HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.rz.Christopher/Ulrych.45-80 No. t151)
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
' City of Aspen
1. DATE SUBMITTED: gli�pp STAFF: So ray Vint
2. APPLICANT: Fronk (MriSfioplier UrtICIA
i3bx N 9
3. REPRESENTATIVE: Frwik Chrt opher -8754
4. PROJECT NAME: Chrls pkY J()(rlJdA (runt
5. LOCATION: WS I Z 15 RA`-I- i l 1P161,1 t q idNrSly
Of A
6. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
Rezoning Subdivision Stream Margin '
P.U.D. Exception 8040 Greenline
Special Review Exemption View Plane
Growth Management 70:30 Conditional Use
HPC Residential Bonus Other
7. REFERRALS:
Attorney ,)1( Sanitation District School District
)( Engineering Dept. Fire Marshal Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
)( Housing Parks State Highway Dept.
Water Holy Cross Electric Other
City Electric Mountain Bell
8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:
I is / 'Al 1
avt,ta c_kaw Lih_
.
9. DISPOSITIION: i P & Z I Approved Denied Date i\ - A , �f -;'
Q-A L
– W o..._L 4 A.� `:, ti,,pJ -A J \-+-� A— e X .
w
Council .1 Approved Denied `, Date ,.O '-'\ . '\to
10. ROU ING:
Attorney ui lding Engineering Other
•
i
r
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Aspen City Council
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: Christopher/Ulrych Rezoning, Public Hearing
DATE: October 30, 1980 November 18, 198 /� -
APPROVED AS TO FORM FOR CITY COUNCIL: 1( g = .'
Pursuant to Section 24-11.5 of the Municip. ode, Frank C' stopher and
Andre Ulrych are requesting rezoning of L% 1, 2, and 3, ock 4, Lakeview
Addition, from R-15, Mandatory PUD, to Nt eighborhood I, mercial . Their
property totals approximately 10,280 squ�. 'e feet and is located on the north
side of Puppy Smith Street behind the new post office. Surrounding land
uses include a municipal electrical substation, located across the street;
the post office and Trueman Center to the south; the Aspen Sanitation Plant;
the Mill Street Venture to the east; and Hallam Lake and the Aspen Center for
Environmental Studies to the west. A single family residence is located on
Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, near the end of Puppy Smith Street. The entire
Lakeview Addition is zoned R-15, PUD, while the Trueman Center SPA's under-
lying zoning is NC and S/C/I. The Sanitation Plant is zoned Public, and
the Hallam Lake and the Roaring Fork River areas are zoned AF-1 and Park,
respectively.
As the attached letter indicates, the applicants wish to construct a three
level structure of approximately 10,000 square feet, which would contain
four employee units on the ground floor, various office spaces on the second
level , and two free-market condominiums on the top floor. They contend that
the City's approval and the subsequent completion of the Trueman Center,
post office and Mill Street Venture, in conjunction with the construction
of the electrical substation, have impacted and changed the character of the
area to such an extent as to render their property unsuitable for residential
development.
The Planning Office has reviewed the applicants' request and offers the fol-
lowing comments:
1. None of the proposed uses outlined in the attached letter are per-
mitted by right in the NC zone district. Business and professional
offices and accessory dwelling units, however, are designated as
conditional uses subject to P & Z approval .
2. Sufficient NC zones currently exist in the area, and the community
at large, to provide for neighborhood-oriented convenience estab-
lishments designed to serve the trade and service needs of the
resident population. Similarly, more than ample office zoning is
available throughout Aspen to accommodate additional business or
professional office demand. A shortage, however, does exist within
the S/C/I zone district, a zoning category intended to allow for
the use of land for limited commercial and industrial purposes,
e.g. , electrical and plumbing service shops, builders' supply, ware-
housing and storage, etc.
3. The rezoning of any additional acreage outside the CC and C-1 zone
districts for commercial use will further increase the potential
for commercial development outside of Growth Management controls,
a situation which has been repeatedly identified as a major con-
tributor to new employee housing demand.
