The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1105 E Ute Ave.A112-00 CASE NUMBER A112-00 PARCEL ID # 2737-182-68022 CASE NAME 1105 E. Ute DRAC PROJECT ADDRESS 1105 E. Ute PLANNER Nick Lelack CASE TYPE DRAC OWNER/APPLICANT Thomas Coleman REPRESENTATIVE Jack Miller DATE OF FINAL ACTION 10/3/00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION Reso. 46-2000 ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 10/20/00 BY J. Lindt - k l CASE NUMBER A112-00 PARCEL ID # 2737-182-68022 CASE NAME 1105 E. Ute DRAC PROJECT ADDRESS 1105 E. Ute PLANNER Nick Lelack CASE TYPE DRAC OWNER/APPLICANT Thomas Coleman REPRESENTATIVE Jack Miller DATE OF FINAL ACTION 10/3/00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION Reso. 46-2000 ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 10/20/00 BY J. Lindt PARCEL ID: 2737-182-68022 -DATE RCVD:-19/8/00 # COPIES:1 --- CASENO|Al 12-00 CASE NAME:~1105 E. Ute DRAC PLNR:~ PROJ ADDR:|1105 E. Ute CASE TYP:~DRAC STEPS1 OWN/APP: Thomas Coleman ADR~321 St. Charles Ave C/S/Z: ]New Orleans/LA/701 PHN*504) 586-8300 REP:|Jack Miller ADR:|Box 4285 - C/S/Z:~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN1925-6930 FEES DUE:|480 D FEES RCVD:|480 (put in Timeslips) STAT: F REFERRALS~ REF:] BY| DUE:| MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED I . | ~ DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| 19*00 1 CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ pz: u,Ev, 4-98 -- 26'00 CLOSED:|g)~*Â·, BY:1.3 , L.~ ~Ar-fl- DRAC: BOA: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMIN: & Apto/ove d DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Thomas Coleman, 321 St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70130 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Parking. Garage, and Driveway Cut Variances, 8040 Greenline Approval Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution #46-2000, 10/3/00 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) October 14,2000 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) October 15,2003 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 14th day of October, 2000, by the City of Aspen Community Dsvelopment Director. ULL% CL.1~ J~ie Ann Woods, Commdty Development Director PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision, by resolution of the Planning and Zoning Commission numbered 46, series of 2000. For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. s/City of Aspen Account Publish in The Aspen Times on October 14, 2000 TVC. MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission/Design Review Appeal Committee THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director 48P FROM: Nick Lelack, Planner~~~ RE: Hoag Lot 4, 1105 E. Ute Avenue - 8040 Greenline Review and Residential Design Standard Variance for a Driveway Cut Exceeding 2-feet in the Front Yard Setback DATE: October 3,2000 APPLICANT: Thomas Coleman REPRESENTATIVE: ..,â€ž~i#.W..d~ Jack Miller, Francis - Krizmanich ...........9...................9,42rri....ill.r ,% LOCATION: : %9,.$ 1%12..... '* Ute Avenue, Hoag Subdivision ..,0- -f=/93Â· S #Al< WI ,/ EXISTING LAND USE: 0.4/# Duplex I. .Â·141.1 PROPOSED LAND USE: Duplex with detached garage The driveway cut would be into this hillside. ZONING: R-15 PUD SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to build an addition LOT SIZE: to an existing duplex and a new detached 17,107 sq. ft. garage. The development requires 8040 Greenline Review, and a variance from the FAR: Residential Design Standards - Parking, Existing: 3,356 sq. ft. Garages and Carports standard. Allowed: approx. 3,890 sq. ft. Proposed: approx. 3,890 sq. ft. REVIEW PROCEDURE The 8040 Greenline Review and Residential Design Standards variance requests are combined in one application. This consolidated application is a one-step review at a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Commission may approve, approve with conditions, or deny either or both requests. STAFF COMMENTS: Thomas Coleman ("Applicant"), represented by Jack Miller of Jack Miller & Associates Architecture/ Planning, is requesting approval for an 8040 Greenline Review and a Residential Design Standard variance for an addition to all existing duplex and a new detached garage. The Land Use Code states that No development shall be permitted at, above, or 150 feet below the 8040 greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all ofthe review criteria, which are discussed in Exhibit A. This property is within 150 feet of the 8,040' elevation. Staff recommends denial of the 8040 Greenline Review finding that not all of the review criteria have been met. One of the criterion Staff does not believe has been met is Criterion 4, which states: The design and location Of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. .Although the application states that the removal of vegetâ‚¬ion and ~ all grading will ]Qe minimized, this development will create large cuts, require significant grading, and cause the removal of a substantial amount of -,-2.EtatioE on the parÂ£Â£1. Staff believes this development will negativel the character of the hillside animountain as a scenic resource, cause a degradation 13 ttlf environme-ntal quality of the site, and therefore is not -compatible with the terrain of the parcel. The site contains a significant amount of ~ 1 J Proposed Addition ~ o.,~ . dense, mature :M:. .1-'>i:ofs,din: 1---'-" z--1 vegetation and very . Â· Â·-'4 1.-c: Proposed Garage i steep slopes. Based ~ Lka.7 ~,4 4.~- , 14-3,42 - Â·. on the site plan 1 f 4.--1 Al...,0.~ t E ' 1.</0, 8 : 4: 4'4' Â· 4. provided by the Applicant, Staff believes the proposed IYâ€¢Â£2* -.I-- .9/ihtÂ·'r' I..*35.4,6 . addition would be D.Wâ‚¬F- 711?A.Ir.#~46%****hu.:.1 I :241, ~ built on approximately 38% -2. r=~LE slopes. The proposed - -F Â·ame,B >-4~84Â· ),4,~.,4,Â· : 4 6 tal/t~ rivewalwould be Duilt on %]Sms ~e a; 4'. < ~ '. 1~ UK t~1Â£7't.'44 ~ , t.: ranging-between 30%- .Â· 70Â°/0, and the goags, Ute Ave. Â· 'Â· 'G would be built on . .. slopes of approximately 44%. The proposed Residential Design Standard variance is from the Parking, Garages and Carports standard. Specifically, the variance is from Land Use Code Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(d), which states, "When the floor of a garage or carport is above or be low the street level, the driveway cut within the front yard setback shaN not exceed two (2) feet in depth, measured from natural grade Currently, there are two curb cuts to the property off of Ute Avenue. These cuts create access to the property via a circular driveway. The driveway 47 1 W is approximately 17 feet wide, - -' < 2, + which appears wide enough to ) accommodate parking on one side and vehicles to pass the parked cars on the other side. No garage currently exists on this lot. The only on-site parking is on the circular driveway. The photographs on the previous pages show the approximate locations of the proposed garage and driveway cut. Staff believes the proposed location and cut would substantially impact the hillside. Staff and the Applicant discussed the potential of moving the garage closer to the street and driveway to minimize the impacts on the steep hillside. However, moving the garage closer to the property line would require a set back variance because accessory buildings must be set back 30 feet from the property line. Variance requests are decided by the Board of Adjustment; although the Board can grant variances for garages, they have typically not granted such variances because not having a garage is not viewed as being a hardship. Though Staff doesn't believe the review criteria are met for either the setback variance or the Residential Design Standard variance, the Applicant will argue that Criteria C: Clearly necessary for reasons offaimess related to unusual site specific constraints, is applicable in this case. Staff believes that existing off-street parking on the circular drive is adequate for the parcel; @taff further believes that a lack of a garage does not constitute -MNaimeadmursuant to CriTeria C. Therefore, Staff recommends de-ifimi-m tile variance finding that none of tREreview criteria have been met by this development proposal. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending denial of the 8040 Greenline Review and Residential Design Standard variance, finding that the review criteria are not met for either request. '= RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE STATED IN THE POSITIVE): "I move to approve Resolution No.414 Series of 2000, approving the 8040 Greenline Review for the addition and garage, and Residential Design Standard variance for a duplex located at 1105 E. Ute Avenue." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A -- Review Criteria and Staff Findings Exhibit B -- Development Application f 43 t i . j j V/ EXHIBIT A 1105 UTE AvENUE REVIEW CRITERIA & STAFF FINDINGS SECTION 26.435(C) ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA, 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW 8040 greentine review standards. No development shall be permitted at, above, or one hundred fifty ( 150) feet below the 8040 greenline unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. lf the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the city. Staff Finding The parcel is developed with a duplex, and the parcel above the subject lot is currently under development. The Applicant is committed to stabilizing and revegetating soils, and removing any hazardous or toxic materials if they exist. Staff recommends a Condition of Approval that the Applicant provide the City Engineer with a soils test demonstrating that the parcel is suitable for additional development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. The Condition further states that if the soils test does not demonstrate that the parcel is suitable for additional development, then the Resolution shall be rendered null and void. 2. The proposed deveZopment does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, soil erosion or have consequent effects on water po Zlution. Staff Finding Staff is concerned that the cuts and grading required to build the addition, garage and driveway may adversely affect runoff and soil erosion. A series of Conditions of Approval are included in the draft resolution to attempt to mitigate impacts caused by this development, if it is approved. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the city. Staff Finding Staff does not believe the proposed development will have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the city. 4. The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located. Staff Finding Staff does not believe the proposed development is compatible with the terrain on the parcel. The parcel contains steep slopes and dense, mature vegetation. The garage would be built into the hillside, requiring significant disturbance of the vegetation across the western front half of the parcel. Therefore, staff does not believe the location is appropriate for a garage. The design of the residential portion of the addition matches that of the existing duplex and is located partly behind the existing structure. However, Staff believes this development proposal will change the character of the mountain and is not compatible with the terrain. Staff does not believe this criterion has been met. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. Staff Finding The application states that "a "shot-crete" system will be used on the deeper excavation areas to eliminate the major over-excavation normally required on a steep slope to minimize the disturbance of terrain and vegetation on the site. Staff agrees that the proposed grading will minimize the grading to the extent practical disturbance to the terrain, vegetation, and natural land features. However, the nature of this development requires significant grading that will disturb the hillside and its natural features. 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space, and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. Staff Finding The duplex, proposed addition, and garage would span across almost the entire front of this lot. The garage and extended driveway would require significant cutting and grading. In addition, Staff does not believe the structures are clustered in a manner that preserves the mountain as a scenic resource or allows for compatible development to the terrain on this parcel. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure win be designed to blend into the open character Of the mountain. Staff Finding The proposed residential addition (23 feet high) is lower than the existing duplex (27 feet high) and partly set behind it, reducing its visibility from the street. The garage would mostly be located below grade to accommodate a driveway grade meeting the City's Engineer's standards. Staff believes the height of the addition could be further reduced to more effectively blend into the hillside. Staff does not believe a garage should be constructed on this site because of the steep slopes, and dense/mature vegetation. Staff does not believe this criterion has been met. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. Staff Finding The property is currently served by all utilities. Conditions of Approval in the draft resolution indicate that additional fees and services may be required to serve the addition; the fees and services would be determined and due at the time of building permit. Staff believes this criterion has been met. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said roads can be properly maintained. Staff Finding The property is served by Ute Avenue. Access from Ute Avenue is achieved by a circular driveway that is located both on the property and in the City right of way. 10. Adequate ingress and egress is available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. Staff Finding A Condition of Approval is that the Aspen Fire Marshal shall approve a fire suppression system for the addition, interior remodeling, and garage, as well as adequate ingress and egress. SECTION 26.410 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS The Design Review Appeal Committee (DRAC) may grant relief from the Residential Design Standards at a public hearing if the variance is found to be: a) in greater compliance with the goals of the AACP; or, b) a more effective method of addressing standard in question; or, c) clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints. Variance requested from the following standard: Section 26.410.040(C)(2)(d) Parking, Garages, and Carports. "When the floor of a garage or carport is above or below the street level, the driveway cut within the front yard setback shall not exceed two (2) feet in depth, measured from natural grade." In response to the review criteria for a DRAC variance, Staff makes the following findings: a) in greater compliance with the goals of the AACP; or, Staff Finding: Part of the intent of the AACP Parks, Open Space & the Environment component is to "Preserve, enhance, and restore the natural beauty of the environment of the Aspen area." This component's goal "E" is to "Protect and enhance the natural environment." Staff does not believe building an extended driveway and garage into the hillside on a parcel with adequate access and on-site parking meets this criterion. a more effective method of addressing standard in question; or, Staff Finding: Staff does not believe the proposed driveway cut far in excess of two (2) feet more effectively addresses the standard in question. Staff does not believe this criteria is met for either variance. c) clearzy necessary for reasons offairness related to unusuat site specific constraints. Staff Finding: Staff does not believe any unusual site specific constraints exist on this lot that would warrant granting the requested variance. Access to the parcel and on-site parking is achieved by the circular driveway. Staff does not believe that the lack of a garage causes unfairness for the property owner. Therefore, Staff believes the existing access and parking are sufficient for this steep, visible, environmentally sensitive site. Staff does not believe this standard has been met. RESOLUTION NO E~ (SERIES OF 2000) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING THE 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW, AND GRANTING A VARIANCE OF THE PARKING, GARAGE, AND CARPORTS RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD FOR LOT 4, HOAG SUBDIVISION, 1105 UTE AVENUE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-182-68-022 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Thomas Coleman ("Applicant"), represented by Jack Miller of Jack Miller & Associates, for an 8040 Greenline Environmentally Sensitive Area Review, and for a variance from the Parking, Garages and Carports Residential Design Standard for an addition to an existing duplex and new garage at Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision, 1105 Ute Avenue; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is approximately 17,107 square feet, and is located in the R-15, Moderate Density Zone District; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission may approve development at or 150 feet below the 8040 Greenline in conformance with the review criteria set forth in Section 26.435.030(C) 8040 Greenline review; and, WHEREAS, the subject property and proposed development are located at an elevation within 150 feet of the elevation 8040 feet above sea level; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department recommended denial of the 8040 Greenline Review with conditions; and, WHEREAS all applications for appeal from the Residential Design Standards of Section 26.410.040 must meet one of the following criteria in order for the Design Review Appeal Committee or other decision making administrative body to grant a variance, namely the proposal must: a) yield greater compliance with the goals o f the Aspen Area Community Plan; b) more effectively address the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to; or c) be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints, and WHEREAS The Planning Staff, in a report dated October 3,2000, recommended denial of the variance from the Parking, Garages and Carports Residential Design Standard finding that none of the criteria have been met; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on October 3,2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a _to _ C--) vote, the 8040 Greenline Review and Residential Design Standard variance for the Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision, 1105 Ute Avenue, with conditions recommended by the Community Development Department; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION as follows: Section 1 That the 8040 Greenline Review for the Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision, 1105 Ute Avenue is approved with the following conditions: 1. All prior City of Aspen approvals shall remain in full force and effect. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit: a. The primary contractor shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director stating that the conditions of approval have been read and understood. b. All tap fees, impacts fees, and building permit fees shall be paid. If an alternative agreement to delay payment ofthe Water Tap and/or Parks Impact fee is finalized, those fees shall be payable according to the agreement. c. The City Engineer shall approve the grading and drainage plan for the parcel, including the proposed addition, driveway, and garage. d. The Applicant shall submit and the Environmental Health Department shall approve a fugitive dust control plan to ensure that dust does not blow onto neighboring properties or get tracked onto adjacent roads. e. Run-off from the site during construction must be prevented by detention ponds, hay bales, or similar methods to be approved by the City Engineer. f. The Applicant shall submit and the Parks Department and Community Development Department shall approve a detailed landscaping plan. g. A tree removal permit as required by the City Parks Department and any approval from the Parks Department Director for off-site replacement or mitigation of removed trees. 3. The building permit application shall include: a. A copy of the final recorded P&Z Resolution. b. The Applicant shall provide the City Engineer with a soils test performed by a professional licensed geotechnical engineer in the State of Colorado demonstrating that the parcel is suitable for additional development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. Ifthe soils test does not demonstrate that the parcel is suitable for additional development, then this Resolution shall be rendered null and void. c. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. d. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. e. The building plans shall demonstrate an adequate fire suppression system for fire protection approved by the Aspen Fire Marshal. The Aspen Fire Marshal shall approve ingress and egress to the property. 4. No excavation or storage of dirt or material shall occur within tree driplines. 5. All construction vehicles, materials, and debris shall be maintained on-site and not within public rights-of-way unless specifically approved by the Director of the Streets Department. All vehicle parking, including contractors' and their employees' shall abide by the parking limitations of the area. The applicant shall inform the contractor of this condition. 6. The applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. 7. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record the Planning and Zoning Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. 8. The applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during construction. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction. 9. The Applicant or owner shall mitigate any public impacts that this project causes, including but not limited to utility expenses and sanitary sewer and water lines. 10. All uses and construction will comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards and with Title 25 and applicable portions of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal code as they pertain to utilities. 11. Colors shall tend to be earth tones to make the building compatible with the hillside. 12. There shall be no future grading on the site without 8040 Greenline Review. Section 2 That the Residential Design Standard variance from the Parking, Garages and Carports Residential Design Standard for a driveway cut in excess of 2-feet in the front yard setback is approved for a the property located at Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision, 1105 Ute Avenue. Aspen, Colorado. Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded. whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby , incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4: This Resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on the 3rd day of October, 2000. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Robert Blaich, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk C:\home\nicki\Active Cases\1105 E. Ute Ave 8040 DRAC.doc FROM ' ,"nT ZMANICH PHONE NO. : 970 927 4263 Sep. 26 2000 10:38AM P2 C 8040 greenline review standardi No development shall be permitted at, above, or one hundred fifty (150) feet below the 8040 grcentine unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below. 1. The parcel on which the proposed development is to be located is suitable for development considering its slope, ground stability characteristics, including mine subsidence and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls and avalanche dangers. If the parcel is found to contain hazardous or toxic soils, the applicant shall stabilize and revegetate the soils, or, where necessary, cause them to be removed from the site to a location acceptable to the city. RESPONSE: The Project is a remodel and addition to the existing residence on Lot 4, Hoag 2-vdivision. If hazardous or toxic soils are encountered during construction, the Applicant will dispose them in a manner acceptable to the City 2. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the natural watershed, runoff, drainage, hoil erosion or have consequent effects on water pollution. RESPONSE: The proposed addition to the existing development will have minimal impact on the natural watershed because of it's small size and location. 3. The proposed development does not have a significant adverse affect on the air quality in the cityÂ· RESPONSE. The proposed addition will add one bedroom to an existing duplex residence No additional air quality impacts are expected from this project. 4, The design and location of any proposed development, road, or trail is compatible with the terrain on the parcel on which the proposed development is to be located- RESPONSE: The property is steep and contains mature evergreen trees. The proposed addition orientation has been designed to minimize the loss of existing vegetation. 5. Any grading will minimize, to the extent practicable, disturbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features. RESPONSE: A"shot-crete" system will be used on the deeper excavation areas. This will eliminate the major over-excavation normally required on a steep slope This technique will help to minimize the disturbance ofterrain and vegetation on the site. 6. The placement and clustering of structures will minimize the need for roads, limit cutting and grading, maintain open space, and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. FROM : KRIZMANICH PHONE NO. : 970 927 4263 Sep. 26 2000 10:39AM PE RESPONSE: The construction ofthe addition next to the existing residence minimizes terrain impacts. 7. Building height and bulk will be minimized and the structure will be designed to blend into the open character ofthe mountain. RESPONSE: The existing residence blends with the site- The proposed addition is designed to complement the original design of the home while minimizing terrain and vegetation disturbances. 8. Sufficient water pressure and other utilities are available to service the proposed development. RESPONSE: The residence is served by existing utilities. 9. Adequate roads are available to serve the proposed development, and said roads can be properly maintained. e Adequate ingress and egress i5 available to the proposed development so as to ensure adequate access for fire protection and snow removal equipment. RESPONSE: The property is adjacent to Ute Avenue and includes the development of a new driveway that will improve access to the residence. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Trails Plan are implemented in the proposed development. to the greatest extent practical. RESPONSE: This criteria is not applicable to the proposed addition CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY* PLANNER: Nick Lelack, 920-5095 DATE: 8/9/00 PROJECT: Coleman Residential Design Standards Review REPRESENTATIVE: Jack Miller & Associates OWNER: Thomas Coleman TYPE OF APPLICATION: Variances from Residential Design Standards DESCRIPTION: The applicant may apply for three variances from the residential design standards for an addition to and existing duplex and a new detached garage for a property at 1105 Ute Avenue. It appears that residential design standard variances may be requested from the following standards: street facing garage forward of the front facade of a house; a driveway cut in excess of two (2) feet; and windows in the "no- window zone" between 9 and 12 feet on the front facade of the addition to the duplex located on the western side of the property. Applicable Land Use Code Section(s) Section 26.410.040, Residential Design Standards Review by: Design Review Appeal Committee (DRAC). Public Hearing: Yes, it is a public hearing. Notice Requirement: For the DRAC hearing, the applicant needs to post the property with a notice sign at least five (5) days before the scheduled hearing; these signs may be obtained from the Community Development Department office, as can the affidavit, which must be presented at the meeting demonstrating the notice requirements have been met. Referral Agencies: None Planning Fees: DRAC application fee is $480 Referral Agency Fees: None Total Deposit: $480.00 (additional hours are billed at a rate of $195/hour). To apply, submit the following information: (Also see Section 26.304.030, Application and Fees) 1. Proof of ownership. 2. Signed fee agreement. 3. Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number o f the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 4. Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 5. Total deposit for review of the application. - 6. 8 copies of DRAC submittal package. _ 7. An 8 14" by 11" vicinity,~map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 8. Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights ofway, ofthe parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department if the proj ect is determined not to warrant a survey document.) 9. A written description ofthe proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form describing how the proposed development complies with one of the criteria for granting a variance. Please include and clearly indicate existing conditions as well as proposed. 10. Copies ofprior approvals. 11. A written description ofproposed construction techniques to be used. 12. For Residential Proposals (Ord. 30): a) Neighborhood block plan at 1"=50' (available from City Engineering Department) Graphically show the front portions of all existing buildings on both sides of the block and their setback from the street in feet. Identify parking and front entry for each building and locate any accessory dwelling units along the alley. Indicate whether any portions of the houses immediately adjacent to the subject parcel are one story (only one living level). b) Site plan at 1" = 10'. Show ground floors of all buildings on the subject parcel, as proposed, and i footprints of adjacent buildings for a distance of 100' from the side property lines. Show topography of the subject site with 2' contours. c) All building elevations at 1/8" = 1'-0. d) Photographic panorama. Show elevations of all buildings on both sides of the block, including present condition of the subject property. Label photos and mount on a presentation board. 14. Copies of prior approvals 15. All other materials required pursuant to the Residential Design Review and Conditional Use Review submittal requirements packets. * The foregoing summary is advisory only and is not biading on the City. The opinions contained herein are based on current zoning and regulations, which are subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not, in any way, create a legal or vested right. September 7,2000 12:59 PM From: S. Hopkins Fax Number: 949-859-7451 Page 1 of 1 - REF EN \l L o i N rn/ MA r -- - h N ~\\~11_22>7/ *Oil#/ 61 - E H4LLAM ST ~~ 417% \%06 Â«Fl\\\\ 11> lili \ 2/1 C 5 1 AL \ f #' \0 â‚¬ a Aspen 0 2 2 1 E 82 2 00 ~EEN ST 44 -0 90 -\-'.4ap> 9+ \ E HOPKRIS AVE 7-vE Jr=:=Jor--1 17< AtÂ©UND PARK A- ill ~N k!22#* L gil Â«4\\ \ 4,89 /,4 A PE C127-2 ~ #SMUGGLER GR~h f E HÂ®PKINS AVE' 3 L*pr li Fl 0 r--~==1 E COOPER e i i # P L ---------1 ----~&4 1 W I -4*Ell. h.7.-%1 p W E 1 82 0 *b---44*.-Ill-- - U-\ 7 say 82 / 1*LJ I 40/ 4 de li I Un f/P~....+ UL 0 *arh \ 4?U 1.4 4 82 1 2 - Q \ Sligax t., y -5 2 u. 'ctfjb v les3D e *0- \RU \ 3 CRYSTTL#RD- 1 87% \N* EK lit 83080 -- 42-2&,-LS,ZE, 9-0# "*COLEMAN DUPLEX\ 0 141â€¢/- rrqi-,4-Naff// 0 ~500 ft Topo USA 2.0 Copyright Â© 1999 DeLorme Yarmouth, ME 04096 Scale: 1 : 6,400 Detail: 15-0 5199 --Ou~~~- T 80 NOMalfi 0~41? 7 JACK MILLER & ASSOCIATES, A.I.A. ARCHITECTURE/PLANNING JM fi >44<+ ': -. September 8,2000 .;ti.4.. 1.. ' 4 P.O. BOX 4285 ..'*4â‚¬ 4 ASPEN, CO. 81612 303-925-6930 Nick Lelack, Planner Aspen/Pitkin Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Subject: Addition to Duplex Located at 1105 E. Ute Avenue Dear Mr. Lelack The owner/applicant proposes to create an addition to an existing duplex of 1,647 square feet to relocate a kitchen, master bedroom and add a bedroom suite. Also, a new detached garage of 790 square feet is proposed. The following items are in conflict with Aspen Ordinance 30 standards, along with reasons for requested variances: 1) Garage Entry Facade Not Perpendicular to Front Street. Due to the steepness of the site, structural orientation and position of major trees, the drive is very limited in location and direction. The garage facade is set at approximately 37Â° on axis with the street. In addition, the floor ofthe garage is 15' above the street, the door will be approximately 60' back from the center of Ute Avenue. Also, the site is heavily treed by major size spruce, so the visibility of the garage door will be limited. The garage itself will be totally under grade exempt for the garage door facade. One 16' garage door is proposed to minimize the width of the front facade, however the door will be designed to appear as 2-car garage doors. 2) Driveway Cut in Excess of 2'. Again, due to the steepness of the site and the distance required by the 30' setback, a cut of approximately 14' will be retained at the maximum height by the by a natural boulder wall with in fill vegetation. 3) Windows in "No Window Zone". The existing duplex was built in 1979 and designed in a rather natural organic "Wrighian" style which fits and blends very well into the site. The addition is designed to maintain the same style and detailing, including the window fenestration, j. e. glass that carries up under the 2 x 12 pitched gables which encroaches into the no window zone. We appreciate your consideration regarding the above variances. Sincerely, Iac14 Miller T)~IK MILLER AND ASSOCIATES CONSTRUCTION TECHNIOUES-COLEMAN DUPLEX Standard construction techniques, i. e. standard wood framing per UBC, standard concrete will be employed with the exception of the rear concrete walls under grade. A "shot crete" excavation system will be used on the deep excavation cuts, in which the vertical rear cut of excavation will pinned with shot crete over to stabilize the earth, then the concrete wall will be formed against in a one-form system. This eliminates the major over excavation normally required which greatly disturbs the natural vegetation. AND USE APPLICATION PRae PROJECT: Name: 777 d #11 a -r Co Le 81 01 1 -9.eÂ·<11Â«Â« Addition -Location: l/DE- a Ute L.04 + 4 Gui= 536&21 5,,on (Indicate street addiess, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) APPLICANT: Name: 31 10 61 j C Co ,(4 #11 <A; M Address: 31 i G Choy (â‚¬ r A-U â‚¬ *, 14 2'w O r lent .LA 1 0 136 Phone #: 564 GIG 15% OD REPRESENTATIVE: Name: J dols Ulllâ‚¬ r Address: 80 x 4354 A<pain co ~ Phone #: 924 613 0 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Conditional Use El Conceptual PUD E Conceptual Historic Devt. Special Review ~ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ~1 Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal El Conceptual SPA ~ Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment ~ Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) U Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption ~ Subdivision ~ Historic Designation ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ~ Subdivision Exemption (includes ~ Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane j Lot Split E Temporary Use E Other: U Lot Line Adjustment El Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Du p (4 + - 82 c h cal It 03,1 -(- D M i 2 22 3 troon'l 0 ' PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Uvut *5;' Reloca-1-,An =r add{4100 01 a kilÂ·chen 42 tf Vt) A *-ev &2 286 U>/ 91-6 7 * 9 441 444(41(M 04 4 102#ircd'Yn 6,12. Ackll *10 \A 01 ZEÂ¥ d tâ‚¬ ~ Have you attached the foliowing? FEES DuE: $ ~ Pre-Application Conference Summary U Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement El Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form El Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents U Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents U Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application 000400 XI .