The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.375 N Spring St.A077-00- 375-N. Spring St DRAC 2737-073-10-001 A077-00 1. 10,Â» 9 ~ 12- , t. . f P 0 -2 9 110.119 CASE NUMBER A077-00 PARCEL ID # 2737-073-10001 CASE NAME 375 N. Spring DRAC PROJECT ADDRESS 375 N. Spring PLANNER Fred Jarman CASE TYPE DRAC OWNER/APPLICANT DCR Limited Family Partnership REPRESENTATIVE Alan Richman DATE OF FINAL ACTION 7/13/00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION Reso. #3-2000 ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 10/16/00 BY J. Lindt PARCEL ID: |2737-073-10001 DATE RCVD: |6/21/00 # COPIES:~ C*Â§E NO~A077-00 CASE NAME:~375 N. Spring DRAC PLNR:Dfrgy ic>v '10 4 PROJ ADDR:FTFN. Spring CASE TYP~|DRAC STEPS1 OWN/APP: DCR Limited Family ADR~1873 S. Bellaire St #7 C/S/Z: ~ Denver/CO/80222 PHN:1(303)759-6644 REP:~Aian Richman ADR:|200 W. Main St. C/S/Z:~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN1920-1125 FEES DUE:~480 D FEES RCVD:1480 STAT:~--- REFERRALS~ REF:| BY| DUE: ~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED r w ..4,9 DATE OF FINAL ACTION -fi~/3~36' , CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ pz: !22â‚¬DC *22 - Acct) BOA: CLOSED: \Ilillfâ‚¬-0- BYÂ·Â·\-i LU\r- DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):~ ADMIN: A PFUU I. .1 Resolution No. _~ . (SERIES OF 2000) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS VARIANCES FOR "GARAGE SETBACK" AND "BUILDING ORIENTATION" FOR OKLAHOMA FLATS ADDITION, LOTS 8,9, 10, 11, AND NORTH HALF OF LOT 7, BLOCK 1, 375 NORTH SPRING STREET, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-073-104)01 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Denice Reich, represented by Alan Richman of Richman Planning Services and Geoffrey I.ester of Charles Cunniffe Architects, seeking two (2) variances from Section 26,410 Residential Design Guidelines for 1) building orientation for the proposed primary residence and 2) a garage setback requirement for a front loaded two-car attached garage on the proposed two story primary residence in the Oklahoma Flats Addition, Lots 8,9.10,11, and North Half of Lot 7. Block 1.375 North Spring Street and, WHEREAS, Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, and North Half of Lot 7, Block 1 of the Oklahoma Flats Addition is a 22,599 sq. ft. lot with three unoccupied structures (proposed for demolition) located in the R-30 Zone District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020 ofthe Aspen Municipal Code, Community Development Department staff reviewed the applicant' s application for compliance with the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410.040 of the Aspen -O >0 Municipal Code and found the submitted development application to be inconsistent with Standard 26.410.040(A)(1), Building Orientation and Standard 26.410.040(C)(2)(b) 0 1- Z in J Parking, Garages, and Carports, of the Aspen Municipal Code; and - O >0 CE Â¤Z WHEREAS, Section 26.410.020(C) of the Aspen Municipal Code provides that 1- 1- if an application is found by Community Development Department staff to be -10- inconsistent with any item of the Residential Design Guidelines, the applicant may either 0 0 0 ~ 9 amend the application or appeal staffs findings to the Design Review Appeal Committee Â® pursuant to Chapter 26.222, Design Review Appeal Committee; and Â®Z 1=..G WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020(B) of the Aspen Municipal Code, I""0 ~ the applicant submitted a request for a variance from Standard 26.410.040(B)(1) of the - Aspen Municipal Code to the Design Review Appeal Committee as it applies to Building - Orientation and Parking, Garages and Carports; and -NO - Â® ac WHEREAS all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of --.(41 ==N Section 26.410.040 must meet one of the following review standards in order for the r.4- -50 11, 111111111111111111[1111 - Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) Yield greater compliance with the goals of the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) More effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or c) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fuirness related to unusual site specific constraints; WHEREAS, the Community Development Director, after review of the requested variances. recommended approval for a variance from the residential design standards for the proposed garage and recommended denial for the proposed house orientation variance request; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing at a regular meeting on July 13,2000, the Design Review Appeal Committee, approved a variance from the Building Orientation standard of Section 26.410.040(A)(1) and Parking, Garages, and Carports standard of Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(b) of the Aspen Municipal Code as it applies to Residential Design Standards for Lots 8,9,10,11, and North Half of Lot 7. Block 1 of the Oklahoma Flats Addition, with conditions, by a vote of 4 to Q (4-0). NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Committee: Section 1 That a proposed variance for a single-family residence at 375 North Spring Street, Aspen, Colorado, is approved pursuant to Section 26.410.040(A)(1), Building Orientation, and Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(b), Parking, Garages, and Carports of the Residential Design Standards meeting Criteria A, a variance is supported by AACP in terms of minimizing the impact on open space and natural features, and Criteria C, the variance is clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual or site specific constraints. The variance is approved with the following conditions: 1. That at the time of building permit the applicant must provide adequate documentation regarding the required location of the ADU so that effective screening of the garage may be achieved; APPROVED by the Committee at its regular meeting on July 13, 2000. APPROVED AS TO FORM: DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS ColÂ»ilITTEE: -0 -0-4- 44/~Â»1 Cify Attorney *obert Blaich, Chair + tot,Â«9961'r./4 11111111111111111111'Ill'11111111111111111111111111 lili 444544Â« 447424 09/27/2000 04:00P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 2 of 2 R 10.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders". and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement. or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date o f this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Denise Reich, 1873 S. Bellaire #700, Denver, CO 80222 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lots 8 & 9, Block 1, Oklahoma Flats Addition Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Building Orientation and Garage Setback Variances Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan DRAC Resolution #05-00, 7/13/00 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) July 22,2000 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) July 23,2003 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 22nd day of July, 2000, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. 0--4 6L- Â·14[e Ann Woods, Community Development Director . PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval o f a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24. Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lots 8 & 9, Block 1, Oklahoma Flats Addition, by resolution of the Design Review Appeals Committee on July 13,2000. For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. s/City of Aspen Publish in The Aspen Times on July 22,2000 EXHIBIT F Resolution No. - (SERIES OF 2000) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS VARIANCES FOR "GARAGE SETBACK" AND "BUILDING ORIENTATION" FOR OKLAHOMA FLATS ADDITION, LOTS 8,9, 10,11, AND NORTH HALF OF LOT 7, BLOCK 1, 375 NORTH SPRING STREET, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-073-10-001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Denice Reich. represented by Alan Richman of Richman Planning Services and Geoffrey Lester of Charles Cunniffe Architects, seeking two (2) variances from Section 26.410 Residential Design Guidelines for 1) building orientation for the proposed primary residence and 2) a garage setback requirement for a front loaded two-car attached garage on the proposed two story primary residence in the Oklahoma Flats Addition. Lots 8. ), 10,11, and North Half of Lot 7. Block 1. 