Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.iz.Norway Shadows Subdivision.1974 HOLLAND & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW 500 EQUITABLE BUILDING JOSIAH G.HOLLAND HARRY L.HOBSON 730 SEVENTEENTH STREET RANDY L.PARCEL SOLOMON N.BARON STEPHEN H.HART KENNETH D.HUBBARD GRAHAM M.CLARK,JR. THOMAS A.FAULKNER JOHN L.J.HART ROBERT L.VER SCHURE DENVER,COLORADO 80202 DAVID G.PALMER ROBERT J.MOIR WILLIAM D.EMBREE,JR. GORDON G.GREINER JUDITH BONNIE KOZLOFF MARK R.LEVY JAMES L.WHITE ROBERT H.DURHAM,JR. MICHAEL D.MARTIN JEANNETTE P.MEIER PATRICK H.WESTFELDT WILLIAM E.MURANE TELEPHONE AREA CODE 303 292-9200 RAUL N.RODRIGUEZ R.BROOKE JACKSON CLAUDE M.MAER,JR. L.WILLIAM SCHMIDT,JR. JACK L.SMITH PAUL T.RUTTUM ROBERT P.DAVISON JAMES P.LINDSAY JOHN D.COOMBE BRITTON WHITE,JR. JOHN FLEMING KELLY EDWIN S.KAHN EUGENE F.McGUIRE WILEY E.MAYNE,JR. FRANK H.MORISON SAMUEL P.GUYTON CABLE ADDRESS HOL HART, DENVER LINDELL L.GU MPER WILLIAM C.McCLEARN JOHN S.CASTELLANO JAY W.TRACEY,JR. DENNIS M.JACKSON MOUNTAIN PLAZA BUILDING JOHN ALLEN MOORE ROBERT E.BENSON BEN E.CHIDLAW DONALD O.KINONEN P. 0. BOX 1128, ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 JAMES E.HEGARTY RICHARD M.KOON FIELD C.BENTON CHARLES T.BRANDT TELEPHONE 925-3476 AREA CODE 303 DAVID BUTLER ROBERT T.CONNERY J.MICHAEL FARLEY HARADON BEATTY WARREN L.TOMLINSON ARTHUR C.DAILY February 7, 1974 BRUCE T.BUELL JEFFREY C.POND DON D.ETTER JOHN UNDEM CARLSON JAMES T.MORAN Ms . Donna Baer City/County Planning Office P.O. Box V Aspen, Co. 81611 Re : Norway Shadows Subdivision (a 27 unit condominium project) Dear Donna : Request is hereby made on behalf of Norway Shadows to formally withdraw the above-referenced project from subdivision approval and Ordiance No. 19 review pro- cedures . You will recall that this project had been tabled by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on September 6, 1973 , pending the receipt of additional information. Very truly yours , • Charles T. Brandt for HOLLAND & HART CTB/bw cc : J.E . Quest • 1 i _,______.... __ 1, i / / I , �"--. Z r kJ-- -- - I =1 f' st'_`� I C 1 i Ef ; K. �I'.__ .c r s 1111140.111 =2211 'MINI FM Ill z 7_ ii ate_._; nn :..w________- y 4 E b { 1 I-ice t-�� 1Ii 1 11-1 ria I NW I _ I c _ j � -_ Q _ _` - ,' L r = = = i / I _ ■ - 1 i 1 1- teon'cjnncd leeeing Asuen Plann'ing & Zoning Senteml.,er 6 , 1973 Ch1man Jdems called the meeting to order at 5t15 p.m. with Barbara Lewis , vn .lehreon, Jack Denkins, Chuck Vidal , and Geri Vagneur. Also present AF.sistant Planner Donna Baer . Episcopal Church- - Ms . Baer explained that the Episcopal Church was located Ordinance ;.39 at the corner of North and Fifth Streets . Further stated Review that the existing structure is a conditional use Architect Ted Mularz submitted drawing of proposed building and gave a brief history. Mularz pointed out the need for additional classroom facilities and a large meeting room. Mularz stated that the Building Committee had done a Master Plan in order to do the project in phases . Could take from 5-10 years for ultimate completion. Stated the • first priority was the Church-proper. Mularz pointed out that they would like to re-do the roof . Under present regulations , can build to 371/2 feet, but are looking at .34 feet. Would extend the Church 10 feet to the south, or 300 square feet, and would replace the present spiral staircase with regular walkup-type stairway. Mularz gave a present site description. Stated they would have room for 9 additional parking spaces . Felt there were no technical problems as far as the variance -was concerned. Whitney Miller was present and pointed out that the existin: structure is twelve years old. 7 Bei s La tin tn Plnni Of f to the proposal. Jenkins stated that he would like to see the project come in as a Master Plan since the function of the building will not change . Chairman Adams suggest they come in after Ordinance 1;19 for the rest of the project. Commission agreed to grant approval of the project. Norway Shadows - Chairman Adams opened the public hearing on Norway Shadows Ordinance -1;,19 Subdivision, Preliminary Plat. Review & Subdivision - Charles Brandt, Attorney, was present representing Preusch Preliminary Properties , Inc. Brandt described the location cy.E the Plat project as 711 S. Aspen, the site presently occupied by the Norway Lodge . Brandt submitted plans for the project and stated there was 41, 000 square feet of land . The Norway Lodge is currently ienting on a month--to--month basis , with an average of 6 month-1 year occupancy. Further stated tha : currently the rent is relatively low and the occupancy 100 . Brandt stated that the proposed use was 27 units in tin cc seperate s tn.]c Lures (1) Bui 3d ii; A - 9 units (a ll 2 PU ; (2) Building