The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.909 Waters Ave.0065.2018.ALSU0065. 2018.ASLU 909 WATERS AVE - RDS VARIATION 2737182 81 003 5 ca n.u 11111111111111111 lilli lilli 11% 11111 Imill lilil" 111'Ull'ill il,11111111 RECEPTION#: 653211, R: $38.00, D: $0.00 DOC CODE: RESOLUTION Pg 1 of 6,01/08/2019 at 02:45:51 PM Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO RESOLUTION NO. 7 (SERIES OF 2018) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIATION FOR A PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS F AND G, BLOCK 120, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 909 WATERS AVENUE. Parcel No. 2737-182-81-003 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from 909 Waters LLC, 909 Waters Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611, requesting approval for a Residential Design Standard Variation for the property at 909 Waters Avenue; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staffreviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended denial of Residential Design Standard Variation; and, WHEREAS, the City ofAspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and took and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on November 20,2018; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission voted to continue review of the application for a future hearing on December 18; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation ofthe Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on December 18, 2018; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria and that the approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution 7, Series of 2018, by a 5 to 1 (5-1) vote, granting approval ofthe Residential Design Standard Variation as identified herein. Page 1 0 f 6 RECEPTION#: 653211,01/08/2019 at 02:45:5 , Pgs 2 of 6, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin Co CO NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission: Section 1: Residential Design Standard Variation Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the request for a Residential Design Standard variation to fill in existing deck and patio space with additional floor area in the rear yard (Chapter 26.410.020.C, Variations), varying from the Articulation of Building Mass standard. All other dimensional standards including height and setbacks shall be met. Section 2: Parks: A tree permit is required prior to removal of trees. Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion ofthis resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on December 18, 2018. APPROYI~;~~) FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:,r-n IU n . An@fea Brfan, Adgistgrit Ji ey *(0cKni t,Vipdthair U L_ ___/ ATTEST: 0...h /LO- J~~ine Stickle, Records Mi - - Exhibits: Exhibit A: Approved Building Plans Page 2 of 6 RECEPTION#: 653211, 01/08/2019 at 02:45:5 1, pgS 3 of 6, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin Co CO Exhibit A: Approved Building Plans di,MPS____-__ ---__-=------------th 1 r--~ 0 . 03 \4 .0 -- M.ir,6 /~-14 1,9 -: lot R & 4 2 7 2* 38* 8.2.2 u<=1*= V I - m=Z=m - :. 1 . / -..#...~-5- : r, Â·r Â·Â·Â·Â·4,9 -3.e.Ea: V.-2 121111 .~ 53 .pe 1 0 ...... -7-50..e -. 0 1 ' O 4 ?ff< ft.~p::~?.3.311; 11 4 : I. + 1 Â£ 2.- 'Ity#413 521 11 1.14 -.Â·~. ~.rÂ·Â·Â·% fr=....., Â·i-22>542= - 1 '. -Â·U.9...2-61. 57*Â·i..4.,tbi.~b*t*' - i. :.....irÂ·rk %.1*%'I; - 2.V-,4 1 '1% 1 V L. 4 4 d Cp PROPOSED SITE RAN 1 MTI iu. , . . 1 KATYAL RESIDENCE 1 6-le: Al NCNED FE-2...d"."..' PROPOSED 909 WAJEIG A~ENUE CK;~1-.m i A.1.02 KM.V~=UNZ 2-=-7---1 SITE PLAN ASPEICCO :1611 1.......r=~00.1 MION COUNTY, CO .~4 1 9,24/1 8 Page 3 0 f 6 RECEPTION#: 653211, 01/08/2019 at 02:45:5 - , Pgs 4 of 6, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin Co CO Exhibit A: Approved Building Plans F2UTO~I- -- --------------------- - ------- 9 4 42 09 0 6 ..1 5 -Al-4 i 1: 1 Ilrpa "I Â®7 - - k'multtl'If t- Pult -1 -112 ---- -1- - - -rÂ® 4 .I--11 1 11; -i a: e L__ 0111;L . I l w 1111 Â¥Â»-2 I # ... 1 ./---- 5 0 0 gon 4 1 & 1 - 6--9-...#- U E 131 *3 *131 -40- ~ 4/9#/4 1 ' 1 1, 2 1 I t.-1.-1 - m 4 fi,- - - -irk. Â® 9 22 U~UCK UNI 11 1 12.1/7 : 1 ..1 . 1 12Â·461/ I. 1' 40* 1' , d. 0 Â®0 4 ~ PROPOSED MA,IN LEVEL 1., Al NC*ID WI Im.g ... KATYAL RESIDENCE PROPOSED 0,41./. cÂ», MAI N A.2.06 909Â¥UJE.AvtNUE :*fw-* KÂ».1,MI,=Et=n%!bINC. .PEN.081611 LEVEL MIKIN COUNTY, CO ,-al,mo-O,u 1 91/=122121 --,Cul 9/24/1. Page 4 0 f 6 2,411 Al,110*,1 RECEPTION#. 653211,01/08/2019 at 02:45:5 1, Pgs 5 of 6, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin C y, CO Exhibit A: Approved Building Plans F2'WLIW- ------------------------------- 9 0 e *9 @ .~---Tiwiir--7-7--â€¢,1-rETIF-r-Tiviy---S 1, 1 1: 1: 11 11 A . 00*Mall 42-Iv ~i-gr-=:- - -re ----I~--2-i 3-11-El--2-2-2 2},2--T-1-1-k---LAD A ~#A 1, 01 k' k mÂ¥01 0 1*. 0 . .e 1 -/ 0 --E a. 1 4 1 : =Ait~T , 147%. d I Ul -1 . 0-4 -------- . i- - r â€¢ -- 4 1 ' 1 -4- 1 :Era/1 1 H- L-â€¢44 1. f 1; il It I: --7 -1 0- . -1. 1 - ~*Â»rÂ«-r 13 W 4 1 1 - \ 1, I 1 N- - -4* bura-------4-1----------------4-1------------- 1 1 1, . IN In- . , 1.1 . ' 12-6 g .. 1 -* 1 0 2 0 a. 6 ~ frOPOSED UPPER LEVEL 6-1â€¢ 4 NOrm 1 0/71 11:Sul I 17 ..1 KATYAL RESIDENCE 1 PROPOSED 909 WAIEISAÂ¥TNUE : UPPER A.2.07 KMRAY),0,Â«DAFICINTECTE. INC. .cm-*--- 1 1 Im, I Wr,U,i A-) a- 100, AWA COm'I ./alle'l... 1 LEVEL .al COL*frr. CO 1 9/24/1/ Page 5 of 6 e e e. DÂ«1 Al-0. RECEPTION#: 653211, 01/08/2019 at 02:45:5 Pgs 6 of 6, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin Coi CO Exhibit A: Approved Building Plans 1 - , FRUI ..2 ./. 5 DUTÂ» 245Â· ly.jul; 112,-4,5-2011Â·ill ./. AS NO'D .TE ,Â·61~,e KATYAL RESIDENCE 3 D: PROPOSED KMAAYMONDA'/111!LCIS INe 1 A,9.02 >X>E.O,Atâ€¢,AÂ¥Ela-E Ur. 1. $-/ 22. Page 6 of6 4 A /*24 .4 I '46 f *kk f~ 40*0 CITY OF ASPEN RECEIVED OCT 4 RECD Land Use Application Determination of Completeness CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Date: October 1, 2018 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for 909 Waters Ave, Residential Design Standards Variation and have reviewed it for completeness (and not compliance). ~Â§~ Your Land Use Application is complete: / Please submit the follow- to begin the land use review process. 1) Digital pdf of the,Witir& applicatiohumb_*ve,emailed files, or file sharing) ~ 2) Review deposit of $3,250.00 (to be billed hourly). 4 2\ 3) One additional hard copy of the application. 1 4-ev6 Â·enaâ€¢u,J Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. ThaphYou. ( Wfpkvi~ ttâ‚¬nnifer ~I~elan. Deputy Planning Director City of A~en, Community Development Department For Office Use Only. Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes- No_Z~* Subdivision, or PD creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No_ -%- Commercial E.P.F. Lodging 1 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 8169-1975 I P: 970.920.5000 I F: 970.920.5197 1 cityofa.pen,com DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City ofAspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.080, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site-specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official, pursuant to Section 26.304.090, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site-specific development plan as described below. 909 Waters LLC, 909 Waters Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address Lots F and G. Block 120, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, commonly known as 909 Waters Avenue. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The applicant has received approval for a Residential Design Standard variation to fill in existing deck and patio space with additional floor area in the rear yard, varying from the Articulation of Building Mass standard. (See Exhibit A in Resolution). Written Description of the Site-Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Approval of a Residential Design Standard variation from the Articulation of Building Mass by the Planning and Zoning Commission via Resolution No. 7, Series of 2018. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) January 31, 2018 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) February 1.2021 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 4th day of February 2019, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. 1Qy26Â£ fjii.ij I Jetsica Garro~ Community Development Director Â¤ Permits Â·27 771 6 97 S / DO B 03 --- 20(15 .Asou El X Ble Edit Record ~ Navigate Fgrm Reports Format Iab Help ~.~ @@ IX â€¢:0: k, 4 ~g ~ i El 45 9 <~a-] 1 91 1 > >] m * A Jump 1 -C Y~ 1'01 6~ 9 0 o H M [B r=* 18 Ii3 (B [ti Bi9 4 @ ~18 *,.,I~ ~Main~ Custom Fields Routing Status | Fee SummarM ' Adons 1 Roubng Mistory I |Fuit type , I Aspen Land Use Permit # 0065.2018.ASLU I-' el. .~ rew:~ :.0:Â« i. .. 8 /-0 4,Â»30=** 4.*... . - . Wk .24 ./- Yl , I. 1 1~ Address 909 1,VATERS*,JE ; APWuite L.-L L - ~~~ i " City ASPEN 1, 4 State CO Â¥ Zip 81611 1 ~>ermit Infbrmatiort .~p..i~â€ž,i,< ,~ Â·M,J*Wpi#-I--- ... 1/ ..~I ~ Master permit 1Â·Â·Â· -'' Routing queue aslu 15 Applied 10/04/2018 p, Project IÂ·Â·Â· Status pending Approved 0.1 ~ Description RDS VARIAJ-ION FOR LAND USE Issuec Closed/Final j Â¥ ~ Submitted CHRIS BENDON Clock Running Days E-O| Expires 09/29/2019 Submitted via I v Owner Last name 909 WATERS LLC -Â· First name NEAL KATYAL-MGR 909 WATERSAVE ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (202> 903-7800 Address 1 Applicant E Owner is applicant? U Contractor is applicant? Last name 909 WATERS LLC |Â·Â·Â» First name NEAL KATYAL- MGR 909 WAJERS AVE ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (202) 903-7800 Cust # 31117 ~ Â· Â· Address Email Lender Last name ~Â·Â·Â· First name Phone () - Address - ]!AspenGold5 [server] Il angeliillil of 1- IPal D By \,1 TS A No lLLP 4 3 790 -00 7 CannÂ«- Lu a 2. --- P .lft 05,5 |Tab Groun& 1|Tnnlhnx | |DIJink Aintez-1 CITY OFASPEN MEMORANDUM TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Kevin Rayes, Planner THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director RE: 909 Waters Avenue- RDS Variation MEETING DATE: November 20, 2018 APPLICANT: Figure 1: Vicinity Map Neal Katyal, 909 Waters LLC /0 3*21 Â· 0 2 /t REPRESENTATIVE: b Chris Bendon, Bendon Adams 22 ' 4 914 r., .-- /1 'i. /'' e LOCATION: ,-2 + .Â¥ 'r.,1,2 - 6-== E.Z:~~ 4 rt ..-.p 909 Waters Avenue rh. ~.-~ wa-kers 4,~4 CURRENT ZONING: .... ..5 P Moderate-Density Residential (R-15) , ~ ~, SUMMARY: Â·$ 901 . --/////p 1% k . The applicant is requesting a .4~ / -J + ii.v, variation from the Residential ' 10. 1..~ i.. Design Standards for the remodel : and addition to a single-family -* 1//9:5'llril~ dwelling. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 4. A Figure 2: 909 Waters Ave, Looking South Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the f.jaill 21Â£11(.4'*i%t.k* 626*' .igjt~-lairv<-* request for a variation from the Articulation of Building Mass .. Residential Design Standard. . 148%*f.7~ ij'in//imill'r.-Fi -,3,1 *mb 9%41.31 1 4 4 I 1 5. - -a . AfF' 2 1 . 9Â· Â· 11.. . - 6. . 4 . I Â¥ j ' EJ o Dec. ts Page 1 of 5 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 I P. 970.920.5000 I F: 970.920.5197 1 cityofaspen.com 11 REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant is requesting the following approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission: â€¢ Residential Design Standards Variation (Section 26.410.020.C, Variations): To grant a variation of the Articulation of Building Mass standard to add to the existing sidewall depth of the dwelling. Applications that do not comply with the standards contained in the Residential Design section of the code, in which an applicant is applying for a variation, require approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. BACKGROUND: 909 Waters Avenue contains a single-family dwelling located within the Aspen Infill Area. Located in the R- 15 Zone District, the lot is 6,000-square feet and is considered non-conforming with regards to lot size. The applicant plans to remodel the existing dwelling and requests a variation from the Articulation of Building Mass Residential Design Standard to build an addition on the rear of the building (see figures 3-6). The existing dwelling (built in the early 90's, prior to RDS standards), exceeds the 50-ft. maximum sidewall depth prescribed in the current Residential Design Standards. The eastern sidewall measures 54-feet, 7>1- inches in length. The western sidewall measures 50-feet 77-inchs. The proposed remodel adds 4 feet along the bulk of the south fagade but incorporates a chamfered corner along the southwest sidewall to minimize impacts to the west fagade. However, by filling in the rear patio and deck areas with a two-story addition, the overall depth of the dwelling will increase, thus increasing to the existing non-conformity. The proposed design requires a variation from the Articulation of Building Mass Non-flexible Residential Design Standard. Non-flexible standards are those that shall be met by all projects subject to the Residential Design Standards, with no Alternative Compliance permitted. The applicant is seeking an RDS variation pursuant to Section 26.410.020.C, Variations. Additionally, the proposed work may impact some trees located in the rear yard. Prior to issuing a building permit, the applicant will need to coordinate with the Parks Department regarding potential impacts to trees on site. REVIEWS: RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIATION: Section 26.410.020.C, Residential Design Standard Variations, require applications that seek a variation from the Residential Design Standards be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission can approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application after considering a recommendation by the Community Development Director based on the standards outlined in section 26.410.020.C, Variation Review Standards. Staff Comment: An application requesting a variation from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the Planning and Zoning Commission shall find that the variation, if granted would: 1. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in the intent statement for that standard as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.Al-3; or 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. The general intent statement of the Residential Design Standard code section specifies that buildings should provide articulation to break up bulk and mass; and preserve historic neighborhood scale and character" to Page 2 of 5 ensure that single-family dwellings respond to neighboring properties by retaining similar massing and scale to adjacent development. The Articulation of Building Mass standard prescribes a maximum sidewall depth of no greater than fifty (50) feet in depth to "reduce the overall perceived mass and bulk of buildings on a property as viewed from all sides." The sidewall lengths and overall depth of the existing dwelling are currently non-conforming. While incorporating the chamfered corner along the southwest sidewall does not increase the sidewall depth, the overall perceived mass of the dwelling will be increased by filling in the deck and patio space in the rear yard. Figure 3: 909 Waters Main Level- Existing Figure 4: 909 Waters Main Level- Proposed 1, 11. L i 1, li SmACK '11 | ~ - 1 L_ _re#-- -2-4 291//S 2. ./ d Â§ 1 to- El .! 1 : '.''l 1 .--------21 -2. 9 - ~ Q2.321 \-1-1 100 I = 100 , t..1 28,2 r--P'-11 Â¢>2 :j- 4: a ]11 ' 0 02 '1 Rpt ili I I 5 42- 5 *'Ma I. A V *>- -----------1 1, J 1 -M I 11--- --<m Â®. -_ ..... ..... -_[Bill[E[k i L M ~ M -r I 11 1,:2= | 0 1 1 Lib- 11 1 1. I EN==1 - - .1..,--r -------- -]r -Â® 1 4... ~49, D- - -1 ~ I ! :'& 9.9 41 - _ -2 1 Prn ~ 0 i 1: 1 0 1: IE - _ceÂ©Â»1 Cr Â·15Â»,6 CON â€¢ 1// 11 1 1/ Â¥ 4-ft ~ - I, _ 321&-CK UNE I 1, 1: * 1 1 I: 4-ft ~ *6 6 1 1 1 1 --. 1 44 4 . 11 Existing deck/patio Proposed Fill in existing deck/patio to add chamfered corner net livable square feet Page 3 of 5 94 eli 3Nll Al*3dON.I 0 - .... t ...1 - . , 4 m - . 7-- ii 41 , lie 4F 2â‚¬:. ./ NE*f * , . 1 - Â¥8211. 4 4,104,6.â‚¬Z~ I -1 4#6 + i ie:,4 : ,/.1./1. 0 1....0-0 0. 