Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.council.066A-12 RESOLUTION # (Series of 2012) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR EMPLOYEE GENERATION STUDY BETWEEN THE CITY OF ASPEN AND ECONOMIC AND PLANNING SYSTEMS INC AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council a contract for professional services for an employee generation study, between the City of Aspen and Economic and Planning Systems Inc., a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby approves that Contract for professional services for an employee generation study, between the City of Aspen and Economic and Planning Systems Inc., a copy of which is annexed hereto and incorporated herein, and does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 23rd day of July 2012. of Michael C. I eland, Mayor I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held, July 23, 2012. Ka fryn S. Koch, City Clerk The City of Owen CITY OF ASPEN STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT - 2009 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES City of Aspen Project No.: 2012-075. AGREEMENT made as of 23rd day of July,in the year 20 12. BETWEEN the City: Contract Amount: The City of Aspen c/o Community Development 130 South Galena Street Total: $25,080.00 Aspen,Colorado 81611 Phone: (970)920-5055 If this Agreement requires the City to pay And the Professional: an amount of money in excess of $25,000.00 it shall not be deemed valid Economic and Planning Systems Inc. until it has been approved by the City Council of the City of Aspen. c/o David Schwartz 730 17th Street City Council Approval: Suite 630 Phone: 303-623-3557 Date: July 23, 2012 Resolution No.: For the Following Project: Employee Generation Study Exhibits appended and made a part of this Agreement: Exhibit A: Scope of Work. Exhibit B: Hourly Fee Schedule. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 1 Section 4 — Timeline The City and Professional agree as set forth below. 1. Scope of Work. Professional shall perform in a competent and professional manner the Scope of Work as set forth at Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. 2. Completion. Professional shall commence Work immediately upon receipt of a written Notice to Proceed from the City and complete all phases of the Scope of Work as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the Work in a timely manner. The parties anticipate that all Work pursuant to this Agreement shall be completed no later than December 1, 2012. Upon request of the City, Professional shall submit, for the City's approval, a schedule for the performance of Professional's services which shall be adjusted as required as the project proceeds, and which shall include allowances for periods of time required by the City's project engineer for review and approval of submissions and for approvals of authorities having jurisdiction over the project. This schedule, when approved by the City, shall not, except for reasonable cause,be exceeded by the Professional. 3. Payment. In consideration of the work performed, City shall pay Professional on a time and expense basis for all work performed. The hourly rates for work performed by Professional shall not exceed those hourly rates set forth at Exhibit B appended hereto. Except as otherwise mutually agreed to by the parties the payments made to Professional shall not initially exceed the amount set forth above. Professional shall submit, in timely fashion, invoices for work performed. The City shall review such invoices and, if they are considered incorrect or untimely,the City shall review the matter with Professional within ten days from receipt of the Professional's bill. 4. Non-Assignability. Both parties recognize that this Agreement is one for personal services and cannot be transferred, assigned, or sublet by either party without prior written consent of the other. Sub-Contracting, if authorized, shall not relieve the Professional of any of the responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement. Professional shall be and remain solely responsible to the City for the acts, errors, omissions or neglect of any subcontractors' officers, agents and employees, each of whom shall, for this purpose be deemed to be an agent or employee of the Professional to the extent of the subcontract. The City shall not be obligated to pay or be liable for payment of any sums due which may be due to any sub-contractor. 5. Termination of Procurement. The sale contemplated by this Agreement may be canceled by the City prior to acceptance by the City whenever for any reason and in its sole discretion the City shall determine that such cancellation is in its best interests and convenience. 6. Termination of Professional Services. The Professional or the City may terminate the Professional Services component of this Agreement, without specifying the reason therefor, by giving notice, in writing, addressed to the other party, specifying the effective date of the termination. No fees shall be earned after the effective date of the termination. Upon any termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs,reports or other material prepared by the Professional pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of the City. Notwithstanding the above, Professional shall not be relieved of any liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by the Professional, and the City may withhold any payments to the Professional for the purposes of set-off until such time as the exact amount of damages due the City from the Professional may be determined. 