375 North Spring Street. and, WHEREAS, Lots 8, 9,10,11, and North Half of Lot 7, Block 1 of the Oklahoma Flats Addition is a 22,599 sq. ft. lot with three unoccupied structures (proposed for demolition) located in the R-30 Zone District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Community Development Department staff reviewed the applicant' s application for compliance with the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410.040 of the Aspen Municipal Code and found the submitted development application to be inconsistent with Standard 26.410.040(A)(1), Building Orientation and Standard 26.410.040(C)(2)(b) Parking, Garages, and Carports, o f the Aspen Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Section 26.410.020(C) of the Aspen Municipal Code provides that if an application is found by Community Development Department staff to be inconsistent with any item of the Residential Design Guidelines. the applicant may either amend the application or appeal staff' s findings to the Design Review Appeal Committee pursuant to Chapter 26.222, Design Review Appeal Committee; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.410.020(B) of the Aspen Municipal Code, the applicant submitted a request for a variance from Standard 26.410.040(B)(1) of the Aspen Municipal Code to the Design Review Appeal Committee as it applies to Building Orientation and Parking, Garages, and Carports; and WHEREAS all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410.040 must meet one of the following review standards in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant an exception, namely the proposal must: a) yield greater compliance with the goals o f the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or c) be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing at a regular meeting on July 13.2000. the Design Review Appeal Committee. approved a variance from the Building Orientation standard of Section 26.410.040(A)(1) and Parking, Garages, and Carports standard of Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(b) of the Aspen Municipal Code as it applies to Residential Design Standards for Lots 8, 9, 10, 11. and North Half of Lot 7, Block 1 of the Oklahoma Flats Addition, with conditions, by a vote of to . NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Committee: Section 1 That a proposed variance for a single-family residence at 375 North Spring Street, Aspen, Colorado, is approved pursuant to Section 26.410.040(A)(1), Building Orientation, and Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(b), Parking, Garages, and Carports of the Residential Design Standards meeting Criteria A, a variance is supported by AACP in terms of minimizing the impact on open space and natural features, and Criteria C, the variance is clearly necessary for reasons 0Â£faimess related to unusual or site specific constraints. The variance is approved with the following conditions: 1. That at the time of building permit the applicant must provide adequate documentation regarding the required location of the ADU so that effective screening of the garage may be achieved; APPROVED by the Committee at its regular meeting on July 13,2000. APPROVED AS TO FORM: DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE: City Attorney Robert Blaich, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk .. /1............/ s U. ,- RE: Appeal From Design Standards All new structures shaillocate at least 10% of their total square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from the building, or linked to it by a subordinate connecting element. a. Yields greater compliance with the goals of the AACP. b. More effectively addresses the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to. c. Be clearly necessary for reason of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints. 2.i. . L_JIGN REVIEW APPEALS BC. .. ID 042 Steve Buettow, chair Home: 925-1693 ( i P.O. Box 9463 Work: 925-2254 #3 Aspen, CO 81612 fax: 925-2258 91 L Robert Blaich Home: 925-7545 319 North 4th Streert fax: 920-3433 Aspen, CO 81611 Jeffrey Halferty Home: 544-0125 Apt. 7/99 215 S. Monarch Work: 920-4535 Box 3906 Fax: 925-4990 Aspen, CO 81611 e-mail jhdesign@rof.net Iff d: Silver King Drive home: 925-8541 fax: 920-1129 Aspen, CO 81611 e-mail: maryandmichael@mail.earthlink. net Al Â£ Tim Mooney Home: 925-8172 apt. 4-13 1998 r. p.o. Box 8931 Work: 925-7000 Aspen, Colo. 81611 920-7365 cell: 379-9400 3041 )Â£-'& 1 zÂ»Â«Li, j- Lf 7- - f v L LDI 4.01 7 915-- - 7-3 -9-6 C L m . I AGENDA ASPEN DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE REGULAR MEETING THURSDAY, JULY 13, 2000 4:00 PM PLAZA I I. COMMENTS A. Commissioners B. Planning Staff C. Public II. MINUTES III. DECLARATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IV. DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING A. 981 KING STREET VARIANCE, NICK LELACK B. 375 NORTH SPRING STREET VARIA>ICE, FRED JARMAN V. ADJOURN TIMES ARE APPROXIMATE. WE RECOMMEND APPLICANTS ARRIVE AT LEAST 1/2 HOUR PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULED TIME. r. '*1 2 9. . . - . ..1 . - Â· . t ./ f -1 1 L. 1- ./1 ' 1. 2<71411'i31 1 - 1 1 ., . .. f*Ell#litigal 1 :1- - - . I . .Nam 1-~,~mdi,ga,BE~VIEW APPEALS COMMrnEE , i TAI iONÂ» FOR 010.41*01%U . N I e..1 -â€¢ 1111.17 OF LOT 7, BLOCK 1, ?,4- 1 - . Â·$~PITKIN COUNTÂ¥ .kilÂ·'-'9, Â· 1-11 1-- . I % V i31.01 ; ; Ek 2:~i<: i M *WAWÂ¢444&-,6Â¢149Q~ --- ~ 104001 1 ,Â·;:%~;i~ ~42,i.tÂ· ..-,~ Â·.: ~ . .~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ 1, -/ 0.6Â·T.Â·Â· '4~ .,Â· i.,b~J 1 0' I . :two (2) variances:fremÂ·Section'. V , -7 - Sed ~Â»*~41'%~74~*91â‚¬Â·*f~*E~:48~ 1,373 Norili Sp~ng S#Aet: ~ ~ j.~t .Â· ~~~ i * .......~ ~ : .1,1.-n, . .... .....4 - 11 . .. -1,111 31Â·*42Â·luk/Â·.:F F:t ...:..1 PM"'.IA*44$& --f I.*22941*gij*!*MO*~10. of Lot 7, Block 1 ofthe Oktahoma . 1,1, I ~~00:11?. ',:1. .'.:Â·~,Â·-1,1-94Ejilia.ILL.., ,1'-. '. -:r~Â·g .-0.=' ,'-Â·- â€¢â€¢-a-'109 -4232 - " ~ ~attle Aspen Municipal Code, %9.iÂ·t. 24Â·it,~-Â·ti:g jo. 2.6.611'L~~.k,ar..Â·Â·.- :, 73Â£:6&Â·tÂ·Â·Â·....~.. .... - ,4...,~=:*e *phcant's applicanon for ~ 24,16-97,4,1,4 KE''h;lt:J~'Â·,Â·tÂ·Â·Â· 11. . ... '.. .. mpe,mi.t (â€¢Delitation to be Inconsistent with . .~ : - r.-..,/: 1./ /,~ r-- ......61.1.-1~ar~-- /NEâ€ž -- . 4 , . LÂ·..4 ..1 Â· 41 . . - Lf 1 --30*p~nent staifto be ' -, ~ - -~ -i~,~ ..0 u -Â·4 t**ff#:RiÂ·~Â·Â·,ir~~alkp<&.3.--%Â·i?/~ ~*~~' Â·'~' ~0-' 2'7 ,~ ~~,&1.*lims ttic,app~icant may ciÂ·ther-=- j ~.'. 1~1 ...,1.-0."18,tnr Appeal CommineÂ¢ I .indedÂ¢Ommt (*'amkmat.lk#Filijietifte HLES*md.4.26.410.040(B)(1) ofth? i ~ t . 4~ ,: * 21 .*.. I . L De,Ijaig,AF, m,0.,4,â€¢-a,~htl~k|bat -Amded-,S'le,4 4*.?*tit 4<ji~:id/:~.~(~*~~~~~~~si*nti~ Dehi#* /St~ 6f ~f <.- f D :.~~pi ' fifitiA-4-1 -/ : . 1'.-4.'....,(*v.â€¢1~00.2//8#0"Al'.47 iNgiint:m:hliBil/8/~Elb#i<,0/ 61Â£82(illris in order 1%,ftip#' Â· *,7 , $ fittititik.-'.1 ' 1. .1:-' 'ya. 1/- ,7-Â·- s. '14' 94- -p -p ~~F-it,~1~ 4 *&#S ... V Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant ' an exception, namely the proposal must: I a) Yield greater compliance with the goals ofthe Aspen Area Community Mai# b) More effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or c) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific COnstl*intS; . WHEREAS, the Community Development Director, after review of the requested variances, recommended approval for a variance from the residential design ~ standards for the proposed garage and' recommended denial for the proposed house ; orientation variance request; and WHEREAS, duri~ aduly notioed public hearing at a regular meeting on July 13,2000. the Design. Review: Appeal> bommittee, approved a variance from the Building Orientation standatd of Section.26.410.040(A)(1) and Parking, Garages, and Carports standard of Section 26.410.04Â«C)(29(b>of *e Aspen Municipal Code as it applies to ~- : ~ , l Residential Design Standwds fbr Lots 8,9,10,11, and North Half of Lot 7, Block 1 of ~ the Oklahoma Flats Addition, with conditions, by a vote of 1 to Q (4-0). NOW, 1'BERÂ¤**E BE rr RESOLVED by the Committee: Section 1 ,~ Â·...~ ~0 : ~ . That a propoigcd variance forasingle.family residenceat 375 North Spring Street Aspen, Colorado, is approved pursuant Â·to Section 26.410.040(A)(1), Building Orientation, and Section 26.410.040(C*2*b), Parking. Garages, 2md CarpOfts ofthe Residential Design Standards meeting Criteria A, a vaciance is supported by AACP'in terms of minimizing the impact on openÂ· space and.natural features, and Criteria C, the valiance is clearly i necessary for reasons,ciffhirness related to unusual or site specific constraints. The variance is approved with ithÂ¢ following conditions: Ar.'I"Ly. 1 Â· 1. Thatat the time of building permit the applicant must provide adequate documentation regarding the required location of the ADU so that effective screening ofthe garage may be achieved; : ' . ~- . APPROVED bythe CommitteÂ¢atitgregularmeeing on July 13,2000. DESIGN REVIEW APPEALS APPROVED AS TO FORM: COwUV#'rrEE: Robert Blaich, Chair City Attorney V ENTUIESÂ· It EST 'bl / 100 ARCHICTURAL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION To: Fgas Jâ€¢â€¢e,WAJ A spau Aw..u,AM 4 920 - 5~919 A rrac'-0 ts A cop Y 0 0, A 'b,Â¢*e Oeto,u rwA l.u 64 1 08 w AMâ€¢ *4,0,6*â€¢'90 , L'-~ a 12*) 69 e~ yL h4*UE A 1 8--*- -EN O-Â® PÂ¥. (446> YOU t+GL-Â¢) AA,EL 0 67â€¢461 eut Â· TH,40 â€¢L , Duvid Muckenhirn '0$1 Offki Box 8352 â€¢ Aspâ€¢o, Coloygdo 11612 Â· Tel,phon, 970.915.8889 Â· Fax 970.925.4006 Â· Cellult, 970.379.1077 1 MEMORANDUM To: Design Review Appeals Committee (DRAC) THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Directord*D FROM: Fred Jarman, Planne~ RE: Reich Variance DATE: July 13,2000 . 1 . 1. 4 . APPLICANT: DRC Family Limited ,*ai 1 Partnership Â«$07- Denice Reich, Owner 4 ..4 . A.:9 1 ' REPRESENTATIVE: Alan Richman, Alan Richman 11 /5//0 411,/14 u,,-Â· : 4 â€¢ / Planning Services .. 