Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
coa.lu.iz.620 E Hyman.1974
$ 1 1 1 Cs:N t — —3 i3 H ILI _ , ILI , z 1 -ic 1 , 4 --` .... . 4- 1-4 t: -, " f--,-....7 , , • ce, L , ,...., 1 - -- 1 , • 4-- L T4 . >--- 1---_- I j I L.: - ---1 -- i z ' . f j - . , ' -.*• -. '■'A A....,---.••• ••• • av,, e — _ r...,ty 145'., 't. \•-a- • ; •...-— .„ .11 ' .•. ';'d 4' I 4 ■••de,!..:;.%. of.OA., 'f.,.''' , ) ' l 46..•••••■•. I '.'."'....'1 t .-..+: .P., 10"4 n W*,...." • . *31;■■• %>;:; . ',,,. ,: , --. i g r... _il,f4t-4 . -r• ,---„... ..;,-....,,,.,,...,;.4,.."-, - ,- I § I 5 T ■ Ii t---- - . I.- -----, 1'------ IL_ ------t ; 1 1 i i--- ---1 1 1 1 } 1 I 1 ____....... . f , ,---- ------4 i . ' . . � | ' ' - ~- - . / | ' � �r __~_ � � -�� -' 8[ ^�' | � �� � � \ . �� u� \ �- � 8 u} �� �� � ����~� �� �� v^ | | ' u/ �_ ------''-----� - -- - -- °------------ ---+ + ' uJ �� __- .� �__'___'_ �_-__---____-�_--__� �' _----_-__~ - _ _________ i + ------- ---' |_ __� ___�� ._f _ _ -_--_-----_--�'_--_--_-_--��'_ 4-- ---- '-- -- --- -- - --_-_-_-_-_ -- -- '- - r- ! • +---- � | � _ __ _ � � 1 ;E | � r --�� -_-' �--_ -_- . ��. '_--__'_ _ -_ ~_--___- ,_------_- ~ ~!~- ' ------ _-_� :L.- _ --_ + �_�____ -------------� --. __' ^� - �--- ------ -------+ | i____'--'- --' '+ +--- ---'-'---- �______�_ ______ | - -- - '- -1- ! ai ,--- --''----' 4___ �-i � ----- '----^ 1� / - � �-----'�-' \ ___��__� 1-1 f--_---_- --_-_ ---__----� ~ - • �- - --- '� `` __-_---__-_-_+ / / ' __.� ---__- -__-- '_4 � -_-__ -_^ _--_- --- ^-- -------r _ � 4-__ �� '-_-_ ; - ---- ------' • � _- L -_-_ � _ l_- _-_- _--_ - '---- --- 1- - - � - -T ' -- ----- ----'--r ' -1__� �_ ' - __�� . . 1-_ � �' -- _ -_-'- _�_, • _-_ __-_-'_-_-_ --__-___t ' . --- - _- - _' - ' - -_ ' '_ - _ _ - _ _ T�l T, —�� IT � 1"--r' �. u . ,/ / � � .+� Z L l �1/4 I / 1 L 1 L ��N�N�--� �N��� -- I . , ' ' - `- _^ p . 3 ` m ' . d ' [ r� V , ^ � � = ,�� ^ ,` �� �� �: ' �� �N� -^ - //� ~ • -' / �^ ( , /' IS / ~~ {� // ' ` - � �, // r- . � ' - ) / ' ' / ! / ' � h / ' 8_ ' | ^-' - / �z / ' � �~--'- - �~�~~~n �� ^ � � | �_- ' �� m __ � . �' ��� ���- ��� �� ][ | / . , ' - �A / | / ` / / �� ~�-'' [ ' '/ | 'v 0 '�-7,:`‘ � -- ' • ' � � �Ali ' • . • ;-- IL 7 - z - . ... • . < 5 _ (1__ i 1 ,,I '--'1 1 T i , .■ 4, 1 1 11 ",,, ,14 I 1 kick; •, I ''. 1 1 11 , 7 . . ;1 • 1, i 1 I.- ILI 11 it I 11 A • II . ___...._ , t.I _..1 11 11 „< r-- cj 111 eil , _ • ----- .'ai c • . -^ • . ' • C4 _ -- IC - ' ■ --- .i_ ;z;iiii i IS ill/V AL111W.p.-- •‹..1.6 7 - .., -.101, .--:1- — _.:77- I .- V-... 7 -, .- i --._ - ' - -.. - :: -ELrirel -i:--; , _ _ .-- . 1,-- ;-.... - 7 I , .-:--, 4 j---- .. _, ' -1--- • - ....-- (#7'/471\-' I.-_-:---1 ,..,--1___I ' i---1—'• . —4 i . • 1 , , a. .., ILI. -11- — ---- 1 - , /I <1 si. .-- ! - 11-1 /113 i(8 , 0 1 1 -4- , . . - 7; ___..,4_____ --. . , L -44- % (f)i 7/ ! . . . . 7 I: si) . • - _ -T-_1.--i ....----I--- - 4 ■ • t.-I-I i I 1 I"1..1.I•.3_1;T_ •_1=__h-'_. 2 7 • . _. ..,• _____:-..___,,,'.---,—• _._.n-__". _.■ Li i i__.._.._._... t I,1■'...- = - . H - i . , 1 1■.,1 I _,. . _ ...... ‘...._ _ . ... _ _ 1I, : .- --, ,-- ._ . _ /...-- - N-#'. `'. -f. 4,' •i:-T• _„ ... t.. _ "of/k' ik,' ■ .. • . .._ ._ : I i -i , ---4-•---r----._- . . ,. --, 41----1—_-.r .,,,. ,°).—_.',s •-ca_. ,-- ---. _. - , - ,:-.1 ,.....-,.:. - , , ...... ,.•, •.‘,. , ''''' . , ."".,----1!1-.---.---.,i--ii'i-.■_}H--t _''-iL.---''_-7-,,,.4,I 1''...■..—.}1...-.—V1'_4—.-.4I./ f."•\. -.j''f''1'.■.O\.s..N,'-.■v 1, 4-1 r-i. ,..1..N..4:. 'O / ;..f - 7 1 — 1ox ,/. ., -'. I-;- s:.Yff, -f s'•■ _i .1--t-: _4-11 L-- --.:4 . //tit:- -,-.9.006.-7. I 1--I • i i-- 3 •'•• .',,t.._:. . • i------, ----- -1/ __ .. ___,-- , 1,. ---1 i----, ..._ _ i I . • . . ,!).■. , _, ____, ._. , ,•,',".., -40) ,'- -,--, , 1 r I 7-Z. .-11•' --; ,:.,41,.:. % - . --.... , I . . , . , III ' ''ee V 1 -■---,-- r_.-_-: -----1 ,--I . ' ,.. . , 1 -......_..i. ..-7 ...1, /'' .-- ' t-i 7--' —i ...-..... ,- • --1 •4°i;‘' " ' '. / i- . ,-..,-,' ------- ;____ - - - -0 --1-: - - --_ ,--?-----, -. i I .: -- . ,,,,,,.,/ . ,,,,-- JO' •...2. -- .72 r--- i ..-----, , '-- . ea 1 vi 430 74.. 1 — . —•--, 1---' ---1_, - , .. 1 ' I 4147' • a _______ - - . . .--- I L. F .1>1 ia-• -<- _.1 ft_ — cf) .1 _ . I 4 ......,____ I .4iL2---- ------I-Acj.,-.-----Lipow - ____=Jr— r==.... ,i ._.....v. A u_i r l• > 11, 'U , II _J . 11 ill - 11. . il IL I ilk- ii- 4 A 'VP / sti,Is , 1-4 .kil i oil- mi • , 3 til ■ - i—, di :, kD z ut ,i--. -- %-- - .. L .. al, . 111 VI \\'"----1 1----/ ------... . s { - i— i 1 . d7 I --- •.. - - • ! - , ....I 'r---, i T , . • ‘ ,-- i-- L...---t • ...E., •...4 , *--1 --; _ —-----17...-----"7:--c_=1 :7------3C—.-----=.- I*"7-7:7-_-_z_r__ • • ..•. . - .. • il. -. • • ; " : , . t ' ''\>.'" . . , . . . -__..._.______-_.-____.----__. ! \)'. .-•- , . ' • 1; • . . . ' - . . . . i - • . . . , -_ . • 1 , , i IL. . . • . -- 17,,N, -. _._-__:1 , , ,.------ ; ,1 .---'—',. • 1 • I : . . " .. . • •. • i . i . • . ,.. . 1 . . ..- . 1 • c , - -. I; • • . ■.-■:- ( . f , , ,. '/ i . . . . 1 / ,.• „, `r-------, "." / . , , . . . .. . .. . • / .,- / , --- . / , I (. . --..-...... ( ; ,.,.... - .. .. I I. ///-- . • 7••-' ( i •' /I . / i ft — _ /•. -....— i _ ——. _ . 1 ' I . - . . _ _ f! t- • . _ . • .. * • 1-: it Z• . C.) . — U i--- --1 . U 3 hi. 11 T a) . IP i 1 1 1 r . 0 i 7 < C_I A - ......_ I D CI 4 I . ...0 AI cc' /....f - 1 • . il il Zill'7,41TOP-I., ...'n-k- 1 11 • I ,1 0...." • ; 1 ...-7.-.....;14 N •r;plarkt. - ; 1 ',•4 1 ' • . ,...=•.,-..-•_,. ...,:do, ,,r1 ■\... i ‘'.. ", `i, : • 1 ...._......___ • i i i. i ...._ a) ' 1 r- • a, . g . . ; _. . _ .. _ I Hi 11. 1 : 1 II 11 \ 1■ , I . 1 1 . 1 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves i OnM•0 C.i.M,E .,L O.B.6 1.CO. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission August 20 , 1974 620 Hyman A scale modelwas presented for a visual conception of Prel : inary & Final - the building to be located next to the Patio Building o V( Hyman . Planning ' s comments were that all referrals were in order, that the gross building size had dropped by 13% and the gross leaseable space dropped by 23% at the conceptual stage of Ordinance 19 from the original that had been rejected to a conceptual design that had been approved by the Commission at a previous meeting. Yank Mojo felt that the building was still in excess of FAR for the present and proposed zoning . 26 parking spaces would be reauired for that size of a building. The Planning di^irecommend preliminary and final approval. . ;Q`: oFFccei 1, W..uot'lAhr. There was some discussion of the calculation of parking spaces. . The representative from 620 Hyman stated the present proposed building had been reduced to 69% efficiency . as opposed to the architect' s usual goal of 80% . They were willing to provide the additional parking to what they could provide on-site. Barnard moved that preliminary & final approval be give on the condition that 5 on-site parking spaces and what ever additional parking spaces shall be required under the new proposed zoning code or whichever zoning cede i adopted based on gross leasable floor space. Jenkins • seconded. All in favor except Collins who voted nay. Motion carried. Christiana 'Chairman Schiffer had been absent at the prior meeting Preliminary & Final on August 6, 1974 , he asked for a background on that meeting which he had been unable to attend. The ' � Christiana had come before them at that time for preliminary and final approval but was tabled at that time due to a discrepancy noted in plans with relation to buildings surrounding the proposed duplex. The owner and manager felt that he had explained the problem created by his architect surticiently and now awaited their decision on preliminary and final approval. The Commission felt they had been misled at the conceptual stage. Gantzel felt that the problem had not been created by his doing. Mr. Johnson stated they had been misled whether intentionally or un- intentionally. Johnson moved to rescind conceptual approval based on an erroneous understanding of what was actually true and reconsider conceptual. Barnard seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. . Barnard moved to adjourn the meeting. Jenkins seconded All in favor, the meeting was adjourned at 6 :25 p.m. . a and to be continued August 21 at 12: 00 p.m. Recording Secretary RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves B0B.w•j C.C.■■`E-Kft B B./1 l CD. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning and Zoning August 6 1974 Limelite, Ms. ,Baer reiterated the concern over the parking continued situation and said that since the building had gone up in 1.955 before any parking requirements, the Planning Office had originally believed that no spaces had to be provided. Since then the City Attorney had ruled that it was to be considered abandonment of a non-conforming use and that not only would they have to maintain the present lot as a parking area but also provide additional space for the new units . Johnson stated that the Commission would have to see new plans because they couldn 't accept the old ones based on Ms. Stuller ' s legal opinion. Architect Don Ball attempted to point out to the Commission that the parking area was not legally • considered a parking area but rather open space and that the owner could use it as he chose. Johnson advised the applicant that he could either withdraw his plans or they would..have to turn them down officially. The applicant withdrew his plan for resubmission as modified. 620 Hyman Applicant did not show for his presentation. Jenkins moved to adjourn the meeting and Barnard seconded. Meeting was adjourned at 5:41 p.m. Recording ecretary -3- • OF P?OCcr{itN, In') L r: ::;:•. n ; ::nr; fl c: nd 7.n n' ,_ Jule- in, 1l Meeting wn,• c r by Chairman •, • 4:12 P.M. with _ Co^ i ssion m r}. T::f ., . 'ollins, Robert i-.:. r JA_ d, City/County Planner Jonn ., cry., planner Donna Baer. Approai of Minutes - Collins mentioned that he .._. .. correct two June 4, 1974; June 11, small items in the minutes of July 2, 1974. In 19.4; Jt=e 13, 1974; regard to the 620 Hyman ;...:itciing conceptual prc,sen- July 2, 1974. tation, the minutes read The new plans have reduced the size of the building by 25% and that reduction came out of usable space" . Collins asked if this figure corzect. :311inr 5tdri O that he would also to be shown in the minutes as casting a no vote en this same issue. Collins made a motion to approve the minutes as cor- j rected, with the provision that the Planning Office • check into the 25% figure used in the minutes. Jenkins seconded the motion. All in favor, motion carried, Old Business; H.P.C. Schiffer noted that because Ordinance 9 precluded thc Criteria the Commission from doing anything that won't have a positive effect as far as putting the recommendation into effect, it seemed to be a consensus of the Commission that they should not make any recommend- ation to City Council. Since the P & Z was required to make a recommendation and a report, a report should be made to Council. Barnard stated that the Commission should request that Council change Ordinance 9. Geri Vagneur arrived. 4 Barnard stated that with the united opposition shown by the public against the district, that he would not be able to indicate that he would be in favor of of such a district. Johnson questioned the appeal procedures. Jenkins • stated that the P & Z could be the appeal board. Jenkins further noted that the H.P.C. should not be the final authority. The H.P.C. should take on. a. staff function with the P & Z in terms of input. There 'should be an appeal before the Courts. City Attorney Stuller asked why Jenkins felt that thc P & Z was more qualified to give an analysis of the issue. Schiffer stated that all concerns should be collectec and submitted to the City Council in the form of a written report. Barnard made a motion that all concerns be put in thc form of a written report, - dated today's .date; that this report be forwarded to City Council, and th it the Planning and Zoning Commission, having received the recommended criteria from the Historic Preser-v.:A- tion Committee, forward them with the report to the City Council with no comment, and also the lctt' received from interested citizens. Collin°: seconC. d the motion. • -1- f t con C?r' Pfioc =E:.D=S 100 !.caves Regular Meeting Planning & Zoning July 2, 1974 Barnard moved that they do nothing with the request, leave the covenant as is. Seconded by Jenkins; • all in favor except Schiffer, who dissents. 620 Hyman The developers have returned with a second conceptual Conceptual presentation because the first did not meet with the approval of the board. They reviewed those buildings that were immediately around them and passed under Ordinance 19. The new plans have reduced the size of the building by 25 and that reduction came out of usable space. The proposal consisted of a restaurant in the basement level and three other stories that would house professional office space. Donna Baer pointed out that the area was zoned commercial and residential and it was their hope that housing would be considered on at least one, preferably the top floor. • Don Fleisher presented the viewpoint of the developers in that they did not want housing. The disruption • of the open space needed in a professional building plus the added cost of installing the plumbing needed for individual units would not be economically sound for such expensive land. The rental that would have to be charged would not he in line with employee housing. Also, he felt that the area was not conducive to housing, i.e. noise and traffic. Barnard felt that in all fairness, the building did not look out of line. Schiffer stated that the floor ratio was improved by the 2,000 square feet reduction. Motion was made by Vagneur that conceptual approval be granted. Seconded by Barnard; all in favor except Jenkins, who abstained. Law Four-Plex Both Planning and Engineering had reviewed the final Preliminary & plans for the proposed building and asked that conditional Final approval be given. Planning's conditions being 1) to provide 6 parking spaces and 2) a covenant between the City and the owners be executed for long term rental. Engineering conditions were 1) provisions for drainage, 2) existing trees remain and others added and 3) trash pads be added. The Board was in agreement with all the 'above recommedations Motion was made by Johnson that approval be given on the condition that 6 parking spaces be provided, a long term rental covenant be drawn between owners and the City, provisions for drainage be made, existing trees remain and others added, and trash pads be added. Jenkins seconded all in favor. -5- ti r RECORD OF t'ROCEEDU. 100 Leaves Regular Meeting T • Aspen Planning and Zoning June 4 1974 Limelite Lodge Addition Jenkins noted i-_hat this was a much less dense use of Conceptual, continued the land than other buildings, and was less intense use of the land. Iie further stated that a lodge could not be supported with much less density. Schiffer noted that another consideration was the height and the bulk. He stated that he was unsure whether consideration of this should be done at this stage. Johnson noted that this was the reason for his vote to • table. He felt he was unsure of what they were talk- ing about in respect to this project. Barnard sug- gested going out and taking a look at this project. Ms. Baer also asked what the Commission would want to consider in regard to the number of parking spaces for the lodge. She stated that 27 spaces would be required, with the 2 to 3 ratio now required by the code. Schiffer stated that this could be considered at another stage. Johnson made a motion that the Commission table. the Limelite Lodge conceptual presentation until June 11, 1974. Seconded by Barnard. Jenkins asked what was being considered in the motion to table. It was stated that the only consideration was to go see the site of the project. All in favor, motion carried. CDES Building - Tabled at request of applicant. Preliminary Reevaluation 620 Hyman Building Ms. Baer stated that she had informed Kit Mason that the board was not interested in hearing the same / building plans again. However, Mr. Mason had under- stood stood that the board was requesting some figures and comparisons with the adjacent buildings, which had been established. Mr. Mason stated that they wished to present this information to the board for their direction. Schiffer stated that under Ordinance 19, if a project was denied, the Commission could not reconsider the disapproval now. The only way it could have been re- considered would be if one of the members on the pre- . vailing side of the motion, had .aide a motion to reconsider at that meeting or at the next regular meeting. It was already past the point where the original building could be reconsidered. Schiffer further mentioned that he felt Mr. Mason • was asking the Commission what they would approve or disapprove. He suggested that he 'turn to the Planning Office for direction. Mason stated that he was willing to make some con- cessions for a building that may b approved. Barnard stated that this was the job of the Planning Office. -8- . RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves ORM'1 C.i.