7. Independent Contractor Status. It is expressly acknowledged and understood by the parties that nothing contained in this agreement shall result in, or be construed as establishing an employment relationship. Professional shall be, and shall perform as, an independent Contractor who agrees to use his or her best efforts to provide the said services on behalf of the City. No agent, employee, or servant of Professional shall be, or shall be deemed to be, the employee, agent or servant of the City. City is interested only in the results obtained under this contract. The manner and means of conducting the work are under the sole control of Professional. None of the benefits provided by City to its employees including,but not limited to, workers'compensation insurance and unemployment insurance, are available from City to the employees, agents or servants of Professional. Professional shall be solely and entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of Professional's agents, employees, servants and subcontractors during the performance of this contract. Professional shall indemnify City against all liability and loss in connection with, and shall assume full responsibility for payment of all federal, state and local taxes or contributions imposed or required under unemployment insurance, social security and income tax law, with respect to Professional and/or Professional's employees engaged in the performance of the services agreed to herein. 8. Indemnification. Professional agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, insurers, and self-insurance pool, from and against all liability, claims, and demands, on account of injury, loss, or damage, including without limitation claims arising from bodily injury, personal injury, sickness, disease, death, property loss or damage, or any other loss of any kind whatsoever,which arise out of or are in any manner connected with this contract, if such injury, loss, or damage is caused in whole or in part by, or is claimed to be caused in whole or in part by, the act, omission, error, professional error, mistake, negligence, or other fault of the Professional, any subcontractor of the Professional, or any officer, employee, representative, or agent of the Professional or of any subcontractor of the Professional, or which arises out of any workmen's compensation claim of any employee of the Professional or of any employee of any subcontractor of the Professional. The Professional agrees to investigate, handle, respond to, and to provide defense for and defend against, any such liability, claims or demands at the sole expense of the Professional, or at the option of the City, agrees to pay the City or reimburse the City for the defense costs incurred by the City in connection with, any such liability, claims, or demands. If it is determined by the final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction that such injury, loss, or damage was caused in whole or in part by the act, omission, or other fault of the City, its officers, or its employees, the City shall reimburse the Professional for the portion of the judgment attributable to such act, omission, or other fault of the City, its officers, or employees. 9. Professional's Insurance. (a) Professional agrees to procure and maintain, at its own expense, a policy or policies of insurance sufficient to insure against all liability, claims, demands, and other obligations assumed by the Professional pursuant to Section 8 above. Such insurance shall be in addition to any other insurance requirements imposed by this contract or by law. The Professional shall not be relieved of any liability, claims, demands, or other obligations assumed pursuant to Section 8 above by reason of its failure to procure or maintain insurance, or by reason of its failure to procure or maintain insurance in sufficient amounts, duration,or types. (b) Professional shall procure and maintain, and shall cause any subcontractor of the Professional to procure and maintain, the minimum insurance coverages listed below. Such coverages shall be procured and maintained with forms and insurance acceptable to the City. All coverages shall be continuously maintained to cover all liability, claims, demands, and other obligations assumed by the Professional pursuant to Section 8 above. In the case of any claims-made policy, the necessary retroactive dates and extended reporting periods shall be procured to maintain such continuous coverage. (i) Workers' Compensation insurance to cover obligations imposed by applicable laws for any employee engaged in the performance of work under this contract, and Employers' Liability insurance with minimum limits of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000.00) for each accident, FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000.00) disease - policy limit, and FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000.00) disease - each employee. Evidence of qualified self-insured status may be substituted for the Workers'Compensation requirements of this paragraph. (ii) Commercial General Liability insurance with minimum combined single limits of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) each occurrence and ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) aggregate. The policy shall be applicable to all premises and operations. The policy shall include coverage for bodily injury, broad form property damage (including completed operations), personal injury (including coverage for contractual and employee acts), blanket contractual, independent contractors, products, and completed operations. The policy shall contain a severability of interests provision. (iii) Comprehensive Automobile Liability insurance