approximately 4" caliper and the 8"
caliper cottonwood tree prior to occupancy of the addition.
A revised site plan showing relocation of the cottonwood
trees in the south side yard area and specifying the caliper
of any new tree at a minimum of 3 1/2" shall be submitted to
the satisfaction of the Planning Office prior to issuance of
a Building Permit.
3 . The lower deck shall be either be removed or anchored for
the purpose of not breaking loose in case of a flood.
Design of the anchoring shall be approved by a professional
engineer and it shall be installed prior to occupancy of the
addition.
4 . Excavation and construction techniques shall be specified in
the Building Permit application to ensure to the satis-
faction of the Building Department, that no undue distur-
bance of the stream bank or to the Roaring Fork River will
result.
sb.lee.sm
4
v 1
ry Q
rw N '\?' d till
�/ 39- a m Lee Stream Margin
J�
�— N603 »°w= � � �� Review - Survey,
Y_ c� Dated 9/3/87
j
'`-,C I n
n � Z ��
0
Z , •s2• M
N
A ÷ �In
S - 'off Z ---------- ' \6‘,.,\
eon .c. 3 p S_
\ oN
A N S s71 \ r
�+ \1 Z5 •r ZO \ `•\ W
•
o \, y ,
T \1 +•-
'! Z c • M
,? ...-'.0::::91...:::::*:::::::1... \ . ' -.'• .../A0- 6...-:, ' ••■' 100 \ -.il
I l'" .-::.:::.::::::.:.....%:.:Ii.i::.::::::.::- ., alk,.::::.:::::•:..
_,Q • ® ® °p i•
I ® . n
,
,° � ,.
i > i ® O qo
d
A o r 85 o
l,.r,_•
r--.
•
n O _�
A -0 \r:
t.
7 . 65 l' o ' 1 ---i,
0 .
0 J
U
'' p r ,
-1 0
O-0 '
•
P
• • • .
i
•
. Lee Stream Margin Review
Site (coverage and Tree Removal Plan
Date 10/1/87
/// ')\( .
NN
•
o
OA N
) // s
Nc
S
Ay o
"I vL �kb
-,.. //
',ci o
rM
Ei, .. i n� = m , .„ ,, r.to Tri_i_14- .
,i
. i.........„c., ....
/ . Zi” 4.0
_J N L—
I
IF
/ CY'
(1
2
) ` + r
/ . ,
.\
� T �� �T�
ZXi
N
`I'
y
N vZ
•
F — eta
iL'i/- -------:- -- - :‘ .
MEMORANDUM w SEP 2 5 1987
TO: Steve Burstein, Planning Office
FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department qv
DATE: September 22, 1987
RE: Lee Stream Margin Review
Having reviewed the above application and made a site inspection,
the Engineering Department has the following comments :
1 . The applicant has indicated that there will be two or three
cottonwoods removed from an area of the river bank in the
southeast part of the property. Since these trees contribute
significantly to the present stabilization of that bank, it
should, be demonstrated that their removal will not cause problems
with erosion in this area.
2 . The Building Department has no record of a permit being issued
for the small wood deck which presently extends out over into the
100 year flood plain on the southeast part of the property. This
deck, if improperly secured, has some potential for producing
damage downstream in a 100 year flood. Therefore, the Engineer-
ing Department recommends that a Professional Engineer be
consulted to determine that this deck is properly anchored.
jg\leestmar
cc : Jay Hammond
Chuck Roth
,
( , • • • ELI%
¢.� O1 51987 5
GROUNDWORK
Box 3863
Aspen, Colorado
81612
October 5, 1987
Mr. Sunny Vann
VANN ASSOCIATES, INC
210 South Galena St. , Suite 24
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Lee Stream Margin Review
Dear Sunny:
At your request, I have examined the effect of the expansion
of the Lee residence upon existing vegetation. My conclusions,
based on an inspection of the site, are as follows:
1. Three ( 3 ) separate cottonwoods, and the smaller half of
a twin trunk cottonwood, will require removal as a result of the
proposed addition.
2. The smaller half of the twin trunk cottonwood, which is
approximately seven (7 ) inches in diameter, and the eight ( 8 )
inch cottonwood located within the proposed building envelope are
infected with a fungal organism. The remaining two ( 2 ) trees
affected by the expansion are approximately four ( 4) inches in
diameter and are healthy. It should be noted that the fungal
organism does not appear to have spread to neighboring healthy
trees.
3 . The smaller half of the twin trunk cottonwood can be
removed safely if proper horticultural practices are employed.
Removal of the diseased trees should help the general health
of the existing cottonwood grove. Compensation, however, would
appear to be appropriate for the removal of the two healthy
specimens. Specificly, I would recommend that three ( 3 ) two and
one-half to three inch caliper narrowleaf cottonwoods (Populus
angustifolia) be planted on the site, two ( 2) of which should be
located in the northeast corner of the property between the
hundred year flood line and the existing deck. In addition, I
would recommend that an eight ( 8 ) to ten ( 10 ) foot high spruce
Picea pungens) be planted in the northeast corner of the property
in order to provide genetic diversity.