0 i.,1- - â€¢- t / I. - 9 - :1/ ...161/ - .. -, ill 1/1.2-~ Ati, /CH= ...IZEY 1 ~D. 1 -.1-4* 2, Â»n , , 4 _4~0v~~~J~~~~~/~ 51 141 RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission deny the request for a variation from the Articulation of Building Mass Residential Design Standard as the proposal increases the existing nonconformity by adding to the perceived mass of the dwelling. PROPOSED MOTION: The resolution is written in the affirmative, approving the request. If the commission supports staff's recommendation, a motion to deny, as suggested below should be used. "1 move to denythe request for Variation from the Articulation of Building Mass Residential Design Standard." Attachments: Exhibit A- Residential Design Standards Review Criteria Exhibit B- Application Exhibit C- Public Noticing Affidavit Exhibit D- Letter from Applicant Page 5 of 5 Exhibit A Residential Design Standards Review Criteria Section 26-410.020.D, Residential Design Standard Variation Review Standards. An application requesting a variation from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and thedeciding board shall findthatthe variation, if granted would: 1. Provide an alternativedesign approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.A.1-3; or 1. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.A.1-3; or Staff Response: The intent of the Articulation of Building Mass standard is to reduce the overall perceived mass an d bulk of buildings on a property as viewed from all sides. The code indicates that this standard is critical in the Infill Area where "small lots, small side and front setbacks, alleys and historic Aspen building forms are prevalent. 909 Waters Ave is located on an undersized, non-conforming lot within the Aspen Infill Area, with a single-family dwelling that does not comply with current RDS Standards. Granting a variation to increase the mass and bulk of the dwelling will increase the non- conformity of the structure which is inconsistent with the intent and standards of the Land Use Code. Staff finds this criterion to not be met. 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Response: Although 909 Waters Ave is non-conforming with regards to lot size, this is not considered an unusual circumstance or site-specific constraint that is unique to the parcel. Many other properties in Aspen are considered non-conforming and are still required to comply with design standards. There are no site-specific constraints or unusual circumstances that would prevent the applicant from complying with this standard. Staff finds this criterion to not be met. 9 ~ Exhibit C Kew.,<, AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTYÂ· goq NArs AWL , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Â«V-26 14 0 4 20 1 0 4 . 100Â·rn ,'141Â£__ V STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) C-/ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City 6*~Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have_ complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: di Publidation of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is qttached hereto, Posting Of notice. By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and Which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. - Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the - day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. Aphotographoftheposted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26:304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage , ;i*paill UE. mail.t6 all owners of property within three hundred (300)- feet of the . property subject tb the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the eunent tax records o f Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy Of the owners and governmental agencies. so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted- prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summazy, including the method ofpublic noN#cation and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Exhibit C Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate- owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Mgnature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this / day of /\Jo (~Â·euuj*r- , 20/ %'' by .~R- 9-7 /0---- % WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 909 Waters Avenue Public Hearing: Tuesday, Novembe, 20,2018, 4.30 PM Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cilies - My commission expires: 3 Ill(b f ' 7 130 S. Galina Sl., Aspen, CO 81611 / Project Location: Parcel ID: 2737Â·182Â·81-003; Le % gally Described as: Lots F and G, Block 120, City and Townsite ol Aspen, Pitkin Counly, Colomdo )/0 i Gib--994.ablk._Â» Description: The applicant, 909 Walers LLC, 909 Waters Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611, Is requesling i variation from a Residential Design Standaid (Artic Notary Public ulation of Building Miss)as part ol the remodel and addition to Ihe single-family dwelling. NICOLE ELIZABETH HENNING 4-2 Land Use Revlewg Reg: Residential Design Slandard Variation NOTARY PUBLIC Â· STATE OF COLORADO Decision Making Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Notary Identification #20154012950 Applicant: 909 Waters LLC. 909 Waters Avenue My Commission Expires 3/31/2019 Aspen, CO 81611 Mere Informalion: For lurlher Inloinlalion relaleÂ£1]r'1~11CHNIENTS AS APPLICABLE: to Ihe projecl, conlact Kevin Ram elite City of A pen Community Development Depallment, 130 ~BLICÂ£!YON Galena SI. Aspen. CO, (970) 429.2797, kevin.,ayes@cityofaspen.com. F THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) Published in Ihe Aspen Times Weekly on Novembe 1,2018. 0000328318 NERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTA-E OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 Â»11 R AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 93 9 #Â®kfb /U- , Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) County of Pitkin ) I, (name, please print) AÂ»1 1 SÂ»Â«- being or reprbsenting an Applicant to Ve City of Aspen, Colorado, hefeby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.Q60 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: l/. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. -A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy ofthepublicationis attached hereto. >trek_ 6- - Signatdre 0 The foregoing "Affidavit ofNotice" was acknowledged before me this3 1 day 0*Jk,nua~ , 2001, by JARâ‚¬Â£.- 22--C--------2/0-9 / PUBLIC NOTICE WITNESS MYHAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site-specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to My commission expires: -3 45 flo the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title . ' 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining ~82.~Pl~'~~%27~tErt*Sydtrg~S &?737- 46* O,8 fade- Block 120, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin Court- ty, Colorado; commonly known as 909 Waters Ave- Notar$ PublicÂ· nue. The applicant has received approval for a Resi- dential Design Standard Variation for the Articula- Non of Building Mass to fill in existing deck and patio space in the rear yard. The improvements are de- picted in the land use application on file with the City of Aspen. For further information contact Kevin Bayes at the City of Aspen Community Develop- rwAR--N~"FIFERSON 1 ment Dept., 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado, ke ATTACH[~ENTSAOTARY PUBLIC vin.rayes@cityofaspen.com, or (970) 429-2797. City of Aspen | STATE OF COLORADO Published in The Aspen Times on January 31, 2018. - ' COPY OF TH]E.F~~~ 0000374160 *lor#19964002767 0/6 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY d09 Ntltâ‚¬#-5 /4 Vt , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: -f-&26 M O \t 2-0 ; 0 4 * 70~\ '20Â£ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, g~.410-vad/UL--- C- (name, please print) being or rep(esenting an Applicant to the City dKAspen, Colorado, hereby .personally certify that I have_ complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (13) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: L./ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Sid notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. -A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(IE)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to .the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage 1 zi?;dpid U.S. mail M all owners of property within three hundred (300)Â· feet of the i property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records o f Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted Â· prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that -was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) L 4 Mineral Estate Owner -Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision ofthis Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey. map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be avilable for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Mgnature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this / day of hjo +euu.kQr , 20LE, by ./4-n~,eh--u- SU 7(5-- . 11.ilriltilkliclirMi./7//Ff ..3. m. o Of, Â· I w. talgatia . Â»1 5 8 2 el <I WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 00.- J -%Â§ f gal 3:zi:#se# 4 52 5/1/ing?liii 1 =,5 - My commission expires: 3* 7~ 0%Â¥g .5/00- 6 00 >ti WheVdLY =nkaggi.En 2 1= c 02.2 3 Notary Public NICOLE ELIZABETH HENNING E--2 &2508#8 2 NOTARY PUBLIC Â· STATE OF COLORADO 189 * 9-2 Notary Identification #20154012950 My Commission Expires 3/31/2019 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 -Pliw~'J UO!)elu.lo#u! Jellurt# 10:3 :uo Beull'Olul anueAÂ¥ SiateM 606 '3 sJ01BM 6uiuoz pue buluueld Apog Oune,1 li un!saa 'E!~ap! Exhibit C CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 909 Waters Avenue ,Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 20 , 20 18 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) i Chris Bendon (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: BY the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days priortothe public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 4 Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof Materials, which was not less than twenty two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) Inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the 2 day of November , 2018 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto: 4 Mailing of notice. By mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E) (2) of The Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days priorto the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S mail to all owners of property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no morethan sixty (60) days priorto the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method Of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) March, 2016 City of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5050 Exhibit C CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, To affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled forthe initial public hearing on the application of development. the names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivision, Spas or PUDsthat create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Development, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notices requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Wheneverthe official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, to whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other significant legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real estate property in the ears of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit Notice" was acknowledged before me this | ~Â· day of NO(EFFI(*812.- , 20_(8-,by 64Â¢6 DENDDN WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL L f TARA L. NELSON NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: 67 I261-202.,C ~ STATE OF COLORADO 1Kili Commission Expires Septemter 25,2021 NOTARY ID #20014030017 fat, Ne (97. Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICES (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICED AS REQIURES BY C.R.S Â§24-65.5-103.3 March, 2016 Citv of Aoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (9701 920 5050 Â£1 + 11 * 46 + 9. jr 1 I i hibit (D~ I . " = PUBLIC NOTICE r- fl it,a Date: November 20.2018 Â£4 -5 f Time :4:90 pM - 9 I- Pia c egity H,Â£ 130_Â§ GaJena St .t Siste{_Cities __12_ -- - Purpose: The-appricant, 902_Waters LLC 909 Â·'i , 1.41 4 Waters Avenue,_Aspen, CO 8161 L is .4 i4 *; ~i L - requesting a variation from the . , it, 0 . Planning Ed Zoning Commission ./ 0 :I -2-lili-- - ~ ~ ~*~~~ " ~' t..~~ ; , ~* ~ I., 4414 =2 3.-ea 4 = 2 from a Residential Design S tandard 14*Â»" 1//f'ke p.-& t. . (Articulation of Bujlding Mass) as part 5 -* A Â·iii :a: ~ of the remodel to the singleÂ·famify i Â¢ 0 , 4 dwellrng on this site, 1.- 3 *~; *IU .u ~ i - - 6 1* For further information, contact Kevin /1> .9 Rayes with Community Deveropment + r 1 *f" > I . p I. . . '1 t. at 970.429.2797 f .7 .1 ... L- 4. 'IF ./ . 'Al & .11: 11 & . a 4-- . 1 .r 44 ' 1 .. . 4 * , 3 r .2 . 44 -4 1 8 : 1 a 1.-7 .',4 *.. - 4, Â· 6 1 1.6 ./ 4 r" - i â‚¬ . A . 3 .. Exhibit C Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius From Parcel: 273718281003 on 10/26/2018 COUNT,1 -3.(F\Q) Instructions: This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. Disclaimer: Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. http:Uwww.pitkinmapsandmore.com Exhibit C LORING ROBERT & ISABEL ROSEN PHILIP B ORR ROBERT L FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLLF 2912 WVILLA ROSA PK 41 OLD CONCORD RD 2700 G RD #12A TAMPA, FL 33611 LINCOLN, MA 01773 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 LITTLE NELL CONDO ASSOC RICHTER VALERIE A TRUST ELLIOTT JASON C & KATHERINE BROOKS 611 S WEST END 6214 N 34TH ST 929 E DURANT AVE #4 ASPEN, CO 81611 PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253 ASPEN, CO 81611 LACHER MARC P INVEST TRUST ROTHSCHILD IVETTE SCHNEIDER TRUST SILVER GLO CONDO ASSOC 840 N LAKE SHORE DR #1101 122 N BEMISTON AVE 930 WATERS AVE CHICAGO, IL 60611 ST LOUIS, MO 63105 ASPEN, CO 81611 UHLFELDER FAMILY INVESTMENTS RLLP ASPEN TOWNHOUSES BY THE RIVER CON[)1 WATCHMAKER LINDA L REV TRUST 210 AABC #AA COMMON AREA 4527 BRUCE AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 1050 WATERS AVE MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55424 ASPEN, CO 81611 NADJAFI MORTEZA & HEIDI GESSNER RICHARD W REV TRUST KANNER REAL ESTATE LLC 736 N MAGNOLIA AVE 1705 11TH ST NE 712 GREENTREE RD ORLANDO, FL 32803 MASSILLON, OH 44646 PACIFIC PLSDS, CA 90272-3909 WILKS DAN H & STACI RICE MARGARET A SEGUIN JEFF W& MADALYN B PO BOX 3116 13912 FLINT 617 E COOPER AVE #412 ASPEN, CO 81612 OVERLAND PARK, KS 66221 ASPEN, CO 81611 UHLFELDER FAMILY INVESTMENTS RLLP GABRICK NORMAN M JJA FAMILY LLC 210 AABC #AA 4910 MALIBU DR 2145 FIELDCREST DR ASPEN, CO 81611 EDINA, MN 55436-2712 OWENSBORO, KY 42301 AIBEL JONATHAN E & BONNIE L 914 WATERS CONDO ASSOC AMERENA ROBIN 10 EDGEWATER DR #5A PO BOX 7756 250 ST KILDA #507 SOUTHBANK CORAL GABLES, FL 33133 ASPEN, CO 81612-7756 MELBOURNE VICTORIA AUSTRALIA 3006, POPEAIDAN RICHARD LHG HOLDING LLC SCHIRMER LESLIE M TRUST 220 CENTRE ST #4 11777 SAN VICENTE BLVD 9TH FL 4100 E QUINCY AVE NEW YORK, NY 10013 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80113 C-L HOLDINGS LLC NEWTON BARBARA LOUISE MEYER WILLIAM J PO BOX 126 PO BOX 9410 1101 17TH ST NW #1000 WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 ASPEN, CO 81612 WASHINGTON, DC 20036 Exhibit C DOHSE J JEFFREY SIEGEL LOIS H QPRT HEMMING GREGORY S TRUST 2552 E ALAMEDA AVE #23 6358 MANOR LANE 311 MIDLAND AVE DENVER, CO 80209 SOUTH MIAMI, FL 33143 ASPEN, CO 81611 CLARENDON CONDO ASSOC KELLY ROSEMARIE LIBERMAN KEITH & KATHLEEN FAMILY TRU 625 S WEST END ST 240 W 102ND ST #54 9554 HIDDEN VALLEY RD ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10025 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 ST MARYS OF ASPEN LLC ORR ROBERT L FAMILY PTNSHP LLLP GRAHAM NELL C 1532 S.E. 12 STREET PH1 2700 G RD #12A 10 PINERIDGERD FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 BASALT,CO 81621 VANTILBURG JOHANNES & JOANNE MIKA PATRICK D 2021 INVESTMENTS LLC 1738 BERKELEY ST 630 N TEJON ST 1000 E MILWAUKEE ST SANTA MONICA, CA 90404 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80903 JANESVILLE, WI 53545 CRONIN F CARLETON & TOBY ANN TRUST WA5 LLC MERRILLS DAPHNE 8748 DORRINGTON AVE 4770 BISCAYNE BLVD # 720 217 SCAIFE RD LOS ANGELES, CA 90048 MIAMI, FL 33137 SEWICKLEY, PA 15143 SNOWFLAKE WATERS LLC NOSTOS LLC NUTTER GEORGE E & LYNDSAY 420 E MAIN STE 2 . 