HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.110 E Hallam St.A106-992737-073-13-801 A106-99
Red Brick PUD Amendment
U
FA
rXIM60
CASE NAME: Red Brick PUD Amendment
PROJ ADDR:1 Lots A, B, C, E, F, G, Block 71 City a
OWN/APP:j City of Aspen ._...� ADF
REP: F ADR
FEES
:AS PUD Amendment
CIS/Z: PHN:
C/S/ZtF---- PHN:
FEES RCVD:
ST
106-99
Joyce Ohlson, 02:03 PM 10/14/99, Red Brick
X-Sender: joyceo@comdev
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 14:03:54 -0600
To: nickl
From: Joyce Ohlson <joyceo@ci.aspen.co.us>
Subject: Red Brick
Cc: tima, juliew@ci.aspen.co.us
Greetings, Nick why don't you take this one given all of your recent
experience with the YellowBrick/Red Brick and workings with Tim.
So, Tim -Nick's your guy. Let us know when you need some excellent
customer
service from your City Com Dev Dept.! JAO
>Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 12:12:49 -0600 (MDT)
>X-Sender: juliew@comdev
>To: Joyceo@ci.aspen.co.us
>From: Julie Ann Woods <juliew@ci.aspen.co.us> cA\0
>Subject: Red Brick 4_
>>Please assign and get back to Tim. thanks. JA. �
>>X-Sender: tima@recreat �\> jv
>>Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 14:43:59 -0600 \ ��� 'Y
>>To: juliew@ci.aspen.co.us L
>>From: Tim Anderson <tima@ci.aspen.co.us>
>>Subject: Red Brick
>>
>>Julie,
>>Although it may be a bit ambitious, I would like to try and bring
forward
>>the presentation of conceptual design of the west end of the Red
Brick and
>>the canopy to the front entry. I was working with Mitch on this
last
>>spring. I guess it would be hard to continue working with him now.
The Red
>>Brick Committee would like to present the conceptual plans to P&Z
(if
>>neccessary) in December. Who should I work with in trying to move
forward
>>with this? Thanks,
>>Tim
Printed for Nick Lelack <nickl@ci.aspen.co.us>
A
>Julie Ann Woods
>Aspen Community Development Director
>phone: (970)920-5100
>fax: (970) 920-5439
Printed for Nick Lelack <nickl@ci.aspen.co.us> 2
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
THRU: AMY MARGERUM, CITY MANAGER
FROM: TIM ANDERSON, RECREATION DIRECTOR
DATE: October 1, 1997
RE: RED BRICK ARTS & RECREATION CENTER SITE PLAN
SUMMARY.In the fall of 1996 the Recreation Department in cooperation with the
Aspen/Snowmass Arts Council began work on a Site Plan for the Red Brick Arts &
Recreation Center. The objective of this process was to involve all tenants and
surrounding neighbors in an effort to ultimately create a vision for what the Site should
reflect in the future. Attached is the product of such an effort.
The adoption of this document does not require official council approval since the
proposed improvements are consistent with the existing land use as filed with the
Community Development Department. The Community Development Director has
reviewed this document and is willing to grant an Insubstantial Amendment to the PUD.
This document is being provided to council for your individual review. If you have
comments or concerns about the Site Plan please advise staff so that we may follow up
with you.
BACKGROUND: The Red Brick was purchased from the Aspen School District and
renovated in 1993/94. The creation of a non profit center in the heart of Aspen by way of
a facility that had long established itself as a spoke in the wheel of this community, is an
issue that you will be hard pressed to find any opponents these days. Many local not for
profits, thanks to this community facility, have been able to maintain their base of
operations here in the Aspen Community. The Recreation Department has been able to
add many youth and adult programs that cater to community desires thanks to the Red
Brick Gymnasium.
CURRENT ISSUES: Although the Red Brick Arts and Recreation Center has done well
in serving the local non profits, the Center's ability to fit into Aspen's West End
Community needs work. With the Center's location such that it adjoins access to the Post
Office, the Rio Grande Trail, Clark's Center, and the West End Walk Experience, it is
essential that the Red Brick plays an important role as an ambassador to guests of the
community as well as host to the locals that travel these routes.