with minimum combined single limits for bodily injury and property damage of not less than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) each occurrence and ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.00) aggregate with respect to each Professional's owned, hired and non- owned vehicles assigned to or used in performance of the Scope of Work. The policy shall contain a severability of interests provision. If the Professional has no owned automobiles, the requirements of this Section shall be met by each employee of the Professional providing services to the City under this contract. (iv) Professional Liability insurance with the minimum limits of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) each claim and ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) aggregate. (c) The policy or policies required above shall be endorsed to include the City and the City's officers and employees as additional insureds. Every policy required above shall be primary insurance, and any insurance carried by the City, its officers or employees, or carried by or provided through any insurance pool of the City, shall be excess and not contributory insurance to that provided by Professional. No additional insured endorsement to the policy required above shall contain any exclusion for bodily injury or property damage arising from completed operations. The Professional shall be solely responsible for any deductible losses under any policy required above. (d) The certificate of insurance provided to the City shall be completed by the Professional's insurance agent as evidence that policies providing the required coverages, conditions, and minimum limits are in full force and effect, and shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of the contract. No other form of certificate shall be used. The certificate shall identify this contract and shall provide that the coverages afforded under the policies shall not be canceled, terminated or materially changed until at least thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to the City. (e) Failure on the part of the Professional to procure or maintain policies providing the required coverages, conditions, and minimum limits shall constitute a material breach of contract upon which City may immediately terminate this contract, or at its discretion City may procure or renew any such policy or any extended reporting period thereto and may pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, and all monies so paid by City shall be repaid by Professional to City upon demand, or City may offset the cost of the premiums against monies due to Professional from City. (f) City reserves the right to request and receive a certified copy of any policy and any endorsement thereto. (g) The parties hereto understand and agree that City is relying on, and does not waive or intend to waive by any provision of this contract, the monetary limitations (presently $150,000.00 per person and $600,000 per occurrence) or any other rights, immunities, and protections provided by the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, Section 24-10-101 et seq., C.R.S., as from time to time amended, or otherwise available to City, its officers, or its employees. 10. City's Insurance. The parties hereto understand that the City is a member of the Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA) and as such participates in the CIRSA Proper- ty/Casualty Pool. Copies of the CIRSA policies and manual are kept at the City of Aspen Risk Management Department and are available to Professional for inspection during normal business hours. City makes no representations whatsoever with respect to specific coverages offered by CIRSA. City shall provide Professional reasonable notice of any changes in its membership or participation in CIRSA. 11. Completeness of Agreement. It is expressly agreed that this agreement contains the entire undertaking of the parties relevant to the subject matter thereof and there are no verbal or written representations, agreements, warranties or promises pertaining to the project matter thereof not expressly incorporated in this writing. 12. Notice. Any written notices as called for herein may be hand delivered or mailed by certified mail return receipt requested to the respective persons and/or addresses listed above. 13. Non-Discrimination. No discrimination because of race, color, creed, sex, marital status, affectional or sexual orientation, family responsibility, national origin, ancestry, handicap, or religion shall be made in the employment of persons to perform services under this contract. Professional agrees to meet all of the requirements of City's municipal code, Section 13-98, pertaining to non-discrimination in employment. 14. Waiver. The waiver by the City of any term, covenant, or condition hereof shall not operate as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term. No term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement can be waived except by the written consent of the City, and forbearance or indulgence by the City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of any term, covenant, or condition to be performed by Professional to which the same may apply and, until complete performance by Professional of said term, covenant or condition, the City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to it under this Agreement or by law despite any such forbearance or indulgence. 