2261 COMPASS PT LN 223 HANNA RD ASPEN, CO 81611 RESTON, VA 20191 TORONTO ONTARIO CANADA M4G 3P3, MCFADDEN GREGORY C VARGAS GERMAN JAVIER SINNREICH MARK & MILLINDA PO BOX 9859 450 E 83RD ST #18D 2231 FISHER ISLAND DR ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10028 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33109 DE GUZMAN KATHLEEN MCGUIREWINTERHAVEN LLC RAVENIS JOSEPH V 11 & M ELIZABETH TRUS 220 CENTRE ST #4 560 DELAWARE AVE STE 400 6041 RIDGEMOOR DR NEW YORK, NY 10013 BUFFALO, NY 14202 SAN DIEGO, CA 92120 LATTERMAN EARL M QPRT BECKER BARRY W IRREV TRUST AJCBMC LLC 5000 5TH AVE APT 306 2404 RANCHO BELLAIRE CT 617 W MAIN ST #B PITTSBURGH~ PA 152322150 LAS VEGAS, NV 89107 ASPEN, CO 81611 CAMPBELL FAMILY TRUST BECNEL DANIEL E JR & MARY HOTARD BAYLDON BARBARA W REV TRUST 1225 S HIGH ST 425 WAIRLINE HWY#B 647 W BARRY AVE DENVER, CO 80210 LAPLACE, LA 70068 CHICAGO, IL 60657-4504 Exhibit C BELL MEREDITH W REVOCABLE TRUST UPCHURCH WILLARD H JR REV TRUST OBRIEN MARY JANE 147 17TH ST NE 2128 BUENA VISTA RD BOX 2306 ATLANTA GA 30309 WINSTON SALEM, NC 27104 SAG HARBOR, NY 11963 MILL IRON INVESTMENTS LLC CLARENDON CONDO ASSOC FRY LLOYD EDWARD PO BOX 64 625 S WEST END ST 1335 STRATFORD DR CARLISLE, MA 01741 ASPEN, CO 81611 PIQUA, OH 45356 UHLFELDER FAMILY INVESTMENTS RLLP SILVERGLO 304 LLC ENATAI VACATION HOME LLC 210 AABC #AA 0133 PROSPECTOR RD #4114B 10000 MEMORIAL DR #480 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77024 PYRFEKT PROPERTIES LLP COHN JOHN R & BARBARA O MEYERS BARBARA A TRUST 1424 CEDAR BAY LN 3533 GREENBRIER DR 821 OLD MARCO LN SARASOTA, FL 34231 DALLAS, TX 75225 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 AGUA FRIA PROPERTIES LLC QUARKY LLC ARNETT DAVID & BETTE 460 ST MICHAELS DR BLDG 300 8200 DOUGLAS AVE #300 5333 N CAMINO REAL SANTA FE, NM 87505 DALLAS,TX 75225 TUCSON, AZ 85718 MEYERS BARBARA A RES TRUST SANDERS RICHARD & JOANNE MCCORMICK ROGER F FAMILY TRUST 821 OLD MARCO LN 8 PARKWAY DR PO BOX 21532 MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 OWENSBORO, KY 42304 KONIN FAMILY TRUST 610 S W END RENTALS E201 LLC CRAZY WOMAN INVESTMENTS LLC 1936 LOMA DR 608 HENNING CT 304 S YELLOWSTONE HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 NAPERVILLE, IL 60540 LIVINGSTON, MT 59047 UHLFELDER FAMILY INVESTMENTS RLLP GOODSIR SUSAN A WERNST INC 210 AABC #AA 1000 CAMPBELL CT 5141 GLENWOOD POINTE LN NE ASPEN, CO 81611 LAKE BLUFF, IL 600441300 ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87111 SHER JOYCE WINTER HAVEN CONDO ASSOC UHLFELDER FAMILY INVESTMENTS RLLP 7936 L'AQU I LA WAY 527 S WEST END ST 210 AABC #AA DELRAY BEACH, FL 33446 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SANDITEN EDWARD STANLEY AES INVESTMENTS LLC OGURI JOINT LIVING TRUST PO BOX 11566 500 PARK CIR 1570 ROSE VILLA ST ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 PASADENA, CA 91106 Exhibit C SCHWARZ REV TRUST JACK LP KLETTENBERG JULIEN & ANNA LISA KART 860 ARDEN RD 10 WESTGATE WALK, KITCHENER 7-95 DARLING POINT RD PASADENA, CA 91106 ONTARIO CANADA N2M2T8, DARLING POINT NSW 2027 AUSTRALIA, TYE MARK M TRUST FVA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS LLC SCHRIER DEREK C & CAMERON CECILY H 21 PO BOX 8992 3312 NE 40TH ST 230 SEA CLIFF AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33308 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94121 ROTHSCHILD ANDREW TRUST BARDING DOROTHY L TRUST SEWELL BEVERLY J TRUST 122 N BEMISTON AVE 711 SE 3RD ST 884 QUAIL RUN DR ST LOUIS, MO 63105 DELRAY BEACH, FL 33483 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505 G&H INVESTMENT CO IONTACH LLC FRYKLUND ROBERT 6471 MANTOVA ST PO BOX 21176 2917 DUKE ST LONG BEACH, CA 90815 CATONSVILLE, MD 21228 HOUSTON, TX 77005 LEE MARIANNE S LTD PARTNERSHIP SNOWFLAKE WATERS LLC WHITAKER PATRICIA D TRUST 2836 PATRIOT PARK PLACE 420 E MAIN STE 2 236 LINDEN AV HENDERSON, NV 89052 ASPEN, CO 81611 ST LOUIS, MO 63105 ASPEN JEWELRY LLC HOWELL JOHN D JR & SARA TAGLER MELINDA 1010 E HYMAN AVE 809 SOMERSET LN 1121 WALZ AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 JONESBORO, AR 72401 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 CHMELIR FRANK J & SANDRA L SIMON JEROME M COX LESTER B REV TRUST 201 39TH ST 610 S WEST END ST #C204 601 S WEST END ST #11 DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60515 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 RAMSEY STACIE A ZIDELL JAMES D LIVING TRUST SCHNEIDER ROBERT C 39 CANTERBURY RD 1015 MORAGA DR 3003 S ONG ST MADISON, NJ 07940 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 AMARILLO, TX 79109 LEFKOWITZ BARRY & NORDIN YLVA MONIQI ROSEN KIM E RAINEY J WALKER & GILLIAN 3015 KALAKAUA AVE #701 100 TOYON DR 2 PALMERSTON VILLAS HONOLULU, HI 96815 FAIRFAX, CA 94930 RATHMINES DUBLIN 6 IRELAND, MIDLAND NO 7 LLC LEE JEFFREY S & CLARE BRONOWSKI FAMI KNOWLES JAMES W PO BOX 3695 3701 ESPLANDE 3936 S MAGNOLIA WY BASALT, CO 81621 MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 DENVER, CO 80237 Exhibit C SEWELL RALPH B TRUST WEINBERG JACK A & SHEILA A BARNHARTWILLIAM & CAROL 884 QUAIL RUN DR 111 RAVINE GLADE 4344 4TH AVE S GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505 GLENCOE, IL 60022 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55409 HARVEY BRIAN L GANT G304 LLC MAX ROSENSTOCK & CO PO BOX 240011 3340 PLAYERS CLUB PKWY# 160 7839 E SORREL WOOD CT LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 MEMPHIS, TN 38125 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258 H2O LAND TRUST FOSSIER MIKE W REV TRUST MOEN DONNE & ELIZABETH FAM TRUST 8502 MARBLEHEAD RD 9 OCEAN VISTA 8 CABALLEROS RD LUTHERVILLE TIMONIUM, MD 21093 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 BEEM CORPORATION SCHARLIN HOWARD & GLORIA HEATZIG BONNIE & ERIC 1201 CURRIEAVE 10 EDGEWATER DR #4A 5304 BOCA MARINA CIR MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 CORAL GABLES, FL 33133 BOCA RATON, FL 33487 BITTEL HANNAH FAMILY TRUST METZGER JOEL R & LAUREL E ASPEN DAY FAMILY PTNRSHP LLLP 801 ART GODFREY RD #600 936 WESTOVER AVE 2475 BROADWAY #305 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140 NORFOLK, VA 23507 BOULDER, CO 80304 SANDEAN LLC WAGNER GANT PROPERTIES LLC GROUP 102 LLC 333 TEXAS ST #2290 3480 MIDDLEBELT RD 6400 RIVERSIDE DR BLDG B SHREVEPORT,LA 71101 WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48323 DUBLIN, OH 43017 DENNIS 11 LLC ROSEN DEBORA A SEIFERT BROTHERS COLORADO TRUST 205 SMILLST#301A 19 HORNSEY LN GARDENS 4459 SNAIL LAKE BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 LONDON N65NX, ENGLAND SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 UHLFELDER FAMILY INVESTMENTS RLLP KWEI THOMAS & AMY HILDEBRAND MELINDA B 210 AABC #AA 75 CAMBRIDGE PKWY PHS PO BOX 1308 ASPEN, CO 81611 CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 HOUSTON,TX 77251 TWFJ INC FIELDS ANDREW G JRB RE HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 329 175 ENGLISH TURN DR 4114 PONDHILL#203 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW ORLEANS, LA 70131 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78231 530 WILLIAM STREET LLC WEST ROGER G & DONNA A BAILEY WAYNE P & HARRIET E 201 N FRANKLIN ST#2000 6650 BURDEN LN 6644 CHEROKEE CT TAMPA, FL 33602 BATON ROUGE, LA 70808 LONGMONT, CO 80503 Exhibit C A SUNSHINE LLC LIEBMANN FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST LEVINSON BONNIE REV TRUST 730 E DURANT AVE # 200 1495 GATEWAY RD 2127 BROADWAY #1 ASPEN, CO 81611 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 GABRIEL ANN LN9 LLC LHG HOLDING LLC 611 S WESTEND ST APT 2 4770 BISCAYNE BLVD #720 11777 SAN VICENTE BLVD 9TH FL ASPEN, CO 81611 MIAMI, FL 33137 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 WEKSTE]N TRUST N & D CRAIR FAM TRUST 7/9/2013 HEMMING HANNAH S TRUST 100 BELVIDERE ST #9A 5931 KANAN DUME RD 311 MIDLAND AVE BOSTON, MA 02199 MALIBU, CA 90265 ASPEN, CO 81611 GIEFER PATRICK WARREN MATTHEW L 81611 PROPERTIES LLC 950 S JOSEPHINE ST 2022 BASELINE DR 637 E HYMAN AVE DENVER, CO 80209 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81507 ASPEN, CO 81611 UHLFELDER FAMILY INVESTMENTS RLLP WOLFE KEVIN & LIANA YAJKO R DOUGLAS 210 AABC #AA â€¢ 911 6TH ST 1121 WALZ AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 GOLDEN, CO 80403 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 CHRISTMAS HOUSE LLC BOWERS ANN S TRUST ACR CAPITAL LLC 150 N RIVERSIDE PLAZA #3300 1664 WAVERLEY STREET N57 W30614 STEVENS RD CHICAGO, IL 606061594 PALO ALTO, CA 94301 HARTLAND, WI 53029 FREEDMAN GARY & DONNA LIVING TRUST RONCHETTO LYNN A DEPALMA JOHN R 533 9TH ST 320 E 42ND ST #101 710 WWILSONAVE SANTA MONICA CA 90402 NEWYORK, NY 10017 GLENDALE, CA 91206 ALLAN FAMILY TRUST BITTEL ARI FAMILY TRUST GRANTJODI 1731 COLGATE CIR 801 ART GODFREY RD #600 4525 JAMESTOWN RD LA JOLLA, CA 92037 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140 BETHESDA, MD 20816 1414 35TH ST LLC KAUFMAN MICHAEL A & SHERRYL W SIMON DONNA L REV TRUST 946 COUNTRY CLUB LN 7 FERNWOOD CT 1294 ROCKRIMMON RD SONOMA, CA 95476 E BRUNSWICK, NJ 08816 STAMFORD, CT 06903 FIDELITAS HOLDING CO LTD LGL SILVERGLO LLC AUGUSTUS PROPERTIES LLC 30 CARTIER ST 6522 ORCHID LN 2714 ARBUCKLE ST OTTAWA ONTARIO CANADA K2P2E7, DALLAS,TX 75230 HOUSTON, TX 77005 Exhibit C LANDOW NATHAN RAPPAPORT FAMILY PARTNERS FAVROT CAFFREY 4710 BETHESDA AVE 1004 NOB HILL AVE N 124 CHARLESTON PK BETHESDA, MD 20810 SEATTLE, WA 98109 METAIRIE, LA 70005 LUND ANSELMO ASPEN PROP SINAI ALLEN YACKER DAN 6301 S KNOLL DR 16 HOLMES RD 1272 SANTA LUISA DR EDINA, MN 55436 LEXINGTON, MA 02173 SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 DURANT MEWS CONDO ASSOC SULLIVAN EDWARD M BESHARAT GERALDINE 923 E DURANT AVE PO BOX 1324 9 WOODLAND RD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612-1324 ELBERTON, GA 30635 MORRIS TRUST GILBERT S DIXON JR LANDOW TOWNHOMES CONDO ASSOC 906 FRANKLIN PO BOX 3948 COMMON AREA RIVER FOREST, IL 60305 ASPEN, CO 81612 901 E DURANT AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 DIAMOND NATHAN & LAUREN S B & J LLC PANTER FAMILY TRUST 5465 BANYAN TRAIL 1249 W 58TH 49 HEARTSTONE DR MIAMI, FL 33156 KANSAS CITY, MO 64113 SANTA FE, NM 87506 WOODWARD TERRY TRUST BOOMERANG LTD INC RENE BJARTE & MELISSA 3662 BRIDGEPOINTE 1104 E WATERS AVE PO BOX 2442 OWENSBORO, KY 42303 ASPEN, CO 81611 RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067 MACHADO MONICA M COMPTON HEATHER G ROSS DWAYNE A & DUREE M FAMILY REV T 450 E 83RD ST #18D PO BOX 3948 10740 PEGASUS ST NEWYORK, NY 10028 ASPEN, CO 816123948 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33324 MICHIEF IN THE MOUNTAINS LLC 323 BOULEVARD ASSOCIATES MERRILLS DAPHNE TRUST 11211 INWOOD RD 5860 SOLWAY ST 217 SCAIFE RD DALLAS, TX 75229 PITTSBURGH, PA 15217 SEWICKLEY, PA 15143 LERNER GREGORY S DAVIS TERRY CONNALLY COLORADO R E PARTNERS LLC 4971 WILLOW ST 1046 ONTARIO 111 W JACKSON BLVD 20TH FL BELLAIRE<TX 774014417 SHREVEPORT, LA 71106 CHICAGO, IL 60604 CHUMLEY ANNALIESE TRUST MCCOY TRUST KEENAN DANIEL M TRUST PO BOX 11630 623 E 2100 SOUTH 1716 SEVERN FOREST DR ASPEN, CO 81612 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106 ANNAPOLIS, MD 21401 Exhibit C SHOHET CAROLYN S GLICKMAN HAN SARAH BRENER DANIEL M & SHARON G PO BOX 64 940 WATERS AVE # 106 5202 POCAHONTAS CARLISLE, MA 01741 ASPEN, CO 81611 BELL-AIR, TX 77401 OKANE MARGARET TRUST KONIN FAMILYTRUST GANT CONDO ASSOC 1105 WOODSIDE PKWY 1936 LOMA DR 610 S WEST END ST SILVER SPRING MD 20910 HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 ASPEN, CO 81611 KOSOSKITRENT WATERS 907 INC ROBINSON MARY ALICE BURKE 4413 ELI ST PO BOX 10671 4477 COLE RD HOUSTON, TX 77007 ASPEN, CO 81612 SYRACUSE,NY 13215 SUPERMAN LLC BARTOK PETER & COLLEEN RYAN ASPEN LLC 3126 S ROCKFORD DR 321 WEST BURNAM RD 1000 E MILWAUKEE ST TULSA, OK 74105 COLUMBIA, MD 65203 JANESVILLE, WI 53545 SNYDER JAMES DANIEL & LINDA RAE STEPHENSON JOANN I SIMPKINS B DOUGLAS & JOHNETTE TETLOL 1225 BRAEBURN 1014 BLAKE AVE 2921 AVALON PL FLOSSMORE, IL 60422 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 HOUSTON, TX 77019 LACHER SIMONE C INVEST TRUST RICHARDS SHIRLEY SMALL RESTON LLC 328 HARRIS AVE 4073 MURIETTA AVE 7311 ARROWOOD RD CLARENDON HILLS, IL 60514 SHERMAN OAKS, CA 91423 BETHESDA, MA 20817 GANT 203 LLC CUMMINS RICHARD GRAHAM MAUREEN & THEODORE L 311 TOWN CENTER 617 W MAIN ST #B 477 E JOHNSTOWN RD BELLA VISTA AR 72714 ASPEN, CO 816111619 COLUMBUS, OH 43230 TATEM SUE BINKLEY WEDOWJAMIE ASPEN VIEW LTD PO BOX 12373 500 WESTOVER DR #2380 100 S MAIN AVE #300 ASPEN, CO 81612 SANFORD, NC 27330 SIDNEY, OH 45365 BENKENDORF TRUST BURKEASPEN LLC GRIFFITH N MICHELLE& C PERRY JR 6190 KILIMANJARO DR W308N6183 SHORE ACRES RD 663 FOREST BLVD EVERGREEN, CO 80439 HARTLAND, WI 53029 INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240 ELIAS BARBARA A KINNEY JANICE FREEDMAN DONNA & GARY 0451 STAGECOACH LN 914 WATERS AVE #17 1149 3RD ST #200 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 ASPEN,CO 81611 SANTA MONICA, CA 90403 Exhibit C BACKUS DIANA MEHL HARRIET HAM PROPERTIES LLC 2843 SABLEWOOD CT 350 W 57TH ST #17A 300 HECTOR AVE DELRAY BEACH, FL 33445 NEWYORK CITY, NY 10019 METAIRIE, LA 70005 HIRSCH MARY H TRUST PROSTIC MARJORIE SUE TRUST WEINSTEIN DAVID M & SHAWNA R 610 S WEST END ST #D203 2225 STRATFORD RD 24 ELM AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 SHAWNEE MISSION, KS 66208 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 809063126 CALVETTI ANDREW KNOKE ROLF M REV TRUST PINE A PHILIP 914 WATERS AVE #18 7660 FAY AVE PMB H 536 50 S COMPASS DR ASPEN, CO 81611 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33308 GANT K302 LLC BERZ FAMILY TRUST TETSUYAMA LLC 58 MISSION 10100 EMPYREAN WY #103 147 EXPLORER DR WICHITA, KS 67207 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 OSPREY, FL 34229 KLEIMAN SUZANNE E TRUST COULON FIELDS SHELLY SILVERMAN MARK J & NANCY C 446 MILLS DR 175 ENGLISH TURN DR 7404 BROOKVILLE RD BENNECIA, CA 94510 NEW ORLEANS, LA 70131 CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815 POWDER HOLDINGS LLC MIDLAND CONDO ASSOC SMULIN MARIANNE REV TRUST 415 E NORTH WATER # 3006 COMMON AREA 15 CANDLELIGHT CT CHICAGO, IL 60611 S WEST END POTOMAC, MD 20854 ASPEN, CO 81611 LACHER RITA R INVEST TRUST HADDON HAROLD & BEVERLY LUBIN SHAFIGHEH 840 N LAKE SHORE DR #1101 141 S JASMINE ST 611 S WEST END ST #5 CHICAGO, IL 60611 DENVER, CO 80224 ASPEN, CO 816112131 CARDALL FAMILY TRUST KAY REV TRUST SCHMIT KIRSTEN 2404 LORING ST #129 2127 BROADWAY #1 400 MCSKIMMING RD SAN DIEGO, CA 92109 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 ASPEN, CO 81611 BACKUS DIANA PROPERTY INVESTORS #1 LLC ELIAS BARBARA A 2843 SABLEWOOD CT 8407 BROOKEWOOD CT 0451 STAGECOACH LN DELRAY BEACH, FL 33445 MC LEAN, VA 22120 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 STEEPLECHASE PARTNERS GEORGIA LLC GANT 103 LLC WEHSENER FAMILY TRUST 3060 PEACHTREE RD #400 311 TOWN CENTER 4014 MTTERMINUS DR ATLANTA, GA 30305 BELLA VISTA, AR 72714 SAN DIEGO, CA 92111 Exhibit C SHIRK JAMES & LINDA TRUST BITTEL DANIEL FAMILY TRUST AVID LEISURIST LLC PO BOX 1549 801 ART GODFREY RD #600 56 S 3RD ST #402 BLOOMINGTON, IL 61702 MIAMI BEACH, FL 33140 BROOKLYN, NY 11249 WILKERSON WILLIAM REV TRUST G3 HOLDINGS LLC SABBATICAL LLC 321 SUNSET DR #3 450 RACETRACK RD 985 MEMORIAL DR #201 FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 WASHINGTON, PA 15301 CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 UHLFELDER FAMILY INVESTMENTS RLLP BLOCK JOEL A REV TRUST FREIS JON 210 AABC #AA 647 W BARRY AVE 136 ELCAMINODR#412 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60657-4504 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 902122705 SCHARLIN GLORIA G DEGEORGE GREGORY A & BECKY R UHLFELDER FAMILY INVESTMENTS RLLP 10 EDGEWATER DR #4A 1032 POTOMAC DR 210 AABC #AA CORAL GABLES, FL 33133-6962 HOUSTON, TX 77057 ASPEN, CO 81611 HORNBROOK ANGELA J AGER REALTY LLC LD ENTERPRISES LLC PO BOX 2074 555 GOLDEN BEACH DR PO BOX 508 CRESTED BUTTE, CO 81224 GOLDEN BEACH , FL 33160 ASPEN, CO 81612 WINTER HAVEN 2 LLC RISCOR INC KOBACKER JEFFREY M PO BOX 21176 12221 MERIT DR#1400 10194 E MOUNTAIN SPRING RD CATONSVILLE, MD 21228 DALLAS, TX 75251 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85255 SHIRK JAMES & LINDA TRUST STEWART SAMUEL & JACQUELINE ROSENBAUM THOMAS F TRUST PO BOX 1549 124 CHARLESTON PK 415 S HILL AVE BLOOMINGTON IL, CO 61702 METAIRIE, LA 70005 PASADENA, CA 91106 JOSEPH RUSSELL C & ELISE E STEEPLECHASE PARTNERS GEORGIA LLC MCCORMICK MARY E 3682 WILLOWICK RD 3060 PEACHTREE RD #400 PO BOX 21532 HOUSTON, TX 77019 ATLANTA, GA 30305 OWENSBORO, KY 42304 HOCKER DAVID E WEINBERG JUDD A TRUST 679534 ONTARIO LTD 620 PARK PLAZA DR 401 N MICHIGAN AVE #3050 2 CHEDINGTON PLACE l A OWENSBORO, KY 423015483 CHICAGO, IL 606115515 TORONTO ONTARIO CANADA M4N 3R5, EPSTEIN ASPEN TRUST RIVER GLEN CONDO ASSOC ZOLET THERESA & DAVID 1900 RITTENHOUSE SQ #8A COMMON AREA 17 PADDOCK CT PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 E DURANT AVE POTOMAC, MD 20854 ASPEN, CO 81611 Exhibit C DENNIS LLC JETVIEWLLC UHLFELDER FAMILY INVESTMENTS RLLP 205 S MILL ST #301A 625 S WEST END ST #4 210 AABC #AA ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 774302 ONTARIO LTD FABER KATHERINE T TRUST CLARENDON LLC 2 CHEDINGTON PLACE l A 415 S HILL AVE PO BOX 177 TORONTO ONTARIO CANADA M4N 3R5, PASADENA, CA 91106 BONDI JUNCTION NSW 1355 AUSTRALIA, P&G LEVIN FAMILY GENERAL PARTNERSHIF CHATEAU SNOW CONDO ASSOC HEMMING LUKE S TRUST 9716 E PRESERVE WY 926 WATERS AVE 311 MIDLAND AVE SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85262 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 1035 DURANT - 4 LLC RICHELMECLAIRE LEVY EDWARD C JR TRUST 1010 69TH ST 940 E WATERS AVE #204 970 SHIRLEY RD BOULDER, CO 80303 ASPEN, CO 81611 BIRMINGHAM, MI 480093730 ORR ROBERT L FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LLLF BITTEL STEPHEN H JANNAINC 2700 G RD #12A 801 ART GODFREY RD #600 500 PATTERSON RD GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 MIAMI BEACH! FL 33140 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 CANUTO INC GRIER HOLINGS LLC LHG HOLDING LLC PO BOX 650 650 RIVIERA DR 11777 SAN VICENTE BLVD 9TH FL BASALT, CO 81621 TAMPA, FL 33606 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 PARKER WILLIAM A JR GANT EXCHANGE LLC WHITEHURST JOHN S & BILLIE PO BOX 4655 MC252 5704 DEVILLE DR 6504 MONTROSE AVE ATLANTA, GA 30302 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 BALTIMORE, MD 212121023 WILLIS ANNIE D HYMAN GARY MARKUS NEIL & JOLIE 601 S WEST END ST #2 3 BEECHWORTH CLOSE 8603 IRVINGTON AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 LONDON UK NW37UT, BETHESDA, MD 20817 FREEMAN GREGORY A & KRISTINA M COATES TOM & LINDA FAM TRUST 490 COUNTY RD 162 655 MONTGOMERY ST #1700 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 Â® BendonAdams September 24, 2018 RECEIVED Mr. Kevin Rayes Community Development Department OCT 4 RECD City of Aspen CITY 01- AbvEN 130 So. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: 909 Waters Avenue Mr. Rayes: Please accept this application for Residential Design ,< .74, 11~- -- 4Â¢g 191.-44.1.(t~4 . 1~ Mass standard, for the 909 Waters Avenue project. ~Wn'.' 71<Aff#%,LA/~ .1.- Â¥ 6%07.1/1/1/ The existing residence, a Harry Teague design, is a INNIE/IP<~â€ž~, #Jir:- * two-story single-family home that sits on a ~~~Â°Â·'~F""~-1,Â£"â„¢t~ful rectangular 6,000 square-foot lot in the East End of ~///i.,v,24,:~*.,<.6 _r :gÂ®:*66 ~ Aspen, just off South West End Street. It is zoned R- . 9~.. f -7426 15 and was constructed in 1990 prior to the - . I... ... C Residential Design Standards. I ** 914 -4 u~4.. r. 2. 4 I. . The home is owned by 909 Waters LLC. Neal Katyal i is the principal of 909 and has authorized , 'Â· 1.2 -' - - : ,-. - .r.*1 BendonAdams to submit this application. Kim * . a.* - .'*.423-4 ' Ii:-- 22- Raymond Architects is the Architect of record and _ e., .ch% has prepared the attached design set. - '~~; '03**..ff- =...t: , 4.~*Wil Mr. Katyal, a Georgetown professor who writes imA.%20?8*Â· 2. 4.*E - f, 12 .4/ about architecture, was drawn to the Harry Teague lEN*** 1 -48*13Â£..4-*., design of the house from the moment he saw it three years ago. Atthe same time, he knew the house was 22Â¢24&.~..4~0 f'13 I *i '* :<ii - small for his immediate and extended family. The ;*24- =,0 Â·In~ '8,- - house was built and designed by a couple 25 years ~2paÂ£F-<VIFI- _~ ago and had never had more than two occupants. - So, he wanted to expand the house to accommodate ~ his larger family, but at the same time insisted that the integrity of the Teague design be 100% unchanged. He therefore rejected out-of-hand easy -Iia-,~1,5 Iwilefri.. ways to expand the house, such as increasing some .--,- .. 0 , of the front of the house to match the frontmost wall. Instead, he required the house to maintain its simple, elegant look and to have the front and visible sides to be entirely unchanged. The project will remodel the existing home and therefore only add to the rear of the building, enclosing a portion of the existing deck. A small addition, creating a partial third level, is proposed to serve as a home office. This space uses a split-level approach to minimize height and fit within zoning restrictions. The proposal includes use of a Transferable Development Right. Although non-conforming with respect to lot size, this non-historic property is an eligible "landing" site, as confirmed by the City through issuance of an official interpretation with respect to this specific property (attached). The use of a TDR assists the City's efforts to protect historic resources, compensating owners of historical properties for relinquishing a portion of their development right. The applicant owns a TDR having purchased it in anticipation of this addition after obtaining the City's official interpretation. Waters Ave. & Initial designs were reviewed with City staff for compliance with the , front of house Residential Design Standards. The applicant and the architects listened - - --- -tlm'~-~iÂ® Â®IÂ®Ill[ closely to the City staff to take account of staffs concerns. While not 1 41'111111111111111111'lilli required at the time of the Teague design, a few minor "jogs" in the existing .-----1]Ullillilll]Ill!]lilil!. side walls help provide visual relief and architectural interest. . _ _ -.RUIWE!!m e. The applicant explored making one or more significant sidewall jogs at roughly 35-45 feet into the property. These options caused the project to 2212 exceed the 40% demolition threshold. Between the extra scope, increased Â¢~2> expense, and the additional regulations applicable upon demolition, incorporation of new, substantial sidewall jogs became impractical. As mentioned, the applicant also briefly considered additions to the front of the home. These concepts were quickly panned for being too impactful on the original design of the home and for not addressing the cramped kitchen and dining areas, which are at the rear of the property. The Residential Design Standards call for a maximum sidewall depth of 50 feet. Section 26.410.030.Bl- Articulation of Building Mass states: A principal building shall be no greater than 50 feet in depth, as measured from the front most-wall of the front facade to the rear wall. The existing conditions of the structure measure the eastern sidewall at 54 feet 7+6 inches, clearly greater than the standard (adopted after the home was built) mandates. The proposed remodel will not lengthen this eastern sidewall. The western sidewall, measuring at 50 feet 77 inches in length, also will not be increased. The overall depth of the structure will be greater. This is possible by use of a chamfered corner, mimicking existing interior and exterior 45-degree angles of the current design. This design decision was prompted by the sidewall regulation but also creates an interior and exterior layout strongly preferred by the applicant. In the end, the proposed design does not change the length of any of the sidewalls. The sidewall standard, however, has been interpreted to account for the overall depth of the home, not just the length of the sidewall. So, while neither sidewall is increasing in length, the increase in the overall depth of the home necessitates this variation. The proposed design achieves that without increasing the visible mass of the house while preserving the integrity of the Teague design. Page 2 of 6 909 Waters RDS Standard of Review The Planning and Zoning Commission may authorize a variation from the Residential Design Standards if one of the two following criteria are met: LUC Section 26.410.020.D.1-2: An application requesting variation from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the deciding board shall find that the variation, if granted would: 1. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statement in Section 26.410.010.A.1-3; or 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site- specific constraints. We believe both criteria are met - there is a clear site-specific constraint and the design approach accomplishes the intent of ~L~~~-~... the sidewall requirement. The Katyal residence is an existing 'Z---k 1-. structure within an existing neighborhood. The Katyals are Ft) seeking an update to the property and a small addition to the f rear to accommodate better living conditions for their larger family. They have never sought to demolish the house. If a full "scrape and replace" were contemplated, adherence to the sidewall regulation would be much easier as the existing site- specific constraint would be removed. The existing home is .-@ highly functional and a nice element of Aspen's architectural inventory. Working with this existing building is unavoidable <-31 and represents a site-specific constraint. I mmi__p Applying new codes to existing properties necessitates . ----IjIMMIMIZIEY-=122- (3111-1-- 1 flexibility and recognition of existing circumstances. The City first initiated residential design controls in 1995 through the 'llillipet adoption of Ordinance 30. This home was built 5 years prior to any residential design criteria. The City's approach to Residential Design Standards has evolved with three or four 0..7.... versions of the Standards. Various versions of the Standards have layered on various compliance issues over the years, the current layer regarding sidewall length. The Teague-designed home is modest in its character and street presence and has fit-in with its Waters Avenue context for the past 25+ years. The adoption of the most-recent Residential Design Standards created this non-conformity. An acceptable design in this context is now non- compliant; but not by an action of the applicant. To shrink the sidewalls of the home to comply with the new standards does not appear as a fair or reasonable request. The applicant explored these options and quickly determined that it would undermine the integrity of the original Teague design. Doing so has other complications as well, including the level of demolition (exceeding the 40% threshold), the level of additional expense, the increase in project timeframe, the increased construction impacts on surrounding property owners, and the fact that the level of overall project complexity would far surpass normal, reasonable expectation. The applicant has no desire whatsoever to demolish the current home. Page 3 of 6 909 Waters RDS Shrinking the sidewalls would r ._i- -,:*Â¥0.14:iÂ·,4// a, 1: 3.Ii:+ 431- have a negligible effect on the ~~ EEZitiÂ®t~ ~ mil \*Inin< 'filiii public's view ofthe home. The Ell//,wirN. Sk-~ *Ine ...Zil... parcel is mid-block and does EMA~.d'41-1 148 no have an alley. The public has a minimal perception of the ......1.1,2.- :. sidewall length given the -Fl- - aspect of the property and the -i-'Il- - ~- view angles. Pictures to the right show the ~~ -~ sidewall view along the east ~ .//m//ai# 2#15~ side of the property (left) and along the western side of the ?~ 114 - property (right) - From the front of the house and anywhere on the street, it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to detect any change whatsoever. This is precisely the look the Katyals were seeking. f...1;4/~/01*~/1////~/~16//*1& F-% The home will remain small in comparison to the ./.38/Ii...1--./&...=IA -4 ---L~ 11~& context of the neighborhood. The Gant to the /"601. 11. south, larger single-family and duplex ,/0/1:4'll'lilill:/19:16/,ImiJ/1/.W 'al'.4. J ||1'111 1 - b.r/777' _,bRE"a structures, and a few multi-family buildings along Waters Avenue are larger in both footprint - 42 ... <hpgr.*1/I t-,1 $ and height than the 909 project. The aerial view, to the right makes this clear, as the houses 51.03-4... ~~ (including both of the neighboring houses) are t.wak/'.2 i.#Mill . 021"'lit. - I.E,t- far largerthan the proposed design (and most all %47.247 r of them are more than 50 feet in depth); the home with the proposed design would remain one of the smallest homes on the street. h.jit~. 3-7-1 -fÂ·.,1~ Incorporation of the chamfered corner is a design element preferred by the applicant. This angle relates to existing internal and external ques to the Teague design and allows the addition to related to the current home. The chamfered corner is also a design approach that meets the overall intent of the sidewall length standard. By clipping this rear corner, there is essentially no visual effect of the addition. The public view from Waters Avenue will be unchanged. Three general intent statements are included in the preamble of the Residential Design Standards Chapter. They read as follows: 1. Connect to the Street. Establish a visual and/or physical connection between residences and streets and other public areas. The area between the street and the front of a residential building is a transition between the public realm of the neighborhood and the private realm of a dwelling. This transition can strongly impact the human experience of the street. Improve the street experience for pedestrians and vehicles by establishing physical and visual relationships between streets, and residential buildings located along streets. Porches, walkways from front entries to the street, and prominent windows that face the street are examples of elements that connect to the street. Page 4 of 6 909 Waters RDS 2. Respond to Neighboring Properties. Reduce perceived mass and bulk of residential buildings from all sides. Encourage a relationship to adjacent development through similar massing and scale. Create a sense of continuity through building form and setback along the streetscape. Providing offsets or changes of plane in the building facades or reducing the height near side lot lines are examples of responding to neighboring properties. 3. Reflect Traditional Building Scale. Retain scale and proportions in building design that are in keeping with Aspen's historic architectural tradition, while also encouraging design flexibility. Reinforce the unique character of Aspen by drawing upon the City's vernacular architecture and neighborhood characteristics in the design of structures. Encourage creative and contemporary architecture, but at a scale that respects historic design traditions. Ensure that residential structures respond to "human- scale" in their design. Ensure that residential structures do not visually overwhelm or overshadow streets. Windows that are similar in size to those seen in historic Aspen architecture or limiting the height of a porch to be in line with the first story of a building are examples of reflecting traditional building scale. The current home presents a comfortable ......g..497.2, :. r ' connection to the street. Although it has a street- ~*li@SE*:23-21: '444. 1 â€¢14 44 acing garage, counter to a primary tenant of the ~ * 1,%124;** , Â·~,7 6% r =A,41.k, -/251 Residential Design Standards, the garage has a 74&*4.*fi~ 137Â«jl ~rion~~ea~~~psaec~bao~~h~rokont~~a~e '3 Zgu: -:~Il' 54 1 Jea:t minimize its appearance. For a property without an 7993/0 alley, this may be the least-intrusive street-facing garage in the community. : The home presents a friendly entrance and an overall sympathetic connection to Waters Avenue. %3.51 r. The large deck, large principal windows, and overall , :' D.F.Gy~ openness are consistent with the intent of the Residential Design Standards. No changes to the street relationship are proposed. Some expansion capability exists on this northern side of the home. However, the applicant does not want to change the front fagade for fear of disrupting the Teague design and increasing the visible mass of the house. A desire to keep the Teague design intact lead to a focus on the rear of the property where improvements to the kitchen / dining room relationship can be easily addressed with no impact on the public's view of the home. The home will continue to have a relatively small mass and scale ~ - compared with neighboring properties. Responding to ~27 /0 04 ~ neighboring properties could argue for a larger building. Multi- .......i:. -9Â»---2 1 Family and hospitality structures in the immediate surroundings, =llf/NFL *91 1-L 0/#.Ili. 1 as well as larger single-family and duplex structures, have larger IW~~*VT (ZiL 1API footprintsand heights. The existing homewillcontinue to provide I.,f)-. - p â€ž 4,-8,4.1 11 1 continuity in the street setback and a continuous massing along rÂ»Â« ':Â«4 - - - Â£ 1 the southern edge of Waters Avenue. 3,-JAWiOh ../.-.... 6,â€¢4 .16124././.