\\ '' 14 E . I / 1 :f i ' ./ 'A. 1 +3 1 1.. 31 e ''' '.7 31/ . , /// 1 14.1 1 414 1' NO W 2.( <211 Mon-{030- 04>k ?ElÂ·\ 1)> 0..~\ ~ t.,~ \ M+43 V 20 ~ . ' 't \ \ 1 ..44 x~32~ / i-J* \1 / t. in / 1 0 \ \\ \ \ 1 1 %' -;- 3(6 f 'lf, / ) ' 0 i 11 ~ '\ \ \ 1 / J. --- ---- -- -A 1/ 44-1 A-- ~nt'J 4 .3 r 3 - 7 \ 4. ------------------~__----- ----<----~~~~---------*,98D. /_c - ~ - 4 - - V L.--------~ \ -------~ : 1 -lw -1/1/ 4 41 1 -1 . - -- --- ---I-- 4 \ 7 22 uâ‚¬. . - I â‚¬ 90 4 V E 992 2 0.33-~\1 - \ *1*- C - n \ , 1\-- .....P\\ -- # - -t , '-*.- - 6 I. Â»224 ------- -8000 -2 S--75- 1..--- \ \3 - Â».1- --'/ - RO - Arm E / - -NA\. C \ 14:24\X..%222-22\21***53/..-'.-*- 910.27\ --& ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM T Z Project: -uottinz n Ref,Jftice A-14(Â·41<I~~ - Oupt.2,9 Applicant: -Flom A .9 04 (4 Ynon Location: \\59 5 0 +C AU 0 Zone District: 3 -15 POD 14 0 3 0.29\01.44 Re <Ve FAI tA Lot Size: i 63 I Age K {03' /WE Lot Area: 14 4-1 1- (for the putposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: - Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: G Proposed: 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing: c~ Proposed: 7 5 pd.7 64-7 1 +I Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): - DIMENSIONS: Floor Arem Existing: 33 SU Allowable: 6787 Proposed: 44 54- Principal bldg. height: Existing: 22 Allowable: F..0 Proposed: 23 Access. bldg. height: Existing: /2- Allowable: Proposed: On- S ite parking: Existing: C. Required: Proposed: 1 0 % Site coverage: Existing: - Required: Proposed: - % Open Space: Existing: - Required: - Proposed: - 1 Front Setback: Existing: 37 Required: 2 â‚¬ Proposed: 3 0 Rear Setback Â·Existing: 14' Required: 20' Proposed: 44' Combined F/R: Existing. 3,1 ~ Required: 2,9 proposed: 14' 1t Side Setback: Existing: /34 6 Required: /D ' Proposed: - Side Setback: Existing: 34; Required: ld/ Proposed: 25' Combined Sides: Existing: 11 - 9 Required: 02Â·49 Proposed: - Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Notg Variations requested: 6,4ygo e not 4-42*lul per Fâ‚¬06(lou\Ov 1-e, 5-lvâ‚¬.4 Il,& Prtue u.jaut CU+ Duer -2.' F Dne- IG' as:Your 01.crr ty} lieu 01 1, 1 C 4 9 1 Wt,14041 8, 113 Lu I+130(W tonâ‚¬. -I 02.48. - 91 40 dizzy& 3 r - 0-pe \IZa-~ - 1 54â‚¬-r' -* PL'07â‚¬8$ â‚¬ ziÂ¥-*9427/5 9.2.~Va:P 1.1 ru64-- 0Â»el_ as k~p:b}/ Â« 1454% 1 -Â· \_B vt 962-, ts&19-- 9,4-25 4%04 ... C p,Â© 09- AA,wwo . /04< Ce-13 a.1-07-1, Le- ,-1 1 jovauk I Â£1-*LP& Â· . .22>st 0 843462*164 \ 30--70-70 0- 4.-2 AD 44'E-0 900,79-Â· I NE- 1Â»S 4-- 4 9Â»22> vÂ·*ev,2 Â· 6 u t- gil rukuct uÂ»--10~. Fkulub /500Â« UR ROODULÂ« Â£4- 4,6- 4 %*vFu 472_ Â£P~A: -~ 9-NO -t> tiv.10' Ovileva v+MoP~-~ l~' ,-- 71 Ylot- CA-_ AC,v/-Ckle - VltÂ·COmE A-'0~0,1--/ 1 9 f 4 ALUM 9175 IN CONC ATJ. 4 \ St *--%-- 0 \1 - 1 43 \ \11 R \ 1- - k 9 ?i/JVY<ZV--.. -* -I â‚¬<1 LÂ» SCALE 01Â«- f â‚¬14> 1 INCH - 10 FEET 1- / i \ \\: 1 44. 0 5 10 15 20 . 44> 02 CONTOUR INTERVAL IS I FOOT -1 64 442 BRASS CAP = r, -- 2 CORNER â€¢4 / E M.S. 5190 DATED 1954 h / 38' 26 -uO .* 4,s'# 8 - \ \ -Tr.0 J t. 193. 12. AAU \ evt/33,% \ \ ~.~~--, /- 46 17. 8646. / -------- i / Pree // 1 - ~1199~<-- * 0 - \ \\1 k \31-4- GRIPE< / - \\\\ \N'. - \\\ \ \ 04 - \ \ 1 -ey - 1 C AREA 17,107 SQ. FT. ./-) - \ \ 11\\ \N \\ \ \ \ i --- \\\ \ 4 \\1 \ 9 - 1 \\ >\\1\\ \\ \ \41 A 4 \\..\ . \ .ifi I I \ 96. -J- Ktr N t \ , \\.l\- \\ \ 1 \ \ LEGEND & NOTES . \\1\ \ \ \ \\- \0 \ lili/0 0 1 L O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT REBAR WITH CAP AS NOTED .1 ID i i --0-2-3-~\ \ 1 \\\ 0 - M G SPIKE OR P-K NAIL SURVEY CONTROL - - \ \\1\/ *-i#h;/ h / / ~ ------- POSTED ADDRESS IS -- Â·n ... 1 Â«\1 \ 0 i \ \\1 \ XFMR ~ B.L.M. BRASS CAP 2nd LEVEL DECK 0 - - ~ ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER \ \\\ \i\\00/\ \4\ \.2.flo TBM - 100.0 Â¥. 34 \ O UTILITY BOX - 1 0 N y ~ * YELLOW PLA M . CAP 2376 - I TITLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY: 2376 . Â»17'Ack\\\\\\\ \ \ \ L + UNIT -B PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC. CASE NO. PCT-6685 - 6 DATED: 07/01/92 1 f ~ INFORMATION DATED: 2/14/1980 \\\4 CALLS IN ( ) CALCULATED USING NEW B.L.M. Â¥ \ 1 \ 10 WIDE STRIP RESERVED TO THE CITY OF _,4 / ASPEN FOR THEE WIDENING OFUTE AVENUE. THIS STRIP TO BE DEEDED BY OWNER OF RECORD AT TIME OF WIDENING. ELEVATION DATUM IS ARBITRARY, BASED ON SET T.B.M. AS SHOWN 4. r.0 CONTOUR INTERVAL IS . 4 1Â«~i~util -\\ / / W CONIFER TREE CALIPER SIZE AS NOTED 9 3 2 eo, A - 1 0 E â‚¬N CERTIFICAT ION l#;3. t~ - / CERTIFIED TO: d k / 0 R.O.W. sj. UNIT -A- //er 1. DAVID W. MeBRIDE. A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF SKI LIFT ..9 -- $A COLORADO DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS FIELD SURVEYED REL I NGU I SHED ~ v â€¢ 64 4 6 01\ / Al I 0 DURING ON THE GROUND OF THE PROPERTY BY RECEPT â€¢-24*Â¥98 LEGALLY DESCR I BED HEREON. AND I S CORRECT BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE 4 AA /* 4 SHOWN AS FOUND HEREON. AND THAT THERE ARE NO DEISCREPANCIES. ~ CONFLICTS. SHORTAGES IN AREA. BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS. ENCROACHMENTS. 9 Â·6 + 3 OVERLAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS. EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD N LOT 5 EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME. EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HOAG SUBD. WI TH NO VISI BLE APPURTENANCES AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT FURNISHED ~ ~ ~* ~ TO THE SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED. THIS CERTIFICATION IS VOID UNLESS ~ SITE IMPROVENENT SURVEY WET STAMPED BY THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYAn,K.Enst- OF SIGNED THIS -~ _ DAY OF -,F~~Â£1.Â·,~2~â€¢â€¢~~ UNITS A & B. HOAG 4 CONDOM I NUMUS . CITY OF ASPEN. ~ /~~4*~,â€¢*G\STE~Â©./Al PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. 0 DAVID W. McB~ IDE RLF16129 ./. 4) i/46.4'0,.,40.Â·'SM PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC. ACCORD I NG TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COINENCE ANY LEGAL ACT I ON 210 S. GALENA STREET 4 BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU ~ ASPEN, COLO. 81611 FIRST DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED . UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE CO-ENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS 2376 PHONE/FAX (970) 925-3816 FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON E-MAIL plumbâ€¢rof.net Job no. 7100 MAY 04, 2000 A .00 ' AUG 14 '00 10:28 JMA 970 927 8899 P.7/6 ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and 11/WW/W/f COU,WA+, (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1, APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for CÂ»gpl ;6 4*Me (hereinafter, THE PROJECI* J 1/ 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 1999) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent ro a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application, APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in rhe interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis, APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following Iheir hearings and/or approvals, APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees k will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4, CITY and APPLICANT furrher agree that k is impracticable for CITY staff tO complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to Collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APP~ITANT By: \ 9-- 4- By; Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director Date; \ Mailing Address: g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 12/27/99 321 ST. CHARLES AVENUE NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70130 August 16, 2000 City of Aspen To Whom It May Concern: Re: 1105 East Ute Please be advised that Jack Miller of Jack Miller & Associates, P, O, Box 4285, Aspen, Colorado 81611, is authorized to act on my behalf for the above referenced property. My mailing and contact information is listed below. The address ofthe location for the permit being applied for is indicated above, namely 1105 East Ute, Aspen, Colorado S ctrely, THO*RE B.