„r,r b.O.n J. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning and Zoning June 4, 1974 620 Hyman Building Mason stated that although there was• no motion to the effect of reconsideration, there were elements that were unknown, such as the comparisons with the ad- \v/ jacent buildings. He stated that he had gotten the impression that this was specifically requested to be presented to the Commission, and that such information was needed to make an evaluation. Mason stated that they were looking. for direction or conceptual approval for some other density. Mason asked if he could present a modification of this project at this time. Schiffer stated that he needed to be on the agenda for Ordinance 19 conceptual approval. - The whole process had to be began again. • Mason stated that he felt the Commission could then agree on what would be acceptable to the board. Schiffer stated that the Commission could not tell the • applicant what kind of building to build. He further noted that there were no parameters in Ordinance 19, and that this had caused previous problems; the ord- inance was discretionary. The applicant could either come back with a new building under Ordinance 19 or • wait until new zoning had been established. Johnson made a. motion that the meeting be adjourned. Collins seconded the motion. Meeting adjourned at 7:50 P.M. Secretary • • • • I pl Du i m If r N r • u.:I: w r•:I n • :f 4 I :c o 1) f 1 n .• :1 m e. ...: h 't 0• '• c' n G 'J1 �. 2• r 3 .4 rn,.1.Y w a< G w m rt x J 7 0 >. rt 0:K r p3 a•�.0 n ,0 a£q1 K x 'LS w c' .r to r. n 0 J N c r. 00.0 r 0 v• a 0 0 N 0 OLDS 0 N w OM 70 ,n 0 0 n 0 DI O w i • rr • ,1 • 't1 • r n i n'c7 . 70 a n 0 0-1 ,1.0 C W C- 0 < 0 n O£ 000G 7 Y l i? • ,r-,m I'' f w o :1 r I' u: r1 rP r 1D r J N ,P ,a • E^ r 0 n w rt ; rt n r t7 U. n 'r 1 -it N.,to, 3 c. '1 N r r• .1 O r 3 r. r•. r G cc Y Cu rt f.• 0 r• :r O 0 0 t�O F.•7 1, n Cu K - at .. W : 0.0 Y .+ • 0 3 r +.l .400 r.R C: ,-.4 ..-.r,-, a, 3 n n 0 ,0- a r O 0: N n K tr•O w r. rn N : 7'0 0 7 n .1 w 0 7 0 7' w 7 r-S O N (D 0'ID G w G W 0. r•0 £ O rr', :[' ` r•r 7 0 r•7 n .n 71(3 0 • n .' '/ 7 n . w 7 0 0 0 G .7 n 0 0 K 0 :r:V N :1 N 7 [: w O N'- N n Lt r 3 r. 7 0 :I 'I 0 , rr 7 n 0 rw N Do r•0.`•: 'f.f••rr • 0 N 0 0 N N 0' r 4 -. I I 0 rt rW '1n N N 0 3 'l 0,a, G ' r7O N K 0 7 '30.0 0ON0 rnN N N7,Y '7 �I ?; n E r, • 10. 0 3-. _ C_ 0 3 _1 w N < G 3 0 7C O N 0 0 0 G r-G r C rt it .-. O • 0� P r-\'G 3) \"G D. cc 0 7 G r £ N 0 G .; 0 K rr.Y\ ID 7 7 0 C000 ~-w r ▪ N ,., ,,..-...11., a` . 7 0 3 S07 73 (3G n a 7 77, K r4 ,0 7 Cl. 0 K r Cn £ n 1? G rr • n G O -.- •. + 0, 0G 0S0 nl r-K C 0 'n N r•.K ID G n K 7--.: a C• 0 P rc ^ CO G II • •r .0 • - ' 01 .Y C C-7 7 r • N n 0 CD 0 r.Dl 0 0.3 '- 1.L 0 < ID r G K G T 7 \"Y a w rrrt 7 ■rt C. n ,♦C ! 7 r r ✓ n 0 C a rl 7.r' rt 7 r n 7 r•0. 'p r 7 7 4 0-7 rr r K 1l O r ID a n 0 _ _ CD rr S 3 r O L -- C K '} N 7 0 •O G 3 0 S 3 '-• 7 rr 0 1 N 7 O. - a C. r )",, 0,7 i." Mrt w rr 7 y 7 4 rr N O 0 K 07 G • -< 7 co 17 I X 0 r-rn r 7 3 O ' r7 ' w r r 7 r.M CD O rr 0 T 0 G 7'. .+: 0 ,. 7 7 11 3 7 0 •.,, 0 C 7 rn ....: 70 ro G G r A rt K G r-r-G K n-£ n0.1 £ K an I n -,Ii rr X.. * 3 •..:n ` C rD (D K r N 0 S .^. < 7 K r-0 7 7 w CD 0 K 0 10 C m r '+ 03 `'.'1 K '3 IT n G 0 r•K 7 ,0 0 r rt .D 1- 0 3 G K' 7 0.000- K< Crt 71 S 71 Y -'O n 0 0 7 \' 0 7 • 0 0 0 7' N 0 K K 7 O K K CD 0 r-ID 7 w 7 7' S, 04 O '7. 3 0 ' < 7 0 7 3 I Cl 0 n 1 0 7 0 0 0 W 01 O 477 S 1-,7 ,1 .0030 00 J O r rr 0 0 r CD N. 3 K N 0 0 K -do 0 £ CD CD K 0 G K G r' 0 ID n C - Z _ ti r 0 0 0 7-J 7 < CO N G O N (0 K r-n C 'u (? n 0-11000- G': K K G C'1 O 701 0 K 0 O r r G 7 r 0 0 0 • r 1 0 0 7 0 N O 0 0' n7%.10 n w n 0 K O G G 0 0 -7 7' -I 7 0.0 rr 7 \ ,a n K 00 G r 0 0 0 N G .^. G 0 n K K 3 K O K O n <'K £ 3 �.: ,' N r11 a 0 K C: 7 K O £ w C 57 0 (33. O .0 �D n CO 0 J 7 0 0 O Y(7 r r 10 N TJ r- 0 0 7 0,3 3 0 to 0•r w 0 O r 7 r C 7 G -. 0 CD b _ r K G £^K 0 K w N 7 ^^., r• O O O c O 7 K n 7 O N K N r K n I I ■ •„O 0 0^ r,.7 K 0 :.a .7 O 7 a 7 7 ,1 7 r O r r-O ,0 O r- M C r 0 0 n 0 n 3 0 C n C G c 0 .• x 0. r-0- E W O c K a TJ K I r 0 7 X r 7 0' 0 C G K 7 0 7 0 0 -'30 0 K rt £ • 0.0 car r K 7 1.4,..." nl K O O K 7 G 0 7 nl O K 7 7 7: an 0 G 70, 7 r r O 0 0£ 7 C'300 N ro N r.0 7 0 to O V- K x r•0'0 0 -" n N K 7 0-< W rn w S nl a K 0 N O 3`< r£'o N 0 K K O CD -anon r. 0 on 0 0 0 CD < r 7 rfr • • 0 r,r- N O r-0 G£ G S G G 7 CD 70400 C O CO 7 O n < r 0 G N C O r 7 r• r 0 £ r- 0 K II rn r 0 O O n 0 0 7 00.<W 7 r S O 0 0 K N 0 GO 'O r G 0 r 0 ,r^ 0 L .-00 1-0 4n £ £ r0 05 r- 0 0- N 3 7 SO SO. 111 3' 0 n 0 0-0 0 0 I^ r '0 n r N'17 0 O 0 r '0 C 0 K C a K 0 < G r r-7 C K 0 7-"< 'r 0 K 70 K Oct 3 1-0 0,000 0 _a m0 ,0 r- r- 0.001-'- ,r I' 7r w. 0 ,N cm' 7 .0 ,00 n rn -'30 00,0 r•N 0 7 0 7 7 7 r 7 iI 0 '-• Oct n 0 0 K I N K 0 'O K r 0 7.0 C 7 0 w.0 G G O 0 0 7 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 < M S ,r 5a 0 £ n 7 0 0 n 0 (D n K .0 .r )G I'I '0 K 7"0 m.0 r.7 3 r 0 0 3 0 0 r-: 0 (D 0 rn 0 0 r- .< r-.n,'S ro 3 ro 7 )•< II _• 0'0 • 'o. G 0 7 •£ 0' 0 G G r• 7 0 K K O 0 n 7 n 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 L n 4 r- 0 0 ::,..( .5,3 £ r 3 CO •L7 4 ro 0 7 K 0 00 7 0 0 K O w 0 K 0 0 < N r O K v li o• ran r- m0 7,32 .303 M m C O K G n (3 '-'-o-c-'3 G ; ■ I 1 't I. C• ;D �.. 1 1 • . :1 L: • w • :< n r„. _ • 0 7 . 0 Ii ■-• II .a I' L •1 •- ,r :1 , C,1 m .••nu) ? La rt:: n o n :' r• i) 't c, G 7 nu:•(1 r-n r.M n a > n::- •' (+ o-•: n< ,r, o In :: '_ _ _ •0 0' 1 'D L` O n ,--0 7o r. :'• :' n 7 (] M ,: :' F O f.' M .n u U) O O 0V ...to '1 O 'D G 0 , O M 7 - N 00 -1 :r ..) N . ,t' ;. 00 .-• D n 7 On C:, 7 rl :' o C r0 V 1 • nu r n m -; (1 M :1 0.0 • J, tr L1 r1 .- C y u 40 .. :1' < fD r < V `-J ,^ 7 O M 7 ,-01 r r 1---.:1 0 0 ,I AD 7 - `, Dt , •, DO , 0 .... or- 7 M G - r M G�' G O O r• 7, (11 co M 7 r- rt , S• W I:, 1 O- •n 7 ., r own n rn C 7 :' o " r 7 a n O 0, um n N a: CL r-r) lit G 0,O 0 on :r n D1 n D, > rt•- ,;,�l n ;,1 n ; r-N c: 00 W `- M n r 7 n 0 r.'D N W co m 7 N Ul :r ,D N '070 1 m On 00 '1 R' ,D n N r 7- M C 0 r•ti '1 M 7 r r1 G D r r u M C0 (1 r t'l: \ n `. l=•r 7 D) ID rt L),U1 n9 r,0 0 M r n u7 G 00 r N ow Or n N 7 ; O '' C' :1 - r- 0 0 .. .T rt.7 0 r rr ' N N G G 7740 ;10 - 0 r• CL N ,0 \O M 00- 0 0 - O 00 r r~ . ^ n n .T r 'U = ti n 0 0, nn ` M 3 0- 3 N r n 7 G r 0 a. '1 U 77 0 0 00 r G- 0 G ,D 0 :- n ' C,G 40 G` 0 `1 o 0'0, 0 0 n no rt 7 G ma. •_] n (0 (0Q I J ' O, 7 < :. 9n .: 0 0 £ n n N 2 0 C7 0 G, u _1 0, .(1 rr rt D u) C 7 ,a, n 0 C I, 0 1 f n O n .D r1 C G 'Cr' ✓ 0 < G(D -C Co n 0 0 M r D rt r N 00 • O 7a n C ma 7 G (D • 0O 0400 :� N C ,P 7 00 r, G H G•0 7 O G 7 7 G`- 0m G 0 77 r CC N ,70 I7 0' 0 .0 C C, 0 - ,- Cr' 7,10 . G G 3 V. O O O n 7 7 4 C.G ' r u C,n r.n n r n 1 7 . MO- 7-0 7 n O r G 7 r - m7 0 r O r 7 r- 0 0 0 -n r r n rn 7 N n 7 0 -r C (D I 7 Cr 0'• 0 W .107 .--C., 7 y 0 G :177- 70 70 ,D n O 0 C-< £ rt 7 r G G r 00 M n I.. On C -O C £ G 0'M n n7 7n, O G D 0 ,5 '-r N 0 07 D O r' '0 5 n M rt 0 N 5 (0 0 n t r.7 r•.(: N ,n I,. M O ,0 0 (D O C n n 7 0 •. G 0 0 0 £ 0 7 C G rt 0 M 0 rt'-n rt • .0 G I` (7 `I^ n- NW X o-,D r1'\ £ M 00 7 M 0 7 n : O r- M 7 r r- r n M 7 0 0 0 7 C rt m ,n 00 0a, ,900 0 r, 0 a,7 0 a G 3 7 (D r C n I 7 G r7 0 N Or 0 •1 0 0 m ,-6,w G W Or rt n G r :cc rr CC , ,70m n (J 'O (^ ,< 7 7 •< n n CO 0 0 7 3 M 0. DC 1-1 M n rt 7 no 0 7 n N G n r 7 n '-n m0 ..0 7 7 0 0 1 0• 0 rt r7 M M 7 0. N 0 C. (D 7 0 77 G N 0 n r '- r-n /D ` n r M r co 0 0 G D 7-G O n 0 0 £ 0 0 rr 17 rt X'r- fD 7 Z M 7 0 (•J C 0.0000. 7 M G r 0 0 .0,7 r-N rt D1 M G ,c7 0,< D G r 0 (n I-t r-C 0 0. rt 17 • C. r 7 n rt r-0 7 - .O .- n n M n r ` r N C 0)'J I tel M O X N n 77 07 O a 7 .7-n 0.-,07 79 ;;1 7 Cl 0.00 < (0 -000' 'O 0, £ M r-C 00 on 0'0 CO C' co n 0 7 0 u o 0 • 0 O C D n -0 on G rt rr G n M v M 0r •o D 0 G 0 1 ,-C- O C. 0a N O 015 _<D ✓-7 OM '(000 n r-r 7 0 w 0 G C G 7 0 O r-n r 7G fY n 7 7 r- 0. O n 0 r O 7 r o 00p-3 v7 < 1-00. G nrt 0 , 'O. 7 0.r-G Il O Cl r 0 r-0 • 0 O n 7 .O r 0C. C.r t 0 0.1 M ,E 'l", Cl 0.0 7 0 07 r n K n 7 r-G n 0 7 00, C O a 07 r•M 00 ••n r-M < n 0 2, 0 7 7 0 0 M r-• Ir 0 9 £ 0 0 G r Dc- 00 7 0 • .(7 0a, 00 Cl Ot 7 C 0 0 -1 -- <,C ,.--0 r- 7 0 7 '00 G 0 u r•0 0 D n 9 , O r G n N n 0 0 00 7 • 40 M 7 CO O r,-. G CO r ,En 0` 0.7 7 M n 0-- 7 r- 0 M 7 O r m7 0 G n r 0. 