The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcoa.lu.iz.Sanderson 410 E Hyman.1973 I OP 'i--V,.... ,i.',`:.',:';'; '.:.'".:'.,, L._ I I- !.J;1 L (,:: :-.q„ ..;:iv-)0 , , -. „ ;• , . . , .. ; . . ........_______......,:. . .....,.. , 1 GE N ilf RA L I ' ! 410 :I,:!ist IirNJ-tn - c,.1i,..:, , i:iN 1 ■,),,I Ilderson B.I.o.;:- r t",f.r,r.■! , `. ." ! _ . V4,..1" F.RDNED ANC, vALIL)/.1E0 Is,' SLI!LIDING INY'EL NON OEPARLMTNI TAls PlEmo Au1HC/i.i7ES THE WO,D; DES,.-RiLIED b!.I.C.E.V. I 1 i',.7:T C.,;■.7 '''.•II .: 1%!=:'.',..' LI P',T'. ri' ''?.. C,A A F ••- •:.- E-•,,FPF•t.E6 f--1 rl _(,)(.,,' ,':] ...i..i' ,- Y:...:-.:,,,, :•:. 1 o/0 ridsmo & Bukwalter ' NAW Iiirkwoo6. Associates ADWT-SS ro rox 90.-1 PHONE F,-.. LICENSE LICENSE NAIF: (Ac; ucE--NsEn) Eadsmo & Buel-cwalter CLASS NUMBER i..:'i. --------- ----- ------ - -- -- - :', ADDRFSS PHONE I1 ,' ICE Ell — — — L r) SUPD-VVISCM FO r; THIS JOE. NAME DATE CERTIFIED; LEGAL 21±. 9N LOT NO. N/part M BLOCK NO. 88 ADDITION ATTACHED[177IDESIGN A Lic. B'yl_ Tri_r_Co BY Copland, inhaa.m_liagman_ThZtaw_________ ...s.FLEA (S.F.) HEIGHT NO. lc.TOTL OCCUPANCY sior.i0d rtaeo AT.' GRADE 1000 (FEET) 1 0 0 GROUP DIV, 2nd. star.if — :,Ac=FMENT FE. f-11 GARAGF s!Nc-,LE Li ATTACHED Lit TOTAL 1 TYPE FILE UNFM. 11 DOUBLE [1 DETACHED DLROOMS CONSTR. ZONE --------- - .-_--.—_____— GD RE it,T* SIZE SPACING SPAN AUTHORIZED iksi .„., BE:LofiOR il,la, (FFELIO'LIRG AGENCY 1 j DATE: BY 7-7 FooriNG SIZE ,7 _ 1" __ ft.r.‘IVIO . _ REVIEW 8zL0II BUILDING rNGG ______ T, EXTERIOR CONC. Li FDN. WALL ROOF PARKING :., ft-BCE:NESS ,T,LI-Ai1Ci-iK [1 MAST Li . ' CAISSONS in R.00FING &GR.REAMS L--) MATCRIAl PUBLIC HEALTH I PLAA.SONRY ABOVE ABOVE ABOVE ENGINEERING THICKNf.ss 1ST FLR 2ND H.R. 3RD FLR. — r1\I I. SIND SEZE ABOVE ABOVE ABOVE & SPACE 1ST FLR. --2•IL) ELk 3RD FIR. 1 pding one room forcommericalspace — 1 FOR INSPECTIONS OR INFORMATION CALL 923- 7335 FOR ALL 'LVORK DONE UNDER THIS PERMIT THE ELRMITTEF ACCEPTS FULL FILSPONSTELLITY FOR VALUATION COMPLIANCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM SUILDING COOE, THE COLINTY ZONING RESOLUTION OP. CITY ZONING ORDINANCE, AND ALL OTHER COUNTS RESOL UTIONS Oil Cli T ORDINANCES WHICHEVER. i OF WORK Q* APPLIES. 20, 000 SEPARATE PERMITS MUST ES OBTAINED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ANL) HEATING, SIGNS, PLAN TOTAL FEE EWIMMING FOOLS AND FENCES. PERMIT EXPIRES KO DAYS FROM BATE ISSUED UNLESS WORK IS STARTED. FILED T P "Cr- 64 . 00 hisvEcTioNs silAii FE REQUESTED ONE WORKING CA',' IN ADVANCE. DOUBLE C.:HECK ti . 32 . 00pl.dk. e i _... . ,___, ALL LEINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL EL MADE GU ALL ITE!.iS OF WORK. BEFORE CBITL:FTEANCY IS PERMITTED. FEE L j CASH Li siT 96 . 00 II IIS BUILDING SHALL NOT EE OCCUPIED I It-ITIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED.[I I BUILDING DEPARTMENT PERMIT SUBJFCT TO REVOCATION OR/SUS ENSICIII FOR VIOLATION OF ANY LAWS GOVERNING SAME. I I OF A ("H, \ _.------ - .. ._-_,-- ii APPROVAL BY DATE __. _ • t 111 (.-; FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY I DATE . I- PERMIT NO. I[CENSE 4 RECEIPTS CLASS 1 AMOUNT NN EN VALIDATED HERE „,.,,,,,,,,,,,v,r.,, , , :--,-, 1 424-73 L I INsrEcTon's colY , . . . . . .-.. . .. ., .. ,. _ _ , • RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves Regular Meeting Aspen Planning & Zoning October. 