4. While the neighborhood in question has undergone a number of changes
in recent years, the essential character of the area north of the
Trueman Center has remained relatively unchanged. The post office,
for all practical purposes, completes the Trueman Neighborhood Com-
mercial SPA Plan, forming a boundary',between permitted NC / S/C/I
uses and the Residential/Hallam Lake natural areas to the north-
west. To permit commercial development of the applicants' property
Memo: Christopher/Ulrych Rezoning
October 30, 1980
Page Two
would represent a further encroachment upon a highly sensitive
area.
5. Puppy Smith Street is already highly impacted by the traffic
generated by the Trueman building, the post office, and the various
commercial uses located in the adjacent Mill Street Venture develop-
ment. To allow further commercial development in this area, par-
ticulary NC commercial establishments, would further exacerbate
a highly congested transportation network.
We have received comments from the Engineering Office and the Water Depart-
ment. These comments generally address specific development-related prob-
lems. However, we have summarized them here for your further information.
1. "Water service in the area is insufficient to serve the proposed
development. Any approval for development should be conditioned
upon replacement of the existing service and/or extension of the
Puppy Street main westerly to the applicants ' property, including
a fire hydrant at the terminus of the main extension. "
2. Rezoning to NC and subsequent development would require submission
of a PUD plan, as virtually all area and bulk requirements are
established via the PUD process. Engineering would most likely
require extension of street improvements begun by the Trueman
project and possible access and/or utility easements in view of
the City's drainage and electrical facilities in the area. The
applicants' property meets the minimum lot requirement of the NC
zone district, and the proposed 10,000 square feet structure is
within the maximum permissable FAR of 1:1.
Recommendation
In view of the above comments, the Planning Office recommends that the appli-
cants' request for rezoning to NC, Commercial be denied. Summarizing, Puppy
Smith Street currently serves as a logical boundary between the higher inten-
sity commercial and public uses to the south and the low intensity, environ-
mental related and open space areas to the north and northwest. Similarly,
the R-15 zoning of the Lakeview Addition functions as a protective buffer - - - -
between these two areas. In view of the extensive Neighborhood/Commercial
development currently existing in the area, the ample availability of
0, Office zoning in other parts of the City, and the highly congested nature
of Puppy Smith Street, it is our opinion that no demonstrable benefit results
from allowing further commercial encroachment north of these boundaries.
The Planning & Zoning Commission concurred with the Planning Office's recom-
mendation for denial at its November 4th, 1980 regular meeting. The Planning
& Zoning Commission's Resolution is attached for your review.
Council Action
Should City Council concur with the Planning & Zoning Commission's recommenda-
tion, the appropriate motion is as follows: "I move to deny the applicants'
request for rezoning of Lots 1 , 2, and 3 of Block 4, Lakeview Addition, from
R-15, Mandatory P.U.D. , to NC - Neighborhood Commercial . "
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION OF ASPEN, COLORADO
Resolution No.
(Series of 1980)
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 24-11 .5 of the Municipal Code, July 15,
1980 was established as a deadline for submission of 1980 Rezoning applications
by private landowners within the City of Aspen, and
WHEREAS, consistent with this section, Frank Christopher and Andre Ulrych
requested rezoning of Lots 1 , 2, and 3, Block 4, Lakeview Addition from R-15
Mandatory P.U.D. , to NC, Neighborhood Commercial , and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was conducted before the Aspen Planning
& Zoning Commission on November 4th, 1980 to consider the applicants' request
in conformance with the criteria established in Section 24-11 .5, and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission did concur with the Planning
Office with respect to the following comments:
1 . None of the proposed uses outlined in the applicants' request are
permitted by right in the NC zone district. Business and professional
offices and accessory dwelling units, however, are designated as condi-
tional uses subject to P&Z approval .