&0*&42.I Page 5 of 6 909 Waters RDS The project will continue the design aesthetic of the home, reflecting traditional building scale. The original Teague design utilized traditional building materials and forms with a contemporary, eclectic skew. This creativity added to the community's vernacular architectural inventory. The scale of the building, placement and sizing of fenestration, and the clear break between first and second floors provides a human sale to the home and reflects, without duplicating, historic development patterns. The proposal maintains this traditional building scale sought by the Residential Design Standards and is faithful to the original design of the house and its light airy presentation. The proposed addition is as sympathetic to the Residential Design Standards as could be expected. No changes are proposed along the street. The home will continue to have a strong connection to the street, will continue its relationship with surrounding properties, and will continue to reflect the traditional building scale in Aspen. The request complies with the Standard of Review. The chamfered corner is an alternative design approach that enables the addition with no changes to current sidewall lengths. This clipped corner is also a design solution sympathetic to the Teague design and provides continuity of both interior and exterior architectural expression. The existing structure is intended to remain in place. Acknowledging the existing structure and its current dimensions is an unavoidable site-specific constraint. The owner has no desire to demolish this home; becoming mandatory if strict adherence to the sidewall length standard is required. We believe the Planning and Zoning Commission's issuance of this variation is well within the spirit and intent of the City's Residential Design Standards. It would be defensible from a Standard of Review standpoint as well as consistent with the desire to maintain enjoyable streetscapes in Aspen's residential neighborhoods. We look forward to your review and commentary and an opportunity to discuss this request with the Planning and Zoning Commission. Please let us know if we can provide additional information, if we can assist with a site visit, or if we can respond to your input in any way. Sincerely, Exhibits: 1. Application Form 2. RDS Checklist Chris Bendon, AICP 3. RDS Interpretation BendonAdams 4. Authorization to Represent 5. Agreement to Pay 6. HOA Form 7. Proof of Ownership 8. Pre-Application Summary 9. Vicinity Map 10. Survey 11. Drawing Set Page 6 of 6 909 Waters RDS Exhibit 1 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LAND USE APPLICATION Project Name and Address: 909 Waters Avenue Parcel ID # CREQUIRED) 2737-182-81-003 APPLICANT: Name: 909 Waters 11 C.. a Colorado I imited Liability Company / Neal Katyal Address: 909 Waters Avenue, Aspen CO, 81611 Phone#: 202.903.7800 Email: katyaln@law.georgetown.edu REPRESENTIVATIVE: Name: BendonAdams Address' 300 South Spring Street Suite 202, Aspen CO 81611 Phone#: 970.925.2855 Ext 3 email: reilly@bendonadams.com Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions Single-family residence proposed for remodel and additional along the rear of the property. RDS variation of sidewall length request. Application proposes landing a TDR. Review: Administrative or Board Review Required Land Use Review(s): RDS Variation Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields: na na 1, existing Net Leasable square footage Lodge Pillows Free Market dwelling units Affordable Housing dwelling units O Essential Public Facility square footage na Have you included the following? FEES DUE: $ 3,250.00 Ul Pre-Application Conference Summary ~ Signed Fee Agreement ~ HOA Compliance form |71 All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary November 2017 Citv of Asoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 Residential Design Standards * Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist T}q OnÂ·.{FA,MI Address: 909 WATERS AVE, ASPEN CO 81611 Representative: BendonAdams Parcel ID: 2737-182-81-003 Email: Chris@BendonAdams.com Zone District/PD: R-15 Phone: 970.925.2855 Instructions: Please fill out the checklist below, marking whether the proposed design complies with the applicable standard as written or is requesting Alternative Compliance (only permitted for Flexible standards). Also include the sheet #(S) demonstrating the applicable standard. If a standard does not apply, please mark N/A and include in the Notes section why it does not apply. If Alternative Compliance is requested for a Flexible standard, include in the Notes section how the proposed design meets the intent of the standard(s). Additional sheets/graphics may be attached. Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to applyfor a new Administrative Compliance Review. Alternative Standard Complies N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes Compliance B. 1.Articulation of Building Mass A variation of this standard is requested. (Non-flexible) - The proposed remodel doesn't alter the existing building orientation. B.2.Building Orientation , i (Flexible) The proposed remodel doesn't alter the existing building orientation. B.3.Build-to Requirement / 1 1 (Flexible) 1 1 The existing building is not altered on the street-facing side. A large loggia B.4.One Story Element ~ (Flexible) ' serves as the one-story element, alternative complance. A.206 C.1.Garage Access / No garage is not being changed. (Non-fiexible) V ~ No changes to the garage are proposed. C.2.Garage Placement 1 (Non-flexible) No changes to the garage are proposed. C.3.Garage Dimensions * (Flexible) 1 V--1 Page 1 of 2 Exhibit 2 Residential Design Standards * Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist THE CmeÂ¥,AFT Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to applyfor a new Administrative Compliance Review. prflil"7,1~-19 . --i'----i=--. -Il.~X--I Standard ")gill~~omplie4 - Compliance , N/A ;,__ ,~~ ~ ~ - Sheet #(s)/Notes :25*~-.4:2: ,â€¢~ j; C.4.Garage Door Design , ~ / No changes to the garage are proposed. (Flexible) 4 -. D.1.Entry Connection The existing building's front entrance is not being relocated and currently faces (Non-flexible) the street. A.202 D.2,Door Height The proposed entry door height is unchanged from existing, 8'-0". A.301 (Flexible) D.3.Entry Porch 1 No changes to the existing entry porch are proposed. A.206 (Flexible) - 1 Ref. sheet A.301 for The existing window grouping creates transparency on the E. 1.Principle Window j i (Flexible) I south (street-facing) elevation. No changes are proposed. E.2.Window Placement , Reference A.301 1 t (Flexible) I V No non-orthogonal windows are proposed. A.301 E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit ~ (Flexible) V E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location The stairwell is within the building footprint. No lightwells are proposed along (Flexible) the street frontage. A.205 Horizontal wood siding is being considered, consistent on all sides. Fiber cement board would E.5.Materials : be used as accent. A. 303. Also, see renderings. These changes may be deleted for budget (Flexible) considerations. Page 2 of 2 Exhibit 3 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LAND USE INTERPRETATION JURISDICTION: City o f Aspen APPLICABLE CODE SECTIONS: 26.710.040.D.11, Floor area ratio (applies to conforming and nonconforming lots o f record) 26.710.050.D.10, External floor area ratio (applies to conforming and nonconforming lots of record) 26.710.060 D.10, Floor area ratio (applies to conforming and nonconforming lots ofrecord) 26.710.070.D.10, Floor area ratio (applies to conforming and nonconforming lots of record) 26.710.080.D.10, Floor area ratio (applies to conforming and nonconforming lots of record) 26.312.040 Nonconforming Lots of Record 26.535.030 Transferable Development Rights EFFECTIVE DATE: November 29, 2017 WRITTEN BY: Leslie Lamont, Contract Planner 01*46 APPROVED BYÂ£ A f VULLIAsica Garrow, Community Development Director SUMMARY: Staff has recently fielded an inquiry requesting clarification as to whether a Historic Transferable Development Right (TDR) can be landed on a nonconforming lot of record. This code interpretation is requested by 909 Waters LLC, represented by Chris Bendon of BendonAdams. Although the property in question is within the Moderate-Density Residential (R- 15) zone district, the following Interpretation currently applies to the Medium-Density Residential (11-6) zone district, the Moderate-Density Residential (R-15) zone district, the Moderate-Density Residential (R-15A) zone district, the Moderate-Density Residential (R-158) zone district; and the I,ow-Density Residential (R-30) zone district. Code Interpretation TDR extinguishment on Non-Conforming Lots Issued November 29, 2017 Page 1 "1 BACKGROUND: In this specific case, the property is located within the R-15 zone district and is approximately 6,000 square feet. In the R-15 zone district the minimum lot size is 15,000 sqvare feet, The property is improved with a detached single-family home and the existing floor area is just under the allowed maximum for this sized lot which is 3,240 square feet. Extinguishment of a Historic TDR on this property would provide an additional 250 square feet of floor area per Section 26.710.050. D.10. According to the applicantls representative, beyond the lot size, there are no other nonconformities on the property. The existing floor area, height, setbacks, etc. are all conforming to the R-15 zone district dimensional requirements as well as Permitted uses - detached residential dwelling. The applicant's representative has reviewed the proposal to use a Historic TDR with the planning staff but has requested an official Interpretation. INTERPRETATION: This Interpretation provides a code interpretation regarding whether a nonconforming lot of record can be a receiver site for extinguishment of a TDR. Sections 26.710.040. D. 11,26.710.050.D.10,26.710.060.D.10,26.710.070. D.10, and 26.710.080. D.10 include the following language: Each City historic transferable development right certificate extinguished, pursuant to Chapter 26.535, Transferable development rights, shall allow an additional two hundred and fifty (250) square foot of floor area. Each residence on the parcel, excluding accessory dwelling units and carriage houses, shall be etigible for one (1) floor area increase in exchange for the extinguishment of one (1) historic TDR. .... Nonconforming uses and structures shall not be eligible for this floor area / * increase.... (Emphasis added) Section 26.535.030, Applicability and prohibitions, describes the eligibility of receiving sites which shall include all properties in the City of Aspen permitted additional development rights for extinguishment of a Historic TDR in Chapter 26.710, Zone Districts. This Section also provides that the allowable development varies depending upon the zone district of the receiving site and the use ofthe land. Although the subject lot is a nonconforming lot of record, the use ofthe property is an allowed use - Detached residential dwelling. Section 26.312.050 A. identifies criteria by which a nonconforming lot of record may be utilized: A. General. A detached single-family dwelling and customary accessory buildings may be developed on a lot of record if: 1. The lot of record is in separate ownership and not contiguous to lots in the same ownership; and Code Interpretation TDR extinguishment on Non-Conforming Lots Issued November 29, 2017 Page 2 2. The proposed single-family dwelling can be located on the lot so that the \ yard, height, open space and floor area dimensional requirements of the zone f district can be met, or a variance is obtained from said dimensional requirements pursuant to Chapter 26.314. Staff findsthat inthe above referenced zone districts (R.&63 R-15, R-15A, R-15B and R-30), ifthe use of the property is a detached single-family dwelling; and if it conforms to the allowances and limitations regarding the permitted use on a nonconforming lot per section 26.312.050A (noted above), then a Historic TDR may be extinguished on a nonconforming lot. Additionally, to land a TDR, it will need to be confirmed that a nonconforming lot of record is not contiguous to lots in the same ownership and there are no other nonconformities associated with this property. Once verified, the extinguishment of a Historic TDR on properly, for a single-family home, that is a nonconforming lot of record in the above referenced zone districts is permitted. APPEAL OF DECISION: Any person with a right to appeal an adverse decision or determination shall initiate an appeal by filing a notice of appeal on a form prescribed by the Community Development Director. The notice of appeal shall be filed with the Community Development Director and with the City office or department rendering the decision or determination within fourteen (14) days ofthe date of the decision or determination being appealed. Failure to file such notice of appeal within the prescribed time shall constitute a waiver of any rights under this Title to appeal any decision or determination. This Interpretation was provided on November 29,2017, and shall become effective on November - 29, 2017. This Interpretation of the Land Use Code shall be valid until such time as the code sectiofts specified are amended to implement this clarification or for other purposes. Code Interpretation TDR extinguishment on Non-Conforming Lots Issued November 293 2017 Page 3 Exhibit 4 * BendonAdams Septernber 1 5. 2018 Jessica Garri,w. AILY Comniur;tv DevelÂ·opment Director City of Aspen 130 So. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: 909 Waters Avenue; Aspen, CO. Ms. Garrow: Please accept this letter authorizing and BendonAdams LLC to represent our ownership interests in 909 Waters Avenue and act on our behalf on matters reasonably associated in securing land use approvals for the property. If there are any questions about the foregoing or if I can assist, please do not hesitate to contact me. Property - 909 Waters Avenue; Aspen, CO 81611 Legal Description - City and Townsite of Aspen, Block 120, Lots F and G Parcel ID - 2737-182-81-003 Owner - 909 Waters LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company Kind Regards, Neal Katyal 909 Waters LLC 4806 Morgan Drive Chevy Chase, MD 20815 202.903.7800 katvaln@law.georgetown.edu 300 SO SPRING ST 1 202 1 ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 1 BENDONADAMS.COM -1 Exhibit 5 . 14' SPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ly,9,6:'2'*-.il:-23'W.-.:y,.i . '..'.':..c,r~/ Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between Ihe City of Aspen ("City") and Please type or print in all caps 903 W.aters Avenue Address of Propertv: 909 Waters LLC BendonAdams Proper-ty Owner Narne: Representative Name (if different from Property Owner) Billing Name and Address Â· Send Bills to : Neal Katyal; 909 Waters LLC; 4806 Morgan Drive; Chevy Chase, MD 20815 Contact info for billing: e-mail: katyaln@law.georgetown.edu Phone: 202.903.7800 I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2017, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that l am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. Ihave read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, 1 agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 3,250 deposit for 10 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ depositfor hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Signature: Jessica Garrow, AICP Community Development Director PRINT Name: Neal Katyal, Manager 909 Waters LLC City Use: Title: (V\11,6 3 tf- Fees Due: $ Received $ Case # November 2017 Citv of Asoen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920 5090 ___A__Exhibit 6 - ''f-F - t'.' Homeowner Association Compliance Policy .**p All land use applications will wi ine City of Aspen are required to Include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) clÂ·rtifying tile scope of work Included In the land use application complles with all applicable covenants and homeawner association policies. The certification must be sionedby the prope/ty owner or Attom"V re,),ru:VotilliL.ttle-mupe/tv owner, Name. Neal Kntyal, Manager; 909 Waters LLC -- Property _ . .. Owner ("I"): Email: katyaln@law georgetown.edu Phone N8.: 202.903.7800 '6 3 , Address of 909 Waters Avenue 1 Property: (subject of Aspen, CO 81611 application) I certify as follows: (pick one) - ~ This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. pe U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or - covenant beneficiary. A I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. 1 4 understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: Ill/#.. date: 9- 1 2.-/r . Owner printed name: Neal Katval, Manager: 909 Waters LLC or, )1,9,11121 Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: d . .... '4- . -i:-6, 6.