15. Execution of Agreement by City. This Agreement shall be binding upon all parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, this Agreement shall not be binding upon the City unless duly executed by the Mayor of the City of Aspen (or a duly authorized official in his absence) following a Motion or Resolution of the Council of the City of Aspen authorizing the Mayor (or a duly authorized official in his absence)to execute the same. 16. Illegal Aliens—CRS 8-17.5-101 & 24-76.5-101. (a) Purpose. During the 2006 Colorado legislative session, the Legislature passed House Bills 06-1343 (subsequently amended by HB 07-1073) and 06-1023 that added new statutes relating to the employment of and contracting with illegal aliens. These new laws prohibit all state agencies and political subdivisions, including the City of Aspen, from knowingly hiring an illegal alien to perform work under a contract, or to knowingly contract with a subcontractor who knowingly hires with an illegal alien to perform work under the contract. The new laws also require that all contracts for services include certain specific language as set forth in the statutes. The following terms and conditions have been designed to comply with the requirements of this new law. (b) Definitions. The following terms are defined in the new law and by this reference are incorporated herein and in any contract for services entered into with the City of Aspen. "Basic Pilot Program" means the basic pilot employment verification program created in Public Law 208, 104th Congress, as amended, and expanded in Public Law 156, 108th Congress, as amended, that is administered by the United States Department of Homeland Security. "Public Contract for Services"means this Agreement. "Services" means the furnishing of labor, time, or effort by a Contractor or a subcontractor not involving the delivery of a specific end product other than reports that are merely incidental to the required performance. (c) By signing this document, Professional certifies and represents that at this time: (i) Professional shall confirm the employment eligibility of all employees who are newly hired for employment in the United States; and (ii) Professional has participated or attempted to participate in the Basic Pilot Program in order to verify that new employees are not employ illegal aliens. (d) Professional hereby confirms that: (i) Professional shall not knowingly employ or contract new employees without confirming the employment eligibility of all such employees hired for employment in the United States under the Public Contract for Services. (ii) Professional shall not enter into a contract with a subcontractor that fails to confirm to the Professional that the subcontractor shall not knowingly hire new employees without confirming their employment eligibility for employment in the United States under the Public Contract for Services. (iii) Professional has verified or has attempted to verify through participation in the Federal Basic Pilot Program that Professional does not employ any new employees who are not eligible for employment in the United States; and if Professional has not been accepted into the Federal Basic Pilot Program prior to entering into the Public Contract for Services, Professional shall forthwith apply to participate in the Federal Basic Pilot Program and shall in writing verify such application within five (5) days of the date of the Public Contract. Professional shall continue to apply to participate in the Federal Basic Pilot Program and shall in writing verify same every three (3) calendar months thereafter, until Professional is accepted or the public contract for services has been completed, whichever is earlier. The requirements of this section shall not be required or effective if the Federal Basic Pilot Program is discontinued. (iv) Professional shall not use the Basic Pilot Program procedures to undertake pre-employment screening of job applicants while the Public Contract for Services is being performed. (v) If Professional obtains actual knowledge that a subcontractor performing work under the Public Contract for Services knowingly employs or contracts with a new employee who is an illegal alien, Professional shall: (1) Notify such subcontractor and the City of Aspen within three days that Professional has actual knowledge that the subcontractor has newly employed or contracted with an illegal alien; and (2) Terminate the subcontract with the subcontractor if within three days of receiving the notice required pursuant to this section the subcontractor does not cease employing or contracting with the new employee who is an illegal alien; except that Professional shall not terminate the Public Contract for Services with the subcontractor if during such three days the subcontractor provides information to establish that the subcontractor has not knowingly employed or contracted with an illegal alien. (vi) Professional shall comply with any reasonable request by the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment made in the course of an investigation that the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment undertakes or is undertaking pursuant to the authority established in Subsection 8-17.5-102 (5), C.R.S. (vii) If Professional violates any provision of the Public Contract for Services pertaining to the duties imposed by Subsection 8-17.5-102, C.R.S. the City of Aspen may terminate the Public Contract for Services. If the Public Contract for Services is so terminated, Contractor shall be liable for actual and consequential damages to the City of Aspen arising out of Professional's violation of Subsection 8-17.5-102, C.R.S. (ix) If Professional operates as a sole proprietor, Professional hereby swears or affirms under penalty of perjury that the Professional (1) is a citizen of the United States or otherwise lawfully present in the United States pursuant to federal law, (2) shall comply with the provisions of CRS 24-76.5-101 et seq., and (3) shall produce one of the forms of identification required by CRS 24-76.5-103 prior to the effective date of this Agreement. 