2. Sufficient NC zones currently exist in the area, and the community at
large, to provide for the neighborhood-oriented convenience estab-
lishments designed to serve the trade and service needs of the resident
population. Similarly, more than ample office zoning is available
throughout Aspen to accommodate additional business or professional
office demand. A shortage, however, does exist within the S/C/I zone
district, a zoning category intended to allow for the use of land for
limited commercial and industrial purposes, e.g. , electrical and plumb-
ing service shops, builders' supply, warehousing and storage, etc.
3. The rezoning of any additional acreage outside the CC and C-1 zone
districts for commercial use will further increase the potential for
commercial development outside of Growth Management controls, a situa-
tion which has been repeatedly identified as a major contributor to
new employee housing demand.
4. While the neighborhood in question has undergone a number of changes
in recent years, the essential character of the area north of the
Trueman Center has remained relatively unchanged. The post office,
for all practical purposes, completes the Trueman Neighborhood Com-
mercial SPA Plan, forming a boundary between permitted NC/ S/C/I uses
and the Residential/Hallam Lake natural areas to the northwest.
To permit commercial development of the applicants' property would
represent a further encroachment upon a highly sensitive area.
5. Puppy Smith Street is already highly impacted by the traffic genera-
ted by the Trueman building, the post office, and the various
commercial uses located inihe adjacent mill Street Venture develop-
ment. To allow further commercial development in this area, particu-
larly NC commercial establishments, would further exacerbate a highly
congested transportation network.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning & Zoning Commission of the
City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby finds the existing Residential zoning for the
parcel in question to be appropriate and the proposed rezoning is not in the
best interest of the City. The Planning & Zoning Commission therefore, respect-
fully recommends to the Aspen City Council that the proposed rezoning be denied.
ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
by
Olof Hedstrom, Chairman
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
August 14, 1980
City of Aspen
Planning Department
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Mr. Vann:
The following letter constitutes our formal application to request
zoning change on lots 1, 2, and 3, block 4, Lakeview Addition, City
and Township of Aspen, County of Pitkin, Colorado . There are many
obvious major changes in the area of the above mentioned properties .
To be explicate, they are as follows : the construction of the True-
man Center including numerous retail stores, plus residential housing
above, construction of City of Aspen' s Electric Sub-station, and the
present construction of the new Aspen Post Office . The Post Office
is directly in front of the above mentioned porperty and has had sub-
stantial impact on said property.
It is our contention that due to the cities approval of the above
mentioned projects and the completion of such, in addition to the
areas existing commercial structures such as the Mill Street Shopping
Center which houses over ten different retail outlets and offices,
plus the Aspen Sanitation Plant and others have changed the character
and desirability for the in question properties ability to support
a residential type structure . We are requesting the zoning for lots
1, 2, and 3 of Block4 Lakeside Addition be changed to Neighborhood
Commercial. Our intentions are to make feasible the construction
of a three-level structure of approximately ten thousand square feet
which would have four employee housing units on the first level,
various office space on the second level and two free market con-
dominiums on the top floor. We would abide by all P .U.D. guide lines
if necessary, but we 're unable to supply the necessary information
for such at this time .
Thanking you in advance for any assistance you can afford us on
this request, we remain
Sincerely yours
ank . Christopher II
\
P.O . Box 8449 Andre Ulryc�ki
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-4754
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
FROM: Jay Hammond, Engineering Office UV
DATE: September 18 , 1980
RE: Christopher/Ulrych Rezoning Request, Lots 1 , 2, and 3,
Block 4, Lakeview Addition
Having reviewed the above rezoning request and made a site inspec-
tion, the Engineering Department has the following comments.
I have little problem with the proposed rezoning request in
terms of Engineering related concerns. NC zoning would require
submission of a P.U.D. plan subject to review under 24-8 . 2 and
without any form of development plan it is impossible to comment
specifically at this time. Should such development occur, we
would probably be concerned with obtaining an extension of
street improvements begun by the Trueman project, possible
access and/or utility easements since we have drainage and
electric facilities in the area, and the normal site requirements
such as parking, open space, area and hulk, etc.