~2:4#Ag~~b/2.02:A,... Mi "' 4'- +-~ 94:706.sitiqi .4 Exhibit 7 ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC 715 WEST MAIN STREET, SUITE 202 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 OWNERSHIP & ENCUMBRANCE R-EPORT This report is based on a search made of documents affecting the record title to the property described hereinafter, searched by legal description and by the names of the grantor or grantee. Consequently, the information as to record owner is taken from the most recent recorded Vesting Deed, and the information as to existing encumbrances reflects those documents of record which specifically described the subject property by legal description or which refer to the owner of the property which are filed by name only and do not include the legal description of the property. No information is furnished relative to easements, covenants, conditions and restrictions. This report does include the results of a search under the names of the property owner(s) in the general index. Liability of Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC under this Ownership and Encumbrance Report is limited to the fee received. Effective Date: September 15,2018 Property Address: 909 Waters Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611 Schedule No: R004676 Parcel No: 273718281003 Taxes: Taxes for the year 2017 have been paid in full in the amount of: $13,530.60. Taxes for 2018 are not yet due or payable. Legal Description: Lots F and G, Block 120, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. Record Owner: 909 Waters LLC, a Colorado limited liability company ' The following liens were found affecting the subject property: Deed of Trust from 909 Waters LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of Citibank, N.A., to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $4,075,000.00 ' dated November 12,2015, and recorded November 12,2015, as Reception No. 624796. Attorne~s fiple Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC //1 1 11 6-x / UU. 7\(1/rruU ) By: Wihfer Van Alstine, Authorized Agent TELEPHONE (970) 925-7328 A A A FACSIMILE (970) 925-7348 49 440* Exhibit 8 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY DATE: August 27,2018 PLANNER: Kevin Rayes, 429.2797 PROJECT NAME AND ADDRESS: 909 Waters Avenue- RDS Variation PARCEL ID# 2737-182-81-003 REPRESENTATIVE: Kim Raymond, Kim Raymond Architects & Interiors DESCRIPTION: (Existing and Proposed Conditions) The potential applicant is interested in requesting a variation from the Residential Design Standards forthe remodel of a single-family dwelling located at 909 Waters Avenue, zoned R-15Â· This lot is located insidethe Aspen Infill Area. The existing single-family dwelling (built prior to existing RDS) exceeds the 50-ft. maximum sidewall depth prescribed in the current Residential Design Standards. The proposed remodel ~ ~ project would addtotheexisting sidewall depth and contributetothe non-compliance of the dwelling. The ~ ~}0% proposed project requires a variation forthe following standard: 47 ~ 1. 26.410.030Â·B.1 -Articulation of Building Mass(Non-flexible) Non-flexiblestandardsarethose standardsthatshall be met byall projectssubjecttothe Residential Design Standards, with no Alternative Compliance permitted. If the application is found to be inconsistent with any of the Non-flexible Standards as written, the applicant may either amend their proposal or seek variation, pursuantto Section 26.410.020.C, Variations. * A variation requires review by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a public hearing. An application e '< 4 ~ requesting a variation from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the Planning and 7 Zoning Commission shall find thatthe variation, if granted would: i. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in :2 the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.A.1-3; or 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards V For yourconvenience- linkstothe Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below: Land Use Application Land Use Code REVIEW BY: â€¢ Staff for Complete Application â€¢ Planningand Zoning Commission REQUIRED LAND USE REVIEW(S): â€¢ None 130 South Galena Street Aspen CO 81611-1973 I P, 970 920.5000 I F: 970920.5197 I cityofaspen.com PUBLIC HEARING: Yes, Planning and Zoning Commission It is the responsibility of applicant to coordinate with Planning staffto meet the notice requirements for the public hearing: GROWTH MANAGEMENT QUOTA SYSTEM: Yes, if there is an addition of floor area related to the remodeling of the single-familydwelling PLANNING FEES: $3,250 deposit forio hours of stafftime (additional/fewer hours will be billed/refunded at a rate of $325 per hour) REFERRALFEES: No. TOTAL DEPOSIT: $3,250 APPLICATION CHECKLIST - These items should first be submitted in a papercopv. 1 Completed Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement. 0 Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). D Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. Il Applicant'sname, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. Il HOA Compliance form (Attached to Application). 0 A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. Â¤ A written description of the proposed remodel an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the developmentapplication and relevant land use approvalsassociated withthe property. 0 Completed copy of the Residential Design Standard Checklist: https://www .citvofaspe n.com/Docu mentCe nter/V i ew/i697/RDS -Application-Packet--- S F-DX Â¤ Written responsesto applicable review criteria. Depending on further review of the case, additional items may be requested of the application. Once the application is deemed complete by staff, the applicant/applicant's representative will receive an e-mail requesting submission of an electronic copy of the complete application and the deposit. Once the deposit is received, the case will be assigned to a planner and the land use review will begin. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. A . a . 0 2-3 40* . r. ' -30 . - 4%4 J 7 %*22? , . .4 4 #r:a -* A- 0 2.21 I .Â«Â»44*tr: D *fii 054*Y. I~* .1. Â»11/eer '.~2~.1 Ii"4*4:Afjj'. '1 - . -\.rk?~7~t4~: ~i' 1 9li j.,4.12 f 4 } j/;4 0 rM 8 - F 'i .5,41 0-, e a",3, ./ - + + 9- ' X 4:1 "*'4"& 1 *fi \2v,t_ t, -fitb-ofl~f AVet ..Â·' .- " TRe Lei I Nellt ~~1. 2 ,.4 lie -40. * Chateau Roa 1 9. 1 Â¥ 5/ 9 i L. , 1WAA} 4 666/948 4~~~~/ ~~:* ~29 ./f~'Sfil frilÂ»-,11%/,F ,. J i. 344 2.38. ,~ N Â¥'~ ~ F. ' 4 ~ 4 4*-'- Â·,~-.k;,1Â·.4t.krs;f; - 1 ... .. 3 1 . 2 i 1 'k 4*~ 44 4. 41 7/ 1/<2, . ; #di ' 2 k Â£ * 44- 4. 1.67 #L k ld.,- 29" aâ€¢~p 4391 .2-+ - :p/bm LAR , 44.4 E ~ '4, sk>f: 03% > ** ~, ~~~ 2 S,14194n~Â¥Â·A~ ~' ~~~&.. 1 ., a &6 4 2,4.~1 } k '64Â© The GA.f 44* ' 1," -i i ~*47*0 6,4, 3208 Exhibit 10 CITY OF ASPEN ~ IMPROVEMENT SURVEY 44- LOTS F AND G, BLOCK 120 CITy AND TO WNSITE OF ASPEN ~ PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO 0 3 10 20 1' = 10' NIOTES ITY OF- ASPEN 1) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: GPS #4 LOTS F AND G, BLOCK 120, Clrf AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. CITY OF ASPEN GPS #1 (7909.13') LOT SIZE- 6000.0 SQ.FT.*. 2) BASIS OF BEARING: A BEARING OF S14Â·50'49~W BETWEEN A FOUND REBAR AND YPC LS# 37935 AT THE N.E PROPERTY CORNER AND A FOUND REBAR AND YPC LS# 37935 AT THE S.E. PROPERTY CORNER. %1 : 3) THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR. TITLE INFORMATION REUED UPON FOR THE PREPARAnON OF THIS SURVEY FURNISHED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO., COMMITMENT NO. 15003435. DATED 10/02/2015 4) UNIT OF MEASUREMENT FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE U.S. SURVEY FOOT. EDGE OF p A #ACENT 5) ELEVATIONS BASED UPON CITY OF ASPEN GPS MONUMENT NO. 1 (7909.13') NAVD 1988 DATUM. BENCHMARK=7909.51' AT N.W. PROPERTY CORNER. CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 1(ONE) FOOT. YPC 6) ACCORDING TO FIRM MAP 08097C0204, PANEL 204 OF 325. DATED JUNE 4,1987, LS# 9184 SAID LOT IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN ZONE X AND OUTSIDE THE 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. BENCHMARK=7909.51 7) CITY OF ASPEN BUILDING RESTRICTIONS: SETBACK RESTRICTIONS: R-15 ZONE DISTRICT REGULATIONS. S75'09'11 *E SIDE YARDS: 10.0 REAR YARD: 10.0' 60.0~, ----~#'Ck )- FRONT YARD: 25.0' RES. 30.0' ACCESSORY / -- \ 8) DISTANCE TO NEAREST INTERSECnNG STREET: 200 FEET=E. YPC 9) NO NATURAL HAZARDS WERE FOUND TO AFFECT SAID PARCEL ACCORDING TO MAPS e\ LS, 37935 PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 25.0' i .-17 ~ ~ CONCRETE \\ 5 0 DRIVEWAY ~ 4.7 1 11-12 1 X. 72. \ .4 \ LEGEND 13.7 . UPPER FLOOR GABLE-7937.8 7912.43 ~ Â® INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED. 8 . N YPC YELLOW PLASTIC CAP 0.. 1.10-7 FF-7413.01 16.9 11-16 LOT E 10.0' -. ' m TELEPHONE RISER EM ELECTRIC METER g k 2 - la.oÂ· .9 --0 9 Â© CABLE RISER GM GAS METER G W,1-17 / SINGLE FAMILY 9-14: TRUNK DIAMETER(INCHES)-DRIP UNE(FEET) LOT H DECIDUOUS TREE e RESIDENCE ~ EVERGREEN TREE F e-,2 / 2/ g Â¥} h. 2 12-15 .0 ." 1 12-,5 e UPPER SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE \ DECK PAnO ~ 1, MICHAEL P. LAFFERTY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON 10/2017 OF THE L -- --*- I ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND. THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL 1 1 j 12-18 / IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS. RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THESE PREMISES ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN. ERROR OF NO M - -7913--- _-~ - 7- ~ CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 1 /15,000. /-10 1-,21.16 N75Â·0911 W VICINITY MAP 1 "=400' *w 10~ 4/ 1 60.00' / Tch-,0 4 e MICHAEL P. LAFFERTY PLS. # 37972 GANT CONDOMINIUMS DATE: YPC LS# 37935 0.50'MT.COR. 24. 94/W' F 1~~ DATE SURVEYED: 10/2017 REVISED: FILE NO: 17565 carbondale /081.23 NOTICE. AccordIng to Colorado low you must comm& . anÂ¥ 12:11 acten baned CLIENTÂ· KATYAL 4133 clystal splings rd phone 970Â·37/1919 upenan,defectlnlhiss~â‚¬) wiÂ·m_nthrec Ycarsaftervoufintd*ov=suchdcfcct fax 970-963Â·5873 Innoevenimayany.er.onbasedup:inan. deteÂ·lindu: sunevbe./I.L.ncedmon laff@sap'ls.net than ten yean fri,m the date of the certlficat;onsbe,~heT# N06Â·35'ICE D 1 KATYAL RESIDENCE 909 WATERS AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 -Jr- . e. 3 r . ./ J.1 -Â·V. 4 le , 1 Â·Â·- 7 14 .. , 1 4 % b .. .1 '14 . 1.. . . I . . ..7 h % . 7- , Â· /63 0944- n * .9 --J . 4 : 4=:*. , ,/ biqi*I. f - 2-- 'U 48:,>;i,2. - I. *gâ€¢m . 1 9. . y.22':).4:P.1/14,Â£ . I e ia . #b//6,/IrlÂ¢, 5: 1 Y~ 11 ws 4 '~:11 70'43> 1 ji' 1,13&-3**la~.~:~/~Ili.~-4Jk... .r> RDS APPLICATION SET SHEET INDEX G. 1.01 GENERAL INFORMATION A. 1.01 EXISTING SITE PLAN A. 1.02 PROPOSE SITE PLAN A. 1.03 PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS A.2.01 EXISTING LOWER LEVEL A.2.02 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL A.2.03 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL A.2.04 EXISTING ROOF LEVEL A.2.05 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 0 A.2.06 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL -- 01. A.2.07 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL A.2.08 PROPOSED OFFICE LEVEL 3 0 -o CD A.2.09 PROPOSED ROOF LEVEL 8 -1 3 rrI A.3.01 EXISTING ELEVATIONS A.3.02 EXISTING ELEVATIONS A.3.03 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS A.3.04 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS A.9.01 3D: EXISTING A.9.02 3D: PROPOSED A.9.03 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE ... KATYAL RESIDENCE RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION GENERAL KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH ASPEN, CO 81611 (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING INFORMATION G.0.01 I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 1NPM20 Exhibit 11 1 ., -0 2 WATERS AVENUE -,2 --'-: -'' --- GRAVEL PARKING ..p =....4.. 0 1910 PROPER Y LINE 1 q 0 01 4 k*E 0 1 97 1 04 >D 12 ------- I 1 0 UJ E e O PE FLAT ROOF ' 0,0- 4 1 1 6,9935 1 41-i= .1 0 I . r 1 2% 0 1 24 1 . E g i 2131 0 1' 1 1 0191 1 1 621*31 1 . 1 91 1 0 r | TREE TO BE < ' ~ REMOVED L .4/1 - SLOPE SLOPE , . 6 1 .1Â·-0.: i te 1'-0": 1 '-0.' 0 1 1 0- q | TREE TO BE ' REMOVED A 11 1 1 0 0 | TREE TO BE .- --- ---- --- -- ------------------- ------ I P ~ REMOVED E 09 1.f "1 f 4 i g g r 2 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -61 1 1 1 1 1 1 9017 1 1 1 1 i 949 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 71 6:> r.6 M I rn -' 94= 0|~ L- --e---4 ---------- - ----------- Jl gm Â°Â° fly Fl EXISTING SITE PLAN [ DATE ~ ISSUE ~ Elit~iLEEEzzl EXISTIING ~ A.1.01 ~ yeak A~ 1- -- 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOTMEASURE ONE INCH ASPEN, CO 81611 (1") EXACTLY. THIS DRAWING L--1-----1 SITE PLAN I I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I | WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR | I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO | REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL 3Nll A1W3 '. I GRAVEL PARI<ING'~ 1-- i '-,- . WATERS AVENUE.-- - --.-.TH.... , Â·-.Â·Â·Â·~':/0 GRAVEL PARI<ING ....~'-2 -': i. tr-It- 7910 PROPERTY LINE --------- 1 1 *l 1 1 1 / 1 4% I I O 01 1 2 0 Al L. 1 . P PÂ» 1 C,Â» 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 >t .1 2 1 1 ------- 1 1< :tif 1- 01.18 2 10 19 LP NO U..1 -IJ 1 1 1 L E L PE FLAT ROOF 1 1 SLOPED SLOPED SLOPED SLOPED 1 --1 ROOF ROOF ROOF ROOF - 1 RADON PIPE ~TERMINATION LOWER & MAIN LEVEL FIREPLACE POWER 1 1 VENTED FLUES 1 1 1 1 1 2,< lâ‚¬%5~ FLAT ROOF 1 *4 1 1 1 6, OFF-90% 1 1 1 86 1 .39 1 949, 20/ \ / bey. --f- &01\ r y 1 I I ri.- 0 1 1 44 1 FLAT ROOF 6 1 2 1 u.1 - SLOPED 2 0 1 ROOF m '0 + I 1 0 .1 1 1 1 j 1 1 L f $ 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U.1 1 1 1 ZI | 79 4 1 0 SETBACK LINE 09 03 1 29 -1 m m cn 40 1 0 1 1 0 11 60 ' 0 1 - Z &90 Â»42 CD-3Â§*POS-EDSIT-E_-PLAN . I Scde: A-S NOTED | DATE | ISSUE | KATYAL RESIDENCE rJERETRDS-UNCE-li-Gir--1 k--t-----1 PROPOSED 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION 1 1 1 KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH ~ A.1.02 ~ ASPEN, CO 81611 (19 EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING L___L--_____d SITE PLAN 1 I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 3Nll *1213 1N3MdO13A3 0 '. FLOORAREA CALCULATIONS CITY OF A5PEN ZONING SUBMISSION PROPOSED SUBGRADE LEVEL EXPOSED WALL CALCU[ATIONS TOTAL WALL AREA EXPOSEDWALLAREA(SQ. SUBGRADE LEVEL WALL. LABEL (SQ. FT.) FT.) 1 281 0 2 283 0 3 113 0 4 359 22 5 373 0 6 406 20 7 35 22 8 35 22 9 175 0 OVERALL TOTAL WALL AREA (SQ. FT.) 2060 EXPOSED WALL AREA (SQ. FT.) 86 % OF EXPOSED WALL (EXPOSED/TOTAL) 4.17% SUBGRADE GROSS FLOOR AREA (SQ. FTJ 2217 SUBGRADE COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 92.55436893 w -----------------1---......-.._----_-_..~U~551~~ Z TOTAL PROPOSED FLOORAREA CALCULATIONS : u E-Â·11 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 93 5 W j MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.1 1527 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 1625 . i OFFICE LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 79 ....&/A ' GARAGE FLOOR AREA 164.5 DECK FLOOR AREA (15% OF 3490 - 523.5) 522 SQ. FT. 0 EXEMPT - usr~x ~ TOTAL PROPOSED FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) 3488.5 (3490 ALLOWED W TDR) ; 7 ElKI 3 1 2 3 Â· Â· i ~. lim, '2-Ill %24 Â·Ea 11 1 #06;> 91 0 2.21Â·',qÂ·t : 283sli' L , . !226 i 4 5 - I Ir...fc kf' %â‚¬M 1 UL- 1 ho- 1 6 78 9 -- : 2222 - - -1...1, :Elia -------- SE[BACKLINE O |35/11| 106 9 924 -4 C) PROPOSED FAR ELEVATIONS (1 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL FAR t1 2-KI,E-grr--i-r-_.~ L.,f=Ir-T//10- SETBACK LINE SETBACK lINE lip . ...i 1!m62182 ..:lk,2 4% - 46 1 :' :' 1 1 J 1 . 1 1 4 m"/~ ... 1 1 1 '' \ 1 el EL---221 i 4 '20 1 1 1% 1 1 .L. 1 - -- r 329 sq It 1 1 ' 50% COUNTS 1 - -1,f:7,4,;1 =164.5 sqft Uf=! , i A. ,,1.025'sof~ 11 1. 1 111-31=m 12 i 1 11=212=1 , 1 : B MUM M101 1 Â·'d 9 ' ./ig'gn 1 0-2 1 1 1 . 1 284 sq ft Cl , Â·. Â· ' 1 Â§20 ... ' 0 -' I --------03Â·2=4-~. 1 â‚¬ 3' c,) r, 1 4.* _z.~T ... Y. m T --*-I - 1. 1Â¥ : 02 158 sqft ~ 11 ~ rti ..1 1- r..0 .*0 3 1 1 ---------------------------il-------------------- (/ -EFBACK LINE SETBACK LINE STERI,#------------ --- --- -- ------2 0 C) PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FAR C-) PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FAR A PROPOSED ROOF LEVEL FAR S~-0/10'76---~ ~,777-77-0-_-__--_~ er=Â£-i/-6/ Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE -- KATYAL RESIDENCE 9.limiling 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL PROPOSED KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. 