16. Warranties Against Contingent Fees, Gratuities, Kickbacks and Conflicts of Interest. (a) Professional warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this Contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by the Professional for the purpose of securing business. (b) Professional agrees not to give any employee of the City a gratuity or any offer of employment in connection with any decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, preparation of any part of a program requirement or a purchase request, influencing the content of any specification or procurement standard, rendering advice, investigation, auditing, or in any other advisory capacity in any proceeding or application, request for ruling, determination, claim or controversy, or other particular matter, pertaining to this Agreement, or to any solicitation or proposal therefore. (c) Professional represents that no official, officer, employee or representative of the City during the term of this Agreement has or one (1) year thereafter shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof, except those that may have been disclosed at the time City Council approved the execution of this Agreement. (d) In addition to other remedies it may have for breach of the prohibitions against contingent fees, gratuities, kickbacks and conflict of interest, the City shall have the right to: 1. Cancel this Purchase Agreement without any liability by the City; 2. Debar or suspend the offending parties from being a Professional, contractor or subcontractor under City contracts; 3. Deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the value of anything transferred or received by the Professional; and 4. Recover such value from the offending parties. 17. Fund Availability. Financial obligations of the City payable after the current fiscal year are contingent upon funds for that purpose being appropriated, budgeted and otherwise made available. If this Agreement contemplates the City utilizing state or federal funds to meet its obligations herein, this Agreement shall be contingent upon the availability of those funds for payment pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 18. General Terms. (a) It is agreed that neither this Agreement nor any of its terms, provisions, conditions, representations or covenants can be modified, changed, terminated or amended, waived, superseded or extended except by appropriate written instrument fully executed by the parties. (b) If any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable it shall not affect or impair the validity, legality or enforceability of any other provision. (c) The parties acknowledge and understand that there are no conditions or limitations to this understanding except those as contained herein at the time of the execution hereof and that after execution no alteration, change or modification shall be made except upon a writing signed by the parties. (d) This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado as from time to time in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, or caused to be executed by their duly authorized officials, this Agreement in three copies each of which shall be deemed an original on the date first written above. CITY : .1• SP N, COLORADO: PROFESS ONAL: �j / /I/4„..“....„, , , ;,� f �r ,�f � [Signature] �` 11.[ i!r! w' . By: -k Xc e..2 i Ci,- BY: „..-4,.-4,.- (��H/¢Jr.,, [Name] [Name] Title: -1-Tie Title: , , , r„ • _ ,— Date: 7'y'y'"(j" Date: 7 l"a 7 3_ Approved as to form: — :—�°-= ity Attorney's Office EXHIBIT A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Scope of Work Task 1: Project Initiation EPS staff will be available for either an in-person meeting or conference call in advance of the project initiation. This will allow us to review and refine the scope to meet the needs and the City's priorities. We will also identify when the survey can be conducted, coordinating both EPS and Aspen staff schedules. In anticipation of the following tasks, we will collect and review business license records and match them against the 2002 previous effort to ensure consistency and increase the likelihood of a more robust study and enable comparisons by type and use. Task 2: Business Survey Design and Methodology Following the initial meeting and before collecting the business surveys, EPS will work with City staff to reevaluate the business type categories and zone district from the 2002 study. This will benefit the effort to ensure that the response data sample is sufficient statistically to determine new employment generation rates. As such, the major component of this task is to schedule a full-day trip to conduct the business survey. Similar to the earlier collection methodology, EPS and/or Aspen staff will walk from business to business over the course of the day collecting information, such as: • Type of business; • Floor level; • Location within Aspen; • Zone District; • Length of operation (longevity in Aspen); • Size of space; • Staffing by season, hours per week, and FT vs. PT; • Effects of housing availability on employment; • Staffing demand volatility (i.e. needs under varying market conditions); and • Future staffing plans. This core of questions will allow us to replicate the data collected in the previous study. The analysis efforts in the following task, however, will facilitate a more robust and refined understanding of