11.2. 1.'.1. , AC I .. . . 1 , *-. /4 3, PARCEL ID: 2737-073-10-001 :1Â¢~ 19.,2 ..t '. 90- I. >f " ADDRESS: 375 North Spring . Street, Aspen, Colorado , ... .....U'.44.-I. 81611 . ZONING: R-30, Low Density Residential West view of property from N. Spring Street showing access onto property (proposed driveway access) and CURRENT LAND USE: Francis Street Right-of-Way. 22,599 sq. ft. lot with three unoccupied structures. 0*'..' frtf 334 2 iâ€¢* -1 1- 1 '19Â¥4!lot 1 PROPOSED LAND USE: 4 ' 6, WfoF. -0 The applicant wishes to build a 4,157 . 0 ) i . 1, Ill* sq. ft. two-story single-family residence [ and detached 800 sq. ft. Accessory Dwelling Unit. In order to do so, the ~ applicant is seeking two (2) Variances from the Residential Design Standards for building orientation and garage setback. 1.1 I , 4..fl I %0 REVIEW PROCEDURE: Variances from the Residential Design . Standards [Chapter 26.410.0401 may be NW view of 375 North Spring Street showing granted by the Design Review Appeal Committee pursuant to Chapter 26.222. Aspen trees in front. /4 f. 1 STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant. Denice Reich, represented by Alan Richman of Richman Planning Services and Geoffrey Lester of Charles Cunniffe Architects, seeks two (2) variances from Section 26.410 Residential Design Guidelines for 1) building orientation for the proposed two-story primary residence and 2) a garage setback requirement for a front loaded two-car attached garage. (See Exhibit A for a description of the specific standard.) The applicant's property is located in the Oklahoma Flats Addition adjacent to the Roaring Fork River. It should be noted; a small residence and two "storage structures" currently exist on the property. All of these structures will be removed prior to construction on a proposed residence. Most recently, the applicant received administrative approval from the Community Development Director for a Stream Margin Amendment to comply with newly adopted stream margin review criteria and an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) approval on June 20, 2000. The following discussion outlines Staff s position on the applicant's variance requests from residential Design Standards for building orientation and garage setback. Staff Recommendation: (Exhibit A contains staff s findings related to the review criteria.) Staff recommends the variance request for "building orientation" be denied because it fails to address the street in a manner which creates a consistent "fagade line," does not contribute to the streetscape, and further detracts from the established parallel nature of existing residences in the neighborhood. Staff recommends the variance request for "parking, garages. and carports" be approved because of existing site constraints and placement of the proposed location of the ADU -which . will effectively screen the garage and cars from public view. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria & Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Proposed Site Plan Showing Residence and ADU Location Exhibit C -- Photo Documentation of Parcel and House Image Exhibit D -- Parcel 2737-073-10-001 Location and Vicinity Map Exhibit E -- Application Letter Exhibit F -- Resolution No. , Series 2000 2 V 2 it EXHIBIT A REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS Building Orientation The first request is a variance from the Residential Design Standards for building orientation of the proposed residence. The applicant proposes to build a 4,157 sq. ft. two-story single- family residence oriented to the Roaring Fork River. The currently proposed position ofthe house is 16 degrees off parallel from North Spring Street. Specific language and graphics referring to site design in Section 26.410 Residential Design Guidelines indicates the following: The intent of these design standards is to encourage residential buildings that address the street in a manner which creates a consistent "faÂ©ade line" and defines the public and semi-public realms. In addition, where fences or dense landscaping exist, or are proposed, it is intended that they be used to define the boundaries ofprivate property without eliminating the visibility ofthe house and front yard.from the street. Building orientation The front facades of at! principal structures shall be Yes. No. parallel to the street. On corner lots, both street-facing facades must be parallel to the intersecting streets. On ~1 , curvilinear streets, the front facade of all structures shall ~\ // be parallel to the tangent of the midpoint of the arc of \ N Yâ‚¬ the street. (See diagram to the right) One element, such as a bay window or dormer, placed at 1 afront corner of the building may be on a diagonal from 1 the street if desired. Staff Finding As proposed. the applicant wishes to orient the residence to the Roaring Fork River, which results in being 16 degrees off parallel from North Spring Street. The applicant contends that certain site requirements, such as avoiding the "A", "B", and eastern group of existing side trees. constrain the design possibilities making a parallel orientation a challenging task. The applicant has shown staff a design, which is parallel to the street; however, this design was undesirable to the applicant. The applicant also contends that the proposed positioning of the residence should not be judged "misaligned" due to the current "off-parallel" position of a neighbor's adjacent residence and will be set back from the street. Staff finds that 1) the neighboring residence (285 N. Spring Street) received a building permit prior to the adoption of Ordinance 30, Series 1995, which formally adopted the Residential Design Guidelines on June 13, 1995, and 2) these guidelines were drafted and adopted in direct response to developments such as the house orientation of 285 N. Spring Street. More than that almost all of the houses on both Bay Street and North Spring Street are oriented towards the street. These existing houses have a direct relationship to the streetscape on which they front. In the applicant' s defense, the adjacent neighbor (285 N. Spring Street) is roughly 15 degrees "off-parallel" 4, from the street but does not appear to be non-street oriented. However, this residence does appear to be "off' just enough to detract from the rest of the residents in the neighborhood. It is the intention of the Land Use Code to keep this trend from reoccurring by utilizing the Residential Design Standards. It is for these reasons Staff does not support this variance so that an undesirable and contrasting building orientation is not continued in a unique neighborhood where almost all of the houses have a direct relationship to the street. Garage Variance The second request is a variance from the Residential Design Standards for a two-car garage setback. The applicant proposes to build an attached front loaded two-car garage to the proposed residence. The currently proposed position of the garage extends ten (10) feet past the front most wall of the house. Specific language and graphics referring to site design in Section 26.410 Residential Design Guidelines indicates the following: The intent of the following parking, garages, and * All:y / carport standards is to minimize the potential for . 1 4=ma \ conflicts between pedestrian and automobile L.r-CE , No. i Yes. trailic bv placing parking, garages, and carports Yes. on allevs, or to minimize the presence of garages I i * Ul and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape .9 1 where alleys do not exist. 1/7 M _ 7-[ j %-1 1 For all residential uses, parking, garages, and Street carports shallbe accessed from an alley or private road if one exists. (See diagram to the right) Staff Finding In this case. the applicant does not have a private road or access from an alley. The applicant intended to use Francis Street as the primary access to the property; however, the City Engineer determined the use of Francis Street to be solely committed as a natural swale for the North Spring Street area. Therefore the applicant must address the following criteria: The front facade of the garage or the front most || supporting column ofa carport shall be set back at least . ten feet (10' 0") further from the street than the front ~ most wall ofthe house. (See diagram to the left) r.-JUIP~ 1 Staff Comments j~ | The proposed garage extends ten (10) feet past the front ' most wall of the house. This standard calls for a recessed ~ garage ten feet behind the front most wall of the house. f. 1 j i Therefore the applicant is requesting a twenty (20) foot \ variance from this standard. The applicant proposes to build a detached 800 sq. ft. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) to be located on the Northeast corner o f the property. Staff 4 suggested that the current garage orientation /placement could be satisfactorily resolved by the effective placement o f the ADU to be directly in front of the garage and therefore screened by the ADU. This proposed placement of the ADU not only screens the direct view of the garage doors but also hides any parked vehicles in the driveway. . c. On lots of at least 15,000 square feet '91 - I 1 + in size, the garage or carport maybe forward of the front fagade of the house only if the garage doors or carport entry are perpendicular to the street (side- loaded). Staff Finding The applicant' s lot size is 22:599 square feet; therefore the garage may be forward of the front fagade of the house only if the garage doors are perpendicular to the street. The applicant contends that due to the absence of rear alleys or private roads and other site constraints, a rear or perpendicular facing garage is not possible. The applicant preferred a perpendicular facing garage: however, as per tree removal permits issued by City Parks Department intended to save two sets of Cottonwood trees labeled "A" and "B" which exist inside the building envelope, the applicant contends that their design respects this agreement but calls for a front loading garage. In addition. side-loaded access to the site via the Francis Street right-of-way was eliminated as a result of its designation by the City Engineer as a drainage sivale. Therefore, as a result of these constraints, the applicant contends it is not able to produce a perpendicular garage design that takes advantage of this criterion. Staff agrees that the proposed garage design should be allowed in consideration of the current site constraints. Â»4 f P--6- l./+A 5 007 -- , W OKLAHOMA FLATS ADDITION ../- t!.Iml :NA..1; ~--4...--e=.= FORK RNER U - ROARING ,- AN /Ilm SITE SECTION 143,5304-0 . 00.---- T' 7 ' ~ 14 '42 '~E-070.1 - I :I /2 A - VEGETAnON 11 0 1 41.6 * 41 .1\O .*. - - 1 , >L' ~, ~~ ~ ~~ - ... .t-STONE~P, -: u - /4 / 90 ./9- -6 // /// 3:2% Â» . 145 \ \ -' -12-- - 7 97 'A vt-.7 7/ . 1 - - \ \M 1 i 1 n 4, W >911 f \ 12 1 rf #1v49;j#yun n tut ~ \ i-%59 h 114 9 A .j : 3 1,/3 .1, 4-__. r EDI I l 61-- 1 1 30 1Â».4 d 117 63 ap!! i . J 1 - A-6 PORCH \\ -d v--r \La, 1 ( 1 1 1 \\ - 1,6- 11 - 1*1 : 0 - 3EPht i ' 79 3 r L \ \41- 21 4 1 4 TV-k 5,-9 1 97 6= 1 /597 < 1 rls=0 -1 e<Â¢32 1 LA - '61* 1!>21 . 109 . A )44 . 83* * .Wr= . ./ 4 - - , 24 ./ Irr-~ s +4 91&'el 44 ...Â· Â»r -1 A m ZE , 4% Lit~ A.D.U. 1 1 0 4 .1, SETBACK LINE ~ dfl-2 i x 0 - A' %[%5 1. ..\~ -Irl. tx*-4 % 0 1 '*6 0 91/ 0[,0-5-'.f i i '. 14 21*9&/0 10 44 a!Â£,% .Â» 14,5 \ -4. 4 }11 *94, 1// 1 A b, 14<r ' 4 0 2,0'90 *~~ REVISED STREET DEDICATJON I -~.2. >24, N,5 30'00-E 937.50' - 461 -4- i> . t* A' IC Â£ 1 SPRING STREET i Vv 1 U) 1 00 1 71 It ,40Â·561 M.00, V~ . '*~ ~~'-* ?i' ItÂ»" 4 '# ~* 4 97).4 I . Ne Â·Â· -â€¢U.r,*, 1~, .1 e 4.54 k A . i .<H o~. I- I I L , *fi~. #52 .: 7 *33*.,i: .1~TÂ¥,#MI 11#r''llit&\ 1 .- ./47. '* S.li~&>1 * . r . 44 11.110,0 9 kit :.: ~:4 â€¢# sE.k ' .: , " -N,1â€ž , i *i;Ii'!14*$.â‚¬ - 1 Mill f 1 . - -11.1/,1 . r 1.1,2.,m t . 1- ,/ 4 * hi-/ tr- ~I./. '' .. - atâ‚¬27â‚¬/MWF%87.-3-'.,f %, h, 0_Ultt c ' I . L n. 4,=f' ~ k _i.li,-3.:v-02.~. %*fipk~-%-*<,i ~I tillitiFF~ 3514814*~jtf-477:~4 ~V it \ 4 . 64?4k*,: 4 *tr.1.Â·s,ZIâ€¢ Cm##44'2<~ 'f ' . . , . ' %, -0,-i.~..~~-~..c~ 4. ~/m<34", 0 .. I .1 *%4*f:=. ...v/*41? i. . ix,Â·,44471*;Â·- 4<:,kN. '41%441 + , 06*FF.*.,w-*,-0,"*,r i 6 4 , 1 /.12 - ml~1" F . 2, 4 1 4 t.': *liia,* '*31 *0 +10,19;[4,0.,1, >,%Â· 411 .45*rifit#.*fL.5/Liwililit:/% 'f.:i 2 1 ; 4 -1-/ . t. - ..17 4 , .ALEE!14-0 7=/3/ 9.1 4*191'"11"56.%2 'e. 114:,t - ANFIA.&"02% t'JN[//Typ. p 7,4.3660,41., 1 1 ' - 1 .* , 4*6.44 4- 1 : .~331 4, l .diftÂ·- -fr,u 2/A*#47. *f k At **' 4 I , ..... .......,., $ 4.- 0* /1, f Â» â€¢'1*Â»-- 4 â€¢ Â£ 0. I t + ~341//2/*Ilizvi< 11' A f ./. ais ?7126'Â¥3' . 11 Itt' . . U Â« '?4 .- 7*:4#. rit,k~4% lig' /Â·Â·9 : .' . I - 2 . '' 1.- p: ' Â« tr,4 2 11â€¢r91. 1.4, 9 49 ..,1 , s :~fl Ziia'=ir~.*<LA# d ~râ€¢r v# 4. F ;4.11' 'm -r ~4%4,401 4 .' 1 .~L -L A,Â¥ , -*42*644*:;6' . .,AR:3 ~tmi all,>qi: I.*g.....- ' ....cr.//.Â£1/.2.%17<1/46 '.4 r'- > S441â‚¬94~t~*'â‚¬; **'<tklf(72 Â·Â·4 57635 Â· :t~ . *,C- W't~~1.15.41 , 9 31 7,1 k % Gr , . .Xt:Â¥254, 0.29.4, 43 . Â»4Â£*Â· - 4 t '11'te tal , 1*2 ... 4.71 * *'' 'f ! f.1 , 2.4 31*-, 2 4 4 9 . . 4,9Â¢â„¢\ 1 ., m 041.121 ..r, 24*/:1:>::. 1* . Â«,2 . 4 . - Mt 4 0 ../ - 41 4-7 , :. 4 . -Â·%Â·.1 t,4 ' 1 1 - . l T . 'CE ' AL**t.%Â¥194*'r<Â¥Lt * r 1 0 eDo Ill:&"FAE./Uli/:1:61/1/E:glvifprifimp#Fill)"iljil'lilliallil ...i"XE' aa,Mamy,FÂ®.4,Â¥424* I ./I'l-/1.9,6---- 7234 44. ri.'..r/"..'.i.."..,i'.i..'.i..'.i..'.i..'.i..."..i.'..i.'..i-)* 6 9111?pr<711 I - - 11 !*r & 1 j, LM /1 1 1 '.Â£ r de~... ~t~.1544'.~. y....41:79 . â€¢V.Â£2 06' , I .. ..0 ..... - 7 - r..:..galiz.En- . -33<J ' 4,44.... Example of Riparian Zone Vegetation Structure on property /Neighbor - . 49---=Ii.P.../9*/ 412~11-Es,4,-*Â¢1'~vt#fiublâ€žJivib#..a~El'.â€¢ 1 ~naâ€¢A .& ./-a . ... ........--......:r ./- I Â· 4,911IRHOEMjiguill././.41/1/ 0 '7 ','N, %' 4..A'~t<Remil./1./.ill/4 .... 1~..,F . g Â¥ ./1 :St=,1. /.b.- t. % 1 42.44-5/*bliÂ¥... /1Â·,r- 4 Ja . =././.m*4.R.=.MW-25. . 1 ... y& v 'Â·.5*4:,WEL,li/ r - I .-,9.Â· i!12 .430.unnia Â·Â·'.,t, ,Â·Â·Â·Â· g.,n Ndu.Â·-Lh411,1.4..4, BRuyâ‚¬:950*91 5 4 *? . 5 .Â·4 4'â€¢-.â€¢:h-%-77,-7Â¢1'~ 457 North Spring Street side ofproperty Existing Berm on southerly property line 5. b ... ..:,1 ,1 U 4. 2, *,4.4 4 1 1, ,. W ** 6- I t. 4. 4 9+ 1 . 4, 4. 1 ~Â¥51 . - - - 4 * * ... 4 4 Trees on Spring Street side of property 7 6 8Â¢ j *fflf,t. 8 E- Ah; 614- c (co,1-k- ) 1 -,-~ 4â‚¬47 -./i> tr Z i ~44-:. -8 Â·Â·Â·9-2~ gli , . .,4 . : " . .1.a, - 1~4 9.e> -1.4 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 J . k A 9, , t . . Â· _ ~- 122~47Â»--,- *. *- v#R /7.-4/ /4 . 4-*'... *192 6. 0 i~ - .3//9 .... 940%. : .11,< 1. \9/.t. :7411;.* gil Â«r r i -11 ./.1 'll , I _10,1- V 'f A-i:,1 *C.,6.1- Â·ir. -I 'll ..A. 4 a ...tf~~ -- -. + < Y T . I. f, . --2- '1. .?~iy ' , - -a ,Â¥,r- *1'4. ~'k- . 7 I i ,Â· *f .I' f. 4 1 4, 11 , 2 >-4 :.AA:t.lrt-'.... HOUSE IMAGES -1 7 - Gi i i.â€¢4 1. lili 0 0 1 4 r *0)1 . V/ 1.â‚¬ 47- r. t., {'' ~ C.~6 4 49* 0." '.1-ar'Ma*54 .4 . .%/ -11: 4 ~~4{t'l~R. '.b=,0~b6 44' 46- ' V. A . 46, C.,21~ '/ 4 J-.:m"%4*~ev 02 2-- r Â«34 7 â€¢=mili#m.NIBili~:mmi,Imil.1. . '~ 454 /33?F"Min; 1/WHET/li../fill'./8//iriii//d Â« ; ~424Â°)'Ii'2*- .fi~N,ji.tÂ·Â· 4-2 I 9 .1/.Ill - 1# I.: 4 I ./ Â» + . 3, 4 *40 . * I . +164, '#444' d'I,~f@itbÂ·~%17' ~% 4*: :>4: ~69 ..,1<i *t 4 **, 1,0&,le) 2:90â€ž942454*r %'4 W >,41 114, ..:,râ‚¬71â‚¬94.4, . Â«Â·54* IAâ€ž44 **44>1-3247/#* 1-to A . aD/1 .+ 14 ; - .' 4 f a. 4 ./ ./ :, * .,<: I .3'5*19L ~4'*'~;' KIN~ M~ ..415%Â»44=iftijg~i,IMC:/.tzp,2 ....1. /4//: ~2*Il, '2 4 , : 0 -1- Nra 4 :: ,<. ~~2~~ p.34:: -:::91 p;rl. 2 "Ju,* 1, *4; / tr tikÂ·~7~3- El fr** 4./' y 2.2... 5 e ,Â·.' 4 Ur< 4 e ..0 02.1.. 5. P,â€¢*te# 00'778*.twk-I,~Ilg--iÂ¥'23= IJ'*5 Wt:t. 1 I. '9,:'/f'*~~1 441. J3~:Iffi -:Â»3949'34** - 74 ' 19Â¥ 46541. '.733>1'<t3 Â·3. I V. 1,4 -*11'ir ' *- t- ./4 E ~<7. A 4'1 2- ~~ t , 1 - 1%. f 4 k 9 14,4.-NI 1 , 3~ 24*0$4 .A *.4: Â¢03 4 t '* 4* ....1 4 :11â€ž5 4, I , Â«.4 , 2 :19.M,4 I 7 L .~ .0 , 1-9., 2 * 2,, .Â«' jtkp'41 47; & . t . . .k. . . 1 â€¢ Â·4' a --3<46 4 3 /3 :< '14 tur 4 '2~~#*. . I Ct : I .,24 + 74,1 3 4.. 1 ... .' UG':0 9 99 2 2Â¥ 4 k .4 + MEMORANDUM /4. CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 6/3 610 E. HYMAN, ASPEN, CO 81611 970/925-5590 970/920-4557 FAX ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS TO: City of Aspen Design Review Appeal Committee (DRAC) FROM: Geoffrey Lester with Alan Richman, Plannir g Consultant DATE: June 22,2000 PROJECT: Spring Street Residence (on behalf of Denice Reich) 375 N. Spring Street, Aspen, Colorado (Oklahoma Flats) JOB NO.: 0015 REGARDING: Variance Application On behalf of our client, we are submitting an application for two (2) variances for your review and consideration. The first variance request is for the garage location and the second variance seeks approval for the proposed house orientation to the primary street. The appropriateness of both requested variances is addressed below in further detail. Please find attached in 8 1/2 x 11 format the Land Use Application, Agreement with fee, the Dimensional Requirements Form, Applicant letter, Disclosure of Ownership and photographic exhibits supporting our variance request. In addition, in larger format we include the Neighborhood Block Plan with Vicinity Map (Al), Site / Landscape Plan (A2), Significant Building Elevations of the main house and A.D.U. (A3), Civil Engineer Survey and a photographic oanorama of the site and adjacent parcels. Project History: Our client and her family have owned this unbuilt parcel for decades and have recently chosen to pursue construction of a single family residence. (Refer to the attached "Architectural Character and Scale" photograohic reference for the desired building concept.) Our client has submitted an amendment to her existing. Stream Margin Review approval as well as an A. D.U. application. Both applications have successfully been approved this month. The past several years spent in pre construction planning and negotiations with the City have resulted in many compromises between our client's wishes and various city departments including City Engineering and the Parks Department. Several significant compromises are