HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.council.089A-01 RESOLUTION NO. 89
SERIES OF 2001
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO,
APPROVING THE 2001-2002 MARKETING PLAN AND BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF
ASPEN TOURISM PROMOTION FUND AND EXTENDING THE TERM OF THE
AGREEMENT REGARDING THE TOURISM PROMOTION FUND THROUGH
DECEMBER 31, 2002.
WHEREAS, on March 26, 2001 the Aspen City Council approved an Agreement
between the City, the Aspen Lodging Association (ALA), and the Aspen Chamber Resort
Association (ACRA) relating to the expenditure of a portion of the receipts of the recently
imposed 1.0% visitor benefit tax; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement requires ACRA to submit to the City a detailed annual
marketing program and expense budget, along with a review of the previous year's program
(except for the fnrst year); and
WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement may be extended by mutual agreement of the
parties upon the submission by ACRA of th~ annual marketing plan and budget and the approval
of the same by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to approve the proposed marketing plan and budget
and thereby extend the term of the Agreement through December 31, 2002.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ASPEN, COLORADO:
That the 2001-2002 marketing plan and budget appended hereto as Exhibit A is hereby
approved and the term of the Agreement is hereby extended to December 31, 2002.
RESOLVED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 10th day of September, 2001, by the
City Council for the City of Aspen, Colorado.
I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is
a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen,
Colorado, at a meeting held September 10, 2001.
Kathryn S. IC/~fch, City Clerk
ASPEN
September 10, 2001
Mayor Klanderud and members of the Aspen City Council:
We appreciate the opportunity to present this marketing plan and
proposed budget for Aspen's tourism promotion fund. As you know.
c I-I A M B E R the Aspen Chamber Resort Association was contracted by the City
R E S O R T of Aspen to administer the marketing funds resulting from the
passage of the lodging tax.
42~ ~i,, (;~,,,~ac p~c~ In this packet, you will find the comprehensive, bound marketing
^~p,n co~o~,~ s~a plan that is a result of eight months of work by the ACRA's
Marketing Advisory Committee and PRACO, the marketing firm
T 970 925 1940
we hired.
.... ...~,,¢,,~,,~,~,~,~ You also will find a brief overview of the plan with bullet points; the
detailed proposed budget for 2001-2002; and a summation of the
feedback we have received from the community.
We're available at any time ~o answer questions, and we look
forward to meeting with you on Monday, Sept. 10.
Christine -Nolen
President and CEO
Aspen Chamber Resort Association
PRACC. LTD.
Public
Relations PRACO
Advertising
2001-2002 ASPEN MARKETING PLAN
5300 DTC ~a;'~a: Campaign Goals
· Increase hotel occuoancy & expenditures for trial visitors
· Provide realistic ROI
~,,gle~ood. CO 8o::: · Re-energize Aspen brand to trial visitors
· Leverage marketing investment through co-ops
Campaign Objectives
Fax303-850-7820 · Generate measurable direct contacts
· Generate $2,400.000 in new lodging revenue by year 2 of campaign
· Provide short-term ROI of $6 to $1
· Provide long-term ROI of $18 to $1
Strategy #1: Research
· Brand Report
· Aspen Ski Co. Co-op Quantitative Survey
· Creative Testing
· ACRA Quantitative Survey
Strategy #2: Package Development
· 52 Packages per year
· Developed by ACRT
· Target "hot deal" travel sections in top 1 00 national newspapers
· Additional efforts in Los Angeles & Dallas
· Trackable and measurable
Strategy #3: Community Relations
·Two-way communication program to educate, inform, and elicit feedback on
the ACRA marketing efforts
Strategy #4: "Booster Shots" - lwo Direct Marketing Campaigns
· Regional focus in LA & Dallas/Ft. Worth (winter & summer)
· MNI Magazines - 6 publications
· Bloomberg.com
· NPR Radio sponsorships
· Direct mail campaign with American Express - series of 3 postcards
· Trackable and measurable
Strategy #5: Campaign Site
· Adjunct to ACRT site
· Address barriers
· Promote & list packages
· Links to booking function or 800#
· Links to a variety of Aspen sites
· Trackable and measurable
ASPEN CHAMBER RESORT ASSOCIATION
2001-2002 MARKETING PLAN:
COMMUNITY COMMENTS AND
MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
At the request of the city manager's office, we've compiled a brief repor~ on
the questions and comments the community offered in response ~o a review of
the marketing plan.
Background: Once the research had been completed and the marketing plan
began to take shape, ACRA and its contracted agency, PRACO. met with a
variety of community groups to discuss strategies and tactics. These groups
included .the ACRA's 20-member Marketing Advisory Committee; the Aspen
Lodging Association; PR Connections, which is the group composed of local
public relations managers; the Aspen Skiing Company staff and its agency
representatives; the Snowmass Village Resort Association staff and its
agency representatives; the ACRA Board of Directors; and the community at
large.