As you will read in the document, many of the issues that have been addressed deal not
only with the function of the facility, but how its appearance fits into our serene mountain
setting as well. This plan allows the building to reflect what Aspen once was, what
Aspen is today, and set a direction for tomorrow.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: At the present time there are no funding requirements.
As you can see in the back of the document, estimated costs associated with various
aspects of the plan have been calculated so we know what issues may be tackled as
funding becomes available. There is $39,092 remaining in the Red Brick construction
fund from the sale of the bonds in 1993. Staff will come back to council at a later date to
pursue funding for the implementation of this plan.
RECOMMENDATION. Staff is recommending that Council accept the Red Brick Arts
and Recreation Center Master Plan Summary as presented.
MANAGER'S COMMENTS:
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tim Anderson, Recreation Director
FROM: Jeff Woods, Parks Director n
DATE: September 15, 1997 U
RE: Red Brick Arts and Recreation Center Master Plan
The Park's Department strongly endorses the overall direction of the Master Plan for the
Red Brick Arts and Recreation Center. The enhancement of the landscape and
strengthening of access routes fit well within the Park's Department mission of reinforcing
the neighborhood character of the West End. However, a couple of minor elements are of
concern. The first issue is the paver design with grass growing in the joints. The grass will
pose a problem for snow removal in the winter. The second issue is lining the trail with
cottonwoods. This needs to be carefully looked at again in regards these trees being located
far enough off the path to accommodate snow removal.
In closing the Park's Department should be involved in any elements of the Master Plan
which are in the Street Right of Way or elements which our department may be called
upon to maintain. In addition there several elements which we may be able to implement.
These include street trees, sidewalk improvements, and irrigation to support plantings
along the street or pathways in the project area.
Memorandum
TO: Tim Anderson, Recreation Director
FROM: Nick Adeh, City Enginee
DATE: October 7, 1997
SUBJECT: Red Brick School Site Improvements Project
I have reviewed the proposed intersection improvements at Hallam and Garmisch Streets. The
intersection neckdown proposal as submitted under a conceptual plan is well justified for this
pedestrian corridor and in order to function as intended it must meet the following criteria:
1. Minimum curb return radius must be 25 feet.
2. As shown on your sketch, handicap ramps must be directional (no diagonal ramp construction will
be allowed). Ramps must be designed and built according to the Engineering Department's
standards and practices.
3. Intersection drainage patterns must be evaluated and improved if necessary, to avoid ponding or
icing in front of the handicap ramps.
4. Cross walks must be clearly striped and marked including vehicle stopping bars (asphalt overlay
and thermoplastic tape is the preferred application).
5. A traffic control plan and signage must be submitted to City Engineer for review and approval. This
includes all Early Warning Signs and Flashers and Regulatory Signs related to the posting and
enforcement of the pedestrian cross walk regulations. The complete design plan and type of devices
and signs must be in accordance with MUTCD.
Tim, I also noticed some work items were substanially underestimated by your consultant, and the
project costs will be higher than the estimated propbable cost of construction. In addition to
construction costs, there will be field engineering work, matreials testing, reporting and preparation of
as -built plans.
I will be happy to help you as much as my time allows and within the resources made available to us
under this project. Please stop by or call me if you have any questions. My extension is 7476.
NA97-W9
ASPEN/SNOWMASS
COUNCIL FOR THE ARTS
Julianne Woods
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
JAN 2 1 1999
_iOPITKIN January 21, 1999
110 E. Hallam St., Suite 118
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Julianne,
Phone: (970) 920-7477 / (800) 951-2787
Fax: (970) 920-5700
aspenart@rof.net www.aspen.com/arts
Enclosed are the plans for renovating The Red Brick Courtyard to
outdoor programming space of Arts Organizations. As we are in
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Robyn Myler, President
provide
the process of determining policies for usage, I wanted to be sure that you
Janet Garwood, Vice President
Nancy Lovendahl, Secretary
were aware of our plans and inform us of any usage restrictions.