-COEEN<KE~ 321 St\'tharles Avenue New Orleans, LA 70130 Phone (504) 586-8300, Ext. 240 Fax: (504) 525-9537 TBC:et LAW OFFICES OF OATES, HUGHESÂ· & KNEZEVICH PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION THIRD FLOOR. ASPEN PLAZA BUILDING 533 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 LEONARD M. OATES AREA CODE 303 ROBERT W. HUGHES TELEPHONE 920Â·1700 RICHARD A. KNEZEVICH TELECOPIER 920-t 121 October 9, 1992 TED D. GARDENSWARTZ OF COUNSEL JOHN THOMAS KELLY Thomas B. Coleman Managing Partner and Chief Executive Officer International Matex 321 St. Charles Ave. New Orleans, LA 70130 RE: Unit A, Hoag 4 Condominiums Dear Tom: In connection with your purchase of the above-referenced property, I am enclosing the Owner' s policy of title insurance, together with the original recorded General Warranty Deed which is attached thereto. The policy conforms to the title insurance commitment. The Exceptions to coverage listed on Schedule B as Nos. 1-4, inclusive, have been omitted. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH, P.C. -By. &0Â£& 81 - 14 4 Ret;ert W. Hughes / (tz> ) RWH/tu Enclosures CC: Wendy Whitman w/encls. coleman\ltrs\coleman.001 r77 . I. n = ISSUED BY ~ CommonwealthÂ® POLICY NUMBER Land Title Insurance Company 128-053437 OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B i AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania I corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount I of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; 1 3. Unmarketability of the title; 1 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title, as insured, but only to the extent provided - . in the Conditions and Stipulations. = 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be ~ ~ hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers, the Policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the I i Company, = COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY i Attest: By: 921, fUL i -1-1 h )U Le >1 -1 - k- aecretary President = EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE ~ 1 The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' - E fees or expenses which arise by reason of: E 1 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmentai regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) I ~ restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of - I any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or & any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or 1 ~ governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting ~ I from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. = (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a - M defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date i of Policy. . 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding E from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without M i knowledge. 1 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant, (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed i in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; E (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or E (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured i ~ by this policy. rl American Land Title Association Owner's Policy (Jo-21-87) Face Page Valid Only If Schedule A, B and Cover Are Attached Form 1141-2 ORIGINAL 'FLII-liHI,I"I-Ill'Illilli~Illillillill/~Illflll"" 12 d Â· )11 M 14 C i j -- A f Â·1 Requested By: /Â·'' c (-lor- h (6(f Liff Cjtitk . Order No: 6 4 K+~ 1) A 1 0 0 2/; Assessed To: N t? Le-ZE--Â·itt , t<Â»tj_pÂ·if Ld, 7- 4,(c,,Â·ze, Le_. >11 . xo. 391 TO Certificate that Taxes are Paid to Date STATE OF COLORADO) r(.1-- * LE ~88. 4~04-7/202>191 Pitkin County , j , do hereby certify that there are no Taxes due and unpaid upon the lands described below, and no Tax Sales of said land unredeem.ed, except as below stated: AMOUNT NECESSARY TAX LIENS WHEN SOLD AMOUNT SOLD FOR TO REDEEM Section or Township Range or Day Menth Year Dollan Ctâ€¢. Dollar Ct:. PART OF SECTIONS OR LOT Lot or Block Addition 1 .4- 6 11-, A //7 l 9 1 29. aÂ».-01 62502) 1 /2/3.1 /4,48 + g l 84 /1 4 / v.u, 0.- 1.1 '335'a-7* *L.u ( 3717,74 1- 9 BA~Li:t~: 14.- -7 --~~ ------ -----0-19 -1--2., Witness nzy hand, this................~..0........_.........day Of-, CDt a)(1-5,1-~,11 4 639 Deputy Cotinty Treasurer. Lf-9â‚¬7--4.../* CLOD,Lk*/LVR 6 6# b. 1fic.,4.,1 r-l~ 15Â·-EL ~ti~-fLE_. f-Fl--91 C F H,Â«k/Co. O,~-i If 1.N' 11 , .. 2 Â·944Â·hÂ·.GÂ·t -Â·3 .--Â· ''//Â· VÂ·- .7..Â· t ,. 1 14 ' 1 Â¢â‚¬.4 , L , 10 'rit. 4 '. , Â·9 ' ...1. .k 1,6 ." .r , %11 i i. 4 3 *01 Â· 4 4 -4 ', 17 . f rÂ· TAX DISTRICT - 2 1-R 1991 1 PERCENT OF FUND LEVY TAX DOLLAR GENERAL 3.368 9.84911 ROAD & BRIDGE 0.226 0.66090 SOCIAL SERVICE 0.095 0.27781 OPEN SPACE & TRAILS 1.786 5.22283 ' COLO MTN COLLEGE 3.997 11.68850 COLO RIVER CON 5 0.394 1.15218 SCHOOL PAYBACK 0.371 1.08492 HOUSING G.0. BONDS 0.735 2.14937 CITY OF ASPEN 5.401 15.79424 ASPEN FIRE 0.874 2.55585 ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL 0.414 1.21067 ASPEN CONSOLIDATED SAN 0.724 2.11721 ' , LIBRARY FUND 1.014 2.96526 AMBULANCE DISTRICT 0.285 0.83343 ASD-GENERAL 12.415 36.30542 ASD - BOND 2.097 6.13230 TOTAL 34.196 100.00000 1. 7.4 IFF .t I W f'- i~ : 4, r. t: ;.7 14 G 4 ' i < E Â· 1,Â·, ' 45 Â· 4 6 01 t Â·Â·Â· " 4 4 91 1/1, b t. ...N 14 . h ' 1 -Illl. 0. 0 ' ,1 41 h .91, - , . 4 2,04,97,~ 7,4,-- ..1* ,7.-42.~ 24/.4 449'*>Â·..1 5,":7'271 25. df t 5 0 Recordâ‚¬ #347757 08/14/92 15:24 Rec $10.00 BK 686 PG 282 1 H Silvia Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $55.00 Â£E Recepti Ull Kecorder 32% RECORDING REQUESTED BY: 41 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: 4 %> R# 347757 91 Ronald Garfi*ld, Esq. H '0 Garfield &/Hecht, P.C. Transfer Declaration Received 601 East /Myman Avenue Aspen, ~61.orado 81611 GENERAL WARRANTY DEED ROBERT W. HOWARD AND CAROLE M. HOWARD for TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations, in hand paid, hereby sells and conveys to THOMAS B. COLEMAN whose address is 321 St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70130 the following real property in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado to wit: UNIT A, HOAG 4 CONDOMINIUMS, according to the Condominium Map thereof recorded November 7, 1980 in Plat Book 10 at Page 59, and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for Hoag 4 Condominiums, recorded November 7, 1980 in Book 398 at Page 628. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. \2 with all its appurtenances and warrant (s) the title to the same C SUBJECT TO AND EXCEPTING: General taxes for 1992, payable January 0 $ 1, 1993; right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the L authority of the United States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 175 at Page 299; easements, rights of way and Â£â‚¬ covenants as set forth on the recorded Plat of subject property; terms, conditions and obligations of Easements and Right of Way Qi a usage as set forth in instrument recorded March 1, 1979 in Book 364 m at Page 219; terms, conditions and obligations of covenants of cl Indemnity as set forth in instrument recorded July 23, 1979 in Book W Or 373 at Page 97; terms, conditions, provisions and obligations of 9 -3- Statement of Exemption for the Definition of Subdivision as set 0 --- forth in instrument recorded November 7, 1980 in Book 398 at Page Q 627; terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, assessment and all matters as disclosed in the Condominium Declaration for Hoag 4 Condominiums as set forth in instrument recorded November 7, 1980 in Book 398 at Page 628; terms of Easement recorded November 7, 1980 in Book 398 at Page 639. SIGNED this FET.4 day of AUGUST , 1992 - Role,ooLU -4* 46~u Robert W. Howard Carole M. Howard CITY OF ASPEN -- 1 â€¢ ON HRETT PAID 707 66%5 NO. #347 7 08/14/92 15:24.Rec $10. BK 686 PG 283 , Silvia .Davis, Pitkin Cnty Clerk, Doc $55.00 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT PAGE TO 'GENERAL WARRANTY DEED STATE OF COLORADO ) )SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing Genera@ Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this /3 e day of dZ.Â®â€ž*.t- , 1992 by Robert W. Howard. %Â· WITNESS my hand and official seal. % :*2#--43 , 2 u '. My commission expires: HELEN M. CLARKE 4 4,-42 NOTARY PUELiC OF NEW JERSEY f ' \I . I My Commission Expires Feb. 6, 1995 Notary Public OVE- O ./ STATE OF COLORADO ) )SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The fore~*ping General Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this Zf day of U.ic-dÂ».1,4 , 1992 by Carole M. Howard. //01Â£ 7 WITNESS my hand and official seal. / 2.... A.Â·Â· â€¢ My commission expires: . , HEIN N. CLARKE E r < C; NOTARY PUE OF NEW 1-0...., : ...0. r 6 4 -2(,4 -15. My Commission Expires F:i'. 