listed below: - The 1990 Stream Margin approval established a building envelope for this property with a 35' setback from the River. Discussions with City Planning staff have verified that this setback is greater than the 15' minimum setback thu Nould be established today if the parcel were to again go through Stream Margin Review. Our client has agreed to abide by this larger setback, which will retain an open feeling along this important City resource. - The City Engineer approached our client in 1999 regarding the need for the City to build a drainage swale in what would have been the continuation of Francis Street. Our client had intended to use Francis Street as access into the property, which would have permitted a side entry into the garage. However, our client accepted the request of the City Engineer and agreed to abandon this preferred access, in favor of the currently proposed access off of Spring Street. - Tree removal and mitigation negotiations with a City Official dictated that two groves of existing Cottonwood trees could not be removed, despite their location within the approved building envelope. Our client also intends to save many other existing trees along the Spring Street side of the property, limiting the options where a driveway access can be built. Based on these and othe npromises, the site specific constrai o design a residence ar6und, are significant. Therefore, we .-J I it is fair to allow approval of the folloj .11 t g two variances: Garage Variance: Due to the absence of rear alleys or private roads and other City negotiated site constraints, a rear or perpendicular facing garage is not possible. A perpendicular facing garage was actually preferable to our client, but the City's request to save the "A" and "13" groups of Cottonwood trees eliminated that option, (Refer to Sheet A2 for tree locations.) In addition, the Francis Street extension was abandoned by City Engineering in favor of a to be built drainage swale. City Staff suggested to our client that the garage orientation issue can be satisfactorily resolved by the placement of the detached A. D.U. directly in front of the garage as viewed from Spring Street. (Although this solution was determined to still require this variance.) This solution not only screens the direct view of the garage doors, but also hides any parked vehicles in the driveway. Please refer to Sheet A2 for further information. Finally, as shown in the attached photographs, most of the neighboring older and recently built houses have set a strong precedent for street facing garages. (Most right off the street, not set back.) Therefore, with all site constraints and precedents considered, we feel it is very fair to approve the garage variance as requested. House Orientation Variance: The obvious design theme in this specific neighborhood is to orient the house to the Roaring Fork River. History proves a strong precedent to this idea whether it be here in the Roaring Fork Valley or beyond. Even the neighborhood road layout is somewhat influenced by this natural geography. Our client wishes to follow suit with the primary house orientation to the river. This orientation decision leaves a subtle 16 degree offset from Spring Street. Beyond the desire of a riverfront orientation, a number of other factors have influenced the design: 1. Our client requested the house to be of a simple, strong form and to be designed well below allowable F.A.R. Designing the house and required A.D.U. to avoid the "A", 'B" and eastern group of existing street side trees, fall within the increased setbacks, and orient precisely to the primary street is a challenging task. When studying the alternative street oriented versions, the house grew larger and more complicated due to the inefficient stepping to respond to the river setback line. It is our opinion that a smaller house footprint (albeit with a modest street orientation issue) and retaining more existing trees is preferred over the alternative soiutions. 2. One of the basic concepts behind the street orientation guideline is to provide residences that consistently relate to the built environment in orientation, scale and character. The proposed building orientation certainly addresses this concept as illustrated on the site plans. The recently built neighboring house to the south, 285 N. Spring Street, orients to the river / street in exactly the same fashion as our proposed house. This precedent makes it clear to us that our slightly angled house does directly relate to it's significant neighbor to the south and therefore will not be judged as "misaligned." If you visit that house, you will perceive that slight angle as a non issue. In a slightly broader context, the orientation of our proposed house with respect to both recently built neighbors to the south will be in alignment, the notable exception being that our house is set further back from the street which is more desirable for this neighborhood. The position of the street oriented A.D.U. directly responds to the orientation of the several existing neighboring residences north of the site. The A.D.U. becomes somewhat of a hinge point mass that nicely adjusts the orientation back to the primary street. We feel our client's wishes of the proposed house orientation on this site have valid reasoning and precedent. In our opinion, this design certainly does not detract from the fabric of the neighborhood, it complements it. We feel it is very fair to approve the house orientation variance as requested. Primary Mass Standard: The DRAC guidelines ask for a comment on the Primary Mass Standard. It is our opinion that our design successfully meets those intentions with the detached A.D.U. mass. The requirement calls for at least 10% of the primary mass square footage to be visually detached from the principal building. "Accessory Dwelling Units are examples of appropriate uses for the secondary mass." - In conclusion, we are asking for two individual variances on issues that may not meet the letter of the Residential Design Standards, but however deal with the site constraints and neighborhood context in a manner that we feel successfully meets the spirit of these guidelines. 9 fil :/1/.1/16/L Jfilillillil:Ziwimill, - 11 1 - 4, =4.1- 1 + 1- 1 - -+4 I.: -4 2. ...., * #46.- ~ ~~: : ~~N ---1475 1 *Tt m m , 4- L I + t 1. :. . : 44:,4., 4 4: , 1 '*a 36:=*MN" 444.- :--= k.=Â·. tÂ»~ 1 + : I .. '1 . i - Architectural Character and Scale 111 ill: .. The following photographs illustrate the existing precedent for street facing Garages in this neighborhood: =9-=- 417...% -i ./.-1 -4.-1 - =.d?..... - 4.--=-0.--2- 11- --10.- - ...I--i - 1 1 " 8 j 1 PXÂ«* tÂ» I :'Â· 231\233 SPRING STREET ... 9. 1â‚¬4.- ..2 ... 1 ....I -- I. -1 + 1164 . . 51374.12* 4; t' -v-1 -20- -- - - 2 -rfw,k-UE-- - 1- 1,4.1 .. 1 11...0% ......2. 1. . -l ...=V * 4*Â· 2â‚¬ l.-4,2 -:-*,=5 =21 - ...... ...2. -1=t 424. Vel VII ~ 285 SPRING STREET r /1 IF ~ .F,11,! I -Yllf ~I - 3,i 1, 1,9 42,2 0 .1. r .:1 1 1 A ,;t *0 - 111* 111 11 "' T) 14& ft Â·' Â»:14 i - *4 '3.9 . , 11 . if' 119 11,1 . - ..1. 1 4,0 LJ/'111 : 1 L i F i . -74.,1- 1 34 i j -- I i .11% . i~ -1 k. f ..: e .? 010Â· . ild-: t . I â€¢tif./.I . lilli I .., 1 11 > 9 45 4 B I 4 t f 91%. ..*,>... Obt >. : 24 4+; 7 4:: CD 1 - I I , Z >,I. Â¥ ar> t./ 4 0- U.3 CO 0 CD I .>49#al~-â€ž - 174 1 I " 4 A I 5% .*4 2 - - . I. ' + ./r rÂ» 4.. VL 270 SPRING STREET 133 .1-4 L .* /4 ./ 7-_'* MEEdg<= =,F- ~ Iii-12 Â·i~~~ I ~- Â· - De= - 11 1 12 :1441 6- r 71 L ,-5:,r,#Mrki- - 1,IT i I. b.1 . - au==2 r I 41 =3. W. 1 A" . -,rÂ· 1 - ~Â« 34*4~ i 21 â‚¬ - 4 2-- 0-71 +1-0- 1+1-1=aeÂ»'14 -=- - --ULA - 390 SPRI NG STR C r--7. LEI . .'.lit , 1 f - /*Â¢ I./. /5.*1.8 ... = *14 -21 2 --t 9.........6 +9 - I =sl.... . . . . . -4 g '. 2 . A.........1 -# ..r.&..% . 4~ 12'.- #;1 -- , 111- 9 4 -4 - -3 Iif I .4 -4 - :4:lA, I 1 ./1 1/.S - Â£, , 1 ,+Ammoil/ - L 1 ~Â·L ./ ./ 2~2~ 4 7 -1/1,~I I,ki- 13 , 1/ - :.4Â¢:1:"E..1 --im.-I--=.rt i --1 7 ~-JE-~i - . + 3 Ar=tf"T~~9 --::~:~-41~7i--9Fr--4: ~---3 ~~v+~~~4. j /42227 . .. 34=, -1.32,4-~1 LÂ·*Â·A + 4% r 4 1 r. '1 2.-1.. - Â¥9 4- - r 4 1 lilli ' ! -= 1 -- ~-- I - 6 -,-L -= - 1 -111 1 - I mi.....Ar.1....../p.9. .,1 4,1 - E. + t.-_---1 -:=11*Mr<*ie-Z- . - +h' 1 ... .5 --0 1- - 6_ - I.-*h_ 1 420 SPRING STREET b' 3 ' i, ..11/---U ..+ ...5Â£5291/"-li"/imif 1 + 1.. I 4 I : 14 1 I '14 24'~ i ' 3 1 . ~t 7~,. . 1 - - Â£ 94 1*E+E" Â£4*5 . f L .1:#24*,11 Ill 6Â¥314*;4 4 re/6 .... . ==124== ial, .per 'L Â· -- :. ~ : -t@Z 1 Ii:- f 1 - 3'sla fl . .-t Â· ~ -, : ....En.-4& 4.11 7 - â‚¬1 --J~~ L~' | 14 ' i 1 16 7- . IF- 9 1, ~ 2-h- TÂ¥- 13 - r ya#~1*h,~1, 38*Q- ~ =- '*A r-_ 4 24=--*-4'9'Ukill'.,1.1, i ..4 1 -+14?= =, LL -1 I. ./*/1/ -111 - .AIMM- ~ r ASW ~ 4 .~ A.-Aly - =-. I -- - 1=. I ' 16jd. 4 Ami##111~.=~~-#.- 727 BAY STREET r '1 + i h * 1.-- - 1 11. f -I *f. 344/64 1 yr 'F- 1 - + -I =6--,.- -- a.-- 14%&34 r #.4- 4-= B. : + , .r 42,1 1 i....../p<-9.12 1 - 1 =-,1/4 / =4 '/ 1-1,- I 'fiye-'. 1 --- lai - 3- 1 -ZE -W lilli' .1 V â‚¬- 1 111'mT - ff r - Als:Lit:) Â· 3 '6 34 -2*4 14*1 1 15'4 JN m~ .. A. . 1Â£911 = 111 -2 =- L --_, L-471 --EE*- 494~1~*,~ . Mjl -25 -:.