Dara Coder, Treasurer
Roberta Allen
Debbie Ayers
Current to use this new space will begin in June 1999. It will
Newton Bartley
Bonnie Battin-Bishop
plans
provide programming opportunities for our arts organizations and an
Judy l PatFallin
Pat
opportunity for the community to interact with artists. A program called
John Hamwi
Caroline Hicks
"Lunch with the Arts" will invite the community to bring lunch and
Meggan Bly Humphrey
Charmaine Locke
experience a variety of arts programming.
Andy Modell
Cookie Neil
Gail Sachson
For summer 1999, we will install the awning over the courtyard area
Sheila Stewart
Laura Theilen
and add additional landscaping and seating. After determining the usage,
Jake Vickery
we will then replace the grass area with a hard surface for summer 2000
SENIOR BOARD
James Baker
programming.
Bob Camp
Molly Campbell
Maggie DeWolfe
Please feel free to contact me with any questions or
Suzanne Farver
Robert Harth
recommendations. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Joanne Lyon
Julia Marshall
Jill Uris
MEMBER ORGANIZATIONS
Anderson Ranch Arts Center
Aspen Art Museum
Aspen Ballet Company & School
Aspen Choral Society
Aspen Community and Institute Committee
Aspen Community Theatre
Aspen Dance Connection
Aspen Filmfest
Aspen Historical Society
Aspen Institute
Aspen Music Festival and School
Aspen Stage
Aspen Theatre in the Park
Aspen Writers' Foundation
Basalt Gallery
Ca
Crystal
Glass Gallery Cc: Amy Margerum, City Mgr.
DanceAspen Vicki Monge, Bldg. Dept.
Earth Voices
Given Institute of the University of Colorado
GrassRoots Television Network, Inc.
Hill's Aspen Gallery of Photography
International Design Conference in Aspen
Jazz Aspen Snowmass
KAJX, Aspen Public Radio
Living Arts Foundation / Sarah Pletts Dance Theatre
Magidson Fine Art Gallery
Wheeler Associates
Woody Creek Learning Community:
Center for Theatre Arts
Woody Creek Ceramics Studio
Wyly Community Art Center
Perdenich,
ly
Lida
Executive Director
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Linda Gerdenich Celebrating the ARTS for 25 years!
F;TA L, W-70 F
VA45T F,, YATIOM. -
— �,,�,,� 1 s�-� .
,���
/ ... r i � � j r I ` I I I I I p . Ix �• r f. � �i.;jq�•.'
ill
4.-
f9� 1 jig ;
i
�� � l � s� � F r'� * w 4�:'�-Fk�:?M�� f'" f s-'" - � r-' y�•' Js"�1e. '" $'r d
(...� � �•�, ��_ LA
.0
1 J 3
i...a'.C' lit
is 6 / ri G1
/ f : r%Jp �LZ
�j VJ 4 rf S
71�
r
r�
BOX 276
11
R E D B R I C K
rA R T S C E N T E R
`GMU AAsE
GG'NG. ?GAS PaMgt�
R E D B R I C K
A R T S C E N T E R
G L E N N N 1 P P A P O 9 T
,�► A R C H T e C T
P 0 S T 0 f F I C E 8 0 Y 2 7 6
98 AS►EN C0LO1A0O 11611
T 9 7 0 f 2 7 0 6 2 S
A I A F 9 7 0 9 Z 7 0 6 5 d
Red Brick Arts and Recreation Center
Red Brick Courtyard
Cost Analysis
1. LANDSCAPE
a. Sandstone slabs set in sand with grass edging.
1,400.sq.ft. ®$15/sq. _ $21,000.
b. Hedges 100 sq.ft. ® $8/sq.= $800.
C. Vines: Hop's, Halls Honey Suckle, Engleman Ivy
20 ® $12 ea. _ $240.
2. SEATING
a. Fixed benches 6 ® $850 ea. _ $5.100.