the employment generation rates by zone by business type. EPS and RRC will ensure, working with staff to identify targeted areas and business types, that the number of survey responses collected will also result in a sample size evenly distributed among business categories and zone districts. To achieve budget and timing efficiencies, we intend to utilize City staff in the collection of responses for the business survey. Task 3: Analysis and Geocoding The primary effort of this task is to analyze the response data collected through the business survey. For comparison purposes, EPS will incorporate the data collected in the 2002 study into a larger dataset for analysis. The secondary effort of the analysis will be to assess the trending of these employment levels using the Department of Labor's Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) micro data. EPS will to geocode these data, which we already have through the second quarter of 2011 from a recent project with the City of Aspen. While the QCEW data are a secondary and independent source, they contain attributes such as business/establishment name, address, and quarterly employment counts, which can be used to cross-reference the collected survey data. EPS will combine both primary (business survey) and secondary(QCEW) data sets into GIS by business type and by zone districts. The result of this effort will be an examination of employment generation rates from 2002 to 2012, and an illustration of how those rates have fluctuated over time. One of the objectives is to provide both a graphic and tabular representation of this work for use in the GMQS. Another objective is to facilitate the larger planning and policy-level dialogue about whether these current conditions represent a departure from historic norms, helping to define a"new normal". Task 4: Comparable Community Practices Also to facilitate the larger discussion among planners, other City and elected officials, a general overview of other communities' employee generation rates and mitigation levels may be valuable. Using RRC's bank of business survey response data from comparable resort communities in Colorado, we will provide Aspen with a summary of rates from other resorts, as well as provide addition information on each of these areas' implementation levels. Task 5: Report and Presentations The final deliverable will be a report summarizing the methodology and approach to implementing the survey, to ensure the consistency of future surveying efforts, the analysis of survey data, maps and tables illustrating the trends in employment generation rates by business category and zone district, as well as a summary of rates and mitigation levels in other resort communities. As included in the previous study, EPS will provide a recap and reexamination of the administrative aspects of the program in the interest of ensuring the discussion considers the multiple options that exist in designing a successful mitigation program. The report will summarize the salient points of each section into several discussions. Also as indicated in the RFP, the deliverables will be in the software formats identified (i.e. MS Word, Adobe Acrobat, Excel, etc.). EPS will also provide ArcGIS shapefiles generated from this effort. • Schedule EPS will complete the scope of work above in approximately five months. As indicated in the RFP, the City anticipates this project being completed within 2012. As such, this is a draft schedule, and if necessary to accommodate the City, we can move forward various elements of the project to achieve a quicker project completion. Figure 1 Project Schedule Aspen Employee Generation Study July August September October November Project Initiation Business Survey Comparable Presentation Final Report *Review scope, (Cont'd) Community •Meeting with staff and (Cont'd) methodology,timing, •Prxess continues Research possibre presentation ,Revision feedbacv and prioriries •Follow-u f',Kena torte officials aMJor Pi rY •Select on oiother elected officials •Finalo.ation otter. common tles •Submittal f f Analysis& Geocoding Draft Report 1 Business Survey •Aralysls of survey data •Atslmitationof I mai Report I, •E➢S trip td Aspen *Analysis and synthesis findings orporation of of MEW data .Consideration of *Compilation of data nments for revision *Analysis In GS mitigation levels and nctf-a:lrn I; *Development of implemention op Employment Genaratton Rates •Possible meeting with ,t 0 city staff - EXHIBIT B PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EPS will to complete the project within the timeframe identified above and for a budget not to exceed $25,080. If the City decides to purchase updated QCEW data, it would represent an additional cost to the City. EPS currently has data through 2nd quarter 2011, and data is available through the 4th quarter 2011. Table 1 Project Budget Aspen Employee Generation Study EPS Staff RRC Staff Principal Senior Production/ Principal Primary in Charge Associate Research in Charge Analyst EPS RRC Total Knudtsen Schwartz McDaniel Cares Morzel Billing Rate $210 $140 $80 $210 $65 Labor Costs Task 1:Project Initiation 2 16 0 0 0 $2,660 $0 $2,660 Task 2:Business Suney 4 24 0 4 10 $4,200 $1,490 $5,690 Task 3:Analysis and Geocoding 0 12 16 0 16 $2,960 $1,040 $4,000 Task 4:Comparable Communities 2 4 0 8 10 $980 $2,330 $3,310 Task 5:Report and Presentation 8 30 6 6 0 $6,360 $1,260 $7,620 Subtotal 16 86 22 18 36 $17,160 $6,120 $23,280 as%of Total Staff Hours 9% 48% 12% 10% 20% Total Staff Hours 124 54 178 Direct Costs Trawl $1,200 $600 $1,800 Subtotal $1,200 $600 $1,800 Total Project Cost $18,360 $6,720 $25,080 Agreement Professional Services