16 , 1973 to the Planning Office. Gillis made a motion to amend the original motion to read that the Commission would review the project under Ordinance #19 , seconded by Johnson. All in favor, motion carried. tii R.O. Anderson Ms. Baer stated that this proposal was an addition of Residence a garage and a studio, and would not increase the density. Gillis made a motion to approve the proposal , seconded by Johnson. All in favor, motion carried. Ordinance #19 Architect Larry Yaw was present and explained that this Review - was a proposal to add a second floor above the Tom Mix ‘,/Sanderson Flying School for retail purposes . Stated that Tom Mix Building has agreed to buy two parking spaces and construct roof drainage according to specifications of the City Engineer- ing Department. Would be an additional 900 plus square feet. • Yaw further pointed out that this addition would not in- terfere with the view. Ms. BAer submitted a diagram of the proposed addition, and stated that the Historic Preservation Committee had re- viewed the proposal and had approved it, Johnson made a motion to approve the addition, seconded by Gillis. All in favor, motion carried. Ordinance #19 Ms. Baer stated that the Historic Preservation Committee i Review - had approved the structure , but .would like to review the ' Woods Building color and the building material. Ms . Baer briefly explained the diagram of the Commission and explained that the City Council must grant approval to the covered walk. Gillis made a motion to approve the proposal on the con- dition that the drainage be satisfactory for the covered roof, seconded by Jenkins . Motion included that the requirement for parking space purchase be determined. All in favor, motion carried. Ordinance 419 Ms . Baer explained that this was a review of two units Review -- second phase of a new six unit condominium. Caribou Condominiums Johnson made a motion to recommend for approval on con- dition that the applicant dedicate a ski easement along the southerly boundary of the property, seconded by Jen- kins . All in favor, motion carried. Ute Avenue Ms. Baer- pointed out that this was a project on Ute Avenue • Condominiums at the Aspen Alps Road, a request for new 14 unit con- dominium. Further pointed out that the zoning in this area was mixed residential . Ms. Bar further pointed out that, the OrdJi nance #1 9 Re- view Committee had recommended d denial of the project for the fol I OW] ng reason - use appears to be i..ncontp�atL!ble with the land use plan and mass of the proposed structure too great . • -4- i ORDINANCE 19 REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES October 11, 1973 PRESENT: Jim Adams and Fred Smith R.O. ANDERSON RESIDENCE - Roaring Fork Road Request for detached garage one studio. Single Family District Recommended conceptual, preliminary and final approval based on determining an • appropriate category of this use and assuring no further development can occur on the property without sub- \,////// division. SANDERSON BUILDING - 410 East Hyman Request for second floor extension of commercial use Central Area Recommended approval of conceptual, pre- liminary and final conditional upon pur- chase by applicant of two parking spaces, conformity with Engineers recounnendation for roof drainage and a determination of F.A.R. that latter to be completed by meeting of October 16, 1973. GOOMBA, INC_ - 307 South Mill (Dr.Barnard' s Building) Request for tube out/delivery restaurant. Interior remodel. Central District Recommended approval of conceptual presenta- tion subject to: 1. Satisfactory negotiation with engineering and planning office regarding parking requirements and access for delivery truck. 2. Construction of sidewalk as shown on plan. BIBBIG RESIDENCE - Park Avenue Request to move a single family dwelling onto 17 ,000 lot (existing single family dwelling) . Multiple Family Recommend approval of conceptual presentation subject to approval of driveway access by Engineering &,: P.O. -_ �c9c1 l of ! (./7 S , . _ s '`` r 2, 's o :31 44. 4 St .