B - 6 units (all 3 Edr) ; (3) Building C - 12 units (all 2 13 1' ) . The three buildings would oecupy 13 , 300 square fet. t . Oi- Continued Meeting Aspen Planning r, Zoninn SepLe;rtber 6 , 3q7 =1 Brandt pointer", out thict although part of the property lies in the AR zone , the AR transition line bisects the propity , Brandt showed the proposed new development on a sketch plan. POinted out that there would be a 30% building coverage . Presently approximately 15% coverage . NOw 16 parking spaces , and would, be 12 more spaces under Building C. Stated buildings would be staggered so that the project would not appear so massive. Brandt pointed out that access would he off of Aspen Street. The grade goes from 7 , 990 feet to 7 , 955 feet, which is not steep. As far as water protection , developers don' t have reading, but realize it is low and are willing to replace the 6" main with an 8" main. Feel that the combination of a transportation system and the parking spaces make the circulation system adequate. The developer feels that the height and hulk of the project will be minimized by the fact that it is tucked to the side of a hill. At this point, Brandt showed slides of the proposed site . Lewis questioned the height of the structures , and. Brandt replied that it would be within the 28 foot height limit. Brandt stated that the developer was willing to donate existing structures to the City as possible employee housing if they build project. Brandt stated that the condominiuMs 'woUld be in the - - $70 , 000 - $90 , 000 sale range. Further gave a brief summary of the problem with the AR transition line. Ms . Baer ran down the Ordinance 419 provisions which would be applicable to this project. Stated that the density would go from 30 , in the current structure , to 100 , in the proposed dev elopment, although these would not be year-round figures . Ms. Baer pointed, out that: (1) AN transition --buildings limited to 2 , 500 square feet per building with a height limit of 25 feet; (2) does not blend into ski hill ; (3) intensive use of land - should be lowered; (4) rural design for hillside structures - does not fit; (5) cover- age is maximum with this project. Ms . Baer further pointed out the following subdivision -.considerations : (1) 6" water main - no density should be added at this site at this time; (2) Willard. Clapper eXpressed concern with acres inland around the site; ('3) pave Ellis - generally poor state of access street due to grade, width, dead-ended, unimproved cul-de-sac , etc. Ms. Baer stated that the Planning Office feels these de- ficiencies should be corrected before consideration of raising density. Vidal stated the problem of water pressure could be solved by add n 8" 3 iSO end 1,c)c) ; Brandt pointed out that occupancy would probably not. be 300 year- round . continued Meeting Aspen P. ODni nc & Zent_sq Se j* r ` < Brandt further pointed out that. Ordinance `a.9 lines are not hard and i nst, and fe j t that the rural scale and dc- sign fits in. As far as fire access is concerned , feel that the Sale problem exists anywhere and that you can get in-and-around. Jenkins pointed out that from anywhere you stand on the project, all you see is building. Vagneur stated that she felt that the proposed project looks much better than what is currently occupying the site. Chairman Adams pointed out that condominiums give the school more revenue and less children. Johnson stated that he felt nothing could be done at this meeting since so much is still unresolved. Vidal pointed out that the developer should look at dif- ferent clustering of the buildings , and feels that ob- server could hardly see the buildings unless one was standing across the street. Felt developer should wait and come in with less density that would cause less ap- prehension on the part of the Commission. . Chuck Vidal left the meeting. Chairman Adams stated he felt a better site plan could be developed, with the possibility of going up rather than spreading out. Stated the Commission had given the de- meeting due to a number of things that are unresolved... At this point, Lewis expressed a desire for more study sessions due to the fact that 1/8 of the time covered by Ordinance 'yl9 had expired. Commission tabled the subdivision plat for Norway Shadows. Bryan Johnson made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7 : 00 p.m. , seconded by Jack Jenkins. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned. • l {.,,,(,),!-- /. d),(77). y/ °ecr_e kary ;/ t t! 1 sik. a , AY/4 7 er / 7- 1-e-raw(-ni} a714-eu z(0,L) I 1 II i --e-tice---/-- --A) 4-t. i I i 46d-e-- -e c-d U / , / / .. , I 41 ' / H II . / dr 010P) , 2 , i / (f I • 1/ 1 r / (----&-Z■,0,----t- W1 / c2 `--?Z--Z---e-e-A---0-0-1 I 1 t IP' 3° / .4 A--2,Z-1, Vri C=I' etti... . 