1 ~ DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH r---1-~ FLOOR AREA i A.1.03 ~ ASPEN, CO 81611 (1") EXACTIY, THIS DRAWING I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR t--1--------1 CALCULATIONS I I www. kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 3Nll NIV813S 3Nll )10%3i. 3N !1 >I)'Â¢91' IN 31,201 N3dS PROPERTY LINE ----Ill.- -- -- -- -- ---- -- ----- Ill/- --- -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 @* e @9 @ 1 40-0" I ' ' 12'-51/2" L ~ 15'-1" 1, 1 12'-5 1/2" i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 11 1~ 1 1 1 1 1; 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 SETBACK LIVE | J --|. 1 1-.1 Il-i I 04 1 5 gl 11 1' 1 -1 -----1-_ -I- -Â® i 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 - 1 8 1 1 - 1 2-1 1 - 1 11 MECHANICAL ROOM ~ - 0 0 1 - 1 1 - 1 1 1 M CO - 1 1 - 1 11 13 -11 1 1 1 11 11 GARAGE 1 ABOVE 11 1 1 --1-00 - 1-4' 1 1 lei ------- -- - ---F~ - --- -~4- - - -~-- ---Â»1 FURNACE ROOM 1 1*3 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 61 l Ai 11 1 EN I \ Lr> 1 - 1 1~ Il - Bo Eo 1 - 1 1~ 1~ - 1 CBAWLSPACE ~ 1 1 1 @1 1 ~ .-~---3 STORAGE 4*ti | 1 1 1 1 16----------1---------------4-2----------------t-4--------jf,-1----------6 1 1 1 1 12 1 6 6 |1 STORAGE 24 ~ 01 1 - 1 STORAGE 1 1~ 1 1: 1 99 1 1~ - 1 0 Qt Ry .=cr % <E) 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 It 1! 1 1 12 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 11 11 I 1 1 1% l' Im I ~SETBACK LINE 1 1 11 1 1 1 W 0 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 820 al 1 1 11 < g 00 1 1 1~ 11 1 1 15-111 ~, ~ 12'-51/2 < 12-51/2" 1 1 40'-oIl mi L---- -9------Â»---8 ---------- -------J 0 1 PROPERTY LINE 9* H m - EXISTING LOWER LEVEL iii z SCALE 1/8 Z I.*"77*?" . 1 KATYAL RESIDENCE 9/20/18 Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL EXISTING 11 - 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH LOWER A.2.01 ASPEN, CO 81611 (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LEVEL 1 970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 -PIE?PERILL!NE 430 1 1146 3Nll Alk13dOZId / , PROPERTY LINE -------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 eve@* @ 1 1 40'-0" 5 6 12'-5 1/211 15'-1" L J 12'-5 1/2" , 5 1 1 1 It 1 1 1 1 IJ I~ 1 1 1 1 li I~ 1 1 1 1 1~ 1~ 1 1 1 1 li I~ 1 1 1 1 1~ 1~ 1 1 1 ' SETBACK Llf]4 ~ 1 - _ - - - - - - ~- - -H Ly J 1- a tri' 'Ar 5 -3 --6 1 1; 1 lei-------11---- -Â«491Â« N -1 -El 1 '1 .0 j tj, ,' I 1 '4 1 -/3 1 ~(ptl. 1 .- -') 9/.'.4 1 1 ~1 , *hi= 1 / I 11 / / 1 | OFFICE 1 il// 1 -0 1 '00 - I EQuuk 1 1 = i GARAGE ~ 1 11 -0 1 !* lim = - v- - - - 1 --------I -'. -Â© 1 1 1 1 10 1 1 144 el 11 1 --------------- 4 1 1 - IN I \ LO 1~ \33 - Bo - 1 LIVING i Il/ LAUNDRY -0 1 1 11 '01 1 1 1/ 1 11 IO-------------------------4-2---------------- --7 --6---61 upp 1 1 L - 1 ~U~- --A- -(0 ~ I â„¢\ 1 1 1 -7== 12Â» 1 1 1 i KITCHEN ~ 1 1/M b 1 9 11 1 IF=9'1 Im N 1 31~ILi_iII - - DINING _ I 6 8 0 Ile, e.'U I Q| ~Â»N~b . , 0 1 }41 A Y & 4 2 ..1 (69' 1 ,#71} r==lir==lic=14 - - -4-4 <0 1 11 11 1 1 11 1 1 I lilli E-1211 1 &11 1 1 1 11 11 61' 1 1 1 <1 1 11 11 Eli I 11 11 WL SETBACK LINE ' 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 Q 1 1 1 1 1 1 '.4, r" 1 1 1~ 1.~ 1 1 15'-1" 12'-5 1/2" 12'-5 1/211 1 1 40'-0:' 11 1 1 1 1 52 17 4 * <b vid I 6 (06 6 6â‚¬ 0 1 rri c L-------------- -------- r- U) 22 -0 O 71 = 4:k. 2 m CO *48. 69 0 'CALE 8 10 , EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 1%349'9;,30'Enfg'A Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE 114;+FÂ«%*1, KATYAL RESIDENCE 8-mmo 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL EXISTING Al/ -- 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH MAIN A.2.02 ASPEN, CO 81611 (1'9 EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LEVEL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 13'-101/2" â€žZ/L O L-,El 3Nll 11213dONd I ., PROPERTY LINE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 @9 9 99 @ 1 40'-0" 1 % I 12'-51/2" L i 15'dll 1, 1 12'-51/2" 1" 1 1 li 1 1 1 1 1 15 li 1 1 1 1 Iq I~ 1 1 1 1 1~ 1~ 1 1 1 1 1~ 15 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 SETBACK LIKE 1 O k 1 9.4 I l \ l/ 45 1 2 ~Â·-~| BEDROOM 1 (0~~ Z70 BEDROOM 2 ~\ ' Â£, u 00'3 BEDROOM 3 6 1 1 Â»71 \V/1 --- ---EL--------'-- ~------ f -----'- _Â®i 1 - 1 IlÂ© i 1 L - ([33} tp=k- ~u-z F===5? - 711 ~ -1 (.43) - I I '1 Q mill~l 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 C) .EM.1. 'O~3E ' ' . 9 jr'--4 ' 4=8 BATH 3 (1- 1 -*D 0- Q [14 d ~ 0\ LA I Ir=M !1 11+11 e.1 U... 1 -el -O el | 1 LO 0 IN 1 0- ...................- 1 1 1 1 -I -I-' - I - I-/ - - 1 1 ek ~-40 Â°. - 1 1.0- 1 1~ - - 1 MASTER BATH -~ -0-rh, U 1 OPEN TO 1 1 1 1 BELOW I lilli- = 1 0- I | ~-------- ~----3 ------1--- T -r---____ ----------------6 1 1 1 1 m- U 1 11 lili 11 1 1 1 11 -1-1 0 11 1 1 ~ 1 CLOSET i MASTER ; _ i BEDROOM Â· ~ 19 1 =6=11 - 1 0 01 N 1 1 -. 1 1 -0 1 1 1 92? 1 1. .. e-SLOPL 1'-0 : r.<i,- *r SLOPE . ~4 1;-00': 1 -0 I (E>- W- - - Iwl 1 IC IU 1 IM I 1 IID It 11 13 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1% 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 19 1 1 1 0 lili 1 1 1 1 fe SETBACK LINE 1 1 1 11 1 1 9 9 'U 1 1 1 1 1 jign, ' ' 1 1 1 1 1 -2 0 -~ C) | |' 12'-51/2" | 15-1 12'-51/2" 1 1 f ' 40-0" 1 ' O 1 1 W Weeae O 1 r.0 69 2 Ce L------------- -_----_J S2 m vo (1 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL -4 C 1 j 'CALE 1 8 1.0 Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE KATYAL RESIDENCE 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE 5UBMITTAL EXISTING 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH UPPER A.2.03 ASPEN, CO 81611 ~11,) EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I LEVEL I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING All 9/24/18 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 13'-101/2" â€žZ/L O L -,El It' p. '11' 3Nll Al~Eld OZId . 4 PROPERTY LINE -------Ill--- ------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 @fe @9 @ 1 40'-0" < 12'-51/2" L , 15'-1 1, I 12'-5 1/2 ''' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'q 11: 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1~ 1 1 1 1 1; 1~ 1 1 1~ 1 1 11 qFTRACIC I IKI~ 64 1.' 1 1 04 119 k 1 /0 1 I lin -r---- 1 1 1 1 1 L 6 1. 1 1 , 1 \ 1 1 1 VI Slept 31)PF 1 1 1% SLOPF 1-0 . 1'-0" 1-0. 3-0 ".0:1.0"10) ' , li I 1 11 / 1 .Ii, 1 1 :, 1 1 1 11 ~ 1 ..1 -1 .1 11 1 . 1 MI | ROOF DRAIN ~R'/ 1 11 11 1 1 .. 1~ 1 1 11 1 ''. 1 1 .' 1 Iii \ 1 . 4 11 - -2-1 -2 1 - 11 . *I 11 1 01 i 5 64Â· 1~ -TI . A EXISTING FIREP[ACE FLUE ', Â· 61 4 ., ~ TOBI REMOVED 'â€¢, 1 3 ? / - I cO P - 1 1 1 1~ ''','., 1 . ..1 .. 1 1 1..... 1 1---- 11 1 1 1 . ... 0 /1\ 1 i~ It /1- 1 11 -19 1 ,.,"' - ROOF DRAIN 2 '~. . 1 1 1 1./ 6 111 1 1 9 1 1- , 1 1 11 :1 , 1 1Â®- -:- - -Ir - D-,1 --- -14 ------- -,-1-- - | 1 SLOPE SLOPE . 4 1 2 " | ~ ~ ~T'.0 in in' ~. 0 =r 11 1 1. I <E) 1 1 i 1 1 1 11 lil 1 1 1 11 IIi I U.JI 1 11 11 11 gil 1 1 1 11 11 11 d 1 1 <1 1 D 11 0 1 r l' 1' 1 Vt I SETBACK LINE i i 1 1 11 11 1 1 #9 =3 1 1 1 1 1 1 'j I 1 1 12'-5 1/2" 15'-1' 32'-51/2" i 1 i 1 40'-0" 1 1 1 1 ' * 0 --- -------- -la- r- vJ kE; .= (1 EXISTING ROOF PLAN 3CALE 1/8 1 0 0 Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE KATYAL RESIDENCE 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL EXISTING A- .-=,=='.1.- 6 1 -I 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH ROOF A.2.04 ASPEN, CO 81611 (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LEVEL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 ,Â£/ L Ol -,El â€žZ/l O L-,El 3Nll *1213dOW PROPERTY LINE I-I--------I--------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 @9 9 @9 @ 1 40'-0" 1 % 1 12'-51/2" L i 15'-11' 1, 1 12'-5 1/2' .. 1 1 1~ 11 1 1 1 1 1 li 1 1 1 1 'J 11 1 1 1 1 11 1~ 1 1 1 1 1~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 SETBACK LINS 1(g)- H--- 0 1 1 1 Ul CLOSET 4 : 01 BATHROOM 4 1 1 1 1 I | - BEDROOM 4 ~ 1 1 - 1 2- KING BED | _ 15-7 1/8 ~ 1 & 0 0 h 1 Id 2, 1 1 1 1 2%4 /\24 GARAGE | 1 1 ABOVE 1- .1. I 1--------J c -Â© | ART WALL NEW RADON PPE 1 1 UP 0 1 1 el 1 9 1 17 1 1 14 -5 3/8 0/ 1 1711 1/4 1 1 1 1 1 , 11 - 6-7 7/8 1 34 _ 1 1 elli Â· .1 I 1 5Â¥ H I FAMILY MECHANICAL | 1 - 60 ROOM , 171.11 3/8 - I.,I t, 1 - 6 13& L.1 I i ' 1 Chi - U. .2 1. EXTRA MECH | 5 1 28 1 1 . 1 -4. STORAGE UNDER C - . 11/ I STAIRS IF NEEDED 1 1 109 1 1 1 1 11 - --1- - 1-1 ---1----------4-Â©~ 1 1 3 ' tze â€¢ I BEDROOM 5 1 3 z @11 POWDER J U- 4 1 1 132:U -1 Z 1 1 1 1 I 14-1 3/8 C . 1 64 1 1 1 9 1 It -O 11 ' - -27 jELL E4 | RWINpYÂ· 9 04 1 88 6 1 1 1 '' . -7-11 9 * --- --_I BAR |' 31-lrl ~-7-r..--811 17'F-----. f.-0-1- __s~Re[-1-------7------6 1 ~ WET - 73- 3 QUEEN BuNK wc . i =-L - - - -~U *) 1 - SHOWER 6 1 1 2 - 1 12Â·113/4" ~_. 1-4-2= 8*=-- 1 6.6 ., 4.4 1 -BN~BATH-- ICE> -Il- --14------ -*.-- ----- -'F iD' 1 1 1 - .CLED 1 BUNKROOM 2 1 6 Iii I r.41 1 1 fi Â¢> a STUDY A STORAGE 1 b co 1 1 1 ~ QUEEN BUNK 02 % 02 ID QUEENBUNK ( STORAGE - 1 -7 1 - -~6 -Â© 1 9 21 1 1 SETBACK LINE 1 1 3, m mi 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 ILI~ 1 1 12'-5 1/2" 151-1 12'-5 1/2" D N al 1 1' 40'-01' 11 6 1 __ yk + 5_4_ ____ _4 ' EM11 C. PROPERTY LINE C-) PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE KATYAL RESIDENCE 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL PROPOSED -9. 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION LOWER A.2.05 KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH ASPEN, CO 81611 (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I LEVEL I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 PROPERTY LINE /2" 116/ L L -18 L â€žUL 2-,59 3Nll )(0~8139 3Nll Al~13dOkld e 4D ... PROPERTY LINE ------------------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 @0 e @9 @ 1 40-011 1 % 5 1 12'-51/2" |, i 15'.1 1, I 12'-5 1/2" . I 1 1 15 15 1 1 1 1 14 li 1 1 1 1 1~ IJ 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 5 fri 1 1 1 1 SETBACK LINE NEVâ€¢ F OOD DED<!NG | EN At SUSP I DED ABOJE SLAB ~ ~ \ - (OVEF L JNG PATE) EL-RY AIE- DRIVEWAY - ~ le- 1 ------ - fÂ«--IHI--it -fla--4 -Ti - 1 7 11 â€ž . 1 , 1.1-1 -- - - -~~ -(01 0 I =RmA 1 '_L_LL .11 1 I /0/, 1 1 11 -0 ./ 1 1 // 1 lid 8% 1 ~ / ./1= 1 hi- OFFICE - POWDER 1 \,~_ ~ ~ l I 1 0 1 39 1 - 1 gl *5 14 1 GAUGE ~ 1 - i ENTRt cickp~ 1 11 --- NEW RAOON PIPE -~ 1 1 2 1 11 1 ---------7-1------------ -/1--------------------------61 1 1 1 el LEI[E] FÂ° ART OR SPECIAL WALL I 1---------------' l.0 1 1 N 1 9 INIC .-' ~_ ]__~-2.-- L.- I (,â€¢10) 9 5 --r-1 UP DN ~ 1 Ir Â£9 1 1- 1 |09 1 1 0 0 STORAGE ~ 1 - 9 1 ENG 183 - 1 OW - 2 1 5 1 1 1 81.....1 - 0-0 1 1 1 BUTLERS PANTRY lei ---------- -----------4-k-- -------i--*- . -11--A------------------- 4,1 0 1 7 PE4 T - FROSIED GLASS WALL ILLUI ILL=Ul i BUFFET I STAct< 1 1 1 11 1Â©1 -3 i KITCHEN 1 I'7 1.:<7 1 b b 1 | 3, , N . 2 3 N _ ~ â€¢ ' C\1 1 Ci DINING DCALION OF_ ___ EXISTING CORNER~ --- -- -- -~~- -Â® 1 109 sql, - 0 \'U 1~=J OF ADDEDNET 1 44> 1 1 j:\ LIVABLE SQ. FT , b 11 4 1 1 0 1 1 ED 1 1 11 I |-E~S-NNIGONC~NER ~ 1 1 1 6 1 11 1 1 44 1 1 1 80 - -1 M 1 Z b 20 1 1 | Diturl U.1 0 | |SETBACK LINE 1 1 1" ' ------Xy I f?g ;qit ~ ~ ~~ 11 1 1 1 1 i 12-51/2, 15'-1" 12'-5 1/2" 0 11 Â®40 41*5*. 1 40'-0" 11 5 1 -------- ------J iNE = rd 23 2 (1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL -4 49 SCALE 1/8 1.0 Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE KATYAL RESIDENCE 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL PROPOSED 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH MAIN A.2.06 ASPEN, CO 81611 (11 EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I LEVEL I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 131-10 1/2" â€žZ/1 0 L -,â‚¬ L .UL l-,9 L .UL Z-,175 3Nll A.1213dOZId I. D. PROPERTY LINE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 @* e @* 40'-0" 1 1 11 12'-5 1/2" 1, 1 15'-1" 1 12'-5 1/2" . 1 1 115 1 1 1 li Iq I 1 1 1~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 li I L 8 1 4 1 I N BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 3 2-0 1 21- 1 A ------r----- --F----__._I___-___6___~ ~ 1Â®- H---1[-4 - ------ 4 ---- --- i LE 1 ' 1.- 1 1 13 0111 0 1 1 <1)~,) L / BATH 2 r====r- { 1,~fl) .h - 1 - 61 01 12 - MAY REQUIRE - M h - a BATH 1 M~ BATH 3 1 8 /= - 0 , 1 1./ 1 \ 3Lu~~ REQUIRE\ /MAYREQUIREJ ~ ~ -0 1 0 CURB ~\ / CURB 2-11 9-510 -2 ---- 444, 1 NEW RADON PIPE~ | 1 || < ~ft_________TTZ_____---___ _L__]4-__________-27-3-----------7------------6 1 LJ- STA{*ED 1 -0 WAS|IER CLOSET I 1= & D#YER 5 1-1 up F SK(L!Gl IT ABOVE | I | 1 DASHED UNE INDI~TEs ~ 1 1 10 1 r * DN 111 0 iwi | 1 IE 1 1 1 0 = 1-- 1 1 4- 1 U i 1 ~ 111 4 6 jIB 3- a 1 MASTER 2-0 1 | | OPEN TO | | I BELOW I I J 1-2-_ NO CURB - 1 1- 1 | IN MASTER 1 le----------1-----1-- t--4-r----_______ ___-13'N FULLLEN~T~ ~A~- ~- - - -- -~ | 1 10==1=1 MIRROR 51 {OWER ~ -1-- - 1 9 ---A- -@) 1 1-= 11 1 " 1.-21% 11 1_1 | ~ MASTER L 11 1 1 ' BEDROOM 1 c4 - 1 1 1 ma 1 1-1 i CLOSET I 1 1,â€¢ 6.ht/2 i ON 1 1 1 IIi 11 1 -3 1 EXISTINGCORNER-1~ ~ 1 .~ ~ ~ 9 ORTAL 150 FRONT ------11-------- -\ :- iD I 54 5 6 1 1 OF ADDED OPEN .4 OF ~22[~NET ~ ~| 1, FACING GAS FIREPLACE . 9 9 wo TO BELOW SQ. FT. 1 : LIVABLE 50 FT 1 1 .: 1. b -0 1 2.- 2.- - Â« I I 1 I 1. O,9 1 : 1611 I ' , " I 1 A=- 41' p %' -11 1 !--_ __ __ __ '<-~~ --'F~ I 7--1 L LOCATION OF 1 EM EXISTING CORNER 40 1 1 :co' 1 2080 1 1 hz 1 1 11 U - LLI 1 liD 1 1. 11 1 1 11 SETBACK LINE i i 1 1 1 1 0 09 1 1 1~ 1~ 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 12'-5 1/2' 15'-111 , ' 12'-5 1/21' f ' /1 5 1 40'-0" I di? JOI * ~41 - - - -- -Icl- -3 m L_________ 21 63 r./J ~ PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL I-' , i , SCALE 1/8 1-0 2 0 Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE KATYAL RESIDENCE 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL PROPOSED A-I ... -- 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH UPPER A.2.07 ASPEN, CO 81611 (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LEVEL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 .Z/L L -,9 1 11 Z/l L -19 1 .0-,6 L .UL Z-,49 SETBACK LIN~ ~ â€ž 3Nll AlNEIdOW . I. PROPERTY LINE -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 Â®9 0 99 @ 1 40-oil 1 s I 12'-51/2" |, i 15'-1" 1, 1 12'-5 1/2" 4 1 . 1 1 1~ 11 1 1 1 1 It 'J 1 1 1 1 11: 1~ 1 1 1 1 1~ 1~ 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1~ 1 1 1 â‚¬FTRAGIC I INE 1 I \ 1 1 \1.. 1 64 0 |'L! 61 1 \ : 1 1 1 al 1.' 1 __ -4 ---'- -Â® 1 11\ , 1, 11 \ / 11 1 1 / 1 1 blop' 111 \ 1, 1 /1 '1 0. 1 -0 1-YÂ· 1-0 ... ; 1 1 1 11 I E., 11<1 0 11 911 1 0" 1' C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 \ / 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 ROOF DRWN- N , 1 294 1' 9 1 ./4 1 1 1 N -jEET,A*67055,(Z LOWER & MIN LEVEL 1 FIREPLAC E POWER ~~Â·~ 1 1 VENTED FLUES ~:I JA 1 // 1 j- 2 2 -/1-2 1 1 1 1 +3 / LO , M 6 1 A - 5002144 / 1 1 41 1 1%009' 1. ' I 11 - 1 Al\\3.~I 1 IJDC 1 1 60 1 aD ill - 1 11 11 1 IN M.-'.--- 1 5 /1 9 1 h 1 2 11 1%'\ 1 11 Al 1 1 1 I T 1 1 11 , Ille- up OFFICE |' 1 1 1.f' 1 1 - 0 1 1 F- 1- 11 1 9 0- 1 I 0 01 04 1 - 106.1 â€¢ 9 0/Pri /; 1 \ ROOF DECK ROOF DRAIN ~,â€¢'' 1 1 1 11 1 60-v---44-j- w i n" in' 1 9 1 4--7 1 ---Â»iD I | 1 1, SLOPE SLOPE . li 1 22 i,~1 i, el I 1, - I. -- -I-\4 1 1-' 1 Ili 11 11 1 1 1 lab Il I ' - 1 6 ~ 1 1 1 1.1 :20 1 11 11 It gil 1 It I~ d I 1 1 -41-- -.4.-@ 1 1 1 1 1 r l' 1' SETBACK LINE 1 1 1 1 1~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 20 1 1 1,N 1,6 1 1 ,~ 12-5 1/2 15'-1" 12'-51/2 95Â· 4~ 1 ' 40'-0" 1' 5 1 (74' I.-f ' 1 L--- - _9_ _____ Â»__ _9___ j_â‚¬ _____9___ - - JO- & Ti 'bm ? ~:4 ik, O PROPOSED OFFICE PLAN 2 g M SCALE 1/8 1-0 -i I Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE KATYAL RESIDENCE 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL PROPOSED . --1/Uwria -- 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH OFFICE A.2.08 ASPEN, CO 81611 (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 1 LEVEL I www. kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 13'-10 1/211 .Z/L 01 -,El 3Nll AlZIEIdOM Â¢41Â°444 . r ....4/ - @9 + 99 @ 11 11 1 1 1~ 1 1 1 11 1 1 4 11 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 _______ ______1____-Â® 6---------1 i_F____________-_-_: _1___---________Â» Â®--------1-------1-1--------1 *. -----1-----Â® 1 1 1 1 I 'SU)pt slopk 1 1 1 El:MIEQQE >1 0 1 0 10-To, 11-0 1-0 1 Iii I 1 I 1;! 1 1 11 1~ 1 1 1 1 1 --- 1, *227 1 1 1 4 --- : --L-r 1 1 1 1 941 1, 19-4 -1, Ir 1 1 U'' ...4. 6, ./. 1 +4. .r 1 1 1 99 - 1 . -- 1 ~ -1 11 1 1 @- - 1.-1-n...e---Ill--Bkil.-, 11 1 - 11 111 1 ~E D' 2 . 2- 1 0 I 1 1 1 1: PJAUÂ« 11 1 I, I ROOF DECK I -----~--- -t - 1, SLOPE SKDPE \ 4 1\ 4 i. lA lA I n 1 n) 11 11 1 \4 4 4 1 ----4 -1----- 1 11 11 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 3 1 1 ~ 1 1 pri 1 1' 11 1 1 1 6 66 6 64 0 2-Â£- rh PROPOSED ROOF PLAN LL,/ SCALE 1 /8 1 -0 Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE KATYAL RESIDENCE . =...........