Page 0 /it b June 22, 2012 Rebecca Hodgson �/r rf Purchasing City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Subject: Employee Generation Study; EPS #123053 Dear Ms. Hodgson: EPS is pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional services for an Employee Generation Study for the City of Aspen. EPS has extensive experience working for the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, and I"hc h`<nnvnricN «J I uul I'.'e other surrounding Roaring Fork Valley municipalities and counties. We are very interested in working with Community Development Department to assist in the update of the City's housing mitigation program. (e EPS is a full-service economic consulting firm with 40 professional staff and offices in Denver, Colorado; Berkeley, Los Angeles, and Sacramento, California. Founded in 1983, EPS has a broad-based practice in market analysis, real estate and land use economics, and land use policy. The firm has worked with a wide range of public and private clients throughout the nation and has established a reputation for both rigor and creativity. The EPS team includes RRC Associates. EPS and RRC have worked together for more than 20 years on many projects that integrate survey results and market analysis. Two of the major strengths of the EPS Team include: Depth of Technical Experience - EPS has completed numerous city, county, and regional housing demand studies, addressing market and affordability issues, perception issues, revitalization, redevelopment, and community development needs. With a broad-based practice in comprehensive planning, housing market studies to balance public and private forces, as well as the development of sustainability planning and analysis tools, EPS brings the experience to translate data and analysis into actionable strategy and policy for long term community planning initiatives. Economic&Planning Systems,Inc. 730 17th Street, Suite 630 Denver, CO 80202-3511 Survey Expertise - RRC Associates, a member of the STR family of 3036233557tei companies, has a depth of survey experience that is unsurpassed. RRC 303 623 9049 fax has completed hundreds of surveys quantifying housing and market issues. With its broad practice of assessing communities' needs, Berkeley Denver particularly in resort communities in Colorado, RRC brings innovative Los Angeles ideas and effective tools for addressing the City's needs. Sacramento www.epsys.com Ms. Rebecca Hodgson June 21, 2012 Page 2 The EPS Team will include Andy Knudtsen, David Schwartz, and Annalisa McDaniel of EPS; and Chris Cares and Tim Morzel of RRC. We are committed to completing the scope of work included in the proposal and have the requisite skills necessary to address all the issues identified in the RFP. We look forward to this opportunity to work with the City of Aspen on this important project. Per the City's request, our proposal is printed on 30% recycled and FSC-certified paper and submitted in a folder that contains 50% recycled content, 30% post-consumer material. Sincerely, ECONOMIC&PLANNING SYSTEMS, INC. nor.,e Andrew M. Knudtsen Principal 123053_plet.doc SECTION 1 — INTRODUCTION Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) is a land economics consulting firm 0 9 experienced in the full spectrum of services related to real estate development, the financing of public infrastructure and government services, land use and conservation planning, and government organization. EPS was founded on the principle that real estate development and land use- related public policy should be built on realistic assessment of market forces and economic trends, feasible implementation measures, and recognition of public policy objectives, including provisions for required public facilities and services. The firms' areas of expertise are as follows: • Real Estate Market and Feasibility Analysis • Land Use Planning and Growth • Public Finance Management • Fiscal and Economic Impact Analysis • Open Space and Resource Conservation • Reuse, Revitalization, and Redevelopment • Government Organization • Housing Development Feasibility and Policy • Transportation Planning and Analysis • Regional Economics and Industry Analysis • Asset Valuation and Repositioning Since 1983 EPS has provided consulting services to hundreds of public- and private-sector clients in Colorado and throughout the United States. EPS is located in Denver, Colorado, and Berkeley, Los Angeles, and Sacramento, California. EPS clients include cities, counties, special districts, education and other non-profit institutions, multi-jurisdictional authorities, property owners, developers, financial institutions, and land use attorneys. The professional staff of 40 includes specialists in public finance, real estate development, land use and transportation planning, government organization, and computer applications. The firm excels in preparing concise analyses that disclose risks and impacts, support decision making, and provide solutions to real estate development and land use-related problems. EPS Project Awards American Society of Landscape Architects, "Honor Award" 2008, Fiscal and Economic Analysis for Cattle Creek Crossing, Lower Roaring Fork Valley (Garfield County), Colorado American Institute of Architects "Excellence in Design" 1998, Stapleton Development Plan, Denver, Colorado APA Sacramento Valley Section of the California Chapter "Certificate of Merit for Comprehensive Planning" 1990, Southern Pacific Railyards Specific Plan, Sacramento, California APA California Chapter"Award of Merit for Planning Implementation" - Sonoma County 2007- 2014 Housing Element, Sonoma County, California APA California