3 '44--d/ 4-e-ea-77kLJ 4-e"-- / eA- 1-1 ?" 4 4 4 eL/ L-a12-- (.) __,.._.•_.-L-/V)k-0 4-X-C-)) i t I I L..e_AJ-Z77,L■C-ee Zit-et-4- "GI/ rilt [ I 11 I 4 . -7(--Z-V---C1 -'t L-WJ /6e--e- e7 , ce-C.e.-.R.., . ■64E--e-,0-e--c-L-C_A_I 1 ) ,"4 ..eif-L:a . Ct-t-e. , /7 l_.,,L. /1_-<. - / i' 1 . , 1 a24994 , is /- -. _ , ./ ..e.1. 2-e-- e--e-f i ..4 c:25--- 0 vie ? x ,1 11 eaL-j-tYla'A-- / - 1 ---(---1--'w 4... P 11 j ' 7 / H 11 1 ....... . v. I ,, . L-i-(-01, 7) .a2::7, 1- -ez-e--e /11) . I , (1a...e.4.41.:(......z4_,) /c-/O • .� r • ��-�, = - Oy : ' d, IP/ frtd'6"1 jilj- C26A7 . 146e1./ L- ' ! . / . . �/ 9 �i,. 4--- i I s . 7. 1 ,, ,vidAelejdi i . . ,,, i . I j . f i \ . 1 X 8/6/73 NORWAY SHADOWS - COLORADO STORM WATER CALCULATIONS, Area of Site = 41, 104 sq. ft. or 0.944 acres Assumed Runoff Coefficient "C" a) Present site with building - parking area - part unpaved "C" = 0.50 b) Proposed development as per plans "C" = 0.90 Present Slope of Site and Rainfall Intensity "i" (from Seelye "Data Book for Civil Engineers - Design" Sec. 18.01) High Point - 7995 Low Point - 7955 40 ' @ 260 ft . distance = 15.4% slope Permissible Discharge for 5 Year Rain (assumed) Q = A x C x i where "i" = 9.5 minutes @ 1.0" rain Q = 0.944 x 0.50 x 3.25 on 5 year return gives Q = 1.53 CFS approx. 3.25" Live Detention for 100 Year Return Rain (assume 1 hour as peak) Live storage (inches) = td (Ci100 - 0.5015) where td = duration of storm, assumed as 1 hour, C = coefficient of runoff 1100 = intensity in inches/hour 100 year storm U. S. Weather Bureau 0.50 = runoff coefficient for present site is = intensity in inches/hour 5 year storm U. S. Weather Bureau (based on "i" from above) :. Live storage (in.) = td (Ci100 - 0.50i5) = 1 hour [(0.90 x 2.50) - (0.50 x 3.25)] = 1 [2 .25 - 1.63] inches = 0.62 NORWAY SHADOWS Page 1 of 4 Acre Feet = 0.62 inch storage x 0.0833 x 0.944 acres = 0.049 Cubic Feet = 0.049 acre feet x 43, 560 = 2134 jl Summary Allowable Discharge: 1.53 CFS Retention Capacity: 2134 FT3 • OVeR t-AW t7 DRAI N{k&E P 1T1-1 REtvip■%.11ti1(.; �rrt= _ 2210 04 ;) -* .—411c,I,P 4,9 ,. 1 \ . . / . Owv / i 7 • * i r j 5Lp� c vi OF FoOF N _ /L' • /aV'=tZFLOV.! 8100 43 1PPR141 tJC> . 11---- 11,7 %. or TOTAL II 0 , fro f+►.O L 4tO �.. --- P•RE 4'4 OO to ___ 14.10 °7 _ = 0F ToTAI. S I 1 t 6K TCH ....4p,„+1 N.T.S. SOUTH PARKING LOT Volume = 1/2 ( 1/2 x .50 ' x 42 ' x 150) Volume = 787 .5 cu. ft. available Required = 14.6% of 2134 -O.ol —. _p,cS. i = 311.6 Cu. ft. ▪ Available storage exceeds required retention Discharge = 14.6% of 1.53 = 0.22 CFS or 99 GPM 0,0� —'®Icy • 4" C.I.P. @ 1/4"/ft. slope = 110 GPM (0.24 CFS) unnwAV SHADOWS Page 2 of 4 EAST BUILDING ROOF & GRADE Area = 4400 sq. ft. = 0. 10 acres Discharge = 0.10 x 0.90 x 2 .50 = 0.23 CFS No retention for this area (overland flow to storm drainage ditch) NORTH PARKING LOT & ROOF N,-nS - o124 GF6 Volume = 1/2 ( [ 1/2 x .50 ' x 25 '' x 180 ' ) a1 0,00 = 562 cu. ft. Required = 19.7% of 2134 = 420 cu. ft. 1 Availagle storage exceeds required o retention I Discharge = 19.7% of 1.53 = 0.30 CFS .. S. Lot = 0.24 CFS N. Lot = 0.30 CFS w ',c0l 0.54 CFS Lou aT 6" 0 pipe at 0.012 '/ft. slope CENTER SECTION OF SITE Catch basins shall be of the drywell type to absorb runoff from roofs and land. Overflow lines will be installed to relieve storm water when ground is frozen in winter when ground is unable to absorb storm water. .: Storm runoff from center area will not normally discharge to the receiving streams. Actual flow to receiving stream S. Lot = 0.24 E. Section = 0.23 N. Lot = 0.30 0.77 CFS (allowable = 1.53 CFS) NORWAY SHADOWS Page 3 of 4 • Joe SANITARY SEWER lv LX units 3 Bedroom = II, people 'x 4 = `T6 21 Units 2 Bedroom = 3 people x`,2j.. _ ., 100 people Average flow = 100 people x 100 GPCPD = 10000 GPD • cit NORWAY SHADOGNTS Page 4 of 4 iIll I ,. \ 1 1 AZei() . 1 -1- 7/Cte-‘.9 d- -4f/"..- �z ? ,2er 4 ' .. " aqi. /- / i __ee...i/t2 ...e.,ae) / / ,� . ' , A4t/(..A- ... '- �� l/ t j62,/,52-„-Y-- Gt p1 (77.0 7_e_e_e____6,"_.e__.) _zo.. Af ---e4,e,- .) I 1 r - I - 1 � I, 2.d.-7,--e2.-c--) ra,,,,,___,_;_.7 Q(' 4./ , I 1 . H `r v I . , i aele--c4-1-17-4- e--(.-- I 1 7)1 617(12/ II , ,e , . - . ,, _ iii ..h i� / • .._ .,7 6-- ( i ) U H 4 - 4A • . 4 A,C.a4 ... 11. ,/ e L9 , _ , t i A.,6..t., ,te_ A.....4 , .,...A. --6--td, /Oil c- .. _ / / 4)( - "/ / 1 ..:., , ., 1 1 , i 01 0 e(-vi Cie 1: 14, ' / , , (lir ■ 191-1-42' ,1 6 eietta . 1 , i 1, , / a P .4,44 , . ,/t.e....„.„,..