3. SUNSHADE
a Fabric 3 ® $780.ea. = $2,340.
b. Cables and installation $2,000.= $2,000.
Subtotal: $31,480_
Less grant money received to date: (11,000.)
Money needed to complete: $20,480.
93
< O ° O w
I
I
I
I
I
I
I U�
I
I
w'
OR
coo IVA 00:00 86/VT/OT
ASCA, 2
b. Community Need - This courtyard expansion will provide great interaction
between artists, arts organizations and the community on an informal basis,
"Lunch with the Arts". Artists will share their creativity and education
opportunities will encourage community interaction. Lunch will provide
another connection for this unique atmosphere. David Laughren from the
Aspen Underground, and Scott Wirkler from In & Out and other restaurants
are interested in serving lunch —"Lunch with the Arts". The location of the
Red Brick is most accessible for community usage. The Arts Council receives
numerous requests to use the community room. The Courtyard will allow
more community usage of the Red Brick.
c. Other Organizations - In a survey to our member organizations (31 to date),
all requested programming opportunities which include, receptions,
demonstrations, children's shows, TV broadcasts, summer arts camps, etc.
Member organizations will host "This Week in the Arts", a preview or behind
the scenes look at their unique programming. Grassroots TV will utilize the
courtyard for taping. The Arts Council hosts "Aspen/Snowmass Arts Scene",
and these programs will be taped in the courtyard to take advantage of the
beautiful mountain scenery. A variety of receptions, artists' demonstrations,
children's exhibitions, etc. would be planned. A nominal fee (to cover
expenses) would be charged for usage to allow us to eventually provide
tables, chairs, sound system, etc. for continued development of the Red Brick
Courtyard.
d. Usage — The number of people utilizing this space is unlimited. The
courtyard would hold approximately 200 people for a reception. Depending
on the organization's usage, numbers of people would vary. The expanded
courtyard will provide a larger outdoor space for community gatherings as
well as serve as a pathway to the various organizations and services. We
can even have our monthly Brown Bags in the courtyard.
e. Budget - Phase 2 — landscaping, seating, $6,140; Phase 3 canopy/tent,
$4340; Phase 4 — entrance reconfiguration $40,000 — (please see Article #4)
Phase 1 funds, $11,100 for a hard surface, were provided by The Aspen
Foundation and individual donors during 1998. In reviewing the Master Plan
approved in 1993, sandstone slabs with grass edging was specified and
approved for the surface. Because of limited funds, the Arts Council planned to
use a concrete type of surface which is less expensive. In preparation for laying
this surface, the contractor discovered some drainage concerns. Since the
construction season is over for this year, we dwel'Iads potto eook ntial aafundst the �tlatlhas1ect
been
and determine the best use of our current as
decided that the best use of the current $11,100 would be to install the
(con't)
ASCA, 3
sunshade, landscaping, and fixed seating using the existing grass
surface. We will then be able to program and use the space during the
summer of 1999, raise additional funds and research replacing the grass with
a suitable and affordable hard surface.
f. Future - Maintenance and management of the courtyard will be the
responsibility of the Arts Council as managers of the Red Brick.
8. Financial information
a. Fiscal year — October 1 — September 30
b. Last fiscal year —(please see Article #5)
c. Current fiscal year — (please see Article #6)
9. 501 c(3) status — (please see Article #7)
(end)
Article #3
-7
,Canopy to cover section of courtyard for outdoor
performances, film sand other activities
.