The site already meets minimum lot requirements and the con-
struction of a 10, 000 square foot structure and would not be in
excess of the 1 :1 FAR. Traffic and utility impacts would pro-
bably be accommodated by previous improvements constructed by
Trueman.
Offices and residential units would be conditional uses in
the NC zone.
ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: SUNNY VANN-PLANNING
FROM: JIM MARKALUNAS
SUBJECT: CHRISTOPHER/ULRYCH REZONING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 1980
Please be advised that the existing line west of hydrant #670 located at
the terminus of Puppy Smith Street is only a small copper service beginning
at 2" and tapering down to 3/4". While adequate for the existing residential
units now located in the Lakeview Addition, it would not be adequate for the
proposed 3-level, 10,000 square foot, 4-unit employee housing facility, including
office units and two free-market units. Therefore, it is my recommendation
that approval of the above referenced project be conditioned upon replacement of
the existing service and/or extension of the Puppy Smith Street main westerly
to the property, including a fire hydrant at the terminus of the main extension.
Aspen/Pitk • tF` R` fling
g Office
treet
130 so �
aspen Ye � a ' 1611
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jim Markalunas, Aspen Water
Jim Reents, Housing Director
Dan McArthur, City Engineer
Ron Stock, City Attorney
Aspen Metro Sanitation District
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: Christopher/Ulrych Rezoning
DATE: August 28, 1980
The attached application is a privately initiated request for rezoning of
Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 4, Lakeview Addition, located adjacent to the Trueman
Center. The lots are currently zoned R-15, and the applicant requests that
they be rezoned to NC, Neighborhood Commercial , based on the surrounding
uses. This item is scheduled for review along with all rezoning applications
on October 21, 1980; therefore, may I please have all written comments con-
cerning this application for rezoning (and its potential development) no
later than October 1, 1980? Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
•
•
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: City of Aspen Annual Privately-Initiated Rezoning Applications
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before the
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, October 21, 1980 at a
meeting to begin at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 130 S. Galena,
Aspen, to consider two privately initiated rezoning applications. The
Given Institute, located on the corner of Garmisch and Francis Streets,
requests rezoning from R-6, Residential , to A, Academic. The second
application, submitted by Frank Christopher and Andre Ulrych, requests
that their property located on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 4, Lakeview
Addition, be rezoned from R-15, Residential , to NC, Neighborhood Com-
mercial . For further information, contact the Planning Office, 130 S.
Galena, Aspen, 925-2020, ext. 225.
s/Olof Hedstrom
Chairman, Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times on September 25, 1980.
Charge to City of Aspen Account.
•
PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE AREA OF LOTS 1, 2, AND 3 IN BLOCK 4,
LAKEVIEW ADDITION, CITY AND TOWNSHIP OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN,
COLORADO .
Elizabeth Paepeke C/0 Morrison & Morrison
105 West Adams Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Block 1, lots 6,7, 8, 9,10,11 pt. 12
Block 2, lots 1,2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, 11, pt. 12
Block 3, lots 1 through 14
Block 4, lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11
Cicero, Jane Beckwith and Richard
P .O . Box 4252
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Block 2, lots 3 & 4
Deming, Edward H. , Baxter, David A. , Morse, Edward W . III.
Mt. States Comm.
P .O . Box Q
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Shopping Center
D.R. and G. Land Mill Street (legal)
Truemen Aspen Co .
4355 Dividson Road
Amlin, Ohio
Clark 's Market
Trueman Sub-Division Lot #2, 3, and 4
United States Post Office
Postmaster, Aspen, Colorado 81611
Aspen Sanitation
565 North Mill Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, Colorado
City of Aspen
Power Building, Relay Station
Aspen, Colorado 81611
FviALCiutttplv r
86k ttItli
1