6, ' .:Si Notary Public ..â€žf,47-' t....... \ron\re\howard.gwd ~ CommonwealthÂ® Land Title Insurance Company SCHEDULE A-OWNER'S POLICY CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY .1Â¥r...v"~ f-7 -r vervrp A Ve: 09Â·r T rv NT,Â¥9 . A 0 1, . u -t.1 L 1.-2 . U. 1.- DCT-6685 8/14/92 @ 3:24 P.M. 9 550.000.CO 128-053437 1 NAME OF INSURED THOMAS B. COLEMAN Tur .â€ž_ ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREIN AND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: IN FEE SIMPLE 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST REFERRED TO HEREIN IS AT DATE OF POLICY VESTED IN: THOMAS B. COLEMAN 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: r ./T T T 1 un NDOMINIUMS. According to the C .n rl n.â€ž . U . "â€ž. thereof recorded ...'-- A. 115 AG 4 CO. Man November 7. 1980 in Plat Book 10 at Page 59, and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for HOAG 4 CONDOMINIUMS. recorded November 7 1980 in Book 398 at Page 628. COUNTY OF PITKIN. STATE OF COLORADO. 9*An<M fm/43 0 U . .. 1 A . j uuu.... I 4 - - u.- ..' U . DTTY, TV POT"V"~V T TT- E .TV'I C.1 0 UnDVIve â‚¬ J v - L . ,0 AVE Co'Ghters i ened ~Ehorized Agent ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 (3031 925-1766 THE POLICY NUMBER SHOWN ON THIS SCHEDULE MUST AGREE WITH THE PREPRINTED NUMBER ON THE COVER SHEET. 163 EFI CommonwealthÂ® LE:E] Land Title Insurance Company SCHEDLT U '. B-OWNERS CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY DIT Trv VT.VOUP - U u _ ./I .,6........ PCT-6685 8/14/92 @ 3:24 P.M. 128-053437 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON 03 THE FOLLOWING: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements. or claims of easements. not shown bv the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundarv lines. shortage in area. encroachments. and anv facts which a correct survey and insnection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown bv the public records. 4. Anv lien. or right to a lien. for services. labor. or material heretofore or hereto- .,In- 4 e:o : imposed bv law and not shown by the public records. 1- 1 .54 . u-- 11 - J ./ u u . 3. Unpatented mining Claims. reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authoriz- inf the issuance thereof; water rights. claims or u=._. +4+1. to water. 6. Taxes for the year 1992 not vet due or payable. 7. Right of wav for ditches or canals constructed bv the authority of the United States. as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 175 at Page 299. 8. Easements. rights of wav and covenants as set forth on the recorded Plat of sublect property. 9. Terms. conditions and obligations of Easements and Right of Wav usage as set forth 1 10-0 ' in instrument recorded March 1.0 1 u in Book 364 at Page 219. 10. Terms. conditions and obligations of Covenants of Indemnity as set forth in instrument recorded July 23. 1979 in Book 373 at Page 97. 11. Terms. conditions. provisions and obligations of Statement of Exemption for the Definition of Subdivision as set forth in instrument recorded November 7. 1980 in Book 398 at Page 627. 12. Terms. conditions. provisions. obligations. assessment and all matters as disclosed in the Condominium Declaration for Hoae 4 Condominiums as set forth in instrument recorded November 7. 1980 in Book 398 at Page 628. 1 9 Tan.v.e -U . IC. .Al O of Easement recorded November 7. 1980 in Book 398 at Pafe 639. EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1. 2, 3&4 ARE HEREBY OMITTED. 177 ~3 .r07 1.. EVJIFI American Land Title Association = Owner's Policy - (Rev. 10-21-87) POLICY OF = TITLE INSURANCE ~ E = Issued by CommonwealthÂ® Land Title Insurance Company t Title Insurance Since 1876 HOME OFFICE EIGHT PENN CENTER PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2198 B-1141-3 L I 'r I J, whi JI â€žun, â€ž,i â€žâ€ž â€žImhi, H â€žI, u â€žuâ€ž,i Il,Juum Jimi, ii.,.muni N, r,WHhmâ€ž â€žâ€ž â€žImlmmilliNWI,1111.,11.hmill!11111111!illl!,IWN,HUNHUNHHINWHHHUNHH,fr. i 7 vÂ»J IJ L-6 3 - LAW OFFICES OF OArrES, KNEZEVICH & GARDENSWARTZ, P.C. PROFESSIONALCORPORATION THIRD FLOOR, ASPEN PLAZA BUILDING 533 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 8161 1 LEONARD M OATES TELEPHONE (970) 920 1700 RICHARD A. KNEZEVICH FACSIMILE (9701 920- 1121 TED D. GARDENSWARTZ e-mail ohkg@rof.net December 3, 1997 DAVID B.KELLY OF COUNSEL, JOHN THOMAS KELLY Mr. Thomas Coleman 321 St. Charles Avenue New Orleans, LA 70130 Re: Original General Warranty Deed Dear Mr. Coleman: Enclosed for your records is the original General Warranty Deed from William R. Frazer and Jane Z. Frazer on the Hoag-4-Condominium Unit B. Should you have any questions and/or comments please feel free to contact me at the above listed number. Sincerely, OATES, KNEZEVICH & GARDENSWARTZ, P.C. -30 ray - John T. Kelly JTK/elh Enclosures -r CtÂ·~.d 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Recorded at 410544 11/12/1997 03:55P WD DAVIS SILVI Reception No. _ 1 of 2 R 11.000 100 .00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO RECORDING REQUESTED BY: WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: John Kelly, Esq. Oates, Hughes & Knezevich ~2 533 East Ilopkins Ave. A Aspen, CO 81611 etal GENERAL WARRANTY DEED William R. Frazer and Jane Z. Frazer, Trustees of the William R. Frazer and Jane :. Frazer 1992 Family Trust dated December 18, 1992 whose address is 250 Tunnel Road, :erkeley, CA 94705, as Grantor, for TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable onsideration, in hand paid, hereby sells and conveys to Thomas B. Coleman whose address is 21 St. Charles Avenue, New Orleans, Louisiana 70130, the following real property in the :ounty of Pitkin, State of Colorado; to wit: UNIT B, HOAG-4-CONDOMINIUM, according to the Condominium Map thereof recorded November 7, 1980 in Plat Book 10 at Page 59 and according to the Condominium Declaration for Hoag-4-Condominium recorded November 7, 1980 in Book 398 at Page 628, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. 1 iith all its appurtenances and warrants title to the same SUBJECT TO AND EXCEPTING: ;eneral taxes for 1997 due and payable in 1998; right of way for ditches or canals constructed y the authority of the United States as reserved in Untied States Patent recorded August 26, 1949 i Book 175 at Page 299; terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Warranty 7Fbeed recorded March 1, 1979 in Book 364 at Page 219; terms, conditions, provisions and Â£,QÂ·@ligations as set forth in Covenant of Indemnity recorded July 23, 1979 in Book 373 at Page 97; ~*tdpns, conditions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Statement of Exception from the Full 236bdivision Process recorded November 7, 1980 in book 398 at Page 627; terms, conditions, 4-provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions and assessments as set forth in the Condominium ~IS-Declaration for Hoag-4-Condominium recorded November 7, 1980 in Book 398 at Page 628, 0-2-deleting therefrom any restrictions indicating preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin; terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Easement recorded November 7, 1997 in Book 398 at Page 639; easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded November 7, 1980 in Plat Book 10 at Page 59; SIGNED this /0 day of November, 1997. WILLIAM R. FRAZER AND JANE Z. FRAZER 1992 FAMILY TRUST DATED DECEMBER 18, 1992 By: 47/Li 9-< -~4*9 William R. Frazer, Trustee (lt-ve -7. â€ž26~4 4,0. 1 ki .,431 i. j j*ne Z. Fraker, *rultee 9 410544 TRANSFER DECLARATION RECEIVED 11/12/1997 CITY OF ASPEN CITY OF Abr:=I 03 7- 1 .7 St L - - - A HRETT PAID : lir *Â«rat 112 Â·Â·1Â·(*4 MITCHELL D, LEE -1~ II STATE OF \C.,/Â£1'-0- - . #1060660 11 NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA 17 '.*,4,4, CON1RA COSTA COUNTY Â· 4 ) SS ~~ ~*j,~.~*f My Comni. Exp..June 4, 1999 ~ COUNTY OF A.a, v~uL. ) The foregoing General Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this / 6 day of November, 1997 by William R. Frazer as trustee of the William R. Frazer and Jane Z. Frazer 1992 Family Trust dated December 18, 1992. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: .1--v .,u- 4. 0Â·c'\'c . 1, 4.- A - i Notary Public STATE oF c.1. (c. A â€ž- ) ) SS COUNTY oF Al.-<.4 ) The foregoing General Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this A day of November, 1997 by Jane Z. Frazer as trustee of the William R. Frazer and Jane Z. Frazer 1992 Family Trust dated December 18, 1992. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: I._c Al ('ell . /'/9/,P" ~= />i.*57 6 - <L Notary Public C.\AVII\DOCS\FRAZER.GWD 1[[-2Â·-PIF---GfEHELLD.L72-71 11 40 ' 'Â· L.,~ '0'Â£~*#44 COMM. #1060660 H 11 11~4:~,5~,~~I NOTAR Y PUBI.IC-CALIFORNIA . CONTRA COSTA COtJNTY ~ ~~ ~~3.-*.â€ž,~~~ My Comm. Exp. June 4. 