0,7 7 m •7 X =N an MG D M0 0 N0 4 .O X 7 G 0 0. 7 rt r.r. 4000 7,077 r- ,0 0 0 r m m O O r'0 -r �-n m0 0 (D ^ (D C r- n.n 10-2 00 0 < 0n 0 O r D ..,r-n Gam'- 'Cr'') 0`< £ 0 0 0 7 n G M rt 7 0 • -?7 • 7 r, O r-M70 0 7 0 7 01- '< '0 7-0,7.0 7.77m71 N O N 0 0 0. G 00 • O D 0 G 0 0 0 r- u G 7 r n 0 0 0 7 co'-'G 0 M N O G r m , r£ n o 0 M £ 00 m•< 010 7 n 0 7 r C.,n 0 7 M M G O--n r- 7 9 0 G Y 'o M D O 0 CD Gn 70 C O 77n 0 O 0 0 O N-• X 0 0 0 7 < r- O 0,N 0. 0 M N 0 Cl 0 7 0 - 3 M 0 0 7 'n O rt 7 0 n r n n 0 7 0 0 0 M O 0 N M 7 CD n M 40 n n 7,< rt r-n o = 3 c 0 -1 0 0 70 n 0 0 • n 0 7 0 017 . D. r N GO no r- I3 r-^„ N 0 0.0 (0 r• 0 O 7 7 O r o N 7 '7 CC 0 .0 r. D n N r-n r-'0 O n 0:7 7 M 0.1 (0 r 7 7 n r C 7 n 0. 0 n G o n n--9 4 N 7 G N 0 7 N'J 7 r< G 0 0 N 0 G 0 GJ1 N r 0 ,-,-.,. r 70 M C, -L.,3 I n o • D n 7 7 D M r-M 0.0 C • N M 1...7 0 7 '0] - •' 0 ,--- 17..1-,CJ MC !--,0-0 = or r -' 0 = 0 00 C -1 O O 0.1300- 40000 - X0,0 O 0 M n C.' '-'O (0 M 0 rt�0 0 0 C G 00 00 ,r) ` G rt 0 O D r 0 7 7 n • r-7 0 0.a C. • Cr C :'1 n M M O G D r 0 0 r m M '-'0 r 7 0 0.0 0 £ n X 7. n n X 0 G n r r-3 r-,:, n O '0 C)1 0, 0 • r- G 0 IX 0 C '-- 0 0 1-DI .L' m r 'G 7'0 0 n M G '9 n r. a n G r.i I o n o 0.r•rt n rt 7 L 0 • W D O M ,,CM , r1 ;J 0' N r 7 n 7 0" !'-I F. O .0 r•C M - 77000 G £ M 77 Cl 7 0 7 0 r,N O n 0 < 0 ✓• 0 0 0 .O N 1-' • M 0 0 0 O 0 0. C C CO G G 'n `• -,,< £- 1 < 7 < 0 O • I 1 0 7 I I 0777r N 1 0 0 r. 00 0, 7 7 I 111 n (0 0.0. Mr r I•- N N ' r I . . 0( 0) 011 4 •• 0 7 _ -• R G - r•.3 'M • 0 0 i3 O �0 N 'm . rt 1 7 4 L1 1. M U U :, 1,01 -' ' 3 D ' 7. 7..V ::-. ...1 '0 < MC N•O 3 V0 '0 G< M 7 J n n X 0 .' rn n'- D0 D n 3 m < 3 D C G 0 a,00 0. 0 0 0 : G C r• '- --0 3 0 N W r O W 0 0 I- G r-N ,D 0 ,0 NC = 70 00- G W r-7 00'0 • n - = < C 00 00 00 • 07 G7n0 r MM • 7 70 • nO Gn • 00 m , N r u T, 7 r C., G' 7 ••('u C+ 7 MO "7, 0., 7 < _ A.:1) '< 0 0 0 r 1-'0 r C 37 r ni 0 O G£ r-w 0 V. m S 0 _ r-E r • '/. In no- P. „'7 < rt rt:.+ O u 7 • r 0' r n :. o n _O -co:, r 0 M n £ _ ~,W 0 -2, CO :, o,-(30 N Cl C, rt n M D 0 0 0 (0 n '0 CO�•N 7'< G• o0 r•3 0'< r. M < 01 % G ,17.< m 0-7O7: 0 0 (D r rt O 0 0, 0 0 0 7 7 ,C ,o I • L o • C)1 7 M 0'0 1: J r r.,. W ,- Cl • i G 0 7 7 •7 n M G r1 n rt 7 C M 3 W C r0 N rt rt n 7 n m 0 7 C- 11 n r 1 17 D r- m a w up. (D n G 5 W r 0 lo 0 N o- 0, m ,n 0 n m 7 r M . N 0 n r 3 0 f C, G G m ((1 G n 0 0 n N r M N 7 7 0 n n n '0 O O W W u 7 0 0 3 n r- r 0. • 0.W M r n n M 'G 0 0 7 0 C r•- O O rt 0 0 0 M M 7 rt G n r W 7 u 7 'T r •< 7 N • `< r(C r O M 0 u O W C'- 7 0. 0 C. rt f, 0 M O 0 M , 7 r• rt• (D 7 N 0,01 n 01 0 7 Cl 0 M'D 'CO O r O r 0. 7c) 00 G r.7 C. 0 0 -, - J O 0 (D n CD Mtn 0 0 W 7 .1 n no 0 7 :, G nr, G " 'ra MO co. Mrn _ C. G Co N WOOD K ( 0. m00 On r-rr 0 7 �1 O 7.0 u n rt rt n 7 ✓,:r M Cl • 7 G 7 0. 7 0 n C CO n G 7 'U 0, C n < 0 7 E - G0 n = - r.'n 0 .0 0 7 n W rf G n m0 rt G, (D r o• • t M P' rt 0 7 - 'C W 7 r.0 •-• -7 'r. _ r C 0 r.O 0 7 n o o ✓ 7 O N '.). r, £ j7 r o n ow a r u n L n n 0-u o , 7 W rt ✓ n n G 0 G £ 0' M 0 C N W .O Cr n.M 7- ,I 0 CC 00.0 X M N7 no 'R r-.4 n 7 7 7 Oct G O rt N n W C- n r-M W 1 0' 7 7 Cu O rt m J L n '*,0 M n n IN O n In rt G n ml) r,r 7 7 0 rt I%^ m Cl 0 O 0 rt '- 3 ✓' M m n D r M M 0 n 7 • 7 7'U 7 r rt Y. % W n 0 0 7 ry 0 '• n m r 07 O.KJ o 7 au no 0 7 D ,0 0 D u W G7 11 7 77 rt. -1 •< 7 0 r n 0 • 0 0 0.0 O V V.0 0 0 X 0 0 rt 0 n 0, N W O M N G 0 5 C7 0 r m n r. 0 0 r n W 'r rt r 0 0 0 7 r•n G rr O''J'0 n 0 7 Z Cl r N 11 7 0 rt 0. 3 6.0 0 M M W u O• r•m rt n X7 r 00 0 7 M W'O 0 n 7 I• 7 D O rt - r W 7 7 rt v 0 00 O N X W0,1 0 7 0-0 n.7 7W r• r-7 n 0 CD ODD D rt r+ 7 N L D Carr ,(4'0 M r-0 0 0 O N ✓, O 7 r-M 0 0 0 0 0 �:0 I. N 90 '00- 05 n 0 rt M 0 r• 7 7 C,r 0 0 7'< 0 77 7 (00--C-' G 0 G - I! 0. 7 0- 01 (0 ti 7 V P c n 0. u0 W CO ✓- 9 04 C 0.9 m • 7 N 0 W 1) 0 0 o w no.- 000-'CC r.n O M W.7 • rt.', 0 0 f• 7 m 0 G O O M 7 n r• , O rt 7 0-'� :.,-7 ,IC £ :r W 7 0000 rt 1 Cl n 1• fl _1 n 7 M 7 0.0,(4 7: •1 T) N M Cl. 0, 0 7 n O v n 00 N 0 rt Cr 77 n 1) 'OM W m - 0, W r-7 r W 7 r 0 O n N n o M CD 0 In 0 0 0 0 u 'r,4 n r- t o N 0 7 M • o n C M 11 C rt f n N M 0 0 0 O nrn.n -4 /I70 MG C'r 7 CD O0 N OW•-') nC 7O Cl Y 7 r. n 7 7 O M O r•. -(CO. Cl , m rD 0 7 0 0 7 n C- r C O C ✓• m M 0 0 CD n 0 C O r M r1 •'W 7 O m r ,n .--c 0' r r 7 r r 7 T) 0 pm o 0 £ 0 a- C: it n n O N '0 0 or rj o r W G G 7 0 0 rt- n 0. 0 0.n M 7 0 :r f Cl ' Cr 0 7 •, Cl, 7:0 rt.- n :1 TJ I-,- C C.• 0 .4 7'(. 0 CD, 01 C rt • 0 C C fj 0 Cr 7 M,n 0 0'r W C r '• In Cr Cr f, r� '1 0 'n 7 CC ^ O r (D V rl N f- 0 01 0 G O D. •10 70 W,r r• C• M 0 W r W :14m L: r n M r• CC, N 0 r•7 0 0,rt C r•-rt r _•.:1 G I:� 00 0 0 m q) 1+n :r r n 0 7 7)-', N 0 0 11 N n 1W Cn L Cl M C t 'n :( n 0- CO r`) W N -1 M 0 r•n 11 0 0 1 N In 7 n n 'r7 lr • '1 7 , 0 r •f 0 :I 0. • M :1 'r ii. c, n 7 0 '1 n 'f n " n m O 0 :1 0 rt 0 't1 � 0 0 O 1, m + 0, 0 D, 7.', f: •1 W 0.a. O M W `I :1 '1 N 't •1 - t, n X C.,et n'1 '1 ^)C, 0 r•C Cl 1 ,-.•,l 0 1 r-Pt Q1 m 0- r1 1., n O c' ID 4, G r -K1 •n 0 C•,'1 0 0. r 0 Cl n m 'Ct 0 n C CO 0 m -C 0 .1 0 :1 1: tt N • '(l • r 7 f• •1 .0 (D 0'00 7 0 0 ,I5 • N 7, r ID m0 . •(D m,LI .- 7 r- 7.' 0 1•,0 C Cl r- M • ' :1 r•N ' C. CC 'r• • •u 7 ■ 0 7 , 7 0 7 7 f • Or 0 0 C1, C'• In + 0 O N M 01,:1 0 r-)l 0- -C • M• 'n n :7' 0 T)Ci r I• M M 0 0- 0 rn r r-11 7 I. 0 .• 'i . CD Cr 7 •C • M r, Cn M 0 G m 0. n n ,70m3: 0 •• 01 I G•0 0 O C) W N •1 ( n 1)' -' rr r) rt W 1 n :1 1 1 4 •C r :1 n or CD 1 n ;, '1 I Cl, W. •I N CO r• I C 1 r1 V. :1 Cl I, ..• 4• ,il IL• :1 j1 r.. 1.(1 G . m I. 0 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 19, I HAVE INSPECTED THE PLANS FOR THE 620 HYMAN STREET BUILDING AND FIND THAT THEY PRESENT NO PROBLEM AS TO THE AVAIL- ABILITY OF SEWER SERVICE TO THE PROJECT. A . 78 :1") ,. (ft ,... , (---,,Icr-- ,ii„..„ , c..._. AGENCY SIGNATURE vz DATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 19, I HAVE INSPECTED THE PLANS FOR THE 620 HYMAN STREET BUILDING AND FIND THAT THEY WILL NOT RESULT IN ANY MAJOR IMPACT ON SCHOOL ENROLLMENT. ce9e2g,L,J,i ,t-t AGENCY SIGNATURE /y/ 7/ DATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 19, I HAVE INSPECTED THE PLANS FOR THE 620 LAYMAN STREET BUILDING AND FIND THAT THEY PRESENT NO PROBLEM AS TO THE FEASIBILITY OF SUPPLYING ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES TO THE PROJECT. 'AGENCY SIGNATURE DATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 19, I HAVE INSPECTED THE PLANS FOR THE 620 HYMAN STREET BUILDING AND FIND THAT THEY PRESENT NO PROBLEM AS TO THE AVAILA- BILITY^ OF GAS SERVIICCE TO THE PROJECT. 27,it WZ(Ve,./(c)&- _ AGENCY SIGNATURE DATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 19, I HAVE INSPECTED THE PLANS FOR THE 620 HYMAN STREET BUILDING AND FIND THAT THEY PRESENT NO PROBLEM AS TO THE AVAILA- BILITY OF WATER SERVICE TO THE PROJECT. ,g) 6 a/or- AGENCY imp NATURE 7...p .. DATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 19, I HAVE INSPECTED THE PLANS FOR THE 620 HYMAN STREET BUILDING AND FIND THAT THEY PRESENT NO PROBLEM CONCERNING ACCESS, CIR- CULATION, NECESSITY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS, DRAINAGE OR OTHER ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS . AGENCY SIGNATURE 2 677 V DATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE 19, I HAVE INSPECTED THE PLANS FOR THE 620 HYMAN STREET BUILDING AND FIND THAT THEY PRESENT NO PROBLEM AS TO THE AVAILA- BILITY OF ELECTRIC SERVICE TO THE PROJECT. - -. )12 /- / * II1' ,r A GENCY ��` AGENCY Afi��'� yG d SO/ DATE MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Planning Office (JS) RE: Zoning Use Determination DATE: May 13, 1976 A specialty food store is proposed for the 620 Hyman Building in the Commerical 1 (C1) zone. The P & Z must determine if the proposed use is expressly or conditionally permitted based on an analysis of the intention of the district and the compatibility of the proposed use with the Cl permitted and conditonal uses. The intent of the Cl zone is to accomodate those commercial uses that are not primarily oriented to serving the tourist population. The gourmet food and food preparation appliance store represents a specialty type store, and it does not neatly fit into the local or tourist market categories - most likely, it will serve both. The store operation is fairly compatible with the permitted uses in the Cl zone, and a catering service, included as part of this proposal , is listed as a permitted use. The use is also compatible with other neighboring businesses of a specialty nature in the Cl District (Patricia Moore, Board & Barrel , Explore Books, etc. ) . The P • la 'ns Office recommends that the propos gourmet food and food preparation app - ere be a oval use in the Cl zone. The special review by the P-&' i7N 1- all o examination of the specific propo l:--4tS use, square footage an • operation as related to-1 purpose of the Cl zone and allowed uses. 6e- Gam_ o r 1 (-61- r%Z S— F- 2‘ 6,,(7) 07111C/1-, f 7P1C- DONALD t.11 May 10, 1976 Mr. Hall Clark Planning Department City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Don McGovern's proposed Gourmet Food Retail Outlet in the Street Level Floor of the 620 Hyman Building. Dear Hall : In follow up of our conversation today, I appreciate the possible con- fusion regarding the conformance of Don McGovern's cheese and gourmet shop with the applicable C-1 code. The character of the proposed shop is equivalent to the Swiss Colony or Hickory Frams stores found in most large shopping centers. Don's store is considerably above these in quality of goods available for sale, though. The distinguishing feature of this type of store is that they retail specialized food stuffs for use at home. This separates them from delicatessans that serve prepared and unprepared foods for take-out or limited sit-down. While, on the other hand, they differ from food markets in the substantially lower frequency of consumer purchase. In addition, Don will be operating a catering service from the store that is planned to be 20-25% of his business. Therefore we have a special- ized retail store oriented to the permanent market, selling gourmet foods and food preparation appliances. This store was planned to compliment the Board & Barrel , a quality retailer of specialized household and kitchen products. We fully understand and compliment your concern about opening another fast-food, deli-type sandwich shop. We have no intention of doing this. We do feel that a quality line of specialized food, coffees, tea & spice, and food appliances is a benefit to the retailing community. Furthermore, this is certainly a permanent resident type of business. We hope this will clear up any confusion over Don's store type and sub- sequent compliance, and therefore allow issuance of his building permit. I thank you for your concern and cooperation. Cordially, Robert B. Jenkins THE DONALD J. FLEISHER COMPANY, INC. P.O. Box 15000, Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-2122 ' � Cheese a Gourmet Shop %I" 41 to, ) 7 (0 /ef .fie Zig.. ,mss oss,1/e c;2/6,s cn'. Be c/-4 C'D.P.� p7 / 74.10/-e)6 /4 /fPJ0,ASec/ recrz/ �ab 5/7/O,47. P,Szz e/ Pe.v ,_ f i- 4,e2 Gv/7 17 7 ///7y, i , /� y � � s �v� � �r� ��°s� ,- s %fie C��',t.e, r/ ,# -- �lo j? v/Pv/Pe /iAe o ro //f7‘�/may 7r/3".73afz:Sr/1 c5 7 4e i4w 7-z; 1 il ,///eisre' . / %eve ,. Gt//�Sfi. /yl�9 .�.�/,p /e/i e.°∎Pv s /7,c��74R,c4,1/S , �X�d1�c°�S. .Zve P "7/e=7,0/P //0:51,Xcx,"---/7 . -Z 1-e/74 -e)..9 ^ G(_i/i/f/649/d4e,/ Azeleezed, S7A/cO 620 HYMAN STREET • BOX 779 • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • PHONE 303 - 925-6500 6404 1 red dyo d. c I Cheese C&, Gourmet Shop •� a �° 0y L F . 2 ?o ,#e e/99,0 e eAis Glr/4� c© ..,.570/?e1. .Ps ,rte /-,e &f97cA , 4 ;;� u.J h/ ri•.grz4fe-..r/ c_)".4 A,74 1.f 671,,e, 79 . . /o (le .e/42)/c/7/ . /..e2%-eV 7‘ e'P 4 f/,49te �60%'�t- cz �v tJ -7�e %/ 04.Jc/ a&7"./e. 7.‘ 4:_5• 1:,'"1////.fie /es/- /Pea-s-c, C e/c'." ` 4/c lives ?",e e/7z A.,4,Uel ie c2/ V`S.04c ory /i%y�.P,!/��j'i�.�.�� CGS; 1 . /1/'aZ7l[cr' Z°i• S f, t/AZ ?*, C C e��$.S /mss i�ii'e lee,e1 C∎i'Pe d//y coos e,v �'o v Lv/,' PAP�S c ; t/Pe5V/e74 e U//1os/ /il/ 10,*L° • 620 HYMAN STREET • BOX 779 • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • PHONE 303 - 925-6500 y a`e + • Shop c A Cheese C& Gourmet r�o�••o`aoa�`�„� .3 /f; .140/11o,-?s �G�.S , ®zvj. a. c�•�v e r, <S'i lee( /A:- © A ,se,/ )-vs -70ey/e 57‘.."-e419/eir V/ZOL-57/ Ce-Z""e /4,���•rte ©�iP �f vs•� 'sr. C// 2/-7 it/ /&,1// 01. /c'e r"--7,-e/ ,ve /I) tea. 44"e sTo�e ,4".e/a/ &4 ?/.7e) _ �if . . viP e/ee-se /(.2/// fe ,4;270z. 7ee:- fgr/i6,1/6 / "/ /A) /,9e ./ e5. /ar MW.42W,le fo,-Sed//4. ,e/e.a./ f/fsZif/. e•g./ Apeepie, — A,Ve i .soc,4/ ors/ 620 HYMAN STREET • BOX 779 • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • PHONE 303 925.6500 C jel. Cheese a Gourmet Shop aft�`q y°yam° Jac M"-' z /si� -r jea W ■.`" /" -tr--","/-er/, ee/ 4Peo-ti-5 "T° ‘0,-/ it7e o ,a47//4 . -1:Ze cp-Z ,,v -Ae.-/ 9,4:55 - . 1 620 HYMAN STREET • BOX 779 • ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • PHONE 303 - 925-6500 ! ; Determination, cl.LctYi :inc` a ;U;l said that an - electric c - area is diff,Lrnet from 'hi ilerd parlor. Baraby noLcd that they had 11 pool tables with small games on the side. Jenkins thought that it should be a conditional use because otherwise it is limiting the applicant ' s economic feasibility and nojo said that he didn ' t think the noise of electric games was , condusive to backgammon or a good game of pool . ':otion Hunt moved to put a billard parlor in the CC zone as a conditional use. Otte seconded. All in favor, motion carried. Subdivision: Mojo exolained�Nt,� t since the PAC Z had tab) c,f the Aspen =aspen View Condos. V3 Con o tar t r t tic hearing in i ru_1r 1-)ecduse of annexation ar:oy; _e;,,s nacdinq to be solved first, Council had* accepted ti on c—ju.r_isciict,ion Since the tine the ayeT i/1u"7��i:cts had gone out, the Fire Marshall had withdrawn his requirement for another fire plug since it was determined that the building was within the legal limits of a broken plug which was being replaced now. Jenkins asked whther the road problems had been taken care of and Andy Hecht, attorney for Aspen View, noted V that the owner of Aspen View had agreed to purchase the recommended road footage and will dedicate that part from their property to the City. Mojo said that the Planning Office recommended approval with . the following stipulations : dedication of Midland Ave. to the City; the owners show the current zoning on the final plat; the area be monumented (as required by the State) ; utility sizes on passing and access easements must be shown; and the owner' s surveyor must contact the City Engineer to work out arrangements for the street improvements prior to the preparation of the final plat. _lotion Hunt moved to approve the preliminary subdivision for the Aspen View C '-:ndos subject to the conditions listed above. Seconded by Otte. All in favor , motion carried. 620 Hyman Building Don Fleisher explained to the P & Z that he had not had control over the first design of the building and when he finally looked at it, he discovered he didn ' t like the design. He then went to Council to ask for an extension of time to resdesign the building under the old density . Council gave him approval under an Ordinance and granted him an extension of time. Since then he has been back to Council several times and has given them the opportunity to pick from the designs he had come up with. He noted that Council had asked him to come before the P & Z to get their approval on the building design but that it was not mandatory that he come. He presented a model of the block where the proposed building will be buitl and also compared the old design to the new one . Jenkins thought that they were out of their purview when they into architectural designs . Fleisher said that it .._. an increasingly important function and that other city boards such as the IIPC were deciding along design criteria. Schiffer said that this wasn ' t one of the criteria under Ordinance 19 and until it wm , they didn ' t have any co mil_ Qv= t architect 1! c: l._ th:,4, they could give their un0_ to Cec„c_,_ i t ) asi qjvc tha extension to I :. _ _ to con ?l.ct rcd si51 1L::_' . Johnson thoucjht- It was an 1 , c, i.. ? .i 'i i in ..:VC5 C l t71. _ i . ' 1:, ∎L ee:1..., i , oz . • • RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves _44•1 C.i.H__ C C]. .egular Meeting Planning & Zonihcj Commission April 1 , 1975 :20 Hyman, cont'd Hunt questioned whether it was necessary to put in the ' stipulation about the density and Schiffer thought that they _ _ should make it as comprehensive as possible. All in favor , motion carried. :ommissioner Comments Johnson brought up his concerns over the recent rehiring of the Mall Planner under a separate department. He questioned whether the P & Z hadn' t been kept from the planning aspect because of this separation. Stanford noted that the Planning of the Mall was being taken out of the Planning Dept. with . a new Mall Planning Dept