Chapter "Comprehensive Planning Award Large Jurisdiction" 2009, City of Sacramento General Plan Update 2030, Sacramento, California Economic&Planning Systems, Inc. 3 Section 1 -Introduction Aspen Employee Generation Study June 21, 2012 APA National Planning Awards, "Outstanding Planning Award Special Citation for Comprehensive Planning in a Large Jurisdiction" 1996, Stapleton Redevelopment Plan, Denver, Colorado Congress for the New Urbanism "Award of Excellence" 2001, Robert Mueller Municipal Airport Reuse Plan, Austin Texas FTA/FHWA/APA "Transportation Planning Excellence Award" 2004, Valley Metro Rail Station Development Opportunities and Strategies, Phoenix, Arizona Local Government Commission, American Institute of Architects, California Chapter of APA, and Bank of America, "Awahnee Award of Honor" 2002, Hayward Cannery Area Design Plan, Hayward, California Local Government Commission of California, "Certificate of Recognition" 2008 to James Musbach, Coyote Valley Specific Plan, San Jose,California Southern California Association of Governments' "Visionary Planning for Mobility Award" 2008, Rialto Downtown Vision and Strategic Plan: Market and Financial Analysis for Downtown Revitalization, Rialto, California Economic& Planning Systems, Inc. 4 Section 1 -Introduction SECTION 2 - QUALIFICATIONS Consulting Team Economic & Planning Systems (EPS) and RRC Associates, an STR Company, are pleased to team together for this project with the City of Aspen. We have collaborated on numerous projects in the last 10 years to successfully provide communities in the state of Colorado and outside with actionable housing-related studies, survey efforts, and policy tools. • Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS): As the project team lead, provides a broad range of services related to housing studies, in addition to our extensive experience in market analysis, land use planning, and public finance. These complementary areas of practice inform our approach and understanding of affordable housing needs beyond the basic issues. As shown in the team diagram, Figure 1, the staffing from EPS for this project will be Andrew Knudtsen, Principal; David Schwartz, Senior Associate; and Annalisa McDaniel, Research Analyst. • RRC Associates, an STR Company (RRC): RRC brings extensive experience in the use of housing-oriented surveys and in the use of proper sampling techniques to ensure the most robust response, including those with substantial student populations. RRC understands the range of economic and demographic issues pertaining to housing and brings experience surveying businesses using a variety of techniques. Staffing from RRC will be Chris Cares, Managing Principal; and Tim Morzel, Research Analyst. Economic&Planning Systems, Inc. 5 Section 2 - Qualifications Aspen Employee Generation Study June 21, 2012 Figure 1 II Organization Chart Aspen Employee Generation Study City of Aspen I __ = I Primary Contact/Project Manager I I I I David Schwartz I I Senior Associate � I Economic&Planning Systems I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I...... ..., (0, RRC I ASSOCIATES � Lead Consultant: I 0 I Methodology, I A Data Analysis, Subcontractor: I I Policy, Implementation Levels, Survey Design,Tabulation,and I I Comparable Community Stats I and Mitigation Rates I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I Andrew Knudtsen David Schwartz Annalisa McDaniel Chris Cares Tim Morzel I I I 1 Principal Senior Associate Research Assistant Managing Director Research Analyst I 1 I I 1\ /I The (6 Team 0 Economic& Planning Systems, Inc. 6 Section 2 - Qualifications Aspen Employee Generation Study June 21, 2012 Project Roles Each EPS Team member brings a depth of experience assessing housing-related issues for public sector clients in a variety of geographies, and particularly in mountain resort economies. The City of Aspen will benefit from the historical perspective that each team member brings to this Employee Generation Study, as well as the perspective of having collaborating previously on not only the 2002 study, but many other survey-based studies and policy planning documents. The general roles and responsibilities of each EPS Team member are described below: • Andrew Knudtsen, Principal (EPS): Having worked on the 2002 study, Andy will provide oversight for this project to ensure it maintains consistency with the methodology of the previous work. • David Schwartz, Senior Associate (EPS): David will serve as the primary contact for the project, coordinating the efforts of the team, project pacing, schedule, billing, and generally ensuring that the work completed maintains the rigor of the previous study and is enhanced for the most robust effort possible. • Annalisa McDaniel, Research Analyst (EPS): Annalisa will perform many of the data analysis functions and geo-coding needs of the project. • Chris Cares, Managing Principal (RRC): Also having worked on the 2002 study, Chris will provide additional oversight for this project to ensure that the data collected maintains the statistical integrity of data collected previously. Chris will also ensure that the analysis of comparable resort community mitigation practices is relevant. • Tim Morzel, Research Analyst (RRC): Tim will complete the analytical tasks associated with providing comparable community statistics, contributing to the distribution and tabulation of the survey. Resumes The following pages consist of résumés for each of the staff contributing to this project. Their individual qualifications, education, and brief descriptions of similar experience are included. Economic&Planning Systems, Inc. 7 Section 2 - Qualifications