... .. — .•- tee«. E �.��' ,-,l_'�._—_._._.. _—_— 1
Paved area and' a ce mo: } -
date community gat gs
p-l@ tt Hgs aspen trees and peren-
nials prwde shade and structure to
plaza area
nside•of
_' -_Y_+•-rid•
Common entry point created at Hallam Street
Red Brick Arts and RecreationCenter
Courtyard Proposal
NOi1TM 6AiiY15M STREET
h'
L
mg
i j
m I I \
i
oZ
m � �
oa
Article #4
r
MEMORANDUM
TO: JULIE ANN WOODS, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
FROM.- TIMANDERSON, RECREATION DIRECTOR
DATE: DECEMBER 17, 1998
RE: RED BRICK EXPANSION
Please find attached conceptual drawings of possible Red Brick expansion to the west end
of the building along Garmisch Street. This expansion is recognized as a part of the Red
Brick Master Site Plan and at the request of the neighbors to clean up and define that end
of the facility. Additional drawings are being prepared which will reflect landscaping,
pedestrian traffic flow, and parking to this portion of the building. At this time I am
seeking direction as to whether this addition would be considered an insubstantial
amendment to the facility use or a substantial amendment. I would assume that this
makes a difference in whether this plan needs to be reviewed by P&Z or not? The plan
will definitely be shown to City Council for input, but I don't want to proceed without
knowing whether or not to go before P&Z. Please advise as to how you would like to
handle the approvals of these improvements to the Red Brick.
I WEST FRANCIS STREKT
i
■
I.
of House
I I I �\ tlllltllll�
\\\ \\ �\ 1 It I I I I� I►�� ���
1111 1,11
/ \\ \\\\\ \\\\\\ 1
f
Given Institute
_
__. - �. ..,� d -- - _ - _ . .� � - �r�r�' ` !yam-- . ' � � �� _' � _ . �.. � _ — — - _ _—. '- ..►• „'- _ . _..- • `. I '� \ V — � = � � _ � ` � 1
y
� To
Y
(90
yF —�
F G�sv� qv v`� ST,�/�t✓Ar �,' -.._
N \
I I �/NFd7GtE9J EAlfPe.', A26A /ZtiG7'101�/ ` G✓a�K- I I \ \ \ \ \\
! >'%A8 pAv6M�N7"' .. �fZ ✓ H B /N t - r` � � \ \
n a
1
I
t
J
RED BRICK ARTS &
RECREATION CENTER
'r'ATNGi.tY 6XTENDm7
SEAT WAU-
r7V#t6C 9PAeZ FaIr- ovr eme. o Flagpc
('jATNB�(I1lGS r PE/LFoI�•,uv�Es�
^V
POP
—MAFFIC- eAGlK/n/a• .,PivmP-_jut's �r
(�iturNF PAiTS�•N ftNl7!oiZ
CHA&le- Aw-r'• SdRFAciS
* is
EAST HALLUM STREET
Reside
vd� grUD'r
I
I
l
I
..,�..•__ .. __ I �j(�,.9• 4ANDSToni�
i s 0"r IN 5 A?J V W/
- J Entry i
l 2.0o F Ex*E NDE�
t �� I SNA DS btK$GT GJa;;T�R-�/
L16 Etr'.
c-
A S PSAI SrK i4BT N4r414w Srj
7b g*, S mr,&.V1& AAvO
*".6 tAwA/ e"Arrs•d
fit• A w
Co?"aAtWdozv AU E A"Af,(—
A>-PSq 5,T/Z60-t• sxr,ENVEr>
A(r0 )-017 59ieA _ C4VlZr1f qA-V
iwA v E m rw r/ A►ziu trot L AmigA
firtrom pEv r/V TG 97,mae7'
�i
Residence
[—In
••
i
L-
Residence
-A
19
0
Residence
1
I
i
i
Residence
001/
MASTER PLAN
RED BRICK ARTS AND RECREATION CENTER
A S P E N C O L O R A D O
Landscape Architects: Design Workshop Inc.
Architect Glenn Rappaport
7L�
0 10 20 40
scale nortn
v
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
•6 •0
LOTS A THROUGH I AND LOTS K THROUGH S. TOGETHER WITH AND INCLUDING
A CERTAIN STRIP OF LAND AS AN ALLEY EXTENDING THROUGH OR BETWEEN
SAID LOTS. BLOCK 64. CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN
LOTS E. F. G AND FRACTIONAL LOTS A. B. AND C. BLOCK 71. CITY AND
TOWNSITE OF ASPEN
TOGETHER WITH THE VACATED PORTIONS OF NORTH ASPEN STREET AND THE
ALLEY OF BLOCK 71 LYING ADJACENT TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS
OF LAND. CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN
COUNTY OF PITKIN. STATE OF COLORADO
CITY MON.
qq--�� HORZ. CNTL.