„( 4 il t y,))//t'. , , , !! r 11 i. ,II d a ORDINANCE NO. 19 - CONCEPTUAL PRESENTATION OWNER : Preusch Properties , Inc. , a Minnesota corporation APPLICANT: Norway Shadows , a limited partnership NAME & TYPE OF SUBDIVISION: Norway Shadows , a 27 unit condominium project LOCATION: 711 S . Aspen, Aspen, Colorado, presently occupied by the Norway Lodge (Lots 13 through 20, inclusive , Block 11 , Eames Addition together with a tract of land designated as "Parcel No. 2" in Book 275 at page 511, Pitkin County, Colorado, records. This written presentation is intended to satisfy Sec . 2. I .A. 1 . of Ordinance No. 19 by describing the proposed development and stating how it complies with the use recommendations of the 1973 Aspen General Land Use Plan and the applicable review criteria. The 41,000 square feet parcel of land being developed pres- ently contains the Norway Lodge . The units in the Norway Lodge have been converted from tourist accommodations to a month-to- month rental arrangement due to the age and desireability of the units. The applicant believes that removal or destruction of the Norway Lodge and construction of condominium units is a realistic use for the property and complies with the use recommendations of the 1973 Aspen General Land Use Plan in the following respects . 1. Location and Zoning - AR-1 , Accommodations/Recreation Transition. The property involved is on Aspen Street (across from Lift 1A) and is , therefore , especially suited to the recreation and accommodation needs of the Aspen visitor. This suitability has been recognized in the 1973 Aspen General Land Use Plan. a 2. Impact - The proposed use for the property, the property's proximity to the proposed transportation system routing , the ski lift and central area all tend to lessen the impact on Aspen and its surroundings . Further, the fact that new structures will replace existing structures should minimize any burdens on community services , i.e . , police protection, fire protection, access , circulation and utilities . 3. Building Bulk and Height - The project consists of 27 luxury condominium units , a recreation room, swimming pool , sauna and 28 off-street parking spaces . The applicant believes the project to be a well designed and considered development present- ing a pleasant aesthetic appearance by the use of natural materials and siting of the structures to appropriately utilize the exist- ing topography. Three buildings comprise the project and of these , Building "A" is "staggered" resembling 3 separate components and Building "B" is divided by an open stair section. The following is the make-up of each building : Building A - 9 units (all two bedrooms) Building B - 6 units (all three bedrooms) Building C - 12 units (all two bedrooms) The three buildings will occupy approximately 13 ,300 square feet of the 41,000 square feet contained within the property boundaries . Although the "bulk and height" of the project may not strictly comply with the Aspen Use Plan, it is submitted that the project does relate well physically to the ski area for the property is tucked up against Shadow Mountain which rises sharply on the west boundary and is situated well below Shadow Mountain Village to the south. Thus , a suitable physical and aesthetic transition exists -2- between the more intensive recreation/accommodation areas to the north and the slopes of Aspen Mountain to the south. 4. Subdivision - Pursuant to Ordinance No. 4, Norway Shadows will comply with the subdivision approval and platting procedures set forth therein. Many of the review criteria contain- ed in Ordinance No. 19 will be covered in the oral presentation on September 4, 1973 , relating to the proposed subdivision. HOLLAND & HART By Charles T. Brandt , attorneys for Norway Shadows -3- 1 ' ME M ll f TO: JIM ADAMS, CHAIRMAN Aspen P & Z Commission From: DAVE ELLIS CITY ENGINEER RE: Norway Shadows Subdivision--Preliminary Plat Date: September 4 , 1973 The subdivision location presents major problems in water supply, street access, and parking. 1) At peak consumption periods the existing water system could barely deliver 1000 gpm combined flow from the two fire hydrants nearest the site. Each year the peak consumption period pressures decrease. In addition the city is trying to establish a minimum fire flow requirement of 1500 gpm in heavily developed areas which the existing system cannot meet. Adding units in this area will also decrease the available supply to existing downstream users on Aspen Street. 2) South Aspen Street is presently one of the worst streets in the city from an access, snow removal, and parking point of view. The addition of another parking lot on the upper end of Aspen is going to aggrevate the access problem. Access to the site should be kept as far down the hill as possible . Because of the extremely severe parking problem on the street, parking should be provided at the minimum rate of 1 space/unit plus spaces for the normal complement of employees on a one to one basis . 