= 1-- 1-3946 4 - 4 1- /3.E 2 9 = :-r + .= -;/4/FL=et =i,Jillillillilillillilillill ~1 - -- - -_ IT--i:*= F - â„¢'JTE :3*k-rUF 3 -- â‚¬ '- - 4 .2 =_=-1- 1*~L, +5 -4-2_ 1--- -â€¢F I.,~ = - 0, 6"VÂ¥"DUC . jo 7...hil./ 1 2 -2 , 2 1 0 -I lill-- tm '.41--2-1 1-== 4, -4 - 4 4% ~L T 8*: 1 .= -7-1, 2=56 . U- -. 1. 9. 731 BAY STREET 44 1 tuL/il . h. . 10 .#.. #Â· IW'ty' *r 1b r'.1111 . . f M -. *7.-- . L. Â· .U. 9 /1.3.4/4 Â· 4'I M.... .3- 2.1 1 * dz, 1 11 1 ...."p/ : Â·,3-,i-ffi'3-12.0~" 11-/ 04* A 00* t -,a: 29721! 'LI,% 4*-~:~ 629 943 41 1 - ' ' - ~ - ~ . + ~ 2,;43#~ 9bbii<2Â· 3. /11 1, -1 1 . 3 F r *AP /1 4 ' 4- 1 . 121 -7,"4*1-Â·id.11*~A."# 41. Â¢1 '1* Irr, - ' :5 - 298 02 ' *-ZA+PV.'Â·Â·i 1 '11* , *t IÂ¥.2.(t. . , . ., tty U T -1 -4 till . *11111.1-m 1- . 1 1 N MI V. 1 + 1 lilli 1 4 M +1.. 00 + ': 11.-32- 'A L I.'111= r . -. . f...14.6 + L .11. ti-- lit Ti'.72&6 0- &Â· / . 4 71 f li - , IP' 1,Â· .= â‚¬ 11 4 1- i .1.*.1'hill - i: 18 '1' / t. il- 4.V Vi 441-21.1. 6 41 t.dIA t _.illf., ~y i U '.4 CD r + 1 15. 1.411 i !111'r / 1 + 1 .~1 5 1 4| .' 1 **1111.i j f 11 ; - 4 kil ~1~ U) i 4. 41 r I ~Ii,i, r+ 16 &, 1 , 1 11 h --1, 1 -â€¢â€¢116,~ill - 1 . 11 4 1 N"Â·2 .91*' '- 9/ K 14&41 Â· i 4* . 1 1 . 111~11 1 1 11 111111111111 -* 4 1 4 - 11 *,1 ,/ Il; 1 'Wi" I' ' wf#Â·M # '14* u . _~ 3% +11,11~111~11 1111 1 1 111'le ~11141,-11 , ill:Â£_ t. 1- - 116 lili 1 111 110 11 1 , * ' ' ./ Li 11,1,11111 . 1 111 .1 - a SIONVhld 032 4 , , PUBLIC NO TIC E DATE TIME r-, Â· PLACE PURPOSE , I -1 I > . 4 -ia -rk, 3 24. 4/'v/ .. Â¥~9214*1/,5.Tft?#10#*01<14 '.'.4 3=- u; 71:054,7 - . Ar?e~ Attachment 8 County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26.52.060(E) I, A LA w (1Â« ck t/'14 A , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. dly mailing of notice, a copy of whicbtached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all ownG?%Â·Â·eÂ£2mcfty wi~ip,Â¢Mfe-e hundred (300) feet ofthe subject property, as indicated , 199__ (which is days prior to the public hearing date of ). - VU,4, 41-#â€ž14 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the L day '7400 .1-0 0-J of e JU\ . *99*_,to the \3 day of Gy'.1 , Wk . (Must be posted for at least 5 -terrtt0) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. 1Â»Â« ,9-41 Signature (Attach photograph here) SiMned before me this 1, day of eS u L~ 1 -,Zt by AL.Ak A*LIA WAVL WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission expires: , \ -aq- 2-00\ Notary Public Nancy Ramaley / Notary Public 0031 Eagles Nest Colin Carbondale, CO 81623 My Commission expires 11-24-2001 ma LAND USE APPLICATION .PRAC PROJECT: Name: 919 K), OffÂ·I+16 Â«1-rzâ‚¬EE FEES{ CEkiCE Location: 17'19, N. 4Â¢120(AG GRZ,EET , 014*iÂ·16HA- FIWTS, *98Â®, 00, I (Indicate street address. lot & block number, legal description (vhere appropriate) (*OTS A 1/ lo, 11 49, Po@Â·TH HALF 'SF berr 1, 51Â»61Â¢: 13 APPLICANT: Name: ULÂ· fz- blv\Â£1-â‚¬C> Fa)41(>l FAFTRIEPE*tle ~/ 4, Ca)(eâ‚¬ Re'cpt Address: [6-13 60 66-LLAÂ·(Be ST. * -700 ; CENdâ‚¬F, 630 2>0 212- Phone #: (1703 3 161 - 641-1- 15 1 -800 - -74-1- -1*1 1 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Al~Ail ActtrikA f[#+IUFFE. 6â‚¬*Â¥12â‚¬Y l.gER, (WN*.â‚¬5 LUNMFFE Apats ) Address: 900 ll). MAIN ST., /19Â¥04,6,0 ~la E. HNMAN AVE 1 ASEGU, COÂ· 8(6,1 1 Phone #: 19/0 - 1 119 / 114- 9610 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): ~ Conditional Use E Conceptual PUD j Conceptual Historic Devt. ~ Special Review ~ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) E Final Historic Development [000 Design Review Appeal ~ Conceptual SPA U Minor Historic Devt. ~ GMQS Allotment ~ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) ~ Historic Demolition El GMQS Exemption Q Subdivision Q Historic Designation ~ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream j Subdivision Exemption (includes Q Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane El Lot Split (2 Temporary Use g] Other: ~ Lot Line Adjustment ~ Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings. uses, previous approvals, etc.) EFWil var. 918â‚¬Â»t tylad:zaA Am#) ENOMâ‚¬*ri 80â€ž0 jk~,9.0. Affulad-(GUS *Fr261(420 Jokle %04>. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings. uses. modifications, etc.) -rwo (Â© Grcel *lk*le F?*110Â»{ 12â‚¬Sloâ‚¬%60â‚¬ torrH Et'(*9(â‚¬0 + .9.0. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: S 450 7 N. Pre-Application Conference Summary g Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agre ement E' Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form 2 Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents ~ Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents 2[ Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and TbtrL Jun,)1=-4 FAM, 91 P.,224.Li* (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for c.32< A ~509,t.,-'17 /12-St gl<lul-- (hereinatter, THE PROJECT). / 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 1999) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional Costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the arnount o f $ 1-ZO . e which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension o f processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By: *~ Ef,EU Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director Date: 47Â· 19.00 iMailing Address: 8,4 m--0 22 'ej, -7-4 L.4.3 4 '.IL 1.-i- 006 LZ>QU N)A,â€¢21 g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc hipg g, 411 12/27/99 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 919 N. 4â‚¬el 06 *refeT pâ‚¬GICalâ‚¬LE Applicant: SS# 1-IM\-rep FAMIC,1 fAÂ¥:rkazatiÂ¥' C c,/6 PalligE <49(a-43 Location: -&19 bit 48*\04 gre-42â‚¬r oWL,AgdHA FLMS , ,Â¢6820 Zone District: K- 30 Lot Size: 715, 619 Â·6e Lot Area: - ( for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: - Proposed: - Number o f residential units: Existing: - Proposed: Â£>Fe (FLUS Pe'OW:HED A.D. 0 3 Number o f bedrooms: Existing: - Proposed. 15 Q ft,us '2 R* A.P. u.3 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): R)~* DIMENSIONS: 41 1Â£3-lee Bu> 400â‚¬,F Floor Area: Existing: - Allowable: 4,790 9Â¥ Proposed: (#A1MED Fbe. A. P. U. f 16' To LawEW '<ba F61*IT te Principal bldg. height: Existing: - Allowable: 29' Proposed: 0Â·an- PrrcH it.cOV:=â€¢ f= 14 ' TD t.da/â‚¬9- 73, fo'Mt 812 Access. bldg. height: Existing: Â·- Allo-wable: 16 Proposed: vt:,1 frrcH %06Â¥. On-Site parking: Existing: - Required: 0% TÂ¥- MOProposed: \ % Site coverage: Existing: - Required: Proposed: \676 % Open Space: Existing: - Required: Proposed. 1523<6 Front Setback: Existing: Required: '26' + 6' Proposed: '622 Rear Setback: Existing.- Required: 905' Proposed: 35' Combined F/R: Existing: Required: 62%' Proposed: 68 ' Side Setback: Existing.- Required. 14' Proposed: t.6 1 Side Setback: Existing: Required: \â‚¬7 ' Proposed: \9 ' Combined Sides: Existing: Required: 5Â© Proposed: 'ixb' Existing non-conformities or encroachments: 106148 Variations requested: 0 2#42 ASE \/#43[MJEâ‚¬ Â© 80{LOIA(6 ZE(argatkj WN@AP<hte Ms. Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: 375 N. Spring Street Residence Variance Application Dear Ms. Woods, I hereby authorize Alan Richman, Alan Richman Planning Services and Geoffrey Lester, Charles Cunniffe Architects to act as my representatives with respect to the Variance requests submitted to your office for my property, referred to as Lots 8, 9,10, 11 and the north half of Lot 7, Block 1, Oklahoma Flats Addition to the City of Aspen. Alan Richman and Geoffrey Lester are authorized to submit these Variance applications and be my representatives in the pending DRAC hearing or any other related hearings and meetings. Should you have any need to contact me during the course of your review of this application, please do so through Alan Richman or Geoffrey Lester, whose addresses and telephone numbers are included in the variance application. Sincerely, Denice Reich -2 . EXHIBIT #2 4329738 01/23/91 10:18 Rec â€¢5.00 Bl: 638 PG 317 f#-46. r, 1 Recorded 4 ... Silvia Davis, Pitkin Crlty ClerlÂ·, Doc %.DO uv.... Recep on Nn "Wrim - SPECIAL WARRANn' DEED E Â·THIS DEED. 11 ..1/th,â€¢ 3rd 44 August . 890 ZI'lz C het..en Richard W. Volk, Trustee UTA dated waiMarch 10, 1984 3.369 '4 - m W X C-my af Pitkin , 51- /4 C....b. v.../% I.j 0 ~ ~fenice C. Reich <) W t- â‚¬ - X ,< -h.K kgal .6:zr- ii Suite 200, 3801 E. Florida, w c Denver, Colorado 80210 -% 2 Â· I I he County of . sU. 04 Calâ€¢.do. 0.90[x grantee: 9 --- 8 d WITNESSETH. Thal the gran,0,91 fr,r ;and in comider*- M the g. 4 Ten Do 11ars ( $ 10.00 ) and gzather good and valuable considerations XNX]ONG # *\:~ Ih' rrempl and -fficten/yof whi:h i.herety,cknowled,ed. 1.S gr-=xi. b-,mngd. told"dcâ„¢r~.d. .ind hi thrâ€¢< p,â„¢r:ta, e S gn,H. 4.- bar:.4...It. con.7 and contirm. unto the K.*4% her heirs d adÂ¢rts fo,râ‚¬r. all tbÂ¢ Int pr,rerti. [emthrr will, impr,4rmenâ‚¬$. I ...t O 0, ir any, inale. 