1(999 ~~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 410544 11/12/1997 03:55P WD DAVIS SILVI 2 of 2 R 11.00 D 100.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 2 JIUBLIC NOTICE DATE , l TIME 1 111 PLACE . -/'..1. 2-'.J-â€¢. 11,/ 1 , PURPOSE lj_ 1/ . 1 1 1 11/ 1 Li;.93 ~ ', .1 .' ~â€ž'Itill~ijd~.Li f[N j-6 1-.1- i' le. I i .t Al UL i MENd,4 OW'Â£1 ..'""'"."110'**4...i 'L, I J J os E Ul 4 County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATION State of Colorado } SECTION 26.52.060 (E) 1 41 no,h x . A r j Ima 44 , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto. by first-ctass, postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property with three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list. on tile day of , 199_ (which is _ days prior to the public hearing date of j. 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on tile subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the g gl~ day of ~5~$1~*~1*'-, e~7 (Must be posted for at least grA Â¢1,05 full FE e, days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. a=,5:44=Uy,7 â€¢ Signature (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this ,t99_by - #000 2 46-64iR& 2Â£12-,n Ui ~c pl ; LYNDEE 1 3 ~Wt?** 1Â¥AND AND OFFICIAL SEAL mrnizE*61%~S*21. 11--0 /- -2--av / *<4~4 LVÂ» te_ i f338+0 74=eke52=t tj 0 / ~j /0--74Â»Jy 01 h- - N.-PA"r--- NotÂ®kPGblic'24ignature Stl,54_ /0 ./ 1 LOT 2 HOAG SUBD. eARASE NOT INCLUDED IN T SUBMISSION, PENDINS APPRÂ¢ \ 1 '15 -.--. -m } r.=.'... 4..j=.W NOTE: SITE ELEV 100.0' = ARCH ELEV 99'-6" Â« r) SITE 4 GRADING PLAN DRAWN BY: S.HOPKINS JACK MILLER AND ASSOCIATES COLEMAN DUPLEX DATE: 9/7/00 SITE PLAN A 10'-OIl ARCHITECTURE/PLANNING LOT #4, HOAG SUBDMSION REVISIONS J M DATE INITIALS: All POST OFFICE BOX 4285 UTE AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ASPEN, COLORADO TELEPHONE 303-927-9513 Â© 2000 JACK MILLER & ASSOC. .. E . ~94.4 Ay- r 4~.r.#:A ~,2- 4 P...........A Nx le 4 I .\\ 4 I \C, 1 'W 1,1,~--L 4 + r.1 rA -X . 1 4 j A i W.I~*26 - 41-%~.1.4-~.~90"~â€ž".~..:. 442/ i .. â‚¬ ajaWY-~via---159%dia~ -- #A 3 -Ir--- ..:-0.. 7 ./.- A. 1/1 -Â·, Â· . . 44 ..1 ~~A- 1--~4.4 / li~6â€¢.~.~ N~~k \Im --94.04.1 4.1-JE - d- - I f a-&-1-Y~./ACV/~ .. .. ilicK--- # - . L /72/1/'ll'lillill."241"31/IM/lili/:i;:1/5/lilk.15*'. iA- 1 . 4'F . I I. .. 4 : 0 11 Al:~ ./7" --E. . P . 1 ...... . 11.94* I.- 1 . I. . 1 'ylv /1 . â€ž .AI- .............Ii....." 9 i* 9/ 9 ... -- . I I -- I . :1~ . 0, :D 47 ~ 146 / 4 44 1 44,4 -/ . ./ X 1 1 1. 1 I 1 -4 A. 0. .. . .A , . L *1 "* 84 . i .4 E. 4. U d ---I---1-I~--- I ---- - -Ill A T.o. RIPSE (EX) 41.- -I - -- ---------- -~ - $-- -1---~ - - 6 T.O. BM (EX) - Y ELEV. Ill'-2" / I - 0 / B mr---------------pl------- ------ --7 - I - ----1--- lili 11 11 11 1 1 TO.PVO. (50 - - - - - - -- --- - - ___.....~ 11-11 -El---11 IL_-UL-~W 8 11 1110 111 YELEV. log'-1.1 DASHED MINDORS ABOVE ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMISSION, PENDINe APPROVAL BY D.R.A.G. \\ I /\ 36" HIGH SAURDRAIL 1 fee G / --%- T ELEV. 99'-61' AYS<2 ' ,~S,~ Cp7.. 1 1 SUBMISSION, PENDING APPROVAL OF D.R GARASE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT - 1 / \ Vt ) &..4 2 A. /3 6 ** /4 - L._______--_______---__--------------------------------------A M I 1 2 ; 1 j + G \ / 404 Â£2124% 041' 1 1 I 1 1 -1. '44 + '..:. r.. b .. NJ & 5* L /1:64 %74%â‚¬ i r.%,*. .014 "%:>Â· g : #'C./ 0 - ....c'e 64 - f *44 9 n: 8' - -I - - - .4,/ ...t'.LL Th..f ..,4~4'.4,'.21/ 1 +'At"A ..1. SZ' ' .(1.01.. 11 C:Â«f,i>+8211.435 Oavd ....-4.1,. 4 1. tâ‚¬: 7 /1 :. 9.1 7- 2~Â©-A / SELAR' ' * C Â·-9 &.C f; *Â«Â·f I 3<61fj . 9Â«7~~34/4 4 %. \ 4 :~- ,-& .~1: 14*'<'2. 6. f * -Â«f:>tÂ£j~i Â»w-)'~'va#i,w '7' 21.Â«f'~~Â·4Â·:i.>tv ~ft>_/te~ , 1 r f-* $ 4 4 W , ~ .1 f /-1 NORTH ELEVATION I b L..1 11_j - 4/ Ii'<4,4 IA , 11, 643 1 1 STONE RETAININe WALL 2 :#:-I STONE RETAINING MALL I 0 4 3 1 9 1 T.O. RIDGEDE><) 1 - - ------ ----- -- ------------|< El.EV. 120'-1"V~ ~ r 1 h T.O. BM(EX) 1 1 ELEV. 80'-O" TO SLAB 8 6.ARASE T.O. E (EX) --- -I-------1-,~I--4.-4- - ---------1- - - ELEV. Ill'-2" I < 1 ) 11'S .1,; '$, 444Â®444444>44%@44@44 1 1 f I './''' 1 43% 70 , ; s jiffilifitillil.ffliftiflillilli'illifiefiliflilitilwhb \ 11 ifiliti,lififilifft'lliffifilifil;11'ifififfilifil?fijly:jigy:tifilyfiff,fifill 1,11'11111!111111111!ifililillifillillillilll'llillitiffilli'flifiliffilillifill e 4/ ' \ L---------------------------------------------2~ 1 11 81' 1 1 1 r.l 11 --0-- 'i t.Â·{'imitittill 11#lijilli# {cit tijii{rki,fii{ K i --- 11 11 11 . filfilifillififilifff, 1/ fif 1 0 .ffifi 40 1 1 45-- H 94: , 404@EP@4 1 1 1 111, 11 11 1! , A n J,,0;4,31*ili 'i''ffi'#'iÂ¥51ff'flifiliff 19''H 'Nliftilmill U T.O.Pem._(EME______-Â£~ ---------- f. 'f u 4 0 U \\ ______4 0 -____u ifi~i~jil~111*lpil, fiffilill,Iillf. fill'fiâ€žlillill'jilitillifili'1'11' \ Iff , filitiffiffilifilififf:ljj):'- E-3 1 4 /fof////tiff;/.6 DASHED MINDOMS ABOVE ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMISSION, PENDING APPROVAL BY P.R.A.C. 36" HIGH file 0 11 1 SAURPRAIL # 1 1 1 1 1 [_11 Â· Â·Â·Â· Â·Â·Â· -Â·Â· Â·Â·Â· ' 1 1 / T.O. PÂ»13. m,0 | | | ELE*74*ZE" -- 1---_~-- - 4.4 Zi-/3 f.i .-LL'ili):S.#:< 1 i 144>261.-Jof i i 1 1 1 lili 1 1 P Li 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 L-1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \\ 1 1 1 1 --------1-1 lili 6.--Or.9 lili ELEVJEC~--~~~--1'~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 eARAGE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT SUBMISSION, PENDING APPROVAL oF P.R.A.C. NOTE: NER AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION SHORS MATERIAL POCHE. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TO SLAB @ GARASE 1 - -_ -- - - -_ -- 4 ~JACKMILLERANDASSOCIATESCOLEMANDUPLEXZOiWN'~~'HopKiNs - 1 EXTER'OR ELEVATIONS ELEV.*acO" INmALS: | ARCHITECTURE/PLANNING I LOT *4, HOAG SUBDMSION REVISIONS -i-7 POST OFFICE BOX 4285 UTE AVENUE DATE: A3.1 /~\ MEST ELEVATION ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 1 ASPEN, COLORADO TELEPHONE 303-927-9513 E-L_ A T.O. RIDGE (EN V ELEV. 120'-1" 06 T.0. BM (bO 7 ELEV. 118'=5" - - - - - - - - - - - 4 T.0. 0 2,0 - I - - - 1 1 .\- ELEV. 117-2 fillj 'Illiff! 'illitilfjlfil;;111111;1111*311111111; ifitfitil j#ffitiffiliffift#ff f:fili;*11 11.ffiliftiff , , , , flijillijill; itil I.'jil'illijilj, '41 1,li, /11 1/lililitlijililfwillillidill"d diÂ·ilijillilil ===7 -r==== \ 1 1 fiffin,liffilm'blifil,!111 fliti, 11,1jf;Iffillifil{,1 f,1. 0.. 1 '~i#jit'jilif~filiJiffil},ifil 1 1 1 1 -~ f:.If~#1~~*f)Illilll ll/llililitiliti.Ii jii i;Ilill vililfillit/fil/fll/1~4/ifilif4flij4~lig3~~1flifty:. illy /11'jill l/11111~1 \ -,1 .......... C..... ...... :........,. L.11'lillililli"llililillillillill'lillilli' fli 49404404~ 1 / / 1 i/j :? / 9\.[1 Vialififf *<311111<flifi;Ff - Ifilififyifil!111.1'' '1'hilifill'liffill'Inlifilifill# 4 nlÂ®1449 W':tfy//'ff/'ff/fl | - El-EV. 110'-10 7 \\ jillfilitifil,EN - -- _ _ * T.O. PYO. (EX) -'Iff DASHED MINPORS ABOVE ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMISSION, n . 4- %' '11 ~it;j,t'il' ra=Â»,Aflljilf<firtfilifilifjjiffifitifiC--- ~f'lldllit.~1#Hfi PENDING APPROVAL BY D,R.A.C. 1% 1 '-----* *,---* cltillillilliffr~f~i. *< ff ill'lil ililli=.alli'll'lil'llilifilijjil'llillitilrlimi,Ii}lifillit-lib 1 1 1 flizihiff 211 *fifuni i ' - - 1 Ilifillillil'lli 'dillill'jilitililill!!ill'11111*p ra)*111111'h :1 jililillifillilt...3 flillililillitililillillifililililit 7 fillifiliff 36" SAURDRAIL BEYOND - 1 11t;s11f11iiY1i/ 1 f ,///Of / - Hill' i 1 1 3 J.JI'll'1111111111-TTâ€žTr.=~flff[IfillifillitillfillftlfilifIMTFTTTIir' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ill Ill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0- 1 1 lili 1 1 1 - -1 -- ---- 1- 1 11 - - -1 - - - 1 - 4- 1 - â€¢k T.O PAD 84 7 1 EL-EV. qq'-61' r 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1-- - - - - ---4-- - - 1 - - - ~F r r r 7 7- - - - - - - - - - t TO. SLAS.14 7 ELEV. 90'-1" 1 1 . 1 1 1 lili 1 1 1 1 - Â® SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 11-0. A T.O. SLAB (@ SARAGE I- - - i - - - 7 17 ELEV. 80'-O" 2---- 1 1 I.il-' ELEV. 120 - ' A T.o. R.IDGE (EX) A T.o. BM (EX) 9 ELEV. 118'-5" 1 7 -0-<2_/ 1 - A T.o. TE (EX) 9 ELEV. 117-2" /1 -/ 1 1 / I 1 l . 1/1/ 10 11 / - --_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 TO PRO (EX) 7 ELEV. 110'-1" - 4 1- 1 - \ --\ ; 1 Ji... \ \ .--1 \ / 1 \ 1/ 2 /1 1 A T.O. PAD. (EX) 1 1 f ELEV. 99'-6" 1 4/ b 1 1 NOTE: NER AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION SHORS MATERIAL POCHE. r-----1 - JACK MILLER AND ASSOCIATES COLEMAN DUPLEX DRAWN BY: S.HOPKINS DATE: 8/5/00 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Â® EAST ELEVATION ARCHITECTURE/PLANNING LOT *4, HOAG SUBDMSION REVISIONS 1/4 n = 1'-O" JM POST OFFICE BOX 4285 UTE AVENUE DATE: INITIALS: ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ASPEN, COLORADO A3.2 TELEPHONE 303-927-9513 Â© 2000 JACK MILLER & ASSOC. r 7,