= = 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL PROPOSED A.. -~ -- 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH ROOF A.2.09 ASPEN, CO 81611 (1') EXACTLY, THIS D~\WING I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL LEVEL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 40 ** e *0 999 3 7 9 T T 9102 L Z d39 .. 0 , @@ 99 It 1 1 1 1 1 1 U.11| | Rjd 1 LU | 0 /1\ 1 1 A ZI JI' />12\ 1 1 /4.-<X 12 6ii 1 1 /4/ \ I 19 // .4 1 // // 1 1 36 1 \.1 l TOP PLATE @ 1 TOP PLATE @ r.GABLE *Pfs-- - 2 -----------flu-- -----_1[42-[--- ---t- --El#_f--- -----f: 117'-6'.7 (33@.LE-RÂ£)913, r n 7'-6" 1 M - 11= ---- 4 8 8 [W45) 0 0 1 ]12 -4-1 1 1 2 11-2 -- - 1 -1 E L -s- 2 -11 E -13 J' 1 C.T.q 1-PEER- 1-IMEL_Plf | T.O. UPEER Lf\,gly 12(r. 1--------- --~~~----- -IUM-AllFITT- ~-------IllnT-lulll-I------~~7-----------i--- 109'-5"ID 1-1- 1 I. 1 1 1 1 1 /'A'\ 1 i 1/447\I 5.0 1 1 i 11/ \- 1 \ leg I 1\ C.T.o. MAIN_Lty[.L-ELY- 4 1 0 1 \ 1 T.O. MAIN LEVEL-Plfr. -' _ 100'-0"1 '7fbo'-OIl - 11 1 11 - 1 1 11 .. - 1 . 1 - 1 . 1 Â· ..1... -- 1 1 1. - 1 It 1 1 1 T.O. SLAB ~ , 1 1 I T.O. SLAB Ch@ BARAAENT __ 1 | ~790-101/411 -~----------- -----------1----------------1----------- _ @ BASEMENT/Â·h ,~ i BOO T/ili 1 1 1 '46 66 C) EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 5(_Alt 1/8" 1 Â·O @ 9 9 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ------- -1 1 1 1 Z It I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MIl 1 1 1 1 1 TOP PLATE @ ' TOP PLATE @ Ch GABLE *RES_ 1, l . , 1 - -GAEE_RÂ£)913/â€¢ 1111111 11 1111 0 11111111 111111 El lilli I V 1 1 7'-6" 117'-61-7 15ill 1--Er] 111 659 It 1 (,49 li 11 - ,-1,U- 1--2-] 1 ~ -6- 9,59 ~|GE-.E11 I 1 1 T.O. UPPER ~ _ LO. UPPER i |l Ht- 31_-- _IgvEL PIZr. ~ 109'-5" I 1 12"41% 1 1 .19, 1(W1 8 4 L==92-11 &#93[ILEE]l ia] i ' i -41 2 . 1 I ~0311 ' 1 '' | | T.O. MAIN T.O. MAIN Flf , i , , LEVEL PLY 11 LEVEL PLY'. 0--- -- ___ ___ Â·.- __-3-w .2-2-2.-r wi - -----rz.- - ww-. 4 4-Il--r=.--r =-==.-=- --==. ------ ---.~=- - --~ 7 ----------7------ 100'.0'*C 1001-011 1 1 /, 1 - 1 11 1 1 - . 1 . 1 11 | 1 ILLI 1 1 1 ... 1 IIi | 1114 1 Â· t .1 - 1 liu 19 1 1 114 T.O. SLAB i Â· ~ I f T.O. SLAB '790'-101/4" I i , Il 90'-101/4':'7 1 11 S; 4 4 4<4Â§ CA EXISTING EAST ELEVATION 4 L ) 'CALE 1/8" 1 0 RECS'lleD - ~*.1,4 12 ty 62. SEP 2 7 2018 C/77 pr p.v #-/. Scale: AS NOTED -;4 DATE ISSUE KATYAL RESIDENCE 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL EXISTING A.3.01 Al/ -- 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH ASPEN, CO 81611 ~11,) EXACTLY, THIS D~\WING ELEVATIONS 1300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 1 WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 2 RUCER-ELINC itill All3dOkid ., 9911 It 1 1 1 1 1 lili 1 1 1 1 %1 â‚¬ A 1 1 /1\ ' 11-1 1 1 I lilli El "6 2 tx i 11 4/ 14 1 1 Â»f \4 5% 1 \11\ ~ ~ /5/ .Auu : R ' r liM // CLI h<\ 1 \\ 1 1 VA 1Â« Wi TOP PLATE @ 1 TOP PLATE @ ~ /1//11 Ii"JI'll |i| r..GABLE-BQ*FS-------------- _6:41--- dll-I LI,rU 1 -- -----4- ---t_u---I]Ht:~ff~-L '2 1: GABJE_RQQF.kâ€¢ <7Â»-611 1 1'11-1Â· 1LL-1*:ROL_ 1 -- --~ -rlill~----1-1 ---1----- 117'-6"I 1 2 3-14: - -- 1 1 9 E 1.;Stly:d 1. I . . 1 1 IV ' 1.1- . L r. , I :1.1 FFEFFF~1 ------------- / 4 . 111...1- 1 1 lilli 1- :: 111111 : chI.Q. PIFER lEVEL PLY | E 11 -7[1 \ -1 \ (4241 tf,9 0 /' 11 \ 1 , 11 : -%21 1 \\ =. F - M , '/ A' ~ 0 1 1 41* : / 1 ' r'hT.O. MAIN LEVEL PLY I --i------------- --------i------ ~001-0. 1 1 1001-01't 1 1 1 TO. SLAB ~ ~ i i T.O. SLAB r~@_B*SEMENT_--_ FDO'-101/4" E- i I I I' ' li 90-101/4"VU 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 44 /Th EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION .ALE 1/8 1 -O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ill 1 1--1 1 w. Z 1 1 - 1 -11 1 1 111 11 11 1 1 1 11 | | LU 11 1 1 1 00 11 1 1 1 I 1 TOP PLATE @ TOP PLATE @ 11 073-il-Q-s- - It lilli ' 111111 117'.6"/2 11- 11 1 6* 9 i M I | PGLE-6,33.1==63-11-70=-T 1--63-3I [--63 1 [ p.3 11 8 1 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 L 1 1 1 ' - 1111a 1 1 ilt=1"11 T.O. UPPER T.O. UPPER 1 CILLELPLY- ---_L --------_ _--_- ----- ------------------------2------_-- 1 -10~ -------- - - -'g\(fLPLYÂ£:I V 1 09'-5 111111 1 - 111117-1 - =1 -7Illt Illl~W29] G [ elli Elli\ 1 =Ila=:5 11111111 \ 0 111111110 - lilli / lilli/ T.O. MAIN 1_EMBL_PE'~ i Il 100'.0"Vi 11 1 - . Im 1. 1 1. 1 1 1 Â·Â·Â· 1 Ell . 1 1 - 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 Ull - 1 1 Mil Mil 1 - ~ ' 1 1 1 , .1 TO. SLAB 9 i Â· I i T.O. SLAB ~90'-101/4" 1 '1 11 90'-101/4"VU 1 1 1 6 6 64 rAN EXISTING WEST ELEVATION =Ur' O* 3 '' SCALE 1/8" 1 -0 5/,z. 1 41Â¥ â€¢t a * 1 SEP 27 2018 CITY r, e- Â· , r.1 3- /,1 CO#,witi i i ulvELOrt.,idNT Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE KATYAL RESIDENCE 921/= 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL AUI 1- EXISTING A.3.02 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH ASPEN, CO 81611 (1') E)ACTLY, THIS DRAWING ELEVATIONS 1300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 1 I www,kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 3 N Il 31 3 Nll Alp*320 9 4 . @3 1 1 1 WOOD SIDING ON ~ LOWER LEVEL & MAIN LEVEL ROOF ADDITION FIREPLACE FLUE TERMINATIONS ~ 11 1 11 0 1% 1 11 7 11 1 LINE INDICATES EXISTING / 11 1 CE 1 GRADE LINE @ 25' OFFSET ~ 61 (MOST-RESTRICTIVE 11 L UNE INDICATES EXISTING LU GIDE LINE @ 25 OFFSET | D- MOST.RESTRICTIVE) | ~ EXTSTING GABLE ROOF || n TO REMAIN ~~ EXISTING GABLE ROOF SC>LAR PANEO BEtiIND ' TOP PLATE @ TOP PLATE @ NEW WOOD SIDING CAQABLf RAP-ES___2___________ _______ ______ -------------- ---------- - -93@_LE_99115Â£1 I 1 1 7'-6" ~ N g -EN E~ 11 1--- 1 1 7-6"t NEW ALUMINUM CLADDED W48 Il â‚¬31I ~ 1%3 1 C 19.'451 || Il 1*44 (W 41} NEW WINIDOWS, COLOR TBD ~ ~ WINDOWS, COLOR TBD .-I NEW FIBER CEMENT SIDING I /â€¢IR: 1-PEER. [:f\(fL_PIF 1- ----- -__ --- --- 1 T.O. UPPER LEVEL PLYÂ£~ I------ ---------------- --------------------- '7109'-5" lili 109'-5"VU | STEEL COLUMNS TO REPLACE ~ ~ EXISTING WOOD COLUMNS ~ | STEEL COLUMNS TO REPLACE EXISTING WOOD COLUMNS 1 F--1 WINDOWS. COLOR TBD NEW ALUMINUM CLADDED 1 1 NEWALUMINUMCLADDED / (*121 (WlÂ·) AviA GARAGE DOOR, COLOR TBD \ ~e - 1 | NEW FI8ER CEMENT SIDING ~ AT ENTRY UNE INDICATES EXISTING i * ff Â°x 1 U .-I 1 1 1 ~ GRADE LINE (MOST-RESTRICTIVE) ' ' I I INE INDICATES EXISTING ~ /1-LA MAIN_LE)/EL BLY- 4 - - - - - _ - 1 1 '4 I 1 GRADE LINE (MOST-RESTRICTIVE) I (2Â· 9&11% Lf\% Lflk. -- r 1 00'-0" 100'-0" I --- -- 1 1 1 1 --4 n. 1 . 1 1 11 - 1 - 1.1 1 1: 1 11 . 11 1 1 1 :.11 . . 1 111 111: M#KI. 1 1 14 1 1 1 1 IM I 1 1 1 chER- 8-8-EMENT SLAB 4 ' i T.O. BASEMENT St.Akâ€¢ 88'-6'-7 4 3 2 1 <7 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION Â»-SCALET,80 9 9 9 9 1 1 @10 1 i ~ MIDPOINT OF ROOF ADDITION BELOW i I ~ EXISTING GABLE, BELOW 25' I IEIGI IT LIMIT ~ 1 1 LINE INDICATES EXISTING 1 11 GRADE LINE@25 OFFSET-~ ~ ----- - -- --------------- 1 1 -- -il--- (MOST. RESTRICTIVE -J I12 ~ ~ LINE INDICATES EXISTING GRADE LINE @ 25 OFFSET | ~ (MOST RESTRICTIVE) 1 1 11 I | I EXISTING SABLE ROOF EXISTINIG SABLE ROOF M ~ ~ TO REMAIN TO REMAIN TOP PLATE @ ~ ~ TOP PLATE @ rhGABLE ROOFS_~ - _GAQ.LE_RE)913/â€¢ ~137_gil- -- 1----------- 117'-6"'7 11 1*52 Il IV/51 Il \[.49 E--63-1 IL_~_|| IL_Ull L===/2==11 I tiN NEW ALUMINUM CLADDED NEW RAILING TO BE 1 STEEL W/ CABLE ~\:a WINDOWS, COLOR TBD 121]1 Lâ‚¬L~:11 1 1 101 T.O. UPPER ~ IO. UPPER râ€¢EELPE_--1-- ------- --- -- ---------------- ------ ------------------- ----13\*PEe ~109'-5" I 1 1 1 11-# 11 1 11 [*19) 11 ' 11 In) 1111 f.9.1111 919.11 1 11 I nl IL=L==!1 | ~ NEW WOOD SIDING ON NEW ALUMINUM CLADDED WINDOWS, COLOR TBD ti,9 1 11 9311 I 1 EAST FACADE. NOTE: NEW ' ' ILL=3 SIDING MUST BE SAME | ~ TH!CKNESS OR LBS THAN STEEL COLUMN SUPPORT I , , | 1 EXISTING SIDING NIEV~ DECK & SPIRAL STAR , T.O. MAIN ' " T.O. MAIN 11 ChLEVELyly_ _ ~ __----_-- _--------- -- --_-_--_ -_--- _---- --_------- LEVEL PLY -- ---------- --------- - tz-----Foo-6,0 ~ i-bo'-O" i 1 1 1 1 - Â· Â· Â· L.GRADE LINE .1 1 \ LINE INDICATES EXISTING 1 1 1 Â· 1 .'Â· 1 '' ~ 1 Â· (MOST-RESTRICTIVE) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FED CB /Rh PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION retwÂ£~4 4~Ka, SEP 2 7 2018 CIVY . ':- DOM ~ KATYAL RESIDENCE ~ ..g,m,170 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL 11,- 1,2. -- 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION - PROPOSED ~I A.3.03 1 | KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. 1 ~ DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH ASPEN, CO 81611 (1") EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING 1-_-_1_-_--___~ ELEVATIONS I I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 1 WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 .) 4~ 99 3 1 1 1 LINE INDICATES EXISTING GRADE ~ NIEW ALUMINUM CLADDED , NEW ROOF ADDITION ~ WINDOWS ON ROOF ADDITION ' @25 OFFSET (MOSTÂ·RESTRICTIVE)-1 , _ - *1 -----1--1---------------------1--- 1-- --- --- - -------------------j--------------- 1 11 1 / 1 0 :1 1 E' " 11 It 1 1 11 LL.1 EXISTING GABLE TO REMA1I CL 2~ |1 - EXSTING CABLE TO REMAIN ~ SOLAR PANELS 11 ~ TOP PLATE @ 11 TOP PLATE @ r.GABLE.RQOFS -_- GABJE_RQQFf/j ---------------- ~7717'-6" I i 117'-6'll ~ ~ NEW WOOD 5ID1NG | NEW ALUMINUM CLADDED {W60} <25 1 '7 0 V.'57 ~ NEW RAILING TO BE ~ ~ CORNER WINDOWS, COLOR TBD .-I 1 139 *-1 ~ STEEL W/ CABLE C.T.Q. l'EFER lEYELELY- L_-_---_--_- 1-Tp-UBEE'-LfV.[1.-PLJ[ulA 109'-5'~7 ~09'-5" 1 1 11 1 NEW ALUMINUM CLADDED ' tp I CORNER WINDOWS, COLOR TeD STEEL COLUMN SUPPORT 1 NEW DECK & SPIRAL STAIR lt~ V 9,23 lei 1 9 ' 2--_1 LINE INDICATES EXISTING GRADE 1 IMOST-RESTRICTIVE) ~ 1 1 2 - - -k LQ @AlliLEVEL-fla. C.T.Q.148Ill LEELPLY_ k--_--- -----h'- --- --------- -------- -------- ----- ~00'-0, i i. i 0 100'-0..7 11 1 1 1 11 1 Â· 1 Â· 1 1 1 1 1.1 1- It lilli .11 1 1 1 11 1 1 - 4 :.: 1 11 I 1 I - 1 I 4.,Â· 1 1 1 . It 1 1 Il 1 . 11 >ti~ 1 1- 1 1 - 1 1 1 d 1 r.10.8-AEEMENLil-48 -1-_-_-_- ____' -_--L__----_-_1_----__-----------L__------------''---- -_-----PLQ-BAyâ‚¬~E_NLS.LABÂ£l~ '78806" 3 4 1 2 /11 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 9 9 9 9 1 1 ' (MID) 1 1 V 1 1 1 1 | LINE INDICATES EXISTING GRADE LINE | | SOUGHT ON MIDPOINT OF 1 | ~ @25 OFFSET (MOST RESTRICTIVE) -~ SOLAR PANELS _____________1_________________._b.--______ i t ROOF ADDITION NEW ROOF ~ ------------7 r e 1 1 LINE INDICATES EXISTING / 11 ~ GRADE LINE @25 OFFSET-/ 1 1 (MOST.RESTRICTIVE) ~ ~ , 1 EXISTING GABLE ROOF 1 TO REMAIN EXISTING GABLE ROOF 1 TO REMAIN ~ TOP PLATE @ ' 1 TOP PLATE @ rhq/01* EQPFS_ _ __ - -__ k*E-<0911>Ch ~117'-6,1 1 1 1--, 1 117'-6"-7 11 [W631 e i 1 1 NEW RA]LING TO BE WINDOWS, COLOR TBD ,/~-- STEEL W/CABLE .--..- ------ -_L__gVEL_PU T.O. UPPER I I T.O. UPPER gh If\(ELPLY ---- rl 09'-5" Il 1 1 09'-5"I7 NEW WOOD SIDING ON J ~ 1 STEEL COLUMN SUPPORT EAST FACADE, NOTE: NEW NEW DECK & SPIRAL STAIR SIDING MUST BE SAME | 1 TZIICKNESS OR LESS TI IAN ~ ~ -1 1 NEW ALUMINUM CLADDED EXISTING SIDING 11 61 I [9,27 te,291 (80) ('6'24) 11 - .-I WINDOWS, COLOR TBD 11 11~===11 MILEI ' ' 11 1 1 11 1 TO. MAIN TO. MAIN ------ - __ EVy L_PULa MLEVEL PLY 1 1 1 .1 1001-011.7 1 1 1 UNE INDICATES EXISTING / ~ (MOST-RESTRICTIVE) ~ 1 Ill 1 11 1 tl 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 B C D EF Ch PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION ircuu :VED SEP 27 2018 Cr ,EN F~~~ PROPOSED ~ 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION A.3.04 1 KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH ASPEN, CO 81611 1 (19 EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING L__1________d ELEVATIONS I I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO 1 WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR 1 REDUCED, AFFECTUNG ALL - 9/24/18| 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. EINI-I A.LABd O>Id . n 71"'r F 0 . F . 40 1 U , tri - 1 --1 1 f/~--11 1' 1'11L.41 p' , in i 41'fF 1 1 1 / F- ~SM W'el Fil IR.- l# 60#14 i - 41,6. , .%- ~ 1-1..1/ A / b 1 --;all...all'll'll//8 'H#fol 41 9 r I all I J*:1'~/ ....." r .'W â€¢*A. 13. Ii: N ~:" . 7= d /-1 EXISTING FROM SOUTH WEST f k Zip 1/ 1 ~11Ii i 41 Cra r.. f .1 44Â¥< 11 - 17 --- -- e,4 ~meer p 1- Ik ta 2 1 2 .4 1 .,- - Li -4,+ -ELE ) a/~-r Â·~ .'Nill I ./ , . '21 *-1 -.I'.'~$.m..*i 1- 71 6 01-1/1/6, ~/48-. 1 4,4 9 === 411 '1. 1 ji{f Â° ~ 'Â·'~i:Â· F -- 11 1-~ ~ i ~ -~: t-1 i. 1! rfe. ill..-'yÂ· iii-' 3 P?fri: , 1,11 -1-9 1 1 4 " i i 1 . 51 11\ = r. M 2 N t $1 fl e .1 t: 1. 2 1 N y .Â·. f _ r 1.- 1 - 10*&11' 4*Ellit~. 4 - - 14- 11 :14111,01 - :1~t -v - - - - ' : we ~ EXISTING FROM SOUTH EAST Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE ... KATYAL RESIDENCE RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL ~---AI'llk'-/-1 3D: 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH A.9.01 ASPEN, CO 81611 (19 EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING EXISTING I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 . 1 - -1 /1 - r 1 4Â· f' n . *.92 0 Y '-f---Ir. 4*4 F . i -/-----r. -- 9 1,=11 1 -1. 6.'1 44, Â· : 1:' Â·13 - .... 1/:r. . 1 ./m . LVE 1 4 3 *- C'- 3 ./5 - -- --1-.I , : 44 0 rl' 1- *t 1, -41- 1 . . k. 1.--r -- 0 -1 - , 5 2051 1* / - If .1.-1 N 91-4,1 f 1 1 Â¢Â· /-1 PROPOSED FROM SOUTH WEST A .152, - -7- 5-3.,, -3.,tI- 458*5-556.- Â· -' C * ' /1 -9,55> - W - - I . - t .. 1 23;41 1 D- 1- ny: -- 4114- -t-*'if L- dRI x.-flif-*a -Â»-r. 1 6. 2-,2- -FErret ze .bl 2- b .i r-/ ' 4/ 11 '4 1,-4.-6,41- . , - 46 1 2 1.101,1,1 1,1 1 '1*,11'G,4 , i 4 .1.t Ch PROPOSED FROM SOUTH EAST Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE ... KATYAL RESIDENCE 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL 3D: 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH A.9.02 ASPEN, CO 81611 (19 EXACTLY, THIS DRAWING PROPOSED I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I I www.kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL 970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18 73?. 9102 L 8 436 . 1/0170'. lift -g. tÂ·:J 5. fvk-Â· 41 9~ j. D . k. - â‚¬ Mt, ./. 11, + 7, .L 4 -- :.1 Â·,<AF.' ~ 41/r##2 d ' I 1...4 - N Â· *r-/4.Â·7 -/ â€ž,62 ty 2~ ti L . 0.. A . -, 4... 1 - - I :.'I ~ ff" 4 2. A .74Â£' *4.-- 1 .'-1.7. A - -29 1 - E 3.Â·Â·Â¥1Â·:M.: I . fl - - .C .,, 1./. . 4Â«... 1~2Â·/ -4.- Â· Â· ~4*;~411 ..4----1 1. 0 fÂ· . I. Â»1*12..6 1.'f :1'/.'~4- ~~/*I:- , 50 J.-"=r.&=FL. -- - - - P 7 4 .- Â¥424 _ M .,1 ------6< Lzi~L#r' 08*,44 c fi 4, - 1,~., I. ........i7.111 1 b..>- Â·it . Ff...1/1/1 , 1 I - .. F I 1iH 8 # 2 1 9 .2-1- r . 'W 06 -1. - -/6 B--'..'-. ' ' 'I./-/ i 4 /47 r -- . 1 L.-- ... 3- , 1 5 *:./ / rÂ»~C. r lI 1. i 'Â· 41 â€¢ Â¢ I j 1.. 1 41 . j, , 1 1.4 . â€¢ -- -1 ' 0 .oi. Cil:@ill"ki<&1 , /1 - r - - ..-i- 44/12: â€¢--. I ...........-.I- tÂ· ,1 1 :.4.1 4 . ..P " p. , ' /Iill'll'llitwillifimal /..................../../.Â£ :.- 1 +44 . , - - .. j I. ... 4:, mr-j./llmj - â‚¬11- '10.2 & t.Â·rr:Â·~ ~~Â·. .1 -- 461*An : + 0~,1 -- Ul.U..... .. ......... -9... . ......#...- .. *-'lmi . -1. 1.1. '.,9... ,/--I Â· i.*I.- 9.-- I //4 4 n -<LO . dis . 5 Mar.dizE--*. - -- . -=?* 0 *MA+L . 9.1,=Pe, W , %/: 1 1...9.p ~ 1.Ii f 1 lili . 1 6 -*Am- 9 9 a. P I t,t',1-A . 4,14, 1, 4 - - 1 1.11- 2%44 9404 ....i ........'~1--all....V-IT-'ll.... - 3*.0 --17 1-1 7=2~40 3- 6,0=11. #. .J - --6.wt/////t 4. i, WNX--./-- ' 'iWl 15 - " 1/ic'AIL-..Ill..=I./.9/.AE Jf,=...4...4 ..~T'.4.' 40Â¥~ i Uni- Â·<9.27. 44Â¥ /lf' -' 2..2.5/.Â£/46'll'imil'.1 , . I ..9, 0- i - r... 4 Â¢.1..2*SdÂ© 1 - rJ22*ft'r 4' / - -9... ."~r v 9 . ..4 -1 ' 1 0. 1 1 . P .. 1 + . -- It â‚¬'' i - 7 * IT â€¢ I . / .'Â¢24' A, L I I , q...Â£ Â· - ===- I -â€¢1 - 'Wil/963 * r b. I Â·Â·D 1.11. 1 11â€ž / 41. .4 -4 -4.47,'. 1 =-4 "f * --- -6 ~ : . 2'.11 :3 . 1 +9..p .1- r 1 '' . 1 141 7.*- r. 111~2~...,l 1 . -. - 0 , .. + . 1 9 . 19.4,2 4 l.* #*t*16Â·2Â·Â· 4 1 1 5. wl , 1 -I r .... 7-41: 4,Â»1124 . 0 -4 f M .1 . 9 , i:b + -. i,4,1. ..f .t~*. ? 1 .*- -rp ..92 ' ... I 1 -4 1 h. - i. -444, 4 + 4 : 9 Â¥ 1'4~h, 1 4 " j r ?~lum I -- I'le 1... ' t im CO G .5 + L Fe 'i-- L - Im..7 + . tr ' rrhi 7 Silli , 4Â£ 1 / 2 - *i ..6-4- ; polvillillillililip 4- J W-1 r 1 . .4 1* - ~t Â£~~~---4 $ # 7 Â·Â·Â· NOTE SCALE OF SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD BUILDINGS IN COMPARISON TO 909 WATERS Scale: AS NOTED DATE ISSUE ... KATYAL RESIDENCE 9/20/18 RDS VARIANCE SUBMITTAL 909 WATERS AVENUE IF THE ABOVE DIMENSION NEIHBORHOOD A.9.03 KIM RAYMOND ARCHITECTS, INC. DOES NOT MEASURE ONE INCH ASPEN, CO 81611 (1") EXACTLY, THIS DKAWING CONTEXT 1 I 300 E. HYMAN AVENUE, SUITE 100 I I www. kimraymondarchitects.com I PITKIN COUNTY, CO WILL HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED, AFFECTING ALL 1970-925-22521 LABELED SCALES. 9/24/18