17'ne and bein, in the Col'yd Pitkin . St= of Cator.In. NE:! deâ€¢cribed m Wbi 14 X !,1 4 Lots 8, 9, 10, 11 and the North half of >Â¢. Lot 7, Block 1, Oklahoma Flats Addition, 4 0 11 0 City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado :j " 144*AA+,A*,kkAW,44* TOGETHER with 211 ind un,ular the heralitirn,na -1 19â€ž8â€žâ€žAces ChertÂ» bcloo,m:. M im 19.vicâ‚¬ Ippertamme. -1 the revinion ind rrver,enâ€¢. rpirminder and r,:maindE:n. re,m. h-cm -d Boda then:041 -d all th, ele-e. ri,hl. tnk. ir*rew. claim Jnd dgmaid .h=,ceâ€¢rr 04 thc - , *nnum,L elther in liw rw equity. of. in and to the abo,z b-imiâ€¢cd pâ€¢ennâ€¢,o. -* :be I ' .: TO HAVE AND TO HOLD ' '", ' ' - 1. ",O the rr-,1. her hein led =lign, River. The vamoâ€¢*L A- h ime f Â· his I 'â€¢41~r~-/*CO#--*mth- ~45 he 811 - will WARRANT AND HDREVT- n. , her hcinand,su,ns. araim: all-defry per-1 or per,om climing dIc -41* or -, p-t l~cm,f. 0. 11-ugh ir -kr iNc *** I IN WTTNESS WHEREOF. th, p.â€¢09 4 S c./,1,4 *ad//./ -*2 40(Ba ki,la/*1999 1%11Â·~ lt/(4% j e Richard W. Volk, Trustee Â¢ 1. UTA dated March 10. 1984 1 1' STATE OF COLORADO 11. ' 1 1 0-,4 Pitkin Thc 6....,f ig--1 -Heb-btah/. me thi 3.... Augu36 . 14 9 0. * hy Richard W. Volk, Trustee UTA dated March 10. 1984. =.'a\h . grant=, except and subject to Wâ€¢-â€¢ ary -11-1 fâ€¢mc,al ..d 7 mreerent of O0ication a!,1 Restric- ,1, o .v.... .--7 ~)~ -* Miff~40'0'.'1 tion recorded .n Book /,_LF at page 76 of the Pitkin ColETET-records \ 1441**14*4144,AW-1 4j 04*: *,41 124 ASPEN -'*4, EXHIBIT #3 Rooorjed â€¢t .'/1//6 - M Acocption No Â»â€¢rorder QUITCLAIM DEED '~ THIS DEED, M.jethil 2673 day or JUNE , 1996, between DENICE C. REICH of the City and 'County or Denver and St.te of Colorado, grinlorm, Ind DCR FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I whose Icpt Â»ddres, Is 1873 South Bellaire Street, 4700 Denver, Colorado 80222 ofiR City and County of Denver and State u< Colondo, grintee(:), WITNESSETH. That thc:rantoÂ«,). for and in considention of th, sum of Ten and other good and valuable consideration------ -------- ---- ------------------ 1)0'tan the reecirt and iumciency or which ti hert ty .cknowledged, 41 8 remised. teleâ€¢Bed, sold and QUITCLAIMED, and by the,e Druents do e e remite, release, xiiand QUITCLAIM unto the vanterts). its heirt, succ,uors and Au.ing, forever, ill the ri,lit, litio. interest, claim and dernand whkh the:ranter(i) ha B In And to Ilte rul property, to,crher with improvemanti, ifirly, litutte, tying ind being in the County of Pitkin and Biate of Colorado, described *i follows: Lots 8, 9, 10, 11 and the North half of Lot 7, Block 1, Oklahoma Plats Addition, City of Aspen, Pitkin, County, Colorado. 394644 07/11/96 04:33P PG 1 OF 1 REC DOC UCC SILVIA DAVI9 PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER 6.00 0.00 itio known by â€¢treet and number u: iumo, ; schedule or **reel number. TO HAVE AND TO HOI.D the urne. logether with mil ind singular the appurteâ€¢Ances ind pri.ile,es thefounto belon,In, or in arlywi,c (hercuntu app,rtlirdnt. a nd alt thi e:tate, rl,ht, title, interâ€¢11 wd claim whilloive:, of the grutorÂ·(i). dther In 18- or eqult>, to the only Draper ule, benefti and behooforthc grantee(i) itS htin ind mist:ni forevor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, rhe trintorm hiS etecuted this deed on the dite set forth above. Elâ€ž-+ a LQI Denice C. Reich '10... 0/ 448 \00 MS f â‚¬40' 72/ STATE OFCOLORADO. .....b # County of Denver Thc foregoing Instrument *11 acknowl,dled be fore me thi, 2618 44 of JUNE , 19 96 . Denice C. Reich. My commission explies 513499 \ w.trte ,~S~d int mciat - 1, N ~ WV , 'If in Denver. insert "Cily ind" W. .. .., A.Id-u u,P-- Ci.â€¢â€¢, /0-1, C.,r l L.*f-,11.,1.-4~4,Â· 1,404 1 e 1 1, 140.933. Râ‚¬v. 4-4 QutTCI-dM t,rED e kâ€¢Ofâ€¢,4 r ibllâ€¢hln. I ;41 WAR. St . Dleâ€¢v, CO 1010] - 0031 1Â·1300 - ~94 1 11 Fred Jarman, Planner Community Development 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO., 81611 July 10, 2000 Dear Fred Jarman: Regarding the variance requests of Denise Reich (scheduled 7/13/2000), I wish the following to be entered into the record: Because Mrs. Reich has an especially large lot presenting no obvious hardship, I think the design rules must be upheld, and her requests denied. Sincerely, n *- Flc,-,4 (/Â£+L p kil,JE,~L--0' Diana Van Deusen 233 N. Spring Street Aspen, CO. 81611 Debra Moore 231 N. Spring St. Aspen, CO 81611 11 July 2000 Fred Jarman, Planner Community Development Building-Planning-Zoning 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Reich Variance at 375 N. Spring St. July 13th. 2000 Scheduled at 4:OOPM To whom it concerns; I am a resident of the City of Aspen and wish to uphold the standards and design guidelines that have been so meticulously created by a knowledgeable committee. Regarding the request for variances made by Denise Reich at 375 N. Spring Street in the City of Aspen, I see no hardships involved that would require any special considerations by this committee. Being that the applicant owns a very large lot (22,599 square feet), she should be more than able to design a home, garage and ADU to fit within all current standards. I commend the city for trying to preserve our town's expected "fine standards" and hope they will deny any unnecessary requests. 2)-20Â» /77"J Debra Moore cc:Design Review Appeals Committee i \ ,. i \ 1 1 \ 11\ 1 \\111 3 183 GIBSON AVE \ VARIANCE APPLICATION -- 6-22-00 ART MUSEUM 1\\\ h ~ ~Qiâ‚¬RING /43 - ~ 9 :L+M-6 Z E i i I 8 // 1% 1 4 E ? M / ~Â«1.14 -:431\ ~ 01 1\ i 91 1 i k TENNIS -<*KGrL_. - 3) j COU~ - 1 PKG Â«L~_f13 'eak : f ~18-5.1 *414 41 ~~~f~_. KG . EG L. ~ 63'-1 ~ lifry--1 - F ; , 1- Z Z | 443 SPRING_] PKG E-1 j H,2,2-1 420 ~~E ~ /0,/ ,/ 1 h Â«----Â»rE-- --fid-1~ 1-k+1-P 1% 1 , ' Ill- SUBJECT 1 ~ - . 6 9-- - FRANCIS STREET- -~,74, 3 'G b U $ LL,1 S SITE - F-- -211- r>itit--1/ A ~730 BAY FfiME \~ 1 ~ ' 4--- L , '-\ -dul- 1 2/'4 ADU| m 44-1 UCIRING G : j \\ tÂ· u g PKG IA f - ill E it % L__g fl I ./ \ L 0 -i- 3 1 ~ 720 Y \ ' PKG $ L BAY STREET 2-w --------- 1 1 VICINITY MAP \ SPRINW W--- 2 ~_S< 4 -7- - - - - G t 4 [ 270 SPRING 1 . 1 -- -- -- *90 G .,E 1, ~ 727 BAY 731 BAY ~ E DENOTES ENTRY 233231 4 G DENOTES GARAGE 1-n 1 4 SPRING PK DENOTES PAPÂ¢KIN 'i 71~-' ' LEGEND 02-a- - - -3 R' 5Â·. PKG 1 1 1 ~/ 1 A HORHII 16 FrIFI, 1-1,EA t-i REFER TO ENLARGED 1 i. ---&- TO #*RFOIFT L - - - -, NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK ' PLAN THIS SHEET - I .. m VREET 1 010â‚¬FENDE*E MS \\ f SHEET NO. N NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK PLAN <Th LIP Al 0 25 50 100 1 6.-'./2~1 1 11111!1-111=,14,I tli~r.21.1, Â£7~USXÂ· SCALE: 1" = 50-0 Â© COPYRIGM[ 0Â·WU.ES CUNNIFFE ARCHrrECJ5 N, CO 81611 ' TELE: 979925-55 5159-91 XY; . 0659-9Z60Â£6 :Bl . SEâ€¢19 0) '5(nIV,Aal . 50ZÂ¥ 115 "GA19 39Â¥TIIA SCINÂ¥,Â£]3 SOLO OOVMO-IOD 'N . Â£2919 00'31Â¥(]NODNO . ZEZ WAS ,6 :3131 . 5Â£419 03 '3(Ilwnll31 . '3AV 133kLLS DNINdS 33N3GISEIM 13321-LS DNIkldS .. VARIANCE APPLICATION rl 6 - 22 - 00 i-/.4 -4 34/ 111111111111111111111 Ill 1111111111 Ill'Ill'Illl 11111111 Ill 1111111111111 I 111111111 I 111111 E l l i L =El--/-1 Â»li Juullilimuillillilv-vill11111111111111111111Ill Wallintlual]1Â®1.24~ 22Â»1 din T 1111111111 lDp' bu j Â»U 11111111111 . .. lilli , <h 1 i r%74.- <727- 1 - . Â£ 4%Â¢~11 Y 17'4. Irlll~lllIlilllIlllIlll~~/-jâ„¢IllillIllilllIlllIlillll .... - I .. 1 Â· -~---~ lit' ~, - .. - *94Â£Â» Il Il'INNII'll'111LIP~ IlllIlllilill!IllII A- - 0-=r 0 -- 0 - Â»e - 15#- E 1.1-7-1/- 155-40 0 \ NÂ£Lf''I IMIEILIng@lkillgalesdWA-.Wg UU - - - =2 ee =â‚¬DÂ«/-4.- = ,=7 74#ir/*441- -6 = - -le'l...# + 0 0 1 0 .=N=. e= *'/1,9, I ' --Â·-,dUL *41 170 ~. -00 - 9 e 1 Z 11-1-4.- - - 0- $4# 41. Â·~i ~ -' 9 .JÂ·-Â· Â· - ir . i .. - - 0 6 * 9 , . 1 '4- - -- "'ph'!49 .1#,+Â·liff:21 the.*14='1 Ful?*18: 'b:1-1 rÂ®~7-10 Â¥1Fill=-1 1 R 1 1 .0.Â·Â·'Â·flit'Â· 4Â· -9 9 11171121 RE.Er;36.ZEIIEL**1~ [Ii--bliull=' UA_~~~~ 1 '. 4 1 roOÂ«E' ~7Â»n t 17)Â»rÂ»>\ 3 9 MAIN HOUSE - SOUTH ELEVATION MAIN HOUSE - EAST ELEVATION FACING SPRING STREET ZO 2U A LU -27[417 Al r Â¥45<2-174:' LA-~=,c<Z -4 4.97 7Â« 1 r_r,~-*rr===,r=r==- * <-- -19- \1 / *64$"9\ po 32* 116)41Illi,Illl,I~~[IlllIlllIIIJ~IlllIlllII 0= e -3 )#*9 F- I l Ill==~~~===11 IlllII Ill= - ==11 IlllIlll - . \IÂ·p----â‚¬ .39~-3,~ \\- *kÂ»/ 1 dr-* - - Uy Il Illill IEnTrrr-m-rurr,H IlllII I M-rrr,-r=,- r-4 IlllIlll 0 e e al||11|111|11||1|11||1111||111|Ill||111|11|11|1|11||11|11|11'xm- O.C. 62-1*- -- 1 mt -fees:3*2 11-2, 7 ~h'=~e=&*Ed:6&a666:&66&666=666&â€¢U~6=6~&6:W:&66~6&=&=~=6~=64~'~>...Xy 3 - '2214Â·71.1 1,1 0 * 1% A- - 1 IÂ»-29 yete- 49 11*8Â¢39~i-~~~PI-I-Il ' 'll:~~I Â¤C=31 I tl~'--1-:,=I:[jtidINLIINEIICUIEI t==1 1 Â« 33 f 11 n.0 . 1 La-Â»Â·11Ill11Illl111Ull| 3311-Al 4 2â‚¬- An 1.:2, o I U ./4--3 "- 23,5 . :al=11 1 A.D.U. - SOUTH ELEVATION A.D.U. - EAST ELEVATION FACING SPRING STREET (A.D.U. RESPONDS TO DETACHED SECONDARY MASS CRITERIA) SHEET NO. 0 4 8 16 F.-1 SCALE: 1/8 " = 1'-0" ...... /*COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS /8 ZEtr-0ZODZ6 :XY:d . 0655-Sm/DZ6 :3131 , Lung 00 'N3dSV * '3AV NVINAH 1SV3 0L9 S1331IHDOV 33=!INNflE) S31MVHD 3DNEICIISEIPI 133kllS DNRIdS 66Â£9-Â£940Â£6 :XW . t6â‚¬9-â‚¬960Z6 :3131 * Emly 03 '31Â¥(]NOQMVI) * Eâ‚¬Z 31InS * '15 GELDZ6 :XY:l * 9â‚¬ZE--9Z00Z6 7131 * 5Et'Le CD '3(]IMn1131 . 3AV OC]Â¥301 133211S D VINdS N SLE SZ99-9Z60Â£6 :XVI * 0659-9ZE,0Z6 ;3131 . Sâ‚¬t].9 OD 'SCRIVI\(13 * 90 ZV 31S 'aA19 39Â¥11IA SCINVMCI3 9L0 ODÂ¥30103 'N3dSV f= 0 . LEGEND. 