3) The drainage plan will have to be analyzed by Wright-McLaughlin and designed to conform with the already completed Urban Runoff Management Plan. 4) An easement for the existing sanitary sewer will be necessary. 5) The normal requirements for participation in street improvement and storm drainage districts will be made. • • • g , SUBDIVISION FLAT Ci .CK F07,111 Date r-/K— Z;, • Gentlemen: According to the procedure set forth in the City of Aspen Subdivision Regulations, any tract of land divided into two or more lots must be divided in accordance with said Subdivision Regulation for the City of Aspen. This form, with attached copy of the plat is provided . so that each utility company may inspect the plat and the • site, making co = ^nts, concerning the placement of ease- ments, etc . , and where necessary sketching recommended alterations cn a copy of the plat. This form and the accompanying copy of the plat must be returned to the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Co.:ma mission no later than seven (7) days from the above date . Remarks• �' --i' 7'1 r'1 Cc ^c^,-e�1.� ./G.%_-(4/j/ ( C z-i. �� (.-C i . -Z t \. 1l 7 �i�.1.P �' 7 ',- �� �yy >_.2..,..- / / -�--4�LVS�. /y2Le t' -, -C."_''-`_-ii _/ z-";�� -- <� t. t.L.y�_ ,- I J • • 1 > /6 ot At_.,6-t.---I.A._cdi .1-4----ck_-e.e._ t A.t...-Q__/ >4:4-t____t_eo( Al Z /k7- -67.: . l h1-- 7._5 _ SUED aVIS J 1 PLAT C J_i.CK t'�?r�V: R 1 t. . , ' Date g--// 17� Gentlemen: . . According to the procedure set forth in the City of Aspen . Subdivision Regulations, any tract of land divided into two or more lots must be divided in accordance with said Subdivision Regulation for the City of Aspen. This form, with attached copy of the plat is provided so that each utility comapa ny may inspect the plat and the • site, making co-_ nnts, concerning the placement of ease- ments, etc . , and where necessary sketching recommended alterations on a copy of the plat. This form and the accom)anying copy of the plat rut be returned to the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Com- mission no later than seven (7) days from the above date . Remarks : Wiz, �6, ,L2 .c ,-,, 2 -74 - rya L —- _..--2, ,--e 0 -,t(-, _.)!,, en t",..- , _.-",--,47 --5_.-:- .___L -r-1 ,Z. <-..--4 _.__--c/))) /7 // 4) /./,/,x; , 2 7I 4/4 At k (7 SUBDIVISION PLAT C=CI: Date / -- 7 S Gentlemen: According to the procedure set forth in the City of Aspen Subdivision Regulations, any tract of land divided into two or more lots must be divided in accordance with said Subdivision Regulation for the City of Aspen. This form, with a ttachfd copy of the plat is provided • so that each ut-i7 i ty colpany ^y inspect the plat and the • site, making cc- nt s, concerning the placement of ease- ments, etc . , and where necessary sketching recommended alterations on a copy of the plat . This form and the accompanying copy of the plat must be returned to the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Com mission no later than seven (7) days from the above date. • Remarks • /'.J.___ ,4 - .lG__ 4/'re' t. d�• fir._!4,42-4-d. 7/4-ov Y .i, ` f�° ..t. .t/F.f. a' t) t °m d, • . SUBDIVISION PLAT CHECK FOam Date /6 -- • Gentlemen: According to the procedure set forth in the City of Aspen Subdivision Regulations, any tract of land divided into two or more lots must be divided in accordance with said Subdivision Regulation for the City of Aspen. • This form, with attached copy of the plat is provided so that each utility company may inspect the plat and the • site , making comm ants, concerning the• placement of ease- ments, etc . , and where necessary sketching recommended • alterations on a copy of the plat . This form and the accompanying copy of the plat must be returned to the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Com- mission no lacer than seven (7) days from the above date . • Remarks : This Subdivision is. within the boundries of the Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District . The Plant The line capacity is questionable , but the District has the responsibility to furnish the necessary line size to adequately service the developre. t ."