! i
I hope this information is helpful in the design of the
addition to the Lee residence. Please do not hesitate to call me
if you require further assistance.
Sincerely,
GROUNDWORK
,1
Way Ethridge
Lan scape Arch' =ct
• Vn •
0
o
CITY a. e,, ?� �, PEN
” � 0_ a Ram g
13 0 h g�a l ai re a t - ,
asp ,' cool Tra • 611 SEP
Sao � .41987 : ,
103-9�,
i I
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 14, 1987
TO: Steve Burstein, Planning Office
FROM: City Attorney
RE: Lee Stream Margin Review
We have no comments at this time except to note that the applica-
tion should be signed or acknowledged by the applicant not the
applicant' s representative.
PJT/mc
v:, zn, - ;P'1- .wsv_R7`: ... -'{_.x.1 :i'V„{j.. h.ra.Jw' c.. .,y.y. ..� ..:.., .. -. + `...;,,..✓^• .x.k„r ,fin "yx'h Ya? ,.. 2":.. ..W.. �..,- ',." rwc%.
.+���,r', ,r�;t� .,�� -b'�yx'y=fa, l:. -:e��lr��r'k saw^' r� ,xr-„ ^�..� �..y.e�i•�.s.+sr ..,�' �f ?��rrat r •'�.�x�,. 5 ...1:
IF .a WO
foommoik ) . ' ^-. .,
/ ' ‘
ii •• .4 111111 IIIISiiiiiig 914 0 ,
OW111„„00011111111111r LV ' ... ( ,-' P m......,
,- /41 ,,,) ,-- '----------------- imr....
” / ....,- ail: m , 4040041 VA
_,-070.11111111-- ■■Pk... 1 ,- #1110 /
• Or a ._ - I ,
2 1 .
\ r '' • ,
• � .
\ ) ^p) i I)Fill
in
<x
I 5:}11 ill
x x1 \\ *
ti w ib
_1 x . r--JT' lx
3 I
ill
\ �- \... �xI r /
/r 11111.t.l&
I / cp
tiyhv«
N
— r I C NQ 1 II I I I W ra•-)
ID
______
k
_x_ ,_, i--- \ f 0
r_ 1
■ 4.611,1
, / I /IL _
!Ali ,
— 11 //
Imo.. „
1 1 :),
0
I ‹ ,7,-;:;; ,.
W
H
_\____
rn 4a',.:,
r._
0, . LT
co 40 )15 .
I I\ � �
J o
1 1hr r- (_______.
' I 1 r -,, ii
r , . .
_____ _
01_
ii ,
cc
• i
cr li ; .---n. . 1 ,--.__
1 CD no)
LI J _ I
Q ,1 o co
v 41 I Z co x , 2 9 x is
x r--1 r- .[E] ., .. ... .. .... .,
. -n- r- 11, . 1 II . -.oft
. „., ØECOnD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Lercvt,a
r�.:,<<7n Planning and .________..=______Zoning April q ,,-...,.
. t 1 i 1'_....
i' mot__._...,----�----- .__
' Smith made the presentation. This is a request for ..•
- ."'") stream margin review. She noted the location on a
� ;_� �r d:.a3�Yin Review
i map. The proposed additions are all within the 100
M' foot setback from the river. The' deck will be on the
A . river side of the house. This is located in the
- Calderwood Subdivision. The additions are an entry, '-
41 a garage, a room extension in the front of the building
.p•,;: and the deck on the river side. The Planning Office
. --r is concerned with the removal of the vegetation in the
area. The deck will be built in the middle of a cotton--
;;;;. wood grove.. The design drawings reflect that the deck
will" be built around the trees to preserve them. The
Planning Office asks that .this be a condition. They
are also concerned that the deck will be built on a
=
R 1 steep slope.
Lance Alice said that the deck would be constructed in
>F;. concrete posts with holes to allow the. trees to grow
through the deck.. The garage would necessitate removal
"vii of three or four trees. Anderson asked how big the
. trees are. Alice said most are larger than 6 ' in dia-
meter. Anderson said his experience with trees grcwing
•
' through decks is that the trees die within eight to .ten
`` years which makes removal of the trees difficult. He ,
rx'_. would like to see a condition that the applicant work •
1" with the County Extension Agent to ensure that every-
, a:. thing be done to preserve the trees ' life.
}
°'4 Collins asked if there would be any problem with any •
trail easements. Smith said the trail is not intended
for the south side of the bridge. She suggested a •
y` condition on the approval. •
•
i
2. Hedstrom moved to approve the stream margin review •
for the Ben Deane residence on Lot 12 of the Calder-
,
4 . . wood Subdivision for the addition of a garage, enclosed
entry, extension of the roof of the bedroom, addition .
of sauna and a new deck, subject to preservation of as
, , many large trees in the new deck area as practical and
I with the advice and assistance of the county agricul-
4 tuaal agent to ensure their, preservation, and subject
to granting of the trail easements on the bank of. the
Roaring Fork River provided that it is warranted by the
Adopted Trail System Master Plan, Schuhmacher seconded.