It must be noted that the general reaction, even from some of the mos~
opinionated, experienced folks in our community, was very positive. The
goals, objectives and strategies of the campaign were affirmed and the
research and thoughtfulness that had led us to this point were acknowledged.
We then proceeded to more specific feedback:
How does this tie in to the Skiing Company's and Snowmass's
marketing plans? Thanks to thorough communication between our
marketing staffs and our agencies, we have all identified some very
consistent audiences we think are ripe for trial. Skico, of course, goes after
the skier/snowboarder audience and segments it from there: Snowmass, no~
surprisingly, will s~rongly target families; and ACRA has identified -by
lifestyle--affluent, active, metropolitan-area adults who love adventure-
based vacations. We are working hard to dovetail our efforts, no~ duplicate
them. SVRA and ACRA are employing two agencies with a strong fraternal
relationship, and we are talking about cooperative advertising in the fall of
2002.
Why is Aspen Central Reservations the call to action? We sent out
requests for proposals to virtually every local travel agent. ACRT's proposal
was selected by a subcommittee of the Marketing Advisory Committee. ACRT
has a sophisticated on-line booking system, tools for measuring results of our
campaign, and is a community-based reservations agency serving the Aspen
and Snowmass communities exclusively.
Another Web site? Don't we have enough in this community? We don't
consider aspeneffect.com another Web site. It's a portal that we need to 1)
break down barriers to visiting and booking Aspen; 2) drive business'to the
sites to which it seamlessly connects: aspensnowmass.com; stayaspen.com;
aspenchamber.org; etc. and 3) you'll hear us say this again and again--we've
got to have a tool to track the results of this campaign.
Why are Los Angeles and Dallas the focuses of the "booster shot"
campaigns? First, it's important to remember that the package
promotions--to the top 100 newspapers with package sections and travel
Web sites--and other elements of the Chamber's marketing efforts are
nationwide. The booster compaigns were limited to two markets because of
the advertising costs. Los Angeles came to the top of everyone's list; research
has sho~vn that we have a very strong California audience, with room for
growth. Dallas was selected as the second city because: it is also a lucrative
market for Aspen; we needed a market that would work for both summer and
winter, and those folks who are not die-hard skiers in the East and Midwest
are not as likely to take a winter Rocky Mountain vacation; and Dallas is a
less expensive buy than, say, Chicago or New York. (As an aside, our research
showed that access was not the detractor we thought it might be. In other
words, we believe the absence of direct flights from Dallas is outweighed by
the positive points of this market.)
We understand public relations is a big part of the effort, but
promoting a package a week? Isn't that just inundating editors with
information they don't want? The major goal of the marketing effort is to
drive business in the lodging sector, so offering vehicles that encourage our
audiences to book is critical. And these are not stories we're pitching to
editorial staffs; these are attractive packages, activity-based, that we're
sending to publications that like to list such packages in special sections.
How does the creative address campaign strategies? Aren't we just
selling sex? As one might expect, the display advertising graphics and copy
received the most comment. (Although a relatively limited portion of the
overall marketing plan, they are the most visible reflection of it.) It is
somewhat challenging to respond to this in a brief such as this, without
reiterating the research findings and strategies that logically led us to this
point. But in short, we believe that to achieve success, we need to do more
than list the attributes of the resort. We also need to do more than deny that
we are expensive, exclusive, and inaccessible. These strategies have been
employed in the past, and are not driving incremental new business.
We have to hit our targeted audience where they hve. and they've told us the
element that distinguishes a successful experience for them is how they feel
on vacation. This group could essentially go anywhere; they make vacation
decisions based on how intense and sensuous they know their experiences
will be.
We also know that the most attractive photos and the best copy are useless if
no one is looking at them. If we are going to employ display advertising at all.
it has ~o draw attention or we've wasted our limited resources.
ASPEN CHAMBER RESORT ASSOCIATION
2001-2002 MARKETING PLAN
PROPOSED BUDGET
PRESENTED TO ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
SEPT. 10, 2001
INCOME
Lodging mx revenue S 440,000
Co-op funds S 140,000
TOTAL INCOME $ 580,000
EXPENSE
Advertising - media buys $ 168,000
*Committee expense $ 1,500
Contract labor
*administration ~ 8,500
research $ 48,000
marketing .plan S 1,500
package development S 12,000
cmmpai~n site $ 28,500
*Legal and accounting $ 10.000
Postage and printing - direct mail $ 156,000
Professional fees
production/graphic design $ 26,000
agency
research $ 12,000
marketing plan $ 18,500
package development $ 38,000
campaign site $ 6,500
community relations $ 15,000
Travel $ 10,000
Contingency $ 20,000
TOTAL EXI~ENSE $ 580,000
* Chamber reimbursement