/ Clint Sam s '�r;ke tive Secretary. • HOLLAND & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW 500 EQUITABLE BUILDING JOSIAH G.HOLLAND DON D.ETTER 730 SEVENTEENTH STREET ARTHUR C.DAILY STEVEN M.HANNON STEPHEN H.HART JAMES T.MORAN JEFFREY C.POND JOHN D.COOMBE JOHN L.J.HART KENNETH D.HUBBARD DENVER,COLORADO 80202 JOHN UNDER CARLSON EUGENE F. McGUIRE WILLIAM D.EMBREE,JR. ROBERT L.VER SCHURE BRUCE W.RATTLER LINDELL L.DUMPER JAMES L.WHITE GORDON G.GREINER RANDY L.PARCEL SOLOMON N.BARON PATRICK M.WESTFELDT ROBERT H.DURHAM,JR. TELEPHONE AREA CODE 303 292-9200 JOSEPH N.DE RAISMES ROBERT J.MOIR CLAUDE M.MAER,JR. WILLIAM E.MURANE GRAHAM M.CLARK,JR. MARK R.LEVY ROBERT P.DAVISON H.GREGORY AUSTIN DAVID G.PALMER JEANNETTE P.MEIER JOHN FLEMING KELLY L.WILLIAM SCHMIDT,JR. JUDITH BONNIE K02LOFF R.BROOKE JACKSON FRANK H.MORISON JAMES P.LINDSAY CABLE ADDRESS HOLHART, DENVER MICHAEL D.MARTIN BRITTON WHITE,JR, WILLIAM C.McCLEARN EDWIN S.KAHN WALTER W.GARNSEY,JR. JAY W.TRACEY,JR. SAMUEL P.GUYTON MOUNTAIN PLAZA BUILDING JACK L.RODRIGUEZ JOHN ALLEN MOORE JOHN S.CASTELLANO JACK L.SMITH JAN E.E.HE AW DENNIS M.JACKSON P. 0. BOX 1128, ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 JAMES E. GARTY ROBERT E.BENSON FIELD C.BENTON DONALD O.KINONEN TELEPHONE 925-3476 AREA CODE 303 DAVID BUTLER RICHARD M.MOON J.MICHAEL FARLEY CHARLES T.BRANDT WARREN L.TOMLINSON ROBERT T.CONNERY BRUCE T.BUELL HARADON BEATTY September 6, 1973 HARRY L.HOBSON OF COUNSEL HAND DELIVERY Ms Donna Baer City/County Planning Office P.O. Box V Aspen, Co. 81611 Re : Norway Shadows Dear Donna : When Ed Quest was in Aspen earlier this week to attend the Tuesday evening Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission meeting , he authorized me to make the following offer to the City of Aspen: In the event that new buildings are constructed on the Norway Shadows property replacing the three existing structures , Norway Shadows Limited Partnership will give to the City of Aspen said structures except for the one structure located in the north- west corner of the property and the westerly portion of the main lodge building. It is the intent of this offer to provide the City of Aspen with the capability of offering low-cost housing (the buildings offered the City presently house 24 tenants) . Details of the offer relating to when the strucutres would have to be removed, etc . can be worked out when construction plans are more definite . I will , of course , mention this offer this evening during our presentation of the Norway Shadows project to the Planning & Zoning Commission. However, I thought you should be apprised of it in advance . Very truly yours , Charles T. Brandt CTB/bw for HOLLAND & HART cc : J.E . Quest 8/6/73 NORWAY SHADOWS - COLORADO STORM WATER CALCULATIONS Area of Site = 41, 104 sq. ft . or 0.944 acres Assumed Runoff Coefficient "C" a) Present site with building - parking area - part unpaved "C" = 0.50 b) Proposed development as per plans "C" = 0.90 Present Slope of Site and Rainfall Intensity "i" (from Seelye "Data Book for Civil Engineers - Design" Sec. 18.01) High Point - 7995 Low Point - 7955 40 ' @ 260 ft. distance = 15 .4% slope Permissible Discharge for 5 Year Rain (assumed) Q = A x C x i where "i" = 9.5 minutes @ 1. 0" rain Q = 0.944 x 0.50 x 3.25 on 5 year return gives Q = 1.53 CFS approx. 3.25" Live Detention for 100 Year Return Rain (assume 1 hour as peak) Live storage (inches) = td (Ci100 - 0.500) where td = duration of storm, assumed as 1 hour, C = coefficient of runoff 1100 = intensity in inches/hour 100 year storm U. S. Weather Bureau 0.50 = runoff coefficient for present site 15 = intensity in inches/hour 5 year storm U. S. Weather Bureau (based on " i" from above) .. Live storage (in. ) = td (Ci100 - 0.5015) = 1 hour [(0.90 x 2 .50) - (0.50 x 3.25)] = 1 [2 .25 - 1.63] inches = 0.62 Page 1 of 4 Acre Feet = 0.62 inch storage x 0.0833 x 0.944 acres = 0.049 Cubic Feet = 0.049 acre feet x 43, 560 =2134 Summary Allowable Discharge: 1.53 CFS Retention Capacity: 2134 FT3 OVeRLAUP ED. klr.WAcE P1Tc44 REM/\\N4.16 c;rr>= 1.1C4 o4-, T3 .1316cHAFGSr----\1/4 , ( eThcl?c,e7 --.4. \. - f ��1 I3L176 "c211 7 %'L Ot= iC3F N ___..0- -7". oisg9xvV 8 ioo 47 -PPRKI NG i, -- • 1 lei,-7?o or TEAL �+ i • • 42 _ q5. ---i -\ \\' I ` . -fOOF i O LA'■1Q ,,. Agt=fr. 4400 - • T -6vaoo 10, 8 1 --- 14.Ed OF TC1AL . R S I"T' SKS TC}—{ ...4.,,.}.II N,T. . SOUTH PARKING LOT Volume = 1/2 ( 1/2 x .50 ' x 42 ' x 150) Volume = 787 .5 cu. ft. available Required = 14.6% of 2134 = 311.6 cu. ft. -0.01 -D,SI ▪ Available storage exceeds required retention Discharge = 14.6% of 1.53 = 0.22 CFS or 99 GPM 0,01 al al • 4" C.I.P. @ 1/4"/ft. slope = 110 GPM (0.24 CFS) _________ -----...- Page 2 of 4 EAST BUILDING ROOF & GRADE Area = 4400 sq. ft. = 0. 10 acres Discharge = 0.10 x 0.90 x 2.50 = 0.23 CFS No retention for this area (overland flow to storm drainage ditch) NORTH PARKING LOT & ROOF N.TS - o,24 CFS U11-1 Volume = 1/2 ( [ 1/2 x .50 ' x 25 '] x 180 ' ) O00 1 = 562 cu. ft. , Required = 19. 7% of 2134 1 = 420 cu. ft. —+ .. Availagle storage exceeds required o retention Discharge = 19.7% of 1.53 = 0.30 CFS S. Lot = 0.24 CFS N. Lot = 0. 30 CFS o,00I ;- 1'v0 0.54 CFS-47(IA) Q�T 6" 0 pipe at 0.012 '/ft. slope CENTER SECTION OF SITE Catch basins shall be of the drywell type to absorb runoff from roofs and land. Overflow lines will be installed to relieve storm water when ground is frozen in winter when ground is unable to absorb storm water. .: Storm runoff from center area will not normally discharge to the receiving streams. Actual flow to receiving stream S. Lot = 0.24 E. Section = 0.23 N. Lot = 0. 