FIRE HYDRANT
ASPEN ARTS AND RECREATION CENTER
P.U.D. PLAN
REBAR NO CAP ( ^Y �� c,VEN (NST(rUTE OF TELE pqT S T NOg,OLOGy FOUND
BOX 978 BLM BRASS
.AP ASPEN TOWNSIT
0o wRO(j CORNER NO. 5
o IRON FE ( / S
l "C NG SCALE
I INCH - 20 FEET
0.
/ s
0 10 20 30 40
DELEC
SWGR. ` l pAVED 39 1
6 T \�
PROPERTY OWNER & APPLICANT
�\
�4 (S !/ / XFMR F<%� CITY OF ASPEN
�% �, �' �s (9 ` / CI O\. 130 S. GALENA ST .
' 7 / 20 2, �/` _LE¢ MTRS T�\ ASPEN. COLORADO 8 1 61 1
S C /23
Z42s _�
27 28 ` / h 25' SEWER EASEMENT `\
/ N BOOK 182 AT PAGE 251
30 31
3
� LOT 4 TRUEMAN NEIGHBORHOOD
N
S � COMMERCIAL PROJECT
7 / 0. 3 / \ GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
9 ( / GRANTED TO THE CITY OF ASPEN s
BY BOOK 359 AT PA* 900
TRASH
/2 / STORAGE "' �6's' \ / 0 .3r
AREA / / / TCONNECTION
r ° I) 6 //9 °
2,9
BRICK SCHOOL N/ 7•4 \ /�
Z O N I N G P U B L/ Qoi. I C I �' / `°'�' .\
`
/ F4�Y; Pb I • /S" V
/ / /1/ / -•..RR / / V y U t.
84
/ '
� / J
0 00,
h I
CONCRE l � e
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL
THIS ASPEN ARTS AND RECREATION CENTER P.U.D. PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND
APPROVED FOR RECORDING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN THIS
DAY OF . 1993 BY ORDINANCE NUMBER RECORDED IN
BOOK AT PAGE OF THE PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS.
SIGNED THIS DAY OF . 1993
ATTEST
MAYOR CITY CLERK
PLANNING AND ZONING APPROVAL
THIS ASPEN ARTS AND RECREATION CENTER P.U.D. PLAN WAS REVIEWED
AND APPROVED FOR RECORDING BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION THIS DAY OF . 1993 BY RESOLUTION NUMBER -
AND RECORDED IN BOOK AT PAGE _ OF THE PITKIN COUNTY RECORDS.
SIGNED THIS DAY OF . 1993.
CHAIRMAN
CITY ENGINEER'S APPROVAL
THIS ASPEN ARTS AND RECREATION CENTER P.U.D. PLAN WAS REVIEWED
AND APPROVED FOR RECORDING BY THE CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT THIS _ DAY OF . 1993.
CITY ENGINEER
SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE
THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS FIELD
SURVEYED DURING FEB. 23 THROUGH 26. 1993 AND IS ACCURATE BASED ON THE
FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN. AND THAT THERE ARE NO DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD
BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS. ENCROACHMENTS. EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN
FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME. EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN OR AS NOTED.
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND APPURTENANCES. AND DOCUMENTS
OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVEYOR ARE EXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS
VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. ALL
EASEMENTS SHOWN IN STEWART TITLE TITLE COMMITMENT ORDER NO. 00018339C4
ARE SHOWN HEREON AND SURVEY IS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRS 1973,
TITLE 38. ARTICLE 51 AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME.