1... E.vd.PL 1 /- C I . CVICTIkt TOE T r,rK.Alk /ARIANCE 4PPLICATION 6 - 22 - 00 B m 14 Cho, ME EET NO. A2 ~HT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHffECTS * 0655-SEG0Z6 :3131 . LEW CD 'NESV * N[AV NVINAH 1SV3 00 * t6Â£9-Â£94(M6 :3131 * Â£79Ly OD '31Â¥(]NOERIVI) * ZEZ 31lf-IS * '15 NIVIN ZOS Z996-9ZZ/0Z6 :XY=I * 8Â£ZE-900Â£6 :3131 * 5Â£149 00 3aINf)1131 * '3AV OCIVZIO1OI) '3 0ZZ 133N1S DNINdS 'NI SLE 5259-9260Â£6 :X\41 . 0659-9ZÂ®Z6 :3131 . SE,[9 OD 'SCINVMCI3 * SOZY ELIS "aA-18 3DVI1IA SCRIVAAC]3 SOLO 00Â¥30103 N3dSV I".6/1.ilic#.UM"/al/6-0,/Ill/"Il..ill'll. . . - I. , 0 0 ... . 00 #4 A . . I , -- - - N./-4 / 0 1, . . . .a .....414 - 0 1- 6 ... --~#~ 94 I - =.----2..2~ N i 0 . -- i ....... P 0 4.9 0%02" itr0 0,0,"0 09/4/.Immill:* \ ~kt/2, A.. 44 . .... 0.- 1 . 4 , . 9 -/y 44 le 01'Al e' . .. P '..4 , 04 -1 - 1 0.00' p 1 1 2.*,&2 41 04 :. . : 4.' Â»1 / , 0 74 '0 801 'r m . # .:,1/:1":0,./ , 61, 4 1 6 Â¥ - *44/0, I ... , . '' y- -jf . / . Â¥ 4 - ./. Il * L f./ 0/0 0 t,Â»e ./ V . .P D . ...0 I 4 0 00 0 ... A, A. .A ~ 1. 0 0 0 . .. 1 0 ....... i VARIANCE APPLICAI ION - JUNE 22,2000 SPRING STREET RESIDENCE 375 N. SPRING STREET ASPEN, COLORADO CL el 'ARLES CUNNIFFE ARCI I ITECTS CA 610 EAST HYMAN AVENUE * ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 * TELE: 970/925-5590 * FAX: 970/920-4557 1 - a / \ 1 1 1 \\\\ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \\ 1 \ 1 1 \ \ 1 1 %\ 1 1 1 ~a 1 \ ------ - -LJ-% 1 1 KN --* \ A - 9.----- i \ 1\ GIBSON AVE. \1 - -- --J VARIANC~ --01 APPLICATION ~ C< 6-22-Â°21 \ /q - -%-- \\\ ART MUSEUM \\ --T-N-- \\\-*%-1- --- 1 -- N N ---1 \ \ - $606 SPRING ./~ Â¢ ~~~_lb.~ . , I-- 1 / I AG % ' 1 1\ E / Fl 9 -3-- 1 3 / ' 4 4 $ S 6 10 M LO 1 1 4 13:3 -- \ %%5 _-3 / Â¢n cy, c, --M I. 1 1 & 1 L..1.-1 % i \ - 10 /\ Url TENNIS F-- PKG 1-1_._~ 6 Aff Â« \ COURT PKG : 27'-9 4 1 1 Ally'lll' 1 + N AZQ_-- 3 /Â»121/9 1 rj A 1 1 % EG ) ~ ~ IE <JE 63'-0' ~ ~ PKG J 1 1/ % 4,3 SPRING : PKG 42-10 420 . E CO 0 U w E ' G ./ 'A i'j 4 .A .. i m 4/ i ------- FRANCIS STREET -------- ''~4'-30 G SUBJECT E- h E. 1 1 4 SITE Â·- - 730 BAY E 375 N. Spring Street V \ \ 1 - Ush Â© lit' -2 & \ ; 0 1 ~i.. 1 - ., - . I.... i :2/'-0. ADU G 1 \ Z Block 1, Oklahoma Flats) 390 SPRING ~ _ ~ \ 1 - 1 - - 1--- 1- -1: m ... =0- I 1 0 1 720 hAY -1 I \ 1/ h hE /Â«Â»4 1 1 L-44 1 F Gtz ,-4 - _ 1 ~ PKG 4 44---- L / \ V-/ /12 2 i - / 6,4 BAY STREET --27* I *-1- -- Il-.- 85 UÂ«/ 1 - VICINITY MAP ~SPRIN~lt'/-11 + f Fo l \ 1 i: El I - ..qi- L--] 1 ~ -Er-* ~ 1 1-7-1 v 1 '44'-0'JG -It ~ G L_711-= 1 LEGEND < ~ 727 BAY 151 731 BAY - - 11 1 1 E DENOTES ENTRY 233/231 1 ------ : G DENOTES GARAGE 1 SPRING & PKG DENOTES PARKING 23'-5" PKG 4.\ /4/// 1 - 24'-8" ' U A 00 ..... E 4 .#&~4880'AN 4 4 4 . S --0 REFER TO ENLARGED -// 11- 1 \Â·23.** t.-I.\ 1 -- , . NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK , 1 1 / - PLAN THIS SHEET / - 7.0 Nepog N d m iii. MAN STREET 1 ., I I '4. iNDEPENDENCE PASS \\ SHEET NO. 1 N N NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK PLAN /1-1 - OF ~-A1 0 25 50 100 - SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" Â©COPYRIGHT CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS ilk= -A//----- S1331!HOMV 33=!INNAD S3-INV 33NlaISBM 133M1S DNINdS XY:1 . 0659-5160Â£6 :3131 . '3AV NVINAH 15Â¥3 0[9 :XW * t6Â£9-Â£940Z6 :3131 * EZ9[9 OD '31Â¥(]NOEINVD * ZEZ 311nS * US NIVIN ZOS * 8EZE--9ZWZ6 3-131 * 5â‚¬*19 OD '3CIINfll-131 * '3AV OCIVNOIO) 3 0ZE 1332l1S DNINdS 'NI SLE SZ59-9ZG0Z6 .XY:1 I 0659-9Z@0Z6 3-131 * SEM.9 OD 'SCINVMCII * SOEV 319 "CIA18 3DVI1IA SCIMVAACI3 SOLO 00Â¥10103 'N3dSV </f ........ aj t,4 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY OF LOTS 8, 9, 10, 11, & NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 7, BLOCK 1, OKLAHOMA FLATS ADDITION CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 0 LEGEND S ELECTRIC RISER A 8ENCH- 7859.50 td BURIED TELEPHONE UNE - SIGN Â£21 GV SET NO. 5 REBAR & ALUM. CAP -9 - BURIED GAS LINE GAS VALVE f* 4 15770 31 Â»UNESS CORNER x * ' X FENCE UNE 6 0547ER SERVICE- 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN UNE 0000 ROCK WALL O SEWER SERV/CE ZONE "A" AS DEPICTED ON 1 *1. Mr FEMA MAP 0809700204 C - tv- CABLE TELEVISION LINE 4 LIGHT POLE Â·Â· HAER VAL 1/E N 74'JO'00*W & If I 107 ELECTRICAL UNE - w - WATER LINE 185.04Â· 44Â» -ss- SANITARY SEWER UNE FIRE HYE)RANT fr \ DED/CA RON (P=5' f792}WANS - ~ ~ | TELEPHONE RISER EASEMENT - BOOK 638, PAGE 76.-*- - (5' FROM HIGH WATER UNE) 1 00 -IS S.rb h. \ --4,--- OVERHEAD UnUTY UNE CABLE RISER 7863 -,Â£427, SEWER MANHOLE 18~ Clip . EXISL CULVERTS STORM DRAIN INLET 5 TREES I Ap 1 .. . -10Â·ki ~ ROCK ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER .. 494; ft:;t Â·f-.- 14 13>to SET NO 5 REBAR *PLASTIC CAP - 7 iÂ·Â·P'?:5 2~>3Â·rf. 4.<. % 1 ... / % < ~ 017 ~ rt':.'165.-,w rI~~'tfis, Â·' 14Â·Â·- , .' REBAR & CAP -/ TREE -Â· Â·-111-272:RÂ·Il...4.72Â¤ ' CONTROL POINT E 8 8~ i~--- ~4 FEES~ nonnn mEE UNE 2.4 1 -- -- Ccb UTILITY POLE 1#' "3"--2 2* :.,+4-4- P.:-4,4 ': .1 2'.1 f GRAPHIC SCALE h11 ~ 25,251 --%-- 433: 1 TREE Legend and Notes.Â· M i litia .148 - - B indicates found monument, rebar and cap as described. 80 9 1 P- 1% \ ( IN FEET ) 4 1 - % indicates set monument, rebor and cap as described. , - - -~-1 - Bearings Gre relative to a beaning of N 74'30'00" Won the South line of Lot 1 of the Volk Lot Split Monumented by No. 5 Rebars with plastic tv.V.Â· E -*EL,#*r 4 L '-'Â·'- .~Â· ' ~~' . , '11 ~ 0 caps marked L.S. 9184 as show,n hereon. ....... Fc BLOCK 1; OKLMMOMAFIA-CS - <li~jg, LOT 1- VOLK LOT SPLIT - Description: Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, and the North holf of Lot 7, Block 1, S74*30'00 "E 180.00' \: 2259932*I ete / Oklahoma Flats Addition, City oif Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. A// information perlaining to ownership, easements, or other encumberances i 3115 Â° 1-- - -- 1 - 777/s survey does not represent o tit/e search by the survepor to detennine -1 ownership or to discover easements or other encumberances of record. ~ I ~ Land Title Guarantee Company dated August 27, 1998, No. 0372411. PA.. of record has been token from o title insurance commitment issued by /:7Â¢D. NO. 5 REAR & PLASUC CAP - - 2<:<â‚¬ag.L:.1.- I. 1.- -1 1 - 1- 1- , 1.. 1 CrrY OF ASPEN N74'55'10 E 2.16' Â·: Â· o. a aih L.* 12707 -I -: - This property is subject to apparent easements for existing utilities and * .. . irrigation ditches. VICINITY MAP ...... 1270 U 1 77*ZE 07 Z> -. - Rock Wall is shown hereon for information only and does not necessarily represent 8' WITNESS CORNER i gr#710 F - . 5 REBAR & ALUM. CAP ~ Â· limits of ownership. -fâ‚¬ F.k,C~.4.-Z. 4 BENCH- 7864.55 ~ h - W#/00 4 Â·Â· 82/CH - 4* -4 4-2-- AREA RESERVED FOR DEDICATION $ '00/al Â» A ----_ 4 7 TO THE C/TY OF ASPEN FOR \ IMPROVEMENTS - BOOK 638, PAGE 76. 74'300 143.67 l spm Surveyor's Certificate: -6 01 LA,IN MASS FI AD,Â«aNT FRopERTY ~ 4 Ke/meth R. PÂ»/son, being o Registered Land Surveyor /77 the State of Colorado. do hereby certify that this 1 -13 -11111 5 0 Ttal improvement survey was made under my supervision and is true RC 9184 *-- 2*2 PIUAR~ 0202 ALLAR --- and correct to the best of my belief and knowledge. 1 SET NO. REBAR & PLASDC CAP further certify that the improvements on the above described ~ HOUSE- L.S. 1571 , parcel on this date, October 12, 1998, except utility connections Smâ€¢99' '04 cre entirely within the boundaries of the pdircel, except as Ot 3-*fet shown, that there are no encroachments upon the described 44 9 premises by improvements on any adjoining premises except as . indicated, and that there is no apparent evidence or sign of 4 + any easement crossing or burdening any part of said parcel, M al at SMH 01 except as noted. 0 4 AVI 2 4. 1= REBAR & CAP Kenneth R. W#son L.S. 15710 Dcte LS. 9184 94 04 NOTE: SETBACKS ARE FROM RESIDENT DWELUNG CODES FROM PNE J A. .4 THE ZONING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FOR PITKIN COUNTY. O,044 -Â£- 9 DID RC RR SPIKE NOTE: AT TIME OF SURVEY, TRUCKS WERE ADDING MATERIAL Rju .. Callâ€¢on < AND TAKING AWAY MATERIAL FROM SITE. Â· L./0/ 3 li %1* . NOT TO SCALE 9879Â» 2%15**G L.S 9184 4 f Notioi: SURVEYORS SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER INC. 88? REVISION DATE BY Job No. 98093A NUM- According to Colorado law, vou must commence - ENGINEERS Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81801 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY 3 ADJUSTED ELEVA TIONS any tegal action based fon any deic# 1,1 rAts suru,y within thrl, .t. Vou 118 W. 6th Street, Suite 200 . .2 REED ~OOPUN~ARPYHAYNAN~~JUDEFDOCEOURS 132: fI OKLAHOMA FLATS Drawn by: JSK first discover -ch dÂ«flarlt .o ovent ..v Date: 9/10/98 any kgat action based tlpon any d,fict k 2/11/99 JSK SGM 1 ass surwy 69 commenced morâ€¢ than ten years Â· (970) 945-1004 (FAX 845-5848) Inom the date 0/ tAe certification shown SCHMUESER hmon Aspen, Colorado (970) 925-6727 4 ADDED A TOP OF BANK LINE ALONG RIVER 6-11-99 JSK Appr. by: KW GORDON MEYER Â· ~~ Â·~ -Ill File: OKFLAT1 - â‚¬ #*8020Â® 41 E:,\dwgs\1998\0kflatl.dwg Tue Aug 03 11: 57: 01 1999 SGM Inc. (JSK ILTB)