�° k L1 .I 4 r';c,Z2 l L' ) a 44 s . .0. FA -7 OZO f 27 September 1973 City Planning and Zonin g Commission Aspen City Hall Aspen, Colorado Re: Sanderson Building Addition Gentlemen: I The following letter responds in seriatim to the requirements of Ordinance 19 as pertains to the above referenced project. Project Description: p The proposed project is a second level addition to the existing single story portion of the Sanderson building abutting the Hyman Street property line of Lots M & N; Block 88. The addition comprises 940 square feet of space to be used for retail (clothing store) purposes. This use is exempt from review under the Excepted Uses and Review Criteria for the CENTRAL AREA. The proposed addition has been reviewed and approved by the Aspen Board of Zoning Adjustment. Lot & Yard Requirements; Building Height The addition conforms to the Lot and Yard requirements of the ex- 1 isting building as per the approval of the Board of Zoning Adjustment. The total height of the building with the addition will be 19 feet above sidewalk level. This is lower in height than the remaining three level portion of the Sanderson building and does not create any ad- ,- -, ditional height to the overall building mass. Off Street Parking The present Sanderson Building has 5 parking spaces conforming to city requirements. As per the determination of the City Planning Office 2 additional spaces will be required to accomodate the building addition. Birkwood Associates agree to purchase the additionally re- quired parking spaces from the city. ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS • ASPEN, COLORADO • 81611 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET • POST OFFICE BOX 2736 • TELEPHONE 303-925-2867 1 Letter to City Planning and Zoning Commission 27 September 1973 Page 2 Utilities r Electric, gas, water and sewer utilities are presently utilized by the existing building on the subject site. r- Fire Protection A letter from the Fire Marshall has been sent to the planning office attesting to the adequacy of fire protection. Engineering A letter from the City Engineering Department has been sent to the planning office attesting to conformance with engineering related criteria. Historic Preservation A letter from the Historic Commission has been sent to the planning office attesting to conformance with Historic related Criteria. =41 EC:D Very truly yours f Copland Finholm Hagman Yaw Ltd ��1 V Larry Y for: Birkwood Associates J JLY:SS • 1 CITY OF ASPEN aspen ,colorado, am' box v 9-6-73 Birkwood Associates P.O. Box 903 c/o Eidsmo & Buckwalter Aspen, Colo. RE: Sanderson Bldg. Addition 410 East Hyman This is to certify that the structure named above has adequate access and water supply for fire protection. Bill Caille Marshall City of Aspen September 18, 1973 Jim Adams , Chairman Aspen Planning and Zoning Box V Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Jim: At its regular meeting on September 13, 1973 the Aspen His- toric Preservation Committee reviewed the proposed additions to the Hoods Building and the Sanderson Building, both of which are in an area recommended by the Historic Preservation Committee for evaluation for possible designation as an H, Historic Overlay District, and found as follows : Sanderson Building - The plans are compatible with tha historic character of the area and are thcre- fore recommended for approval. Woods Building - The plans are compatible with the historic character of the area and are recommended for approval with t1 following condition. The Historic Preservation Committee 'could request that the applicant submit a painting scheme and indicate building materials to the Committee prior to final approval. Sincerely, id Finholm Chairman HISTORIC PRESERVATION CMIITTEE DF/bk