being instituted by the City Manager. Schiffer said that he objected to • Cole being supervised by the City Manager and felt that there was top much bureaucracy already within City Hall . He noted that the Mall Commission is making recommendations to Council whereas they haven' t been in the planning process since the zoning code was being worked on. Johnson thought that the Commission was being eroded away by these other commissions and thought that they should take a stand. He had always thought that the P & Z was supposed to be under. Council directly. Jenkins agreed that they have had function taken away from them and it looked like the Planning Office was being disintregrated now too. Stanford said that they have now the opportunity to attack some projects such as updating the Land Use Plan, etc. Schiffer thought that they had been led away from their primary function, that of planning, to strictly administrative. Stanford noted that he was working on the Rio Grande property new and it would be something they could get started on and working with. • Johnson said that the planning had fallen on Stanford' s shoulders and he thought that they should take it back. Jenkins mentioned his feelings about the change in the parking situation and that they shouldn' t have given up. He noted that Council had overridden them because they just hadn' t kept up with what Council wanted. Johnson thought that they might need someone who can be a laison with the Council. Otee suggested that the chain of command to Council be restated . Bill JDunaway tried to give perspective to Jenkins ' ce= nt > by _ i.ncr that last year when they working on the parking rcc,uircments, they and Council had been working together on it, then without the P Z knowing about it, Council reversed themselves about the parking but P & Z went ahead with the buy-out parking idea . Schiffer i .su It th:. _ + .. lt: start working on the U Design study soon. I?c also suggested that they state t leir f `cl1.h- _r on the Y.a11 f leaning Department . t ', t Iicy _!Mould a._te }mown to Ceu!w' i,I L. ee to .fl 1(::- 1 t:t1 a the P t� 1, };�;�:] .• i _. lt. .,:1'• )t i)1" ti. i:1111I 1. !'1'. .i ! O '.;I )111(i (1U1a .t{ .f)llt. I v. • Il. ' ; 111 i ;1 '1`;;A I. is tt I. i.! "t'U .;11Ul.l I(1 i;, •_l 1 ,;IL• .Ire H ,.:I; ! • „ }: itl,1 I,ut i1!'_ tIt!' Rid (;,. HII(H ..I1, 4 Aspen City Council Regular Meeting • March 10, 1975 1 The MA.A. would offer to 'spend $10,000 to renovate the basement and to pay $3,500 per summer providing whatever is spent: for renovation is credited against the rent. The M.A.A. is also asking for a minimum of a three year lease. • Ted Armstrong, Parks and Recreation Direction, said there was a soda fountain in the basement and the space is just barely adequate to install some type of kitchen which would feed that amount of people. Mayor. Standley questioned the ventilation and electric system. Armstrong told Council some, ventilation and storage for foods would have to be installed. Mayor Standley asked if there was sufficient capacity to feed that many people. Edgar Stern said not everyone ate at once. Mayor Standley mentioned that Grass- roots was willing to move their office space upstairs. Councilwoman Markalunas asked what would happen to the recreation program down in the basement. Armstrong said they could make other arrangements. Councilwoman Markalunas moved to lease the basement of the Wheeler Opera House, or that portion under the control of the City, to the M.A.A. for three years as per their memo- randum submitted dated March 10, 1975, and to move Grassroots upstairs; seconded by Councilwoman Pedersen. Councilman Behrendt suggested A rent of $1 per year plus their share of the utilities. Edgar Stern said the M.A.A. planned on paying their utilities as they would only use the for nine weeks. Mayor Standley told Council the City could use the space at other times. Armstrong asked if other civic groups already using that space could still have it when the M.A.A. wasn't using it. Edgar Stern said the M.A.A. would prefer to keep it under their control but perhaps something could be worked out for after 8 p.m. and the MA.A.A could lock up the kitchen. Councilman De Gregorio suggested the motion be amended to include the fact that the City iii can use the space after 8 p.m. Councilwoman Markalunas amended her motion so to read. All in favor, motion carried. ASPEN VILLAS - Final Subdivision • Yank Mojo, Planning Department, presented the final plat to Council. He also told Council that the Villas were drawing up an agreement to prohibit use of the basements in the Villas for bedroom purposes. Mojo mentioned to Council the property was valued at one- quarter JJ million dollars for cash dedication purposes. The cash dedication to the City will be $10,000. Mayor Standley asked where the public trail will be. Mojo told Council it was on the western boundary and will be paved in concrete. There will be accesses to this meanderinc path from Seventh and Hallam. The bike path will not go on Seventh and Hallam because 1 that is too dangerous. Mayor Standley asked if the bike path could be marked as such. Mojo said yes, it could. City Attorney Stuller said this agreement was directing that the subdivision agreement be recorded and the City was accepting the cash dedication. Councilwoman Markalunas said it was her understanding that there were to be no parking signs along Hallam from the bridge to the corner. That hasn't been done. In the summer the bike trail is obstructed with parked cars. Mojo told Council it was up to the City to post the signs. Also, there are to be no curb cuts off Hallam street except one. Councilman De Gregorio made a motion to approve the final plan for subidivision; seconded by Councilwoman Pedersen. Art Daily, representing the Villas, pointed out to Council the figure on pages 4 and 5 of the subdivision agreement for escrow arrangements should be $67,256. All in favor of the motion, except Councilman Behrendt and Mayor Standley. Motion carried • 620 HYMAN BUILDING • Don Fleisher presented two models to Council for his proposed building site that he felt are both better than the building approved under Ordinances #19 and 450, Series of 1974. The first model had three. levels above grade and the roofline fits into the scheme of the block. The second model had one floor below grade. Fleisher pointed out to Council that these are not final design schemes but to demonstrate how mass and density can work and still take into account the rest of the block. Both of these plans have the same amount • of open space but it has been distributed differently. Fleisher also mentioned they are still studying which one they liked best. Councilman Behrendt moved the Council vote in favor of the two story model. Councilman Breasted asked if the two story scheme had all been worked out. Jerry McCarthy, . representing Tom Wells who is the architect for the project, told Council some of the exact plans may vary, but he could live with the two story project. The two story scheme allows then the most square footage a;:ci Las the tow:c_;t profile. Fleisher told Council they wanted to go ahead with one design. Councilman Behrendt called his motion; Councilman De Gregorio seconded. Councilwoman Pedersen asked if Fleisher still had to come back April 15 if the Council voted on this project. Fleisher said Council would vote on one of these schemes and he won't come back again or Council could vote to let them re-design the project on their ideas. Either result would be a synthesis of the two projects and ideas. Councilman Breasted asked what range of subtlety they were talking about in changing of their design. Councilman i'.rea::ted ;,aid he fclt .