30 0.77 CFS (allowable = 1.53 CFS) NORWAY SHADOWS Page 3 of 4 SANITARY SEWER 4 units 3 Bedroom = 4 people x 4 = 16 21 Units 2 Bedroom = 3 people x 21 = 63 Future 7 Units 2 Bedroom = 3 people x 7 = 21 100 people Average flow = 100 people x 100 GPCPD = 10000 GPD NORWAY SHADOWS Page 4 of 4 LEGAL NOTICE Notice is hereby given, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing on September 4 , 1973 , 5 : 00 p.m. , City Council Chambers to consider the preliminary plat for Norway Shadows Subdivision more fully described as follows : "Lots 13, 14 , 15, 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 and 20 of Block 11 an unpl..atted portion of Eames Addition, Aspen, Colorado. " Plat is on file in the office of the City/County Planner and may be examined by any interested person or persons during office hours. /s/ Lorraine Graves City Clerk Published in the Aspen Today August 22 , 1973 THE ABOVE NOTICE SHALL SERVE AS NOTIFICATION TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. l / .f 7 / �.G jZ LL; (-6-6. ) t (/ i �/ ✓ /L ✓Z L CITY OF ASPEN aspen ,colora do, asst' box v MEMORANDUM TO: City Clerk FROM: Planning Office SUBJECT: Norway Shadows Subdivision DATE: Augusta, 1973 Please schedule and advertise Norway Shadows Subdivision preliminary plat for Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing on A4, 1973. Legal description as follows : Lots 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 , 18, 19 and 20 of Block 11 an unplatted portion of Eames Addition, Aspen, Colorado. Envelopes are attached for notification of adjacent owners . �� �.� 8// 7/7.3 HOLLAND & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW 500 EQUITABLE BUILDING JOSIAH G.HOLLAND DON D.ETTER ARTHUR C.DAILY STEVEN M.HANNON STEPHEN H.HART JAMES T.MORAN 730 SEVENTEENTH STREET JEFFREY C.POND JOHN D.COOMBE JOHN L.J.HART KENNETH D.HUBBARD DENVER COLORADO 80202 JOHN UNDEM CARLSON EUGENE F. MCGUIRE WILLIAM D.EMBREE,JR. ROBERT L.VER SCHURE BRUCE W.SATTLER LINDELL L.GUMPER JAMES L.WHITE GORDON G.GREINER RANDY L.PARCEL SOLOMON N.BARON PATRICK M.WESTFELDT ROBERT H.DURHAM,JR. TELEPHONE AREA CODE 303 292-9200 JOSEPH N.DE RAISMES ROBERT J.MOIR CLAUDE M.MAE R,JR. WILLIAM E.MURANE GRAHAM M.CLARK,JR. MARK R.LEVY ROBERT P.DAVISON H.GREGORY AUSTIN DAVID G.PALMER JEANNETTE P MEIER JOHN FLEMING KELLY L.WILLIAM SCHMIDT,JR. JUDITH BONNIE KOZLOFF R.BROOKE J FRANK H.MORISON JAMES P.LINDSAY CABLE ADDRESS HOLHART, DENVER MICHAEL D.MARTIN R.BROOKE E JACKSON ACKSO WHITE,JR. WILLIAM C.McCLEARN EDWIN S.KAHN WALTER W.GARNSEY,JR. JAY W.TRAC EV,JR. SAMUEL R.GUYTON MOUNTAIN PLAZA BUILDING RAUL N.RODRIGUEZ JOHN ALLEN MOORE JOHN S.CASTELLANO BEN E.CHIDLAW DENNIS M.JACKSON JACK L.SMITH P. O. BOX 1128, ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 JAMES E.HEGARTY ROBERT E.BENSON FIELD C.BENTON DONALD O.KINONEN TELEPHONE 925-3476 AREA CODE 303 DAVID BUTLER RICHARD M.KOON J.MICHAEL FARLEY CHARLES T.BRANDT WARREN L.TOMLINSON ROBERT T.CONNERY August 7 , 1973 BRUCE T.BUELL HARADON BEATTY HARRY L.HOBSON OF COUNSEL HAND DELIVERY Ms . Donna Baer City/County Planning Office Aspen, Co. 81611 Re : Norway Shadows Subdivision (a 27 unit condominium project) Dear Donna : Accompanying this letter are twelve copies of each of the following items for submission to the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to Ordinance No. 4 (subdivisions) and Ordinance No. 19 (series of 1973) : 1 . Preliminary plat of the proposed subdivision; and 2 . Landscape plan I am also enclosing a list of the names and addresses of all adjacent property owners and the written statement or presentation required under Ordinance 19. In addition to the written statement , we also intend to make an oral presentation to the Planning Commission at its August 21st meeting . I understand the Norway Shadows project has been placed on the agenda for that meeting . With respect to the filing fee under Ordinance No. 19, the estimated building permit fee has been previously paid to the City of Aspen at the time of Norway Shadow's application for a building permit with the Building Inspector . Should you have any questions , please let me know. Very truly yours , CTB/bw Charles T. Brandt Encl. for HOLLAND & HART cc : Mr. Ed Quest Mr . James Otis F ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS South - Shadow Mountain Condominiums (see attached list) West - Mountain Edge Enterprises David Barbee , John W. Barbee and Hallie Barbee Rugheimer, General Partners P.O. Box 788 Aspen, Co. 81611 North - Aspen Skiing Corporation P.O. Box 1248 Aspen, Co. 81611 East - Aspen Street �.t r,�"!