SIGNED THIS DAY OF . 1993
DAVID W. McBRIDE
RLS 16129
CLERK AND RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE
j THIS ASPEN ARTS AND RECREATION CENTER P U.D. PLnu WAS ACCEPTED FOR
I RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY
AT O'CLOCK _.M. THIS _ DAY OF . 1993 IN PLAT
IkT car-C A¢ Or OTIAN NIURER
CLERK AND RECORDER
LEGEND AND NOTES
T
�Fo 0 FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT • 5 REBAR WI�H NO CAP OR AS NOTED
BARN \�, BASIS OF BEARINGS FOUND ROUNDHEADS CL OF ASPEN STREET N14'50'49'E
:ss AS SHOWN
\� 2 TO 4 FEET OF SNOW AND ICE COVERED PROPERTY AT TIME OF SURVEY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN TITLE COMMITMENT DOES NOT INCLUDE VACATED
\ COR 38
ASPEN STREET OR ANY PORTION OF THE ALLEY IN BLOCK 71.
ATA (WEST
1(S256.6') 1959 OFFICIAL MAP OF THE CITY OF ASPEN WAS USED FOR PROPERTY
3�0'.36'
'W LOCATIONS. BOTH ASPEN STREET AND FRANCIS STREET ARE NOTED
) ON THIS MAP AS BEING VACATED AS SHOWN.
SE GLIDDEN 1980 BLM SURVEY AND RESURVEY OF ASPEN TOWNSITE WAS USED IN
HOUSE IN DETERMINING THE LOCATION OF ASPEN TOWNSITE LINE 4-5. CORNER 5
TE CURB l � / l 3
o
43.09 ((-w
4.82.
/
o /
/•� ?* ? PARCEL EXCEPTED IN TITLE
75.30. \ / COMMITMENT SEE IT OF 1PG 606
O.C.D. TO THE CITY OF ASPEN
FOUND DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE BLM FIELD NOTES AND CORNER NO.38 IS
OBLITERATED AND ITS LOCATION WAS DETERMINED WITH THE REFERENCE
TIE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE GLIDDEN HOUSE.
Q SET PROPERTY CORNER NO. 4 REBAR WITH RED PLA. CAP. "ASEI 16129-
SET P-K NAIL SURVEY CONTROL POINT
SURVEY PRECISION IS GREATER THAN 1:10.000
PARKING SPACE AS NUMBERED 9x18
PLAT NOTES
►..I
Aspen
LAND USE TABLE
. , .�.�. �A.
FRONT SETBACK IS REDUCED
TO 4 FOOT AROUND EX I STING
•' �hc ' 69. 73 • ^
A. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS: 10 FEET
B. MAXIMUM HEIGHT (INCLUDING VIEWPLANES): 25 FEET
l
ENTRY AS SHOWN
Wkk
C. MAXIMUM FRONT YARD: 10 FEET (EXCEPT 4 FT. BY GYM ENTRY)
D. MINIMUM REAR YARD: 15 FEET
- '••
E. MINIMUM SIDE YARD: 5 FEET
/79
W
F. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 60 FEET
•46•
G. MINIMUM LOT AREA: 6.000 SOFT.
H. TRASH ACCESS AREA: SEE ABOVE
I. INTERNAL FLOOR AREA RATIO 0.75:1
I N I MUM PERCENT OPEN SPACE: NO REQUIREMENT
J . MINIMUM
PREPARED BY
K. OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: 35 SPACES
I
ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC.
9sA
EXISTING BUILDING SIZES
U
v 210 S. GALENA STREET
@lj
ORIGINAL BRICK SCHOOL 14.000 SO FT.
B
CLASSROOM ADDN 11.240 SO.FT.
o P.O. BOX 2506
$
M�unl$jn
GYM.BSMT.OFF. ADDN. 10.560 SO.FT,
iFOUND
ROUNDHEADS
(�
1 N14'50'49-E 100.0'
ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION
2 n ASPEN. COLO. 81611
V I C I N I T Y MAP
TOTAL SIZE 35.600 SOFT.
CL ASPEN STREET
BASIS OF BEARINGS
BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER You
COR 72
PHONE/FAX (303) 925-3816
S
FIRST DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT. MAY ANY ACTION BASED CITY MONUMENT
CI ENT
UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS
i
FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON-
JOB NO 23049 FEB. 27. 1993
0
r