-ill thi'e; should 7ery clear so that Fleisher didn' t spend money and time unneccsnarily in a misunde•rsLiriding. Fleisher answered that this i:; just a model which sIn w_; a concept and not a design. If the Council approve_: this concert than hu will d, ,:gin it. • • • • E -ar Meeting A. _ .n City Council. Mt .i 10, 1975 • • :ncilwoman Markalunas mentioned she liked the three story concept better because it :n't make the block look like such a pancake. Jerry McCarthy told Council they needed -ection so that they could pursue a design. Mayor Standley said Council could accept :ceptual idea of the two story model but Fleisher will have to do some more work on design and bring it back to Council for final approval. The Council is reserving I .al approval. in favor of the motion except Councilmembers Markalunas and Pedersen; motion carried. _IL DEVELOPMENT . inner John Stanford presented a map to Council and told them that the County had a j -k program scheduled this summer with regards to work on the trails and suggested some ! _ils the City could get involved in if they wished. first was a paved trail from the Rio Grande trail down through Castle Creek and netting with the existing underpass under the bridge down to the music school. Stanford _d Council this is a tentative part of developing a loop system around the City. -ther trail could be the Ute Avenue trail link through the Benedict property to Highway Another possibility is a trail in the general alignment of the Salvation Ditch from -hway 82 to behind Silver King. There is also the possibility of going from where the Grande trail ends by the Hunter Creek and Roaring Fork bridge down to Mill Street the old Rio Grande right-of-way. 1 -nford also pointed out the City could construct a trail from Sleeker to Main to -enth in order to allow bikes to avoid Main Street. Stanford mentioned the opportunity demonstrating how urban trails could be incorporated by building a path from the ! _.dge the City just built on East Hopkins to Park Circle. _.ncilwoman Markalunas asked about using penaprime which is much less expensive than i� :ring. Penaprime might be adequate for bicycles. -_n Stanford also said the Rio Grande trail link could go from Main Street through the Grande property and connect most likely at Mill Street. This would get the people :king from Silver King off Mill Street. _ncilman Breasted indicated he would rather see a very strong pedestrian link made from parking lot to town than from Silver King. He believed this is a higher priority. _nford answered that that could be incorporated into the Rio Grande trail element. =nford told Council he was presenting these choices to see if the City would like to any further with trial implementation this summer. The County trail system will cost =fund $5.00 per lineal foot not including labor. ' -] -or Standley affirmed all County trails in the City limits will require City approval -st. The City will look at all their engineering plans. The City is taking flak for . e County trails built last summer because citizens think they are ours and because trails did not stand up over the winter. 7. ncilman Breasted asked if there would be recommendations for the signing of trails. anford said the County has developed a trail signing program _and perhaps the City may t to look at them. Councilman Breasted indicated he meant something along the lines an overall trails system map. City Manager Mahoney told Council the Mall Commission addressing a trails system map. I■ • nn Stanford asked City Manager Mahoney to address the budget in terms of trail _alimentation. City Manager Mahoney told Council that the City could incorporate some this with the water preservation we need to do and go down the end of Galena Street .h steps into the parking lot. The City has three ditches that we must preserve this . caner, we can enlarge the ditches and use beneficially. The City can apply the water Ute Children's Park, dump the water back over the ridge below the cemetery, down :rough the Gant area and Glory Hole park, through our storm sewer run off and come off • r the Courthouse; and have the water cascading down Galena Street and into the Rio ande parking lot, apply it either to ponds or some other beneficial use. City Manager _money said he would like to incorporate a trail to serve the Rio Grande parking lot th this water system. , --.ancilwoman Markalunas pointed out the steps would be nothing but trouble in the winter- me. Perhaps a meandering path would be better. Planner Stanford said the path _ready meandered somewhat and the Planning Department would like to provide a more __ect access to the parking lot. -.nor Standley said Council didn't budget any money for trails in 1975. John Stanford _id the link between Bleeker and Main Street would cost around $1,500. Councilwoman r _-kalunas suggested using chip and seal as the Villas are doing. This would cost 3 as much and it would be a good experiment to see if chip and seal were adequate for _r_e paths. :uncilman Breasted said he would rather see the Council pursuing a separate crossing of E :stle Creek. -nor Standley told Council this was not an appropriate way to be attacking the trail -stem. Councilwoman Markalunas asked the City Manager to see what the budget can stand d have this subject brought back at the next meeting. Councilwoman Markalunas indicated -e felt Council was pretty much in favor of these two links (Rio Grande and Sleeker) . t i 0 I u■ / vv.AVZcl d c Z jy H C 4 ( ct ol1/4) o sc- re- s r oo o s& C z o we r4-i�J � P � SixooC& S i CCU - /40 �2c�sc-�rzova dos T9< aisr Ta p(29)os&fD c de4U L-7. Ni1 & ® rrE- 1Ec c Lt- c(jk'bi 1z- w1 E'-- o Sg" „ Vjo u.)ov( j C 7a'” (.6, 1 't JAJLc-JcS `7416'12 c s A aria fy(-2 7 TO `C-EGr 63iuT72 la-2tr Za SwcfL 0 40 rev Al c62- (4,u0/46k4. J pyck (,t)O C/fiic• b r b C. 6%-g/9/44 // J r Gr- I c S0 - co c "r140' 69/77RG Jam} 2./ /, ec,- X1-(Ca7 4----cy-s7-0 // MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen City Council FROM: Planning Office • SUBJECT: 620 Hyman Office Building DATE: November 11, 1974 The 620 Hyman Office Building is a 12,780 square foot office complex located on Hyman Street between Spring and Hunter Streets. The lot size is 6,000 square feet and the proposed zoning is Commerical -1. The recommended floor area ratio for this zone is 1.5 to 1. The 620 Hyman Building was first submitted on April 29, 1974 at that time the building contained 14,700 square feet. On May 7, 1974 the Planning and Zoning Commission refused to grant conceptual approval for reasons of bulk and density: On July 2, 1974 the project was resubmitted at the lower floor area of 12,780 square feet, a reduction of 13%. The Planning and Zoning Commission gave conceptual approval 'at this time. The floor area ratio of the proposal is 2.13 to 1, which exceeds the recommended FAR of 1.5 to 1. The uses are consistent with the proposed zoning code. The project received preliminary and final approval on August 20, 1974. The Planning Office cannot recommend approval of this project based on the inconsistency of the proposed building FAR with the recommended FAR of the new zoning code. July 24, 1974 Donna Baer City of Aspen P.O. Box V Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Donna: This letter is to confirm our several conversations of earlier this month regarding the scheduling of our preliminary and final presentations before the P & Z for the 620 Hyman Office Building. As I understand we will be on the August 6th agenda for preliminary and August 20th for final. Thank you for your assistance in scheduling these meetings. Sincerely, Kit Mason KM/gg the doremus/fleisher/mason co post office box 15000/aspen,colorado 81611/phone: 303 925-2122 TO: Aspen Planning and '7oning Commission FROM: Planning Office SUBJECT: 620 Hyman Bldg. - Ord. 19 Conceptual Presentation DATE: 7/2/74 Application for 12,780 sq . ft. of commercial/office on 6,000 sq. ft. of lot. Located in proposed Commercial/Residential zone district. Use is correct. Recommended FAR is as follows : 1.5: 1 commercial (or office) use or 9000 sq. ft. of building including area below grade and 2: 1 if 4 is in residential use. 620 HYMAN OFFICE BUILDING REDUCTION DATA April 29 June 5 % Change Building Coverage 4,000 4' 3,520 4' -12% Gross Building Size 14,700 ifP 12,7804 -13% Building Above Grade 10,960p - - - 9,520 ? - -13% - - - - Gross Leasable Space 11,560 8,8800 -23% Housing NONE NONE NONE FAR 2.45 to 1 2. 13 to 1 -13% Proposed Zoning Comm/MF Comm/MF Proposed FAR 2.0 to 1 2.0 to 1 with 25% Housing with 25% Housing otherwise 1.5 to otherwise 1.5 to 1 1 NOTE: Source: The Doremus/Fleisher/Mason Company Letters of April 29, 1974 and June 5, 1974. 