�/�Th glop 71 7 is I ti .V. 3OX :J...). AS. EiN, L.0LU:�ALD0 u i C.- + . P • UiiiE (303) .92 5-703 3 Fal.)ruary 5, 97 Dr. Bob & r Broc D.. H. B & B n' Ot 1 i rJ w. . �G v c.. Kay .�..v�a�G �� ... ,�r_O�J; :.° JO;. ....6 v vG�a.....:i Suite 1127, NBC 3+ dg. 65 Elm Acres Dr. New Orleans, La. 70I12 Pond Du Lac, Wis . 5 935 Off: 504-525-5069 Off: 414-921-3610 or 523-0463 Tue & Fri: 722-0530 Res: 504-367-8981 Res : 414-922-2431 UNIT / UNIT //8 J 7 lJ � Misses Marion M. Maurice &f Anne A��. elshoimw Jr. . and 'Lois 1orroll 825 Tonkawa till. 55356 9 North 23rd Ave . Long La:s.; Mn. ` Melrose Part, ill. • 60160 Off: 612-339-0725 ' Res : 312-214-0729 Res : 612-471-8816 _ U7-17' :#L;. LiNT'' #9 9 Roy D. Murphy Harold O. & Cynthia Lyman 1101 L. University ' 6750 France Ave . So . , Suite 123 Urbana,➢ r ,. 61801 Minneapolis, Mn. 55435 Cff: 217-328-3361 Off: 67.2--9•2 " cta5-4.2 0 • Res: 217-344-5396 Res : 612-922-8425 UN TT #5 UNIT _;`r1.0 Dean Van Eaton Dr. Samuel W. & Thelma un.per Sr Orchard Pl . 175 �,�;;• Ave . S .W.S .�+�1. 1.1 7� OrC a New . , 5511, 2 St Paul, Mn.Brighton, Mn. St. . aa�., ,..r.. 55102 Off: 612-633-4400 Off: 612-222-6000 Res : 6w 2- :: :,_.-8 ' Res: 612-452-1175 (036 -7.x09 Mrs Thelma Smalley Do:. L. Sheridan 455 Cloverleaf Dr. 2616 Hillside Ln. 422 ,.ow-- , �1a. 9 20., Minneapolis, Mn. 55 Everett,vv, i Of": 612-633-4400 Res : 206-355-9454 Res : 612-544-2200 UNIT !r'!.7 UNIT. fr 6 Ted & Nancy Johnson / Brirda e Judy f :. r: a � r John &7. Solon, Chic 4-el..-,y r 0' 7,.r W' s. . 5321L' e: : 27.6-248 1w4 / n.7�1 !). .„,)• .)^r/'.L Poe: 414-279-6516 • .\J. BOX ✓.✓• AS ._N, CO OFAB'Q G v i Pi fG,\E (3C3) ,J' 2�/-1LJ.�.d T;NT • man & Sally Ventres,, J r Mrs . Elizabeth B G ; f y ' 1802 N .E. Loop 410 Carlson, Greiner & 'Law Suite 207 670 Pillsbury B..c4g. Sup. .- ., San Antonio, Tx. 78217 Minneapolis ,neapo: is , Mn. 55402 • - Off: 612-333-153) • Res: 612-935-5813 UNIT y!I3 i.8 • v1. ,µ, /'�i Bob & Katie Car tor 13305 Capital Ave . Ralph & Elsie iurn y'uis t Oak Park, iV.i. 43237 Tu n:iuis;, Paper Co . Off: 313-547-7000 3003 N. Pacific St. 's. . 313-682-..3J3 Minnoapolis, Mn. 5,5411 Off: 612-529-7711 rv`m ,/1' Ii Res: 612-473-9693 Dr. t, k r -n 1419 Jr. Geo . L. & Beth Gc;.•.ns.1V L1..� 210 Downtown Prof. Bldg. 822 +: arc uette Ave . L Dick W. & Ann Lane Minneapolis, M . .+ 1402 ... �� Loewi & Co. Off: 612-588-0541 One E. Milwaukoe or 338-3839 '. Janesville , Wis . 53545 Res: 612-473-5553 Off: 6°8-754-6626 Res:. 608-752-7625 Dr. Richard & Marge 6500 Staude•r Circle Paul Y. & Elizabeth Ryan 'M.':..n r ap l r s, Mn. $J4Gr Campbell, B VnnGn9 Steil & Ryan Off: 612-336-2675 One East Milwaukee , Suite 30E • or X-ray: 588-0616 Janesville , Wis . 5355 - Res : 612-935-4870 Off: 608-754-4433 Res : 608-752-8425 ' TT= #15 - TSIT 1420 • Bill F. & Marty Seelbach 17866 Lake Rd. Bob & Ann Kons vas Millsboro Rd. Lakewood, Ohio 44107 Mansfield, Ohio 44906 Gff: 216-621-6640 Off: 419-524-40022 Res: 216-221-0467 Res : 419-756-7694 1r•rm lr 6 UNIn 1$21 V r Edward Z; Louise k„L,os V Ea.. . M. & Marilee :ar o i Vr . 1360 Dain Towor 1604 Deck Building Try .n+/. • *f'♦♦...+..u.l 7 G:•�ol ..y, . . �J n✓4 V2 Ci n^ \ •V O_V, Y a• 71101 Res: 612-474-?188 Jw8-86�-6913 MEMO TO: JIM ADAMS ,, CI]A1PM N Aspen P & Z Commission From: DAVE ELLIS CITY ENGINEER RE : Norway Shadows Subdivision-Preliminary Plat . Date: September 4 , 1973 The subdivision location presents major problems in water supply, street access, and parking. 1) At peak consumption periods the existing water system could barely deliver 1000 gpm combined flow from the two fire hydrants nearest the site . Each year the peak consumption period pressures decrease . In addition the city is trying to establish a minimum fire flow requirement of 1500 gpm in heavily developed areas which the existing system cannot meet.. Adding units in this area will also decrease the available supply to existing downstream users on Aspen Street. 2) South Aspen Street is presently one of the worst streets in the city from an access, snow removal, and parking point of view. The addition of another parking lot on the •upper end of Aspen is going to aggrevate the access problem. Access to the site should be kept as far down the hill as possible . Because of the extremely severe parking problem on the street, parking should be provided at the minimum rate of 1 space/unit plus spaces for the normal complement of employees on a one to one basis. 3) The drainage plan will have to be analyzed by Wright-McLaughlin and designed to conform with the already completed Urban Runoff Management Plan. 4) An easement for the existing sanitary sewer will be necessary. 5) The normal requirements for participation in street improvement and storm drainage districts will be made.