'w_ All in favor, motion approved.
Kalnins/Raphael The applicants have owned this duplex on Lot 13 of the
Duplex, Subdivision Snowbunny Subdivision for the last six years . It has
Exemption been previously divided by a use and occupancy agree-
ment. They occupy both of the two units and intend to
it
stay. The Housing Authority finds it complies with
Ordinance 53 and recommends the six month minimum lease
restriction. The City Engineer has no problems with the
subdivision exemption request and recommended no condi-
tions.
•
- Gideon Kaufman, re presenting the applicants, noted that
i .
P g PP
the reason they have not made this application before
• is because the park dedication fee was still in effect.
Baranko asked how large the lot is . Smith said it is
15, 864 square feet and does conform to the district.
i
177.74 is ,.. I_ +.v r?v^xsfa ) -h:.pvrr4kv7z , ".t'w^ R'. . roa.1.tr^'�mk ir-
- � ,.,. � +_ ,qtr
V7 r-
HARLAN LEE �l.._.- -lit 1
& ASSOCIATES 1 SEP 81987 i
ti
September 3, 1987
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 87611,
RE : ' Lot 12
Calderwood Subdivision
Gentlemen :
Sunny Vann is hereby authorized to submit an
application for Stream Margin Review on my
behalf for Lot 12, Calderwood Subdivision .
I am currently under contract to buy the
house and it will close this month .
Thank you .
SincereV ,
Harlan J . // ee
{
HJL/cn
310 Washington Street, Suite P214❑Marina del Rey, CA 90292❑ (213) 827-0171
4
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Attorney
City Engineer
FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office
RE: Lee Stream Margin Review
DATE: Sept. 9, 1987
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted
by Sunny Vann on behalf of his client, Harlan Lee requesting
Stream Margin Review for expansion of an existing single-family
residence located at 1106 Waters Avenue. The applicant wishes to
construct an approximately 400 square foot addition to an
existing two story residence on Lot 12 of the Calderwood Subdivi-
sion. The existing residence contains approximately 2, 100 square
feet and is zoned R-15.
Please review this material and send your comments to this office
no later than Sept. 22, 1987 in order for this office to have
adequate time to prepare for its presentation before P&Z.
Thank you.
• •
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 9/8/x'7 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE: q\�lc`l o?W-47/-09 4/-1 ? 3 ?4- �7
STAFF MEMBER:
PROJECT NAME: L P e S74r ea rrm /112!„-g in Re V/ C cJ
Project Address: //06 rs /Wye • /�sDe.0-7
APPLICANT: //a r7 A f e
Applicant Address: 3/0 t • SY • S. ?�� Ar e a-(D2/,f ,C/9
//
• 9oa9R
REPRESENTATIVE: SGf/9/75! Van
Representative Address/Phone: 73oX 8S/Fs ./1s0en S- 6958
TYPE OF APPLICATION: ?l-p2 r2? /)/Qrg�� if e VI P c
S) ✓
PAID: YE NO AMOUNT: 4 4L QO (/
1 STEP APPLICATION:
P&Z MEETING DATE: ' -A • (41k \ --7 PUBLIC HEARING: YES 0
DATE REFERRED: q-9-4-7—4- INITIALS: `1
2 STEP APPLICATION:
CC MEETING DATE: PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
DATE REFERRED: INITIALS:
REFERRALS:
A/ City Attorney Mtn. Bell School District
✓ City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn Nat Gas
Housing Dir. Holy Cross State Hwy .Dept(GW)
Aspen Water Fire Marshall State Hwy Dept(GJ)
City Electric Fire Chief Bldg:Zon/Inspect
Envir. Hlth. Roaring Fork Roaring Fork
Aspen Consol. Transit Energy Center
S.D. Other
FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL:
City Atty City Engineer Bldg. Dept.
Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
r ,
1
ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
(303) 925-2020
y �
SL_,� '\ �n
nt
RE: ■ .,•A
Dear 5.. ..--\
This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its
preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined
that your application IS NOT complete.
Additional items required include:
Disclosure of Ownership (one copy only needed)
, Adjacent Property Owners List/Envelopes/Postage (one copy)
Additional copies of entire application
Authorization by owner for representative to submit applica-
tion
Response to list of items (attached/below ) demonstrating
compliance with the applicable policies and regulations of the
Code, or other specific materials
A check in the amount of $
X A. Your application i complete and we have scheduled it for
review by the on OC---.(n//q We will
call you if we need any additional information prior to that
date. Several days prior. to your hearing, we will call and
make available a copy of the memorandum.. Please note that it
IS NOT your responsibility to post your property with a
sign, which we can provide you for a $3 .00 fee..
B. Your application is incomplete, : we have not scheduled it
review at this time. When we receive the materials we have
requested, we will place you on the next available agenda.
If you have any questions, please call S
the planner assigned to your case.
Sincerely,
ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE
AA-A--v\ J.__