620 HYMAN BUILDING COMPARISONS LOT STORIES BUILDING TOTAL FLOOR AREA INCLUDING BASEMENT 6000 sq. ft. 3 Crandall 10, 000 sq . ft. leaseable 6000 sq. ft. 3 Aspen Furniture 9, 600 gross 3000 sq. ft. 2 Galconda 5 ,200 gross 3000 sq. ft. 2 Alpine Jewelry 2, 600 gross 6000 sq. ft. 3 Hannah Dustin 5, 500 leaseable 9000 sq. ft. 3 Bidwell 16, 000 leaseable 3000 sq. ft. 3 Pat Moore 4, 100 gross (including apt. ) 6000 sq. ft. 4 620 Hyman 14,700 gross 10, 800 leaseable BUILDING COMPARISONS Patio Building Aspen Furniture 620 Hyman Lot square footage 6,000 6,000 6,000 Lot coverage 5,340 4,370 4,000 Open area 660 1,630 2,000 Open area percentage 11% * 28% 33% Total building sq. footage 15,470 11,620 14,700 Above grade sq. footage 10,470 7,250 10,960 Toatl usable sq. footage 12,495 9,375 10,800 Height (feet) 25 29 37 Parking None 4 2 *Includes interior atrium. • June 5, 1974 Members Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission Aspen, Colorado 81611 Members: We would like to submit for your consideration under Ordinance 19 our 620 Hyman II Office Building. Attached is a summary of the various elements of our proposal , as well as comparisons between this project and adjacent buildings and other approvals. We feel that this project as proposed is in compliance with the 1973 Aspen General Land Use Plan and is complementary to the buildings, uses and area in which it is located. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 41/ feit2erP, Kit Mason Enclosures t e doremus/fleishe!/mason post office box 15000/aspen,colorado 81611/phone: 303 925-2122 PROJECT: 620 Hyman II Oftce LOCATION: 620 Hyman Street, between Aspen Furniture and Patio Building. DEVELOPERS: Doremus/Fleisher/Mason Company P. 0. Box 15000 Aspen, Colorado 81611 OWNERS: John Doremus Don Fleisher Kit Mason James Cox ARCHITECT: Dallas B. Peacock, A.I.A. DESCRIPTION: A professional office building of contemporary design to house the offices of the Doremus/ Fleisher/Mason Company plus other commercial users. This use complies with the 1973 Aspen General Land Use Plan. ZONING: C-C LOT SIZE: 6,000 square feet. BUILDING COVERAGE: 3,520 ,square feet ----- + Z. .�0 OPEN AREA: 2,480 square feet OPEN SPACE: 41% GROSS BUILDING SIZE: 12,780 square feet ' 3 'O l?t//FC c>� ABOVE GRADE: 9,520 square feet � t7 GROSS LEASABLE: 8,880 square feet BUILDING HEIGHT: 37 feet (Garden level plus 3) PARKING: No on-site parking planned. Will join future parking district or purchase from city. HOUSING: None provided.—_ REVIEW PROCEDURE: Request to be reviewed under Ordinance 19 for conceptual approval . e dore post office box 15000/aspen,colorado 81611/phone: 303 925-2122 620 HYMAN BUILDING COMPARISONS ADJACENT BUILDINGS Patio Building Aspen Furniture 620 Hyman Lot square footage 6,000 6,000 6,000 Open area 660 1,630 2,480 Open area percentage 11* 28 41 Above grade sq. footage 10,470 7,250 9,520 Total building sq. footage 15,470 11,620 12,780 Total usable sq. footage 12,495 9,375 8,880. Height (feet) 25 29 37 Parking None 4 None Planned *Includes interior atrium. 6/4/74 DCM ASPEN BUILDING COMPARISONS ORDINANCE 19 APPROVALS 3rd Bergman RBH CDES Stevens/ Durant/ Generation Bldg. Office Office Ginn Galena Lot sq. footage 4,500 6,000 6,750 9,000 10,500 9,000 Open area 1,296 716 1,687 3,168 Open area % 28.8 11.9 25.0 35.2 Above grade sq. footage 4,766 7,736 13,500 15,552 21,000 9,800 Total bldg. sq. footage 7,054 13,500 21,545 21,000 15,600 Height (feet) 37 22 3 33 3 28 stories stories 6/3/74 DCM MEMORANDUM TO: Building Inspector FROM: Planning Office SUBJECT: 620 Hyman Building - Ord. 19 Conceptual Review DATE : May 15 , 1974 At its meeting 5/7/74 the Planning and Zoning Commission denied an application under Ord. 19 review for the 620 Hyman Building for the following reasons : 1. Building exceeds desirable height, bulk and lot coverage ratios for use of the land. 2. The intensity of use concentrated on the site would contribute unacceptably to already critical problems of traffic congestion and housing shortages . 3. Traffic generated by restaurant use in the building is not desirable in the fringe of the central area. 4. The building does not conform with Ordinance 19 policy (;E5) to hold the growth level substantially below that of the late sixties , or the intent or purpose of the central area land use category to locate residential and professional office uses on the fringe of the central area. Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission Dated 620 HYMAN BUILDING COMPARISONS LOT STORIES BUILDING TOTAL FLOOR AREA INCLUDING BASEMENT 6000 sq. ft . 3 Crandall 10,000 sq .ft. leaseable 6000 sq. ft. 3 Aspen Furniture 9, 600 gross 3000 sq. ft. 2 Galconda 5,200 gross 3000 sq. ft . 2 Alpine Jewelry 2, 600 gross 6000 sq.ft. 3 Hannah Dustin V 5, 500 leaseable 9000 sq. ft. 3 Bidwelle°'` 16,000 leaseable 3000 sq. ft. 3 Pat Moore 4, 100 gross (including apt. ) 6000 sq. ft. 4 620 Hyman 14,700 gross 10,800 leaseable TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Planning Office SUBJECT: 620 Hyman Building - Conceptual DATE: 5/7/74 Central Area 44000 sq. ft. of lot 14,700 sq. ft. of total floor area 37 ' high - no view plane involved - 1 story higher than adj . bldgs . Uses: 3 floors of offices or 1 of commercial and 2 of offices , restaurant on garden level Not located in the historic district. Considerations : Use: tourist commercial on street level is most computable with district. Parking: If restaurant is open for lunch - 90 autos will be generated, if open for dinner only, approximately - 60; commercial will probably generate more cars than office use. Employee generation: Economic needs additional information in the form of an economic impact study in order to calculate number of new jobs and resultant additional population. Landscaping: detailed plan for court area. April 29, 1974 Ms. Donna Baer Planning Office City of Aspen P. 0. Box V Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Donna: I am enclosing copies of the outline of our 620 Hyman Office Building project for the May 7 P & Z hearing. I will be out of town until May 7, so if you have any questions, please contact my secretary, Karen, or Dallas Peacock. I hope that all is satisfactory. Thank you again for your assistance in our efforts. Sinc r ly, Kit Mason Enclosure ,e, t e doremuslielsher/mason company post office box 15000/aspen,colorado 81611/phone: 303 925-2122 P1 (4/65) 2 B.I. 61 DING INSPECT4ON DEPARTMENT CITY OF ASPEN – COUNTY OF PITYINF1, COLORADO . ADD ;ESS i' . . , '' OF J GENERAL `._ 620 W. Hyman Office Bldg. CONSTRUCTION _-= _ __ PERMIT Li WHEN SIGNED AND VALIDATED BY BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES THE WORK DESCRIBED BELOW. CLASS OF WO^I(: NEW nK ADDITION ❑ ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR❑ MOVE ❑ WRECK ❑ OWN-- : 620 Hyman Associates _ c/o NAME Doremus ,F1Iischer, Mason ADDRESS PO 15000 PHONE 2123 t- NAME (AS LICENSED) Shaw Construction LICENSE LICENSE �- (..c -- --- —__ NUMBER CLE INSURANCEI ADDRESS - - PHONE ❑ ® 1 SUPERVISOR 0 FOR THIS JOB NAME DATE CERTIFIED LEGAL — – __ DESCRIPTION LOT NO. BLOCK NO. ADDITION SURVEY ATTACHED❑ DESIGN BY Tri-Co .Manag-eme t BY Dallas Peacock A Llc. AREA(S.F.) PE NO. • TO AT GRADE TOTAL HEIGHT NO. OCCUPANCY (FEET) STORIES UNITS GROUP r BASEWENT FIN. ❑ GARAGE SINGLE ❑ ATTACHED❑ TOTAL TYPE DI V. UNFIN. ❑ DOUBLE DETACHED FIRE DEPTH SIZE ❑ ROOMS CONSTR. ZONE BELOW FIRST SPACING SPAN AUTHORIZED— �Z GRADE �y FLOOR AGENCY _ BY DATE EXTERIOR F"` BUILDING FOOTING III� CEILING REVIEW SIZE . 2 EXTERIOR -4, ZONING FUN. WALL CONC. ❑ b THICKNESS ROOF PARKING MAS'Y ik THICK CAISSONS ROOFING -- SLAB ❑ &GR.REAMS ❑ MATERIAL PUBLIC HEALTH MASONRY ABOVE ABOVE :XTERIO 1 THICKNESS 1ST FLR. 2ND FUR. ABOVE ENGINEERING 3RD FLR. NALL STUD SIZE ABOVE ABOVE & SPACE 1ST FLR. 2ND FLR. ABOVE 3RD FLR. REMARKS Commerical_ offices , retail , etc. 1 ,tOTES TO AFPLICANT: — I i _ i FOR INSPECTIONS OR INFORMATION CALL 925-7336 FOR All WORK DONE UNDER THIS PERMIT THE PERMITTEE ACCEPTS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, THE COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION VALUATION I ZONING ORDINANCE, AND ALL OTHER COUNTY RESOLUTIONS OR CITY ORDINANCES WHICHEVER 1 �} 1 OF WORK 32 0,000 ` `P E PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND HEATING, SIGNS, J S tJ , . i v FOOLS AND FENCES. PLAN PER; it EXPIRES 60 LAYS FROM DATE ISSUED? FILED T P T81 L SEE j ! UNLESS WORK IS STARTED. g L C D REQUIRED INSPECTIONS SHALL BE REQUESTED ONE WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE. Y7 DOUR F I CHECK H - A L F I'AL INSPECTIONS 1 LL BE MADE 0." ALL tT .. I, WORK BEFORE OCCUPANCY IS PERMITTED. FEE - r. k a l L? �• 6, 5- , 5 1�j; a ':, LI:IL DING SHALL NOT }, OCCUPIED UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED.�] I I- CASH A /J t ) PERMIT SUBJECT TO REVOCI:TION Q!F SPE,./IS!ON FOR VIOLATION OF ANY LAWS GOVERNING SAME. BUILDING DEPART?* t� !GIN;VIVRE !%c: ` '/. (//A/30-,....__ - — - --_ -- _T APPROVAL BY DATE / , THIS FORM iS A PERMIT ONLY DATE PERMIT NO. LICENSE # RECEIPTS CLASS ¢ AMOUNT WHEN VALIDATED HERE 7_9_78 319=74 -